Hubbry Logo
Struma disasterStruma disasterMain
Open search
Struma disaster
Community hub
Struma disaster
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Struma disaster
Struma disaster
Struma disaster
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Struma disaster
Location41°23′N 29°13′E / 41.383°N 29.217°E / 41.383; 29.217
Date24 February 1942
TargetThe ship Struma, carrying Jewish refugees from Romania to the British Mandate of Palestine
Attack type
Ship sinking
Weaponstorpedo
Deaths781 refugees,[1] 10 crew members [2]
PerpetratorsSoviet Navy

The Struma disaster was the sinking on 24 February 1942 of the ship MV Struma which had been trying to take nearly 800 Jewish refugees from the Axis member Romania to Mandatory Palestine. She was a small iron-hulled ship of only 240 GRT and had been built in 1867 as a steam-powered schooner[3] but had recently been re-engined with an unreliable second-hand diesel engine.[4][5] Struma was only 148.4 ft (45 m) long, had a beam of only 19.3 ft (6 m) and a draught of only 9.9 ft (3 m)[6][3] but an estimated 781 refugees and 10 crew were crammed into her.[7][2]

Struma's diesel engine failed several times between her departure from Constanța on the Black Sea on 12 December 1941 and her arrival in Istanbul on 15 December. She had to be towed by a tug boat to leave Constanța and to enter Istanbul. On 23 February 1942, with her engine still inoperative and her refugee passengers aboard, Turkish authorities towed Struma from Istanbul through the Bosporus out to the coast of Şile, in North Istanbul. Within hours, on the morning of 24 February, the Shch-213 torpedoed her, killing 781 refugees[1] and 10 crew, which made it the Black Sea's largest exclusively-civilian naval disaster of World War II. Until recently, the number of victims had been estimated at 768,[8] but the current figure is the result of a recent study of six different passenger lists.[7] Only one person aboard, the 19-year-old David Stoliar, survived (he died in 2014).

Voyage and detention

[edit]
See also: Romania during World War II
Struma about 1890

Struma had been built as a luxury yacht[5] but was 74 years old. In the 1930s, she had been relegated to carrying cattle on the Danube River under the flag of convenience of Panama.[9] The Mossad LeAliyah Bet intended to use her as a refugee ship to sail to British-controlled Palestine but shelved the plan after German forces entered Bulgaria.[9] Her Greek owner, Jean D. Pandelis, instead contacted Revisionist Zionists in Romania.[9] The New Zionist Organization and a Zionist youth movement, Betar, began to make arrangements, but an argument over the choice of passengers left the planning in the hands of Betar.[9]

Apart from the crew and 60 Betar youth, there were over 700 passengers, who had paid large fees to board the ship.[9][10] The exact number is not certain, but a collation of six separate lists produced a total of 791 passengers and 10 crew.[7][11] Passengers were told they would be sailing on a renovated boat with a short stop in Istanbul to collect their Palestinian immigration visas.[12] Romanian Prime Minister Ion Antonescu's government approved of the voyage.[10]

Each refugee was allowed to take 20 kilograms (44 lb) of luggage.[13] Romanian customs officers took many of the refugees' valuables and other possessions, along with food that they had brought with them.[13] The passengers were not permitted to see the vessel before the day of the voyage. They found that she was a wreck with only two lifeboats.[citation needed] Below decks, Struma had dormitories with bunks for 40 to 120 people in each.[14] The berths were bunks on which passengers were to sleep four abreast, with a width of 60 centimetres (2 ft) for each person.[14]

On 12 December 1941, the day of her sailing, Struma's engine failed and so a tug towed her out of the port of Constanța.[15] Since the waters off Constanța were mined, a Romanian vessel escorted her clear of the minefield.[13] She then drifted overnight while her crew tried vainly to start her engine.[15] She transmitted distress signals, and on 13 December, the Romanian tug returned.[15] The tug's crew said they would not repair Struma's engine unless they were paid.[15] The refugees had no money after they had bought their tickets and leaving Romania and so they gave all their wedding rings to the tugboatmen, who then repaired the engine.[15] Struma then got under way, but by 15 December, her engine had failed again and so she was towed into the port of Istanbul, Turkey.[15]

There, she remained at anchor, while British diplomats and Turkish officials negotiated over the fate of the passengers. The Turkish government of Prime Minister Refik Saydam refused to accept Jewish refugees into Turkey, with Saydam once stating that his country "would not accept masses of Jews, nor individual Jews who were oppressed in other countries."[16] Turkish officials informed their British counterparts that they would not allow Struma's passengers to land unless Britain permitted them to emigrate to Palestine. As the passengers were attempting to illegally immigrate to Palestine in violation of the restrictions laid out in the White Paper of 1939, British diplomats informed the Turkish government no such permission would be given. While she was detained in Istanbul, Struma ran short of food. Soup was cooked twice a week, and supper was typically an orange and some peanuts for each person. At night, each child was issued a serving of milk.[14]

Following weeks of negotiation, the British agreed to honour the expired Palestinian immigration visas that a few passengers possessed, allowing them to travel to Palestine overland. With the help of several sympathetic residents of Istanbul, a few passengers managed to escape into Turkey. One woman, Madeea Solomonovici, was admitted to an Istanbul hospital after she had miscarried.[10] On 12 February, British officials agreed that passengers aged between 11 and 16 would be given Palestinian visas, but a dispute occurred over their transportation to Palestine.[citation needed] According to some researchers, a total of 9 passengers disembarked, and the remaining 782 and 10 crew stayed on the ship.[2] Others believe that there had only been 782 passengers initially, with only Solomonovici being allowed to leave the ship.[17]

Towing to sea and sinking

[edit]
Map of the Bosporus Strait showing where Struma was anchored in quarantine in Istanbul Harbour (1) and was later torpedoed and sunk in the Black Sea (2)

The Anglo-Turkish negotiations reached an impasse, as neither side would relent. On 23 February 1942, a small group of Turkish policemen tried to board the ship, but the refugees resisted their attempts to board.[14] A larger force of about 80 police officers subsequently surrounded Struma with motor boats, and after about half an hour of resistance managed to board the ship.[14] Despite weeks of work by Turkish engineers, the engine would not start, and Struma was unable to move without being towed.[18] The police detached the ship's anchor and attached her to a tug, which towed her through the Bosporus and out into the Black Sea.[14][19]

As she was towed along the Bosporus, many passengers hung signs over the sides that read "SAVE US" in English and Hebrew that were visible to those who lived on the banks of the strait.[20][page needed] The Turkish authorities abandoned the ship in the Black Sea, about ten nautical miles (20 kilometres) north of the Bosporus, where she drifted helplessly.[14][20][page needed] On the morning of 24 February there was a huge explosion, and the ship sank. Decades later, it was revealed that the ship had been torpedoed by the Soviet Navy submarine Shch-213, which had also sunk the Turkish vessel Çankaya the evening before.[21][22]

Struma sank quickly, and many people were trapped below decks and drowned.[23] Many others aboard survived the sinking and clung to pieces of wreckage, but for hours, no rescue came, and all but one of them died from drowning or hypothermia.[14][23] Of the estimated 791 people killed, more than 100 were children.[24] Struma's First Officer Lazar Dikof and the 19-year-old refugee David Stoliar clung to a cabin door, which was floating in the sea.[25][23] The First Officer died overnight, but Turks in a rowing boat rescued Stoliar the next day.[23] He was the only survivor.

Turkey held Stoliar in custody for many weeks. Simon Brod, a Jewish businessman from Istanbul who during World War II helped rescue several Jewish refugees who reached Turkey, arranged for Stoliar to be fed during his two-month incarceration. Upon his release, Brod brought Stoliar home and provided him with fresh clothes, a suitcase and a train ticket to Aleppo after the British government had given him papers to go to Palestine. Stoiliar later joined the British Army and served in the Eighth Army during the North African campaign.[26][27]

Aftermath

[edit]

On 9 June 1942, Lord Wedgwood, a prominent Zionist, opened the debate in the House of Lords by alleging that the British government had reneged on its commitment towards the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine and urged for the mandate over Palestine to be transferred to the United States. He stated during his speech: "I hope yet to live to see those who sent the Struma cargo back to the Nazis hung as high as Haman cheek by jowl with their prototype and Führer, Adolf Hitler".[28] In response to the disaster, the Anglo-Jewish poet Emanuel Litvinoff, who was then serving in the Pioneer Corps, wrote a poem mourning the sinking of Struma, which included the lines:

Today my khaki is a badge of shame,
Its duty meaningless; my name
Is Moses and I summon plague to Pharaoh.
Today my mantle is Sorrow and O
My crown is Thorn. I sit darkly with the years

And centuries of years, bowed by my heritage of tears.[29]

For many years, there were competing theories about the explosion that sank Struma. In 1964, a German historian discovered that Shch-213[30] had fired a torpedo, which sank the ship.[31] That was later confirmed from several other Soviet sources.[32] The submarine had been acting under secret orders to sink all neutral and enemy shipping entering the Black Sea to reduce the flow of strategic material to Nazi Germany.[33] Frantz and Collins call the sinking of Struma the "largest naval civilian disaster of the war".[34] Greater numbers of civilians perished in other maritime disasters of the war, including MV Wilhelm Gustloff, SS Cap Arcona and Jun'yō Maru, but there were also military personnel aboard those ships when they sunk.[citation needed]

Struma monument in Holon, Israel

On 26 January 2005, the Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon made a speech to the Knesset in which he stated:

The leadership of the British Mandate displayed... obtuseness and insensitivity by locking the gates to Israel to Jewish refugees who sought a haven in the Land of Israel. Thus were rejected the requests of the 769 [sic] passengers of the ship Struma who escaped from Europe – and all but one [of the passengers] found their death at sea. Throughout the war, nothing was done to stop the annihilation [of the Jewish people].[35]

Wrecks

[edit]
Struma monument in Ashdod, Israel

Struma

[edit]

In July 2000, a Turkish diving team found a wreck on the sea floor in about the right place and announced that it had found Struma. A team, led by a British technical diver and a grandson of one of the victims, Greg Buxton, later studied that and several other wrecks in the area but could not positively identify any as Struma since the wreck that had been found by the Turks was far too large.[36]

On 3 September 2000, a ceremony was held at the site to commemorate the tragedy. It was attended by 60 relatives of Struma victims, representatives of the Jewish community of Turkey, the Israeli ambassador and prime minister's envoy and British and American delegates, but David Stoliar chose to not attend for family reasons.[37]

Soviet Shch-213 submarine

[edit]

In November 2008, a team of Dutch, German and Romanian divers of the Black Sea Wreck Diving Club discovered the wreck of Shch-213 off the coast of Constanța in Romania. Since the registration markings that could have helped to identify the wreck were missing because of damage to the submarine, it took divers until 2010 to identify her as Shch-213.[38]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Struma disaster

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Struma disaster was the sinking on 24 February 1942 of the MV Struma, a dilapidated barge repurposed to carry 767 Jewish refugees from to British , which was torpedoed by a Soviet in the Black hours after Turkish authorities towed it from harbor and abandoned it at sea. The vessel departed , , in December 1941 amid escalating Nazi-allied , including pogroms and deportations, with passengers comprising diverse professionals, Zionists, and pioneers desperate to escape. Upon arrival in on 16 December 1941, the overcrowded and unseaworthy ship was placed under for over two months, as British officials denied entry visas to in adherence to strict quotas set by the 1939 White Paper, prioritizing Arab political concerns over Jewish needs during . Turkish authorities, maintaining neutrality, permitted no disembarkation and ultimately complied with British pressure by towing the Struma beyond on 23 1942, leaving it adrift without engine or provisions. The following morning, Soviet Shch-213, patrolling against Axis vessels, fired torpedoes that struck the defenseless ship, causing it to sink rapidly with the loss of 766 lives, including over 100 children; the sole survivor, 19-year-old David Stoliar, clung to wreckage until rescued by a Turkish vessel. This catastrophe, the deadliest involving Jewish refugees in the Black Sea, underscored the lethal consequences of Allied restrictions and wartime policies that stranded civilians in harm's way, sparking international outrage and protests against British Mandate governance while exemplifying the broader systemic barriers to Jewish escape from . The event's causal chain—from Romanian driving flight, to bureaucratic refusals prolonging vulnerability, to inadvertent Soviet aggression—highlighted how state priorities overrode humanitarian imperatives, contributing to the Holocaust's toll beyond extermination camps.

Historical Context

Jewish Persecution and Flight from Romania

Romania's Jewish population stood at approximately 728,000 persons according to the 1930 , representing about 4 percent of the country's total inhabitants. Following Ion Antonescu's seizure of power in September 1940 and 's alignment with the , the regime implemented discriminatory policies including citizenship revocation, property confiscation, and forced labor, exacerbating longstanding and creating conditions of acute vulnerability for . These measures, rooted in Antonescu's ideology of ethnic purification, directly contributed to widespread violence and mass flight attempts as anticipated systematic extermination akin to that unfolding in Axis-occupied territories. Pogroms orchestrated or tolerated by the regime marked early escalations of terror, most notably the Iași pogrom from June 26 to 28, 1941, where Romanian military, police, and civilians massacred Jews in the city, followed by "death trains" that suffocated thousands more en route. Official estimates from postwar investigations placed the toll at over 13,000 killed in Iași alone, with Antonescu's prior directives on June 19 evidencing state complicity in anti-Jewish preparations. Such events, combined with rural expulsions and urban restrictions, displaced tens of thousands and signaled to Romanian Jews the regime's intent for their elimination, prompting desperate evasion of further pogroms reported in Bessarabia and northern Bukovina. From October 1941 onward, Antonescu authorized deportations of from annexed regions to , the occupied zone between the and rivers, targeting those deemed threats to . Approximately 150,000 from and northern were transported in inhumane conditions, with mortality rates soaring due to exposure, starvation, and executions upon arrival; by 1942, ghettos and camps in held over 100,000 deportees under Romanian administration, where epidemics and arbitrary killings claimed additional tens of thousands. These actions, independent of direct German oversight yet paralleling Nazi extermination policies, underscored the causal link between state-orchestrated and the surge in illegal escape efforts from Romania's ports. In response to these perils, Jewish communities turned to organized operations—clandestine Zionist initiatives to circumvent immigration barriers and transport refugees by sea to . Groups like the Revisionist Zionists coordinated vessel charters and forged documents, enabling hundreds of Romanian Jews to attempt crossings despite risks of interception; between 1940 and 1942, such networks facilitated departures from ports like , driven by firsthand awareness of pogroms and convoys that had already reduced Jewish numbers through flight or death. This underground mobility reflected a rational of survival amid empirical evidence of regime lethality, with participants prioritizing evasion over uncertain legal channels.

British Immigration Policy Under the Mandate

The League of Nations , confirmed in 1922, tasked Britain with facilitating a Jewish national home as per the while safeguarding the rights of non-Jewish communities and maintaining the territory's economic as a practical limit on . Absent explicit quotas, British policy initially permitted significant Jewish entry—over 250,000 between 1919 and 1931—but Arab pressures, rooted in fears of demographic displacement, increasingly constrained implementation. This framework reflected Britain's dual commitments to Zionist aspirations and Arab self-rule promises from negotiations, though the latter's vagueness allowed administrative discretion amid rising intercommunal tensions. Escalating Arab-Jewish violence, exemplified by the 1929 riots that killed 133 Jews and injured hundreds more in attacks on communities in Hebron, Safed, and Jerusalem, highlighted opposition to immigration as a flashpoint, prompting British commissions to recommend safeguards like land transfer controls. The decisive shift came with the 1936–1939 Arab Revolt, a sustained campaign of strikes, sabotage, and assaults demanding an end to Jewish immigration and land purchases, which inflicted over 5,000 Arab, 400 Jewish, and 200 British deaths and required 20,000 troops for suppression. In response, the 1939 White Paper capped Jewish immigration at 75,000 over five years—divided into an initial 10,000, then 40,000 conditional on economic conditions, and a final 25,000—after which entry would hinge on Arab acquiescence, explicitly citing the revolt's political costs and the need to avert further instability. As unfolded, adherence to these restrictions prioritized stability for British campaigns, including defenses against Axis advances in , where Arab unrest could disrupt vital supply routes like the and oil fields. Unfettered immigration, linked causally to prior outbreaks like the , threatened to bolster Axis appeals to Arab nationalists resentful of Mandate rule, as evidenced by pre-war pro-German sympathies in and elsewhere; thus, policy aimed to neutralize such risks by deferring to Arab consent, subordinating Zionist claims to wartime imperatives.

Turkish Neutrality in World War II

Turkey signed a mutual assistance pact with Britain and France on October 19, 1939, committing to collective defense against foreign aggression in the Mediterranean and Balkans, but invoked its obligations only selectively due to overriding security concerns. Following the German invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939, and subsequent Axis advances, Turkey declared neutrality on September 2, 1939, prioritizing self-preservation amid its limited military capabilities and exposure to multiple fronts. This stance stemmed from pragmatic calculations rather than ideological alignment, as Turkey's armed forces, reorganized under President İsmet İnönü after Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's death in 1938, lacked the strength for prolonged conflict and focused on internal consolidation post-World War I. A primary driver of neutrality was the persistent Soviet threat to Turkish territorial integrity, rooted in historical revanchism over regions lost in the 1877-1878 Russo-Turkish War and reinforced by Joseph Stalin's demands for influence over the Turkish Straits. The Soviet Union, which had signed the 1936 Montreux Convention affirming Turkish control of the Bosphorus and Dardanelles, eyed revisions to secure Black Sea access and bases, especially as Bulgaria and Romania—Turkey's neighbors—aligned with the Axis powers in November 1940 and 1941, respectively, heightening vulnerabilities along the Black Sea coast. Turkey refused Allied requests for air and naval basing rights until mid-1943, when limited concessions were made under pressure, to avoid provoking Axis retaliation or Soviet opportunism that could exploit any perceived weakness. This caution extended to maintaining strict oversight of the Straits, denying full passage to warships from belligerents and thereby insulating the Black Sea from broader naval escalation. In line with its non-entanglement policy, Istanbul served as a controlled transit hub for a limited number of refugees, including approximately 11,469 Jews between 1940 and 1944, who were permitted passage under rigorous visa and quarantine protocols to prevent diplomatic complications or domestic unrest. Turkish authorities enforced these measures to sidestep involvement in extraterritorial disputes, such as those over Jewish immigration to Palestine, balancing humanitarian allowances with geopolitical insulation amid pressures from both Axis and Allied spheres. Neutrality persisted until February 23, 1945, when Turkey declared war on Germany and Japan to meet United Nations membership criteria, by which time Axis defeat was assured.

The Ship and Initial Voyage

Specifications and Condition of MV Struma

The MV Struma was an iron-hulled vessel built in 1867 as a steam-powered schooner yacht, later converted for use as a cattle barge along the Danube River during the 1930s. With a gross tonnage of 240 GRT, the ship measured approximately 45 meters in length, featured a beam of 6 meters, and had a draught of 3 meters. Its single-screw auxiliary diesel engine, installed as a second-hand replacement, was inherently unreliable due to the vessel's age and lack of robust maintenance history, rendering it susceptible to mechanical failure under stress. Designed to carry roughly 75-150 passengers or equivalent cargo like livestock, the Struma possessed no dedicated sanitary facilities, insufficient lifeboats (only two outdated ones), and no life belts suitable for human occupants, compromising basic seaworthiness from first principles of vessel stability and emergency preparedness. Chartered for approximately $1,000 by a group linked to the Jewish Agency, the ship received only minimal pre-voyage modifications, such as basic bunks, prioritizing low cost over structural reinforcements or safety upgrades. Overcrowding exacerbated these deficiencies when 769 to 781 individuals were loaded aboard, yielding a linear density of about 17 persons per meter of hull length and far exceeding safe capacity, which inherently amplified risks of instability, disease transmission, and inadequate evacuation in rough seas. This combination of obsolescent design, cost-driven neglect, and excessive loading formed a causal chain predisposing the vessel to operational hazards, independent of external events.

Passenger Composition and Organization

The passengers aboard the MV Struma comprised 769 Jewish refugees, primarily from Romania, who had endured or escaped the massacres targeting Jews in Bessarabia and Bukovina following Romania's alignment with the Axis powers. Many hailed from these northern regions, where Romanian forces and German allies had conducted systematic killings since mid-1941, prompting families, professionals, and others to seek independent escape routes amid blocked legal emigration. The demographic included approximately 101 children, emphasizing the inclusion of vulnerable dependents in this act of self-rescue. This group was assembled via Revisionist Zionist organizations, notably the New Zionist Organization and Betar youth movement, which facilitated the chartering of the vessel for clandestine operations bypassing British Mandate quotas. Refugees paid steep sums—up to $1,000 per head, a prohibitive amount reflecting wartime economic desperation—for tickets advertised as a direct path to Palestine via Turkey, underscoring their preference for high-risk private initiatives over dependence on indifferent state mechanisms. Command was under Captain Grigor Timofei Garabatenko, a Bulgarian officer, supported by a crew of 10 that included non-Jews and at least one Jewish member, Vice-Captain Lazar Dikoff, with no armed personnel aboard to affirm the expedition's non-combatant status.

Departure and Journey to Istanbul

The MV Struma departed from the , on December 12, 1941, carrying approximately 767 Jewish refugees and 10 crew members seeking to reach Palestine via Istanbul. On the day of departure, the ship's diesel engine failed, necessitating a tug to tow it out of port. The vessel's journey across the Black Sea to Istanbul spanned four days, marked by repeated engine malfunctions that required temporary repairs at sea. Despite these mechanical issues and the ship's inherent unseaworthiness as a converted cattle barge, no fatal accidents occurred during the transit. The Struma arrived at the mouth of the Bosphorus on December 16, 1941, where it was assisted by a tug into Turkish waters and anchored offshore due to its dilapidated condition. Overcrowding exacerbated the voyage's hardships, with passengers lacking adequate food, water, and sanitary facilities, heightening risks of illness such as dysentery amid the confined quarters. Romanian authorities, aligned with the Axis powers, permitted the sailing as part of limited emigration efforts organized by Zionist groups, though under stringent conditions reflecting wartime restrictions.

Detention and Stalemate

Arrival and Initial Handling in Istanbul

The MV Struma reached Istanbul on 15 December 1941, after its engine failed en route from Romania and it was towed into the harbor by a Turkish tugboat. Turkish authorities immediately anchored the vessel in a designated rea off the coast, refusing to allow the approximately 769 Jewish passengers and crew to disembark due to the absence of entry visas or confirmed onward transit arrangements. In adherence to Turkey's policy of strict neutrality amid World War II, maritime officials conditioned any landing on British approval for the refugees' destination of , as the passengers held no immigration certificates issued by the Mandate authorities. The British Embassy in Ankara was promptly notified, reiterating the requirement for Palestine entry permits, which deferred resolution to London. Initial assessments by Turkish inspectors highlighted the ship's dilapidated state as a cattle ferry repurposed for passengers, but no immediate repairs or offloading were authorized pending diplomatic clearance. During the first weeks, provisions were scarce, with limited supplies ferried from shore only after initial stocks depleted around 10 days post-arrival, primarily through interventions by the local Jewish community rather than systematic government aid. Passengers dispatched urgent telegrams to the Jewish Agency in Palestine appealing for intervention, though Turkish officials maintained the quarantine protocol, prioritizing national security and avoidance of entanglement in Allied-Axis refugee flows. This procedural stance reflected Turkey's broader wartime caution against harboring undocumented migrants that could provoke reprisals or compromise its neutral status.

Onboard Conditions and Passenger Suffering

The MV Struma, a 240-ton cattle ferry designed to carry no more than 100-200 passengers, was severely overcrowded with approximately 769 Jewish refugees during its two-month detention in Istanbul harbor from mid-December 1941 to February 1942, resulting in cramped conditions that exacerbated physical and health hardships. Cabins were described as freezing and fetid, with insufficient sleeping spaces for nearly 800 people, forcing many to endure constant exposure to winter cold, icy winds, and dampness without adequate shelter or heating. Sanitation was critically inadequate, with only one functional toilet available for the entire group, leading to widespread filth and poor hygiene that facilitated the spread of infections. Daily routines were marked by severe shortages and enforced immobility, as Turkish authorities prohibited disembarkation and confined passengers to the quarantined vessel anchored off . Food and water supplies ran perilously low, delivered sporadically via small lighters or obtained through bribery of local officials, often insufficient to prevent hunger and dehydration amid the stasis. Passengers, lacking engine power or permission to move, spent weeks in limbo, with the psychological strain of uncertainty compounding physical deprivations; fevers became rife due to the combination of overcrowding, exposure, and malnutrition, contributing to a gradual decline in health. This prolonged immobility directly linked to supply disruptions and environmental exposure precipitated onboard deterioration, with reports of illness and exhaustion underscoring the causal role of the harbor detention in passenger suffering prior to expulsion.

Diplomatic Negotiations and Standoff

Upon arrival in Istanbul on December 16, 1941, Turkish authorities anchored the Struma in the harbor and prohibited passengers from disembarking, stipulating that Britain must approve their onward travel to . Britain refused, enforcing the 1939 White Paper's immigration quota of 75,000 Jews over five years, designed to avert Arab unrest amid wartime priorities, and deeming the refugees from Axis-aligned Romania as potential security risks. The Jewish Agency for Palestine lobbied Turkish and British officials in January and February 1942 for refugee admission, floating proposals to send approximately 70 children (aged 11-16) to Palestine using unused quota certificates or to relocate adults to the British colony of Mauritius, but passengers rejected non-Palestine destinations, and British concessions remained unfulfilled and delayed. Turkey, maintaining neutrality amid Axis pressures, pursued alternatives such as a U.S.-backed transit for 300,000 Romanian Jews (declined due to logistical and British constraints) or repatriation to Romania (refused by Romanian authorities), while rejecting Jewish organizations' offer to fund a temporary onshore camp. The standoff persisted for 71 days, with minimal provisions reaching the ship despite aid efforts by local Jewish groups, as Britain urged Turkey to repel the vessel to deter further illegal voyages and Turkey balanced Allied relations against regional instability. On February 23, 1942, following negotiation failures, Turkish police boarded the resisting vessel and towed it seaward into the Black Sea without fuel, food, or water, effectively ending the diplomatic impasse.

Expulsion and Sinking

Turkish Decision to Tow to Sea

On February 23, 1942, Turkish authorities, seeking to resolve the prolonged standoff over the MV Struma, deployed approximately 80 police officers to board the vessel anchored in Istanbul harbor. The officers encountered resistance from the passengers, who scuffled with them and displayed protest signs reading "SOS," "Save Us," and "Jewish Immigrants" along the railings, but ultimately the anchor chain was cut, allowing the military tugboat Aldemar to tow the ship through the Bosporus Strait into the Black Sea. The towing took about five hours, navigating the strait’s 12 natural bends, after which the Struma—still without a functioning engine, fuel, or additional provisions—was cast adrift beyond Turkish territorial waters, approximately 10 miles offshore. The decision stemmed from Turkey’s efforts to uphold its declared neutrality in World War II amid mounting diplomatic pressures. With no resolution from British authorities on granting transit visas to Palestine or from Romanian officials on accepting the refugees’ return, Turkish leaders, including President İsmet İnönü, Prime Minister Refik Saydam, and Foreign Minister Şükrü Saraçoğlu, determined that allowing the passengers to disembark would set a precedent for unrestricted refugee landings, potentially overwhelming Turkish resources and compromising neutrality under the Montreux Straits Convention. By towing the vessel seaward, authorities aimed to extricate Turkey from the impasse without formally endorsing either Allied or Axis demands, prioritizing national security and avoidance of entanglement in the broader conflict over humanitarian disembarkation. Passenger protests continued during the operation but did not escalate to widespread violence, leaving the ship adrift by evening with its occupants facing immediate peril from the lack of propulsion.

The Torpedoing Incident

On the morning of 24 February 1942, the Soviet Shch-213, patrolling the Black Sea amid operations targeting Axis-aligned shipping, detected the adrift MV Struma approximately 15 kilometers east of the Bosphorus. The submarine's combat log recorded the encounter as an "unprotected enemy vessel," prompting Captain-Lieutenant I. A. Denezhko to order a torpedo attack without further identification efforts, consistent with the fog-of-war conditions in the theater. At around 0400 hours local time, Shch-213 fired a single torpedo from a distance of 1,118 meters, which struck the Struma amidships, detonating with devastating force. The impact tore through the overcrowded, unseaworthy hull, causing an instantaneous structural failure and plunge to the seabed in roughly 75 meters of water. The rapidity of the sinking—completing within minutes—prevented any post-impact distress signals from the vessel.

Immediate Loss of Life and Sole Survivor

The torpedoing resulted in the deaths of 781 Jewish refugees and 10 crew members aboard the Struma, primarily from drowning and hypothermia in the frigid Black Sea, with no other survivors beyond those previously disembarked in Istanbul. Passenger manifests compiled from six historical records—including Constanța port police lists (765 names), American consular documents (768 names), and Romanian immigration rolls (767 names)—yield a verified total of 781 unique individuals present at the sinking, accounting for duplicates, surname variations, and minor discrepancies across sources. David Stoliar, a 19-year-old Romanian Jewish passenger, was the sole survivor, having gripped wreckage amid the post-explosion debris until rescued after roughly 24 hours adrift. In his testimony, Stoliar described the torpedo strike's sudden violence leaving him isolated in the water, where he endured oil-slicked conditions and extreme cold, eventually grasping his solitude as others succumbed rapidly. He initially rejected portrayals of himself as a hero, emphasizing the collective tragedy over personal endurance.

Aftermath and Investigations

Rescue Efforts and Confirmation of Sinking

Following the explosion that sank the Struma at approximately 2:00 a.m. on February 24, 1942, Turkish authorities initiated a search in the near the Istanbul coast. However, rescue operations were limited by wartime constraints and rough weather conditions, with a full-scale effort delayed by about 24 hours. A small team of six Turkish coast guardsmen from the Şile lighthouse station conducted a patrol in a rowboat and located debris from the wreck, including wreckage to which passengers had clung. Amid the debris, 19-year-old David Stoliar was found alive after approximately 12 hours in the freezing waters, having been hurled overboard by the blast and gripped a piece of deck planking overnight. The Turkish rescuers pulled him from the sea on February 25, 1942; he was the sole survivor among the 791 passengers and crew, with the ship's first officer having perished from exposure during the night. Stoliar later recounted hearing a torpedo strike before the explosion, but initial Turkish and British assessments dismissed this in favor of non-hostile causes. No systematic recovery of bodies or additional debris was feasible due to the stormy seas, strong currents, and the remote location roughly 10 miles offshore. Contemporary reports attributed the sinking to an internal boiler explosion, a collision, or a stray mine, reflecting the inconclusive nature of wartime probes amid Black Sea naval activity. Definitive confirmation that a Soviet torpedo had caused the sinking emerged only after the war, through declassified Soviet submarine logs and operational records revealing aggressive patrols against neutral vessels in the region. British and Turkish investigations remained inconclusive during the conflict, hampered by secrecy and lack of access to Axis or Soviet archives.

Wartime Responses from Involved Parties

The Turkish government maintained official silence regarding the Struma's sinking on February 24, 1942, to preserve its neutrality and avoid antagonizing the Soviet Union amid wartime tensions in the Black Sea region. Turkish authorities focused instead on the sole survivor, David Stoliar, whom they interrogated intensively on February 25 and 26 while he was in critical condition from exposure and injuries; he fainted during questioning and required hospitalization before being deported to without further public disclosure of the incident's details. British officials recorded the sinking in internal communications shortly after February 24, 1942, expressing private relief that the refugee impasse had ended tragically but without altering their firm stance against allowing the passengers entry to Palestine, as reaffirmed in Foreign Office assessments prioritizing wartime immigration controls. No public admission of British diplomatic pressure on Turkey to tow the vessel seaward was made contemporaneously, with responses in Parliament on February 26, 1942, defending the policy of denial without addressing the loss of life directly. Soviet authorities issued no immediate statements claiming responsibility for the torpedoing, consistent with operational secrecy during the German advance in the region; Black Sea Fleet records from the Shch-213 submarine, declassified later, logged the February 24 attack as a standard engagement against a suspected enemy target in , without identifying the Struma or acknowledging casualties at the time. This classification reflected broader Soviet naval doctrine treating unidentified shipping as potential Axis threats, minimizing any wartime scrutiny of the incident.

Post-War Inquiries into Causes

Following the war, declassified British Foreign Office documents from the 1940s, released in subsequent decades, underscored the enforcement of strict immigration quotas under the 1939 White Paper on Palestine, which limited Jewish entry to 75,000 over five years and prioritized legal certificates, contributing to the diplomatic impasse that left the Struma adrift without resolution. These archives detailed communications revealing British pressure on Turkey to deny landing rights, framing the refusal as a measure to deter further illegal voyages amid wartime security concerns over unvetted refugees. Turkish state archives, including Republican Archives Presidency records (e.g., BCA 30.10/171.185.21), post-war examinations confirmed the towing on February 23, 1942, as compliant with neutrality obligations under the 1936 Montreux Convention on the Straits, which prohibited belligerent vessels but allowed neutral enforcement against stateless or unauthorized ships to prevent territorial complications. These documents highlighted Turkey's balancing of humanitarian aid—such as temporary provisioning—with avoidance of precedent-setting refuge that could invite Axis reprisals or strain overcrowded internment camps, positioning the action as a legal expulsion rather than abandonment. In the 1990s, after the Soviet Union's collapse, declassified naval logs disclosed that the Shch-213 submarine's commander reported encountering "an unprotected enemy vessel" on February 24, 1942, and sinking it with a torpedo from 1,118 meters, with no indication of recognition as a refugee craft beyond wartime patrol assumptions of hostility. Soviet commendations for the crew treated the Struma as a legitimate target in the Black Sea theater, aligning with broader patterns of misidentification amid opaque fog and lack of markings, absent evidence of intentional civilian targeting. The disaster constituted the largest single-incident civilian loss in the Black Sea, with 769 fatalities representing roughly 0.3% of the estimated 280,000 Romanian Jewish victims of the Holocaust. These inquiries established baseline causal chains—policy rigidities, neutral enforcement, and operational errors—without resolving apportionment of responsibility.

Responsibilities and Controversies

British Policy and Immigration Restrictions

The British government's 1939 White Paper on Palestine imposed severe restrictions on Jewish immigration, capping legal entries at 75,000 over five years (1939–1944), with subsequent admissions contingent on Arab acquiescence to prevent the Jewish population from exceeding one-third of the total. This framework prioritized strategic imperatives during World War II, including securing Arab cooperation to protect Middle Eastern oil resources, supply routes, and bases from Axis influence, as mass Jewish influxes risked reigniting Arab revolts akin to the 1936–1939 uprising. Empirical assessments by British officials weighed that unrestricted immigration could alienate Arab leaders, potentially enabling German or Italian advances through sympathetic populations, thereby outweighing humanitarian appeals amid existential wartime threats to the Empire. In the Struma's case, arriving in Istanbul on December 15, 1941, with 781 Jewish refugees aboard, British authorities in Palestine and London categorically denied landing permissions, classifying the voyage as illegal under the White Paper despite available quota slots and the absence of verified security risks among passengers. Alternatives such as temporary relocation to Mauritius—a British colony—were rejected for Struma's group due to proven logistical strains; prior efforts in 1940 to intern 1,580 intercepted illegal immigrants there exposed capacity limits (initially planned for 4,000 but scaled back), inadequate facilities, and high escape or unrest risks, rendering mass deterrence unfeasible without diverting scarce wartime shipping and resources. Zionist critics, including the Jewish Agency, decried the policy's rigidity as morally culpable, asserting it systematically blocked viable escape routes and contributed to refugee deaths by forcing reliance on unseaworthy vessels. British defenders countered with data showing roughly 51,000 legal Jewish entries succeeded under the quota by 1944, arguing that endorsing illegal sailings incentivized profiteering smugglers, heightened interception perils (as with Struma's engine ), and undermined quota without yielding net gains in refugee safety. The policy's causal calculus favored verifiable war advantages—sustained Arab quiescence enabling Allied operations—over probabilistic humanitarian relief, as illegal routes empirically correlated with higher fatalities from sinkings or returns to peril. The Struma's expulsion and February 24, 1942, sinking elicited protests in Palestine and the United States but elicited no policy reversal; quotas persisted unrelaxed through 1945, with British focus remaining on intercepting subsequent illegal convoys to avert escalatory precedents that could jeopardize regional stability. This steadfastness underscored the prioritization of geopolitical containment over reactive adjustments, even as the event highlighted tensions between imperial defense and refugee imperatives.

Turkish Governmental Actions and Neutrality Constraints

Turkey detained the MV Struma upon its arrival in Istanbul on December 15, 1941, after the ship's engine failed shortly after departing Romania, invoking provisions of the 1936 , which regulated maritime passage through the and while permitting Turkey to enforce neutrality by denying transit to vessels lacking valid documentation or posing security risks, such as unauthorized refugee transports. Turkish authorities initiated engine repairs and offered medical assistance to passengers, allowing nine individuals to disembark for health reasons and permitting 70 children to proceed to , but refused general landing rights absent British approval for onward travel, as diplomatic communications with the British Embassy on December 20, 1941, highlighted the impasse over Palestine immigration quotas. On February 23, 1942, after 71 days of stalemate, Turkish police towed the still-inoperable vessel into the , a decision framed as pragmatic enforcement of neutrality rather than abandonment, aimed at compelling return to Romania or resolution without establishing a precedent for mass refugee disembarkation that could invite Allied or Axis reprisals amid escalating wartime pressures, including Soviet advances and demands on access. Limited provisions were extended indirectly, with authorities permitting Istanbul's Jewish community to deliver food and water after initial shortages, averting immediate starvation while adhering to constraints against full harbor support that might signal endorsement of illegal migration. This reflected broader neutrality imperatives under President İsmet İnönü's government, which balanced supplies to both Axis and Allies to deter invasion, as Soviet threats in 1942—coupled with Germany's Caucasus campaign—heightened risks of Straits militarization violations under . Critics have labeled the towing harsh, yet archival diplomatic exchanges, including Turkish public appeals to Britain on February 10, 1942, underscore efforts to resolve the crisis multilaterally rather than malice, prioritizing over humanitarian exceptions in a context where unrestricted landings could precipitate refugee floods from Axis-occupied Romania. Turkey's transit visa policies, formalized in a 1940 law, facilitated safe passage for thousands of European Jews through its territory to neutral destinations or , enabling broader rescues during the war despite the Struma's tragedy, as neutrality shielded its own and allowed indirect aid via overland routes.

Soviet Military Operations and Torpedo Attack

The Soviet Shchuka-class submarine Shch-213, operating in the as part of the Soviet 's efforts to interdict Axis supply convoys supporting German advances in the region, conducted patrols targeting enemy and auxiliary vessels during early 1942. These operations occurred amid intensified submarine warfare, with Soviet forces under pressure to disrupt Romanian and Bulgarian shipping routes amid the fleet's defensive posture following Axis territorial gains. On February 23, 1942, Shch-213, commanded by Captain-Lieutenant D. M. Denezhko, first engaged the Turkish schooner Çankaya (464 GRT), shelling and torpedoing it off the Bosporus while it returned from Bulgarian waters, reflecting the submarine's aggressive posture toward perceived neutral facilitators of Axis logistics. Early on February 24, 1942, approximately two hours after the Çankaya engagement, Shch-213 detected the adrift Struma—a small, immobilized cattle ferry lacking visible flags or markings due to its derelict state—and misidentified it as an unprotected enemy merchant vessel, possibly Bulgarian-flagged despite its Panamanian registry. Soviet operational logs recorded the target as the "Struma," an "unprotected enemy vessel," and authorized a torpedo strike without further reconnaissance, launching a single 533 mm torpedo from a distance of 1,118 meters that struck effectively, causing the ship to sink within two minutes due to its structural vulnerabilities and lack of watertight integrity. This tactic aligned with standard Soviet submarine doctrine for quick, low-risk engagements in contested waters, prioritizing speed over verification amid frequent Axis convoy transits. The incident's logs depict the attack as a routine success warranting commendation from Soviet naval command, yet the misidentification underscores reconnaissance shortcomings in an operational environment dense with patrol demands and visibility constraints, where adrift neutrals posed ambiguous threats without clear identification protocols. While some analyses suggest possible rationalization of the target as complicit in Axis supply chains via Turkish neutrality, primary records indicate no deliberate intent beyond error-prone targeting, as the submarine's high-tempo patrols—four major outings in 1942—limited opportunities for detailed assessment, contributing to the fog of war without mitigating the recklessness of unverified strikes. Shch-213 continued operations until its unrelated loss on October 14, 1942, likely to Romanian mines or German auxiliary chaser UJ-116/Xanten off Tulcea, Romania.

Wrecks and Archaeological Findings

Discovery and State of Struma Wreck

In July 2000, a Turkish diving team announced the discovery of a wreck believed to be the Struma on the Black Sea floor off the coast near Istanbul, at a depth of approximately 75 to 80 meters. An international expedition followed in August 2000 to survey potential sites, diving to depths of up to 77 meters over nine days, though challenging conditions prevented conclusive confirmation of the identity. The reported wreck lies upright with its hull largely intact, as evidenced by sonar scans and underwater photography revealing a torpedo entry hole consistent with the 1942 sinking. Limited artifacts, including passenger personal items and possibly the ship's nameplate, have been documented in situ, providing evidentiary value for historical verification, but none have been salvaged. No human remains have been recovered, underscoring the site's status as a war grave containing the remains of nearly 800 victims. Exploration is constrained by the 75-meter depth requiring technical diving expertise and the Black Sea's strong currents and low visibility, which complicate sustained operations. Turkish authorities designated the site for 01 to safeguard its integrity against looting or unauthorized disturbance, limiting further access to preserve its archaeological and commemorative significance.

Fate and Wreck of Shch-213 Submarine

Following the sinking of Struma on 24 February 1942, Shch-213 continued patrol operations in the Black Sea as part of the Soviet Black Sea Fleet's efforts against Axis shipping and naval forces. The submarine, a Shchuka-class (Series X) diesel-electric vessel commissioned in 1938, undertook multiple sorties amid intensified wartime activity, including engagements with Romanian and German assets. Shch-213 was lost with all hands during its sixth war patrol, with the most probable sinking date of 14 October 1942 near Tulcea, Romania, in approximate coordinates 44°17.340'N, 28°xx'E. The cause is attributed to either a mine explosion—likely from Romanian-laid defensive fields—or depth-charge attack by the German auxiliary submarine chaser UJ-116 (Xanten), which reported an inconclusive engagement with a submerged contact in the area; approximately 50 crew members perished, with no survivors recovered. This loss underscored the hazardous minefields and anti-submarine measures deployed by Axis powers in the western Black Sea, contributing to the high attrition rate among Soviet submarines during the 1942 campaign. The wreck of Shch-213 rests upright on a sandy seabed at a depth of 31 meters, listing approximately 30 degrees to starboard, with evident blast damage from the presumed mine detonation compromising structural integrity forward of the conning tower while leaving much of the hull otherwise intact. First explored by technical divers in the 2010s, the site reveals a 58-meter-long vessel with its propellers and stern largely preserved, though periscope masts and deck fittings show corrosion and wartime wear; torpedo tubes were found empty, consistent with operational expenditure during patrols. These findings affirm the submarine's active role in Black Sea contestation post-February 1942 but provide no material evidence linking its final missions to deliberate civilian targeting beyond routine interdiction protocols.

Legacy

Impact on Jewish Refugee Efforts

The sinking of the Struma on February 24, 1942, which claimed 768 Jewish lives, initially prompted heightened caution among organizers of Aliyah Bet, the clandestine maritime immigration network, due to the evident perils of overcrowded, unseaworthy vessels navigating hostile waters. However, it did not deter subsequent efforts, as the escalating Nazi extermination campaign—formalized at the Wannsee Conference on January 20, 1942—intensified the desperation to flee Europe, overriding maritime risks for remaining Jewish communities in Romania and beyond. By the end of 1942, seven additional Aliyah Bet transports had departed Romanian ports, carrying hundreds more refugees despite the recent catastrophe, demonstrating operational resilience amid wartime constraints. Between 1942 and 1944, Aliyah Bet saw continued sea voyages attempting to transport thousands of Jews to , with estimates indicating around 10,000 individuals undertaking such high-risk escapes from Axis-occupied territories, even as British naval interceptions and Allied blockades persisted. These endeavors reflected a calculated persistence, where the Struma loss underscored logistical vulnerabilities but failed to halt operations, as Zionist groups like the adapted by sourcing alternative vessels and routes, often under Romanian fascist oversight. The tragedy's visibility fueled internal resolve, contributing to the post-war momentum of voyages like the in 1947, which drew global attention to Mandate-era restrictions. In the long term, the Struma disaster exposed the inadequacies of British immigration quotas under the 1939 White Paper, which capped Jewish entry at 75,000 over five years amid rising genocide, thereby strengthening the Zionist argument for sovereign control over Palestine to facilitate unrestricted rescue and settlement. Across the full scope of Aliyah Bet from 1934 to 1948, approximately 2,000 participants perished out of tens of thousands who attempted ding an overall ughly 5%, a figure that highlights the relative success of the enterprise despite isolated horrors like Struma, as survival imperatives and organizational learning mitigated broader cessation. This persistence affirmed that policy-induced barriers, rather than inherent infeasibility, drove fatalities, bolstering post-war advocacy for statehood as a causal remedy to Mandate failures.

Commemorations and Historical Reassessments

Memorials to the Struma victims include monuments in Holon and Ashdod, Israel, erected to honor the 768 Jewish refugees who perished. In Romania, a monument in Bucharest was established at the initiative of survivor Max Ludvik, who lost two sons in the disaster. Annual commemorative services occur in Istanbul, such as the 80th anniversary event on February 24, 2022, at Sarayburnu Point, where participants gathered to remember the tragedy. In a landmark acknowledgment, the Turkish government hosted its first official state commemoration on February 25, 2015, at Sarayburnu Sepetçiler Kasrı in Istanbul, attended by officials and Jewish community leaders to mourn the victims without assigning singular blame, emphasizing shared wartime isolation. Romania marked its first national commemoration in 2022, honoring the estimated 779 Jews killed, reflecting delayed official recognition of the event's scale. Historical reassessments, such as in the 2003 book Death on the Black Sea by Douglas Frantz and Catherine Collins, apportion responsibility multilaterally across Jewish emigration organizers who chartered the unseaworthy vessel, British immigration restrictions prioritizing imperial security, Turkish neutrality amid Axis pressures, and Soviet military actions, countering narratives of isolated malice with evidence of interconnected wartime realpolitik and refugee desperation driving high-risk voyages. These analyses underscore empirical causal chains, including the Struma's conversion from cattle transport without adequate safety modifications, rather than attributing the disaster solely to external hostility. The sole survivor, David Stoliar, whose 19-year-old account of clinging to wreckage for over 24 hours before rescue humanizes the passengers' plight, rarely spoke publicly but contributed to post-war testimonies; he died on May 1, 2014, in , at age 91, with his passing receiving limited contemporary notice until a 2016 obituary revived awareness of his role in preserving firsthand details. Reassessments incorporating Stoliar's experiences challenge one-sided victimhood by noting the self-organized nature of the voyage, undertaken despite warnings of the ship's condition, as part of broader illegal migration efforts amid Holocaust escalation.

References

  1. https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/voyage-of-the-struma
  2. https://www.yadvashem.org/exhibitions/struma/overview.html
  3. https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/romania
  4. http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/947/the-holocaust-in-romania-the-extermination-and-protection-of-the-jews-under-antonescus-regime
  5. https://www.ushmm.org/m/pdfs/20080226-romania-commission-executive-summary.pdf
  6. https://www.yadvashem.org/holocaust/this-month/june/1941-3.html
  7. https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/transnistria-governorate
  8. https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/aliyah-bet
  9. https://www.nli.org.il/en/discover/israel/zionism/zionism-history/haapala
  10. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/aliyah-bet-1939-1948
  11. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/palmanda.asp
  12. https://www.un.org/unispal/history2/origins-and-evolution-of-the-palestine-problem/part-i-1917-1947/
  13. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/brwh1939.asp
  14. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19448953.2021.1987764
  15. https://belleten.gov.tr/eng/full-text/3131/eng
  16. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19448953.2021.1935082
  17. https://academic.oup.com/dh/article/47/4/621/7223457
  18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4283302
  19. https://1997-2001.state.gov/regions/eur/rpt_9806_ng_turkey.pdf
  20. https://resistances.religacion.com/index.php/about/article/download/132/221/435
  21. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-perspectives-on-turkey/article/christians-muslims-and-jews-turkey-and-the-management-of-refugees-from-greece-during-world-war-ii/450D45932FE50C73E1252DCD24AD4F43
  22. https://www.historynet.com/turkey-wwii-neutrality/
  23. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/surviving-black-sea-appreciation-david-stoliar-sole-survivor-1942-struma-disaster
  24. https://aish.com/death-at-sea-the-tragedy-of-the-struma/
  25. https://www.oldsaltblog.com/2023/02/remembering-the-mv-struma-disaster-almost-800-jewish-refugees-lost-81-years-ago-today/
  26. https://www.jhi.pl/en/articles/the-struma-tragedy%2C292
  27. https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/interview-with-lone-survivor-of-torpedoed-jewish-refugee-ship-struma-a-901490.html
  28. https://wwv.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/Microsoft%2520Word%2520-%25206052.pdf
  29. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-irgun-rsquo-s-role-in-illegal-immigration
  30. https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-sole-survivor-of-the-struma/
  31. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/237879255/grigor-timofei-garabatenko
  32. https://www.academia.edu/71184834/SIX_SUNKEN_VESSELS_in_JEWISH_HISTORY_1940_1944_by_MEIR_Halevi_GOVER
  33. https://www.israeled.org/ss-struma/
  34. https://plural.upsc.md/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/04_Articol_IRIMIA_75-107-pag.pdf
  35. https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2004/february/doomed-start
  36. http://turkishjews.com/struma/
  37. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4105822
  38. https://uboat.net/allies/warships/ship/5044.html
  39. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/24/world/middleeast/david-stoliar-survivor-of-world-war-ii-disaster-dies-at-91.html
  40. https://www.jewishgen.org/databases/holocaust/0140_Struma.html
  41. https://www.yadvashem.org/exhibitions/struma/david-stoliar.html
  42. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/remembering-david-stoliar-the-only-survivor-of-1942-struma-disaster
  43. https://jewishjournal.com/culture/arts/5504/
  44. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1942/feb/26/sinking-of-the-struma
  45. https://israeled.org/ss-struma/
  46. https://en.jabotinsky.org/archive/catalog-of-files/?section=%25D7%2591&arc=562&itemId=138466
  47. https://iupress.istanbul.edu.tr/journal/jps/article/the-struma-incident-refugees-wartime-diplomacy-and-turkiyes-neutral-struggle?id=1513020
  48. https://oldsaltbooks.wordpress.com/2013/04/12/the-shch-213-submarine-encountered-on-the-morning-of-24-2-1942-an-unprotected-enemy-vessel-struma-the-ship-was-successfully-torpedoed-from-a-distance-of-1118-meters-and-sunk-junior-officer/
  49. https://jweekly.com/2003/10/10/documentary-offers-gripping-look-at-fate-of-jewish-refugee-ship/
  50. https://www.yadvashem.org/holocaust/about/final-solution-beginning/romania.html
  51. https://www.facebook.com/bnaibrithinternational/posts/more-than-280000-romanian-jews-were-murdered-during-the-holocaust-under-the-anto/1105398001622998/
  52. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/british-restrictions-on-jewish-immigration-to-palestine
  53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4283956
  54. https://www.quest-cdecjournal.it/holocaust-and-the-indian-ocean-jewish-detention-in-mauritius-1940-1945/
  55. https://www.nytimes.com/1942/03/13/archives/the-struma-disaster.html
  56. https://www.amazon.com/Turkey-Holocaust-Rescuing-Persecution-1933-1945/dp/0333582349
  57. https://www.blackseawrecks.ro/wiki/wrecks/sc213
  58. https://ahoy.tk-jk.net/macslog/SinkingoftheStruma.html
  59. https://uboat.net/allies/warships/class.html?ID=213&navy=USSR
  60. http://www.scubadiving.com/wreck-diving-russia-WWII-advanced
  61. https://academic.oup.com/book/47368/chapter/422542472
  62. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/server/api/core/bitstreams/a0578b88-b06b-4e87-9188-64214858ec32/content
  63. https://www.salom.com.tr/salomTurkey/haber/121397/victims-of-the-struma-disaster-commemorated-on-80th-anniversary
  64. https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/turkish-government-commemorates-jews-killed-in-1942-struma-tragedy-392217
  65. https://bianet.org/haber/turkey-s-first-official-struma-disaster-commemoration-162583
  66. https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-1st-time-romania-commemorates-holocaust-refugees-who-died-when-ship-torpedoed/
  67. https://www.amazon.com/Death-Black-Sea-Untold-Holocaust/dp/0066212626
  68. https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/death-on-the-black-sea-douglas-frantz/1100609442
  69. https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/oral-history/david-stoliar-describes-how-he-survived-the-sinking-of-the-struma
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.