Hubbry Logo
List of radar typesList of radar typesMain
Open search
List of radar types
Community hub
List of radar types
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
List of radar types
List of radar types
List of radar types
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

This is a list of different types of radar.

Detection and search radars

[edit]

Search radars scan great volumes of space with pulses of short radio waves. They typically scan the volume two to four times a minute. The radio waves are usually less than a meter long. Ships and planes are metal, and reflect radio waves. The radar measures the distance to the reflector by measuring the time of the round trip from emission of a pulse to reception, dividing this by two, and then multiplying by the speed of light. To be accepted, the received pulse has to lie within a period of time called the range gate. The radar determines the direction because the short radio waves behave like a search light when emitted from the reflector of the radar set's antenna.

[edit]
RAF Boeing E-3 Sentry AEW1 (AWACS) with rotating radar dome. The dome is 30 ft (10 m) across. The E-3 is accompanied by two Panavia Tornado F3.

Targeting radars

[edit]
Main article: Fire-control radar

Targeting radars utilize the same principle but scan smaller volumes of space far more often, usually several times a second or more, while a search radar will scan a larger volume less frequently. Missile lock-on describes the scenario where a targeting radar has acquired a target, and the fire control can calculate a path for the missile to the target; in semi-active radar homing systems, this implies that the missile can "see" the target that the targeting radar is "illuminating". Some targeting radars have a range gate that can track a target, to eliminate clutter and electronic countermeasures.

Missile guidance systems

[edit]
Main article: Missile guidance

Others

[edit]

Battlefield and reconnaissance radar

[edit]
Military map marking symbol Radar as of NATO standard APP-6a

Instrumentation radars

[edit]

Instrumentation radars are used to test aircraft, missiles, rockets, and munitions on government and private test ranges. They provide Time, Space, Position, Information (TSPI) data both for real time and post processing analysis.[2]

Repurposed NASA and military radars

Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS)

Custom

  • AN/MPS-39 Multi-Object Tracking Radar (MOTR)
  • TAMTS
  • BAE Rule
  • ROTR
  • ROSA
  • ROSA II
  • COSIP
  • Dynetics MRS

Fuzes and triggers

[edit]

Radar proximity fuzes are attached to anti-aircraft artillery shells or other explosive devices, and detonate the device when it approaches a large object. They use a small rapidly pulsing omnidirectional radar, usually with a powerful battery that has a long storage life, and a very short operational life. The fuzes used in anti-aircraft artillery have to be mechanically designed to accept fifty thousand g, yet still be cheap enough to throw away.[citation needed]

Weather-sensing radar systems

[edit]

Weather radars can resemble search radars. This radar uses radio waves along with horizontal, dual (horizontal and vertical), or circular polarization. The frequency selection of weather radar is a performance compromise between precipitation reflectivity and attenuation due to atmospheric water vapor. Some weather radars uses doppler shift to measure wind speeds and dual-polarization for identification of types of precipitations.[3][4]

  • Storm front reflectivities on a weather radar screen (NOAA)
    Storm front reflectivities on a weather radar screen (NOAA)
  • Wind profiling radar
    Wind profiling radar
[edit]
Main article: Radar navigation
Surface search radar display commonly found on ships

Navigational radars resemble search radar, but use very short waves that reflect from earth and stone. They are common on commercial ships and long-distance commercial aircraft.

Marine radars are used by ships for collision avoidance and navigation purposes. The frequency band of radar used on most ships is X band (9 GHz/3 cm), but S band (3 GHz/10 cm) radar is also installed on most oceangoing ships to provide better detection of ships in rough sea and heavy rain condition. Vessel traffic services also use marine radars (X or S band) for tracking ARPA and provides collision avoidance or traffic regulation of ships in the surveillance area.

General purpose radars are increasingly being substituted for pure navigational radars. These generally use navigational radar frequencies, but modulate the pulse so the receiver can determine the type of surface of the reflector. The best general-purpose radars distinguish the rain of heavy storms, as well as land and vehicles. Some can superimpose sonar and map data from GPS position.

Air Traffic Control and navigation

[edit]

Air traffic control uses primary and secondary radars. Primary radars are a "classical" radar which reflects all kind of echoes, including aircraft and clouds. Secondary radar emits pulses and listens for special answer of digital data emitted by an Aircraft Transponder as an answer. Transponders emit different kind of data like a 4 octal ID (mode A), the onboard calculated altitude (mode C) or the Callsign (not the flight number) (mode S). Military use transponders to establish the nationality and intention of an aircraft, so that air defenses can identify possibly hostile radar returns. This military system is called IFF (Identification Friend or Foe).

Air traffic control radar at London Heathrow Airport

Space and range instrumentation radar systems

[edit]

Mapping radars

[edit]

Mapping radars are used to scan a large region for remote sensing and geography applications. They generally use synthetic aperture radar, which limits them to relatively static targets, normally terrain.

Specific radar systems can sense a human behind walls. This is possible since the reflective characteristics of humans are generally more diverse than those of the materials typically used in construction. However, since humans reflect far less radar energy than metal does, these systems require sophisticated technology to isolate human targets and moreover to process any sort of detailed image. Through-the-wall radars can be made with Ultra Wideband impulse radar, micro-Doppler radar, and synthetic aperture radar (SAR).[5]

Speed radar

[edit]
  • Radar gun, for traffic policing and as used in some sports

Radars for biological research

[edit]

Radar range and wavelength can be adapted for different surveys of bird and insect migration and daily habits. They can have other uses too in the biological field.

  • "MERLIN Avian Radar System for Bird Activity Monitoring and Mortality Risk Mitigation" (PDF).
  • Insect radar
  • Wearable radar and miniature radar systems are used as electric seeing aids for the visually impaired, as well as early warning collision detection and situational awareness.
Further information: Bioradiolocation

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

List of radar types

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A list of radar types catalogs the diverse categories of radar systems, which are detection and location technologies employing radio waves to identify the range, , , and other attributes of remote such as , ships, formations, or . These systems are broadly classified by operational principles like modulation, transmitter-receiver configuration, functional purpose, and specific applications, encompassing everything from basic pulsed radars for to sophisticated radars for mapping. Radar types are often divided into primary and secondary systems based on signal interaction with targets. Primary radars emit their own signals and detect echoes reflected from passive targets, enabling independent operation without target cooperation, as seen in surveillance and navigation applications. In contrast, secondary radars, such as air traffic control interrogators, query cooperative transponders on targets to elicit coded responses containing data like altitude or identity, providing higher precision and reliability in controlled environments. Another fundamental classification distinguishes between pulsed and continuous wave (CW) radars by signal transmission method. Pulsed radars transmit short, high-power bursts separated by listening intervals, allowing range determination via the time delay of echoes (calculated as R=ct/2R = ct/2, where cc is the speed of light and tt is the round-trip time), and are widely used for both stationary and moving target detection. CW radars, including unmodulated and frequency-modulated (FMCW) variants, emit uninterrupted waves; unmodulated CW focuses on velocity via Doppler shift (fd=−2v/λcos⁡θf_d = -2v/\lambda \cos\theta), while FMCW enables range estimation through beat frequency analysis during frequency sweeps, suiting applications like automotive speed sensing. Configuration-based types include monostatic and bistatic radars, differentiated by antenna placement. Monostatic radars co-locate the transmitter and receiver (often sharing a single antenna via a ), simplifying for most civilian and uses like monitoring. Bistatic radars separate these components across distinct sites, enhancing stealth or coverage in scenarios such as long-range or environmental sensing, though at the cost of increased complexity. Specialized radar types address niche functions, including Doppler radars that exploit frequency shifts for velocity profiling in meteorology and aviation, monopulse radars for high-accuracy angular tracking via single-pulse comparisons, and passive radars that detect targets using ambient signals like broadcast transmissions for covert operations. Imaging radars, such as synthetic aperture types, generate two-dimensional maps for terrain analysis or remote sensing, while non-imaging variants deliver scalar data for altimetry or speed enforcement. Application-specific examples include weather radars for precipitation and wind detection, navigational radars for maritime collision avoidance, and instrumentation radars for aerospace testing.

Detection and Surveillance Radars

Air and Surface Search Radars

Air and surface search radars are rotating or electronically scanned systems designed to provide 360-degree coverage for detecting and tracking aircraft, ships, vehicles, or other targets in aerial and maritime environments, typically operating within line-of-sight ranges limited to approximately 400 km. These radars scan large volumes of space using short radio wave pulses to determine target position, course, and speed, serving as the primary sensors for initial surveillance in air defense and naval operations. They often integrate with Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) systems, which use synchronized antennas to interrogate transponders on friendly assets for automatic identification, reducing the risk of misidentification in cluttered environments. The historical development of these radars began in the 1930s with early warning systems like the UK's Chain Home network, a chain of fixed coastal stations using long-wave transmitters and receivers mounted on tall towers to detect low-flying aircraft up to 150 miles (240 km) away, playing a pivotal role in the Battle of Britain during World War II. Post-war advancements shifted to higher-frequency microwave bands for improved resolution, with mechanical rotating antennas dominating until the 1970s and 1980s, when phased-array technologies emerged. Modern iterations, such as Active Electronically Scanned Arrays (AESA), enable rapid beam steering without physical movement, enhancing resistance to jamming and multi-target tracking. Key technical specifications include pulse repetition frequency (PRF), which governs unambiguous range and resolution—low PRF (e.g., 280-1000 Hz) for long-range detection to avoid echo overlap beyond 400 km, and antenna gain typically around 30-40 dBi to achieve detection ranges of 200-400 km against aircraft with radar cross-sections of 1 m². For instance, the U.S. Navy's AN/SPS-49(V), a two-dimensional (2D) air search radar, operates in the L-band with a 250 nautical mile (463 km) range, providing bearing and range data via a horizon-stabilized parabolic antenna, and is deployed on aircraft carriers for volume air surveillance. Search radars are categorized as 2D or : 2D variants measure range and but require separate height-finding radars for altitude, while incorporate scanning—either mechanical nodding or electronic beam tilting—to provide full positional data in a single scan. The exemplifies a 3D AESA radar, using an L-band pencil-beam for 360-degree and up to 60-degree coverage, achieving instrumented detection ranges of 200-250 nautical miles (370-463 km) and integrating with for IFF . In operational contexts, fixed-site ground-based air search radars like the AN/FPS-117 support national airspace surveillance and coastal defenses, often unmanned and networked for remote operation across multiple nations. Shipborne platforms employ mobile variants, such as the AN/SPS-67(V) for surface search, an X-band system focused on detecting ships, shorelines, and navigational hazards up to 50 nautical miles (93 km) in high-sea states, aiding collision avoidance and low-altitude threat monitoring on surface combatants. These systems cue targeting radars for precise follow-on engagement after initial detection.

Over-the-Horizon and Early Warning Radars

Over-the-horizon (OTH) radars enable detection of targets such as aircraft and ballistic missiles at ranges exceeding line-of-sight limitations, typically beyond 1,000 km, by exploiting atmospheric propagation modes distinct from conventional microwave radars. These systems play a critical role in strategic early warning, providing advance notice of potential threats to national airspace and missile defenses. Early warning radars, including both OTH and high-altitude line-of-sight variants, form layered surveillance networks that integrate with broader air defense architectures for timely threat assessment. The primary propagation mechanisms for OTH radars are skywave and surface-wave modes, both operating in the high-frequency (HF) band of 3 to 30 MHz. Skywave propagation relies on reflection from the ionosphere's F-layer (at altitudes of 240 to 350 km), allowing signals to bounce over the horizon and achieve ranges up to 4,000 km, though performance varies with ionospheric conditions like solar activity and time of day. In contrast, surface-wave propagation involves electromagnetic coupling to the Earth's surface, particularly over seawater, enabling ranges up to 400 km via diffraction along the curvature; this mode uses vertical polarization to minimize attenuation and is suited for maritime surveillance. These mechanisms overcome the geometric horizon constraint of higher-frequency radars, but they introduce dependencies on environmental factors such as ionospheric density and tropospheric ducting. Prominent examples of OTH systems include Australia's Jindalee Operational Radar Network (JORN), developed starting in the 1970s and achieving operational status in 2003 as a skywave-based HF network. In 2018, a major upgrade was announced to modernize the network, improving surveillance capabilities. JORN consists of three remote OTH radars in Queensland, the Northern Territory, and Western Australia, providing surveillance ranges of 1,000 to 3,000 km for air and sea threats north of Australia. Another key system is Russia's Voronezh series, introduced in the 2000s as VHF/UHF phased-array radars for strategic early warning, with the Voronezh-M variant offering detection ranges up to 6,000 km against ballistic missiles and low-observable aircraft. For non-OTH early warning, the U.S. COBRA DANE radar, an L-band phased-array system operational since the 1970s in Alaska, supports missile defense by tracking exo-atmospheric objects up to 3,200 km for treaty verification and threat monitoring. Technical challenges in OTH radar design stem from the HF band's long wavelengths, necessitating large antenna arrays spanning over 2 km and high-power transmitters delivering 200 to 1,200 kW average power to compensate for propagation losses. Signal processing must mitigate multipath interference from multiple ionospheric reflections, using techniques like eigen-decomposition and frequency management systems to select single-mode paths and decontaminate phases for accurate target detection. Ionospheric variability—driven by solar flares, diurnal cycles, and geomagnetic activity—further complicates operations, requiring real-time monitoring via backscatter sounders to adapt frequencies and avoid absorption in the D-layer. During the Cold War, OTH and early warning radars evolved rapidly to counter bomber and missile threats, with the U.S. RCA 474L Ballistic Missile Early Warning System (BMEWS) representing a foundational effort from the 1950s. Deployed in the early 1960s at sites like Thule Air Base in Greenland, the 474L network used UHF radars to provide 15 to 30 minutes of warning against intercontinental ballistic missiles over polar routes. These systems spurred advancements in OTH technology for extended surveillance, with modern upgrades enhancing capabilities for tracking hypersonic vehicles through improved signal processing and integration. Limitations of OTH radars include poor to wide beamwidths at HF frequencies, which can obscure precise target localization amid clutter. They are also vulnerable to electronic jamming, as the shared transmitter-receiver in monostatic setups allows adversaries to overload receivers with . Bistatic configurations, separating transmitter and receiver by tens to of kilometers, mitigate these issues by diluting jammer across angles and improving resolution through baseline , as demonstrated in HF surface-wave and implementations.

Targeting and Fire Control Radars

Missile Guidance and Seeker Radars

Missile guidance and seeker radars are compact radar systems integrated into the of missiles to enable autonomous or semi-autonomous terminal homing on targets, such as , ships, or ground installations. These radars operate in the final phase of flight, providing real-time tracking and to precise intercepts, often in cluttered environments. Unlike larger radars, seekers are constrained by size, power, and , typically using high-frequency bands like X-band (8-12 GHz) for resolution and resistance to jamming. They support capabilities in modern systems, reducing the burden on the launching platform. Active radar homing (ARH) seekers incorporate both a transmitter and receiver, allowing the missile to independently illuminate and track targets without external support in the terminal phase. The AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM), introduced in the 1990s, exemplifies this with its X-band active radar seeker, enabling beyond-visual-range engagements up to approximately 100 km overall missile range, though the seeker's effective acquisition distance is shorter and classified. In contrast, semi-active radar homing (SARH) seekers rely on reflected energy from an external illuminator, such as a shipborne or aircraft radar, making them dependent on continuous target illumination but simpler and more cost-effective for longer-range surface-to-air missiles (SAMs). The Standard Missile-1 (SM-1), used in naval defense since the 1960s, employs SARH with a ground- or ship-based illuminator for homing on anti-ship threats. SARH systems like those in early Patriot missiles transitioned to hybrid modes for improved autonomy. Key technical principles include Doppler processing, which exploits frequency shifts in returned echoes to measure and filter clutter, of high-speed from ground returns or decoys. This is critical in semi-active seekers, where the missile processes Doppler-shifted signals from the illuminator's beam to maintain lock. Monopulse tracking enhances angular accuracy by simultaneously comparing signals from sum and difference antenna patterns within a single , achieving errors below 0.1 degrees for precise guidance against maneuvering . Integration often involves radars for mid-course , such as Track-via-Missile (TVM) in the Standard Missile-2 (SM-2), where the missile's receiver relays target via a two-way link to the launcher, allowing uplink commands before seeker activation. Initial target acquisition may briefly reference handover from battlefield targeting radars. Historically, radar seekers evolved from World War II-era experiments in radar-assisted guidance, with operational systems emerging post-war as active and semi-active technologies matured. Early efforts focused on semi-active designs for anti-aircraft roles, progressing to active seekers in the 1970s-1980s for reduced vulnerability to platform maneuvers. Modern examples include the Evolved SeaSparrow Missile (ESSM) Block 2, introduced in the 2000s, which features an active seeker optimized for terminal homing against anti-ship missiles in naval engagements. In cruise missiles, support fuze triggering by providing precise altitude data for height-of-burst detonation; the Tomahawk Land Attack Missile uses a for terrain contour matching navigation and to inform the fuze for optimal impact timing.

Gunfire and Battlefield Targeting Radars

Gunfire and battlefield targeting radars are specialized systems designed to detect, track, and provide precise targeting data for directing , anti-aircraft guns, and short-range weapons against threats on the battlefield, including incoming projectiles and low-flying . These radars operate in surveillance and acquisition modes to support rapid control, often employing Doppler processing for velocity measurement to distinguish moving targets from clutter. Early examples trace back to , where they evolved from basic detection tools to integrated direction systems, enabling accurate aiming of anti-aircraft batteries under visibility conditions. A seminal historical example is the German Würzburg radar, developed in 1938 and operational by the early 1940s, which used a 560 MHz frequency for high-accuracy tracking of aircraft to guide anti-aircraft guns with ranges up to 30-40 km. This parabolic antenna system represented an early fire control radar, providing elevation and azimuth data for gun batteries and influencing post-war designs by demonstrating the feasibility of radar-directed artillery. By the 1970s, U.S. systems like the AN/TPQ-36 Firefinder radar advanced this capability, focusing on counter-battery roles to locate enemy mortar and artillery positions through projectile trajectory analysis, achieving detection ranges of up to 12 km for mortars and 24 km for rockets with an accuracy of approximately 50 meters circular error probable (CEP) for hasty surveys. Modern iterations, such as the phased-array radar integrated into the Patriot surface-to-air missile system since the , employ fan-beam electronic scanning for simultaneous and coverage, supporting both and precise guidance for surface-to-air batteries against aerial threats at ranges exceeding 100 km. These s often incorporate (CW) or pulse-Doppler modes for velocity discrimination, enhancing target classification in cluttered environments, and integrate with electro-optical sensors for hybrid targeting to improve identification and reduce false alarms in scenarios. Modern iterations continue to evolve, with upgrades like the and transition toward the as of 2025. Vehicle-mounted examples include the Russian 1L222 Avtobaza, a mobile electronic warfare support from the 2000s that uses passive ESM to detect and locate enemy airborne radar emitters, aiding indirect fire coordination over up to 150 km. Operational effectiveness relies on mortar and radar data fusion for rapid response, where real-time trajectory computations enable counterfire within seconds, achieving location accuracies as low as 50 meters CEP for high-angle threats like mortars. This fusion supports layered defense by providing initial acquisition data that can cue missile guidance systems, though these radars primarily focus on direct battlefield threats such as artillery barrages rather than long-range missiles.

Air Traffic Control and Aviation Radars

Air traffic control (ATC) and aviation radars are essential for monitoring and guiding aircraft in controlled airspace, ensuring safe separation and efficient operations. These systems primarily include primary surveillance radar (PSR) for non-cooperative detection and secondary surveillance radar (SSR) for cooperative interrogation of aircraft transponders. PSR operates by transmitting electromagnetic pulses and detecting reflections from aircraft surfaces to determine range and azimuth, providing independent surveillance without relying on onboard equipment. In contrast, SSR sends interrogation signals to transponders on aircraft, which reply with encoded data such as identity, altitude, and position, enabling more precise tracking. A key example of PSR in terminal airspace is the Airport Surveillance Radar Model 11 (ASR-11), deployed widely in the United States since the 2000s, operating in the S-band (2700–2900 MHz) with a range of up to 60 nautical miles (NM) and a peak effective power of 25 kW. For en-route surveillance, the Air Route Surveillance Radar Model 4 (ARSR-4), used across the U.S. since the 1990s, provides long-range coverage up to 250 NM in L-band (1215–1400 MHz), supporting national airspace monitoring with three-dimensional position data. Precision Approach Radar (PAR) systems offer specialized guidance for low-visibility landings, delivering real-time lateral and vertical instructions to pilots during final approach to the runway. To mitigate ground clutter and weather interference, these radars employ Moving Target Indication (MTI) processing, which filters out stationary echoes by exploiting Doppler shifts from moving aircraft, enhancing detection reliability. SSR has evolved to include Mode S, a standard implemented globally since the 1980s, which interrogates transponders at 1030/1090 MHz to obtain enhanced data like 3D position, velocity, and aircraft identification, reducing interference in dense airspace compared to earlier Mode A/C systems. Modern ATC integrates these radars with Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B), where aircraft broadcast GPS-derived positions to supplement radar data, improving update rates and accuracy in areas with limited coverage. The development of ATC radars accelerated post-World War II, building on military technologies adapted for civilian use; by 1946, the U.S. Civil Aeronautics Administration (CAA) tested radar-equipped control towers to manage growing air traffic. In the 1950s, integration of Long Range Aid to Navigation (LORAN) systems with early radars enhanced positional accuracy for en-route guidance. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) established standards for SSR interoperability in the 1970s–1980s, mandating Mode S for global harmonization and safe airspace management. These advancements have enabled radar data to overlay basic terrain mapping for collision avoidance, though primary focus remains on aircraft tracking. As of 2025, the FAA continues modernization efforts under the NextGen program, planning to replace more than 600 radars and build six new control centers to sustain reliable operations amid growing air traffic.

Ground Mapping and Synthetic Aperture Radars

Ground mapping radars utilize synthetic aperture techniques to generate high-resolution images of terrestrial surfaces from airborne or spaceborne platforms, enabling detailed terrain analysis independent of weather or lighting conditions. (SAR) operates as an active imaging system, transmitting microwave pulses and processing the backscattered echoes to form two-dimensional images with resolutions often finer than 1 meter. This capability stems from the platform's motion, which synthesizes a virtual antenna aperture much larger than the physical one, typically achieving cross-range resolutions comparable to or better than the range resolution. The core principle of SAR involves Doppler beam sharpening, where the relative motion between the radar platform and the target induces frequency shifts in the received signals; these Doppler variations are exploited during signal processing to enhance azimuthal resolution beyond the diffraction limit of the real antenna beam. In practice, SAR systems control parameters such as frequency, polarization, incidence angle, and spatial resolution to optimize imaging, with X-band systems like TerraSAR-X demonstrating sub-meter resolutions in spotlight mode. SAR modes include stripmap, which provides continuous imaging over wide swaths of 5 to 100 kilometers at moderate resolutions (around 3 meters), suitable for broad-area mapping, and spotlight mode, which focuses the beam on a smaller area (e.g., 10 km by 10 km) to achieve higher resolutions (down to 1 meter or less) by extending the synthetic aperture length. Historical development of SAR began in the 1950s with U.S. airborne prototypes, pioneered by Carl Wiley at Goodyear Aircraft in 1951, who conceptualized the synthetic aperture to overcome resolution limitations in real-aperture radars. Early systems evolved through military applications, leading to the first spaceborne SAR on in 1978, which demonstrated ocean and land over a three-month mission despite its short operational . By the 2000s, advancements enabled operational satellites like , launched in 2007 as an X-band system capable of 1-meter resolution for scientific and commercial . Military examples include the AN/APG-81 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar on the F-35 Lightning II, operational since the 2010s, which incorporates SAR modes for high-resolution ground reconnaissance and targeting in adverse conditions. Civilian applications feature the European Space Agency's Sentinel-1 constellation, launched starting in 2014, using C-band SAR for global Earth observation, including land deformation monitoring and disaster response with swath widths up to 400 kilometers, with the full constellation as of November 2025 including Sentinel-1A (2014), 1B (2016), 1C (December 2024), and 1D (November 2025). A notable recent development is the NASA-ISRO NISAR mission, launched in July 2025, which uses dual-frequency (L- and S-band) SAR for comprehensive Earth observation, including deformation mapping and biomass estimation. These systems highlight SAR's versatility in both defense and environmental monitoring. Key applications of SAR extend to (InSAR), which combines phase from multiple images to derive topographic maps with centimeter-level accuracy, as used in generating digital models for geological studies. Polarimetric SAR further enhances utility by transmitting and receiving signals in multiple polarizations (e.g., HH, VV, HV), allowing classification of surface materials like , , or urban structures based on signatures. These techniques have been in missions like TanDEM-X, which produced a global model from onward.

Weather and Environmental Sensing Radars

Meteorological and Precipitation Radars

Meteorological radars are specialized systems designed to detect and quantify precipitation, such as rain, snow, hail, and other hydrometeors, by measuring the backscattered signals from atmospheric particles. These radars operate primarily in the S-band or C-band frequencies to minimize attenuation by rain, enabling detection of weather phenomena over large areas for forecasting severe storms, flash floods, and aviation hazards. Unlike general surveillance radars, they prioritize volume coverage patterns to sample the atmosphere in three dimensions, focusing on echo intensity and motion rather than discrete targets. The development of weather radars traces back to the 1940s, when researchers at MIT's Radiation Laboratory adapted surplus military radar equipment to observe precipitation echoes for the first time. These early experiments, conducted amid World War II secrecy, demonstrated radar's potential for meteorological applications, such as detecting storm cells and tropical cyclones by 1945. This foundational work paved the way for operational networks; in Europe, the OPERA (Operational Programme on the Exchange of Weather Radar Information) program, established in 1999 under EUMETNET, coordinates data from 215 radars (as of July 2025) across 31 member states to produce continent-wide composites for nowcasting and climate monitoring. A prominent example is the WSR-88D, part of the U.S. (Next ) network deployed in the 1990s, which uses S-band frequencies (2.7–3.0 GHz) to achieve detection ranges up to 230 km for reflectivity measurements. This supports severe warnings by mapping intensity via the reflectivity factor, expressed in decibels relative to Z (dBZ), where values above 50 dBZ indicate or , and scales from -30 dBZ ( ) to +75 dBZ (extreme ). To counter signal weakening in , attenuation correction algorithms adjust dBZ values using dual-frequency comparisons or polarimetric data, improving accuracy in intense storms. Doppler capabilities in these radars measure radial velocity—the component of particle motion toward or away from the radar—to detect rotation in storms, enabling tornado identification through signatures like velocity couplets exceeding 20 m/s. The NEXRAD network's dual-polarization upgrades, implemented starting in 2010, transmit both horizontal and vertical waves to differentiate hydrometeor types (e.g., rain vs. hail) and refine velocity estimates, enhancing tornado detection lead times by providing debris signatures during touchdowns. Volume scan strategies, such as the 14 elevation angles in NEXRAD's Volume Coverage Pattern 2, complete full atmospheric sampling every 4–6 minutes, prioritizing low-level scans for tornado genesis. Advancements in the 2000s include phased-array weather radars, exemplified by the CASA (Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere) project, which deploys networked X-band systems for urban-scale monitoring with electronic beam steering. These allow rapid volume updates every 30 seconds, compared to minutes for parabolic antennas, facilitating real-time tracking of fast-evolving mesoscale phenomena like supercells. By adaptively steering beams toward areas of interest, such as growing thunderstorms, CASA radars improve quantitative precipitation estimation and warning precision in regions with complex terrain. As of 2025, NOAA is advancing phased-array technologies for future NEXRAD upgrades targeting operations beyond 2040, while new installations like Tonga's weather radar enhance monitoring in the Pacific region.

Ocean and Atmospheric Monitoring Radars

and atmospheric monitoring radars are specialized systems designed to observe dynamic oceanic and atmospheric phenomena, providing critical for , maritime safety, and research. These radars utilize various frequency bands to measure surface currents, patterns, wave characteristics, and upper atmospheric conditions, often over vast coastal and open- regions. Unlike ground-based mapping radars, they focus on fluid interfaces and transient atmospheric layers, enabling non-invasive of parameters such as surface velocity fields and ionospheric disturbances. High-frequency (HF) surface current radars represent a cornerstone of coastal ocean monitoring, operating in the 3-30 MHz band to map radial surface currents up to 200 km offshore with resolutions on the order of 1-3 km. These systems exploit the Doppler shift of radio waves backscattered from ocean waves resonant with the radar frequency, known as Bragg scattering, to derive current vectors when deployed in pairs or networks. A prominent example is the CODAR SeaSonde, developed in the 1990s by CODAR Ocean Sensors, which has been widely adopted for real-time monitoring of coastal dynamics, including search-and-rescue operations and pollution tracking. Scatterometers extend this capability to satellite-based vector measurements over open , relying on the normalized radar cross-section derived from Bragg to infer near-surface and direction with accuracies of about 0.5 m/s and 20 degrees, respectively. The QuikSCAT satellite, launched by in 1999, pioneered this approach using a Ku-band (13.4 GHz) rotating pencil-beam antenna, providing global coverage every 70 minutes until its decommissioning in 2009, and influencing subsequent missions like ASCAT on MetOp satellites. For wave monitoring, over-the-ocean X-band radars (typically 8-12 GHz) have become essential, measuring significant wave heights up to 10 meters with spatial resolutions of 10-50 meters by analyzing the Doppler spectrum of sea clutter. These marine radars, often integrated with numerical models like WaveWatch III for forecasting, support applications in offshore engineering and ship by providing short-range (up to 50 km) real-time wave spectra. Historical advancements trace back to the 1970s with the SEASAT satellite's , which operated at 13.5 GHz to measure sea surface height variations with 10 cm precision over global swaths, laying the groundwork for modern studies. This has evolved into GNSS Reflectometry (GNSS-R), a passive technique using reflected signals from GPS satellites to achieve altimetric accuracies of 1-10 cm for and observations, as demonstrated in missions like NASA's CYGNSS launched in 2016. In environmental applications, multipolarization radar configurations enable oil spill detection by distinguishing slick-dampened capillary waves from ambient sea clutter, achieving detection thresholds for spills as thin as 1 micrometer over areas with 1-10 cm sea state resolutions. These systems, often combining L- or C-band polarimetric data, support rapid response to maritime incidents, as evidenced by operational use in the Gulf of Mexico following the 2010 Deepwater Horizon event. As of 2025, AI-enhanced models for satellite-derived ocean winds are improving forecasting precision.

Instrumentation and Test Radars

Range Tracking and Telemetry Radars

Range tracking and telemetry radars are specialized instrumentation systems employed in missile test ranges to precisely monitor the trajectories of projectiles, missiles, and vehicles during flight tests. These radars provide time-space position information (TSPI) essential for post-test analysis, performance evaluation, and safety monitoring, often integrating with telemetry systems to correlate radar-derived position data with onboard sensor metrics such as velocity, acceleration, and structural integrity. Unlike operational targeting radars, these systems focus on high-fidelity data collection for engineering validation rather than real-time engagement. A primary type is the monopulse tracking radar, which uses simultaneous lobe comparison in a single pulse to achieve superior angular accuracy over sequential lobing methods, enabling precise azimuth, elevation, and range measurements for fast-moving test objects. The AN/FPS-16, a C-band monopulse radar deployed at White Sands Missile Range in the 1950s and operational through the 1970s, exemplifies this technology, offering tracking ranges up to approximately 1,000 km with angular errors below 0.1 milliradians and range accuracy under 10 meters for point-source targets. This radar supported early missile tests and was later modified, such as the AN/FPQ-13 variant, to enhance real-time data processing for complex trajectories. Telemetry integration enhances these radars by aiding antenna pointing for telemetry receivers, where radar tracks guide narrow-beam antennas to maintain links with the test vehicle, ensuring uninterrupted data flow on parameters like propulsion efficiency and aerodynamics. This synergy achieves overall trajectory measurement accuracies better than 10 meters, critical for validating vehicle performance against models. Historically, the AN/FPS-16 at Cape Canaveral in the 1950s tracked early space launches, including Explorer 1 and contributions to the Apollo program, with upgrades in the 1960s incorporating digital signal processing for improved beamforming and noise rejection. At facilities like the Defense Site on , radars such as the Ground-Based Radar Prototype (GBR-P) support ICBM tests by providing acquisition, tracking, and discrimination data, often fused with optical and sensors for comprehensive multi-sensor validation of . In the , programs for hypersonic , including the (HAWC), rely on advanced range radars with correction via Kalman filtering to estimate states amid high-speed maneuvers and plasma-induced signal disruptions, achieving robust reconstruction for speeds exceeding Mach 5. Kalman filtering, an optimal recursive , fuses noisy measurements with predictive models to minimize position , a technique standard in modern range since its for in the 1960s.

Space Surveillance and Astronomical Radars

Space surveillance radars are specialized systems designed to detect, track, and characterize objects in Earth's orbit, including satellites and space debris, to ensure space situational awareness and mitigate collision risks. These radars operate primarily in line-of-sight modes, using high-power transmissions to achieve long-range detection of small objects at geostationary altitudes up to approximately 36,000 km. One early example is the Haystack radar, developed in the United States during the 1960s as an X-band system (operating around 10 GHz) for orbital object tracking, which later contributed to the U.S. Space Surveillance Network starting in 1979 by imaging satellites and debris down to centimeter-scale sizes in low Earth orbit. Historical development of these radars traces back to the late , when the Hill radar, a UHF system operating at about 450 MHz, successfully tracked the Soviet Sputnik I satellite shortly after its launch on , , marking the first U.S. radar detection of an artificial satellite. This capability evolved over decades, leading to modern systems like the , a S-band radar (2-4 GHz) deployed in the , which provides global coverage for low Earth orbit objects as small as 10 cm by uncued detection and precise tracking across inclinations. Technical features of space surveillance radars often include high-power continuous wave (CW) modes to measure radial velocity through Doppler shifts, enabling precise orbital parameter determination for deep space objects. For instance, the Goldstone Deep Space Station (DSS-14) radar, part of NASA's Deep Space Network, employs CW operations at up to 450 kW transmit power to support velocity profiling of asteroids and spacecraft at interplanetary distances. These systems may integrate with range tracking radars for supplementary telemetry data during satellite maneuvers. Astronomical radars extend these principles to planetary science, using bistatic configurations for ranging and imaging celestial bodies like asteroids to assess potential Earth impact hazards. The Arecibo Observatory radar, operational from 1963 until its collapse in 2020, exemplified this by providing high-resolution delay-Doppler imaging of near-Earth asteroids, such as 1999 JM8, achieving 15-meter range resolution to reveal its irregular shape and tumbling motion. Such observations have informed models of asteroid composition and trajectories, contributing to global planetary defense efforts. Emerging technologies like quantum radars, which leverage entangled photons for enhanced sensitivity, show promise for detecting stealthy orbital objects by exploiting quantum correlations to overcome classical radar limitations, but as of 2025, no operational systems exist for space surveillance applications, remaining in experimental stages.

Specialized Application Radars

Speed Detection and Measurement Radars

Speed detection and measurement radars are compact systems that utilize the Doppler effect to determine the velocity of moving objects, such as vehicles, athletes, or projectiles, by measuring the frequency shift in reflected microwave signals. These radars operate primarily in the microwave frequency bands, with early models using X-band (around 10 GHz) and later handheld units shifting to K-band (24 GHz) or Ka-band (35 GHz) for improved resolution and reduced interference. The technology originated from wartime radar developments at the MIT Radiation Laboratory in the 1940s, where Doppler principles were explored for velocity tracking, though initial speed enforcement applications emerged in the post-war era. Commercialization for highway use began in the 1950s, with the first widespread adoption by law enforcement in Chicago in 1954, enabling non-contact speed measurement from a distance. Two primary types dominate speed detection radars: continuous wave (CW) Doppler systems, which transmit a steady microwave signal to directly measure radial velocity via frequency shift without range information, and pulsed Doppler systems, which emit short pulses to resolve both range and speed ambiguities in cluttered environments. CW radars, common in handheld police units, offer simplicity and low power consumption but can suffer from range ambiguity when multiple targets are present, while pulsed variants provide better discrimination at the cost of increased complexity. For relative speed measurement, many systems incorporate moving target indicator (MTI) processing, which filters out stationary clutter by exploiting Doppler shifts, ensuring accurate velocity readings for approaching or receding objects. Handheld Doppler radar guns exemplify police enforcement tools, such as the Stalker DSR introduced in the 1990s, a Ka-band unit operating at 35.5 GHz with ±1 mph accuracy for stationary or moving patrols, featuring direction-sensing to distinguish oncoming traffic. In sports applications, compact devices like the Pocket Radar Ball Coach, developed in the 2010s, use similar CW Doppler principles at 24.125 GHz to measure baseball pitch speeds up to 120 feet with ±1 mph precision, aiding athlete training without bulky equipment. Automotive adaptive cruise control radars, often frequency-modulated CW (FMCW) systems in the 77 GHz band, integrate Doppler velocity measurement with range detection to maintain safe following distances, as seen in systems from manufacturers like Bosch since the late 1990s. Calibration is essential for accuracy, with standards traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), employing methods like tuning forks vibrating at known frequencies or fifth-wheel odometers on test vehicles to verify speed readings within ±1 mph across 5 to 150 mph ranges. These procedures ensure legal admissibility in enforcement and reliability in applications, mitigating errors from environmental factors or device drift.

Biological and Proximity Fuze Radars

Biological and proximity fuze radars represent a specialized of radar technologies designed for detecting living or triggering munitions , often in constrained environments like foliage or urban settings. These systems leverage miniaturized components to subtle movements or proximity, applications from to non-invasive vital monitoring. Unlike broader radars, they prioritize high-resolution detection of biological signatures or short-range , typically operating in the or millimeter-wave bands for precision and . Proximity fuzes, to these radars, emerged as a critical advancement in munitions , with the variable-time (VT) serving as a seminal example. Developed collaboratively by British and American , the VT fuze utilized a miniature to detect targets within 3-20 meters, triggering airburst detonation in shells for enhanced anti-aircraft and ground effectiveness. First deployed in combat by the U.S. Navy in January 1943 aboard the USS Helena, it dramatically improved artillery lethality against aircraft and troops by exploding at optimal proximity rather than on impact. British experiments in the late 1930s laid foundational work, testing early radio-based prototypes for rockets and bombs as part of broader radar innovations shared via the Tizard Mission. This evolution continued into smart fuzes like the M734 multi-option fuze for 60mm, 81mm, and 120mm mortar rounds, introduced in the 1980s, which incorporated selectable proximity modes using electronic sensors for precise detonation in varied terrains. Biological radars extend these principles to detect human presence through motion or vital signs, often employing ultra-wideband (UWB) impulse technology for non-contact sensing. UWB radars, prominent since the 2000s, transmit short pulses to capture subtle chest movements associated with heartbeat and respiration, enabling through-wall detection even in obstructed environments. A representative system is the Xaver 400, a portable UWB radar developed by Camero-Tech, which provides real-time imaging of personnel locations and movements behind walls up to 20 meters, aiding tactical operations by identifying the number and posture of individuals. Systems like the AN/PPS-5 man-portable pulse-Doppler radar detect troop movements up to 5 kilometers by exploiting Doppler shifts from biological motion, with performance reduced in dense vegetation due to microwave frequencies in the X-band (around 9-10 GHz). These radars achieve foliage penetration using lower microwave frequencies, minimizing attenuation while resolving moving targets. Emerging bio-radars are increasingly applied in medical monitoring, where non-contact detection of vital signs addresses gaps in traditional lists focused on military uses. These systems use UWB or continuous-wave radars to track respiration and heart rates remotely, supporting applications like neonatal care or elder monitoring without wearables. For instance, the Bio-Radar Health Monitoring System (BRAHMS) continuously assesses vital signs from distances up to several meters, leveraging radar's ability to penetrate clothing and detect micro-motions with high accuracy. Such developments, underrepresented in older radar classifications, highlight the shift toward healthcare, with ongoing research emphasizing integration with missile seekers for final arming in modern munitions.

References

  1. https://www.radartutorial.eu/02.basics/Classification%20of%20Radar%20systems%20(1).en.html
  2. https://www.waves.utoronto.ca/prof/svhum/ece422/notes/24-radar.pdf
  3. https://www.elprocus.com/radar-basics-types-and-applications/
  4. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/navy/nrtc/14089_ch3.pdf
  5. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/how-radar-gave-britain-the-edge-in-the-battle-of-britain
  6. https://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/17992-evolution-of-aesa-radar-technology
  7. https://www.radartutorial.eu/19.kartei/07.naval/karte002.en.html
  8. https://www.navy.mil/Resources/Fact-Files/Display-FactFiles/Article/2167967/ansps-49v-radar-set/
  9. https://www.radartutorial.eu/19.kartei/02.surv/karte007.en.html
  10. https://nuke.fas.org/guide/usa/airdef/an-fps-117.htm
  11. https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/ground-based-air-surveillance-radars/fps-117.html
  12. https://www.navy.mil/Resources/Fact-Files/Display-FactFiles/Article/2167975/ansps-67v-radar-set/
  13. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA474069.pdf
  14. https://www.rohde-schwarz.com/us/solutions/aerospace-and-defense/land/emso-testing/white-paper-over-the-horizon-principles-and-challenges-of-operating-in-the-hf-band_257123.html
  15. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9965424/
  16. https://www.armadainternational.com/2023/05/russian-air-defence-analysis-part-3/
  17. https://www.spaceforce.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Article/2197716/cobra-dane-radar/
  18. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2002RS002789
  19. https://spp.fas.org/military/program/track/bmews.htm
  20. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/4/689
  21. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA397960.pdf
  22. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/6-121/fm612_4.htm
  23. https://www.army.mil/article/260548/tobyhanna_army_depot_commences_work_on_next_gen_radar_system
  24. https://defense-update.com/20111205_kvant-1l222-avtobaza-electronic-intelligence-elint-system.html
  25. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/6-121/FM612_52.HTM
  26. https://www.faa.gov/uas/advanced_operations/upper_class_etm/ETM-Surveillance-Technologies.pdf
  27. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_90-114B_CHG_1.pdf
  28. https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/asr-11
  29. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA327689.pdf
  30. https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/atc_html/chap5_section_12.html
  31. https://www.mathworks.com/help/radar/ug/ground-clutter-mitigation-with-moving-target-indication-mti-radar.html
  32. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/APAC/Documents/The-6th-Edition-of-Mode-S-Downlink-Aircraft-Parameters-Implementation-and-Operations-Guidance-Document.pdf
  33. https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/chap4_section_5.html
  34. https://www.natca.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NATCA_ATC_History.pdf
  35. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/about/history/milestones/radar_departure_control.pdf
  36. https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2025-05/Brand%20New%20Air%20Traffic%20Control%20System%20Plan.pdf
  37. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/earth-observation-data-basics/sar
  38. https://descanso.jpl.nasa.gov/SciTechBook/series2/02Chap1_110106_amf.pdf
  39. https://www.radartutorial.eu/20.airborne/ab05.en.html
  40. https://www.dlr.de/en/research-and-transfer/projects-and-missions/terrasar-x/synthetic-aperture-radar-sar
  41. https://ethw.org/Synthetic_Aperture_Radar
  42. https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/terrasar-x
  43. https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/seasat
  44. https://www.northropgrumman.com/what-we-do/mission-solutions/radars/an-apg-81-active-electronically-scanned-array-aesa-fire-control
  45. https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Sentinel-1
  46. https://science.nasa.gov/mission/nisar/mission-overview/
  47. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/land-subsidence-in-california/science/interferometric-synthetic-aperture-radar-insar
  48. https://www.eoportal.org/other-space-activities/polsar
  49. https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/reflectivity
  50. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/metadata/landing-page/bin/iso?id=gov.noaa.ncdc:C00345
  51. https://training.weather.gov/wdtd/courses/rac/documentation/rac25-principles.pdf
  52. https://www.amsweatherband.org/weatherband/articles/wireless-wonder-a-history-of-radar-use-for-weather-operations-part-i/
  53. https://eumetnet.eu/wp-content/themes/aeron-child/observations-programme/current-activities/opera/database/OPERA_Database/index.html
  54. https://www.weather.gov/iwx/wsr_88d
  55. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atot/33/11/jtech-d-15-0091_1.pdf
  56. https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/velocity
  57. http://twister.ou.edu/papers/CASA_BAMS2009.pdf
  58. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/103/10/BAMS-D-21-0172.1.xml
  59. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/10/6/320
  60. https://wpo.noaa.gov/phased-array-radar-article/
  61. https://www.sprep.org/news/weather-ready-pacific-saving-lives-in-tonga-with-new-weather-radar
  62. https://www.khon2.com/business/press-releases/ein-presswire/829043177/smarter-satellite-winds-ai-model-boosts-ocean-weather-forecasting
  63. https://itea.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/9-2_White-Sands-Missile-Range-WSMR-TSPI-Capabilities-Overview-Radar-GPS-ITEA.pdf
  64. https://www.radartutorial.eu/19.kartei/01.oth/karte008.en.html
  65. https://wsmrmuseum.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/AN-FPS-16-Context-June-2016.pdf
  66. https://www.trmc.osd.mil/wiki/download/attachments/113019895/320-94.pdf?api=v2
  67. https://www.army.mil/article/161899/multiple_object_tracking_radars_at_wsmr
  68. https://spp.fas.org/military/program/6555th/6555c3-2.htm
  69. https://www.smdc.army.mil/Portals/38/Documents/Publications/Fact_Sheets/RTS.pdf
  70. https://www.ll.mit.edu/about/facilities/reagan-test-site
  71. https://www.ll.mit.edu/r-d/projects/haystack-ultrawideband-satellite-imaging-radar
  72. https://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/haystack.htm
  73. https://mostlymissiledefense.com/2012/05/05/space-surveillance-sensors-millstone-hill-radar/
  74. https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/space-fence.html
  75. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/app/uploads/2025/06/Almanac2025_Space-Systems.pdf
  76. https://deepspace.jpl.nasa.gov/files/GSSR_improved_capabilities_09452079.pdf
  77. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/9/1530
  78. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/1999/08/radar-images-earth-crossing-asteroid
  79. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2002M%2526PS...37..779B
  80. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3328848/china-mass-producing-next-gen-quantum-radar-detector-track-stealth-aircraft-f-22
  81. https://asiatimes.com/2025/10/stealth-buster-china-touts-next-gen-quantum-radar-tech/
  82. https://copradar.com/chapts/chapt3/ch3d1.html
  83. https://kustomsignals.com/blog/100-plus-years-in-the-making-the-incredible-history-of-the-police-speed-gun
  84. https://www.ll.mit.edu/about/history/mit-radiation-laboratory
  85. https://trafficlogix.com/the-history-of-radar-enforced-speed-limits/
  86. https://man.fas.org/dod-101/navy/docs/es310/cwradar/cwradar.htm
  87. https://www.imsar.com/portfolio/moving-target-indicator/
  88. https://stalkerradar.com/police-radar/dsr/
  89. https://www.pocketradar.com/products/ball-coach-radar
  90. https://www.pocketradar.com/pages/specifications
  91. https://www.bosch-mobility.com/en/solutions/assistance-systems/adaptive-cruise-control/
  92. https://www.nist.gov/publications/calibration-speed-enforcement-down-road-radars
  93. https://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/87.pdf
  94. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA031189.pdf
  95. https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/r/radio-proximty-vt-fuzes.html
  96. https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/Warfare-Centers/NSWC-Dahlgren/Who-We-Are/History/Blogs/VT-Fuze/
  97. https://www.historynet.com/proximity-fuze/
  98. https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/1999/august/tiny-miracle-proximity-fuze
  99. https://bulletpicker.com/multioption_-m734.html
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5901946/
  101. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-31669-y
  102. https://camero-tech.com/xaver-products/xaver-400/
  103. https://www.radartutorial.eu/19.kartei/11.ancient3/karte036.en.html
  104. https://archive.ll.mit.edu/publications/journal/pdf/vol12_no2/12_2tacticalradars.pdf
  105. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA023838.pdf
  106. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11342929/
  107. https://wis-wander.weizmann.ac.il/math-computer-science/radar-knows-best-new-technology-monitors-health-remotely
  108. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355082620_Radar-based_vital_signs_monitoring
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.