Hubbry Logo
26th century BC26th century BCMain
Open search
26th century BC
Community hub
26th century BC
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
26th century BC
26th century BC
26th century BC
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Millennia
3rd millennium BC
Centuries
Timelines
State leaders
  • 27th century BC
  • 26th century BC
  • 25th century BC
Decades
  • 2590s BC
  • 2580s BC
  • 2570s BC
  • 2560s BC
  • 2550s BC
  • 2540s BC
  • 2520s BC
  • 2510s BC
  • 2500s BC
Categories:
Births – Deaths
Establishments – Disestablishments

The 26th century BC was a century that lasted from the year 2600 BC to 2501 BC.

Events

[edit]

Crete

[edit]

Egypt

[edit]

Mesopotamia

[edit]
  • c. 2600–2334 BC: Early Dynastic period III. Dominion of the First Dynasty of Ur. The Royal Cemetery at Ur is constructed.[3]
  • c. 2600 BC: Reign of Akalamdug, king of Ur.[4]
  • c. 2600–2500 BC: The Instructions of Shuruppak, the earliest known literary texts, are created in Adab, Shuruppak and Abu Salabikh.[5]
  • 2570 BC: Reigns of Uhub, king of Kish, and of En-hegal, king of Lagash.[4]
  • 2560–2525 BC: Reign of Mesannepada, king of Ur. The city, which had only 4,000 citizens at the time, would become a large capital during the 40 years of Mesannepada's reign. Its opulence was brought about by its commercial activity: Ur's southern river port concentrated Mesopotamian trade with clients along the Persian Gulf shores.[4]
  • 2550 BC: Reign of Mesilim, king of Kish. He was an apparent suzerain over the Lagash king Luga-shag-engur and the Adab king Nin-kisalsi. A conflict between Lagash and the neighboring Umma begins over fields claimed by each of the parties. An initial crisis is settled by Mesilim in favor of Lagash.[4]
  • 2540 BC: Mesannepada, who has already dominated the city of Nippur, takes advantage of an eclipse of power in Kish (caused by an incursion by the Elamites of Awan) to seize the city. He becomes the ruler of all of Lower Mesopotamia as he becomes the king of Kish, and his name appears on a pearl in Mari.[4]
  • 2525–2485 BC: Reign of A'annepada, king of Ur.[4]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

26th century BC

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The 26th century BC (2600–2501 BC) was a century in the Early defined by the consolidation of early urban civilizations across Eurasia, particularly in the Nile Valley, , and the region, where advancements in architecture, governance, and trade laid foundations for subsequent historical developments. In , the period fell within the Fourth Dynasty of (ca. 2625–2500 BC), a time of unparalleled monumental construction under pharaohs like , , and . initiated large-scale pyramid building with structures such as the Meidum Pyramid (ca. 2600 BC) and the at (ca. 2600 BC), demonstrating evolving engineering techniques and state mobilization of labor. 's reign (ca. 2589–2566 BC) saw the completion of the around 2560 BC, the largest pyramid ever built at approximately 146.6 meters tall, symbolizing the pharaoh's divine power and Egypt's centralized economy supported by Nile-based agriculture. This era also featured the development of solar theology and administrative reforms, with evidence from Giza mastabas showing elite burial practices and artistic sophistication. In , the 26th century BC corresponded to the Early Dynastic III period (ca. 2600–2350 BC), marked by the rise of independent Sumerian city-states such as , , Kish, and , each governed by ensi (rulers) who managed temple economies and irrigation systems. Royal inscriptions from this time, including those referencing legendary figures like of (traditionally dated ca. 2700–2500 BC), highlight conflicts between city-states and the emergence of cuneiform writing for administrative and literary purposes. Archaeological sites like the Royal Cemetery at reveal elite tombs with rich grave goods, including the (ca. 2600–2400 BC), illustrating , , and artistic motifs of warfare and banqueting. Further east, the Indus Valley saw the onset of the Mature Harappan phase (ca. 2600–1900 BC) of the Indus Valley Civilization, with urban centers like and featuring standardized baked-brick architecture, advanced drainage systems, and granaries indicative of planned societies. This phase, emerging from earlier regional cultures, encompassed over 1,000 sites across modern and northwest , supported by agriculture, trade in and , and a script still undeciphered on seals depicting animals like the . Evidence from sites such as shows craft specialization and weights suggesting a bureaucratic system without evident palaces or kings. In , the Bell Beaker phenomenon spread rapidly from ca. 2750 to 2500 BC, involving distinctive inverted-bell pottery, archery equipment, and metalwork across western and central regions, possibly linked to mobility and exchange networks rather than a unified culture. This period also witnessed the in China (ca. 3000–1900 BC), with proto-urban settlements and early bronze casting, foreshadowing the . Overall, the 26th century BC exemplified interconnected yet regionally distinct innovations in technology, religion, and social organization that propelled complexity.

Overview

Scope and Chronology

The 26th century BC encompasses the period from 2600 BC to 2501 BC, a span of 100 years within the broader (3000–2001 BC). This century is defined using the , where BC (Before Christ) years count backward from the traditionally calculated year of Jesus Christ's birth, with no separating from AD 1. In archaeological contexts, BC dating provides a conventional framework for aligning prehistoric and early historic periods across regions, though it relies on modern reconstructions rather than ancient calendrical systems. Precise chronology for the 26th century BC faces significant challenges due to the scarcity of contemporary written records, necessitating indirect methods for establishing timelines. Historians and archaeologists primarily depend on king lists—such as Egyptian royal annals or Mesopotamian Sumerian King Lists—for relative sequencing of rulers and events, though these sources often include legendary or exaggerated regnal lengths that complicate . of organic materials like charcoal, seeds, and wood offers calibrated absolute dates, typically using Bayesian modeling to refine ranges within 50–100 year margins of error, but issues such as the "" (incorporation of older carbon) and wiggles introduce uncertainties, especially for short-lived events. Astronomical alignments, including solar eclipses or planetary positions recorded in later texts, provide occasional tie-points, yet their application to the remains limited and debated due to incomplete data. This century approximately aligns with the established Early in key regions of the and , following the transition from the (Copper Age) period around 4000–3500 BC, marked by the widespread adoption of bronze metallurgy and . In the Southern Levant and , it falls within Early Bronze Age III (ca. 2900–2500 BC), a phase of urban development preceding later collapses. For instance, in , the era corresponds to the height of , including early pyramid construction. Regional variations persist, with the onset occurring earlier in the (ca. 3300 BC) compared to , highlighting the period's role in a gradual technological and societal shift.

Broader Historical Context

The 26th century BC corresponds to the early phase of the , a period defined by the widespread adoption of bronze metallurgy and the intensification of social complexity following the era, which spanned roughly 4500–3500 BC in the and featured initial copper working and semi-sedentary communities. This century preceded the consolidation of expansive empires and centralized states in the later third millennium BC, such as those in and , marking a transitional stage where regional polities began to exhibit proto-urban characteristics without the full imperial frameworks that emerged around 2300 BC. In the Southern Levant, the Early Bronze Age encompassed much of the fourth and third millennia BC, with continuity and discontinuity in settlement patterns reflecting socioeconomic shifts from Chalcolithic village-based societies to more hierarchical structures. Globally, the 26th century BC witnessed the nascent stages of urbanism primarily in the and , where early states unified territories through administrative innovations and trade networks, while lifeways persisted in and with gradual transitions toward complexity. In northern , an "urban explosion" occurred around 2600–2500 BC, with sites like , , and Hamoukar expanding to 65–120 hectares, supported by dry-farming, centralized storage, and interregional exchange of goods such as and textiles, indicating the formation of polities with estimated populations of 10,000–20,000. Similarly, in , the Indus Civilization's Mature Harappan phase began circa 2600 BC, featuring planned cities like with standardized weights, copper tools, and reduced settlement density concentrated in urban hubs across northwestern India's alluvial plains. In contrast, remained predominantly , characterized by dispersed farming communities, megalithic monuments, and emerging mobility networks linked to Corded Ware and Bell Beaker cultures, without widespread urbanization until later in the millennium. 's , active in the Valley around 2600–2000 BC, maintained traditions of rammed-earth villages and specialized crafts like working, with early walled settlements (e.g., Pingliangtai at 3.4 hectares) signaling incipient but not full urban dominance. Climatic conditions in the early third millennium BC, particularly seasonal Mediterranean rainfall in the , fostered agricultural extensification through drought-tolerant cereals and intensive dry-farming, generating surpluses that underpinned population growth and urban nucleation. from northern Mesopotamian sites reveals shifts to rain-fed cultivation on marginal lands around 2600 BC, enhancing economic productivity and enabling the support of larger settlements. These stable environmental factors contrasted with later arid episodes, allowing for the demographic and technological foundations of early states. In , this era aligned with the initial phases of , where similar agricultural stability facilitated monumental projects.

Regional Developments

Egypt

The 26th century BC marked a pivotal era in under the Fourth Dynasty of , characterized by the reigns of pharaohs who advanced and solidified centralized authority. , reigning approximately from 2613 to 2589 BC, initiated significant engineering innovations through his projects at , including the and the . The , with its distinctive angle change from 54° to 43° midway up, represented an experimental attempt to achieve a true smooth-sided , reflecting adjustments in techniques to address structural instability during building. The subsequent , the first successful true , stood at about 105 meters with a consistent 43° slope, demonstrating refined corbelled vaults and internal chambers that influenced later designs. These monuments, built with millions of and casing blocks, underscored 's role in transitioning from step pyramids to more geometrically precise forms, supported by organized labor and resource mobilization. Sneferu's son, , who ruled from around 2589 to 2566 BC, elevated these achievements with the , completed circa 2570 BC as his tomb. This structure, originally 146 meters tall and comprising approximately 2.3 million stone blocks averaging 2.5 tons each, formed the largest ever built, with a base covering 13 acres. Its construction involved sophisticated labor organization, with workers divided into specialized teams of about 2,000 men rotating in shifts, housed in nearby settlements and provisioned with bread, beer, and meat rather than relying on forced slave labor. Evidence from papyri and archaeological sites indicates these crews, named after royals or deities, quarried, transported, and placed blocks using ramps and levers, completing the project over roughly 20 years through state-directed efficiency. Egyptian society during this period revolved around a highly centralized pharaonic power, where the king was viewed as a divine intermediary ensuring cosmic order (ma'at), enabling the mobilization of resources for monumental works. Nile-based , with annual floods providing fertile for , , and cultivation, generated surpluses that sustained a of millions and funded projects through taxation and labor during inundation seasons. An emerging administrative , comprising viziers, scribes, and overseers, managed grain storage, labor rosters, and supply chains via hieroglyphic records on and stone, facilitating the coordination of thousands across the kingdom. This hierarchical system, from the down to provincial nomarchs, ensured stability and resource allocation, allowing Egypt to thrive amid broader developments in the .

Mesopotamia

The Early Dynastic III phase in , spanning approximately 2600–2350 BC, marked a period of intensifying political fragmentation and competition among Sumerian city-states, particularly in southern . During this time, the First Dynasty of Ur emerged as a significant power, with its rise centered on the city of , which grew into a key trade hub. The dynasty's early rulers included Akalamdug, who reigned around 2600 BC and is known from a indicating his authority prior to the formal king list entries. , the founder of the dynasty and son of Akalamdug, ruled from circa 2560–2525 BC, expanding Ur's influence through military campaigns and trade, supporting a estimated at around 4,000 inhabitants. His successor, A'annepada, son of , governed from approximately 2525–2485 BC, continuing the dynasty's consolidation of power in the region. Political dynamics were characterized by frequent conflicts and diplomatic interventions among rival city-states, reflecting the decentralized nature of Sumerian governance. A notable example of diplomacy occurred around 2550 BC when Mesilim, king of Kish, mediated a border dispute between Lagash and Umma over the fertile Gu'edena region, establishing a boundary marked by stelae and canals to resolve water and land access issues. Mesannepada further asserted Ur's dominance by seizing control of Kish circa 2540 BC, adopting the prestigious title "king of Kish" despite his base in Ur, which facilitated unification efforts across Lower Mesopotamia and enhanced Ur's regional hegemony. These actions underscored the interplay of warfare and negotiation in maintaining city-state alliances and borders. Urban growth in Ur during this period was exemplified by monumental constructions that highlighted the city's accumulating wealth from long-distance trade. The Royal Cemetery at , built between circa 2600–2500 BC, featured elaborate shaft tombs for elite burials, including multi-room structures with human attendants and vast assemblages of grave goods such as gold jewelry, beads from , and artifacts linked to Indus Valley exchanges. These lavish interments, including possible tombs of rulers like , demonstrated Ur's prosperity derived from commerce in luxury materials, reinforcing its status as a thriving urban center amid the Early Dynastic III rivalries.

Indus Valley Civilization

The Mature Harappan phase of the Indus Valley Civilization commenced around 2600 BC, representing a pivotal transition from the Early Harappan period's regional settlement patterns to a unified urban network driven by population expansion and . This era witnessed substantial demographic growth, with major urban centers supporting populations of 40,000 to 80,000 residents and over 1,000 sites spanning the Indus region from present-day to northwest . A key development was the standardization of weights and measures, using binary and decimal systems that ensured consistency in trade and resource allocation across distant communities. The founding of prominent cities like in the 26th century BC exemplified this urban maturation, with emerging as a parallel hub of comparable scale and sophistication. 's layout adhered to a rigorous , with orthogonal streets dividing the city into blocks that housed multi-roomed structures built from uniform baked bricks. Residential and public buildings incorporated advanced , including covered brick-lined drains that channeled to street-side cesspits and an extensive network of wells for supply. Economic vitality stemmed from long-distance trade networks, as indicated by terracotta stamp seals inscribed with an undeciphered script used for marking goods and documents, alongside imports of from Afghan mines in . Craft specialization flourished, with dedicated workshops producing and advanced copper-bronze for tools and ornaments. The absence of monumental palaces or temples in these cities points to an egalitarian , lacking overt signs of elite dominance or centralized religious authority.

Aegean and Mediterranean Regions

The 26th century BC marked a transitional phase in the Aegean and Mediterranean regions, characterized by the late stages of the Early Minoan I period on and the Early Cycladic II period across the Cycladic islands, with emerging settled communities and nascent maritime exchanges. On , during the latter part of Early Minoan I (c. 3100/3000–2700/2650 BC), communities transitioned toward more organized settlements, evidenced by open villages at sites like and , where rectangular buildings and deep wells indicate stable habitation and resource management. These developments reflect early societal organization, with evidence of specialized activities such as pottery production and initial agricultural intensification in coastal and inland areas. Pottery styles evolved prominently, featuring dark-on-light decoration in Ayios Onouphrios Ware, where red-brown-black paint formed rectilinear patterns on jugs, cups, and bowls, signaling stylistic innovation and possible cultural exchanges. Initial trade networks began linking to the , facilitating the exchange of goods like ceramics and metals, with loose contacts extending to the and indirect influences from Mesopotamian regions through intermediary routes. In the broader Aegean, the Early Cycladic II (Keros-Syros) culture (c. 2700–2400/2300 BC) saw pre-palatial advancements on islands like and , where small communities engaged in and , producing iconic marble figurines of the Spedos type (c. 2600–2400 BC)—abstracted female forms often painted with and for ritual purposes. Burial practices in cemetery sites, such as those on , involved stone-lined pits with including figurines and marble vessels, suggesting emerging social hierarchies and symbolic expressions of status. Sea played a pivotal role, with Cycladic islanders exporting minerals like and to , mainland , and western Asia Minor, leveraging advanced boat-building for inter-island connectivity. Mediterranean extensions of these networks show limited but significant interactions, particularly through obsidian procurement from Melos, a key source exploited since the Final and continuing into the Early , where over 800 tonnes were quarried at sites like Sta Nychia. This trade, reaching coastal sites across the Aegean and beyond, underscores early maritime mobility, with Melian obsidian comprising up to 95% of tools at settlements like Saliagos. Continuity of Neolithic farming practices persisted in coastal Mediterranean areas, including mixed and herding on islands and mainland fringes, supporting population growth and sustaining these exchange systems without major disruptions.

Cultural and Technological Advances

Architecture and Urban Planning

In the 26th century BC, Egyptian architecture saw significant advancements in pyramid construction, exemplified by Sneferu's experimental projects. The at featured an initial slope angle of approximately 54 degrees, which was abruptly reduced to 43 degrees midway up the structure to address structural instability during construction, marking a key evolution in engineering techniques. This adjustment allowed for the completion of a stable monument, though its irregular form highlighted the challenges of achieving a true pyramidal shape. Sneferu's subsequent refined these lessons with a consistent 43-degree slope, paving the way for more precise designs. The culmination of these innovations appeared in the Great Pyramid of Khufu at , the largest and most technically sophisticated true pyramid of the era. Constructed with a uniform slope of about 51.5 degrees, it utilized an estimated 2.3 million blocks, many quarried locally and transported via the . The exterior was originally sheathed in smooth white Tura casing stones, polished to reflect sunlight and create a gleaming, seamless surface that enhanced its monumental scale. Internally, the pyramid incorporated a series of chambers, including the descending passage, ascending corridor, Grand Gallery, King's Chamber with its , and Queen's Chamber, designed with corbelled roofs to distribute weight and prevent collapse. In Mesopotamia, architectural developments in the 26th century BC emphasized elaborate tomb complexes, as seen in the Royal Cemetery at Ur during the Early Dynastic III period. These multi-room tombs, such as the renowned PG 1237 (attributed to Queen Puabi), consisted of rectangular chambers built from mud bricks and accessed via sloping entrances. Surrounding many tombs were large death pits filled with the remains of attendants and sacrificed individuals, arranged in orderly rows to accompany the elite in the afterlife, reflecting ritualistic urban burial practices integrated into the city's fabric. Structural elements included corbelled arches and vaulted ceilings in brick, which provided stability for the underground vaults, while interiors were adorned with inlaid artifacts like lapis lazuli mosaics depicting animals and geometric patterns on the "Standard of Ur." The Indus Valley Civilization showcased pioneering in cities like , where a rigid orthogonal grid of streets—typically 9-12 meters wide—organized the layout into distinct blocks, facilitating efficient movement and resource distribution. This grid system supported multi-story baked-brick houses aligned to cardinal directions, promoting standardized construction across the urban expanse. Covered drains, constructed from precisely joined bricks and running along streets, channeled wastewater from private bathrooms and latrines to main sewers, demonstrating advanced . Bricks were standardized in a 4:2:1 length-to-width-to-height ratio (typically 28x14x7 cm), ensuring uniformity and strength for flood-prone environments, where elevated platforms and protective bunds mitigated seasonal inundations from the . Across these regions, comparative engineering techniques underscored shared innovations in stone and brick work during the 26th century BC. In Egypt, ramps—likely straight, zigzag, or spiraling—combined with levers and rollers facilitated the hauling of massive limestone blocks up to 80 tons, while copper chisels and dolerite pounders shaped the stone. Mesopotamian builders employed similar copper tools for cutting mud bricks and inlays, using corbelling for arches without true keystones, as in Ur's tombs. In the Indus, copper implements aided in brick molding and drainage excavation, with levers and sledges enabling the transport of materials in a flood-resilient framework. These methods, reliant on human labor and basic mechanics, highlight a convergence of practical solutions to large-scale construction challenges.

Literature and Early Writing Systems

The , dating to approximately 2600–2500 BC during the Early Dynastic IIIa period, constitute the earliest known example of Sumerian . This collection of proverbs and advisory texts, attributed to the king of instructing his son , survives on clay tablets excavated from sites including and Adab. The content emphasizes ethical conduct, practical governance, and agricultural wisdom, with sayings such as "You should not curse strongly: it rebounds on you" and guidance on avoiding theft, quarrels, and arrogance to maintain social harmony. In , the Sumerian script was well established by the 26th century BC and continued to develop during the Early Dynastic II–III periods, adapted for both administrative accounting and nascent literary purposes. By the Early Dynastic II–III periods, the sign inventory had expanded to over 1,000 distinct forms, enabling the recording of complex transactions, lists, and the proverbs seen in texts like the . This evolution supported the administrative needs of growing urban centers, marking a key step in the script's use beyond mere pictographic notation. Contemporaneously in the Indus Valley, the undeciphered emerged on stamp seals and artifacts from around 2600 BC, featuring more than 400 distinct symbols often combined with animal motifs. These short inscriptions, typically comprising 4–5 signs, appear primarily on trade-related objects and lack extended narrative texts, suggesting a function possibly linked to or ownership rather than full linguistic expression. In Egypt's Fourth Dynasty (c. 2613–2494 BC), hieroglyphic writing was used in monumental inscriptions on tombs, stelae, and royal monuments, recording royal titles, offerings, and brief biographical statements, but no evidence exists of or narrative compositions during this century.

References

  1. https://www.memphis.edu/egypt/resources/timeline.php
  2. https://wiki.datalab.ischool.uw.edu/egyptian-pyramids-when-built
  3. https://www.uc.edu/content/dam/refresh/cont-ed-62/olli/21-fall/egypt2.pdf
  4. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/N_and_N/nn256.pdf
  5. https://reich.hms.harvard.edu/sites/reich.hms.harvard.edu/files/inline-files/nature25738_Olalde_0_1.pdf
  6. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Longshan-culture
  7. https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/centuries-and-how-to-refer-to-them
  8. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/archaeological-time.htm
  9. https://gizamedia.rc.fas.harvard.edu/documents/khaled_chronology.pdf
  10. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/ois11.pdf
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309446459_The_Late_Chalcolithic_to_Early_Bronze_Age_I_Transition_in_the_Southern_Levant_Determining_Continuity_and_Discontinuity_or_Mind_the_Gap
  12. https://oi.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/urj.pdf
  13. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00934690.2018.1464332
  14. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10814-020-09153-x
  15. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/handle/10125/17124/AP-v38n2-119-153.pdf
  16. https://leilan.yale.edu/sites/default/files/publications/article-specific/styring_et_al_2017_isotope_evidence_nature_plants.pdf
  17. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0021828615582356
  18. https://www.si.edu/spotlight/ancient-egypt/pyramid
  19. https://smarthistory.org/pyramid-of-khufu/
  20. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00004-014-0193-9
  21. https://gizamedia.rc.fas.harvard.edu/images/MFA-images/Giza/GizaImage/full/library/lehner_harvard_mag.pdf
  22. https://archaeology.org/issues/july-august-2022/features/egypt-wadi-el-jarf-port-papyri/
  23. https://smarthistory.org/egyptian-social-organization-from-pharaoh-to-farmer/
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277379123002202
  25. https://gizamedia.rc.fas.harvard.edu/images/MFA-images/Giza/GizaImage/full/library/strudwick_admininstration.pdf
  26. https://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/what-do-we-know-about-the-people-buried-in-the-royal-cemetery/
  27. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/as11.pdf
  28. https://juniperpublishers.com/gjaa/pdf/GJAA.MS.ID.555669.pdf
  29. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/ur-the-royal-graves
  30. https://chronontology.dainst.org/period/TaEmPyLwffTK
  31. https://southasia.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/499/2025/02/Kenoyer2006_CulturesSocietiesIndusTrad.pdf
  32. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/archaeology-of-south-asia/an-era-of-integration/00DC42FB267DC54A977FD0EDFB9D3B47
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273317048_Evaluating_Potential_Lapis_Lazuli_Sources_for_Ancient_South_Asia_using_Sulfur_Isotope_Analysis
  34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-020-09147-9
  35. https://sites.dartmouth.edu/aegean-prehistory/lessons/lesson-5-narrative/
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329771468_Obsidian_in_the_prehistoric_Aegean_Trade_and_uses
  37. https://www1.udel.edu/artsci/DTI/units/2016/02/Units/16.02.05.pdf
  38. https://gizamedia.rc.fas.harvard.edu/documents/lehner_treasures_032-045.pdf
  39. https://gizamedia.rc.fas.harvard.edu/images/MFA-images/Giza/GizaImage/full/library/petrie_gizeh.pdf
  40. https://commons.library.stonybrook.edu/context/amar/article/1009/viewcontent/3809.pdf
  41. https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/Bardsley_uncg_0154D_13730.pdf
  42. https://www.academia.edu/1175274/Bricks_and_urbanism_in_the_Indus_Valley
  43. https://web.mae.ufl.edu/uhk/pyramid-technology.pdf
  44. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED179448.pdf
  45. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/oip99.pdf
  46. https://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/section5/tr561.htm
  47. https://cdli.ox.ac.uk/wiki/sign_lists
  48. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/dcclt/signlists/SignLists/index.html
  49. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-02320-7
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/216842497_The_Collapse_of_the_Indus-Script_Thesis_The_Myth_of_a_Literate_Harappan_Civilization
  51. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Egyptian-Old-Kingdom
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.