Hubbry Logo
ACT UPACT UPMain
Open search
ACT UP
Community hub
ACT UP
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
ACT UP
ACT UP
ACT UP
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP) is an international, grassroots political group working to end the AIDS pandemic. The group works to improve the lives of people with AIDS through direct action, medical research, treatment and advocacy, and working to change legislation and public policies.[1][2][3]

Key Information

ACT UP was formed on March 12, 1987, at the Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center in New York City.[4] Co-founder Larry Kramer was asked to speak as part of a rotating speaker series, and his well-attended speech focused on action to fight AIDS. Kramer spoke out against the state of the Gay Men's Health Crisis (GMHC), which he perceived as politically impotent.[5] Kramer had co-founded the GMHC but had resigned from its board of directors in 1983. According to Douglas Crimp, Kramer posed a question to the audience: "Do we want to start a new organization devoted to political action?" The answer was "a resounding yes." Approximately 300 people met two days later to form ACT UP.[2]

At the Second National March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights, in October 1987, ACT UP New York made their debut on the national stage, as an active and visible presence in both the march, the main rally, and at the civil disobedience at the United States Supreme Court Building the following day.[2][6] Inspired by this new approach to radical, direct action, other participants in these events returned home to multiple cities and formed local ACT UP chapters in Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, Rhode Island, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., and other locations.[2][6][7] ACT UP spread internationally. In many countries separate movements arose based on the American model. For example, the famous gay rights activist Rosa von Praunheim co-founded ACT UP in Germany.

ACT UP New York actions

[edit]
"Silence=Death" poster

Much of the documentation chronicling ACT UP's history is drawn from Douglas Crimp's history of ACT UP, the ACT UP Oral History Project,[8] and the online Capsule History of ACT UP, New York.[9]

Wall Street

[edit]

On March 24, 1987, 250 ACT UP members demonstrated at Wall Street and Broadway to demand greater access to experimental AIDS drugs and for a coordinated national policy to fight the disease.[10] An op-ed article by Larry Kramer published in The New York Times the previous day described some of the issues ACT UP was concerned with.[11] Seventeen ACT UP members were arrested during this civil disobedience.[12]

On March 24, 1988, ACT UP returned to Wall Street for a larger demonstration in which over 100 people were arrested.[13]

On September 14, 1989, seven ACT UP members infiltrated the New York Stock Exchange and chained themselves to the VIP balcony to protest the high price of the only approved AIDS drug, AZT. The group displayed a banner that read, "SELL WELLCOME" referring to the pharmaceutical sponsor of AZT, Burroughs Wellcome, which had set a price of approximately $10,000 per patient per year for the drug, well out of reach of nearly all HIV positive persons. Several days following this demonstration, Burroughs Wellcome lowered the price of AZT to $6,400 per patient per year.[14]

General Post Office

[edit]

ACT UP held their next action at the New York City General Post Office on the night of April 15, 1987, to an audience of people filing last minute tax returns. This event also marked the beginning of the conflation of ACT UP with the Silence=Death Project, which created a poster consisting of a right side up pink triangle (an upside-down pink triangle was used to mark gays in Nazi concentration camps) on a black background with the text "SILENCE = DEATH." Douglas Crimp said this demonstration showed the "media savvy" of ACT UP because the television media "routinely do stories about down-to-the-wire tax return filers." As such, ACT UP was virtually guaranteed media coverage.[2]

Cosmopolitan magazine

[edit]

In January 1988, Cosmopolitan magazine published an article by Robert E. Gould, a psychiatrist, entitled "Reassuring News About AIDS: A Doctor Tells Why You May Not Be At Risk."[2] The main contention of the article was that in unprotected vaginal sex between a man and a woman who both had "healthy genitals" the risk of HIV transmission was negligible, even if the male partner was infected. Women from ACT UP who had been having informal "dyke dinners" met with Gould in person, questioning him about several misleading facts (that penis to vagina transmission is impossible, for example) and questionable journalistic methods (no peer review, bibliographic information, failing to disclose that he was a psychiatrist and not a practitioner of internal medicine), and demanded a retraction and apology.[15] When he refused, in the words of Maria Maggenti, they decided that they "had to shut down Cosmo." According to those who were involved in organizing the action, it was significant in that it was the first time the women in ACT UP organized separately from the main body of the group.[16] Additionally, filming the action itself, the preparation and the aftermath were all consciously planned and resulted in a video short directed by Jean Carlomusto and Maria Maggenti, titled, "Doctor, Liars, and Women: AIDS Activists Say No To Cosmo." The action consisted of approximately 150 activists protesting in front of the Hearst Building (parent company of Cosmopolitan) chanting "Say no to Cosmo!" and holding signs with slogans such as "Yes, the Cosmo Girl CAN get AIDS!"[2] Although the action did not result in any arrests, it brought significant television media attention to the controversy surrounding the article. Phil Donahue, Nightline, and a local talk show called "People Are Talking" all hosted discussions of the article. On the latter, two women, Chris Norwood and Denise Ribble took the stage after the host, Richard Bey, cut Norwood off during an exchange about whether heterosexual women are at risk from AIDS.[17]

Women and the CDC's AIDS definition

[edit]

Following their participation in the Cosmopolitan protest, ACT UP's Women's Caucus targeted the Center for Disease Control for its narrow definition of what constituted HIV/AIDS. While causes of HIV transmission, like unprotected vaginal or anal sex, were similar among both men and women, the symptoms of the virus varied greatly. As historian Jennifer Brier noted, "for men, full-blown AIDS often caused Kaposi's sarcoma, while women experienced bacterial pneumonia, pelvic inflammatory disease, and cervical cancer." Since the CDC's definition did not account for such symptoms as a result of AIDS, American women in the 1980s were often diagnosed with AIDS Related Complex (or ARC) or HIV. "In this process," Brier explained, "these women effectively were denied the Social Security benefits that men with AIDS had fought hard to secure, and won, in the late 1980s."[18] In October 1990, attorney Theresa McGovern filed suit representing 19 New Yorkers who claimed they were unfairly denied disability benefits because of the CDC's narrow definition of AIDS. At an October 2, 1990, protest to raise attention for McGovern's lawsuit, two hundred ACT UP protesters gathered in Washington and chanted "How many more have to die before you say they qualify," and carried posters to the rally with the tagline "Women Don't Get AIDS/ They Just Die From It."[19] The CDC's initial reaction to calls of the revising the AIDS definition included setting the threshold of AIDS for both men and women at a T cell count of under 200. However, McGovern dismissed this suggestion. "Lots of women who show up at hospitals don't get T cells taken. No one knows they have HIV. I knew how many of our clients were dying of AIDS and not counted." Rather, McGovern, along with the ACLU and the New Jersey Women and AIDS Network, called for adding fifteen conditions to the list of the CDC's surveillance case definition, which was eventually adopted in January 1993. Six months later, the Clinton administration revised federal criteria for evaluating HIV status and making it easier for women with AIDS to secure Social Security benefits.[20] The Women's Caucus's role in altering the CDC's definition helped to not only drastically increase availability of federal benefits to American women, but helped uncover a more accurate number of HIV/AIDS infected women in the United States; "under the new model, the number of women with AIDS in the United States increased almost 50 percent."[19]

Members of the ACT UP Women's Caucus collectively authored a handbook for two teach-ins held prior to the 1989 CDC demonstration, where ACT UP members learned about issues motivating the action. The handbook, edited by Maria Maggenti, formed the basis for the ACT UP/New York Women and AIDS Book Group's book titled Women, AIDS and Activism, edited by Cynthia Chris and Monica Pearl, and assembled by Marion Banzhaf, Kim Christensen, Alexis Danzig, Risa Denenberg, Zoe Leonard, Deb Levine, Rachel (Sam) Lurie, Catherine Saalfield (Gund), Polly Thistlethwaite, Judith Walker, and Brigitte Weil.[21] The book was published in Spanish in 1993 titled La Mujer, el SIDA, y el Activismo.[22] Members of the original Women and AIDS Handbook Group included Amy (Jamie) Bauer, Heidi Dorow, Ellen Neipris, Ann Northrop, Sydney Pokorney, Karen Ramspacher, Maxine Wolfe, and Brian Zabcik.[citation needed]

FDA

[edit]

On October 11, 1988, ACT UP had one of its most successful demonstrations (both in terms of size and national media coverage) when it successfully shut down the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) for a day.[23][24] Media reported that it was the largest such demonstration since demonstrations against the Vietnam War.[citation needed]

The AIDS activists shut down the large facility by blocking doors, walkways and a road as FDA workers reported to work. Police told some workers to go home rather than wade through the throng.

"Hey, hey, FDA, how many people have you killed today?" chanted the crowd, estimated by protest organizers at between 1,100 and 1,500. The protesters hoisted a black banner that read "Federal Death Administration."

Police officers, wearing surgical gloves and helmets, started rounding up the hundreds of demonstrators and herding them into buses shortly after 8:30 a.m. Some protesters blocked the buses from leaving for 20 minutes.

Authorities arrested at least 120 protesters, and demonstration leaders said they were aiming for 300 arrests by day's end.[23]

Among the protestors was artist David Wojnarowicz, then HIV/AIDS positive, wearing painted jean jacket that read: "If I die of AIDS—forget burial—just drop my body on the steps of the F.D.A."— a nascent meme.[25] At this action, and via their campaigning in general, activists demonstrated their thorough knowledge of the FDA drug approval process.[26] ACT UP presented precise demands for changes that would make experimental drugs available more quickly, and more fairly. "The success of SEIZE CONTROL OF THE FDA can perhaps best be measured by what ensued in the year following the action. Government agencies dealing with AIDS, particularly the FDA and NIH, began to listen to us, to include us in decision-making, even to ask for our input."[24]

"Stop the Church"

[edit]
Main article: Stop the Church
See also: Anti-Catholicism in the United States

ACT UP disagreed with Cardinal John Joseph O'Connor on the Roman Catholic Archdiocese's public stand against safe sex education in New York City Public Schools, condom distribution, the Cardinal's public condemnation of homosexuality, as well as the Church's opposition to abortion. This led to the first Stop the Church protest on December 10, 1989, at St. Patrick's Cathedral, New York.[9][27][28][29]

Originally, the plan was just to be a "die-in" during the homily but it descended into "pandemonium."[27] A few dozen activists interrupted Mass, chanted slogans, blew whistles, "kept up a banchee screech," chained themselves to pews, threw condoms in the air, waved their fists, and lay down in the aisles to stage a "die-in."[30][31][32][27][33] While O'Connor went on with mass, activists stood up and announced why they were protesting.[29] One protester, "in a gesture large enough for all to see,"[34] desecrated the Eucharist by spitting it out of his mouth, crumbling it into pieces, and dropping them to the floor.[9][30][35][36][37][38][excessive citations]

One hundred and eleven protesters were arrested, including 43 inside the church.[39] Some who refused to move had to be carried out of the church on stretchers.[27] The protests were widely condemned by public and church officials, members of the public, the mainstream media, and some in the gay community.[35]

Saint Vincent's Catholic Medical Center

[edit]

In the 1980s, as the gay population of Greenwich Village and New York began succumbing to the AIDS virus, Saint Vincent's Catholic Medical Center established the first AIDS Ward on the East Coast and second only to one in San Francisco, and soon became "Ground Zero" for the AIDS-afflicted in NYC.[40] The hospital "became synonymous" with care for AIDS patients in the 1980s, particularly poor gay men and drug users.[41] It became one of the best hospitals in the state for AIDS care with a large research facility and dozens of doctors and nurses in its employ.[41]

ACT UP protested the hospital one night in the 1980s due to its Catholic nature.[41] They took over the emergency room and covered crucifixes with condoms.[41] Their intent was both to raise awareness and offend Catholics.[41] Instead of pressing charges, the sisters who ran the hospital decided to meet with the protesters to better understand their concerns.[41]

Storm the NIH

[edit]
Demonstrators at the "Storm the NIH" Event

On May 21, 1990, around 1000 ACT UP members initiated a choreographed demonstration at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland, splitting into sub-groups across the campus. The protest was in part directed at National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and its director, Anthony Fauci.[42] Activists were angered by what they felt was slow progress on promised research and treatment efforts.[43] According to Kramer, this was their best demonstration, but was almost completely ignored by the media because of a large fire in Washington, D.C., on the same day.[citation needed]

Day of Desperation

[edit]

On January 22, 1991, during Operation Desert Storm, ACT UP activist John Weir and two other activists entered the studio of the CBS Evening News at the beginning of the broadcast. They shouted "AIDS is news. Fight AIDS, not Arabs!" and Weir stepped in front of the camera before the control room cut to a commercial break. The same night ACT UP demonstrated at the studios of the MacNeil/Lehrer Newshour. The next day activists displayed banners in Grand Central Terminal that said "Money for AIDS, not for war" and "One AIDS death every 8 minutes." One of the banners was handheld and displayed across the train timetable and the other attached to bundles of balloons that lifted it up to the ceiling of the station's enormous main room. These actions were part of a coordinated protest called "Day of Desperation."[44]

Seattle schools

[edit]

In December 1991, ACT UP's Seattle chapter distributed over 500 safer-sex packets outside Seattle high schools. The packets contained a pamphlet titled "How to Fuck Safely," which was photographically illustrated and included two men performing fellatio. The Washington state legislature subsequently passed a "Harmful to Minors" law making it illegal to distribute sexually explicit material to underage persons.[45]

Macy's Herald Square

[edit]

On November 29, 1991, the Black Friday shopping day, ACT UP activists dressed in Santa Claus costumes chained themselves inside Macy's flagship Herald Square department store to protest the store's decision not to rehire an HIV-positive Santa, Mark Woodley. They sang protest Christmas songs with lyrics such as, "Santa Claus has HIV, fa-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la/Macy's won't rehire he, fa-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la." Nineteen activists were arrested at the action.[46][47]

Boston and New England

[edit]

"In January 1988, [ACT UP/Boston] held its first protest at the Boston offices of the Department of Health and Human Services, regarding delays and red tape surrounding approval of AIDS treatment drugs. ACT UP/Boston's agenda included demands for a compassionate and comprehensive national policy on AIDS; a national emergency AIDS project; intensified drug testing, research, and treatment efforts; and a full-scale national educational program within reach of all. The organization held die-ins and sleep-ins, provided freshman orientation for Harvard Medical School students, negotiated successfully with a major pharmaceutical corporation, affected state and national AIDS policies, pressured health care insurers to provide coverage for people with AIDS, influenced the thinking of some of the nation's most influential researchers, served on the Massachusetts committee that created the nation's first online registry of clinical trials for AIDS treatments, distributed information and condoms to the congregation at Cardinal Bernard Francis Law's Confirmation Sunday services at Holy Cross Cathedral in Boston, and made aerosolized pentamidine an accessible treatment in New England."[7]

In February 1988 ACT UP Boston, in collaboration with ACT UP New York, Mass ACT OUT, and Cure Aids Now demonstrated at both the Democratic and Republican presidential debates and primaries in New Hampshire, and at other events during the presidential race.[48]

During an ordination of priests in Boston in 1990, ACT UP and the Massachusetts Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Civil Rights chanted and protested outside during the service.[49][50][51] The protesters marched, chanted, blew whistles, and sounded airhorns to disrupt the ceremony.[49] They also threw condoms at people as they left the ordination and were forced to stay back behind police and police barricades.[49] One man was arrested.[52] The demonstration was condemned by Leonard P. Zakim, among others.[52]

Los Angeles

[edit]

ACT UP Los Angeles (ACT UP/LA) was founded December 4, 1987, and continued holding demonstrations until the early 2000s. During their run they tackled healthcare access, political issues related to LGBTQ civil rights, and supported national ACT UP campaigns.[53]

Some of their more local work focused on policy regarding the migration of HIV-positive people into the U.S., pushing for AIDS clinical trials, promoting needle exchange programs for intravenous drug users, and surveying speaking out against discrimination by health care and insurance providers.[54] They were effective in distributing their research on Antiviral Therapy (AZT), local and international actions, and updates on the different caucuses through their ACT UP/LA newsletter. The newsletter also served as both an educational outreach and fundraising tool.[citation needed]

Memorable actions by ACT UP/LA are the protests and demonstrations in county-based locations such as the USC county hospital, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, and the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services.[55] ACT UP/LA and about fifteen other organizations formed an "Alternative Budget Coalition," rented the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors' meeting room, and held a mock hearing on the county's $10+ billion budget, saying it spent too little on fighting AIDS.[56] Prominent activists in this period included Connie Norman, one of the people who led ACT UP's push for a bill (AB101) to protect workers from being fired because of their sexuality, California governor Pete Wilson's veto of which led to the AB101 Veto Riot.[57] ACT UP/LA and its associated Women's Caucus put on a “Week of Outrage” in conjunction with the national organization, which consisted of demonstrations, a teach-in, safe-sex vending event.[58]

Women's Caucus ACT UP/LA

[edit]

The Women's Caucus (WC) of ACT UP/LA served an important collaboration between men and women who were being affected by HIV and AIDS.[59] WC within the ACT UP/LA organization was unique because in this chapter they had a significant amount of control over how they included women's issues into the organizations larger gay male actions. Men were present in the WC, but only as allies, which harvested a collaboration for effective actions, rallies, and any acts of resistance for the whole organization as a whole.[60] While the collaboration was not always perfect, at the end it created a stronger force against discrimination of HIV+ people in Los Angeles.[61]

Some of the work that the WC did was distribute statistical information about women who are HIV+, the lack of appropriate screening and health care access, information about safer sex practices (in English and Spanish), as well as acts of action to push for better. Lauren Leary was an integral in the organization because her work revolved around gathering existing research about HIV and AIDS in women and men and current treatment options. An ACT UP national collective of women came together to create the “Women's Treatment and Research Agenda” in 1991.[59]

Washington D.C.

[edit]

Giant condom over Senator's home

[edit]

Peter Staley and other activists affiliated with ACT-UP wrapped the Arlington, Virginia home of Senator Jesse Helms in a 15-foot condom on September 5, 1991. The protest condemned the Helms AIDS Amendments, which continued to block funding for education, as well as his ongoing opposition to People With AIDS, including numerous homophobic falsehoods about HIV and AIDS. Helms had actively passed laws stigmatizing the disease, and his staunch attempts to block federal funding for, and education about, HIV and AIDS had significantly increased the death toll. Some of the harmful legislation he enacted is still in place.[62] The condom was inflated and the message on it read: "A CONDOM TO PREVENT UNSAFE POLITICS. HELMS IS DEADLIER THAN A VIRUS." The event was captured live on the news.[63] This was the first action of the affinity ACT group TAG (Treatment Action Guerillas).[64] While the police were called, no one was arrested, and the group was allowed to take the condom down, though they did receive a parking ticket.[64][62] The event was dramatized, with fictionalized characters, in a 2019 episode of the FX television series POSE.[65]

Ashes Actions

[edit]

In October 1992 and October 1996, during displays of the NAMES Project AIDS Memorial Quilt and just before presidential elections, ACT UP activists held two Ashes Actions.[66] Inspired by a passage in David Wojnarowicz's 1991 memoir Close to the Knives, these actions scattered the ashes of people who had died of AIDS, including Wojnarowicz and activist Connie Norman, on the White House lawn, in protest of the federal government's inadequate response to AIDS.[66]

Canada

[edit]

Vancouver

[edit]

Formed in 1989, ACT UP Vancouver began at a public meeting to determine how to respond to the government's inaction on the AIDS crisis,[67] and focused their activism on the provincial political crises surrounding AIDS.[68] The first ACT UP event took place in Robson Square as a public display of art in which three mummies wrapped in linen hung upside down to depict the inaction and neglect of the provincial government on those affected by AIDS. They organized and participated in various protests, including the Les Misérables at the Queen Elizabeth Theater. They protested against the Premier of British Columbia Bill Vander Zalm who was in favor of enacting quarantine legislation (Bill 34). There was a diverse range of activist groups from the community who protested against Bill 34, there were many members from ACT UP, support from the First Nations community, and politically left-leaning people.[69] Despite its impact, the organization eventually dissolved around 1991, following their State of the Province protest.[70] They stated their dissolution was not due to a lack of commitment from members, but rather a lack of expertise and negative press stemming from arrests, which led to other organizations distancing themselves from ACT UP.[71] One of the arrested members, John Kozachenko, was accused of vehicle damage, though he asserted his innocence and the charges were later dropped.[72] Members felt the incident interfered with the groups's ability to initiate reforms in conservative Vancouver.[73]

Montreal

[edit]

The AIDS crisis in Montreal was very pronounced and is often underrepresented in discussion about the pandemic. ACT UP worked to end the AIDS pandemic and to combat the extreme homophobia that gay men faced as a result of stigma and stereotypes. ACT UP NYC protested the Fifth International AIDS Conference in 1989 and inspired the creation of ACT UP MTL. They also confronted Montreal prisons about their high rates of HIV, which they suggested were due to condoms not being available to prisoners.[74]

ACT UP MTL was formed in March 1990. Despite discouragement by the provincial government and Minister of Health, who felt that public information about AIDS prevention would encourage homosexuality and drug use, ACT UP MTL was responsible for translating English AIDS prevention resources into French and creating their own informational flyers that were accessible to Quebec's Francophone population. The chapter was also responsible for several demonstrations in a Montreal city park to raise awareness about those living with AIDS and those lost to HIV/AIDS complications. In 1994, the park was officially named Le Parc de l’Espoir and an AIDS memorial monument was constructed.[75]

Halifax

[edit]

The creation of ACT UP Halifax is credited to Dan Hart, an activist and leader of the queer movement in Halifax in the 1980s who even hosted many of ACT UP's events in his own home.[76][77][78][79] While this branch of ACT UP is less known in comparison to the larger cities in the United States and Canada, it has made some notable actions during its time. On December 1st, 1990 a protest march was held on Barrington Street. What made this march different was the attendance of Pedro the Donkey, brought by the protestors to be used as a disruption method during the protest.[78][79][77][80] Pedro held true to his purpose and refused to move when protesters were asked to vacate the street. This allowed Halifax's ACT UP group to peacefully protest while staying within the confines of the law.

England and Scotland

[edit]

London

[edit]

Formed in January 1989, by Rob Archer and Rae Trewartha, ACT UP [London] was the first ACT UP chapter in Europe.[81]

Its first action was at Wellcome's annual shareholder meeting, the parent company of Burroughs Wellcome, the makers of AZT, the first treatment that targeted HIV directly.[81]

This was quickly followed by a protest at Pentonville Prison, where condoms were floated over the walls.[82][83]

The next action was to highlight employment discrimination. It was at Texaco's UK headquarters.  It was the first of a serious of protests against Texaco.[84] They later targeted YHA employment discrimination.[85]

The next action blocked traffic at Elephant and Castle, South London's busiest road junction. It called on the government to end the 6 month delay for social security benefits for newly diagnosed people living with AIDS, and to improve the rate. A follow up in October, saw the first arrests in the UK. Three people were arrested including Kenny Lieske from Edinburgh ACT UP.[86] In March 1990, members of ACT UP London chained themselves to the gates of Downing Street on budget day.

ACT UP London's last protest was a march in Kennington on World AIDS Day (1 December 1993). This was on cuts to social security benefits for disability benefits.

The group was revived by Dan Glass in 2014. The second incarnation came about to campaign for PreP to be made freely available on the NHS. Prep is a pill that if taken regularly prevents HIV infection and transmission.[87]

Edinburgh

[edit]

Formed in October 1989, by Kenny Lieske, Rob Archer and Tim Hopkins. Edinburgh had the highest number of HIV cases in Europe, most cases being among drug users.

Edinburgh ACT UP's first protest was on World AIDS Day 1989.  After a march along Princes Street, it ended in a rally where balloons were released. One black balloon was released for each person who had died in Scotland, and one white balloon for each person alive living with AIDS.

Edinburgh ACT UP's next action was actually in London, inside Wellcome's annual shareholders' meeting a year after ACT UP London's protest. It got extensive positive coverage in the Scottish print media (before[88] and after[89] the action) and likewise with the English quality newspapers.[90]

Edinburgh ACT UP's most successful campaign was to change how the government funded AIDS in Scotland. The AIDS budget was poorly allocated often not spent on AIDS services at all. The campaign was to target the funding where it was most needed prioritising regions with the most people with HIV. Edinburgh ACT UP's biggest protest blocked traffic outside of the Scottish Office. It attracted MPs and received extensive media coverage. Within a few months the government had capitulated.[91]

Leeds

[edit]

It was one of the more active groups in the UK. It successfully changed Leeds Hospital Fund's pay out policy to include people with AIDS. Other ACT UPs include Manchester, Glasgow[92] and Norwich.[93]

Structure of ACT UP

[edit]
ACT UP protests in New York City against Uganda's Anti-Homosexuality Bill

ACT UP was organized as effectively leaderless; there was a formal committee structure. Bill Bahlman recalls there were initially two main committees. There was the Issues Committee that scrupulously studied the issues surrounding an advancement the group wanted to achieve and the Actions Committee that would plan a Zap or Demonstration to achieve that particular goal. This was intentional on Larry Kramer's part: he describes it as "democratic to a fault."[11] It followed a committee structure with each committee reporting to a coordinating committee meeting once a week. Actions and proposals were generally brought to the coordinating committee and then to the floor for a vote, but this was not required - any motion could be brought to a vote at any time.[16] Gregg Bordowitz, an early member, said of the process:

This is how grassroots, democratic politics work. To a certain extent, this is how democratic politics is supposed to work in general. You convince people of the validity of your ideas. You have to go out there and convince people.[94]

This is not to say that it was in practice purely anarchic or democratic. Bordowitz and others admit that certain people were able to communicate and defend their ideas more effectively than others. Although Larry Kramer is often labeled the first "leader" of ACT UP, as the group matured, those people that regularly attended meetings and made their voice heard became conduits through which smaller "affinity groups" would present and organize their ideas. Leadership changed hands frequently and suddenly.[94]

  • Some of the Committees were:[citation needed]
    • Issues Committee
    • Action Committee
    • Finance Committee
    • Outreach Committee
    • Treatment and Data Committee
    • Media Committee
    • Graphics Committee
    • Housing Committee

Note: As ACT UP had no formal organizing plan, the titles of these committees are somewhat variable and some members remember them differently than others.

In addition to Committees, there were also Caucuses, bodies set up by members of particular communities to create space to pursue their needs. Among those active in the late 1980s and/or early 1990s were the Women's Caucus (sometimes referred to as the Women's Committee)[95] and the Latino/Latina Caucus.[96]

Along with committees and caucuses, ACT UP New York relied heavily on "affinity groups." These groups often had no formal structure, but were centered on specific advocacy issues and personal connections, often within larger committees. Affinity groups supported overall solidarity in larger, more complex political actions through the mutual support provided to members of the group. Affinity groups often organized to perform smaller actions within the scope of a larger political action, such as the "Day of Desperation," as well as when the Needle Exchange group presented NY City Health Department officials with thousands of used syringes they had collected through their exchange (contained in water cooler bottles).[97][98][99]

Gran Fury

[edit]

Gran Fury functioned as the anonymous art collective that produced all of the artistic media for ACT UP. The group remained anonymous because it allowed the collective to function as a cohesive unit without any one voice being singled out. The mission of the group was to bring an end to the AIDS Crisis by making reference to the issues plaguing society at large, especially homophobia and the lack of public investment in the AIDS epidemic, through bringing art works into the public sphere in order to reach the maximum audience. The group often faced censorship in their proceedings, including being rejected for public billboard space and being threatened with censorship in art exhibitions. When faced with this censorship, Gran Fury often posted their work illegally on the walls of the streets.[100]

DIVA-TV

[edit]

DIVA-TV, an acronym for "Damned Interfering Video Activist Television," was an affinity group within ACT UP that videotaped and documented AIDS activism. Its founding members are Catherine Gund, Ray Navarro, Ellen Spiro, Gregg Bordowitz, Robert Beck, Costa Pappas, Jean Carlomusto, Rob Kurilla, George Plagianos.[101] One of their early works is "Like a Prayer" (1991), documenting the 1989 ACT UP protests at St. Patrick's Cathedral against New York Cardinal O'Connor's position on AIDS and contraception. In the video, Ray Navarro, an ACT UP/DIVA TV activist,[102] serves as the narrator, dressed up as Jesus. The documentary aims to show mass media bias as it juxtaposes original protest footage with those images shown on the nightly news.

Although less as a "collective" after 1990, DIVA TV continued documenting (over 700 camera hours) the direct actions of ACT UP, activists, and the community responses to HIV/AIDS, producing over 160 video programs for public access television channels - as the weekly series "AIDS Community Television" from 1991 to 1996[103] and from 1994 to 96 the weekly call-in public access series "ACT UP Live"; film festival screenings; and continuing on-line documentation and streaming internet webcasts. The video activism of DIVA TV ultimately switched media in 1997 with the establishing and continuing development of the ACT UP (New York) website. The most recent DIVA TV-genre video program documenting the history and activism of ACT UP (New York) is the feature-length documentary: "Fight Back, Fight AIDS: 15 Years of ACT UP" (2002), screened at the Berlin Film Festival and exhibited worldwide. DIVA TV programs and camera-original videotapes are currently re-mastered, archived and preserved, and publicly accessible in the collection of the "AIDS Video Activist Video Preservation Project" at the New York Public Library.[104]

Institutional independence

[edit]

ACT UP had an early debate about whether to register the organization as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit in order to allow contributors tax exemptions. Eventually they decided against it, because as Maria Maggenti said, "they didn't want to have anything to do with the government."[15] This kind of uncompromising ethos characterized the group in its early stages;[editorializing] eventually it led to a split between those in the group who wanted to remain wholly independent and those who saw opportunities for compromise and progress by "going inside [the institutions and systems they were fighting against]."[105]

Later years

[edit]
Change of civil status, free and liberated, ACTUP Paris, trans march, Paris 2017

ACT UP, while extremely prolific and certainly effective at its peak, suffered from extreme internal pressures over the direction of the group and of the AIDS crisis. After the action at NIH, these tensions resulted in an effective severing of the Action Committee and the Treatment and Data Committee, which reformed itself as the Treatment Action Group (TAG).[105][106] Several members describe this as a "severing of the dual nature of ACT UP."

In 2000, ACT UP/Chicago was inducted into the Chicago Gay and Lesbian Hall of Fame.[107]

ACT UP chapters continue to meet and protest, albeit with a smaller membership. ACT UP/NY and ACT UP/Philadelphia are particularly robust, with other chapters active elsewhere. Activists from this group started giving out syringes illegally as Prevention Point Philadelphia.[108]

Housing Works, New York's largest AIDS service organization and Health GAP, which fights to expand treatment for people with AIDS throughout the world, are direct outgrowths of ACT UP.

Mattilda Bernstein Sycamore, who was a member of ACT UP San Francisco, is currently working on a new anthology of writing by current and former members of ACT UP chapters in the US and around the world, titled ACT UP Beyond New York: Stories and Strategies from a Movement to End the AIDS Crisis, which will be published by Haymarket Books.[109]

Factionalism in San Francisco

[edit]

In 2000, ACT UP/Golden Gate changed its name to Survive AIDS, to avoid confusion with ACT UP/San Francisco (ACT UP/SF). The two had previously split apart in 1990, but continued to share the same essential philosophy. In 1994, ACT UP/SF began rejecting the scientific consensus regarding the cause of AIDS and the connection to HIV, and the two groups became openly hostile to each other, with mainstream gay and AIDS organizations also condemning ACT UP/SF.[110] ACT UP/SF would link up with People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) against animal research into AIDS cures.[110] Restraining orders have been granted after ACT UP/SF members physically attacked AIDS charities that help HIV-positive patients,[111] and activists associated with the chapter have been found guilty of misdemeanor charges laid after threatening phone calls to journalists and public health officials.[112]

See also

[edit]

Organizations

People

Media and Research

References

[edit]

Works cited

[edit]
  • ACT UP/New York Women and AIDS Book Group (1990). "Women, AIDS, and Activism." South End Press.
  • ACT UP/New York Women and AIDS Book Group (1993). "La Mujer, el SIDA, y el Activismo." South End Press.
  • Brier, Jennifer (2009). "Infectious Ideas: U.S. Political Responses to the AIDS Crisis." University of North Carolina Press.
  • Laurence, Leslie (1997). "Outrageous Practices: How Gender Bias Threatens Women's Health." Rutgers University Press.
  • Faderman, Lillian (2015). The Gay Revolution. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 9781451694130.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

ACT UP

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
ACT UP, an acronym for AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power, is a decentralized activist organization founded in March 1987 in to combat the AIDS epidemic through direct-action protests targeting government inaction, pharmaceutical delays, and institutional indifference. The group emerged amid rising deaths, primarily among gay men and intravenous drug users, demanding accelerated drug development, expanded clinical trials, and increased federal funding for research and treatment. Employing tactics such as die-ins, building occupations, and traffic blockades, ACT UP chapters worldwide disrupted operations at agencies like the (FDA) and (NIH) to force policy shifts. Key achievements included pressuring the FDA to implement expedited review processes, reducing approval times for drugs from years to months via mechanisms like the parallel track policy, which allowed broader access to experimental treatments outside traditional trials. These reforms, alongside advocacy for affordable generics and community involvement in trials, contributed to the approval of over 40 therapies and a scaling up of global treatment access. Funding for AIDS research also surged, with NIH budgets rising substantially in response to sustained demonstrations highlighting bureaucratic delays amid thousands of preventable deaths. However, ACT UP's confrontational methods sparked controversies, including over 7,000 arrests for actions deemed disruptive or illegal, such as invading St. Patrick's Cathedral during Mass to protest opposition to distribution and safer . Critics argued that tactics like public "outings" of influential figures and internal factionalism alienated potential allies, exacerbated racial and gender tensions within the movement, and prioritized spectacle over sustainable policy engagement. Despite internal fractures leading to splinter groups like Treatment Action Group, ACT UP's model influenced subsequent and protest strategies, though its legacy remains debated for balancing urgency-driven lawbreaking against long-term institutional trust.

Founding and Early Development

Origins in the AIDS Crisis Context

The AIDS epidemic began in the United States with the reporting of five cases of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia among gay men in on June 5, 1981, by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), marking the first recognized cluster of what would be identified as acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Initially termed gay-related immune deficiency (GRID), the condition involved profound immunosuppression leading to opportunistic infections and cancers, with early mortality rates near 100% absent treatments. Transmission occurred primarily through sexual contact, , and , rapidly concentrating in communities of men who have sex with men (MSM) and intravenous drug users, where high-risk behaviors such as unprotected anal intercourse and shared needles accelerated spread. By 1985, AIDS cases exceeded those of all prior years combined, with cumulative deaths surpassing 5,000 and climbing rapidly amid diagnostic advances revealing widespread infection. Societal stigma portrayed the as a consequence of moral deviance tied to homosexuality and drug use, fostering reluctance for comprehensive measures like or venue closures, while moralistic rhetoric from some officials delayed campaigns. The Reagan administration allocated minimal funding initially—less than $10 million in 1982 for a killing hundreds—prioritizing other health initiatives despite C. Everett Koop's later advocacy for frank prevention . President Reagan's first public acknowledgment of AIDS came on September 17, 1985, during a , after over 5,500 deaths, framing it as a priority yet yielding slow acceleration in research at the (NIH). Pharmaceutical development lagged, with no approved therapies until azidothymidine (AZT) in 1987, burdened by lengthy FDA approval processes averaging years for trials. This confluence of epidemiological explosion, institutional inertia, and cultural denial—exacerbated by perceptions of the crisis as self-inflicted within marginalized groups—generated profound frustration, culminating in demands for expedited action from affected communities by the mid-1980s.

Formation and Initial Leadership

ACT UP, the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power, emerged in in March 1987 amid escalating frustration with government inaction on the AIDS epidemic, which had claimed over 15,000 American lives by that point. The organization's formation was catalyzed by a speech delivered by playwright and activist on March 10, 1987, at the Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center, where he lambasted the complacency of the LGBT community and federal authorities, urging the creation of a militant group to confront pharmaceutical profiteering, bureaucratic delays in drug approvals, and inadequate public health responses. This address, attended by a packed audience, directly precipitated the inaugural meeting and establishment of ACT UP as a diverse coalition of activists committed to . From its inception, ACT UP adopted a deliberately non-hierarchical structure, eschewing formal leadership titles in favor of consensus-based decision-making through weekly general meetings open to all members, reflecting a commitment to broad participation over centralized authority. Larry Kramer, who had previously co-founded the Gay Men's Health Crisis in 1981, served as a pivotal founding influence but held no official role; his confrontational style and prior advocacy shaped the group's aggressive ethos, though internal tensions arose early due to his insistence on prioritizing treatment access over broader social issues. Other early participants, drawn from artists, scientists, and affected individuals, included figures like Maxine Wolfe, a psychologist who contributed to strategic planning, but the initial cohort emphasized collective agency without designated heads, enabling rapid mobilization for its debut protest on Wall Street on March 24, 1987, which targeted high drug prices and drew hundreds of demonstrators. This leaderless model, while fostering innovation, later amplified factional disputes as the group expanded.

Ideology and Objectives

Core Principles and Demands

ACT UP's core principles centered on a commitment to as the primary means to address the AIDS crisis, emphasizing urgency, nonpartisanship, and collective anger to compel systemic change from government agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and other institutions. The group's described it as "a diverse, nonpartisan group of individuals, united in anger, and committed to to end the AIDS crisis," reflecting a focus on pragmatic, results-oriented rather than ideological purity or electoral politics. This approach rejected complacency in the face of government inaction and bureaucratic delays, prioritizing empirical outcomes like accelerated drug access over symbolic gestures. Key demands from ACT UP's founding in 1987 included the immediate release of all experimental AIDS drugs to patients, bypassing lengthy approval processes that were delaying potentially life-saving treatments amid rising death tolls—over 59,000 AIDS-related deaths in the U.S. by 1990. They called for a massive increase in funding for AIDS research at agencies like the (NIH) and (FDA), criticizing the Reagan administration's initial allocation of just $1.7 billion in federal AIDS funding by 1987 as insufficient relative to the crisis's scale. Additional demands encompassed prohibiting discrimination against (PWAs) in employment, housing, insurance, and treatment; mandating large-scale public education campaigns to curb transmission; and releasing all AIDS-related data, such as lists of contaminated blood donors, to enable informed prevention. These were articulated in early protests, such as the March 24, 1987, demonstration against exorbitant AZT pricing—initially $10,000 annually per patient—and demands for "parallel track" access to unapproved therapies. ACT UP also advocated for PWAs' right to self-advocacy in treatment decisions, including access to unproven therapies when standard options failed, challenging medical and institutional gatekeeping that prioritized regulatory caution over patient survival. This principle influenced later policy shifts, such as FDA reforms in 1988-1990 that expanded compassionate use programs and expedited approvals, directly crediting activist pressure for reducing approval times from years to months for certain antiretrovirals. Demands extended to ending profiteering by pharmaceutical firms, with calls for and transparency in drug development costs, as evidenced by arrests of 17 activists during the inaugural action protesting Burroughs Wellcome's monopoly on AZT. While focused on AIDS-specific reforms, these principles underscored a broader causal view: that institutional inertia and profit motives were exacerbating mortality, necessitating confrontational tactics to enforce accountability.

Relationship to Broader Activism

ACT UP emerged within the broader context of post-Stonewall gay liberation efforts, drawing participants from established LGBTQ activist networks who sought more confrontational tactics amid the AIDS crisis's devastation of gay communities. Founded in March 1987 in New York City, the group built on the momentum of 1969's Stonewall riots and subsequent gay rights organizing, but shifted focus to direct action against perceived governmental neglect of HIV/AIDS, which by 1987 had killed over 20,000 primarily gay men in the U.S. Early ACT UP members, including figures like Vito Russo from gay liberation circles, integrated demands for AIDS treatment access with challenges to societal homophobia, reclaiming symbols like the pink triangle—originally a Nazi marker for homosexuals—for protest graphics such as the "Silence = Death" poster produced by its Gran Fury collective in 1987. This symbolism linked AIDS activism to historical queer persecution, amplifying ties to gay rights struggles. The organization's structure and strategies also reflected influences from feminist and , particularly through the involvement of lesbian activists who brought consensus-based decision-making and models honed in women's liberation groups of the 1970s. ACT UP's emphasis on nonviolent echoed tactics from the U.S. civil rights era, such as sit-ins and marches, while adapting them for pharmaceutical and institutional targets; for instance, its 1989 "Stop the Church" protest against Catholic opposition to education drew on feminist critiques of religious . Women, often lesbians, played key roles in campaigns addressing gender-specific AIDS issues, like expedited drug approvals for pregnant women with , fostering intersections with reproductive rights activism. However, internal tensions arose over racial and class dynamics, with critiques from members of color highlighting ACT UP's predominantly white, middle-class composition despite efforts to incorporate Black liberation influences and disability rights perspectives. ACT UP's model of decentralized, media-savvy extended its impact beyond AIDS, inspiring and while influencing tactics in diverse movements. By the early , chapters proliferated internationally, adapting U.S. strategies to local contexts, such as ACT UP/Golden Gate's coalitions with advocates or European groups linking AIDS to anti-colonial health inequities. Its success in pressuring policy changes—like FDA fast-tracking of AZT in 1987—demonstrated the efficacy of disruption, a blueprint later echoed in campaigns post-, including equality pushes that built on ACT UP's visibility gains, and even non-LGBTQ efforts like anti-globalization protests. Critics note that ACT UP's radicalism waned as institutional integration grew, but its legacy endures in emphasizing affected communities' leadership over elite lobbying in organizing.

Organizational Framework

Decentralized Structure and Affinity Groups

ACT UP adopted a decentralized organizational model that eschewed traditional hierarchies, enabling rapid mobilization across independent chapters while fostering local autonomy. Established in on March 12, 1987, the group expanded to over 80 chapters worldwide by the early 1990s, each operating independently without a national governing body or mandatory coordination, which allowed adaptation to regional contexts but occasionally led to inconsistencies in strategy and messaging. This structure drew from anarchist and direct-action traditions, prioritizing volunteer-driven initiatives over centralized leadership, with no paid staff and decisions made through open weekly meetings using modified rather than pure consensus to resolve disputes efficiently. Within chapters, such as ACT UP/New York, the absence of formal leaders meant influence arose from consistent participation and committee work, promoting broad involvement but risking factionalism as membership grew to thousands. Meetings, often attended by hundreds, focused on agenda items proposed by working groups, with votes taken by majority or two-thirds thresholds when consensus stalled, reflecting a pragmatic balance between inclusivity and decisiveness amid the urgency of the AIDS crisis. This non-hierarchical approach, while empowering diverse voices—including those of people living with —contrasted with more rigid activist models and contributed to both innovative tactics and internal debates over tactics like needle exchange programs. Affinity groups formed the tactical backbone of this structure, consisting of 5 to 15 members who self-organized around shared skills, identities, or action-specific goals to plan direct actions, provide mutual support during arrests, and distribute risks in mass mobilizations. These autonomous units, inspired by anti-nuclear and feminist organizing precedents, operated outside formal chapter oversight, enabling specialized efforts like the Gran Fury graphics collective's visual campaigns while ensuring participants could scout routes, handle legal logistics, or care for arrested comrades without central directives. For instance, during the December 10, 1989, "Stop the Church" protest against Cardinal John O'Connor, multiple affinity groups coordinated blockades and disruptions at St. Patrick's Cathedral, demonstrating how this model scaled participation—drawing over 5,000 demonstrators—while maintaining flexibility and accountability through debriefs at chapter meetings. Critics within and outside ACT UP noted that affinity groups sometimes bypassed broader democratic input, potentially prioritizing subsets, yet their role in sustaining momentum during the epidemic's peak underscored the decentralized framework's effectiveness for high-stakes .

Support Collectives like Gran Fury and DIVA-TV

ACT UP's model fostered specialized support collectives that enhanced direct actions through media and visual strategies, countering perceived government and media inaction on the AIDS crisis. These groups operated autonomously but aligned with ACT UP's demands for accelerated drug trials, increased funding, and public awareness. Gran Fury and DIVA-TV exemplified this approach, producing provocative graphics and video documentation that bypassed traditional media channels. Gran Fury, established in January 1988 within ACT UP/New York, functioned as a graphics collective of 10 to 12 members focused on art to publicize AIDS-related grievances. Named after a Plymouth police car model symbolizing state repression, the group began with illegal poster wheat-pasting and Xerox flyers, evolving to design stickers, T-shirts, and billboards critiquing figures like President and pharmaceutical pricing. Key works included the 1989 "Kissing Doesn't Kill" campaign challenging homophobia and the 1990 "Welcome to America" installation at the , which juxtaposed AIDS statistics with consumerist imagery to highlight disparities in healthcare access. Gran Fury's output, distributed at protests and exhibitions, aimed to exploit visual media for political impact, with over 100 projects by the mid-1990s. DIVA-TV, or Damned Interfering Video Activist Television, formed in 1989 as ACT UP/New York's video to document demonstrations and produce counter-narratives against portrayals of AIDS . Comprising filmmakers like Gregg Bordowitz, Catherine Gund, and Jean Carlomusto, the collective captured over 700 hours of footage from events such as the 1989 "Stop the Church" protest and the 1990 "Target City Hall" action, editing them into short films like "Pride '89" and "Like a ." These videos, screened at community centers and compiled into series like Deep Dish TV, emphasized activist perspectives on policy failures, including delays in AZT distribution and FDA approvals. DIVA-TV's work extended to training members in guerrilla filming techniques, ensuring raw, unfiltered records that supported legal defenses and historical archiving. Both collectives amplified ACT UP's reach by integrating art and media into , with Gran Fury's static visuals complementing DIVA-TV's dynamic footage to sustain public pressure into the . Their efforts contributed to tangible outcomes, such as heightened awareness leading to policy shifts, though internal debates arose over aesthetic versus explicit messaging.

Activism Tactics

Direct Action and Civil Disobedience

ACT UP's direct action tactics emphasized nonviolent civil disobedience to highlight government and pharmaceutical industry inaction on the AIDS crisis, drawing from civil rights and anti-apartheid movements. Activists disrupted public spaces, government proceedings, and corporate events through methods such as die-ins—where participants lay motionless to symbolize AIDS deaths—blocking building entrances, chaining themselves to structures, and infiltrating speeches to interrupt proceedings. These actions aimed to force media coverage and policy concessions by creating immediate, visible spectacles of urgency. The group's inaugural demonstration on March 24, 1987, targeted to protest high costs of AIDS drugs like AZT from Burroughs Wellcome, involving approximately 250 participants who halted trading on the floor and resulted in 17 arrests for . Subsequent tactics included large-scale die-ins, such as those during protests at the (FDA) headquarters on September 14, 1988, where over 1,000 activists participated, leading to 132 arrests after blocking access and staging mock funerals. Disruptions extended to religious and political venues, including a 1989 invasion of St. Patrick's Cathedral mass led by Cardinal John O'Connor, criticized by ACT UP for his stance on use and , resulting in arrests amid chants and banner displays. Over its peak years from to the mid-1990s, ACT UP orchestrated hundreds of such actions across U.S. chapters, amassing thousands of arrests—estimated at over 7,000 nationwide—to pressure institutions for faster drug approvals and increased . Tactics evolved to include "zaps" of officials' speeches, where activists seized microphones or threw symbolic items like fake blood, ensuring confrontational visibility without reliance on traditional petitions. While effective in catalyzing regulatory reforms, these methods drew criticism for their abrasiveness, though ACT UP maintained they were proportionate responses to delayed treatments contributing to preventable deaths.

Media Manipulation and Visual Strategies

ACT UP utilized visual strategies through affinity groups like Gran Fury, formed in 1988, to generate materials including posters, stickers, shirts, and pins that conveyed concise, provocative messaging on the AIDS crisis. These graphics provided a unified visual identity for the organization, enhancing cohesion during protests and public interventions. Gran Fury's designs often repurposed mainstream imagery, such as newspaper portraits of politicians, combined with attention-grabbing techniques to government inaction and pharmaceutical . A seminal visual element was the adoption of the "Silence=Death" motif, featuring an inverted —a Nazi-era symbol of homosexual persecution—paired with the slogan demanding political response to the epidemic. Originally produced by the Silence=Death collective in late 1986 and early 1987 as wheatpasted posters in , it was integrated into ACT UP's campaigns shortly after the group's founding in March 1987, appearing on apparel and placards to symbolize the consequences of governmental and societal silence. Other notable Gran Fury works included the 1989 "Kissing Doesn't Kill" bus poster juxtaposing with a same-sex kiss to challenge moralistic rhetoric on AIDS transmission, and the "Read My Lips" series parodying political ads to highlight funding shortfalls. These visuals aimed to disrupt public complacency by exploiting shock and irony, though their aggressive style drew criticism for alienating potential allies. To manipulate media coverage and counter perceived neglect or bias in mainstream outlets, ACT UP orchestrated direct actions as visual spectacles tailored for television, including die-ins, street blockades, and symbolic disruptions timed to coincide with news cycles. Demonstrators wore coordinated Gran Fury-designed shirts and carried uniform signage, such as "AIDSgate" placards accusing officials of negligence, to ensure legible, quotable messaging amid chaos. Complementing this, the DIVA-TV , established in 1989 as "Damned Interfering Video Activists," documented over 700 hours of footage from actions, producing edited videos for distribution via activist networks and public access channels. This self-produced media served as a counter-narrative tool, allowing ACT UP to bypass editorial filters and amplify unvarnished depictions of protests and policy failures, marking an early adoption of video technology for grassroots activism.

Major U.S. Campaigns

Actions Targeting Government Agencies

ACT UP directed significant direct actions against U.S. government agencies responsible for AIDS , drug regulation, and policy, criticizing bureaucratic delays in approving treatments and allocating resources amid the escalating . These protests highlighted perceived governmental , with activists demanding expedited clinical trials, parallel approval tracks for experimental drugs, and increased for AIDS-specific . On October 11, 1988, ACT UP coordinated its first national demonstration, "Seize Control of the FDA," involving approximately 1,500 activists who encircled the headquarters in . Protesters carried mock tombstones symbolizing daily AIDS deaths and blocked entrances, resulting in over 100 arrests while chanting demands for streamlined drug approval processes to make experimental therapies accessible to dying patients. The action pressured the FDA to engage with activists, contributing to subsequent policy shifts under new Commissioner David Kessler, including programs and faster review timelines for AIDS drugs. In May 1990, ACT UP escalated with "Storm the NIH," mobilizing over 1,000 participants to the campus in , on May 21. Demonstrators disrupted operations by occupying buildings, deploying smoke bombs, and affixing symbolic labels to research facilities critiquing slow progress; demands centered on prioritizing AIDS research, diversifying clinical trials to include women and minorities, and implementing community oversight in study design. The event led to arrests exceeding 100 and prompted NIH Director James Wyngaarden to meet with activists, influencing expansions in funding and trial inclusivity. ACT UP also targeted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), protesting in 1990 outside its headquarters to challenge narrow AIDS surveillance definitions that excluded opportunistic infections predominantly affecting women, intravenous drug users, and hemophiliacs. These actions, part of a multi-year campaign, contributed to the CDC's 1992 revision broadening the case definition, thereby increasing reported cases and federal funding allocations. Additional disruptions, such as die-ins and blockades at Department of Health and Human Services facilities, underscored demands for coordinated federal response but yielded fewer immediate structural changes compared to FDA and NIH engagements.

Protests Against Pharmaceutical Industry

ACT UP's protests against the centered on accusations of profiteering from exorbitantly priced AIDS medications and delays in . On March 24, 1987, the group organized its inaugural demonstration on , targeting companies like Burroughs Wellcome for charging approximately $10,000 annually for (AZT), the first approved antiretroviral drug, which activists argued created an unaffordable monopoly amid the escalating AIDS crisis. Seventeen participants were arrested during the action, which highlighted how patent protections enabled high margins on treatments for a fatal affecting primarily marginalized populations. Subsequent campaigns intensified scrutiny on Burroughs Wellcome's AZT pricing strategy. In September 1989, a wave of demonstrations erupted, including a rally of about 350 activists on September 14 at the , protesting projected profits exceeding $1 billion from AZT sales while access remained limited for low-income patients. Activists contended that the company's pricing—initially set at $8,000 to $10,000 per year per patient—prioritized revenue over equitable distribution, despite federal funding contributing to AZT's development through taxpayer-supported trials. These actions yielded measurable concessions from the industry. Within weeks of the 1987 Wall Street protest, Burroughs Wellcome announced plans to expand AZT access programs, though activists dismissed them as insufficient; by late 1989, following sustained pressure, the company reduced the annual price to $6,400 per patient, a 20% cut attributed by ACT UP to their campaigns despite the firm's claim of prior intent. The protests also amplified demands for parallel track mechanisms and compassionate use protocols, indirectly compelling pharmaceutical firms to accelerate experimental distribution to avoid further reputational and financial backlash. Overall, ACT UP's tactics exposed structural incentives in the industry for delaying generic and inflating costs, contributing to broader reforms in transparency and access during the .

Confrontations with Institutions and Media

ACT UP members staged a major protest known as "Stop the Church" on December 10, 1989, outside and inside St. Patrick's Cathedral in , targeting the Roman Catholic Archdiocese's opposition to condom distribution and amid the AIDS epidemic. Approximately 5,000 demonstrators gathered, organized jointly with Women's Health Action and Mobilization (WHAM!), to challenge Cardinal John O'Connor's public statements condemning , , and safer-sex practices, which activists contended exacerbated HIV transmission by discouraging preventive measures. Several hundred protesters entered the cathedral during the 10:15 a.m. Mass, chanting slogans and distributing condoms, leading to disruptions that prompted police intervention and the arrest of 111 individuals on charges including . The action highlighted tensions between ACT UP's demands for evidence-based policies and the Archdiocese's doctrinal positions, with protesters accusing church leaders of prioritizing moral teachings over empirical data on disease prevention. O'Connor's against municipal for AIDS programs that included explicit safer-sex messaging was cited as a direct barrier to reducing infections, particularly among high-risk populations. While the drew widespread media attention, it also elicited backlash from conservative outlets and church officials, who framed the disruption as an on religious freedom rather than a of institutional influence on . ACT UP also directed criticism toward outlets for inadequate or biased AIDS reporting, as seen in their response to a 1987 New York Times article that downplayed the urgency of experimental treatments. Activists argued that such coverage reflected institutional reluctance to confront pharmaceutical pricing and regulatory delays, often relying on official sources without sufficient scrutiny of data on patient outcomes. In one instance, ACT UP members publicly questioned Times reporters on their selective emphasis, asserting that behind-the-scenes skepticism about activist claims undermined public awareness of verifiable mortality statistics—over 52,000 U.S. AIDS deaths by 1989. These exchanges underscored ACT UP's strategy of leveraging direct actions to force media accountability, though coverage frequently portrayed the group as disruptive rather than data-driven.

International Activities

Expansion to Canada

ACT UP's influence reached Canada prominently through collaboration at the Fifth International Conference on AIDS in in June 1989, where members from the New York chapter joined forces with Canadian groups AIDS Action Now! from and Réaction-SIDA to stage a takeover of the , demanding greater inclusion of (PWAs) in research and policy discussions and criticizing inadequate funding for community-based responses. This event highlighted the export of ACT UP's direct-action model northward, inspiring the formal establishment of dedicated chapters. The Montreal chapter, ACT UP/Montréal, was founded in 1990, directly modeled after the U.S. prototype, with early activities including visual protests, poster campaigns, and die-ins to pressure pharmaceutical companies and government officials for faster drug access and research prioritization. Members, such as those documented in archival videos from 1990 to 1993, focused on bilingual activism in Quebec, compiling media coverage of disruptions targeting institutional neglect, and contributed to community landmarks like Parc de l'Espoir, an AIDS memorial park established to commemorate victims and sustain visibility. In , ACT UP began operations in July 1990, adopting tactics but operating on a narrower scope than U.S. counterparts, with protests such as a 50-person demonstration outside a Social Credit party convention decrying discriminatory policies amid rising infections among marginalized groups. The group emphasized local epidemics, including intravenous drug use, while maintaining relative discretion compared to more confrontational chapters elsewhere. Toronto did not develop a formal ACT UP chapter; instead, AIDS Action Now!, established in the late , functioned as a parallel militant organization, collaborating on cross-border actions like the 1989 Montreal seizure and employing similar strategies of media stunts and policy confrontations to advocate for treatment equity without paid staff or pharmaceutical funding. These Canadian efforts, while smaller in scale, mirrored ACT UP's decentralized affinity-group structure and contributed to national shifts in policy by amplifying demands for patient involvement and expedited approvals.

Efforts in Europe

ACT UP established its first European chapter in in 1989, marking the beginning of organized against inadequate responses to the AIDS crisis in the region. The group targeted pharmaceutical companies, including an early action protesting Burroughs Wellcome's pricing and distribution of AZT, employing tactics such as die-ins and visual disruptions to demand affordable treatments and research funding. In , ACT UP-Paris was founded in June 1989 by activists including Didier Lestrade, drawing inspiration from the New York model to address delays in treatment access and policy. The chapter conducted high-profile demonstrations, such as occupying pharmaceutical offices and , to pressure for expanded clinical trials and inclusion of women and injecting drug users in AIDS definitions, which had previously excluded many affected groups from benefits. By the early , ACT UP-Paris had influenced French policy through participation in the National Agency for AIDS Research (ANRS), advocating for evidence-based protocols and challenging restrictive eligibility criteria for antiretrovirals. These efforts contributed to broader access to therapies, though the group faced resistance from authorities prioritizing cost controls over rapid deployment.30506-5/abstract) Chapters emerged in other countries, including , , and Barcelona, Spain, by the early 1990s, focusing on local issues like immigration-related barriers to care and pharmaceutical monopolies. In , activists protested at international AIDS conferences, such as the 1993 event, to highlight disparities in global treatment equity and demand accountability from European regulators. European ACT UP groups coordinated transnationally, sharing tactics like media stunts and legal challenges to harmonize EU-wide standards for drug approval, though fragmented national policies limited unified impact. Despite achievements in raising awareness—evidenced by increased funding allocations in and the by the mid-1990s—these efforts often encountered backlash for disruptive methods, with critics arguing they alienated policymakers without proportional policy shifts.30506-5/abstract)

Policy Achievements

Reforms in Drug Approval and Access

ACT UP's campaigns significantly influenced U.S. (FDA) policies on expediting approvals and expanding access to experimental treatments for during the 1980s and early 1990s. Through direct actions such as the "Seize Control of the FDA" protest on October 11, 1988, which involved over 1,000 demonstrators blocking entrances to FDA headquarters in , the group demanded accelerated research, development, and approval of AIDS drugs, criticizing the agency's traditional multi-phase trial requirements as unduly restrictive for patients facing imminent death. This pressure contributed to FDA Commissioner David Kessler later acknowledging ACT UP's role in altering the agency's approach to the AIDS crisis, leading to procedural reforms that prioritized speed over exhaustive pre-market data for life-threatening conditions. A pivotal achievement was the advocacy for the Parallel Track program, a concept originating within ACT UP's treatment activist committees in the late 1980s, which the FDA formally adopted on May 11, 1990. This initiative allowed to promising investigational drugs outside conventional clinical trials for HIV-positive individuals ineligible for standard studies or lacking satisfactory alternative therapies, thereby providing treatment to thousands who would otherwise be excluded; for instance, it facilitated access to drugs like Bristol-Myers Squibb's (ddI) for over 20,000 patients by 1991. ACT UP members, including those from the Treatment Action Group (TAG)—a 1992 splinter focused on science-based advocacy—collaborated with pharmaceutical companies and regulators to implement Parallel Track, emphasizing ethical distribution to prevent diversion and ensure monitoring, though critics noted risks of unproven therapies without robust safety data. ACT UP also drove reforms in accelerated approval pathways, advocating for the use of surrogate endpoints—such as cell counts or reductions—instead of requiring direct survival data, which shortened review times for antiretrovirals. This approach, formalized in FDA guidelines by the early 1990s, enabled approvals like (AZT) in 1987 under emergency mechanisms and subsequent drugs, reducing timelines from years to months; by 2019, the FDA had approved 32 antiretrovirals partly due to precedents set amid AIDS activism. Additionally, the group pressured for compassionate use and programs, challenging restrictions on off-label prescribing and import of unapproved drugs, which influenced state-level initiatives like California's 1987 law and federal policies permitting buyer clubs to distribute experimental agents under monitored conditions. These reforms, while credited with saving lives by broadening treatment options during a period when over 300,000 Americans had died from AIDS by , faced scrutiny for potentially lowering evidentiary standards, as evidenced by later withdrawals of drugs like due to inefficacy or toxicity post-approval. Nonetheless, ACT UP's insistence on patient inclusion in trial design—demanding representation on FDA advisory committees and simplified protocols—established models for stakeholder involvement that persisted beyond , influencing modern and designations.

Influences on Public Health Definitions and Funding

ACT UP played a significant role in advocating for expansions to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) surveillance case definition of AIDS, which initially focused on opportunistic infections and conditions more common among gay men, thereby excluding many cases among women, injection drug users, and heterosexuals. Through campaigns led by its Women and AIDS working group in the late 1980s and early 1990s, ACT UP highlighted how manifestations like recurrent severe vaginal , , and invasive were not qualifying indicators, resulting in underdiagnosis and ineligibility for disability benefits and services for affected women. This pressure contributed to the CDC's 1991 proposal and 1993 implementation of a revised classification system, which included all HIV-infected individuals with counts below 200 cells/µL or specific illnesses, regardless of prior exclusions, leading to a substantial rise in reported cases—such as a 24% increase in pediatric AIDS diagnoses from 783 in 1992 to 968 in 1993—and broader eligibility for public health funding and support programs. On funding, ACT UP's high-profile actions, including the May 21, 1990, "Storm the NIH" protest involving over 1,000 demonstrators at the campus in , demanded accelerated clinical trials, more diverse research priorities, and increased allocations for AIDS studies amid criticisms of bureaucratic delays. These efforts correlated with marked growth in NIH AIDS research budgets, rising from approximately $579 million in 1990 to $1.04 billion by 1993, as congressional appropriations responded to heightened public and political awareness of the epidemic's urgency, though direct causation is debated among analysts attributing gains partly to activist mobilization.

Criticisms and Controversies

Disruptive Tactics and Public Reaction

ACT UP employed a range of disruptive direct-action tactics to draw attention to the AIDS crisis, including die-ins where activists lay motionless in public spaces to symbolize deaths from the disease, traffic blockades, office occupations, and interruptions of speeches or religious services. On March 24, 1987, during its first major action on , approximately 300 protesters demonstrated against pharmaceutical pricing, resulting in 17 arrests for blocking streets and chanting slogans like "Hell no, we won't buy it, drugs at price we can't try it." Tactics often involved theatrical elements such as throwing fake blood to represent AIDS victims' suffering or chaining themselves to buildings, as seen in protests targeting the FDA on March 5, 1988, where over 1,000 activists gathered, leading to 17 arrests and heightened media coverage that pressured regulatory changes. One of the most contentious actions occurred on December 10, 1989, at St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York, where activists disrupted Cardinal John O'Connor's mass to protest the Catholic Church's opposition to condom distribution and safe-sex education; around 5,000 protested outside while 111 entered the church, chanting "Stop killing us" and performing die-ins between pews, resulting in arrests and widespread condemnation for desecrating a religious service. Other methods included "zaps"—coordinated phone or fax floods to overwhelm targets—and public shaming, such as outing closeted officials, which ACT UP itself acknowledged as among its most destructive and threatening approaches. These tactics aimed to force institutional responsiveness but frequently escalated confrontations, including the use of smoke bombs and overturned tables at conferences. Public reaction to ACT UP's methods was polarized, with supporters crediting the disruptions for accelerating policy shifts like faster drug approvals, while critics decried them as excessively radical and alienating. The St. Patrick's Cathedral protest, for instance, drew accusations of from parishioners and media outlets, with reporting it as an "act of desecration" that offended many observers despite its policy aims. TIME magazine described the event as part of a "" in increasingly demonstrations, highlighting backlash from religious communities and moderates who viewed the interruptions as disrespectful and counterproductive to building broader coalitions. Even within activist circles, some argued the aggressive style, including threats and property disruptions, risked repelling potential allies and framing AIDS as fringe rather than a imperative, though empirical outcomes like increased funding suggest the shock value yielded tangible gains amid initial hostility.

Internal Factionalism and Strategic Disputes

ACT UP experienced significant internal tensions over strategic approaches, particularly between advocates of uncompromising and those favoring collaboration with government and pharmaceutical entities to influence treatment development. These disputes intensified in the early as the organization grew, leading to debates over whether to prioritize confrontational protests or provide scientific expertise to regulatory bodies like the FDA and NIH. The Treatment + Data (T+D) committee, which focused on analyzing clinical trials and advocating for parallel track access to experimental drugs, exemplified this shift toward "insider" tactics, contrasting with the group's founding emphasis on nonviolent . A pivotal fracture occurred in January 1992 when members of the T+D committee, including figures like Mark Harrington and Gregg Gonsalves, departed ACT UP New York to form the Treatment Action Group (TAG), arguing that sustained engagement with policymakers was essential for accelerating drug approvals amid evolving treatments like AZT combinations. This split, preceded by years of strategic conflicts, divided the group into "purists" committed to outsider disruption and reformers seeking institutional leverage, ultimately stalling ACT UP's momentum as attendance at meetings declined from peaks of over 800 in 1987-1988 to fewer than 100 by mid-1992. Critics within ACT UP viewed TAG's formation as elitist, accusing it of prioritizing white, middle-class expertise over mobilization, though TAG credited ACT UP's earlier pressure for enabling its advisory role. Racial and gender dynamics exacerbated these rifts, with accusations of systemic surfacing as ACT UP struggled to address disparities in AIDS impact on communities of color and women. In 1990, activist Keith Cylar publicly stated, “ACT UP is a racist organization,” highlighting perceptions of white dominance in leadership and priorities that marginalized intravenous drug users and minorities, despite efforts like the Majority Action Committee formed in to advocate for these groups. Internal conflicts over intensified disagreements on broader AIDS-fighting strategies, with some factions pushing for intersectional focus on and discrimination, while others emphasized universal treatment access, leading to threats of permanent divisions as the group's size amplified factionalization. These disputes reflected deeper causal tensions between the urgency of immediate survival-driven action and long-term organizational sustainability, though ACT UP's consensus-based floor meetings allowed vigorous debate without formal hierarchies until fractures proved irreconcilable.

Debates on Effectiveness and Unintended Consequences

Proponents of ACT UP's strategies argue that the group's direct actions significantly accelerated FDA drug approval processes for AIDS treatments, reducing review times from over two years to mere months by the early 1990s through sustained protests, such as the 1988 occupation of FDA headquarters. This pressure contributed to the establishment of the Parallel Track program in 1987 and the formalization of Accelerated Approval in 1992, allowing provisional approvals based on surrogate endpoints like counts rather than full clinical outcomes, which enabled earlier access to therapies like (AZT) approved in 1987. Advocates credit these reforms with saving lives by expanding access to experimental drugs for thousands, as evidenced by the subsequent drop in AIDS mortality following protease inhibitor approvals in 1995-1996. Critics, however, contend that ACT UP's causal impact on these changes is overstated, noting that FDA reforms like Parallel Track predated major demonstrations and stemmed partly from internal agency responses to the crisis's scale, with over 100,000 U.S. AIDS cases by 1988 driving bureaucratic shifts independently. Empirical attribution remains challenging due to confounding factors, including lobbying and congressional pressures via the of 1992, which funded faster reviews through fees rather than activism alone. Moreover, some analyses highlight that ACT UP's confrontational tactics, while raising awareness, alienated policymakers and the public, potentially delaying consensus on evidence-based standards in favor of expediency. Unintended consequences include the erosion of rigorous pre-market testing, as accelerated pathways set precedents for approving drugs on incomplete data, contributing to later controversies over efficacy and safety in non-AIDS contexts. Former ACT UP member Peter Lurie, now an FDA critic from within public health circles, has argued that the push against bureaucracy inadvertently advanced anti-regulatory agendas, enabling corporate influences to prioritize speed over comprehensive safety trials, with examples like oncology drugs approved via surrogates but later withdrawn for inefficacy. Internally, the emphasis on disruptive actions fostered factionalism and burnout, as documented in post-1990s schisms that fragmented the movement and reduced its sustained influence, per reflections from participants. These outcomes underscore debates over whether short-term gains in access outweighed long-term risks to regulatory integrity and public trust in pharmaceutical oversight.

Decline and Fragmentation

Peak and Waning in the 1990s

![ACT UP demonstrators storming the NIH in 1990][float-right]
ACT UP reached its zenith of influence and mobilization in the early , with chapters expanding to over 100 worldwide by and an estimated peak membership of around 10,000 activists across 19 countries. This period saw large-scale demonstrations, including the "Storm the NIH" action on May 21, , where approximately 1,000 protesters gathered at the campus in , to demand accelerated AIDS research, expanded clinical trials, and parallel drug distribution tracks, resulting in 82 arrests. Earlier actions, such as the January Albany protests against New York State's inadequate AIDS response and demonstrations in Georgia with 63 arrests, underscored the group's tactical escalation and coordination across regions. By the mid-1990s, however, ACT UP's momentum began to falter amid medical breakthroughs and organizational challenges. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's approval of the first protease inhibitors in late 1995, followed by the widespread adoption of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in 1996, marked a turning point; U.S. AIDS-related deaths, which peaked at over 40,000 in 1995, declined sharply thereafter as combination therapies proved effective in suppressing HIV. These advances, partly hastened by ACT UP's earlier advocacy for expedited drug approvals, reduced the epidemic's immediate lethality and diminished the urgency for mass protests, contributing to a perceptible waning of street activism by 1994-1995. Internal divisions exacerbated the decline, with factionalism over tactics and emerging prominently by 1996; for instance, ACT UP/San Francisco's rejection of the HIV-AIDS causal link in 1994 led to splits and hostility with other chapters. Burnout among activists, coupled with the radical democratic structure fostering disputes, fragmented the movement, as evidenced by dissolving chapters and reduced participation in New York, once the . By 1997, observers noted ACT UP's activism as fading, reflecting both the tempered crisis and unresolved strategic debates.

Key Internal Splits

One prominent internal split occurred in early 1992, when members of ACT UP/New York's Treatment and Data Committee departed to establish the Treatment Action Group (TAG), a nonprofit dedicated to accelerating AIDS treatment research through institutional engagement rather than . This division reflected growing tensions between activists favoring "inside" strategies—such as negotiating with pharmaceutical companies, government agencies, and researchers—and those committed to ACT UP's original confrontational tactics, including street protests and . TAG's formation marked a strategic pivot toward evidence-based advocacy and policy influence, which some viewed as abandoning ACT UP's radical roots, while others saw it as necessary evolution amid advancing treatments like AZT combinations. Broader factionalism exacerbated these rifts, with disputes over tactical priorities, organizational democracy, and ideological scope fracturing chapters nationwide by the mid-1990s. In ACT UP/New York, debates intensified over balancing AIDS-specific goals with wider politics, leading to paralyzing consensus processes and member burnout; by 1996, such internal conflicts had significantly weakened the group's cohesion and effectiveness. Similar divisions emerged in other locales, such as , where tactical disagreements prompted a 1992 split into ACT UP/SF (focused on local ) and ACT UP/ (later rebranded Survive AIDS in 2000 to emphasize global issues), highlighting persistent clashes between localized militancy and broader agendas. These schisms, compounded by the AIDS crisis's partial abatement through medical advances, contributed to ACT UP's fragmentation, as radical democratic structures proved vulnerable to endless debate without unified leadership.

Recent and Ongoing Efforts

Revived Chapters Post-2000

Following the widespread decline of ACT UP chapters in the late due to advances in antiretroviral therapies and internal divisions, ACT UP/New York persisted as one of the most active groups, conducting demonstrations against global barriers to AIDS treatment and U.S. domestic policies. In 2000, ACT UP/NY joined Health GAP in , to protest and World Bank policies hindering debt relief for AIDS-affected countries, resulting in mass arrests alongside global justice activists. By July 2002, ACT UP/NY collaborated with ACT UP/ and South Africa's Treatment Action Campaign at the International AIDS Conference in , targeting Coca-Cola's practices for African workers, which prompted the company to concede coverage expansions. These efforts marked a shift toward international pharmaceutical access and economic critiques, with further actions in September 2002 protesting the detention of Chinese AIDS activist Wan Yanhai, leading to his release the next day. ACT UP/Philadelphia similarly endured post-2000, adapting to an evolving disproportionately affecting , Latino, and low-income communities by diversifying membership and targeting local systemic failures. The chapter campaigned against Pennsylvania's and New Jersey's inadequacies, emphasizing intersectional advocacy rooted in origins while addressing racial disparities in care. By 2011, it had sustained operations amid national fragmentation, focusing on policy reforms for marginalized groups. Alongside ACT UP/NY, participated in 2009 at insurers like and UnitedHealth, demanding Medicare for All and an end to coverage denials for severe conditions, yielding multiple arrests. True revivals of dormant chapters emerged around 2011, inspired by ACT UP/NY's 25th anniversary events in 2012. ACT UP/ re-formed in November 2011, starting with biweekly meetings that evolved to monthly gatherings and participation in New York-based protests for a financial speculation to fund global AIDS programs. ACT UP/, previously inactive, revitalized concurrently through weekly meetings, teach-ins on economic policies like the speculation , and recruitment at events, culminating in a major action busing members to a 2012 march for a "Robin Hood " on trades to support healthcare and initiatives. These efforts reflected a broader pattern of smaller-scale resurgence, with revived groups leveraging ACT UP/NY's infrastructure for training and joint campaigns on issues extending beyond , such as universal healthcare funding via market transaction taxes. By the mid-2010s, ACT UP/NY and remained the primary active U.S. chapters, with sporadic revivals elsewhere emphasizing against pharmaceutical pricing and government neglect.

Contemporary Campaigns to 2025

In the , ACT UP/New York intensified campaigns to safeguard international AIDS funding amid proposed U.S. policy shifts, particularly targeting the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). On January 6, 2024, activists marched to demand restoration of PEPFAR's $4.8 billion annual programming, reversal of funding freezes, and protection from 2025 budget cuts, framing these as essential to preventing millions of infections globally. By June 7, 2025, ACT UP/NY escalated at a Tesla showroom in Manhattan's , where protesters smeared images of President and with a red substance symbolizing blood, protesting a proposed congressional rescission package that threatened PEPFAR's continuity. These efforts highlighted ACT UP's ongoing emphasis on federal accountability for global programs, which have supported over 50 countries since 2003. Domestically, ACT UP/NY pursued economic reforms to bolster health funding, advocating for a Financial Speculation Tax (FiST) of 0.05% or less on transactions to generate revenue for AIDS research and treatment without raising taxes on ordinary citizens. The group also organized annual Pride Health Fairs, such as the fifth event on June 29, 2025, in , offering services like needle exchange and testing to LGBTQ+ communities, explicitly rejecting corporate sponsorships in favor of activist-led survival support. On 2024, ACT UP/NY held a and LGBTQ+ march against Mayor and Trump administration policies perceived as undermining AIDS responses. Other chapters mirrored this focus on intertwined AIDS and broader health equity issues. ACT UP/Philadelphia coordinated the Equal Rights, Equal Care March and Rally on October 26, 2025, in —the first major LGBTQIA+ mobilization there in over a decade—demanding state protections for queer healthcare access amid threats to rights and services. Revived groups like ACT UP/Boston engaged in queer protests at health centers, such as Fenway Community Health, to address local disparities in HIV care and prevention. These activities reflect ACT UP's adaptation of tactics to contemporary challenges, including funding threats and intersectional advocacy, though critics from conservative outlets have questioned PEPFAR's allocation toward non-HIV priorities.

Historical Impact and Evaluation

Contributions to AIDS Response

ACT UP's direct actions pressured regulatory agencies to expedite drug development and approval processes. On October 11, 1988, over 1,000 activists participated in the "Seize Control of the FDA" demonstration at the headquarters in , occupying the site and demanding faster research, development, and approval of treatments. Within a week, the FDA announced new rules effective immediately for accelerated review of drugs, shifting from typical timelines exceeding two years to approvals in months for subsequent therapies. These efforts contributed to policy innovations like the parallel track mechanism, announced by the Department of Health and Human Services in June 1989, which enabled broader access to experimental drugs outside traditional clinical trials for those ineligible or unable to participate. ACT UP advocacy also influenced programs and "accelerated approval" pathways based on surrogate endpoints, facilitating earlier availability of antiretrovirals. In research prioritization, the May 21, 1990, "Storm the NIH" protest drew thousands to the campus, criticizing delays in treatment-focused studies and demanding increased clinical trials and diverse participant inclusion. This action, alongside ongoing pressure, correlated with heightened federal AIDS research funding, rising from $12 million in targeted appropriations in 1983 to substantially larger allocations by the early 1990s, though direct causation remains debated amid broader political responses. ACT UP members negotiated with pharmaceutical firms, securing price cuts for AZT—initially approved in March 1987—from $10,000 annually to lower levels by 1989 and further reductions thereafter, improving affordability for patients. By fostering treatment literacy among activists and collaborating on trial designs, the group enhanced scientific rigor, such as advocating for community representation in protocols, which informed later research standards.

Balanced Assessment of Long-Term Effects

ACT UP's pressure campaigns demonstrably accelerated U.S. regulatory reforms, notably contributing to the FDA's adoption of accelerated approval mechanisms for life-threatening illnesses by 1992, which shortened drug review timelines from over two years to mere months and enabled programs like the parallel track initiated in 1989. These changes facilitated earlier availability of therapies such as (AZT) and protease inhibitors, correlating with a sharp post-1995 decline in U.S. AIDS mortality—from 50,510 deaths in 1995 to 14,110 in 1998—transforming from a near-uniformly fatal diagnosis to a manageable for many. The model's emphasis on involvement in clinical trials also established enduring precedents for stakeholder input in , influencing frameworks for other diseases including cancer, where surrogate endpoints now support provisional approvals pending confirmatory data. Yet, evaluations of these tactics' sustainability reveal mixed outcomes, as ACT UP's confrontational style—exemplified by disruptions at FDA headquarters and NIH facilities—prioritized urgency over deliberation, potentially eroding institutional trust in scientific processes. While yielding immediate resource gains, such methods contributed to factional burnout among activists and a post-1990s fragmentation that diminished the group's cohesive influence as treatment advances reduced crisis momentum. Critics, including former regulators, contend that the precedent of external agitation on approvals risks future imbalances, where expedited pathways approve interventions with incomplete long-term safety profiles, as seen in broader debates over drugs where initial benefits sometimes fail to materialize. Empirical assessments using , such as Gamson's success criteria, affirm ACT UP's short-term policy wins but highlight limited evidence of transformative systemic cures or prevention shifts attributable solely to , underscoring that breakthroughs like HAART stemmed primarily from parallel pharmaceutical and research advances. In causal terms, ACT UP amplified public and federal prioritization of AIDS—boosting NIH funding from $1.4 billion in 1990 to over $2.5 billion by 1995—but its long-term legacy hinges on whether advocacy-driven haste enhanced or merely timed inevitable progress, with no rigorous studies isolating activist effects from endogenous scientific momentum. The approach's export to global contexts yielded uneven results, succeeding in urban U.S. policy tweaks but faltering in resource-poor settings where sustained infrastructure, not episodic protests, proved decisive for scale-up. Overall, while empirically linked to lives extended through faster therapies, ACT UP's model underscores trade-offs between rapid mobilization and enduring institutional robustness, informing cautionary lessons for contemporary health advocacy amid risks of backlash or diluted evidentiary standards.

References

  1. https://actupny.com/actions/
  2. https://archives.nypl.org/10
  3. https://www.history.com/articles/act-up-aids-patient-rights
  4. https://actupny.com/act-up-chronology-in-brief/
  5. https://www.center4research.org/aids-activist-takes-new-fight-defending-fda/
  6. https://nautil.us/how-the-drug-industry-has-exploited-reforms-started-in-the-fight-against-aids-238237/
  7. https://www.treatmentactiongroup.org/about-us/history/
  8. https://cosmonautmag.com/2021/10/act-up-fight-back-a-history-of-aids-in-america/
  9. https://oasis.library.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1204&context=rtds
  10. https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/atc/4956.html
  11. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/06/14/how-act-up-changed-america
  12. https://forgeorganizing.org/article/act-was-vanguard-organization/
  13. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/27/6/21-0284_article
  14. https://www.cdc.gov/museum/online/story-of-cdc/aids/index.html
  15. https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/history/hiv-and-aids-timeline
  16. https://works.swarthmore.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1167&context=suhj
  17. https://www.history.com/articles/aids-epidemic-ronald-reagan
  18. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5021a2.htm
  19. https://www.aclu.org/podcast/how-act-up-changed-the-face-of-aids-and-activism
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6830949/
  21. https://www.npr.org/transcripts/1007361916
  22. https://www.democracynow.org/2007/3/29/larry_kramer_on_the_20th_anniversary
  23. https://dp.la/primary-source-sets/act-up-and-the-aids-crisis
  24. https://actupny.org/documents/earlytactics.html
  25. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/march-24/act-up-first-action-on-wall-street
  26. https://actupny.com/accurate-info/
  27. https://actupny.org/documents/greenbergAU.html
  28. https://nvdatabase.swarthmore.edu/content/us-aids-coalition-unleash-power-act-demands-access-drugs-1987-89
  29. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/health-and-medicine/act
  30. https://lux-magazine.com/article/the-real-story-of-act-up-sarah-schulman/
  31. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/02/09/689924838/how-to-demand-a-medical-breakthrough-lessons-from-the-aids-fight
  32. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/act-up-stonewall/
  33. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jun/08/act-up-protest-movements-us-direct-action
  34. https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/blog/act-ups-fearless-activism-and-organizing-model-fighting-justice
  35. https://www.socialistalternative.org/2023/05/28/united-in-anger-act-up-the-struggle-for-queer-rights-today/
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9942075/
  37. https://www.unitedinanger.com/unit-2-the-structure-of-act-up
  38. https://actupny.org/documents/CDdocuments/Affinity.html
  39. https://www.metmuseum.org/perspectives/act-up-gran-fury
  40. https://actupny.org/divatv/
  41. https://justseeds.org/a-peoples-art-history-of-the-united-states-excerpt-act-up-and-gran-fury/
  42. https://archives.nypl.org/3648
  43. https://www.theartstory.org/artist/gran-fury/
  44. https://actupny.org/indexfolder/GranFury1.html
  45. https://visualaids.org/events/detail/diva-tv
  46. https://archives.nypl.org/mss/3622
  47. https://www.ajadedgay.com/blog/act-up-the-radical-fight-for-hivaids-awareness-and-lgbtq-rights/
  48. https://hyperallergic.com/60650/gran-fury-in-2012/
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1470625/
  50. https://actupny.org/documents/CDdocuments/ACTUP_CivilDisobedience.pdf
  51. https://www.nytimes.com/1990/01/03/nyregion/rude-rash-effective-act-up-shifts-aids-policy.html
  52. https://www.poz.com/article/ACT-history-activism-12524-3756
  53. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK234569/
  54. https://www.eyemagazine.com/feature/article/gran-fury
  55. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/community/articles/a-history-of-silence
  56. https://lithub.com/silence-death-how-an-iconic-protest-poster-came-into-being/
  57. https://www.artforum.com/columns/the-feats-and-failures-of-gran-fury-251734/
  58. https://americanarchive.org/exhibits/hiv-aids-and-public-broadcasting/5-1989-1991-broadcasting-act-up-direct-action
  59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/800820
  60. https://umedia.lib.umn.edu/item/p16022coll100:32?facets%255Bcollection_name_s%255D%255B%255D=GAZE%2BTV%2BCollection
  61. https://www.actuporalhistory.org/actions/seize-control-of-the-fda
  62. https://www.actuporalhistory.org/actions/storm-the-nih
  63. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/againsttheodds/index_13.html
  64. https://boundarystones.weta.org/2025/07/29/1988-act-demonstrators-occupied-fda-headquarters-demand-action-aids
  65. https://www.c-span.org/classroom/document/?9730
  66. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/oct/11/act-up-hiv-aids-1988-fda-protest
  67. https://actupny.org/documents/FDAhandbook1.html
  68. https://www.the-scientist.com/demonstrating-discontent-may-21-1990-31227
  69. https://www.globalhealthchronicles.org/items/show/8189
  70. https://www.actuporalhistory.org/actions/women-aids
  71. https://actupny.org/documents/cron-87.html
  72. https://www.nyclgbtsites.org/site/act-up-demonstration-at-the-new-york-stock-exchange/
  73. https://www.nytimes.com/1989/09/16/us/wave-of-protests-developing-on-profits-from-aids-drug.html
  74. https://www.mcny.org/story/act-hivaids-and-fight-healthcare
  75. https://www.nytimes.com/1989/12/11/nyregion/111-held-in-st-patrick-s-aids-protest.html
  76. https://actupny.org/YELL/stopchurch99.html
  77. https://actuporalhistory.org/actions/stop-the-church
  78. https://www.americamagazine.org/arts-culture/2019/06/21/pose-revisits-controversial-aids-protest-inside-st-patricks-cathedral/
  79. https://actupny.org/alert/Media-Irresponsibility.html
  80. https://actupny.org/documents/montreal.html
  81. http://aidsactionnow.org/page_id_38/
  82. https://aidsactivisthistory.omeka.net/items/show/67
  83. https://historicplacesdays.ca/places/parc-de-lespoir/
  84. https://www.aidsactivisthistory.ca/2017/10/26/from-the-video-vault-act-up-montreal-1990-1993/
  85. https://wp-prod-aids2022-org.azurewebsites.net/2022/04/29/the-international-aids-conference-returns-to-montreal/
  86. https://utppublishing.com/doi/10.3138/cbmh.33.1.103
  87. https://www.aidsactivisthistory.ca/features/george-w-smith/aids-action-now/
  88. https://www.catie.ca/positive-side/my-generation
  89. https://www.bishopsgate.org.uk/collections/act-up-london-archive/
  90. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/health/article/2023/01/20/didier-lestrade-co-founder-of-act-up-paris-we-could-really-solve-the-aids-problem-once-and-for-all_6012278_14.html
  91. https://www.actupparis.org/2008/08/05/act-up-paris-and-treatment-activism/
  92. https://assets.cengage.com/gale/psm/2000000R.pdf
  93. https://www.actupparis.org/2000/06/01/knowledge-is-a-weapon/
  94. https://www.cato.org/blog/challenging-moral-authority-fda-lesson-history
  95. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK234216/
  96. https://actupny.org/treatment/access-philos.html
  97. https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/fda-history-exhibits/history-fdas-role-preventing-spread-hivaids
  98. https://actupny.org/treatment/Medley.html
  99. https://academic.oup.com/book/39225/chapter/338740353
  100. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/hypatia/article/women-dont-get-aids-they-just-die-from-it-memory-classification-and-the-campaign-to-change-the-definition-of-aids/776219BDBBF0DD701EA77DAB52278016
  101. https://journals.tulane.edu/ncs/article/view/2424/2248
  102. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00018871.htm
  103. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00025813.htm
  104. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1990/05/22/1000-rally-for-more-vigorous-aids-effort/6874f3c6-0732-46d8-9829-c2540f47a010/
  105. https://www.treatmentactiongroup.org/publication/aids-research-at-the-nih-a-critical-review-part-i-summary/
  106. https://www.kff.org/hiv-aids/u-s-federal-funding-for-hivaids-trends-over-time/
  107. https://www.history.com/articles/aids-activism-protests-act-up-die-ins
  108. https://thecommspot.com/comm-subjects/strategic-communication/case-studies-in-strategic-communication/public-relations-case-study-act-up-aids-activism-1987-present/
  109. https://www.actuporalhistory.org/actions/stop-the-church
  110. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/13/t-magazine/act-up-aids.html
  111. https://www.vox.com/2022/6/14/23166411/act-up-protest-gay-pride-2022
  112. https://time.com/archive/6704250/in-a-rage-over-aids/
  113. https://www.treatmentactiongroup.org/publication/pathogenesis-activism/
  114. https://files.eportfolios.macaulay.cuny.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/6609/2019/04/16210143/Gould_ACT-UP.pdf
  115. https://cancerhistoryproject.com/article/accelerated-approval-and-the-fda/
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11657587/
  117. https://nyujlpp.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Michael-D-Greenberg-AIDS-Experimental-Drug-Approval-and-the-FDA.pdf
  118. https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/histories-product-regulation/promoting-safe-effective-drugs-100-years
  119. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/fda-increasingly-approves-drugs-without-conclusive-proof-they-work
  120. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/11/opinion/dont-weaken-the-fdas-drug-approval-process.html
  121. https://www.poz.com/blog/reflecting-on-act-up
  122. https://owd.tcnj.edu/~borland/2006-aids/cassy2.htm
  123. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/nov/29/act-up-aids-new-york-spencer-cox
  124. https://actupny.org/documents/cron-90.html
  125. https://ccr.cancer.gov/news/landmarks/article/first-aids-drugs
  126. https://www.history.com/articles/hiv-aids-crisis-timeline
  127. https://www.nytimes.com/1997/03/21/nyregion/a-decade-old-activism-of-unmitigated-gall-is-fading.html
  128. https://archives.nypl.org/mss/5987
  129. https://www.inquirer.com/philly/health/20110605_Philadelphia_ACTUP_chapter_going_strong.html
  130. https://www.academia.edu/5849578/AHA_2014_Still_ACTing_UP_Philadelphia_AIDS_Activism_into_the_21st_Century_
  131. https://actupny.com/newly-revived-act-up-chapters/
  132. http://www.actupphilly.org/history
  133. https://www.instagram.com/p/C1zr41tuXLA/
  134. https://actupny.com/act-up-smears-trump-and-musks-faces-with-blood/
  135. https://www.state.gov/pepfar
  136. https://actupny.com/pride-health-fair-2025/
  137. https://actupny.com/category/actions/
  138. http://www.actupphilly.org/
  139. https://www.facebook.com/actupboston/
  140. https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/report/pepfar-aids-relief-leftwing-funding-apparatus
  141. https://www.unitedinanger.com/unit-4-discussion-guide
  142. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/againsttheodds/get_involved/conversation3.html
  143. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5994318/
  144. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3964196/
  145. https://www.patient-view.com/2023/powerful-patient-advocacy-the-lasting-legacy-of-act-up/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.