Hubbry Logo
ProboscisProboscisMain
Open search
Proboscis
Community hub
Proboscis
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Proboscis
Proboscis
Proboscis
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A syrphid fly using its proboscis to reach the nectar of a flower

A proboscis (/proʊˈbɒsɪs, -kɪs/) is an elongated appendage from the head of an animal, either a vertebrate or an invertebrate. In invertebrates, the term usually refers to tubular mouthparts used for feeding and sucking. In vertebrates, a proboscis is an elongated nose or snout.

Etymology

[edit]

First attested in English in 1609 from Latin proboscis, the latinisation of the Ancient Greek προβοσκίς (proboskis),[1] which comes from πρό (pro) 'forth, forward, before'[2] + βόσκω (bosko), 'to feed, to nourish'.[3][4] The plural as derived from the Greek is proboscides, but in English the plural form proboscises occurs frequently.

Invertebrates

[edit]

The most common usage is to refer to the tubular feeding and sucking organ of certain invertebrates such as insects (e.g., moths, butterflies, and mosquitoes), worms (including Acanthocephala, proboscis worms) and gastropod molluscs.

Mosquitoes

[edit]

Mosquitoes use their proboscis to suck up blood. Only the female mosquitoes take blood meals.[5] Male proboscis are not strong enough to break human skin.[6] Both female and male mosquitoes can feed on fruit and flower nectars.[6] Their proboscis is sharp when examined on a molecular level; this feature has been used to research modifications to syringes and various medical equipment.[7]

Acanthocephala

[edit]
Scanning electron microscopy of proboscis of an Acanthocephala[8]

The Acanthocephala, the thorny-headed worms or spiny-headed worms, are characterized by the presence of an eversible proboscis, armed with spines, which they use to pierce and hold the gut wall of their host.

Lepidoptera mouth parts

[edit]
Convolvulus hawk-moth (Agrius convolvuli) feeding with extended proboscis

The mouth parts of Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) mainly consist of the sucking kind; this part is known as the proboscis or 'haustellum'. The proboscis consists of two tubes held together by hooks and separable for cleaning. The proboscis contains muscles for operating. Each tube is inwardly concave, thus forming a central tube up which moisture is sucked. Suction takes place due to the contraction and expansion of a sac in the head.[9] A specific example of the proboscis being used for feeding is in the species Deilephila elpenor. In this species, the moth hovers in front of the flower and extends its long proboscis to attain its food.[10]

A few Lepidoptera species lack mouth parts and therefore do not feed in the imago. Others, such as the family Micropterigidae, have mouth parts of the chewing kind.[11]

The study of insect mouthparts was helpful for the understanding of the functional mechanism of the proboscis of butterflies (Lepidoptera) to elucidate the evolution of new form-function.[12][13] The study of the proboscis of butterflies revealed surprising examples of adaptations to different kinds of fluid food, including nectar, plant sap, tree sap, dung[14][15][16] and of adaptations to the use of pollen as complementary food in Heliconius butterflies.[17][18] An extremely long proboscis appears within different groups of flower-visiting insects, but is relatively rare.

Gastropods

[edit]
Proboscis of a predatory marine snail Mitra mitra.
Kellet's whelks feeding on a dead fish using a long, prehensile proboscis.

Some evolutionary lineages of gastropods have evolved a proboscis. In gastropods, the proboscis is an elongation of the snout with the ability to retract inside the body; it can be used for feeding, sensing the environment, and in some cases, capturing prey or attaching to hosts. Three major types of proboscises have been identified: pleurembolic (partially retractable), acrembolic (fully retractable), and intraembolic (variable in structure). Acrembolic proboscises are usually found in parasitic gastropods.[19][20] The proboscis in gastropods is protruded using hydraulic pressure generated by the wall musculature of the head-foot. It is retracted using specialized proboscis retractor muscles.[21]

Vertebrates

[edit]
Asian elephant drinking water with trunk

The elephant's trunk and the tapir's elongated nose are called "proboscises", as is the snout of the male elephant seal.

Notable mammals with some form of proboscis are:

The proboscis monkey is named for its enormous nose.

The human nose is sometimes called a proboscis, especially when large or prominent.

Notable fishes with some form of proboscis are:

See also

[edit]
  • Beak – Facial structure found in birds and various other animal clades
  • Nostril – Nose orifice that enables the entry and exit of air
  • Rostrum (anatomy) – Anatomy term
  • Snout – Extended part of an animal's mouth


References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Proboscis

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A proboscis is an elongated, flexible extending from the head of various animals, primarily functioning as a specialized organ for feeding, sensing, or manipulation. In biological terms, it encompasses structures ranging from the tubular mouthparts of invertebrates to the prominent snouts of certain vertebrates, adapted for tasks such as sucking liquids or grasping objects. The term "proboscis" derives from Latin proboscis, borrowed from proboskís (προβοσκίς), meaning "elephant's trunk" or "means for taking food", from pró (πρό, "forward") + bóskō (βόσκω, "to feed"). In vertebrates, the proboscis most notably appears as the trunk of elephants (Elephas maximus and Loxodonta africana), a multifunctional organ containing approximately 40,000 muscles that enables feeding on , , and social communication through trumpeting or touching. Tapirs and the (Nasalis larvatus) also exhibit proboscis-like snouts, with the latter's enlarged nasal structure in adult males serving roles in vocalization amplification, particularly in Southeast Asian habitats. These adaptations highlight the proboscis's evolutionary versatility in enhancing survival in diverse environments. Among invertebrates, the proboscis is exemplified by the coiled, extensible feeding tube in and moths (), which uncoils to siphon nectar from flowers, often exceeding the insect's body for accessing deep corollas. Mosquitoes (Culicidae) possess a piercing-sucking proboscis for extracting blood, while bees like honeybees (Apis mellifera) use a shorter version integrated with other mouthparts to collect and . In marine snails such as , the proboscis extends to capture prey, demonstrating its role in predatory strategies across phyla. Overall, the proboscis underscores , where similar morphological solutions arise independently to address feeding challenges in disparate taxa.

Introduction

Definition

A proboscis is an elongated, flexible appendage that protrudes from the head of various animals across both invertebrate and vertebrate taxa, primarily functioning as a feeding structure adapted for sucking up liquids, piercing tissues, or probing into food sources. This organ enables the efficient acquisition of nutrients, such as floral nectar in insects or bodily fluids in parasitic worms, by forming a conduit for fluid transport. While its core role centers on alimentation, the proboscis occasionally serves secondary sensory purposes, like detecting chemical cues, or manipulative ones, such as grasping objects in advanced forms. Structurally, the proboscis typically exhibits a tubular or snout-like morphology and is often retractable or eversible to facilitate deployment and storage. In like , it commonly arises from the fusion of modified mouthparts, such as the interlocking galeae that enclose a central lined with sensory elements and supported by intrinsic muscles. In vertebrates, it develops from muscular hydrostat tissues, exemplified by the trunk, which integrates nasal and labial components for versatility. Although homologous within specific lineages—such as shared mouthpart derivations in certain arthropods—the proboscis generally represents analogous structures across distant taxa, converging on similar designs despite independent origins. The primary function of the proboscis revolves around nutrient acquisition from liquid or semi-liquid diets, with adaptations like coiled configurations in moths for extraction or hooked tips in acanthocephalans for host penetration. Derived secondary roles, such as defensive eversion in worms or limited locomotor assistance in elongated forms, emerge as evolutionary extensions in select groups. From an evolutionary perspective, the proboscis originates as a specialization of anterior head appendages or snouts, driven by selective pressures to exploit fluid-based food resources, resulting in repeated independent innovations across animal kingdoms through .

Etymology

The term "proboscis" originates from the Latin proboscis, which is a direct borrowing from the proboskís (προβοσκίς), literally meaning "elephant's trunk" or "means for taking ." This compound word combines pró (πρό, "forward" or "before") with boskein (βόσκειν, "to feed" or "to graze"), reflecting its association with a feeding structure. The word entered English in the early , with the earliest recorded use in by English naturalist Edward Topsell, who applied it to the elephant's trunk in his Historie of Foure-Footed Beastes. In scientific contexts, the term's usage evolved from describing features like the elephant's trunk to broader applications in during the , marking a shift toward its role in taxonomic descriptions of feeding appendages. By the , refinements in and expanded its application to various flexible, tubular structures across phyla, emphasizing functional adaptations for rather than rigid morphology. "Proboscis" is distinguished from related terms like "rostrum," which denotes a harder, beak-like projection often used for piercing or probing, as seen in weevils or crustaceans, and "," a shorter, more generalized nose region lacking specialized elongation for feeding. Post-19th-century further delineated these distinctions, prioritizing "proboscis" for soft, extensible organs in biological . In cultural usage, the term appeared informally in 19th-century English and to humorously refer to a prominent , though scientific discourse maintains its strict zoological precision.

Proboscis in Invertebrates

In Arthropods

In arthropods, the proboscis is a specialized feeding formed by the fusion of mouthparts such as the galeae of the maxillae, labial palps, or other structures into a tubular conduit for liquid uptake, often coiled or straight and supported by hydrostatic mechanisms involving pressure for extension and retraction. This adaptation is prevalent in , where it facilitates suctorial feeding on , sap, or , with the tube enclosing a central food canal sealed by cuticular structures like legulae. In Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), the proboscis arises from the elongation and fusion of the two maxillary galeae, which interlock via ventral and dorsal legulae to form a sealed, flexible tube equipped with sensilla for detecting nectar composition and quality. The structure typically coils when at rest and uncoils via hydrostatic pressure, allowing probing deep into flowers, with variations in length and tip morphology—such as smooth for narrow corollas or mop-like for viscous fluids—tailored to specific host plants. In Hymenoptera (bees and wasps), the proboscis often features an elongated glossa (tongue) integrated with maxillary and labial palps, forming an extensible structure that uses adhesion, capillarity, and a lapping mechanism to collect nectar from shallow or clustered sources. Dipteran insects (flies and mosquitoes) exhibit diverse proboscis forms, including a piercing type in blood-feeders like mosquitoes, where the labium sheathes elongated stylets with prestomal teeth for penetrating , combined with a cibarial pump for suction. In nectar-feeding flies, the proboscis is a flexible rostrum ending in labella with pseudotracheae—capillary channels that sponge and channel fluids—supported by muscular pumps for efficient uptake from surfaces like flowers or decaying matter. For Coleoptera (beetles), particularly weevils, the proboscis integrates into a short rostrum (elongated ) housing chewing mouthparts at the tip, enabling piercing of seeds or fruits for liquid extraction, with evolutionary origins likely independent and twice in the group. Functional adaptations include sucking pumps, such as the cibarial pump in Diptera that generates negative pressure interdependent with for fluid flow, and enhanced by porous surfaces or saliva in and . Evolutionary trade-offs in nectar-specialized forms often involve reduced or vestigial mandibles, prioritizing tube elongation over biting capabilities to optimize interactions. This diversity spans over 100,000 species with proboscis variations, closely linked to ecological roles in and fluid across habitats.

In Mollusks

In mollusks, the proboscis is a muscular, invaginable tube derived from the , serving as a key component of the feeding apparatus. It is often integrated with the , a chitinous ribbon-like structure bearing teeth used for rasping or sucking food, and is everted through hydrostatic pressure generated within the , the main filled with . This eversible structure allows for precise extension and retraction, facilitating the capture and manipulation of diverse food sources across . Among gastropods, the proboscis exhibits specialized adaptations based on diet. In predatory species such as cone snails (genus Conus), it functions as a harpoon-like organ, deploying a radular tooth to inject potent neurotoxins that paralyze prey like or other mollusks. In contrast, herbivorous gastropods, including many sea slugs (nudibranchs), possess an elongated proboscis equipped with a for scraping and microbial films from substrates. These extensions enable access to sessile resources in intertidal or environments. The proboscis plays critical functional roles in prehensile manipulation and , allowing mollusks to , , and draw food into the buccal cavity. In some species, such as the Antarctic whelk Neobuccinum eatoni, symbiotic bacteria within the proboscis contribute to by aiding in the breakdown of complex organic matter, enhancing nutrient extraction from prey. Evolutionarily, proboscis derives from the ancestral buccal mass, a muscular complex surrounding the mouth that has diversified to support varied feeding strategies. In non-gastropod mollusks like cephalopods, variations include the buccal mass's extension around a chitinous in octopuses, which facilitates biting and tearing rather than eversion.

In Annelids and Nematodes

In annelids, particularly within the class, the proboscis manifests as an eversible that serves as a versatile feeding and burrowing apparatus. In species such as ragworms (e.g., Nereis spp.), this structure is strongly muscular, enabling rapid extension and retraction through coordinated contractions of circular and longitudinal muscles, which allows it to evert outward to capture prey or probe marine sediments. The everted is often armed with chaetae—bristle-like setae—or chitinous jaws that aid in grasping and ensnaring small , facilitating predation in intertidal and subtidal environments. In nematodes, the proboscis equivalent is typically a stylet-like , most prominently developed in plant-parasitic species such as root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.). This hollow, needle-like structure, measuring approximately 15 μm in length, functions to pierce cell walls, allowing the nematode to inject and toxins that suppress host defenses while creating a feeding site. The stylet's protractile mechanism relies on esophageal muscles that thrust it forward, enabling intracellular penetration and withdrawal of cellular contents through the lumen. Both annelids and nematodes employ a for proboscis operation, where coelomic fluid under pressure provides rigidity and facilitates movement against surrounding tissues or substrates. Sensory papillae distributed on the proboscis surface enhance host detection and environmental navigation; in polychaetes, these papillae bear for prey identification, while in nematodes, they include amphids and deirids that sense chemical cues from potential hosts. Ecologically, the proboscis supports burrowing and sediment turnover in marine ecosystems, promoting nutrient cycling through deposit feeding and predation. In nematodes, it drives , with plant-parasitic forms causing significant crop damage by inducing and disrupting function, while influencing microbial communities.

In Acanthocephala

In , commonly known as thorny-headed worms, the proboscis serves as a specialized attachment organ rather than a feeding , enabling these parasites to firmly within the intestinal tract of their definitive hosts. The proboscis is eversible and typically cylindrical or spherical in shape, retracting into a muscular proboscis receptacle when not in use. It is armed with recurved hooks arranged in longitudinal or spiral rows, numbering from 4 to 18 or more depending on the species, with each row containing multiple hooks that possess a and blade for enhanced penetration. Some species also feature rootless spines interspersed among the hooks, contributing to the organ's spiny appearance. Associated glandular structures, including cement glands particularly prominent in males, secrete a proteinaceous substance that further secures the worm to the host's mucosa. The primary function of the proboscis is mechanical attachment and penetration of the host's intestinal wall, often causing localized ulceration and without any role in , as acanthocephalans absorb nutrients directly through their body surface. Upon eversion, the hooks embed into the mucosal tissue of hosts such as , birds, reptiles, amphibians, and mammals, preventing dislodgement by or host defenses. In species like Macracanthorhynchus hirudinaceus, the proboscis may extend deeply into the of hosts, expanding to form a bulbous . The cement secretion not only aids initial attachment but also plays a role in male-female pairing during by temporarily gluing partners together. In the life cycle of , the proboscis integrates critically during the parasitic phase in the definitive host. Infective cystacanth larvae, developed within intermediate hosts like or crustaceans, are ingested by vertebrates; the proboscis then everts rapidly post-ingestion, facilitating attachment to the within hours. Maturation occurs over 8–12 weeks, during which species-specific patterns—such as the 12–15 spiral rows in Moniliformis moniliformis, a parasite of rats and occasionally humans—ensure host-specific adaptation and reduce dislodgement risks. This eversion is powered by hydrostatic pressure from the receptacle's muscular walls, with inverter muscles allowing retraction for repositioning. Evolutionarily, the proboscis represents a key derived from rotifer-like ancestors, with molecular and morphological evidence indicating Acanthocephala's close relation to these free-living through shared tegumental features. This structure has enabled the phylum's diversification into over 1,100 , each exhibiting high host specificity tied to trophic webs, such as fish-eating birds or insectivorous mammals. Variations in proboscis armature, including hook row counts and spine distributions, serve as diagnostic traits for classification and reflect selective pressures for efficient across diverse lineages.

Proboscis in Vertebrates

In Mammals

In mammals, the proboscis typically manifests as an elongated or trunk adapted for feeding, manipulation, and sensory functions, with the elephant's trunk serving as the most prominent example. This structure evolved independently in several lineages, reflecting convergent adaptations to diverse ecological niches. Unlike the rigid snouts of many mammals, proboscides in these groups are often flexible muscular hydrostats, enabling precise control without skeletal support. The trunk exemplifies this , functioning as a multifunctional for respiration, olfaction, feeding, and social interaction. Composed as a hydrostat, it contains approximately 90,000 muscle fascicles arranged in radial, longitudinal, and transverse orientations, allowing for exceptional dexterity and strength. These fascicles enable the trunk to bend inward for grasping, with the tip featuring finer, microscopic structures (~0.01 mm³ volume) for pinpoint manipulation. trunks measure up to 2 meters in length, while Asian varieties are slightly shorter at around 1.5–1.8 meters, weighing up to 140 kg in adults. The distal tip includes a prehensile "finger" (in ) or pointed extension (in Asian elephants) for plucking or probing, with paired nostrils positioned at the end to facilitate breathing and scent detection. possess over 2,000 olfactory receptor genes—twice as many as dogs—concentrated in the trunk's nasal passages, granting them one of the most acute senses of smell among mammals, capable of detecting sources up to 12 km away. Other mammals exhibit specialized proboscis-like structures tailored to their diets and environments. Tapirs possess a flexible, prehensile snout formed by the fusion of the upper lip and nose, which they use to browse on leaves, fruits, and aquatic plants in dense forests or wetlands. This short trunk, about 15–20 cm long, allows omnidirectional movement for selective grasping, with muscular arrangements enabling complex manipulations similar to but simpler than the elephant's. In contrast, the aardvark and various anteaters (such as the giant anteater) have elongated, tubular snouts integrated with extensible tongues for myrmecophagy, probing termite mounds and ant nests up to 30 cm deep. The aardvark's snout, equipped with nine olfactory bulbs for enhanced scent detection, funnels soil-displaced insects toward its 30 cm sticky tongue, consuming up to 50,000 termites nightly. The proboscis monkey, however, features a non-feeding nasal enlargement unique among primates: adult males develop pendulous, bulbous noses that amplify resonant calls, serving as visual and acoustic signals of dominance and mate attraction rather than manipulative tools. Additional examples include the saiga antelope (Saiga tatarica), whose flexible, trunk-like nose filters dust and aids thermoregulation in steppe environments, and male elephant seals (Mirounga spp.), which possess an inflatable proboscis for amplifying roars during breeding displays. Elephant shrews (Macroscelidea) also feature elongated snouts for probing insects in leaf litter. Structurally, mammalian proboscides incorporate extended nasal passages for airflow and olfaction, often with convoluted turbinates to increase sensory surface area. In , these passages span the trunk's length, supporting via evaporative cooling and integrating with the for detection. Evolutionary convergence is evident in the proboscidean lineage, where early forms like from the late Eocene (~35 million years ago) show nascent trunk elongation alongside dental adaptations for aquatic browsing, evolving into the fully developed hydrostat by the . This parallels independent developments in perissodactyls (tapirs) and xenarthrans (anteaters), driven by selective pressures for resource exploitation in fragmented habitats. Behaviorally, these structures facilitate foraging and communication, enhancing survival and social cohesion. use their trunks to uproot , siphon (up to 8 liters per intake), and probe soil, with coordinated movements allowing efficient calorie intake in variable environments. Socially, trunk gestures—such as entwining during greetings, swinging to signal agitation, or touching to convey —form a visual and tactile language, often combined with infrasonic rumbles for long-distance coordination in herds. In tapirs, the aids selective to avoid toxins, while aardvarks employ it nocturnally to minimize exposure during raids. evidence traces proboscidean precursors to Eocene , rhino-like herbivores with robust skulls suggesting proto-snout for foliage stripping, though full trunks emerged later in afrotherian .

In Fish

In fish, the proboscis typically manifests as an elongated , an extension of the or upper adapted for sensory detection and prey capture in aquatic environments. Billfishes, such as (Xiphias gladius) and (Makaira spp.), exemplify this with their prominent, sword-like rostra formed by the prolonged upper jaw, often comprising up to one-third of the total body length in adults. These structures, composed of ossified , enable high-speed slashing through schools of prey like sardines or , injuring multiple individuals for easier subsequent consumption. Additionally, the rostrum incorporates mechanosensory elements, such as lacunae rostralis—fluid-filled cavities connected to pores—that detect vibrations or contact with prey during strikes or manipulation, enhancing precision in open-ocean hunting. Other fish species exhibit specialized rostral appendages tailored to specific habitats. The elephantnose fish (Gnathonemus petersii, family ) features a flexible, trunk-like appendage known as the Schnauzenorgan, densely packed with electroreceptors that facilitate active electrolocation. This structure allows the fish to generate and sense electric fields, detecting prey and navigating in the murky, sediment-laden waters of African rivers where vision is limited. Similarly, the (Polyodon spathula) possesses a broad, paddle-shaped rostrum lined with thousands of mechanosensory pits and , enabling the detection of water pressure changes from movements and weak electric signals from prey. This adaptation supports filter-feeding by guiding the fish toward dense swarms in riverine environments. Structurally, these rostra vary from rigid, bony extensions in billfishes, which minimize hydrodynamic drag through streamlined shapes and lubricating oil secretions, to more flexible, cartilaginous forms in paddlefishes that prioritize sensory array distribution. Ecologically, such appendages confer advantages in diverse niches: billfishes leverage theirs for predatory pursuits across vast pelagic zones, while elephantnose and paddlefishes rely on them for precise foraging and orientation in low-visibility freshwater systems. These traits trace their evolutionary origins to Cretaceous teleost lineages, where early adaptations for elongated snouts emerged in marine predators, driving diversification amid changing oceanic conditions.

In Other Vertebrates

In birds, proboscis-like structures manifest primarily through modifications to the bill and , enabling specialized feeding adaptations. Hummingbirds, such as the ( colubris), feature an elongated, slender bill paired with a highly specialized that functions as a functional proboscis to access in deep, tubular flowers. This employs a dynamic phase transport mechanism, where is trapped between lamellae during retraction and propelled toward the throat via and bill movements, allowing efficient extraction during hovering. Similarly, woodpeckers exhibit a remarkable extension system, where the , supported by the hyoid apparatus, can protrude up to four inches beyond the bill to extract from crevices in bark. The wraps around the like a spring-loaded , facilitating rapid protraction through elastic energy storage and release. In reptiles and amphibians, true proboscis structures are rare, with analogous features limited to highly modified tongues rather than snout extensions. The chameleon's tongue represents a prime example of such an , functioning as a ballistic proboscis analog for prey capture through explosive projection. This mechanism relies on elastic energy stored in sheaths surrounding the tongue muscles, enabling extension up to 800% of its resting length at accelerations exceeding 500 m/s², far surpassing direct muscular power alone. Certain amphibians, such as frogs in the family Pipidae (e.g., the Surinam toad, Pipa pipa), exhibit powerful tongue projections for capturing aquatic prey, though less elongated than '. In contrast, the tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus), a reptile with a relatively elongated , utilizes enhanced olfactory capabilities tied to its nasal region for detecting environmental cues, though this lacks the dynamic projection seen in . Additionally, the platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus), a , has an elongated, sensitive bill functioning as a proboscis analog, equipped with electroreceptors for detecting prey in murky waters, similar to some fish rostra. These structures in non-mammalian, non- vertebrates emphasize and bill modifications over true nasal , often powered by elastic mechanisms for quick deployment. In birds, such adaptations primarily support via nectarivory, as in hummingbirds, while in reptiles and amphibians, they facilitate predation, exemplified by the chameleon's insect-hunting precision. Overall, proboscis-like diversity remains limited in these groups compared to the more varied snout and rostral forms in mammals and , reflecting ecological niches dominated by aerial or terrestrial rather than aquatic probing.

References

  1. https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionary/proboscis
  2. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/proboscis
  3. https://www.etymonline.com/word/proboscis
  4. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-023-04945-5
  5. https://a-z-animals.com/reference/proboscis/
  6. https://www.amentsoc.org/insects/glossary/terms/proboscis/
  7. https://blogs.ifas.ufl.edu/entnemdept/2018/04/05/bug-word-day-proboscis/
  8. https://www.britannica.com/animal/whelk
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9825987/
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/proboscis
  11. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00222930903219954
  12. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10539-021-09811-4
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467803904000659
  14. https://elifesciences.org/articles/90908
  15. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/proboscis_n
  16. https://genent.cals.ncsu.edu/bug-bytes/mouthparts/
  17. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/proboscis
  18. https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=PROBOSCIS
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12024784/
  20. https://genent.cals.ncsu.edu/insect-identification/order-diptera/
  21. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-06391-w
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4848642/
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247510464_The_evolutionary_and_biomechanical_implications_of_snout_and_proboscis_morphology_in_Caenogastropoda_Mollusca_Gastropoda
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0742841393900872
  25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470586/
  26. https://manoa.hawaii.edu/exploringourfluidearth/biological/invertebrates/phylum-mollusca
  27. https://www.britannica.com/animal/gastropod/Food-and-feeding
  28. https://oxfordre.com/neuroscience/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264086.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264086-e-285
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391736948_The_juvenile_Antarctic_whelk_Neobuccinum_eatoni_maintains_a_specialized_microbiome_in_its_proboscis_even_in_adulthood
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Luiz-Simone/publication/355911059_Malacopedia_The_mollusk_buccal_mass_-generalities/links/6183d9bea767a03c14f11d12/Malacopedia-The-mollusk-buccal-mass-generalities.pdf
  31. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2017.00580/full
  32. https://inverts.wallawalla.edu/Annelida/Nereidae/Nereis_vexillosa.html
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6182992/
  34. https://manoa.hawaii.edu/exploringourfluidearth/biological/invertebrates/worms-phyla-platyhelmintes-nematoda-and-annelida
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10557390/
  36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26211599/
  37. https://extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/BP/BP-121-W.pdf
  38. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IN470
  39. https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/Biology_II_Laboratory_Manual_%28Lumen%29/08%253A_Invertebrate_II/8.05%253A_Reading-_Annelids
  40. https://books.byui.edu/Invertebrate_Life/cdltnmgayw
  41. https://nemaplex.ucdavis.edu/General/Anatomy/sensory.htm
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6829015/
  43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23586563/
  44. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(23)01220-4
  45. https://www.elephantsforafrica.org/elephant-facts/
  46. https://www.science.org/content/article/elephants-may-have-best-noses-earth
  47. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2012.00315.x
  48. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/facts/aardvark
  49. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2025.0098
  50. https://a-z-animals.com/animals/saiga-antelope/
  51. https://www.britannica.com/animal/elephant-seal
  52. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2021.0215
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12308342/
  54. https://www.britannica.com/animal/Uintatherium
  55. https://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2019/04/30/what_do_swordfish_use_their_swords_for.html
  56. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/218/6/824/14487/Feeding-in-billfishes-inferring-the-role-of-the
  57. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfb.15018
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23459527_Active_electrolocation_in_Gnathonemus_petersii_Behaviour_sensory_performance_and_receptor_systems
  59. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/57/5/399/221708
  60. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/223/19/jeb224956/225847/Oil-gland-and-oil-pores-in-billfishes-in-search-of
  61. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.231296
  62. https://nationalzoo.si.edu/migratory-birds/news/flower-specialist
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10112966/
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5063634/
  65. https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=soundswild.episode&id=woodpecker-tongue
  66. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15209111/
  67. https://hu.gatech.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Hu18_tongue_review.pdf
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5583331/
  69. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-56006-5
  70. https://gardens.si.edu/gardens/pollinator-garden/why-what-when-where-who-how-pollination/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.