Hubbry Logo
Robert F. Kennedy BridgeRobert F. Kennedy BridgeMain
Open search
Robert F. Kennedy Bridge
Community hub
Robert F. Kennedy Bridge
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Robert F. Kennedy Bridge
Robert F. Kennedy Bridge
from Wikipedia

KML is from Wikidata

The Robert F. Kennedy Bridge (RFK Bridge; also known by its name prior to 2008, the Triborough Bridge) is a complex of bridges and elevated expressway viaducts[3] in New York City. The bridges link the boroughs of Manhattan, Queens, and the Bronx. The viaducts cross Randalls and Wards Islands, previously two islands and now joined by landfill.

Key Information

The RFK Bridge, a toll bridge, carries Interstate 278 (I-278) as well as the unsigned highway New York State Route 900G. It connects with the FDR Drive and the Harlem River Drive in Manhattan, the Bruckner Expressway (I-278) and the Major Deegan Expressway (Interstate 87) in the Bronx, and the Grand Central Parkway (I-278) and Astoria Boulevard in Queens. The three primary bridges of the RFK Bridge complex are:[3]

These three bridges are connected by an elevated highway viaduct across Randalls and Wards Islands and 14 miles (23 km) of support roads. The viaduct includes a smaller span across the former site of Little Hell Gate, which separated Randalls and Wards Islands.[3][4] Also part of the complex is a grade-separated T-interchange on Randalls Island, which sorted out traffic in a way that ensured that drivers paid a toll at only one bank of tollbooths.[5] The tollbooths have since been removed, and all tolls are collected electronically at the approaches to each bridge.

The bridge complex was designed by Allston Dana with the collaboration of Othmar Ammann and architect Aymar Embury II,[6] and has been called "not a bridge so much as a traffic machine, the largest ever built".[5] The American Society of Civil Engineers designated the Triborough Bridge Project as a National Historic Civil Engineering Landmark in 1986.[7] The bridge is owned and operated by MTA Bridges and Tunnels (formally the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, or TBTA), an affiliate of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

Description

[edit]

The RFK Bridge is made of four segments. The three primary spans traverse the East River to Queens; the Harlem River to Manhattan; and Bronx Kill to the Bronx,[8] while the fourth is a T-shaped approach viaduct that leads to an interchange plaza between the three primary spans on Randalls Island. The Queens arm of the viaduct formerly crossed Little Hell Gate, a creek located between Randalls Island to the north and Wards Island to the south.[3] Excluding elevated ramps, the segments are a total of 17,710 feet (5,400 m) long, with a 13,560-foot-long (4,130 m) span between the Bronx and Queens, and a 4,150-foot-long (1,260 m) span between Manhattan and the interchange plaza.[9][10][8] In total, the bridge contains 17.5 miles (28.2 km) of roadway, including elevated ramps.[11]

The bridge was primarily designed by chief engineer Othmar H. Ammann and architect Aymar Embury II.[6] Wharton Green served as the Public Works Administration (PWA)'s resident engineer for the project.[12]

The East River suspension bridge, pictured in 2022

East River suspension bridge (I-278)

[edit]

The East River span, a suspension bridge across the Hell Gate of the East River, connects Queens with Wards Island. It carries eight lanes of Interstate 278, four in each direction, as well as a sidewalk on the northeastern side. The span connects to Grand Central Parkway, and indirectly to the Brooklyn–Queens Expressway (I-278), in Astoria, Queens.[13] Originally it connected to the intersection of 25th Avenue and 31st Street; the former was later renamed Hoyt Avenue.[14] The suspension span was designed by chief engineer Othmar Ammann.[15] The span was originally designed to be double-decked, with eight lanes on each deck.[16][10] When the construction of the Triborough Bridge was paused in 1932 due to lack of funding, the suspension span was downsized to a single deck. There are Warren trusses on each side of the span, which stiffen the deck.[16]

The center span between the two suspension towers is 1,380 feet (421 m) long,[16][17] and the side spans between the suspension towers and the anchorages are each 700 feet (213 m) long.[16] The total length of the bridge is 2,780 feet (847 m), and the deck is 98 feet (30 m) wide.[16] The columns under the Wards Island approach roadway were originally placed atop 400,000 steel ball bearings, allowing the roadway to move sideways by up to 13.25 inches (337 mm) in either direction.[17]

At mean high water, the towers are 315 feet (96 m) tall, and there is 143 feet (44 m) of clearance under the middle of the main span.[16] The suspension towers were originally designed by Arthur I. Perry. Each tower was supposed to have two ornate arches at the top, similar to the Brooklyn Bridge, and was to have been supported by four legs: two on the outside and two in the center.[18][10] A 1932 article described that each tower would be made of 5,000 tons of material, including 3,680 tons of steel.[10] The final design of the suspension towers, by Ammann, consists of comparatively simple cross bracing supported by two legs.[18] The tops of each tower contain cast iron saddles in the Art Deco style, over which the bridge's main cables run. These are topped by 30-foot (9.1 m) decorative lanterns with red aircraft warning lights.[19]

The span is supported by two main cables, which suspend the deck and are held up by the suspension towers. Each cable is 20 inches (51 cm) in diameter and contains 10,800 miles (17,400 km) of individual wires.[20] Each main cable is composed of 37 strands of 248 wires, for a total of 9,176 wires in each cable. The wires are fastened together by "strand shoes", placed at regular intervals.[21] At the Wards Island and Astoria ends of the suspension span, there are two anchorages that hold the main cables.[10][21] The anchorages contain a combined 133,500 tons of concrete.[20] There are also bents atop each anchorage, which conceal the ends of each main cable.[21]

The Harlem River lift bridge in 2007

Harlem River lift bridge (NY 900G)

[edit]
New York State Route 900G
LocationManhattan
Length0.66 mi[22] (1,060 m)

The Harlem River span is a lift bridge that connects Manhattan with Randalls Island, designed by chief engineer Ammann.[15] It carries six lanes of New York State Route 900G (NY 900G), an unsigned reference route, as well as two sidewalks, one on each side.[23] The span connects to FDR Drive and Harlem River Drive, as well as the intersection of Second Avenue and East 125th Street, in East Harlem, Manhattan. At the time of its completion, the Harlem River lift bridge had the largest deck of any lift bridge in the world, with a surface area of 20,000 square feet (1,900 m2). To lighten the deck, it was made of asphalt paved onto steel girders, rather than of concrete.[24]

The movable span is 310 feet (94 m) long[23][24] and 92 feet (28 m) wide.[23] The side spans between the movable span and the approach viaducts are each 195 feet (59 m) long. The total length of the bridge is 700 feet (213 m).[24] The towers are 210 feet (64 m) above mean high water. Each of the lift towers is supported by two clusters of four columns, which supports the bridge deck. A curved truss at the top of each pair of column clusters forms an arch directly underneath the deck.[24]

The lift span is 55 feet (17 m) above mean high water in the "closed" position, but can be raised to 135 feet (41 m).[23][25] The movable section is suspended by a total of 96 wire ropes, which are wrapped around pulleys with 15-foot (4.6 m) diameters.[25] These pulleys, in turn, are powered by four motors that can operate at 200 horsepower (149 kW).[24][26]

Exit list

[edit]

NY 900G is officially maintained as a north–south route, despite its largely east-west progression.[22] The entire route is in the New York City borough of Manhattan. All exits are unnumbered.

Locationmi[27]kmDestinationsNotes
Randall's Island0.00.0

I-278 to I-87 north – Bronx, Queens, Airports
Southern terminus; exit 46 on I-278
0.10.16Randalls Island, Icahn StadiumSouthbound exit and northbound entrance; access via Central Road
Harlem River0.2–
0.4
0.32–
0.64
Bridge (southbound toll)
East Harlem0.40.64
FDR Drive south
Northbound exit and southbound entrance; exit 17 on FDR Drive

Harlem River Drive north
Northbound exit and southbound entrance; exit 17 on Harlem River Drive
0.60.97East 125th Street / 2nd AvenueNorthern terminus; at-grade intersection
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi

Bronx Kill crossing (I-278)

[edit]
Bronx Kill crossing in 2008

The Bronx Kill span is a truss bridge that connects the Bronx with Randalls Island. It carries eight lanes of I-278, as well as two sidewalks, one on each side. The span connects to Major Deegan Expressway (I-87) and the Bruckner Expressway (I-278) in Mott Haven, Bronx.[13] It originally connected to the intersection of East 134th Street and Cypress Avenue, a site now occupied by the interchange between I-87 and I-278.[14] The truss span was designed by consulting engineers Ash-Howard-Needles and Tammen.[15]

The Bronx Kill span contains three main truss crossings, which are fixed spans because the Bronx Kill is not used by regular boat traffic.[26] The main truss span across the Bronx Kill is 383 feet (117 m) long,[15] while the approaches are a combined 1,217 feet (371 m).[4][15] The total length of the bridge is 1,600 feet (488 m). The truss span is 55 feet (17 m) above mean high water.[15]

Interchange plaza and approach viaducts

[edit]
An elevated roadway being widened, seen from the ground
Renovation of interchange plaza viaduct, seen in 2016
A two-story stone building with trees in front
TBTA headquarters on Randalls Island, near the Manhattan span

The three spans of the RFK Bridge intersect at a grade-separated T-interchange on Randalls Island.[13] The span to Manhattan intersects perpendicularly with the I-278 viaduct between the Bronx and Queens spans.[26] Although I-278 is signed as a west-east highway, the orientation of I-278 on the bridge is closer to a north-south alignment, with the southbound roadway carrying westbound traffic, and the northbound roadway carrying eastbound traffic.[13] Two circular ramps carry traffic to and from eastbound I-278 and the RFK lift bridge to Manhattan.[13][28][29] Randalls and Wards Islands are accessed via exits and entrances to and from westbound I-278; to and from the westbound lift bridge viaduct; to eastbound I-278; and from the eastbound lift bridge viaduct. Eastbound traffic on I-278 accesses the island by first exiting onto the lift bridge viaduct.[13]

The interchange plaza originally contained two tollbooths: one for traffic traveling to and from Manhattan, and one for traffic traveling on I-278 between the Bronx and Queens. The tollbooths were arranged so vehicles only paid one toll upon entering Randalls and Wards Islands, and there was no charge to exit the island.[5][28][29] The elevated toll plazas had a surface area of about 9 acres (3.6 ha) and were supported by 1,700 columns, all hidden behind a concrete retaining wall.[28] In 2017, the MTA started collecting all tolls electronically at the approaches to each bridge,[30] and the tollbooths were removed from the toll plazas on the RFK Bridge and all other MTA Bridges and Tunnels crossings.[31][32]

The Robert Moses Administration Building, a two-story Art Deco structure designed by Embury, served as the headquarters of the TBTA (now the MTA's Bridges and Tunnels division). The building was next to the Manhattan span's plaza, to which it was connected. In 1969, the Manhattan span's toll plaza was moved west and the I-278 toll plaza was moved south, and both toll plazas were expanded more than threefold. This required the destruction of the building's original towers. A room was built in 1966 to store Moses's models and blueprints of planned roads and crossings, but they were moved to the MTA's headquarters at 2 Broadway in the 1980s. The building was renamed after Moses in 1989.[33]

The interchange plaza connects with the over-water spans via a three-legged concrete viaduct that has a total length of more than 2.5 miles (4.0 km). The segments of the viaduct rest atop steel girders, which in turn are placed perpendicularly between concrete piers spaced 60 to 140 feet (18 to 43 m) apart.[24] Each pier is supported by a set of three octagonal columns. The viaduct is mostly eight lanes wide, except at the former locations of the toll plazas, where it widens. The viaduct once traversed Little Hell Gate, a small creek that formerly separated Randalls Island to the north and Wards Island to the south; the waterway has since been filled in.[28] The viaduct rose 62 feet (19 m) above the mean high water of Little Hell Gate.[26]

Development

[edit]

Planning

[edit]

Initial plans

[edit]

Edward A. Byrne, chief engineer of the New York City Department of Plant and Structures, first announced plans for connecting Manhattan, Queens and the Bronx in 1916.[34][15] The next year, the Harlem Boards of Trade and Commerce and the Harlem Luncheon Association announced their support for such a bridge, which was proposed to cost $10 million. The "Tri-Borough Bridge", as it was called, would connect 125th Street in Manhattan, St. Ann's Avenue in the Bronx, and an as-yet-undetermined location in Queens. It would parallel the Hell Gate Bridge, a railroad bridge connecting Queens and the Bronx via Randalls and Wards Islands.[35] Plans for the Tri-Borough Bridge were bolstered by the 1919 closure of a ferry between Yorkville in Manhattan and Astoria in Queens.[36]

Map of the bridge's path, highlighted in red

A bill to construct the bridge was proposed in the New York State Legislature in 1920.[37] Gustav Lindenthal, who had designed the Hell Gate Bridge, criticized the Tri-Borough plan as "uncalled for", as the new Tri-Borough Bridge would parallel the existing Hell Gate Bridge. He stated that the Hell Gate Bridge could be retrofitted with an upper deck for vehicular and pedestrian use.[38] Queens borough president Maurice K. Connolly also opposed the bridge, arguing that there was no need to construct a span between Queens and the Bronx due to low demand. Connolly also said that a bridge between Queens and Manhattan needed to be built further downstream, closer to the Queensboro Bridge, which at the time was the only bridge between the two boroughs.[39][40]

The Port of New York Authority included the proposed Tri-Borough Bridge in a report to the New York state legislature in 1921.[41] The following year, the planned bridge was also included in a "transit plan" published by Mayor John Francis Hylan, who called for the construction of the Tri-Borough Bridge as part of the city-operated Independent Subway System (see § Public transportation).[42][43] In March 1923, a vote was held on whether to allocate money to perform surveys and test borings, as well as create structural plans for the Tri-Borough Bridge. The borough presidents of Manhattan and the Bronx voted for the allocation of the funds, while the presidents of Queens and Staten Island agreed with Hylan, who preferred the construction of the new subway system instead of the Tri-Borough Bridge.[44] The bridge allocation was ultimately not approved.[45] Another attempt at obtaining funds was declined in 1924, although there was a possibility that the bridge could be built based on assessment plans that were being procured.[46]

Funding

[edit]

The Tri-Borough Bridge project finally received funding in June 1925, when the city appropriated $50,000 for surveys, test borings and structural plans. Work started on a tentative design for the bridge.[4][47] By December 1926, the $50,000 allotment had been spent on bores.[48] Around the same time, the proposal to convert the Hell Gate Bridge resurfaced.[49] Albert Goldman, the Commissioner of Plant and Structures, had finished a tentative report for the Tri-Borough Bridge by that time; however, it was not immediately submitted to the New York City Board of Estimate as a result of a reorganization of the city's proposed budget.[50][51] Goldman finally published the report in March 1927, stating that the bridge was estimated to cost $24.6 million.[52] He explained that the Hell Gate Bridge only had enough space for five lanes of roadway, so a new bridge would have to be constructed parallel to it.[53]

Though two mayoral committees endorsed the Tri-Borough plan,[54] as did several merchants' associations,[55] construction was delayed for a year because of a lack of funds.[56] The Board of Estimate did approve $150,000 in May 1927 for preliminary borings and soundings.[57] That September, a group of entrepreneurs proposed to fund the bridge privately.[58] Under this plan, the bridge would be set up as a toll bridge, and ownership would be transferred to the city once the bridge was paid for.[59] In August 1928, Mayor Jimmy Walker received a similar proposal from the Long Island Board of Commerce to build the Tri-Borough Bridge using $32 million of private capital.[60] The Queens Chamber of Commerce also favored setting up tolls on the bridge to pay for its construction.[61] Yet another plan called for financing the bridge using proceeds from a bond issue, which would also pay for the proposed Queens–Midtown Tunnel.[62]

The Tri-Borough Bridge was being planned in conjunction with the Brooklyn–Queens Expressway, which would create a continuous highway between the Bronx and Brooklyn with a southward extension over The Narrows to Staten Island. In January 1929, New York City aldermanic president Joseph V. McKee endorsed the bridge, saying there was enough funding to begin one of four proposed bridges on the expressway's route.[63] The newly elected borough president of Queens, George U. Harvey, also endorsed the bridge, as did Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce leader George Vincent McLaughlin.[64] Trade groups petitioned Mayor Walker to take up the bridge's construction.[65] By the end of the month, Walker acquiesced, and he had included both the Tri-Borough Bridge and a tunnel under the Narrows in his 10-year traffic program.[66] The preliminary borings were completed by late February 1929.[67] The results of the preliminary borings showed that the bedrock in the ground underneath the proposed bridge was sufficient to support the spans' foundations.[68]

In early March, the Board of Estimate voted to start construction on the bridge and on the Narrows tunnel once funding was obtained. The same month, the board allocated $3 million toward the bridge's construction.[69][70] Separately, the Board of Estimate voted to create an authority to impose toll charges on both crossings.[71] In April 1929, the New York state legislature voted to approve the Tri-Borough Bridge as well as a prison on Rikers Island before adjourning for the fiscal year.[72] The same month, New York state governor Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the bill to approve the move of about 700 beds in Wards Island's mental hospital, which were in the way of the proposed bridge's suspension span to Queens.[73] The New York state legislature later approved a bill that provided for moving the Queens span's Wards Island end, 1,100 feet (340 m) to the west, thereby preserving hospital buildings from demolition.[74]

Finalization of plans

[edit]
Queens suspension span over the East River, seen at dusk

The bridge was ultimately planned to cost $24 million and was planned to start construction in August 1929.[75] By July, the groundbreaking was scheduled for September.[76] The preliminary Triborough Bridge proposal comprised four bridges: a suspension span across the East River to Queens; a truss span across Bronx Kill to the Bronx; a fixed span across the Harlem River to Manhattan; and a steel arch viaduct across the no-longer-extant Little Hell Gate between Randalls and Wards Islands.[76]

In August 1929, plans for the bridge were submitted to the United States Department of War for approval to ensure that the proposed Tri-Borough Bridge would not block any maritime navigation routes. Railroad and shipping groups objected that the proposed Harlem River span, with a height of 50 feet (15 m) above mean high water, was too short for most ships, and suggested building a 135-foot-high (41 m) suspension span over the Harlem River instead.[77] Because of complaints about maritime navigational clearance, the Department of War approved an increase in the Harlem River fixed bridge's height to 55 feet (17 m), as well as an increase in the length of the Hell Gate suspension bridge's main span from 1,100 to 1,380 feet (340 to 420 m).[74]

Initial construction

[edit]

The scale of the Triborough Bridge project, including its approaches, was such that hundreds of large apartment buildings were demolished to make way for it. The structure used concrete from factories "from Maine to the Mississippi", and steel from 50 mills in Pennsylvania. To make the formwork for pouring the concrete, a forest's worth of trees on the Pacific Coast was cut down.[9] Robert Caro, the author of a biography on Long Island State Parks commissioner and Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority chairman Robert Moses, wrote about the project:

Triborough was not a bridge so much as a traffic machine, the largest ever built. The amount of human energy expended in its construction gives some idea of its immensity: more than five thousand men would be working at the site, and these men would only be putting into place the materials furnished by the labor of many times five thousand men; before the Triborough Bridge was completed, its construction would have generated more than 31,000,000 man-hours of work in 134 cities in twenty states.[5]

First contracts

[edit]

The Board of Estimate approved the first contracts for the Triborough Bridge in early October 1929, specifically for the construction bridge piers on Randalls and Wards Islands and in Queens. This allowed for the start of construction on the Triborough Bridge's suspension span to Queens.[74] A groundbreaking ceremony was held in Astoria Park, Queens, on October 25, 1929, just a day after Black Thursday, which started the Great Depression.[20] Mayor Walker turned over the first spadeful of dirt for the bridge in front of 10,000 visitors.[78] After the groundbreaking ceremony, further construction was delayed because the company originally contracted to build the piers, the Albert A. Volk Company, refused to carry out the contract. In early December, the contract for the piers was reassigned to the McMullen Company.[79] Meanwhile, the Board was condemning the land in the path of the bridge's approaches.[80] However, this process was also postponed because homeowners wanted to sell their property to the city at exceedingly high prices.[81]

The War Department gave its approval to the Bronx Kills, East River, and Little Hell Gate spans in late April 1930, after construction was already underway on the Queens suspension span across the East River.[82] A week later, the War Department also approved the Harlem River span, with another amendment: the span was now a movable lift bridge, which could be raised to allow maritime traffic to pass.[83] Shortly afterward, a special mayoral committee sanctioned a $5 million expenditure for the Triborough project,[84] and in July 1930, a $5 million bond issue to fund the Triborough Bridge's construction was passed.[85]

Plans for an expressway to connect to the bridge's Queens end were also filed in July 1930. This later became the Brooklyn–Queens Expressway, which was connected to the bridge via the Grand Central Parkway.[86] There were also proposals for an expressway to connect to the Bronx end of the bridge along Southern Boulevard.[87] Robert Moses, the Long Island state parks commissioner, wanted to expand Grand Central Parkway from its western terminus at the time, Union Turnpike in Kew Gardens, Queens, northwest to the proposed bridge.[88] The Brooklyn-Queens Expressway proposal, which would create a highway from the Queens end of the bridge to Queens Boulevard in Woodside, Queens, was also considered.[89]

Manhattan lift bridge over the Harlem River

A contract to build the suspension anchorage on Wards Island was awarded in January 1931.[90] At the time, progress on the bridge approaches was proceeding rapidly, and it was expected that the entire Triborough Bridge complex would be completed in 1934.[14] By August 1931, it was reported that the Wards Island anchorage was 33% completed, and that the corresponding anchorage on the Queens side was 15% completed. Work on drainage dikes, as well as contracts for bridge approach piers, were also progressing.[91] A report the next month indicated that the overall project was 6% completed, and that another $2.45 million in contracts was planned to be awarded over the following year.[92][93] In October, contracts for constructing the bridge piers were advertised.[94] By December 1931, the project was 15% completed,[95] and the city was accepting designs for the Queens span's suspension towers.[96] The granite foundations in the water near each bank of the East River, which would support the suspension towers, were completed in early or mid-1932.[97][98] At the time, there were no funds to build six additional piers on Randalls Island and one in Little Hell Gate, nor were there funds to build the suspension towers themselves.[97]

Funding issues

[edit]

The Great Depression severely impacted the city's ability to finance the Triborough Bridge's construction.[20] City comptroller Charles W. Berry had stated in February 1930 that the city was in sound financial condition, even though other large cities were nearing bankruptcy.[99] However, the New York City government was running out of money by that July.[100] The Triborough project's outlook soon began to look bleak. Chief engineer Othmar Ammann was enlisted to help guide the project, but the combination of Tammany Hall graft, the stock market crash, and the Great Depression which followed it, brought the project to a virtual halt.[101] Investors shied away from purchasing the municipal bonds needed to fund it.[6]

By early 1932, the Triborough Bridge project was in danger of cancellation.[102] As part of $213 million in cuts to the city's budget, Berry wanted to halt construction on the span in order to avoid a $43.7 million budget shortage by the end of that year.[103] With no new contracts being awarded, the chief engineer of the Department of Plant and Structures, Edward A. Byrne, warned in March 1932 that construction on the Triborough Bridge would have to be halted.[104] Though Queens borough president Harvey objected to the impending postponement of the bridge's construction,[105] the project was still included in the $213 million worth of budget cuts.[106] Following this, Goldman submitted a proposal to fund the planning stages for the remaining portions of construction, so that work could resume immediately once sufficient funding was available.[107]

In August 1932, Senator Robert F. Wagner announced that he would ask for a $26 million loan from the federal government, namely President Herbert Hoover's Reconstruction Finance Corporation, so there could be funds for the construction of both the Triborough Bridge and Queens-Midtown Tunnel.[108] Queens borough president Harvey also went to the RFC to ask for funding for the bridge.[109] Soon after, the RFC moved to prepare the loan for the Triborough Bridge project.[110] However, when Mayor Walker resigned suddenly in September 1932, his successor Joseph V. McKee refused to seek RFC or other federal aid for the two projects, stating, "If we go to Washington for funds to complete the Triborough Bridge [...] where would we draw the line?"[111] Governor Al Smith agreed, saying that such requests were unnecessary because the bridge could pay for itself.[112] Harvey continued to push for federal funding for the Triborough Bridge, prioritizing its completion over other projects such as the development of Jamaica Bay in southern Queens.[113] Civic groups also advocated for the city to apply for RFC funding.[114]

In February 1933, a nine-person committee, appointed by Lehman and chaired by Moses, applied to the RFC for a $150 million loan for projects in New York state, including the Triborough Bridge.[115] However, although the RFC favored a loan for the Triborough project,[116] the new mayor, John P. O'Brien, banned the RFC from giving loans to the city.[117] Instead, O'Brien wanted to create a bridge authority to sell bonds to pay for the construction of the Triborough Bridge as well as for the Queens-Midtown Tunnel.[118] Robert Moses was also pushing the state legislature to create an authority to fund, build, and operate the Triborough Bridge.[101] A bill to create the Triborough Bridge Authority (TBA) passed quickly through both houses of the state legislature,[119] and was signed by Governor Herbert H. Lehman that April. The bill included a provision that the authority could sell up to $35 million in bonds and fund the remainder of construction through bridge tolls.[120][121] George Gordon Battle, a Tammany Hall attorney, was appointed as chairman of the new authority, and three commissioners were appointed.[122]

Shortly after the TBA bill was signed, the War Department extended its deadline for the Triborough Bridge's completion by three years, to April 28, 1936.[123] Lehman also signed bills to clear land for a bridge approach in the Bronx,[124] and he promised to resume construction of the bridge.[125] That May, the TBA asked the RFC for a $35 million loan to pay for the bridge.[126][127] The RFC ultimately agreed in August to grant $44.2 million, to be composed of a loan of $37 million, as well as a $7.2 million subsidy.[128] However, the loan would only be given under a condition that 18,000 workers be hired first,[129] so the city's Board of Estimate voted to hire 18,000 workers to work on the Triborough project.[130] The funds for the Triborough Bridge, as well as for the Lincoln Tunnel from Manhattan to New Jersey, were ready by the beginning of September.[131]

Construction resumes

[edit]
Art Deco saddle housing on Queens suspension bridge

The city purchased land in the path of the Triborough Bridge in September 1933,[132] and construction on the Triborough Bridge resumed that November.[102] By January 1934, contracts were being prepared for the completion of the suspension span and the construction of the other three spans;[133] one of these contracts included the construction of the bridge's piers.[134] That February, the TBA contemplated condensing the Queens span's 16-lane, double-deck roadway into an 8-lane, single deck road, as well as simplify the suspension towers' designs, to save $5 million.[135] According to the agency, it would take 40 years for the bridge to reach a level of traffic where all sixteen lanes were needed.[136] In April, a new plan was approved that would reduce the bridge's cost from $51 million to $42 million.[136][137] Chief engineer Ammann had decided to collapse the original design's two-deck roadway into one, requiring lighter towers and lighter piers.[101] The steel company constructing the towers challenged the TBA's decision in an appellate court, but the court ruled in favor of the TBA.[138]

1934 progress

[edit]

By January 1934, the TBA was in turmoil: one of the TBA's commissioners had resigned,[139] and New York City Mayor Fiorello H. La Guardia was trying another TBA commissioner, John Stratton O'Leary, for corruption.[140] The TBA's general counsel also resigned.[141] As a result, Public Works Administration (PWA) administrator Harold L. Ickes refused to distribute more of the RFC grant until the existing funds could be accounted for.[142] Ickes also warned that he would cancel the RFC grant if the political disputes regarding the TBA were not cleared up.[143] After O'Leary was removed, La Guardia appointed Moses to fill O'Leary's position,[144] and Ickes also promised to give $1.5 million toward the bridge's construction,[145] which the city received that March.[146] Moses became the chairman of the TBA in April 1934, after a series of interim chairmen had held the post.[147] Moses, who also had positions in the state and city governments, sought to expedite the project,[102] awarding a contract in May for the construction of an approach highway to the Queens span.[148]

A contract to clear land in the bridge's right-of-way was awarded in April 1934,[149] and work began that month.[150] Over 300 buildings had to be destroyed.[151] Families living in the path of the bridge's approaches protested the eviction notices given to them.[152] The Harlem Market on First Avenue, which stood in the way of the Manhattan approach, was to be moved to the Bronx Terminal Market.[153] The construction of the Triborough Bridge across Little Hell Gate also required the demolition of hospital buildings on Randalls and Wards Islands.[154] The New York City Department of Hospitals applied for funds to build the Seaview Hospital on Staten Island, which would house the hospital facilities displaced by the Triborough Bridge.[155] Homes in Astoria and wooden docks were also demolished to make way for the bridge.[156]

Moses continued to advocate for new roads and parkways to connect with the bridge as part of an interconnected parkway system.[157] The complex of roads included the Grand Central Parkway and Astoria Boulevard in Queens; 125th Street, the East River Drive (now the FDR Drive), and Harlem River Drive in Manhattan; and Whitlock Avenue and Eastern Boulevard (now Bruckner Expressway) in the Bronx.[158] The first of those roads, the Grand Central Parkway, was planned to start construction in early 1934.[159] That July, the Department of War approved the Bronx Kill span as a fixed truss span, since the Bronx Kill was not a navigable waterway; the span could be replaced with a lift bridge if needed.[158][160] The same month, the city approved the first segment of the East River Drive, leading from the intersection of York Avenue and 92nd Street to the Triborough Bridge approach at 125th Street.[161][162] The bridge approach on the Bronx side was also finalized, running along Southern and Eastern boulevards,[162] with a future extension to Pelham Bay Park in the northeastern Bronx.[163]

Civic groups advocated for an approach highway from the West Bronx,[164] and Bronx borough president James J. Lyons tried to block the Board of Estimate from approving the Manhattan approach highway until a West Bronx approach was also provided for.[165] Despite this, in October 1934, the Board of Estimate approved the East River Drive approach while rejecting the West Bronx approach.[166] While reformers embraced Moses's plans to expand the parkway system, state and city officials were overwhelmed by their scale, and slow to move to provide financing for the vast system.[101] Partial funding came from interest-bearing bonds issued by the Triborough Bridge Authority, to be secured by future toll revenue.[167][168]

1935 progress

[edit]

Financing disputes with the PWA involved complex political infighting.[169] The disputes peaked in January 1935, when Ickes passed a rule that effectively prohibited PWA funding for the TBA unless Moses resigned the post of either TBA chairman or New York City Parks Commissioner.[170][171] This came as a result of Moses's criticism that New Deal funding programs like the PWA were too slow to disburse funds.[171] Moses refused to resign in spite of Ickes's persistence,[172] and Ickes threatened to withhold salaries for TBA workers as well.[173] Though La Guardia was supportive of Moses, even petitioning Roosevelt for help,[174] he was willing to replace the TBA chairman if it resulted in funding for the bridge.[175] In mid-March, Ickes suddenly backed down on his ultimatum; not only was Moses allowed to keep both of his positions, but the PWA also resumed its payments to the TBA.[176] La Guardia re-appointed Moses to the TBA the same year.[177]

Meanwhile, in February 1935, the TBA awarded a contract to construct the piers for the Harlem River lift structure.[178] Despite an impending lack of funds due to the dispute between Moses and Ickes, the TBA announced its intent to open bids for bridge steelwork.[179] By March, the suspension towers for the East River span to Queens were nearing completion, and support piers on Randalls and Wards Islands had progressed substantially.[180][163] After the Moses–Ickes dispute had subsided, the TBA started advertising for bids to build the steel roadways of the Randalls and Wards Islands viaducts, as well as the East River suspension span.[181] Less than a week afterward, the first temporary wires were strung between the two towers of the suspension span.[182] The wires in the main cables were laid by machines that traveled along these temporary wires.[21] A contract for the Harlem River lift span's steel superstructure was awarded that May,[183] followed by a contract for the Bronx Kill truss span's structure the following month.[184]

The spinning of the main span's suspension cables was finished in July 1935. By that time, half of the $41 million federal grant had been spent on construction, and the bridge was expected to open the following year.[185] The bridge was expected to relieve traffic on nearby highways,[186] and, with the upcoming 1939 New York World's Fair being held in Queens, would also provide a new route to the fairground at Flushing Meadows–Corona Park.[187] The construction of the Bronx approach was delayed after the city's corporation council found that the approach could not be built using federal funds.[188] By October 1935, the Queens approach and the Randalls and Wards Islands viaduct was nearly complete. Vertical suspender cables had been hung from the main cables of the Queens suspension span, and the steel slabs to support the span's roadway deck were being erected. The concrete piers supporting Bronx span were still being constructed, and the site of the Manhattan span was marked only by its foundations.[189] The deck of the Queens suspension span was completed the following month.[190] The work was dangerous, as some workers fell off the scaffolding that had been erected to allow them to build the suspension span, while others died due to lead poisoning.[156]

The interchange plaza between the Queens, Bronx, and Manhattan spans

In November 1935, a controversy emerged over the fact that the Triborough Bridge would use steel imported from Nazi Germany, rather than American producers.[191] Although American steel producers objected to the contract, the PWA approved of it anyway, because the German steel contract was cheaper than any of the bids presented by American producers.[192] Moses also approved of the decision because it would save money,[193] and the TBA said that federal regulations had forced the agency to turn to a German manufacturer.[194] La Guardia blocked the deal, writing that "the only commodity we can get from Hitlerland [Germany] is hatred, and we don't want any in our country",[195] and Ickes also banned the use of imported materials on PWA projects.[196] The TBA then re-awarded the contract to the Jones and Laughlin Steel Company.[197]

1936 progress

[edit]

By February 1936, the TBA had awarded contracts for paving the Bronx Kill and East River spans, as well as for constructing several administrative buildings for the TBA near the bridge.[198] Lyons continued to object to Moses's plans for the bridge's Bronx approach.[199] Moses wanted to speed up construction on the Triborough Bridge so that it would meet a deadline of July 11, 1936.[200] He objected to Ickes's decision, in March 1936, to decentralize control of PWA resident engineers, who would report to state PWA bosses instead of directly to the PWA's main office in Washington, D.C. Moses believed that the PWA boss for New York, Arthur S. Tuttle, was indecisive.[200][201] In return, Ickes assured Moses of Tuttle's full cooperation.[202]

The 300-by-84-foot superstructure of the Harlem River lift span was assembled in Weehawken, New Jersey. It was floated northward to the Triborough Bridge site in April 1936.[203] Early the next month, the 200-ton main lift span was hoisted into place above the Harlem River in a process that took sixteen minutes.[204] In addition, the city gave the New York City Omnibus Corporation a temporary permit to operate bus routes on the Triborough Bridge, connecting the bus stops at each of the bridge's ends, during the summer months.[205] Moses appealed to Ickes to increase the construction workers' workweeks from 30 to 40 hours so the bridge would be able to open on time, but was initially rejected.[206] A 40-hour workweek was approved that June.[207] As late as the day before the bridge's opening on July 11, workers were still putting finishing touches on the bridge and surrounding highways.[208][209]

A byproduct of the Triborough project was the creation of parks and playgrounds in the lands underneath the bridges and approaches.[102] The largest of these parks was Randall's Island Park, located on Wards and Randalls Islands.[210][211] The park on Randalls Island was approved in February 1935[212] and included an Olympic-sized running track called Downing Stadium, work on which began in mid-1935;[210][213] the stadium was incomplete at the time of the bridge's opening.[209] The plan included infilling a strait, Little Hell Gate, between the two islands.[211] Smaller parks were also built in Astoria and Manhattan.[102][4]

When the Triborough Bridge was finished, it was the largest PWA project in the eastern U.S.,[214] having cost $60.3 million (equivalent to $1 billion in 2025) according to final TBA figures.[215][1] Based on expenditures, the PWA had originally estimated the bridge's cost to be as high as $64 million.[214][216] In either case, the Triborough Bridge was one of the largest public works projects of the Great Depression, more expensive than the Hoover Dam.[4][217][218] Of this, $16 million came from the city and $9 million directly from the PWA. The latter also purchased $35 million worth of TBA bonds, which were eventually bought back and resold to the public.[102] The PWA had finished giving out the $35 million loan by February 1937,[219] and the Reconstruction Finance Corporation had sold the last of the TBA's funds that July.[220] Additional income came from toll collection: the toll was initially set at 25 cents per passenger car, with lower rates for motorcycles and higher rates for commercial vehicles.[221]

Operational history

[edit]

Opening

[edit]

The toll rates for the bridge were decided upon in March 1936.[222] By May, the opening ceremonies for both the Triborough Bridge and the Downing Stadium were scheduled for July 11.[223] The dedication was scheduled to occur on the Manhattan lift span, prompting objections from both Bronx and Queens officials.[224] Due to the previous conflicts between President Roosevelt and Robert Moses, the attendance of the former was not certain until two weeks before the ceremony.[225] PWA administrator Ickes's attendance was finalized only four days beforehand.[226]

The completed structure, described by The New York Times as a "Y-shaped sky highway",[227] was dedicated on Saturday, July 11, 1936, along with Downing Stadium.[227][228] The ceremony for the Triborough Bridge was held at the interchange plaza, and was attended by Roosevelt, La Guardia, Lehman, Ickes, and Postmaster General James A. Farley, who all gave speeches.[228][229] Robert Moses acted as the master of ceremonies.[227][217] The ceremonies were broadcast nationwide via radio,[217] and a parade was also held on 125th Street in Manhattan to celebrate the bridge's opening.[230] Queens residents, excluded from the official ceremony, hosted an unofficial gathering in Astoria.[156] The Triborough Bridge opened to the general public at 1:30 p.m.,[231] and by that midnight an estimated 200,000 people had visited the bridge.[227][11] The bridge saw 40,000 vehicles on its first full day, July 12,[232] and about 1,000 vehicles an hour on July 13, its first full weekdays.[233] The TBA recorded 242,000 total vehicles in the bridge's first week,[234] 953,100 during the first month,[235] and 2.7 million in its first three months.[236]

After the bridge's opening, one Queens civic group predicted that the bridge would increase real-estate values in Queens and on Long Island at large.[237] The ferry between Yorkville, Manhattan, and Astoria, Queens, was made redundant by the new Triborough Bridge,[238][239] and the city had closed the ferry by the end of July 1936.[240] Traffic on the Queensboro Bridge, the only other vehicular bridge that connected Manhattan and Queens, declined after the Triborough Bridge opened,[241] though not by as much as city officials had anticipated.[242] In 1937, the first full year of the bridge's operation, it generated $2.85 million (equivalent to $63.83 million in 2025) in revenue from 11.18 million vehicles.[243] This was far more than the 8 million vehicles that TBA officials had originally anticipated.[244] The American Institute of Steel Construction declared the Triborough Bridge the "most beautiful" steel bridge constructed during 1936.[245] Newsday, writing retrospectively in 1994, said: "More than any other structure, the Triborough unified the boroughs of New York City."[156]

1930s to mid-1960s

[edit]

Highway construction

[edit]
The Grand Central Parkway/I-278 approach to the bridge's Queens suspension span

When the bridge opened, none of the spans had direct connections to the greater system of highways in New York City.[8] In Queens, the Grand Central Parkway extension to the Triborough Bridge was nearly completed at the time of the bridge's opening. The Manhattan span was planned to connect to the East River Drive (now the FDR Drive), the first segments of which were still under construction.[8] The section of the East River Drive from the bridge south to 92nd Street opened that October.[246] Originally, there was no direct access from the Queens span to Wards Island, but in November 1937, Moses announced the construction of a ramp from the Queens span that would lead down to the island.[247] The next year, a lawsuit was filed by two Wards Islands landowners, who alleged that the Triborough Bridge had been built on portions of their land. They each received nominal damages of $1.[248][249]

The Bronx span ended in local traffic at the no-longer extant intersection of 135th Street and Cypress Avenue.[8] The first of two approach highways in the Bronx was approved late in 1936[250] and was partially funded by the PWA.[251] Consisting of ramps to the intersection of 138th Street and Grand Concourse,[252] this highway opened in April 1939[253] and later became part of the Major Deegan Expressway (Interstate 87).[254] Another approach highway in the Bronx, the present Bruckner Boulevard, was approved in 1938[255] and extended eastward to the Bruckner Interchange.[256] Both Bronx approach roads were completed in time for the 1939 New York World's Fair, which was held in Queens.[254]

Moses continued expanding the system of highways in the mid-20th century, including arteries that led to the Triborough Bridge, namely the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway in Queens[257] and the Bruckner Expressway in the Bronx.[258] Both highways became part of I-278, as did the Queens and Bronx spans of the Triborough Bridge, by the 1960s.[259] In the 1950s, there were also plans for a highway to be constructed between the Triborough Bridge's Manhattan span and a never-built 125th Street Hudson River bridge, which would have allowed direct highway access to the New Jersey Turnpike.[260]

Bridge traffic and modifications

[edit]

The Triborough Bridge Authority was headquartered in an administration building adjacent to the Manhattan span's toll plaza, where by 1940, it controlled the operation of all toll bridges located entirely within New York City.[33] Though the Bronx–Whitestone Bridge between the Bronx and Queens opened in April 1939,[261][262] the Triborough Bridge did not see any initial decline in traffic, likely because both spans were heavily used during the World's Fair.[263] Soon after, vehicle rationing caused by the onset of World War II resulted in a decline in traffic at crossings operated by the TBA including the Triborough Bridge.[264] Still, by 1940, the Triborough Bridge was the most profitable crossing operated by the TBA.[265] The New York Times, describing the bridge as "generally recognized as a monument to engineering ingenuity", attributed the bridge's popularity to the design of its three spans.[266] In 1941, one of the lift span's original gates was removed after a motorist damaged it.[267]

Traffic decreased significantly during the war, declining to 5.1 million vehicles in 1943, though traffic counts again increased afterward.[268][269] The TBA became the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority (TBTA) in 1946, though TBTA operations continued to be managed from the Triborough Bridge.[270] The bridge was repainted for the first time in September 1946 for $600,000.[269][271] The bridge recorded over 100 million total vehicles in its first decade of operation.[268] By 1951, the bridge accommodated 29.4 million vehicles a year, more than any other toll road in the U.S.;[272] the TBTA claimed in early 1952 that the bridge was the busiest toll road in the world.[273]

Late 1960s to 1990s

[edit]

In 1968, the Triborough Bridge received its first major renovation in its 31-year history. Seven tollbooths were added, three at the Manhattan span's toll plaza and four at the Queens/Bronx spans' toll plaza, and several ramps were widened at a cost of $20 million. The project also added a direct ramp from the Manhattan span to the southbound lanes of Second Avenue in East Harlem.[274] The TBTA administration building was also expanded during this project.[33] Traffic from the Manhattan span was temporarily diverted during this project.[275][276]

At some point in the 20th century, a sign on the bridge informed travelers, "In event of attack, drive off bridge"; according to New York Times columnist William Safire, the "somewhat macabre sign" must have "drawn a wry smile from millions of motorists".[277] The TBTA replaced the movable toll gates across all of its toll booths in 1989, including those at the Triborough Bridge.[278] By that year, pieces of concrete were falling off the bridge, prompting concerns about deterioration.[279] By the early 1990s, the bridge accommodated about 160,000 daily vehicles, and the TBTA employed 140 toll collectors there.[280] During that decade, the TBTA discovered high concentrations of lead under the bridge's Queens approaches, prompting the agency to remove the lead.[281] The TBTA also rearranged the lanes at the bridge's toll plazas in 1992.[282] The Triborough Bridge remained the TBTA's busiest facility in the 1990s, with over 200,000 daily vehicles.[283]

In 1997, more renovations of the bridge were announced.[284] The project consisted of three phases. The first phase involved renovating the Queens span and approach ramps, as well as replacing the suspender cables;[285][286] work on the Queens span's anchorage began in February 1997.[286] On the Queens side, an exit ramp from westbound I-278 to 31st Street necessitated the destruction of the entrance to the southern sidewalk.[287] The second phase involved renovating the Bronx span and approach ramps. The third phase involved renovating the Manhattan span and approach ramps.[285] By early 1999, there were more than 500 potholes on the bridge, requiring workers to use 22.5 short tons (20.1 long tons; 20.4 t) of concrete and 65 short tons (58 long tons; 59 t) of asphalt to repave the deck.[288] Work on replacing the Queens span's suspender cables and adding an orthotropic deck to the Queens suspension span started in 2000.[289][290] The replacement of the deck was estimated to cost $125 million.[291]

2000s to present

[edit]
Reconstruction of the viaduct between the Manhattan lift span and the Queens suspension bridge span

In January 2008, then-governor Eliot Spitzer proposed renaming the bridge after former U.S. senator Robert F. Kennedy, who had been assassinated during a 1968 presidential bid.[292] Though the Kennedy family supported the renaming,[292] there were initial doubts over whether local residents would use the new name.[293] The New York State Legislature approved the bill that June,[294] and the Triborough Bridge was officially renamed after Kennedy on November 19, 2008.[295][296] The MTA announced further renovations to the Triborough Bridge in 2008; the work included the replacement of the roadways at the toll plazas, as well as the rehabilitation of various ramps and the construction of a new service building.[284] The same year, the MTA awarded contracts to renovate the Queens span's anchorages.[297]

In 2015, the MTA started two reconstruction projects on different parts of the bridge[298] as part of a $1 billion, 15-year program to renovate the bridge complex.[299] The MTA commenced construction on a $213 million rehabilitation of the 1930s-era toll plaza between the Queens and Bronx spans, which included a rebuilding of the roadway and the supporting structure underneath. The new toll plaza structure was completed in 2019.[298] Cashless tolling was implemented on June 15, 2017,[30][300] allowing drivers to pay tolls electronically via E-ZPass or Toll-by-Mail without having to stop at any tollbooths.[30] Shortly afterward, the tollbooths were demolished.[31][32]

A ramp from the Manhattan span to the northbound Harlem River Drive was being built for $68.3 million, and was to be finished by December 2017;[298] this was delayed pending the reconstruction of the Harlem River Drive viaduct around the area.[301] In February 2020, the northbound Harlem River Drive ramp's completion was tentatively announced for 2021,[302] though the ramp ultimately opened in November 2020.[303] The project was expected to cost $72.6 million[304] and involved designing a new overpass to fit between the Harlem River Drive's two existing roadways.[305] The Harlem River lift span was also rehabilitated prior to 2020.[306]

On December 15, 2021, the MTA Board approved a contract to construct a ramp to connect the walkway on the north side of the bridge's Manhattan span to a future park to be constructed along the Manhattan Greenway by the New York City Economic Development Corporation along the Harlem River south of East 127th Street. Work was expected to cost $19.6 million, and would be bundled with a $26 million project to upgrade and renew elements of the bridge. Work was expected to be done by spring 2023, with the ramp opening with the expected completion of the park in 2025.[307]

Usage

[edit]

The toll revenues from the RFK Bridge pay for a portion of the public transit funding for the New York City Transit Authority and the commuter railroads.[308] The bridge had annual average daily traffic of 164,116 in 2014. For that year, the bridge saw annual toll-paying traffic rise by 2.9% to 59.9 million, generating $393.6 million in revenue at an average toll of $6.57.[309]

Entrance to the Queens span

Pedestrian and bicycle sidewalks

[edit]

The bridge has sidewalks on all three spans where the TBTA officially requires bicyclists to walk their bicycles across[310] due to safety concerns.[311] However, the signs stating this requirement have been usually ignored by bicyclists,[312]: 16  and the New York City Government has recommended that the TBTA should reassess this kind of bicycling ban.[312]: 57  Stairs on the 2 km (1.2 mi) Queens span impede access by disabled people, and only the northern sidewalk on that span is open to traffic; the Queens end of the southern sidewalk was demolished in the early 2000s.[313] The two sidewalks of the Bronx span are connected to one long and winding ramp at the Randalls Island end,[314] though another pedestrian bridge between Randalls Island and the neighborhood of Port Morris, Bronx, opened to the east of the RFK Bridge in November 2015.[315]

Public transportation

[edit]

The RFK Bridge carries the M35, M60 SBS and X80 bus routes operated by MTA New York City Transit, as well as several express bus routes operated by the MTA Bus Company: BxM6, BxM7, BxM8, BxM9, BxM10 and BxM11. The M35 travels from Manhattan to Randalls and Wards Islands (with the X80 also operating during special events), while the M60 SBS runs between Manhattan and Queens, and the MTA Bus express routes travel between Manhattan and the Bronx.[316] The M60 has used the bridge since the early 1990s.[317]

In the 1920s, John F. Hylan proposed building the Triborough Bridge as part of his planned Independent Subway System. The proposal entailed extending the New York City Subway's BMT Astoria Line along the same route the Triborough now follows. It would have created a crosstown subway line along 125th Street, as well as a new subway line in the Bronx under St. Ann's Avenue.[42][43][318]

Tolls

[edit]

As of January 4, 2026, drivers pay $12.03 per car or $5.06 per motorcycle for tolls by mail/non-NYCSC E-Z Pass. E-ZPass users with transponders issued by the New York E‑ZPass Customer Service Center pay $7.46 per car or $3.25 per motorcycle. Mid-Tier NYCSC E-Z Pass users pay $9.79 per car or $4.18 per motorcycle. All E-ZPass users with transponders not issued by the New York E-ZPass CSC will be required to pay Toll-by-mail rates.[319]

When the Triborough Bridge opened, it had a combined 22 tollbooths spread across two toll plazas.[221] Motorists were first able to pay with E‑ZPass in lanes for automatic coin machines at the toll plazas on August 21, 1996;[320] in contrast to other MTA Bridges & Tunnels facilities where E-ZPass lanes were interspersed with cash only lanes, all of the E-ZPass lanes at either of the Triborough Bridge's toll plazas were grouped together.[321] The implementation of E-ZPass allowed each toll lane to accommodate 900 vehicles an hour, compared with the 250 to 400 vehicles that the old toll lanes could accommodate.[283]

Open-road cashless tolling began on June 15, 2017.[30] The tollbooths were dismantled, and drivers are no longer able to pay cash at the bridge. Instead, there are cameras mounted onto new overhead gantries manufactured by TransCore[322] near where the booths were formerly located.[323][324] A vehicle without an E-ZPass has a picture taken of its license plate and a bill for the toll is mailed to its owner.[325] For E-ZPass users, sensors detect their transponders wirelessly.[323][324][325]

Historical tolls

[edit]
Historical passenger tolls for the Robert F. Kennedy Bridge[a]
Years Toll Toll equivalent in 2025[326] Ref.
Cash E-ZPass Cash E-ZPass
1936–1972 $0.25 N/a $1.92–5.80 N/a [327]
1972–1975 $0.50 $2.99–3.85 [328][329]
1975–1980 $0.75 $2.93–4.49 [329]
1980–1982 $1.00 $3.34–3.91 [330]
1982–1984 $1.25 $3.87–4.17 [331]
1984–1986 $1.50 $4.49–4.41 [332]
1986–1987 $1.75 $4.96–5.14 [333]
1987–1989 $2.00 $5.19–5.67 [334]
1989–1993 $2.50 $5.57–6.49 [335]
1993–1996 $3.00 $6.16–6.69 [336]
1996–2003 $3.50 $3.50 $6.13–7.18 $6.13–7.18 [337]
2003–2005 $4.00 $4.00 $6.59–7.00 $6.59–7.00 [338]
2005–2008 $4.50 $4.00 $6.73–7.42 $5.98–6.59 [339]
2008–2010 $5.00 $4.15 $7.38–7.48 $6.13–6.21 [340]
2010–2015 $6.50 $4.80 $8.83–9.60 $6.52–7.09 [341][342]
2015–2017 $8.00 $5.54 $10.51–10.87 $7.28–7.52 [343][344]
2017–2019 $8.50 $5.76 $10.70–11.16 $7.25–7.57 [345][346]
2019–2021 $9.50 $6.12 $11.29–11.96 $7.27–7.71 [347][348]
2021–2023 $10.17 $6.55 $10.75–12.08 $6.92–7.78 [349]
2023–2026 $11.19 $6.94 $11.19–11.82 $6.94–7.33 [350]
2026–present $12.03 $7.46 $12.03 $7.46 [351]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Robert F. Kennedy Bridge is a complex of three bridges, viaducts, and approach roadways spanning the , , and Bronx Kill to connect the New York City boroughs of , , and via Randall's Island. Constructed during the under the direction of and the Triborough Bridge Authority, it opened to traffic on July 11, 1936, as the Triborough Bridge, representing a major engineering achievement that facilitated inter-borough travel and economic integration with its suspension span over the , vertical lift span over the , fixed span over the Bronx Kill, and 14 miles of approaches. In 2008, the renamed it after , the former U.S. Senator from New York, despite his lack of direct involvement in the bridge's design or construction and criticism that the change supplanted a descriptively accurate geographic name for a politically symbolic one, leading many residents to persist in using the original Triborough designation. Operated as a tolled crossing by and carrying along with local routes, the structure handles heavy daily traffic volumes while undergoing continuous rehabilitation, including cashless tolling implementation and pedestrian/bicycle path expansions to enhance multimodal access.

Engineering and Physical Structure

East River Suspension Bridge (I-278)

The East River Suspension Bridge constitutes the longest span of the Robert F. Kennedy Bridge complex, carrying across the from Randall's Island in to Astoria in . This features a main span measuring 1,380 feet (421 meters) between its two towers, with side spans each approximately 700 feet, enabling efficient load distribution over the waterway. Engineering design emphasized suspension configuration to accommodate the span's length, where compressive forces in arch alternatives would necessitate impractically massive abutments and foundations in the riverbed sediments. Unlike the nearby , an arch structure with a 977-foot main span completed in 1916, the suspension approach leverages tensile strength in cables to support the deck, aligning with first-principles of favoring tension members for extended clear distances over deep water. The bridge employs two main cables, each 20 inches in diameter, comprising 37 strands of 248 wires, anchored to massive blocks and passing over towers that facilitate vertical load transfer via . Stiffening trusses along the deck enhance rigidity against flexural deformations from vehicular loads and dynamic forces, with the original design calibrated for heavy truck traffic on what became an interstate route. Empirical data from contemporaneous suspension bridges, such as the (main span 3,500 feet, opened 1931), informed wind resistance features including aerodynamic fairings and cable wind screening to mitigate vortex-induced oscillations. Load-bearing capacity targets dead loads from the 90-foot-wide roadway and live loads exceeding 50 tons per lane, distributed via the cable system's curve that optimizes stress under gravity. Seismic considerations, though minimal in the 1930s design era, drew from observed behaviors in bridges, incorporating flexible anchorages to absorb lateral accelerations; subsequent retrofits, including wind and structural enhancements completed in phases through 2023, bolstered resilience without altering core suspension geometry.

Harlem River Lift Bridge (NY 900G)

The Lift Bridge, designated as New York State Route 900G and integrated into (I-278), is a that spans the , connecting Randall's Island to as part of the Robert F. Kennedy Bridge complex. Completed in , it features a main lift span measuring 310 feet (94 meters) in length, flanked by fixed approach spans of approximately 230 feet each. The structure employs a tower-driven vertical lift mechanism, where the deck is suspended from two 210-foot towers via wire ropes running over sheaves connected to s. This system, utilizing multiple sheaves and ropes per tower (four sheaves with twelve ropes each), balances the span's weight to enable efficient lifting for vessel passage while minimizing requirements during operations. The bridge's vertical clearance above mean high water is approximately 55 feet when closed, sufficient for most local maritime traffic but requiring lifts for taller vessels. The lift mechanism allows the span to rise to provide adequate navigational clearance, historically accommodating commercial and recreational boats on the . Engineering upgrades, including a comprehensive electrical and mechanical rehabilitation completed in 2020, modernized the drive motors, control systems, wire ropes, and added features such as standby generators and enhanced access platforms. These improvements addressed aging components in the nearly 85-year-old structure, ensuring operational reliability and reducing potential failure risks in the tower drive assembly. Operationally, the bridge opens on demand for marine traffic, with frequency determined by navigational needs rather than fixed schedules, reflecting the historically low volume of vessel passages on the compared to busier waterways. Empirical records indicate infrequent lifts, often fewer than those of nearby swing bridges like the Willis Avenue, which have seen declining openings due to reduced commercial shipping. Downtime from lifts or maintenance is managed to limit disruptions to I-278's high traffic volumes, typically involving brief closures coordinated with the U.S. ; post-2020 upgrades have further minimized unplanned outages by enhancing system redundancy and monitoring. Historically, since its commissioning, the bridge has maintained a strong reliability record, with rehabilitations like the 2020 project extending its service life and supporting consistent performance amid evolving traffic demands.

Bronx Kill Crossing (I-278)

The Bronx Kill crossing of the Robert F. Kennedy Bridge carries Interstate 278 (I-278) via a series of fixed steel through truss spans connecting Randall's Island to the Bronx over the shallow, tidal Bronx Kill waterway. This design employed multiple truss sections totaling approximately 1,600 feet in length, with a main span of 383 feet, selected for its simplicity and economy given the non-navigable nature of the channel at the time of construction. The structure includes six truss spans supported by heavy concrete piers, allowing adaptation to the shallow water depths without the need for movable mechanisms like those on other segments of the bridge complex. Engineers opted for a fixed-span configuration over a potentially convertible lift span to minimize costs and maintenance, as the Bronx Kill presented minimal navigational demands and tidal fluctuations that could be managed through pier foundations designed for scour resistance in the silty, variable-flow environment. The trusses, featuring riveted polygonal Warren configurations, provide essential for the crossing's role in linking Randall's Island to the mainland, thereby enhancing the overall stability of the multi-borough bridge system by distributing loads across fixed supports. resistance was achieved through standard protective coatings on the members, grounded in established material science practices for marine environments to prevent degradation from saltwater exposure and . These spans accommodate eight lanes of vehicular traffic plus sidewalks, underscoring the crossing's function as a durable, low-maintenance link in the I-278 corridor.

Interchange Plaza and Approach Viaducts

The Interchange Plaza on Randall's Island constitutes the central nexus of the Robert F. Kennedy Bridge complex, where the spans crossing the East River, Harlem River, and Bronx Kill converge to form a multi-level junction. This hub integrates ramps and elevated roadways to direct Interstate 278 (I-278) traffic across boroughs while accommodating merges with Interstate 87 (I-87), the Major Deegan Expressway, via directional interchanges that separate eastbound/westbound flows from northbound/southbound movements. The configuration employs a three-legged design, with curving ramps rising to varying elevations to optimize sight lines and reduce congestion at the plaza's core. Approach viaducts extend from the plaza, elevating roadways over Randall's Island parkland using steel s supporting concrete decks to span park areas without extensive ground excavation. These viaducts incorporate expansion joints for and contraction, alongside integrated drainage systems featuring scuppers and downspouts to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup and ensure longevity under heavy loads. Notable segments include viaducts measuring 4,712 feet and 3,217 feet in length, forming part of the broader approach network that exceeds 10 miles when combining all directional spurs and connectors. The viaducts' structural capacity supports peak-hour traffic volumes, with the complex designed for daily flows approaching 200,000 vehicles across its spans, maintained through periodic to verify integrity against dynamic stresses like braking forces and wind loads. Empirical assessments confirm no under rated loads, attributing resilience to the hybrid steel-concrete composition and reinforced foundations.

Planning and Construction History

Initial Planning and Design Debates

The conceptual origins of the Triborough Bridge trace to the early 1920s, when New York City's burgeoning vehicular traffic—evidenced by a rise from 18,000 daily vehicles on existing East River spans in 1912 to 171,352 by 1925—necessitated improved borough connectivity. Plans for a multi-span crossing had been sketched as early as , but implementation stalled until a 1920 bill in the proposed linking , , and to alleviate congestion and support suburban expansion. Gustav Lindenthal, the engineer behind the 1916 Hell Gate Bridge spanning the nearby, opposed the project in 1928, deeming it redundant to the existing rail link between and and advocating instead for enhanced rail utilization over new vehicular . His critique highlighted debates over duplicative crossings, prioritizing established rail capacity amid uncertain automotive growth, though proponents countered with empirical traffic data favoring dedicated road links for regional efficiency. Route selection centered on as a central hub, enabling crossings of the (to ), (to ), and Bronx Kill (to ) in a unified 3.5-mile complex. This configuration was chosen for its engineering practicality in navigating the waterways' junction, grounded in observed traffic patterns rather than optimistic forecasts, avoiding direct competition with rail routes like while integrating boroughs via verifiable demand. Design evolved toward a hybrid of structural types under chief engineer , with suspension adopted for the East River's 1,380-foot main span to optimize material use and cost for long distances, vertical lift for the to permit maritime navigation without excessive height, and fixed truss for the shorter Bronx Kill crossing. This departed from uniform alternatives like full systems, which proved less viable for the site's variable spans and clearance needs, favoring span-specific efficiencies derived from load-bearing analyses and economic constraints over speculative uniformity.

Funding Challenges and New Deal Involvement

The Triborough Bridge project encountered acute funding shortages in the early 1930s as the eroded New York City's fiscal capacity. Initial site preparations and caisson work commenced in following legislative authorization, but by , plummeting tax revenues and investor aversion to risk halted progress, leaving only skeletal foundations amid widespread municipal bankruptcies nationwide. Local bond proposals faltered, as credit markets froze and property owners demanded inflated compensation, exacerbating delays and underscoring the limits of state and city financing without external guarantees. In response, the created the Triborough Bridge Authority (TBA) on February 28, 1933, granting it authority to issue revenue bonds repayable from tolls rather than general taxation, a mechanism intended to attract private capital while insulating taxpayers from direct liability. Yet Depression-induced paralysis—marked by yields exceeding 6% for even secure issues—rendered this insufficient, with prospective investors wary of unproven toll projections and the city's credit downgrade. The TBA's early bond offerings yielded minimal uptake, compelling appeals for federal backing to bridge the viability gap. Federal intervention via the (PWA), established under the National Industrial Recovery Act of June 1933, proved decisive. The PWA allocated $44 million in combined grants and loans—specifically $9 million outright grant and $35 million loan—for the project, covering over 70% of the estimated $60.3 million total cost, supplemented by $16.1 million in funds and TBA bonds. This infusion, sourced from federal borrowing that swelled the national debt from $22.5 billion in 1933 to $40.4 billion by 1936, directly enabled bond market confidence and construction resumption, demonstrating how subsidized circumvented local constraints but imposed nationwide burdens for a regionally focused outlay. Critics at the time, including fiscal conservatives in , highlighted such PWA allocations as prone to political favoritism over rigorous cost-benefit scrutiny, akin to pork-barrel distribution amid competing national priorities like farm relief and banking stabilization. Without this causal lifeline of federal subsidies, from contemporaneous stalled projects suggests the bridge would have languished indefinitely, as municipal revenues alone covered under 30% of expenses.

Construction Phases and Engineering Milestones

Construction of the Triborough Bridge resumed in January 1934 following funding from the , which provided a $9 million grant and $35 million loan to advance the project amid the . Initial contracts focused on foundational work, including the sinking of caissons and erection of towers for the suspension span and the lift bridge, alongside piers for the Bronx Kill crossing. These efforts employed up to 3,000 workers at peak, coordinated by over 200 contractors and supported by materials from 600 manufacturing plants across 30 states, totaling 2,000,000 cubic yards of and 91,000 tons of and iron products. Cable spinning for the suspension span commenced in early 1935, with the first thin strands thrown across the channel on March 19, halting traffic to facilitate the operation. Engineers supervised the process under Othmar Ammann's design, completing the main cables by July 1935 after weaving thousands of individual wires into the final bundles anchored to the towers. This milestone enabled the installation of vertical suspenders and the stiffening truss, addressing the span's 2,640-foot length between anchorage points on Wards Island and . Deck installation and approach viaducts progressed through 1936, with the East River suspension span structurally complete by mid-year, integrating the 770-foot —featuring 210-foot towers and the world's largest such span at the time—and the Bronx Kill fixed crossing. Site-specific obstacles, including variable waterway depths and urban terrain, were overcome through modular construction and arch spans over creeks, culminating in the removal of temporary supports by July 1936. The project's aggressive timeline involved over 2,000 study drawings and 9,000 working drawings produced in 30 months, showcasing coordinated engineering under the Triborough Bridge Authority.

Opening and Early Operations

Inauguration and Immediate Effects

The Triborough Bridge was officially dedicated on July 11, 1936, by President during a on Randall's , highlighting its role in unifying New York City's boroughs and advancing regional infrastructure under the . The event emphasized the bridge's completion after years of construction delays, with Roosevelt praising its potential to serve the city, state, and nation by facilitating efficient vehicular and pedestrian movement across the , , and Bronx Kill. The inaugural day operated toll-free, drawing an estimated 200,000 vehicles and resulting in severe congestion, including traffic backups extending up to 15 hours as motorists from , , and accessed the new crossing. This immediate surge underscored public demand for direct land connections, bypassing circuitous routes and water crossings that had previously dominated inter-borough travel. Post-opening, the bridge rapidly alleviated cross-borough bottlenecks, shortening a standard 45-minute trip via legacy arterials and ferries to approximately 16 minutes for equivalent routes. Traffic volumes on competing spans, such as the Queensboro and Williamsburg Bridges, declined by about 30% in the ensuing weeks, reflecting a shift away from ferry-dependent itineraries and signaling reduced operational strain on municipal services. These effects validated the bridge's design for high-volume throughput, though initial adjustments to approach ensured clearer amid unfamiliar traffic flows.

Early Traffic Patterns and Modifications

Following its opening on July 11, 1936, the Triborough Bridge experienced swift vehicular adoption, recording 4,756,008 vehicles in the partial year from opening through December 31. Traffic volume more than doubled the next year to 11,042,949 vehicles in 1937, then slightly increased to 11,420,111 in 1938, exceeding projections set during planning. These figures reflected the bridge's utility in linking , , and , drawing commuters and commercial traffic previously bottlenecked at alternatives like the . The surge strained the original configuration, which featured two lanes per direction on the main East River suspension span and similar setups on viaducts and approaches, leading to early signs of congestion during peak hours. This prompted capacity-focused responses, including the 1939 opening of the Bronx-Whitestone Bridge to siphon excess Bronx-bound volume from the Triborough system. Traffic data indicated the Triborough's volumes stabilized or dipped modestly in 1939–1940 amid economic pressures, but rebounded with a 10 percent rise in , underscoring persistent demand pressures. Empirically, the bridge accelerated goods transport by enabling direct cross-borough routing without dependencies or delays, mitigating pre-existing jams that had imposed calculable economic costs through idling vehicles and slowed freight. Initial operational tweaks included toll rate adjustments and signage refinements to manage flow, though major structural widening awaited expansions; accident records from the era, while not prompting widespread redesigns, informed localized safety retrofits such as reinforced barriers on high-risk curves by the early 1940s.

Naming History and Controversies

Original Designation as Triborough Bridge

The Triborough Bridge received its original designation upon opening to traffic on July 11, 1936, as a descriptive name highlighting its function in linking the boroughs of , , and the Bronx across the , , and Bronx Kill. The term "Triborough" directly referenced this tri-borough connectivity, underscoring the structure's practical role as a unified complex of three bridges, viaducts, and approach roads designed to integrate vehicular, pedestrian, and potential transit flows among these jurisdictions. This prioritized geographic and operational clarity over eponymy, consistent with early 20th-century practices that favored functional descriptors in official , reports, and to ensure unambiguous identification for users and administrators. The Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, established in 1933 to oversee the project, employed the name in all formal capacities from inception through mid-century operations, reflecting a focus on utility amid the era's emphasis on regional unification via New Deal-era . Public recognition of the "Triborough" designation has endured into the , with widespread colloquial and navigational use persisting despite subsequent administrative changes, as evidenced by ongoing references in media, driver familiarity, and local discourse that retain the original term for its evocative precision. This longevity attests to the name's inherent alignment with the bridge's physical and connective essence, facilitating intuitive comprehension across generations without reliance on personal commemoration.

2008 Renaming to Robert F. Kennedy Bridge

The passed Assembly Bill A10789 in June 2008, renaming the Triborough Bridge as the Robert F. Kennedy Bridge to honor the former U.S. senator's contributions to the state. Sponsored by Assembly Speaker , a Democrat, the measure received support from Governor [Eliot Spitzer](/page/Eliot Spitzer) and members of the , who emphasized Robert F. Kennedy's tenure representing New York in the U.S. Senate from January 1965 until his assassination in June 1968. The bill advanced amid Democratic legislative majorities, framing the change as recognition of Kennedy's advocacy for urban poverty alleviation and social programs during his brief senatorial career, though he held no prior elected office in New York and focused primarily on federal issues rather than state infrastructure projects. Kennedy's legislative record in the Senate included initiatives on , , and , such as support for programs aiding underprivileged youth, but lacked documented ties to the Triborough Bridge or its operations, which predated his political rise by nearly three decades. The renaming effort aligned with broader political efforts to commemorate Democratic figures from the era, bypassing consultations with bridge users or fiscal impact assessments beyond basic compliance. Implementation entailed replacing roughly 140 directional signs across state roadways approaching the bridge, incurring a $4 million expenditure from public funds for materials, labor, and installation, separate from minor MTA costs for on-bridge signage. This outlay stemmed directly from statutory requirements for uniform signage under state transportation policy, representing an avoidable fiscal commitment to symbolic rebranding that yielded no enhancement to the structure's , , or capacity, as the bridge's physical attributes remained unchanged.

Public Backlash, Costs, and Persistent Use of Original Name

The renaming of the Triborough Bridge to the on , , elicited immediate centered on the financial burden and perceived politicization of public infrastructure nomenclature. State officials estimated the cost of replacing approximately 140 road signs at $4 million, a figure decried by opponents as an unnecessary expenditure amid fiscal constraints, with one commentator labeling it a "complete waste of " that diverted funds from maintenance or other priorities. Critics, including those from right-leaning perspectives, argued that honoring —a figure known for advocating measures following the assassinations of and , as well as his opposition to the —imposed a partisan legacy on a functionally descriptive structure unrelated to his tenure or achievements in transportation. This view framed the change as an erasure of the bridge's neutral, geographic heritage in favor of symbolic gestures driven by advocacy, despite RFK's own environmental skepticism toward large-scale infrastructure projects. Proponents of the renaming, including state lawmakers and Kennedy supporters, justified it as a tribute to RFK's civil rights advocacy and public service as a New York senator, emphasizing his role in advancing social justice initiatives. However, empirical indicators of public reception undermine claims of widespread adoption: as early as 2008, skeptics questioned whether the name would "catch on," a prediction borne out by persistent colloquial use of "Triborough" in everyday speech, media references, and navigation systems. Anecdotal evidence from New Yorkers, including online forums and local commentary, reveals that "tens of thousands" continue to default to the original designation, with some outlets like Bloomberg noting its endurance in traffic websites and public discourse over a decade later. The failure of the RFK name to supplant Triborough underscores a causal disconnect between legislative and organic naming conventions, where descriptive utility prevails over imposed honorifics absent broad consensus or direct relevance. Remnants of original , such as a large "Triboro Bridge" marker in persisting years after the change, further illustrate this resistance, symbolizing broader taxpayer frustration with costs yielding negligible behavioral shifts. No formal surveys quantify exact usage splits, but the consistent invocation of "Triborough" in GPS queries, driver parlance, and even semi-official contexts—contrasting with the bridge's engineered purpose of borough connectivity—evidences the renaming's limited efficacy. This persistence aligns with patterns in other renamings, where functional names endure due to ingrained familiarity rather than ideological preference.

Mid-to-Late 20th Century Operations

Postwar Highway Expansions and Usage Growth

Following , the Triborough Bridge experienced substantial growth in vehicular usage amid the nationwide surge in automobile ownership and suburban expansion. By 1950, the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority reported record traffic volumes across its facilities, contributing to net profits of $10,654,794, attributed in part to heightened postwar demand for cross-borough travel. This trend continued, with a 4% overall increase in vehicles recorded by 1955, setting another peak despite variability among individual crossings. Such empirical data reflected broader regional patterns, where major highway traffic nearly doubled in the late 1940s and early 1950s due to economic recovery and rising . To integrate the bridge into the emerging and accommodate escalating volumes, its spans were designated as part of (I-278) in June 1958, linking the suspension bridge and Bronx Kill viaduct to the and . This alignment facilitated smoother through-traffic flows, aligning with federal interstate planning initiated under the 1956 Federal-Aid Highway Act. Concurrently, ramp modifications and additions connected the bridge to the Throgs Neck Expressway (later designated I-695), constructed under Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority oversight from the mid-1950s to enhance east-west mobility in and . These tie-ins, planned in Robert Moses-led studies like the 1955 Joint Study of Arterial Facilities, supported the 1961 opening of the and its approaches, diverting overflow from the Bronx-Whitestone Bridge while boosting capacity for Triborough-linked routes. Congestion pressures from the traffic boom prompted operational adjustments, including empirical analyses of peak-hour bottlenecks that informed ramp signaling and approach optimizations without major bridge-span widening, as the original six-lane configuration persisted. By the early , these postwar adaptations had embedded the bridge within a denser , sustaining usage growth tied to interstate and patterns.

Modifications for Increased Capacity

In the 1960s, the Triborough Bridge's effective capacity was enhanced through widening of connected approach roadways, such as the Grand Central Parkway, which was expanded from four to eight lanes between the bridge and to manage surging postwar traffic volumes originating from and destined to the bridge spans. This incremental adjustment improved ingress and egress flow without requiring alterations to the bridge's core viaducts or suspension elements, reflecting a cost-effective strategy that leveraged existing alignments to accommodate approximately doubled regional vehicle usage by the late 1960s. By the 1970s, further tweaks focused on safety-driven modifications informed by crash analyses, including the installation of concrete median barriers along 12.3 miles of the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway between the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel and Triborough Bridge approaches. These barriers addressed crossover accidents—prevalent in data from high-volume urban corridors—by physically separating opposing lanes, thereby reducing incident frequency and resultant lane closures that bottlenecked bridge throughput. Such targeted interventions, prioritizing causal reductions in disruption over expansive rebuilds, extended the bridge's operational capacity at lower expense than full-span widenings, which would have entailed prohibitive seismic retrofits and navigational clearances amid growing shipping demands. Through the 1980s and 1990s, similar engineering refinements continued, integrating the bridge more seamlessly with interstate corridors like I-278 and I-95 via ramp optimizations and barrier upgrades on adjacent viaducts, sustaining traffic handling amid volumes exceeding original design projections by over 50% without radical overhauls. These measures underscored a pragmatic balance, where empirical crash reductions and flow efficiencies yielded higher throughput returns than equity-focused reallocations, preserving the structure's integrity for escalating urban mobility needs.

21st Century Developments and Usage

Electronic Tolling and Infrastructure Upgrades

The implemented cashless tolling, also known as , on the Robert F. Kennedy Bridge effective June 15, 2017, converting the facility to an all-electronic system. Overhead gantries equipped with sensors read transponders for registered users and capture license plate images for others, who receive toll bills by mail, eliminating the need for vehicles to stop at traditional booths. This upgrade facilitates uninterrupted traffic flow through the former toll plaza area, directly addressing congestion bottlenecks previously caused by queuing. Post-implementation data from the MTA indicates a 6.6 percent increase in usage on the bridge in 2017, reflecting higher adoption of electronic payment methods. Across facilities, including the RFK Bridge, cashless tolling has correlated with reduced customer travel times and a 7 percent rise in average daily traffic volumes, demonstrating improved throughput efficiency without proportional delays. Infrastructure enhancements since the have focused on technological and structural improvements for operational resilience and efficiency. Seismic retrofits to the superstructure incorporate isolation systems to mitigate risks, prioritizing the bridge's role as a key evacuation route based on analyses of vulnerability. Deck replacement projects, such as those on the suspended spans and Queens , have involved lane-by-lane removal of deteriorated surfaces and installation of new or composite decks, accompanied by upgrades to support stringers, drainage systems, and seismic reinforcements to extend under heavy loads. Advanced monitoring and detection systems have been integrated facility-wide, enabling real-time data collection on traffic conditions, structural health, and environmental factors to support dynamic management and . Energy-efficient LED lighting replaced legacy mercury vapor fixtures in the bridge's ornamental necklace lighting by 2011, reducing power consumption and enhancing visibility for safer nighttime operations.

Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Integration

The Robert F. Kennedy Bridge provides sidewalks along its three main spans—the , the Bronx Kill , and the Harlem River lift bridge—accommodating pedestrians and cyclists under regulations, which require cyclists to dismount on the lift span during operation. Prior to recent upgrades, these paths featured low barriers, intermittent stairs, and incomplete linkages to adjacent boroughs and Randall's Island, rendering cross-borough travel intimidating and non-continuous for non-motorized users. In May 2025, the MTA completed a major overhaul of pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, introducing a continuous across the lift bridge and extending ADA-compliant connections from to Randall's Island and . This included wider, smoother surfaces with improved lighting, higher barriers for safety, and switchback ramps to eliminate stairs and ensure end-to-end without vehicle interference. The upgrades replaced outdated ramps, such as the southern pedestrian access from 124th Street in , with fully compliant designs supporting devices alongside bicycles and foot traffic. These enhancements addressed longstanding gaps in non-vehicular connectivity, though full dedicated bike lanes remain absent across the entire complex, limiting capacity during peak multimodal demand. Transit integration relies primarily on bus services, with the M60 Select Bus Service (SBS) operating as the principal public route traversing the bridge from Manhattan's via 125th Street to Astoria Boulevard in and . This corridor connects to multiple subway lines, including the 1, A/B/C/D, 2/3, and at 125th Street stations, facilitating transfers for riders avoiding vehicular tolls. Proximity to stations like Astoria Boulevard (N/W lines) enhances last-mile access, but the absence of direct rail links on the bridge itself underscores reliance on bus-based multimodal trips, with no published MTA data isolating or cyclist volumes amid overall bridge usage. Historical underinvestment in seamless non-motorized paths has constrained broader adoption, as evidenced by pre-2025 barriers that deterred consistent use despite available sidewalks.

Current Traffic Volumes and Patterns

The Robert F. Kennedy Bridge accommodates approximately 189,000 vehicles per day on average in 2024, reflecting a total annual volume of 69.1 million vehicles. This marks a 1.9% increase from 2023's 67.8 million vehicles, continuing a post-pandemic recovery trend that saw volumes rebound from a pandemic-low of 50.4 million vehicles (about 138,000 daily) in 2020. Traffic patterns exhibit seasonal and diurnal peaks, with monthly averages exceeding 200,000 vehicles per day in high-recreation periods such as June 2024 (200,179 vehicles daily). Weekday rush hours, typically from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. for inbound travel toward and 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. for outbound, concentrate volumes on the East River suspension span, which serves as the primary east-west linkage between and via Randall's and Wards Islands. Congestion at this span prompts diversions to parallel routes like the Queens-Midtown Tunnel during peak demand. The initial sharp decline in volumes post-2020 stemmed from widespread adoption and mobility restrictions amid the , reducing commuter flows by over 50% from pre-2020 baselines. Subsequent resumption of in-office work has driven sustained growth, enabling 2023 volumes to surpass historical highs across facilities, including the RFK Bridge, despite lingering hybrid work arrangements. Early 2025 data indicate a slight 0.9% dip from 2024, potentially influenced by emerging factors like the Central Business District Tolling Program.

Tolls and Economic Management

Historical Toll Structures and Adjustments

Upon its opening on July 11, 1936, the Triborough Bridge imposed a flat toll of 25 cents on passenger vehicles, collected unidirectionally to finance outstanding bonds and operational costs while directing toward . This rate applied uniformly to cars, with higher fees scaled by vehicle class, such as additional charges for trucks based on axle count to reflect greater wear on . Toll adjustments occurred periodically to address revenue shortfalls amid escalating maintenance demands and , which outpaced initial projections for self-sustaining operations. By the early , rates had doubled to 50 cents for passenger cars, reflecting postwar traffic growth and deferred upkeep expenses. Further hikes followed: to 75 cents around 1975, $1.00 by 1980, and $1.25 in 1982, as bond obligations and structural repairs strained collections. These escalations maintained tolls as a user fee mechanism, intended to allocate costs directly to beneficiaries rather than taxpayers, though critics contended they functioned regressively by disproportionately burdening lower-income commuters without alternatives to driving.
PeriodPassenger Car Toll (Cash Rate)Key Driver for Adjustment
1936$0.25Initial bond financing and operations
1972–1975$0.50Inflation and traffic-induced wear
1975–1980$0.75Rising maintenance shortfalls
1980–1982$1.00Debt service and cost escalation
1982–1986$1.25Congestion management and repairs
Such structures prioritized variable pricing by vehicle type—e.g., multi-axle trucks paying multiples of the base rate—to align fees with marginal impact, though data from Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority reports indicated persistent gaps between toll income and expenditures, necessitating hikes beyond inflation.

Revenue Generation and Allocation for Upkeep

The , which operates the Robert F. Kennedy Bridge, generated approximately $2.4 billion in toll revenues across its facilities in 2023, with projections reaching $2.6 billion in 2024 from 337.3 million toll-paying vehicles. These revenues, collected primarily through electronic tolling systems like and cashless gantries implemented since the early 2010s, fund operations, maintenance, and capital debt service for the agency's nine toll crossings, including the RFK Bridge. Debt service on general revenue bonds, secured by these tolls, supports upgrades and repairs system-wide, with annual bond issuances such as the Series 2025A bonds earmarked for such purposes. A portion of the operating budget, totaling $491.4 million in 2023, covers direct upkeep expenses like routine maintenance and administrative costs across facilities. However, after debt obligations and operations, surplus revenues—amounting to $1.591 billion in 2023— are transferred to subsidize the broader MTA's mass transit operations, including subways and buses operated by New York City Transit. This cross-subsidization model, in place since the 1980s, has drawn criticism from fiscal analysts for diverting bridge-specific toll funds away from dedicated infrastructure preservation toward unrelated transit deficits, potentially straining long-term upkeep financing amid rising capital needs. Enforcement actions, including fines for toll evasions and violations such as overweight vehicles, contributed to increased metrics in 2023, generating supplemental that partially offsets damage-related repair costs but represents a minor fraction compared to tolls. Critics argue this reliance on penalties highlights inefficiencies in the allocation model, where user fees intended for asset maintenance effectively underwrite external subsidies, underscoring the need for ring-fenced funding to ensure fiscal sustainability for bridges like the RFK.

Maintenance, Safety, and Ongoing Challenges

Long-Term Deterioration and Repair Efforts

The Bridge's framework, to its opening, has undergone progressive deterioration from exposure to corrosive elements inherent in its and setting, compounded by deicing salts applied during winter . Soluble salt contamination on surfaces has been documented prior to recoating efforts, accelerating pitting and section loss in unprotected areas. Cyclic traffic loads have induced fatigue cracks, particularly in panels, as revealed through monitoring during load testing that simulated AASHTO fatigue truck passages. To counteract , the (MTA) has executed multi-phase painting programs, including complete removal of original lead-based coatings via abrasive blasting followed by application of high-performance protective systems. A notable example encompasses spans 68 to 103 of the , where incidental steel repairs accompanied coating abatement to restore structural integrity. Suspended span retrofits and anchorage rehabilitations, budgeted at over $400 million, further integrate these coatings to seal vulnerabilities against moisture ingress. Concrete and asphalt deck wear from abrasion and freeze-thaw cycles has prompted targeted replacements, such as partial deck overhauls on ramps involving cap beam and joint renewals. Underdeck repairs across , , and Bronx segments address substructure degradation, while precast deck installations minimize downtime during rehabilitation. These measures, informed by empirical data from inspections, have demonstrably extended component lifespans—upgrading elements to a projected 50-year service horizon through enhanced welding and barrier systems.

Recent Structural Issues and Overweight Vehicle Damage

Overweight trucks traversing the Robert F. Kennedy Bridge have inflicted substantial damage, contributing to an estimated $30 million in annual repair costs across (MTA) bridges and tunnels operated by . This overloading accelerates wear on structural components, with violations of the standard 80,000-pound gross vehicle weight limit leading to exponential increases in stress per excess pound, as noted by analyses of similar . To mitigate this, the MTA initiated automated enforcement in 2025 using weigh-in-motion sensors and license plate recognition cameras at key crossings, including the RFK Bridge, to detect and fine violators in real time without halting traffic. Such measures address the causal role of repeated overloading in hastening and joint failures, distinct from baseline age-related degradation in the bridge's 1930s-era spans. Concrete deck and substructure elements have shown specific deterioration, including spalling, cracking, and abrasion from abrasive truck traffic and de-icing salts, necessitating targeted repairs such as removal of unsound material from beams, columns, and underdeck areas during 2010s rehabilitation projects. These issues reflect localized poor condition in affected components, where heavy loads compound surface and subsurface , rather than uniform design deficiencies.

Safety Incidents, Inspections, and Future Improvement Plans

The Robert F. Kennedy Bridge has experienced multiple vehicular accidents resulting in injuries, including a multi-vehicle collision on August 5, 2025, where a car caught fire after a three-car crash, injuring six people and prompting FDNY response. Earlier that week, on July 30, 2025, an injury crash in the East Harlem vicinity snarled traffic and injured several individuals during peak hours. On August 22, 2025, three people were injured in a crash on a Bronx ramp to the bridge, leading to temporary access restrictions by police. Historical incidents include a truck jackknifing on October 9, 2015, which halted Bronx-bound traffic entirely, and a March 21, 2020, collision injuring five construction workers when a box truck struck their flatbed. The New York Police Department (NYPD) and MTA Bridges and Tunnels typically respond to such events with traffic management and investigations, though comprehensive accident statistics are maintained by the MTA without public aggregation beyond individual reports. Bridge inspections occur biennially under New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) and federal standards, with MTA Bridges and Tunnels conducting hands-on evaluations of over 1,000 structural components, including element-level assessments for hazards like fatigue and corrosion. A 2024 independent engineering review by Stantec analyzed TBTA inspection reports, confirming ongoing monitoring of high-hazard conditions such as interchange ramps and lift spans, with priorities for safety including deck integrity and barrier systems rated generally as good to fair. Regulatory oversight involves coordination between MTA, NYSDOT, and third-party firms for load rating and compliance, emphasizing prevention of overweight vehicle damage identified as a key structural risk. Future improvement plans prioritize enhanced enforcement against overweight trucks, which cause an estimated $30 million in annual damage across MTA bridges; the MTA proposes deploying weigh-in-motion (WIM) technology—roadway sensors paired with cameras—on the RFK Bridge to automate weight checks, issue fines up to $650 per violation, and reduce overload incidents by up to 60%, as demonstrated in pilot programs on other routes. Public hearings on this system were held in October 2025, with implementation aimed at preserving structural integrity. Additionally, the MTA's 20-Year outlines options for redesigning the Bronx-to-RFK Bridge interchange to mitigate risks, including better ramp geometry and signage to address collision hotspots. These initiatives build on recent rehabilitations, such as lift span upgrades, to extend while focusing on causal factors like vehicle weight and interchange complexity.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.