Hubbry Logo
World PassportWorld PassportMain
Open search
World Passport
Community hub
World Passport
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
World Passport
World Passport
World Passport
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The World Passport is a fantasy travel document sold by the World Service Authority, a non-profit organization founded by Garry Davis in 1954.[1][2]

Appearance and price

[edit]
Data page of the World Passport.

The World Passport is similar in appearance to a genuine national passport or other such authentic travel document. In 1979 the World Passport was a 42-page document, with a dark blue cover, and text in Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, Spanish, and Esperanto. It contained a five-page section for medical history and a six-page section for listing organisational affiliation. The fee charged at that time was US$32 plus postage for a three-year World Passport that could be renewed for a further two years.[3]

The version of the World Passport current as of 2017 was produced in January 2007. It has an embedded "ghost" photo for security, covered with a plastic film. Its data page is in the format of a machine-readable passport, with an alphanumeric code bar in the machine-readable zone (MRZ) enabling it to be scanned by an optical reader. However, in place of a valid ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 code in the MRZ "issuer" and "nationality" fields, it uses the non-standard code "WSA".

According to the WSA website, the fee is $75 for a three-year World Passport, $100 for five years, and $125 for ten years. A "World Donor Passport" valid for fifteen years with a special cover is issued gratis to donors of at least $500 which, according to the WSA, is used to provide free documents to refugees and stateless persons.[4][5] In addition, the customer can choose between two World Passport covers: "World Passport" or "World Government Passport". The WSA recommends their customers purchase the second option.[6]

A potential customer must provide as proof of identity a notarized certification of the details on the form, a copy of their national identity papers, or a fingerprint from their right index finger.[4] People have been known to obtain World Passports in names other than their legal names; see the relevant section below.

  • Renewals page.
    Renewals page.
  • Children's information page.
    Children's information page.
  • Notes.
    Notes.
  • Affiliations page.
    Affiliations page.
  • Visa page.
    Visa page.
  • Attention.
    Attention.

As a travel document

[edit]

The appearance is so similar to a genuine passport that in 1974 a criminal case was lodged against Garry Davis in France regarding his sale of World Passports.[7]

According to the WSA, the version of the document introduced in 2007 was filed as a Machine Readable Travel Document (MRTD) with the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).[8] However, ICAO documents on MRTDs cite the World Service Authority and its World Passport as an example of "Fantasy Documents".[9][10]

Wikinews has related news:

Notable acceptances

[edit]

Success in crossing a border using a World Passport is generally attributable to the whim or ignorance of individual immigration officers, not official recognition of the document.[11] The World Service Authority website has scans of letters dating from many decades ago from six countries (Burkina Faso, Ecuador, Mauritania, Tanzania, Togo, and Zambia) which the WSA claims is legal recognition of the World Passports. These letters of recognition are several decades old (1954 for Ecuador, 1972 for Burkina Faso, 1975 for Mauritania, 1995 for Tanzania, 1983 for Togo, 1973 for Zambia).[12][needs update]

According to the World Service Authority website, some World Passports have reportedly been accepted on a case-by-case basis by over 180 countries (i.e., they have been stamped with a national visa or entry or exit stamp), and according to the World Service Authority some countries in the past accorded the document legal recognition.[13][14][non-primary source needed]

The World Passport came under increased international scrutiny in 1996, after the hijacking of the MS Achille Lauro. In the aftermath of the incident, one of the captured hijackers, Youssef Majed al-Molqi, escaped imprisonment in Italy and used a World Passport which he had purchased in 1988 to leave the country and travel to Spain before he was recaptured.[15][16][17]

Notable rejections

[edit]

Many countries and territories say they do not recognize the World Passport because it is not issued by a competent government authority, and thus does not meet the definition of a passport. By 1975, Garry Davis had already been detained twenty times for his attempts to cross international borders with a World Passport.[18]

Commonwealth of Independent States

[edit]

The Russian government states that it does not recognise the World Passport. In a 1995 interview with Kommersant, a spokesman for the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs' Department of Consular Services stated that the World Passport is not an acceptable document for proving identity or citizenship status at Russian border crossings; only a diplomatic passport, official passport, seaman's passport, or general civil passport are accepted.[19] However, one Russian media report claims that some members of the House of Romanov, travelling to Saint Petersburg for the reburial of the remains of one of their ancestors, were permitted by Russian authorities to obtain visas in their World Passports, in light of the special situation.[20]

In December 2008, a man claiming to be a Russian citizen attempted to cross the border from Latvia into Belarus at the Urbany checkpoint using a World Passport; he stated he lost his Russian documents while in Sweden. He was arrested by the Belarusian border guards. A spokesman for Belarus' State Border Committee in an interview with a local newspaper stated that Belarus does not accept the World Passport at border crossings. He also claimed it was the first known case of its kind in the country.[21][22]

United States

[edit]
New World Passport

The United States Department of State's official position on the World Passport is that it is a booklet produced by a private organisation upon payment of a fee, and not a passport. As early as 1991, the US Air Transport Association specifically included the World Passport in a training film as an example of unacceptable travel papers.[23] In 2012, a Belizean man attempted to enter the U.S. through the Veterans International Bridge at Los Tomates using a World Passport. The man in question had prior felony convictions for drug trafficking and immigration offences, and had previously been deported from the United States multiple times. He claimed that he wanted to speak with President Obama about genocide in Belize. In a bench trial, Judge Andrew S. Hanen found the man guilty of felony attempted re-entry after deportation.[24]

Other countries

[edit]

Activist Kenneth O'Keefe tried to travel to Iraq using a World Passport in 2003, but was rejected transit rights by Turkey, and had to apply for an American passport to continue his journey.[25][26]

In 2004, two men from China on board Cathay Pacific Flight 302 from Hong Kong to Guangzhou attempted to pass through immigration at Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport using World Passports. The officers at the airport arrested them for illegal entry.[27]

Also, though Garry Davis claims to have traveled to India using a World Passport and to have given one personally to Jawaharlal Nehru,[28][29] in May 2007 an Indian citizen was arrested for attempting to leave India at Begumpet Airport using a World Passport. The man, intending to travel to the United States, had purchased what he believed was a genuine passport and visa. His travel agency and Air India staff both accepted his World Passport, but Indian immigration did not. The Times of India called it a clear case of "internet fraud" and stated that the man had been "duped".[30]

The Council of the European Union has a table of travel documents entitling the holder to cross external borders of Schengen states and which may be endorsed with a visa; the World Passport is listed as a fantasy passport to which a visa may not be affixed.[2]

In February 2013, both Panama and Costa Rica rejected the use of the World Passport by Sage Million, a fugitive from Hawaii.[31]

Hip-hop artist and actor Yasiin Bey (Mos Def) was arrested in South Africa on January 15, 2016 for attempting to leave the country using a World Passport. He had entered the country using an American passport and had lived in Cape Town since May 2013. South Africa's Department of Home Affairs released a statement saying that Mr. Bey would be allowed to appeal the immigration action and possibly seek permanent residency.[32][33]

Use by refugees and stateless persons

[edit]

The World Service Authority sells World Passports to refugees and other people who are unable to obtain valid, authentic travel documents. According to the WSA, refugees in camps are given free World Passports. WSA reports that it "has [given out] more than 10,000 free World Passports to refugees residing in camps throughout the world" and that it "has documentary evidence that the issuance of such passports may permit refugees to leave such camps to seek asylum elsewhere or to claim other rights often denied to refugees".[34] However, many of those refugees have found World Passports to be useless.[23] According to statements by Garry Davis in the mid-1970s, major users of World Passports at the time included persons in Southeast Asia fleeing from wars, as well as holders of Rhodesian passports who were otherwise unable to travel internationally as no other country accepted their documents besides South Africa.[35]

Many East African refugees arriving in Nordic countries in the early 1990s had World Passports.[36] In July 2011, a Georgian citizen attempted to pass through Latvian border control with a World Passport, though he also had a valid Georgian passport in his possession; after presenting his World Passport, he requested asylum in Latvia.[37]

Another category of users of World Passports are stowaways on ships. Vessel owners are legally responsible for the stowaways until they can find a country to let them ashore, but countries are often reluctant due to questions over the validity of the stowaways' documents. From 1992 to 2006 the WSA sold their document to such individuals on five occasions.[38]

As an identity document

[edit]

The World Service Authority promotes the World Passport not just as a document for international travel, but a "neutral, apolitical document of identity".[39] Investor Doug Casey, himself a World Passport customer, has suggested that a World Passport is useful at hotels and other non-governmental institutions where security is uncertain; if one is asked to hand over one's real passport in such situations, one can provide the World Passport instead of a genuine national passport.[40] Governmental authorities do not share this assessment.

The Criminal Records Bureau of the United Kingdom Home Office states that registered bodies should not accept the World Passport as a proof of identity, warning that "a fake 'World Passport' can be purchased online by members of the public and should not be confused with a genuine passport".[41] The Isle of Man's Financial Supervision Commission, which regulates the isle's banks and company formation agents, states that the World Passport is not an acceptable document to prove either the nationality or identity of the bearer. Specifically, it classifies it as a spurious or fantasy passport, a term which it defines to mean as documents which "have the appearance of a passport, but are issued by organisations with no authority and to which no official recognition has been given".[42]

The United States Social Security Administration will also not accept any World Service Authority document (including the World Passport and World Donor Passport) as evidence of identity, age, citizenship, alien status, or marital status for either claims or enumeration purposes.[43] The Virginia Department of Social Services explicitly classifies all World Service Authority documents as "unacceptable documents" for verification of identity.[44] The United States Department of State instructs all U.S. embassies and consulates not to provide any notarial, apostille, or other authentication services in respect of World Passports, whether regarding the World Passport itself or documents relating to the purchase of a World Passport. They warn that such documents could be used for fraudulent or criminal purposes.[45][46] In 1996 a man was able to buy a World Passport in a name that was not his own, but was detected after repeated attempts to use it to prove his identity when opening accounts at various banks in Indiana, without providing a verifiable address or telephone number. He was convicted of fraud on a financial institution.[47]

As a political statement

[edit]

Regardless of its almost universal lack of acceptance, an individual may also seek to obtain a World Passport as part of a political statement. A number of Russian citizens have obtained the World Passport as a form of protest against the "red tape" imposed by the Russian government on their own citizens aiming to travel abroad.[48] In 1977, two mayors of West Bank towns bought World Passports during a visit by Garry Davis.[49]

Sale by third parties

[edit]
Old version of World Passport

Despite its limited acceptance, other entities have also sought to manufacture and sell the fantasy travel document, without the consent of the WSA. The Isle of Man's Financial Supervision Commission reports that they have identified counterfeit World Passports.[42] Also, the first cross-jurisdictional fake passport case ever found in Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, involved counterfeit World Passports. In February 1981, the local Public Security Bureau identified some Hong Kong criminals who were charging World Passport customers HK$18,000 plus CN¥50-100 (roughly US$3,300 at the official exchange rate at that time) in processing fees, and misrepresenting to them that World Passport customers could settle in any country in the world.[50]

As mentioned above, Russia does not accept World Passports, but in the 1990s, many company formation agents in Russia sold the World Passport together in a package-deal with the setup of an offshore company (international business company), and falsely claimed that all countries of the world accept it as an identity document.[19] In some cases, such companies charged up to US$1,000 for the document alone.[51]

In Malaysia in 1994, a Nigerian man was arrested at the Central Market, Kuala Lumpur by tourist police during an identity check, after he showed a World Passport. A search of his belongings showed that he carried a total of five World Passports, as well as a real Nigerian passport that had been used by another person to travel to Malaysia and Hong Kong. Authorities suspected he might have been trying to sell the fantasy travel documents to other foreign nationals lacking valid travel documents.[52]

Notable World Passport owners

[edit]

Many notable people have owned World Passports. Although some may have purchased them, the WSA typically gives them to prominent people. Garry Davis, the WSA founder, owned World Passport No. 1, originally manufactured in 1954.[53][54]

Entertainers who have been given or purchased World Passports include violinist Yehudi Menuhin,[55] actor Patrick Stewart,[56][57][58] musician and actor Yasiin Bey (Mos Def) and actor LeVar Burton.[59][60][57] Other World Passport holders include activists such as whistleblower Edward Snowden[61][62] and Julian Assange.[63]

Criminals and terrorists who have owned World Passports include Triston Jay Amero, an American man charged with hotel bombings in Bolivia,[11] and Youssef Majed al-Molqi, one of the hijackers of the MS Achille Lauro in 1985.[16][64]

The WSA has awarded a number of "honorary World Passports", though these are without approval from those who received them. These honorary documents have been given to figures including Indian prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru,[28] 34th president of the United States Dwight D. Eisenhower,[65] and last president of Czechoslovakia and first president of the Czech Republic Václav Havel.[66]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

World Passport

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
![World Passport cover](./assets/1.World_PassportCoverCover The World Passport is a document issued by the (WSA), a founded in , designed to function as a universal travel credential for individuals declaring themselves world citizens unbound by national sovereignty. It mimics the format of conventional passports, featuring 30 pages, machine-readable data, security elements like holograms and embedded logos, and availability in seven languages, while specifying only birthplace rather than nationality. Established by , a former Broadway who renounced his U.S. citizenship to advocate for , the WSA has issued nearly five million and related documents, positioning them as assertions of to under Article 13(2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The organization claims the passport has received visa stamps or entry permissions on a case-by-case basis from authorities in over 185 countries, with de jure recognition from six nations—, , , , , and —but such instances do not equate to broad legal validity. In practice, the World Passport lacks endorsement from the as an official document or from any as a substitute for national passports, rendering it ineffective for reliable international and often resulting in denials or legal complications for holders. Its promotion reflects an ideological pursuit of , yet empirical evidence underscores its status as a symbolic or supplementary item rather than a functional instrument, with acceptance varying unpredictably and dependent on individual officials' discretion rather than established policy.

History and Origins

Garry Davis and the World Citizenship Movement

, born Sol Gareth Davis on July 27, 1921, served as a bomber pilot in the United States Army Air Forces during , participating in missions over that contributed to the Allied bombing campaign. Following the war's end in 1945, Davis experienced a profound shift toward , attributing his transformation to remorse over the destruction caused by aerial bombings and a broader rejection of in favor of global unity to prevent future conflicts. This ideological pivot, rooted in his firsthand exposure to warfare's human cost, led him to advocate for supranational identity, arguing that national allegiances perpetuated division and war. On May 25, 1948, Davis formally renounced his U.S. citizenship at the American Embassy in , declaring himself a "citizen of the " as a symbolic act to promote one-world government ideals and challenge exclusive national sovereignty. Influenced by post-war movements for federal world governance, Davis viewed citizenship renunciation as a personal affirmation of humanity's shared allegiance over state boundaries, drawing from principles outlined in documents like the preamble to the Charter, which he interpreted as implying universal transcending nations. In November 1948, Davis and supporters disrupted a session of the in by entering the chamber uninvited and demanding recognition for world citizenship, an action that briefly halted proceedings and garnered international media attention. This protest catalyzed the formation of the of World Citizens, a movement Davis founded to lobby for a world constitutional convention and supranational governance as antidotes to nationalism-driven conflicts. The initiative positioned world citizenship as a practical ethic derived from Davis's veteran experiences, emphasizing causal prevention of through eroded national barriers rather than reformed diplomacy alone.

Establishment of the World Service Authority

The (WSA) was founded on January 1, 1954, by in as the administrative organ of the self-proclaimed World Government of World Citizens, which Davis had declared in 1953 following registrations of over 750,000 individuals as world citizens. This entity emerged from Davis's post-World War II activism, including his 1948 renunciation of U.S. citizenship to protest and advocate for under universal principles. Structured as a private non-profit organization—later incorporated in the District of Columbia—WSA lacks any formal endorsement, treaty, or authority from sovereign governments or international bodies like the . WSA's establishment addressed practical demands for documentation arising from the world citizenship registrations initiated in , positioning itself to issue identity and travel papers enforceable under what it terms "world law." The organization's inaugural activity included the first issuance of World Passports in June 1954, with early distributions aimed at stateless persons, refugees displaced by conflicts, and dissidents facing national restrictions on movement. These documents were produced without reliance on state infrastructure, relying instead on Davis's interpretation of foundational texts such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as granting supranational citizenship rights. From inception, WSA operated independently of governmental oversight, self-funding through application fees and donations while asserting administrative functions like registration and certification to promote a borderless global polity. Its claims to issue valid travel instruments stem from a unilateral declaration of authority, unratified by any interstate agreement and routinely rejected by border authorities as lacking legal force under municipal laws.

Development and Iterations of the Document

The World Passport was first issued in 1954 by the (WSA) as a rudimentary booklet designed to symbolize world citizenship, lacking the standardized security or formatting of national passports. Early versions featured basic pages and spaces but omitted machine-readable elements or advanced anti-forgery measures, reflecting the document's origins as a symbolic assertion rather than a technically compliant travel instrument. Subsequent iterations in the incorporated a machine-readable zone (MRZ) to approximate (ICAO) standards outlined in Doc 9303 for machine-readable travel documents (MRTD), enabling potential scanning by automated systems despite the absence of sovereign endorsement. This update aimed to enhance usability amid global shifts toward digitized border controls, though the WSA's version remained uncertified by ICAO or member states. By the , further adaptations included "ghost" security paper with embedded logos and images visible under specific lighting, laminated data pages with scanned photographs simulating biometric verification, and a 30-page format printed in seven languages, all intended to deter counterfeiting without integrating electronic chips or holographic overlays found in official e-passports. These modifications, while improving mimicry of legitimate documents, did not secure formal recognition, as evidenced by consistent rejections from bodies like the U.S. State Department. The WSA reports issuing over 500,000 such passports since , primarily during peaks like the late 1980s to mid-1990s amid geopolitical upheavals, though independent verification of issuance volumes is unavailable. No substantive design changes have occurred in the 2020s, underscoring the document's stasis in the face of negligible governmental uptake and evolving international standards for secure travel credentials.

Document Features and Issuance

Physical Design and Security Elements

The World Passport is issued as a 30-page booklet designed to resemble conventional national passports in format. It features a dark blue cover embossed with the title "World Passport" printed in seven languages: English, French, Spanish, Arabic, Russian, Chinese, and Esperanto, accompanied by symbolic emblems such as a globe representing universal citizenship. The interior includes dedicated pages for personal data, visas, affiliations, and notes, with the biodata page incorporating a scanned photograph of the holder and an alphanumeric machine-readable zone (MRZ) code line compliant with basic Machine Readable Travel Document (MRTD) standards. Security elements in the World Passport are limited compared to those in sovereign-issued passports adhering to International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Doc 9303 specifications. The document employs "ghost" security paper, which embeds faint watermark-like images visible under transmitted light, along with the scanned photo serving as a basic anti-tampering measure. However, it lacks advanced features standard in official passports, such as embedded electronic chips for biometric , holographic overlays, optically variable inks, or ultraviolet-reactive elements for covert verification. These omissions render it susceptible to replication without specialized forensic equipment, distinguishing it from state-issued documents fortified against counterfeiting through multi-layered overt, covert, and forensic protections. Unlike camouflage passports or fraudulent forgeries intended for deception, the World Passport is openly marketed and distributed by the (WSA) as a universal travel instrument, with its design transparently promoted on WSA platforms without claims of mimicking specific national issuances. This overt presentation, including the WSA-issued serial numbers and explicit world citizenship branding, positions it as a novelty or ideological artifact rather than a covert substitute, though its rudimentary security has led to routine identification and rejection at border controls equipped with standard document scanners.

Application Requirements and Pricing

Applications for the World Passport are processed by the through online forms or mailed submissions, requiring applicants to furnish basic personal details such as full name, date and , , , phone number, height, eye color, and any distinguishing marks, along with two color passport-sized photographs (approximately 1.5 by 1.5 inches) bearing the applicant's name on the back of one. Identity verification is mandatory via a photocopy of a valid ID, a notarized , or a right index , but no formal background investigations or checks are performed. Applicants must also sign an attestation of understanding and data consent form, affirming world citizenship principles and acknowledging that the issuer assumes no responsibility for border authorities' recognition of the document. The application emphasizes accessibility for those renouncing primary national allegiances in favor of universal citizenship, with payments accepted via certified check, international , PayPal, or major credit cards; all fees are explicitly non-refundable regardless of processing outcome or document usability. Standard processing requires 4 months, though expedited options are available for additional charges. World Passports are issued with selectable validity periods and corresponding fees, as outlined below:
Validity PeriodCost (USD)
3 years75
5 years100
10 years125
15 years (Donor Passport, via $500 donation to World Refugee Fund)500
Expedited issuance incurs extra fees of $50 for approximately 30 days, $75 for 15-20 days, or $150 for 5-10 days per applicant, excluding shipping times which may vary due to holidays or mail delays. Shipping and handling starts at a minimum of $5 for U.S. first-class mail or $10 for international , with premium options like ($40 international), ($40 U.S.), or courier services ( or , $55-$160 depending on location) available at higher rates; the disclaims liability for lost or delayed shipments. This fee structure highlights the document's private, commercial production without governmental subsidies or vetting akin to passports.

Validity Periods and Renewal

The World Passport, issued by the (WSA), is available in validity periods of 3 years (US$75), 5 years (US$100), or 10 years (US$125). A premium "World Donor Passport," offered to contributors of US$500 or more to the WSA's World Refugee Fund, carries a 15-year validity. These durations are determined unilaterally by the WSA and apply to new issuances. Renewal of an existing World Passport can be obtained by returning the current document to the WSA along with the applicable fee, which is lower than for new issuances: for 3 years, for 5 years, or for 10 years. The process does not require submission of evidence regarding prior use of the document, compliance with any international norms, or verification of ongoing "world citizen" activities; it consists primarily of administrative payment and form completion. Expired passports cannot be renewed and necessitate a full new application at standard issuance rates. Processing times range from 3 months for standard requests to as little as 5-10 days for expedited service at additional cost. While the WSA maintains that initial issuance confers a perpetual status as a "world citizen" based on universal declarations, the document itself expires at the end of its designated period without automatic extension or endorsement from any intergovernmental body. Renewal serves only to extend the physical document's usability as issued by the WSA, without imposing or eliciting reciprocal obligations from , such as recognition of ongoing or identity verification tied to enforceable duties. In contrast to national passports, which link renewal to verifiable entailing obligations like taxation, legal compliance, and potential —enforced through state mechanisms—the World Passport's renewal mechanics remain detached from any such framework, relying solely on WSA's internal procedures and lacking external validation or measures. This self-administered system underscores the absence of binding international commitments beyond the organization's assertions.

Foundations in International Declarations

The (WSA) grounds its issuance of the World primarily in Articles 13 and 15 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted by the on December 10, 1948. Article 13(2) states that "Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country," while Article 15 affirms that "Everyone has the right to a " and prohibits arbitrary deprivation of or denial of the right to change it. WSA interprets these provisions as establishing a universal right to world citizenship and free movement that overrides national passport systems, positioning the World as a de facto implementation of these rights. This interpretation, however, misapplies the UDHR's declarative nature, as the document functions as a non-binding moral and political commitment rather than enforceable . Unlike treaties such as the International Covenant on (ICCPR), which require state ratification to impose obligations, the UDHR was passed as a resolution without legal force or mechanisms for direct enforcement against sovereign states. It serves as a foundational aspirational standard that has influenced subsequent binding instruments, but it does not authorize private entities like WSA to issue supranational travel documents or compel recognition by governments. WSA's extension of these articles to claim superseding authority ignores the UDHR's explicit framing as a "common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations," not a source of automatic legal entitlements. WSA further alludes to post-World War II ideals of global unity embedded in the UN Charter (1945), such as the preamble's call for "faith in fundamental " and to avert future conflicts, to bolster its cosmopolitan framework. Yet this overlooks the Charter's core affirmation of state sovereignty, particularly Article 2(1) on sovereign equality and Article 2(7) prohibiting UN interference in domestic matters without Security Council authorization. No provision in the Charter endorses world citizenship documents or erodes states' exclusive control over entry, borders, and nationality issuance, which remain governed by and bilateral agreements rather than unilateral declarations. Empirically, the UDHR and Charter have not engendered any recognized supranational regime, as evidenced by the continued primacy of national passports under frameworks like the 1920 Paris Conference on and the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, which defer to state discretion.

WSA's Assertions of Universal Validity

The World Service Authority (WSA) maintains that the World Passport derives its universal validity from Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which affirms the right to and residence within states, as well as the right to leave and return to one's country. According to WSA documentation, this foundational human right supersedes national in regulating travel, rendering the passport a legitimate irrespective of state issuance or endorsement. The organization argues that the document enforces these rights by identifying the bearer as a member of the global human community, rather than as a subject of any nation-state. WSA further asserts that empirical acceptance by over 185 countries since 1954 substantiates the passport's validity, with evidence drawn from stamps, entry/exit endorsements, and traveler submissions rather than formal diplomatic agreements. Of these, six nations—, , , , , and —are claimed to have provided recognition on specific occasions, while the remainder reflect approvals. This track record, spanning more than 70 years, is presented by the WSA as proof of the passport's practical utility in international travel. In WSA rhetoric, refusals by sovereign authorities to honor the passport constitute violations of international human rights norms, positioning the organization as a de facto issuer under emerging "world law." Such rejections are characterized as arbitrary impositions that discriminate against world citizens, with the passport serving as a tool to challenge and ultimately transcend national border controls. The WSA promotes the document as emblematic of world citizenship, functioning as a prototype for unified predicated on universal enforcement.

Challenges to Claims Under Sovereign Law

Under the , which establishes sovereign states' exclusive jurisdiction over their territories—including and the issuance of official travel documents—private entities cannot unilaterally create enforceable alternatives, as recognizes no supranational authority overriding this prerogative absent mutual consent via treaties. This framework, rooted in the 1648 and reinforced in modern instruments like the UN Charter's affirmation of sovereign equality, grants states a monopoly on legitimate coercive force for regulating entry and exit, rendering documents without governmental backing ineffective against state enforcement mechanisms such as deportation or denial of entry. Private issuances like the World Passport lack reciprocal recognition agreements or the capacity to compel compliance, as states prioritize over non-state claims derived from declarations like the UDHR, which WSA invokes but which hold no binding force in passport validation under . The (ICAO) standards in Doc 9303 explicitly require machine-readable travel documents, including passports, to be issued by to facilitate global interoperability, security vetting, and fraud prevention; non-governmental mimicry of these formats does not confer equivalent status, as the document's technical resemblance alone cannot substitute for state-issued and liability. WSA's World Passport, despite adopting ICAO-like elements such as biometric pages, fails this criterion because it originates from a nongovernmental body without diplomatic channels or accountability to ICAO member states, undermining its utility in sovereign verification processes. United States federal courts and administrative bodies have consistently affirmed the World Passport's invalidity as a substitute for national identification or travel documents under domestic and immigration law. In Davis v. District Director (1980), the U.S. District Court ruled that the WSA-issued passport does not qualify under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(7), which mandates evidence of valid entry documents from recognized authorities, treating it instead as insufficient for admission. The Board of Immigration Appeals in Matter of Davis (1977) similarly excluded a holder relying solely on the World Passport, upholding sovereign denial absent national credentials. The U.S. Department of State further codifies this in its Foreign Affairs Manual, stating WSA passports "are not acceptable as 'passports' for visa issuing purposes" due to their private origin, a position echoed in recent cases like Bryzzhev v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (2024), where entry was barred for lacking governmental issuance. These rulings underscore that without sovereign enforcement, the document functions as a symbolic item rather than a legally operative one.

Empirical Recognition as a Travel Document

Documented Instances of Acceptance

The (WSA) maintains records of official letters from six governments—, , , , , and —acknowledging the World Passport as a valid , with dates spanning the 1970s to 1980s. These letters, scanned on the WSA website, represent purported recognitions, often extended on humanitarian grounds or in response to WSA , though independent verification of their remains limited. Mauritania's recognition, for instance, was reportedly withdrawn in 1981, reflecting the transient nature of such endorsements. De facto acceptances have occurred sporadically, typically involving entry stamps or visas issued on a case-by-case basis rather than under established policy. Examples include isolated border crossings in and during the 1970s, where officials permitted travel amid humanitarian appeals or administrative discretion, as self-reported by WSA holders. Post-2000 instances are scarcer and confined to ad hoc permissions in unstable regions, such as temporary facilitation for stateless individuals fleeing conflict, though no corroborated patterns emerge from governmental records. The WSA displays photographic evidence of stamps from over 150 countries on its passports, suggesting occasional operational tolerance at checkpoints, but these lack third-party audits and often stem from oversights or informal negotiations rather than formal validity. Empirical data on success rates is sparse, with WSA estimates of entry permissions numbering in the thousands over decades, yet outweighed by documented refusals in traveler accounts and legal cases. No systematic governmental endorsement exists, and acceptances remain exceptional, averaging fewer than a handful per year based on available WSA-submitted examples. These instances underscore the document's , dependent on individual officer discretion rather than legal equivalence to national passports.

Systematic Rejections by Governments

Governments worldwide systematically reject the World Passport as a valid , treating it as a private novelty item rather than an official credential issued by a sovereign authority. This pattern manifests in routine border denials, where immigration officials refuse entry, visas, or even transit based on its lack of governmental backing, often resulting in travelers falling back on alternative identification or facing and . In the United States, U.S. Customs and Border Protection has classified the World Passport as invalid since its issuance began in 1954 by the , a private entity founded by . The U.S. Department of State's Foreign Affairs Manual explicitly deems it unacceptable for visa purposes, noting that only documents from recognized governments qualify as passports. Similar rejections occur at U.S. ports of entry, where presenting it as primary identification leads to immediate invalidation and potential referral to secondary inspection. EU and Schengen Area states enforce outright rejection, mandating passports from entities with international legal standing, which the World Service Authority lacks; border agencies consistently deny its use for crossing external frontiers. Asian nations, including and , follow suit, with authorities viewing it as non-compliant with bilateral agreements and ICAO standards for machine-readable travel documents, resulting in systematic refusals without exception for routine travel. This continuity persists into the , with no documented new recognitions amid enhanced global border security measures post-COVID-19 and amid geopolitical tensions, underscoring the document's practical nullity despite promotional claims by its issuer. Over 190 maintain non-recognition, as evidenced by the absence of diplomatic validations or treaty incorporations for the World Passport in official records.

Specific Country Case Studies

In the United States, the World Passport has consistently been rejected as a valid , leading to deportations and legal consequences. In 1977, , founder of the , was ordered deported by a U.S. after presenting a World Passport upon arrival, with authorities holding him in airline custody pending appeal. In a 2012 federal case, U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen convicted an individual of after he misrepresented a World Passport as legitimate for U.S. admission, underscoring judicial non-recognition. Claims of acceptance in countries like include self-reported visas issued to World Passport holders by the , which lists one such instance without independent verification of sustained validity or border crossing success. Similarly, purported visa endorsements from appear in promotional materials but lack documented evidence of reliable entry or exit facilitation, with such instances often attributed to rather than policy. In post-Soviet (CIS) countries, uniform rejections prevail due to non-recognition under national sovereignty laws, with no verified cases of acceptance despite anecdotal WSA reports; travelers presenting the document face denial at borders aligned with international passport standards. For African contexts, such as 1990s displacements, no empirical records confirm World Passport utility, with aid organizations relying instead on UNHCR-issued documents for movement. Recent attempts during the 2022 Ukraine crisis failed to enable border passage, as Russian and Ukrainian authorities dismissed the World Passport amid heightened security, rendering it irrelevant for evacuation or transit in conflict zones.

Uses Beyond Travel

Applications for Stateless Persons and

Some stateless individuals and have obtained World Passports from the (WSA) as an informal stopgap measure when national or convention-issued travel documents are unavailable, particularly for basic identification or limited mobility needs. The WSA operates a World Refugee Fund, which has facilitated the issuance of these documents—often free or at reduced cost—to those in dire circumstances, including stateless groups lacking official papers; for instance, donors contributing at least $500 receive a special "World Donor Passport," with proceeds supporting aid to . However, such applications do not confer legal travel , and the WSA's claims of derive primarily from its own rather than independent verification, reflecting the organization's ideological commitment to world citizenship over established international protocols. The High Commissioner for (UNHCR) does not endorse or recognize the World Passport as a valid substitute for official travel documents under the 1951 Refugee Convention or the 1954 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons, which mandate state-issued Convention Travel Documents (CTDs) for international movement. These CTDs, formatted to (ICAO) standards, provide and stateless persons with verifiable rights to exit, enter, and transit countries of or asylum states; in contrast, the World Passport lacks backing and interoperability with global border systems. While non-governmental organizations occasionally assist with WSA applications for symbolic or provisional identity purposes, UNHCR guidance emphasizes pursuing state-recognized documents to avoid complications, as alternative papers like the World Passport hold no standing in refugee status determination or resettlement processes. Empirical cases illustrate marginal benefits overshadowed by risks, including exposure to detention or delays that can exacerbate vulnerability. For example, a stateless individual detained in cited possession of a World Passport, which immigration authorities deemed invalid under national law, prolonging incarceration without resolving status claims. Similarly, high-profile attempts, such as rapper Yasiin Bey's (formerly Mos Def) use of the document in in 2016, resulted in arrest and rejection at borders, highlighting how reliance on it can trigger scrutiny rather than facilitate passage for those without alternatives. Reported outcomes among refugees suggest it may serve temporarily for internal identity verification in permissive contexts but often hinders access to UNHCR aid or legal protections by diverting focus from verifiable claims under international conventions.

Role as Identity or Symbolic Document

The World Passport functions chiefly as a symbolic assertion of world citizenship, representing the holder's renunciation of exclusive national allegiance in favor of universal human identity. Promoted by the (WSA) since 1954, it draws on principles derived from the Universal Declaration of , positioning itself as a token of planetary unity amid sovereign divisions. Holders often view it as an emblem of commitment to globalist ideals, including and shared humanity, though this appeal remains confined to philosophical or ideological circles rather than institutional frameworks. Unlike identity documents, which confer enforceable and obligations under national —such as access to services, taxation, or civic participation—the World Passport carries no comparable legal weight. It is not accepted for routine administrative functions like banking verification, electoral registration, or contractual authentication, as these require validation by recognized state authorities. The WSA's accompanying World Identity Card, issued separately, similarly lacks with official systems, underscoring the passport's role as inspirational rather than operational. In practice, its identity role manifests sporadically in informal or self-declared contexts, such as personal declarations within cosmopolitan or groups, where it symbolizes resistance to statist boundaries. However, this usage yields no tangible privileges, differentiating it sharply from documents tied to juridical ; empirical instances of broader acceptance are absent, reflecting its status as a novelty artifact over a viable .

Political and Ideological Statements

The World Passport serves as a symbolic tool in advocacy efforts challenging national border regimes, positioning holders as protesters against state monopoly on mobility. In the 1950s, presented the document at international checkpoints and public demonstrations to assert world citizenship over national allegiance, framing borders as obsolete barriers to human unity. This tactic persists in modern open-borders campaigns, where activists deploy it to highlight purported rights to frictionless global transit, often in tandem with demands for supranational governance structures. Ideologically, proponents root its validity in cosmopolitan tenets of universal personhood, invoking Article 13 of Declaration of Human Rights for and portraying as a contingent historical artifact rather than an enduring causal necessity for ordered societies. Adherents, including WSA affiliates, contend it fosters awareness of mobility as an inherent entitlement, critiquing bordered polities for perpetuating inequality and conflict through exclusionary consent mechanisms. Such endorsements appeal to transnational elites and pacifist circles, envisioning it as a precursor to federated world order where individual agency supersedes collective national determinations. Critics, drawing from realist analyses of state formation, dismiss these claims as utopian abstraction detached from empirical governance dynamics, where territorial control emerges from populations' voluntary aggregation for mutual defense and , rendering unilateral declarations impotent absent coercive . Nationalist perspectives further decry it as subversive to consent-based legitimacy, arguing that eroding invites unmanaged migration flows disruptive to cultural and economic equilibria, with no verifiable instances of concessions elicited by its . Overall, while it amplifies rhetorical challenges to , the passport functions more as performative symbolism than substantive contestation, yielding negligible causal impact on interstate relations or legal norms.

Criticisms, Risks, and Real-World Impact

The issuance of valid passports constitutes a core exercise of state sovereignty, enabling governments to verify , regulate borders, and extend exclusively to their citizens or authorized residents. reserves this function to recognized states, as private entities lack the territorial jurisdiction, coercive enforcement, and mutual recognition required to produce documents with legal force in interstate relations. The (WSA), established in 1954 as a nongovernmental , asserts authority to issue World Passports based on a private interpretation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), particularly Articles 13 () and 15 (right to ). However, the UDHR, adopted by the UN on December 10, 1948, functions as a non-binding aspirational framework without mechanisms for non-state issuance or enforcement, and no or delegates passport prerogatives to such organizations. In stark contrast to state passports, which evolved through multilateral treaties among sovereign entities—such as the 1920 Paris Conference on Passports, Customs Formalities and Through Tickets, attended by representatives from 34 countries to harmonize post-World War I travel controls—the World Passport derives from unilateral claims without intergovernmental or reciprocal obligations. States maintain monopolies on documentation to ensure accountability, including duties like taxation and national defense, which private documents inherently circumvent by offering no equivalent governance structure. The absence of democratic mandate—no elections, taxation base, or military apparatus—further undermines any pretense of legitimacy, as effective demands both and capacity to defend territorial claims, principles absent in the WSA's model. No intergovernmental body, including the (ICAO), which sets standards for machine-readable documents under Annex 9 to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation (ratified by 193 states as of 2023), recognizes the WSA as a legitimate issuer. ICAO guidelines explicitly require documents to emanate from competent national authorities, categorizing private alternatives as invalid for facilitating secure international . This systemic exclusion reflects causal realities: without state-backed verification, such documents cannot reliably attest identity or allegiance, exposing users to rejection at borders and potential liability for . Promoting World Passports thus risks eroding the foundational balance of rights and responsibilities in the , where entails mutual protections unavailable through symbolic alternatives.

Potential for Fraud and Misuse

The World Passport has been associated with legal repercussions for holders who present it as a valid in place of national passports, leading to charges of misrepresentation, use of false identity, or violations. In January 2016, American rapper (formerly Mos Def) was detained by South African authorities at while attempting to board a flight to using a World Passport; he faced charges including using a false identity, presenting an unrecognized , and overstaying a visa, with a court date initially set for March 8, 2016. South African officials classified the document as unofficial, resulting in Bey's temporary inability to leave the country until he obtained alternative travel arrangements. Similar incidents highlight risks of criminal misuse. In 2006, Michael Ross, an American-born individual charged with plotting hotel bombings in , utilized a World to facilitate travel across while evading detection. In 1996, a hijacker of the in 1985 employed a World to flee for following an attempted escape, prior to recapture. Founder himself encountered arrests, including in 1987 by French authorities who charged him with creating a counterfeit , though he was released after contesting the validity of the accusation. The U.S. Department of State explicitly deems World Service Authority passports unacceptable for visa issuance or travel purposes, categorizing the issuing organization as private and without governmental authority, which underscores the potential for holders to face penalties for deception at borders. While the World Service Authority advises against relying solely on the document for international travel and disclaims liability for rejections, its relatively accessible issuance process—available via application and fee—has facilitated instances where individuals or third parties misrepresent its utility, contributing to encounters with law enforcement rather than enabling seamless mobility.

Evidence of Limited Practical Success

Despite issuing over 750,000 World Passports since its inception, the document has achieved acceptance for border crossings only in isolated, discretionary cases rather than as a reliable travel instrument. The World Service Authority explicitly states it cannot guarantee acceptance by any nation, reflecting an acknowledgment of inconsistent outcomes dependent on individual immigration officers rather than legal equivalence to state-issued passports. Quantitative comparisons underscore this shortfall: holders of national passports enjoy an average of 111 visa-free destinations worldwide, per the methodology tracking access to 227 travel points, whereas the World Passport provides no standardized or predictable visa-free entry, with reliable access approaching zero across sovereign . Border authorities routinely reject it as lacking validity under international norms like the 1920 passport conference standards, which affirm state monopoly on travel documentation. In its seven decades of existence since , the World Passport has exerted no verifiable influence on alleviating —estimated at over 4.4 million documented cases by UNHCR in recent assessments—or broadening global mobility metrics, as mobility indices continue to correlate exclusively with national citizenship strengths rather than alternative documents. This absence of aggregate impact aligns with reports from migration analysts noting that non-state passports fail to integrate into waiver frameworks or reciprocal agreements that underpin practical freedom.

Notable Holders and Events

Prominent Individuals Associated

(1921–2013), an American peace activist who renounced his U.S. citizenship in 1948 to advocate for , founded the in 1953 and held World Passport number 1, which he used for international travel as a symbol of global unity despite consistent non-recognition by national authorities. His motivations stemmed from post-World War II disillusionment with , aiming to promote "one world" governance through symbolic documentation that he believed derived legitimacy from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Davis's persistent attempts to cross borders with the passport often resulted in detentions or denials, illustrating its practical limitations even for its originator. Other recipients include rapper (formerly Mos Def), who in January 2016 attempted to use a World Passport to leave amid a visa dispute but was detained at , as officials deemed it invalid for travel. Bey's case highlighted the document's fringe status, with South African authorities confirming it lacked legal standing equivalent to national passports. Similarly, World Passports have been issued to figures like and , though no records indicate their use for travel or formal endorsement, reflecting symbolic rather than operational association. In 2012, Davis personally delivered one to while the WikiLeaks founder was in the Ecuadorian embassy in , motivated by shared themes of challenging state sovereignty, but Assange relied on other documents for his eventual relocation. Stateless advocates have occasionally wielded World Passports in legal challenges to assert supranational rights, such as in asylum claims or border disputes, but courts worldwide have uniformly rejected their validity, reinforcing the absence of enforceable authority. No endorsements from sitting leaders are documented, underscoring the initiative's marginal influence among state powers. In the 1950s, , founder of the , faced multiple arrests in the United States and abroad for attempting to use the World Passport as a valid . Davis, who had renounced his U.S. citizenship in , was detained on several occasions when presenting the passport at borders, as authorities rejected it in favor of national-issued identification. For instance, early travels to countries including resulted in detentions for , underscoring the document's lack of legal standing despite Davis's claims of universal applicability. By the 1970s, legal challenges persisted. On May 13, 1977, Davis attempted re-entry to the at using a World Service Authority-issued , prompting exclusion proceedings by immigration officials. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of ruled against recognition, affirming that the document held no authority under federal , and Davis was denied admission. This case highlighted ongoing conflicts with sovereign border controls, as similar encounters in during the 1980s led to expulsions and arrests in nations such as and , where Davis was detained for lacking endorsed papers. In the , isolated attempts by stateless individuals and to leverage the World Passport for asylum or mobility yielded denials equivalent to invalid documentation. Holders, including those from conflict zones, found it afforded no procedural weight in refugee status determinations, as international bodies like the UNHCR prioritized state-issued or convention travel documents over symbolic alternatives. No equivalence to recognized refugee passports, such as Nansen documents historically, was granted. The 2016 detention of rapper (formerly Mos Def) in marked a notable later encounter. On January 14, Bey attempted to depart using a after his U.S. passport expired, leading to by authorities who deemed it fraudulent and unauthorized for exit formalities. He was released after obtaining U.S. travel papers, but the incident drew attention to persistent non-recognition. Incidents involving the World Passport have been minimal in the 2020s, with advanced digital verification systems at borders further limiting its utility and reducing reported detentions to near obscurity. No major publicized arrests or legal challenges have emerged, reflecting its marginal role amid biometric and data-linked immigration protocols.

References

  1. https://worldservice.org/docpass.html
  2. https://worldcitizengov.org/what-is-the-world-passport/
  3. https://worldservice.org/gov.html
  4. https://worldservice.org/visas.html
  5. https://worldservice.org/legal.html
  6. https://nomadcapitalist.com/global-citizen/what-is-the-world-passport/
  7. https://offshorecircle.com/articles/guide-to-world-citizen-passport/
  8. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/29/us/garry-davis-man-of-no-nation-dies-at-91.html
  9. https://www.ncronline.org/news/people/garry-davis-forged-path-world-citizenship
  10. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/jul/20/mondialist-world-cities-pacifist-movement-cahors-sarrazac-davis
  11. https://worldcitizengov.org/our-history/
  12. https://garrydavis.org/h_worldcitgov.html
  13. https://towardfreedom.org/story/archives/youth/world-citizen-garry-davis-vs-national-borders/
  14. https://worldcitizengov.org/2021/06/26/2015-new-years-message/
  15. https://worldservice.org/wcwfaq.html?s=1
  16. https://garrydavis.org/h_worldpass.html
  17. https://www.vice.com/en/article/world-passports-and-the-people-trying-to-create-a-borderless-world/
  18. https://fam.state.gov/fam/09FAM/09FAM040309.html
  19. https://www.theworldismycountry.com/worldpassport
  20. https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/news-centre/insights/public-security/civil-identity/passport-security-features-advanced-technology
  21. https://govassist.com/blog-v2/world-passport-577793bc
  22. https://worldservice.org/appform.html
  23. https://worldservice.org/docpapp.html
  24. https://worldservice.org/wcwfaq.html
  25. https://worldservice.org/renew.html
  26. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
  27. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/bsimmons/files/simmons_borderrules_isr_2019.pdf
  28. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/publications/DocSeries/9303_p1_cons_en.pdf
  29. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/481/1178/2397699/
  30. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/legacy/2012/08/17/2650.pdf
  31. https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10368795/bryzzhev-v-united-states-customs-and-border-protection/
  32. https://www.ecoi.net/en/document/1192871.html
  33. https://www.japan-guide.com/forum/quereadisplay.html?0%2B88398
  34. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1977/05/18/judge-orders-gary-davis-deported-appeal-is-filed/28cbda6b-abc5-4803-b9f8-453ca62c112d/
  35. https://www.finglobal.com/2016/01/21/what-is-a-world-passport-and-where-is-it-accepted/
  36. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1926&context=jil
  37. https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-reasons-for-not-wanting-to-have-a-passport-or-visa
  38. https://help.unhcr.org/global/travel-documents/
  39. https://www.unhcr.org/what-we-do/build-better-futures/long-term-solutions/complementary-pathways-admission-third-4
  40. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/TreatySeries_360_117.pdf
  41. https://sign.moveon.org/petitions/stop-deportation-of-stateles
  42. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3267&context=facsch_lawrev
  43. https://ceoworld.biz/2022/08/09/how-to-obtain-the-world-passport/
  44. https://oneworld.network/world-citizenship/
  45. https://iworld.com/en/blog/global-citizenship-passport
  46. https://worldservice.org/update.html
  47. https://calhoun.faculty.asu.edu/sites/g/files/litvpz3321/files/publications/articles/calhouncosmopolitanismandnationalism.pdf
  48. https://www.towardfreedom.org/story/archives/youth/world-citizen-garry-davis-vs-national-borders/
  49. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e857
  50. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/passport-power-history
  51. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-22/mod-def-and-the-world-passport-that-s-trying-to-erase-national-boundaries
  52. https://apnews.com/travel-d43e69d6a45247c0b386785a7e27997c
  53. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-man-charged-in-bolivian-bombings/
  54. https://www.taste2travel.com/freedom-of-movement-index/
  55. https://www.investasian.com/lifestyle/world-passport/
  56. https://worksthatwork.com/6/world-passport
  57. https://immigrationlawdc.com/immigration-issues/six-questions-on-refugeeasylee-status
  58. https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/01/15/mos-def-was-arrested-in-south-africa-for-using-a-world-passport-yes-thats-a-real-thing/
  59. https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-38065758
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.