Hubbry Logo
Mixed raster contentMixed raster contentMain
Open search
Mixed raster content
Community hub
Mixed raster content
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mixed raster content
Mixed raster content
Mixed raster content
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Mixed raster content (MRC) is a method for compressing images that contain both binary-compressible text and continuous-tone components, using image segmentation methods to improve the level of compression and the quality of the rendered image.[1] By separating the image into components with different compressibility characteristics, the most efficient and accurate compression algorithm for each component can be applied.

MRC-compressed images are typically packaged into a hybrid file format such as DjVu and sometimes PDF.[2] This allows for multiple images, and the instructions to properly render and reassemble them, to be stored within a single file.

Some image scanners optionally support MRC when scanning to PDF. A typical manual states that without MRC, the image is generated in a single process, with text and graphics not distinguished. With MRC, separate processes are used for text, graphics, and other elements, producing clearer graphics and sharper text, at the price of slightly slower processing. MRC is recommended to optimise the scanning of documents with harder-to-read text or lower-quality graphics.[3] MRC can also reduce the size of the scanned file,[4] though higher compression using JBIG2 can sometimes lead to character substitution errors in scanned documents.[5]

File format

[edit]
MRC (ISO/IEC/ITU)
Internet media typeimage/mrc
Magic number\xFF\xD8
Extended fromJPEG
StandardISO/IEC 16485:2000; ITU-T Recommendation T.44 (01/2005)

A form of MRC is defined by international standard bodies as ISO/IEC 16485, or ITU recommendation T.44 (accessible free of charge). It defines a file format with bilevel masks and two data layers in each "stripe" of the image. The mask can be encoded in ITU T.4, JBIG1, or JBIG2, while the images can be JPEG, JBIG1, or run-length encoded color. The format is loosely based on JPEG, with a APP13 segment registered for this purpose.

It is not known whether this file format is actually used, as formats like DjVu and PDF have their own ways of defining layers and masks.[2]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mixed raster content

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Mixed raster content (MRC) is a compression technique and imaging model designed for compound documents that combine binary elements like text, line art, and graphics with continuous-tone photographic or pictorial content, enabling efficient encoding by segmenting the image into layers and applying specialized compression algorithms to each. The MRC model employs a three-layer structure to represent the image: a high-resolution binary mask layer that selects between foreground and background pixels on a per-pixel basis; a foreground layer capturing sharp, colorful text and graphics at full resolution; and a background layer holding smoothed, low-resolution continuous-tone elements to reduce data volume. Segmentation typically involves classifying image blocks—such as 8×8 pixel regions—into categories like text, pictures, or uniform areas using rate-distortion optimization to balance compression efficiency and visual quality. Encoding in MRC applies tailored methods to each layer: the mask uses lossless binary coders like or CCITT Group 4 for precise edge definition without artifacts; the foreground and background leverage lossy algorithms such as or wavelet-based compression for color data, often at reduced resolutions for the background to minimize bitrate. This layered approach allows different resolutions and coding schemes within a single page, supporting flexible quality-compression tradeoffs and achieving ratios up to 150:1 for scanned documents while mitigating issues like jagged text edges through techniques such as adaptive . First standardized as Recommendation T.44 in 1999, with a revision in 2005, MRC facilitates efficient processing, interchange, and archiving of mixed-content images in applications including color (per RFC 2301), PDF optimization, and document scanning software, where it excels at preserving text legibility alongside compact storage of imagery. Originally proposed in the late 1990s for emerging standards like and , MRC has become integral to hyper-compression workflows in imaging SDKs and remains relevant for bandwidth-sensitive environments.

Introduction

Definition and Purpose

Mixed raster content (MRC) is a compression technique designed for compound images that combine binary-compressible elements, such as text and line art, with continuous-tone components, like photographs or graphics, by employing image segmentation to separate these distinct parts for targeted encoding. This approach addresses the compound image compression problem, where traditional single-algorithm methods fail to handle mixed content effectively. Conventional compression standards like JPEG apply lossy techniques optimized for photographic images, which introduce artifacts such as blurring and ringing around sharp edges in text and graphics, degrading readability and visual sharpness. In contrast, binary formats like those for text require lossless compression to preserve exact details, but they inefficiently handle continuous-tone areas, leading to larger file sizes. MRC resolves this by segmenting the image into regions suited to different compression strategies, enabling the use of specialized coders for each type of content. The primary purpose of is to achieve superior compression ratios while maintaining high-quality preservation across diverse content types, reducing file sizes significantly—often by factors of 10 or more—without introducing noticeable artifacts in critical areas like text. This results in efficient storage and transmission for applications involving , such as scanned documents featuring text overlays on photographic backgrounds, where the text remains crisp and the imagery retains natural tones. By leveraging a multi-layered representation, MRC optimizes the between compression efficiency and , outperforming unified methods in both metrics for compound documents.

Historical Development

The Mixed Raster Content (MRC) model was initially proposed in 1998 by Ricardo L. de Queiroz, Robert R. Buckley, and Ming Xu in their paper presented at the SPIE Electronic , introducing a layered approach to compress compound images combining binary text and continuous-tone elements. This work laid the foundation for separating image components into distinct layers—a binary for text and , a foreground for high-detail areas, and a background for smoother regions—to achieve better compression ratios than single-layer methods. The development of was motivated by the shortcomings of compression in handling scanned documents during the late 1990s surge in digital archiving, where traditional struggled with sharp edges in text and graphics overlaid on photographic content, leading to artifacts and inefficient file sizes. As scanning technology proliferated for preserving books, maps, and forms, the need for a hybrid model that leveraged efficient binary coding for text (like ) alongside for images became evident, addressing the growing demands of electronic document storage and transmission. Key milestones in MRC's adoption included its formal standardization as ISO/IEC 16485 in 2000, which defined the format for representing mixed bi-level and multi-level raster pages using recommended coding schemes. Around the same time, the emerging format integrated MRC-like layered compression techniques, enabling high-quality scanned document distribution over the by separating foreground text from background images, with early implementations appearing by 2000. The Recommendation T.44, which specifies the MRC imaging format for efficient processing and archiving, was first issued in 1997, with subsequent versions in 1999 and finalized in 2005, incorporating enhancements for multilayer representations. Post-2000, evolved through incorporation into extensions, particularly in Part 6 ( Compound Image File Format), which adopted the multilayer model for documents starting around 2001 to support scalable, high-fidelity compression. By the 2010s, techniques were integrated into PDF compression tools, enhancing reduction for scanned PDFs while preserving text sharpness, as seen in software libraries and systems. No major updates to the core standards have occurred by 2025, though it continues to be supported in kits like LEADTOOLS, which provide APIs for encoding and decoding in modern imaging applications.

Technical Model

Layer Structure

Mixed Raster Content (MRC) utilizes a three-layer imaging model to efficiently represent compound images that combine sharp-edged elements like text and graphics with smoother continuous-tone regions such as photographs or halftones. This structure separates the image into distinct components, allowing for targeted processing and storage while preserving visual fidelity. The foreground layer captures sharp-edged elements like text and graphics, potentially including continuous-tone colors, at full or high resolution to preserve detail and sharpness. The background layer holds continuous-tone elements, such as images or textured paper backgrounds, at reduced resolution to efficiently compress smooth areas while maintaining gradations and colors. The mask layer is a bilevel segmentation map, using 1 bit per pixel to indicate whether the foreground (1) or background (0) contributes to each position in the final image. During reconstruction, the layers are composited by overlaying the foreground onto the background according to the mask, effectively "pouring" the foreground content through the mask onto the background plane. This selective blending ensures that sharp elements appear crisp while continuous-tone areas remain smooth, without interference between the two. A visual representation of this stacking can be seen in diagrams where the binary mask acts as a , aligning the lower-resolution foreground precisely over the higher-resolution background to form the complete . To optimize memory usage and computational efficiency, the is divided into horizontal bands known as stripes, which span the full width of the page and allow at varying resolutions within each band. Stripes can be of different types—such as one-layer (for uniform continuous-tone regions), two-layer (background and ), or three-layer (full model)—enabling selective application of the model based on local content. Key properties of the model include the ability for layers to operate at independent resolutions, with the typically maintained at the highest resolution to preserve edge accuracy for text, while foreground and background may be subsampled (e.g., by factors of 2 or 4) in non-critical areas, particularly the background for continuous-tone content. This flexibility reduces data volume without significant perceptual loss. The layered architecture supports independent compression of each component using algorithms suited to their characteristics, such as for the binary mask; for the foreground and background, or wavelet-based methods for continuous-tone parts, with binary elements in the foreground using where applicable.

Segmentation Process

The segmentation process in Mixed raster content (MRC) aims to decompose an input compound —such as a scanned containing text, , and continuous-tone pictures—into distinct layers by identifying high-contrast regions typically associated with text and graphics for the foreground, while assigning smoother pictorial areas to the background. This separation is guided by a binary mask that indicates ownership for each layer, enabling targeted compression of diverse content types. The original MRC model employs region classification to assign uniform masks to text/graphics regions or transition identification to detect edges for mask generation, ensuring sharp preservation of binary elements without degrading continuous-tone quality. Key techniques for segmentation include adaptive thresholding to produce bilevel masks, via morphological operations to refine boundaries, and clustering algorithms like the Expectation-Maximization (EM) method, which fits Gaussian mixtures to pixel data in perceptually uniform color spaces such as Lab* for robust classification of foreground and background pixels. Block-based processing is commonly used for efficiency, where the image is partitioned into small overlapping blocks (e.g., 8×8 or 16×16 pixels), and local statistics like variance and mean intensity are computed to apply per-block thresholds that minimize a rate-distortion cost function, balancing compression efficiency and reconstruction fidelity. These methods adapt to varying content by classifying pixels based on criteria such as high local contrast for text regions, often incorporating Markov random fields to enforce spatial consistency across blocks. The process unfolds in sequential steps: initially, the image is analyzed in horizontal stripes or blocks to subsample pixels and estimate parameters like cluster means and covariances; next, pixels are classified (e.g., foreground if exceeding a quadratic decision boundary in color space, background otherwise), yielding a preliminary binary mask; this mask then directs the rendering of foreground and background layers by selecting dominant colors or smoothed values, respectively, with optional post-processing like connected component analysis to isolate and refine objects such as embedded graphics. For large images, multi-resolution approaches process a downsampled version first to initialize thresholds, propagating decisions to full resolution for computational efficiency. In practice, scanned pages exemplify this: high-variance blocks in grayscale or color channels signal text blocks via thresholding akin to OCR preprocessing, generating masks that delineate sharp characters while relegating halftone images to the background, as demonstrated in magazine scans where EM clustering accurately extracts photographic objects amid text. Challenges in segmentation include handling scan noise, show-through artifacts, and ambiguous mixed regions where text overlays faint images, which can lead to misclassification and artifacts like jagged edges. Solutions involve pre-segmentation smoothing with Gaussian filters to reduce noise, adaptive parameter tuning in clustering (e.g., fallback to 1D thresholding if 3D color fails), and global optimization via cost functions that penalize inconsistencies, such as to discard small erroneous foregrounds. These adaptive strategies minimize layer assignment errors, achieving precise masks that enhance overall document fidelity without excessive computational overhead.

Standards and Formats

ITU-T T.44 Specification

The Recommendation T.44 (01/2005) defines the Mixed Raster Content (MRC) imaging format for telefax applications, enabling efficient processing, interchange, and transmission of compound images that combine pictorial and textual elements in document systems. This standard supports layered representation to optimize compression for mixed content, primarily targeting black-and-white and color documents in environments. Originally issued in April 1999, with Amendment 1 in February 2000 adding color support, and consolidated in January 2005, it integrates with the T.30 protocol for real-time transmission. Key requirements of T.44 include support for resolutions up to 400 × 400 dpi, accommodating high-quality document imaging needs. It mandates a three-layer model consisting of a binary mask layer for segmentation, a foreground layer for text and , and a background layer for continuous-tone elements like images or halftones. Binary layers, such as the mask, may be encoded using T.4 (including MMR), JBIG1, or methods to ensure of sharp-edged content. Continuous-tone layers leverage compatible coding schemes, like for color or data, while the base mode requires implementation of one to three layers per stripe for compatibility. The scope of T.44 is focused on transmission-oriented applications within facsimile networks, distinguishing it from the ISO/IEC 16485 standard, which adopts the same core model but emphasizes storage and interchange without the telecom-specific transmission protocols. Although not formally standardized, the .mrc file extension is commonly used for files in practice.

File Format Details

Mixed Raster Content () files are structured as a series of JPEG-like segments, beginning with the Start of Image (SOI) marker (0xFFD8) followed immediately by an Application (APP13) marker (0xFFED) to delineate MRC-specific content. This APP13 segment includes a length field and the MRC magic number identifier, which alerts decoders to the presence of MRC data within a JPEG-compatible framework. The overall file employs a binary format where subsequent segments encode page-level and stripe-level information, ensuring compatibility with decoders while extending functionality for multi-layer raster content. The core structure consists of a header segment providing global layer information, such as the number of layers (typically three: , foreground, and background) and page dimensions, followed by compressed data streams for each layer. Pages are divided into horizontal stripes for progressive processing, with each stripe preceded by a header that specifies parameters including stripe height, layer-specific resolutions, coded image width, and height. The layer, which is bi-level and spans the full stripe dimensions, selects between foreground and background contributions; the foreground stream captures high-detail elements like text at higher resolution, while the background handles continuous-tone areas at lower resolution. These streams are encapsulated as marker segments, allowing flexible integration of various coders without altering the base format syntax. The image/mrc is commonly used for MRC files, as listed in some MIME type registries for and imaging standards. This type facilitates transmission and storage, aligning with RFC specifications for and image interchange. MRC files support encapsulation within container formats like PDF and for multi-page documents and enhanced metadata handling, enabling seamless integration into workflows requiring lossless or lossy modes based on layer-specific coding choices. In PDF, MRC segments can be embedded as XObjects, preserving the multi-layer model while allowing selective recompression. The exact segment layout, including stripe headers with fields for width, height, and resolution, is defined in ISO/IEC 16485:2000, which harmonizes with T.44 requirements for marker segment syntax and layer synchronization. The T.44 specification supports color handling in foreground and background layers through palette and tag mechanisms, including RGB and CMYK color spaces via compatible encodings such as . These allow for multi-channel color encoding while maintaining with grayscale modes.

Compression Techniques

Encoding Methods

Mixed Raster Content (MRC) encoding applies compression algorithms to the segmented layers to achieve high efficiency while preserving the distinct characteristics of text and imagery. After segmentation produces the foreground, background, and mask layers, each undergoes targeted preprocessing, such as quantization to reduce in continuous-tone areas or downsampling to lower resolution in non-critical regions, before is applied to minimize redundancy. This layered approach allows for optimized compression ratios by matching coding methods to content type, as outlined in the foundational MRC model. The mask layer, a binary representation of text and line art, employs lossless binary compression methods to ensure perfect reconstruction and readability; JBIG2 is the primary standard for its superior performance on textual patterns through pattern recognition and arithmetic coding, while bi-level compression methods such as Group 3 (T.4: MH, MR) or Group 4 (T.6: MMR) serve simpler cases with run-length encoding. The foreground layer, capturing constant or limited colors for textual elements, is compressed losslessly if binary or lossily using at reduced resolution (e.g., 1/4 or 1/8 of full ) to balance fidelity and . The background layer, handling continuous-tone pictures and fills, relies on lossy DCT-based techniques like for intra-block prediction and quantization or for wavelet-based coding, enabling aggressive compression without impacting overlaid text sharpness. Key techniques emphasize lossless treatment for the mask and foreground to maintain text integrity, contrasting with lossy background compression that exploits spatial correlations in ; multi-stripe encoding divides the page into horizontal bands (typically 256 lines each), allowing independent layer coding per stripe for progressive transmission and during decoding. Optional hyper-compression extends this by further subsampling layers or applying advanced filters for ultra-low in archival scenarios. , such as Huffman or arithmetic, is universally applied across layers post-transformation to achieve final efficiency. MRC encoding delivers 10-20 times better compression ratios than plain for compound documents, with benchmarks on mixed text-image pages showing up to 70:1 ratios using for backgrounds/foregrounds and MMR for masks, compared to 's 5-10:1 at equivalent perceptual quality. In PDF tools implementing , 300 dpi color scans of documents are routinely reduced by 50-80% in relative to standard compression, preserving crisp text without visible artifacts.

Decoding Process

The decoding process for Mixed Raster Content (MRC) reconstructs the original image from the compressed file by its structure and synthesizing the layered components according to Recommendation T.44. The process begins with the file header, which contains essential metadata such as page dimensions, layer resolutions, stripe configurations, and coding parameters for each layer (foreground, background, and selector mask). This header information enables the decoder to interpret the segmented data streams correctly. Following parsing, the selector mask—a binary layer typically at high resolution (e.g., 300–600 dpi)—is decoded first using methods like or T.4 bi-level coding to identify regions for foreground or background selection. Next, the foreground layer, which captures sharp elements like text and in color or at reduced resolution, is decoded using or similar continuous-tone methods. The background layer, representing smoother areas such as images or fills at even lower resolution, undergoes analogous decoding. If resolutions differ across layers, (e.g., via ) aligns them to the mask's resolution. The core synthesis step involves pixel-wise compositing: for each , the decoder selects values from the foreground if the mask bit is 1 or from the background if 0, blending them to form the final raster. This selective reconstruction preserves high fidelity in textual regions while efficiently handling continuous-tone areas. To manage memory, MRC files are organized into horizontal stripes (bands), each containing independent layer segments that can be decoded sequentially in a band-by-band manner. This striped structure supports progressive rendering, allowing partial display as data arrives, which is particularly useful for transmission over networks. Error resilience is inherent in the format, leveraging JPEG's built-in error detection (e.g., cyclic redundancy checks) for continuous-tone layers and JBIG2's robust bi-level coding for the mask. T.44 also facilitates recovery from partial transmissions by enabling decoding of complete stripes even if others are lost, aiding and web applications. The output is a full-color or raster image at the specified resolution, potentially including embedded metadata like color profiles from the header.

Applications

Document Imaging

Mixed raster content (MRC) plays a key role in document imaging by enabling efficient scanning and processing of physical documents that combine text, graphics, and images. In scanner hardware, MRC support facilitates real-time compression during the creation of PDF files, optimizing output quality without requiring post-scan processing. For instance, Visioneer OneTouch scanners incorporate MRC through their software interface, where users can enable the feature in scan properties to separately handle text for sharpness and images for detail preservation. A standard workflow for MRC-based document imaging begins with scanning at 300 dpi resolution to capture sufficient detail for . The process then involves automatic segmentation to isolate text, photographic, and background elements, followed by layer-specific compression using MRC techniques to generate compact, searchable PDFs. This approach ensures high-fidelity reproduction of mixed-content pages, such as forms with embedded photos or charts. In archiving applications, MRC preserves text sharpness across large collections of scanned documents, making it suitable for long-term preservation while minimizing storage demands in libraries and digital repositories. By layering content and applying targeted compression, MRC reduces file sizes substantially compared to uniform methods, aiding efficient management of vast archives without compromising legibility. Enterprise document management systems leverage for handling mixed-content scans, achieving 50-70% size reductions that streamline storage and retrieval in high-volume environments. Overall, 's compression efficiency enhances document imaging by balancing quality and , particularly for searchable outputs in professional settings.

Integration with PDF and

Mixed raster content (MRC) has been integrated into the PDF format as a compression filter for images since the release of 6 in 2003, allowing for efficient encoding of compound documents containing both text and continuous-tone elements. This integration enables MRC to be applied directly to image streams within PDF files, leveraging segmentation to separate textual foreground from background imagery for optimized compression. Tools such as ORPALIS PDF Reducer utilize this capability for hyper-compression, achieving file size reductions of up to 90% for scanned documents without significant loss in visual quality. In PDF implementation, MRC operates through XObject streams embedded with specific markers that denote the layered structure, facilitating selective decoding of foreground and background layers during rendering. As of 2022, SDKs like Dynamsoft's libraries have incorporated support for PDF generation in mobile scanning applications, enabling seamless compression of captured documents into portable formats. Recent enhancements as of 2024, such as improved compression in Nitro PDF, continue to advance its use in cloud-based storage and processing workflows for archived scans. MRC forms a core component of the DjVu format since its standardization around 2001, where it structures documents into layers with bitonal text foregrounds encoded via JB2 and JPEG-like backgrounds using the IW44 codec. This layered approach in DjVu optimizes files for web distribution, achieving high compression ratios for color scanned documents while preserving sharp text edges and detailed imagery. The IW44 codec specifically wraps the layers, supporting progressive decoding that prioritizes visible regions for efficient online viewing. Interoperability between and archival standards is enhanced through export mechanisms that generate -compliant files, ensuring long-term preservation of segmented document layers in regulated environments. Scanners and software workflows can thus produce MRC-encoded PDFs that meet requirements, maintaining both compressibility and accessibility for institutional archives.

Evaluation

Advantages and Benefits

Mixed Raster Content (MRC) compression achieves superior efficiency for compound images by decomposing them into layers—a binary that selects between a foreground layer for text, line art, and graphics and a background layer for continuous-tone elements—allowing each to be encoded with the most suitable , such as for the binary mask and for the continuous-tone layers. This layered approach yields compression ratios 5 to 10 times better than standard for text-heavy s, reducing a typical 300 dpi color magazine page from several hundred kilobytes in to 40-60 KB in MRC. For example, a 1 MB scan of a mixed can often be compressed to around 100 KB using MRC while retaining perceptual quality. In terms of quality preservation, MRC maintains sharp text edges without the ringing artifacts common in JPEG compression of compound images, as the high-resolution mask layer ensures precise reconstruction of binary elements. Photographic regions retain fidelity through dedicated continuous-tone encoding, with studies showing 45-60% reduction in mean squared error distortion compared to other MRC implementations at equivalent bit rates. This preservation extends to optical character recognition (OCR), where MRC's clean separation of text layers supports improved accuracy by enhancing contrast and edge clarity without introducing compression-induced noise. The benefits extend to bandwidth savings, making MRC particularly suitable for document transmission and storage, as the reduced file sizes—often under 10% of uncompressed or JPEG equivalents for text-dominant pages—facilitate faster delivery over networks like fax systems defined in ITU-T T.44. Additionally, MRC offers scalability for high-resolution documents, where the mask layer can operate at full resolution (e.g., 600 dpi) while downsampling background and foreground layers, avoiding proportional increases in file size and enabling efficient handling of large scans without quality loss.

Limitations and Comparisons

Mixed raster content (MRC) compression incurs higher computational costs compared to single-layer methods due to the multi-layer segmentation and encoding process. Segmentation errors represent a key limitation, as inaccuracies in separating text from background can lead to text blurring or artifacts in the decoded image, particularly when non-text elements are misclassified as foreground. Early versions of the MRC standard, such as the 1999 ITU-T T.44 specification, offered limited color support, primarily focusing on monochrome or basic grayscale layers, with full color extensions added in later amendments like Mode 4. A notable in arises from the use of compression in the binary mask layer, which can introduce character substitution s, where similar-looking symbols are swapped, potentially altering document content in scanned images. Such errors have been observed in scanner implementations, with error rates reaching up to 1% in challenging documents featuring small fonts or noise. In comparisons, MRC outperforms JPEG for compound documents with text and graphics, achieving up to 8-10 times smaller file sizes while preserving sharp edges, but it underperforms on pure photographic images where the layered approach introduces unnecessary resolution loss in non-text areas. Versus , MRC delivers similar compression ratios for mixed content but excels specifically in documents by combining for text masks with for continuous-tone layers, avoiding the common in single-layer compression of edges. Compared to alone, which is optimized for binary images, MRC extends capabilities by incorporating photo handling through its foreground and background layers, though at the expense of added segmentation overhead. Overall, MRC strikes a balance between file size reduction and quality preservation for compound images but proves less suitable for non-compound content like uniform photographs, where simpler codecs suffice without the segmentation trade-offs. As of 2025, MRC remains relevant for compound document compression in SDKs and scanning software, though neural methods are gaining traction for general images.

References

  1. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/3653/1/Mixed-raster-content-MRC-model-for-compound-image-compression/10.1117/12.334618.full
  2. https://engineering.purdue.edu/~bouman/publications/pdf/pics01.pdf
  3. https://www.leadtools.com/help/sdk/v20/mrc/api/introduction.html
  4. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-T.44/en
  5. https://www.gdpicture.com/blog/pdf-optimization-series-part6-mrc-compression/
  6. https://www.iso.org/standard/32228.html
  7. https://leon.bottou.org/publications/pdf/jei-1998.pdf
  8. https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2301.txt
  9. https://www.leadtools.com/sdk/mrc
  10. https://www.imaging.org/common/uploaded%20files/pdfs/Papers/2006/ICIS-0-736/33854.pdf
  11. https://thanglong.ece.jhu.edu/Tran/Pub/mrctrans.pdf
  12. https://ijcst.com/vol32/2/vishwanath.pdf
  13. https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-T.30-200210-S!!Amd2!!PDF-E&type=items
  14. https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-T.44-199904-S!!PDF-E&type=items
  15. https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-T.44-200501-I%21%21PDF-E&type=items
  16. https://www.leadtools.com/help/sdk/v21/main/api/mixed-raster-content-mrc.html
  17. https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-T.44-199904-S%21%21PDF-E&type=items
  18. https://www.leadtools.com/help/leadtools/v175/dh/to/Leadtools.Topics.Mrc~MR.Topics.MRCGeneralInformation.html
  19. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/es/#!iso:std:32228:en
  20. https://www.digipres.org/formats/mime-types/
  21. https://www.orpalis.com/blog/pdf-optimization-series-part6-mrc-compression/
  22. https://www.pdf-tools.com/public/downloads/manuals/Image2PdfAPI.pdf
  23. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3949.html
  24. https://www.leadtools.com/help/sdk/dh/to/mrc-general-information.html
  25. https://patents.google.com/patent/EP1006714A2/en
  26. https://engineering.purdue.edu/~bouman/publications/pdf/tip19.pdf
  27. https://www.visioneer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/OTGuide.Win_85-0110-200.EN_.pdf
  28. https://www.interscanllc.com/blog/best-resolution-for-scanning-documents
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329624748_Document_Image_Compression_with_Application_to_Digital_Preservation_in_Digital_Libraries
  30. https://www.accusoft.com/resources/blog/mrc-compression-imagegear/
  31. https://dev.to/revisepdf/compressing-scanned-documents-special-considerations-3bpa
  32. https://www.dynamsoft.com/blog/imaging/mrc-compression-pdf/
  33. https://www.djvu-soft.narod.ru/planetdjvu/the_mrc_mixed_raster_content_model_and_djvu.htm
  34. https://www.pdfblog.at/2022/02/pdfcompressor-pdf-mrc-mixed-raster-content-compression-reduce-document-color-scans-by-a-factor-of-8-to-10/?lang=en
  35. https://www.leadtools.com/help/sdk/v21/dh/to/file-formats-leadtools-pdf-with-mixed-raster-content-pdf.html
  36. https://www.gonitro.com/documentation/release-notes
  37. https://www.sndjvu.org/spec.html
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2330768_DjVu_a_Compression_Method_for_Distributing_Scanned_Documents_in_Color_over_the_Internet
  39. https://www.abbyy.com/ocr-sdk/features/pdf-conversion/
  40. https://ocr4linux.com/en:documentation:pdfa_mrc_export_keys
  41. https://www.ijirset.com/upload/2014/icets/201_EE486.pdf
  42. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TIP.2010.2101611
  43. https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-T.44-200002-S%21Amd1%21PDF-E&type=items
  44. https://www.computerworld.com/article/1504935/the-xerox-character-substitution-bug-is-worse-than-first-thought.html
  45. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32537073
  46. https://arxiv.org/html/2406.10036v1
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.