Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Arthropod leg
View on WikipediaThis article needs additional citations for verification. (March 2025) |
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: Images need relocation, the Crustacean section needs expansion so that the text is less sandwiched. (May 2025) |
The arthropod leg is a form of jointed appendage of arthropods, usually used for walking. Many of the terms used for arthropod leg segments (called podomeres) are of Latin origin, and may be confused with terms for bones: coxa (meaning hip, pl.: coxae), trochanter, femur (pl.: femora), tibia (pl.: tibiae), tarsus (pl.: tarsi), ischium (pl.: ischia), metatarsus, carpus, dactylus (meaning finger), patella (pl.: patellae).
Homologies of leg segments between groups are difficult to prove and are the source of much argument. Some authors posit up to eleven segments per leg for the most recent common ancestor of extant arthropods[1] but modern arthropods have eight or fewer. It has been argued[2][3] that the ancestral leg need not have been so complex, and that other events, such as successive loss of function of a Hox-gene, could result in parallel gains of leg segments.
In arthropods, each of the leg segments articulates with the next segment in a hinge joint and may only bend in one plane. This means that a greater number of segments is required to achieve the same kinds of movements that are possible in vertebrate animals, which have rotational ball-and-socket joints at the base of the fore and hind limbs.[4]
Biramous and uniramous
[edit]The appendages of arthropods may be either biramous or uniramous. A uniramous limb comprises a single series of segments attached end-to-end. A biramous limb, however, branches into two, and each branch consists of a series of segments attached end-to-end.
The external branch (ramus) of the appendages of crustaceans is known as the exopod or exopodite, while the internal branch is known as the endopod or endopodite. Other structures aside from the latter two are termed exites (outer structures) and endites (inner structures). Exopodites can be easily distinguished from exites by the possession of internal musculature. The exopodites can sometimes be missing in some crustacean groups (amphipods and isopods), and they are completely absent in insects.[5]
The legs of insects and myriapods are uniramous. In crustaceans, the first antennae are uniramous, but the second antennae are biramous, as are the legs in most species.
For a time, possession of uniramous limbs was believed to be a shared, derived character, so uniramous arthropods were grouped into a taxon called Uniramia. It is now believed that several groups of arthropods evolved uniramous limbs independently from ancestors with biramous limbs, so this taxon is no longer used.[citation needed]
Chelicerata
[edit]
Arachnid legs differ from those of insects by the addition of two segments on either side of the tibia, the patella between the femur and the tibia, and the metatarsus (sometimes called basitarsus) between the tibia and the tarsus (sometimes called telotarsus), making a total of seven segments.
The tarsus of spiders has claws at the end as well as a hook that helps with web-spinning. Spider legs can also serve sensory functions, with hairs that serve as touch receptors, as well as an organ on the tarsus that serves as a humidity receptor, known as the tarsal organ.[6]
The situation is identical in scorpions, but with the addition of a pre-tarsus beyond the tarsus. The claws of the scorpion are not truly legs, but are pedipalps, a different kind of appendage that is also found in spiders and is specialised for predation and mating.
In Limulus, there are no metatarsi or pretarsi, leaving six segments per leg.
Crustacea
[edit]This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (May 2025) |

The legs of crustaceans are divided primitively into seven segments, which do not follow the naming system used in the other groups. They are: coxa, basis, ischium, merus, carpus, propodus, and dactylus. In some groups, some of the limb segments may be fused together. The claw (chela) of a lobster or crab is formed by the articulation of the dactylus against an outgrowth of the propodus. Crustacean limbs also differ in being biramous, whereas all other extant arthropods have uniramous limbs.[citation needed]
Myriapoda
[edit]
Myriapods (millipedes, centipedes and their relatives) have seven-segmented walking legs, comprising coxa, trochanter, prefemur, femur, tibia, tarsus, and a tarsal claw. Myriapod legs show a variety of modifications in different groups. In all centipedes, the first pair of legs is modified into a pair of venomous fangs called forcipules. In most millipedes, one or two pairs of walking legs in adult males are modified into sperm-transferring structures called gonopods. In some millipedes, the first leg pair in males may be reduced to tiny hooks or stubs, while in others the first pair may be enlarged.
Insects
[edit]
Insects and their relatives are hexapods, having six legs, connected to the thorax, each with five components. In order from the body they are the coxa, trochanter, femur, tibia, and tarsus. Each is a single segment, except the tarsus which can be from three to seven segments, each referred to as a tarsomere.
Except in species in which legs have been lost or become vestigial through evolutionary adaptation, adult insects have six legs, one pair attached to each of the three segments of the thorax. They have paired appendages on some other segments, in particular, mouthparts, antennae and cerci, all of which are derived from paired legs on each segment of some common ancestor.
Some larval insects do however have extra walking legs on their abdominal segments; these extra legs are called prolegs. They are found most frequently on the larvae of moths and sawflies. Prolegs do not have the same structure as modern adult insect legs, and there has been a great deal of debate as to whether they are homologous with them.[7] Current evidence suggests that they are indeed homologous up to a very primitive stage in their embryological development,[8] but that their emergence in modern insects was not homologous between the Lepidoptera and Symphyta.[9] Such concepts are pervasive in current interpretations of phylogeny.[10]
In general, the legs of larval insects, particularly in the Endopterygota, vary more than in the adults. As mentioned, some have prolegs as well as "true" thoracic legs. Some have no externally visible legs at all (though they have internal rudiments that emerge as adult legs at the final ecdysis). Examples include the maggots of flies or grubs of weevils. In contrast, the larvae of other Coleoptera, such as the Scarabaeidae and Dytiscidae have thoracic legs, but no prolegs. Some insects that exhibit hypermetamorphosis begin their metamorphosis as planidia, specialised, active, legged larvae, but they end their larval stage as legless maggots, for example the Acroceridae.
Among the Exopterygota, the legs of larvae tend to resemble those of the adults in general, except in adaptations to their respective modes of life. For example, the legs of most immature Ephemeroptera are adapted to scuttling beneath underwater stones and the like, whereas the adults have more gracile legs that are less of a burden during flight. Again, the young of the Coccoidea are called "crawlers" and they crawl around looking for a good place to feed, where they settle down and stay for life. Their later instars have no functional legs in most species. Among the Apterygota, the legs of immature specimens are in effect smaller versions of the adult legs.[citation needed]
Fundamental morphology of insect legs
[edit]
A representative insect leg, such as that of a housefly or cockroach, has the following parts, in sequence from most proximal to most distal: coxa, trochanter, femur, tibia, tarsus, and pretarsus.
Associated with the leg itself there are various sclerites around its base. Their functions are articular and have to do with how the leg attaches to the main exoskeleton of the insect. Such sclerites differ considerably between unrelated insects.[7]
Coxa
[edit]The coxa is the proximal segment and functional base of the leg. It articulates with the pleuron and associated sclerites of its thoracic segment, and in some species it articulates with the edge of the sternite as well. The homologies of the various basal sclerites are open to debate. Some authorities suggest that they derive from an ancestral subcoxa. In many species, the coxa has two lobes where it articulates with the pleuron. The posterior lobe is the meron which is usually the larger part of the coxa. A meron is well developed in Periplaneta, the Isoptera, Neuroptera and Lepidoptera.[citation needed]
Trochanter
[edit]The trochanter articulates with the coxa but usually is attached rigidly to the femur. In some insects, its appearance may be confusing; for example it has two subsegments in the Odonata.[citation needed] In parasitic Hymenoptera, the base of the femur has the appearance of a second trochanter.[citation needed]
Femur
[edit]
In most insects, the femur is the largest region of the leg; it is especially conspicuous in many insects with saltatorial legs because the typical leaping mechanism is to straighten the joint between the femur and the tibia, and the femur contains the necessary massive bipennate musculature.[citation needed]
Tibia
[edit]The tibia is the fourth section of the typical insect leg. As a rule, the tibia of an insect is slender in comparison to the femur, but it generally is at least as long and often longer. Near the distal end, there is generally a tibial spur, often two or more. In the Apocrita, the tibia of the foreleg bears a large apical spur that fits over a semicircular gap in the first segment of the tarsus. The gap is lined with comb-like bristles, and the insect cleans its antennae by drawing them through.[citation needed]
Tarsus
[edit]
The ancestral tarsus was a single segment and in the extant Protura, Diplura and certain insect larvae the tarsus also is single-segmented. Most modern insects have tarsi divided into subsegments (tarsomeres), usually about five. The actual number varies with the taxon, which may be useful for diagnostic purposes. For example, the Pterogeniidae characteristically have 5-segmented fore- and mid-tarsi, but 4-segmented hind tarsi, whereas the Cerylonidae have four tarsomeres on each tarsus.
The distal segment of the typical insect leg is the pretarsus. In the Collembola, Protura and many insect larvae, the pretarsus is a single claw. On the pretarsus most insects have a pair of claws (ungues, singular unguis). Between the ungues, a median unguitractor plate supports the pretarsus. The plate is attached to the apodeme of the flexor muscle of the ungues. In the Neoptera, the parempodia are a symmetrical pair of structures arising from the outside (distal) surface of the unguitractor plate between the claws.[11] It is present in many Hemiptera and almost all Heteroptera.[11] Usually, the parempodia are bristly (setiform), but in a few species they are fleshy.[12] Sometimes the parempodia are reduced in size so as to almost disappear.[13] Above the unguitractor plate, the pretarsus expands forward into a median lobe, the arolium.

Webspinners (Embioptera) have an enlarged basal tarsomere on each of the front legs, containing the silk-producing glands.[14]
Under their pretarsi, members of the Diptera generally have paired lobes or pulvilli, meaning "little cushions". There is a single pulvillus below each unguis. The pulvilli often have an arolium between them or otherwise a median bristle or empodium, meaning the meeting place of the pulvilli. On the underside of the tarsal segments, there frequently are pulvillus-like organs or plantulae. The arolium, plantulae and pulvilli are adhesive organs enabling their possessors to climb smooth or steep surfaces. They all are outgrowths of the exoskeleton and their cavities contain blood. Their structures are covered with tubular tenent hairs, the apices of which are moistened by a glandular secretion. The organs are adapted to apply the hairs closely to a smooth surface so that adhesion occurs through surface molecular forces.[7][15]
Insects control the ungues through muscle tension on a long tendon, the "retractor unguis" or "long tendon". In insect models of locomotion and motor control, such as Drosophila (Diptera), locusts (Acrididae), or stick insects (Phasmatodea), the long tendon courses through the tarsus and tibia before reaching the femur. Tension on the long tendon is controlled by two muscles, one in the femur and one in the tibia, which can operate differently depending on how the leg is bent. Tension on the long tendon controls the claw, but also bends the tarsus and likely affects its stiffness during walking.[16]
Variations in functional anatomy of insect legs
[edit]
The typical thoracic leg of an adult insect is adapted for running (cursorial), rather than for digging, leaping, swimming, predation, or other similar activities. The legs of most cockroaches are good examples. However, there are many specialized adaptations, including:
- The forelegs of mole crickets (Gryllotalpidae) and some scarab beetle (Scarabaeidae) are adapted to burrowing in earth (fossorial).
- The raptorial forelegs of mantidflies (Mantispidae), mantises (Mantodea), damsel bugs (Nabidae) and ambush bugs (Phymatinae) are adapted to seizing and holding prey in one way, while those of whirligig beetles Gyrinidae are long and adapted for grasping food or prey in quite a different way.
- The forelegs of some butterflies, such as many Nymphalidae, are reduced so greatly that only two pairs of functional walking legs remain.
- In most grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera), the hind legs are saltatorial; they have heavily bipinnately muscled femora and straight, long tibiae adapted to leaping and to some extent to defence by kicking. Flea beetles (Alticini) also have powerful hind femora that enable them to leap spectacularly.
- Other beetles with spectacularly muscular hind femora may not be saltatorial at all, but very clumsy; for example, particular species of bean weevils (Bruchinae) use their swollen hind legs for forcing their way out of the hard-shelled seeds of plants such as Erythrina in which they grew to adulthood.
- The legs of the Odonata, the dragonflies and damselflies, are adapted for seizing prey that the insects feed on while flying or while sitting still on a plant; they are nearly incapable of using them for walking.[7]
- The majority of aquatic insects use their legs only for swimming (natatorial), though many species of immature insects swim by other means such as by wriggling, undulating, or expelling water in jets.

Evolution and homology of arthropod legs
[edit]The embryonic body segments (somites) of different arthropods taxa have diverged from a simple body plan with many similar appendages which are serially homologous, into a variety of body plans with fewer segments equipped with specialised appendages.[17] The homologies between these have been discovered by comparing genes in evolutionary developmental biology.[18]
| Somite (body segment) |
Trilobite (Trilobitomorpha) |
Spider (Chelicerata) |
Centipede (Myriapoda) |
Insect (Hexapoda) |
Shrimp (Crustacea) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | antennae | chelicerae (jaws and fangs) | antennae | antennae | 1st antennae |
| 2 | 1st legs | pedipalps | - | - | 2nd antennae |
| 3 | 2nd legs | 1st legs | mandibles | mandibles | mandibles (jaws) |
| 4 | 3rd legs | 2nd legs | 1st maxillae | 1st maxillae | 1st maxillae |
| 5 | 4th legs | 3rd legs | 2nd maxillae | 2nd maxillae | 2nd maxillae |
| 6 | 5th legs | 4th legs | collum (no legs) | 1st legs | 1st legs |
| 7 | 6th legs | - | 1st legs | 2nd legs | 2nd legs |
| 8 | 7th legs | - | 2nd legs | 3rd legs | 3rd legs |
| 9 | 8th legs | - | 3rd legs | - | 4th legs |
| 10 | 9th legs | - | 4th legs | - | 5th legs |
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Kukalova-Peck, J. (1992). "The "Uniramia" do not exist - the ground plan of the Pterygota as revealed by Permian Diaphanopterodea from Russia (Insecta, Paleodictyopteroidea)". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 70 (2): 236–255. Bibcode:1992CaJZ...70..236K. doi:10.1139/z92-037.
- ^ Fryer, G. (1996). "Reflections on arthropod evolution". Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58 (1): 1–55. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01659.x.
- ^ Schram, F. R. & S. Koenemann (2001). "Developmental genetics and arthropod evolution: part I, on legs". Evolution & Development. 3 (5): 343–354. doi:10.1046/j.1525-142X.2001.01038.x. PMID 11710766. S2CID 25997101.
- ^ Pat Willmer; Graham Stone; Ian Johnston (12 March 2009). Environmental Physiology of Animals. John Wiley & Sons. p. 329. ISBN 978-1-4443-0922-5.
- ^ Geoff A. Boxshall & Damià Jaume (2009). "Exopodites, Epipodites and Gills in Crustaceans" (PDF). Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny. 67 (2). Museum für Tierkunde Dresden: 229–254. doi:10.3897/asp.67.e31699. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-04-26. Retrieved 2012-01-14.
- ^ Pechmann, Matthias (November 2010). "Patterning mechanisms and morphological diversity of spider appendages and their importance for spider evolution". Arthropod Structure & Development. 39 (6): 453–467. Bibcode:2010ArtSD..39..453P. doi:10.1016/j.asd.2010.07.007. PMID 20696272. Retrieved 20 August 2020.
- ^ a b c d Richards, O. W.; Davies, R.G. (1977). Imms' General Textbook of Entomology: Volume 1: Structure, Physiology and Development Volume 2: Classification and Biology. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 0-412-61390-5.
- ^ Panganiban, Grace; Nagy, Lisa; Carroll, Sean B. (1994). "The role of the Distal-less gene in the development and evolution of insect limbs". Current Biology. 4 (8): 671–675. Bibcode:1994CBio....4..671P. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00151-2. PMID 7953552. S2CID 22980014.
- ^ Suzuki, Y; Palopoli, MF (Oct 2001). "Evolution of insect abdominal appendages: are prolegs homologous or convergent traits?". Dev Genes Evol. 211 (10): 486–92. doi:10.1007/s00427-001-0182-3. PMID 11702198. S2CID 1163446.
- ^ Galis, Frietson (1996). "The evolution of insects and vertebrates: homeobox genes and homology". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 11 (10): 402–403. Bibcode:1996TEcoE..11..402G. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)30038-4. PMID 21237897.
- ^ a b Friedemann, Katrin; Spangenberg, Rico; Yoshizawa, Kazunor; Beutel, Rolf G. (2013). "Evolution of attachment structures in the highly diverse Acercaria (Hexapoda)" (PDF). Cladistics. 30 (2): 170–201. doi:10.1111/cla.12030. PMID 34781597. S2CID 86195785. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 January 2014. Retrieved 25 January 2014.
- ^ Schuh, Randall T. & Slater, James Alexander (1995). True Bugs of the World (Hemiptera:Heteroptera): Classification and Natural History. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. p. 46. ISBN 978-0-8014-2066-5.
- ^ Goel, S. C. (1972). "Notes on the structure of the unguitractor plate in Heteroptera (Hemiptera)". Journal of Entomology Series A, General Entomology. 46 (2): 167–173. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1972.tb00124.x.
- ^ Ross, Edward S. (1991). "Embioptera". In Naumann, I. D.; Carne, P. B.; et al. (eds.). The Insects of Australia. Volume 1 (2 ed.). Melbourne University Press. pp. 405–409.
- ^ Stanislav N Gorb. "Biological attachment devices: exploring nature's diversity for biomimetics Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 2008; 366(1870): 1557-1574 doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2172 1471-2962
- ^ RADNIKOW, G.; BÄSSLER, U. (1991-05-01). "Function of a Muscle Whose Apodeme Travels Through a Joint Moved by Other Muscles: Why the Retractor Unguis Muscle in Stick Insects is Tripartite and has no Antagonist". Journal of Experimental Biology. 157 (1): 87–99. Bibcode:1991JExpB.157...87R. doi:10.1242/jeb.157.1.87. ISSN 0022-0949.
- ^ Novartis Foundation; Hall, Brian (2008). Homology. John Wiley. p. 29. ISBN 978-0-470-51566-2.
- ^ Brusca, R.C.; Brusca, G.J. (1990). Invertebrates. Sinauer Associates. p. 669.
Arthropod leg
View on GrokipediaIntroduction
Definition and Diversity
Arthropod legs are jointed appendages that emerge from the segmented body of members of the phylum Arthropoda, enabling a range of functions beyond primary locomotion, including manipulation of objects, sensory perception, and roles in reproduction such as copulation or egg-laying. These structures are a defining feature of arthropods, allowing for precise control through flexion at joints where the exoskeleton is softer and more flexible.[3] Arthropod legs typically consist of multiple podomeres (segments) connected by arthrodial membranes, facilitating diverse movements essential to the phylum's ecological success.[4] The exoskeleton enveloping these legs is primarily composed of chitin, a tough polysaccharide that forms a lightweight yet rigid framework, often reinforced with proteins and minerals for added strength.[5] Internal muscles attach to the inner surface of this chitinous cuticle, contracting to flex the joints and power leg motion, while the overall design permits efficient force transmission without relying on a hydrostatic skeleton.[6] This musculoskeletal system underpins the appendages' versatility, from simple walking to specialized tasks like prey capture.[3] The study of arthropod legs originated with early naturalists like Carl Linnaeus, who in his 1758 Systema Naturae grouped jointed-limbed invertebrates under the broad class Insecta, laying foundational observations on their morphology and segmentation. Modern arthropodology, the specialized field examining these organisms, has since integrated anatomical dissections, developmental biology, and genetic analyses to elucidate leg structure and function across taxa.[7] With over 1.2 million described arthropod species—accounting for more than 80% of all known animal species—the diversity of legs is profound, ranging from the eight walking legs (four pairs) typical of spiders to the 1,306 legs recorded in the millipede Eumillipes persephone, highlighting adaptations to varied habitats and lifestyles.[8][9][10] Arthropod legs generally fall into two basic structural categories: biramous, with a two-branched form, and uniramous, featuring a single branch.[11]Biramous and Uniramous Legs
Arthropod legs exhibit two primary structural types: biramous and uniramous appendages. Biramous legs consist of two branches—an outer exopod and an inner endopod—arising from a basal protopodite, which itself comprises the precoxa, coxa, and basis segments. This configuration is typical of crustaceans, where the exopod often functions as a paddle for swimming, while the endopod serves for walking or grasping, enabling versatile locomotion in aquatic environments.[12][13] In contrast, uniramous legs feature a single branch, representing the persistent endopod with the exopod suppressed or lost during development. These legs are characteristic of chelicerates, myriapods, and insects, typically segmented into a coxa, trochanter, femur, tibia, and tarsus, which supports efficient terrestrial walking and running by providing a streamlined, unbranched form for propulsion.[9][14] Comparatively, the protopodite in biramous legs anchors the dual branches, allowing multifunctional adaptations, whereas uniramous legs streamline the segmentation sequence post-coxa for specialized locomotion without branching. Biramous structures are considered ancestral in arthropods, as evidenced by their presence in extinct trilobites and modern crustaceans, with evolutionary transitions to uniramous forms occurring independently in multiple lineages through the developmental suppression of the exopod branch. This shift likely facilitated adaptations to terrestrial habitats by reducing drag and enhancing stability.[15][16][17]Legs in Chelicerates
Structure and Segmentation
Chelicerates possess a prosoma that bears six pairs of uniramous appendages, consisting of one pair of chelicerae, one pair of pedipalps, and four pairs of walking legs.[18] These appendages exhibit a segmented structure derived from the ancestral arthropod limb, with the walking legs typically comprising seven podomeres: the proximal coxa, followed by the trochanter, femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, and distal tarsus.[19][20] The segmentation pattern reflects evolutionary modifications within Chelicerata, where the chelicerae and pedipalps represent specialized anterior appendages homologous to the walking legs in more basal arthropods.[21] The chelicerae are small, pincer-like appendages positioned anterior to the mouth, typically consisting of two segments: a robust basal paturon and a movable distal fang or claw.[18] In arachnids, such as spiders and scorpions, these non-ambulatory structures are classified as modified legs due to their developmental and positional homology with the subsequent appendage pairs.[21] Pedipalps, the second pair, are generally shorter than the walking legs and segmented similarly, often into six podomeres, but with reduced size and enhanced sensory or manipulative features in various taxa.[19] Walking legs in arachnids feature dicondylar (bicondylar) joints at most intersegmental articulations, allowing bidirectional movement through paired condyles that enhance flexibility and precision in locomotion.[22][23] This joint morphology contrasts with monocondylar types in other arthropods and is a key structural trait in chelicerates, particularly arachnids.[22] Among chelicerates, merostomates such as horseshoe crabs (Xiphosura) display variations in leg segmentation, with walking legs bearing gnathobases—spiny, medial projections on the coxae that integrate with the feeding apparatus.[24][25] These coxal structures, present on the second through fifth pairs of appendages, contribute to the overall segmented architecture while adapting the proximal limb base for additional roles, though the core podomere sequence remains consistent with other chelicerates.[25]Functions and Adaptations
Chelicerate legs primarily facilitate locomotion through walking and jumping, with specialized adaptations enhancing adhesion and propulsion on diverse substrates. In spiders, tarsal claws at the distal end of the legs interlock with rough surfaces to provide grip during walking and jumping, enabling stable traction on irregular terrain. These claws, often paired and curved, work in conjunction with scopulae—dense arrays of adhesive setae—for attachment to smoother surfaces, as demonstrated in salticid spiders where claw ablation leads to slipping during acceleration on smooth substrates. This dual mechanism allows spiders to navigate vertical and horizontal planes efficiently, supporting rapid jumps that can cover distances up to 50 times their body length in species like Phidippus.[26][27] In solifuges (sun-spiders), leg extension relies on a combination of hydraulic pressure and elastic mechanisms, compensating for the absence of extensor muscles in certain joints. Hemolymph is pumped into the leg segments to hydraulically extend the femoropatellar joint, facilitating swift movements across arid environments where these chelicerates are known for their speed, reaching up to 16 km/h. This hydraulic system, similar to that in spiders, enables powerful strides and rapid evasion, with elastic energy storage in joints further amplifying propulsion during chases.[28][29] Sensory functions are integral to leg adaptations in chelicerates, with tarsi bearing trichobothria—fine, hair-like sensilla that detect airborne vibrations and air currents from approaching prey or predators. These mechanoreceptors on spider tarsi respond to low-frequency stimuli down to approximately 10 Hz, allowing precise localization of flying insects through near-field airflow detection, as observed in wandering spiders like Cupiennius salei. Chemoreceptors on the tarsi complement this by sampling chemical cues from substrates, aiding in prey identification and habitat assessment during foraging walks.[30][31] Predatory roles extend to modified appendages like pedipalps in scorpions, which function as enlarged chelae for grasping and immobilizing prey. The robust pedipalps deliver a firm grip on insects or small vertebrates, often crushing exoskeletons before venom injection via the telson, with chela morphology varying by species—larger in ground-dwelling forms for handling larger prey. This adaptation enhances capture efficiency in nocturnal hunting, where pedipalps also bear trichobothria for initial prey detection.[32][33] Environmental adaptations in arachnid legs indirectly support respiration through the integrated role of book lungs, which provide efficient gas exchange to meet the oxygen demands of sustained leg activity. In scorpions and basal spiders, book lungs in the ventral opisthosoma facilitate diffusion-based respiration, sustaining metabolic rates during prolonged walking or burrowing.[34][35]Legs in Crustaceans
Pereiopods and Other Appendages
In crustaceans, pereiopods refer to the thoracic appendages primarily adapted for walking and clinging, typically numbering up to five pairs in malacostracans such as decapods.[12] These appendages exhibit a basically biramous design, a primitive feature among crustaceans, consisting of a proximal protopodite and two distal rami: the endopod, which serves for locomotion, and the exopod, which may function in sensing or auxiliary swimming where present.[36] The protopodite is subdivided into segments including a precoxa (when present), coxa, and basis, while the endopod comprises five main segments: ischium, merus, carpus, propodus, and dactylus.[37] In many advanced crustaceans like decapods, the exopod is reduced or absent in adult pereiopods, rendering them functionally uniramous, though the biramous condition persists in larval stages or certain primitive groups.[16] Anterior to the pereiopods, crustaceans possess head appendages including antennules (first antennae) and antennae (second antennae), which are sensory structures but can exhibit leg-like morphology and functions in some taxa, such as aiding in locomotion or substrate exploration.[12] Antennules are typically biramous with segmented flagella for chemoreception and mechanoreception, while antennae are uniramous and often bear a broad, paddle-like exopod called the scaphocerite in decapods for balance during swimming.[12] Pereiopods show significant differentiation along the thorax to support specialized roles. The anterior pairs, known as maxillipeds (typically the first three), are modified for feeding, with their protopods bearing endites that manipulate food toward the mouthparts.[38] In decapods, the first pair of pereiopods is often transformed into chelipeds—pincer-like claws used for defense, prey capture, and agonistic interactions—exhibiting sexual dimorphism where males typically develop larger, more robust chelipeds than females.[39] Sexual dimorphism is prominent in crustacean appendages, particularly with male gonopods derived from pereopods or adjacent thoracic structures in groups like peracarids (e.g., isopods and amphipods), where the first one or two pairs are modified into copulatory organs for sperm transfer, contrasting with unmodified female pereopods.[40] This modification enhances reproductive success but can reduce locomotor efficiency in males compared to females.[41]Swimming and Walking Adaptations
In crustaceans, pleopods, also known as swimmerets, are biramous appendages located on the abdomen that primarily facilitate swimming through a drag-based propulsion mechanism, where the flattened exopods and endopods beat rhythmically to generate thrust.[42] These structures enable efficient backward or forward locomotion in aquatic environments, as seen in species like mysids and decapods, where well-developed pleopods support sustained swimming.[43] In females of many species, pleopods serve a dual function by providing a brooding platform for eggs, with specialized setae on the endopods attaching and aerating the developing embryos to prevent fungal growth and ensure oxygenation.[44] This adaptation is particularly evident in peracarids and decapods, where the pleopods form a protective ventral pouch during the brooding period, enhancing offspring survival rates.[45] For walking and semi-terrestrial locomotion, peraeopods in isopods exhibit modifications that support weight-bearing and traction on land, featuring robust segmentation with dactyli equipped for gripping substrates like soil or leaf litter.[46] In terrestrial isopods such as woodlice (Oniscidea), these appendages enable slow, crawling movement, with adaptations like white body pigmentation for desiccation resistance complementing their locomotor efficiency.[47] Females further adapt peraeopods 1–5 with oostegites—brood pouch-forming plates—that not only protect eggs and juveniles during terrestrial brooding but also stabilize the body during walking by distributing load across the ventral surface.[48] Propulsion mechanics in swimming crustaceans involve coordination between appendages and ventilatory structures, notably the scaphognathites, which are the exopods of the second maxillae that rhythmically beat to drive water currents over the gills for respiration.[49] During locomotion, these movements create an auxiliary forward thrust while maintaining gill ventilation, separating inhalant and exhalant streams to optimize oxygen uptake without interrupting swimming efficiency, as observed in crabs and shrimp.[50] This integration ensures sustained activity in active swimmers. An illustrative example is found in krill (Euphausiacea), where thoracic legs form a dynamic feeding basket lined with setae that filters phytoplankton during forward swimming, allowing continuous locomotion and nutrition without halting movement.[51] The basket's rhythmic expansion and contraction, perpendicular to the swimming direction, captures particles efficiently while pleopods provide primary propulsion.[52]Legs in Myriapods
Structure in Centipedes
Centipedes (class Chilopoda) possess a distinctive leg arrangement adapted for rapid predation and locomotion, featuring a series of uniramous appendages that are homologous to those in other arthropods. The first pair of these appendages is highly modified into forcipules, which are not true walking legs but venom-injecting structures derived from the first pair of trunk appendages. These pincer-like forcipules consist of four to five segments, including a large trochanteroprefemur and smaller femur, tibia, and tarsus, with venom glands opening at the tips for subduing prey.[53][54] The walking legs of centipedes are uniramous and extend from the subsequent trunk segments, numbering an odd total of 15 to 191 pairs depending on the species and developmental stage. Each leg typically comprises six to seven podomeres: coxa, trochanter, prefemur, femur, tibia, and tarsus, with the tarsus sometimes subdivided into additional articles ending in paired claws for grasping surfaces during movement. These trunk legs are morphologically similar across segments, facilitating coordinated, wave-like propulsion, though variations occur in length and robustness among different chilopod orders. The ultimate (last) pair of legs is often elongated and held off the ground, serving primarily sensory functions such as detecting vibrations or chemical cues rather than locomotion.[2][55] In centipede anatomy, leg insertion occurs ventrolaterally on the sternites of each trunk segment, reflecting the fusion of pleural elements into the ventral sclerites without significant tergosternal fusion. This arrangement allows for flexible articulation and efficient body undulation during hunting, with the coxa directly articulating to the sternite for stability.[56]Structure in Millipedes
Millipede legs exhibit a distinctive diplosegmental arrangement, where the trunk is composed of diplosegments—fused pairs of original segments—each bearing two pairs of legs, resulting in up to 1,306 legs (653 pairs) in species such as Eumillipes persephone, with Illacme plenipes having up to 750 legs (375 pairs).[10][57] This configuration arises from the fusion of two embryonic segments into a single diplosegment, with one tergite covering the dorsal surface and two sternites supporting the ventral attachment of the leg pairs. Each leg is uniramous, consisting of seven podomeres: the coxa, prefemur, femur, postfemur, tibia, tarsus, and pretarsus (claw), with the telopodite comprising the distal portions beyond the coxa. The coxa of millipede legs is notably short and directly attached to the sternum, positioning the body close to the substrate and facilitating a low, burrowing posture essential for navigating soil and leaf litter environments.[10] This compact coxal structure, combined with the multiplicity of short legs, generates substantial propulsive force for burrowing while minimizing exposure above ground.[57] In males, certain posterior trunk legs are modified into gonopods, specialized appendages used for sperm transfer during copulation; these structures develop from walking leg primordia through metamorphosis, featuring elongated coxal processes and complex telopodites adapted for precise insemination.[58] Gonopods typically occur on the seventh and eighth leg-bearing rings in helminthomorph millipedes, with the telopodite often reduced or elaborated into lamellae and solenomeres for species-specific mating functions.[58] For defense, millipedes retract their legs tightly against the body when coiling into a spiral or ball-shaped posture, shielding the vulnerable appendages and underside behind the hardened exoskeleton and repugnatorial glands.[59] This leg retraction enhances the protective efficacy of coiling, a primary antipredator strategy in these slow-moving arthropods.[59]Legs in Insects
Fundamental Morphology
The fundamental morphology of insect legs is characterized by a standardized segmentation into six podomeres, forming a uniramous appendage adapted primarily for locomotion. These segments articulate sequentially from the proximal to distal end: the coxa, trochanter, femur, tibia, tarsus, and pretarsus. This arrangement provides flexibility and strength, enabling precise movements through hinged joints and targeted muscle actions.[60] The coxa serves as the basal segment, articulating directly with the thorax via pleural coxal processes, which are mesal inflections of the coxal wall that connect to the thoracic pleuron for stable attachment and leverage. Shaped as a short cylinder or truncate cone, it is often girdled by a basicostal suture and may feature additional articulations with the trochantin or sternum.[60] The trochanter, a small proximal segment, connects the coxa to the femur via a hinge joint, frequently appearing fused with the femur in some taxa; it facilitates initial leg elevation and rotation.[60] The femur is the largest and most robust segment, acting as the primary weight-bearing element and housing key extensor muscles that power tibial movement; its cylindrical form supports substantial force during locomotion.[60] Distally, the tibia is a slender, elongated segment with apical spurs or spines for traction, articulating with the femur and containing flexor muscles for leg bending.[60] The tarsus, the penultimate segment, consists of 1 to 5 subsegments (tarsomeres) that enhance grip and sensory feedback, lacking intrinsic muscles but relying on proximal actuators for flexion.[60] Terminating the leg, the pretarsus includes adhesive structures such as paired claws (ungues), an arolium pad, and an unguitractor plate, enabling surface adhesion; its depressor muscle originates indirectly from the tibia or femur via an apodeme, with no dedicated levator.[60] Joints between segments are primarily dicondylar, featuring two condyles for hinge-like flexion and extension (e.g., coxa-trochanter, femur-tibia, tibia-tarsus), except for the monocondylar trochanter-femur joint, which has a single dorsal condyle permitting rotary motion.[60] Muscle arrangements include direct depressors and elevators that originate and insert within the leg segments for precise control, alongside indirect muscles that leverage thoracic structures like the tergum or pleuron for broader elevation and depression via tendons or apodemes.[60] This basal design underpins hexapod locomotion across diverse environments.[60]Variations and Specializations
Insect legs exhibit remarkable diversity in form and function, adapting the fundamental segmental structure to specialized roles across various orders. These modifications enhance survival through optimized locomotion, predation, foraging, and sensory perception. Saltatorial legs, specialized for jumping, are prominently featured in orthopterans such as grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). The hind legs are characterized by an elongated and robust femur that houses large extensor tibiae muscles, which are fast-twitch fibers capable of rapid contraction to generate explosive power.[61] During preparation for a jump, the flexor tibiae muscle within the femur co-contracts with the extensor to store elastic energy in cuticular structures like the semilunar processes at the femur-tibia joint; sudden release propels the insect distances up to 20 times its body length.[62] This morphology prioritizes power over endurance, with the elongated femur amplifying leverage for takeoff.[63] Cursorial legs, adapted for rapid running on terrestrial surfaces, are slender and elongated throughout, minimizing drag while maximizing stride length and speed. In cockroaches (Blattodea: Blattidae), such as the American cockroach (Periplaneta americana), the legs feature long, thin femora, tibiae, and tarsi with sparse spining for traction, enabling bursts of speed up to 1.5 m/s.[60][64] This streamlined design supports agile evasion and foraging, with the trochanter-femur joint providing efficient energy transfer during alternating leg movements.[65] Raptorial legs, evolved for prey capture in predatory insects, are robust forelegs with specialized spination on the femur and tibia to grasp and immobilize victims. In praying mantises (Mantodea), the forelegs fold like a jackknife, with the tibia featuring movable spines that interlock with fixed spines on the concave femoral surface during the strike, securing prey in under 100 ms.[66] The femur's thickened structure accommodates powerful flexor muscles, while variations in spine length and density across species like Polyspilota aeruginosa optimize for different prey sizes, from small insects to vertebrates. This adaptation combines mechanical interlocking with rapid extension for precise, high-success predation.[68] Natatorial legs facilitate swimming in aquatic environments, often appearing as flattened, oar-like appendages fringed with hydrofuge hairs for propulsion and buoyancy. In predaceous diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae), such as Dytiscus marginalis, the hind legs are enlarged and paddle-shaped, with the tibia and tarsus bearing dense setae that increase surface area for thrust, allowing underwater speeds of up to 0.13 m/s via sculling motions.[69][70] A complementary specialization occurs in corbiculate bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae), where female hind legs bear pollen baskets or corbiculae—concave regions on the tibia surrounded by long, curved hairs that retain moist pollen loads weighing up to 30% of body mass.[71] These structures, formed by differential expression of genes like Ultrabithorax in workers, include a pollen press on the tibia for compacting loads during foraging.[72] Sensory specializations on insect legs often involve chemosensilla, hair-like structures that detect chemical cues via contact. In flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae), such as Drosophila melanogaster, the tarsi host basiconic and trichoid sensilla innervated by gustatory receptor neurons, enabling rapid assessment of food quality or oviposition sites through sugars, salts, or bitter compounds before proboscis extension.[73] These sensilla, concentrated on the distal tarsomeres, number approximately 28 on the foreleg and integrate with antennal olfaction for host selection, with response latencies under 100 ms to attractive stimuli like sucrose.[74] This tarsal chemoreception is crucial for phytophagous and parasitic species, allowing immediate rejection of toxins.[75]Evolution of Arthropod Legs
Fossil Record and Homology
The fossil record of arthropod legs extends back to the early Cambrian period, approximately 520 million years ago (mya), with the earliest evidence preserved in exceptionally preserved Lagerstätten such as the Chengjiang and Burgess Shale biotas. Trilobites, one of the earliest diverging euarthropod groups, exhibit biramous appendages consisting of a stout inner ramus for walking and a slender outer ramus likely used for respiration or swimming, as seen in species like Olenoides serratus from the Burgess Shale.[76] These biramous legs represent the primitive condition for euarthropods, with segmentation and jointing enabling flexible locomotion in marine environments.[17] Concurrently, "great appendage" arthropods, such as those in the megacheiran clade (e.g., Leanchoilia), display specialized raptorial frontal appendages adapted for predation, featuring elongate, multi-segmented structures with terminal claws that diverge from the more generalized biramous trunk limbs.[77] Key fossils like Fuxianhuia protensa from the Chengjiang biota (~520 mya) provide insights into early leg morphology and segmentation homology.[78] This basal euarthropod possesses annulated (multi-ringed) trunk legs with distinct proximal and distal podomeres, suggesting that the segmented architecture of arthropod appendages was established near the base of the euarthropod stem and is homologous across major arthropod lineages, including modern crustaceans, insects, and chelicerates. The preservation of these annulated legs in Fuxianhuia highlights a conservative evolutionary pattern, where limb segmentation likely originated once in the common ancestor of euarthropods, facilitating diverse adaptations from locomotion to sensory functions.[79] Debates on appendage homology center on the phylogenetic position of arthropods within protostomes, contrasting the Articulata hypothesis with the Ecdysozoa clade. Under the now largely rejected Articulata hypothesis, arthropod legs are derived from limb buds or parapodia-like structures in annelid-like ancestors, implying serial homology between annelid segmentation and arthropod tagmosis.[80] In contrast, molecular and developmental evidence supporting Ecdysozoa (grouping arthropods with nematodes and tardigrades) suggests that arthropod appendages evolved de novo within the ecdysozoan lineage, independent of annelid parapodia, with segmentation arising convergently or from a more plesiomorphic bilaterian condition.[81] Fossil transition forms, such as euthycarcinoids (e.g., Mictomerus from the Cambrian Potsdam Group), illustrate a shift from the ancestral biramous condition to uniramous limbs in stem-lineages leading to terrestrial groups like myriapods and insects, featuring simple, elongate walking legs without exopods but retaining primitive trunk tagmosis. This morphological progression underscores the evolutionary flexibility of arthropod legs, from aquatic biramy to terrestrial uniramia, while preserving core homologies in segmentation and jointing.[82]Developmental Mechanisms
The development of arthropod legs begins with the formation of limb buds, where the distal-less (Dll) gene plays a pivotal role in initiating outgrowth across diverse arthropod taxa. In insects like Drosophila melanogaster, Dll is expressed early in the ventral-lateral regions of the embryo, marking presumptive limb primordia and promoting cellular proliferation necessary for bud extension. This expression pattern is conserved in other arthropods, including crustaceans, where Dll activates downstream targets to specify distal fates and prevent apoptosis in the developing appendage.[83] Similar roles have been confirmed in chelicerates, such as the spider Cupiennius salei.[84] Seminal studies in the butterfly Precis coenia confirmed Dll's role in all limb types except genital appendages in insects.[85] These findings underscore its ancestral function in arthropod appendage initiation. Along the anterior-posterior (A-P) axis, segmentation of the body establishes the positions of leg primordia through the action of pair-rule genes, such as even-skipped (eve). In the model insect Drosophila, eve and related pair-rule genes like runt and hairy divide the blastoderm into periodic stripes that align with parasegment boundaries, thereby patterning where leg buds will form in thoracic segments. Evolutionary analyses in non-insect arthropods, including centipedes and spiders, reveal conserved yet divergent expression of eve orthologs, which maintain double-segmental periodicity to specify leg-bearing segments while adapting to varying trunk morphologies.[86] For instance, in the myriapod Glomeris marginata, pair-rule gene orthologs exhibit striped patterns that correlate with the sequential addition of leg primordia during short-germ development.[87] Proximodistal (PD) patterning within the leg bud relies on a cascade involving Hox genes for proximal segment identity and epidermal growth factor (EGF) signaling for overall axis subdivision. Hox genes, such as Sex combs reduced (Scr) and Ultrabithorax (Ubx), confer segment-specific identities that influence proximal structures like the coxa, repressing distal gene expression in a concentration-dependent manner.[4] Concurrently, EGF signaling, mediated by the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), propagates from proximal to distal regions, regulating the expression of PD axis genes like Distal-less (distal), dachshund (intermediate), and homothorax (proximal) to differentiate segments such as the coxa from the tarsus.[88] This mechanism, first elucidated in Drosophila legs, appears conserved in other arthropods, where EGFR mutants disrupt tarsal development while sparing proximal elements.[89] Recent advances using RNA interference (RNAi) have illuminated the functional consequences of disrupting these pathways, particularly in leg suppression. Post-2010 studies in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus demonstrated that RNAi knockdown of Dll during leg regeneration abolishes distal structures, resulting in truncated appendages lacking tarsi and claws, confirming its essential role in PD outgrowth.[90] Similarly, in spiders like Parasteatoda tepidariorum, RNAi targeting Dll orthologs post-2010 revealed a gap gene-like function, suppressing entire limb buds and leading to limbless thoraces, highlighting evolutionary conservation and potential co-option in chelicerate development. These experiments, extended to beetles and crustaceans, underscore RNAi as a tool for dissecting leg formation without lethality, revealing nuanced interactions between Dll and pair-rule regulators.[86]References
- https://www.[biorxiv](/page/BioRxiv).org/content/10.1101/2024.04.18.590067v1.full.pdf
