Hubbry Logo
Tropical cyclogenesisTropical cyclogenesisMain
Open search
Tropical cyclogenesis
Community hub
Tropical cyclogenesis
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tropical cyclogenesis
Tropical cyclogenesis
Tropical cyclogenesis
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Global tropical cyclone tracks between 1985 and 2005, indicating the areas where tropical cyclones usually develop
Part of a series on
Tropical cyclones
Structure
Effects
Climatology and tracking
Naming
Tropical cyclones portal

Tropical cyclogenesis is the development and strengthening of a tropical cyclone in the atmosphere.[1] The mechanisms through which tropical cyclogenesis occur are distinctly different from those through which temperate cyclogenesis occurs. Tropical cyclogenesis involves the development of a warm-core cyclone, due to significant convection in a favorable atmospheric environment.[2]

Tropical cyclogenesis requires six main factors: sufficiently warm sea surface temperatures (at least 26.5 °C (79.7 °F)), atmospheric instability, high humidity in the lower to middle levels of the troposphere, enough Coriolis force to develop a low-pressure center, a pre-existing low-level focus or disturbance, and low vertical wind shear.[3]

Tropical cyclones tend to develop during the summer, but have been noted in nearly every month in most basins. Climate cycles such as ENSO and the Madden–Julian oscillation modulate the timing and frequency of tropical cyclone development.[4][5] The maximum potential intensity is a limit on tropical cyclone intensity which is strongly related to the water temperatures along its path.[6]

An average of 86 tropical cyclones of tropical storm intensity form annually worldwide. Of those, 47 reach strengths higher than 119 km/h (74 mph), and 20 become intense tropical cyclones (at least Category 3 intensity on the Saffir–Simpson scale).[7]

Conditions

[edit]

There are six main requirements for tropical cyclogenesis: sufficiently warm sea surface temperatures, atmospheric instability, high humidity in the lower to middle levels of the troposphere, enough Coriolis force to sustain a low-pressure center, a preexisting low-level focus or disturbance, and low vertical wind shear.[3] While these conditions are necessary for tropical cyclone formation, they do not guarantee that a tropical cyclone will form.[3]

Warm waters, instability, and mid-level moisture

[edit]
Main article: Lapse rate
Waves in the trade winds in the Atlantic Ocean—areas of converging winds that move slowly along the same track as the prevailing wind—create instabilities in the atmosphere that may lead to the formation of hurricanes.

Normally, an ocean temperature of 26.5 °C (79.7 °F) spanning through at least a 50-metre depth is considered the minimum to maintain a tropical cyclone.[3] These warm waters are needed to maintain the warm core that fuels tropical systems. This value is well above 16.1 °C (60.9 °F), the global average surface temperature of the oceans.[8]

Tropical cyclones are known to form even when normal conditions are not met. For example, cooler air temperatures at a higher altitude (e.g., at the 500 hPa level, or 5.9 km) can lead to tropical cyclogenesis at lower water temperatures, as a certain lapse rate is required to force the atmosphere to be unstable enough for convection. In a moist atmosphere, this lapse rate is 6.5 °C/km, while in an atmosphere with less than 100% relative humidity, the required lapse rate is 9.8 °C/km.[9]

At the 500 hPa level, the air temperature averages −7 °C (19 °F) within the tropics, but air in the tropics is normally dry at this level, giving the air room to wet-bulb, or cool as it moistens, to a more favorable temperature that can then support convection. A wet-bulb temperature at 500 hPa in a tropical atmosphere of −13.2 °C (8.2 °F) is required to initiate convection if the water temperature is 26.5 °C, and this temperature requirement increases or decreases proportionally by 1 °C (1.8 °F) in the sea surface temperature for each 1 °C change at 500 hpa. Under a cold cyclone, 500 hPa temperatures can fall as low as −30 °C (−22 °F), which can initiate convection even in the driest atmospheres. This also explains why moisture in the mid-levels of the troposphere, roughly at the 500 hPa level, is normally a requirement for development. However, when dry air is found at the same height, temperatures at 500 hPa need to be even colder as dry atmospheres require a greater lapse rate for instability than moist atmospheres.[10][11] At heights near the tropopause, the 30-year average temperature (as measured in the period encompassing 1961 through 1990) was −77 °C (−107 °F).[12] A recent example of a tropical cyclone that maintained itself over cooler waters was Epsilon of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season.[13]

Role of Maximum Potential Intensity (MPI)

[edit]

Kerry Emanuel created a mathematical model around 1988 to compute the upper limit of tropical cyclone intensity based on sea surface temperature and atmospheric profiles from the latest global model runs. Emanuel's model is called the maximum potential intensity, or MPI. Maps created from this equation show regions where tropical storm and hurricane formation is possible, based upon the thermodynamics of the atmosphere at the time of the last model run. This does not take into account vertical wind shear.[14]

Coriolis force

[edit]
Main article: Coriolis force
Schematic representation of flow around a low-pressure area (in this case, Hurricane Isabel) in the Northern hemisphere. The pressure gradient force is represented by blue arrows, the Coriolis acceleration (always perpendicular to the velocity) by red arrows

A minimum distance of 500 km (310 mi) from the equator (about 4.5 degrees from the equator) is normally needed for tropical cyclogenesis.[3] The Coriolis force imparts rotation on the flow and arises as winds begin to flow in toward the lower pressure created by the pre-existing disturbance. In areas with a very small or non-existent Coriolis force (e.g. near the Equator), the only significant atmospheric forces in play are the pressure gradient force (the pressure difference that causes winds to blow from high to low pressure[15]) and a smaller friction force; these two alone would not cause the large-scale rotation required for tropical cyclogenesis. The existence of a significant Coriolis force allows the developing vortex to achieve gradient wind balance.[16] This is a balance condition found in mature tropical cyclones that allows latent heat to concentrate near the storm core; this results in the maintenance or intensification of the vortex if other development factors are neutral.[17]

Low level disturbance

[edit]

Whether it be a depression in the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), a tropical wave, a broad surface front, or an outflow boundary, a low-level feature with sufficient vorticity and convergence is required to begin tropical cyclogenesis.[3] Even with perfect upper-level conditions and the required atmospheric instability, the lack of a surface focus will prevent the development of organized convection and a surface low.[3] Tropical cyclones can form when smaller circulations within the Intertropical Convergence Zone come together and merge.[18]

Weak vertical wind shear

[edit]
See also: Wind shear § Effects on tropical cyclones
Tropical Storm Paulette in 2020, with its low-level centre partially exposed due to strong windshear.

Vertical wind shear of less than 10 m/s (20 kt, 22 mph) between the surface and the tropopause is favored for tropical cyclone development.[3] Weaker vertical shear makes the storm grow faster vertically into the air, which helps the storm develop and become stronger. If the vertical shear is too strong, the storm cannot rise to its full potential and its energy becomes spread out over too large of an area for the storm to strengthen.[19] Strong wind shear can "blow" the tropical cyclone apart,[19] as it displaces the mid-level warm core from the surface circulation and dries out the mid-levels of the troposphere, halting development. In smaller systems, the development of a significant mesoscale convective complex in a sheared environment can send out a large enough outflow boundary to destroy the surface cyclone. Moderate wind shear can lead to the initial development of the convective complex and surface low similar to the mid-latitudes, but it must diminish to allow tropical cyclogenesis to continue.[19]

Favorable trough interactions

[edit]

Limited vertical wind shear can be positive for tropical cyclone formation. When an upper-level trough or upper-level low is roughly the same scale as the tropical disturbance, the system can be steered by the upper level system into an area with better diffluence aloft, which can cause further development. Weaker upper cyclones are better candidates for a favorable interaction. There is evidence that weakly sheared tropical cyclones initially develop more rapidly than non-sheared tropical cyclones, although this comes at the cost of a peak in intensity with much weaker wind speeds and higher minimum pressure.[20] This process is also known as baroclinic initiation of a tropical cyclone. Trailing upper cyclones and upper troughs can cause additional outflow channels and aid in the intensification process. Developing tropical disturbances can help create or deepen upper troughs or upper lows in their wake due to the outflow jet emanating from the developing tropical disturbance/cyclone.[21][22]

There are cases where large, mid-latitude troughs can help with tropical cyclogenesis when an upper-level jet stream passes to the northwest of the developing system, which will aid divergence aloft and inflow at the surface, spinning up the cyclone. This type of interaction is more often associated with disturbances already in the process of recurvature.[23]

Times of formation

[edit]
Peaks of activity worldwide

Worldwide, tropical cyclone activity peaks in late summer when water temperatures are warmest. Each basin, however, has its own seasonal patterns. On a worldwide scale, May is the least active month, while September is the most active.[24]

In the North Atlantic, a distinct hurricane season occurs from June 1 through November 30, sharply peaking from late August through October.[24] The statistical peak of the North Atlantic hurricane season is September 10.[25] The Northeast Pacific has a broader period of activity, but in a similar time frame to the Atlantic. The Northwest Pacific sees tropical cyclones year-round, with a minimum in February and a peak in early September. In the North Indian basin, storms are most common from April to December, with peaks in May and November.[24]

In the Southern Hemisphere, tropical cyclone activity generally occurs between early November and April 30. Southern Hemisphere activity peaks in mid-February to early March.[24] Virtually all the Southern Hemisphere activity is seen from the southern African coast eastward, toward South America. Tropical cyclones are rare events across the south Atlantic Ocean and the far southeastern Pacific Ocean.[26]

Season lengths and averages
Basin Season
start 		Season
end 		Tropical
cyclones 		Refs
North Atlantic June 1 November 30 14.4 [27]
Eastern Pacific May 15 November 30 16.6 [27]
Western Pacific January 1 December 31 26.0 [27]
North Indian January 1 December 31 12 [28]
South-West Indian July 1 June 30 9.3 [27][29]
Australian region November 1 April 30 11.0 [30]
Southern Pacific November 1 April 30 7.1 [31]
Total: 96.4

Unusual areas of formation

[edit]
Hurricane Pablo formed in the extreme northeastern Atlantic during the 2019 season.

Middle latitudes

[edit]

Areas farther than 30 degrees from the equator (except in the vicinity of a warm current) are not normally conducive to tropical cyclone formation or strengthening, and areas more than 40 degrees from the equator are often very hostile to such development. The primary limiting factor is water temperatures, although higher shear at increasing latitudes is also a factor. These areas are sometimes frequented by cyclones moving poleward from tropical latitudes. On rare occasions, such as Pablo in 2019, Alex in 2004,[32] Alberto in 1988,[33] and the 1975 Pacific Northwest hurricane,[34] storms may form or strengthen in this region. Typically, tropical cyclones will undergo extratropical transition after recurving polewards, and typically become fully extratropical after reaching 45–50° of latitude. The majority of extratropical cyclones tend to restrengthen after completing the transition period.[35]

Near the Equator

[edit]
Main article: List of tropical cyclones near the Equator

Areas within approximately ten degrees latitude of the equator do not experience a significant Coriolis force, a vital ingredient in tropical cyclone formation.[36] However, a few tropical cyclones have been observed forming within five degrees of the equator.[37]

South Atlantic

[edit]
Main article: South Atlantic tropical cyclone

A combination of wind shear and a lack of tropical disturbances from the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) makes it very difficult for the South Atlantic to support tropical activity.[38][39] At least six tropical cyclones have been observed here, including a weak tropical storm in 1991 off the coast of Africa near Angola, Hurricane Catarina in March 2004, which made landfall in Brazil at Category 2 strength, Tropical Storm Anita in March 2010, Tropical Storm Iba in March 2019, Tropical Storm 01Q in February 2021, and Tropical Storm Akará in February 2024.[40]

Mediterranean and Black Seas

[edit]
Main article: Mediterranean tropical-like cyclone

Storms that appear similar to tropical cyclones in structure sometimes occur in the Mediterranean Sea. Notable examples of these "Mediterranean tropical cyclones" include an unnamed system in September 1969, Leucosia in 1982, Celeno in 1995, Cornelia in 1996, Querida in 2006, Rolf in 2011, Qendresa in 2014, Numa in 2017, Ianos in 2020, and Daniel in 2023. However, there is debate on whether these storms were tropical in nature.[41]

The Black Sea has, on occasion, produced or fueled storms that begin cyclonic rotation, and that appear to be similar to tropical-like cyclones observed in the Mediterranean.[42] Two of these storms reached tropical storm and subtropical storm intensity in August 2002 and September 2005 respectively.[43]

Elsewhere

[edit]

Tropical cyclogenesis is extremely rare in the far southeastern Pacific Ocean, due to the cold sea-surface temperatures generated by the Humboldt Current, and also due to unfavorable wind shear; as such, Cyclone Yaku in March 2023 is the only known instance of a tropical cyclone impacting western South America. Besides Yaku, there have been several other systems that have been observed developing in the region east of 120°W, which is the official eastern boundary of the South Pacific basin. On May 11, 1983, a tropical depression developed near 110°W, which was thought to be the easternmost forming South Pacific tropical cyclone ever observed in the satellite era.[44] In mid-2015, a rare subtropical cyclone was identified in early May, slightly near Chile, even further east than the 1983 tropical depression. This system was unofficially dubbed Katie by researchers.[45] Another subtropical cyclone was identified at 77.8 degrees longitude west in May 2018, just off the coast of Chile.[46] This system was unofficially named Lexi by researchers.[47] A subtropical cyclone was spotted just off the Chilean coast in January 2022, named Humberto by researchers.[48][49]

Vortices have been reported off the coast of Morocco in the past. However, it is debatable if they are truly tropical in character.[42]

Tropical activity is also extremely rare in the Great Lakes. However, a storm system that appeared similar to a subtropical or tropical cyclone formed in September 1996 over Lake Huron. The system developed an eye-like structure in its center, and it may have briefly been a subtropical or tropical cyclone.[50]

Inland intensification

[edit]
Main article: Brown ocean effect

Tropical cyclones typically began to weaken immediately following and sometimes even prior to landfall as they lose the sea fueled heat engine and friction slows the winds. However, under some circumstances, tropical or subtropical cyclones may maintain or even increase their intensity for several hours in what is known as the brown ocean effect. This is most likely to occur with warm moist soils or marshy areas, with warm ground temperatures and flat terrain, and when upper level support remains conducive.

Influence of large-scale climate cycles

[edit]
See also: Tropical cyclones and climate change

Influence of ENSO

[edit]
Loop of sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies in the Tropical Pacific
ENSO effects on hurricanes distribution.
Main article: El Niño–Southern Oscillation

El Niño (ENSO) shifts the region (warmer water, up and down welling at different locations, due to winds) in the Pacific and Atlantic where more storms form, resulting in nearly constant accumulated cyclone energy (ACE) values in any one basin. The El Niño event typically decreases hurricane formation in the Atlantic, and far western Pacific and Australian regions, but instead increases the odds in the central North and South Pacific and particular in the western North Pacific typhoon region.[51]

Tropical cyclones in the northeastern Pacific and north Atlantic basins are both generated in large part by tropical waves from the same wave train.[52]

In the Northwestern Pacific, El Niño shifts the formation of tropical cyclones eastward. During El Niño episodes, tropical cyclones tend to form in the eastern part of the basin, between 150°E and the International Date Line (IDL).[53] Coupled with an increase in activity in the North-Central Pacific (IDL to 140°W) and the South-Central Pacific (east of 160°E), there is a net increase in tropical cyclone development near the International Date Line on both sides of the equator.[54] While there is no linear relationship between the strength of an El Niño and tropical cyclone formation in the Northwestern Pacific, typhoons forming during El Niño years tend to have a longer duration and higher intensities.[55] Tropical cyclogenesis in the Northwestern Pacific is suppressed west of 150°E in the year following an El Niño event.[53]

Influence of the MJO

[edit]
5-day running mean of MJO. Note how it moves eastward with time.
Main article: Madden–Julian oscillation

In general, westerly wind increases associated with the Madden–Julian oscillation lead to increased tropical cyclogenesis in all basins. As the oscillation propagates from west to east, it leads to an eastward march in tropical cyclogenesis with time during that hemisphere's summer season.[56] There is an inverse relationship between tropical cyclone activity in the western Pacific basin and the north Atlantic basin, however. When one basin is active, the other is normally quiet, and vice versa. The main cause appears to be the phase of the Madden–Julian oscillation, or MJO, which is normally in opposite modes between the two basins at any given time.[57]

Influence of equatorial Rossby waves

[edit]
Main article: Rossby wave

Research has shown that trapped equatorial Rossby wave packets can increase the likelihood of tropical cyclogenesis in the Pacific Ocean, as they increase the low-level westerly winds within that region, which then leads to greater low-level vorticity. The individual waves can move at approximately 1.8 m/s (4 mph) each, though the group tends to remain stationary.[58]

Seasonal forecasts

[edit]

Since 1984, Colorado State University has been issuing seasonal tropical cyclone forecasts for the north Atlantic basin, with results that they claim are better than climatology.[59] The university claims to have found several statistical relationships for this basin that appear to allow long range prediction of the number of tropical cyclones. Since then, numerous others have issued seasonal forecasts for worldwide basins.[60] The predictors are related to regional oscillations in the global climate system: the Walker circulation which is related to the El Niño–Southern Oscillation; the North Atlantic oscillation (NAO); the Arctic oscillation (AO); and the Pacific North American pattern (PNA).[59]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tropical cyclogenesis

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Tropical cyclogenesis is the developmental process by which a pre-existing atmospheric disturbance organizes into a self-sustaining , featuring a warm-core low-pressure center with converging surface winds and intense convective activity over warm tropical waters. This formation typically requires surface temperatures exceeding 26.5°C to provide the necessary energy through and release, a deep moist layer in the , low vertical to allow vertical alignment of the vortex, and sufficient away from the to enable cyclonic rotation. The process often begins with mesoscale convective systems that generate mid-level through diabatic heating, followed by the downward extension of this circulation to the surface via convergence and convective downdrafts. Globally, tropical cyclogenesis exhibits distinct spatial and temporal patterns, with primary formation regions in the Atlantic, eastern North Pacific, western North Pacific, north , south , and southwest Pacific basins, peaking during local warm seasons due to enhanced instability and influences. Large-scale phenomena such as the Madden-Julian Oscillation and El Niño-Southern Oscillation modulate genesis frequency and location by altering convective organization and environmental conditions. While empirical observations confirm these environmental prerequisites, ongoing research debates the relative roles of bottom-up convection-driven spin-up versus top-down descent of upper-level , highlighting the multiscale interactions inherent to the phenomenon.

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Processes and Stages

Tropical cyclogenesis initiates from a pre-existing disturbance, such as a or , where scattered deep begins to organize around an area of low-level cyclonic . The primary physical process driving development is the release of from condensing in updrafts, which warms the mid-troposphere and promotes upper-level , thereby strengthening low-level convergence and inflow of moist air. This convective heating also stretches vertical columns of air, conserving and amplifying relative at the surface through mechanisms like merger of vortical structures and processes. As aggregates and becomes more persistent, feedback loops emerge: enhanced surface winds increase and heat fluxes from the ocean, fueling further instability, while reduced vertical allows the system to maintain coherence. spin-up occurs via nonlinear interactions, where rainbands and downdrafts contribute to tangential wind buildup, often culminating in a "pocket of " that descends to low levels. These meso-scale processes, embedded within favorable large-scale conditions like sufficient Coriolis parameter, transition the disturbance into a self-organizing vortex. The developmental stages typically unfold sequentially: in the formative phase, initial convective bursts precede significant circulation, with an early maximum in often observed before low-level closure. Organization follows as convection aligns azimuthally around an intensifying , suppressing dry air intrusion and building a warm core anomaly through differential heating. Genesis is achieved when a closed surface circulation forms with maximum sustained winds of at least 33 knots (61 km/h), classifying the system as a tropical depression; further symmetric intensification may then produce an eyewall, marking the onset of tropical storm status at 34 knots. Observational studies indicate this progression can span 1-3 days, though rapid cases occur via "" convection directly over the center.

Distinctions from Other Cyclogenesis Types

Tropical differs from extratropical in its energy derivation from release through organized deep over warm ocean surfaces, fostering a symmetric, warm-core vortex without associated fronts. Extratropical , by comparison, is powered by baroclinic stemming from horizontal temperature contrasts between polar and warmer air masses, producing asymmetric, cold-core systems with prominent warm and cold fronts that delineate sharp boundaries in temperature, moisture, and wind. Structurally, tropical cyclones exhibit a radial with a central eye of subsidence-induced warming and minimal gradients radially, enabling efficient inward spiraling of moist air to sustain . Extratropical cyclones display gradual decreases along frontal zones, with shifts (e.g., from northeasterly to northwesterly) and drops across fronts, such as from 17°C to 12°C during passages, reflecting their reliance on geostrophic adjustments to thermal asymmetries rather than purely convective dynamics. Geographically and dynamically, tropical formation demands low-latitude environments with sea surface temperatures above 26.5°C, high , and low vertical to permit vortex spin-up from pre-existing disturbances like easterly waves. Extratropical development occurs in mid-latitudes (typically 30°–60°), often amplified by upper-level divergence from interactions and convergences, allowing larger-scale evolution independent of surface heat fluxes. Subtropical cyclogenesis bridges these by featuring hybrid warm-to-cold core transitions and partial frontal influences in baroclinic zones, but lacks the full convective symmetry of purely tropical systems.

Historical Understanding

Early Observations and Naming

Early records of tropical cyclones date back over a millennium in , with the earliest documented occurring in AD 816 when a struck Mizhou in Province, northern , as described in historical chronicles noting severe winds and flooding. These accounts, derived from Chinese documentary sources, enabled reconstructions of activity spanning AD 975 onward in regions like Province, tallying over 500 events based on descriptions of storm impacts such as destroyed crops, flooded villages, and shipwrecks. Such records primarily captured mature storms rather than formative stages, as typically unfolds over remote ocean basins, but they established patterns of seasonal recurrence tied to influences and coastal vulnerabilities. In the Atlantic basin, European exploration yielded early cyclone observations, with documenting a hurricane off on June 29, 1502, during his fourth voyage, where he noted gale-force winds forcing his fleet to seek shelter and causing the loss of one vessel. Ship logs from the 16th to 19th centuries provided sporadic reports of encounters with rotating storms, often amid navigational hazards, while land-based accounts in the and detailed devastating landfalls, such as the 1780 Great Hurricane that killed an estimated 22,000 people across the . These pre-instrumental observations relied on qualitative descriptions of wind direction shifts, pressure sensations via barometers introduced in the , and damage assessments, offering indirect insights into cyclone dynamics but little on genesis mechanisms until systematic weather mapping in the mid-19th century. Naming conventions for tropical cyclones emerged informally to facilitate communication among mariners and officials. For several centuries, storms in the Catholic-influenced West Indies were identified by the saint's feast day coinciding with their occurrence, such as the San Felipe hurricane on September 13, reflecting the liturgical calendar's role in colonial record-keeping. Storms were also labeled by impacted locations, like the "Dominica Hurricane" of 1772, or notorious figures, emphasizing effects over origins. In the late 19th century, Australian meteorologist Clement Wragge pioneered alphanumeric designations for southwest Pacific cyclones starting in 1887, progressing from letters (e.g., "Cyclone A") to sarcastic women's names when funding for his service lapsed, aiming to streamline telegraphic warnings and public alerts. This ad hoc approach preceded standardized personal naming, which the U.S. Weather Bureau adopted in 1950 using the phonetic alphabet before shifting to female names in 1953 for brevity in forecasts.

Key Theoretical Milestones

Early theoretical understanding of tropical cyclogenesis emphasized the role of release in organized within pre-existing disturbances. In 1950, Herbert Riehl proposed a foundational model describing hurricane formation as an amplification of weak tropical disturbances through the efficient release of conditional instability, where vertical motion in cumulonimbus clouds transports heat and moisture upward, sustaining low-level convergence and pressure falls. This framework highlighted the cyclone's energy cycle, drawing from observations of mature storms, and posited that genesis requires initial and sufficient moisture convergence to overcome dissipative forces. A major advance came in 1964 with the introduction of Conditional Instability of the Second Kind (CISK) by Jule Charney and Arnt Eliassen. CISK theorized that small-scale cumulus , triggered by large-scale ascent, generates divergent outflow aloft that induces further low-level convergence, creating a loop for vortex intensification. This mechanism explained the cooperative interaction between mesoscale and synoptic-scale dynamics, predicting rates dependent on cumulus entrainment rates, though later critiques noted its reliance on unrealistically large-scale moisture convergence and neglect of surface fluxes. Subsequent developments shifted focus toward air-sea interactions, culminating in Kerry Emanuel's 1986 theory of steady-state maintenance via wind-induced surface heat exchange (WISHE). Emanuel argued that tropical cyclones self-organize through feedback between near-surface winds, , and fluxes, rather than relying primarily on CISK-like cumulus-large-scale , with genesis hinging on initial spin-up to enable sustained radial inflow of moist air. This axisymmetric model integrated thermodynamic efficiency akin to a , emphasizing ventilation and ocean , and provided a basis for potential intensity estimates that aligned better with observations than prior paradigms.

Advances in Observation and Modeling

The introduction of satellite-based observations in the mid-20th century transformed the detection and monitoring of tropical cyclogenesis by enabling global, continuous surveillance of convective disturbances over remote ocean basins. On September 10, 1961, the TIROS III satellite provided the first imagery of , capturing the cyclone's structure prior to verification by surface or aircraft reports, which previously limited early detection to sporadic ship encounters or limited reconnaissance flights. Geostationary satellites, such as the GOES series operational since 1975, further advanced real-time tracking of pre-genesis maxima and mesoscale convective systems, reducing reliance on subjective extrapolations from sparse data and improving lead times for genesis forecasts. Modern polar-orbiting systems like the (JPSS), with daily global coverage, now deliver high-resolution infrared and microwave imagery to resolve low-level circulation spin-up and moisture convergence patterns essential to . In situ and aircraft observations have complemented with targeted vertical profiling during vulnerable early stages. Since 2018, U.S. hurricane missions in the Atlantic and East Pacific have adopted adaptive sampling strategies, deploying dropwindsondes and tail Doppler radars to map inflow asymmetries and vortex pre-formation, yielding data that refines genesis probability estimates in operational centers. Uncrewed aerial systems, tested in the Western Pacific as early as 2016 for Nangka, extend endurance for sampling nascent disturbances without crew risk, while platforms like saildrones and underwater gliders provide sustained measurements of gradients and salinity stratification that precondition genesis environments. The Aeroclipper system, first deployed from in September 2022, exemplifies hybrid aerial-oceanic sampling for air-sea data, enhancing understanding of transfers critical to convective organization in pre-cyclone pouches. Numerical modeling advances have shifted from idealized axisymmetric representations to high-resolution, physics-based simulations capable of replicating genesis dynamics. Cloud-permitting models in radiative-convective equilibrium setups, advanced since the 2010s, demonstrate how self-aggregation of deep convection and radiative cooling feedbacks can spontaneously form proto-vortices from random perturbations, underscoring the primacy of moist processes over external forcing in many cases. Operational dynamical models, including the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) system and its successor, the Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS), have incorporated finer horizontal grids (down to 1-2 km nesting) and improved microphysics schemes by 2018-2021, yielding verifiable gains in forecasting rapid intensification episodes tied to genesis completion, with error reductions of up to 10-15% in 24-48 hour intensity guidance relative to prior baselines. Enhanced data assimilation, integrating satellite-derived winds and aircraft sondes, has bolstered ensemble predictions of genesis potential by quantifying uncertainties in initial disturbances, such as mid-level trough interactions or intraseasonal oscillations. These developments, validated against reanalysis datasets, affirm that vortex hot towers—intense convective plumes observed in simulations—play a causal role in spin-up, though their predictability remains challenged by sub-grid scale parameterizations.

Essential Physical Conditions

Thermodynamic Requirements

Tropical cyclogenesis demands sea surface temperatures (SSTs) of at least 26.5°C sustained over an area of roughly 2° by 2° to supply via and fluxes that drive . This threshold, refined from earlier estimates of 26°–27°C, supports the formation of a warm core structure by enabling surface fluxes exceeding 100 W m⁻² under typical wind speeds, though exceptions occur with extended pre-formation periods allowing gradual intensification from lower SSTs around 25.5°C. Additionally, the oceanic must extend to depths of at least 50 m with total above 50–70 kJ cm⁻² to resist entrainment of cooler subsurface water during vortex spin-up, preventing premature weakening. Atmospheric plays a pivotal role, with low-level relative (below 850 hPa) needing to exceed 80% to limit dry air that suppresses , while mid-tropospheric (around 600 hPa) above 60–70% sustains upright updrafts by reducing evaporative cooling aloft. These conditions, integrated into genesis parameters like those of Gray (), ensure a moist thermodynamic environment where precipitable exceeds 35–40 mm, facilitating the release of conditional without mid-level that could inhibit vortex consolidation. Conditional instability requires a moist adiabatic steeper than the environmental profile, yielding (CAPE) values often surpassing 1500–2000 J kg⁻¹ in the pre-genesis stage to power organized deep convection reaching 15–18 km altitude. This , drawn from the contrast between warm, moist boundary layers and cooler upper tropospheres, enables the overturning of into kinetic form, though it diminishes as the storm organizes and moistens the column, shifting reliance to sustained surface fluxes. Together, these thermodynamic elements provide the energy reservoir—primarily release exceeding 10¹⁹ J per day—for the transition from meso-scale disturbances to self-amplifying cyclones.

Dynamic and Kinematic Factors

Dynamic factors in tropical cyclogenesis involve the primary forces—pressure gradient, Coriolis, and friction—that govern the rotational balance of the nascent vortex, while kinematic factors describe the associated velocity fields, including vorticity, convergence, and shear. These elements ensure the efficient organization of deep convection into a coherent, intensifying system capable of maintaining itself against dissipative processes. The Coriolis parameter, f=2Ωsin⁡ϕf = 2 \Omega \sin \phi, where Ω\Omega is Earth's and ϕ\phi is , introduces planetary vorticity essential for cyclostrophic balance; formations are rare poleward of about 5° , where ff falls below approximately 2×10−52 \times 10^{-5} s−1^{-1}, as insufficient prevents the accumulation of tangential from radial inflow. Relative ζ\zeta, often pre-existing at low levels (e.g., 850 hPa) from mesoscale disturbances like easterly waves, provides the initial spin-up, which is amplified through vortex stretching under convergent flow, converting horizontal convergence into vertical motion and enhancing . Low vertical , defined as the magnitude of the vector difference in horizontal winds between approximately 850 hPa and 200 hPa, must typically remain below 10–12.5 m/s to permit symmetric development; exceeding this threshold tilts the vortex column, separates inflow and outflow layers, and advects anomalies away from the center, suppressing genesis. Kinematically, radial inflow at low levels drives mass convergence, fostering upward motion and release, while upper-level anticyclonic relative supports and outflow, completing the vertical circulation that sustains the system. These factors interact with thermodynamic conditions, but dynamically unfavorable shear or deficits alone can preclude formation even in moist, warm environments.

Role of Pre-Existing Disturbances

Pre-existing disturbances serve as foundational precursors in tropical cyclogenesis by providing initial low-level relative , convergence, and that enable the spin-up of a mesoscale vortex into a tropical depression. These disturbances, often originating from synoptic-scale features such as tropical easterly waves, supply the necessary rotational momentum absent in quiescent tropical environments, where spontaneous formation without such seeds is rare. Empirical analyses indicate that tropical cyclones rarely develop de novo; instead, they evolve from these disturbances through cooperative interactions with and vertical modulation. Tropical easterly waves (TEWs), westward-propagating synoptic-scale perturbations in the , represent the predominant type of pre-existing disturbance, particularly in the Atlantic and eastern Pacific basins. Originating over as African easterly waves (AEWs), these features propagate into the Atlantic with wavelengths of 2000–4000 km and periods of 3–5 days, fostering mesoscale convective clusters that precondition the environment for genesis. Studies attribute 50–70% of North Atlantic tropical cyclones to AEWs, as these waves enhance low-level inflow and reduce local vertical through aggregation. In the western North Pacific, TEWs similarly initiate 40–60% of formations, often via an initial convective burst preceding surface vortex consolidation by 1–2 days. Other disturbances, including equatorial Rossby waves, Kelvin waves, and monsoon trough vortices, contribute regionally by modulating and fields. For instance, equatorial waves can forecast genesis probability up to two weeks in advance by amplifying precursor signals in rainfall and divergence patterns across basins. These features lower the energy barrier for by concentrating and facilitating air-sea interaction fluxes, though success depends on ambient conditions like sea surface temperatures exceeding 26.5°C and Coriolis parameter sufficiency. Not all disturbances succeed; only a fraction—typically 10–30% in active wave regimes—intensify, as quantified by relative thresholds above 10^{-5} s^{-1} and shear below 10 m s^{-1}. The causal mechanism involves disturbance-induced convergence drawing in moist boundary-layer air, which fuels deep and generates anomalies that descend to the surface, closing the low-level circulation. Observational composites from and reanalysis data reveal that pre-genesis disturbances exhibit embedded mesoscale convective systems with outbound propagation of gravity waves, further organizing the vortex. Modeling experiments confirm that suppressing these disturbances, such as through idealized AEW removal, reduces genesis frequency by up to 50% in simulations, underscoring their indispensable role over purely thermodynamic forcing.

Climatological Patterns

Seasonal and Geographic Distributions

Tropical cyclogenesis occurs predominantly within seven major ocean basins located between roughly 5° and 30° latitude north and south, where warm sea surface temperatures exceed 26.5°C and the Coriolis parameter provides sufficient rotational forcing for vortex spin-up, while avoiding the near-equatorial zone deficient in Coriolis effect. These basins encompass the North Atlantic (including the Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico), the northeastern Pacific (east of 140°W), the northwestern Pacific, the northern Indian Ocean (divided into the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea subregions), the southern Indian Ocean (east of 90°E), the northern Australian region, and the southwestern Pacific (east of 160°E). Formations beyond 30° latitude are infrequent due to cooler waters and stronger vertical wind shear, and equatorial genesis (within 5° of the equator) is exceedingly rare owing to inadequate initial rotation. Globally, about 87% of events transpire between 20°N and 20°S, with roughly two-thirds occurring in Northern Hemisphere basins, reflecting asymmetric distribution driven by land-ocean contrasts and monsoon influences. The northwestern Pacific basin accounts for the majority of global activity, generating 25–30 named storms annually, far exceeding other regions due to expansive warm waters and persistent monsoon troughs conducive to disturbance organization. In contrast, the North Atlantic and northeastern Pacific each average 12–15 named storms, while the northern Indian Ocean yields only 5–6, constrained by monsoon dynamics and land interruptions. Southern Hemisphere basins collectively produce comparable totals to the north but spread across larger areas, with the southern Indian and southwestern Pacific each averaging around 8–10 systems. Overall, 80–100 named tropical cyclones form worldwide each year, with roughly half intensifying to hurricane or typhoon strength. Seasonal patterns mirror hemispheric summer maxima in solar insolation and , with activity peaking from June to November and from November to April, as the shifts to maximize convective potential. Peak genesis coincides with optimal thermodynamic disequilibrium, typically late summer to early fall in the respective hemispheres, though bimodal or extended cycles occur in monsoon-influenced basins. The following table summarizes key seasonal characteristics by basin:
BasinPrimary SeasonPeak MonthsNotes on Distribution
North AtlanticJune 1–November 30September (midpoint ~September 10)Activity ramps mid-August to mid-October; origins shift from /Gulf early to open Atlantic later.
Northeastern PacificMay 15–November 30August–SeptemberSimilar to Atlantic but earlier onset; fewer landfalls due to offshore tracks.
Northwestern PacificYear-round; main July–NovemberAugust–SeptemberHighest global frequency; influenced by persistent western Pacific .
Northern IndianApril–DecemberMay (pre-), November (post-)Bimodal due to breaks; dominates early peak, later.
Southern Indian & Australian/Southwestern PacificNovember–AprilJanuary–MarchHemispheric summer peak; activity synchronized across southern basins.
These distributions arise from causal interplay of gradients, low-level from easterly waves or troughs, and suppressed shear during peak periods, with empirical records confirming consistency over decades despite interannual variability from modes like ENSO.

Diurnal and Intraseasonal Variations

Tropical cyclogenesis exhibits a marked diurnal cycle, with global formation events peaking between 0300 and 0900 local (LST), as evidenced by an analysis of 1594 tropical cyclones from 2001 to 2020 using best-track . This period accounted for 463 formations, 16% more frequent than the 2100–0300 LST window (389 events), reflecting the role of daytime solar heating in fostering convective organization that culminates overnight. Regional patterns align closely, with peaks in the 0300–0900 LST interval dominant in the western North Pacific (135 events), eastern North Pacific (120), North Atlantic (88), and northern (31), while the shows bimodal tendencies including 2100–0300 LST (123 events). Associated convective features underscore this timing: radial infrared brightness temperature gradients, driven by clouds colder than 208 , maximize between 0300 and 0600 LST, with minimal abundance from 1500 to 1800 LST. Within 200 km of the circulation center, cold cloud fractions escalate from 4.9% two days pre-genesis to 44.4% one day prior, displaying stronger diurnal amplitude than at outer radii (200–500 km). These dynamics link to mesoscale convective systems initiated by diurnal heating, which precondition low-level and convergence essential for spin-up.
Intraseasonal variations in tropical cyclogenesis are predominantly driven by the (MJO), an eastward-propagating convective envelope at approximately 5 m s⁻¹ with 30–60 day periods that alternates active and suppressed phases across the . Genesis rates surge during MJO convective phases, with probabilities elevating by factors of 3–12 relative to suppressed phases, varying by basin—for instance, a factor of 12 in the North Indian Ocean and 6 in the western North Pacific—based on 1979–2015 records. The Intraseasonal Genesis Potential Index (ISGPI) formalizes this modulation, prioritizing 500-hPa ascent (ω500) as the dominant predictor, supplemented by 850-hPa relative and zonal , outperforming static seasonal indices in capturing MJO-driven fluctuations. Related modes, such as the boreal summer intraseasonal , amplify regional effects, enhancing preconditioning via synoptic waves and waves during favorable phases. These oscillations account for clustered genesis events, with suppressed periods correlating to reduced and increased shear.

Unusual and Anomalous Cases

Formations in Marginal Regions

Tropical cyclogenesis in marginal regions, such as subtropical latitudes beyond the core tropical belts, typically involves the formation of characterized by a hybrid structure featuring a upper-level core and a warm low-level core. These systems develop over waters with sea surface temperatures often below the 26.5°C threshold required for conventional genesis, relying instead on baroclinic instability, upper-level divergence, and synoptic-scale disturbances to initiate organization. Vertical in these areas, typically higher than in deep , inhibits full convective symmetrization, yet genesis occurs when shear is temporarily reduced or when pre-existing from extratropical precursors aligns with moist . In the North Atlantic, subtropical cyclone formation frequently precedes tropical transitions, where an extratropical low acquires sufficient warm-core characteristics through convective heating and reduced baroclinicity. For instance, the system that became in November 1994 originated as a , demonstrating how marginal thermal environments can support initial development before equatorward movement enhances intensification. Similarly, in the South Atlantic basin, where pure tropical cyclones are exceedingly rare due to persistent shear and cooler waters, subtropical systems dominate, as evidenced by a showing hybrid cyclones with gale-force winds forming preferentially in response to warm and mid-level troughs. Further poleward, near 30°-40° latitude, genesis events challenge standard thermodynamic limits, often requiring anomalous warm sea surface temperatures or favorable synoptic setups like cut-off lows. Examples include subtropical cyclones near at approximately 27°S in 2015 (unofficially named ) and an unnamed system in 2018 closer to continental margins, highlighting the role of localized ocean-atmosphere interactions in marginal zones. These formations underscore the transitional nature of in such regions, where dynamical factors like anomalies compensate for suboptimal moisture and instability profiles. Overall, while less frequent and intense than equatorial counterparts, these events contribute to broader variability, particularly in basins with peripheral warm pools.

Equatorial and Polar Proximity Events

Tropical cyclogenesis near the equator is highly uncommon owing to the near-zero Coriolis parameter at the equator, which fails to provide the planetary vorticity required for the initial spin-up of a low-pressure vortex into an organized rotating system. Standard theory posits that sufficient Coriolis force demands formation at least 5° latitude poleward of the equator to enable the geostrophic balance necessary for cyclone intensification. Exceptions arise when pre-existing cyclonic vorticity from equatorial Rossby waves, mixed Rossby-gravity waves, or monsoon troughs compensates for the weak planetary rotation, allowing convection to aggregate and deepen the system. Such events remain rare, with documented cases confined to specific basins where favorable shear and moisture align transiently. The record for the closest approach to equatorial formation belongs to Typhoon Vamei, which initiated on December 26, 2001, at 1.4° N latitude (approximately 150 km north of the equator) in the near . This system rapidly organized amid low vertical and warm sea surface temperatures exceeding 29° C, reaching typhoon intensity with sustained winds of 120 km/h before striking eastern and dissipating. Prior instances include Typhoon Sarah, which formed at 1.7° N in the western North Pacific in August 1956, and Typhoon Kate in the same basin in July 1970, both leveraging enhanced convection from intraseasonal oscillations to overcome the dynamical barrier. These anomalies highlight how transient equatorial wave activity can imprint sufficient relative vorticity—on the order of 10^{-5} s^{-1}—to initiate genesis, though longevity is limited without poleward . In stark contrast, polar proximity precludes true tropical cyclogenesis due to thermodynamic disequilibrium: sea surface temperatures in polar regions routinely fall below 10° C, far short of the 26.5° C threshold required for the release of to fuel convective updrafts and maintain a warm-core . Baroclinic dominates at high latitudes (>60° N or S), favoring extratropical cyclones driven by temperature gradients rather than equatorial , while strong upper-level impose disruptive shear exceeding 10 m/s. No verified instances exist of pure tropical systems forming near the poles; instead, transitional hybrids or subtropical cyclones occasionally emerge at marginal high latitudes (around 40°-50° N), as in the unnamed eastern North Pacific system of , which underwent tropical transition over uncharacteristically warm waters near 40° N but retained hybrid characteristics. Tropical cyclones approaching polar vicinities invariably extratropicalize, losing symmetric warm-core dynamics en route, as observed in recurving Atlantic systems affecting . Polar lows, intense mesoscale vortices over sea ice margins, superficially resemble miniature tropical cyclones in appearance and winds (up to 30 m/s) but derive energy baroclinically from cold outflows, not ocean heat fluxes, underscoring their distinct causal mechanisms.

Inland and Non-Oceanic Intensification

Tropical cyclones generally undergo rapid weakening after landfall due to enhanced surface friction, reduced moisture availability, and disruption of the warm-core structure that sustains their intensity. However, under specific conditions, these systems can maintain strength or reintensify over land, a phenomenon termed Tropical Cyclone Maintenance and Intensification (TCMI) or the "brown ocean effect." This effect arises when antecedent heavy precipitation saturates the soil, creating a land surface analogous to the ocean by supplying latent heat through evaporation and maintaining high humidity in the boundary layer. Warm soil temperatures, typically above 26°C, further support convective activity by providing sensible heat flux, counteracting the usual energy deficit over land. The requires prior rainfall to elevate anomalies, often from 20-50% above climatological norms, enabling sustained evaporative cooling and heat release similar to sea surface processes. Without such preconditioning, frictional drag and dry dominate, leading to decay rates of 10-20% per day in maximum winds. Observations indicate this inland reintensification is rare, occurring in fewer than 5% of landfalling systems since 1970, but its frequency may relate to regional rather than large-scale climate drivers. Causal mechanisms emphasize local over dynamic forcing, with feedbacks amplifying in the inner core. Documented cases illustrate these dynamics. Tropical Storm Erin (2007) made landfall near San Jose, , on August 16 with 40 mph winds, weakened over drier terrain, but reintensified over on August 19, reaching 40 mph sustained winds again due to saturated soils from prior Midwest rainfall, producing over 10 inches of additional precipitation. Similarly, Tropical Storm Bill (2015) landfell in on June 16 as a 50 mph system, decayed initially, but maintained and partially reintensified over the Plains through June 20, with anomalies exceeding 30% enabling release equivalent to marginal tropical conditions. Tropical Storm Fay (2008) exhibited multiple landfalls in and Georgia, redeveloping tropical features inland with winds briefly increasing to 60 mph over wet southeastern soils. Non-oceanic intensification extends to analogous processes over large inland water bodies, though true tropical cyclogenesis—initial formation without oceanic origins—remains undocumented over due to insufficient scale for warm-core development. Instead, hybrid maintenance occurs where lakes or rivers supplement , but empirical data prioritize the brown ocean mechanism for verifiable wind recovery. These events underscore the role of surface in modulating post-landfall evolution, with implications for forecasting inland hazards where models often underestimate persistence.

Influences from Atmospheric and Oceanic Variability

ENSO and Teleconnection Effects

The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) exerts a profound influence on tropical cyclogenesis through modulation of atmospheric and oceanic conditions across multiple basins. During the warm phase, El Niño, anomalous warming in the central and eastern tropical Pacific enhances convection there while shifting the Walker circulation eastward, leading to increased vertical (VWS) in the Atlantic basin that inhibits cyclone formation. Conversely, the cool phase, La Niña, features cooler Pacific waters, westward-shifted convection, reduced Atlantic VWS, and consequently heightened tropical cyclone (TC) activity in that region. These effects stem from teleconnections that propagate ENSO signals globally via changes in sea surface temperatures (SSTs), , and mid-tropospheric humidity. In the Atlantic, El Niño events correlate with 20-30% fewer tropical storms and hurricanes compared to neutral or La Niña years, primarily due to elevated VWS exceeding 12.5 m/s, which disrupts vortex organization. La Niña phases, by contrast, foster lower shear environments conducive to genesis, with historical data showing up to 50% more named storms during strong events like 2020-2022. In the Pacific, El Niño boosts eastern and central basin activity through warmer SSTs and reduced shear, while suppressing western North Pacific genesis via altered monsoon dynamics and increased shear eastward. Teleconnections amplify these patterns; for instance, Pacific SST anomalies influence interactions, further modulating vorticity fields essential for initial disturbances. Global TC genesis potential indices, incorporating factors like potential intensity, VWS, and absolute , reveal ENSO-driven interannual variability exceeding 15-20% in affected basins. Post-El Niño decay phases can prolong suppression in the Atlantic through lingering shear anomalies, as observed in transitions following 2015-2016 events. These teleconnections operate via propagation and stratospheric-tropospheric coupling, linking Pacific to extratropical circulation changes that indirectly favor or hinder low-level convergence needed for cyclogenesis. Empirical models confirm that ENSO phase alone explains up to 25% of variance in seasonal TC counts, underscoring its causal primacy over local factors in many scenarios.

MJO and Rossby Wave Interactions

The Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) modulates tropical cyclogenesis globally by organizing large-scale convection, which alters environmental favorability such as vertical wind shear, moisture, and vorticity. Active convective phases of the MJO suppress wind shear and enhance mid-tropospheric humidity, increasing genesis potential by 2–3 times compared to suppressed phases in basins like the Atlantic and western North Pacific. In the Atlantic, genesis rates peak during MJO phases 6–8, when enhanced convection over Africa and the western Indian Ocean propagates eastward, preconditioning the main development region with low shear (typically below 12.5 m s⁻¹) and high relative humidity above 60% at 700 hPa. Similarly, western North Pacific cyclogenesis surges in phases 3–5 due to MJO-induced low-level convergence and upper-level divergence. Equatorial Rossby (ER) waves interact synergistically with the MJO to initiate and organize genesis precursors. These westward-propagating waves, with periods of 10–20 days, embed within the MJO envelope, providing antisymmetric vorticity gyres that amplify cyclonic circulations in disturbances. In the western North Pacific, composite analyses show that MJO-filtered convection combined with ER wave activity increases genesis by enhancing low-level relative vorticity (up to 10⁻⁵ s⁻¹ anomalies) and reducing convective inhibition. The MJO modulates ER wave amplitudes, with active phases boosting their influence on synoptic-scale disturbances derived from easterly waves or Kelvin waves. Biweekly ER waves further bridge intraseasonal MJO scales to mesoscale features critical for genesis, channeling energy downward through scale interactions that foster mesoscale convective aggregation. Observational diagnostics indicate these waves contribute to 20–30% of attributed genesis events by exceeding rainfall anomaly thresholds (e.g., >5 mm day⁻¹) at disturbance locations during MJO passage. While mid-latitude trains excited by MJO convection can indirectly affect tropical environments via teleconnections—such as shear modulation over subtropical genesis zones—the dominant interactions for core tropical cyclogenesis involve equatorial-scale Rossby modes.

Aerosol and Pollution Modulation

Aerosols, both natural and anthropogenic, influence tropical cyclogenesis through direct radiative effects by scattering or absorbing sunlight, thereby cooling the surface and stabilizing the atmosphere, and indirect effects by serving as (CCN) that alter cloud microphysics and precipitation efficiency. In regions like the North Atlantic, outbreaks within the (SAL) suppress cyclogenesis by introducing dry mid-level air that inhibits deep convection, increases atmospheric stability via subsidence, and reduces sea surface temperatures through shading, leading to fewer tropical disturbances developing into cyclones during periods of high dust loading. Observational data from 2007–2017 show that intense SAL events correlate with reduced Atlantic tropical cyclone frequency, with dust suppressing cloud formation and convective organization essential for genesis. Anthropogenic pollution aerosols, such as sulfates from industrial emissions, exert hemisphere-asymmetric effects on cyclogenesis by perturbing the Walker circulation and strengthening trade winds, which decreases northern hemisphere (NH) tropical cyclone genesis potential through enhanced vertical wind shear and reduced moisture convergence, while increasing southern hemisphere (SH) activity via weakened shear. Simulations indicate that aerosol-induced cooling patterns shift global tropical cyclone distributions, with NH reductions of up to 20% in genesis indices under high-emission scenarios, though these effects are modulated by concurrent greenhouse gas forcing. In the North Indian Ocean, aerosol loading from South Asian pollution has been linked to suppressed cyclogenesis during certain monsoon phases by invigorating shallow convection at the expense of deep cumulonimbus towers required for vortex spin-up. Indirect effects can either promote or hinder genesis depending on concentration and storm stage; low to moderate levels may enhance convective vigor by delaying warm rain and lofting more aloft, potentially aiding initial disturbance organization, whereas high concentrations overload clouds with small droplets, weakening downdrafts and overall storm potential through excessive anvil spreading and radiative cooling. For instance, modeling of idealized cyclones shows that elevated leads to more compact systems with intensified inner-core updrafts but reduced outer rainbands, complicating net genesis outcomes in polluted maritime environments like ship track corridors. Volcanic aerosols, as in the 2018 case of Typhoon Wukong, demonstrate nonlinear suppression of genesis via combined radiative stabilization and cloud invigoration that disrupts preconditioning moisture profiles. Empirical attribution remains challenging due to sparse in-situ measurements and model sensitivities, with discrepancies between reanalyses and proxies highlighting the need for integrated aerosol-climate assessments. Observations from adjusted historical datasets, accounting for pre-satellite era undercounts, indicate no significant long-term increase in global tropical cyclone frequency since reliable records began in the late ; instead, multiple peer-reviewed analyses reveal either stability or modest declines. For instance, a 2022 study using extended reanalysis data found robust decreasing trends in annual tropical cyclone numbers at global scales during the , with regional declines in most basins except the North Atlantic. Similarly, examinations of post-1990 satellite-era data show fewer global hurricanes and reduced , a metric incorporating frequency, duration, and intensity. These trends persist even after adjustments for observational improvements, suggesting natural variability, such as shifts toward La Niña-like conditions, as key drivers rather than monotonic increases. In the North Atlantic, tropical cyclogenesis exhibits pronounced multidecadal variability tied to the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), with elevated activity since the mid-1990s—averaging around 14-15 named storms annually in recent decades compared to 9-10 in the -1980s—but no clear century-scale upward trend beyond this oscillation. Northwest Pacific formation shows a similar oscillatory pattern, including a decline from the late to followed by recovery, without evidence of a sustained increase over the full instrumental record. Other basins, such as the Northeast Pacific and , display flat or declining frequencies in adjusted datasets, contributing to the global stasis or downturn. While global frequency trends remain subdued, some evidence points to shifts in cyclogenesis characteristics, such as increased proportions of rapidly intensifying storms in certain regions since the , potentially linked to warmer sea surface temperatures, though overall genesis rates have not risen commensurately. NOAA syntheses confirm no change in global cyclone frequency or average intensity over the late 20th century, but note a rise in the share of Category 4-5 events, from about 8% pre-1970 to 15-20% post-2000 in some basins. These patterns underscore the dominance of internal variability over any uniform anthropogenic signal in historical cyclogenesis data, with high-quality reanalyses reinforcing the absence of widespread increases.

Discrepancies Between Models and Data

Climate models simulating historical frequently diverge from observational records in their depiction of global frequency trends. Analyses of the CMIP6 historical simulations (1850–2014) indicate that 75% of 20 models detect a decreasing global (TC) frequency, driven by simulated increases in atmospheric stability and vertical under rising greenhouse gases. In contrast, best-track observational datasets, such as IBTrACS, show no significant long-term decline or increase in global TC genesis frequency during the satellite era (circa 1970–present), with annual counts fluctuating around 80–90 events amid natural variability from modes like ENSO and the . This discrepancy highlights models' challenges in replicating observed stability, potentially due to biases in evolution, such as an erroneous Central Pacific El Niño-like warming pattern in CMIP6 that suppresses genesis more than observed La Niña-like conditions. Regional inconsistencies further underscore these issues. In the North Atlantic, adjusted century-scale observations (post-1850) reveal no robust upward trend in TC genesis after correcting for undercounting in pre-satellite records, with recent increases since the largely attributable to internal multidecadal oscillations rather than external forcing. CMIP6 models, however, often underestimate genesis frequency in this basin while overestimating it in the Central Pacific, leading to flawed hindcasts of interdecadal variability and trends. High-resolution variants in CMIP6-HighResMIP improve spatial patterns but still exhibit poor fidelity in long-term genesis changes, particularly in the , where simulated trends mismatch empirical data influenced by cooling and oscillatory cycles. These model-data gaps complicate projections of anthropogenic influences on . While ensembles like CMIP6 anticipate fewer TCs globally under continued warming—offset by potential intensification from higher potential intensity—observational trends lack a detectable human-induced signal in , as natural variability dominates short records and adjustments for observational inhomogeneities yield flat or basin-specific patterns without global coherence. Such discrepancies arise from coarse resolution limiting mesoscale vortex formation, erroneous teleconnections, and incomplete representation of preconditioning factors like and moisture, underscoring the need for refined parameterizations to align simulations with data.

Debates on Anthropogenic Attribution

Observational records spanning over four decades indicate no statistically significant long-term increase in global frequency, with some analyses revealing a modest decline since the era began in 1970. For instance, data from 1972 to 2023 show stable or decreasing numbers of and hurricanes worldwide, despite a 0.8°C rise in global sea surface temperatures over the same period. This contrasts with theoretical expectations from thermodynamic arguments, which suggest warmer oceans could thermodynamically favor more genesis events, yet highlights the dominance of dynamical factors like vertical and atmospheric stability, which have not systematically shifted to promote increased formation. Attribution studies, such as those by Knutson et al. (2019), conclude low confidence in detecting anthropogenic signals in observed frequency due to substantial natural variability and observational uncertainties prior to consistent monitoring. Climate models, including those from CMIP6 ensembles, frequently project a decrease in global tropical cyclone genesis under anthropogenic forcing, with 75% of historical simulations showing reduced frequency from 1850 to present, attributed to stabilized upper-level atmospheres in warmer climates. However, these projections diverge from some basin-specific observations, such as transient upticks in North Atlantic activity during the –, which align more closely with multidecadal s like the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation than with trends. Critics, including researchers like Klotzbach and , argue that model biases—such as overestimating vertical reductions or underrepresenting cooling effects—undermine confident attribution, emphasizing that short-term records (less than 50 years of reliable data) preclude robust separation of anthropogenic from natural forcings. The IPCC AR6 assesses medium confidence in human influence on the proportion of major tropical cyclones but low confidence for overall frequency changes, reflecting discrepancies between modeled intensity increases and observed stability in genesis rates. Debates intensify over potential future risks, where attribution hinges on whether thermodynamic enhancements (e.g., higher potential intensity from warmer seas) outweigh dynamical suppressions. Peer-reviewed syntheses, such as those in Nature Climate Change (2022), report declining twentieth-century trends in cyclone counts, challenging narratives of anthropogenic amplification, while acknowledging robust increases in rainfall rates per storm—estimated at 5–10% per degree of warming—linked to moisture-laden atmospheres. Skeptical perspectives highlight institutional incentives in academia toward emphasizing detectable signals, potentially overlooking null results from data like global metrics, which exhibit pronounced cycles but no upward trend through 2024. Causal realism demands prioritizing these observations over model consensus, as undetected frequency decreases in simulations suggest over-reliance on incomplete physics, with natural modes like ENSO explaining most interannual variance in genesis.

Forecasting and Predictability

Operational Genesis Prediction Methods

Operational prediction of tropical cyclogenesis primarily relies on global (NWP) models to forecast environmental conditions conducive to disturbance development, such as low vertical , high mid-level moisture, and sufficient low-level . Centers like the (NHC) and (JTWC) use outputs from models including the (GFS), European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecasting System, and United Kingdom (UKMET) model, along with their ensemble variants, to issue genesis probabilities up to 120-168 hours in advance. These models simulate the evolution of tropical waves or cloud clusters, identifying potential genesis when simulated tracks align with observed disturbances and thermodynamic favorability thresholds are met, though verification shows persistent challenges with false alarms exceeding 50% in some basins for 48-hour forecasts. Statistical-dynamical hybrid models supplement pure dynamical guidance by applying discriminant analysis or to predictors derived from NWP fields, such as 850-200 hPa vertical below 12.5 m/s, relative humidity above 70% at 500 hPa, and potential intensity exceeding current intensity by at least 20 m/s. The NHC's five-day genesis forecasts, for instance, incorporate consensus from multiple global ensembles, where ECMWF often outperforms others in Atlantic basin skill scores, achieving probability of detection around 70% for high-confidence events at 72 hours. Operational indices like the Genesis Potential Index (GPI) or ensemble-based variants extend this by weighting factors including Coriolis parameter and , calibrated against historical best-track data from 1980-2020, to generate probabilistic fields over ocean basins. Satellite-based observational inputs, including imagery for convective organization and winds for low-level circulation, inform subjective adjustments to model guidance, particularly for invest areas flagged in tropical weather outlooks with low (<30%), medium (30-50%), or high (>50%) genesis probabilities. , deployed by NHC in the Atlantic and eastern Pacific, provide direct measurements of vortex structure during the pre-genesis phase, reducing uncertainty in cases where models diverge, as evidenced by improved 24-hour genesis verification scores dropping from mean errors of 25% in the 2000s to under 15% post-2015 due to higher-resolution . Despite advances, operational skill remains lower in the eastern North Pacific and , where model biases in moisture lead to overprediction of genesis in shear-suppressed environments.

Seasonal and Subseasonal Forecasts

Seasonal forecasts of tropical cyclogenesis typically employ statistical, dynamical, or hybrid models to predict basin-wide activity, including the number and locations of genesis events, over periods of 3–6 months. These forecasts, issued by agencies such as , NOAA, and GFDL, rely on predictors like sea surface temperatures (SSTs), ENSO phases, and patterns, with outputs encompassing total cyclone counts, (ACE), and landfall probabilities. Skill levels vary by basin and issuance timing: in the Atlantic, modest correlations (around 0.5) emerge by June for basin-wide activity, improving to good skill by August; in the western North Pacific (WNP), reliable predictions for intense typhoon numbers and ACE are achievable by July. The GFDL SPEAR model demonstrates significant skill (Spearman's rank correlations of +0.4 to +0.8 up to lead month 4) for TC counts in the North Atlantic (NA), WNP, and eastern North Pacific (ENP), outperforming earlier models like FLOR in the WNP. Subseasonal forecasts, spanning 2–8 weeks, focus on probabilistic genesis predictions using models from the Subseasonal-to-Seasonal (S2S) prediction project, incorporating dynamical ensembles from centers like ECMWF, NOAA's GEFS, and BoM. These leverage modulations from the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) and Boreal Summer Intraseasonal (BSISO), with skill highest during favorable MJO phases that enhance genesis potential. ECMWF exhibits the strongest performance, maintaining skill up to week 5 in the Atlantic and WNP (via Brier Skill Score >0), and week 2 in the ENP and South Pacific, though overall skill declines sharply after week 1 across basins, often approaching zero by weeks 3–5 due to model biases in MJO-TC relationships and resolution limitations. Potential predictability exceeds realized skill, suggesting improvements via larger ensembles, bias correction, and hybrid statistical-dynamical approaches; for instance, post-processing enhances WNP genesis forecasts, where extratropical influences like breaking contribute to 55% of events. Operational extensions include NOAA's weeks 1–4 outlooks and ECMWF's week 1–4 TC activity maps, with ongoing challenges in low-resolution models underpredicting intense systems and regional track biases.

Recent Technological and Methodological Advances

Advances in have significantly enhanced the prediction of tropical cyclogenesis, particularly for short- to medium-range forecasts. Studies utilizing convolutional neural networks (CNNs), such as ResNet and architectures, applied to gridded meteorological data have demonstrated superior performance in identifying genesis events, achieving optimal results at 12- to 18-hour lead times by analyzing environmental fields like and . Similarly, and methods trained on reanalysis data, including mid-level and vertical , have yielded genesis forecast accuracies of approximately 80% for lead times up to several days. Deep learning models integrating ERA5 reanalysis and IBTrACS cyclone tracks have further improved probabilistic genesis forecasts, attaining accuracies of 86.9% to 92.9% for predictions up to 60 hours ahead across multiple basins, outperforming traditional statistical-dynamical approaches in handling non-linear environmental interactions. Operational centers have incorporated these techniques into ensemble systems, with global models like ECMWF's medium-range ensemble showing reduced jumpiness and improved consistency in Atlantic genesis probabilities through refined data assimilation and probabilistic outputs. Methodological progress includes the development of binary datasets structured as multi-channel images for training ML classifiers on genesis versus non-genesis events, enabling scalable applications for early warning systems and reducing reliance on subjective analyst input. Surveys of major operational centers reveal widespread adoption of hybrid statistical-dynamical genesis indices, enhanced by higher-resolution global models and satellite-derived observations, leading to verifiable skill improvements in basins like the western North Pacific from 2017 to 2020. These advances prioritize empirical validation against historical events, though challenges persist in capturing rare rapid-onset genesis amid model biases toward frequent disturbances.

References

  1. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/cyclo/
  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603223000425
  3. https://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/btang/papers/2020_TCGenesis_TCRR.pdf
  4. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/98/11/bams-d-16-0116.1.xml
  5. https://www.noaa.gov/tropical-cyclone-climatology
  6. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/project2007/TCgenesis.html
  7. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutgloss.shtml
  8. https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/education/tropstrm.shtml
  9. https://www.weather.gov/mob/tropical_definitions
  10. https://www.weather.gov/source/zhu/ZHU_Training_Page/tropical_stuff/sub_extra_tropical/subtropical.htm
  11. https://www.medievalists.net/2012/10/earliest-historical-records-of-typhoons-in-china/
  12. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0004-5608.00253
  13. https://www.hurricanescience.org/history/storms/pre1900s/1502/index.html
  14. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastdeadly.shtml
  15. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutnames_history.shtml
  16. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/storm-names.html
  17. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/21/9/917/159782/A-Model-of-Hurricane-Formation
  18. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1950JAP....21..917R/abstract
  19. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ftp/hrd/annane/prelim_notes/QJ_1997_Smith_cisk.pdf
  20. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/43/6/1520-0469_1986_043_0585_aasitf_2_0_co_2.xml
  21. https://twister.caps.ou.edu/MM2005/Emanuel_JAS86.pdf
  22. https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/news/noaa-satellites-have-you-covered-hurricane-season
  23. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hurricane_blog/paper-summarizing-recent-advances-in-observing-tropical-cyclones-released-online-in-tropical-cyclone-research-and-review/
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603220300187
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603223000152
  26. https://met.nps.edu/~mtmontgo/papers/Chapter_22.pdf
  27. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/28/20/jcli-d-14-00637.1.xml
  28. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/16/2/1520-0434_2001_016_0219_atcgpf_2_0_co_2.xml
  29. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/25/12/jcli-d-11-00517.1.xml
  30. https://cyclone.wmo.int/pdf/Chapter-Four.pdf
  31. https://www.coaps.fsu.edu/papers/regional_effects_hurricane_landfalls/
  32. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/141/2/mwr-d-11-00309.1.xml
  33. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA265216.pdf
  34. https://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/tang/papers/2024_TropicalCyclones_EncylopediaAtmosSci.pdf
  35. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/75/5/jas-d-17-0131.1.xml
  36. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020MS002207
  37. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/13116/noaa_13116_DS1.pdf
  38. https://escholarship.org/content/qt7g6054vk/qt7g6054vk.pdf
  39. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/134/9/mwr3204.1.xml
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9889306/
  41. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/45586
  42. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2023GL108102
  43. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ade609
  44. https://www.meteo.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~roger/Tropics/TCs_RegionsOccurrence.html
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Regions-of-global-tropical-cyclogenesis-and-the-average-annual-number-of-hurricane_fig1_221912124
  46. https://climatlas.com/tropical/
  47. https://community.wmo.int/en/tropical-cyclone-climatology
  48. https://www.weather.gov/media/tbw/1921/Climatology.pdf
  49. https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/tropical/tropical-cyclone-introduction
  50. https://www.e-education.psu.edu/meteo3/l12_p3.html
  51. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2025GL117248
  52. https://wmo.int/resources/wmo-fact-sheets/tropical-cyclone-climatology
  53. https://weather.metoffice.gov.uk/learn-about/weather/types-of-weather/hurricanes/location
  54. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL111413
  55. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/31/22/jcli-d-18-0515.1.xml
  56. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/139/9/mwr-d-10-05060.1.xml
  57. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2014GL062479
  58. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/TCFAQ_A.txt
  59. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/31145/noaa_31145_DS1.pdf
  60. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/project97/tcfaqA.html
  61. https://journals.ametsoc.org/downloadpdf/view/journals/clim/25/21/jcli-d-11-00212.1.pdf
  62. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/marinersguide.pdf
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603223000516
  64. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/hydr/22/10/JHM-D-20-0150.1.xml
  65. https://openscholar.uga.edu/record/4972/files/ThomasAndrewPhD.pdf
  66. https://www.weather.gov/media/ilx/Research-Case_Studies/MaloneTSErin.pdf
  67. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/64997/noaa_64997_DS1.pdf
  68. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10282237
  69. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.818671/full
  70. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/enso/impacts-el-nino-and-la-nina-hurricane-season
  71. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/lanina/index.html
  72. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603225000347
  73. https://spj.science.org/doi/10.34133/olar.0082
  74. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/27/17/jcli-d-13-00559.1.pdf
  75. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-51241-9
  76. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/27255/noaa_27255_DS1.pdf
  77. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020GL087148
  78. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/138/4/2009mwr3114.1.xml
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037702651530004X
  80. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/140/3/mwr-d-11-00110.1.xml
  81. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GL117438
  82. https://ntrs.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/api/citations/20110009949/downloads/20110009949.pdf
  83. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/33/1/jcli-d-18-0811.1.pdf
  84. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/36/24/JCLI-D-23-0251.1.xml
  85. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2017jd027808
  86. https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/news/the-saharan-air-layer-what-it-why-does-noaa-track-it
  87. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/news/feature-articles/saharan-dust-versus-atlantic-hurricanes
  88. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27030-z
  89. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9094658/
  90. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/35/8/JCLI-D-21-0228.1.xml
  91. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/71/6/jas-d-13-0202.1.xml
  92. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603218300407
  93. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/am-pdf/10.1029/2022JD036775
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4459184/
  95. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-022-01388-4
  96. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2021GL095774
  97. https://tropical.colostate.edu/Publications/papers/Klotzbach_etal_GRL2022.pdf
  98. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/climvari/
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8639808/
  100. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/64358/noaa_64358_DS1.pdf
  101. https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-tropical-cyclone-activity
  102. https://research.noaa.gov/research-global-warming-contributed-to-a-decline-in-annual-tropical-cyclones-in-the-20th-century/
  103. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adl2142
  104. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021EF002275
  105. https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes/
  106. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/35/19/JCLI-D-21-0875.1.pdf
  107. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/100/10/bams-d-18-0189.1.pdf
  108. https://climateataglance.com/climate-at-a-glance-global-tropical-cyclones
  109. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapter11.pdf
  110. https://judithcurry.com/2019/02/17/hurricanes-climate-change-detection/
  111. https://www.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-05/2Blake-SECARTwebinar-20220517.pdf
  112. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/65091
  113. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/46394
  114. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S222560322300053X
  115. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/40/5/WAF-D-24-0115.1.xml
  116. https://rammb2.cira.colostate.edu/tc_research/ens-tcgi/
  117. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutgtwo/aboutgtwo2.shtml
  118. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603219300700
  119. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/38/9/JCLI-D-24-0356.1.xml
  120. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/33/4/waf-d-17-0165_1.pdf
  121. https://tropical.colostate.edu/Publications/papers/SchreckIII_etal_2023.pdf
  122. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/39/1/WAF-D-23-0103.1.xml
  123. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2023MS003637
  124. https://www.oajaiml.com/uploads/archivepdf/905443158.pdf
  125. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-024-03281-5
  126. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023TCRR...12..323H/abstract
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.