Hubbry Logo
Tree shapingTree shapingMain
Open search
Tree shaping
Community hub
Tree shaping
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Tree shaping
Tree shaping
from Wikipedia

Needle & Thread Tree by Axel Erlandson
A chair formed by tree shaping[1]

Tree shaping (also known by several other alternative names) uses living trees and other woody plants as the medium to create structures and art. There are a few different methods[2] used by the various artists to shape their trees, which share a common heritage with other artistic horticultural and agricultural practices, such as pleaching, bonsai, espalier, and topiary, and employing some similar techniques. Most artists use grafting to deliberately induce the inosculation of living trunks, branches, and roots, into artistic designs or functional structures.

Tree shaping has been practiced for at least several hundred years, as demonstrated by the living root bridges built and maintained by the Khasi people of India. Early 20th-century practitioners and artisans included banker John Krubsack, Axel Erlandson with his Tree Circus, and landscape engineer Arthur Wiechula. Several contemporary designers also produce tree-shaping projects.

History

[edit]
Living root bridges in Nongriat village, Meghalaya

Some species of trees exhibit a botanical phenomenon known as inosculation (or self-grafting); whether among parts of a single tree or between two or more individual specimens of the same (or very similar) species. Trees exhibiting this behavior are called inosculate trees.[3]

The living root bridges of Cherrapunji, Laitkynsew, and Nongriat, in the present-day Meghalaya state of northeast India are examples of tree shaping.[4] These suspension bridges are handmade from the aerial roots of living banyan fig trees, such as the rubber tree.[5] The pliable tree roots are gradually shaped to grow across a gap, weaving in sticks, stones, and other inclusions, until they take root on the other side.[5] This process can take up to fifteen years to complete.[6] There are specimens spanning over 100 feet, some can hold up to the weight of 50 people.[7][8] The useful lifespan of the bridges, once complete, is thought to be 500–600 years. They are naturally self-renewing and self-strengthening as the component roots grow thicker.[8]

Living trees were used to create garden houses in the Middle East, a practice which later spread to Europe. In Cobham, Kent there are accounts of a three-story house that could hold 50 people.[9][4]

Pleaching is a technique used in the very old horticultural practice of hedge laying. Pleaching consists of first plashing living branches and twigs and then weaving them together to promote their inosculation. It is most commonly used to train trees into raised hedges, though other shapes are easily developed. Useful implementations include fences, lattices, roofs, and walls.[3][10] Some of the outcomes of pleaching can be considered an early form of what is known today as tree shaping.[citation needed] In an early, labor-intensive, practical use of pleaching in medieval Europe, trees were installed in the ground in parallel hedgerow lines or quincunx patterns, then shaped by trimming to form a flat-plane grid above ground level. When the trees' branches in this grid met those of neighboring trees, they were grafted together. Once the network of joints were of substantial size, builders laid planks across the grid, upon which they built huts to live in, thus keeping the human settlement safe in times of annual flooding.[3] Wooden dancing platforms were also built and the living tree branch grid bore the weight of the platform and dancers.[11]

Methods

[edit]

There are a few different methods[2] of shaping trees. There is aeroponic culture, instant tree shaping[12][13] and gradual tree shaping.[13]

Chair created using aeroponic root shaping[14]

Aeroponic culture uses aeroponics, a process of growing tree roots in a nutrient rich mist. Once the roots are of a desired length for the pre-determined design they are shaped as they are planted.[15][14] This technique may be used in part to help form large permanent structures, such as eco-architecture.[16] The oldest known root shaping are the living root bridges built by the ancient War-Khasi people of the Cherrapunjee region in India.[citation needed]

Living red alder bench by Richard Reames

Instant tree shaping is a method that uses flexible thin trees 2 to 4 m (6.6 to 13.1 ft).[12][17]: 196 [18][19] The trees are bent and woven into different designs and held until cast.[12][20]: 80  Bends are then held in place for several years until their form is permanently cast. With this method it is possible to perform initial bending and grafting on a project in an hour, as with Peace in Cherry by Richard Reames.[17]: 193 [20]: 56–57  Girdling, also called ring-barking, may be employed to help balance a design should one part of the design outgrow the other, creating a loss of symmetry. Creasing is performed by folding trees such as willow and poplar over upon themselves without breaking.[20]: 57, 69 [17]: 80 

"Grownup furniture" three-legged stool by Chris Cattle

Gradual tree shaping[13][21] starts with designing and framing.[21][22] Young seedlings or saplings[23]: 4  3–12 in. (7.6–30.5 cm) long[24][22] are planted. The growth is guided along predetermined design pathways; this may be a wooden jig[9] or a complex wire design.[25] The shaping zone is a small area just behind the growing tip that forms the final shape.[21] [26] This zone requires day to day or weekly guiding of the new growth. To achieve a finished piece takes longer with this method. A chair design might take 8 to 10 years to reach maturity.[27] Some of Axel Erlandson's trees took 40 years to assume their finished shapes.[28]

Common techniques

[edit]

Some techniques are common to all the above methods though sometimes they are used differently for each.

Framing might consist of a combination or any one of several materials, including the tree itself, living[17]: 178  or dead.[29]: 58 

Grafting is a commonly employed technique that exploits the natural biological process of inosculation. A branch is cut and held in place, it can be of the same plant or another cultivar of the plant. Grafting is applied to create permanent connections and joints.[citation needed]

Pruning can be used to balance a design by controlling and directing growth into a desired shape.[26][29]: 70 [30]

Timing is used as part of the construction and is intrinsic to achieving this art form.[clarification needed][31][failed verification]

Structure

[edit]

Living grown structures have a number of structural mechanical advantages over those constructed of lumber [citation needed] and are more resistant to decay. While there are some decay organisms that can rot live wood from the outside, and though living trees can carry decayed and decaying heartwood inside them; in general, living trees decay from the inside out and dead wood decays from the outside in.[32] Living wood tissue, particularly sapwood, wields a very potent defense against decay from either direction, known as compartmentalization. This protection applies to living trees only and varies among species.[citation needed]

Growing structures is not as easy as it would seem.[33] Quick growing willows have been used to grow building structures, they provide support or protection.[33] A young group of German architects are in the process of such a structure and they are continually monitored and checked.[33] Once the trees are of age to be able to take on load-bearing weight they are tested for stability and strength by a structural engineer.[33] Once this is approved the supporting framework is removed.[33] Projects are limited to the trees' weight loading ability and growth.[33] This is being studied and the load capacity will be proved by testing on prototypes.[34]

Design options

[edit]

Designs may include abstract, symbolic, or functional elements. Some shapes crafted and grown are purely artistic; perhaps cubes, circles, or letters of an alphabet, while other designs might yield any of a wide variety of useful shapes, such as clothes hangers,[35] laundry and wastepaper bins,[35] ladders,[36] furniture,[37] tools, and tool handles. Eye-catching structures such as living fences and jungle gyms[36] can also be grown, and even large architectural designs such as live archways, domes,[37] gazebos,[36] tunnels, and theoretically entire homes[16] are possible with careful planning, planting, and culturing over time.[11] The Human Ecology Design team (H.E.D.) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is designing homes that can be grown from native trees in a variety of climates.[38]

Suitable trees are installed according to design specifications and then cultured over time into intended structures. Some designs may use only living, growing wood to form the structures, while others might also incorporate inclusions[13][26] such as glass, mirror, steel and stone, any of which might be used either as either structural or aesthetic elements.[26] Inclusions can be positioned in a project as it is grown and, depending on the design, may either be removed when no longer needed for support or left in place to become fixed inclusions in the growing tissue.[29]: 117 

The befit of using trees to grow a design which is then harvested for furniture, is that these pieces are stronger than the results of conventional manufacturing process. As the grain of the timber flows through the design instead of being chopped into smaller pieces then glued back together to form the design. All the joins of a shaped tree are grafted forming a stronger bond than a manufactured piece.[9]

Environmental benefits

[edit]

Shaped tree projects can play a role in mitigating the imbalance of carbon dioxide-oxygen that happens in cities, creating a microclimate that could be soothing to human habitation. The types of projects that could work in this environment would be playground equipment, road furniture, walkways with over-bridges and bus shelters. This increased growth of trees would improve the shade and create a fresh wind channel. When choosing the trees to use a fruit tree would have the added use of giving food as well. It can be renewable in the long run and when they die they can be used as fertilizer.[39]

The trees and shaped roots can hold the soil preventing soil erosion and forestalling landslides.[40] In the right circumstances the trees could be planted over landfills and garbage dumps. Biodegradable waste could be used to help the trees remain healthily.[39]

Chronology of notable practitioners

[edit]

Tree fortifications

[edit]

Julius Caesar describes in his De Bello Gallico that the Nervii planted and bent trees into wall-like hedges[41]. Similar practices have been used throughout Europe until the 18th century, often as a comparatively cheap method to delineate regional borders with large-scale border fortifications. The resulting fortifications that developed around the original bent trees, usually left alone for centuries, could range up to 100 m in thickness. A similar example from Asia was the Willow Palisade that derived its name from the willows with wickered branches that made up part of the barrier.

War-Khasi people

[edit]

The ancient War-Khasi people of India worked with the aerial roots of native banyan fig trees, adapting them to create footbridges over watercourses. Modern people of the Cherrapunjee region carry on this traditional building craft. Roots selected for bridge spans are supported and guided in darkness as they are being formed, by threading long, thin, supple banyan roots through tubes made from hollowed-out trunks of woody grasses. Preferred species for the tubes are either bamboo or areca palm, or 'kwai' in Khasi, which they cultivate for areca nuts. The Khasi incorporate aerial roots from overhanging trees to form support spans and safety handrails. Some bridges can carry fifty or more people at once. At least one example, over the Umshiang stream, is a double-decker bridge. They can take ten to fifteen years to become fully functional and are expected to last up to 600 years.[citation needed]

John Krubsack

[edit]

John Krubsack was an American banker and farmer from Embarrass, Wisconsin. He shaped and grafted the first known grown chair,[12] harvesting it in 1914. He lived from 1858 to 1941. He had studied tree grafting and become a skilled found-wood furniture crafter.[42] The idea first came to him to grow his own chair during a weekend wood-hunting excursion with his son.[citation needed]

He started box elder seeds in 1903, selecting and planting either 28[42] or 32[43] of the saplings in a carefully designed pattern in the spring of 1907.[42] In the spring of 1908, the trees had grown to six feet tall and he began training them along a trellis, grafting the branches at critical points to form the parts of his chair.[42] In 1913, he cut all the trees except those forming the legs, which he left to grow and increase in diameter for another year, before harvesting and drying the chair in 1914; eleven years after he started the box elder seeds.[42] Dubbed The Chair that Lived; it is the only known tree shaping that John Krubsack did.[42][43] The chair went on tour via several exhibitions around the US and was featured in Ripley's Believe It or Not!.[42] The chair is on permanent display in a Plexiglas case at the entrance of Noritage Furniture; the furniture manufacturing business now owned by Krubsack's descendants, Steve and Dennis Krubsack.[17]

Axel Erlandson

[edit]
Basket Tree by Axel Erlandson
Needle & Thread Tree by Axel Erlandson

Axel Erlandson was a Swedish American farmer who started training trees as a hobby on his farm in Hilmar, California, in 1925. He was inspired by observing a natural sycamore inosculation in his hedgerow.[3] In 1945, he moved his family and the best of his trees from Hilmar to Scotts Valley, California, and in 1947,[17] opened an horticultural attraction called the Tree Circus.

Erlandson lived from 1884 to 1964; training more than 70 trees during his lifetime. He considered his methods trade secrets and when asked how he made his trees do this, he would only reply, "I talk to them."[23] His work appeared in the column of Ripley's Believe It or Not! twelve times.[44] 24 trees from his original garden have survived transplanting to their permanent home at Gilroy Gardens in Gilroy, California. His Telephone Booth Tree is on permanent display at the American Visionary Art Museum in Baltimore, Maryland[38] and his Birch Loop tree is on permanent display at the Museum of Art and History in Santa Cruz, California. Both of these are preserved dead specimens.

Arthur Wiechula

[edit]
19th-century sketch by Arthur Wiechula of inosculated branches

Arthur Wiechula was a German landscape engineer who lived from 1868 to 1941. In 1926, he published Wachsende Häuser aus lebenden Bäumen entstehend (Developing Houses from Living Trees) in German.[45][46] In it, he gave detailed illustrated descriptions of houses grown from trees and described simple building techniques involving guided grafting together of live branches; including a system of v-shaped lateral cuts used to bend and curve individual trunks and branches in the direction of a design, with reaction wood soon closing the wounds to hold the curves.[47] He proposed growing wood so that it constituted walls during growth, thereby enabling the use of young wood for building.[47] Weichula never built a living home, but he grew a 394' wall of Canadian poplars to help keep the snow off of a section of train tracks.[45]

Dan Ladd

[edit]

Dan Ladd is a Northampton, Massachusetts based American artist who works with trees and gourds. He began experimenting with glass, china, and metal inclusions in trees in 1977 in Vermont and started planting trees for Extreme Nature in 1978.[48] He became inspired by inosculation he noticed in nature and by the growth of tree trunks around man-made objects such as fences and idle farm equipment.[48] He shapes and grafts trees, including their fruits and their roots, into architectural and geometric forms.[48] Ladd calls human-initiated inosculation 'pleaching' and calls his own work 'tree sculpture'.[48] Ladd binds a variety of objects to trees, for live wood to grow around and be incorporated, including teacups, bicycle wheels, headstones, steel spheres, water piping, and electrical conduit.[48] He guides roots into shapes, such as stairs, using above-ground wooden and concrete forms and even shapes woody, hard-shelled Lagenaria gourds by allowing them to grow into detailed molds.[49] A current project at the DeCordova and Dana Museum and Sculpture Park in Lincoln, Massachusetts incorporates eleven American Liberty Elm trees grafted next to each other to form a long hillside stair banister. Another of his installations, Three Arches, consists of three pairs of 14-foot sycamore trees, which he grafted into arches to frame different city views, at Frank Curto Park in Pittsburgh.[38][50]

Nirandr Boonnetr

[edit]

Nirandr Boonnetr is a Thai furniture designer and crafter. He became inspired as a child, both by a photograph of some unusually twisted coconut palms in southern Thailand and by a living fallen tree he noticed, which had grown new branches along its trunk, forming a kind of canopied bridge.[17] His hobby began in 1980 because of his concern the Thailand forests are being ravaged by woodcarvers to the point that one day the industry would eventually carve itself out of existence.[51] He began his first piece, a guava chair, c. 1983.[17] Originally intended as something for his children to climb and play on, the piece evolved into a living tree chair.[17]: 91  In fifteen years he created six pieces of "living furniture",[51] including five chairs and a table. The Bangkok Post dubbed him the father of Living Furniture.[17][52] Shortly thereafter, he presented a chair as a gift to her Royal Highness, Princess Sirindhorn. Nirandr Boonnetr has written a detailed, step-by-step booklet of instructions hoping his hobby of living furniture will spread to other countries.[51] One of his chairs was exhibited in the Growing Village pavilion at the World's Fair Expo 2005 in Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.[citation needed]

Peter Cook and Becky Northey

[edit]
People trees, by Pooktre

Peter Cook and Becky Northey of Pooktre are Australian artists who live in South East Queensland. Cook began to grow his first chair in 1987 with 7 willow cuttings.[53] He was inspired by three fig trees on his property.[54][53] They were the featured artists at the Growing Village pavilion showing 8 pieces of grown art at the World's Expo 2005 in Nagakute, Aichi Prefecture, Japan.[55]

Their methods involve guiding the tree's growth along predetermined wire design pathways over a period of time.[15][27] They shape growing trees both for living outdoor art and for intentional harvest. They most often use Myrobalan Plum for shaping.[25]

Richard Reames

[edit]
Richard Reames's Peace in Cherry

Richard Reames is an American nurseryman and author based in Williams, Oregon, where he owns and manages a nursery, and design studio collectively named Arborsmith Studios.[56] He was inspired by the works of Axel Erlandson,[17]: 150 [20]: 16 [57] and began sculpting trees in 1991[58] or 1992.[29] He began his first experimental grown chairs[20]: 57  in the spring of 1993.[20]: 85 

In 1995, Reames wrote and published his first book, How to Grow a Chair: The Art of Tree Trunk Topiary. In it, he coined the word arborsculpture.[20] His second book, Arborsculpture: Solutions for a Small Planet was published in 2005.[17]

Christopher Cattle

[edit]
Christopher Cattle's grown stool in sycamore

Christopher Cattle is a retired furniture design professor from Oxford England.[59] He started his first planting of furniture in 1996.[9] According to Cattle, in the late 1970s he developed an idea to train and graft trees to grow into shapes[60] in response to questions from students asking how to build furniture using less energy.[59] Using various species of trees and wooden jigs to shape them,[24] he has grown 15 three-legged stools to completion.[citation needed]

He hopes to inspire others to grow their own furniture,[38][60] and envisions that, "One day, furniture factories could be replaced by furniture orchards."[38] He calls his works "grown up furniture", "grown stools",[59][61] and "grown furniture", calling them "the result of mature thinking."[59]

Mr. Wu

[edit]

Mr. Wu is a Chinese pensioner who designs, crafts and grows furniture in Shenyang, Liaoning, China. He's been practicing this from 2000.[62] [63][64] He enjoys some worldwide fame.[65] He has patented his technique of growing wooden chairs and as of 2005, had designed, grown, and harvested one chair, in 2004. He had six more growing in his garden.[64] Wu uses young elm trees,[66] which he says are pliant and do not break easily.[64] He also says that it takes him about five years to grow a tree chair.[63] He now uses his finished chairs within his home. With the hope of inspiring others to grow furniture.[62]

Gavin Munro

[edit]

Gavin Munro is a designer who grows chairs, lamps, mirror frames and tables[67][68] by training trees in his chair orchard located at Wirksworth, in Derbyshire, England.[69] Munro co-founded Full Grown in 2005.

[edit]

Other artistic horticultural practices such as bonsai, espalier, and topiary share some elements and a common heritage, though a number of distinctions may be identified.[citation needed]

Bonsai

[edit]

Bonsai is the art of growing trees in small containers. Bonsai uses techniques such as pruning, root reduction, and shaping branches and roots to produce small trees that mimic full-sized mature trees. Bonsai is not intended for production of food, but instead mainly for contemplation by viewers, like most fine art.[70][71]

Espalier

[edit]

Espalier is the art and horticultural practice of training tree branches onto ornamental shapes along a frame for aesthetic and fruit production by grafting, shaping and pruning the branches so that they grow flat, frequently in formal patterns, against a structure such as a wall, fence, or trellis.[72] The practice is commonly used to accelerate and increase production in fruit-bearing trees and also to decorate flat exterior walls while conserving space.[72]

Pleaching

[edit]

Pleaching is a technique of weaving the branches of trees into a hedge commonly, deciduous trees are planted in lines, then pleached to form a flat plane on clear stems above the ground level. Branches are woven together and lightly tied.[73] Branches in close contact may grow together, due to a natural phenomenon called inosculation, a natural graft. Pleach also means weaving of thin, whippy stems of trees to form a basketry affect.[74]

Topiary

[edit]

Topiary is the horticultural practice of shaping live trees, by clipping the foliage and twigs of trees and shrubs to develop and maintain clearly defined shapes,[75] often geometric or fanciful. The hedge is a simple form of topiary used to create boundaries, walls or screens. Topiary always involves regular shearing and shaping of foliage to maintain the shape.[citation needed]

Plantings for the future

[edit]

The Fab Tree Hab

[edit]
Fab Tree Hab 3D render

Three MIT designers – Mitchell Joachim, Lara Greden and Javier Arbona – created a concept of a living tree house which nourishes its inhabitants and merges with its environment.[39][76] The project of Fab Tree Hab is expected to take a minimum of five years to grow the home.[77] The plans are for the interior to be lined with clay and plastered to keep the weather outside and to look normal. The exterior is to be all natural.[77]

The Patient Gardener

[edit]

A Swedish architectural firm VisionDivision took part in a week-long workshop at the Italian university Politecnico di Milano[1] with the students. The result was an 80-year plan[78] of a living cherry tree dome in an hourglass shape and grown furniture. On 8 November 2011, ten Japanese cherry trees were planted with the framing of the dome. The Japanese cherry trees were planted in a diameter of eight-meter circle. Four of these trees are to be living staircases to a future top level. The stair trees will have their branches grafted into each other to form the rungs.[1][78] VisionDivision's architects helped the students and instructors to create an easy maintenance plan for future gardeners of the university.[78]

Baubotanik Tower

[edit]

The Baubotanik Tower was designed by Ferdinand Ludwig as part of his doctoral thesis with the help of Prof. Dr. Speck. Growing at the University of Stuttgart is a three-storey tower of living white willows (Salix alba). This nine-meter-tall construction is fully grown as of 27 April 2024, with a base area of around eight square meters.[11] [34] : 86 

The framing is made up of mainly steel scaffolding which is supporting the growing trees, while keeping them to the correct form. They started with 400 white willow (Salix alba) grown in baskets on multiple levels with one row of willows planted into the ground. Once the trees were two meters tall, they were planted at the different levels of the tower. These plants are then trained to the design.[11][34]

The root system of the bottom level of willows needs to develop large enough to support the willows on the above levels, so that the scaffold becomes obsolete and then it and the watering and fertilising baskets can be removed altogether.[34] : 86 

The trees are grafted together with the objective of all the different plants eventually becoming a single organism. The overall aim is to have a living structure with the strength to support itself and to carry a working load. Ferdinand predicts the tower will be stable enough to support itself in five to ten years.[34] Ferdinand does state "However, these are only estimates."[11]

Assessment

[edit]

The advantages are trees can improve the habitation by generating more oxygen, giving shade and reuse of waste water creating a micro climate. Living trees are less prone to rot than timber via a process called compartmentalization. The joins are stronger than man made joinery. Mostly resistant to earthquakes and tsunamis.[39]

Some issues are the lack of working knowledge of how trees grow by architects and others. The speed of growth is unpredictable and they can grow in unwanted ways – thus creating a need to make plans adjustable. Trees can only reach a specific height and size dictated by their species. The environment can have a large impact on the growth and health of the trees.[39]

Alternative names

[edit]

The practice of shaping living trees has several names. Practitioners may have their own name for their techniques, so a standard name for the various practices has not emerged.[55] "Arborsculpture",[58][79][80] "tree sculpture",[48] "living furniture",[52] and other names have been used.[59][81][82]

The following names are also encountered:

In fiction and art

[edit]
1516 painting by Jean Perréal

In 1516, Jean Perréal painted an allegorical image,[58] La complainte de nature à l'alchimiste errant, (The Lament of Nature to the Wandering Alchemist), in which a winged figure with arms crossed, representing nature, sits on a tree stump with a fire burning in its base, conversing with an alchemist in an ankle-length coat, standing outside of his stone-laid shoreline laboratory. Live resprouting shoots emerge from either side of the tree stump seat to form a fancifully twined and inosculated two-story-tall chair back.[88][89][90]

In 1758, Swedish scientist, philosopher, Christian mystic, and theologian Emanuel Swedenborg published Earths in the Universe, in which he wrote of visiting another planet where the residents dwelled in living groves of trees, whose growth they had planned and directed from a very young stage into living quarters and sanctuaries.[79][91]

In the late 19th century, Styrian Christian mystic and visionary Jakob Lorber published The Household of God. In it, he wrote about the wisdom of planting trees in a circle, because once grown together, the ring of trees would be a much better house than could be built.[79][92]

In J. R. R. Tolkien's popular fiction, The Lord of the Rings, elves were able to shape trees by singing,[93] and in Lothlórien, a forest described therein, trees were shaped into homes and walkways.

There are also tree-shaping elves in the 1978 comic book series Elfquest. They created homes, bows, animal forms, and other things to grow instantly from living trees. Most notable of these elves are Redlance and Goodtree.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Tree shaping, also known as arborsculpture, is the practice of guiding the growth of living trees and other woody plants to form artistic sculptures, functional structures, or architectural elements through deliberate cultivation techniques. This horticultural art combines principles of botany and design, leveraging natural processes like —where branches fuse together—to create self-sustaining forms that continue to grow, repair, and adapt over time. The origins of tree shaping trace back centuries, with early depictions appearing in a 1516 painting by French alchemist Jean Perréal showing an angel seated in a grafted form. In the early , American banker John Krubsack grew the first known living from grafted box elder saplings between 1903 and 1914, demonstrating practical applications for furniture. German landscape architect Arthur Wiechula advanced the field in 1926 with his book Wachsende Häume aus lebenden Bäumen entstehend, promoting woven branch structures for garden architecture. The term "arborsculpture" was coined in 1995 by arborist Richard Reames and artist Barbara Delbol in their book How to Grow a : The Art of Tree Trunk Topiary, which popularized the practice in modern contexts. Key techniques in tree shaping include approach grafting, where living branches are brought into contact to heal and fuse; bending and weaving young shoots around frames; to direct energy toward desired growth; and bracing to support structures during development. These methods typically use fast-growing, pliable such as (Salix spp.), (Acer spp.), (Fagus spp.), or sycamore (Platanus spp.), with projects requiring 3 to 15 years or more to mature depending on scale. Pioneering practitioner created over 70 shaped trees in , starting in the 1920s, including a "Basket Tree" and "Telephone Booth Tree," which formed the basis of his Tree Circus attraction opened in 1947 and later relocated to where 25 specimens survive as of 2025 (19 on public display). In contemporary applications, tree shaping extends to under the banner of baubotanik, as developed by German architect Ferdinand Ludwig, who has constructed living structures like a three-story willow tower in Wald-Ruhestetten near and the Plane-Tree-Cube pavilion in using metal frames for initial support. Practitioners such as Reames continue to produce functional items like chairs and ladders, while emerging research integrates bio-hybrid systems, including robotic to direct growth via light manipulation, as explored in MIT studies on automated shaping. This evolution highlights tree shaping's potential for , where living materials offer carbon-sequestering, adaptive alternatives to static construction.

Overview

Definition and principles

Tree shaping, also known as arborsculpture, is a horticultural practice that involves the gradual manipulation of living trees and other woody plants to create deliberate structures, functional items, or artistic forms. This art form relies on guiding the natural growth of branches, trunks, and roots over extended periods, typically using techniques such as , , , and bracing to form shapes that integrate seamlessly with the plant's . At its core, tree shaping exploits key biological principles of . When branches are bent or stems are directed, trees respond through the layer—a thin, generative tissue beneath the bark—where new wood and cells form annually, allowing the plant to adapt and stabilize altered positions. achieves fusion when layers of two stems are aligned and secured, promoting formation and eventual , where the tissues heal and grow together as a single unit. disrupts —the hormonal control exerted by the tree's leading shoot that inhibits lateral growth—redirecting energy to desired branches and encouraging bushier or shaped development. further supports the process, as trees compartmentalize injuries from cuts or bends by producing protective tissue, preventing decay and enabling structural integrity over time. Successful tree shaping requires selecting appropriate species with flexible wood, rapid growth, and strong regenerative abilities, such as willows (Salix spp.), maples (Acer spp.), alders (Alnus spp.), and sycamores (Platanus spp.), which thrive in various soils and climates. The process demands patience, as forms develop over years to decades; for instance, initial bracing may hold for at least one year until lignification sets the shape, while complex structures like arches or furniture can take 10 or more years to mature fully. Key prerequisites include starting with young saplings (typically 6-8 feet tall) planted in suitable, well-drained locations, and employing non-lethal guides like wires, ties, molds, or stakes to direct growth without restricting vascular flow or causing girdling. The basic workflow begins with planning the design, selecting and planting saplings spaced 3-4 feet apart, and immediately applying initial bends or grafts secured with tape or braces. Ongoing maintenance involves regular to balance growth, watering to support vigor, and adjustments to guides as the tree expands, ensuring the final form emerges organically from the plant's living .

Alternative names

Tree shaping is referred to by various alternative names that underscore its blend of horticultural, artistic, and architectural elements, with terms varying by region and emphasis. Common synonyms include arborsculpture, arbortecture, biotecture, and living architecture, while more specialized or traditional designations encompass grown furniture, tree training, and baubotanik. The term arborsculpture, derived from the Latin "arbor" meaning and "sculpture," was coined in 1995 by horticulturist Richard Reames and artist Barbara Delbol in their book How to Grow a : The of Trunk , to describe the intentional shaping of trees into artistic forms through and guiding growth. This highlights the sculptural aspect, distinguishing it from mere , and gained prominence as the practice transitioned from novelty to recognized form. In contrast, arbortecture and biotecture emphasize structural and biological integration, often used in contexts where shaped trees form functional buildings or environmental installations, reflecting a practical or eco-focused lens rather than purely aesthetic ones. Baubotanik, a portmanteau of German words for "building" (Bau) and "" (Botanik), was introduced by architect Ferdinand Ludwig in the early to denote engineered living plant structures, particularly in . Grown furniture, meanwhile, points to utilitarian outcomes like chairs or tables formed from living wood, prioritizing functionality over ornamentation. Terminology for tree shaping has evolved significantly, shifting from ancient folk practices to contemporary artistic descriptors in the post-. Early methods like —interlacing branches to form living hedges or tunnels—date back to Roman times and medieval gardens, where they served practical purposes such as boundary-making and shade provision without a dedicated artistic label. By the , innovators like farmer , who shaped over 70 trees into whimsical forms for his 1940s "Tree Circus" attraction, popularized sculptural applications, though he used descriptive phrases like "circus trees" rather than formalized terms. The rise of modern labels such as arborsculpture in the late marked a pivot toward viewing the practice as intentional bio-art, influenced by environmental movements and advancements in techniques, while regional variations like baubotanik emerged in to address urban . This linguistic progression mirrors the field's growth from utilitarian to a global medium for living design.

History

Traditional origins

Tree shaping has deep roots in indigenous and folk practices across various cultures, where communities manipulated living s for practical purposes long before modern horticultural innovations. In northeastern , the Khasi and Jaintia peoples of have constructed living root bridges using the of the rubber tree (Ficus elastica), a technique passed down through generations and dating back at least several centuries. These bridges, some spanning over 50 meters and estimated to be more than 500 years old, are formed by guiding flexible roots across streams and ravines, where they are woven, secured with stones or , and allowed to thicken over time into durable, self-sustaining structures that grow stronger with age. This method not only facilitates safe passage in the region's rugged, monsoon-prone terrain but also exemplifies adapted to local ecology. In , traditional tree shaping emerged in ancient and medieval contexts for agricultural and landscape purposes. Early artistic depictions include a by French alchemist Jean Perreal showing an angel seated in a grafted tree form. The Romans practiced early forms of , training fruit trees flat against walls or trellises to maximize sunlight exposure and space in orchards, a method described in classical texts and evidenced in archaeological remains of walled gardens. By the medieval period, became widespread across , particularly in , , and , where branches of trees like , lime, or were intertwined and woven to form living hedges, arbours, and boundary fences that provided shade, privacy, and protection from wind or . These techniques, often labor-intensive and renewed seasonally, were integral to monastic gardens and feudal estates, blending utility with aesthetic enclosure. Globally, similar utilitarian shaping appears in East Asian gardening traditions and other non-industrial societies. In , grafting techniques for fruit trees and ornamentals were documented as early as the BCE, with ancient texts describing the joining of branches to enhance yields or create novel forms in imperial gardens, influencing landscape design for erosion control and aesthetic harmony. adopted and refined these methods from the 7th century onward, incorporating into and orchard practices to shape trees for compact, enduring displays. These practices underscore tree shaping's cultural role in fostering , resource management, and integration with natural landscapes in pre-modern societies.

Modern development

In the early , tree shaping emerged as an experimental practice among individual pioneers in and . John Krubsack, a banker and farmer from Embarrass, , planted 32 box elder saplings in 1903 to form the first known grown chair, which he harvested after 11 years of and training; the piece debuted at the 1915 Panama-Pacific International Exposition in . Concurrently, in , agricultural engineer Arthur Wiechula advanced the concept through his 1926 publication Developing Houses from Living Trees, where he detailed methods for training trees into architectural forms and demonstrated success by cultivating a 394-foot living wall from Canadian poplars. By mid-century, tree shaping gained public visibility as a novelty art form. , a Swedish-American farmer in , began shaping trees in the using and bending techniques, culminating in his "Circus Trees" collection of over 70 sculptural forms by the 1940s; he opened the Tree Circus roadside attraction in Scotts Valley in 1947, drawing visitors through the until its closure in 1963, with one tree later exhibited at the 2005 World Expo in Aichi, Japan. The late saw expanded documentation and global reach, transitioning tree shaping from isolated experiments to a documented . In 1995, Oregon-based Richard Reames published How to Grow a : The of Tree Trunk , coining the term "arborsculpture" and popularizing techniques for creating living furniture, which inspired widespread adoption among hobbyists. Simultaneously, in , furniture designer Nirandr Boonnetr began shaping guava trees into chairs and tables in the 1980s, motivated by deforestation concerns, producing harvestable living pieces that emphasized resource conservation. Entering the , tree shaping has evolved with a stronger emphasis on and integration into eco-art, leveraging digital tools for precise planning of long-term growth patterns. Projects like the 2005 Fab Tree Hab—a conceptual grafted developed by MIT architecture students using techniques on-site scaffolds—highlight its potential for eco-friendly housing that sequesters carbon while providing habitat. This period has also seen minor growth in eco-art installations worldwide, such as living sculptures in public spaces that promote environmental awareness, though no major paradigm shifts have occurred through 2025.

Methods

Grafting techniques

Grafting techniques in tree shaping focus on joining living tree tissues to form durable, fused structures that support artistic or functional designs. These methods rely on the layer, the thin growth tissue beneath the bark, to heal and integrate the joined parts into a single vascular system. Key types include for natural fusions and approach for joining living branches, with variants like whip-and-tongue for secure contacts between similar-diameter parts. Inosculation begins with branches or trunks positioned in close contact, often through initial bending or weaving, where natural rubbing erodes the bark over time. The exposed layers then align and heal, intermingling vascular tissues and forming new bark to encase the union, typically requiring 1 to 3 years for full integration depending on species and environmental conditions. This method is particularly effective with flexible species like (Salix spp.), sycamore ( spp.), and poplar ( spp.), which have thin bark and vigorous growth. Approach grafting, the easiest method for tree shaping, involves bringing living branches into contact without severing them, binding the wounds to align layers for fusion over about 1 year. Variants such as whip-and-tongue use matching cuts and interlocks for stability in similar-diameter branches, secured with ties or tape while tissue forms. These techniques are applied to construct frames, arches, and multi-trunk forms, such as intertwining branches to create living furniture or supportive lattices in structures. For instance, approach grafts allow non-severed branches to fuse while guiding growth toward desired shapes. Challenges in grafting include risks of from improper cuts or exposure, incompatibility between that prevents fusion, and long-term stability issues like included bark weakening joints under stress. Success demands precise alignment, secure immobilization with materials like stretch tape, and regular monitoring to seal wounds and brace against wind or movement until the graft strengthens.

Bending and guiding techniques

Bending and guiding techniques in tree shaping involve the mechanical manipulation of young tree branches and trunks to direct growth into predetermined forms, relying on the plasticity of living wood without the need for surgical interventions. Practitioners typically select flexible, unbranched saplings or "whips" and apply gradual pressure to curve them, using supports to maintain the position until the tree's natural thickening process sets the shape. This method emphasizes patience, as abrupt forces can cause fractures, and instead promotes distributed bending over broader areas to minimize stress on the vascular tissues. Common tools and materials include stakes for anchoring, or for initial tying, and wire—often aluminum or for its malleability—to secure bends without constricting growth as the tree expands. Wooden braces or metal rods serve as jigs to enforce specific curves, while tree tape protects bark from abrasion during prolonged contact. complements these by removing competing shoots, redirecting the tree's energy toward the guided structure and promoting balanced development. The process begins with initial bending during the tree's first one to two years of growth, when tissues are most pliable, followed by periodic adjustments and maintenance over five to twenty years to stabilize the form as the wood lignifies and thickens. Growth rates dictate the pace; faster species may achieve preliminary shapes in a few seasons, but full maturation requires ongoing monitoring to counteract natural tendencies toward vertical growth. Fast-growing species such as (Salix spp.) and poplar (Populus spp.) are ideal due to their vigorous response and flexibility, allowing quicker results in experimental designs, though they demand vigilant care to prevent overgrowth. Risks include branch breakage if bends exceed the tree's tolerance, particularly in less resilient woods, underscoring the need for incremental adjustments. These techniques can integrate with for more intricate architectures, but stand alone for simpler, organic forms.

Notable Practitioners and Works

Traditional practitioners

The Khasi and Jaintia peoples of , , have practiced tree shaping for centuries, most notably through the creation of living root bridges using the of trees. These bridges, guided across streams and rivers, serve as durable crossings in the region's hilly terrain and have been maintained for over 500 years, with some structures supporting heavy foot traffic and even growing stronger over time. In rural and , traditional hedgerow pleachers—folk practitioners in agricultural communities—have interweaved living branches of species like , blackthorn, and hawthorn to form living fences and boundaries, a technique dating back to for containment and land division. These communal efforts create dense, self-renewing hedgerows that enhance and soil stability in landscapes. Southeast Asian communities, particularly in Indonesia and Vietnam, have employed bamboo weaving techniques to construct communal structures such as bridges and pavilions, guiding young bamboo culms to form flexible, living frameworks that integrate with the environment for flood-prone areas. Across these traditions, techniques emphasize root guiding—where flexible roots or branches are trained along supports—and natural , the fusion of tissues between adjacent plants, which thrives in humid, tropical or temperate climates to ensure structural integrity without mechanical fasteners. These practices are transmitted through oral traditions within indigenous and rural groups, fostering intergenerational knowledge, while contemporary preservation initiatives, such as community-led maintenance programs, aim to protect these skills amid and environmental changes.

Early modern pioneers

One of the earliest documented pioneers in tree shaping was John Krubsack, a banker and farmer from Embarrass, . In 1903, he began experimenting with growing a from living box elder trees, using techniques to fuse 32 saplings into a functional furniture piece over the course of 11 years. By 1914, the chair was harvested and later displayed at the 1915 Panama-Pacific International Exposition in , marking the first known instance of shaped tree furniture created for practical use. In , landscape engineer Arthur Wiechula advanced the conceptual framework for tree shaping through his writings in the early . In 1926, he published Wachsende Häuser aus lebenden Bäumen entstehend, a book that outlined methods for designing structures using guided tree growth, such as arches and frames from young saplings. Wiechula's work emphasized aesthetic and functional designs, drawing on natural tree forms to create living architecture, though he focused more on theory and small-scale applications than large constructions. Axel Erlandson, a Swedish-American farmer in , emerged as a key figure in the 1920s by transforming tree shaping into public spectacle. Starting in 1925 near Turlock, he grafted and bent species like sycamores, box elders, and willows into whimsical forms, including hearts, spirals, and an elephant-shaped tree. By the 1940s, Erlandson had created over 70 such "Circus Trees," which he exhibited at his Tree Circus attraction in Scotts Valley from 1947 until his death in 1964, attracting visitors with shapes like intertwined trunks forming ladders and birdcages. These early modern pioneers shifted tree shaping from utilitarian or traditional practices toward artistic expression and public display, laying groundwork for its evolution into a recognized form of living that influenced subsequent generations of arborsculptors.

Contemporary artists

Dan Ladd, based in , has been shaping trees into furniture and s since the 1980s, using techniques such as and bending to create living architectural forms like arches and benches. His works, often constructed from and other , emphasize with the natural environment and have been exhibited in public spaces, including the Five Elm Arches in , which spanned 58 feet before partial deterioration. Ladd also conducts educational workshops to teach arborsculpture methods, promoting the practice as a sustainable alternative to traditional . In , Nirandr Boonnetr has specialized in heart-shaped trees since 1987, beginning with a tree shaped for family use and expanding to commercial plantings of and other species. His designs, which involve gradual bending and wiring over years, have gained popularity for ornamental and tourism purposes, with heart forms symbolizing affection and integrated into landscapes for sale. Richard Reames, operating from Williams, , has advanced tree shaping through laburnum arches and other grafted structures since the 1990s, coining the term "arborsculpture" to describe the art. His projects include living sculptures like intertwined hearts and walkways, showcased at Arborsmith Studios, and he has promoted globally via books such as Arborsculpture: Solutions for a Small Planet (2005), which details techniques and historical context. Reames' work highlights environmental benefits, using non-invasive methods to grow functional art without harvesting mature trees. Other notable contemporary artists include Christopher Cattle in the UK, who since the late 1970s has developed woven forms from sycamore and , creating grown furniture like chairs and lattices through interweaving young stems. In , Mr. Wu of Province crafts large-scale structures, including chairs and frames, by molding pliant branches over five years or more, resulting in robust, harvestable pieces. Gavin Munro, also in the UK, leads Full Grown, cultivating furniture forests of and into chairs, tables, and lamps since the 2000s, with pieces maturing over a decade and entering commercial markets into the 2020s. Munro's approach emphasizes sustainable production, harvesting only the shaped portions to minimize waste. and Becky Northey of Pooktre in , active since the , have shaped trees into whimsical forms like chairs and animals using non-invasive techniques. These artists reflect broader trends in contemporary tree shaping toward , with works sold as eco-friendly furniture and featured in installations worldwide, fostering greater and in the field.

Designs and Applications

Functional structures

Functional structures in tree shaping emphasize utilitarian applications, where living trees are trained to form practical items such as furniture and architectural elements that serve everyday purposes. These designs leverage the natural growth of woody to create load-bearing objects like chairs, tables, ladders, bridges, and gazebos, often using species such as , sycamore, or box elder that respond well to bending and . Unlike static wooden constructions, these living forms continue to develop, adapting to environmental stresses while providing functional utility. Chairs represent one of the earliest and most iconic functional forms in modern tree shaping. In 1903, banker and farmer John Krubsack planted 32 box elder saplings and spent about 11 years bending and their stems to form the world's first known grown chair, completed in 1914 after the wood had sufficiently matured. This chair, dubbed "The Chair that Lived," demonstrated the feasibility of cultivating furniture directly from living trees, with the intertwined branches providing a natural seat and backrest. Similarly, British designer Gavin Munro has developed orchards in where and other trees are shaped into chairs over 8 to 10 years, allowing the wood to grow into ergonomic forms before minimal harvesting. As of 2025, Munro's Full Grown company continues to produce grown furniture, with recent harvests showcased in exhibitions. Tables are another common type, with Munro's Full Grown company producing specimens where multiple trunks are grafted to form tabletops supported by living legs, enabling pieces that integrate seamlessly with garden landscapes. Ladders and larger architectural elements extend the utility of tree shaping to vertical and spanning structures. In the early , Swedish-American arborsculptor shaped sycamore trees into functional ladders by grafting branches to form rungs and sides, creating climbable forms that could support weight as the wood thickened. Bridges, often rooted in traditional practices but adapted in modern contexts, utilize living roots or trunks for spanning waterways or paths; for instance, the Khasi and War-Jaintia peoples in India's region guide rubber fig tree roots across streams to form suspension bridges capable of bearing pedestrian loads. Gazebos, as shaded enclosures, are constructed by planting rods in circular patterns and weaving them into domed or arched frameworks that thicken over time into supportive shelters. Engineering these structures relies on the biological of trees to ensure and . Load-bearing capacity develops through natural thickening, where trees add annual growth rings in response to mechanical stress, increasing girth at joints and supports to distribute weight effectively; for example, grafted branches in chairs or bridges self-adjust by expanding to handle loads up to several hundred pounds once mature. Stability is achieved via deep integration with the soil, anchoring the structure against wind and , while symmetrical designs prevent uneven stress concentrations. The primary advantages of functional tree-shaped structures include their self-repairing nature, as living wood can heal minor damages through compartmentalization and new tissue growth, extending usability beyond that of harvested timber. Additionally, they offer eco-friendly alternatives to dead wood furniture and buildings by minimizing resource extraction and waste, as the trees continue to photosynthesize and stabilize during their growth phase.

Artistic forms

Tree shaping in its artistic forms emphasizes sculptural and ornamental expressions, where living trees are manipulated to create visually striking, non-utilitarian designs that evoke wonder and creativity. Practitioners employ techniques such as and to form abstract sculptures, including spirals and arches that twist in defiance of natural growth patterns. For instance, arborsculptor Richard Reames has crafted multi-story spirals from poplar trees, where branches are split and regrafted at intervals to form ascending helices up to 30 feet tall, creating an illusion of integrated with organic forms. These abstract works prioritize fluid, geometric abstractions that highlight the malleability of living wood, often resulting in forms that appear impossible without mechanical intervention yet remain fully biological. Animal-inspired shapes represent another key category, on imaginative to imbue trees with qualities. , a pioneering figure, created the "Four-Legged Giant" by four American sycamore saplings together, bending them to simulate the sturdy legs of a colossal creature, complete with a trunk that rises like a body. This piece, developed in the 1920s, exemplifies how early artists used multiple plantings and selective pruning to mimic animal anatomy, fostering a sense of playful narrative in the landscape. Symbolic forms further expand this artistic palette, incorporating motifs like hearts and peace signs that convey emotional or philosophical intent; Reames, for example, has shaped trees into interlocking hearts by guiding young branches along curved molds and securing grafts to fuse them seamlessly. Spirals in willow or oak, achieved through repeated bending and wiring during the tree's early growth stages, symbolize continuity and growth, often evoking ancient motifs while harmonizing with natural branching tendencies. The design process for these artistic forms begins with meticulous sketching of projected growth paths, accounting for species-specific flexibility and annual wood accretion rates to anticipate how branches will thicken over time. Artists like Reames start with flexible saplings—such as box elder or —planted in precise patterns, then use temporary molds, wires, or frames to curve trunks into desired contours, removing supports only after grafts heal and new bark forms, a process spanning 5 to 10 years for mature expressions. This patient orchestration ensures structural integrity while allowing the tree's vitality to infuse the final with organic asymmetry, avoiding rigid in favor of evolving, living art. Exhibitions of such works often occur in public gardens and themed attractions, where they captivate audiences; Erlandson's Circus Trees, including his animal and abstract forms, were relocated to in 1985, drawing visitors to experience the surreal harmony of shaped nature amid a family-oriented botanical setting. Similarly, Reames' pieces have been showcased at international venues like the 2005 World Expo in Aichi, , underscoring arborsculpture's role in blending with . Aesthetic goals in artistic tree shaping center on achieving a symbiotic —forms that seem defiantly unnatural yet thrive as vital organisms, promoting a deeper appreciation for nature's adaptability. By contrasting straight bole growth with imposed curves and fusions, these sculptures create visual tension that resolves in elegant, biomorphic harmony, inviting viewers to ponder the boundaries between cultivation and creation. This emphasis on expressive potential over permanence distinguishes artistic forms from utilitarian applications, though brief overlaps in technique may occur.

Environmental benefits

Tree shaping, also known as arborsculpture, offers significant environmental advantages by leveraging the natural processes of living trees to create sustainable structures that continue to function ecologically over time. Unlike traditional wooden constructions that require harvesting and contribute to , shaped trees remain , actively sequestering through and accumulation throughout their lifespan, which can span decades or centuries. This ongoing carbon absorption outperforms static products, as living trees convert atmospheric CO2 into stored carbon at rates comparable to unmanaged forests, potentially mitigating urban impacts. For instance, projects like Baubotanik living architectures demonstrate how shaped trees can sequester carbon while providing functional shade that reduces urban islands and lowers demands for cooling. In terms of , tree shaping integrates living structures into ecosystems, creating habitats for such as birds, , and small mammals that utilize the branches, trunks, and foliage for nesting and . These shaped forms enhance local biodiversity by mimicking natural tree canopies in urban or altered landscapes, supporting pollinators and reducing . Additionally, examples like the living root bridges in , , not only connect communities but also stabilize steep slopes, preventing and landslides while fostering diverse understory plant growth and microbial activity in the root zones. This approach promotes , as the bridges' root systems anchor soil layers more effectively than alternatives, preserving watershed integrity. Resource efficiency is another key benefit, as tree shaping eliminates the need for resource-intensive harvesting, processing, and transportation of timber, thereby reducing the of construction materials. Living structures grow on-site using sunlight, water, and nutrients, requiring no fossil fuel-derived inputs for material production and allowing for self-repair through natural growth. In urban efforts, arborsculpture replaces cut-wood furniture or shelters with low-impact alternatives, conserving forests and minimizing waste. Compared to conventional , these living forms can optimize water use by improving soil retention and reducing runoff, though initial establishment may demand careful . Despite these advantages, tree shaping presents challenges that must be managed to avoid ecological drawbacks. Poorly executed shaping can stress trees, leading to weakened health, increased vulnerability to pests, or dieback, which may reduce overall and habitat value if structures fail prematurely. Maintenance requirements, such as , protection from storms, and monitoring, are intensive, particularly in the early growth phases, and unsuitable selection can exacerbate rot or structural instability. While redundant planting mitigates some losses, tree mortality from environmental factors like or can occur, necessitating ongoing intervention to sustain benefits.

Future Projects

Conceptual designs

One prominent design in tree shaping is the Fab Tree Hab, originally conceptualized in the 2000s by architect Mitchell Joachim and his team at Terreform ONE. This project proposes habitable dwellings grown from interwoven native saplings (Salix spp.) to create a living, multispecies habitat that functions as a terrestrial . The structure integrates human shelter with ecological support for wildlife, emphasizing symbiotic growth where trees provide shade, insulation, and air filtration while aiding in nutrient cycling and stability. Originally envisioned as prefabricated units using computer numeric controlled (CNC) milling for initial shaping, the design has evolved; a physical was completed in 2024 near in , combining tree-grafting with computationally designed timber scaffolds to form a 1000 ft² multispecies habitat. This realization envisions scalable communities that minimize environmental disruption by emerging directly from the landscape. Building on similar principles, the Baubotanik Tower represents a German initiative pioneered by architect Ferdinand Ludwig and collaborators at the . This experimental demonstration project, started in the 2000s, constructs self-supporting towers through the guided —natural —of young trees, such as willows or maples, to form load-bearing wooden frameworks that evolve over decades. By combining living plant elements with temporary non-living supports, baubotanik produces dynamic that adapts to environmental stresses, offering shade, , and in urban settings. The structure, located in Wald-Ruhestetten south of , serves as a test building, with the concept extending to broader applications like bridges or pavilions, where tree growth replaces traditional materials, potentially reducing carbon footprints through biogenic construction. As of 2025, it continues to demonstrate plant-technical composite structures. Extending these ideas, conceptual proposals for urban forests reimagine shaped tree canopies as collective housing solutions, where grafted arboreal networks provide modular shelters in dense cities, drawing from the Fab Tree Hab's village-scale vision for low-income communities. Similarly, bio-mimetic designs in tree shaping incorporate termite mound principles for natural ventilation, guiding branch growth to form chimney-like structures that passively cool interiors via currents. Scientific assessments support the feasibility of such designs, with computational simulations demonstrating that guided willow growth achieves structural integrity sufficient for light load-bearing, exhibiting compressive stresses below 10 MPa after 13 years at rates of 0.6 meters per year in height and 0.5 cm per year radially. These models, based on finite element analysis and Eurocode standards, confirm displacements within allowable limits (e.g., ≤ L/250), though long-term maintenance for and environmental adaptation remains essential for durability spanning 20-30 years.

Experimental plantings

One prominent experimental planting initiative is the Full Grown project in , , led by Munro since the early 2010s, which cultivates groves of and other trees shaped into commercial furniture such as and tables. Trees are trained around custom frames, pruned, and grafted to form the desired structures, with growth taking approximately six years per piece before harvest, as demonstrated by the first Gatti Chair planted in 2012 and completed in 2018. This approach tests scalability for "bio-facture," aiming to produce living furniture groves on a commercial scale without traditional , with ongoing plantings monitored for structural integrity and aesthetic development. As of May 2025, the project continues to expand, producing limited-edition pieces. Overall goals across these projects include scaling for public spaces, such as parks, and integrating smart sensors for real-time growth tracking, like and stability metrics, to optimize shaping without major breakthroughs in by late 2025.

Horticultural shaping

Tree shaping, also known as arborsculpture, shares conceptual roots with other horticultural arts that manipulate plant growth, but it distinctly emphasizes the formation of living structural elements from trunks and branches rather than surface . involves the cultivation of miniature trees through selective , wiring, and container restriction to mimic mature forms in reduced scale, a practice originating in ancient and refined over centuries. In contrast, tree shaping operates on a large scale, guiding full-sized trees to grow into functional architectures like furniture or shelters, allowing natural expansion rather than dwarfing. Topiary, dating back to Roman times and revived in European gardens during the , sculpts the foliage and outer branches of evergreens—often using shears to maintain geometric or representational shapes—resulting in designs reliant on dead wood for permanence once clipped. Tree shaping diverges by focusing on the living, internal framework of the tree, and branches to fuse into self-supporting structures without ongoing trimming of the exterior. This approach yields dynamic, evolving forms that integrate growth patterns, unlike topiary's static, surface-oriented results. Despite these differences, overlaps exist in the toolkit and principles of both practices; for instance, wire is commonly used in and tree shaping to direct branch positioning, while pruning techniques from inform the selective removal in arborsculpture to encourage fusion. Tree shaping extends these methods beyond ornamental miniatures or clippings to create practical builds, such as chairs or arches, by leveraging the tree's innate healing and abilities. Historically, bonsai's emphasis on patient, non-invasive guidance of growth has influenced modern arborsculpture, providing foundational techniques that artists like Richard Reames adapted for larger-scale works in the late . This lineage underscores tree shaping's evolution from traditional Asian and European plant arts into a contemporary synthesis.

Landscape integration

Tree shaping techniques, such as and , enable the seamless incorporation of living woody plants into broader architectures, enhancing both functionality and visual appeal in gardens, urban settings, and agricultural areas. involves training trees flat against walls or trellises through selective and tying, creating two-dimensional forms that optimize fruit production in constrained spaces. This method directs plant energy toward fruit-bearing branches, resulting in earlier and more abundant yields for like apples and pears, while improving air circulation to reduce pest issues and facilitating easier harvesting. Its utility shines in space-limited environments, such as urban gardens or small estates, where traditional tree forms would overwhelm available area. Pleaching complements espalier by weaving branches of trees or shrubs to form living hedges, tunnels, or fences, a practice with roots in medieval European gardens and orchards. Historically employed from the late medieval period through the early 18th century, it created shaded pathways and sturdy property boundaries on farms and estates, often allowing branches to graft naturally for added strength. In contemporary landscapes, pleaching continues this tradition, providing durable, low-maintenance structures that integrate with existing hardscapes like paths or walls. Examples of tree shaping's landscape integration include the creation of living pergolas in public parks, where flexible species like are bent and grafted to form shaded arbors or footbridges that blend with recreational design. Urban green walls also leverage these techniques, with espaliered trees trained vertically against building facades to form verdant screens that structures and support in dense cityscapes. These applications draw from related horticultural practices, such as , to achieve cohesive environmental embedding. The primary benefits of such integrations lie in aesthetic enhancement and space efficiency; shaped trees serve as dynamic focal points or living sculptures that evolve with seasons, adding texture and color without dominating the site. By maximizing vertical and linear growth, they promote efficient in modern landscaping, supporting sustainable designs that combine utility with ornamental value.

Cultural Impact

Representations in art and fiction

Tree shaping has found vivid expression in literature, where it often symbolizes the interplay between human or mythical agency and the organic growth of trees. In J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings, the Ents are depicted as ancient, ambulatory tree-like beings who shepherd forests, representing sentient life intertwined with arboreal forms and evoking a profound harmony between nature and guardianship. Modern eco-fiction extends this motif, portraying shaped or responsive forests as collaborative entities in environmental narratives; for instance, Richard Powers's The Overstory centers trees as protagonists shaped by human actions and ecological forces, illustrating patience and interconnectedness in the face of crisis. In visual arts, tree shaping inspires sculptures and installations that echo the techniques of early practitioners like , whose grafted forms have influenced contemporary works blending living elements with artistic intervention. Erlandson's "Circus Trees," preserved at , serve as enduring sculptural representations of woven branches forming fantastical shapes, such as baskets and ladders, highlighting human-guided natural . Recent examples include the 2025 Venice Biennale project "Trees as ," which features Baubotanik structures grown from shaped trees in a park setting to explore living building forms. Photography further captures this aesthetic in the living root bridges of , , where roots are trained over decades into suspension spans, documented in images that emphasize cultural ingenuity and symbiotic growth. Media representations include documentaries profiling real-world tree shapers, such as those on British designer Gavin Munro, who grows into furniture through and , as featured in reports on his Full Grown initiative, which underscore sustainable innovation and long-term cultivation. In fiction, films like James Cameron's Avatar depict bioluminescent tree networks as sacred, interconnected ecosystems central to the Na'vi culture. Across these mediums, tree shaping evokes core themes of , the rewards of patient , and mutual collaboration between creators and the arboreal world, transforming static forms into dynamic symbols of environmental ethos.

Critical assessment

Tree shaping, also known as arborsculpture, offers notable strengths in and educational value. As a living architectural practice, it leverages trees' natural capabilities while reducing reliance on resource-intensive building materials that contribute to 39% of global emissions. This approach promotes environmental harmony by fostering structures that actively mitigate climate impacts, such as and urban heat islands, rather than depleting forests. Additionally, tree shaping enhances environmental awareness through hands-on, multi-sensory learning experiences, integrating into educational curricula to cultivate and creativity among students in outdoor settings. Despite these benefits, tree shaping faces significant limitations, including its time-intensive nature and vulnerability to environmental stressors. Achieving structural maturity often requires 8-50 years of guided growth, with even simpler forms taking 15-30 years, which delays practical applications and demands long-term commitment from practitioners. Shaped trees remain susceptible to diseases, pests, and extremes, such as or storms, potentially compromising stability and necessitating ongoing maintenance like and . Some critiques raise ethical concerns regarding the practice of guiding natural growth through bending, , and as forms of human intervention in living organisms. In its societal role, tree shaping holds potential for climate-adaptive by enabling resilient urban that provides cooling, carbon storage, and management, thereby supporting cities' transitions to sustainable networks. However, critiques highlight its anthropocentric focus, which may overlook broader ecological interdependencies in favor of human-centric forms. Current gaps include the scarcity of rigorous scientific studies, with much of the field relying on trial-and-error by individual pioneers rather than standardized methodologies. Opportunities for future advancements lie in bio-engineering, such as genetic modifications for faster growth and resilience, though no major breakthroughs have been identified as of November 2025.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.