Hubbry Logo
PhotoagingPhotoagingMain
Open search
Photoaging
Community hub
Photoaging
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Photoaging
Photoaging
Photoaging
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Photoaging of a woman.

Photoaging or photoageing[1] (also known as "dermatoheliosis"[2]) is a term used for the characteristic changes to skin induced by chronic UVA and UVB exposure.[3]: 29 

Effects of UV light

[edit]

Molecular and genetic changes

[edit]

UVB rays are a primary mutagen that can only penetrate through the epidermal (outermost) layer of the skin and can cause DNA mutations.[4] These mutations arise due to chemical changes within skin cells. These mutations may be clinically related to specific signs of photoaging such as wrinkling.[5][6]

DNA UV mutation

Melanocytes and basal cells are embedded in the epidermal layer. Upon exposure to UVB rays, melanocytes will produce more melanin, a pigment that gives skin its color. UVB can cause the formation of freckles and dark spots, both of which are symptoms of photoaging; these are most common in people with fair or light skin.[7] With frequent long-term exposure to UVB rays, signs of photoaging might appear and precancerous lesions or skin cancer may develop.[4]

UVA rays are able to penetrate deeper into the skin than UVB rays, damaging the dermal layer as well as the epidermal. The dermis is the second major layer of the skin and it comprises collagen, elastin, and extrafibrillar matrix which provides structural support to the skin. However, with constant UVA exposure, the size of the dermis layer will be reduced, thereby causing the epidermis to start drooping off the body. Due to the presence of blood vessels in the dermis, UVA rays can lead to dilated or broken blood vessels which are most commonly visible on the nose and cheeks. UVA can also damage DNA indirectly through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which include superoxide anion, peroxide and singlet oxygen. These ROS damage cellular DNA as well as lipids and proteins.[citation needed]

Pigmentation

[edit]

UV exposure can also lead to inflammation and vasodilation which is clinically manifested as sunburn. UV radiation activates the transcription factor, NF-κB, which is the first step in inflammation. NF-κB activation results in the increase of proinflammatory cytokines, for example: interleukin 1 (IL-1), IL-6 vascular endothelial growth factor, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α). This then attracts neutrophils which lead to an increase in oxidative damage through the generation of free radicals.[citation needed]

Additionally, UV radiation would cause the down-regulation of an angiogenesis inhibitor, thrombospondin-1, and the up-regulation of an angiogenesis activator which is platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor, in keratinocytes. These enhance angiogenesis and aid in the growth of UV-induced neoplasms.[citation needed]

Immunosuppression

[edit]

It has been reported that UV radiation leads to local and systemic immunosuppression, due to DNA damage and altered cytokine expression. This has implications in cutaneous tumor surveillance. The Langerhans cells may undergo changes in quantity, morphology, and function due to UV exposure and may eventually become depleted. One proposed explanation for this immunosuppression is that the body is attempting to suppress an autoimmune response to inflammatory products resulting from UV damage.[8]

Degradation of collagen

[edit]

UV exposure would also lead to the activation of receptors for epidermal growth factor, IL-1, and TNF-α in keratinocytes and fibroblasts, which then activates signaling kinases throughout the skin via an unknown mechanism.[9] The nuclear transcription factor activator protein, AP-1, which controls the transcription of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), is expressed and activated. MMP-1 is a major metalloproteinases for collagen degradation. This entire process is aided by the presence of reactive oxygen species that inhibits protein-tyrosine phosphatases via oxidation, thereby resulting in the up-regulation of the above-mentioned receptors. Another transcription factor NF-κB, which is also activated by UV light, also increases the expression of MMP-9.

The up-regulation of MMP can occur even after minimal exposure to UV, hence, exposure to UV radiation which is inadequate to cause sunburn can thus facilitate the degradation of skin collagen and lead to presumably, eventual photoaging. Thus, collagen production is reduced in photoaged skin due to the process of constant degradation of collagen mediated by MMPs.

In addition, the presence of damaged collagen would also down-regulate the synthesis of new collagen. The impaired spreading and attachment of fibroblasts onto degraded collagen could be one of the contributing factors to the inhibition of collagen synthesis.

Retinoic acids and photodamage

[edit]

UV radiation decreases the expression of both retinoic acid receptors and retinoid X receptors in human skin, thereby resulting in a complete loss of the induction of RA-responsive genes. It also leads to an increase in activity of the AP-1 pathway, increasing MMP activity and thus resulting in a functional deficiency of vitamin A in the skin.

Signs, symptoms and histopathology

[edit]

Early symptoms of photoaging:

  • Dyspigmentation, the formation of wrinkles and other symptoms appear around regions of skin commonly exposed to sun, mostly the eyes, mouth and forehead.[10] The lips may be affected.[10] In Canadian women, the upper chest is commonly affected.[10]
  • Spider veins on face and neck
  • Loss of color and fullness in lips

Symptoms of photoaging attributed to prolonged exposure to UV:

  • Wrinkles deepen and forehead frown lines can be seen even when not frowning.
  • Telangiectasias (spider veins) most commonly seen around the nose, cheeks and chin.
  • Skin becomes leathery and laxity occurs.
  • Solar lentigines (age spots) appear on the face and hands.
  • Possibly pre-cancerous red and scaly spots (actinic keratoses) appear.
  • Cutaneous malignancies

In addition to the above symptoms, photoaging can also result in an orderly maturation of keratinocytes and an increase in the cell population of the dermis where abundant; hyperplastic, elongated and collapsed fibroblasts and inflammatory infiltrates are found.

Photodamage can also be characterized as a disorganization of the collagen fibrils that constitute most of the connective tissue, and the accumulation of abnormal, amorphous, elastin-containing material, a condition known as actinic elastosis.

Defense mechanisms

[edit]

Endogenous defense mechanisms provide protection of the skin from damages induced by UV.

Epidermal thickness

[edit]

UV exposure which would lead to an increase in epidermal thickness could help protect from further UV damage.

Pigment

[edit]

It has been reported in many cases that fairer individuals who have lesser melanin pigment show more dermal DNA photodamage, infiltrating neutrophils, keratinocyte activation, IL-10 expression and increased MMPs after UV exposure. Therefore, the distribution of melanin provides protection from sunburn, photoaging, and carcinogenesis by absorbing and scattering UV rays, covering the skin lower layers and protecting them from the radiation.[11]

Repair of DNA mutation and apoptosis

[edit]

The damage of DNA due to exposure of UV rays will lead to expression of p53, thereby leading to eventual arrest of the cell cycle. This allows DNA repair mediated by endogenous mechanisms like the nucleotide excision repair system. In addition, apoptosis occurs if the damage is too severe. However, the apoptotic mechanisms decline with age, and if neither DNA repair mechanism nor apoptosis occurs, cutaneous tumorigenesis may result.

Tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs)

[edit]

TIMPs regulate the activity of MMP. Many studies have shown that UV rays would induce TIMP-1.

Antioxidants

[edit]

The skin contains several antioxidants, including vitamin E, coenzyme Q10, ascorbate, carotenoids, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase. These antioxidants provide protection from reactive oxygen species produced during normal cellular metabolism. However, overexposure to UV rays can lead to a significant reduction in the antioxidant supply, thus increasing oxidative stress. Hence, these antioxidants are essential in the skin's defense mechanism against UV radiation and photocarcinogenesis.

Treatment

[edit]

Treatment and intervention for photoaging can be classified into a unique paradigm based on disease prevention.

Primary prevention

[edit]

Primary prevention aims to reduce the risk factors before a disease or condition occurs.

Sun protection is the most effective form of primary prevention of photoaging. The major methods of sun protection are sunscreen products, sun protective clothing, and reducing exposure to the sun, especially during peak sun hours (10 AM-4PM in the spring and summer seasons). Broad-spectrum sunscreen products provide optimal coverage for protection against UV damage because they protect against both types of UVA rays (UVA1 and UVA2) along with UVB rays. Proper application methods and timing are important factors in proper sunscreen use. This includes using a proper quantity of sunscreen, applying sunscreen prior to sun exposure, and consistent reapplication (especially after exposure to water or sweat).[12]

Secondary protection

[edit]

Secondary protection refers to early detection of disease, potentially while still asymptomatic, to allow positive interference to prevent, delay, or attenuate the symptomatic clinical condition. This includes the following: retinoids (e.g. tretinoin), antioxidants (e.g. topical vitamin C, oral supplements, CoQ10, Lipoic acid), estrogens, growth factors and cytokines.

There are various forms of topical retinoids. Tretinoin, a retinoid, is widely considered to be the most efficacious treatment for photoaging by dermatologists due to consistent evidence from several randomized clinical trials. Retinoids are vitamin A derivatives that bind to retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and retinoid X receptors (RXRs). Binding to these receptors induces a cascade of cellular processes that ultimately lead to increased collagen production and epidermal thickening, reducing the appearance of skin sagging and wrinkling. Tretinoin is also efficacious for the treatment of acne. Adapalene and tazarotene are also third-generation synthetic retinoids that are used for the treatment for acne. Adapalene has not been widely studied or proven for use in photoaging. However, it has been used off-label for that purpose. Tazarotene has been proven to be efficacious in the treatment of photoaging. Retinoid derivatives, known as retinol and retinal, are often used in over the counter cosmeceutical products for anti-aging purposes. The form of retinol and retinal are metabolized in the skin to retinoic acid, which can then act on the RARs and RXRs.[13] These products are considered cosmeceuticals rather than drugs due to their lack of regulation, and they have not been widely studied. Furthermore, tretinoin is the most well studied and consistent in its efficacy in the treatment of photoaging.[14]

Tertiary prevention

[edit]

Lastly, tertiary prevention is the treatment of an existing symptomatic disease process to ameliorate its effects or delay its progress. Such tertiary prevention includes the use of chemical peels, resurfacing techniques (e.g. micro-dermabrasion), ablative or non-ablative laser resurfacing, radio-frequency technology, soft tissue augmentation (also known as fillers),[15] and botulinum toxins. Photorejuvenation procedures are performed by dermatologists to reduce the visible symptoms. Each of these treatment modalities have primary concerns that they address. For example, botulinum injections paralyze facial muscles. This prevents muscle contraction and subsequent wrinkle formation.[16] Injectable fillers are often used in the nasolabial fold to increase volume and minimize the appearance of sagging or wrinkling.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Photoaging

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Photoaging, also known as premature aging, refers to the cutaneous changes induced by chronic exposure to (UV) from , resulting in wrinkles, pigmentation irregularities, loss of elasticity, and a leathery texture, distinct from intrinsic chronological aging. This process primarily affects sun-exposed areas such as the face, , hands, and arms, and is exacerbated by factors like skin phototype and cumulative UV dose. The primary cause of photoaging is ultraviolet radiation, with UVA (320–400 nm) penetrating deeper into the to generate (ROS) and UVB (280–315 nm) damaging DNA in the , leading to and cellular . Key mechanisms include the of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), such as MMP-1, which degrade and in the , while inhibiting new synthesis through pathways involving activator protein-1 (AP-1) and nuclear factor-kappa B (). Additionally, UV-induced ROS cause , mitochondrial DNA deletions, and telomere shortening, accumulating over decades to form "solar scars" that manifest as clinical signs. Clinically, photoaging presents with coarse wrinkles, solar elastosis (accumulation of abnormal elastic fibers), mottled or , actinic lentigines (age spots), telangiectasias, and epidermal thinning, often appearing years after initial exposure. These changes not only alter skin appearance but also increase susceptibility to skin cancers, as photoaging and photocarcinogenesis share overlapping pathways like DNA damage and . Prevention focuses on strict photoprotection, as no amount of unprotected sun exposure is considered completely safe for preventing skin aging; any UV radiation contributes to cumulative photoaging, including wrinkles, pigmentation changes, and loss of elasticity. Dermatologists recommend consistent use of broad-spectrum sunscreens with SPF 30 or higher applied daily and reapplied every two hours during exposure, alongside protective clothing, hats, and avoiding peak sun hours (10 a.m. to 2 p.m.). Brief incidental exposure may occur in daily life, but deliberate unprotected exposure—even once a month—is not advised for aging prevention. For vitamin D needs, reliance on diet or supplements is preferred over intentional sun exposure to avoid UV damage. Topical and oral antioxidants, such as vitamins C and E, mitigate oxidative damage by neutralizing ROS and reducing UV-induced , while retinoids like tretinoin can reverse some effects by stimulating production. Early intervention is crucial, as photoaging is largely avoidable through consistent photoprotection.

Overview and Causes

Definition and Risk Factors

Photoaging, also known as dermatoheliosis, refers to the premature aging of the skin caused primarily by chronic exposure to (UV) from , which induces structural and functional changes distinct from those of intrinsic chronological aging. Unlike intrinsic aging, which is a genetically determined influenced by time and internal factors, photoaging results from cumulative extrinsic damage that accelerates deterioration, particularly in sun-exposed areas such as the face, , and hands. This involves , , and degradation of skin components, leading to visible and histological alterations that superimpose upon the baseline changes of chronological aging. Epidemiologically, photoaging accounts for approximately 80-90% of visible aging signs in sun-exposed regions among populations with lighter types, with photodamage incidence reaching 80-90% in individuals of Fitzpatrick types I-III, common in European and North American cohorts. It is more prevalent in fair-skinned individuals (Fitzpatrick types I-II), who exhibit heightened susceptibility due to lower protection, as well as in outdoor workers and residents of tropical or high-UV climates, where prolonged solar exposure exacerbates the condition. For instance, studies indicate that Caucasians experience up to 90% of facial aging attributable to photoaging, highlighting its dominance over intrinsic factors in these demographics. Key risk factors for photoaging include cumulative lifetime UV dose, which correlates directly with severity, and skin phototype on the , where types I-II confer greater vulnerability through reduced natural photoprotection. Age of onset is typically insidious, beginning in early adulthood with subclinical changes accumulating over decades, though acceleration occurs post-30 years. Co-factors such as , which promotes oxidative damage and collagen breakdown, and air pollution, including particulate matter that generates free radicals, synergize with UV to amplify photoaging effects. Recent research (2023-2025) also implicates visible light and infrared radiation as contributors, with visible light inducing pigmentation changes and infrared promoting activity, particularly in urban environments with combined exposures. In comparison to intrinsic aging, photoaging overlays these extrinsic insults on chronological processes, resulting in more pronounced wrinkling, elastosis, and fragility, comprising the majority of observable facial aging in affected populations.

Role of UV Radiation

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation from solar exposure is the primary environmental trigger for photoaging, with its effects mediated by the wavelength-specific penetration and biological interactions within skin layers. The UV spectrum relevant to terrestrial exposure includes UVA (320–400 nm), which constitutes about 95% of UV reaching the Earth's surface and penetrates deeply into the dermis, inducing oxidative stress through reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation that degrades collagen and elastin. UVB (290–320 nm) primarily affects the epidermis, causing direct DNA damage via cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6-4 photoproducts, while contributing to photoaging through cumulative inflammatory responses. UVC (100–280 nm) is almost entirely absorbed by the stratospheric ozone layer and does not reach the skin under normal conditions, rendering it negligible for photoaging. UV radiation penetrates the skin by being absorbed by endogenous chromophores such as DNA, melanin, urocanic acid, and porphyrins, which transfer energy to molecular oxygen, producing ROS including superoxide anions, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radicals. This absorption leads to photochemical reactions that initiate signaling cascades promoting matrix metalloproteinase expression and extracellular matrix degradation, key to photoaging. Dosimetry metrics quantify these effects: the minimal erythema dose (MED) represents the smallest UV dose producing visible erythema 24 hours post-exposure, varying by skin type and wavelength (e.g., higher for UVA than UVB), while the standard erythema dose (SED) is defined as 100 J/m² of effective UV irradiance weighted by the erythema action spectrum, used to standardize exposure risks across spectra. The dose-response relationship in photoaging distinguishes chronic low-dose exposures, which accumulate subclinical damage leading to gradual dermal remodeling and wrinkling over years, from acute high-dose events that primarily cause immediate and sunburn but contribute less to long-term aging. Recent research (2023–2025) highlights compounding roles of non-UV solar components: visible light (400–700 nm), particularly blue-violet wavelengths, induces pigmentation and in melanocytes via ROS, exacerbating photoaging in darker types, while infrared radiation (700 nm–1 mm), especially IR-A (700–1400 nm), penetrates deeply to cause , mitochondrial dysfunction, and further ROS production, amplifying UV-induced damage. Environmental factors modulate UV exposure intensity: higher altitudes reduce atmospheric , increasing UV by 4–10% per 1000 m ; lower latitudes elevate annual UV index due to ; and seasonal variations peak UVB in summer (UV index often >8) while UVA remains relatively constant, intensifying photoaging risks in equatorial or high- regions. These interactions with UV can result in DNA adducts and oxidative modifications in cells.

Pathophysiological Mechanisms

Molecular and Cellular Changes

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation, particularly UVB, induces direct DNA damage in skin cells, primarily through the formation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and (6-4) photoproducts. These lesions arise when adjacent pyrimidine bases in DNA absorb UVB photons, leading to covalent bonds that distort the DNA helix and impede replication and transcription. CPDs are the most abundant, with formation rates estimated at approximately 0.05 to 0.22 CPDs per 10^5 bases per J/m² of UVB in human keratinocytes. In contrast, (6-4) photoproducts form at lower yields, typically in a 1:3 to 1:5 ratio relative to CPDs. UVA radiation contributes indirectly via photosensitization, generating oxidative lesions such as 8-oxoguanine, which results from guanine oxidation by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and occurs at rates of about 0.71 to 2.58 lesions per 10^6 bases per kJ/m². These damages accumulate in epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts, initiating photoaging cascades if not repaired efficiently by nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathways. Persistent DNA damage activates intracellular signaling pathways that propagate photoaging signals. UV exposure triggers the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, including extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK), c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK), and p38, which phosphorylate transcription factors like activator protein-1 (AP-1). AP-1, composed of c-Fos and c-Jun dimers, upregulates genes involved in matrix degradation. Concurrently, nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) translocates to the nucleus upon UV-induced IκB degradation, promoting pro-inflammatory and pro-senescence gene expression. These pathways intersect to amplify ROS production and inhibit antioxidant defenses, exacerbating cellular stress. Additionally, chronic UV exposure accelerates telomere shortening in skin fibroblasts by promoting telomerase inactivation and oxidative damage to telomeric DNA, while inducing mitochondrial dysfunction through mtDNA mutations and impaired electron transport chain activity, leading to elevated ROS and energy deficits. At the cellular level, unrepaired DNA lesions induce p53-mediated senescence, a stable arrest that prevents propagation of damaged cells. Activated binds to promoters of p21 and other inhibitors, halting progression from G1 to in and fibroblasts. Senescent cells develop a (SASP), secreting factors such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs, e.g., MMP-1 and MMP-3), which reinforce paracrine senescence in neighboring cells and contribute to remodeling, including degradation. This SASP amplifies photoaging by creating a chronic inflammatory microenvironment. Recent research highlights epigenetic dysregulation as a key mechanism in photoaging. UV-induced modifications, particularly reduced of H3 and H4 at promoter regions of repair and genes, lead to condensation and suppressed transcription in photoaged skin. Studies from 2023 demonstrate that UVA exposure alters activity, correlating with decreased expression of collagen-synthesis genes in human dermal fibroblasts. Furthermore, miRNA dysregulation in photoaged involves upregulation of miR-34a and downregulation of miR-200 family members, which target and MAPK pathways, respectively, promoting and as observed in UVB-irradiated models. These findings underscore the role of non-coding RNAs in sustaining UV-induced epigenetic memory.

Extracellular Matrix Alterations

Photoaging profoundly disrupts the dermal (ECM), leading to structural weakening and loss of integrity. A primary alteration involves , the predominant ECM protein, where (UV) radiation suppresses the synthesis of types I and III by fibroblasts while simultaneously upregulating matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Specifically, MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-9 are markedly increased, resulting in excessive degradation of mature fibrils and reduced overall content. This imbalance creates fragmented, disorganized networks that fail to provide adequate tensile strength. The molecular pathway driving MMP overexpression begins with UV-generated reactive oxygen species (ROS), which activate mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). This activation promotes phosphorylation of c-Jun, a subunit of the activator protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factor, culminating in enhanced transcription of MMP genes. The process can be represented as: UV radiation→ROS production→c-Jun phosphorylation (via MAPKs)→AP-1 activation→MMP-1/3/9 transcription\text{UV radiation} \rightarrow \text{ROS production} \rightarrow \text{c-Jun phosphorylation (via MAPKs)} \rightarrow \text{AP-1 activation} \rightarrow \text{MMP-1/3/9 transcription} Additionally, AP-1 represses transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling, further diminishing procollagen synthesis and perpetuating . Elastin fibers, essential for recoil, undergo anomalous remodeling in photoaged , manifesting as solar elastosis—a hallmark of accumulated, dysfunctional elastic material in the upper . UV exposure induces overexpression of tropoelastin, the soluble precursor to , leading to excessive deposition of abnormal, clumped fibers that lack normal functionality and contribute to dermal thickening and rigidity. This contrasts with intrinsic aging, where simply diminishes; in photoaging, the aberrant synthesis and degradation imbalance drives the pathological accumulation. Beyond and , other ECM constituents are compromised, including glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and . GAGs, which maintain hydration and matrix organization, show depletion in photoaged skin, with reduced levels of associated proteoglycans like and fibromodulin, exacerbating matrix instability. , a that supports and fibrillogenesis, undergoes fragmentation primarily through MMP-mediated , disrupting its scaffolding role and promoting further ECM disarray. Recent studies from 2023 to 2025 highlight the exacerbating role of (AGEs) in ECM cross-linking during photoaging. UV radiation, combined with or , accelerates AGE formation, which covalently cross-links and fibers, increasing stiffness and inhibiting repair. For instance, glyoxal-derived AGEs with UVB exposure enhance ECM degradation and cross-linking in dermal models, while interventions reducing AGE accumulation have shown improved integrity and reduced wrinkling in UV-irradiated animal skins. These findings underscore AGEs as a modifiable pathway in photoaging progression.

Inflammatory and Immune Responses

(UV) radiation triggers acute inflammatory responses in the skin, primarily through the release of pro-inflammatory s such as interleukin-1 (IL-1) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) from and other resident cells. This surge activates downstream signaling pathways, including , leading to the expression of additional mediators like IL-6 and IL-8, which amplify the inflammatory cascade. Concurrently, UV exposure induces leukocyte infiltration, with neutrophils and macrophages migrating into the to clear damaged cells, contributing to short-term and as part of the skin's immediate defense mechanism. In contrast, chronic UV exposure fosters immunosuppression, characterized by the depletion of Langerhans cells, which are key antigen-presenting cells in the epidermis, reducing the skin's ability to mount effective immune responses. This is accompanied by an increase in regulatory T-cells (Tregs), which suppress effector T-cell activity and promote tolerance to UV-damaged cells, thereby perpetuating a state of immune evasion. Additionally, DNA damage from UV radiation signals through Toll-like receptors (TLRs), particularly TLR4 and TLR7, activating innate immune pathways that further dampen adaptive immunity and link photodamage to broader immunosuppressive effects. These inflammatory and immunosuppressive processes play a central role in photoaging by sustaining low-grade chronic inflammation, which accelerates in fibroblasts and . Persistent cytokine signaling, especially from TNF-α and IL-1, drives the (SASP), releasing matrix-degrading enzymes and additional pro-inflammatory factors that reinforce tissue remodeling and breakdown characteristic of aged . This feedback loop amplifies photoaging hallmarks, such as wrinkle formation and loss of elasticity, by linking immune dysregulation to long-term dermal degeneration. Recent advances from 2023 to 2025 have elucidated the involvement of microbiome alterations in UV-induced , where chronic exposure shifts microbial composition toward pro-inflammatory , exacerbating barrier dysfunction and immune imbalance in photoaged . Furthermore, inflammasome activation has emerged as a key mediator, triggered by UV-generated damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), leading to IL-1β maturation and heightened inflammaging that sustains in photoaged tissues. Studies indicate that modulating pathways can mitigate these effects, highlighting potential therapeutic targets for reversing UV-driven immune perturbations.

Clinical Manifestations

Visible Signs and Symptoms

Photoaging manifests through distinct epidermal changes, including fine wrinkles, dyspigmentation such as solar lentigines and irregular hyper- or , increased roughness, and actinic keratoses presenting as rough, scaly patches. These alterations arise from cumulative (UV) radiation exposure, which disrupts production, epidermal turnover, and function, leading to uneven pigmentation, a textured appearance, and precancerous lesions. For instance, solar lentigines—flat, brown spots—commonly appear on sun-exposed areas due to localized hyperactivity. Actinic keratoses, often precancerous, reflect chronic UV-induced damage to the . Individuals with sun-damaged skin discoloration, such as solar lentigines or irregular hyperpigmentation, should always consult a board-certified dermatologist for evaluation. Dermatologists can diagnose the condition, rule out skin cancer, assess whether the discoloration represents hyperpigmentation or another issue, and determine if a biopsy is necessary. Self-treatment carries risks, including skin irritation, uneven results, or delayed detection of serious conditions like skin cancer. Dermal signs of photoaging include coarse wrinkles, loss of elasticity, and sagging. These features stem from UV-induced degradation of and in the , resulting in diminished resilience. The severity of these signs is commonly assessed using the Glogau scale, a validated classification system that categorizes photoaging into four levels based on wrinkle depth, pigmentation, and texture:
LevelDescriptionTypical Age RangeKey Features
I (Mild)No wrinkles28–35 yearsEarly photoaging with mild pigment changes; no keratoses; minimal or no makeup required.
II (Moderate)Wrinkles in motion35–50 yearsEarly to moderate photoaging with early brown spots and palpable keratoses; smile lines visible; some foundation used.
III (Advanced)Wrinkles at rest50–65 yearsAdvanced photoaging with obvious discolorations, visible capillaries, and keratoses; heavy foundation applied.
IV (Severe)Only wrinkles60+ yearsSevere photoaging with yellow-gray , prior skin damage history, and no normal remaining; makeup cakes and cracks.
Regional variations in photoaging are prominent, with the face showing periorbital fine lines known as crow's feet, the neck exhibiting deep horizontal creases and laxity, and the hands displaying prominent veins, thinning , and age spots due to frequent exposure. and ethnic differences influence presentation: women often report more severe aging perceptions than men, while ethnic groups vary—individuals with lighter skin (e.g., Caucasians) experience earlier fine and coarse wrinkles, whereas those with darker skin (e.g., ) show delayed wrinkling but increased pigmentation irregularities and soft-tissue sagging. Asians typically present with predominant pigmentary changes and mid-face descent, while Latinos exhibit mottled pigmentation and jowl formation. Recent observations from 2023–2025 highlight increased recognition of hand photoaging in middle-aged adults, where dorsal hand signs like brown spots and wrinkles become more noticeable earlier due to unprotected UV exposure, prompting targeted clinical studies on this underappreciated area.

Histopathological Features

Photoaged skin exhibits distinct histopathological alterations primarily in the and , which aid in differentiating it from intrinsically aged skin. In the , chronic UV exposure leads to , resulting in increased epidermal thickness compared to sun-protected areas, where thickness remains relatively stable across age groups. This hyperplastic response is accompanied by the presence of atypical , characterized by nuclear enlargement, hyperchromasia, and loss of polarity, often seen in subclinical actinic damage. Additionally, basilar vacuolization occurs, with cytoplasmic clearing and degeneration in the basal layer due to UV-induced damage to the . The shows profound changes, including solar elastosis, where amorphous, basophilic masses of degraded accumulate in the superficial , replacing normal elastic fibers. bundles appear reduced, fragmented, and disorganized, with decreased staining for types I and III , particularly after the fourth decade in sun-exposed . Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are increased and abnormally distributed in the , often accumulating around vessels and contributing to the altered . These dermal alterations stem from MMP-driven degradation of structural proteins, as detailed in pathophysiological mechanisms. Vascular features in photoaged skin include telangiectasias, manifesting as dilated, tortuous superficial dermal vessels, and perivascular with lymphocytic infiltrates, indicating chronic low-grade . These changes contribute to increased vascular and permeability compared to intrinsically aged skin. Histopathological examination via provides diagnostic utility by distinguishing photoaging from intrinsic aging; photoaged skin demonstrates more pronounced elastosis, , and inflammatory infiltrates, whereas intrinsically aged skin shows dermal with minimal elastosis and flatter rete ridges. This contrast highlights the role of cumulative UV exposure in driving these tissue-level changes.

Natural Protective Mechanisms

Structural Defenses

The skin employs several inherent structural adaptations to counteract ultraviolet (UV) radiation, primarily through modifications in the epidermal architecture that limit UV penetration and absorption. These defenses form a passive physical barrier, reducing the amount of UV that reaches deeper cellular layers and thereby mitigating photoaging damage. Key components include enhancements in the epidermis and pigmentation mechanisms, which collectively attenuate UV exposure without relying on active biochemical processes. A primary structural defense is the thickening of the , particularly the , which acts as the outermost barrier against environmental insults including UV radiation. Acute and chronic UV exposure induces hypertrophy of the through increased proliferation of , leading to epidermal that can reduce UV transmission by up to several fold depending on exposure levels. This proliferation is triggered by UV-mediated activation of the (EGFR), which promotes and migration to replenish damaged layers. Within the , the lower stratum compactum layer becomes more densely packed and cohesive, enhancing overall barrier integrity and further impeding UV diffusion compared to the looser superficial stratum disjunctum. Another critical structural adaptation is the enhancement of melanin pigmentation, which provides broad-spectrum UV absorption. UV radiation stimulates melanogenesis in melanocytes via the release of α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) from , which binds to the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) to upregulate eumelanin production. Eumelanin, the predominant protective pigment, absorbs 50-75% of incident UV radiation, converting it to heat and scattering remaining photons to prevent deeper tissue damage. This pigmentation not only shields underlying and dermal fibroblasts but also correlates with phototypes exhibiting darker constitutive skin tones, offering innate resistance to photoaging progression. Despite these protective mechanisms, structural defenses diminish over time with repeated UV exposure and chronological aging, contributing to the cumulative effects of photoaging. Chronic UV irradiation can impair barrier function by altering organization and structure, leading to increased permeability and reduced efficacy against subsequent exposures. Concurrently, age-related epidermal thinning and loss of proliferative capacity in further erode these barriers, allowing greater UV penetration into the and accelerating matrix degradation.

Biochemical Repair Processes

Biochemical repair processes in the skin counteract (UV)-induced damage central to photoaging by restoring cellular integrity and preventing cumulative harm. (NER) serves as the primary pathway for eliminating UV-generated DNA lesions, such as cyclobutane and 6-4 photoproducts, which distort the DNA and threaten stability. Within NER, the complementation group C (XPC) protein plays a pivotal role in the global genome repair subpathway by recognizing and binding to these helical distortions, initiating the recruitment of repair factors to excise and replace the damaged segment. Impaired NER efficiency, often declining with age, contributes to persistent DNA damage accumulation in photoaged skin, exacerbating mutations and . In cases of irreparable DNA damage, the tumor suppressor protein activates to eliminate compromised , thereby safeguarding tissue from oncogenic transformation during chronic UV exposure. transcriptionally upregulates pro-apoptotic genes like BAX and PUMA while inhibiting anti-apoptotic factors, ensuring in severely affected cells without propagating errors to daughter cells. This -mediated is particularly vital in the , where UV penetration is highest, and its dysregulation in photoaging can lead to survival of mutated cells, promoting premature skin aging phenotypes. Antioxidant systems provide a frontline defense against (ROS) generated by UV radiation, which drive in photoaging. (SOD) enzymatically converts superoxide radicals into , mitigating initial ROS propagation, while and (GPx) further decompose into water and oxygen, preventing and protein oxidation in skin cells. These enzymes are transcriptionally regulated by the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a master regulator that translocates to the nucleus under to bind antioxidant response elements, thereby upregulating SOD, catalase, GPx, and other detoxifying genes like heme oxygenase-1. Nrf2 activation in and fibroblasts enhances resilience to UV-induced ROS, reducing photoaging markers such as fragmentation and elastosis. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors, particularly the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), maintain by counteracting UV-stimulated that degrade dermal during photoaging. TIMP-1 broadly inhibits (MMP-1), gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9), and stromelysins (MMP-3), forming stable complexes that prevent enzymatic cleavage of fibrils essential for skin firmness. TIMP-2 specifically targets MMP-2 activation by binding to its proenzyme form, while TIMP-3 inhibits a wider array including membrane-type MMPs, collectively preserving dermal architecture against UV-triggered . Overexpression of TIMP-1, for instance, has been shown to suppress UVB-induced breakdown, improving skin elasticity and reducing roughness in experimental models of photoaging.

Prevention Strategies

Behavioral Interventions

Behavioral interventions for photoaging prevention emphasize habitual practices that limit (UV) radiation exposure, serving as a primary strategy to mitigate cumulative damage without relying on topical agents. These approaches focus on modifying daily routines to reduce direct contact, thereby slowing the development of wrinkles, pigmentation irregularities, and loss of elasticity associated with chronic UV exposure. Key practices include strategic timing of outdoor activities, environmental modifications, and informed decision-making based on . No amount of unprotected sun exposure is considered completely safe for preventing photoaging, as any UV radiation contributes to cumulative skin damage, including wrinkles, irregular pigmentation, and loss of elasticity. Dermatologists generally advise against deliberate unprotected exposure, even infrequently such as once a month, and recommend minimizing all UV exposure through consistent use of protective measures including shade, protective clothing, and broad-spectrum sunscreen. Brief incidental exposure may be unavoidable in daily life but should be minimized. For vitamin D requirements, reliance on dietary sources or supplements is recommended rather than intentional sun exposure to avoid exacerbating photoaging risks. Sun avoidance constitutes a of these interventions, particularly by restricting outdoor exposure during peak UV intensity hours, typically from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., when UVB rays are most potent. This includes avoiding tanning beds and other artificial UV sources, which can cause similar photoaging effects as natural sunlight. Seeking shade under trees, umbrellas, or architectural structures further diminishes UV penetration, as shaded areas can block up to 50% of direct rays while still allowing indirect exposure that requires additional caution. Complementing these tactics, wearing with ultraviolet protection factor (UPF) ratings—such as UPF 50+ fabrics that block over 98% of UV rays—provides a physical barrier, with tightly woven, dark-colored garments offering superior compared to lighter or loosely woven alternatives. Studies indicate that consistent use of such reduces UV to the skin, thereby lowering the incidence of photoaging markers like solar elastosis. Public health education and policy measures amplify individual adherence by fostering widespread awareness and enforceable guidelines. Campaigns, such as those promoted by the , disseminate information on UV risks through media and school programs, encouraging behaviors like shade-seeking and protective dressing, which have been shown to increase sun-safe practices among adolescents and adults. For outdoor workers, who face heightened exposure risks, guidelines from the U.S. (OSHA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend provisions such as shaded rest areas, scheduled breaks during peak hours, and access to protective attire, which can reduce occupational UV doses by up to 40% when implemented. Monitoring tools empower proactive adjustments, with mobile applications like the EPA's SunWise UV Index app delivering location-specific forecasts to guide activity planning and avoid high-risk periods. Personal UV dosimeters, wearable devices that quantify cumulative exposure, enable users to track daily doses and correlate them with behavioral patterns, promoting sustained adherence; one study found that real-time feedback from such devices increased protective behaviors in young adults by 25% over two weeks. Overall, consistent implementation of these interventions—encompassing avoidance, education, policy support, and monitoring—can reduce photoaging risk by 20-50%, as evidenced by decreased UV exposure and improved skin protection scores in randomized trials, though long-term outcomes depend on adherence levels.

Photoprotective Measures

Photoprotective measures primarily involve the use of topical sunscreens and supplementary agents to block or absorb (UV) radiation, serving as essential secondary prevention strategies against photoaging. Consistent application of broad-spectrum sunscreen, in combination with behavioral interventions such as shade-seeking and protective clothing, is critical to minimize UV exposure given that no unprotected exposure is entirely safe for skin aging prevention. These measures mitigate UV-induced damage to and by reducing exposure to UVA and UVB rays, which accelerate extrinsic aging processes. Sunscreens are categorized into chemical and physical filters based on their mechanisms of action. Chemical sunscreens, such as , absorb UV radiation and convert it to heat, providing effective protection against UVA rays when formulated with stabilizers to prevent . In contrast, physical sunscreens like zinc oxide and reflect and scatter UV rays, offering broad-spectrum coverage with minimal skin penetration and lower risk of irritation, making them suitable for sensitive skin prone to photoaging. Both types are often combined in formulations to achieve optimal protection, with broad-spectrum sunscreens recommended to cover both UVA (measured by PA rating, where PA++++ indicates highest protection) and UVB (measured by SPF, where SPF 30 blocks about 97% of UVB). Proper application is crucial for efficacy, with a standard dosage of 2 mg/cm² required to achieve labeled SPF protection; for an average adult body, this equates to approximately 30 mL per application. Reapplication every two hours, or immediately after or sweating, maintains coverage, while water-resistant formulations extend protection for 40 or 80 minutes depending on the rating. It is recommended to apply broad-spectrum SPF 30+ sunscreen every day, even indoors or on cloudy days, as UVA rays can penetrate windows and up to 80% of UV rays can pass through clouds. Daily use of broad-spectrum sunscreens with SPF 30 or higher has been shown to reduce clinical signs of photoaging, such as fine wrinkles and pigmentation, over long-term periods. Beyond traditional sunscreens, -infused products incorporate compounds like vitamins C and E to neutralize free radicals generated by UV exposure, enhancing overall photoprotection when combined with UV filters. Oral photoprotectors, such as Polypodium leucotomos extract (PLE) at 240 mg twice daily, provide systemic effects that reduce UV-induced , DNA damage, and inflammatory markers associated with photoaging. Recent advances from 2023 to 2025 have focused on nano-based sunscreens, utilizing nanoparticles of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide to improve UV absorption efficiency, texture, and cosmetic elegance while minimizing white cast and irritation. These formulations enhance photostability and bioavailability of active ingredients, offering superior broad-spectrum protection with reduced environmental impact compared to conventional versions. As of 2025, legislative efforts like the SAFE Sunscreen Standards Act, introduced in June 2025, seek to expedite FDA approval of innovative UV filters, potentially enhancing photoprotection options.

Treatment Approaches

Established Therapies

Before initiating any treatment for photoaging, particularly for discoloration or pigmentation irregularities, individuals should consult a board-certified dermatologist. Dermatologists can perform a thorough skin examination to diagnose potential underlying conditions, such as skin cancer, and determine if a biopsy is necessary. They tailor personalized treatment plans based on individual skin type, medical history, and the extent of damage, ensuring safe and effective interventions. Self-treatment with over-the-counter products risks skin irritation, uneven results, or delaying diagnosis of serious issues, whereas professional oversight minimizes these complications. Established therapies for photoaging encompass a range of evidence-based and cosmetic interventions aimed at reversing visible signs such as wrinkles, pigmentation irregularities, and loss of elasticity through targeted epidermal and dermal remodeling. These treatments, including topical agents, chemical peels, mechanical procedures, and systemic supplements, have been validated in clinical studies for their ability to stimulate production, inhibit degradative enzymes, and improve skin texture, with most showing sustained benefits after several months of use. While effective, they often require multiple sessions or consistent application and may involve transient side effects like or redness. Topical retinoids, particularly tretinoin at concentrations of 0.025% to 0.1%, represent a cornerstone treatment for photoaging by promoting epidermal , stimulating new formation in the , and inhibiting matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that degrade components. Clinical trials demonstrate that daily application for 4 to 6 months significantly reduces fine wrinkles, mottled , and sallowness, with histological evidence of increased pro synthesis and reduced collagen breakdown, leading to improved dermal thickness and elasticity lasting up to 24 months. Common side effects include mild , peeling, dryness, burning, and itching, which typically resolve with time or dose adjustment, and the treatment is generally well-tolerated even in sensitive . Chemical peels using (typically 20-70%) or (TCA, 15-35%) provide epidermal resurfacing by inducing controlled exfoliation and , thereby accelerating skin turnover, reducing dyspigmentation, and enhancing deposition in superficial dermal layers. peels, applied in serial sessions every 2-4 weeks, improve photoaged skin texture and fine lines by stimulating renewal and production, while TCA peels penetrate deeper to address actinic damage and mild rhytides, with combination approaches (e.g., priming before TCA) yielding superior outcomes in wrinkle depth and pigmentation. Efficacy is supported by randomized studies showing significant improvement in clinical photoaging parameters after 3-6 treatments, though risks include transient post-inflammatory , particularly in darker skin types. Procedural interventions like microdermabrasion and resurfacing target dermal remodeling to counteract photoaging-induced matrix degradation. Microdermabrasion, involving mechanical abrasion with aluminum oxide crystals or diamond tips in weekly sessions, effectively diminishes fine wrinkles, dullness, and enlarged pores by promoting superficial epidermal turnover and mild stimulation, with clinical trials reporting significant enhancements in brightness and texture after 6 treatments. resurfacing, particularly with ablative CO2 or fractional CO2 systems, vaporizes damaged epidermis and coagulates dermal , triggering neocollagenesis and elastin reorganization; ultra-pulsed or fractional modes achieve wrinkle reduction and improved elasticity in photoaged after 1-3 sessions, with deeper penetration (up to 3,500 µm) enabling effective treatment of rhytides and laxity. These procedures carry risks of and downtime but offer durable results, often lasting 1-2 years. Systemic oral antioxidants, such as a supplement containing marine protein, , grape seed extract, , and extract, mitigate photoaging by neutralizing and supporting integrity from within, with clinical trials demonstrating reduced photodamage and improved skin density after 3-6 months of supplementation. Efficacy data from randomized studies indicate enhanced dermal (up to 57%), particularly in UV-exposed areas, alongside better hydration and . These supplements are safe for long-term use, with minimal gastrointestinal side effects, and complement topical therapies by addressing systemically.

Emerging Interventions

Hydrogel therapies represent a promising advancement in photoaging treatment by enabling sustained release of active compounds such as antioxidants and retinoids directly into the . These biocompatible matrices, including - and -based formulations, enhance penetration and bioavailability compared to conventional creams, leading to improved reduction and preservation. For instance, a multifunctional /β-glucan/cystine loaded with demonstrated high stability, reduced irritation, and superior anti-photoaging effects in preclinical models by promoting proliferation and inhibiting matrix metalloproteinases. Recent reviews of 21 studies confirm that -, -, and -based outperform traditional topical applications in mitigating UV-induced damage, with notable decreases in depth and increased elasticity observed in 2023-2025 investigations. Dietary supplements targeting photoaging focus on bioactive compounds that bolster resilience from within. Oral peptides, derived from hydrolyzed sources, have been evaluated in multiple randomized controlled trials, showing enhancements in hydration, elasticity, and wrinkle reduction after 8-12 weeks of supplementation at doses of 2.5-10 g daily. A of 26 RCTs involving over 1,700 participants reported significant improvements in firmness and reduced photoaging markers, attributed to increased dermal density. Similarly, flavanols from cocoa polyphenols exhibit photoprotective effects by scavenging free radicals and modulating inflammatory pathways; clinical trials indicate that high-flavanol intake (200-320 mg daily) over 12-24 weeks increases the minimal erythema dose (MED), delaying UV-induced and supporting barrier integrity in photoaged individuals. Regenerative technologies are emerging as innovative tools to reverse photoaging through cellular rejuvenation and precision medicine. Stem cell-derived exosomes, particularly from adipose and mesenchymal sources, deliver growth factors and microRNAs that promote synthesis and reduce ; studies on UV-exposed models showed marked attenuation and hydration improvements after topical or injectable application. AI-personalized regimens leverage algorithms to analyze , genetic profiles, and environmental factors, tailoring antioxidant and repair protocols for optimal outcomes in anti-aging care. These systems enhance treatment efficacy by predicting photoaging progression and recommending customized interventions, as demonstrated in 2025 clinical evaluations of AI-driven skincare platforms. Complementing these, plant-based phytochemicals such as (e.g., beta-carotene) and essential fatty acids (e.g., omega-3 from flaxseed) provide defense against UV damage; supplementation trials report reduced photoaging signs through ROS quenching and enhanced epidermal . Nano-interventions offer targeted delivery to combat photoaging at the molecular level, with nanoparticles encapsulating antioxidants for deeper dermal penetration. Polymeric and lipid-based nanocarriers loaded with vitamins C and E or have shown enhanced photoprotection in models, reducing degradation and more effectively than free compounds. (PDT) using photosensitizers like methyl aminolevulinate, combined with nano-enhanced light activation, facilitates reversal of photoaging by stimulating neocollagenesis and clearing senescent cells; ongoing 2024 trials for hand photoaging report improved texture and pigmentation with minimal downtime, building on evidence from treatments. These approaches, including 2024-2025 investigations into nano-antioxidant formulations, underscore potential for non-invasive, site-specific reversal of UV-induced changes.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2630545/
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3789494/
  3. https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/tanning/risks-tanning
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4665475/
  5. https://www.aad.org/public/everyday-care/sun-protection/vitamin-d
  6. https://www.aad.org/public/everyday-care/sun-protection/tanning/no-safe-tan
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11897929/
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/photoaging
  9. https://www.lorealdermatologicalbeauty.com/inter/la-roche-posay/article/mechanisms-of-skin-aging
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3790843/
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2907965/
  12. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=146148
  13. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40257-025-00933-z
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12018068/
  15. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9284/12/4/144
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001731025001000
  17. https://journals.lww.com/njca/fulltext/2024/13020/photoaging_versus_chronological_aging___a.5.aspx
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4926402/
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7852213/
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2909639/
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8611133/
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11626319/
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12024170/
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8069861/
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1011134420305224
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1995595/
  27. https://cancerci.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12935-023-03012-7
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8365893/
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8381358/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9307547/
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022202X20322843
  32. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/phpp.12943
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12181222/
  34. https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258%2824%2901668-5/fulltext
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4292080/
  36. https://www.aad.org/public/cosmetic/age-spots-marks/get-rid-spots
  37. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/age-spots/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20355864
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8407284/
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3482795/
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4756870/
  41. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20241101/Two-topical-treatments-show-similar-benefits-for-photoaging-of-the-hands.aspx
  42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2646001/
  43. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1034/j.1600-0625.2002.110502.x
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661825002737
  45. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1976538-overview
  46. https://ajp.amjpathol.org/article/S0002-9440%2810%2961295-3/fulltext
  47. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0909-752X.2006.00146.x
  48. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.aocd.org/resource/resmgr/jaocd/contents/volume37/37-4.pdf
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4299862/
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17920816/
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4872709/
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3041166/
  53. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/16/23/3978
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11303474/
  55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35645796/
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891584922004658
  57. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22718114/
  58. https://www.jidonline.org/article/S0022-202X%2815%2935556-1/fulltext
  59. https://www.aad.org/public/everyday-care/sun-protection
  60. https://www.skincancer.org/prevention/sun-protection/
  61. https://www.skincancer.org/risk-factors/tanning/
  62. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21332806/
  63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.08.009
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9414157/
  65. https://www.who.int/activities/raising-awareness-on-ultraviolet-radiation
  66. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.569857/full
  67. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/outdoor-workers/about/sun-exposure.html
  68. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/1998-04-16
  69. https://www.epa.gov/enviro/sunwise-uv-index-mobile-app
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8138709/
  71. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/0003-4819-154-3-201102010-00009
  72. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537164/
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8361399/
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3543289/
  75. https://cosmoderma.org/topical-sunscreens-best-practices/
  76. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/understanding-over-counter-medicines/sunscreen-how-help-protect-your-skin-sun
  77. https://www.aad.org/public/everyday-care/sun-protection/sunscreen-patients/sunscreen-faqs
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8252523/
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9854756/
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4345929/
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045653523029727
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12389211/
  83. https://beautymatter.com/articles/safe-sunscreen-standards-act-us-regulation
  84. https://doi.org/10.1097/JW9.0000000000000003
  85. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljad282
  86. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13040
  87. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31603267/
  88. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17083587/
  89. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S50367
  90. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S79447
  91. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144861725013748
  92. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12166275/
  93. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10180699/
  94. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1582946/full
  95. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26581682/
  96. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-024-01993-z
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12085869/
  98. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/18/3/403
  99. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00289-025-05903-3
  100. https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/2/207
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.