Hubbry Logo
Speech from the throneSpeech from the throneMain
Open search
Speech from the throne
Community hub
Speech from the throne
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Speech from the throne
Speech from the throne
Speech from the throne
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

King Charles III reading the speech from the throne at the 2024 State Opening of Parliament in the United Kingdom

A speech from the throne, or throne speech, is an event in certain monarchies in which the reigning sovereign, or their representative, reads a prepared speech to members of the nation's legislature when a session is opened. The address sets forth the government's priorities for its legislative agenda, for which the cooperation of the legislature is sought. The speech is often accompanied by formal ceremony. It is often held annually, although in some places it may occur more or less frequently, whenever a new session of the legislature is opened.

Historically, when monarchs exercised personal influence and overall decision-making in government, a speech from the throne would outline the policies and objectives of the monarch; the speech was usually prepared by the monarch's advisers, but the monarch supervised the drafting of the speech at least to some extent and exercised final discretion as to its content. In modern constitutional monarchies, whether by law or by convention, the head of state or their representative reads the speech from the throne, but it is prepared by the ministers in cabinet. The event continues to be practiced in the Commonwealth realms, where it is also known as the King's Speech (or Queen's Speech if the reigning monarch is female) in the United Kingdom.[1] In the Netherlands, it is held on Prince's Day.[2]

In addition to monarchies, many republics have adopted a similar practice in which the head of state, often a president, addresses the legislature. In parliamentary republics where the president is merely a ceremonial figurehead, these speeches are often similar in tone to the throne speech of a constitutional monarchy, whereas in presidential systems, the speeches are somewhat different in that the president exercises personal discretion over the content but the principle of separation of powers means the legislature is not obligated to follow whatever agenda (if any) may be contained in such a speech.

Commonwealth realms

[edit]

Terminology

[edit]

In the United Kingdom, the speech is known as His Majesty's Most Gracious Speech, the Gracious Address, or, less formally, the King's Speech (or Queen's Speech, when the reigning monarch is female). In Canada, it is known as the Speech from the Throne (often shortened to Throne Speech) (in French: Discours du Trône). Since 1973, the lieutenant governor of Quebec has delivered a short inaugural address termed the Allocution, after which the premier reads his or her Discours d'ouverture (Opening Speech), called the Message inaugural from 1974 to 1984.

In Hong Kong, the governor's address was termed the Policy Address during Chris Patten's governorship. In the Irish Free State, the governor-general delivered the Governor-General's Address to Dáil Éireann; only two were ever given, in 1922 and 1923.

History

[edit]
King Henry VIII at the opening of the Parliament of England at Bridewell Palace, 1523

In the Commonwealth realms, the speech from the throne is an oration that forms part of a ceremony marking the opening of parliament.[3] Some records indicate the ceremony has taken place since the Middle Ages,[4] while others place its origins in the 16th century,[5] when England was still an absolute monarchy.[6] The speech explained to parliament the reasons it was summoned and sometimes set out the sovereign's policies and objectives.[7] The monarch would sometimes speak to parliament in person; Edward III (in 1365), Richard II, and Edward IV did so to both houses of parliament on multiple separate occasions.[7]

However, various other figures gave the oration on the sovereign's behalf: between 1347 and 1363, it was read by the chief justice; in 1401 by the chief justice of the Common Pleas; in 1344, 1368, 1377 (speaking for a presiding Edward III[7]), 1399, and 1422, by the archbishop of Canterbury; and in 1343, 1363, and, usually after 1368, by the lord chancellor[4][8] who was then the prolocutor, or chairman of the House of Lords. It was given on his[clarification needed] behalf by the bishop of Winchester in 1410; in 1453 and 1467, the bishop of Lincoln; the bishop of Rochester in 1472; and the keeper of the Privy Seal in 1431.[8] It may have been written by or with the input of the king's or queen's advisers, but, the monarch, as supreme governor, was the principal author.[citation needed]

Contemporary practice

[edit]
Governor General Dame Cindy Kiro delivers the Speech from the Throne in the former chambers of the Legislative Council, the abolished upper house of New Zealand's Parliament.

Today, within the tenets of constitutional monarchy, the speech is written by the sitting cabinet,[3] with or without the reader's participation,[9] and outlines the legislative programme for the new parliamentary session.[10] Due to the parliamentary tradition of the sovereign being barred from the lower chamber,[9][11] in those realms possessing a bicameral parliament, the ceremony takes place in the legislature's upper chamber,[12] with members of both houses in attendance. In most unicameral parliaments, the speech is read in the one legislative chamber. Unusually, in the Irish Free State, the speech was delivered in the lower house of its bicameral parliament.

In the United Kingdom, the speech is typically read by the reigning sovereign at the State Opening of Parliament. Traditions surrounding the opening and the speech go back to the 16th century. The present ceremony dates from 1852, when the Palace of Westminster was rebuilt after the 1834 fire. The ceremony now usually occurs annually, usually in November or December, or soon after a general election.[13] The monarch may, however, appoint a delegate to perform the task in his or her place. Elizabeth II did this during her pregnancies in 1959 and 1963, when it was delivered instead by the Lord Chancellor; and again due to ill health in 2022, when it was delivered by Prince Charles (now Charles III); he and Prince William were acting as Counsellors of State.[14]

Queen Elizabeth II (left, seated with Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, right) delivers the Speech from the Throne from the Canadian Senate throne, 1957.

In those countries that share with the UK the same person as their respective sovereign, the speech from the throne will usually be read on the monarch's behalf by his or her viceroy, the governor-general, although the monarch may deliver the address in person: Queen Elizabeth II read the Throne Speech in the Parliament of New Zealand in 1954, 1963, 1970, 1974, 1977, 1986, and 1990, the Parliament of Australia in 1954 and 1974,[15] and the Parliament of Canada in 1957 and 1977. Another member of the royal family may also perform this duty, such as when, on 1 September 1919, the Prince of Wales (later King Edward VIII) read the Speech From the Throne in the Canadian parliament. On two occasions, the administrator of the Government delivered the address to the Parliament of Canada: 16 May 1963 and 30 September 1974.[16] Charles III read the speech from the throne in Canada on 27 May 2025.

In the Australian states, the relevant governor reads the speech, though the Australian monarch may also perform the task: Queen Elizabeth II opened the parliaments of some of the Australian states in 1954 and of New South Wales in 1992. In almost all the Canadian provinces, the relevant lieutenant governor delivers the speech; it is uncertain whether the Canadian monarch can do the same in any legislature of a Canadian province. In Quebec, however, the speech is referred to as the "Opening Address" (French: Allocution d'ouverture).[17] In each of the Canadian territories, the commissioner reads the Throne Speech or Opening Address to the legislature.

Brenda Murphy delivers the throne speech as the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick, the monarch's representative in that province.

In British overseas territories that have instituted this practice, the relevant governor delivers the speech. A throne speech is not typical in the devolved legislatures within the United Kingdom; the nearest equivalent is a statement of the legislative agenda of the executive branch, usually given by a first minister.[18] However, the British monarch often undertakes visits and speaks to the devolved bodies in a less official capacity. During her reign Queen Elizabeth II was present and gave an address at all openings of the Scottish parliament, usually speaking reflectively upon its accomplishments and wishing the institution well for its coming term rather than considering the plans of the executive.

It is considered improper for the audience, including members of parliament, to show support or disapproval for any content of the speech while it is being read: that is reserved to the debate and vote that follows in legislative chambers or chamber.[19] In 1998 in the UK, when the Queen read out the proposed House of Lords Act 1999, Labour Party MPs briefly interrupted it by vocalising support while Conservative peers responded with "shame!".[20] Protest, though, has been expressed during a throne speech, such as when, in 2011, Brigette DePape, a page in the Canadian Senate, interrupted Governor General David Johnston's reading of the Speech From the Throne by standing and holding a sign calling for the then Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, to be stopped.[21]

Address in reply

[edit]
New Zealand's Leader of the Opposition, Chris Hipkins, speaks during the Address in Reply debate.

Formally, the motion that follows the speech merely calls on parliament to thank the monarch or viceroy via an Address in Reply. The debate is, however, often wide-ranging, exploring many aspects of the government's proposed policies, and spread over several days. When the Address in Reply is eventually voted on, the vote, if an amendment expressing lack of confidence in the monarch or viceroy's ministers is moved and carried, is held to constitute a Motion of no confidence in the government, resulting in the end of that government's mandate.[22] In some legislatures, this discussion and vote is preceded by a symbolic raising of other matters, designed to highlight the independence of parliament from the Crown; a practice that originated after King Charles I was tried and executed by parliament.[23] In the British House of Commons, the other business raised is by tradition the Outlawries Bill, while the House of Lords reads the Select Vestries Bill; neither proceeds past the first reading. In the House of Commons of Canada, the bill considered is Bill C-1, an Act Respecting the Administration of Oaths of Office,[24] while in the Senate, it is Bill S-1, an Act Relating to Railways.[25] The texts of these two bills have nothing to do with either oaths of office or railways; instead, they contain near-identical wordings that explain their pro forma function.[24][25] In Australia and New Zealand, by contrast, no pro forma bills are introduced; there, the respective houses of representatives instead consider some brief and non-controversial business items before debating the Address in Reply.[26][27]

Other equivalents

[edit]

Monarchies

[edit]

Japan

[edit]
Emperor Akihito convoking the National Diet, 2011

In Japan, the emperor makes only a short speech of greeting during the National Diet opening ceremony;[28] he does not refer to any government policies, instead allowing the Prime Minister to address political matters.

Malaysia

[edit]

Malaysia also has the same practice, with the Yang di-Pertuan Agong making such an address to the Parliament of Malaysia in joint session during its state opening yearly every March.

Morocco

[edit]

The king addresses parliament at the beginning of its yearly session on the second Friday of October. The speech may only be legally binding if it is read before both houses of parliament.[29]

Netherlands

[edit]
King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands reading the speech from the throne, 2015

In the Netherlands, the speech from the throne is held annually on the third Tuesday in September, which is called Prinsjesdag (Prince's Day).[30] Article 65 of the constitution states that "A statement of the policy to be pursued by the Government is given by or on behalf of the King before a joint session of the two Houses of the States General that is held every year on the third Tuesday in September or on such earlier date as may be prescribed by Act of Parliament."

The monarch travels from Noordeinde Palace by coach to the Ridderzaal (Hall of Knights) in the Binnenhof of The Hague to read the speech before a joint session of the States General.[31] Following the speech, the president of the joint session calls out 'Long live the King!’ after which the monarch is greeted with three cheers. The monarch and his retinue leave and the joint session is declared to be closed. The monarch returns to the palace in the coach and, along with other members of the royal house, appears on the palace balcony.[32] Following the 1983 revision of the constitution, a parliamentary session changed from lasting a year to lasting for four years. As a result, the speech no longer marks the opening of a session of parliament but the start of a new parliamentary year.[33]

Norway

[edit]
King Haakon VII of Norway delivering the speech from the throne of the Storting, 1950

In Norway, the monarch is required by article 74 of the constitution to preside over the opening of a session of the Storting (which happens every October) after it has been declared to be legally constituted by the president of the Storting.[34][35] The monarch delivers the speech before parliamentarians in the chamber of the Storting. The heir to the throne also regularly accompanies the monarch.[35]

Upon the monarch's arrival in the chamber, the members of the Storting stand and the first verse of the royal anthem, Kongesangen, is sung.[36] The monarch is handed the speech by the prime minister and proceeds to deliver the speech while all remain standing. Afterwards, the monarch and members take their seats and the Report on the State of the Realm, an account of the government achievement of the past year, is read (traditionally in Nynorsk),[35] customarily by the youngest member of the government present.[36][37]

The members and monarch rise and the monarch is presented with the report by the prime minister and the monarch returns the speech and report to the president. The president gives some remarks and closes with "May God preserve our King and country", joined by other members of the Storting and the first verse of the national anthem is then sung. After the monarch and his retinue have left, the meeting is adjourned and the speech and report are first debated at the subsequent sitting.[36]

Spain

[edit]

In Spain, speeches from the throne used to be practiced before the declaration of the Second Spanish Republic in 1931. With the restoration of the Spanish monarchy in 1975, the monarch still opens parliament but no longer gives a "speech from the throne". The monarch gives a speech but it does not focus on or direct government policy.

Sweden

[edit]
King Oscar II of Sweden and Norway, wearing his crown and ceremonial robes, delivering the speech from the throne, 1898

In Sweden, the practice of having a speech from the throne given by the monarch was held until 1974, coinciding with the rewrite of the constitution of Sweden which removed formal involvement of the monarch in the legislative process. The old opening of the legislature was called "The Solemn Opening of the Riksdag" (Swedish: Riksdagens högtidliga öppnande) and was full of symbolism. The speech was given before the Riksdag in the Hall of State at the Royal Palace. The King would be seated on the Silver Throne as he gave his speech.

Prior to 1907, the monarch and the princes of the royal blood would also wear their royal and princely robes and their crowns and coronets. After Oscar II's death, his successor, Gustav V was not crowned, and thus did not wear the crown when opening the Riksdag. Instead, the crown and sceptre would be placed on cushions beside the throne and the robe would be draped on the throne.

After the abolition of the opening ceremony at the palace, last held in 1974 and only once during the reign of Carl XVI Gustaf, the opening is now held at the Riksdag chamber in the presence of the monarch and his family. It is still the monarch who officially opens the annual session but he no longer gives a "speech from the throne"; the monarch is invited by the Speaker and delivers an introductory speech and then declares the session open. After the speech, the Prime Minister delivers a statement of the upcoming government agenda (Swedish: Regeringsförklaring) for the forthcoming legislative year is made.[38]

Thailand

[edit]

In Thailand, the monarch makes a speech at a joint session in the Ananta Samakhom Throne Hall, advising the National Assembly in their work.

Republics

[edit]

Many republics also hold a yearly event in which the president gives a speech to a joint session of the legislature, such as the State of the Union address given by the president of the United States and in most U.S. states, where the governor gives a similar State of the State address. Similarly, the president of the Philippines gives the State of the Nation Address. In Hispanophone American countries, this practice is known as mensaje a la nación (message to the nation). Often such are on or near the first day of the legislature's new session. However, in theory, rather than just outline the priorities for the coming year, the head of state is supposed to provide a report to the legislature on what the country's condition is, hence the term State of the Nation.

Supranational unions

[edit]

The European Union has an equivalent practice known as the State of the Union, in which the President of the European Commission addresses a plenary session of the European Parliament every September. It is regulated by the 2010 Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission.[39]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Speech from the throne

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A speech from the throne is a ceremonial address delivered by the reigning or viceregal representative from a in the chamber of the of to open a new session in Commonwealth realms, outlining the government's proposed legislative program and policy priorities for the ensuing parliamentary term. Drafted exclusively by the elected government without input from the sovereign, who reads it verbatim, the speech underscores the constitutional separation wherein acts solely on ministerial advice while maintaining formal precedence in parliamentary proceedings. The practice traces its origins to 16th-century , evolving from medieval customs where the sovereign or officials explained the summons of , with formalized delivery by the monarch from the throne becoming standard during the . In the , it anchors the , featuring rituals such as the Yeomen of the Guard's search for intruders—a precaution rooted in the 1605 —and the summoning of by . Adapted across realms like , , and , the speech is typically presented by the , preserving Westminster-model conventions amid devolved executive authority. Beyond symbolism, the speech prompts debate on an Address in Reply, functioning as an implicit confidence vote; historical defeats, such as those precipitating government collapses in 1835 and 1841, highlight its role in enforcing ministerial accountability to . This mechanism ensures that the government's agenda receives legislative scrutiny from the outset, reinforcing within .

Origins and Historical Development

Early English Roots

The antecedents of the speech from the throne lie in the medieval English monarch's prerogative to summon parliamentary assemblies and declare their purposes, a practice rooted in feudal traditions of royal consultation with vassals and estates. In the 13th century, kings such as Henry III and I convened councils that evolved from ad hoc feudal gatherings—predecessors to formalized —where the sovereign or their chancellor opened proceedings by announcing the summons's objectives, including redress of grievances, confirmation of charters, and requests for financial aids to fund wars. This mechanism underscored the king's unilateral authority to initiate legislative sessions, as could not convene without royal writs specifying the agenda. A pivotal example occurred with Edward I's of November 1295, summoned via writs to approximately 292 and temporal, along with representatives from shires and boroughs, to address pressing fiscal needs amid conflicts with and . The opening address by the articulated these imperatives, framing the assembly as an extension of royal will rather than an independent body, thereby maintaining monarchical control over ' deliberations. Such addresses, drawn from the writs' content, served to orient proceedings toward the king's priorities, transitioning informal advisory councils into structured legislative openings without yielding prerogative power. Surviving historical records, including writs in the Close Rolls and early parliamentary rolls from the late , provide of these practices as tools for royal dominance, where the dictated the assembly's scope to secure consent for taxation and policy while precluding unsolicited initiatives from . This early form predated later constitutional balances, reflecting a causal dynamic wherein royal summons and declarative addresses were essential to legitimize and direct feudal-era law-making, ensuring alignment with the crown's strategic imperatives.

Evolution in the United Kingdom

In the eighteenth century, during the reign of George III (1760–1820), the speech from the throne retained elements of royal prerogative, with the monarch personally delivering it and exerting influence over its content amid ongoing consultations with ministers, reflecting the era's balance between crown authority and emerging cabinet cohesion. This period marked a gradual causal shift as ministerial drafting gained prominence, driven by the practical necessities of policy coordination and the monarch's limited capacity to dictate amid factional politics. By the early nineteenth century, the 1832 Reform Act fundamentally altered parliamentary representativeness by enfranchising middle-class male householders, abolishing rotten boroughs, and reallocating seats to industrial areas, thereby amplifying the House of Commons' democratic legitimacy and reinforcing cabinet accountability to elected representatives rather than the crown. This representational expansion causally propelled the speech toward embodying the government's program, culminating in 1841 when Lord John Russell explicitly stated in that it reflected ministers' advice, solidifying its role as an executive outline detached from personal royal input. In the twentieth century, post-World War II standardization further ceremonialized the institution, with the speech approved via and limited to minor monarchical adjustments, aligning it with Britain's transition to a welfare-oriented state and diminished imperial commitments. Queen Elizabeth II's inaugural delivery on 4 November 1952, preceding her , emphasized continuity with her father's legacy while outlining legislative priorities in a decolonizing context, such as ties and domestic reconstruction, without notable deviations from governmental draft. The 2019 prorogation crisis exemplified persistent tensions in this evolved framework, when Prime Minister Boris Johnson's request to suspend from mid-September to mid-October—ostensibly to prepare a new Queen's Speech following his July appointment—prevented legislative scrutiny during deadlines, prompting legal challenges. The UK Supreme Court ruled the unlawful on 24 September 2019, determining it frustrated 's essential functions without justification and undermined the crown's impartiality in assenting to executive advice, thereby affirming judicial boundaries on such ceremonial mechanisms to preserve constitutional equilibrium. This episode highlighted how the speech's preparation and timing, now firmly governmental, remain susceptible to political instrumentalization, yet constrained by evolving norms of .

Expansion to Commonwealth Realms

The tradition of the Speech from the Throne extended to British dominions in the nineteenth century as colonial legislatures with adopted analogous procedures, whereby governors delivered opening addresses outlining executive priorities to assembled parliamentarians. In , the British North America Act of 1867 formalized a federal modeled on the United Kingdom's, incorporating the Speech from the Throne as a core element from the outset of , with Lord Monck delivering the inaugural federal address to mark the summoning of . Similarly, pre- provincial assemblies in had employed governor's speeches since gaining in the 1840s, establishing continuity in the practice. Australia's federation in 1901 marked a further adaptation, as the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act enabled the opening of the first federal Parliament on 9 May 1901, when the Duke of Cornwall and York—acting for King Edward VII—delivered the Speech from the Throne in Melbourne's Exhibition Building, articulating the new government's program to the assembled houses. This event reflected the dominion's evolution from colonial assemblies, where governors had long opened sessions with policy addresses, into a unified entity retaining the ceremonial link to the Crown for legislative legitimacy. New Zealand, having established its Parliament under the New Zealand Constitution Act 1852, integrated comparable governor-delivered openings as part of its responsible government framework, predating full dominion status. The Statute of Westminster, enacted on 11 December 1931, granted legislative autonomy to the dominions by ending the Parliament's superior authority over them, yet Commonwealth realms preserved the Speech from the Throne as a constitutional convention tied to their shared . This persistence stemmed from the structural necessity of distinguishing the Crown's representative—via the —from the partisan executive in Westminster-style systems, ensuring parliamentary sessions commenced with a neutral of causes rather than direct ministerial initiative, even as realms exercised independent foreign and domestic policies. The retention amid processes highlighted the tradition's functional role in upholding monarchical impartiality and institutional stability, independent of imperial oversight.

Constitutional Role and Purpose

Separation of Executive and Legislative Powers

The Speech from the Throne exemplifies constitutional arrangements in Westminster systems where the Crown serves as a neutral figurehead, delivering the executive government's legislative program to Parliament without direct partisan involvement from the Prime Minister or ministers. This mechanism upholds a formal distinction between the executive—embodied in the responsible government drawn from the legislature—and the legislature itself, even as fusion of powers occurs through ministerial accountability. By having the monarch or viceroy read the speech, the process reinforces the Crown's role above party politics, presenting the agenda as a statement of royal will while ensuring legislative scrutiny begins immediately upon delivery. This practice aligns with Walter Bagehot's 1867 analysis in , which differentiates the "dignified" elements—such as the , which command deference and symbolize national unity—from the "efficient" elements, including the Cabinet and , which exercise real power. The Throne Speech bridges these by vesting the dignified with the task of articulating the efficient government's priorities, thereby preserving public reverence for the while channeling executive intent through a non-partisan medium. Bagehot argued this arrangement conceals the efficient machinery beneath dignified forms, preventing overt displays of partisan control that could erode institutional stability. In operational terms, the speech formally summons into session, marking the transition from and enabling the to convene for business. It initiates debate on the in Reply, which serves as an implicit vote in the ; defeat on this motion historically signals loss of parliamentary support, prompting or dissolution, as seen in Canadian instances where minority governments faced tests post-election, such as the Liberal survival of the 2025 Throne Speech vote. This structure tests executive stability empirically, particularly after elections, by requiring legislative endorsement of the outlined agenda before substantive lawmaking proceeds. Contrary to misconceptions portraying the as the speech's originator, authorship resides unequivocally with the , a convention solidified by the amid the rise of responsible parliamentary rule. Ministers draft and Cabinet approves the content, reflecting the executive's policy priorities, while the Crown's delivery maintains ceremonial detachment—a verifiable division evidenced in procedural records and scholarly examinations of agenda-setting. This delineation counters attributions of executive power to the , emphasizing instead the Crown's conduit function in a system where legislative confidence sustains the ministry.

Symbolic and Ceremonial Functions

The Speech from the Throne embodies the symbolic role of the monarch as an impartial , seated on the throne in the to represent the continuity of independent of transient political majorities. This positioning underscores the constitutional principle that acts as a non-partisan focal point for national authority, distinct from the executive's policy agenda outlined in the speech itself. The throne, as a enduring of monarchical power, has historically signified of legitimate rule, reinforcing the 's detachment from legislative partisanship in Westminster systems. Ceremonial rituals during the State Opening, such as the royal procession and the monarch's donning of state regalia, serve to affirm the unity of Parliament's three components—the , the , and the —without endorsing any government's program. A key element is the summoning of Commons members by the of the , whose initial refusal of entry—marked by the door being slammed shut—symbolizes the elected chamber's autonomy from the and the hereditary , preserving bicameral equilibrium. This tradition, observed consistently since at least the , highlights how ceremonial acts maintain institutional checks amid evolving political contexts. These non-partisan symbols and rituals contribute to national cohesion by publicly enacting reverence for constitutional norms and the , fostering a shared that transcends electoral divisions. In constitutional monarchies, such ceremonies correlate with enhanced regime stability, as evidenced by the Westminster model's endurance for over 300 years since the of 1688–1689, during which rituals have helped mitigate factional strife without reliance on forceful interventions. Scholarly analysis attributes this persistence partly to the monarchy's symbolic function in providing unity and limiting executive overreach, contrasting with more volatile republican alternatives in comparable historical settings.

Preparation by Government

The Speech from the Throne is drafted by the government to outline its legislative agenda, reflecting the executive's priorities as derived from electoral mandate. In the , civil servants in relevant departments contribute sections under ministerial direction, with the coordinating the process to ensure coherence across policy areas. The draft is then reviewed iteratively by senior ministers, the , and the Cabinet—often via the Parliamentary Business and Legislation Committee—before finalization as a statement of intended government action. Upon completion, the text is submitted to the or viceregal representative for approval prior to delivery; constitutional conventions limit involvement to ceremonial endorsement, with substantive changes historically rare to maintain neutrality and avoid policy interference. For instance, prior to the early , meetings allowed for potential monarchial input, but modern practice emphasizes governmental authorship, as alterations would undermine the speech's role in binding the executive to its announced programme. In , a parallel process occurs through the and departmental officials, where the Prime Minister's office leads drafting of policy goals into a cohesive , submitted to the without expectation of revision. Though non-binding, the speech serves as a forecast of legislative intentions, enabling parliamentary and public , with governments in majority-held legislatures typically advancing a substantial share of proposed measures. UK data from the Hansard Society reveals that, in sessions like 2022–2023, roughly 40–50% of introduced government bills—many stemming from the speech—achieve by mid-session, rising with extended parliamentary time and executive control. This empirical pattern across realms affirms the mechanism's function in translating electoral outcomes into policy articulation, free from viceregal alteration.

Practice in the United Kingdom

The King's Speech Procedure

The King's Speech procedure forms the ceremonial core of the , initiating a new parliamentary session. The arrives at the Palace of Westminster, typically by state coach from , accompanied by a procession that includes the . Upon entering the , peers don their ceremonial robes and coronets, while the announces the 's approach. The Gentleman Usher of the then proceeds to the , where doors are slammed in her face to symbolize parliamentary independence, before she knocks three times and summons the to the Lords chamber. Seated on the Sovereign's Throne in the , the monarch receives the speech from the , who presents it on a crimson cushion. The King or Queen reads the speech aloud, outlining the government's legislative agenda for the session, as occurred on 17 2024 when King Charles III delivered the address before both Houses, emphasizing priorities such as border security and economic stability. Commoners and bishops remain uncovered (hats off) during the delivery, while peers don coronets upon the monarch's command at the speech's conclusion, underscoring the hierarchical traditions. The speech concludes with the monarch's withdrawal, after which resumes business. Following the delivery, each debates a motion for an "Address in Reply" to the , expressing thanks for the speech and serving as the primary forum for scrutinizing the government's program. In the , the Leader of the Opposition traditionally moves an to this motion, critiquing the agenda; historically, such amendments have tested government support, with defeat signaling a loss of confidence, though no government has fallen on this vote since 1924. The multi-day , often spanning five days, allows broad discussion across areas. In cases of the monarch's absence due to illness or other reasons, Lords Commissioners—typically senior royals or privy councillors appointed by —read the speech from the throne to ensure procedural continuity, as in 1959 and 1963 when Queen Elizabeth II was unable to attend. The presiding commissioner delivers the text verbatim, maintaining the separation of the sovereign's role from governmental authorship. This adaptation preserves the ceremonial integrity without the sovereign's physical presence.

Key Traditions and Variations

The State Opening features the monarch donning the and in the Robing Room before leading a through the Royal Gallery to the . is transported separately in its own coach and carried into the Robing Room by the . These elements emphasize ceremonial grandeur and the symbolic unity of the realm under . A central tradition involves the Gentleman Usher of the summoning members of the after the Lords are assembled, with the Commons door initially slammed shut before being opened following three knocks with the rod. This ritual, originating in the 1641 incident when Charles I attempted to arrest MPs, underscores the Commons' independence from direct monarchical summons and prevents potential armed confrontations akin to those precipitating the . By ritualizing exclusion until formal invitation, the practice enforces a structured separation that has maintained procedural stability across centuries. While the core ceremony persists with minimal alteration to preserve its symbolic authority, adaptations occur for practical reasons, such as enhanced security protocols post-2001 or broadcasting adjustments since 1958 to broaden public access. In recent openings, including , the full and rituals were retained despite shorter speech durations tailored to legislative priorities, balancing with contemporary efficiency. Empirical records indicate rare disruptions, with no substantive interruptions to the core sequence in over 300 years, affirming the 's causal efficacy in averting procedural conflicts through formalized deference.

Practice in Other Commonwealth Realms

Canada

In Canada, the Speech from the Throne opens each session of and outlines the federal government's legislative agenda and priorities for the coming term. It is typically delivered by the , as the monarch's representative, from the throne in the Senate chamber, with members of the summoned to attend. The speech is prepared by the Prime Minister's Office and , reflecting the executive's policy intentions rather than the Governor General's personal views. Due to Canada's bilingual framework under the Official Languages Act, the speech is read in both English and French, often alternating paragraphs or sections to ensure accessibility. The procedure emphasizes ceremonial : the arrives in a formal , the Usher of the the , and the speech concludes with the traditional formula summoning "to declare the causes of its ." Following delivery, both houses the in Reply, a motion thanking that serves as an implicit confidence vote in the government; defeat on this motion has historically led to resignation or dissolution. This dynamic underscores the speech's role in testing parliamentary support post-election or . On May 27, 2025, King Charles III personally delivered the speech to open the first session of the 45th —the first such instance by a reigning since Queen Elizabeth II in 1977—highlighting Canada's distinct amid external pressures, including U.S. President Trump's public remarks on and annexation threats. The 2025 address committed to bolstering national defense, , and economic resilience, framing Canada as "strong and free" against "unprecedented challenges." Controversies have arisen when the speech intersects with confidence crises, as in December 2008, when requested from Michaëlle Jean hours before a vote on the Address in Reply, avoiding defeat by a ; critics argued this undermined parliamentary , though defenders cited reserve powers discretion. Such events illustrate the speech's vulnerability to executive maneuvers, with the 's role limited to ceremonial delivery absent clear constitutional breach. At the provincial level, lieutenant governors deliver analogous speeches opening each , mirroring federal form but tailored to provincial competencies like health and education; alignment with the federal throne speech varies by partisan control, with data from 2019–2024 showing over 70% thematic overlap in resource and infrastructure priorities under Liberal federal and provincial s, dropping to under 50% in conservative-led provinces amid policy divergences. These subnational speeches reinforce federalism's decentralized execution while maintaining the Crown's symbolic unity.

Australia and New Zealand

In , the opens each new by delivering a speech in the Senate chamber of , outlining the government's legislative priorities for the term. This practice, rooted in the adopted upon federation in 1901, underscores the constitutional separation between the executive and legislature, with the speech prepared entirely by the elected government and read verbatim by the as the monarch's representative. The ceremony is markedly less elaborate than the UK's, lacking processions or regalia like Black Rod's summons, and focuses on procedural efficiency in a bicameral federal context. Recent examples include the July 2025 opening of the 48th Parliament, where the speech addressed economic reforms and amid post-election priorities. Australia's republican debates, ongoing since the 1999 referendum rejection, have fueled scrutiny of the 's role in this ritual, with proponents arguing it perpetuates monarchical symbolism incompatible with an independent republic; however, no reforms have materialized, preserving the tradition despite periodic calls for an elected to deliver or adapt the address. In practice, speeches have incorporated local policy emphases, such as indigenous reconciliation efforts; for instance, the November 2022 opening speech for the 47th committed to constitutional recognition via an Indigenous Voice, culminating in the October 2023 , which failed with 60.06% voting against amid concerns over divisiveness and legal risks. In New Zealand, the Governor-General similarly delivers the Speech from the Throne at the State Opening of Parliament, a unicameral process that integrates bicultural elements distinct from the UK model, including a Māori haka pōwhiri (formal welcome) and guard of honour before the address in the Legislative Chamber, Wellington. Adopted post-1852 self-governance and formalized as a dominion in 1907, the format emphasizes Treaty of Waitangi principles, with speeches frequently referencing Māori-Crown relations and equitable outcomes, as in the 2020 address committing to strengthened partnership amid COVID-19 recovery. The December 2023 opening for the 54th Parliament, under the new National-led coalition, detailed 33 priorities like reinstating Three Waters reforms and disestablishing the Māori Health Authority, reflecting a shift toward fiscal restraint and frontline service delivery over prior expansive initiatives. These antipodean variants maintain the core Westminster function of signaling government intent while diverging through simplified ceremonies, absence of royal attendance, and contextual adaptations—Australia's federalism and republican tensions versus New Zealand's bicultural protocols and post-1950 unicameral efficiency—yielding shorter, policy-focused addresses typically under 30 minutes compared to the UK's hour-plus spectacle. Empirical patterns show consistent post-election delivery within weeks, ensuring legislative momentum without the UK's annual cycle.

Smaller Realms and Territories

In smaller realms, the speech from the throne retains its core constitutional function of outlining the government's legislative agenda at the opening of parliament, delivered by the as the monarch's representative, though ceremonies are often scaled to local resources and incorporate viceregal protocols adapted from Westminster traditions. In , the presents the Throne Speech annually during the ceremonial opening, as seen on February 13, 2025, when Deputy Governor-General Steadman Fuller delivered it in the absence of the principal officeholder, emphasizing legislative priorities including processes amid ongoing debates on transitioning from a . This practice persists despite republican pressures, serving to maintain separation of executive and legislative roles while providing a platform for government policy articulation. Papua New Guinea exemplifies viceregal delivery in a Pacific context, where the formally opens parliamentary sessions with a speech prepared by the executive, as occurred on August 30, 2022, for the Eleventh Parliament, detailing national goals and directions under the Westminster-derived system. The procedure underscores constitutional continuity in diverse, multi-ethnic settings, with the address introducing bills and priorities, though hybrid elements reflecting indigenous customs occasionally influence ceremonial aspects without altering the speech's substantive role. Similarly, in the , the 's Speech from the Throne opens parliamentary meetings, inheriting the Westminster model to affirm democratic processes, as demonstrated on April 24, 2025, by Sir David Tiva Kapu, who highlighted national unity and executive responsibilities amid post-election stability needs. Retention of this counters sporadic republican advocacy in the region by reinforcing monarchical impartiality and procedural familiarity, with the speech serving as a non-partisan outline of objectives despite smaller-scale events compared to larger realms. These adaptations ensure the mechanism's functionality in low-population territories, prioritizing legal continuity over elaborate pomp while facing pressures from movements that have not yet disrupted its observance.

Equivalents in Other Monarchies

Japan

In Japan, the Emperor delivers a ceremonial address, known as the okotoba (imperial utterance), at the opening of ordinary and extraordinary sessions of the , the country's bicameral legislature. This practice, established under the post-World War II Constitution of 1947, symbolizes the continuity of imperial tradition while underscoring the Emperor's apolitical role as "the symbol of the State and of the unity of the People," as defined in Article 1. Unlike legislative agenda-setting speeches in other systems, the Emperor's address is brief, typically expressing hopes for successful deliberations, national unity, and public welfare without outlining government policy. For instance, at the opening of the first Diet session on June 23, 1947, conveyed profound joy at the assembly of representatives and emphasized the Diet's role in advancing 's welfare under the new democratic framework. The content and delivery of the address reflect the 1947 Constitution's deliberate shift from the prewar (1889), where the Emperor held substantive legislative prerogatives, such as exercising power with the Diet's consent (Article 5 of the Meiji text). reforms, influenced by Allied occupation authorities, confined the Emperor to ceremonial acts performed "with the advice and approval of the Cabinet" (Article 7), mirroring the symbolic evolution of throne speeches in realms but rooted in Japan's unique cultural emphasis on imperial reverence (tennō sei) for social cohesion. The address is prepared in coordination with the and Cabinet, ensuring alignment with constitutional limits, though it avoids partisan content. This ceremonial function occurs annually for the ordinary session (typically January) and as needed for extraordinary sessions, with the Emperor arriving in state procession to the . Distinct from the Emperor's address, the Prime Minister's subsequent policy speech (seiji shushō hōsei) details the Cabinet's legislative priorities, economic plans, and , serving as the de facto equivalent to policy-outlining elements in other parliamentary openings. The imperial address thus fulfills a non-legislative , fostering a sense of national solemnity and historical continuity amid democratic governance, without influencing debate or votes. This arrangement has persisted through transitions, including Emperor Akihito's addresses in the late and Emperor Naruhito's in recent sessions, such as the 219th extraordinary Diet on October 24, 2025. By invoking imperial symbolism, it causally reinforces public acceptance of parliamentary authority in a society where the Emperor embodies cultural stability, as evidenced by consistent ritual observance since 1947 despite political upheavals.

Malaysia

In , the Yang di-Pertuan Agong delivers the Royal Address (Ucapan Yang di-Pertuan Agong) at the ceremonial opening of each session of the federal Parliament, presenting the government's priorities for legislative action. This procedure, instituted upon on August 31, 1957, under the first Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Tuanku Abdul Rahman ibni Almarhum Tuanku Muhammad, integrates the ceremonial into the parliamentary process while adhering to constitutional limits on monarchical authority. The address, drafted by the and Cabinet, is read from the throne in the chamber, followed by a motion of thanks debated by members, which serves as the initial forum for government-opposition exchanges. The elective nature of the Malaysian monarchy distinguishes this practice from hereditary systems, as the Yang di-Pertuan Agong is selected for a five-year term by the —a council of the nine hereditary sultans from Malay states—emphasizing consensus among state-level monarchs over automatic . This rotational election, occurring every five years since 1957, positions the address as a post-selection affirmation of federal unity, where the newly installed king symbolically bridges state autonomies with national policy in a comprising sultanates and non-royal territories. The process underscores causal reliance on ruler agreement, enabling discretionary inputs in areas like and , though the speech remains government-driven. Content of the address prioritizes Islamic foundational principles, affirming the religion's status under Article 3 of the Federal Constitution while permitting non-proselytizing practice of other faiths, alongside multi-ethnic cohesion to counter race-religion-royalty sensitivities. It addresses by advocating adaptation of policies to state contexts, including observance of the 1963 for and integration, and economic imperatives such as 2023's 3.7% GDP expansion, RM329.5 billion in investments, and 127,000 new jobs, with calls for subsidy targeting and debt management. For instance, Ibrahim's February 26, 2024, address to the 15th Parliament's third session highlighted these themes, urging unity and self-reliance in .

Other Examples

In the Netherlands, the Troonrede, or Speech from the Throne, is delivered by the monarch to a joint session of the States General on Prinsjesdag, the third Tuesday in September. The King outlines the government's planned policies and legislative priorities for the upcoming parliamentary year, a practice rooted in constitutional tradition where the speech is drafted by the cabinet. The event features a ceremonial procession from the Noordeinde Palace to the Binnenhof, including the Golden Coach and the carrying of royal regalia such as the crown and scepter, underscoring symbolic continuity amid modern governance. Sweden's equivalent occurs at the opening of the session, typically in early September following elections, where the monarch formally declares the assembly open with a brief . King Carl XVI Gustaf, for instance, delivered such a speech on September 27, 2022, invoking national unity and historical continuity before the presents the government's agenda. This ceremonial act, stripped of substantive policy influence since the 1974 , persists as a marker of monarchical-head-of-state status in a parliamentary democracy. Both nations exemplify the evolution of monarchical parliamentary openings from absolutist-era assertions of royal will to formalized rituals under elected oversight, empirically enduring in social democracies where welfare policies dominate despite the ceremonies' limited causal role in .

Equivalents in Republics and Supranational Bodies

Republican Ceremonial Speeches

In the United States, the State of the Union address fulfills a constitutional obligation for the president to report on national conditions and propose legislation to Congress. Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution requires the president to "from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient." The first such address occurred on January 8, 1790, when President George Washington outlined federal priorities before a joint session. Annually since 1947, it has been broadcast, serving primarily to advance the executive's agenda amid partisan dynamics. This direct delivery by the head of government and state contrasts with viceregal practices, as it embeds the speech within the president's political accountability without an independent intermediary, potentially amplifying executive influence over legislative debates. India's President's Address to Parliament provides a closer structural parallel in a , where the ceremonial delivers a government-drafted outline of policy priorities. Article 87(1) of the Indian Constitution mandates the address at the first session following general elections to and the first session each year thereafter, informing of summons causes and government plans. For instance, on June 27, 2024, President addressed a , highlighting economic reforms and amid coalition dynamics. Prepared by the , the content reflects executive intentions, followed by a motion of thanks enabling debate, akin to responses in monarchical systems. Yet, as an elected officeholder in a , the president lacks the apolitical permanence of a hereditary or appointed , tying delivery more explicitly to partisan electoral cycles despite ceremonial separation. These republican formats highlight causal variances in accountability: presidential systems like the U.S. route speeches through the fused head of state-, fostering unmediated executive-legislative confrontation, whereas semi-presidential or parliamentary republics like interpose a , diluting direct political heat but retaining authorship. In Ireland, no routine equivalent exists; the president may address the under Article 13.7.2° of the Constitution, but such interventions are , with session openings handled by legislative leaders rather than a scripted executive program. This sparsity underscores how republican designs often prioritize elected assembly autonomy over formalized viceregal announcements.

European Union and Similar

The address in the serves as the primary supranational equivalent to a speech from the throne, delivered annually by the to the of the , typically in September. This practice, initiated by Commission President in 2010, assesses past achievements and outlines legislative and policy priorities for the coming year. Unlike the ceremonial and non-partisan nature of throne speeches in realms, the EU address is an executive policy statement, often accompanied by a detailing proposed initiatives and submitted alongside the Commission's work program. Ursula von der Leyen, President since 2019 and re-elected for the 2024-2029 term, delivered the 2025 address on September 10 in , emphasizing security priorities amid threats from and regional instability, while proposing enhancements to defense preparedness and economic resilience. The speech triggers parliamentary debate but lacks the binding legislative opening function of a throne speech, as the Commission's proposals require approval from the European Parliament and the of the EU, reflecting the body's limited supranational authority derived from treaties ratified by sovereign member states. This format underscores the EU's partial sovereignty transfer, where member states retain veto powers in key areas like and taxation, constraining the address's role compared to a unified executive's agenda-setting in monarchies. Empirical evidence from integration history shows persistent challenges, with opt-outs and requirements—such as the 27 member states' consensus needed for treaty changes—limiting the Commission's ability to impose programs akin to a government's throne speech mandate. Looser parallels exist in other supranational organizations, such as the Secretary General's annual reports to the , which outline alliance priorities but do not initiate legislative sessions or carry ceremonial weight. Similarly, the UN Secretary-General's addresses to the General Assembly, including annual reports on global threats, focus on coordination among sovereign states without enforceable legislative triggers, highlighting the absence of pooled sovereignty sufficient for throne-like rituals. These examples illustrate how supranational bodies prioritize policy advocacy over the formalized, tradition-bound openings seen in constitutional monarchies.

Criticisms, Defenses, and Public Reception

Arguments for Irrelevance and Cost

Critics of the Speech from the Throne argue that it serves little substantive purpose in contemporary parliamentary democracies, functioning primarily as a scripted formality where the or recites a government-drafted agenda without independent input or . The document outlines legislative priorities determined by the prime minister's office, rendering the ceremonial delivery redundant as the content could be disseminated through modern channels like press conferences or parliamentary statements, which are more direct and cost-free. This view posits the ritual as an anachronistic holdover from feudal traditions, disconnected from elected where lies with ministers rather than hereditary figures. Public opinion data underscores claims of widespread indifference, particularly in realms like Canada where the event garners minimal engagement. A May 2025 Angus Reid Institute poll found 83% of Canadians expressed indifference to King Charles III delivering the Speech from the Throne, with only 37% viewing it positively despite a slight edge over negative perceptions. Such apathy reflects broader republican sentiments in Australia and New Zealand, where advocates argue the ceremony symbolizes outdated imperial ties irrelevant to national identity and policy-making. Fiscal critiques highlight the event's expense as unjustified given its perceived obsolescence, with preparation involving security, protocol, and broadcast costs borne by taxpayers amid competing public priorities. In the United Kingdom, the State Opening of Parliament—encompassing the King's Speech—entails significant outlays for pageantry and logistics, though exact annual figures are not itemized separately from broader operations; critics extrapolate from related royal events, estimating indirect costs in the low millions of pounds when factoring security and maintenance. In Canada, the 2020 Speech from the Throne, delivered amid economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, drew backlash for prioritizing rhetorical commitments over immediate fiscal restraint, including promises on reconciliation and anti-racism that some opposition members deemed performative amid debates over monument removals tied to Black Lives Matter protests. These arguments frame the Speech from the Throne as a resource drain in resource-constrained environments, where funds could redirect to or social programs; republican groups in contend it perpetuates a misaligned with egalitarian values, amplifying calls for constitutional to eliminate such vestigial expenses.

Benefits for Stability and Tradition

The Speech from the Throne enhances political stability by establishing a predictable ceremonial opening to parliamentary sessions, wherein the government's agenda is publicly declared, enabling immediate structured debate and scrutiny by opposition parties. This process facilitates the Address in Reply motion, which historically includes opportunities for amendments, thereby testing the government's legislative legitimacy early in the session without precipitating crises. By embodying centuries-old constitutional practices, the speech reinforces institutional continuity, distinguishing constitutional monarchies—which data show are markedly stable, comprising the majority of long-enduring democracies—from republics prone to higher executive turnover and regime disruptions. Empirical analyses indicate that monarchies correlate with stronger property rights protection and elevated living standards, attributes linked to their ritualistic separation of and executive roles. Public approval for the monarchy in realms like the United Kingdom sustains this framework, with polls recording steady support around two-thirds, underpinning regime resilience amid partisan volatility elsewhere. The low incidence of throne speech-related parliamentary collapses—typically resolved through routine votes rather than breakdowns—counters claims of obsolescence, as the event's formality minimizes procedural disruptions in diverse, multi-party legislatures. Furthermore, the speech's non-partisan delivery by the or symbolizes national unity above electoral divides, a causal mechanism for cohesion in federations where regional tensions persist, as evidenced by consistent ceremonial adherence across nations without fostering division.

Empirical Data on Public Support and Controversies

In , a May 2025 Angus Reid Institute poll indicated that 83% of respondents were indifferent to King Charles III delivering the Speech from the Throne, the first by a reigning since 1957, though a plurality of those expressing an opinion viewed it more positively than negatively. A concurrent Pollara Strategic Insights survey found 48% of believed the 's delivery enhanced national , compared to 22% who saw it as detrimental, amid U.S. President Trump's annexation . These polls coincided with a surge in overall favorability, rising from 44% in 2024 to 52% in 2025 per Research Co., attributed by some to the speech's emphasis on constitutional stability during external threats. The 2025 Canadian speech sparked limited , primarily from republican advocates critiquing it as an anachronistic reinforcement of colonial ties, while monarchist groups highlighted its role in underscoring apolitical continuity against perceived foreign encroachments. No widespread protests occurred, and legislative confidence votes post-speech proceeded without disruption, reflecting the ritual's minimal direct impact on parliamentary function. In the , public reception of centers more on policy content than ceremony, with 's July 2024 poll showing divided views on legislative proposals but no equivalent data isolating ceremonial support. Broader retention polls, such as 's August 2025 tracker, report 65% favoring continuation versus 23% for an elected , stable despite generational divides where only 37% of 18-24-year-olds express support. Across Commonwealth realms, support for monarchical institutions varies, with at the lowest end (23-52% retention favorability in 2025 polls) yet showing ritual endurance; maintains Governor-General openings amid ~40% republic sentiment but without polled opposition to the event itself. Controversies remain policy-driven rather than ceremonial, as evidenced by the absence of significant public backlash in recent iterations, prioritizing empirical stability over reformist critiques.

References

  1. https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/occasions/stateopening/
  2. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/what-is-the-kings-speech/
  3. https://www.canada.ca/en/privy-council/campaigns/speech-throne/info-speech-from-throne.html
  4. https://www.samaracentre.ca/articles/speech-from-the-throne
  5. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9501/CBP-9501.pdf
  6. https://theconversation.com/kings-speech-what-is-it-and-why-does-it-matter-217159
  7. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/middle_ages/birth_of_parliament_01.shtml
  8. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/originsofparliament/birthofparliament/
  9. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/originsofparliament/birthofparliament/overview/edward/
  10. https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1386-1421/survey/ii-place-parliament-kings-government
  11. https://history.blog.gov.uk/2013/04/24/george-iii-and-his-prime-ministers/
  12. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/houseofcommons/reformacts/overview/reformact1832/
  13. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/parliamentwork/offices-and-ceremonies/collections/parliament-and-the-queen/queens-speech-to-parliament-1952/
  14. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9006/
  15. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2019-0192-judgment.pdf
  16. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/proroguing-parliament
  17. https://lop.parl.ca/sites/ParlInfo/default/en_CA/Parliament/throneSpeech
  18. https://www.gov.mb.ca/thronespeech/about.html
  19. https://carleton.scholaris.ca/bitstreams/4534cb02-93ab-44c1-a0b7-7104070c2168/download
  20. https://www.aph.gov.au/Visit_Parliament/Art/Stories_and_Histories/The_first_sitting_of_the_Commonwealth_Parliament_1901
  21. https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-649287775
  22. https://www.aph.gov.au/Visit_Parliament/Art/Stories_and_Histories/The_Inauguration_of_the_Commonwealth_1901
  23. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/constitution/lawreg-loireg/p1t171.html
  24. https://www.canada.ca/en/intergovernmental-affairs/services/federation/statute-westminster.html
  25. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/statute-of-westminster
  26. https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/important-commemorative-days/anniversary-statute-westminster.html
  27. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4351/4351-h/4351-h.htm
  28. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095718350
  29. https://www.ourcommons.ca/procedure/procedure-and-practice-3/ch_02_2-e.html
  30. https://www.ipolitics.ca/2025/06/04/liberals-survive-confidence-vote-as-throne-speech-motion-passes-through-house/
  31. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00859.x
  32. https://www.royal.uk/the-role-of-the-monarchy
  33. https://uollb.com/blogs/uol/crown-monarch-throne-and-sovereign
  34. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/parliamentwork/offices-and-ceremonies/overview/state-opening/
  35. https://www.parliament.uk/about/mps-and-lords/principal/black-rod/
  36. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/parliamentwork/offices-and-ceremonies/overview/black-rod/
  37. https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/publications/guides/state-opening-of-parliament-what-is-it
  38. https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/blog/the-state-opening-of-parliament-history-tradition-and-what-to-expect
  39. https://academic.oup.com/ajj/article/69/3/189/7888997
  40. https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/news/parliament-matters-podcast-e45
  41. https://lop.parl.ca/sites/PublicWebsite/default/en_CA/ResearchPublications/202513E
  42. https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/blog/what-is-the-state-of-the-governments-legislative-programme-as-parliament
  43. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-kings-speech-2024
  44. https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/publications/guides/kings-speech-debate-address
  45. https://www.yeomenoftheguard.co.uk/state-opening-of-parliament
  46. https://www.royal.uk/state-opening-of-parliament
  47. https://historyofparliamentblog.wordpress.com/2020/01/21/black-rod-and-the-door-of-the-house-of-commons/
  48. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49647756
  49. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9501/
  50. https://www.royal.uk/news-and-activity/2023-11-07/the-state-opening-of-parliament-2023
  51. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/oct/19/state-opening-uk-parliament-could-disrupted-security-staff-strikes
  52. https://www.ourcommons.ca/procedure/our-procedure/ParliamentaryCycle/c_g_parliamentarycycle-e.html
  53. https://sencanada.ca/en/about/procedural-references/notes/n1/
  54. https://www.ourcommons.ca/procedure/procedure-and-practice-3/ch_15_1-e.html
  55. https://www.canada.ca/en/privy-council/campaigns/speech-throne/2025/speech-from-the-throne.html
  56. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c93lx42r42do
  57. https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/27/americas/king-charles-canada-parliament-speech-intl-latam
  58. https://www.craigmarlatt.com/canada/government/speech.html
  59. https://www.cpac.ca/articles/2025-throne-speech
  60. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Practice_and_Procedure/aso/so002
  61. https://www.gg.gov.au/about-governor-general/media/speech-opening-48th-parliament-commonwealth-australia
  62. https://www.facebook.com/GovernorGeneralAustralia/posts/today-the-governor-general-performed-her-constitutional-duty-at-the-opening-of-t/1308708890612166/
  63. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/australia-s-royal-dilemma-king-charles-serves-conflicting-commonwealth-interests
  64. https://ministers.pmc.gov.au/former-ministers/burney/2023/referendum-night-speech
  65. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansards/26440/&sid=0117
  66. https://gg.govt.nz/governor-general/blog/2023/12/state-opening-54th-parliament
  67. https://gg.govt.nz/publications/speech-throne-2020
  68. https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/301021676/full-transcript-speech-from-the-throne-formal-opening-of-parliament
  69. https://gazette.govt.nz/notice/id/2023-vr5697
  70. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/504026/governor-general-dame-cindy-kiro-highlights-government-s-extensive-ambitious-agenda-at-state-opening-of-parliament
  71. https://hapaipublic.org.nz/Attachment?Action=Download&Attachment_id=150321
  72. https://jis.gov.jm/government/the-legislature/
  73. https://solomons.gov.sb/parliament-opens-third-meeting-with-governor-generals-speech-from-the-throne/
  74. https://jis.gov.jm/media/2025/02/Throne-Speech-2025-V2-1-2.pdf
  75. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=946005600956198&id=100066403014064&set=a.586008913622537
  76. https://opm.gov.jm/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Throne-Speech-2022-.pdf
  77. https://www.parliament.gov.pg/uploads/hansard/H-11-20220830-M02-D01.pdf
  78. https://www.facebook.com/349747055559633/posts/governor-general-grand-chief-sir-bob-dadae-delivering-his-speech-to-open-the-11t/1302343916966604/
  79. https://solomons.gov.sb/speech-from-the-throne-his-excellency-reverend-david-tiva-kapu-governor-general-of-solomon-islands/
  80. https://www.facebook.com/opmcpress/videos/speech-from-the-throne/935677271844207/
  81. https://solomonstarnews.com/third-parliament-meeting-opens-with-ggs-speech-from-the-throne/
  82. https://www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/shiryo/05/143shoshi.html
  83. https://japan.kantei.go.jp/constitution_and_government_of_japan/constitution_e.html
  84. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Japan_1946?lang=en
  85. https://japan.kantei.go.jp/constitution_and_government_of_japan/fundamental_e.html
  86. https://blogs.kcl.ac.uk/kslr/2012/04/06/comparison-of-the-status-of-the-monarchs-speech-in-parliament-between-the-uk-and-japan/
  87. https://www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/shiryo/03/074b_e/074b_etx.html
  88. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/yda-senarai-yang-di-pertuan-agong.html?uweb=yg&lang=en
  89. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/index.php?modload=content&action=001&id=1693&uweb=web&lang=en
  90. https://www.parlimen.gov.my/glosari1.html?&lang=en
  91. https://international.astroawani.com/malaysia-news/sultan-ibrahims-royal-address-opening-ceremony-third-session-15th-parliament-459832
  92. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/malaysias-unique-rotational-monarchy-2023-10-26/
  93. https://factsanddetails.com/southeast-asia/Malaysia/sub5_4c/entry-3672.html
  94. https://www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/how-parliament-works/speech-throne
  95. https://www.dutchnews.nl/2024/09/pomp-and-ceremony-as-the-dutch-government-presents-its-budget/
  96. https://www.kungahuset.se/english/archive/news/2022-09-27-hm-the-king-opens-the-parliamentary-session
  97. https://www.riksdagen.se/en/news/the-opening-of-the-riksdag-session/
  98. https://www.kungahuset.se/english/archive/speeches/2016-09-13-hm-the-kings-speech-at-the-opening-of-the-parliamentary-session
  99. https://history.house.gov/Institution/SOTU/State-of-the-Union/
  100. https://www.constitutionofindia.net/articles/article-87-special-address-by-the-president/
  101. https://prsindia.org/policy/president-address
  102. https://prsindia.org/articles-by-prs-team/explained-why-the-president%25E2%2580%2599s-address-matters
  103. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/state-union/state-union-2025_en
  104. https://epthinktank.eu/2025/09/02/2025-state-of-the-union-address-purpose-historical-significance-and-overview-of-addresses-since-2010/
  105. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/united-states-america/2025-state-union-address-president-von-der-leyen_en
  106. https://ecfr.eu/article/podium-of-power-von-der-leyens-state-of-the-union-address-confronts-europes-defence-preparedness/
  107. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/project-result-content/f3e63255-be18-47df-ba3d-4d855edcdb99/Letzte_Fassung_-_Secession.pdf
  108. https://jean-monnet.ch/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/22-04-european-integration-g--grin-cdd-n-24.pdf
  109. https://www.swp-berlin.org/publikation/new-realities-in-foreign-affairs-diplomacy-in-the-21st-century
  110. https://en.as.com/latest_news/what-are-the-differences-between-nato-the-un-and-the-eu-n-4/
  111. https://macleans.ca/opinion/lessons-from-throne-speeches-past-dont-believe-the-hype/
  112. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XT6EHjrsIzU
  113. https://www.canlii.org/en/commentary/doc/2002CanLIIDocs73
  114. https://angusreid.org/king-charles-throne-speech-canada/
  115. https://nationalpost.com/news/royals/angus-reid-poll-king-charles-throne-speech
  116. https://crownedrepublic.com.au/debating-notes/
  117. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/nov/21/obscene-anger-after-cost-of-king-charless-coronation-revealed
  118. https://macleans.ca/news/canada/what-were-seeing-in-2020-is-idle-no-more-2-0/
  119. https://www.ipolitics.ca/2020/09/02/its-high-time-we-take-on-the-monument-debate-the-canadian-way/
  120. https://periscopekasaustralia.com.au/australia-a-constitutional-monarchy-with-republican-potential/
  121. https://www.sfu.ca/~aheard/conventions-1.html
  122. https://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/Constitutional%2520Monarchy%2520as%2520Equilibrium.pdf
  123. https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Symbolic_Unity_Monarchies_Republics.pdf
  124. https://www.reddit.com/r/monarchism/comments/1ml3u9k/new_yougov_poll_shows_steady_23_support_for_the/
  125. https://www.canada.ca/en/privy-council/campaigns/speech-throne/frequently-asked-questions.html
  126. https://www.pollara.com/canadians-warming-to-king-charles-and-the-monarchy/
  127. https://researchco.ca/2025/03/21/monarchy-canada-2025/
  128. https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/king-charless-throne-speech-deconstructed-not-a-single-word-was-accidental
  129. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn8z174gk3jo
  130. https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/50134-what-do-britons-think-of-the-policies-in-the-2024-kings-speech
  131. https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/52737-royal-family-favourability-trackers-august-2025
  132. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy7e4q779wo
  133. https://www.facebook.com/CheshireLive/posts/support-for-the-monarchy-has-hit-a-record-low-according-to-new-researchhowever-m/1230803175755698/
  134. https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2023/05/the-monarchy-the-view-from-the-commonwealth-realms/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.