Hubbry Logo
General DynamicsGeneral DynamicsMain
Open search
General Dynamics
Community hub
General Dynamics
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
General Dynamics
General Dynamics
General Dynamics
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
M1 Abrams

Key Information

Stryker
Minigun

General Dynamics Corporation (GD), headquartered in Reston, Virginia, is an American industrial and technology company. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government; it receives over 3% of total spending by the federal government of the United States on contractors.[2]

The company is ranked 96th on the Fortune 100[3] and 242nd on the Forbes Global 2000.[4] In 2024, 69% of revenue was from the federal government of the United States, 14% was from U.S. commercial customers, 10% was from non-U.S. government customers and 7% was from non-U.S. commercial customers.[1]

The company was formed in 1952 via the merger of submarine manufacturer Electric Boat and aircraft manufacturer Canadair.[5]

Operations

[edit]

The company's Gulfstream Aerospace division (23% of 2024 revenues) produces business jets including the Gulfstream G650/G700/G800 series and offers business aircraft services under Jet Aviation.[6][1] The company's marine systems division (30% of 2024 revenues) designs and builds nuclear submarines and includes Bath Iron Works, General Dynamics Electric Boat, and National Steel and Shipbuilding Company.[1] The company's combat systems division (19% of 2024 revenues) includes General Dynamics Land Systems,[7] General Dynamics European Land Systems (GDELS), Steyr-Daimler-Puch,[8] and Santa Bárbara Sistemas,[9] and produces Phalanx CIWS,[10] Expeditionary tanks, the M1 Abrams series main battle tank,[7] Expeditionary Fighting Vehicles,[11] M104 Wolverine,[12] LAV III,[13] Stryker armoured fighting vehicles,[14] XM2001 Crusader self-propelled howitzer,[15] GAU-17 (Minigun),[16] GAU-19,[17] ASCOD AFV,[9] Pandur II,[8] Mowag (including Mowag Duro, Mowag Eagle, and Mowag Piranha),[18] Leopard 2E,[19] and Scout SV.[20][1] The company's technologies division (28% of 2024 revenues) includes General Dynamics Mission Systems and provides services such as consulting, mission-support, mobile communication, computers, command-and-control and cyber (C5) mission systems, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.[1] It is modernizing the information technology systems of the United States Central Command[21] and for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.[1][22]

History

[edit]

1899-1920

[edit]

Isaac Leopold Rice bought the Holland Torpedo Boat Company from John Philip Holland in 1899.[23][24] Holland continued to work at the company as chief engineer. The company was renamed Electric Boat Company.[25] Electric Boat was responsible for designing and building the USS Holland, purchased by the United States Navy in 1900 for $150,000 (roughly $5.75M in 2025).[26]

Electric Boat also sold modified Holland-class and Plunger-class submarines to the British Royal Navy through the English armaments company Vickers as well as to Japan and Russia.[27] In 1906, Electric Boat won contracts to design C-class submarines but subcontracted the construction to the Fore River Shipyard in Quincy, Massachusetts.[28]

Holland passed away in 1914.[29] Lawrence Spear, who replaced him as chief engineer, redesigned the Holland submarine. The submarine redesign replaced the submarine's observation dome with a conning tower, a periscope, and first-of-its-kind torpedo tubes.[25][30][31]

In 1911, Electric Boat acquired the New London Ship and Engine Company in Groton, Connecticut, to build parts for submarines, diesel engines, and commercial ships.[32] Isaac Rice died in 1915 and was replaced by his associate Henry Carse. Carse expanded the company with the purchase of several companies, including Electro Dynamics, Elco Motor Yacht, and New London Ship & Engine of Groton, Connecticut. Following the acquisitions, the company was renamed Submarine Boat Corporation. During World War I, the company received orders from the U.S. Navy to build 85 submarines, 722 submarine chasers, and 118 surface ships.[33]

1921-1940

[edit]

In 1924, the Peruvian government ordered two submarines built at the New London Ship & Engine shipyard in Groton, Connecticut.[34] In 1925, Carse reorganized the company, emphasized production of surface ships, and brought back the Electric Boat Company. In 1933, Electric Boat expanded its presence in Groton, Connecticut, by acquiring a second shipyard to build submarines. The USS Cuttlefish was the first submarine built at the Groton Shipyard.[35] In the early 1930s, the U.S. government placed orders for submarines and PT (patrol/torpedo) boats from Electric Boat facilities at Groton and the Elco plant in New Jersey, respectively. Lawrence Spear retired in 1937, replaced by John Jay Hopkins. Hopkins led the company's strong re-emergence as a shipbuilder in World War II.[36]

1941-1960

[edit]

During World War II, Electric Boat and its Elco Yacht and Electro Dynamic subsidiaries mobilized full-capacity production. The sudden production expansion led to a labor shortage. Women filled the open jobs as welders and riveters. During World War II, Electric Boat produced 74 submarines and 398 PT boats.[37] When the war ended in 1945, the Navy reduced its orders for new vessels. The company reduced its workforce from 13,000 to 4,000.[25]

Electric Boat diversified at the end of WWII, so John Jay Hopkins acquired the Canadian government-owned Canadair.[38] It was up for sale, and Hopkins bought the company for $10 million in 1946. The factory alone was worth more than $22 million, according to the Canadian government's calculations, excluding the value of the remaining contracts for planes or spare parts. However, Canadair's production line and inventory systems were in disorder when Electric Boat purchased by the company.[39] Hopkins hired Canadian-born mass-production specialist H. Oliver West to take over the president's role and return Canadair to profitability. Shortly after the takeover, Canadair began delivering its new Canadair North Star (a version of the Douglas DC-4) and was able to deliver aircraft to Trans-Canada Airlines, Canadian Pacific Airlines, and British Overseas, and Airways Corporation (BOAC) well in advance of their contracted delivery times.[40][29]

Defense spending increased with the onset of the Cold War, and Canadair went on to win many Canadian military contracts for the Royal Canadian Air Force and became a major aerospace company. These included Canadair CT-133 Silver Star trainer, the Canadair Argus long-range maritime reconnaissance and transport aircraft, and the Canadair F-86 Sabre. Between 1950 and 1958, 1,815 Sabres were built.[41] Canadair also produced 200 CF-104 Starfighter supersonic fighter aircraft, a license-built version of the Lockheed F-104.[42]

In 1951, the company was awarded the contract to build the world's first nuclear-powered submarine, the USS Nautilus (SSN571).[43] The submarine was launched in 1954.[44]

Aircraft production became increasingly important at Canadair, and Hopkins argued that the name "Electric Boat" was no longer appropriate. In 1952, Hopkins established the General Dynamics Corporation as a parent company holding Electric Boat and Canadair.[45]

In 1953, General Dynamics (GD) purchased Convair from the Atlas Group.[46] The sale was approved by government oversight with the provision that GD would continue to operate out of Air Force Plant 4 in Fort Worth, Texas. This factory had been set up in order to spread out strategic aircraft production and rented to Convair during the war to produce B-24 Liberator bombers. Convair worked as an independent division inside General Dynamics and, over the next decade, developed the F-106 Delta Dart interceptor, the B-58 Hustler bomber, and the Convair 880 and 990 airliners.[47] Convair also developed the Atlas missile, the U.S.'s first operational intercontinental ballistic missile.[48] Convair led the development of the American nuclear aircraft program, which the Pentagon enthusiastically supported. CEO Hopkins was a strong advocate of nuclear power and its numerous applications, but the nuclear airplane, or 'N-bomber,' was later found to be impractical, and the project was abandoned.[49]

In the late 1950s, General Dynamics hired Erik Nitsche as a graphic designer to develop corporate reports and advertising material designs, including the "Atoms for Peace" series of posters for the 1955 International Conference on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy in Geneva, Switzerland.[50][51][52] These designs have become iconic examples of the mid-century modernist graphic design style.[53]

In 1957, Hopkins fell seriously ill and was replaced by Frank Pace later that year.[54] John Naish succeeded Joseph McNarney as president of Convair.[55] In the same year, General Dynamics purchased Liquid Carbonic Corporation in September 1957 and controlled it as a wholly owned subsidiary.[56][57]

In 1959, the U.S. Navy commissioned Electric Boat to design and build the first fleet ballistic-missile submarine, USS George Washington (SSBN598).[58] The George Washington-class ballistic missile submarines were derived from the Skipjack-class submarine design, with a 130-foot missile compartment inserted between the control and reactor sections.[59] The USS George Washington (SSBN-598) was initially laid down as the Skipjack-class USS Scorpion (SSN-589), but was repurposed during construction to accommodate the Polaris missile system. Materials from other planned attack submarines, including USS Sculpin (SSN-590), were also reallocated to the program.[59][60]

The same year, Chicago industrialist Henry Crown became the company's largest shareholder and merged his Material Service Corporation with General Dynamics in 1959.[61] General Dynamics subsequently reorganized into Eastern Group in New York City and Western Group in San Diego, California, with the latter taking over all of the aerospace activities and dropping the Convair brand name from its aircraft in the process. The board decided to build all future planes in Fort Worth, Texas, ending plane production at Convair's original plant in San Diego, California, but continuing with space and missile development there.[62]

1961-1980

[edit]

In 1961, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara initiated the Tactical Fighter Experimental (TFX) program to develop a single aircraft design for the Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps.[63] General Dynamics and Boeing were selected to submit updated designs. McNamara selected General Dynamics' proposal due to the greater commonality between its versions. The Boeing aircraft shared less than half of the major structural components. The F-111's design pioneered variable-sweep wings, after-burning turbofan engines, and automated terrain-following radar for low-level, high-speed flight.[64] General Dynamics continued to develop its version of the F-111 at the former Convair facility in Fort Worth, Texas. The company built 563 F-111s.[65]

In 1962, Roger Lewis was appointed Chairman and CEO of General Dynamics.[66] In 1963, General Dynamics purchased the Quincy Shipbuilding Works from Bethlehem Steel.[67] In 1965, General Dynamics reorganized into 12 operating divisions based on product lines.[68] In 1967, Electric Boat launched the USS Sturgeon (SSN637), the lead ship in the Sturgeon class of attack submarines.[69] In 1970, the board replaced Roger Lewis with former McDonnell Douglas president David S. Lewis as Chief Executive Officer. David S. Lewis relocated the company headquarters to St. Louis, Missouri, in 1971.[70] Later that year, Electric Boat and Newport News Shipbuilding were awarded contracts to co-manufacture the Los Angeles-class submarines.[71] In 1972, Electric Boat received contracts for the design and development of the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine. Electric Boat developed a new modular process to build the 560-foot submarines.[72] The process remains the industry standard.[73] Construction of the flagship Los Angeles-class attack submarine began the same year.[74] In 1973, General Dynamics established the Quonset Point Facility in North Kingstown, Rhode Island, to provide off-site manufacturing support for the Groton facility. Production began the following year.[75]

The U.S. Air Force initiated the Lightweight Fighter (LWF) program to develop a new fighter aircraft that met the requirements of Major John Boyd's "energy-maneuverability" theory. General Dynamics organized its own version of Lockheed's Skunk Works, the Advanced Concepts Laboratory, and responded with a new aircraft design incorporating advanced technologies.[76] General Dynamics submitted a design in 1972 for a new lightweight fighter, the YF-16. The YF-16 first flew in January 1974 and proved slightly better performance than the Northrop Grumman YF-17 in head-to-head testing. General Dynamics YF-16 was selected as the first Lightweight Fighter for the U.S. Air Force. It entered production as the F-16 Fighting Falcon in January 1975 with an initial order of 650 and 1,388.[77] The F-16 also won contracts worldwide, beating the F-17 in foreign competition. General Dynamics built an aircraft production factory in Fort Worth, Texas to fulfill the contracts. F-16 orders eventually totaled more than 4,600, making it the company's largest aircraft program.[78]

In 1975, General Dynamics Electric Boat broke ground on a land-level submarine construction facility in Groton, Connecticut.[79]

Land Systems and Marine Systems focus

[edit]
Main article: General Dynamics Land Systems

In 1976, General Dynamics sold the struggling Canadair back to the Canadian government for $38 million. By 1984, General Dynamics had four divisions: Convair in San Diego, General Dynamics-Fort Worth, General Dynamics-Pomona, and General Dynamics-Electronics. In 1985 a further reorganization created the Space Systems Division from the Convair Space division. In 1985, GD also acquired Cessna. In 1986 the Pomona division (which mainly produced the Standard Missile and the Phalanx CIWS for the Navy) was split up, creating the Valley Systems Division. Valley Systems produced the Stinger surface-to-air missile and the Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM). Both units were recombined into one entity in 1992. In 1986, the General Dynamics Quincy Shipbuilding Division was closed.

Henry Crown, still GD's largest shareholder, died on 15 August 1990. Following this, the company started to rapidly divest its under-performing divisions under CEO William Anders. Cessna was re-sold to Textron in January 1992, the San Diego and Pomona missile production units to General Motors-Hughes Aerospace in May 1992, the Fort Worth aircraft production to Lockheed in March 1993 (a nearby electronics production facility was separately sold to Israeli-based Elbit Systems, marking that company's entry into the US market), and its Space Systems Division to Martin Marietta in 1994. The remaining Convair Aircraft Structure unit was sold to McDonnell Douglas in 1994. The remains of the Convair Division were simply closed in 1996. GD's exit from the aviation world was short-lived, and in 1999 the company acquired Gulfstream Aerospace. The Pomona operation was closed shortly after its sale to Hughes Aircraft.

In 1995, General Dynamics purchased the privately held Bath Iron Works shipyard in Bath, Maine, for $300 million, diversifying its shipbuilding portfolio to include U.S. Navy surface ships such as guided-missile destroyers.[80] In 1998, the company acquired NASSCO, formerly National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, for $415 million. The San Diego shipyard produces U.S. Navy auxiliary and support ships as well as commercial ships that are eligible to be U.S.-flagged under the Jones Act.[81]

Having divested itself of its aviation holdings, GD concentrated on land and sea products. GD purchased Chrysler's defense divisions in 1982, renaming them General Dynamics Land Systems. In 2003, it purchased the defense divisions of General Motors as well. It is now a major supplier of armored vehicles of all types, including the M1 Abrams, LAV 25, Stryker, and a wide variety of vehicles based on these chassis. Force Protection, Inc. was acquired by General Dynamics Land Systems in November 2011 for $350 million.

General Dynamics UK

[edit]
Main article: General Dynamics UK

In 1997, General Dynamics acquired Computing Devices Ltd based in Hastings, England, which had developed avionics and mission systems for the Panavia Tornado, British Aerospace Harrier II and Hawker Siddeley Nimrod.[82][83] In 2001, Computing Devices Canada (CDC) was awarded a contract from the UK Ministry of Defence to supply tactical communication systems for their Bowman program. The work for this was carried out at its new UK headquarters in Oakdale, Wales, and the company was renamed General Dynamics UK Limited.[84] As of 2020, it comprises two business units: General Dynamics Land Systems – UK and General Dynamics Mission Systems – UK and operates in eight sites across the United Kingdom.[85] It is currently responsible for delivering the General Dynamics Ajax family of armored vehicles, the Foxhound light protected patrol vehicle and the Morpheus communications system to the UK Ministry of Defence.

21st century

[edit]
In 1999, the company acquired Gulfstream Aerospace. Here, a Gulfstream G650 departs Bristol Airport, England, in 2014.

In 2004, General Dynamics bid for the UK company Alvis plc, the leading British manufacturer of armored vehicles. In March the board of Alvis Vickers voted in favor of the £309m takeover. However at the last minute BAE Systems offered £355m for the company. This deal was finalized in June 2004.[86]

On August 19, 2008, GD agreed to pay $4 million to settle a lawsuit brought by the US Government claiming that a GD unit fraudulently billed the government for defectively manufactured parts used in US military aircraft and submarines. The US alleged that GD defectively manufactured or failed to test parts used in US military aircraft from September 2001 to August 2003, such as for the C-141 Starlifter transport plane. The GD unit involved, based in Glen Cove, New York, closed in 2004.[87]

In 2014, the government of Canada announced it had selected the General Dynamics Land Systems subsidiary in London, Ontario, to produce Light Armoured Vehicles for Saudi Arabia as part of a $10 billion deal with the Canadian Commercial Corporation.[88] The sale has been criticized by political opponents because of the Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen.[89][90] In December 2018, after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau suggested Canada might scrap the deal, the company warned that doing so could lead to "billions of dollars in liability" and risk the loss of thousands of jobs.[91][92] Trudeau has since said that while he is critical of Saudi conduct, he cannot simply scrap the deal because "Canada as a country of the rule of law needs to respect its contracts."[93] On 30 January 2019, CEO Phebe Novakovic warned investors that the matter had "significantly impacted" the company's cash flow because Saudi Arabia was nearly $2 billion in arrears on its payments.[94]

In 2018, General Dynamics acquired information technology services giant CSRA for $9.7 billion, and merged it with GDIT.[95]

General Dynamics has been accused by groups such as Code Pink and Green America of "making money from human suffering by profiting off the migrant children held at U.S. detention camps"[96] due to its IT services contracts with the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Refugee Resettlement, the government agency that operates shelters for unaccompanied children to include those separated from their families as part of the Trump administration family separation policy.[97][98] The company says it has no role in constructing or operating detention centers, and that its contracts to provide training and technical services began in 2000 and have spanned across four presidential administrations.[99]

It was announced in September 2018 that the U.S. Navy awarded contracts for 10 new Arleigh Burke-class destroyers from General Dynamics Bath Iron Works and Huntington Ingalls Industries.[100]

Former U.S. Secretary of Defense General Jim Mattis re-joined the company's board of directors in August 2019. He had previously served on the board, but resigned and divested before becoming Secretary of Defense.[101]

In September 2020, General Dynamics announced a strategic counter-drone partnership, providing General Dynamics' global network with access to Dedrone's complete drone detection and defeat technology.[102]

In December 2020, the board of directors for General Dynamics announced a regular quarterly dividend of $1.10, payable on February 5, 2021.[103][104]

On December 26, 2020, General Dynamics confirmed that their business division General Dynamics Land Systems was awarded a $4.6 billion contract by the U.S. Army for M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams main battle tanks.[105]

According to a report by Reuters, General Dynamics was the primary contractor for a United States military-run propaganda campaign to spread disinformation about the Sinovac Chinese COVID-19 vaccine, including using fake social media accounts to spread the disinformation that the Sinovac vaccine contained pork-derived ingredients and was therefore haram under Islamic law.[106] The campaign primarily targeted people in the Philippines and used a social media hashtag for "China is the virus" in Tagalog.[106] The campaign ran from the spring of 2020 to mid-2021.[106] In 2024, General Dynamics IT was awarded a $493 million contract by The Pentagon.[106] According to an unnamed source cited by Reuters, a military audit of General Dynamics's work on the project concluded that the company had engaged in sloppy tradecraft and took inadequate precautions to conceal the origins of the fake accounts created for the campaign.[106]

General Dynamics' supply of weapons to Israel in the Gaza war has led to protests at facilities in Pittsfield, Massachusetts; Lincoln, Nebraska; Saco, Maine; New London, Connecticut; and Garland, Texas.[107][108][109][110][111]

Acquisitions timeline

[edit]

20th-century acquisitions

[edit]
Year Acquisition Business group
1947 Canadair[112] Aerospace
1953 Convair[113] Aerospace
1955 Stromberg-Carlson[114] Combat Systems
1957 Liquid Carbonic Corporation[115] Aerospace
1959 Material Service Corporation[116]
1982 Chrysler's combat systems[117] Combat Systems
1995 Bath Iron Works[118] Marine Systems
1996 Teledyne Vehicle Systems[119] Marine Systems
1997 Advanced Technology Systems[120] Combat Systems
1997 Lockheed Martin Defense Systems[121] Combat Systems
1997 Lockheed Martin Armament Systems[121] Combat Systems
1997 Computing Devices International[122] Technologies
1998 National Steel and Shipbuilding Company[123] Marine Systems
1999 Gulfstream Aerospace[124] Aerospace
1999 GTE Government Systems[125] Technologies
2000 Saco Defense[126][127] Combat Systems

21st-century acquisitions

[edit]
Year Acquisition Business group
2001 PrimeX Technologies Inc.[128] Technologies
2001 Motorola Integrated Systems[129] Technologies
2001 Galaxy Aerospace Company[130] Aerospace
2001 Santa Bárbara Sistemas[131] Combat Systems
2002 EWK Eisenwerke Kaiserslautern[132] Combat Systems
2003 GM Defense[133][134] Combat Systems
2003 Steyr-Daimler-Puch Spezialfahrzeug[citation needed] Combat Systems
2003 Veridian and Digital Systems Resources[135] Technologies
2003 Datron's Intercontinental Manufacturing Company[136] Combat Systems
2004 Spectrum Astro[137] Aerospace
2004 MOWAG[138] Combat Systems
2005 MAYA Viz Ltd [139] Technologies
2005 Tadpole Computer[140] Technologies
2005 Itronix[141] Technologies
2006 FC Business Systems [142] Technologies
2006 Anteon International[143] Technologies
2007 Mediaware International [144] Technologies
2008 ViPS, Inc.[145] Technologies
2008 Jet Aviation[146] Aerospace
2009 Axletech International[147] Combat Systems
2010 Kylmar Ltd.[148] Combat Systems
2011 Vangent, Inc.[149] Technologies
2011 Metro Machine Imperial Docks Inc.[150] Marine Systems
2011 Force Protection Inc.[151] Combat Systems
2012 Earl Industries’ Ship Repair Division[152] Marine Systems
2012 Open Kernel Labs[153] Technologies
2012 Applied Physical Sciences[154] Aerospace
2016 Bluefin Robotics[155] Marine Systems
2018 CSRA Inc.[156][157][158] Technologies
2018 Hawker Pacific[159] Aerospace
2018 FWW Fahrzeugwerk GmbH[160] Combat Systems

Divestitures

[edit]
Year Divestiture Purchaser
1953 Liquid Carbonic Corporation[161] Houston Natural Gas Co.
1957 Asbestos Corporation Limited Société nationale de l'amiante (SNA)
1967 General Atomics[162] Gulf Oil
1976 Canadair[163] Canadian government
1991 Data Systems Division[164] Computer Sciences Corporation
1995 Tactical Missiles Division Hughes Aircraft Company
1992 Cessna[165] Textron
1992 Electronics Division[166] The Carlyle Group
1993 Fort Worth Division (F-16s)[167] Lockheed Corporation
1994 Space Systems Division[168] Martin Marietta
1994 Convair's aerostructure unit[169] McDonnell Douglas
2006 Material Service[170] Hanson
2007 Freeman United Coal Mining Co.[171] Springfield Coal Co.
2010 Spacecraft development and manufacturing[172] Orbital Sciences Corporation
2014 Advanced Systems[173] MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates

Corporate affairs

[edit]

Corporate governance

[edit]

General Dynamics current chairman and chief executive officer is Phebe Novakovic.

Board Member Role
Phebe Novakovic Chairman and chief executive officer
James Crown Lead Director
Rudy de Leon Director
Cecil D. Haney Director and chair, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Mark M. Malcolm Director
Jim Mattis Director
C. Howard Nye Director and chair, Audit Committee
Robert K. Steel Director and chair, Sustainability Committee
Catherine B. Reynolds Director and chair, Finance and Benefit Plans Committee
Laura J. Schumacher Director and chair, Compensation Committee
John G. Stratton Director
Peter A. Wall Director

As of December 2022.[174]

Financials

[edit]
Year Revenue
in mil. US$[175] 		Net income
in mil. US$ 		Assets
in mil. US$ 		Employees
2005 20,975 1,461 19,700 72,200
2006 24,063 1,856 22,376 81,000
2007 27,240 2,072 25,733 83,500
2008 29,300 2,459 28,373 92,300
2009 31,981 2,394 31,077 91,700
2010 32,466 2,624 32,545 90,000
2011 32,677 2,526 34,883 95,100
2012 30,992 −332 34,309 92,200
2013 30,930 2,357 35,494 96,000
2014 30,852 2,533 35,337 99,500
2015 31,781 3,036 31,997 99,900
2016 30,561 2,572 33,172 98,800
2017 30,973 2,912 35,046 98,600
2018 36,193 3,345 45,408 105,600
2019 39,350 3,484 49,349 102,900
2020 37,925 3,167 51,308 100,700
2021 38,469 3,257 50,073 103,100
2022 39,407 3,390 51,585 106,500

As of January 2023.[175][176]

Carbon emissions

[edit]

General Dynamics reported Total CO2e emissions (Direct + Indirect) for 2021 at 696,118 mt (-8.7% year over year) and aims to reducing greenhouse gas emissions 40% by 2034. The company is on track to become carbon neutral before 2060.[177]

General Dynamics's annual total CO2e Emissions (in Metric Tons)[178]
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
901,666 817,293 821,773 784,264 794,161 762,200 696,118 681,454

Company demographics

[edit]

In 2021, General Dynamics's U.S. workforce was 21% veterans, 23% female, and 27% people of color. The US Department of Labor awarded the company the 2021 HIRE Vets Gold Award.[179] The company has 26 Employee Resource Groups serving 10 employee segments.[180] Approximately 20% of the company's employees are represented by labor unions such as International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM), The International Union, and United Auto Workers (UAW).[180] Independent research published by American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD), U.S. Department of Labor, Military Times, U.S. Veterans Magazine, Professional Women's Magazine, Forbes, and Fortune selected General Dynamics as a top employer.[180] General Dynamics' community contributions in 2021 were 70% in Education & Social Services, 18% in Arts & Culture, and 12% in Service Member Support.[180]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

General Dynamics

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
General Dynamics Corporation is an American multinational aerospace and defense company headquartered in Reston, Virginia, that designs, manufactures, and supports advanced military systems including nuclear-powered submarines, main battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, and business jets, alongside mission-critical technologies such as command and control systems. The company operates through four primary business segments: Aerospace, which produces high-performance business jets under the Gulfstream brand; Marine Systems, focused on nuclear submarine construction and repair; Combat Systems, encompassing land vehicles like the M1 Abrams tank and Stryker wheeled platforms; and Technologies, delivering integrated information and cybersecurity solutions for defense applications. Tracing its heritage to the Electric Boat Company founded in 1899 for submarine development, General Dynamics was established in 1952 as a holding company for key defense assets, later expanding through acquisitions such as Convair in 1953 and Chrysler Defense in 1982, which bolstered its land systems capabilities. Notable achievements include christening the USS Nautilus in 1954, the first nuclear-powered submarine, and securing multi-billion-dollar contracts for Virginia-class attack submarines and Columbia-class ballistic missile submarines, underscoring its central role in U.S. naval superiority. While reliant on government contracts that have occasionally drawn congressional oversight for procurement issues in past decades, General Dynamics maintains a diversified portfolio balancing military and commercial aviation revenues.

Business Segments

Aerospace

General Dynamics' Aerospace segment centers on Corporation, acquired in May 1999 for $5.3 billion from Corporation, marking the company's re-entry into . Gulfstream focuses on designing and producing large-cabin, ultra-long-range business jets that dominate the premium market segment, with models emphasizing speed, range, and luxury for transoceanic flights. The subsidiary operates production facilities in , and , supporting end-to-end from fuselage assembly to final outfitting. Key aircraft include the G650, certified in 2012 with a maximum range of 7,000 nautical miles at Mach 0.85 and powered by twin Rolls-Royce BR725 engines, featuring pioneering flight controls for enhanced efficiency and reduced pilot workload. The G650ER variant extends this to 7,500 nautical miles, enabling nonstop routes like New York to . The newer G700, entering service in 2022, achieves 7,750 nautical miles range at Mach 0.85 with Rolls-Royce Pearl 700 engines, accommodating up to 19 passengers in a cabin over 56 feet long, and incorporates the Symmetry with active sidesticks and touchscreen for superior . These models incorporate innovations such as advanced systems, which Gulfstream developed to minimize mechanical complexity while maintaining , and high-efficiency yielding low cabin altitudes below 4,000 feet at cruising altitudes. Gulfstream's production has scaled with demand, delivering 38 aircraft in the second quarter of 2025 alone, including large-cabin models, contributing to a record nine-month performance for the year. Innovations like the PlaneConnect system for real-time diagnostics and enhanced vision systems further differentiate the fleet, supporting Gulfstream's position as the leader in ultra-long-range business , where it commands significant through superior performance metrics. In 2025, the segment reported third-quarter revenue of $3.23 billion, a 30.3% increase year-over-year, driven by higher deliveries of new business jets amid robust global demand for sustained by economic resilience and geopolitical uncertainties favoring flexible, secure travel options. General Dynamics raised its full-year aerospace revenue guidance accordingly, reflecting a backlog exceeding $20 billion and continued in next-generation models like the G800, certified in 2025 with an 8,000 range.

Marine Systems

General Dynamics' Marine Systems business unit encompasses nuclear-powered design and construction through its division and auxiliary surface shipbuilding via (NASSCO). serves as the prime contractor for all U.S. nuclear programs, specializing in advanced stealth and strike capabilities, while NASSCO focuses on auxiliary vessels and commercial tankers to support naval logistics and maritime commerce. Electric Boat operates primary facilities in Groton, Connecticut, for submarine assembly and engineering, and Quonset Point, Rhode Island, for modular fabrication and outfitting across its 125-acre site. The division employs approximately 24,000 workers across these locations and plans to hire 3,000 additional staff in 2025, primarily in Groton, to meet production demands for ongoing programs. It leads construction of the Virginia-class attack submarines, which incorporate enhanced payload modules for extended missile capacity, with a September 2025 contract modification worth $642 million for long-lead materials and advance procurement. For the Columbia-class ballistic missile submarines, intended to replace Ohio-class vessels, Electric Boat holds prime responsibility, including a 2020 award of $9.5 billion for initial design and production phases, followed by a $9.47 billion contract for the lead ship's full construction. Recent modifications include up to $17.1 billion in April 2025 for sustainment and production across both - and Columbia-class efforts. Virginia-class Block VI variants, funded starting July 2025, integrate hypersonic strike capabilities to counter evolving threats, enabling modular upgrades for future weapon systems without full redesigns. NASSCO, based in , , designs and builds auxiliary ships for the U.S. Navy's , including expeditionary sea bases and replenishment oilers, alongside commercial tankers since 1960. In September 2024, it secured a potential $6.7 billion contract for up to eight John Lewis-class (T-AO 205) fleet oilers to enhance for carrier strike groups. These vessels support naval sustainment operations, with NASSCO's yards also handling repairs for Pacific Fleet ships.

Combat Systems

General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS), a of General Dynamics, specializes in the , production, and sustainment of tracked and wheeled military ground vehicles, including main battle tanks and infantry combat vehicles. Its flagship product is the series of main battle tanks, which has undergone continuous upgrades to enhance lethality, protection, and mobility. The M1A2 System Enhancement Package Version 3 (SEPv3) incorporates advanced armor, improved power generation, and enhanced survivability features, with production supported by a $4.6 billion U.S. awarded in 2020 for upgrades expected to complete by 2028. These enhancements, including digital fire control systems, have demonstrated effectiveness in high-intensity conflicts such as those in and , where Abrams tanks provided superior protection against improvised explosive devices and anti-tank threats due to their composite armor and reactive elements. The family of eight-wheeled armored vehicles, derived from the platform, offers rapid deployment capabilities with a top speed exceeding 60 mph and capacity for nine soldiers plus crew. GDLS has produced over 4,000 variants, including carrier and mortar configurations, with recent upgrades like the A1 featuring a 450-horsepower , reinforced suspension, and in-vehicle networks for improved integration. A $712 million order in 2023 expanded production of Double-V Hull A1 vehicles, emphasizing mine-resistant hulls proven in counter-insurgency operations. GDLS also leads international programs, such as the AJAX family of tracked armored vehicles for the , comprising six variants like and recovery models with digitized systems for all-weather operations. The program, valued at £5 billion, supports over 4,100 jobs and has progressed to vehicle unveilings in 2025 despite earlier developmental challenges. Exports include a $1.148 billion deal in 2022 for 250 M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams tanks to , with initial deliveries of 28 units occurring in January 2025, bolstering allies' heavy armor capabilities amid regional tensions.

Mission Systems

General Dynamics Mission Systems develops and integrates command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) solutions, alongside cyber defense and information technology systems, primarily for U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and allied military clients. These offerings emphasize secure, interoperable networks to enable real-time data sharing and mission command in contested environments. A flagship program is the Warfighter Information Network-Tactical (WIN-T), serving as the U.S. Army's tactical backbone for satellite-based voice and data communications without reliance on fixed infrastructure. Complementary capabilities include cyber resilience tools for threat detection and mitigation, as well as satellite communications systems supporting next-generation networks like the Mobile User Objective System (MUOS), which provides cell phone-like secure connectivity for forces. The division has expanded into artificial intelligence (AI)-driven analytics and secure data platforms to process vast datasets for predictive decision-making in military operations. In 2019, General Dynamics Mission Systems acquired Deep Learning Analytics to bolster machine learning expertise for defense applications. Recent DoD contracts, such as the $1.25 billion Enterprise Mission Information Technology Services (EMITS) 2 task order awarded to General Dynamics Information Technology (a related entity under the Technologies segment) in September 2025, incorporate AI, machine learning, cybersecurity, and data analytics to modernize Army networks in Europe and Africa. These efforts have driven backlog growth, contributing to the Technologies segment's role in the company's record $109.9 billion total backlog as of September 2025, up 19% year-over-year amid sustained DoD demand. Strategic partnerships enhance hybrid cloud solutions for classified environments, including a collaboration with (AWS) announced in March 2025 to advance cybersecurity, AI, and cloud migration for government missions. This enables AWS services via the milCloud 2.0 platform, a DoD-compliant hybrid cloud offering scalable, secure computing for tactical edge operations, as demonstrated in AI-integrated systems like for tasks. Such integrations support resilient architectures resistant to cyber threats, aligning with DoD priorities for multi-domain operations.

History

Origins and Early Acquisitions

The Electric Boat Company was established on February 7, 1899, by financier Isaac Leopold Rice in , primarily to complete and commercialize submersible boat designs developed by Irish engineer . Rice, a battery manufacturer seeking naval applications for electric propulsion, partnered with Holland to build the inventor's sixth prototype, known as Holland VI, a 53-foot vessel launched that year. This craft, equipped with a gasoline engine for surface travel and electric motors for submerged operation, demonstrated practical torpedo capabilities and was purchased by the U.S. Navy in April 1900 as USS Holland (SS-1), marking the service's first commissioned . Electric Boat rapidly expanded submarine production in the early , delivering multiple vessels to the U.S. Navy and export markets, including the Lake-class boats for Britain during , while refining designs for diesel-electric propulsion and underwater endurance. The company's focus remained on military underwater craft amid interwar naval rearmament, though commercial ventures like pleasure boats provided limited diversification. By the onset of , Electric Boat had become a key supplier, constructing over 100 submarines that played a critical role in Allied and Pacific operations. Seeking postwar expansion beyond naval shipbuilding, Electric Boat acquired a controlling stake in Canadair Limited on April 30, 1946, a Canadian firm reorganized by the government in 1944 from the earlier Canadian Associated Aircraft operations. The purchase, valued at approximately $22 million by some accounts, integrated Canadair's expertise in licensed production of U.S. designs, such as variants of the Douglas DC-3 transport, into Electric Boat's portfolio. Under this ownership, Canadair shifted toward military jets, contributing to North American F-86 Sabre assembly lines by the early 1950s amid rising Cold War demand, while fulfilling contracts for trainer and reconnaissance aircraft during the Korean War buildup. These pre-merger operations underscored an early emphasis on defense-oriented hardware, driven by needs in the post-World War II era, as navigated surplus inventories and anticipated advancements. Submarine output peaked with wartime efficiencies, including modular construction techniques that delivered Gato- and Balao-class boats at rates exceeding three per month, sustaining the firm's technical edge in undersea warfare. Canadair's integration similarly capitalized on transatlantic alliances for production, positioning the combined entities for broader military-industrial scale amid geopolitical tensions.

Formation and Cold War Expansion

General Dynamics was established on April 24, 1952, under the direction of John Jay Hopkins, who reorganized the Company—already the parent of since 1947—into a diversified defense entity to capitalize on emerging and opportunities amid escalating tensions. Hopkins, having joined in 1937 and overseen its World War II production surge of , surface ships, and PT boats, positioned the new corporation for strategic expansion by integrating submarine expertise with aircraft manufacturing. In March 1953, General Dynamics acquired from the Atlas Group for $40 million, incorporating advanced aircraft and divisions that enhanced capabilities in high-speed flight and rocketry critical for nuclear deterrence. Central to the company's growth was Convair's development of the Atlas (SM-65) , the first U.S. operational ICBM, with initial deployments at Vandenberg Base in September 1959. Originating from a initiative, the liquid-fueled Atlas achieved its first successful Series C launch on December 23, 1958, from , covering roughly 4,300 miles downrange and validating its 6,000-mile operational range for delivering thermonuclear warheads. By 1962, over 120 Atlas missiles were deployed in hardened silos across the U.S., forming a cornerstone of second-strike deterrence against Soviet intercontinental threats until phased out in favor of solid-fuel successors. Aviation advancements included the F-111 Aardvark, for which General Dynamics won the $2.2 billion Tactical Fighter Experimental (TFX) contract in November 1962, tasked with producing a variable-sweep-wing supersonic bomber capable of low-level penetration strikes. The aircraft, powered by twin engines and featuring , achieved first flight in December 1964 and entered service in 1967, with production totaling 563 units that supported strategic interdiction and nuclear delivery roles to counter Warsaw Pact armor concentrations. The rapid expansion strained management in the late 1950s and early 1960s, prompting ' retirement due to illness in October 1957 and his replacement by Frank Pace Jr., who divested underperforming assets like the Quincy shipyard to refocus on core defense competencies. Further leadership transitions, including the appointment of Roger Lewis as president in 1962, addressed cost overruns and integration issues from acquisitions, stabilizing operations and securing sustained contracts for deterrence-focused systems through disciplined oversight and divestment of non-strategic units.

Aviation Developments and Challenges

In the 1970s, General Dynamics' Fort Worth division secured a pivotal role in the U.S. 's Lightweight Fighter (LWF) program, leading to the development of the F-16 Fighting Falcon. The YF-16 prototype rolled out on December 13, 1973, and achieved its first flight in early 1974, demonstrating innovative features such as controls and a for enhanced maneuverability. On , 1975, the Air Force selected the General Dynamics over Northrop's YF-17, awarding a full-scale development contract that emphasized cost-effective air superiority with potential multirole capabilities. The F-16 entered production in the late 1970s, with the first operational F-16A delivered to the Air Force in January 1979, marking a shift toward versatile fighters that could perform air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. This transition was bolstered by a multinational production agreement involving European partners, which facilitated exports and strengthened U.S. alliances through technology sharing and co-production. By the end of General Dynamics' involvement in 1993, the program had produced thousands of aircraft, contributing to a global total exceeding 4,600 units, the majority exported to over 25 nations and proving instrumental in operations from the 1980s onward. Amid these successes, the 1980s brought significant challenges with the A-12 Avenger II program, a joint effort with McDonnell Douglas to develop a stealthy carrier-based for the . Initiated in the early under the Advanced Tactical Aircraft initiative, the program awarded a $4.8 billion in 1988, but encountered severe technical hurdles in achieving low observability, weight reduction, and composite materials integration. By 1990, delays pushed the first flight beyond schedule, with cost overruns surpassing $1 billion, leading Secretary of Defense to cancel the program on January 7, 1991, after approximately $5 billion in expenditures and no flight-worthy prototypes. These aviation efforts highlighted General Dynamics' strengths in fighter innovation against the risks of ambitious stealth projects, where empirical design constraints clashed with aggressive timelines and budgets, ultimately straining resources before the division's sale to Lockheed in 1993. The F-16's enduring export dominance offset some financial pressures from failures like the A-12, underscoring the causal link between proven multirole performance and sustained international demand.

1990s Reorganization and Divestitures

In response to post-Cold War defense budget cuts, General Dynamics appointed William Anders as CEO on January 1, 1991, tasking him with reorganizing the company amid shrinking Pentagon spending and excess capacity. Anders implemented aggressive downsizing, including an 80% reduction in corporate staff by March 1993 and broader workforce reductions totaling tens of thousands across divisions, aimed at eliminating inefficiencies and refocusing on sectors where the company held global leadership. These measures, executed primarily between 1992 and 1993, prioritized operational streamlining over preservation of non-core assets, generating significant shareholder value through asset monetization and cost reductions. By December 1993, these efforts had delivered shareholder gains approaching $4.5 billion, equivalent to a dividend-reinvested return of 553% from ' appointment, as divestitures and efficiency gains offset declining revenues from traditional defense contracts. A key divestiture was the sale of the Space Systems Division—previously a profitable unit producing Atlas launch vehicles—to , announced on December 22, 1993, and completed effective May 1, 1994, for an estimated $250 million to $350 million. This transaction allowed General Dynamics to exit the commercial space sector, redirecting resources toward core competencies in land, sea, and air defense systems. The reorganization emphasized retention of high-volume programs like F-16 fighter production at , despite related workforce cuts of 5,800 jobs (29% of the aircraft division) in July 1992 due to softening export demand. Rigorous cost controls, including capacity rationalization and performance-based incentives, restored operating profitability by mid-decade, with the company achieving positive earnings through focused execution on remaining contracts rather than diversification. This shift marked a transition from broad conglomerate operations to a leaner defense specialist, enhancing long-term viability amid industry consolidation.

21st-Century Growth and Focus

In the early , General Dynamics pursued strategic acquisitions to bolster its and international capabilities. The company acquired Motorola's Integrated Systems division in , enhancing its command, control, communications, computers, , , and reconnaissance (C4ISR) offerings. Similarly, the purchase of , a Spanish armored manufacturer, expanded its European land systems footprint, supporting NATO-aligned production. These moves aligned with growing demand for integrated defense solutions amid post-Cold War realignments. The Global War on Terror prompted adaptations in General Dynamics' combat systems, emphasizing mobility and survivability against asymmetric threats. General Dynamics Land Systems delivered over 4,000 wheeled combat vehicles to the U.S. starting in 2002, with rapid deployment to in 2003 for urban operations and convoy protection, where their speed and modularity proved effective against improvised explosive devices. Concurrently, the firm upgraded M1 Abrams tanks with reactive armor kits and urban survival enhancements, such as the Tank Urban Survival Kit introduced in 2005, to counter roadside bombs and close-quarters combat experienced in and . These modifications sustained Abrams' relevance in , with thousands of systems refurbished through sustainment contracts. // Note: Avoided wiki, but cross-ref with army.mil By the 2020s, General Dynamics shifted emphasis toward great-power competition, particularly naval undersea capabilities. , a key subsidiary, secured multiple U.S. Navy contracts for Virginia-class submarines, including a $1.85 billion modification in July 2025 for long-lead materials and preliminary construction, and a $642 million award in September 2025 for production support. These awards contributed to backlog expansion, driven by congressional mandates for fleet growth to deter peer adversaries like , with the firm's marine systems segment reporting sustained order inflows exceeding $90 billion company-wide by mid-decade. This focus reflected broader U.S. defense priorities, prioritizing stealthy, long-endurance platforms over legacy systems.

Acquisitions and Divestitures

Key 20th-Century Transactions

General Dynamics was incorporated in 1952 as the parent company of the Company, which had acquired in 1947, establishing an initial focus on and manufacturing. In 1954, the company acquired Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corporation (), integrating advanced production capabilities including fighters and bombers, which significantly expanded its aerospace portfolio amid demands. This move positioned General Dynamics as a major defense contractor, leveraging Convair's expertise in projects like the F-102 Delta Dagger. Diversification efforts continued in 1959 with the merger of Material Service Corporation, a Chicago-based aggregates and materials firm, into General Dynamics, approved by shareholders of both entities; this transaction, driven by industrialist , aimed to balance defense revenues with commercial operations in and building supplies. The acquisition reflected a to mitigate reliance on contracts through high-growth civilian sectors, though it later faced antitrust scrutiny in related acquisitions. In the late 1980s, General Dynamics acquired Aircraft in 1985, bolstering its general aviation segment with business jets and trainers. However, post-Cold War defense cutbacks prompted a wave of divestitures in the early 1990s to streamline operations and reduce exposure to volatile aircraft markets. The company sold its subsidiary to in 1992, its division to Hughes Aircraft for approximately $450 million in stock, and its Fort Worth tactical aircraft division—responsible for the F-16 Fighting Falcon—to Lockheed for $1.5 billion in cash, with the deal closing in 1993. Additional sales included space systems to and data systems operations in 1991, generating over $3 billion in proceeds that funded a pivot toward core competencies in combat vehicles, submarines, and information systems. These transactions reshaped General Dynamics from a broad conglomerate with heavy aviation emphasis to a focused defense prime, emphasizing stable segments like marine and land systems; by shedding fighter and missile lines, the company achieved greater balance against procurement fluctuations, enhancing long-term resilience in a contracting defense market.

21st-Century Deals

In 2003, General Dynamics acquired Veridian Corporation for $1.5 billion in cash, completing the transaction on August 11 after shareholder approval. Veridian, with projected 2003 revenue of $1.2 billion and a $2.6 billion contract backlog, specialized in intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and chemical-biological detection systems, enhancing General Dynamics' capabilities in command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) domains critical to networked warfare. The 2018 acquisition of for $9.7 billion marked General Dynamics' largest deal to date, integrating CSRA's federal IT services portfolio, including cybersecurity, , and mission support contracts valued at over $7 billion in backlog. This move expanded General Dynamics' presence in government IT modernization, particularly for defense and agencies facing escalating cyber threats and data-driven operations. In September 2024, General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT), a , acquired Iron EagleX, Inc., a veteran-owned firm providing AI, , cybersecurity, and solutions tailored to U.S. Command and community needs. Iron EagleX's expertise in and secure data analytics supported General Dynamics' push into advanced digital warfare technologies, aligning with demands for resilient systems against adversarial cyber incursions. These transactions underscore General Dynamics' to acquire specialized firms bolstering technological edges in C4ISR and cybersecurity, driven by empirical shifts toward integrated, data-centric defense architectures amid peer competitions in electronic and information domains.

Strategic Divestments

In the early , amid a post-Cold War defense spending downturn, General Dynamics under CEO implemented a emphasizing divestitures of non-core units to preserve cash, reduce debt, and concentrate on profitable competencies in armored vehicles, nuclear submarines, and tactical . This approach prioritized operational streamlining over diversification into commercial or peripheral defense sectors, allowing reallocation toward segments with enduring military demand and higher margins. A pivotal transaction occurred in May 1992, when General Dynamics sold its missile business—headquartered in and encompassing production of systems like the and —to Hughes Aircraft Company for $450 million in stock. The unit had reported $76 million in operating profit on $1.4 billion in sales in 1991, but faced declining volumes amid budget cuts, prompting the sale as part of broader efforts to exit commoditized or cyclical defense submarkets. Similarly, in 1994, the company divested its Space Systems Division, which developed Atlas launch vehicles and components, to in a deal announced in December 1993 and effective May 1, 1994. This move shed exposure to the competitive commercial sector and government programs vulnerable to fiscal constraints, enabling sharper specialization in ground- and sea-based combat platforms less susceptible to such volatility. These sales, alongside disposals of electronics and commercial aviation units like in 1992, facilitated a leaner structure oriented toward defense niches with proven technological edges and stable pipelines, yielding enhanced specialization and resource efficiency without reliance on broader industry consolidation.

Financial Performance

General Dynamics has exhibited consistent expansion amid sustained U.S. and international defense budgets, with annual revenues surpassing $30 billion consistently since 2016. In , the company reported full-year of $47.7 billion, reflecting a 12.9% increase from $42.3 billion in 2023, driven by demand for combat vehicles, submarines, and systems. Net earnings for reached $3.8 billion, a 14.1% rise from $3.3 billion in 2023, underscoring operational efficiencies in a sector characterized by long-term contracts.
YearRevenue ($B)YoY Growth (%)Net Earnings ($B)Net Margin (%)
202037.95.43.28.4
202138.51.63.28.3
202239.42.33.48.6
202342.37.33.37.8
202447.712.93.88.0
This upward trajectory continued into 2025, with third-quarter revenue climbing 10.6% year-over-year to $12.9 billion on October 24, 2025, accompanied by operating earnings of $1.3 billion and diluted of $3.88. The company subsequently raised its full-year 2025 revenue guidance to approximately $52 billion, reflecting robust contract performance and backlog conversion. Operating margins held steady at 10.3% in Q3 2025, a slight expansion from prior periods, bolstered by cost management in fixed-price development and production contracts that comprise a significant portion of defense work. Relative to peers such as , , and RTX, General Dynamics' revenue growth has outpaced industry averages in recent years, with 2024 gains exceeding 's reported declines amid program adjustments. This resilience stems from diversification across land systems, marine platforms, IT services, and business aviation, mitigating risks from single-program dependencies that affect more specialized competitors like . Net margins around 8% compare favorably to sector norms, supported by steady defense appropriations that ensure predictable cash flows absent the volatility seen in commercial aerospace-heavy peers.

Backlog and Contract Wins

As of the third quarter of 2025, General Dynamics reported a total estimated value of $167.7 billion, comprising a funded backlog of $109.9 billion and additional potential value from options and indefinite-delivery . This backlog, equivalent to approximately 2.5 years of trailing twelve-month revenue at current run rates, underscores the company's revenue stability derived from multi-year defense and commitments, contrasting with more volatile commercial sectors. The book-to-bill ratio stood at 1.5:1 for the quarter, indicating inflows exceeding billings and supporting sustained production through the decade. Marine Systems, encompassing submarine and surface ship construction, contributed significantly to backlog growth, with Electric Boat securing key modifications for the Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine program. In June 2025, the U.S. awarded a $987 million contract modification to for long-lead-time materials and construction costs on Columbia-class boats, building on prior awards totaling billions for and initial production of the 12-boat fleet. Earlier in April 2025, received a $12.4 billion award (with potential to $17.2 billion if options exercised) for submarine-related work, further bolstering the segment's $20+ billion in unfunded backlog visibility. These contracts reflect prioritized U.S. investments in strategic deterrence, providing General Dynamics with predictable workload amid appropriations. Aerospace backlog expansion, driven by Gulfstream orders, added to overall strength, with the segment reporting robust for models like the G650 and G700 amid global executive travel recovery. Combat Systems and Technologies segments also secured wins, including a $150 million contract for Abrams tank engineering services and multiple GDIT IT modernization deals exceeding $1 billion each for U.S. Strategic Command and Europe-Africa. Collectively, these awards mitigate cyclical exposure in defense procurement by locking in funded obligations, enabling efficient capital allocation and supply chain planning over 5-10 year horizons.

Stock Performance and Shareholder Value

General Dynamics is listed on the under the GD. In 2025, shares reached a record high of $360.50 on following the Q3 earnings release, which reported adjusted of $3.88—surpassing analyst estimates of $3.71—and of $12.91 billion, exceeding forecasts of $12.53 billion. This performance drove a 3.95% pre-market surge and contributed to a year-to-date gain of over 16% as of late October. The company has prioritized shareholder returns through a consistent and active share repurchases, aligning with enhanced capital allocation following its operational reforms. Quarterly dividends have grown steadily, with a $1.50 per share payment declared for May 2025—up from $1.42 earlier in the year—resulting in an annual payout of $6.00 and a trailing yield of 1.96%. The board authorized additional repurchases in December 2024, supporting a trailing buyback yield of 6.89% and total yield of 8.85%. Investor metrics underscore efficient value creation, with (ROE) at 17.78% for the , reflecting strong profitability from equity deployment amid a robust contract backlog. This ROE exceeds the five-year median of 18.7% for the firm and positions GD favorably relative to broader capital goods peers. In sector comparisons, GD's one-year return of approximately 16% has trailed the S&P 500's 16% gain but demonstrated resilience in defense, with shares hitting all-time highs amid elevated geopolitical demand, outperforming some peers like RTX in stability while competing closely with the U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF over longer horizons.

Corporate Governance and Leadership

Board and Executive Structure

Phebe N. Novakovic has served as Chairman and of General Dynamics since January 1, 2013, overseeing the company's strategic direction in , defense, and marine systems. Prior to this, she held positions as President and from May 2012 and joined the firm in 2001 as of . The comprises 11 members as of , with a policy aiming for at least two-thirds under NYSE rules to ensure objective oversight. Independent directors include Laura J. Schumacher, serving as Lead Director and Chair of the Compensation Committee; C. Howard Nye, Chair of the ; and others such as retired Cecil D. Haney, former U.S. of Defense James N. Mattis, and industry executives like Charles W. Hooper of , bringing specialized expertise in defense, , and financial auditing relevant to the company's government contracting focus. Standing committees support board functions, including the , which oversees financial reporting, internal controls, and compliance with defense-specific regulations; the Compensation Committee, responsible for executive pay aligned with performance metrics like contract execution and backlog growth; and the , which evaluates director qualifications emphasizing sector knowledge. These structures prioritize risk management in a highly regulated industry, with committee chairs selected for their and relevant experience. The executive leadership team reports to Novakovic and includes key roles such as Danny Deep, Executive Vice President of Global Operations since June 2025, managing and ; Amy Gilliland, Executive Vice President and President of General Dynamics ; and Mark Burns, Executive Vice President and President of , reflecting recent promotions to bolster operational depth. Succession planning forms a core element of the board's annual risk oversight, involving regular reviews of internal talent pipelines to address retention challenges in the competitive defense sector, where demand for engineering and expertise outpaces supply. This process ensures continuity amid geopolitical pressures driving sustained investments.

Management Transitions

In the mid-1980s, General Dynamics underwent a leadership shift when chairman and CEO David S. Lewis retired in 1985 amid ongoing federal investigations into cost overruns on submarine contracts. His successor, Stanley C. Pace, implemented an overhaul, dismissing 27 employees implicated in misconduct, while pursuing diversification through the $600 million acquisition of Cessna Aircraft in 1985. These changes aimed to restore credibility and adapt to tightening defense budgets, though the company continued facing over program delays and expenses. The early 1990s marked a transformative period under William A. Anders, who assumed the roles of chairman and CEO in 1991 following the Cold War's end and sharp reductions in U.S. defense spending. Anders drove aggressive reforms, including a 25% workforce reduction (eliminating 24,800 positions by June 1992), divestitures of non-core assets such as in 1992 for $400 million and the Fort Worth division in 1993, and a 94% debt reduction to $125 million by 1993. These measures refocused the company on high-margin defense segments like combat vehicles and submarines, contributing to financial stabilization and a increase from under $1 billion in 1991 to over $3 billion by Anders's departure as CEO in 1993. James N. Mellor succeeded him, continuing selective acquisitions such as in 1995 for $300 million to bolster naval capabilities. Post-1997 leadership under Nicholas D. Chabraja provided extended stability, with Chabraja serving as CEO until 2009 after joining the board in 1993. His tenure emphasized and strategic buys, including the $5 billion reacquisition of in 1999 and information systems expansions, driving revenue from $10.4 billion in 2000 to sustained profitability amid post-9/11 defense expansions. This era's focus on core competencies and operational efficiency supported performance recoveries, with reaching $901 million in 2000. Phebe N. Novakovic's ascension as CEO and chairman in January 2013 extended this stability, leveraging her prior roles at the company and intelligence background to navigate sequestration cuts and pursue targeted growth in IT and , maintaining backlog strength above $80 billion annually.

Lobbying and Government Relations

General Dynamics conducts lobbying efforts focused on defense policies, appropriations, and regulatory frameworks, activities consistent with those of other major contractors in the sector reliant on contracts. In 2024, the company expended $12.21 million on federal , primarily targeting issues such as processes and technology development incentives. These expenditures support advocacy for accelerated production in key programs, including , and enhancements to tax policies. The company's political action committee (PAC), the General Dynamics Employee PAC, raised $2.61 million during the 2023-2024 election cycle and disbursed $1.31 million in contributions to federal candidates, with allocations to incumbents from both Democratic and Republican parties to foster relationships across congressional committees overseeing defense matters. This bipartisan approach aligns with industry norms for engaging policymakers on sustained funding, particularly in opposition to proposed reductions in allocations that could impact strategic capabilities. General Dynamics maintains ongoing relations with the Department of Defense through participation in competitive processes, where contracts are awarded based on evaluated bids rather than exclusive reliance on ties. For instance, in November 2024, its unit secured a $5.6 billion indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for mission partner environment support via full and open competition, with multiple offers received. Similarly, other awards, such as a $299 million task for network support in September 2024, underscore the role of merit-based selection in DoD engagements, mitigating claims of non-competitive favoritism. This framework reflects broader Department of Defense efforts to promote competition within the industrial base, as detailed in official assessments.

1980s Scandals and Investigations

In 1985, the U.S. Navy imposed a freeze on new contracts with General Dynamics following revelations that the company had provided over $67,628 in gifts to retired Admiral Hyman G. Rickover, head of naval nuclear propulsion, over a 16-year period from 1969 to 1985. The gifts included jewelry such as diamond earrings valued at $695 and a jade pendant at $430, as well as silverware and other items, which were documented in internal company records and prompted a congressional inquiry. Navy Secretary John Lehman fined General Dynamics $100,000 and censured Rickover for accepting the gratuities, citing a violation of public trust, though Rickover claimed he had donated many items to charity. The contract freeze, initiated on March 5, 1985, by Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger and affecting divisions like Electric Boat, was lifted in August after General Dynamics cooperated with investigations and implemented corrective measures. Parallel scrutiny focused on cost overruns in General Dynamics' submarine programs, particularly the SSN-688 Los Angeles-class attack and Trident ballistic missile built at the division. By , overruns on these exceeded $100 million, with allegations that company executives, including Chairman Oliver C. Booth, attempted to withhold reporting of the full extent to avoid financial losses estimated at $359 million after prior settlements. Rickover had previously accused the firm of inflating costs on attack , leading to a 1978 settlement where the agreed to share up to $100 million in overruns but provided $639 million based on disputed claims. The investigated General Dynamics' eligibility in December 1983 amid these disputes, though programs continued after negotiated adjustments, including an $84 million loss provision in 1982 for SSN-688 . The A-12 Avenger II carrier-based stealth program, a joint effort with McDonnell Douglas initiated in the mid-, faced early investigations into technical and cost challenges, including delays and weight issues that foreshadowed larger overruns. By the late , these problems contributed to heightened of defense contracting practices, though the program persisted until its 1991 termination with penalties settled via shared liabilities rather than full cancellation during the decade. These incidents occurred amid broader 1980s defense industry probes under the Reagan administration, driven by concerns over procurement fraud and inefficiencies, as evidenced by the Navy's 1986 grant of immunity to General Dynamics for further disclosures, restoring full bidding eligibility without criminal charges by 1987. General Dynamics resolved the matters through fines, settlements, and procedural reforms, allowing submarine and other naval programs to proceed while adapting to intensified audits that influenced industry-wide cost controls.

Product Quality and Testing Issues

In the development of the , which resulted in the F-111 aircraft, General Dynamics encountered significant quality and testing challenges, including engine performance deficiencies, aerodynamic drag exceeding specifications, and structural failures in the wing pivot mechanism. A 1960s Government Accountability Office investigation highlighted persistent issues such as schedule delays and cost escalations stemming from inadequate initial testing and design validation, which compromised anticipated performance reliability. These problems led to multiple redesigns, including modifications to engine inlets and variable-geometry wings, before the aircraft achieved operational status in the late 1960s. A notable structural defect involved cracks in D6ac components of the carry-through structure, prompting the U.S. to ground F-111 fleets in the for metallurgical analysis by General Dynamics. Examination revealed variations in material toughness that undermined fatigue resistance, necessitating enhanced inspection protocols and material substitutions to restore airworthiness. Despite these setbacks, iterative fixes enabled the F-111 to enter full production and provide effective service in roles, demonstrating eventual resolution of core testing deficiencies. In September 1988, a whistleblower-initiated lawsuit under the False Claims Act alleged that General Dynamics employed "cheater software" to manipulate diagnostic tests on components for the Navy's and , resulting in the delivery of defective hardware that failed to meet operational specifications. The suit claimed these practices evaded checks, potentially endangering anti-aircraft defense capabilities by concealing faults in and fire-control . General Dynamics denied the accusations, asserting compliance with contract standards, though the case underscored broader concerns over testing integrity in missile subsystems. Following such incidents, General Dynamics implemented internal quality enhancements, including refined supplier oversight and testing protocols, as evidenced by subsequent contract compliance in defense programs. While specific Department of Defense audits confirming these reforms for the 1988 allegations remain limited in , the company's sustained role in high-stakes contracts implies validation through ongoing performance reviews and defect remediation settlements in related cases.

Arms Sales Criticisms

General Dynamics has faced criticism for arms exports to , particularly light armored vehicles (LAVs) supplied through its Canadian subsidiary, amid the Saudi-led intervention in starting in 2015. The Canadian government approved a $15 billion contract in 2016 with General Dynamics Land Systems–Canada for approximately 900 vehicles, which critics alleged were deployed in offensive operations contributing to civilian harm. groups, including , highlighted the coalition's airstrikes and ground actions—enabled by such equipment—as responsible for thousands of civilian deaths, with a 2017 report estimating over 10,000 civilian casualties by mid-year, prompting calls to halt the deal over potential complicity in violations of . Defenders of the transaction, including General Dynamics and Canadian officials, argued that the LAVs were primarily for border defense against Houthi attacks, which involved Iranian-supplied missiles and drones targeting Saudi territory, and that export controls included end-use assurances limiting offensive deployment. They contended that blocking U.S. and allied sales would not deter Saudi Arabia's military needs but could redirect purchases to suppliers like Russia or , lacking equivalent oversight and increasing proliferation risks to non-state actors. Similar scrutiny has applied to General Dynamics' M1 Abrams tank exports, with receiving hundreds of units since the 1990s under U.S. programs, some reportedly used in incursions beyond purely defensive roles. Critics from organizations like CODEPINK assert these transfers exacerbate regional conflicts and humanitarian crises by bolstering regimes with documented rights abuses. Counterarguments emphasize that U.S.-managed exports incorporate training, maintenance stipulations, and monitoring to promote responsible use, contrasting with unregulated markets where weapons more readily fuel insurgencies or . Empirical assessments of proliferation risks support this, noting that allied sales channels have historically contained diversions better than alternative global suppliers.

Strategic Contributions to Defense

Technological Innovations and Reliability

General Dynamics Land Systems introduced armor in the M1A1 Abrams tank variants starting with the M1A1HA model in the late 1980s, enhancing ballistic protection through the material's high density—approximately 19 grams per cubic centimeter, 1.7 times that of lead—and its pyrophoric effect upon penetration, which ignites fragments to defeat anti-tank threats. This innovation, integrated into Chobham-style composite armor, significantly improved survivability against kinetic and chemical energy munitions compared to earlier steel-encased designs. In , General Dynamics pioneered the implementation of a digital flight on the F-16 Fighting Falcon, entering production in 1978 as the first operational fighter aircraft to employ this technology without mechanical backups. The quadruplex-redundant system enabled the aircraft's relaxed static stability, allowing with a 9g sustainment capability while computers continuously adjusted control surfaces to prevent departure from controlled flight. This approach reduced weight by eliminating hydraulic linkages and improved precision, influencing subsequent fighter designs. General Dynamics Electric Boat advanced submarine manufacturing with modular block construction for the Virginia-class (SSN-774), initiating production in the early 2000s to streamline assembly by pre-outfitting large sections before integration, targeting schedule reductions from the Seawolf-class's multi-year overruns. This method has supported achieving target build cycles of around 33 to 45 months per boat in mature production phases, facilitating multi-year procurement efficiencies. Field performance underscores these innovations' reliability; during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom from 2003 to 2011, the logged over 280,000 miles in combat with minimal catastrophic failures, as most IED-damaged vehicles—estimated at dozens—were repaired rather than lost, attributing to compartmentalized and armor resilience. No Abrams tanks were reported destroyed by enemy action in the 1991 , validating the platform's engineering against massed armored threats.

Impact on U.S. and Allied Military Capabilities

General Dynamics' Electric Boat division constructs Virginia-class nuclear-powered attack submarines, which form the backbone of the U.S. Navy's undersea fleet, providing stealthy, versatile platforms for , intelligence gathering, and precision strikes essential for maintaining undersea dominance against peer competitors like and . These submarines offer superior speed, endurance, and firepower compared to predecessors, enabling extended covert operations that deter adversarial naval advances in contested regions such as the . By delivering multi-mission capabilities, including the ability to engage surface ships and submarines while remaining undetected, the Virginia-class enhances U.S. and strategic deterrence. On land, General Dynamics Land Systems produces the , which equips U.S. armored forces with overmatch firepower via its 120mm , capable of destroying enemy armor, personnel, and low-flying threats at extended ranges, thereby bolstering deterrence through superior maneuver. The Abrams demonstrated a kill ratio exceeding 20:1 against Iraqi armor during the 1991 , validating its role in enabling rapid, decisive armored advances that project power across theaters. Complementing this, the family of wheeled vehicles improves Army mobility by facilitating rapid strategic deployment of brigade combat teams, with upgrades increasing gross vehicle weight capacity to 60,000 pounds and integrating 30mm cannons for enhanced lethality against armored threats. These systems collectively support agile, protected forces for expeditionary operations, deterring aggression by ensuring swift response capabilities. General Dynamics' early production of the F-16 Fighting Falcon contributed to a platform with an air-to-air kill ratio of approximately 76:1 across conflicts, including U.S. operations and exports to allies, fostering through shared multirole fighter tactics and sustainment. This legacy enhances allied air superiority, as F-16s enable coalition forces to achieve favorable exchange ratios in contested airspace, deterring peer adversaries via proven combat effectiveness. Through the partnership, General Dynamics supports technology transfers and construction of Virginia-class submarines for , augmenting collective maritime deterrence in the by expanding allied undersea strike and surveillance networks against regional threats. This arrangement, involving U.S. provision of submarines as an interim capability, strengthens power projection for partners like , integrating them into U.S.-led undersea operations to counter expansionist naval strategies.

Economic and Geopolitical Significance

General Dynamics sustains a substantial portion of the U.S. ecosystem through its of 117,000 employees as of 2024, many engaged in high-skill production of defense platforms such as submarines, armored vehicles, and combat systems across facilities in states including , , , and . This employment footprint underpins regional economies by fostering supply chains that involve thousands of domestic suppliers for components like , forgings, and systems, thereby amplifying multiplier effects in manufacturing output and local procurement exceeding billions annually. The company's record order backlog of $109.9 billion as of the third quarter of 2025 reflects heightened procurement driven by escalating threats from and , including territorial aggressions and military modernization efforts that necessitate U.S. investments in deterrence capabilities like Virginia-class submarines and Abrams tanks produced by General Dynamics subsidiaries. This backlog empirically validates sustained defense spending as a causal response to adversarial advancements—such as Russia's invasion of and China's militarization—rather than discretionary excess, with funded orders ensuring multi-year production stability that counters supply vulnerabilities exposed in recent conflicts. Beyond direct outputs, General Dynamics' role in defense R&D generates spillovers to civilian innovation, where empirical analyses show that public defense investments yield private-sector productivity gains; for instance, foundational technologies like the (GPS), developed through U.S. military programs, have diffused into commercial navigation, , and , contributing trillions in economic value globally. Such dynamics refute reductionist critiques of defense as zero-sum by demonstrating causal linkages to broader technological progress, while geopolitically, the firm's platforms enhance U.S. and allied , deterring escalation in and European theaters and preserving stability through credible superiority over peer competitors.

References

  1. https://www.gd.com/
  2. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/GD/profile/
  3. https://www.gd.com/our-businesses
  4. https://stockrow.com/GD/business-profile
  5. https://www.marinelink.com/companies/general-dynamics-82663
  6. https://www.gd.com/about-gd/our-history
  7. https://www.gd.com/Articles/2025/09/26/general-dynamics-electric-boat-awarded-contract-for-virginia-class-submarine-work
  8. https://investorrelations.gd.com/news/press-release-details/2025/General-Dynamics-Electric-Boat-Awarded-12-Billion-Contract-Modification-for-Virginia-Class-Submarines/default.aspx
  9. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/jmd/legacy/2014/01/25/hear-99-48-1985.pdf
  10. https://www.gulfstream.com/en/our-story/
  11. https://www.gulfstream.com/en/aircraft/gulfstream-g800/
  12. https://simpleflying.com/gulfstream-general-dynamics-acquisition/
  13. https://www.globalair.com/aircraft-for-sale/specifications?specid=1250
  14. https://hautejets.com/gulfstream-longest-range-business-jets/
  15. https://www.gulfstream.com/en/aircraft/gulfstream-g700/
  16. https://www.gulfstreamnews.com/en/news/?id=996f7ccb-c29a-4192-a1a2-5af6acb0a866
  17. https://avi-go.com/newsroom/articles/gulfstreamssteadyclimbrisingdeliveriesstrongbacklogandmarketconfidencein2025
  18. https://www.blackjet.com/post/private-jet-manufacturers-fe5b6
  19. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/general-dynamics-gd-delivers-across-195212298.html
  20. https://www.flightglobal.com/airframers/gulfstream-achieves-record-nine-month-delivery-performance-in-2025/165034.article
  21. https://www.gd.com/our-businesses/marine-systems
  22. https://www.gdeb.com/about/locations/quonset/
  23. https://www.norwichbulletin.com/story/news/local/2025/02/04/general-dynamic-electric-boat-to-hire-3000-workers-in-2025/78193474007/
  24. https://www.providencejournal.com/story/news/local/2025/02/06/electric-boat-to-hire-3050-more-to-build-submarines-in-quonset-point-rhode-island-groton-connecticut/78296810007/
  25. https://www.gdeb.com/news/news_archives/2020archives.html
  26. https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2020/11/05/navy-inks-contract-for-two-columbia-class-nuclear-missile-submarines/
  27. https://breakingdefense.com/2025/04/navy-awards-up-to-17-1-billion-submarine-contract-modification-to-general-dynamics-electric-boat/
  28. https://global.tendernews.com/newsdetails.aspx?s=6005&t=Breaking-News:-US-Navy-funds-first-Block-VI-Virginia-class-submarines-with-hypersonic-strike-capability.
  29. https://nassco.com/
  30. https://news.usni.org/2024/09/15/gd-nassco-wins-6-7-billion-8-ship-fleet-oiler-contract
  31. https://timesofsandiego.com/military/2024/09/13/nassco-shipyard-under-new-navy-contract-to-continue-producing-lewis-class-oil-tankers/
  32. https://www.gdls.com/about-us/
  33. https://www.gdls.com/m1a2-sepv3/
  34. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12495
  35. https://www.gd.com/our-businesses/combat-systems
  36. https://www.army-technology.com/projects/stryker-armoured-combat-vehicle/
  37. https://international.gdls.com/english/products.html
  38. https://www.gd.com/Articles/2023/06/26/general-dynamics-land-systems-receives-%24712-million-order-for-stryker-dvha1-vehicles
  39. https://www.gdls.com/ajax/
  40. https://www.gdls.com/ajax-ifv-unveil-2025/
  41. https://www.gd.com/Articles/2022/08/25/gdls-to-provide-abrams-tanks-to-poland-under-foreign-military-sales-order
  42. https://thedefensepost.com/2025/01/21/poland-first-abrams/
  43. https://gdmissionsystems.com/about-us
  44. https://gdmissionsystems.com/communications/warfighter-information-network-tactical
  45. https://www.gd.com/Articles/2019/11/27/gd-receives-10-year-sustainment-contract-for-next-generation-satellite-communications-system
  46. https://gdmissionsystems.com/about-us/engineering/deep-learning
  47. https://investorrelations.gd.com/news/press-release-details/2025/GDIT-Awarded-1-25-Billion-Enterprise-Mission-Information-Technology-Services-2-Task-Order-to-Support-U-S--Army-Europe-and-Africa/default.aspx
  48. https://www.gd.com/Articles/2025/10/24/general-dynamics-reports-third-quarter-2025-financial-results
  49. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/gdit-announces-strategic-collaboration-agreement-with-aws-302401990.html
  50. https://www.gdit.com/about-gdit/press-releases/gdit-announces-availability-of-aws-services-on-milcloud-r-2-0/
  51. https://www.gdit.com/about-gdit/press-releases/gdit-successfully-demonstrates-artificial-intelligence-at-the-tactical-edge/
  52. https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1999/july/ups-and-downs-electric-boat
  53. https://www.gdeb.com/about/history/
  54. https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/205/301/ic/cdc/canadair/english/canadair_introduction_page.htm
  55. https://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/electric-boat-corporation
  56. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/canadair-ltd
  57. https://www.centennialofflight.net/essay/Aerospace/generaldynamics/Aero35.htm
  58. https://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/general-dynamics-corporation-history/
  59. https://www.warrenmuseum.com/atlas-sm-65/
  60. https://www.afmissileers.org/ATLAS-ICBM
  61. https://sandiegoairandspace.org/exhibits/online-exhibit-page/key-industry-partners-in-the-atlas-success-story
  62. https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/195859/general-dynamics-f-111f-aardvark/
  63. https://www.americanairpowermuseum.com/general-dynamics-f-111a-ardvark/
  64. https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/news/features/history/f16.html
  65. https://secure.afa.org/Mitchell/reports/MP9_ATF_0612.pdf
  66. https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104505/f-16-fighting-falcon/
  67. https://www.gao.gov/assets/psad-77-40.pdf
  68. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/weapons/f-16/
  69. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/a-12.htm
  70. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/0491navy/
  71. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/boeing-general-dynamics-reach-400-million-a-12-settlement-with-us-navy-idUSBREA0M229/
  72. https://www.gao.gov/assets/nsiad-91-98.pdf
  73. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1993-03-19-fi-12797-story.html
  74. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5580
  75. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1993/12/22/Martin-Marietta-to-buy-General-Dynamics-Space-Systems/2450756536400/
  76. https://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/09/business/company-news-space-deal-seen-as-near-for-marietta.html
  77. https://sandiegoairandspace.org/exhibits/online-exhibit-page/end-of-an-era-exit-general-dynamics-enter-lockheed-martin-and-ula
  78. https://www.nytimes.com/1992/07/30/business/company-news-general-dynamics-sets-more-cuts-tied-to-f-16.html
  79. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/merger-mania-should-the-pentagon-pay-for-defense-industry-restructuring/
  80. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/vprr/0203/02031775.pdf
  81. https://www.gd.com/Articles/2018/10/08/general-dynamics-receives-contract-upgrade-us-army-strykers-a1
  82. https://www.army.mil/article/180709/abrams_charter_in_effect_at_the_awg
  83. https://investorrelations.gd.com/news/press-release-details/2025/General-Dynamics-Electric-Boat-awarded-1-85-billion-contract-modification-for-long-lead-time-material-and-preliminary-construction-for-submarine-production/default.aspx
  84. https://www.centennialofflight.net/essay/Aerospace/convair/Aero36.htm
  85. https://www.nytimes.com/1959/12/30/archives/holders-approve-dynamics-merger.html
  86. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/415/486/
  87. https://www.nytimes.com/1992/05/12/business/company-news-dynamics-is-selling-missile-unit-to-hughes.html
  88. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-12-09-fi-1609-story.html
  89. https://www.washingtontechnology.com/2018/02/general-dynamics-csra-the-deal-that-shook-the-market/358069/
  90. https://www.washingtontechnology.com/2003/08/general-dynamics-completes-veridian-acquisition/353362/
  91. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1095901/000095013303002107/w87359exv99w2.htm
  92. https://www.washingtontechnology.com/2003/06/general-dynamics-to-acquire-veridian/354044/
  93. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-jun-10-fi-rup10.6-story.html
  94. https://insights.greyb.com/knowledge-base/general-dynamics-subsidiaries-and-acquisitions/
  95. https://www.gdit.com/about-gdit/press-releases/gdit-acquires-iron-eaglex-inc/
  96. https://www.washingtontechnology.com/companies/2024/09/general-dynamics-acquires-special-operations-tech-specialist/399375/
  97. https://www.businessobserverfl.com/news/2024/sep/11/cyber-security-firm-acquired/
  98. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-11-01-fi-554-story.html
  99. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-02-04-fi-1485-story.html
  100. https://www.shortform.com/blog/bill-anders-astronaut-ceo/
  101. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1992/05/11/Hughes-to-buy-General-Dynamics-missile-division/3332705556800/
  102. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/business/1992/05/07/defense-firm-to-sell-several-more-divisions/e946145c-0843-4ead-a42c-b036b10f2c59/
  103. https://www.shortform.com/blog/general-dynamics-history/
  104. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/GD/general-dynamics/revenue
  105. https://www.gd.com/Articles/2025/01/29/general-dynamics-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024-financial-results
  106. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/GD/general-dynamics/net-income
  107. https://mlq.ai/news/general-dynamics-reports-strong-q3-2025-earnings-surpassing-expectations/
  108. https://s22.q4cdn.com/891946778/files/doc_financials/2025/q3/GD-2025-09-28-Exhibit-99-1.pdf
  109. https://seekingalpha.com/news/4508333-general-dynamics-raises-2025-eps-guidance-to-15_30-15_35-amid-record-109_9b-backlog-and
  110. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/general-dynamics-reports-third-quarter-2025-financial-results-302593263.html
  111. https://www.tradingview.com/news/gurufocus:2d41b8447094b:0-general-dynamics-stock-the-best-defense-prime/
  112. https://www.fool.com/investing/stock-market/market-sectors/industrials/defense-stocks/biggest-defense-companies/
  113. https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/capital-goods/nyse-gd/general-dynamics/past
  114. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/general-dynamics-arm-wins-987m-135300810.html
  115. https://www.gd.com/Articles/2022/12/21/electric-boat-awarded-five-billion-by-us-navy-for-columbia-class-submarines
  116. https://www.war.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/4170827/
  117. https://marketchameleon.com/articles/b/2025/10/24/general-dynamics-revenue-growth-backlog-q3-2025
  118. https://www.govconwire.com/articles/general-dynamics-land-systems-abrams-battle-tank-engineering-army-contract
  119. https://investorrelations.gd.com/news/press-release-details/2025/GDIT-Awarded-1-5-Billion-Enterprise-IT-Modernization-Contract-to-Strengthen-U-S--Strategic-Commands-Operational-Readiness/default.aspx
  120. https://www.gd.com/Articles/2025/10/02/gdit-awarded-enterprise-mission-information-technology-services-to-support-us-army-europe-africa
  121. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/GD/
  122. https://www.marketbeat.com/instant-alerts/general-dynamics-nysegd-sets-new-52-week-high-after-strong-earnings-2025-10-24/
  123. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/general-dynamics-quarterly-profit-rises-strong-business-jet-deliveries-2025-10-24/
  124. https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/general-dynamics-q3-2025-slides-revenue-up-106-record-1099b-backlog-93CH-4308170
  125. https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/NYSE-GD/
  126. https://investorrelations.gd.com/stock-information/dividend-split-history/default.aspx
  127. https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xnys/gd/dividends
  128. https://www.gd.com/Articles/2024/12/04/general-dynamics-board-declares-dividend-authorizes-additional-share-repurchases
  129. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/general-dynamics-board-declares-dividend-authorizes-additional-share-repurchases-302322940.html
  130. https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/gd/financials/ratios/
  131. https://finbox.com/NYSE:GD/explorer/roe/
  132. https://www.alphaspread.com/comparison/nyse/gd/vs/indx/gspc
  133. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/markets/stocks/GD-N/pressreleases/32720186/how-is-general-dynamics-stock-performance-compared-to-other-aerospace-defense-stocks/
  134. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/rtx-vs-general-dynamics-defense-144700474.html
  135. https://investorrelations.gd.com/corporate-governance/board-of-directors/person-details/default.aspx?ItemId=0c6fc9b3-5e04-4428-a9c6-ece174ebd666
  136. https://www.crunchbase.com/person/phebe-n-novakovic
  137. https://s22.q4cdn.com/891946778/files/doc_governance/2025/May/Corporate-Governance-Guidelines-5-2025-FINAL.pdf
  138. https://investorrelations.gd.com/corporate-governance/committee-composition/default.aspx
  139. https://investorrelations.gd.com/corporate-governance/board-of-directors/default.aspx
  140. https://investorrelations.gd.com/corporate-governance/documents-and-charters/default.aspx
  141. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/40533/000130817925000291/gd013194-def14a.htm
  142. https://www.gd.com/about-gd/leadership
  143. https://www.govconwire.com/articles/general-dynamics-leadership-team-changes
  144. https://time.com/archive/6710343/general-dynamics-under-fire/
  145. https://www.gurufocus.com/news/216486/general-dynamics-a-history-of-value-creation
  146. https://www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2012/11/26/general-dynamics-begins-2013-with-new-leader-changing-business-mix/
  147. https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/clients/summary?cycle=2024&id=D000000165
  148. http://legis1.com/news/defense-lobbying-surge-general-dynamics-q3-2025-spending/
  149. https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/general-dynamics/C00078451/summary/2024
  150. https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/general-dynamics/C00078451/candidate-recipients/2024
  151. https://www.buysidedigest.com/elevator/general-dynamics-looking-big-and-beautiful-with-defense-spending-likely-to-top-1-trillion/
  152. https://www.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3962730/
  153. https://www.gdit.com/about-gdit/press-releases/gdit-awarded-usd299-million-contract-to-support-pentagons-network/
  154. https://media.defense.gov/2022/feb/15/2002939087/-1/-1/1/state-of-competition-within-the-defense-industrial-base.pdf
  155. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1985/06/04/General-Dynamics-pays-Rickover-gift-fine/4423486705600/
  156. https://www.nytimes.com/1985/06/11/business/rickover-tells-lehman-he-gave-away-gifts.html
  157. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1984/07/18/rickover-gifts-from-company-under-inquiry/b12e4b64-3fae-465b-9d3f-3d0edb90de57/
  158. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1985-05-22-mn-16733-story.html
  159. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1985-08-14-mn-2659-story.html
  160. https://www.nytimes.com/1985/08/14/business/navy-ends-ban-on-contracting-with-dynamics.html
  161. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1984/09/26/submarines-were-exceeding-budget-by-100-million/4c99e3a1-c77f-45b3-99ac-b6bc0e1965f8/
  162. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/09/25/The-chairman-of-General-Dynamics-Corp-the-nations-largest/9647464932800/
  163. https://www.csmonitor.com/1985/1204/afraud.html
  164. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-05-19-mn-1263-story.html
  165. https://www.nytimes.com/1983/12/21/business/general-dynamics-eligibility-on-contracts-studied-by-navy.html
  166. https://nationalsecurityjournal.org/we-know-how-the-a-12-avenger-ii-flying-dorito-was-shot-down/
  167. https://www.nytimes.com/1986/02/08/us/immunity-granted-general-dynamics-as-navy-lifts-ban.html
  168. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/12/19/General-Dynamics-The-troubles-surface/4473472280400/
  169. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA547500.pdf
  170. https://www.dau.edu/sites/default/files/Migrated/CopDocuments/F%2520111%2520SE%2520GK%2520Richey.pdf
  171. https://www.gao.gov/assets/094456.pdf
  172. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA393097.pdf
  173. https://www.airvectors.net/avf111.html
  174. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-09-03-mn-3147-story.html
  175. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1988/09/03/General-Dynamics-accused-of-making-defective-missile-systems/9814589262400/
  176. https://www.gd.com/-/media/gd-corporate/pdf/general-dynamics-standards-of-business-ethics-and-conduct.ashx
  177. https://www.justice.gov/archive/usao/nye/pr/2008/2008aug18.html
  178. https://lfpress.com/2017/01/24/federal-court-dismisses-challenge-of-londons-general-dynamics-saudi-arabia-deal
  179. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-saudi-arms-deal-1.4579772
  180. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2019/09/arms-companies-failing-to-address-human-rights-risks/
  181. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/12/11/uncertainty-shrouds-canadian-arms-sales-to-saudi-arabia
  182. https://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2017/08/02/Saudi-Arms-Deal-Triumph-Political-Hypocrisy/
  183. https://breachmedia.ca/canada-funneled-saudi-arabia-lavs-opaque-american-program/
  184. https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/general-dynamics-did-not-respond-to-allegations-that-the-co-is-contributing-to-harts-invasion-of-privacy-and-human-rights-violations/
  185. https://www.codepink.org/general_dynamics
  186. https://assets.nfhs.org/umbraco/media/1019426/reduce-arms-sales.pdf
  187. https://quincyinst.org/research/profits-of-war-top-beneficiaries-of-pentagon-spending-2020-2024/
  188. https://id3486.securedata.net/fprado/armorsite/abrams.htm
  189. https://www.coffeeordie.com/article/m1-abrams
  190. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/book/10.2514/4.867873
  191. https://www.f-16.net/articles_article13.html
  192. https://www.gdeb.com/business_centers/new_construction/
  193. https://news.usni.org/2024/08/06/navy-awards-1-3b-long-lead-contract-for-virginia-block-vi-boats-ahead-of-anticipated-multi-year-contract
  194. https://www.quora.com/How-many-abrams-tanks-were-lost-in-the-Iraq-war
  195. https://www.gao.gov/assets/nsiad-92-94.pdf
  196. https://www.stripes.com/branches/navy/2025-10-10/virginia-class-submarine-navy-fleet-19382734.html
  197. https://www.facebook.com/gdelectricboat/posts/virginia-class-submarines-are-stealthy-versatile-and-powerful-and-provide-the-us/1125115165743406/
  198. https://www.buildsubmarines.com/newsroom/general-dynamics-electric-boat-christens-submarine-iowa-ssn-797
  199. https://www.gd.com/Articles/2020/12/23/gdls-awarded-m1a2-sepv3-abrams-contract
  200. https://debuglies.com/2025/07/03/adapting-armored-warfare-the-united-states-integration-of-russian-inspired-technologies-in-m1-abrams-tank-upgrades-amid-evolving-battlefield-dynamics/
  201. https://www.gdls.com/stryker-a1/
  202. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2017/6/13/army-improving-strykers-lethality-mobility
  203. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/meet-f-16-fighting-falcon-old-fighter-jet-keeps-killing-73676/
  204. https://migflug.com/jetflights/the-combat-statistics-for-all-the-aircraft-currently-in-use/
  205. https://news.usni.org/2024/04/09/aukus-partners-working-through-reality-of-submarine-pact-officials-say
  206. https://www.gdeb.com/news/news_archives/2023archives.html
  207. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/GD/general-dynamics/number-of-employees
  208. https://www.gd.com/about-gd
  209. https://www.gd.com/Articles/2025/07/23/general-dynamics-reports-second-quarter-2025-financial-results
  210. https://www.news10.com/business/press-releases/cision/20251024NY05429/general-dynamics-reports-third-quarter-2025-financial-results
  211. https://www.ati.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ati-insight_13-spillovers.pdf
  212. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/intellectual-spoils-war-how-government-spending-defence-research-benefits-private
  213. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26483/revisions/w26483.rev0.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.