Hubbry Logo
SedentismSedentismMain
Open search
Sedentism
Community hub
Sedentism
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sedentism
Sedentism
Sedentism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Look up sedentism in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

Part of a series on
Economic, applied, and development
anthropology
Basic concepts
Provisioning systems
Case studies
Prestations
Gifting
Provisioning
Colonialism and development
Political economy
Related articles
Major theorists
Social and cultural anthropology

In anthropology, sedentism (sometimes called sedentariness; compare sedentarism[1]) is the practice of living in one place for a long time. As of 2025, the large majority of people belong to sedentary cultures. In evolutionary anthropology and archaeology, sedentism takes on a slightly different sub-meaning, often applying to the transition from nomadic society to a lifestyle that involves remaining in one place permanently. Essentially, sedentism means living in groups permanently in one place.[2] The invention of agriculture led to sedentism in many cases, but the earliest sedentary settlements were pre-agricultural.

Initial requirements for permanent, non-agricultural settlements

[edit]

For small-scale nomadic societies it can be difficult to adopt a sedentary lifestyle in a landscape without on-site agricultural or livestock breeding resources, since sedentism often requires sufficient year-round, easily accessible local natural resources.

Non-agricultural sedentism requires good preservation and storage technologies, such as smoking, drying, and fermentation, as well as good containers such as pottery, baskets, or special pits in which to securely store food whilst making it available. It was only in locations where the resources of several major ecosystems overlapped that the earliest non-agricultural sedentism occurred. For example, people settled where a river met the sea, at lagoon environments along the coast, at river confluences, or where flat savanna met hills, and mountains with rivers.

Criteria for the recognition of sedentism in archaeological studies

[edit]

In archaeology a number of criteria must hold for the recognition of either semi or full sedentism.

According to archaeologist Ofer Bar-Yosef, they are as follows:[3][4]

1. Increasing presence of organisms that benefit from human sedentary activities, e.g.

  • House mice
  • Rats
  • Sparrows

2. Cementum increments on mammal teeth

  • Indications that hunting took place in both winter and summer

3. Energy expenditure

  • Leveling slopes
  • Building houses
  • Production of plaster
  • Transport of undressed stones
  • Digging of graves
  • Shaping of large mortars

In many mammals dark cementum is deposited during winter when food is scarce and light cementum is deposited in the summer when food is abundant, so the outermost cementum layer shows at which season the animal was killed. Thus, if animals were killed year-round in some area it suggests that people were sedentary there.[5]

Historical regions of sedentary settlements

[edit]
Herd of horses on summer mountain pasture in the Pyrenees
Regions of origin of sedentary life: north central Europe, northeast Asia, and the fertile crescent

The first sedentary sites were pre-agricultural, and they appeared during the Upper Paleolithic in Moravia and on the East European Plain between c. 25000–17000 BC.[6] In the Levant, the Natufian culture was the first to become sedentary at around 12000 BC. The Natufians were sedentary for more than 2000 years before they, at some sites, started to cultivate plants around 10000 BC.[7] A year-round sedentary site, with its larger population, generates a substantial demand on locally provided natural resources, a demand that may have triggered the development of deliberate agriculture.

The Jōmon culture in Japan, which was primarily a coastal culture, was sedentary from c. 12000 to 10000 BC, before the cultivation of rice at some sites in northern Kyushu.[8][9] In northernmost Scandinavia, there are several early sedentary sites without evidence of agriculture or cattle breeding. They appeared from c. 5300–4500 BC[10] and are all located optimally in the landscape for utilization of major ecosystem resources;[citation needed] for example, the Lillberget Stone Age village site (c. 3900 BC), the Nyelv site (c. 5300 BC), and the Lake Inari site (c. 4500 BC).[citation needed] In northern Sweden the earliest indication of agriculture occurs at previously sedentary sites, and one example is the Bjurselet site used during the period c. 2700–1700 BC, famous for its large caches of long distance traded flint axes from Denmark and Scania (some 1300 km). The evidence of small-scale agriculture at that site can be seen from c. 2300 BC (burnt cereals of barley).

Historical effects of increased sedentism

[edit]
Beja nomads from Northeast Africa

Sedentism increased contacts and trade, and the first Middle East cereals and cattle in Europe could have spread through a stepping-stone process, where the productive gifts (cereals, cattle, sheep and goats) were exchanged through a network of large pre-agricultural sedentary sites (rather than through a wave of an advancing spread of people with agricultural economy) and where the smaller sites found in-between the bigger sedentary ones did not get any of the new products. Not all contemporary sites during a certain period (after the first sedentism occurred at one site) were sedentary. Evaluation of habitational sites in northern Sweden indicates that less than 10 percent of all the sites around 4000 BC were sedentary. At the same time, only 0.5 to 1 percent of these represented villages with more than 3 to 4 houses. This means that the old nomadic or migratory life style continued in a parallel fashion for several thousand years, until somewhat more sites turned to sedentism, and gradually switched over to agricultural sedentism.

The shift to sedentism is coupled with the adoption of new subsistence-strategies, specifically moving from foraging (hunter-gatherer) to agricultural and animal domestication. The development of sedentism led to the rise of population aggregation and the formation of villages, cities, and other community types.

Deleuze and Guattari detect a trend in mental bias resulting from sedentism: "History is always written from the sedentary point of view and in the name of a unitary State apparatus, at least a possible one, even when the topic is nomads."[11]

In South America, sedentism may date from 5500 BC.[12]

In North America, evidence for sedentism emerges around 4500 BC.[citation needed]

Forced sedentism

[edit]

Forced sedentism or sedentarization occurs when a dominant group restricts the movements of a nomadic group. Nomadic populations have undergone such a process since the first cultivation of land; the organization of modern society has imposed demands that have pushed aboriginal populations to adopt a fixed habitat.

At the end of the 19th and throughout the 20th century many previously nomadic tribes turned to permanent settlement. It was a process initiated by local governments, and it was mainly a global trend forced by the changes in the attitude to the land and real property and also due to state policies that complicated border crossing. Among these nations are Negev Bedouin in Jordan, Israel and Egypt,[13] Bashkirs, Kyrgyz, Kazakhs, Evenks, Evens, Sakha in the Soviet Union, some Kurdish tribes in Turkey, Tibetan nomads in China,[14] Babongo in Gabon, Baka in Cameroon,[15] Innu in Canada, Romani in Romania and Czechoslovakia, etc.

As a result of forced sedentarization, many rich herdsmen in Siberia have been eliminated by deliberate overtaxation or imprisonment, year-round mobility has been discouraged, many smaller sites and family herd camps have been shut down, children have been separated from their parents and taken to boarding schools. This caused severe social, cultural and psychological issues to Indigenous peoples of Siberia.[16][17]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sedentism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Sedentism refers to the anthropological and archaeological concept of human groups occupying settlements on a year-round or near-permanent basis, diverging from the mobile patterns predominant in societies. This shift, detectable through evidence of durable structures, storage facilities, and reduced residential mobility in archaeological records, emerged among pre-agricultural as early as 15,000 years ago in regions like the , where post-glacial climate stabilization supported resource predictability. Empirical indicators include intensified site occupation, ground stone tools for processing wild plants, and skeletal data showing dietary shifts without full reliance on . The transition to sedentism, exemplified by the Natufian culture in the Near East (circa 13,000–10,500 years before present), often preceded systematic plant and animal domestication, challenging linear narratives that equate settlement solely with agriculture. Causal factors, grounded in paleoenvironmental and demographic data, encompass climatic amelioration enabling seasonal resource abundance, population densities straining mobile strategies, and technological adaptations like grinding tools that enhanced caloric returns from wild foods. While sedentism facilitated demographic expansion—evidenced by higher fertility rates and reduced energy expenditure on movement—it also introduced vulnerabilities such as pathogen concentration and resource depletion, contributing to subsequent innovations in farming and social hierarchies. Not a uniform or irreversible process, sedentism coexisted with varying degrees of mobility across hunter-gatherer groups, as ethnographic analogies and site analyses reveal continua rather than binaries with nomadism.

Definition and Conceptual Framework

Core Definition and Characteristics

Sedentism refers to a behavioral characterized by the long-term, often year-round, occupation of fixed settlements, in contrast to nomadic or highly mobile lifestyles that involve frequent relocation in search of resources. This shift represents a fundamental change in subsistence and social organization, enabling populations to exploit localized resources more intensively without constant movement. While frequently associated with the advent of , sedentism can occur independently among hunter-gatherers in resource-rich environments, as evidenced by pre-agricultural sites with semi-permanent structures. Key characteristics of sedentary societies include the construction of durable housing, such as multi-room dwellings or pit houses, designed for repeated use rather than temporary shelters. Communities exhibit increased population densities, with settlements supporting dozens to hundreds of individuals in proximity, fostering interpersonal networks and division of labor. reflects accumulation of possessions, including tools, ceramics, and storage facilities like pits or granaries, which indicate reliance on predictable supplies and reduced logistical mobility. profiles often show trade-offs, such as higher rates of infectious diseases due to crowding and challenges, alongside evidence of nutritional stress from diet specialization. Archaeologically, sedentism is marked by site features like deep refuse deposits (middens), intensive land modification such as slope leveling or foundation trenches, and the presence of commensal like house mice, which thrive in human-occupied spaces. These traits distinguish sedentary patterns from ephemeral camps of mobile groups, where artifact densities are lower and structures more ephemeral. Socially, sedentism correlates with emerging inequality, territoriality, and practices tied to place, though these vary by context and are not universal prerequisites.

Distinction from Nomadism and Mobility Patterns

Sedentism is defined by low residential mobility, wherein human groups occupy fixed settlements for prolonged durations, frequently year-round, facilitating the development of permanent structures, storage facilities, and localized . In opposition, nomadism features high residential mobility, characterized by recurrent relocation of entire social units to pursue shifting or patchy resources, precluding substantial in site durability. This contrast stems from adaptive responses to environmental predictability: sedentary patterns emerge where resources permit sustained exploitation from a single locale, whereas nomadic ones suit environments demanding frequent shifts to maintain subsistence. Nomadic lifestyles encompass distinct subtypes, including nomadism—wherein communities herd domesticated animals across seasonal pastures for primary sustenance—and nomadism, reliant on tracking wild game and plants without fixed bases. These differ from sedentary modes by emphasizing mobility over territorial anchoring, often resulting in lighter material cultures and decentralized to accommodate movement. Peripatetic nomadism, involving itinerant trades or services among settled populations, further illustrates specialized mobility untethered to production sites. Mobility patterns in societies form a continuum rather than a strict binary, incorporating logistical mobility—where foragers radiate from stable base camps for resource procurement—alongside hybrid strategies like , entailing seasonal vertical migrations between lowlands and highlands while retaining core settlements. Such variability challenges oversimplified sedentism-nomadism dichotomies, as groups may alternate modes based on ecological pressures or social needs, with sedentism not invariably precluding short-term expeditions. Archaeological proxies, such as feature density and artifact discard rates, reveal these gradients, underscoring that sedentism amplifies site accumulation absent in highly mobile systems.

Preconditions and Enabling Factors

Environmental and Resource Requirements

Sedentism necessitates environments featuring abundant, predictable, and year-round accessible natural resources that reduce the imperative for frequent mobility, such as aquatic habitats where stocks are replenished seasonally or areas with concentrated terrestrial food sources resistant to rapid depletion. These conditions often include coastal zones, river valleys, or lakes providing marine fish, , and species, alongside permanent freshwater sources to support sustained occupation without exhaustive ranges. Favorable climates, characterized by higher mean temperatures, increased rainfall (e.g., 400–600 mm annually in semiarid zones or up to 1,200 mm in Mediterranean woodlands), and lower seasonal variance, further enable resource stability by enhancing plant productivity and faunal availability. In non-agricultural contexts, resource-rich "islands" like seasonal pans, river confluences, or woodland parklands sustain sedentary or semi-sedentary hunter-gatherers through diverse, high-yield staples. For instance, wild plants such as cereals, legumes, nuts (e.g., mongongo nuts), berries, melons, and tubers offer caloric density and storability, while game like gazelles, deer, or smaller mammals with limited home ranges (3–25 km²) permit repeated harvesting from fixed locales. Permanent or semi-permanent water bodies, including lakes (e.g., Hula Lake) or river systems (e.g., Canímar River in ), complement these by facilitating , waterfowl exploitation, and hydrological stability against dry periods. Archaeological cases illustrate these prerequisites: In the during the Epipaleolithic (ca. 15,000–11,500 ), Natufian groups achieved sedentism in oak-dominated Mediterranean woodlands with dense wild cereal stands, supplemented by hunting and seasonal fruits/nuts, enabled by winter rains and stable water sources. Similarly, early sites in coastal (cal. BC 2237–790) relied on marine and riverine proteins alongside terrestrial , with homogeneous isotopic signatures indicating localized dependence. Such settings contrast with resource-scarce or highly variable ecosystems, where mobility persists due to depletion risks or seasonal scarcity.

Non-Agricultural Sedentary Settlements

Non-agricultural sedentary settlements represent instances where human groups established permanent or semi-permanent habitations relying primarily on , gathering, , and , without dependence on domesticated plants or animals. These settlements typically arose in environments with high resource predictability and abundance, such as coastal zones, riverine systems, or oak-pistachio parklands, enabling year-round subsistence without seasonal migration. Archaeological indicators include durable pit-houses, storage facilities for wild foods, and dense refuse middens, which supported population nucleation prior to agricultural intensification. The in the , dating from approximately 15,000 to 11,500 years ago, provides the earliest well-documented example of such sedentism. Inhabiting oak-pistachio woodlands and wetlands of the Mediterranean zone, Natufians constructed semi-subterranean round houses with stone foundations at sites like Ain Mallaha and El-Wad Terrace, accommodating groups of 50–100 individuals. Their economy centered on intensive gathering of wild cereals, hunting, and small game, supplemented by grinding tools for processing acorns and ; storage pits for harvested grains indicate planning for resource surpluses, fostering reduced mobility. This pattern emerged during the Late Epipaleolithic amid post-glacial climatic amelioration, which expanded edible plant availability, though debates persist on whether full sedentism or seasonal aggregation predominated, as evidenced by faunal remains showing some mobility. In , the Jomon period of , beginning around 16,000 years ago and lasting until circa 300 BCE, featured semi-sedentary coastal settlements sustained by and nut harvesting. Sites such as Sannai-Maruyama reveal pit dwellings and large villages housing up to 500 people, with evidence of year-round occupation from stratified shell middens and early used for boiling fish and nuts. The temperate climate and nutrient-rich Pacific currents supported diverse , including , , and chestnuts, obviating the need for cultivation; however, settlement patterns varied, with some inland groups exhibiting logistical mobility for seasonal resources rather than full permanence. North America's Coast indigenous societies, observed ethnographically from the late (circa 5000 years ago onward) but with archaeological roots in earlier shell mound complexes, exemplify resource-rich sedentism through salmon-centric economies. Groups like the Kwakwaka'wakw maintained plank-house villages of 20–30 structures along rivers, relying on weirs, drying racks, and storage for anadromous fish runs, alongside berry gathering and marine hunting; cedar forests provided materials for semi-permanent architecture, enabling populations of several hundred without farming. This model underscores how ecological redundancy—predictable biomass exceeding 10 million metric tons annually in prime rivers—permitted sedentism, though pre-contact accounts note occasional relocations tied to . Other cases, such as the Middle Archaic period sites in the (Illinois) around 5000–4000 BCE, including the Koster site with deeply stratified occupation layers, demonstrate localized sedentism via nut mast exploitation and riverine in environments. These examples collectively illustrate that sedentism's preconditions—stable, high-yield wild resources—could precede by millennia, challenging linear narratives of farming as the sole driver, though such settlements often transitioned to cultivation under demographic or climatic stress.

Archaeological Evidence and Recognition

Criteria for Identifying Sedentism

Archaeologists recognize sedentism in the through multiple lines of evidence pointing to prolonged, year-round occupation rather than seasonal or transient use of sites. Substantial investments in , such as the construction of durable dwellings with leveled foundations, plastered floors, or transported building materials, indicate a commitment to permanence beyond temporary camps. Similarly, the presence of specialized storage facilities, like deep pits or granaries for surplus resources, reflects planning for sustained residency and reduced mobility. Domestic waste patterns provide further diagnostic clues, including the accumulation of thick, stratified middens with high volumes of refuse, such as remains and broken tools, which accumulate over extended periods in fixed locations. Artifact assemblages in sedentary contexts typically exhibit high density, diversity, and evidence of on-site manufacture and repair, including curated toolkits for varied subsistence and domestic activities. Reused features like hearths with superimposed layers or postholes from rebuilt structures further attest to multi-seasonal or multi-generational use. Biological proxies enhance these material indicators; for instance, the proliferation of commensal species, particularly house mice (Mus domesticus), whose remains increase markedly in sites with human sedentism due to reliable food waste and shelter, serves as a reliable marker of long-term habitation starting around 15,000 years ago in regions like the . Faunal and botanical analyses revealing year-round exploitation of resources—evidenced by non-seasonal kill profiles in animal bones or diverse processing tools—corroborate reduced mobility. In prehistoric contexts, confirming sedentism requires integrating chronological methods, such as high-resolution of multiple features to establish occupation duration spanning years or decades, alongside mobility proxies like isotope ratios in enamel to detect limited residential shifts. Site size exceeding typical camps (often >0.5 hectares with population estimates >50 individuals) and intra-settlement burials also signal demographic stability. However, these criteria are not infallible; large artifact counts or dwellings alone may reflect seasonal aggregations rather than true sedentism, necessitating cross-validation to avoid overinterpretation.

Methods and Challenges in Prehistoric Contexts

Archaeologists identify sedentism in prehistoric contexts through multiple lines of evidence, including the presence of durable architecture such as stone or mud-brick structures, which suggest investment in fixed residences rather than temporary camps. Site features like storage pits, leveled building platforms, and in situ artifacts in dense clusters indicate prolonged occupation, as these require sustained resource accumulation and maintenance incompatible with high residential mobility. Faunal and floral remains spanning all seasons, detected via seasonality analysis of growth increments in shells or oxygen isotope ratios (δ¹⁸O) in mammal teeth, provide proxy data for year-round habitation rather than seasonal aggregation. High-resolution of multiple samples from stratigraphic layers helps establish occupation duration, with overlapping dates across features signaling multi-generational use rather than ephemeral events. Indicators of accumulation, such as increased bones or coprolites, reflect refuse heaps from sedentary living, as mobile groups disperse such materials. Burials integrated into domestic spaces and evidence of resource processing installations, like grinding stones in primary contexts, further corroborate reduced mobility by implying territorial attachment and social investment in place. Challenges arise from equating material density with sedentism, as thick artifact layers or numerous dwellings can result from repeated short-term visits by semi-mobile groups, as seen in Natufian sites where proposed sedentary indicators may instead reflect logistical camps. Post-depositional processes, including , bioturbation, and anthropogenic reuse, obscure stratigraphic integrity, complicating duration assessments; for instance, radiocarbon "old wood" effects or sample contamination can inflate perceived occupation spans. proxies are limited by sample preservation—perishable seasonal markers rarely survive—and may not distinguish full sedentism from extended seasonal residency, particularly in temperate zones with overlapping resource peaks. Regional environmental biases exacerbate detection issues: arid preservation favors architecture visibility, while humid degrade organic remains, underrepresenting sedentism in mobile-equated contexts. Conceptual ambiguities persist, as sedentism exists on a mobility continuum rather than as a binary state, with prehistoric groups potentially alternating strategies undetected by static site ; ethnographic analogies from modern foragers highlight how logistical mobility can mimic sedentary signatures without residential permanence. Integrating multiple proxies—e.g., combining isotopes, dating, and —mitigates these, but absence of direct ethnographic controls for cases demands cautious inference, prioritizing empirical aggregation over assumed thresholds.

Historical Development and Regional Variations

Earliest Evidence and Timelines

The earliest indications of prolonged , potentially representing semi-sedentism, appear at the Ohalo II site near the in , dated to approximately 23,000 calibrated years before present (cal ). This /Epipaleolithic camp preserves evidence of at least six brush huts with stone foundations, hearths, and extensive remains of over 140 plant species alongside fish and small game, suggesting intensive, repeated occupations rather than brief visits. However, the site's seasonal exploitation of resources implies it may not reflect year-round residency but rather extended stays characteristic of complex . Clearer evidence of sedentism emerges with the in the during the Epipaleolithic period, spanning roughly 15,000 to 11,500 cal BP (ca. 13,000–9,500 BCE). Early Natufian phases (ca. 15,000–13,000 cal BP) feature semi-subterranean round houses with stone bases, storage pits for wild cereals, and ground stone tools for processing, indicating territorial attachment and reduced mobility among hunter-gatherers. Sites like Ain Mallaha (Eynan) and El-Wad Terrace demonstrate dense artifact accumulations and cemeteries, hallmarks of permanent or semi-permanent communities reliant on intensified wild resource exploitation rather than . By the Late Natufian (ca. 13,000–11,500 cal BP), sedentism intensified amid climatic shifts at the end of the , with some sites showing larger structures and increased reliance on cereals, bridging to the where full sedentism coincided with early around 11,500 cal BP. This Levantine timeline precedes agricultural sedentism elsewhere, such as in or the , by millennia, underscoring the role of local ecological abundance in enabling pre-agricultural settlement. While debates persist on whether Natufian occupancy was fully sedentary or seasonally variable, the cumulative archaeological signatures— including skeletal stress markers of localized populations—support a significant departure from nomadic patterns.

Key Regions of Early Sedentary Societies

The , particularly the southern Levant including modern-day , , and , hosts the earliest well-documented evidence of sedentism among societies during the Epipaleolithic period. The , dating from approximately 14,500 to 11,500 years (), transitioned to semi-permanent settlements characterized by circular stone houses, storage facilities, and ground stone tools for processing wild cereals. Sites such as Eynan (Ain Mallaha) reveal clusters of up to 100 individuals living in structured dwellings with hearths and burial practices indicating year-round occupation, supported by abundant wild resources during the Bølling-Allerød warming phase. Biological indicators, including dental hypoplasia and increased parasite loads in remains, further corroborate reduced mobility and prolonged site habitation. In , particularly , the Jomon culture exemplifies independent development of sedentary communities starting around 16,000–14,000 . Large shell midden sites like Sannai-Maruyama demonstrate permanent villages with pit houses, storage pits, and populations exceeding 500 individuals, sustained by diverse marine and terrestrial resources without reliance on . This pattern reflects logistical mobility strategies where base camps facilitated intensive exploitation of predictable coastal and forested environments during the . Similar early sedentism appears in the and basins of China by the early , with sites showing semi-subterranean houses and resource storage predating full . Other regions, such as central , witnessed sedentism around 11,500–10,000 at sites like , where monumental stone structures suggest organized labor by sedentary or seasonally aggregating hunter-gatherers exploiting wild game and plants. In the , evidence emerges later, with pre-agricultural sedentary patterns in the by circa 3000 at Ceibal, involving earthen platforms and , though full sedentism often coincided with incipient cultivation. These regional variations highlight that sedentism arose convergently in resource-rich zones conducive to intensified , preceding or independent of in multiple cases.

Causes of the Transition to Sedentism

Ecological and Demographic Pressures

Ecological pressures on early human societies arose primarily from climatic fluctuations at the termination of the Pleistocene epoch around 11,700 years ago, which reshaped vegetation patterns and resource predictability across various regions. These shifts, including the end of the and subsequent warming, increased habitat stability in refugia like river valleys and oases, concentrating and plant resources while elevating the energetic costs of nomadic relocation amid variable conditions. In arid zones, such as the , the "oasis hypothesis" posits that desiccation and reduced mobility forced human-animal-plant aggregations around diminishing water sources, fostering proto-sedentary exploitation of localized patches rather than broad ranges. Empirical reconstructions from paleoclimate proxies, including cores and lake sediments, indicate that cooling events like the (circa 12,900–11,700 years ago) intensified resource stress in , prompting delayed-return strategies such as storage and site fidelity to buffer against . Such environmental constraints rendered sustained mobility inefficient, as the metabolic demands of exceeded benefits in increasingly fragmented ecosystems. Demographic pressures amplified these ecological strains through gradual population expansions that outpaced the regenerative capacity of hunted and gathered resources in mobile economies. Pre-sedentary forager densities, estimated at 0.1–1 person per square kilometer in optimal habitats, approached local carrying limits by the Epipaleolithic, as inferred from settlement clustering and artifact accumulations in sites like Ohalo II (circa 23,000 years ago) and Natufian villages (circa 12,500–9,500 BCE). This induced Boserupian dynamics, wherein density-dependent competition spurred subsistence intensification, including selective harvesting and habitat management, to avert Malthusian checks like or . Archaeological evidence from the documents a 10–20-fold population increase during the Natufian period, correlating with semi-permanent base camps and reduced residential mobility, as territorial defense and resource defense became viable responses to inter-group rivalry over depleting patches. In regions like , millet-related sedentism emerged amid Holocene boundary population pulses, where growth rates exceeding 0.1% annually strained wild stands, necessitating cultivation experiments around 9,000–8,000 BCE. These pressures interacted causally with ecology, as climatic amelioration post-Younger Dryas supported higher densities (up to 5–10 persons per square kilometer in sedentary precursors), but only until feedback loops from overuse demanded fixed investments in land and storage. Peer-reviewed models emphasize that without such demographic escalation—driven by lowered child transport costs in proto-villages—ecological opportunities alone insufficiently explain the ubiquity of sedentism across hemispheres.

Technological and Subsistence Innovations

The development of ground stone tools, such as mortars, pestles, and querns, facilitated intensive processing of wild seeds, cereals, and , supporting denser populations and reduced mobility in pre-agricultural contexts. These tools emerged prominently in the of the around 12,500–9,500 BCE, where use-wear analysis reveals their application in pulverizing plant materials that chipped stone implements could not efficiently handle. By enabling bulk food preparation, ground stone assemblages contributed to experimental sedentism, as evidenced by increased tool densities at sites like those in the Epipaleolithic . Harvesting technologies, including composite flint sickles, marked early subsistence intensification by allowing efficient collection of wild grains. Archaeological residues on sickles from Ohalo II in the , dated to approximately 23,000 years ago, indicate systematic harvesting of wild cereals like , predating full and suggesting proto-agricultural practices that reduced ranges. In the proper, around 10,000 BCE in the , refined sickles with hafted blades further optimized yield from managed stands, correlating with settlement permanence as populations shifted toward carbohydrate-rich diets. Storage innovations, particularly predomestication granaries, were pivotal in buffering seasonal resource variability and incentivizing permanent occupation. Excavations at Dhra' in the uncovered circular, mud-plastered granaries dating to 11,000 years ago, designed to store wild cereals and protect against , representing a technological leap that preceded morphological plant . These structures, with capacities for hundreds of kilograms, imply communal investment in , fostering sedentism by enabling surplus accumulation and delayed-return subsistence strategies over nomadic immediacy. Subsistence shifts toward animal and plant management amplified these technological foundations. Evidence of proto-herding, including dung layers from tended goats dated to 12,500 years ago in the Near East, indicates early corralling practices that stabilized protein sources without full domestication. Plant cultivation experiments, building on harvesting tools, transitioned to domestication by 9,500–8,500 BCE for species like emmer wheat and barley in the Levant, where genetic markers in archaeobotanical remains confirm human selection for non-shattering traits, yielding reliable harvests that sustained villages. In regions like northeast China, sedentism via millet processing predated full domestication around 6,000 BCE, underscoring how integrated innovations created causal pathways to settlement stability.

Consequences and Impacts

Demographic and Health Effects

The transition to sedentism facilitated a demographic transition characterized by increased fertility rates, shorter interbirth intervals, and reduced mobility costs for child-rearing, leading to exponential population growth in early agricultural societies. Prehistoric populations exhibited near-zero net growth rates, whereas sedentary farming communities in regions like the and experienced population densities rising from approximately 0.1 to 1-10 individuals per square kilometer by the early . This demographic expansion, observed in densities and settlement sizes, offset higher mortality through surplus food production, though it often culminated in density-dependent checks like or disease outbreaks. Health outcomes deteriorated for many early sedentary populations compared to mobile foragers, with skeletal analyses revealing widespread indicators of nutritional stress and infectious disease. Early farmers showed reduced adult stature—averaging 5-10 cm shorter than preceding hunter-gatherers—alongside increased prevalence of porotic hyperostosis (indicating anemia from iron-deficient diets reliant on cereals) and linear enamel hypoplasias (signaling childhood malnutrition or illness). Dental caries rates surged fourfold due to carbohydrate-heavy diets, while periosteal infections from zoonotic pathogens rose with animal domestication and crowding in permanent villages. These changes reflect causal shifts: sedentism concentrated populations, amplifying pathogen transmission, and monocrop agriculture diminished dietary diversity, contrasting the varied, protein-rich foraging diets. Despite individual health declines, aggregate demographic gains persisted, with fertility increases (e.g., from 4-6 to 6-8 surviving children per in some Eurasian cases) sustaining population booms even amid elevated of 20-50%. Regional variations existed; for instance, in the , Natufian semi-sedentary groups already showed transitional stress, but full sedentism amplified it, while some later adaptations led to gradual stature recovery over millennia. Empirical skeletal data from and the consistently indicate net morbidity increases, challenging narratives of unqualified progress but underscoring sedentism's role in enabling larger-scale human societies through compensatory reproductive strategies.

Social Stratification and Economic Specialization

The transition to sedentism, facilitated by reliance on and resource storage, generated consistent food surpluses that supported population densities unattainable in mobile societies, with early groups expanding to 4 persons per under dry farming and up to 25 under systems. These surpluses reduced the necessity for universal subsistence labor, enabling economic specialization where individuals focused on crafts, trade, or administration rather than food production; for instance, in sites like WF16 in southern (circa 11,700–10,422 years ), diverse structures for communal processing and storage imply emerging roles beyond domestic tasks, organized through collective labor. Specialization intensified division of labor, as surpluses incentivized expertise in areas like tool-making, , and activities, fostering interdependence and networks that amplified resource accumulation. This shift contrasted with egalitarian norms, where mobility constrained wealth hoarding; fixed settlements allowed inheritance of stored goods and land, concentrating advantages among coordinators of or defense, as modeled in evolutionary frameworks where high dispersal costs from invested locked groups into hierarchical preferences. Archaeological indicators of stratification, such as variable house sizes and , appear more pronounced in mid-to-late contexts, like Çatalhöyük (circa 7100–6000 BCE), where ground stone artifacts reveal household-level craft disparities tied to control, though overt inequality remained limited compared to later developments. In ’s early Chahai site, sharing strategies in faunal remains suggest community structures that mitigated but did not eliminate differential access, paving the way for ranked societies as surpluses scaled with technological coordination. Overall, sedentism's causal chain—surplus enabling specialists who managed collective endeavors—drove the erosion of , with leadership evolving into in resource-intensive environments.

Long-Term Technological and Cultural Advancements

The establishment of sedentary agricultural communities generated reliable food surpluses, which alleviated subsistence pressures and enabled labor specialization in non-farming pursuits, thereby driving technological progress. In the , this surplus supported the development of copper metallurgy by the late 7th millennium BCE, as evidenced by sites in and the where settled populations constructed permanent furnaces and processed ores, marking a shift from sporadic crafting to systematic production. Similarly, technologies emerged around 6000 BCE in , with canal systems diverting river waters to expand cultivable land and sustain higher population densities, a direct outcome of fixed settlements investing in communal . These foundations extended to mechanical and administrative innovations in emerging urban centers. By circa 3500 BCE, the invention of the in Sumeria facilitated transport of goods and production, responding to the logistical demands of surplus redistribution in densely populated areas. Writing systems, such as , arose around 3200 BCE in to record grain allocations and trade, necessitated by the administrative complexities of sedentary economies with property accumulation and labor division. Culturally, sedentism fostered enduring institutions by providing stability for knowledge preservation and social elaboration. Surplus-enabled elites sponsored monumental and complexes, as seen in the proliferation of temples and from 4000 BCE onward in , which reinforced hierarchical governance and religious authority. This institutionalization is corroborated by archaeological patterns showing egalitarian forager bands evolving into stratified village hierarchies with formalized property norms and cooperative frameworks, trends accelerating post-10,000 BCE in the .

Controversies and Alternative Perspectives

The "Neolithic Revolution as Worst Mistake" Debate

In his 1987 essay "The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race," published in Discover magazine, biologist Jared Diamond posited that the adoption of agriculture during the Neolithic Revolution, beginning around 10,000 years ago, represented a profound error for human well-being, leading to nutritional deficiencies, increased labor demands, higher disease prevalence, and social hierarchies that exacerbated inequality. Diamond supported this with bioarchaeological evidence from skeletal remains, noting that post-agricultural populations exhibited signs of poorer health, including higher rates of dental enamel hypoplasia (indicating malnutrition or illness during growth), iron-deficiency anemia, and infectious diseases like tuberculosis, compared to pre-agricultural hunter-gatherers. He further argued that farmers' diets, reliant on starchy staples such as wheat, rice, and potatoes, were less diverse and nutritious than the varied wild foods of foragers, resulting in reduced average stature—for instance, late Paleolithic males in Greece averaged 5 feet 9 inches tall, while Neolithic farmers there averaged 5 feet 5 inches. Additionally, Diamond highlighted how sedentary farming intensified workloads, with estimates suggesting hunter-gatherers foraged 3–5 hours daily versus farmers' year-round toil, and enabled rapid population growth that outstripped resources, fostering famine, plague, and warfare. Empirical studies largely corroborate the short-term health detriments described, attributing them to denser settlements that promoted zoonotic diseases from domesticated animals and contaminated water sources, as well as dietary shifts causing craniofacial changes like narrower jaws and increased dental caries from carbohydrate-heavy meals. Osteological data from sites across and the show a general decline in robusticity and height during the agricultural transition, with adult dropping—for example, from around 35–40 years in some groups to 25–32 years in early farmers—due to these stressors. Proponents of the "mistake" thesis, including some anthropologists, extend this to critique agriculture's role in enabling and gender-based labor divisions, arguing that the surplus it generated disproportionately benefited elites while imposing hardships on the masses. Critics, however, contend that Diamond's framing overlooks the adaptive necessities and long-term gains of sedentism, emphasizing that population pressures from successful foraging likely compelled the shift, as groups faced their own risks like high (up to 30–40% in some ethnographic analogs), intergroup , and unpredictability. Bioarchaeological reviews indicate that while initial declines occurred, they were not universal—some early farming communities showed nutritional improvements from domesticated crops—and agriculture's surplus facilitated specialization, technological innovations like and writing, and eventual medical advances that raised to modern levels. Economists and evolutionary biologists argue that labeling it a "mistake" anthropomorphizes , ignoring how it scaled human populations from millions to billions, enabling cumulative cultural progress despite transitional costs; for instance, econometric analyses trace persistent but diminishing negative effects on stature and that were offset by broader societal advancements. This perspective holds that without agriculture, humanity would lack the demographic base for subsequent revolutions in science and , rendering the transition a net evolutionary success rather than an error.

Empirical Critiques and Evidence for Net Benefits

Sedentism, despite short-term health costs such as reduced stature and increased disease load evident in early skeletal remains, enabled food surpluses that supported exponential , rising from sparse densities to densities exceeding 1 person per square kilometer in fertile regions by the , around 5000 BCE. This demographic expansion, driven by higher fertility rates linked to year-round resource stability and reduced mobility constraints on reproduction, created conditions for labor specialization and cumulative technological progress, including advanced , systems, and proto-urban settlements documented archaeologically in sites like by 7000 BCE. Empirical analyses of global variations attribute a substantial portion—up to 20-30% in cross-country regressions—to the timing of the Neolithic transition, with earlier-adopting regions benefiting from millennia of institutional and technological compounding that elevated average lifespans from under 30 years in pre-agricultural eras to over 70 in modern contexts. For instance, genetic and archaeological data from Eurasian populations show that post-Neolithic selection pressures favored traits enhancing energy allocation for reproduction and survival in dense settlements, leading to life history shifts that, over generations, mitigated initial nutritional deficits through diversified crops and early by 4000 BCE. Critiques of portrayals like Diamond's emphasize that immediate metrics of decline overlook causal pathways to : sedentary surpluses underpinned division of labor, fostering and writing systems by the (circa 3000 BCE), which in turn enabled , precursors, and caloric abundance far surpassing hunter-gatherer baselines of 2000-2500 kcal/day with high seasonal variance. Population scaling in sedentary contexts also amplified social learning, as larger groups—evidenced by settlements housing hundreds versus nomadic bands of 20-50—facilitated transmission and risk-pooling, yielding net adaptive advantages confirmed by models of where sedentism correlates with accelerated tool complexity and reduced per-capita effort. Longitudinal skeletal and isotopic studies reveal stature recovery and dietary breadth expansion by the period (5000-3000 BCE), with robusticity indicators rebounding as agricultural intensification incorporated proteins from domesticated herds, countering early post-transition spikes and underscoring sedentism's role in buffering environmental shocks through storage and networks absent in mobile foragers. These dynamics affirm that, while not without trade-offs, sedentism's empirical legacy lies in enabling civilizational trajectories that resolved many of the vulnerabilities—such as susceptibility and limited medical intervention—inherent to nomadic lifestyles.

Modern and Forced Sedentism

State-Imposed Sedentarization Policies

State-imposed sedentarization policies refer to initiatives that compel nomadic or pastoralist populations to adopt fixed settlements, often justified by aims of administrative control, economic modernization, , or . These policies have historically targeted mobile groups whose lifestyles hindered state , taxation, and border enforcement, leading to profound demographic, cultural, and ecological disruptions. from multiple regions demonstrates that such forced transitions frequently resulted in elevated mortality, loss of traditional livelihoods, and social disintegration, as nomadic adaptations to marginal environments proved incompatible with abrupt sedentary mandates. In the , sedentarization efforts intensified during the late as part of Stalin's collectivization drive, particularly in where Kazakh nomads, who comprised about 80% of the population in , were targeted for settlement to facilitate grain production and ideological conformity. A 1929 resolution by the 7th of Kazakhstan declared full sedentarization by the end of the first Five-Year Plan (1933), involving the of and into farms, which devastated economies reliant on seasonal mobility. This policy contributed directly to the , killing an estimated 1.5 million Kazakhs—roughly 38% of the ethnic Kazakh population—through starvation, disease, and flight, as nomads lacked the infrastructure for sedentary in arid steppes. Similar coercive measures have persisted in , where sedentarization of Tibetan pastoral nomads began in the but expanded significantly under the Sedentarization Project (NSP) launched in 2003, ostensibly to combat grassland degradation and alleviate through relocation to permanent housing and state-managed farming. By 2011, over 1.7 million Tibetan herders had been resettled in provinces like and , with policies accelerating post-2016 to include forced evictions from "ecologically fragile" areas, stripping families of and traditional rights. Reports indicate these relocations often exacerbate , as resettled nomads face rates exceeding 70% and cultural erosion, with state narratives emphasizing environmental benefits despite evidence of limited ecological improvement and reliance on unsustainable subsidies. In the of , post-independence governments in countries like and pursued sedentarization during the 1970s droughts to integrate nomadic Fulani and Tuareg herders into national development plans, including villagization schemes that resettled thousands but triggered conflicts over reduced mobility and access to pastures. These efforts, driven by rainfall deficits and state priorities for sedentary , displaced pastoralists onto marginal lands, contributing to heightened inter-ethnic violence and vulnerability, as evidenced by clashes in northern where sedentarized groups lost adaptive resilience to environmental variability. Overall, such policies underscore a pattern where state centralization overrides ecological suitability, yielding net harms including demographic collapse and persistent inequality, as nomadic systems historically sustained higher densities in arid zones than imposed sedentism allowed.

Contemporary Implications for Nomadic Groups

In the , nomadic groups worldwide continue to experience sedentarization pressures from state policies, land privatization, , and economic integration, often resulting in partial or full transitions to settled lifestyles. For instance, in northern China's Uyghur Autonomous Region, government-led resettlement programs since the early 2000s have relocated pastoralists to villages with improved housing and infrastructure, such as and electricity, though outcomes vary by resource availability. Similarly, among Asian and African , sedentarization facilitates greater access to , healthcare, and markets through settled family members who act as intermediaries. Health transitions during sedentarization frequently involve heightened vulnerability to both infectious and non-communicable diseases. The Punan Tubu of Indonesian , resettled near urban areas over the past three decades, have seen rises in , dengue, , skin diseases, intestinal parasites, and rodent-borne illnesses due to poor in permanent settlements and increased human-animal contact, alongside a shift to chronic conditions like , cancer, , and from dietary changes to energy-dense, low-nutrient foods. In contrast, some Chinese pastoral villages report ancillary benefits, such as lamb survival rates improving from 60-70% to over 95% due to better fodder and shelters post-resettlement. Nomadic communities broadly face barriers like inadequate fixed addresses and remote locations, exacerbating limited access to medical facilities. Social and cultural implications include erosion of traditional identities and communal structures. The Birhor tribe in India's Odisha state, transitioning from forest-based hunting-gathering since the mid-20th century, encounters identity threats and cultural shocks from reliance on market economies and village interactions, diminishing forest-tied practices like monkey catching and prompting debates over tribal nomenclature. Among the Punan Tubu, sedentarization has weakened mutual aid networks and traditional healing, contributing to social issues such as alcoholism, violence, and suicide in urban settings, compounded by stigma as "savages." Economically, sedentarization shifts livelihoods from to diversified activities but often yields uneven results, with ecological strains amplifying risks. In Xinjiang's Village A, post-sedentarization livestock holdings increased 2.5-fold to 1002 sheep units per household, supplemented by and land rents, yet Village B saw stagnant herds and 87.5% reliance. Broader ecological shifts include dependence on artificial systems, as seen in the shrinkage of Ebinur Lake to under 77% of its 1950 extent (1.2 × 10^5 ha) from tied to sedentism. For groups like the Birhor, occupational pivots to rope-making or labor yield variable incomes but sustain partial migration, underscoring incomplete adaptation.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167268115001985
  2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282563749_The_Origins_of_Sedentism_Climate_Population_and_Technology
  3. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac/62/
  4. https://www.thoughtco.com/sedentism-ancient-process-building-community-172756
  5. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.000355
  6. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/climate-clothing-and-agriculture-in-prehistory/sedentism-and-domestication/96B89DC573C597F3FE3A59C2FEE937D9
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234147675_MobilitySedentism_Concepts_Archaeological_Measures_and_Effects
  8. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/77933548.pdf
  9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/nomadism
  10. https://sites.pitt.edu/~rhayden/RMH_Professional_page/India_fieldwork_files/Cultural%2520Ecology%2520of%2520Service%2520Nomads.pdf
  11. https://open.uapress.arizona.edu/read/sedentism-and-mobility-in-a-social-landscape
  12. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/economic-prehistory/transition-to-sedentism/ED824F054B0372C278E308262BE702D8
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11725792/
  14. https://www.columbia.edu/itc/anthropology/v1007/baryo.pdf
  15. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1115&context=anthropologyfacpub
  16. https://metode.org/issues/monographs/mobility-and-sedentariness.html
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290112191_Jomon_Collectors_and_Foragers
  18. https://www.iup.edu/ages/files/anthropology/research/oer09.pdf
  19. https://nerd.wwnorton.com/ebooks/epub/websv1/EPUB/content/1.2.2-chapter02.xhtml
  20. https://oxfordre.com/environmentalscience/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.001.0001/acrefore-9780199389414-e-164
  21. https://archaeology.sites.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/187/2020/09/Hammett-1991-PhD-RLA.pdf
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3100919/
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X2300353X
  24. https://www.science.org/content/article/when-did-humans-settle-down-house-mouse-may-have-answer
  25. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2413963121
  26. https://www.geogsci.com/EN/10.1007/s11442-023-2156-0
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284229561_Can_seasonality_studies_be_used_to_identify_sedentism_in_the_past
  28. https://journal.equinoxpub.com/JMA/article/view/693
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8791512/
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249234268_On_the_shore_of_a_fluctuating_lake_Environmental_evidence_from_Ohalo_II_19500_BP
  31. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-antiquity/article/centered-on-the-wetlands-integrating-new-phytolith-evidence-of-plantuse-from-the-23000yearold-site-of-ohalo-ii-israel/D478469DBCCFF07D8CF91D263D7CC2C6
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047248414000554
  33. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-17096-5
  34. https://www.persee.fr/doc/paleo_0153-9345_2018_num_44_1_5783
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2584673/
  36. https://ehrafarchaeology.yale.edu/document?id=m080-028
  37. https://junkohabu.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/habu-2014-cwp.pdf
  38. https://resolve.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/1168A640F08D7D236550A16A6E7F0481/9781139017831c43_p724-741_CBO.pdf/early_sedentism_in_east_asia_from_late_palaeolithic_to_early_agricultural_societies_in_insular_east_asia.pdf
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4394245/
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6638895/
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277379116303985
  42. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1717&context=ccr&simple=True
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030438781000091X
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440304000731
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4614720/
  46. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/stone-tools-in-human-evolution/residential-sedentism/80482D9427E713072796CDE9D205193C
  47. https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2017-02-20/ty-article/flint-sickles-prove-grain-cultivation-in-galilee-23-000-years-ago/0000017f-ee43-d639-af7f-efd7d1010000
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379116301780
  49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26314333_Evidence_for_food_storage_and_predomestication_granaries_11000_years_ago_in_the_Jordan_Valley
  50. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090623150619.htm
  51. https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1017642108
  52. https://today.uconn.edu/2022/09/ancient-dung-reveals-earliest-evidence-for-animal-tending/
  53. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218751
  54. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/497665
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7741108/
  56. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1908960116
  57. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/nebanthro/article/1186/viewcontent/28_Latham.pdf
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1570677X11000402
  59. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01256568
  60. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0148468
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9169634/
  62. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4132689/
  63. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sociology/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00035/full
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11379307/
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278416522000289
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286197903_Sedentism_social_complexity_and_metallurgy_in_upland_Southeast_Asian_populations
  67. https://fiveable.me/ancient-mediterranean/unit-2/innovations-agriculture-technology-trade/study-guide/7lQSTmDryh1EhbR9
  68. https://pueaa.unam.mx/uploads/materials/james-c-scott-against-the-grain.pdf?v=1743489059
  69. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/3759/110p001.pdf
  70. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119362500.ch2
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6628670/
  72. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21507735/
  73. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/187/
  74. https://www.livinganthropologically.com/archaeology/agriculture-worst-mistake/
  75. https://equitablegrowth.org/agriculture-the-worst-mistake-in-the-history-of-the-human-race-todays-economic-history/
  76. https://www.nber.org/papers/w30221
  77. https://ftp1.economics.smu.edu/wpaper/2022/OZAK/OZAK-2022-03.pdf
  78. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/80105/1/541602659.pdf
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7253633/
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9343229/
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/sedentarization
  82. https://oxfordre.com/asianhistory/viewbydoi/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.314
  83. https://www.sciencespo.fr/mass-violence-war-massacre-resistance/en/document/kazakh-famine-beginnings-sedentarization.html
  84. https://yris.yira.org/spring-issue/the-kazakh-famine-of-1930-1933-and-stalinist-collectivization-the-limitation-of-legal-frameworks-for-genocide-in-communist-studies/
  85. https://pastoralismjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2041-7136-1-4
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4132466/
  87. https://www.hrw.org/report/2024/05/22/educate-masses-change-their-minds/chinas-forced-relocation-rural-tibetans
  88. https://gsconlinepress.com/journals/gscarr/sites/default/files/GSCARR-2022-0341.pdf
  89. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000098355
  90. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/706945
  91. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/no-longer-nomadic-changing-punan-tubu-lifestyle-requires
  92. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11384521/
  93. https://medwinpublishers.com/AEOAJ/roots-and-routes-the-journey-from-nomadism-to-sedentarization.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.