Hubbry Logo
RhytidectomyRhytidectomyMain
Open search
Rhytidectomy
Community hub
Rhytidectomy
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Rhytidectomy
Rhytidectomy
from Wikipedia

Rhytidectomy
Temporal incision behind the hairline in endoscopic midface lift (rhytidectomy). Note the shiny surface of the deep temporal fascia. This plane is dissected down to the orbital rim and connected to the midface subperiosteal plane created through the sublabial incision under the upper lip, and often through a lower eyelid incision.
ICD-9-CM86.82
MedlinePlus002989

A facelift, technically known as a rhytidectomy (from the Ancient Greek ῥυτίς (rhytis) 'wrinkle', and ἐκτομή (ektome) 'excision', the surgical removal of wrinkles), is a type of cosmetic surgery procedure intended to give a more youthful facial appearance. There are multiple surgical techniques and exercise routines. Surgery usually involves the removal of excess facial skin, with or without the tightening of underlying tissues, and the redraping of the skin on the patient's face and neck. Exercise routines tone underlying facial muscles without surgery. Surgical facelifts are effectively combined with eyelid surgery (blepharoplasty) and other facial procedures and are typically performed under general anesthesia or deep twilight sleep.

According to the most recent American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery facelifts were the third most popular aesthetic surgery in 2019, surpassed only by rhinoplasty and blepharoplasty.[1]

Cost varies by country where surgery is performed. Prices were quoted ranging from US$2,500 (India and Panama) to US$15,000 (United States and Canada) as of 2008.[2] Costs in Europe mostly ranged £4,000–£9,000 as of 2009.[3]

History

[edit]
Sublabial incision through which periosteum of maxilla is elevated in an endoscopic midface lift (rhytidectomy).

Cutaneous period (1900–1970)

[edit]

In the first 70 years of the 20th century, facelifts were performed by pulling on the skin on the face and cutting the loose parts off. The first facelift was reportedly performed by Eugen Holländer in 1901 in Berlin.[4] An elderly Polish female aristocrat asked him to: "lift her cheeks and corners of the mouth". After much debate, he finally proceeded to excise an elliptical piece of skin around the ears. The first textbook about facial cosmetic surgery (1907) was written by Charles Miller (Chicago) entitled The Correction of Featural Imperfections.[5]

In the First World War (1914–1918), the Dutch surgeon Johannes Esser made one of the most famous discoveries in the field of plastic surgery to date, namely the "skin graft inlay technique,"[6] the technique was soon used on both English and German sides in the war. At the same time, the British plastic surgeon Harold Delfs Gillies used the Esser-graft to school all those who flocked towards him who wanted to study under him. That's how he earned the name "Father of 20th Century Plastic Surgery". In 1919, Dr Passot was known to publish one of the first papers on face-lifting, this consisted mainly of the elevating and redraping of the facial skin. After this, many others began to write papers on face-lifting in the 1920s. From then, the esthetic surgery was being performed on a large scale, form the basis of the reconstructive surgery. The first female plastic surgeon, Suzanne Noël, played a large role in its development and she wrote one of the first books about esthetic surgery named Chirurgie Esthetique, son rôle social.[citation needed]

SMAS period (1970–1980)

[edit]

In 1968, Tord Skoog introduced the concept of subfacial dissection, therefore providing suspension of the stronger deeper layer rather than relying on skin tension to achieve his facelift (he publishes his technique in 1974, with subfacial dissection of the platysma without detaching the skin in a posterior direction).[7] In 1976, Mitz and Peyronie described the anatomical Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System, or SMAS,[8] a term coined by Paul Tessier, Mitz and Peyronie's tutor in craniofacial surgery, after he had become familiar with Skoog's technique. After Skoog died of a heart attack, the superficial muscular aponeurotic system (SMAS) concept rapidly emerged to become the standard face-lifting technique, which was the first innovative change in facelift surgery in over 50 years.[9]

Deep plane period (1980–1991)

[edit]

Tessier, who had his background in the craniofacial surgery, made the step to a subperiosteal dissection via a coronal incision.[10] In 1979, Tessier demonstrated that the subperiosteal undermining of the superior and lateral orbital rims allowed the elevation of the soft tissue and eyebrows with better results than the classic face-lifting. The objective was to elevate the soft tissue over the underlying skeleton to re-establish the patient's youthful appearance.[citation needed]

Volumetric period (since 1991)

[edit]

At the start of this period in the history of the facelift, there was a change in conceptual thinking, surgeons started to care more about minimizing scars, restoring the subcutaneous volume that was lost during the ageing process and they started making use of a cranial direction of the "lift" instead of posterior.[citation needed]

The technique for performing a facelift went from simply pulling on the skin and sewing it back to aggressive SMAS and deep plane surgeries to a more refined facelift where variable options are considered to have an aesthetically good and a more long-lasting effect.[citation needed]

Indications

[edit]
The difference between an aged eye and a youthful eye, looking at the distance from the cilliary margin to the inferior-most point of the orbicularis oculi muscle.
A. Increased redundancy of the nasolabial fold (caused by a descent of cheek fat) B. Increased distance from the ciliary margin to the inferior-most point of the orbicularis oculi muscle (caused by decreasing tone of the orbicularis oculi muscle) C. Jowl (a broken jaw line by ptosis of the platysma muscle) D. The intended effect of a facelift

A facelift is performed to rejuvenate the appearance of the face. Aging of the face is most shown by a change in position of the deep anatomical structures, notably the platysma muscle, cheek fat and the orbicularis oculi muscle.[11] These lead up to three landmarks namely, an appearance of the jowl (a broken jaw line by ptosis of the platysma muscle), increased redundancy of the nasolabial fold (caused by a descent of cheek fat) and the increased distance from the ciliary margin to the inferior-most point of the orbicularis oculi muscle (caused by decreasing tone of the orbicularis oculi muscle).[11] The skin is a fourth component in the aging of the face. The ideal age for face-lifting is at age 50 or younger, as measured by patient satisfaction.[12][13][14] Some areas, such as the nasolabial folds or marionette lines, in some cases can be treated more suitably with Botox or liposculpture.[citation needed]

Contraindications

[edit]

Contraindications to facelift surgery include severe concomitant medical problems, both physical and psychological. While not absolute contraindications, the risk of postoperative complications is increased in cigarette smokers and patients with hypertension and diabetes.[15] These strong relative contraindications consist primarily of diseases predisposing to poor wound healing. Patients are typically asked to abstain from taking aspirin or other blood thinners for at least one week prior to surgery. Patients motivations and expectations are an important factor in order to determine the patient's medical status. A psychiatric illness leading to unreasonable expectations for the surgical outcome, such as a distorted perception of reality, can be a contraindication to surgery. Some kinds of hypersensitivity to anesthesia are a contraindication.[citation needed]

Surgical anatomy

[edit]
Facelift: Generally relevant anatomy
Head nerves
Head arteries
Details
ArteryFacial artery, Temporal artery, Arteria supratrochlearis, Arteria infraorbitalis
VeinTemporal vein
NerveGreater auricular nerve, Facial nerve, Mental nerve
Identifiers
MeSHD015361
Anatomical terminology
A dissection in the deep plane can mostly be performed safely, because the facial nerve innervates the facial muscles on the deep surface of these muscles (except for the muscles which are lying deep to the facial nerve, the mentalis, the levator anguli oris and the buccinator). The fibres of the nerve are becoming more superficially medially. Therefore, the dissection of a deep plane begins further away of the surface then it ends. This allows the undermining to be carried out towards the nasolabial fold without harming the branches of the facial nerve.
  • Retaining ligaments
The retaining ligaments in the face provide an anchorage of superficial structures to underlying bone. Four retaining ligaments exist.[16] The platysma-cutaneous ligaments and the platysma-auricular ligament are aponeurotic condensations which connect the platysma to the dermis. The osteocutaneous ligaments, the zygomatic ligament and the mandibular ligament, are more important. They attach to the skin and bone, leading to a counteraction of gravitational forces. These ligaments should be released surgically to obtain a fully mobile facelift flap.
Injury to the greater auricular nerve is the most seen nerve injury after rhytidectomy.[17][18] Care should be taken in elevation over the sternocleidomastoid muscle, because of the terminal branches of the nerve that pass superficially to innervate the earlobe.
The composite flap is vascularised by facial, angular and/or inferior orbital arteries. The facial artery supplies the platysma and goes on as the angular artery, which connects with the branches of the arteria supratrochlearis and arteria infraorbitalis. The parts of the face elevated are in continuity in the deep-plane and the composite rhytidectomy include the SMAS layer in the lower face, subcutaneous tissue and the skin as the arteries to these parts are preserved.[19] With this option you can create a well vascularized tissue flap, which can be used to tighten the skin without loss of vascularization, this will result in fewer complications like skin slough and necrosis.

Procedures

[edit]

Many different procedures are used for rhytidectomy.[20] The differences are mostly the type of incision, the invasiveness and the area of the face that is treated. Each surgeon practices multiple different types of facelift surgery. At a consultation the procedure with the best outcome is chosen for every patient. Expectations of the patient, the age, possible recovery time and areas to improve are some of the many factors taken in consideration before choosing a technique of rhytidectomy.[citation needed]

In the traditional facelift, an incision is made in front of the ear extending up into the hairline. The incision curves around the bottom of the ear and then behind it, usually ending near the hairline on the back of the neck. After the skin incision is made, the skin is separated from the deeper tissues with a scalpel or scissors (also called undermining) over the cheeks and neck. At this point, the deeper tissues (SMAS, the fascial suspension system of the face) can be tightened with sutures, with or without removing some of the excess deeper tissues. The skin is then redraped, and the amount of excess skin to be removed is determined by the surgeon's judgement and experience. The excess skin is then removed, and the skin incisions are closed with sutures and staples.

The technique of a SMAS facelift, consisting of mobilisation, repositioning and fixating.

SMAS lift

[edit]

The SMAS (Superficial Musculo Aponeurotic System) layer consists of suspensory ligaments that encase the cheek fat, thereby causing them to remain in their normal position. This procedure is often performed in tandem with blepharoplasty as an ancillary procedure.[21][22] Resuspension and securing the SMAS anatomical layer can lead to rejuvenation of the face, by counteracting aging and gravity caused laxity.[22] Modifications to this technique led to development of the "Composite Facelift" and "Deep plane Facelift."[23]

Deep-plane facelift

[edit]

In order to correct the deepening of the nasolabial fold more accurately, the deep plane facelift was developed. Differing from the SMAS lift by freeing cheek fat and some muscles from their bone implement. This technique has a higher risk at damaging the facial nerve. The SMAS lift is an effective procedure to reposition the platysma muscle; however, the nasolabial fold is according to some surgeons better addressed by a deep plane facelift or composite facelift.

Composite facelift

[edit]

As well as in the deep plane facelift, in the composite facelift a deeper layer of tissue is mobilised and repositioned. The difference between these operating techniques is the extra repositioning and fixation of the orbicularis oculi muscle in the composite facelift procedure. The malar crescent caused by the orbicularis oculi ptosis can be addressed in a composite facelift.[citation needed]

Mid face-lift

[edit]

The mid face area, the area between the cheeks, flattens and makes a woman's face look slightly more masculine. The mid face-lift is suggested to people where these changes occur, yet without a significant degree of jowling or sagging of the neck. In these cases a mid face-lift is sufficient to rejuvenate the face opposed to a full facelift, which is a more drastic surgery. The ideal candidates for a mid face-lift is when a person is in his 40s, or if the cheeks appear to be sagging and the nasolabial area has laxity or skin folds. To achieve a younger appearance the surgeon makes several small incisions along the hairline and inside the mouth, this way the fatty tissue layers can be lifted and repositioned. This way there are practically no scars. The fatty layer that lies over the cheekbones is also lifted and repositioned. This improves the nose-to-mouth lines and the roundness over the cheekbones. The recovery time is rather short and this procedure is often combined with a blepharoplasty (eyelid surgery)

Mini-facelift

[edit]

The mini-facelift is the least invasive type of facelift which is similar to a full facelift, the only difference is the omission of the neck lift in the mini lift procedure. It is also called the ‘S’ lift because of the shape of the incision that is used or the ‘short-scar’ facelift. This lift is a more temporary solution to the ageing of the face which also has less downtime and is done on people who have deep nasolabial folds, sagging facial structures, yet still have a firm and well-contoured neck. The position of the incision is usually made from the hairline around the ear with scars hidden in the natural crease of the skin. The mini lift can be performed with an endoscope, which is used to reposition the soft tissues. After this, the skin is repositioned by the surgeon with small sutures.[24] This type of lift is a good alternative to the full facelift to people with premature ageing.[citation needed]

Blue represents the incisions in the Skin only facelift. Green represents the S-lift. Red is the extensive undermining done in several facelift techniques.

Subperiosteal facelift

[edit]

The subperiosteal facelift technique is done by vertically lifting the soft tissues of the face, completely separating it from the underlying facial bones and elevating it to a more esthetically pleasing position, correcting deep nasolabial folds and sagging cheeks. The technique is often combined with standard techniques, which provide a long-lasting rejuvenation of the face and is done in all age groups. The difference between this and other lifts is that the subperiosteal facelift has a longer period of facial swelling after the procedure.[citation needed]

Skin-only facelift

[edit]

With the skin-only facelift only the skin of the face is lifted and not the underlying SMAS, muscles or other structures. As the elastin fibers disintegrate, the skin itself loses elasticity in older patients. A skin only face lift requires skill in understanding the extent of safe removal of skin and the Vector of pull to get an optimal result. It can be done with a simple ellipse of skin removed with minimal undermining of skin flaps or more extensively with large skin flaps. It can last 5 to 10 years but some patients may want a touch-up at 6 to 12 months after the procedure. The reason that this option is considered is that it has fewer complications and quicker recovery. One of the fathers of plastic surgery Sir Harold Gilles described a simple ellipse of skin excision in a socialite who was pleased with her quick recovery and outcome. Can be done for a simple jowl lift in a 35 to 45-year-old patient.[citation needed]

Thread lift

[edit]

A technique called thread lift or non-surgical face lift simplifies the operation. Silicone threads with barbs are used to pull the face and neck skin upwards without the need of skin excision. These are non-absorbable threads and combination of these threads with other methods of facial rejuvenation reveals even better results.[25] One such procedure is thread-lift with anti-ptosis (APTOS) sutures.[26]

In the UK aesthetic practitioners—who administer thread lifts and other treatments—are not required to have any mandatory qualifications, although some treatments can cause serious complications. In Liverpool the BBC found 26 cosmetic training academies offering courses ranging in price from £150 to £5,000 in 2021, lasting from a couple of hours online to a couple of days of face-to-face training. A professionally trained cosmetic doctor, Vincent Wong, said that a thread lift is the most dangerous procedure an aesthetic practitioner can do. A great many things can go wrong, more so than any injectable treatment, because threads stay in the skin and cannot be pulled out; while the results can be very good, the procedure can also cause irreversible damage. The professional training of Wong—already a physician with a degree in surgery—in this procedure involved four courses over three months.[27]

A nurse sent undercover by the BBC to take and secretly film a course teaching thread lifting was shocked at the unprofessionalism and unsafe practices she was taught. While exceptional sterility is required to avoid possible long-term infection, there was no attempt to control infection. The tutor touched various objects and then the patient's face, and the procedure was carried out on a chair instead of a clean bed. Several blood vessels were accidentally punctured, and the patient was clearly in severe pain. Patients drank alcohol before the treatment and vaped during it. Ashton Collins, the director of Save Face, a national register of accredited medical practitioners that provide non-surgical cosmetic treatments, said that "there's no doubt that if people following that course go on to do treatments [it] will cause a lot of complications".[27][26]

MACS facelift

[edit]

The term MACS-lift – or Minimal Access Cranial Suspension lift – allows for the correction of sagging facial features through a short, minimal incision, elevating them vertically by suspending them from above. There are many advantages to having a MACS facelift versus a traditional facelift. For starters, the MACS-lift uses a shorter scar that is in front of the ear, instead of behind, which is much easier to hide. Overall, the MACS-lift surgery is safer because less skin is raised. This means that there is less risk of bleeding and nerve damage. The operation also takes less time, lasting 2.5 hours instead of the 3.5 hours that the traditional facelift requires. There is also a shorter recovery period, 2–3 weeks instead of 3–4 weeks. The MACS lift has been successfully used for to correct complication after thread-lift with APTOS.[26]

Complications

[edit]

The most common complication is bleeding which usually requires a return to the operating room. Less common, but potentially serious, complications may include damage to the facial nerves and necrosis of the skin flaps or infection. Although the facial plastic surgeon attempts to prevent and minimise the risk of complications, a rhytidectomy can have complications. As a risk to every operation, complications can be derived as a reaction to the anesthetics.

Hematoma is the most seen complication after rhytidectomy.[17][18][28][29][30][31][32] Arterial bleeding can cause the most dangerous hematomas, as they can lead to dyspnea. Almost all of the hematomas occur within the first 24 hours after the rhytidectomy.[17][18][28]

Nerve injury can be sustained during rhytidectomy. This kind of injury can be temporary or permanent and harm can be done to either sensory or motor nerves of the face. As a sensory nerve, the great auricular nerve is the most common nerve to get injured at a facelift procedure.[18][28] The most injured motor nerve is the facial nerve.[18][33]

Skin necrosis can occur after a facelift operation. Smoking increases the risk of skin necrosis 12-fold.[15] Scarring is considered a complication of facelift surgery. Hypertrophic scars can appear. A facelift requires skin incisions; however, the incisions in front of and behind the ear are usually inconspicuous.

Hair loss in the portions of the incision within the hair-bearing scalp can rarely occur. A distortion of the hairline—and facial hair in men—can result after a rhytidectomy. There is a high incidence of alopecia after rhytidectomy.[34][35] The permanent hair loss is mostly seen at the incision site in the temporal areas. In men, the sideburns can be pulled backwards and upwards, resulting in an unnatural appearance if appropriate techniques are not employed to address this issue. Achieving a natural appearance following surgery in men can be more challenging due to their hair-bearing preauricular skin. In both men and women, one of the signs of having had a facelift can be an earlobe which is pulled forwards and/or distorted. If too much skin is removed, or a more vertical vector not employed, the face can assume a pulled-back, "windswept" appearance. This appearance can also be due to changes in bone structure that generally happen with age.[2]

One of the most often overlooked (or not discussed) areas of a traditional facelift procedure is the effects on the anatomical positioning and angles of the ears. Most patients are, in many cases, not made aware that the vector forces in a facelift will lower the ears as well as change the angle of the ears. Ear lowering can be as much as 1 cm and change in the angle as much as 10 degrees.

Infection is a rare complication for patients who have undergone a rhytidectomy.[36] Staphylococcus is the most usual causative organism for an infection after facelift surgery.[17]

See also

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Rhytidectomy, commonly referred to as a facelift, is a cosmetic surgical procedure designed to rejuvenate the appearance of the face and by addressing age-related changes such as sagging , deep creases between the and , jowls, and loose under the and . The involves elevating the , tightening underlying muscles and connective tissues like the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), and excising excess to create a smoother, more youthful contour, though it does not halt the aging process or treat fine wrinkles and sun damage. The origins of rhytidectomy trace back to 1901, when German surgeon Eugene von Holländer performed the first documented procedure to correct facial scarring and sagging. Advancements accelerated in the mid-20th century, with Swedish surgeon Tord Skoog introducing the SMAS layer manipulation technique in 1969, which allowed for more durable lifting of deeper tissues rather than just skin excision. Further innovations, such as Sam Hamra's deep-plane facelift in 1990, extended the dissection beneath the SMAS to reposition the midface and neck more comprehensively, influencing modern variations like the minimal access cranial suspension (MACS) lift and extended deep-plane approaches. During the procedure, which typically lasts 3 to 6 hours under general or intravenous , surgeons make incisions hidden in the hairline, around the ears, and sometimes under the to access facial layers. Techniques vary by patient needs, including SMAS plication (folding and suturing the layer), imbrication (overlapping tissues), or deep-plane dissection to lift fat pads and muscles; adjuncts like fat grafting or eyelid may enhance outcomes. Ideal candidates are generally healthy adults over 40 with realistic expectations, stable elasticity, and no uncontrolled medical conditions like or active , which contraindicate due to heightened complication risks. Rhytidectomy remains one of the most popular cosmetic surgeries, with 79,058 procedures performed in 2024, reflecting a 1% increase from 78,482 in 2023. The majority of patients (59%) are aged 55 to 69, followed by those 70 and older (20%), with women comprising 93% of recipients; trends show a slight shift toward younger patients in their 30s and 40s seeking preventive rejuvenation. Recovery involves 2 to 4 weeks of , during which patients experience swelling, bruising, and temporary numbness, managed with pain medication, cold compresses, and elevation; strenuous activity is restricted for up to 6 weeks to minimize scarring. Potential complications, occurring in 0.2% to 8% of cases, include (the most common, treatable by drainage), (0.7% to 2.5%, often resolving spontaneously), , (higher in smokers), and alopecia around incisions. Results typically last 10 years, providing long-term improvement in facial harmony, though maintenance with nonsurgical treatments like fillers or lasers can extend benefits.

History

Cutaneous Excision Era (1900–1970)

The Cutaneous Excision Era marked the inception of rhytidectomy as a surgical intervention for facial rejuvenation, with techniques centered exclusively on the removal and redraping of to address visible signs of aging such as wrinkles and sagging. The first documented procedure occurred in 1901, when German surgeon Eugen Holländer performed a facelift on a Polish aristocrat by excising redundant in the preauricular and temporal regions with minimal undermining, aiming to smooth facial contours without deeper . This approach relied on direct excision and simple closure, reflecting the era's limited understanding of facial anatomy and emphasis on superficial correction. Subsequent advancements refined these skin-focused methods while maintaining the absence of deeper tissue manipulation. In 1919, French surgeon Raymond Passot introduced a technique involving small elliptical excisions in the preauricular area to eliminate nasolabial folds and cheek wrinkles, accompanied by limited undermining of the skin and detachment of underlying subcutaneous fat for better redraping. A pivotal milestone came in 1920 when American surgeon Adalbert Bettman described a continuous incision extending from the temporal scalp through the preauricular, postauricular, and mastoid regions, enabling broader skin mobilization and reducing visible scarring compared to earlier vertical or isolated excisions. Over the following decades, procedures evolved from rudimentary skin pulls to more extensive subcutaneous undermining; for instance, in 1927, surgeon O.H. Barnes advocated wide undermining to allow tension-free closure, enhancing contour improvement in the jowls and neck. Despite these innovations, the era's techniques exhibited significant limitations due to their superficial nature, which overlooked ptosis in underlying muscles and fat compartments. High recurrence rates were common, with sagging often returning within months to a few years because skin-only tightening could not counteract deeper gravitational forces. Visible scarring frequently marred outcomes, particularly from initial vertical incisions that healed poorly in non-hair-bearing areas, while excessive skin tension produced unnatural, "pulled" appearances that distorted facial harmony. These shortcomings underscored the need for more comprehensive approaches in subsequent decades.

SMAS Manipulation Era (1970–1980)

The SMAS manipulation era marked a significant advancement in rhytidectomy by shifting focus from purely cutaneous techniques to addressing deeper facial layers, building briefly on the limitations of skin-only excision that often resulted in short-lived results due to excessive skin tension. In 1969, Swedish plastic surgeon Tord Skoog pioneered the concept of dissecting and repositioning tissues along the superficial fascial plane, recognizing its role in supporting facial structures without relying solely on skin redraping, which laid the groundwork for more durable lifts. This approach emphasized plication of the underlying fascia to correct ptosis while minimizing visible scarring and unnatural tightness. The formal identification of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) as a distinct anatomical layer came in 1976 through the cadaveric studies of Vladimir Mitz and Martine Peyronie, who described it as a fibromuscular network continuous with the platysma and , ideal for surgical manipulation to restore midface and lower face contours. Surgeons began incorporating separate undermining of the skin flap and SMAS layer, allowing independent mobilization; techniques such as SMAS plication—involving suture folding without excision—or imbrication, where redundant SMAS is overlapped and sutured, became standard to redistribute tension away from the skin, promoting a more natural, harmonious rejuvenation. These methods targeted jowl and ptosis by elevating the SMAS superiorly and posteriorly, reducing the risk of skin distortion seen in prior eras. Clinical outcomes during this period demonstrated improved longevity, with SMAS-based rhytidectomies providing lifts that typically endured 5–10 years, substantially longer than the 2–5 years associated with cutaneous-only procedures, due to the offered by SMAS repositioning. Patient satisfaction was enhanced by subtler postoperative changes and better preservation of facial dynamics, though long-term follow-up revealed potential risks including progressive SMAS relaxation or weakening, which could lead to recurrent sagging in some cases, particularly with ongoing aging or poor tissue quality. Seminal contributions from this era, including refinements by surgeons like Jack Anderson who advocated extended SMAS dissection, solidified these techniques as foundational, influencing subsequent evolutions in facial rejuvenation.

Deep Plane Era (1980–1991)

The deep plane era marked a significant advancement in rhytidectomy by emphasizing and repositioning of deeper layers as a composite unit, building on earlier superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) plication techniques from the . In 1980, Michael L. Lemmon and Sam T. Hamra introduced refinements to Tord Skoog's composite undermining approach, reporting outcomes from 577 patients where skin and SMAS were elevated together to achieve more natural rejuvenation without excessive skin tension. This sub-SMAS method laid the groundwork for treating the face as an integrated structure. By 1990, Hamra further evolved the technique into the formalized deep plane rhytidectomy, involving extensive below the zygomaticus muscles to access and mobilize deeper tissues for improved longevity of results. Key features of the deep plane approach included treating the , SMAS, and underlying fat as a single flap to preserve and avoid separate skin undermining, which had previously led to unnatural pulling. Dissection extended medially into the and inferiorly into the , targeting the release of retaining ligaments such as the zygomatic and mandibular ones to free ptotic tissues. This allowed for vertical vector repositioning of deeper structures, with particular emphasis on effacing the through direct midface elevation rather than superficial tightening alone. Hamra's 1990 description highlighted the importance of this extended sub-SMAS plane to address midfacial descent comprehensively, minimizing reliance on skin excision for contouring. The technique offered advantages in durability and aesthetics, including reduced skin thinning due to the robust blood supply of the composite flap and superior midface elevation that provided more natural, youthful contours compared to prior methods. Clinical outcomes demonstrated enhanced correction of jowls and nasolabial folds with lower rates of recurrent laxity over time. However, limitations included prolonged operative times, often exceeding four hours due to the meticulous dissection required, and an elevated risk of nerve injury, with facial nerve complications reported in less than 1% of cases but great auricular nerve issues up to 7%. These risks stemmed from proximity to branches of the facial nerve during ligament release, necessitating precise anatomical knowledge.

Volumetric and Modern Eras (1991–present)

The volumetric era of rhytidectomy, emerging in the , marked a toward addressing aging as a process of and volume loss rather than solely skin laxity, with pioneers like Roderick Hester introducing techniques such as the centrofacial transblepharoplasty subperiosteal cheek lift to restore midface volume through direct access and repositioning of soft tissues. This approach emphasized volumetric restoration to counteract the observed in aging faces, where fat atrophy leads to hollowing in the malar and periorbital regions. Complementing Hester's contributions, Rod J. Rohrich advanced the understanding of fat compartments, demonstrating through anatomical studies that the face's subcutaneous fat is divided into discrete units that independently atrophy with age, necessitating targeted interventions like autologous fat grafting to replenish deflated areas and achieve natural rejuvenation. Rohrich's lift-and-fill facelift integrated superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) manipulation with compartment-specific fat transfer, showing improved contour harmony and longevity in outcomes compared to traditional lifts. Following the turn of the millennium, hybrid techniques combining high SMAS plication with elements of deep-plane dissection gained prominence, allowing for more secure suspension of facial tissues while minimizing skin undermining for reduced morbidity. The high SMAS facelift, refined in this period, involved elevating and plicating the SMAS at a superior level to reposition the malar fat pad and jowls effectively, often yielding results with less tension on the skin and fewer visible scars. Concurrently, extended deep-plane rhytidectomy evolved to provide comprehensive by incorporating broader releases across the midface, jawline, and , enabling holistic repositioning of composite flaps for enhanced durability and natural appearance in patients with moderate to severe ptosis. These post-2000 developments built on prior deep-plane principles by extending dissections to address multidimensional aging vectors, resulting in studies reporting sustained improvements in depth and mandibular definition over 5–10 years. In the 2020–2025 period, innovations focused on preservation-oriented and minimally invasive refinements to optimize recovery and subtlety, including the preservation facelift utilizing rotating pedicle flaps to limit while enhancing vascular preservation and jawline . This technique, blending extended deep-plane elements with high SMAS suspension, demonstrated shorter drainage times (average 1–2 days) and lower complication rates (under 5%) in comparative analyses of over 100 patients, prioritizing natural results with reduced bruising. The limited delamination deep-plane approach further advanced this trend by restricting subcutaneous undermining to essential areas, facilitating faster recovery (typically 7–10 days to social engagement) and minimizing risks like or through preserved perforator vessels. Adjuncts such as laser-assisted lifting, often employing fractional CO2 lasers for resurfacing, complemented these surgical advances by improving texture and elasticity without extensive incisions, with indicating enhanced patient satisfaction in hybrid protocols. Safety profiles improved via advanced modalities, including tumescent local infiltration with mild sedation, which reduced general risks and postoperative in over 90% of cases, enabling outpatient procedures with complication rates below 2%.

Facial Aging

Pathophysiology of Aging

Facial aging involves multifaceted biological changes across , soft tissues, and skeletal structures, driven by intrinsic factors such as and hormonal shifts, alongside extrinsic influences like exposure and environmental stressors. A primary mechanism is the progressive loss of skin elasticity, primarily due to elastin degradation within the dermal . Elastin fibers, essential for resilience, undergo enzymatic breakdown by matrix metalloproteinases and oxidative , with declining steeply between ages 40 and 50, resulting in thinner, less compliant that contributes to rhytides and laxity. Concurrently, the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) weakens with age, as evidenced by increased laxity correlated with chronological progression (r = 0.72, p < 0.001), impairing its role in supporting overlying soft tissues and facilitating sagging. compartment further exacerbates volume deflation, particularly in the midface, where deep fat layers diminish by approximately 18.4% over an 11-year period, leading to hollowing and pseudoptosis. Skeletal resorption compounds these effects, with progressive causing midface retrusion and orbital enlargement, altering the foundational support for soft tissues. Bone-specific alterations include maxillary retrusion, characterized by a decrease in the maxillary of about 10° from young adulthood to later decades, which reduces anterior projection and promotes midface flattening. This retrusion, combined with resorption at the pyriform aperture, diminishes skeletal buttressing, allowing s to descend and deepen nasolabial folds. plays a critical role, as retaining ligaments such as the zygomatic-cutaneous and mandibular ligaments attenuate over time, losing tensile strength and permitting inferior migration of adjacent structures. This weakening directly contributes to jowl formation, where prejowl sulcus concavity accentuates due to mandibular border resorption and herniation, while nasolabial deepening arises from unsupported cheek descent tethering against the fold. Soft tissue descent is amplified by , acting on lax structures to induce ptosis, particularly of the malar fat pads, which migrate inferomedially, bulging against the nasolabial crease and exacerbating midface hollowing. In the lower face, the succumbs to gravitational forces, developing ptosis and visible banding as its attachments weaken, further contributing to submental fullness and jawline blurring. These integrated changes underscore the volumetric and gravitational dynamics central to facial aging .

Clinical Signs Indicating Surgery

Rhytidectomy addresses prominent clinical manifestations of facial aging, including rhytids or wrinkles in the perioral and nasolabial regions, which appear as deep creases due to repetitive folding and loss of elasticity. Jowls form from sagging and along the jawline, while submental laxity presents as loose and excess under the , often creating a double chin appearance. These signs stem briefly from pathophysiological changes such as atrophy and ligamentous weakening. Midface descent leads to flattened cheeks and deepened nasolabial folds, and marionette lines extend from the oral commissures downward, contributing to a downturned expression. Severity of these signs is assessed using validated grading scales to determine suitability for surgical intervention, focusing on ptosis and volume loss that non-surgical treatments cannot adequately correct. The Glogau Wrinkle Scale, for instance, categorizes from type I (mild, early wrinkles) to type IV (severe, deep wrinkles with significant laxity), with rhytidectomy typically indicated for types III and IV where moderate-to-severe sagging predominates. Such scales enable objective evaluation of how these clinical features impact facial harmony and guide decisions for procedures that resuspend ptotic tissues. Ideal candidates for rhytidectomy are generally individuals aged 40 to 70 years exhibiting moderate-to-severe skin laxity that persists despite non-invasive options like fillers or lasers. In this demographic, the cumulative effects of gravitational pull and tissue degradation become visually prominent, making surgical repositioning effective for restoring a more youthful contour.

Preoperative Considerations

Indications

Rhytidectomy is primarily indicated for healthy adult patients aged 40 and older who present with moderate to severe facial aging characterized by laxity, deep nasolabial folds, jowls due to loss of , and excess fatty deposits or loose in the submental and submandibular areas. These structural changes, arising from the clinical signs of facial aging such as tissue descent and volume loss, are best addressed surgically when non-invasive treatments prove insufficient. The procedure is particularly suitable for individuals seeking durable rejuvenation effects lasting 10 to 15 years, depending on factors like quality and lifestyle. In addition to isolated facial concerns, rhytidectomy is frequently combined with adjunctive procedures to optimize outcomes. For instance, it is commonly paired with to simultaneously correct periorbital aging and with autologous fat grafting to restore midface volume and smooth transitions between facial compartments. This integrated approach enhances overall harmony and addresses multiple aspects of aging for more natural, long-lasting results. Clinical evidence supports the efficacy of rhytidectomy for these indications, with studies demonstrating high satisfaction rates of over 90% in alleviating structural descent and improving facial aesthetics. For example, an of 2,153 patient reviews reported 92% positive satisfaction. Such outcomes are most pronounced in patients without significant comorbidities, where the effectively repositions soft tissues for a more youthful appearance.

Contraindications

Rhytidectomy, or facelift surgery, carries specific contraindications to ensure and optimal outcomes, as certain conditions can significantly elevate perioperative risks or compromise . These are categorized into absolute and relative contraindications, with psychological factors also playing a critical role in candidate selection. This section complements the indications by highlighting exclusionary criteria for patients who may not be suitable despite desiring facial rejuvenation. Absolute contraindications encompass conditions that pose substantial threats to surgical safety and are generally prohibitive. These include major medical comorbidities such as uncontrolled coagulopathies or bleeding diatheses, which heighten the risk of excessive intraoperative or postoperative hemorrhage. Active skin infections in the facial region represent another absolute barrier, as they can lead to widespread dissemination or severe wound complications under surgical stress. Similarly, severe cardiopulmonary diseases that amplify anesthesia-related risks, including significant cardiac or pulmonary insufficiency, render the procedure inadvisable due to potential life-threatening events like thrombosis or . Relative contraindications involve factors that do not outright preclude but necessitate careful risk-benefit assessment and often preoperative optimization. is a prominent relative contraindication, as impairs microvascular and delays , increasing the likelihood of skin flap ; cessation for at least 2-4 weeks pre- and postoperatively is strongly recommended. Unrealistic expectations regarding surgical outcomes can also qualify as relative, potentially leading to postoperative dissatisfaction even with technically successful results. Additionally, patients exhibiting only mild signs of aging, such as fine wrinkles, may be better suited to non-surgical interventions like dermal fillers or resurfacing, as rhytidectomy is optimized for moderate to severe ptosis and may yield suboptimal benefits or unnecessary risks in minimal cases. Psychological screening is essential to identify contraindications related to , which can profoundly impact surgical satisfaction and recovery. (BDD) is a key concern, as affected individuals often harbor distorted perceptions of their appearance, leading to persistent dissatisfaction despite aesthetic improvements; preoperative evaluation by a is mandatory in suspected cases. A of psychiatric issues, including depression or anxiety disorders, warrants thorough assessment to gauge motivation and mitigate risks of postoperative psychological , such as exacerbated depression in approximately 30% of patients.

Patient Evaluation

Patient evaluation for rhytidectomy begins with a comprehensive assessment to identify suitable candidates, mitigate risks, and align surgical planning with individual anatomy and expectations. This process integrates medical history review, physical examination, and ancillary tools to ensure optimal outcomes while minimizing complications such as hematoma or poor wound healing. The medical history review is foundational, encompassing a detailed inquiry into comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, bleeding disorders, and connective tissue diseases that could impair healing or increase perioperative risks. Smoking history is scrutinized, as active tobacco use elevates skin flap necrosis risk by up to 7.5% compared to 2.7% in nonsmokers, necessitating cessation at least 4 weeks preoperatively. Medication profiles are evaluated, including anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, and herbal supplements (e.g., vitamin E, ginkgo biloba) that promote bleeding, which should be discontinued 2 weeks prior under medical supervision. Psychiatric history is probed to detect body dysmorphic disorder or unrealistic expectations, ensuring psychological suitability. Physical examination focuses on facial aging signs, including skin laxity, rhytids, fat descent, jowls, nasolabial folds, midface volume loss, platysma banding, and skeletal structure to assess and support. General is evaluated through cardiovascular, pulmonary, and neurologic systems to confirm tolerance. This step helps identify indications like moderate to severe ptosis and contraindications such as active infections or uncontrolled coagulopathies. Standardized photography in frontal, lateral, oblique, and submental views documents baseline , facilitates technique selection, and supports postoperative comparison. Adjuncts such as 3D imaging and AI-assisted simulations enhance planning by providing volumetric analysis of soft tissues and predictive visualizations of outcomes, allowing tailored approaches to midface or deep-plane techniques. Laboratory tests, including and coagulation panels, may be ordered based on history to rule out or thrombotic risks. Preoperative optimization includes halting antihypertensives if exceeds 150/90 mmHg and arranging medical clearance for high-risk patients. Patients are advised to avoid aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 2 weeks prior to reduce bruising. is obtained through detailed discussions of benefits, such as rejuvenated contours, and risks, including (1-2%) or scarring, fostering realistic expectations and rapport. This evaluation ultimately tailors the procedure to the patient's unique and confirms psychological readiness for recovery.

Surgical Anatomy

Superficial Layers (Skin and SMAS)

The facial comprises the and , forming the outermost barrier manipulated in rhytidectomy procedures. The is a consisting of four to five layers: the (containing stem cells and melanocytes), (with desmosome-linked ), (featuring keratohyalin granules for barrier formation), and (composed of dead, keratinized cells providing protection). In the face, epidermal thickness is generally uniform but contributes to regional variations in overall resilience during surgical undermining. The , situated beneath the , is divided into the papillary (loose, vascular layer interfacing with the ) and reticular (dense, fibrous layer) sublayers. It is primarily composed of type I and III fibers (providing tensile strength), fibers (enabling elasticity and recoil), and an amorphous of glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans that maintains hydration and structural integrity. These components degrade with age, reducing dermal support and contributing to rhytidectomy indications, though surgical techniques focus on repositioning rather than restoring composition. skin thickness varies regionally to accommodate functional demands: it is thinnest in the eyelids (approximately 0.5 mm, facilitating mobility but increasing delicacy during periorbital adjustments) and thickest in the cheeks (1.5–2 mm, offering greater durability for flap elevation and tension). Deep to the subcutaneous fat lies the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), a continuous fibromuscular layer first described by Mitz and Peyronie in 1976 as the investing of the parotid and regions. It extends superiorly from the temporalis fascia and galea aponeurotica, blending with the , and inferiorly to the platysma across the lower face and neck, separating superficial and deep fat compartments while varying in density (looser laterally, more fibrous medially to the ). The SMAS invests and interconnects the facial mimetic muscles (e.g., zygomaticus, orbicularis oculi), anchoring them to the via fibrous to transmit contractile forces for expressions like smiling or frowning. Age-related laxity in the SMAS leads to descent of attached structures, exacerbating jowls, , and midface ptosis—key targets in superficial rhytidectomy approaches. In rhytidectomy, the superficial layers guide dissection planes: skin undermining occurs suprasMAS to mobilize redundant tissue for redraping, while SMAS manipulation (e.g., plication or imbrication) redistributes tension vectorially to support lifted contours without overburdening the . This strategy minimizes risks like , which arises from excessive periorbital traction pulling the lower lid away from the , by shifting primary stress to the robust SMAS rather than the delicate . Such techniques form the foundation for deeper s in advanced facelifts, ensuring layered support.

Deep Layers (Muscles, Ligaments, and Vasculature)

The deep layers of the facial anatomy, situated beneath the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), encompass critical muscular, ligamentous, and neurovascular structures that provide support and mobility to the face, influencing both expressive function and the manifestations of aging in procedures. These layers are essential for understanding the risks associated with sub-SMAS dissection in extended-plane techniques, where precise navigation prevents complications such as ptosis exacerbation or neuropraxia. The mimetic muscles within these deep layers, including the zygomaticus major and minor, , and platysma, play pivotal roles in and contribute to ptosis observed in aging. The zygomaticus major and minor muscles, located in the prezygomatic space, elevate the upper lip and corner of the mouth to facilitate smiling, while their progressive weakening and descent lead to midcheek ptosis and deepening of the during aging. Similarly, the , spanning the prezygomatic and premaxillary spaces, enables eyelid closure and cheek elevation for eye protection and expression; its laxity in aging contributes to periorbital hollowing and lateral canthal descent, potentially worsened by superficial trauma during deeper dissections. The platysma, a thin sheet overlying the lower masseter in the premasseter space, aids in depressing the lower lip and jawline contouring during expressions like frowning; age-related or banding of the platysma exacerbates neck ptosis and jowl formation, with its attachments to the SMAS allowing coordinated movement that must be preserved to avoid postoperative asymmetry. Retaining ligaments in the deep layers anchor the SMAS and overlying soft tissues to the underlying and bone, maintaining facial contour and resisting gravitational descent, though their attenuation with aging necessitates selective release in deep-plane approaches. The zygomatic ligament, also known as McGregor's patch, arises from the along the inferior zygoma and inserts into the via the SMAS, tethering the malar fat pad and limiting midfacial mobility; its release is crucial for addressing cheek ptosis but risks over-dissection near the . The masseteric ligaments, comprising upper and lower components, originate from the parotideomasseteric and anterior masseter border, weaving into the SMAS to stabilize the superficial and platysma; the upper masseteric ligament (mean length 0.68 cm) and lower (1.12 cm) act as barriers to descent, with weakening contributing to jowl prominence and requiring division for effective lower face rejuvenation. These ligaments demarcate surgical planes, guiding dissection while minimizing formation from associated perforators like the transverse facial artery branch within McGregor's patch. The vasculature and nerves traversing these deep layers pose significant risks during rhytidectomy, particularly in the premasseter and prezygomatic spaces, where injury can lead to ischemia or motor deficits. Branches of the and vein, including the transverse facial artery (located 2.5 cm lateral and 3 cm inferior to the lateral ), supply the midface and parotid region; their disruption risks flap necrosis or excessive bleeding, especially in the fibrofatty . The marginal mandibular nerve, a terminal branch of the running deep to the SMAS and often lateral to the facial vein (in 22.6% as a single branch, with plexiform variations in 35.5%), innervates the depressor anguli oris, depressor labii inferioris, and muscles for lower lip depression; its proximity to the heightens vulnerability during subplatysmal dissection, with reported temporary rates of 0.7%-2.5% and potential for permanent deficit if stretched or severed. Preservation strategies emphasize staying superficial to the platysma initially and identifying the nerve 2 cm lateral to the oral commissure to mitigate these complications.

Surgical Techniques

Skin-Only Facelift

The skin-only facelift, also known as the subcutaneous or cutaneous rhytidectomy, represents the foundational technique in facial rejuvenation surgery, focusing exclusively on the excision and redraping of without addressing underlying structures. This approach is particularly suited for patients with mild to moderate skin laxity, such as younger individuals exhibiting good tone in the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), where the primary concern is gravitational descent of the skin envelope rather than deeper tissue ptosis. By relying solely on skin tightening, the procedure minimizes surgical complexity while providing subtle improvement in facial contours, particularly along the jowls and neck. The surgical procedure begins with incisions placed along the temporal hairline and preauricular area, typically following the incision pattern: starting in the temporal hair tuft, curving along the root of the , encircling the (extending 1-2 mm onto the ), and continuing into the postauricular hairline for optimal scar concealment. A subcutaneous flap is then undermined using facelift scissors, extending approximately 4-8 cm anterior to the tragus to allow for adequate mobilization while preserving vascular supply, often guided by to maintain flap thickness. Excess skin is marked and excised in an ellipse measuring 2-5 cm, followed by redraping and closure with fine sutures (e.g., 6-0) under minimal tension to avoid complications such as ischemia or distortion of the (pixie ear deformity). The operation is performed under general supplemented with tumescent local (e.g., 500-1,000 mg lidocaine and 0.5-1 mg epinephrine per liter of saline) and typically lasts 2-3 hours. Postoperatively, patients experience relatively quick recovery, with dressings removed on day 1 and sutures or staples taken out around day 7, allowing most to resume light activities within 1-2 weeks, though full resolution of swelling may take several months. This technique originated in the early as the initial method of rhytidectomy, predating more advanced layered approaches. However, its outcomes are limited by the inherent elasticity of , resulting in shorter longevity compared to procedures involving deeper tissue manipulation—often lasting only a few years at best—with recurrent ptosis frequently necessitating revision .

SMAS Lift

The SMAS (superficial musculoaponeurotic system) lift represents an advancement in rhytidectomy techniques, involving the independent manipulation of the SMAS layer through plication or imbrication to enhance facial rejuvenation beyond simple skin tightening. This method addresses the descent of underlying soft tissues by folding and suturing the SMAS, thereby providing structural support and more natural contouring of the face and neck. The surgical procedure begins with infiltration of a tumescent solution or local anesthetic subcutaneously to facilitate . An incision is made from the temporal region, curving anterior to the and extending into the postauricular sulcus, allowing for of a flap using or electrocautery, typically undermining up to 4-8 cm depending on the extent of laxity. The SMAS layer is then identified and mobilized separately; scoring or incising the SMAS vertically about 2 cm anterior to the tragus enables plication with nonabsorbable or slowly absorbable sutures (such as 2-0 or 3-0 ), directing the lift posteriorly and superiorly to reposition ptotic tissues toward the mastoid or . Excess SMAS may be excised infra-auricularly if needed, followed by redraping and trimming of the skin flap with closure using fine sutures (5-0 or 6-0). This high-SMAS approach, which elevates the SMAS flap along the , is commonly employed to achieve vector-directed tightening. Advantages of the SMAS lift include even distribution of tension between the resilient SMAS and overlying skin, which minimizes unnatural pulling and promotes longer-lasting results compared to skin-only methods, with reduced risk of skin necrosis or widened scars. It effectively suspends descended soft tissues, sharpening the cervicomandibular angle, diminishing jowls, and improving jawline definition, while maintaining low complication rates such as (under 5%) and high patient satisfaction. The procedure is typically performed on an outpatient basis under general or with , lasting 3-4 hours bilaterally. A key variation is the extended SMAS technique, which involves more distal of the SMAS into the region for comprehensive , including platysmal plication and subplatysmal fat trimming to address submental fullness and platysmal banding. This extension enhances midface and cervical rejuvenation without requiring deeper plane entry, offering stable support for moderate to severe laxity. The concept of SMAS manipulation originated from anatomical descriptions in the , building on earlier plication principles to evolve from traditional skin-only facelifts.

Deep-Plane Facelift

The deep-plane facelift is a surgical technique for facial rejuvenation that involves in a plane beneath the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) to mobilize the skin-SMAS composite as a single unit, allowing for more comprehensive repositioning of deeper facial tissues. Originally described by Sam Hamra in , this approach builds on SMAS principles by extending the deeper to address midface ptosis and nasolabial folds more effectively than superficial techniques. The procedure typically begins with a preauricular incision along the tragal edge, extending into the postauricular crease and occipital to conceal scarring. A subcutaneous flap is elevated, followed by entry into the sub-SMAS plane through incision of the SMAS itself, often starting anterior to the . Key steps include complete release of retaining ligaments, such as the zygomatic ligaments (including McGregor's patch) and masseteric ligaments, to free the malar and midface tissues; this is achieved using meticulous to avoid deeper structures. The mobilized composite is then advanced along a superolateral vector, typically at 10–15 degrees beyond the direction, and secured with sutures for suspension, while the overlying skin is redraped tension-free. Recent variants from the 2020s incorporate limited , such as partial separation of the orbicularis oculi laterally without lower involvement, to refine mid-cheek contouring while minimizing extent. The surgery generally lasts 4–6 hours under general . This technique yields natural-looking results by restoring deeper structural support, particularly effective for correcting nasolabial folds, jowls, and midface descent, with durability often exceeding 10 years in long-term follow-up, as evidenced by case series showing sustained correction at 10-year intervals. Compared to SMAS-only methods, it provides more lasting rejuvenation due to ligament release and volumetric repositioning. Risks include higher exposure of branches during deep , with temporary weakness (neuropraxia) occurring in 2–5% of cases, primarily affecting the zygomatic or buccal branches and resolving within weeks to months; permanent is rare at less than 1%. Other complications, such as or skin necrosis, are comparable to other facelifts but require vigilant intraoperative monitoring.

Composite Facelift

The composite facelift, developed by plastic surgeon Sam T. Hamra in 1992, represents an advanced extension of deep-plane rhytidectomy that integrates the repositioning of skin, , and underlying cheek fat as a unified musculocutaneous flap to achieve balanced facial rejuvenation. This technique emphasizes maintaining the anatomic attachments between these layers during elevation and superomedial vector repositioning, allowing for simultaneous correction of midface descent, nasolabial folds, and periorbital aging while preserving vascular supply and natural tissue relationships. Unlike earlier methods, it addresses the holistic aging process by treating the face as an interconnected unit, extending dissection from the neck platysma upward through the midface and periorbital regions for comprehensive 360-degree access. The procedure begins with incisions along the temporal , preauricular , and postauricular sulcus, often combined with a subciliary lower incision to facilitate periorbital access. Sub-orbicularis is performed medially over the zygomaticus muscles and malar eminence, preserving 6-7 mm of pretarsal orbicularis with the skin flap to support lower integrity. The malar fat pad is then suspended and repositioned superiorly and medially, attached to the elevated orbicularis oculi flap, to restore midface volume and smooth the . Lateral canthopexy follows, involving division of the lateral canthal and its reattachment to the orbital rim or via osseous fixation, which tightens the lower and prevents while enhancing cheek projection. This approach directly targets the tear trough deformity and lower -cheek junction by redistributing orbital fat and muscle, eliminating the visible transition between eyelid and midface without separate in many cases. Neck contouring is achieved through platysma plication and , integrated into the composite flap for seamless jawline definition. Surgical duration typically ranges from 5 to 7 hours under general , reflecting the meticulous required. In contemporary practice, the composite facelift is frequently combined with autologous fat grafting to augment deficient areas like the tear trough or malar regions, enhancing volumetric restoration and of results. Outcomes include , harmonious anti-aging effects with improved midface support, reduced jowling, and a rejuvenated periorbital appearance that persists for 10-15 years in suitable candidates, as evidenced by long-term follow-up studies. However, the technique demands a steeper due to its technical complexity, including precise flap handling to avoid facial nerve injury or vascular compromise, limiting its adoption to experienced surgeons.

Mid-Face Lift

The mid-face lift is a specialized rhytidectomy technique focused on rejuvenating the central region by elevating the malar fat pads and submalar tissues to counteract age-related ptosis. This procedure targets the descent of midfacial structures, which contributes to flattened cheeks, deepened nasolabial folds, and tear trough hollowing, without addressing the full face or neck. It is ideally suited for patients exhibiting isolated midface ptosis, particularly those who do not require or desire a more extensive facelift, such as younger individuals with early signs of central aging or those seeking correction after previous lower surgery or filler complications. Surgical access for the mid-face lift commonly employs intraoral incisions via the gingivolabial sulcus or transblepharoplasty approaches through the lower eyelid, minimizing visible scarring. Once accessed, the procedure involves subperiosteal dissection to release the zygomatic and masseteric ligaments, allowing mobilization of the midfacial soft tissues in a vertical vector. Elevation is then achieved through suspension using nonabsorbable sutures, such as 2-0 polydioxanone, anchored to the temporal fascia or periosteum, or occasionally with resorbable mesh for added support; endoscopic assistance is often utilized for precision in this plane. The operation typically lasts 1 to 3 hours under general anesthesia and is performed on an outpatient basis. Outcomes of the mid-face lift include enhanced cheek projection, restoration of malar volume, and softening of nasolabial folds, yielding a more youthful and harmonious central facial contour with enduring results often lasting 5 to 10 years. Patient satisfaction rates vary across studies and patient reviews. Medical literature often reports high satisfaction, with rates around 85-95% in some series, while patient-reported outcomes on sites like RealSelf show lower satisfaction, around 60-70% "Worth It" ratings. The use of concealed incisions results in minimal visible scarring, promoting faster recovery compared to traditional facelifts, with most patients resuming normal activities within 1 to 2 weeks. This technique complements broader rhytidectomy methods by providing targeted midfacial support when integrated into composite procedures.

Mini-Facelift

The mini-facelift, also known as a short-scar rhytidectomy, is a less invasive variant of traditional facelift procedures designed for patients exhibiting early signs of aging, such as mild jowls and subtle sagging. This technique employs limited incisions typically starting in the preauricular crease and extending to the lobule, avoiding extension into the temporal or postauricular regions to minimize scarring. Skin undermining is restricted to 2-4 cm anterior to the ear, allowing for focused elevation of the superficial tissues without extensive dissection. The superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) is addressed through purse-string suturing or plication, where permanent sutures (e.g., 2-0 Mersilene) are placed in a running locked fashion to gather and elevate the SMAS in a superior-posterior vector, providing support to the cheek and jawline while reducing nasolabial folds. This approach often incorporates adjunctive measures like submental or platysmaplasty for contouring in select cases, but it prioritizes superficial access over deeper manipulations. Performed under with optional mild , the procedure generally lasts 1-2 hours, enabling outpatient execution. It serves as a variant of broader SMAS-based methods but emphasizes brevity and reduced tissue trauma for quicker outcomes. Key advantages include accelerated recovery, with most patients resuming normal activities within 1-2 days and suture removal by day 6-7, alongside lower procedural costs and minimal risks compared to full facelifts. Complication rates remain low, featuring rare instances of (1%), suture extrusion (up to 15%), or minor scarring, with no reported permanent injuries or in large series. It is particularly suited for individuals aged 40-60 with mild to moderate perioral and jowl laxity, offering natural-looking without overcorrection. However, limitations arise in addressing severe rhytids, significant midface ptosis, or pronounced banding, where results may appear moderate and require supplementary treatments for optimal . Patient dissatisfaction can occur if expectations exceed the technique's capacity for subtle enhancements, underscoring its role as an entry-level option rather than a comprehensive solution for advanced aging.

Subperiosteal Facelift

The subperiosteal facelift is a deep-plane technique that involves directly on the facial bones to release and elevate the envelope, particularly suited for patients with severe midfacial ptosis or those requiring revision . This approach extends the principles of midface lifting by addressing broader facial aging through bone-adherent undermining. The procedure typically begins with a temporal incision, approximately 3-5 cm behind the hairline, to create an endoscopic pocket for access. Subperiosteal undermining then proceeds from the temporal region across the and , extending inferiorly to the mandibular border, allowing comprehensive release of the and retaining ligaments at key points such as the zygoma, orbital rim, and . Broad suspension follows, using nonabsorbable sutures (e.g., 2-0 ) to secure the mobilized and fat pads—including Bichat's fat pad, malar fat pad, and suborbicularis oculi fat (SOOF)—to the deep , enabling vertical vector repositioning of the entire facial s. The generally lasts 4-5 hours under general , reflecting the technical demands of endoscopic navigation and extensive . This technique repositions the full facial envelope, providing robust support for long-term results, though it is associated with higher postoperative swelling due to the deep periosteal manipulation. Outcomes include dramatic of the midface, enhanced malar projection, reduction in nasolabial folds, and concomitant brow and lateral canthal lift, with studies reporting excellent rejuvenation in over 80% of cases across 200 patients followed for up to 41 months. However, increased is common, persisting for 2-4 weeks and occasionally up to 3 months, necessitating prolonged recovery with measures like facial massage starting after the first week.

Thread Lift

A thread lift is a that uses specially designed sutures to lift and tighten sagging facial tissues, serving as a non-surgical alternative for addressing mild to moderate laxity. The technique involves the insertion of threads through small punctures in the skin, typically using a or fine needle, to anchor the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) and reposition ptotic tissues without excision or extensive . Performed under , the procedure generally lasts 45 to 90 minutes, allowing patients to remain awake and return to normal activities shortly after. The threads employed are primarily absorbable materials such as (PDO), which dissolve over 4 to 6 months while providing mechanical support and stimulating production through activation. Barbed or cogged variants grip the tissue for immediate lifting, whereas smooth threads offer subtle tightening and volumization. In the procedure, entry points are marked along the desired lift vectors, such as from the temporal region toward the midface; threads are then advanced subdermally or within the SMAS layer into the subcutaneous layer to lift and tighten mid-face tissues, including loose skin under the chin using PDO or Silhouette threads for immediate lift and ongoing collagen tightening, tensioned to elevate areas like the cheeks and jowls, indirectly addressing nasal base depression and nasolabial folds, and secured without visible scarring. This approach targets mild laxity in the midface and lower face, improving contours and reducing early signs of aging without the recovery associated with traditional rhytidectomy, though it offers limited support for bony depressions and is mainly suitable for mild cases with skin laxity, often requiring repetition. Clinical results from thread lifts provide immediate enhancement, with effects lasting 1 to 2 years as new formation maintains the lift post-dissolution, though long-term beyond 2 years remains limited in available studies. satisfaction is generally high for suitable candidates with mild ptosis, but outcomes vary based on thread type and placement. Advances include cone-thread systems, such as those in the Silhouette InstaLift, featuring bidirectional cones for enhanced tissue grip and volume restoration, often combined with dermal fillers to optimize rejuvenation in the cheeks and nasolabial folds.

MACS Facelift

The Minimal Access Cranial Suspension (MACS) lift is a short-scar rhytidectomy technique that emphasizes vertical repositioning of tissues through limited and purse-string sutures in the superficial musculoaponeurotic (SMAS). Introduced as a modification of the S-lift, it builds on mini-facelift concepts by incorporating stronger anchorage and precise suture configurations to achieve efficient lifting with reduced invasiveness. The procedure targets sagging in the lower face, jowls, and midface while preserving natural contours and minimizing recovery time. The surgical steps begin with an inverted L-shaped preauricular incision, extending below the sideburn for limited access, followed by subcutaneous undermining over the jowl and upper neck regions. Two permanent purse-string sutures are then placed in the SMAS: a vertical U-shaped suture and an oblique O-shaped suture, both anchored to the at the level of the helical crus to provide upward pull on descended tissues. For midface enhancement, a third vertical purse-string suture may be added over the malar to address the . Excess skin is excised along the incision line, and the procedure, performed under with , typically lasts 2 to 3 hours. This technique offers benefits such as targeted correction of jowls and midface ptosis through minimal , resulting in less tissue trauma, shorter scars, and more natural-appearing outcomes compared to extensive undermining methods. It is particularly suited for patients with mild to moderate aging changes, providing efficient vertical lift without lateral tension that can distort facial features. Evidence from clinical studies supports the MACS lift's in selected cases, with outcomes comparable to full SMAS techniques for mild-moderate but with lower morbidity, including reduced operative time and fewer complications. In a series of 88 (mean age 55.5 years), pleasing results were achieved over 20 months with a very low complication rate, primarily minor issues like temporary . A of 739 across six studies reported no major complications, high satisfaction (up to 96%), and minor adverse events such as hematomas (0.8%) or seromas (0.4%), underscoring its safety profile for outpatient settings.

Preservation Facelift

The preservation facelift is a 2020s innovation in rhytidectomy that employs limited-dissection techniques to maintain vascular integrity while achieving enhanced jawline definition through targeted tissue manipulation. This approach integrates elements of the extended deep-plane and high superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) facelifts, serving as a modern extension of deep-plane methods with reduced invasiveness. By minimizing skin undermining to approximately 2–3 cm, typically limited to two finger widths below the mandibular border, the procedure preserves the superficial vascular network and anatomical boundaries, thereby lowering the risk of tissue necrosis and promoting faster healing. Surgical incisions begin at the temporal region, curve around the sideburns and ear helix, and extend into the postauricular sulcus for discreet scarring. Central to the technique are rotating pedicle SMAS flaps, which are mobilized along the mandibular ramus and rotated to sharpen the mandibular border and accentuate the gonial angle. These flaps are secured using 4-0 sutures, allowing for precise jawline contouring without extensive detachment of the SMAS layer from the overlying . Additional refinement in the involves creating a platysma with purse-string sutures to improve cervicomental definition. The procedure is performed under , often supplemented with intravenous or general , and typically lasts about 3 hours, depending on concurrent treatments. Local infiltration uses a solution of 0.5% lidocaine, 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, saline, and to minimize bleeding. Drains, if placed, are removed after an average of 1.5 days. Advantages of the preservation facelift include a shortened recovery period, with most patients resuming normal activities within 1 week due to reduced tissue trauma and swelling. Complication rates are notably low, with occurring in less than 1% of cases (0% in a cohort of 57 patients) and overall adverse events at approximately 7%, compared to higher rates in traditional deep-plane techniques. This preservation of vascularity yields more natural-appearing results by avoiding over-dissection, which can lead to a pulled or unnatural look, while still providing durable rejuvenation through composite tissue repositioning. Recent studies from 2025, including a comparative analysis of 134 patients (57 undergoing preservation facelift and 77 receiving extended deep-plane), demonstrate superior patient comfort, with mean drain duration of 1.5 days versus 4.3 days for deep-plane (p=0.00001), and reduced complications (7% versus 29%; p=0.03). These findings indicate comparable to deep-plane facelifts, with sustained jawline enhancement and improved of the lifted tissues, attributed to the minimal-dissection strategy.

Postoperative Management

Recovery Process

Following rhytidectomy, immediate postoperative care focuses on minimizing swelling and ensuring patient comfort. Surgical drains are typically placed to remove excess blood and fluid, remaining in place for 24 to 48 hours before removal during a follow-up visit on postoperative day 1. A compressive is applied around the face to reduce bruising and swelling, and patients are instructed to keep their head elevated at a 30- to 45-degree angle, particularly during , to promote fluid drainage. Cold compresses or ice packs are applied intermittently for the first 48 to 72 hours to further control , while avoiding direct contact with the skin to prevent injury to numb areas. Pain is generally mild to moderate and managed with oral analgesics, such as acetaminophen or prescribed non-opioid medications, with most patients requiring them primarily in the first 3 days. The recovery timeline varies slightly by individual factors and surgical technique, such as mini-facelift versus deep-plane approaches, but follows a predictable pattern for most patients. For deep-plane facelifts, walking 1 mile per day is generally not recommended during the first week; light, short walks are encouraged to promote circulation and prevent blood clots, but prolonged walking or any strenuous activity should be avoided to allow proper healing and reduce swelling. Recovery varies by individual, and patients should follow their surgeon's specific instructions. Bruising and swelling typically peak around days 3 to 5 postoperatively, then begin to subside, with significant resolution occurring within 2 to 3 weeks. Patients can often resume light activities and return to work after 10 to 14 days, once visible bruising has faded with makeup camouflage if needed; however, strenuous exercise and full physical activity are deferred for 4 to 6 weeks to avoid compromising healing. Sutures are usually removed between days 7 and 14, depending on incision healing. Ongoing care emphasizes wound management and protection to optimize long-term results. Starting around week 2, gentle is introduced to improve pliability and reduce , using silicone-based products or as directed by the surgeon. Strict sun avoidance is recommended for at least 6 to 12 months, with broad-spectrum (SPF 30 or higher) applied to incisions once healed, to prevent and promote even fading. Recent advances, such as enhanced recovery after (ERAS) protocols tailored to rhytidectomy, incorporate multimodal analgesia, preoperative optimization, and early mobilization to reduce use and shorten downtime by up to 20-30%, enhancing patient satisfaction without increasing risks.

Complications

Rhytidectomy, like all surgical procedures, carries risks of various complications, though overall rates remain low with modern techniques and careful patient selection. The most frequent complication is , occurring in 2% to 5% of cases, which involves the accumulation of blood under the flap and can lead to increased swelling or, if untreated, . Major , requiring surgical evacuation, affect approximately 1% of patients, while minor ones may resolve with aspiration or ; prompt recognition and intervention are essential to prevent adverse outcomes. Seroma formation, a collection of , is infrequent in rhytidectomy. Infection occurs infrequently, with an incidence of less than 1%, particularly when prophylactic antibiotics are administered perioperatively; it typically presents as or and is managed with antibiotics or . Nerve injuries, affecting motor or sensory branches, are also notable, with temporary deficits reported in 0.7% to 2.5% of cases due to traction or electrocautery, resolving spontaneously within weeks to months, while permanent damage is rare at under 1%. Aesthetic complications include , which may arise from uneven swelling, , or inherent facial differences exacerbated by surgery, often improving over time but occasionally necessitating revision. Alopecia at incision sites occurs infrequently, usually temporary and linked to tension or electrocautery damage to hair follicles, treatable with or scalp reduction if persistent. Skin , a rare but serious issue affecting 2.7% of nonsmokers, is more prevalent in smokers (up to 7.5%) due to compromised vascularity and is managed conservatively with if needed. Long-term aesthetic concerns, such as over-pull (excessive tightening leading to a "windswept" appearance) or under-correction (inadequate ), can occur but are minimized through precise vector planning. Prevention strategies emphasize meticulous intraoperative , avoidance of anticoagulants preoperatively, and gentle tissue handling to reduce and risks. Postoperative measures include a taper to control swelling, compression garments, and close monitoring; infection prophylaxis with antibiotics further lowers rates. Complication profiles can be influenced by technique choice, with deep-plane approaches potentially altering risks compared to superficial methods. Overall mortality is extremely low, less than 0.02%, primarily from anesthesia-related events or in high-risk patients, underscoring the of contemporary rhytidectomy when performed by experienced surgeons.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.