Hubbry Logo
Pro-ROC campPro-ROC campMain
Open search
Pro-ROC camp
Community hub
Pro-ROC camp
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Pro-ROC camp
Pro-ROC camp
Pro-ROC camp
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

The pro-Republic of China camp (Chinese: 親中華民國派 or 民國派), or the pro-Kuomintang camp (親國民黨派), is a political alignment in Hong Kong. It generally pledges allegiance to the Republic of China (ROC) in Taiwan and the Kuomintang (Chinese Nationalist Party).

The pro-ROC camp were called "Rightists" and was one of the two major political forces in Hong Kong during the first decades of the post-war period of the British colony of Hong Kong. The pro-ROC camp, who competed with the pro-Communist ("Leftists"), has gradually declined in numbers after the Republic of China's departure from the United Nations in 1971 and the signing of the Sino-British Joint Declaration in 1984 which decided Hong Kong's sovereignty to be handed over to the People's Republic of China (PRC). Today, it is generally aligned with the pro-democracy camp in Hong Kong and the Pan-Blue Coalition in Taiwan led by the Kuomintang.

The pro-ROC camp closely follows the Kuomintang's doctrines, including Sun Yat-sen's Three Principles of the People and the 1992 Consensus of Cross-strait relations. It opposes Taiwan independence and also supports universal suffrage in Hong Kong. The only elected representatives of the pro-ROC camp in the post-handover era are from the Democratic Alliance, of which party chairman Johnny Mak and Shek King-ching occupied seats in the Yuen Long District Council until 2021.

History

[edit]

Pre-war period

[edit]

The support base of the Kuomintang has existed even before the founding of the Republic of China (ROC), as its founding father Sun Yat-sen was a medical student in British Hong Kong in the late 19th century and set up anti-Qing revolutionary organisations in Hong Kong. After the founding of the Republic, Hong Kong pro-Nationalist forces remained their close contact with the Nationalist revolutionary government in Canton. With the Canton's support, the pro-Nationalists and pro-Communists launched the 1922 Hong Kong Seamens' Strike and 1925 Canton–Hong Kong General Strike. In 1927, the pro-Nationalists gained their status as the Nationalist Party became the official government in China until 1949.

Early post-war period

[edit]
Double Ten riots of 1956 was started by the pro-Nationalist triad members.

The Chinese Civil War saw the influx of pro-Kuomintang refugees and former soldiers to Hong Kong who were driven from their homeland by the Communists, and they first settled at refugee centers in Kai Lung Wan.[1] After years of exile and grinding poverty, many of them were steeped in bitterness and yearning for revenge against the Communists. The pro-Kuomintang triad members played a key part in the Double Ten riots, which was escalated from provocations between pro-Nationalist and pro-Communist factions in 1956.[2] A government official ordered that Republic of China flags be removed from the Lei Cheng Uk estate, eventually leading to the riots.[1] After the riots ended, the colonial government decided to move the Nationalists to a more remote spot. This became the most iconic pro-Nationalist neighbourhood Rennie's Mill, which was a Nationalist enclave in the colony until it was redeveloped into the Tseung Kwan O New Town in the 1990s on the eve of the handover of Hong Kong.

Rennie's Mill Middle School in 1995 flying the flag of the Republic of China.

The KMT also subsidized schools in Hong Kong via the Overseas Chinese Affairs Commission, such as the Hong Kong Tak Ming College and Chu Hai College of Higher Education. The British government in Hong Kong did not recognize Chu Hai College's accreditation, so it was instead registered under the Republic of China's Ministry of Education, giving it recognition as if the school were located in Taiwan.[1]

Some Hong Kong newspapers advertised joining the KMT military, and a number of Hong Kong residents signed up and defended Kinmen Island in 1958. Some of these members returned to Hong Kong and joined the Republic of China Veterans' Association, where they gathered at the Red House every National Day.

The political scene in Hong Kong was split into pro-Nationalist and pro-Communist factions in the first decades of the post-war Hong Kong, of which both camps controlled various sectors from labour unions, schools, media to film companies. The largest pro-Nationalist trade unions was the Hong Kong and Kowloon Trades Union Council (TUC) established in 1948, which was the main rival of the pro-Communist Hong Kong and Kowloon Federation of Trade Unions (FTU). The pro-Nationalist forces also owned the Hong Kong Times which was founded in 1949 with an anti-communist stance and was regarded as a Kuomintang party organ.[3] Many major newspapers at that time were also generally pro-Nationalist, such as the Kung Sheung Daily News, Wah Kiu Yat Pao and the Sing Tao Daily which used the Minguo calendar until the 1980s or 90s.[4][clarification needed]

Long decline

[edit]
Pro-ROC supporters holding the flag of the Republic of China during the pro-democracy protest in December 2005.
Obelisk at Sun Yat Sen Commemorative Garden, Tuen Mun

After the Republic of China's departure from the United Nations, the Taipei government lost a great prestige in the Chinese community. The pro-Kuomintang forces also suffered a decline. The signing of the Sino-British Joint Declaration in 1984, which decided Hong Kong's sovereignty to be handed over to the People's Republic of China (PRC), also resulted in diminished numbers of the pro-Taiwan forces. In the 1990s, it saw the two pro-Kuomintang newspapers Hong Kong Times and Hong Kong United Daily closed. The right-leaning Sing Tao Daily also could not be classified as a rightist paper anymore after a political metamorphosis.

The pro-Kuomintang camp also tried to participate in the elections as the colonial government introduced representative democracy in the 1980s but could hardly launch an effective campaign. In 1985, it saw the TUC representative Pang Chun-hoi occupy a seat in the Labour functional constituency along with FTU representative Tam Yiu-chung in the first elected Legislative Council of Hong Kong. Pang was generally aligned with the liberal cause in the legislature and served for three terms until he stepped down in 1995.

In 1994, the pro-Nationalists founded a political party 123 Democratic Alliance to contest in the 1995 first full Legislative Council election. Yum Sin-ling, the leader of the alliance won a seat through an Election Committee composing of District Board members in the last colonial Legislative Council on the eve of the handover.

Since 1997, the pro-ROC camp has become a small faction within the pro-democracy camp. The Democratic Alliance led by Johnny Mak was founded in 2003 and cooperated with pro-democrat legislator Albert Chan in the 2003 District Council election. It was briefly affiliated with the radical democratic party People Power between 2011 and 2012. The other currently active pro-Taiwan political groups include the China Youth Service & Recreation Centre and Hong Kong Chung Shan Research Institute, the local KMT branch. The Hong Kong Chung Shan Research Institute as of 2021 numbers around 2000 members and is run entirely by local cadres.[5]

Political and labour organisations

[edit]

Former political party

[edit]

Former media

[edit]

Notable politicians

[edit]

These Hong Kong politicians were also members of the Kuomintang.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pro-ROC camp

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The pro-ROC camp, also referred to as the pro-Kuomintang or pro-Taiwan camp, constitutes a loose political alignment in of organizations, labor groups, and individuals who pledge loyalty to the Republic of China—governed from —as the legitimate sovereign authority over , in opposition to the and the . This faction traces its origins to the influx of supporters, military personnel, and refugees who arrived in after the Communists' defeat of the Nationalists in the , establishing communities such as Rennie's Mill that preserved Republic of institutions, , and anti-communist ideology amid British colonial neutrality toward the rival Chinese claimants. Ideologically rooted in Sun Yat-sen's —nationalism, democracy, and people's livelihood—the camp historically advocated for the "unification of " under the Republic of China's constitutional framework, viewing the mainland's communist regime as illegitimate and temporary. During the era, it clashed with pro-PRC elements in events like the 1956 Double Tenth riots, sparked by disputes over Republic of China celebrations and escalating into widespread violence that highlighted the imported Chinese civil conflict on soil. In the post-handover period, the camp experienced sharp decline due to assimilation, with the mainland, and Beijing's increasing control, yet maintained cultural activities such as Double Tenth observances until recent suppressions under the 2020 national security law, which prompted many groups to curtail public expressions or dissolve formally. Though numerically marginal today and overshadowed by localist and pro-democracy forces, the pro-ROC camp's persistence underscores a strand of Chinese anti-communist that rejects the 's narrative while upholding the of 's foundational claim to represent the Chinese polity.

Ideology and Principles

Anti-Communist Foundations

The anti-communist foundations of the pro-ROC camp trace back to the , during which the (KMT) under actively opposed the (CCP) following the on April 12, 1927, which purged communist elements from KMT ranks and initiated an all-out anti-communist campaign. This conflict escalated after , culminating in the CCP's victory and establishment of the on October 1, 1949, prompting the KMT-led of government and approximately 2 million nationalists to retreat to . The KMT framed its continued governance in Taiwan as a bulwark against communist expansion, maintaining the ROC's claim to represent all of against what it deemed an illegitimate totalitarian regime. In , these foundations solidified through policies under , declared on May 20, 1949, to counter the threat, including strict suppression of pro-CCP activities, mandatory anti-communist education, and mobilization against Mao Zedong's forces. The regime's enforcement, lasting until July 15, 1987, emphasized ideological opposition to Marxism-Leninism, portraying as a scourge eroding and drawing on the KMT's as an alternative framework rooted in nationalism, democracy, and livelihood. This stance aligned with broader dynamics, fostering U.S. alliances like the 1954 Mutual Defense Treaty to contain in Asia. Overseas, the pro-ROC camp's manifested in communities, particularly among Chinese fleeing the mainland after 1949, who viewed the ROC as the legitimate, non-communist embodiment of Chinese . In regions like and the , these groups formed organizations supporting the ROC, countering CCP propaganda and promoting anti-communist unity, often through cultural and political networks that rejected communist ideology in favor of ROC sovereignty. This transnational extension reinforced the camp's core causal rationale: opposition to the CCP's authoritarian control, evidenced by events like the famine (1958-1962) and (1966-1976), which underscored communism's human costs and validated the ROC's defensive posture.

Support for ROC Legitimacy

The pro-ROC camp asserts the legitimacy of the Republic of China based on its founding as the constitutional successor to the Qing Empire after the Xinhai Revolution, proclaimed on January 1, 1912, in . This establishment marked the end of over two millennia of imperial rule and the adoption of a republican framework under Sun Yat-sen's leadership. The camp emphasizes that the ROC government, despite retreating to in 1949 following defeat in the , preserved institutional continuity, including the 1947 constitution that claims sovereignty over the entirety of . Central to this legitimacy is fidelity to the —nationalism (minzu), (minquan), and people's livelihood (minsheng)—articulated by as the guiding ideology for a modern Chinese state. Pro-ROC adherents argue that the ROC upholds these principles through its constitutional order, contrasting sharply with the People's Republic of China's imposition of communist rule via military conquest in 1949, which lacked broad electoral consent and deviated from republican traditions. In , this ideological commitment manifested among Kuomintang exiles and sympathizers who formed communities preserving ROC allegiance, viewing it as the authentic embodiment of Sun's vision against Marxist-Leninist authoritarianism. Further bolstering ROC legitimacy in the camp's view is Taiwan's since the , culminating in direct presidential elections from onward, which demonstrate effective implementation of democratic governance under the ROC framework. This evolution from authoritarian rule to a vibrant , with freedoms of speech, assembly, and a free press, stands in opposition to the PRC's one-party and suppression of dissent. Historically, the ROC held China's seat in the until , reflecting broad international acknowledgment of its status as the legitimate Chinese government during the mid-20th century. Pro-ROC groups in , such as labor unions and cultural associations tied to KMT networks, have sustained this perspective by commemorating ROC national holidays and advocating for democratic values aligned with Taiwan's model.

Alignment with Chinese Cultural Conservatism

The pro-ROC camp aligns with Chinese cultural conservatism through its support for the Republic of China's policies emphasizing Confucian ethics, familial hierarchy, and the preservation of pre-communist cultural heritage, positioning these as bulwarks against the ideological disruptions of the . This stance reflects a commitment to traditional values like propriety (li), righteousness (yi), integrity (lian), and selflessness (chi), which underpin social harmony and national resilience. Such alignment distinguishes the camp from pro-PRC elements, which historically subordinated cultural traditions to Marxist-Leninist orthodoxy, including the eradication of classical texts and rituals during the from 1966 to 1976. Central to this ideological overlap is the Kuomintang-led , launched on February 19, 1934, by in , which sought to revitalize Confucian morality amid threats from and Japanese aggression. The movement prescribed daily regimens for hygiene, discipline, and ethical conduct, drawing directly from Confucian classics to cultivate a disciplined citizenry capable of resisting ideological subversion; it enrolled over 7 million participants by 1937 and persisted in post-1949 as a foundation for anti-communist cultural education. In , this evolved into the Movement, formalized in 1967 via the Promotion Council for the Chinese Cultural Renaissance, which organized lectures, exhibitions, and school curricula on classical poetry, calligraphy, and rites to counter the PRC's cultural purges—efforts that restored over 1,000 traditional texts and festivals by the . Pro-ROC advocates, particularly in communities and prior to the 1997 handover, extended this conservatism by championing ROC-sponsored cultural institutions that prioritized ancestral veneration, , and meritocratic hierarchies over egalitarian or materialist alternatives. For instance, ROC-backed schools in during the 1950s-1980s integrated Confucian pedagogy to instill loyalty to the , fostering resistance to PRC-influenced . This cultural framework informs the camp's critique of modern liberal shifts, such as expansive , viewing them as erosions of the organic essential to Chinese civilizational continuity.

Historical Development

Pre-War Roots

The pro-ROC camp's ideological foundations originated in the late revolutionary movement against imperial rule, culminating in the establishment of the Republic of China on January 1, 1912, following the of October 10, 1911. , provisional president of the new republic and founder of its governing party (initially the , reorganized as the in 1912), drew significant support from communities, including in , where anti-monarchical sentiments flourished due to the colony's exposure to Western republican ideas. Hong Kong served as a critical base for Sun Yat-sen's activities from the 1890s onward, providing a secure environment under British administration for plotting uprisings and disseminating propaganda. Educated at institutions like the Government Central School (now Queen's College) and the Hong Kong College of Medicine, Sun formed revolutionary networks, including planning the failed Uprising of October 1900 and other attempts to overthrow the Qing. By 1905, he established the mainland-oriented branch of the in , recruiting intellectuals, merchants, and students who later played roles in the . These efforts fostered early republican loyalty among the local Chinese elite, emphasizing national unification, modernization, and rejection of dynastic rule. In the and , amid the Kuomintang's (1926–1928) to unify under the government, Hong Kong's Chinese bourgeoisie and middle class increasingly aligned with KMT , viewing it as a bulwark against fragmentation and Japanese expansionism. Economic boycotts, such as the 1930s "national goods" movement promoting Chinese products over Japanese imports, reflected this support, with local chambers of commerce and newspapers propagating KMT-led anti-imperialist campaigns. Although British authorities restricted overt political organization to maintain neutrality, cultural associations and remittances from sustained the republican cause, laying groundwork for post-war anti-communist consolidation.

Early Post-War Expansion

Following the Kuomintang's (KMT) defeat on the Chinese mainland in 1949, thousands of Nationalist soldiers, officials, businessmen, and intellectuals fled to , significantly bolstering the pro-Republic of (ROC) camp. This influx transformed into a hub for anti-communist Chinese nationalists, with the pro-ROC faction, often labeled "rightists," emerging as one of the territory's two dominant political forces alongside pro-PRC leftists during the initial post-war decades. The British colonial administration tolerated these activities to maintain stability, viewing the pro-KMT presence as a counterbalance to communist influence amid the and tensions. In 1950, the Rennie's Mill area in Tiu Keng Leng became a key settlement for KMT refugees, particularly defeated soldiers and their families who squatted around the abandoned Hongkong Milling Company site near Junk Bay. This enclave, dubbed "Little ," housed thousands and functioned as a self-sustaining pro-ROC stronghold, complete with schools like Rennie's Mill Middle School that promoted Nationalist ideology and Sun Yat-sen's . Community organizations and social networks expanded rapidly, organizing anti-communist rallies, cultural events, and youth groups to preserve Chinese cultural conservatism and ROC legitimacy claims over the mainland. Pro-ROC media outlets proliferated to disseminate KMT-aligned views, including the establishment of newspapers and publications that criticized the while advocating for the ROC's status. Labor unions and merchant associations affiliated with the camp gained traction in industries like shipping and textiles, leveraging refugee capital and networks from pre-1949 . By the mid-1950s, this expansion had solidified the pro-ROC camp's infrastructure, setting the stage for heightened ideological clashes, though British restrictions on overt military activities limited armed operations from bases.

Peak Influence and Conflicts

The pro-ROC camp attained its zenith of influence in during the early , amid a massive influx from following the Communist victory in , which swelled the territory's population from approximately 600,000 in 1945 to an estimated 3 million by 1950. This period saw the establishment of robust anti-communist networks, including rightist labor unions, triad-affiliated groups, and cultural organizations like the Free Association, which propagated ROC legitimacy through schools, media, and community enclaves. A emblematic hub was Rennie's Mill Camp in Tiu Keng Leng, founded in early 1950 by British authorities to resettle ex-Kuomintang soldiers and their families—totaling thousands of staunch ROC loyalists—who formed a self-sustaining "Little " with institutions such as Rennie's Mill Middle School, fostering and anti-CCP sentiment. These structures enabled covert KMT operations, dissemination, and mobilization against perceived communist infiltration, bolstered by tacit U.S. support amid dynamics. Intensifying ideological rivalries with pro-PRC leftist unions and fronts, however, precipitated violent conflicts, including labor strikes and street skirmishes that tested British colonial neutrality under a "firmness without provocation" . Tensions peaked during the Double Tenth Riots of October 10–12, 1956, ignited by pro-ROC triad members protesting colonial restrictions on ROC commemorations of the 1911 Xinhai Revolution's anniversary, escalating into clashes with pro-communist groups that spread across and . The unrest resulted in 60 deaths, over 500 injuries, and widespread property damage, with British forces deploying and troops to suppress the violence, arresting hundreds and deporting key pro-KMT agitators. The riots prompted a diplomatic from the PRC and underscored the fragility of Hong Kong's position, as British authorities, wary of provoking , curtailed KMT activities—including detaining a ROC forced to land in 1956—to preserve amid pressures. These events marked the onset of the pro-ROC camp's erosion, as colonial repression and the riots' fallout fragmented its organizations, deported operatives, and diminished public support, shifting momentum toward pro-PRC elements by the late . Despite this, enclaves like Rennie's Mill persisted as bastions of ROC loyalty into the , though increasingly isolated and viewed by authorities as a "political " due to their potential to ignite further cross-border animosities.

Gradual Marginalization

The pro-ROC camp's influence in waned progressively from the 1970s onward, accelerated by the Republic of China's loss of its seat on October 25, 1971, through Resolution 2758, which seated the (PRC) as the sole representative of and expelled ROC delegates.) This diplomatic reversal undermined the camp's foundational claim to represent legitimate Chinese sovereignty, eroding morale among rightist supporters and reducing recruitment, as global recognition shifted toward the PRC. Concurrently, the aging of the 1949 exile cohort—estimated at tens of thousands of affiliates and sympathizers who had fled to —led to natural attrition, with younger generations increasingly identifying as local Hong Kongers rather than adherents to pan-Chinese ROC nationalism. Colonial authorities further contributed to this marginalization through post-1967 policies emphasizing over ideological contention, effectively sidelining both pro-ROC rightists and pro-PRC leftists in favor of apolitical stability. The PRC's economic opening under Deng Xiaoping's reforms from 1978 onward drew businesses into deepening ties with the mainland, incentivizing pragmatic alignment with and diminishing the appeal of anti-communist ROC loyalty among the commercial elite. Pro-ROC media outlets, such as the Hong Kong Times, ceased operations by 1994 amid falling circulation and financial pressures, reflecting broader erosion of institutional support. The 1984 , formalizing Hong Kong's to PRC sovereignty effective July 1, 1997, intensified the decline by signaling the inevitability of Beijing's dominance, prompting many rightists to emigrate or disengage politically. Symbolic losses mounted, including the removal of the last ROC flag display in Tiu Keng Leng—"Little "—in 1996, a neighborhood once emblematic of the camp's vibrancy. Politically, the 123 Democratic , a pro-ROC grouping led by Patrick Yum Sin-ling, secured one seat in the 1995 elections but disbanded in 2000 after failing to sustain broader appeal amid rising localist sentiments and pro-Beijing consolidation. By the , the camp had contracted to niche cultural preservation efforts, such as the Hong Kong Chung Shan , with negligible influence in electoral or civic spheres.

Organizational Framework

Political Entities

The pro-Republic of China (ROC) camp in developed political entities primarily through labor federations and ad hoc alliances, as formal political parties faced suppression under British colonial policies that prohibited overt branches of both the (KMT) and (CCP). These groups emphasized , recognition of the ROC as China's legitimate government, and limited democratic reforms compatible with colonial structures, often channeling influence via electoral participation in district boards and later legislative bodies after reforms in the 1980s and 1990s. A cornerstone entity was the Hong Kong and Kowloon Trades Union Council (TUC), established in the late 1940s as the largest anti-communist labor federation, rivaling pro-CCP unions like the Federation of Trade Unions. With over 50 affiliated unions by the , the TUC organized workers in key sectors such as transport and manufacturing, using strikes and rallies to counter leftist agitation, including during the 1967 riots where it mobilized against pro-CCP violence. Aligned with the KMT regime in , the TUC promoted ROC symbols and ideology, such as displaying Taiwan's flag during Double Tenth celebrations until restrictions post-1997, and maintained political clout through endorsements in local elections, though its influence waned amid economic shifts and Beijing's growing sway. As indirect elections expanded in 1982 and direct polls in 1991, pro-ROC actors formed electoral alliances to contest seats. The 123 Democratic Alliance, launched in 1994 by Taiwan-educated activist Yum Sin-ling and pro-KMT business figures, secured one seat via an election committee, advocating Taiwan-style reforms and opposition to PRC sovereignty claims. This group exemplified the camp's blend of pro-democracy rhetoric with explicit ROC loyalty, though it dissolved amid low electoral success and the 1997 handover. Smaller entities, including community associations tied to KMT exiles, provided mobilization but lacked sustained parliamentary presence due to voter preferences for moderate pro-Beijing or pan-democratic options. Post-handover, laws enacted in 2020 accelerated the marginalization of these entities; the TUC continues as a diminished labor voice, while explicit pro-ROC parties like the Democratic Alliance (founded 2003, dissolved 2021) held minor district seats until crackdowns, reflecting the camp's shift from overt political contestation to cultural preservation amid 's consolidation of control.

Media and Propaganda Arms

The pro-ROC camp in utilized Chinese-language newspapers as primary vehicles for disseminating Nationalist ideology, countering pro-PRC messaging, and fostering anti-communist sentiment during the colonial era. These outlets emphasized the Republic of China's legitimacy as the rightful government of all , promoted Sun Yat-sen's , and highlighted PRC policy failures, often framing local events like labor disputes or cultural festivals through an anti-communist lens. Circulation was bolstered by readership among exiles, business communities, and conservative intellectuals, though they faced competition from better-funded leftist media subsidized by . Sing Tao Daily, founded in 1938 by , emerged as a flagship pro-ROC publication, aligning with positions pre- and post-1949 by critiquing communist land reforms and supporting Taiwan's economic model. It persisted in using the Minguo calendar—dating from the ROC's 1912 founding—well into the 1980s, symbolizing rejection of the People's Republic's timeline, and covered events like the 1956 Double Tenth Riots favorably toward ROC supporters. Ownership changes in the late 1990s shifted it toward pro-Beijing stances, reflecting broader marginalization of Nationalist voices ahead of the 1997 handover. The Times (Xianggang Shibao), a explicitly pro-Kuomintang daily, operated from the post-war period until its closure in 1994, publishing s that denounced PRC propaganda and advocated for Taiwan's . Similarly, the United Daily maintained a Nationalist line until shutting down in the , amid declining readership and financial pressures from pro-PRC competitors. These papers often reprinted Taiwan-sourced content, including from the Central Daily News, to amplify ROC narratives on issues like the and UN representation. Beyond print, propaganda efforts included pamphlets and radio broadcasts tied to community networks, such as those from Rennie's Mill enclave residents, which distributed anti-communist literature during peak tensions in the and . also played a role, with pro-ROC groups screening Taiwan-produced movies decrying Maoist policies, though lacking dedicated studios, they relied on defections from leftist filmmakers to produce counter-narratives. These arms waned by the as British authorities restricted overt political agitation and economic ties to the mainland grew, leading to and closures.

Labor and Community Networks

The pro-Republic of China (ROC) camp in Hong Kong established a significant presence in the labor sector through the Hong Kong and Kowloon Trade Unions Council (TUC), founded in 1948 by Kuomintang-aligned groups amid the influx of anti-communist refugees following the Chinese Civil War. This council functioned as the principal counterweight to the pro-communist Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions (HKFTU), organizing workers across industries such as stevedoring, textiles, and manufacturing, where it advocated for improved wages and conditions while embedding anti-communist ideology. By the 1950s, the TUC represented dozens of affiliated unions, drawing membership from the estimated 100,000 to 200,000 mainland Chinese émigrés who supported the ROC government in Taiwan, and it actively participated in labor disputes, including strikes that aligned with broader rightist political goals. The organization's loyalty to the Kuomintang was evident in its support for Taiwan's positions, such as during textile industry crises in the 1950s, where it backed ROC economic policies against mainland competition. Community networks bolstered the pro-ROC camp's influence, particularly through affiliations with anti-communist Chinese benevolent societies, associations, and kaifong (neighborhood) committees that provided welfare services to refugees and promoted aligned with ROC values. These groups, often rooted in pre-1949 mainland ties, distributed aid, organized education on Sun Yat-sen's , and mobilized support during confrontations with pro-PRC elements, such as the 1956 Double Tenth riots. For instance, rightist community organizations collaborated with the TUC to extend labor protections into informal sectors, fostering loyalty among working-class families displaced by the communist victory on the mainland. Over time, these networks declined as colonial authorities prioritized stability, co-opting some kaifong groups into government advisory roles by the 1970s, which diluted their overt pro-ROC activism while preserving underlying anti-communist sentiments.

Key Events and Controversies

1956 Double Tenth Riots

The 1956 Double Tenth Riots erupted on October 10, 1956, coinciding with the Republic of China's National Day, amid heightened tensions between pro-Republic of China (ROC) nationalists and pro-People's Republic of China (PRC) communists in British colonial Hong Kong. Pro-ROC groups, aligned with the Kuomintang (KMT), organized flag-hoisting ceremonies and parades to commemorate the event, which provoked counter-demonstrations and clashes with pro-PRC elements and colonial police enforcing restrictions on such displays. The violence began in Kowloon when pro-ROC participants attempted to raise the ROC flag during a street procession, leading to arrests that escalated into widespread unrest, including attacks on police stations, looting, and arson. The riots spread to and other areas, resulting in 59 deaths and over 440 injuries, marking one of the most destructive episodes of in Hong Kong's colonial history up to that point. British authorities deployed the 7th Hussars and imposed the colony's first-ever curfew on October 11, restoring order within days through military patrols and mass arrests. Colonial reports attributed the instigation primarily to pro-KMT agitators, many of whom were recent immigrants from the mainland, who exploited the occasion to challenge both communist rivals and British oversight of political activities. In the aftermath, the government deported several pro-ROC leaders and intensified surveillance on nationalist organizations, while the PRC lodged diplomatic protests accusing the British of favoritism toward KMT elements. The events highlighted the pro-ROC camp's capacity for mobilization in 's divided Chinese community but also exposed its vulnerabilities, as the riots alienated some local residents and prompted colonial crackdowns that marginalized overt KMT activities thereafter. Economic disruptions from the violence, including damage to shops and factories, further underscored the costs of factional strife during the proxy conflicts in the colony.

Clashes with Pro-PRC Forces

The ideological divide between pro-Republic of China (ROC) nationalists and pro-People's Republic of China (PRC) communists in colonial frequently manifested in street-level violence during the and , as both camps vied for influence over Chinese immigrant communities, labor unions, and educational institutions. These skirmishes often involved attacks on rival party offices, outlets, and schools, with pro-ROC groups targeting communist bookstores and leftist gatherings to disrupt PRC influence, while pro-PRC militants retaliated against perceived nationalist strongholds. Such incidents, though sporadic, underscored the colony's role as a proxy battleground for the unresolved , with British authorities intermittently intervening to maintain order but tolerating limited by anti-communist elements aligned with the status quo. The most extensive clashes beyond isolated brawls erupted amid the 1967 riots, which began as a at a factory in May but rapidly escalated under pro-PRC orchestration, inspired by Mao Zedong's and supported logistically from across the border. Pro-PRC forces, including union militants and students from leftist schools, deployed over 1,000 homemade bombs, pipe bombs, and petrol bombs, resulting in 51 deaths—mostly civilians and police—and approximately 800 injuries, alongside widespread and intimidation campaigns targeting non-leftist businesses. Pro-ROC organizations, including Kuomintang-affiliated networks and allied triad societies, mobilized in defense of the colonial government, engaging in direct counterattacks on pro-PRC assembly points, union halls, and rioters, which contributed to the suppression of the unrest by August after the arrest of over 5,000 leftist activists. These confrontations highlighted the pro-ROC camp's strategic alignment with British rule against perceived communist subversion, though they also exposed internal vulnerabilities, as triad involvement occasionally blurred lines between ideological defense and opportunistic criminality. By late , the decisive defeat of the pro-PRC uprising—marked by the flight of key leftist leaders to the mainland—temporarily diminished overt PRC agitation, but simmering tensions persisted in subtler forms, such as proxy battles in schools where pro-ROC students disrupted communist efforts. Colonial records indicate that such violence waned as eroded grassroots support for radical ideologies on both sides.

Colonial Era Repression and Co-optation

The 1956 Double Tenth Riots, sparked by pro-ROC nationalists protesting a incident during Republic of China celebrations on October 10, led to widespread violence including attacks on pro-PRC targets and clashes with police, resulting in 59 deaths, over 400 injuries, and thousands of arrests. The British colonial administration responded by declaring a , deploying military forces, and targeting Kuomintang-linked groups such as the Three Principles Youth Groups for their role in instigating the unrest. In the aftermath, authorities arrested hundreds of rightist activists, deported several KMT operatives to , and imposed bans on training and unauthorized political assemblies to curb subversive activities. This repression extended beyond immediate , as the government pursued a policy of strategic neutrality toward both KMT and CCP factions to navigate pressures from and , while prioritizing territorial stability. Pro-ROC organizations faced ongoing surveillance and restrictions on open propaganda, with the colonial monitoring their activities to prevent escalation that could invite PRC intervention. By the , following the 1967 pro-CCP riots, the administration further marginalized political extremism from both sides, dissolving militant rightist cells and prohibiting their involvement in labor disputes or anti-communist . Co-optation efforts complemented repression, as British officials incorporated anti-communist Chinese elites—often sympathetic to ROC ideals—into advisory structures to bolster administrative legitimacy and counter leftist influence. Figures from pro-ROC business and community networks were appointed to the Urban Council, Executive Council, and kaifong (neighborhood) associations, where they channeled nationalist sentiments into depoliticized welfare and anti-crime initiatives rather than irredentist agitation. This integration allowed tolerance for cultural expressions of veneration and Three Principles education in select schools, provided they remained subordinate to colonial oversight and avoided direct challenges to British rule. Over time, such measures diluted the pro-ROC camp's , transforming it from a confrontational force into a co-opted pillar of the colonial order amid Hong Kong's economic prioritization in the .

Notable Individuals

Political Leaders

Pang Chun-hoi (1921–2003) served as a prominent labor leader and political representative aligned with the pro-ROC camp, heading the Cotton Industry Workers' General Union and acting as vice-president of the Hong Kong and Trades Union Council (TUC), a federation sympathetic to doctrines and opposing pro-PRC unions. His election to the in September 1985 via the labor functional constituency represented a key achievement for pro-ROC elements, reflecting their influence in working-class networks despite broader marginalization under colonial policies balancing factions. Lee Kwok-keung chaired the TUC during periods of heightened camp activity, overseeing its operations as the third-largest union federation and a counterweight to the pro-PRC Federation of Trade Unions, with advocacy rooted in anti-communist labor organizing that echoed Republic of China principles. The TUC, established in , facilitated political mobilization through strikes and community efforts, though formal electoral gains remained limited until indirect representation expanded. In the 1990s, Yum Sin-ling founded the 123 Democratic Alliance, a short-lived pro-Taiwan grouping that secured a seat in the 1995 elections, positioning itself as a defender of ROC heritage amid handover anxieties; the party dissolved by 2000, with Sin-ling emigrating to the . These leaders operated within constraints of colonial non-partisan and post-1949 dynamics, prioritizing union-based influence over mass parties, as overt affiliation risked British repression to maintain neutrality with .

Intellectuals and Exiles

Following the Kuomintang's retreat to in , numerous Chinese intellectuals sympathetic to the Republic of China (ROC) fled to , where British colonial rule provided relative safety from communist reprisals. These exiles, often former educators, writers, and scholars disillusioned with the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) , formed intellectual networks that bolstered the pro-ROC camp's ideological resistance. Many settled in enclaves like Rennie's Mill, a established around 1950 that evolved into a pro-Kuomintang stronghold known as "Little ," hosting schools and cultural institutions dedicated to preserving Republican-era values and anti-communist narratives. Intellectuals in these communities contributed to publications and educational efforts promoting ROC legitimacy, such as journals critiquing CCP policies and advocating for democratic constitutionalism rooted in Sun Yat-sen's Three Principles of the People. For instance, figures like Gu Mengyu, a liberal intellectual and former Kuomintang vice president who resided in Hong Kong after 1949 until his death in 1972, exemplified this strand by bridging Republican traditions with anti-communist advocacy, though his third-force leanings critiqued KMT authoritarianism. Similarly, Cheng Siyuan, a Hong Kong-based activist and associate of exiled Kuomintang leader Li Tsung-jen, engaged in third-force initiatives that emphasized anti-communism while operating from Hong Kong as a base for influencing overseas Chinese opinion. These exiles' activities extended to cultural preservation, including efforts to maintain memorials and Republican symbols amid colonial-era tensions with pro-CCP elements. However, their influence waned as Hong Kong's pro-ROC camp faced internal divisions and external pressures, with many intellectuals eventually relocating to or the West by the 1960s and 1970s. Unlike mainland academics often aligned with CCP narratives post-1949, these figures prioritized empirical critiques of communist governance, drawing on pre-1949 experiences of and under both KMT and CCP regimes.

Cultural Figures

Ni Kuang (1935–2022), a Hong Kong-based renowned for his and novels, emerged as a leading anti-communist voice within the pro-ROC camp, producing over 300 works that critiqued and PRC policies. Fleeing the mainland in 1957, he contributed to and explicitly equated patriotism with opposition to the , stating in interviews that resisting communism constituted true loyalty to Chinese heritage—a stance resonant with ROC claims to legitimacy over the mainland. Teresa Teng (1953–1995), a Mandarin pop singer of immense popularity across and greater Chinese communities, bolstered pro-ROC cultural sentiments through patriotic performances, including the "Ode to the Republic of China," which praised ROC governance and anti-communist resilience during the era. Born to ROC military parents in , her music symbolized free Chinese identity, broadcast via ROC propaganda to counter PRC influence, and her 1989 Concert for Democracy in China further aligned her with opposition to communist rule. These figures helped sustain ROC-aligned cultural narratives in colonial by embedding anti-communist themes in literature and music, fostering community loyalty to Taiwan's government amid ideological clashes with pro-PRC elements. Their works emphasized traditional values and republican ideals, contrasting with mainland cultural upheavals like the .

Decline Factors and Criticisms

Economic and Political Pressures

The British colonial government in prohibited the formal establishment of (KMT) branches and restricted related political activities to preserve neutrality between the (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC) during the era. This policy, enforced through laws against subversive organizations, curtailed the pro-ROC camp's ability to function as a cohesive political entity, confining their influence to informal networks, cultural associations, and limited public rallies such as Double Tenth celebrations. Following clashes like the 1956 Double Tenth Riots and the 1967 leftist unrest, authorities intensified surveillance and occasional arrests of pro-ROC activists perceived as threats to public order, further discouraging overt mobilization and fostering a climate of within the camp. Economically, the PRC's 1978 reform and opening-up policies transformed into the primary conduit for foreign investment into the mainland, with Hong Kong-origin firms accounting for over 70% of realized by the early 1990s. Pro-ROC individuals and businesses, often ideologically opposed to communist , faced systemic barriers to accessing these opportunities, as PRC officials prioritized partnerships with pro-Beijing elites who demonstrated loyalty through political alignment. This dynamic prompted a shift among Hong Kong's tycoons—such as , who joined drafting committees—toward accommodating Beijing, depriving the pro-ROC camp of erstwhile financial patrons and eroding its socioeconomic base among merchants and professionals who prioritized mainland market access over anti-communist principles. These pressures compounded as the 1984 signaled the 1997 handover, prompting emigration among pro-ROC families to or Western countries; between 1984 and 1997, net outflows exceeded 500,000 residents, disproportionately affecting ideologically committed anti-PRC communities. The resulting demographic and resource drain weakened institutional continuity, with remaining adherents increasingly isolated from Hong Kong's youth, who benefited from cross-border and viewed ideological rigidities as impediments to prosperity.

Internal Divisions

The pro-ROC camp in has historically featured divisions between hardline (KMT) loyalists, who emphasized anti-communist ideology and the eventual unification of under the Republic of China, and more pragmatic factions focused on local governance and adaptation to colonial rule. These tensions emerged prominently in the post-1949 period, as KMT exiles clashed internally over strategies for confronting pro-PRC elements without alienating British authorities, leading to fragmented organizations like the Chinese Reform Association and the Civic Association, which competed for influence rather than unifying under a single banner. Generational rifts further exacerbated these splits, with first-generation refugees from the mainland adhering rigidly to KMT directives from , while Hong Kong-born descendants in the 1970s and 1980s increasingly viewed ROC loyalty as secondary to preserving local freedoms amid growing economic ties to the PRC. This shift contributed to declining mobilization, as evidenced by the failure of the 123 Democratic Alliance—founded in 1994 by pro-ROC activist Yum Sin-ling to contest elections—which disbanded in 2000 after poor electoral performance and internal financial disputes, underscoring organizational disunity and inability to attract mass support beyond niche anti-communist circles. By the late 1990s, ideological evolution deepened divisions, with some groups pivoting from explicit KMT partisanship to broader advocacy for Sun Yat-sen's and democratic republicanism, fostering tentative alliances with Hong Kong's pan-democratic movement. However, this adaptation alienated purists who saw it as diluting the camp's core mission of opposing PRC sovereignty, resulting in further fragmentation and reduced political coherence ahead of the 1997 handover.

External Suppression by PRC

The PRC has systematically undermined pro-ROC elements in through united front tactics, media influence, and legal mechanisms, viewing such sentiments as a challenge to its claims over both territories. During the pre- era, PRC-aligned entities conducted campaigns and loyalty competitions targeting KMT sympathizers, leveraging underground networks to marginalize pro-ROC activities amid rivalries. Post-1997 handover, these efforts intensified via economic and political pressures, contributing to the decline of pro-ROC institutions without overt violence but through co-optation and isolation. Pro-ROC media outlets, key to disseminating alternative narratives, were particularly vulnerable. The Hong Kong Times, a pro-Taiwan publication using Republican calendar dating, closed in 1994 amid financial strains linked to shifting political winds. Similarly, Sing Tao Daily—historically sympathetic to ROC views—was sold in 1998 to a pro-Beijing consortium, altering its editorial stance. These transitions aligned with PRC strategies to control information flows and erode pro-ROC cultural influence in society. Politically, pro-ROC groups faced marginalization post-handover. The 123 Democratic Alliance for Social Progress, a pro-Taiwan party that secured one seat in 1995, disbanded in 2000 after electoral irrelevance, exacerbated by PRC-backed establishment dominance and the erosion of colonial-era tolerances for anti-CCP expression. Symbols of pro-ROC heritage, such as the Red House in —a KMT-era commemorative site—have been threatened with demolition since 2016 by mainland Chinese owners, reflecting indirect PRC leverage over property and cultural preservation. The 2020 National Security Law (NSL), imposed directly by Beijing's National People's Congress Standing Committee on June 30, 2020, marked an escalation, with Article 29 criminalizing collusion with foreign entities—including Taiwanese organizations—perceived as undermining PRC authority. This prompted severe censorship of Taiwan-related discourse, severance of official Hong Kong-Taiwan links (e.g., abrupt closure of Hong Kong's Taipei Economic and Trade Office in May 2021), and self-censorship among remaining pro-ROC sympathizers to avoid subversion charges. Such measures have effectively neutralized organized pro-ROC activities, framing them as extensions of "foreign interference" despite their historical roots in anti-CCP rather than separatist ideologies.

Contemporary Relevance

Post-Handover Adaptation

Following the 1997 handover of to the (PRC), the pro-Republic of (ROC) camp experienced a marked decline in public visibility and political influence, as overt displays of allegiance to became untenable under the new sovereignty. Pro-Kuomintang media outlets, such as the Hong Kong Times, had already ceased operations by 1994, and remaining symbols like the last ROC flag in Tiu Keng Leng village were lowered in 1996, signaling pre-handover pressures that intensified afterward. Political groups faced dissolution or marginalization; for instance, the 123 Democratic Alliance, led by Yum Sin-ling, failed to retain its seat and disbanded in 2000, with Yum emigrating to the in 1999. In response, surviving elements adapted by pivoting to low-profile, cultural, and community-oriented activities to preserve ROC-associated heritage without direct confrontation. Commemorations of ROC national holidays, such as the Double Tenth () anniversary of the , shifted to private venues like restaurants and community halls, with occasional public gatherings at sites like the Red House in , a historical building linked to . Organizations such as the Hong Kong Chung Shan Research Institute and the China Youth Service and Recreation Centre emphasized conservation of 's legacy, framing it as cultural rather than political advocacy. These groups also engaged in discreet support for Taiwan's elections, campaigning for candidates among an estimated 4,000 Hong Kong members as of 2016. Electorally, the camp maintained a minimal presence through small pro-ROC parties like the Democratic Alliance, which focused on local district issues rather than overt Taiwan advocacy. Figures such as Johnny Mak Ip-shing, associated with the Democratic Alliance, prioritized student services and community work in areas like , avoiding mainstream political platforms where pro-ROC stances risked exclusion. This adaptation reflected broader constraints, including threats to heritage sites—the Red House faced potential demolition after its 2016 purchase by a owner—compelling the camp to operate in niches insulated from PRC scrutiny. While influence waned amid rising localism and pro-PRC dominance, these strategies sustained a subdued network tied to sympathies.

Alliances with Pro-Democracy Elements

The pro-ROC camp in has pursued tactical alliances with pro-democracy elements through joint opposition to encroachment by the , emphasizing shared commitments to and electoral reforms despite divergent long-term goals on unification. Pro-ROC advocates, rooted in exile networks, have supported and participated in demonstrations calling for greater democratic accountability, viewing such efforts as steps toward a governed by the rather than rule. These alignments emerged prominently in the post-handover era, where pro-ROC groups cooperated with pan-democrats on platforms critiquing Beijing's erosion of 's autonomy under the . A key example is the 123 Democratic Alliance, founded in the early 1990s by Taiwan-educated activist Yum Sin-ling, which contested legislative elections in 1995 and advocated pro-democracy positions alongside allegiance to the Republic of China. The group, drawing from pro-Taiwan business and intellectual circles, aligned with broader calls for electoral openness while promoting KMT ideals, securing a seat for Yum before her emigration to the in 1999. Similarly, figures like district councillor Mak Ip-shing have maintained pro-ROC advocacy while engaging in local democratic activism in areas such as , including support for KMT candidates in Taiwanese elections attended by around 4,000 Hong Kong-based members as of 2016. Such alliances manifested in attendance at pro-democracy rallies, where pro-ROC participants expressed against PRC policies, though tensions arose over ideological differences—pro-ROC unificationism clashing with localist sentiments. Incidents like the 2012 at residences of PRC officials by a pro-Taiwan individual underscored the camp's militant anti-CCP fringe, yet overall cooperation focused on nonviolent advocacy for democratic . These partnerships waned after the 2020 National Security Law, which suppressed cross-factional , but they highlighted causal convergence: mutual recognition that PRC dominance threatened both Hong Kong's freedoms and the ROC's legitimacy.

Impact of National Security Law

The Hong Kong National Security Law, enacted by the Standing Committee of the on June 30, 2020, has profoundly restricted public expressions of support for the Republic of China (ROC), interpreting such activities as potential or with foreign entities under Articles 18–23 of the law, which prohibit , , , and with foreign forces. Pro-ROC advocates, who historically viewed the ROC as the legitimate and as a democratic model, faced heightened scrutiny, as their promotion of ROC sovereignty or symbols was reframed by authorities as threats to national unity under the (PRC). This led to a sharp decline in organized activities, with police invoking the law to investigate and prosecute perceived endorsements of alternative Chinese governance structures. A key impact was the effective prohibition of Double Tenth (October 10) celebrations, which commemorate the ROC's founding in 1911 and had been a longstanding tradition among Hong Kong's pro-ROC community, often involving flag-raising and cultural events at schools and private gatherings. In 2021, authorities warned against such observances, citing risks under the NSL, resulting in widespread cancellations; for instance, traditional events at pro-ROC affiliated institutions were halted amid fears of arrest for displaying ROC flags or banners. Subsequent years saw no public Double Tenth activities, with participants from prior events facing surveillance or warnings, contributing to self-censorship among remaining supporters. Arrests under the NSL have targeted individuals and networks with connections, including those echoing pro-ROC sentiments through advocacy for democratic reforms modeled on . On July 10, 2025, Hong Kong national security police arrested four males aged 15 to 47 for alleged conspiracy to subvert state power via a -based organization promoting Hong Kong , with evidence including online and ROC-related materials seized during raids. Such cases, part of over 290 NSL-related arrests by mid-2024, have deterred pro-ROC networking, as authorities equate linkages with foreign collusion punishable by up to . The law prompted the exile of pro-ROC figures and sympathizers to , where some sought asylum after participating in groups advocating ROC governance restoration or anti-PRC unification under . By 2022, hundreds of Hong Kong dissidents, including those with pro-ROC leanings, had relocated, forming networks that continue advocacy from afar but face Hong Kong bounties under expanded NSL extraterritorial provisions. This emigration wave, accelerated post-2020, eroded the camp's domestic presence, with surviving members operating underground or disengaging to avoid prosecution.

References

  1. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00977004241290138
  2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233060340_Strategy_for_Survival_The_Cold_War_and_Hong_Kong%27s_Policy_Towards_Kuomintang_and_Chinese_Communist_Activities_in_the_1950s
  3. https://journals.lwbooks.co.uk/tcc/vol-2022-issue-22/article-9588/
  4. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/making-of-leaderful-mobilization/context/C1054D353F2C6EDBC754B8EBE222E84E
  5. https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/canceled-09232021140537.html
  6. https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/article/2114900/old-soldiers-hopes-one-china-grow-double-tenth-celebration-hong-kong-draws
  7. https://hklabourrights.org/news/history-will-remember-hkctus-legacy/
  8. https://taiwantoday.tw/AMP/politics/taiwan-review/7068/kuomintang-versus-communism
  9. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/chinese-rev
  10. https://taiwantoday.tw/AMP/politics/taiwan-review/4930/anti-communist-road-to-freedom
  11. https://oftaiwan.org/history/white-terror/martial-law/
  12. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1953-1960/taiwan-strait-crises
  13. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1409172
  14. https://economia.uniroma2.it/ba/globalgovernance/corso/asset/YTo0OntzOjI6ImlkIjtzOjQ6IjIyMDYiO3M6MzoiaWRhIjtzOjU6IjYyMDc5IjtzOjI6ImVtIjtOO3M6MToiYyI7czo1OiJmZGU3ZSI7fQ==
  15. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/thoughts-on-the-republic-of-china-and-its-significance/
  16. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-significance-of-the-republic-of-china-for-cross-strait-relations/
  17. https://hongkongfp.com/2017/02/26/hong-kongs-pro-taiwan-camp-kuomintang-exiles-conservers-sun-yat-sens-heritage/
  18. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=wilj
  19. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12646
  20. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2019/07/28/2003719466
  21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2054509
  22. https://www.roc-taiwan.org/us_en/post/4531.html
  23. https://globaltaiwan.org/2022/12/bringing-taiwan-to-an-international-audience-an-overview-of-taipeis-cultural-policy/
  24. https://hk.history.museum/en/web/mh/exhibition/2003_past_02.html
  25. https://www.sunyatsenhistoricaltrail.hk/
  26. https://www.discoverhongkong.com/us/explore/culture/dr-sun-yat-sen-historical-trail.html
  27. https://hk.drsunyatsen.museum/en/web/sysm/exhibitions.html
  28. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03068374.2019.1636515
  29. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstreams/bde0d71c-9448-41e2-b425-08cd0e2533e8/download
  30. https://varsity.com.cuhk.edu.hk/index.php/2011/12/kmt-in-hk/
  31. https://www.scmp.com/article/639003/not-so-run-mill
  32. https://zolimacitymag.com/hong-kongs-industrial-history-part-viii-the-ill-fate-of-rennies-mill-aka-little-taiwan/
  33. https://industrialhistoryhk.org/rennies-mill-the-origin-and-evolution-of-a-special-enclave-in-hong-kong/
  34. https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1088478/memories-haven-nationalists
  35. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698249908402424
  36. https://www.academia.edu/27780250/Strategy_for_survival_The_cold_war_and_Hong_Kongs_policy_towards_Kuomintang_and_Chinese_communist_activities_in_the_1950s
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385324529_The_KMT_versus_the_CCP_Dueling_Chinese_Nationalisms_and_the_Politics_of_Colonial_Rule_During_Hong_Kong%27s_1956_Riots
  38. https://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/article/2025663/what-sparked-hong-kongs-double-tenth-riots
  39. https://www.globalmediajournal.com/open-access/whose-sound-and-fury-the-1967-riots-of-hong-kong-through-the-times.php?aid=35130
  40. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-16517764
  41. https://apjjf.org/2020/24/chan
  42. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/edcoll/9789047428817/Bej.9789004175372.i-270_007.pdf
  43. https://www.scmp.com/article/126544/paper-revamped-hk-bid
  44. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/730604
  45. https://sk.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/embed/socialmovement/chpt/communist-movement-media-1950s-1960s-hong-kong
  46. https://naarb.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Leung-Chiu-1989.pdf
  47. https://www.pcint.org/07_TP/005/005-china.htm
  48. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0023656X.2025.2456795
  49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2644656
  50. https://www.economist.com/china/2021/08/21/hong-kongs-government-is-crushing-the-citys-pro-democracy-unions
  51. https://www.qrhmuseum.com/the-hong-kong-riots-of-1956-7th-hussars
  52. https://hongkongfp.com/2024/06/17/hong-kongs-worst-ever-riots-read-the-history/
  53. http://www.icwa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/GCD-6.pdf
  54. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-08-16/hong-kong-protests-1960s-chaos-could-teach-what-should-come-next
  55. https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/hongkong-history-08012022151908.html
  56. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/political-censorship-in-british-hong-kong/patriotism-to-you-can-be-revolutionary-heresy-to-us-hardened-control-of-media-schools-and-entertainment/4565683826540447119A5E63538D3895
  57. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/chapter-one-_-hong-kong-in-the-shadow-of-china.pdf
  58. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/making-of-leaderful-mobilization/making-of-a-liberal-oligarchy/447049BFE874E46F62CFB71A57E789BE
  59. https://hkupress.hku.hk/image/catalog/pdf-preview/9789622099302.pdf
  60. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA353083.pdf
  61. https://taiwanfellowship.ncl.edu.tw/files/scholar_publish/2111-muuehpepkgezdsg.pdf
  62. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/polo-34.pdf
  63. https://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/17531
  64. https://nspirement.com/2019/10/29/hong-kong-writer-ni-kuang-being-anti-ccp-is-true-patriotism2.html
  65. https://chinaheritage.net/journal/you-cant-rebel-you-cant-start-a-revolution-and-you-cant-be-independent-how-ni-kuang-saw-the-future-of-hong-kong/
  66. https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/news/4587960
  67. https://www.asianstudies.org/publications/eaa/archives/prodigy-of-taiwan-diva-of-asia-teresa-teng/
  68. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/17/world/asia/hong-kong-ban-independence-party.html
  69. https://newleftreview.org/issues/i87/articles/jon-halliday-hong-kong-britain-s-chinese-colony
  70. https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=scholarlyworks
  71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837796000294
  72. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/hongkong-protests-tycoons/
  73. https://ash.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/overholt_hong_kong_paper_final.pdf
  74. https://www.promarket.org/2023/11/06/the-decay-of-hong-kongs-liberal-political-economy/
  75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265618252_Underground_Front_The_Chinese_Communist_Party_in_Hong_Kong
  76. https://apjjf.org/2022/16/wu
  77. https://isdp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Asia-Paper-HK-Oct-2023-Final-23rd-October.pdf
  78. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/hong-kong-freedoms-democracy-protests-china-crackdown
  79. https://hongkongfp.com/2025/07/10/hong-kong-nat-security-police-arrest-4-aged-15-to-47-for-alleged-subversion-via-taiwan-based-group/
  80. https://www.chinafile.com/tracking-impact-of-hong-kongs-national-security-law
  81. https://www.mercatornet.com/taiwan-needs-to-accept-freedom-loving-dissidents
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.