Hubbry Logo
Optical coatingOptical coatingMain
Open search
Optical coating
Community hub
Optical coating
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Optical coating
Optical coating
from Wikipedia
Optically coated mirrors and lenses

An optical coating is one or more thin layers of material deposited on an optical component such as a lens, prism or mirror, which alters the way in which the optic reflects and transmits light. These coatings have become a key technology in the field of optics. One type of optical coating is an anti-reflective coating, which reduces unwanted reflections from surfaces, and is commonly used on spectacle and camera lenses. Another type is the high-reflector coating, which can be used to produce mirrors that reflect greater than 99.99% of the light that falls on them. More complex optical coatings exhibit high reflection over some range of wavelengths, and anti-reflection over another range, allowing the production of dichroic thin-film filters.

Types of coating

[edit]
Reflectance vs. wavelength curves for aluminium (Al), silver (Ag), and gold (Au) metal mirrors at normal incidence

The simplest optical coatings are thin layers of metals, such as aluminium, which are deposited on glass substrates to make mirror surfaces, a process known as silvering. The metal used determines the reflection characteristics of the mirror; aluminium is the cheapest and most common coating, and yields a reflectivity of around 88%-92% over the visible spectrum. More expensive is silver, which has a reflectivity of 95%-99% even into the far infrared, but suffers from decreasing reflectivity (<90%) in the blue and ultraviolet spectral regions. Most expensive is gold, which gives excellent (98%-99%) reflectivity throughout the infrared, but limited reflectivity at wavelengths shorter than 550 nm, resulting in the typical gold colour.

By controlling the thickness and density of metal coatings, it is possible to decrease the reflectivity and increase the transmission of the surface, resulting in a half-silvered mirror. These are sometimes used as "one-way mirrors".

The other major type of optical coating is the dielectric coating (i.e. using materials with a different refractive index to the substrate). These are constructed from thin layers of materials such as magnesium fluoride, calcium fluoride, and various metal oxides, which are deposited onto the optical substrate. By careful choice of the exact composition, thickness, and number of these layers, it is possible to tailor the reflectivity and transmitivity of the coating to produce almost any desired characteristic. Reflection coefficients of surfaces can be reduced to less than 0.2%, producing an antireflection (AR) coating. Conversely, the reflectivity can be increased to greater than 99.99%, producing a high-reflector (HR) coating. The level of reflectivity can also be tuned to any particular value, for instance to produce a mirror that reflects 90% and transmits 10% of the light that falls on it, over some range of wavelengths. Such mirrors are often used as beamsplitters, and as output couplers in lasers. Alternatively, the coating can be designed such that the mirror reflects light only in a narrow band of wavelengths, producing an optical filter.

The versatility of dielectric coatings leads to their use in many scientific optical instruments (such as lasers, optical microscopes, refracting telescopes, and interferometers) as well as consumer devices such as binoculars, spectacles, and photographic lenses.

Dielectric layers are sometimes applied over top of metal films, either to provide a protective layer (as in silicon dioxide over aluminium), or to enhance the reflectivity of the metal film.[1] Metal and dielectric combinations are also used to make advanced coatings that cannot be made any other way. One example is the so-called "perfect mirror", which exhibits high (but not perfect) reflection, with unusually low sensitivity to wavelength, angle, and polarization.[2]

Antireflection coatings

[edit]
Comparison of uncoated glasses (top) and glasses with an anti-reflective coating (bottom).

Antireflection coatings are used to reduce reflection from surfaces. Whenever a ray of light moves from one medium to another (such as when light enters a sheet of glass after travelling through air), some portion of the light is reflected from the surface (known as the interface) between the two media.

A number of different effects are used to reduce reflection. The simplest is to use a thin layer of material at the interface, with an index of refraction between those of the two media. The reflection is minimized when

,

where is the index of the thin layer, and and are the indices of the two media. The optimum refractive indices for multiple coating layers at angles of incidence other than 0° is given by Moreno et al. (2005).[3]

Such coatings can reduce the reflection for ordinary glass from about 4% per surface to around 2%. These were the first type of antireflection coating known, having been discovered by Lord Rayleigh in 1886. He found that old, slightly tarnished pieces of glass transmitted more light than new, clean pieces due to this effect.

Practical antireflection coatings rely on an intermediate layer not only for its direct reduction of reflection coefficient, but also use the interference effect of a thin layer. If the layer's thickness is controlled precisely such that it is exactly one-quarter of the wavelength of the light in the layer (a quarter-wave coating), the reflections from the front and back sides of the thin layer will destructively interfere and cancel each other.

Interference in a quarter-wave antireflection coating

In practice, the performance of a simple one-layer interference coating is limited by the fact that the reflections only exactly cancel for one wavelength of light at one angle, and by difficulties finding suitable materials. For ordinary glass (n≈1.5), the optimum coating index is n≈1.23. Few useful substances have the required refractive index. Magnesium fluoride (MgF2) is often used, since it is hard-wearing and can be easily applied to substrates using physical vapour deposition, even though its index is higher than desirable (n=1.38). With such coatings, reflection as low as 1% can be achieved on common glass, and better results can be obtained on higher index media.

Further reduction is possible by using multiple coating layers, designed such that reflections from the surfaces undergo maximum destructive interference. By using two or more layers, broadband antireflection coatings which cover the visible range (400-700 nm) with maximum reflectivities of less than 0.5% are commonly achievable. Reflection in narrower wavelength bands can be as low as 0.1%. Alternatively, a series of layers with small differences in refractive index can be used to create a broadband antireflective coating by means of a refractive index gradient.

High-reflection coatings

[edit]
A woman wears sunglasses featuring a highly reflective optical coating
Diagram of a dielectric mirror. Thin layers with a high refractive index n1 are interleaved with thicker layers with a lower refractive index n2. The path lengths lA and lB differ by exactly one wavelength, which leads to constructive interference.

High-reflection (HR) coatings work the opposite way to antireflection coatings. The general idea is usually based on the periodic layer system composed from two materials, one with a high index, such as zinc sulfide (n=2.32) or titanium dioxide (n=2.4), and one with a low index, such as magnesium fluoride (n=1.38) or silicon dioxide (n=1.49). This periodic system significantly enhances the reflectivity of the surface in the certain wavelength range called band-stop, whose width is determined by the ratio of the two used indices only (for quarter-wave systems), while the maximum reflectivity increases up to almost 100% with a number of layers in the stack. The thicknesses of the layers are generally quarter-wave (then they yield to the broadest high reflection band in comparison to the non-quarter-wave systems composed from the same materials), this time designed such that reflected beams constructively interfere with one another to maximize reflection and minimize transmission. The best of these coatings built-up from deposited dielectric lossless materials on perfectly smooth surfaces can reach reflectivities greater than 99.999% (over a fairly narrow range of wavelengths). Common HR coatings can achieve 99.9% reflectivity over a broad wavelength range (tens of nanometers in the visible spectrum range).

As for AR coatings, HR coatings are affected by the incidence angle of the light. When used away from normal incidence, the reflective range shifts to shorter wavelengths, and becomes polarization dependent. This effect can be exploited to produce coatings that polarize a light beam.

By manipulating the exact thickness and composition of the layers in the reflective stack, the reflection characteristics can be tuned to a particular application, and may incorporate both high-reflective and anti-reflective wavelength regions. The coating can be designed as a long- or short-pass filter, a bandpass or notch filter, or a mirror with a specific reflectivity (useful in lasers). For example, the dichroic prism assembly used in some cameras requires two dielectric coatings, one long-wavelength pass filter reflecting light below 500 nm (to separate the blue component of the light), and one short-pass filter to reflect red light, above 600 nm wavelength. The remaining transmitted light is the green component.

Extreme ultraviolet coatings

[edit]

In the EUV portion of the spectrum (wavelengths shorter than about 30 nm) nearly all materials absorb strongly, making it difficult to focus or otherwise manipulate light in this wavelength range. Telescopes such as TRACE or EIT that form images with EUV light use multilayer mirrors that are constructed of hundreds of alternating layers of a high-mass metal such as molybdenum or tungsten, and a low-mass spacer such as silicon, vacuum deposited onto a substrate such as glass. Each layer pair is designed to have a thickness equal to half the wavelength of light to be reflected. Constructive interference between scattered light from each layer causes the mirror to reflect EUV light of the desired wavelength as would a normal metal mirror in visible light. Using multilayer optics it is possible to reflect up to 70% of incident EUV light (at a particular wavelength chosen when the mirror is constructed).

Transparent conductive coatings

[edit]

Transparent conductive coatings are used in applications where it is important that the coating conduct electricity or dissipate static charge. Conductive coatings are used to protect the aperture from electromagnetic interference, while dissipative coatings are used to prevent the build-up of static electricity. Transparent conductive coatings are also used extensively to provide electrodes in situations where light is required to pass, for example in flat panel display technologies and in many photoelectrochemical experiments. A common substance used in transparent conductive coatings is indium tin oxide (ITO). ITO is not very optically transparent, however. The layers must be thin to provide substantial transparency, particularly at the blue end of the spectrum. Using ITO, sheet resistances of 20 to 10,000 ohms per square can be achieved. An ITO coating may be combined with an antireflective coating to further improve transmittance. Other TCOs (Transparent Conductive Oxides) include AZO (Aluminium doped Zinc Oxide), which offers much better UV transmission than ITO. A special class of transparent conductive coatings applies to infrared films for theater-air military optics where IR transparent windows need to have (Radar) stealth (Stealth technology) properties. These are known as RAITs (Radar Attenuating / Infrared Transmitting) and include materials such as boron doped DLC (Diamond-like carbon)[citation needed].

Phase correction coatings

[edit]
Beam path at the roof edge (cross-section); the P-coating layer is on both roof surfaces

The multiple internal reflections in roof prisms cause a polarization-dependent phase-lag of the transmitted light, in a manner similar to a Fresnel rhomb. This must be suppressed by multilayer phase-correction coatings applied to one of the roof surfaces to avoid unwanted interference effects and a loss of contrast in the image. Dielectric phase-correction prism coatings are applied in a vacuum chamber with maybe 30 different superimposed vapor coating layers deposits, making it a complex production process.

In a roof prism without a phase-correcting coating, s-polarized and p-polarized light each acquire a different geometric phase as they pass through the upper prism. When the two polarized components are recombined, interference between the s-polarized and p-polarized light results in a different intensity distribution perpendicular to the roof edge as compared to that along the roof edge. This effect reduces contrast and resolution in the image perpendicular to the roof edge, producing an inferior image compared to that from a porro prism erecting system. This roof edge diffraction effect may also be seen as a diffraction spike perpendicular to the roof edge generated by bright points in the image. In technical optics, such a phase is also known as the Pancharatnam phase,[4] and in quantum physics an equivalent phenomenon is known as the Berry phase.[5]

This effect can be seen in the elongation of the Airy disk in the direction perpendicular to the crest of the roof as this is a diffraction from the discontinuity at the roof crest.

The unwanted interference effects are suppressed by vapour-depositing a special dielectric coating known as a phase-compensating coating on the roof surfaces of the roof prism. These phase-correction coating or P-coating on the roof surfaces was developed in 1988 by Adolf Weyrauch at Carl Zeiss[6] Other manufacturers followed soon, and since then phase-correction coatings are used across the board in medium and high-quality roof prism binoculars. This coating corrects for the difference in geometric phase between s- and p-polarized light so both have effectively the same phase shift, preventing image-degrading interference.[7]

From a technical point of view, the phase-correction coating layer does not correct the actual phase shift, but rather the partial polarization of the light that results from total reflection. Such a correction can always only be made for a selected wavelength and for a specific angle of incidence; however, it is possible to approximately correct a roof prism for polychromatic light by superimposing several layers.[8] In this way, since the 1990s, roof prism binoculars have also achieved resolution values that were previously only achievable with porro prisms.[9] The presence of a phase-correction coating can be checked on unopened binoculars using two polarization filters.[6]

Fano-resonant optical coatings

[edit]

Fano-resonant optical coatings (FROCs) represent a new category of optical coatings.[10] FROCs exhibit the photonic Fano resonance by coupling a broadband nanocavity, which serves as the continuum, with a narrowband Fabry–Perot nanocavity, representing the discrete state. The interference between these two resonances manifests as an asymmetric Fano-resonance line-shape. FROCs are considered a separate category of optical coatings because they enjoy optical properties that cannot be reproduced using other optical coatings. Mainly, semi-transparent FROCs act as a beam splitting filter that reflects and transmits the same color, a property that cannot be achieved with transmission filters, dielectric mirrors, or semi-transparent metals.

FROCs enjoy remarkable structural coloring properties, as they can produce colors across a wide color gamut with both high brightness and high purity.[11] Moreover, the dependence of color on the angle of incident light can be controlled through the dielectric cavity material, making FROCs adaptable for applications requiring either angle-independent or angle-dependent coloring. This includes decorative purposes and anti-counterfeit measures.

FROCs were used as both monolithic spectrum splitters and selective solar absorbers, which makes them suitable for hybrid solar-thermal energy generation.[10] They can be designed to reflect specific wavelength ranges, aligning with the energy band gap of photovoltaic cells, while absorbing the remaining solar spectrum. This enables higher photovoltaic efficiency at elevated optical concentrations by reducing the photovoltaic's cell temperature. The reduced temperature also increases the cell's lifetime. Additionally, their low infrared emissivity minimizes thermal losses, increasing the system's overall optothermal efficiency.[10]

Sources

[edit]
  • Hecht, Eugene. Chapter 9, Optics, 2nd ed. (1990), Addison Wesley. ISBN 0-201-11609-X.
  • I. Moreno, et al., "Thin-film spatial filters", Optics Letters, 30, 914–916 (2005), doi:10.1364/OL.30.000914.
  • C. Clark, et al., "Two-color Mach 3 IR coating for TAMD systems", Proc. SPIE, vol. 4375, p. 307–314 (2001), doi:10.1117/12.439189.

References

[edit]

See also

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
An optical coating is a thin film or multilayer stack of dielectric or metallic materials applied to the surface of an optical component, such as a lens, mirror, or window, to modify its interaction with light by controlling reflection, transmission, absorption, or polarization. These coatings exploit the principles of optical interference, where light waves reflecting from multiple interfaces within the film layers interfere constructively or destructively depending on the film's thickness, refractive index, and the wavelength of light; for instance, a quarter-wave optical thickness (physical thickness times refractive index) produces a 180-degree phase shift that enables destructive interference for anti-reflection effects. The most common types include anti-reflection (AR) coatings, which reduce surface reflectance from about 4% (for uncoated glass in visible light) to about 1.2% per surface using single-layer materials like (refractive index 1.38) or multilayer broadband designs achieving under 0.5% over 100-200 nm bandwidths; high-reflection coatings, such as stacks exceeding 99.5% reflectivity at specific wavelengths or metallic mirrors like aluminum, silver, or for broadband performance; and specialized variants like beam splitters, polarizers, or protective overcoats for durability in harsh environments. Fabrication techniques typically involve methods, including (pioneered commercially in the 1930s for AR coatings), , or deposition, alongside chemical approaches like sol-gel or to achieve precise layer thicknesses from nanometers to micrometers. Optical coatings are essential in numerous applications, enhancing light transmission in cameras and eyeglasses, boosting in lasers and solar cells, minimizing in imaging systems, and enabling high-damage-threshold mirrors (up to 10-20 J/cm²) for high-power in , devices, and scientific instruments. Their development has evolved from simple single-layer films in the early to complex rugate and graded-index designs today, driven by advances in materials like SiO₂, TiO₂, and ZrO₂ for UV to spectral ranges.

Fundamentals

Definition and principles

Optical coatings consist of thin films, typically ranging from 10 nm to 10 μm in thickness, applied to optical surfaces to modify the reflection, transmission, absorption, or polarization of . These films are engineered using materials with varying refractive indices to achieve precise control over behavior at interfaces. The fundamental principles governing optical coatings stem from the interaction of with boundaries between media of different refractive indices, as described by the . These equations quantify the reflection and refraction at interfaces; for normal incidence, the amplitude rr is given by r=n1n2n1+n2,r = \frac{n_1 - n_2}{n_1 + n_2}, where n1n_1 and n2n_2 are the refractive indices of the incident and transmitting media, respectively. For an uncoated surface in air (with nair1n_{\text{air}} \approx 1 and nglass1.5n_{\text{glass}} \approx 1.5), this results in approximately 4% reflection per surface due to the index mismatch. This inherent reflection reduces throughput in optical systems, motivating the use of coatings to mitigate such losses. In thin-film optical coatings, the key mechanism is interference arising from multiple reflections within the layered structure. Light waves partially reflected at each film interface interfere constructively or destructively depending on the film's thickness, the wavelength of light, and the refractive indices involved, leading to tailored optical properties. A critical aspect is the phase shift upon reflection: when light reflects off a medium with a higher refractive index (external reflection), it undergoes a 180° phase change, while reflection from a lower-index medium (internal reflection) does not, influencing the interference patterns. For instance, antireflection coatings exploit destructive interference to minimize reflection at targeted wavelengths.

Historical development

The foundations of optical coatings trace back to early observations of . In 1704, conducted experiments with thin soap films, demonstrating how interference between light waves reflected from the film's surfaces produces vivid colors, laying the groundwork for understanding optical thin films. During the , advancements in optics highlighted the practical challenges of surface reflections, which reduced light throughput in instruments. A pivotal milestone occurred in 1935 when Alexander Smakula, working at , developed the first practical single-layer anti-reflection coating using , enabling precise control of light reflection through layers to enhance transmission in optical systems. During in the 1940s, these coatings found critical military applications, including on aircraft windshields to improve pilot visibility by reducing glare and on periscopes for submarines and tanks to minimize detection risks. Postwar progress built on evaporation techniques pioneered by John Strong in and , who developed methods to deposit durable metallic and films, such as aluminized mirrors for telescopes that resisted tarnishing. High-reflection coatings, refined in the postwar period, proved essential for early laser mirrors following the 1960 invention of the , enabling efficient beam reflection in resonators. By the 1960s, ion-assisted deposition emerged as a key advancement, using beams during film growth to enhance adhesion and mechanical durability of coatings for demanding environments. In the , around the , nanostructured and metamaterial-based optical coatings began to proliferate, leveraging subwavelength patterns to achieve unprecedented control over light manipulation, such as antireflection surpassing traditional multilayer designs.

Materials and Fabrication

Common materials

Optical coatings commonly employ , metallic, and materials, selected based on their refractive indices, absorption characteristics, and compatibility with substrates to achieve desired optical performance across various wavelengths. Dielectrics provide low-loss, transparent layers essential for interference-based functionalities, while metals offer high reflectivity but may suffer from environmental degradation. Semiconductors bridge optical and electrical properties, and emerging hybrids introduce flexibility for advanced applications. Among dielectrics, (MgF₂) serves as a low-index with a of approximately 1.38 in the visible range (0.4–0.7 µm), making it ideal for to visible antireflection applications due to its transparency from 0.11 to 7.5 µm and high damage threshold. (SiO₂), with a of about 1.46 at visible wavelengths, offers excellent durability and resistance to as fused silica, enabling its use in robust coatings across 0.21–2.5 µm. (TiO₂) provides a high of around 2.61 in the (0.43–1.53 µm), facilitating high-reflectivity structures while maintaining low absorption in that range. (ZrO₂), with a of approximately 2.1–2.2 in the visible range, is valued for its high durability and use in UV to IR coatings. Metallic materials are prized for their reflectivity but require protection against oxidation or tarnishing. Aluminum exhibits the highest reflectance among metals in the (200–400 nm) and (3–10 µm) regions, though it readily forms an layer that can alter performance over time. Silver delivers superior reflectivity of over 98% in the visible range (e.g., 98.7% at 0.59 µm), but it tarnishes upon exposure to compounds, necessitating protective overcoats. specializes in applications, maintaining high reflectivity beyond 1 µm with inherent resistance to oxidation, as evidenced by its complex (n ≈ 0.28, k ≈ 2.93 at 1 µm). Semiconductor materials like (ITO) combine transparency with conductivity, featuring a of approximately 1.83 in the visible (0.25–1.0 µm) for use in transparent conductive layers with low extinction (k ≈ 0.003). (ZnS) acts as an with a of about 2.37 across 0.4–14 µm, valued for its broad in the 8–12 µm band and mechanical robustness. Material selection hinges on refractive index matching to minimize reflections at interfaces, compatibility of thermal expansion coefficients with the substrate to prevent delamination under temperature variations, and low absorption coefficients in the target wavelength range—for instance, materials with negligible absorption below 200 nm for extreme ultraviolet (EUV) applications. Emerging hybrid organic-inorganic materials, such as polymer-based composites, enable flexible coatings by integrating organic components for bendability while retaining inorganic , as demonstrated in dynamic photonic structures.

Deposition techniques

Optical coatings are typically fabricated using vacuum-based deposition methods that ensure precise control over film thickness, , and uniformity, which are critical for achieving desired . (PVD) techniques dominate the field due to their ability to produce high-quality, low-loss films suitable for multilayer stacks. These processes involve the transfer of material from a source to the substrate in a controlled environment, minimizing contamination and enabling atomic-scale deposition. Thermal , a foundational PVD method, heats the source material—such as metals or oxides like TiO₂ for high-index layers—using resistive or electron-beam sources in a to vaporize it, allowing atoms or molecules to condense on the substrate. This technique operates at levels of 10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁷ and substrate temperatures up to 300°C, with deposition rates ranging from 0.1 to 10 nm/s, enabling flexible production for short runs but potentially leading to columnar microstructures if not optimized. , another PVD variant, employs a plasma (often ) to bombard a target material, ejecting atoms that deposit onto the substrate; magnetron sputtering enhances uniformity and rate while maintaining low substrate temperatures. Typical parameters include pressures of 10⁻³ to 10⁻⁶ and deposition rates of 0.1–1 nm/s, resulting in denser films with better compared to , though it requires higher input. Chemical vapor deposition (CVD), particularly plasma-enhanced CVD (PECVD), offers advantages for uniform on complex geometries by decomposing precursor gases in a plasma at lower temperatures. In PECVD, films form at pressures around 0.1 and substrate temperatures of 200–400°C, with rates of 1–10 nm/min, producing conformal layers suitable for specialized optical components while reducing thermal stress on heat-sensitive substrates. Alternative methods include sol-gel spin coating, a wet-chemical approach where a precursor solution is spun onto the substrate, dried, and annealed to form oxide films, offering low-cost deposition for simple antireflection layers at rates controlled by spin speed (typically 1000–5000 rpm) and ambient to 600°C annealing. Ion beam assisted deposition (IBAD) enhances PVD by simultaneously bombarding the growing film with low-energy ions (0.2–2 keV), operating at 10⁻⁵ Torr vacuum and rates of 0.1–0.5 nm/s, which densifies the structure, reduces stress, and improves environmental stability without elevating substrate temperatures significantly. Key process parameters—such as vacuum levels (10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁷ for most PVD), substrate temperatures ( to 300°C), and deposition rates (0.1–10 nm/s)—directly influence film quality by affecting adatom mobility and microstructure, with higher minimizing defects but increasing equipment costs. during deposition relies on in-situ monitoring; (QCM) measures mass accumulation to track thickness and rate in real-time with sub-nanometer precision, while assesses and optical constants by analyzing polarized light reflection. These tools ensure precise layer control, enabling high-performance coatings with minimal variability.

Types of Coatings

Antireflection coatings

Antireflection coatings are optical thin-film layers designed to minimize reflection at interfaces, thereby maximizing transmission through surfaces such as lenses or windows. These coatings exploit to cancel out reflected rays, enhancing overall optical efficiency in devices where stray reflections can degrade performance. By reducing surface from typical values of 4-5% per interface for glass-air boundaries to much lower levels, antireflection coatings improve image quality and light throughput. The simplest antireflection design is a single-layer coating with a quarter-wave optical thickness, given by d=λ4nd = \frac{\lambda}{4n}, where λ\lambda is the design wavelength and nn is the refractive index of the coating material. This thickness positions the reflections from the air-coating and coating-substrate interfaces to undergo destructive interference, effectively suppressing the net reflection at that wavelength. A common material for such coatings is magnesium fluoride (MgF₂), with a low refractive index of approximately 1.38, applied to glass substrates; this reduces reflectance from about 4% to around 1% at the target wavelength in the visible spectrum. For broader spectral coverage, multilayer antireflection coatings stack alternating high- and low-index layers to achieve more uniform low over extended wavelength ranges. V-coatings, consisting of two layers with specific thicknesses and indices, provide high performance in narrow bands (around 10 nm width) by shaping the reflectance curve into a V-like minimum. Graded-index multilayer designs, where the varies continuously across the stack, extend effectiveness to wider angular incidences by mimicking a gradual transition from air to substrate. Advanced multilayer antireflection coatings can achieve reflectance below 0.5% across the (400-700 nm), significantly boosting transmission efficiency. However, performance is angularly dependent; at incidence angles exceeding 30°, the effective path length through the layers increases, shifting the interference conditions and raising reflectance. For an ideal single-layer antireflection on ( ≈1.5) in air ( ≈1.0), the required effective coating index is neff=nsubstratenair1.22n_{\text{eff}} = \sqrt{n_{\text{substrate}} \cdot n_{\text{air}}} \approx 1.22
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.