Hubbry Logo
UrUrMain
Open search
Ur
Community hub
Ur
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Ur
Ur
from Wikipedia

Ur[a] (/ʊr/ or /ɜːr/[3]) was a major Sumerian city-state in ancient Mesopotamia, located at the site of modern Tell el-Muqayyar[b] (Arabic: تَلّ ٱلْمُقَيَّر, lit.'mound of bitumen') in Dhi Qar Governorate, southern Iraq. Although Ur was a coastal city near the mouth of the Euphrates on the Persian Gulf, the coastline has shifted and the site is now well inland, on the south bank of the Euphrates, 16 km (10 mi) southwest of Nasiriyah in modern-day Iraq.[4] The city dates from the Ubaid period c. 3800 BC, and is recorded in written history as a city-state from the 26th century BC, its first recorded king being Mesannepada.

Key Information

The city's patron deity was the moon god Nanna (Sin in Akkadian), and the name of the city is derived from UNUGKI, literally "the abode (of Nanna)".[4] The site is marked by the partially restored ruins of the Ziggurat of Ur, which contained the shrine of Nanna, excavated in the 1930s. The temple was built in the 21st century BC (short chronology), during the reign of Ur-Nammu and was reconstructed in the 6th century BC by Nabonidus, the last king of Babylon.[5]

The name 𒋀𒀊𒆠 URIM5KI for "Country of Ur" on a seal of King Ur-Nammu

Society and culture

[edit]

Archaeological discoveries have shown that Ur was a major Sumerian urban center on the Mesopotamian plain. The discovery of Ur's Royal Tombs further confirmed this. These tombs, which date to the Early Dynastic IIIa period (approximately in the 25th or 24th century BC), contained many luxury items made of precious metals and semi-precious stones imported from long distances (Ancient Iran, Afghanistan, India, Asia Minor, the Levant and the Persian Gulf).[5] This immense wealth shows Ur's economic importance during the Early Bronze Age.[6]

Lizard-headed nude woman nursing a child, from Ur, Ubaid period, c. 4500–4000 BC; Iraq Museum
Enthroned King Ur-Nammu (c. 2047–2030 BC)

Excavation in the old city of Ur in 1929 revealed the Lyres of Ur, instruments similar to the modern harp but in the shape of a bull and with eleven strings.[7]

Standard of Ur mosaic (c. 2600 BC)
The Standard of Ur mosaic, from the royal tombs of Ur, is made of red limestone, bitumen, lapis lazuli, and shell. The "peace" side shows comfort, music, and prosperity. The "war" side shows the king, his armies, and chariots trampling on enemies.

History

[edit]

The site consists of a mound, roughly 1200 by 800 metres with a height of about 20 metres above the plain. The mound is split by the remnants of an ancient canal into north and south portions.[8] The remains of a city wall are visible surrounding the site. The occupation size ranged from about 15 hectares in the Jemdet Nasr period to 90 hectares in the Early Dynastic period and then peaking in the Ur III period at 108 hectares and the Isin-Larsa period at 140 hectares, extending beyond the city walls. Subsequent period had varying lesser degrees of occupation.[9]

Prehistory

[edit]

When Ur was founded, the Persian Gulf's water level was two-and-a-half metres higher than today. Ur is thought, therefore, to have had marshy surroundings; irrigation would have been unnecessary, and the city's evident canals likely were used for transportation. Fish, birds, tubers, and reeds might have supported Ur economically without the need for an agricultural revolution sometimes hypothesized as a prerequisite to urbanization.[10]

Prehistoric Ubaid period

[edit]

Archaeologists have discovered evidence of early occupation at Ur during the Ubaid period (c. 5500–3700 BC), a prehistoric period of Mesopotamia.[11] The name derives from Tell al-'Ubaid where the earliest large excavation of Ubaid period material was conducted initially in 1919 by Henry Hall and later by Leonard Woolley.[12]

Later, a layer of soil covered the occupation levels from the Ubaid period. Excavators of the 1920s interpreted the layer of soil as evidence for the Great Flood of the Epic of Gilgamesh and Book of Genesis. It is now understood that the South Mesopotamian plain was exposed to regular floods from the Euphrates and the Tigris rivers, with heavy erosion from water and wind, which may have given rise to the Mesopotamian and derivative Biblical Great Flood stories.[13]

Early Bronze Age

[edit]

There are various main sources informing scholars about the importance of Ur during the Early Bronze Age.

Early Dynastic period II

[edit]

Proto-cuneiform tablets from the Early Dynastic period, c. 2900 BC, have been recovered.[14][15]

Early Dynastic period III

[edit]

The First Dynasty of Ur seems to have had great wealth and power, as shown by the lavish remains of the Royal Cemetery at Ur. The Sumerian King List provides a tentative political history of ancient Sumer and mentions, among others, several rulers of Ur. Mesannepada is the first king mentioned in the Sumerian King List, and appears to have lived in the 26th century BC. That Ur was an important urban centre already then seems to be indicated by a type of cylinder seal called the City Seals. These seals contain a set of Proto-Cuneiform signs which appear to be writings or symbols of the name of city-states in ancient Mesopotamia. Many of these seals have been found in Ur, and the name of Ur is prominent on them.[16]

Akkadian period

[edit]

Ur came under the control of the Semitic-speaking Akkadian Empire (c. 2334–2154 BC) founded by Sargon the Great between the 24th and 22nd centuries BC. This was a period when the Semitic-speaking Akkadians, who had entered Mesopotamia in approximately 3000 BC, gained ascendancy over the Sumerians, and indeed much of the ancient Near East.

Ur III period

[edit]
Plaque with woman's face BM 122113

After a short period of chaos following the fall of the Akkadian Empire the third Ur dynasty was established when the king Ur-Nammu came to power, ruling between c. 2047 BC and 2030 BC. During his rule, temples, including the Ziggurat of Ur, were built, and agriculture was improved through irrigation. His code of laws, the Code of Ur-Nammu (a fragment was identified in Istanbul in 1952) is one of the oldest such documents known, preceding the Code of Hammurabi by 300 years. He and his successor Shulgi were both deified during their reigns, and after his death he continued as a hero-figure: one of the surviving works of Sumerian literature describes the death of Ur-Nammu and his journey to the underworld.[17]

Ur-Nammu was succeeded by Shulgi, the greatest king of the Third Dynasty of Ur, who solidified the hegemony of Ur and reformed the empire into a highly centralized bureaucratic state. Shulgi ruled for a long time (at least 42 years) and deified himself halfway through his rule.[18]

Ziggurat of Ur

The Ur empire continued through the reigns of three more kings with Akkadian names, Amar-Sin, Shu-Sin, and Ibbi-Sin. It fell around 1940 BC to the Elamites in the 24th regnal year of Ibbi-Sin, an event commemorated by the Lament for Ur.[19][20]

According to one estimate, Ur was the largest city in the world from c. 2030 to 1980 BC. Its population was approximately 65,000 (or 0.1 per cent share of global population then).[citation needed]

Middle Bronze Age

[edit]

The site was occupied in the Isin-Larsa and Old Babylonian periods. The city of Ur lost its political power after the demise of the Third Dynasty of Ur. Nevertheless, its important position which kept on providing access to the Persian Gulf ensured the ongoing economic importance of the city during the second millennium BC. The city came to be ruled by the Amorite first dynasty of Babylon which rose to prominence in southern Mesopotamia in the 19th century BC. During the Old Babylonian Empire, in the reign of Samsu-iluna, Ur was abandoned. It later became a part of the native Sealand Dynasty for several centuries.

Late Bronze Age

[edit]

It then came under the control of the Kassites in the 16th century BC, and sporadically under the control of the Middle Assyrian Empire between the 14th and 11th centuries BC.[21]

Iron Age

[edit]

The city, along with the rest of southern Mesopotamia and much of the Near East, Asia Minor, North Africa and southern Caucasus, fell to the north Mesopotamian Neo-Assyrian Empire from the 10th to late 7th centuries BC. From the end of the 7th century BC Ur was ruled by the so-called Chaldean Dynasty of Babylon. In the 6th century BC there was new construction in Ur under the rule of Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon. The last Babylonian king, Nabonidus, improved the ziggurat. However, the city started to decline from around 530 BC after Babylonia fell to the Persian Achaemenid Empire, and was no longer inhabited by the early 5th century BC. The demise of Ur was perhaps owing to drought, changing river patterns, and the silting of the outlet to the Persian Gulf.

Identification with the Biblical Ur

[edit]
"Abraham's House" in Ur, photographed in 2016

Ur is possibly the city of Ur Kasdim mentioned in the Book of Genesis as the birthplace of the Jewish and Muslim patriarch Abraham (Avraham in Hebrew, Ibrahim in Arabic), traditionally believed to have lived some time in the 2nd millennium BC.[22] There are, however, conflicting traditions and scholarly opinions identifying Ur Kasdim with the sites of Şanlıurfa, Urkesh, Urartu, or Kutha.

The biblical Ur is mentioned four times in the Torah or Hebrew Bible (Tanakh in Hebrew), with the distinction "of the Kasdim"—traditionally rendered in English as "Ur of the Chaldees". The Chaldeans had settled in the vicinity by around 850 BC, but were not extant anywhere in Mesopotamia during the 2nd millennium BC period when Abraham is traditionally held to have lived. The Chaldean dynasty did not rule Babylonia (and thus become the rulers of Ur) until the late 7th century BC, and held power only until the mid 6th century BC. The name is found in Genesis 11:28, Genesis 11:31, and Genesis 15:7. In Nehemiah 9:7, a single passage mentioning Ur is a paraphrase of Genesis.[citation needed]

Pope John Paul II wanted to visit the city according to the biblical tradition as part of his trip to Israel, Jordan and the Palestinian territories but the visit was cancelled due to a dispute between the Government of Saddam Hussein and representatives of the Holy See.[23]

In March 2021, Pope Francis visited Ur during his journey through Iraq.[24]

Archaeology

[edit]
Carved stone with integral handle from Ur

In 1625, the site was visited by Pietro Della Valle, who recorded the presence of ancient bricks stamped with strange symbols, cemented together with bitumen, as well as inscribed pieces of black marble that appeared to be seals. He retrieved several inscribed bricks.[25] It was visited in 1835 by James Baillie Fraser and John Ross who provided a detailed description.[26] In January 1850 William Loftus and H. A. Churchill visited the site and collected brick inscriptions.[27] European archaeologists did not identify Tell el-Muqayyar as the site of Ur until Henry Rawlinson successfully deciphered some bricks from that location, brought to England by William Loftus.[28]

Foundation cone of A'annepada for Inanna, British Museum BM 90951

The site was first excavated, on behalf of the British Museum and with instructions from the Foreign Office, by John George Taylor, British vice consul at Basra in 1853, 1854, and again in 1858.[29][30][31] It had long been thought that Taylor only worked at the site in 1853 and 1854 but a 48 page handwritten report of his work there in 1858 has now come to light. Finds from the dig included a carved stone with integral handle, a plaque with woman's face, and a foundation cone of A'annepada.[32] Taylor uncovered the Ziggurat of Ur and a structure with an arch later identified as part of the "Gate of Judgment".[33] Among the finds were copies of a standard cylinder of Nabonidus, Neo-Babylonian ruler, mentioning the prince regent Belshar-uzur, usually thought to be the Belshazzar of the Book of Daniel in the Hebrew Bible.[34] Between 1854 and 1918 locals excavated over two hundred tablets from the site, mostly from the temple Ê-nun-maḫ, of the moon god Sin.[35] Built by the Ur III ruler Ur-Nammu, the ziggurat was later repaired by Isin ruler Ishme-Dagan early in the 2nd millennium BC.[36] Stamped bricks on the ziggurat detail the rebuilding of the temple of Ningal by 14th century BC Kassite ruler Kurigalzu I.[37]

Some cuneiform tablets were found. Thirty four of these tablets were inadvertently mixed in with those excavated at Kutalla. Only in recent years has this error been recognized.[38] Typical of the era, his excavations destroyed information and exposed the tell. Natives used the now loosened, 4,000-year-old bricks and tile for construction for the next 75 years, while the site lay unexplored, the British Museum having decided to prioritize archaeology in Assyria.[39]

The site was considered rich in remains, and relatively easy to explore. After some soundings were made during a week in 1918 by Reginald Campbell Thompson, H. R. Hall worked the site for one season (using 70 Turkish prisoners of war) for the British Museum in 1919, laying the groundwork for more extensive efforts to follow. Some cuneiform tablets from the Isin-Larsa period were found, including omen and medical texts. They are now in the British Museum.[40][41][42]

Aerial photograph of Ur in 1927

Excavations from 1922 to 1934 were funded by the British Museum and the University of Pennsylvania and led by the archaeologist Sir Charles Leonard Woolley.[43] The last two seasons focused on closing the site properly.[44][39][45] A total of about 1,850 burials were uncovered, including 16 that were described as "royal tombs" containing many valuable artifacts, including the Standard of Ur. Most of the royal tombs were dated to about 2600 BC. The finds included the unlooted tomb of a queen thought to be Queen Puabi (formerly transcribed as Shub-ab), known from a cylinder seal found in the tomb, although there were two other different and unnamed seals found in the tomb. Many other people had been buried with her, in a form of human sacrifice.[46] Near the ziggurat were uncovered the temple E-nun-mah and buildings E-dub-lal-mah (built for a king), E-gi-par (residence of the high priestess) and E-hur-sag (a temple building).

Outside the temple area, many houses used in everyday life were found. Excavations were also made below the royal tombs layer: a 3.5-metre-thick (11 ft) layer of alluvial clay covered the remains of earlier habitation, including pottery from the Ubaid period, the first stage of settlement in southern Mesopotamia. Woolley later wrote many articles and books about the discoveries.[47] One of Woolley's assistants on the site was the British archaeologist Max Mallowan.[48]

Bitumen "mortar" among Ur's mudbricks
Circular groups of bricks excavated in 1900

A number of royal inscriptions were found during the Woolley excavations.[49][50] Numerous cuneiform tablets were also recovered. These included archives, temple and domestic, from the Early Dynastic and Sargonic periods,[51][52][53][54] the Ur III period,[55][56] Old and Middle Babylonian period,[57][58] and the Neo-Babylonian and Persian periods.[59] Many literary and religious texts were also recovered.[60][61][62]

The discoveries at the site reached the headlines in mainstream media in the world with the discoveries of the Royal Tombs. As a result, the ruins of the ancient city attracted many visitors. One of these visitors was the already famous Agatha Christie, who as a result of this visit ended up marrying Max Mallowan.[63][64] During this time the site was accessible from the Baghdad–Basra railway, from a stop called "Ur Junction".[65]

In 2009, an agreement was reached for a joint University of Pennsylvania and Iraqi team to resume archaeological work at the site of Ur.[66] Excavations began in 2015 under the direction of Elizabeth C Stone and Paul Zimansky of the State University of New York. In part of the section they planned to work (designated AH) they found that a large area had been leveled to build a modern reconstruction of the fictional "House of Abraham" and another area have been paved over for a Papal visit.[67] The first excavation season was primarily to re-excavate Woolley's work in an Old Babylonian housing area with two new trenches for confirmation. Among the finds were a cylinder seal and balance pan weights. A number of cuneiform tablets were unearthed, a few Ur III period, a few from the Isin-Larsa period (including one from Rim-Sîn I year 24), a few Old Babylonian period, and a number of Old Akkadian period.[68] A similar though smaller dig was made in a Neo-Babylonian housing area. [69][70] In the 2017 season an urban area adjacent to Wooleys very large AH area was excavated. The burial vault of a Babylonian general Abisum was found. Abisum is known from year 36 of Hammurabi into the reign of Samsu-iluna. Thirty cuneiform tablets were found around the vault and another 12 inside the tomb itself. A 3rd excavation season was conducted in 2019 (the University of Pennsylvania excavated in 2023 though nothing has yet been published of that work).[71] A notable find was a large cuneiform tablet dated to the 6th year of Ur III ruler Ibbi-Sin on the swap of two large residences between private individuals (Munimah and Gayagama). One home was about 240 square meters and the other 423 square meters which is especially large for a home in that time.[72]

Some distance south of Area AH in 2017 and 2019 a German team of Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München directed by Adelheid Otto excavated a large home of Sîn-nādā (mid 19th century BC) chief administrator of the Temple of Ningal in the Isin-Larsa period. In levels below the final occupation were found tablets dating to Sin-Eribam and Silli-Adad, rulers of Larsa. They included a new copy of the Lament for Sumer and Ur.[73][74][75]

The Royal Tomb Excavation

[edit]
Rawlinson's March 1854 letter to The Athenaeum announcing his reading of the Nabonidus cylinders which connected Muqeyer or "Um Qeer" with the name Ur[76]

When the Royal Tombs at Ur were discovered, their size was unknown. Excavators started digging two trenches in the middle of the desert to see if they could find anything that would allow them to keep digging. They split into two teams – A and team B. Both teams spent the first few months digging a trench and found evidence of burial grounds by collecting small pieces of golden jewelry and pottery. This was called the "gold trench". After the first season of digging finished, Woolley returned to England. In Autumn, Woolley returned and started the second season. By the end of the second season, he had uncovered a courtyard surrounded by many rooms.[77] In their third season of digging archaeologists had uncovered their biggest find yet, a building that was believed to have been constructed by order of the king, and a second building thought to be where the high priestess lived. As the fourth and fifth season came to a close, they had discovered so many items that most of their time was now spent recording the objects they found instead of actually digging objects.[78] Items included gold jewelry, clay pots and stones. One of the most significant objects was the Standard of Ur. By the end of their sixth season they had excavated 1850 burial sites and deemed 17 of them to be "Royal Tombs". Some clay sealings and cuneiform tablet fragment were found in an underlying layer.[79]

Woolley finished his work excavating the Royal Tombs in 1934, uncovering a series of burials. Many servants were killed and buried with the royals, who he believed went to their deaths willingly. Computerized tomography scans on some of the surviving skulls have shown signs that they were killed by blows to the head that could be from the spiked end of a copper axe, which showed Woolley's initial theory of mass suicide via poison to be incorrect.[80]

Reconstructed Sumerian headgear and necklaces found in the tomb of Puabi in the "Royal tombs" of Ur

Inside Puabi's tomb there was a chest in the middle of the room. Underneath that chest was a hole in the ground that led to what was called the "King's Grave": PG-789. It was believed to be the king's grave because it was buried next to the queen. In this grave, there were 63 attendants who were all equipped with copper helmets and swords. It is thought to be his army buried with him. Another large room was uncovered, PG-1237, called the "Great death pit". This large room had 74 bodies, 68 of which were women. This was based on artifacts found with the bodies, weapons and whetstones in the case of males and simple, non-gold, jewelry in the case of females. There is some debate about the gender of one body. Two large ram statues were found in PG-1237 which are believed to be the remains of lyres. Several lyres were found just outside the entrance. The bodies were found to have perimortem blunt force injuries which caused their death. They also had skeleton markers for long term manual labor.[81][82][83]

Most of the treasures excavated at Ur are in the British Museum, the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology and the Baghdad Museum. At the Penn Museum the exhibition "Iraq's Ancient Past",[84] which includes many of the most famous pieces from the Royal Tombs, opened to visitors in late Spring 2011. Previously, the Penn Museum had sent many of its best pieces from Ur on tour in an exhibition called "Treasures From the Royal Tombs of Ur." It traveled to eight American museums, including those in Cleveland, Washington and Dallas, ending the tour at the Detroit Institute of Art in May 2011.[citation needed]

Samples from two stratigraphic layers in the royal cemetery area, from before the royal burials, have been radiocarbon dated. The ED Ia layer dated to c. 2900 BC and the ED Ic layer to c. 2679 BC.[85][86]

Current status and preservation

[edit]

Though some of the areas that were cleared during modern excavations have sanded over again, the Great Ziggurat is fully cleared and stands as the best-preserved and most visible landmark at the site.[87] The famous Royal tombs, also called the Neo-Sumerian Mausolea, located about 250 metres (820 ft) south-east of the Great Ziggurat in the corner of the wall that surrounds the city, are nearly totally cleared. Parts of the tomb area appear to be in need of structural consolidation or stabilization.[citation needed]

There are cuneiform (Sumerian writing) on many walls, some entirely covered in script stamped into the mud-bricks. The text is sometimes difficult to read, but it covers most surfaces. Modern graffiti has also found its way to the graves, usually in the form of names made with coloured pens (sometimes they are carved).[citation needed]

The Great Ziggurat itself has far more graffiti, mostly lightly carved into the bricks. The graves are completely empty. A small number of the tombs are accessible. Most of them have been cordoned off. The whole site is covered with pottery debris, to the extent that it is virtually impossible to set foot anywhere without stepping on some. Some have colours and paintings on them. Some of the "mountains" of broken pottery are debris that has been removed from excavations.

Pottery debris and human remains form many of the walls of the royal tombs area. In May 2009, the United States Army returned the Ur site to the Iraqi authorities, who hope to develop it as a tourist destination.[88]

Wall plaque from Ur, c. 2500 BC; the British Museum

Since 2009, the non-profit organization Global Heritage Fund (GHF) has been working to protect and preserve Ur against the problems of erosion, neglect, inappropriate restoration, war and conflict. GHF's stated goal for the project is to create an informed and scientifically grounded Master Plan to guide the long-term conservation and management of the site, and to serve as a model for the stewardship of other sites.[89]

Since 2013, the institution for Development Cooperation of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs DGCS[90] and the SBAH, the State Board of Antiquities and Heritage of the Iraqi Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities, have started a cooperation project for "The Conservation and Maintenance of Archaeological site of UR". In the framework of this cooperation agreement, the executive plan, with detailed drawings, is in progress for the maintenance of the Dublamah Temple (design concluded, works starting), the Royal Tombs—Mausolea 3rd Dynasty (in progress)—and the Ziqqurat (in progress). The first updated survey in 2013 has produced a new aerial map derived by the flight of a UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) operated in March 2014. This is the first high-resolution map, derived from more than 100 aerial photograms, with an accuracy of 20 cm or less. A preview of the ortho-photomap of Archaeological Site of Ur is available online.[91]

Tell Sakhariya

[edit]

The site (30º 58’ 33.84” N by 46º 08’ 28.36” E) was first noted, as Tell Abu Ba’arura Shimal ("Father of Sheep Droppings, North"), as a Kassite period occupation (300 NE X 150 X 2.5. Cassite: 3.5 ha) during an archaeological survey of the region in the 1960s.[92] The site, which lies 6.45 kilometers northeast of Ur, was excavated in a five week season from December to January 2011 – 2012 by a joint Iraqi State Board of Antiquities and Heritage and the State University of New York at Stony Brook team led by Elizabeth Stone and Paul Zimansky. It was measured at about 250 meters by 200 meters with two high points, about 3.5 meters above the plain, separated by a saddle. Seven trenches were dug, some small, and three yielded simple slope wash.[93] On the surface were found Kassite and Old Babylonian period ceramics and satellite imagery suggested the presence of a large square building and a number of other walls but the excavators found no building remains in surface or magnetic gradiometry surveys, or in the later trenches. Three occupational levels were determined. The top layer contained Kassite pottery fragments, a late Kassite kiln, and a number of late Kassite burials. The second held Sealand Dynasty ceramics along with lithic (grinding stones, cuboids and one balance weight), metal, floral and faunal (primarily cattle, sheep, and goats) remains.[94] The excavators deemed the occupations to be repeated but transient. Neither level showed signs of formal or residential architecture.

The final, earliest level also lacked notable architecture but featured a very large mud or clay platform, made from clean material, devoid of sherds, bones, or other living debris. Coring to a depth of 4 meters (1 meter below the plain) failed to find the bottom of the platform. Part of the platform is underlain by a square baked brick pavement and remains of a fish pond were found. Two 5 meter by 10 meter trenches, 55 meters apart, were excavated in this platform. An inscribed brick of the first Ur III ruler Ur-Nammu (c. 2112-2094 BC) "describing the construction of a barag - a pedestal or podium and a garden" was found out of context. Also found were four fragmentary inscribed bricks (surface finds), three inscribed cones (one datable to Larsa ruler Rim-Sîn I (c. 1822-1763 BC) year 15), and two Sumerian language cuneiform tablets. One tablet was from the early Kassite period and the other tablet was a receipt for copper utensils is dated to year 28 of Ur III ruler Shulgi (c. 2094-2046 BC). After this excavation season a nearby prison was expanded by the Iraqi government blocking access to the site and precluding further campaigns.[95] It has been proposed as the site of Ur III Ga’eš. The ziggurat at Ur can be seen from the summit of the site.[96][97][98][99]

Ga’eš

[edit]

Based on the archaeology the site of Tell Sakhariya has been proposed as the Ur III period city of Ga’eš (ga-eški and ga-eš5ki), site of the Akiti festival of Nanna/Sin, held every year for 11 days in the seventh month of the year and 7 days in the first month of the year. The festival began at Nanna’s temple in Ur and ended in Ga’eš, possibly traveling via a canal.[100] The temple of Nanna/Sin there was called the Karzida (kar-zi-da) was located at Ga’eš (the names Karzida and Ga’eš appear to have been used interchangeably for the city). The 36th year name of Ur III ruler Shulgi read "Year Nanna of Ga’eš was brought into his temple" and the 9th year name of Ur III ruler Amar-Sin read "Year En-Nanna-Amar-Sin-kiagra, was installed for the third time as en-priestess of Nanna of Ga’eš / of Karzida". Amar-Sin established a Giparu (nunnery) for the en-priestess of Nanna at Karzida saying "he caused En-aga-zi-ana, his beloved priestess (en), to enter there".[101] When the en-priestess died she was buried a with "golden crown (aga), which is followed by five other golden objects".[102][103][104] From tablets found at Ur it is known that wrestling competitions were held at Ga’eš reading "for the ‘house of wrestling’ in the Akiti (building), issued in Ga’eš, during the Akiti month" and "100 liters of ordinary beer, the beer for the ‘house of wrestling’ … issued in Ga’eš", for example.[105] All that is known with certainty about its location is that it lay one days journey from Ur and was on a canal. A sketch in a 1990's paper concerning the Iturungal Canal placed Ga’eš in a location corresponding to Tell Sakhariya.[106] It has been suggested that Ga’eš was mentioned in Early Dynastic II period administrative texts.[107] The final textual mention of was from the time of Larsa ruler Sin-Iddinam (c. 1849-1843 BC) a cone reading "Sm-i[ddinam], mighty man, [s]on [born] in Ga’eš provider of U[r], king of Lars[a], king of the land of S[umer] and Akkad] ...".[108] Apparently Ga’eš had a gate tower based on a text from Drehem "1 fattened sheep for the great gate tower in Ga’eš" dating to the reign of Su-Sin.[109]

One of the Temple Hymns of Enheduanna, the daughter of Sargon of Akkad (c. 2334-2279 BC), is dedicated to Ga’eš and the Karzida temple of Nanna/Sin there.[110]

"Shrine, great sanctuary?, founded at a cattle-pen, ‘Small’ city, . . . . of Suen Karzida, your interior is a . . . . place, your foundation is holy and clean, Shrine, your Gipar is founded in purity, Your door is (of) strong copper, set up at a great place, Cattle-pen (filled with) the lowing (of the cows), like a young bull you . . . the horn,Your prince, the lord of heaven, standing in the . . . ., At noon (like the sun) radiating . . . ., O Karzida, he, Ašimbabbar, has placed the house upon your . . . . has taken his place on your dais. The house of Nanna in Ga’eš"[95]

Ga’eš was also mentioned in the Sumerian literary composition Lament for Sumer and Ur

"... Mighty strength was set against the banks of the Id-nuna-Nanna canal. The settlements of the E-danna of Nanna, like substantial cattle-pens, were destroyed. Their refugees, like stampeding goats, were chased (?) by dogs. They destroyed Gaeš like milk poured out to dogs, and shattered its finely fashioned statues. 'Alas, the destroyed city, my destroyed house,' Its sacred Ĝipar of en priesthood was defiled. Its en priestess was snatched from the Ĝipar and carried off to enemy territory. A lament was raised at the dais that stretches out toward heaven. Its heavenly throne was not set up, was not fit to be crowned (?)."[111][112]

And in another composition:

"O, sanctuary, big chamber built like ? a stall, mighty beaming city of Suen, Karzida, your interior is a powerful place, your foundation is holy and clean. O, sanctuary, your Ĝipar is established in purity, your door is copper, something (very) strong, established in the Underworld. O, cattle-pen, which rai[ses] the horns like a breeding bull, your prince, the lord of heaven standing in ... joy. ... at midday and ... O Karzida, Ašimbabbar, a house has established in your holy space and took (his) residence in your sanctuary!"[113]

List of rulers

[edit]

The Sumerian King List (SKL) gives a list of only thirteen rulers from three dynasties of Ur. The once supposed second dynasty of Ur may have never existed.[114] The first dynasty of Ur may have been preceded by one other dynasty of Ur (the "Kalam dynasty") unnamed on the SKL—which had extensive influence over the area of Sumer and apparently led a union of south Mesopotamian polities. This predynastic period of Ur may include at least two rulers out of the first eight on this list (Meskalamdug and Akalamdug). The following list should not be considered complete:

# Depiction Ruler Succession Titles Approx. dates Notes
Early Dynastic IIIa period (c. 2600 – c. 2500 BC)
Predynastic Ur (c. 2600 – c. 2500 BC)
A-Imdugud
𒀀𒀭𒅎𒂂
Governor of Ur c. 2600 BC
Ur-Pabilsag
𒌨𒀭𒉺𒉋𒊕
Possibly son of A-Imdugud[116] King of Ur c. 2550 BC
  • temp. of Ursangpae[117]
  • Known from an inscription fragment found in tomb PG 779 located in the Royal Cemetery at Ur
# Depiction Ruler Succession Titles Approx. dates Notes
Early Dynastic IIIb period (c. 2500 – c. 2350 BC)
Kalam dynasty (c. 2550 – c. 2500 BC)
Akalamdug
𒀀𒌦𒄭
Possibly son of Meskalamdug King of Ur c. 2550 BC
  • temp. of Akurgal[117]
  • Known from dynastic beads and tomb inscriptions found in tomb PG 1332 located in the Royal Cemetery at Ur
Meskalamdug
𒈩𒌦𒄭
Possibly son of Akalamdug King of Kish c. 2550 BC
  • temp. of Enakalle[117]
  • Known from dynastic beads and tomb inscriptions found in tomb PG 755 located in the Royal Cemetery at Ur
Puabi
𒅤𒀜
Possibly Coregent with Meskalamdug Queen of Ur c. 2550 BC
  • Known from inscriptions found in tomb PG 800 located in the Royal Cemetery at Ur
  • She may have ruled in her own right as queen regnant[118]
# Depiction Ruler Succession Titles Approx. dates Notes
First dynasty of Ur / Ur I dynasty (c. 2500 – c. 2340 BC)

"Then Uruk was defeated and the kingship was taken to Ur."

— SKL

1 Mesannepada
𒈩𒀭𒉌𒅆𒊒𒁕
Son of Meskalamdug King of Sumer
King of Kish
King of Ur
c. 2550 - c. 2525 BC
  • temp. of Ur-Lumma[117]
  • Known from the SKL, Tummal Chronicle, and an inscribed seal found in tomb PG 1232/1237 located in the Royal Cemetery at Ur
2 Meskiagnun
𒈩𒆠𒉘𒉣
Son of Mesannepada King of Sumer
King of Ur
c. 2485 - c. 2450 BC
  • temp. of Epa'e[117]
  • Known from the Tummal Chronicle his tomb PG 1157 located in the Royal Cemetery at Ur
3 Elulu
𒂊𒇻𒇻
King of Sumer
King of Ur
c. 2445 BC
4 Balulu
𒁀𒇻𒇻
King of Sumer
King of Ur
c. 2445 BC
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain

"4 kings; they ruled for 171 years. Then Ur was defeated and the kingship was taken to Awan."

— SKL

Lugal-kinishe-dudu
𒈗𒆠𒉌𒂠𒌌𒌌
King of Sumer
King of Uruk and Ur[117]
King of Kish
King of Uruk
Governor of Uruk
Lord of Uruk
c. 2400 BC
Lugal-kisal-si
𒈗𒆦𒋛
Son of Lugal-kinishe-dudu[117] King of Uruk and Ur[117]
King of Kish
King of Uruk
King of Ur
c. 2400 BC
Enshakushanna
𒂗𒊮𒊨𒀭𒈾
Lord of Sumer and King of all the Land
King of Sumer
King of Uruk
King of Ur
c. 2350 BC
Proto-Imperial period (c. 2350 – c. 2334 BC)
A'annepada
𒀀𒀭𒉌𒅆𒊒𒁕
Son of Mesannepada King of Ur c. 2350 BC
  • temp. of Entemena[117]
  • Known from dedication tablets with inscriptions found in tomb PG 580 located in the Royal Cemetery at Ur
Lunanna
𒇽𒀭𒋀𒆠
King of Ur Uncertain; this ruler may have r. c. 2350 – c. 2112 BC sometime during the Proto-Imperial period.[117]
# Depiction Ruler Succession Titles Approx. dates Notes
Akkadian period (c. 2334 – c. 2154 BC)
Second dynasty of Ur / Ur II dynasty (c. 2340 – c. 2112 BC)

"Then Uruk was defeated and the kingship was taken to Ur."

— SKL

1 Nanni
𒈾𒀭𒉌
King of Sumer
King of Ur
r. c. 2340 BC
(54 or 120 years)
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
2 Meskiagnun II
𒈩𒆠𒉘𒉣
Son of Nanni King of Sumer
King of Ur
Uncertain
(48 years)
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain
3 Unknown King of Sumer
King of Ur
Uncertain
(2 years)
  • Known from the SKL; very little otherwise
  • Historicity uncertain

"3 kings; they ruled for 578 years. Then Ur was defeated and the kingship was taken to Adab."

— SKL

# Depiction Ruler Succession Titles Approx. dates Notes
Ur III period (c. 2154 – c. 2004 BC)
Third dynasty of Ur / Ur III dynasty (c. 2112 – c. 2004 BC)

"Then Uruk was defeated and the kingship was taken to Ur."

— SKL

1 Ur-Nammu
𒌨𒀭𒇉
Possibly son of Utu-hengal King of Sumer and Akkad
King of Sumer
King of Ur
c. 2112 – c. 2094 BC
2 Shulgi
𒀭𒂄𒄀
Son of Ur-Nammu and Watartum King of the Four Corners
King of Sumer and Akkad
King of Sumer
King of Ur
c. 2094 – c. 2046 BC
3 Amar-Sin
𒀭𒀫𒀭𒂗𒍪
Possibly son of Shulgi King of the Four Corners
King of Sumer and Akkad
King of Sumer
King of Ur
c. 2046 – c. 2037 BC
4 Shu-Sin
𒀭𒋗𒀭𒂗𒍪
Possibly son of Amar-Sin King of the Four Corners
King of Sumer and Akkad
King of Sumer
King of Ur
c. 2037 – c. 2028 BC
5 Ibbi-Sin
𒀭𒄿𒉈𒀭𒂗𒍪
Son of Shu-Sin King of the Four Corners
King of Sumer and Akkad
King of Sumer
King of Ur
c. 2028 – c. 2004 BC

"5 kings; they ruled for 108 years. Then the reign of Ur was abolished. The very foundation of Sumer was torn out. The kingship was taken to Isin."

— SKL

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Ur (Sumerian: Urim; cuneiform: 𒋀𒀊𒆠) was a major Sumerian city-state in southern Mesopotamia, located at Tell al-Muqayyar in present-day Iraq. It emerged during the Late Uruk period (c. 3500–3200 BCE) and developed into one of the region's earliest and most enduring urban centers, benefiting from its position near the Euphrates River. This location supported agriculture, trade, and its role as the cult center of the moon god Nanna (Sin), marked by the Great Ziggurat constructed under the Third Dynasty of Ur (c. 2112–2004 BCE). Excavations led by Leonard Woolley in the 1920s revealed the Royal Cemetery (c. 2600–2500 BCE), highlighting Ur's wealth and social complexity during the Early Dynastic period. Under the Third Dynasty, Ur briefly formed an empire, with administrative reforms and legal innovations under Ur-Nammu, before declining amid invasions and environmental changes.

Geography and Environment

Location and Topography

Ur is located at the site of Tell al-Muqayyar in , southern , at coordinates 30°57′45″N 46°06′11″E, approximately 16 kilometers southwest of the modern city of . The site lies on the alluvial plain of southern Mesopotamia, characterized by flat, low-lying terrain formed by sediment deposits from the and rivers, with elevations near . The ancient city occupies a prominent tell, or , resulting from of occupational debris accumulation, measuring roughly 1,200 meters northwest-southeast by 800 meters northeast-southwest and rising up to 20 meters above the surrounding plain. This elevated platform supported key structures, including of the Nanna, and provided defense against seasonal flooding in the riverine environment. In Sumerian times, around the third millennium BCE, Ur was positioned near the Euphrates River's mouth, directly adjacent to the Persian Gulf, enabling it as a major port for maritime commerce; subsequent silting of the river and delta progradation has shifted the coastline southward, rendering the site now about 10 kilometers west of the Euphrates and over 200 kilometers inland from the Gulf.

Riverine and Climatic Context

Ur lay along the River in southern , near its outlet to the Persian Gulf around 2500 BCE. This position enabled irrigation agriculture and supported trade through riverine and maritime routes. Branches of the river ran through the city, with paleochannels defining ancient suburbs and harbors, as revealed by aerial and analysis. Avulsions shifted the river's course eastward between 2500 and 2000 BCE, leaving the site now about 16 km inland from the . The region has a semi-arid climate with hot, dry summers exceeding 40°C, mild winters averaging 10–15°C, and annual rainfall of 100–250 mm, mostly from November to April. Seasonal flooding and engineered networks were essential to sustain crop yields in the alluvial soils, driving Ur's prosperity. Unpredictable floods and droughts, however, challenged these systems and influenced settlement patterns and .

Etymology and Historical Names

Sumerian and Akkadian Designations

In Sumerian texts, the city now known as Ur was designated Urim, written in cuneiform as URIM𒋀𒀊𒆠, under the patronage of the moon god Nanna. The name appears in administrative and royal inscriptions from the Early Dynastic period onward, reflecting its role as a major urban center in southern Mesopotamia. The etymology of Urim remains uncertain, though it may derive from the Sumerian ur or uru, meaning "city" or "abode." Akkadian sources adapted the name to Uru, preserving phonetic similarity under Semitic conventions during periods of Akkadian influence, such as the Sargonic Empire (c. 2334–2154 BCE). This form appears in bilingual texts and royal annals, illustrating linguistic continuity amid shifts from Sumerian to Akkadian dominance. Some interpretations link Urim to "the shining city" or Nanna's luminous attributes, but these lack direct cuneiform evidence and rely on associative rather than philological analysis.

Later References

In Mesopotamian texts from the Old Babylonian period onward—including Kassite, Assyrian, and Neo-Babylonian eras—the city was known as Uru or Uri, cuneiform variants of the earlier Sumerian Urim. Neo-Babylonian inscriptions, such as those from Nabonidus (556–539 BCE), consistently use Uru and record restorations to the ziggurat and temples of the moon god Nanna/Sin. This continuity reflects enduring local usage despite political changes, with Ur serving as a provincial center under Babylonian control. The Hebrew Bible refers to it as ʾŪr Kaśdīm (Ur of the Chaldees), naming it as Abraham's birthplace in Genesis 11:28, 31; 15:7; and Nehemiah 9:7. The term Kaśdīm denotes the Chaldean tribes that dominated southern Mesopotamia from the 9th century BCE, especially during the Neo-Babylonian Empire (626–539 BCE). Scholars view this specifier as a later redaction, since the Chaldeans rose to prominence long after Ur's Early Dynastic and Ur III peaks (ca. 2600–2000 BCE) but controlled the region—including Tell el-Muqayyar—by the 8th–6th centuries BCE, aiding geographic identification for exilic or post-exilic readers. Archaeological and textual evidence supports linking this to southern Babylonian Ur, though a minority view proposes northern sites such as Urfa based on Genesis migration routes; most data favors the Muqayyar location. Classical Greek sources rarely mention Ur by name, as the city had declined in prominence by the Achaemenid Persian (539–330 BCE) and Hellenistic periods. Historians like Herodotus addressed broader Babylonian geography rather than specific Sumerian sites. Berossus, a 3rd-century BCE Babylonian priest writing in Greek, refers to Mesopotamian cities and kings but does not single out Ur, underscoring its reduced visibility after the Neo-Babylonian era.

Prehistoric Development

Ubaid Period Settlements

Archaeological evidence shows that Ur was first settled during the Early Ubaid period, around 5500–5000 BC, as permanent village communities emerged in southern Mesopotamia. Leonard Woolley's early 20th-century excavations uncovered Ubaid layers beneath later strata, revealing tripartite mud-brick houses used for domestic activities such as food processing and storage. These early settlements remained small, typically under 4 hectares, with self-sufficient households focused on subsistence agriculture—including cultivation of barley and emmer wheat—supported by basic irrigation channels from nearby waterways. By the Late Ubaid phase (c. 4500–4000 BC), Ur expanded to about 10 hectares, comparable to sites like Eridu, with denser occupation and possible communal structures for ritual or administrative functions. Pottery from these levels includes painted buff wares with geometric motifs and Coba bowls, reflecting regional cultural continuity alongside local adaptations to the floodplain setting. Beveled-rim bowls found in Woolley's trenches suggest early standardization in production, potentially linked to organized labor for irrigation maintenance. Burial practices featured flexed inhumations in simple pits, often accompanied by grave goods such as shell beads and tools, indicating emerging social differentiation through access to materials from the . Environmental evidence from nearby sites points to a wetter phase with fertile alluvial soils that supported flood-based farming, though risks of salinization were already present. The transition to the Uruk period at Ur displayed continuity in settlement layout, with Ubaid houses gradually developing into more complex compounds, reflecting steady intensification rather than sudden change.

Historical Periods

Early Dynastic Era

The Early Dynastic period (c. 2900–2350 BCE) marked the maturation of Ur as a Sumerian city-state, with temple-palace institutions centralizing economic and political control amid competition among roughly 20–30 regional powers. Population growth to over 200,000 in southern supported urban expansion, with Ur featuring large settlements exceeding 40 hectares. The First Dynasty of Ur commenced with , identified as the foundational ruler through contemporary seals and later king lists, contemporary with of who briefly conquered the city. Subsequent kings included Mes-kiagnuna, Elulu, and Balulu, though reign lengths in textual sources like the —such as 80 years for Mesannepada—are likely exaggerated for legendary effect. Seals of and Akalamdug from royal contexts suggest familial or dynastic continuity, linking rulers to military campaigns and divine patronage under the moon god Nanna. Archaeological evidence from the Royal Cemetery, spanning Early Dynastic IIIA (c. 2600–2500 BCE) and comprising about 660 burials including 16 elite tombs, attests to Ur's wealth and ritual sophistication. These featured vaulted chambers stocked with gold, silver, jewelry, copper weapons, and musical instruments, alongside "death pits" containing 6–74 human attendants sacrificed to accompany the deceased, indicating a hierarchical society where elites held semi-divine status. Prominent interments include Queen Puabi's tomb (PG 800), equipped with a headdress, , and banquet wares, and PG 755 of , yielding a gold helmet and weapons symbolizing martial prowess. Artifacts like the , inlaid with shell, lapis, and limestone mosaics depicting warfare, chariots, and captives on one side alongside peaceful banqueting on the other, illustrate the era's and tributary economy. Ur's prosperity derived from irrigated and date cultivation, sheep-goat herding, and trade networks importing , tin, and from afar, managed by temple estates that owned land and mobilized labor. Rulers, evolving from priestly to hereditary kings, mediated between divine cults and assemblies, fostering stability until external conquests disrupted the dynasty c. 2350 BCE.

Akkadian and Gutian Interregnum

After Sargon of Akkad conquered Ur around 2334 BC, the city was incorporated into the Akkadian Empire, establishing the first centralized imperial rule over southern Mesopotamia. Ur served as a major provincial center, where Akkadian governors handled administration, taxation, and military duties, while temples to the moon god Nanna preserved Sumerian religious traditions despite Akkadian becoming the official administrative language. Standardization of weights, measures, and cuneiform script under rulers such as Rimush and Naram-Sin supported Ur’s integration into empire-wide trade networks, including imports of lapis lazuli from the east and timber. Archaeological evidence shows growing Semitic influences in pottery and seals, yet urban infrastructure remained largely intact. The Akkadian Empire collapsed amid internal revolts, Elamite attacks, and severe aridification around 2200 BC, leading to the Gutian invasion circa 2154 BC. Originating from the Zagros Mountains, the Gutians established loose overlordship focused on tribute collection with limited administrative control. The Sumerian King List records 21 Gutian rulers whose reigns averaged less than five years each. This interregnum (c. 2154–2113 BC) led to regional fragmentation and economic decline in Sumerian city-states like Ur, as evidenced by reduced textual records and diminished temple endowments. In Ur itself, Gutian influence appears in fifteen high-status burials dated 2150–2100 BC, containing distinctive artifacts that suggest elite Gutian settlers or allies integrated into local hierarchies. Sumerian officials likely continued to govern locally under Gutian suzerainty, paying tribute while retaining some autonomy. The period brought reduced monumental building, lower agricultural production, famine, and social instability—later condemned in Sumerian laments as rule by “mountain shepherds” unfamiliar with urban governance. The Gutian period ended when Utu-hengal of Uruk defeated the final Gutian king, Tirigan, around 2113 BC, paving the way for Ur’s revival under Ur-Nammu.

Third Dynasty of Ur

The Third Dynasty of Ur (c. 2112–2004 BCE, middle chronology) revived Sumerian power in southern Mesopotamia after the Gutian interregnum. Ur-Nammu, governor of Ur under Utu-hengal of Uruk, defeated the Gutians around 2112 BCE and founded the dynasty, creating a centralized empire covering Sumer, Akkad, and parts of Elam. Over 65,000 cuneiform tablets from sites such as Umma and Girsu document an advanced bureaucracy that tightly controlled labor, agriculture, and resources. Ur-Nammu (r. 2112–2095 BCE) built the Great Ziggurat of dedicated to the moon god Nanna, a 30-meter-high stepped platform of baked bricks. He issued the , the earliest known legal code, which featured a prologue and laws emphasizing restitution for offenses such as murder or theft over retribution. His successor (r. 2094–2047 BCE) expanded the empire through military campaigns, deified himself to strengthen absolute rule, and reformed administration by standardizing weights, measures, and a decimal-based taxation system. His reign produced royal hymns praising his divinity, scholarly works, and extensive canal construction that improved irrigation and increased yields of barley and dates. Later rulers Amar-Sin (r. 2046–2038 BCE) and Shu-Sin (r. 2037–2029 BCE) preserved the bureaucratic system. Amar-Sin focused on temple construction, while Shu-Sin built the "Amorite Wall," a 270-kilometer defense against western incursions. The economy centered on state-directed agriculture through temple and palace estates, using corvée labor for irrigation and harvesting, and supplemented by trade in metals, timber, and lapis lazuli. Administrative records show provincial ensi governors reporting to Ur, with detailed tracking of grain, wool, and livestock to curb corruption. Decline set in under Ibbi-Sin (r. 2028–2004 BCE) amid drought, soil salinization, heavy taxation, unrest, and external pressures. Elamite forces exploited these weaknesses, sacking Ur around 2004 BCE and capturing Ibbi-Sin, which fragmented the empire into smaller states such as Isin and Larsa. This collapse ended Sumerian dominance and shifted Mesopotamia toward Amorite and Babylonian influences, although Ur III administrative innovations influenced later empires.

Post-Ur III Decline

The Third Dynasty of Ur collapsed around 2004 BCE when Elamite forces under the Simashki ruler Kindattu invaded southern Mesopotamia, sacked Ur, and captured its final king, Ibbi-Sin (r. ca. 2028–2004 BCE). This defeat followed prolonged internal pressures, including administrative overextension, droughts, and Amorite incursions, which had already weakened control over outlying provinces—as shown in administrative texts and royal letters requesting grain shipments during famines. The sack ended Sumerian imperial dominance and reduced Ur to a subordinate city-state in a fragmented political landscape. During the ensuing Isin-Larsa period (ca. 2004–1763 BCE), Ur lost its political independence. It first came under the Dynasty of Isin, established by Ishbi-Erra (a former governor under Ibbi-Sin) around 2017 BCE. Kings of Isin, such as Lipit-Ishtar (ca. 1934–1924 BCE), retained some authority over Ur’s temples and economy, with evidence of temple maintenance and local administration. However, Ur functioned primarily as a regional cult center rather than an administrative hub. By the mid-20th century BCE, Larsa rose under Gungunum (ca. 1932–1906 BCE) and incorporated Ur into its sphere of influence. Archaeological layers from this era show continued occupation on a reduced scale, including merchants’ houses but less monumental construction than in Ur III times. Archaeological evidence indicates no complete abandonment after the sack. Instead, Ur experienced population decline and a shift toward local trade and agriculture, compounded by ongoing salinization in irrigation canals that reduced crop yields. The ziggurat and Nanna temple remained active religious centers, supported by endowments from later rulers. Yet Ur’s influence steadily diminished amid competition from emerging powers such as Babylon, leading to greater marginalization in the Old Babylonian period. This decline stemmed from broader factors—ecological stress and the unsustainability of Ur III’s centralized bureaucracy—beyond mere external conquest.

Governance and Rulers

Dynastic Structures

The dynasties of were hereditary monarchies typical of ancient , with kingship passing primarily through patrilineal descent within royal families, supported by temple priesthoods and military elites. The First Dynasty (c. 2600–2400 BC) showed early father-to-son succession. The names Mes-ki-ag-Nunna as the son of founder . Inscriptions identify A'annepada as Mesannepada's son and a king of Ur who built structures for the goddess . Subsequent rulers Elulu and Balulu maintained continuity until conquest by . The Third Dynasty (c. 2112–2004 BC) formed a centralized empire. founded the line and was succeeded by his son after 18 years. Shulgi ruled 46 years, deified himself, and formalized provincial governance through appointed governors (ensi), strengthening dynastic authority over temple estates. Succession continued patrilineally to Amar-Suen (Shulgi's son, 9 years), then laterally to Shu-Suen (likely another son of Shulgi or brother of Amar-Suen, 9 years), indicating flexibility through seniority or elite consensus. , Shu-Suen's son, ended the dynasty after 24 years. Royal inscriptions consistently invoked parental lineage for legitimacy. Queens such as Abi-simti (mother of Shu-Suen) held influence, but primary power remained with male heirs.
DynastyKey Rulers and RelationsDuration (approx.)
First (founder); Mes-ki-ag-Nunna (son); Elulu; Balulu160 years total per SKL
Third (founder); (son); Amar-Suen (son); Shu-Suen (fraternal/lateral); (son)108 years total
This structure intertwined kingship with divine favor from the moon god Nanna, Ur's patron deity. Rulers served as high priests (en) while delegating administration to kin or loyalists, ensuring stability until external pressures like Elamite incursions ended the dynasty.

Key Rulers and Achievements

, founder of the First Dynasty of Ur (c. 2560–2520 BCE), is listed in the as the first ruler after kingship transferred from Kish. His reign during the Early Dynastic period featured opulent royal tombs at Ur containing rich artifacts, such as the gold helmet of (likely a relative), made from imported materials including lapis lazuli. These tombs reflect Ur's economic prosperity, extensive trade networks, and military strength, enabling control over southern amid rival city-states. founded the Third Dynasty of Ur (c. 2112–2095 BCE) by overthrowing the Gutian interregnum and unifying core Mesopotamian territories. His major achievements included major construction projects, such as the Great dedicated to the moon god Nanna, along with temples, canals, and fortifications that supported agriculture and defense. He also promulgated the , the earliest known legal code, which prescribed penalties for offenses like murder and theft, emphasizing restitution over retribution in a state-administered justice system. His son ruled for 48 years (2094–2047 BCE), consolidating the empire through administrative reforms that centralized bureaucracy and standardized weights, measures, and accounting across provinces. He expanded territorial control, deified himself during his lifetime with associated hymns and cult practices, and patronized literature praising his divine status and physical prowess while sustaining economic stability through temple estates. Later rulers, including and , maintained these systems but faced growing peripheral rebellions, leading to the dynasty's collapse under .

Economy and Society

Agriculture and Irrigation

The agricultural economy of ancient Ur depended on irrigation to turn the arid alluvial plains of southern into fertile farmland, primarily using water from the River. Starting around 4000 BCE, Sumerians built extensive canal networks, levees, and ditches to control flooding and drain marshes for expanded . These systems enabled surplus production that supported urban growth and Ur's prominence during the Early Dynastic and Ur III periods. Early agriculture near Ur may have benefited from tidal influences in the nearby , where semi-diurnal tides naturally inundated coastal marshes. Rising sea levels and climatic changes around 4000 BCE necessitated artificial . By the Ur III dynasty (ca. 2112–2004 BCE), irrigation was highly organized under state control, with administrative texts documenting labor for maintenance, , and embankment repairs to prevent floods and distribute water across provincial estates. dominated as the staple crop, with high yields of up to 30–40 kor per under optimal conditions, alongside , dates, , and in irrigated gardens. Livestock complemented arable farming, with state herds of , sheep, and grazing on fields and irrigated pastures, as evidenced by Ur III ration lists allocating from canal-irrigated meadows. Long-term irrigation caused soil salinization from evaporation in poorly drained fields, contributing to declining yields by the late third millennium BCE, though Ur's proximity to river replenishment mitigated some effects during its peak. These practices sustained a dense and generated surpluses for and temple economies, highlighting the role of in societal complexity.

Trade Networks and Crafts

Ur's location near the outlet to the made it a major trade hub in the third millennium BCE, especially during the Ur III period (ca. 2112–2004 BCE). Maritime routes linked Ur to (modern ), (), and (Indus Valley). Exports included woolen garments, cloth from about 13,000 weavers, and barley. Imports comprised copper—such as 18,000 kg recorded—along with tin, , sissoo wood, and precious stones. Cuneiform tablets document merchants like Lu-Enlilla trading wool and leather for metals and stones from Magan, often tithing portions to deities such as . Overland and riverine routes using donkey caravans and barges connected Ur to inland Mesopotamian centers and Persia. Administrative texts from 's reign (2112–2095 BCE) indicate centralized control, with taxes in barley and cattle supporting state expeditions. Artifacts like the incorporate materials from the , , and , showing Ur's integration into long-distance networks that supplied raw materials for elite consumption and manufacturing. Crafts flourished in specialized workshops under state or temple oversight during the Ur III era. Lapidaries (zadim) processed semi-precious stones such as , , , and into beads, cylinder seals, and ornaments, as detailed in texts like UET 1498. They worked alongside smiths, carpenters, and leatherworkers to create goods from imported resources. Supply disruptions during 's reign may have led to experimentation with artificial materials like . Advanced metallurgy produced intricate jewelry and tools, while large-scale textile production supported exports. Cylinder seals and inlaid artifacts from royal contexts demonstrate skill in engraving and mosaic techniques, applied to administrative, ritual, and status purposes.

Religion, Culture, and Art

Deities and Ziggurat Worship

The patron deity of was Nanna, the Sumerian moon god, revered as the city's tutelary figure whose emphasized lunar cycles, , and divine judgment. Nanna's worship dominated religious life in Ur, with his temple complex, Ekišnugal, serving as the central hub for rituals including offerings, incantations, and prophetic divinations aligned with the moon's phases. His consort, , a associated with reeds and queenship, was jointly honored alongside Nanna, particularly in matrimonial and that underscored the divine couple's role in cosmic order and human prosperity. Secondary deities included , the goddess of love and war, who maintained a significant presence through temples like E-maḫ in Ur, where foundation deposits and inscriptions attest to royal dedications and invocations for military success. Other cults, such as those for (a and vegetation deity) and various astral figures, existed but were subordinate to Nanna's primacy, reflecting Ur's position within the broader Sumerian pantheon where city-states elevated local patrons while acknowledging the heptad of great gods (An, Enlil, , , Nanna, Utu, ). The Ziggurat of Ur, constructed circa 2100 BCE by King of the Third Dynasty, functioned as the elevated platform for Nanna's summit temple, symbolizing a link between earthly rulers and celestial authority. Worship practices atop the ziggurat were restricted to high priests who conducted daily libations, animal sacrifices, and nocturnal ceremonies to invoke Nanna's favor, with public participation limited to courtyard gatherings and processional festivals reenacting mythic journeys, such as Nanna's annual pilgrimage to . These rituals, documented in hymns and administrative texts, integrated astronomical observations for calendrical accuracy, ensuring agricultural and royal legitimacy through perceived divine synchronization. Evidence from excavated foundation cones and votive offerings confirms the ziggurat's role in state-sponsored piety, where kings positioned themselves as intermediaries, building and restoring the structure to affirm piety and power.

Social Stratification and Daily Life

Ancient Ur had a rigid social hierarchy. At the top were kings and high-ranking , who held political and religious authority. Below them came scribes, merchants, and temple administrators, followed by artisans and free farmers. Semi-free dependents (UN-il₂) received rations from state or temples, while slaves (arad)—often war captives or debt-bound—formed the lowest level. Cuneiform records from the Third Dynasty of Ur (c. 2112–2004 BCE) distinguish free citizens from UN-il₂ dependents and arad slaves. Excavations by , especially the (c. 2600–2400 BCE), reveal elite burials rich in gold and contrasting with simpler graves, confirming sharp wealth disparities. Daily life revolved around agriculture and temple activities. Most inhabitants irrigated fields along the to grow —the staple for and —plus dates, onions, and marsh fish. Men worked in fields, workshops, or canal maintenance, while women handled , food preparation, and household duties. Temple complexes employed thousands, including over 10,000 female weavers in the Ur region during the Third Dynasty, paid in grain and oil rations. Urban residents lived in mud-brick houses clustered around streets and local shrines. Wealthier families occupied spacious villas over 200 m², with courtyards, ovens, and private chapels. Families were patriarchal and extended, centered on the male head, though women such as temple administrator Nuṭṭuptum managed economic affairs and taught children literacy through tablets. Children played with clay toys and rattles; elite boys attended edubba schools to train as scribes. Leisure included board games, lyre music, and offerings at neighborhood chapels. Slaves and dependents faced harsher labor, but the efficient bureaucracy—documented in over 65,000 Ur III tablets—ensured rations and some stability across social strata.

Artistic and Literary Legacy

The artistic legacy of ancient Ur is prominently represented by artifacts from the Royal Cemetery, excavated in the 1920s, which date primarily to the Early Dynastic III period (circa 2600–2350 BCE). These include intricate inlaid mosaics, gold jewelry, and showcasing advanced Sumerian techniques in shell, , , and precious metals. The , a trapezoidal wooden box approximately 21.5 by 49.5 centimeters, features shell and stone inlays on its "war" and "peace" sides, illustrating royal banquets, tribute-bearing animals, and battle captives, possibly serving as a soundbox for a or a ceremonial standard. Other notable items from the tombs include Queen Puabi's headdress, composed of over 2,000 small and beads forming floral motifs, and a "Ram in the Thicket" figure of , silver, , and white shell, symbolizing and divine favor. Bull-headed lyres with silver-bearded heads and inlaid soundboxes further highlight Ur's mastery of composite materials and , reflecting themes of kingship, warfare, and afterlife rituals. These works, now housed in institutions like the and Museum, demonstrate Ur's role in pioneering representational art that influenced subsequent Mesopotamian styles. In literature, Ur's legacy endures through the Lamentation over the Destruction of Ur, a Sumerian composition from circa 2000 BCE, penned shortly after the Elamite sack that ended the Third Dynasty of Ur. This 35-tablet poem, part of the Mesopotamian city lament genre, voices the goddess Ningal's grief over the city's ruin, detailing floods, fires, and abandonment by gods like , while invoking cosmic disorder. Preserved in from sites including and Ur itself, it exemplifies Sumerian poetic sophistication with repetitive refrains, mythological allusions, and historical , contributing to the broader corpus of Sumerian that shaped Akkadian and biblical literary traditions. Royal inscriptions from Ur III rulers, such as Ur-Nammu's legal and building hymns, further underscore the city's textual output, blending administrative precision with devotional rhetoric.

Archaeology and Excavations

Leonard Woolley's Campaigns

The Joint Expedition of the British Museum and the University Museum of the University of Pennsylvania, directed by C. Leonard Woolley, conducted excavations at Ur from 1922 to 1934. The project was initiated under British Mandate authority in Iraq, with Woolley selected for his prior experience in Mesopotamian fieldwork, including surveys at Carchemish. Annual campaigns typically ran from October to March, aligning with cooler weather to preserve laborers' productivity and site integrity, involving local Iraqi workers alongside international specialists. Excavation efforts targeted multiple sectors, beginning with clearance around the ziggurat and extending to the royal cemetery southwest of the platform, residential quarters, and harbor areas associated with later periods. In the 1926–1927 season alone, teams uncovered approximately 600 burials within three months, demonstrating the scale of operations. Woolley coordinated with assistants like his wife, Katharine Woolley, for artifact handling and stratigraphic documentation, while navigating logistical challenges such as and artifact transport to for division. Woolley's methodology emphasized stratigraphic control and detailed field records, cataloging artifacts with sequential U-numbers totaling around 20,094 entries across the project. Finds were divided per agreement: half retained in (now at the ), with the remainder equally shared between the sponsoring institutions. This systematic approach yielded comprehensive data on Ur's occupational sequence from the onward, though later analyses have critiqued some interpretive overreach in Woolley's publications. The campaigns concluded in 1934 amid funding constraints and shifting political conditions in .

Royal Tombs Discoveries

The Royal Cemetery at Ur was excavated by from 1926 to 1931 as part of a joint expedition by the and the Museum. The dig uncovered approximately 1,800 burials, of which 16 were classified as royal tombs due to their architectural sophistication and rich . These tombs, dating to the Early Dynastic III period (c. 2600–2400 BCE), consisted of sunken stone chambers with corbelled or vaulted roofs, accessed by steep ramps—unlike simpler pit graves. Woolley's careful stratigraphic documentation preserved details of tomb construction and contents, revealing a funerary complex that included elite individual burials and associated "death pits" containing retainer skeletons. Among the most notable finds was tomb PG 789, linked to (likely a queen or priestess, based on her ), which preserved an intact burial with silver, gold, and items, including a headdress of gold leaves and beads, jewelry, and vessels. Tomb PG 1237, known as the "Great Death Pit," contained 74 skeletons—six courtiers and 68 female attendants—laid out in orderly rows, indicating ritual to accompany a primary burial. Some showed evidence of mercury poisoning or blunt force trauma. The grave goods encompassed masterpieces such as the "Ram in the Thicket" , the with shell, lapis lazuli, and red limestone inlays depicting warfare and banqueting scenes, and a gold helmet inscribed to with repoussé decoration. These thousands of items, crafted from imported materials including lapis lazuli from Afghanistan and obsidian from Anatolia, highlight Ur's extensive trade networks and central role in the region. Across the royal tombs, over 200 retainers—musicians, soldiers, servants, and others—were sacrificed, with bodies often deliberately arranged and some showing signs of preservation attempts using natron or desiccants. Osteological analyses support Woolley's interpretation of these as elite retinue sacrifices, with many deaths likely non-violent (possibly from toxic substances), though debate continues over whether participation was voluntary or coerced, given the lack of defensive wounds. Reanalyses of pottery typology and archival data have refined the cemetery's chronology to seven brief phases, tying it to Ur's prominence before the Akkadian conquest. The artifacts, now primarily in the , , and , provide primary evidence of Sumerian elite ideology, which emphasized provisioning the deceased with wealth and human attendants for the afterlife.

Modern Surveys and Challenges

In the decades following Leonard Woolley's excavations, modern archaeological surveys at Ur have increasingly relied on non-invasive technologies to map the site's urban extent and detect subsurface features without disturbing ancient strata. A 2019 reassessment combining aerial photography, declassified Cold War-era CORONA satellite imagery, and targeted ground surveys delineated the intramural and extramural zones of the Early Dynastic city, revealing a planned urban layout extending over approximately 50 hectares with associated canals and agricultural fields in the hinterland. These methods identified previously undocumented suburbs and peripheral settlements, highlighting Ur's role as a densely occupied port city reliant on riverine trade. Recent advancements in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry and structure-from-motion (SfM) techniques have enabled high-resolution 3D modeling and feature detection at Tell el-Muqayyar. Studies conducted between 2023 and 2025 used UAV flights at altitudes of 120 meters with 70-80% image overlap to generate orthomosaics and digital elevation models, uncovering potential buried structures such as walls and pits near the ziggurat. Hybrid integrations of UAV data with geophysical surveys, including magnetometry, have refined interpretations of the site's hydrology and early urban expansion, confirming the presence of ancient waterways that supported Sumerian agriculture. These surveys emphasize landscape archaeology, shifting focus from tomb-centric digs to broader environmental contexts, though data processing remains computationally intensive and requires ground-truthing limited by access constraints. Fieldwork at Ur faces persistent challenges from Iraq's geopolitical instability, environmental degradation, and resource limitations, which have curtailed systematic surveys since the 1990s Gulf Wars. Ongoing conflicts, including ISIS insurgencies from 2014 to 2017, exacerbated looting and illicit excavations, with satellite monitoring revealing over 1,000 new pits at Mesopotamian sites by 2015, though Ur's core ziggurat zone benefited from partial Iraqi military protection. Preservation efforts are hampered by natural erosion, wind-driven sand abrasion, and episodic flooding from the Euphrates, which have damaged mud-brick structures; for instance, rainwater runoff has undermined conservation patches on the ziggurat since the 1980s. Institutional and logistical barriers, including bureaucratic delays from the Iraqi State Board of Antiquities and Heritage and funding shortages, compound these issues. Experts advocate prioritizing in situ conservation—such as stabilizing exposed walls with chemical consolidants—over new excavations, given the site's vulnerability to tourism (over 100,000 visitors annually pre-COVID) and potential salinization from rising groundwater. Despite UNESCO World Heritage status granted in 2016, implementation of protective zoning remains incomplete, with calls for approaches emphasizing local Iraqi capacity-building to sustain surveys amid intensifying climate variability and aridification.

Biblical and Extrabiblical Identifications

Ur Kasdim Hypothesis

The Ur Kasdim hypothesis identifies the biblical city of Ur Kasdim—Abraham's birthplace and early home in Genesis 11:28 and 11:31—with the ancient Sumerian city of Ur at Tell el-Muqayyar in southern Iraq's Dhi Qar Governorate. This view places Abraham's origins in a major Sumerian city-state that flourished during the Third Dynasty of Ur (c. 2112–2004 BCE), roughly matching traditional chronologies for Abraham around 2000 BCE. The identification emerged in the 19th century after cuneiform decipherment. In 1854, Henry Rawlinson linked the site to biblical Ur using Nabonidus cylinder inscriptions, equating the ancient name "Urim" with "Ur" and interpreting "Kasdim" as referring to the Chaldean region of southern Babylonia. Leonard Woolley's excavations (1922–1934) provided key support by revealing Ur's advanced society, including the Great Ziggurat of the moon god Nanna, royal tombs with rich grave goods (c. 2600–2400 BCE), and evidence of extensive trade networks. Proponents argue that Ur's role as a cultic and commercial hub aligns with the biblical depiction of an idolatrous urban environment from which Abraham was called. The term "Kasdim" is often explained as a later biblical gloss, reflecting Chaldean dominance in southern Mesopotamia during the 9th–6th centuries BCE. Challenges persist. The Chaldeans were West Semitic groups who migrated to southern Mesopotamia only in the late second millennium BCE, making "Kasdim" anachronistic for the third millennium. The migration route from Ur Kasdim to Haran (Genesis 11:31) appears geographically implausible from distant southern Ur, favoring a northern Mesopotamian origin instead. No direct archaeological evidence connects Abraham to the site, despite Ur's well-documented urban sophistication. Despite these issues, the hypothesis remains the dominant scholarly position, supported by Ur's verifiable antiquity and the absence of stronger alternatives.

Alternative Theories and Evidence

The traditional and majority scholarly identification of Ur Kasdim, the biblical birthplace of Abraham (Genesis 11:28, 31), is the ancient city at Tell el-Muqayyar in southern Mesopotamia (modern Iraq). However, the anachronistic reference to "Chaldeans" (Kasdim)—an Aramean group not attested in southern Mesopotamia until the 10th–9th centuries BC—has prompted alternative proposals locating Ur Kasdim in northern Mesopotamia, which better align with the Early or Middle Bronze Age cultural milieu (ca. 2100–1800 BC) of Aramean and Amorite pastoral groups described in Genesis. A prominent northern hypothesis identifies Ur Kasdim with the area near modern Şanlıurfa (Urfa) in southeastern Turkey. Proponents argue that this placement fits the patriarchal migration from Ur to Haran (Genesis 11:31), located roughly 50 km north of Urfa, as a shorter overland journey within the same region before continuing to Canaan—contrasting with the longer route from southern Mesopotamia. Local traditions in Urfa link Abraham to sites such as the Pool of Abraham, though these derive from Hellenistic and medieval sources without direct contemporary confirmation. Other northern candidates include Urkesh (modern Tell Mozan) in northern Syria, suggested due to its Hurrian and Semitic influences during the 3rd–2nd millennia BC and its proximity to trade routes connecting to Haran and Aram-Naharaim (Genesis 24:10). These proposals draw on cuneiform references to "Ur" variants in Upper Mesopotamia and biblical indications of Abraham's Aramean heritage (Deuteronomy 26:5). Critics of northern theories highlight the lack of definitive 2nd-millennium BC inscriptions naming any site "Ur Kasdim" and suggest that "Kasdim" may represent a later editorial gloss by exilic authors projecting contemporary Neo-Babylonian Chaldea onto earlier traditions. While supported by some scholars, including Cyrus Gordon, the northern hypothesis remains a minority position.

Site Preservation and Legacy

Current Condition and Threats

The archaeological site of Ur at Tell el-Muqayyar in Dhi Qar Governorate, southern , remains partially preserved. Its most prominent feature is the restored , originally constructed around 2100 BCE during the Third Dynasty of Ur and partially rebuilt in the 6th century BCE by . The site includes excavated residential areas, the Royal Cemetery with its chamber tombs, and remnants of the sacred precinct of the moon god Nanna, though much of the ancient urban fabric has eroded or been built over. As part of the Ahwar of Southern Iraq UNESCO World Heritage property, inscribed in 2016, Ur receives nominal international recognition. Maintenance depends on Iraq's State Board of Antiquities and Heritage, which faces resource constraints amid national instability. Environmental degradation, exacerbated by climate change, poses major threats. Rising groundwater salinity causes salt crystallization in mud-brick walls, resulting in spalling and disintegration of monuments such as the Royal Cemetery tombs. Increased sandstorms, driven by desertification and reduced Euphrates River flows from upstream damming in Turkey and Iran, accelerate erosion and partial burial of exposed features. The site's proximity to the shrinking riverbed heightens risks of flooding during heavy rains or further desiccation. Human-induced damage adds to these challenges. Looting intensified after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion, with illegal excavations damaging unexcavated areas and removing artifacts. Under Saddam Hussein, asphalt roads were constructed across the ancient city, fragmenting its layout and facilitating unauthorized access. Although ISIS did not target Ur as severely as northern sites like Nimrud, post-conflict instability has perpetuated illicit digging and inadequate security. Urban encroachment from nearby Nasiriyah and insufficient funding for stabilization measures, such as reinforcing the ziggurat's base against wind and salt damage, leave the site vulnerable to irreversible loss without sustained intervention.

Cultural and Historical Impact

![Standard of Ur - peace side.jpg][float-right] Excavations of the Royal Tombs at Ur in the 1920s and 1930s revealed a stratified society with advanced metallurgy, intricate jewelry, and retainer sacrifice around 2600–2400 BCE. These discoveries demonstrated significant cultural and technological sophistication in art and ritual, reshaping views of pre-Bronze Age civilizations. They also highlighted Ur's role in early state formation, with artifacts showing hierarchical structures and economic surplus generated through trade and agriculture. During the Third Dynasty of Ur (c. 2112–2004 BCE), the city served as capital of a large territorial state under rulers such as Ur-Nammu and Shulgi. Thousands of cuneiform tablets record a bureaucratic system that managed labor allocation, taxation, and resource distribution across Mesopotamia. Innovations such as standardized measures and corvée labor marked a peak of Sumerian centralization and influenced later governance models. The Standard of Ur mosaic panels depict warfare on one side and feasting on the other, providing visual evidence of military tactics, elite banquets, and animal husbandry. These scenes reflect Sumerian ideals of kingship, prosperity, and social order. The ziggurat dedicated to the moon god Nanna, built by Ur-Nammu, symbolized divine kingship and remains an archetype of sacred architecture, influencing studies of religious urbanism. Ur's proposed identification as biblical Ur Kasdim (Genesis 11:28–31) has placed it in Abrahamic traditions as Abraham's birthplace, though no direct archaeological evidence supports the patriarchal narratives. This connection links secular archaeology to religious history. In 2016, Ur was inscribed as part of UNESCO's World Heritage Site "The Ahwar of Southern Iraq," recognizing its contributions to human heritage amid ongoing efforts to protect it from environmental and conflict-related threats.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.