Hubbry Logo
AbenakiAbenakiMain
Open search
Abenaki
Community hub
Abenaki
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Abenaki
Abenaki
Abenaki
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

PeopleAlnôbak (Wôbanakiak)
LanguageAbenaki (Alnôbadôwawôgan),
Plains Indian Sign Language (Môgiadawawôgan)
CountryDawnland (Ndakinna)
     Wabanaki

The Abenaki (Abenaki: W8banaki[4]) are an Indigenous people of the Northeastern Woodlands of Canada and the United States. They are an Algonquian-speaking people and part of the Wabanaki Confederacy. The Eastern Abenaki language was predominantly spoken in Maine, while the Western Abenaki language was spoken in Quebec, Vermont, and New Hampshire.

While Abenaki peoples share cultural traits, they historically did not have a centralized government.[5] They came together as a post-contact community after their original tribes were decimated by colonization, disease, and warfare.

Names

[edit]

The word Abenaki and its syncope, Abnaki, are both derived from Wabanaki, or Wôbanakiak, meaning "People of the Dawn Land" in the Abenaki language.[3] While the two terms are often confused, the Abenaki are one of several tribes in the Wabanaki Confederacy.

Alternate spellings include: Abnaki, Abinaki, Alnôbak,[6] Abanakee, Abanaki, Abanaqui, Abanaquois, Abenaka, Abenake, Abenaki, Abenakias, Abenakiss, Abenakkis, Abenaque, Abenaqui, Abenaquioict, Abenaquiois, Abenaquioue, Abenati, Abeneaguis, Abenequa, Abenkai, Abenquois, Abernaqui, Abnaqui, Abnaquies, Abnaquois, Abnaquotii, Abasque, Abnekais, Abneki, Abonakies, Abonnekee.[7]

Wôbanakiak is derived from wôban ("dawn" or "east") and aki ("land")[8] (compare Proto-Algonquian *wa·pan and *axkyi) — the aboriginal name of the area broadly corresponding to New England and the Maritimes. It is sometimes used to refer to all the Algonquian-speaking peoples of the area—Western Abenaki, Eastern Abenaki, Wolastoqiyik-Passamaquoddy, and Mi'kmaq—as a single group.[3]

The Abenaki people also call themselves Alnôbak, meaning "Real People" (cf., Lenape language: Lenapek) and by the autonym Alnanbal, meaning "men".[5]

Historically, ethnologists have classified the Abenaki by geographic groups: Western Abenaki and Eastern Abenaki. Within these groups are the Abenaki bands:

Western Abenaki

[edit]
Historical territories of Western Abenaki tribes, c. 17th century
  • Androscoggin (also Arsigantegok Arrasaguntacook, Ersegontegog, Assagunticook, Anasaguntacook), lived along the St. Francis River in Québec. Principal village: St. Francis (Odanak). The people were referred to as "St. Francis River Abenakis", and this term gradually was applied to all Western Abenaki.[9]
  • Cowasuck (also Cohass, Cohasiac, Koasek, Koasek, Coos – "People of the Pines"), lived in the upper Connecticut River Valley. Principal village: Cowass, near Newbury, Vermont.
  • Missiquoi (also Masipskwoik, Mazipskikskoik, Missique, Misiskuoi, Missisco, Missiassik – "People of the Flint"), also known as the Sokoki. They lived in the Missisquoi Valley, from Lake Champlain to the headwaters. Principal village around Swanton, Vermont.[10]
    • Sokoki (also Sokwaki, Squakheag, Socoquis, Sokoquius, Zooquagese, Soquachjck, Onejagese – "People Who Separated"), lived in the Middle and Upper Connecticut River Valley. Principal villages: Squakheag, Northfield, Massachusetts, and Fort Hill.
  • Pennacook (also Penacook, Penikoke, Openango), lived in the Merrimack Valley, therefore sometimes called Merrimack. Principal village Penacook, New Hampshire. The Pennacook were once a large confederacy who were politically distinct and competitive with their northern Abenaki neighbors.

Smaller tribes:

Wabanaki Nation

[edit]

Eastern Abenaki

[edit]
Eastern Abenaki
  • Androscoggin (also Alessikantekw, Arosaguntacock, Amariscoggin), lived in the Androscoggin Valley and along the St. Francis River, therefore often called "St. Francis River Abenaki".
  • Kennebec (also Kinipekw, Kennebeck, Caniba, later known as Norridgewock), lived in the Kennebec River Valley in central Maine. Principal village: Norridgewock (Naridgewalk, Neridgewok, Noronjawoke); other villages: Amaseconti (Amesokanti, Anmissoukanti), Kennebec, and Sagadahoc.
  • Penobscot (also Panawahpskek, Pamnaouamske, Pentagouet), lived in the Penobscot Valley. Principal villages: Penobscot (Pentagouet), now Indian Island, Old Town, Maine; other villages: Agguncia, Asnela, Catawamtek, Kenduskeag, Mattawamkeag, Meecombe, Negas, Olamon, Passadumkeag, Precaute, Segocket, and Wabigganus. Now a separate federally recognized tribe.
  • Pequawket (also Pigwacket, Pequaki), lived along the Saco River and in the White Mountains. Principal village Pigwacket was located on the upper Saco River near present-day Fryeburg, Maine. Occupied an intermediate location, therefore sometimes classed as Western Abenaki.

Smaller tribes:

Wolastoqiyik and Passamaquoddy:

Location

[edit]
Abenaki wigwam with birch bark covering.

The homeland of the Abenaki, called Ndakinna (Our Land; alternately written as N'dakinna or N'Dakinna), previously extended across most of what is now northern New England, southern Quebec, and the southern Canadian Maritimes. The Eastern Abenaki population was concentrated in portions of New Brunswick and Maine east of New Hampshire's White Mountains. The other major group, the Western Abenaki, lived in the Connecticut River valley in Vermont, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts.[11] The Missiquoi lived along the eastern shore of Lake Champlain. The Pennacook lived along the Merrimack River in southern New Hampshire. The maritime Abenaki lived around the St. Croix and Wolastoq (Saint John River) Valleys near the boundary line between Maine and New Brunswick.

English colonial settlement in New England and frequent violence forced many Abenaki to migrate to Quebec. The Abenaki settled in the Sillery region of Quebec between 1676 and 1680, and subsequently, for about twenty years, lived on the banks of the Chaudière River near the falls, before settling in Odanak and Wôlinak in the early eighteenth century.[12]

In those days, the Abenaki practiced a subsistence economy based on hunting, fishing, trapping, berry picking and on growing corn, beans, squash, potatoes and tobacco. They also produced baskets, made of ash and sweet grass, for picking wild berries, and boiled maple sap to make syrup. Basket weaving remains a traditional activity practiced by some tribal members.[13]

During the Anglo-French wars, the Abenaki were allies of France, having been displaced from Ndakinna by immigrating English settlers. An anecdote from the period tells the story of a Wolastoqew war chief named Nescambuit (variant spellings include Assacumbuit), who killed more than 140 enemies of King Louis XIV of France and received the rank of knight. Not all Abenaki people fought on the side of the French, however; many remained on their Native lands in the northern colonies. Much of the trapping was done by the people and traded to the English colonists for durable goods. These contributions by Native American Abenaki peoples went largely unreported.[citation needed]

Two tribal communities formed in Canada, one once known as Saint-Francois-du-lac near Pierreville (now called Odanak, Abenaki for "coming home"), and the other near Bécancour (now known as Wôlinak) on the south shore of the St. Lawrence River, directly across the river from Trois-Rivières. These two Abenaki reserves continue to grow and develop. Since the year 2000, the total Abenaki population (on and off reserve) has doubled to 2,101 members in 2011. Approximately 400 Abenaki reside on these two reserves, which cover a total area of less than 7 km2 (2.7 sq mi). The unrecognized majority are off-reserve members, living in various cities and towns across Canada and the United States.[citation needed]

There are about 3,200 Abenaki living in Vermont and New Hampshire, without reservations, chiefly around Lake Champlain.[citation needed] The remaining Abenaki people live in multi-racial towns and cities across Canada and the US, mainly in Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, and northern New England.[5]

In December 2012, the Nulhegan Band of the Coosuk Abenaki Nation created a tribal forest in the town of Barton, Vermont. This forest was established with assistance from the Vermont Sierra Club and the Vermont Land Trust. It contains a hunting camp and maple sugaring facilities that are administered cooperatively by the Nulhegan. The forest contains 65 acres (0.26 km2).[14] The Missiquoi Abenaki Tribe owns forest land in the town of Brunswick, Vermont, centered around the Brunswick Springs. These springs are believed to be a sacred Abenaki site.

Language

[edit]
Main article: Abenaki language

The Abenaki language is closely related to the Panawahpskek (Penobscot) language. Other neighboring Wabanaki tribes, the Pestomuhkati (Passamaquoddy), Wolastoqiyik (Maliseet), and Mi'kmaq, and other Eastern Algonquian languages share many linguistic similarities. It has come close to extinction as a spoken language. Tribal members are working to revive the Abenaki language at Odanak (means "in the village"), a First Nations Abenaki reserve near Pierreville, Quebec, and throughout New Hampshire, Vermont, and New York state.

The language is polysynthetic, meaning that a phrase or an entire sentence is expressed by a single word. For example, the word for "white man" awanoch is a combination of the words awani meaning "who" and uji meaning "from". Thus, the word for "white man" literally translates to "Who is this man and where does he come from?"

History

[edit]

There is archaeological evidence of Indigenous people in what is today New Hampshire for at least 12,000 years.[15][16]

In Reflections in Bullough's Pond, historian Diana Muir argues that the Abenakis' neighbors, pre-contact Iroquois, were an imperialist, expansionist culture whose cultivation of the corn/beans/squash agricultural complex enabled them to support a large population. They made war primarily against neighboring Algonquian peoples, including the Abenaki. Muir uses archaeological data to argue that the Iroquois expansion onto Algonquian lands was checked by the Algonquian adoption of agriculture. This enabled them to support their own populations large enough to have sufficient warriors to defend against the threat of Iroquois conquest.[17][page needed]

In 1614, Thomas Hunt captured 24 Abenaki people, including Squanto (Tisquantum) and took them to Spain, where they were sold into slavery.[18] During the European colonization of North America, the land occupied by the Abenaki was in the area between the new colonies of England in Massachusetts and the French in Quebec. Since no party agreed to territorial boundaries, there was regular conflict among them. The Abenaki were traditionally allied with the French; during the reign of Louis XIV, Chief Assacumbuit was designated a member of the French nobility for his service.

Around 1669, the Abenaki started to emigrate to Quebec due to conflicts with English colonists and epidemics of new infectious diseases. The governor of New France allocated two seigneuries (large self-administered areas similar to feudal fiefs). The first, of what was later to become Indian reserves, was on the Saint Francis River and is now known as the Odanak Indian Reserve; the second was founded near Bécancour and is called the Wôlinak Indian Reserve.

Abenaki wars

[edit]
Main article: French and Indian Wars

When the Wampanoag under King Philip (Metacomet) fought the English colonists in New England in 1675 in King Philip's War, the Abenaki joined the Wampanoag. For three years they fought along the Maine frontier in the First Abenaki War. The Abenaki pushed back the line of white settlement through devastating raids on scattered farmhouses and small villages. The war was settled by a peace treaty in 1678, with the Wampanoag more than decimated and many Native survivors having been sold into slavery in Bermuda.[19]

During Queen Anne's War in 1702, the Abenaki were allied with the French; they raided numerous English colonial settlements in Maine, from Wells to Casco, killing about 300 settlers over ten years. They also occasionally raided into Massachusetts, for instance in Groton and Deerfield in 1704. The raids stopped when the war ended. Some captives were adopted into the Mohawk and Abenaki tribes; older captives were generally ransomed, and the colonies carried on a brisk trade.[20]

The Third Abenaki War (1722–25), called the Dummer's War or Father Rale's War, erupted when the French Jesuit missionary Sébastien Rale (or Rasles, ~1657?-1724) encouraged the Abenaki to halt the spread of Yankee settlements. When the Massachusetts militia tried to seize Rale, the Abenaki raided the settlements at Brunswick, Arrowsick, and Merry-Meeting Bay. The Massachusetts government then declared war and bloody battles were fought at Norridgewock (1724), where Rale was killed, and at a daylong battle at the Indian village near present-day Fryeburg, Maine, on the upper Saco River (1725). Peace conferences at Boston and Casco Bay brought an end to the war. After Rale died, the Abenaki moved to a settlement on the St. Francis River.[21]

The Abenaki from St. Francois continued to raid British settlements in their former homelands along the New England frontier during Father Le Loutre's War (see Northeast Coast campaign (1750)) and the French and Indian War.

Canada

[edit]

The development of tourism projects has allowed the Canadian Abenaki to develop a modern economy, while preserving their culture and traditions. For example, since 1960, the Odanak Historical Society has managed the first and one of the largest aboriginal museums in Quebec, a few miles from the Quebec-Montreal axis. Over 5,000 people visit the Abenaki Museum annually.[citation needed] Several Abenaki companies include: in Wôlinak, General Fiberglass Engineering employs a dozen Natives, with annual sales exceeding C$3 million.[citation needed] Odanak is now active in transportation and distribution.[citation needed] Notable Abenaki from this area include the documentary filmmaker Alanis Obomsawin (National Film Board of Canada).[22]

United States

[edit]

Maine: federally recognized tribes

[edit]

The Penobscot Indian Nation, Passamaquoddy people, and Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians have been federally recognized as tribes in the United States.[23]

Vermont: state-recognized tribes

[edit]

Nulhegan Band of the Coosuk Abenaki Nation, Koasek Abenaki Tribe, Elnu Abenaki Tribe, and the Missisquoi Abenaki Tribe are, as of 2011, all state-recognized tribes in the United States.

The Missisquoi Abenaki applied for federal recognition as an Indian tribe in the 1980s but failed to meet four of the seven criteria.[24][25] The Bureau of Indian Affairs found that less than 1 percent of the Missisquoi's 1,171 members could show descent from an Abenaki ancestor. The bureau's report concluded that the petitioner is "a collection of individuals of claimed but mostly undemonstrated Indian ancestry with little or no social or historical connection with each other before the early 1970s."[26]

State recognition allows applicants to seek certain scholarship funds reserved for American Indians and to for members to market artwork as American Indian or Native American-made under the Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990.[27]

In 2002, the State of Vermont reported that the Abenaki people have not had a "continuous presence" in the state and had migrated north to Quebec by the end of the 17th century.[28] Facing annihilation, many Abenaki had begun emigrating to Canada, then under French control, around 1669.[29]

"Race-shifting" controversy
[edit]

The Abenaki Nation, based in Quebec, claim that those self-identifying as Abenaki in Vermont are settlers making false claims to Indigenous ancestry.[30][26][31][32] While the Odanak and Wolinak Abenaki First Nations in Quebec initially believed claims from residents of Vermont who said they were Abenaki, the Odanak reversed their position in 2003, calling on the groups in Vermont to provide them with genealogical evidence of Indigenous ancestry.[26]

Scholars have not been able to find credible evidence of the Vermont Abenaki's claims of Indigenous ancestry.[26] Anthropological research from the first half of the 20th century indicates that no Abenaki community actively existed in Vermont during that time period.[33]

Researcher Darryl Leroux characterizes the Vermont Abenaki's claims of Abenaki ancestry as "race-shifting", arguing that genealogical and archival evidence shows that most members of the state-recognized tribes are descended from white French Canadians.[33] Leroux found that only 2.2 percent of the Missisquoi Abenaki membership has Abenaki ancestry, with the rest of the organization's root ancestors being primarily French Canadian and migrating to Vermont in the mid-19th century.[33] The Abenaki Nation of Missisquoi's shifting claims about its root ancestors as well as loose membership criteria are consistent with race-shifting patterns.[33]

Leroux's research prompted renewed calls by the Abenaki First Nations to reassess Vermont's state recognition process.[34]

New Hampshire and minority recognition

[edit]
A 36 ft (11 m) statue of Keewakwa Abenaki Keenahbeh in Opechee Park in Laconia, New Hampshire

New Hampshire does not recognize any Abenaki tribes.[24] It has no federally recognized tribes or state-recognized tribes; however, it established the New Hampshire Commission on Native American Affairs in 2010. The various Cowasuck, Abenaki, and other Native and heritage groups are represented to the commission.[35]

In 2021, a bill was introduced to the New Hampshire legislature to allow New Hampshire communities to rename locations in the Abenaki language.[36] This bill did not pass.[37]

Culture

[edit]

There are a dozen variations of the name "Abenaki", such as Abenaquiois, Abakivis, Quabenakionek, Wabenakies and others.

The Abenaki were described in the Jesuit Relations as not cannibals, and as docile, ingenious, temperate in the use of liquor, and not profane.[38]

Abenaki lifeways were similar to those of Algonquian-speaking peoples of southern New England. They cultivated food crops and built villages on or near fertile river floodplains. They also hunted game, fished, and gathered wild plants and fungi.[5]

Unlike the Haudenosaunee, the Abenaki were patrilineal. Each man had different hunting territories inherited through his father.

Most of the year, Abenaki lived in dispersed bands of extended families. Bands came together during the spring and summer at seasonal villages near rivers, or somewhere along the seacoast for planting and fishing. During the winter, the Abenaki lived in small groups further inland. These villages occasionally had to be fortified, depending on the alliances and enemies of other tribes or of Europeans near the village. Abenaki villages were quite small with an average number of 100 residents.[5]

Most Abenaki crafted dome-shaped, bark-covered wigwams for housing, though a few preferred oval-shaped longhouses.[5][39] During the winter, the Abenaki lined the inside of their conical wigwams with bear and deer skins for warmth.

Gender, food, division of labor, and other cultural traits

[edit]

The Abenaki were a farming society that supplemented agriculture with hunting and gathering. Generally the men were the hunters. The women tended the fields and grew the crops.[40] In their fields, they planted the crops in groups of "sisters". The three sisters were grown together: the stalk of corn supported the beans, and squash or pumpkins provided ground cover and reduced weeds.[40] The men would hunt bears, deer, fish, and birds.

The Abenaki were a patrilineal society, which was common among New England tribes. In this they differed from the six Iroquois tribes to the west in New York, and from many other North American Native tribes who had matrilineal societies.

Groups used the consensus method to make important decisions.

Storytelling

[edit]

Storytelling is a major part of Abenaki culture. It is used not only as entertainment but also as a teaching method. The Abenaki view stories as having lives of their own and being aware of how they are used. Stories were used as a means of teaching children behavior. Children were not to be mistreated, and so instead of punishing the child, they would be told a story.[41]

One of the stories is of Azban the Raccoon. This is a story about a proud raccoon that challenges a waterfall to a shouting contest. When the waterfall does not respond, Azban dives into the waterfall to try to outshout it; he is swept away because of his pride. This story would be used to show a child the pitfalls of pride.[42]

Mythology

[edit]
See also: Abenaki mythology

Ethnobotany

[edit]

The Abenaki smash the flowers and leaves of Ranunculus acris and sniff them for headaches.[43][44] They consume the fruit of Vaccinium myrtilloides as part of their traditional diet.[45] They also use the fruit[46] and the grains of Viburnum nudum var. cassinoides[47] for food.[48]

Many other plants are used for various healing and treatment modalities, including for the skin, as a disinfectant, as a cure-all, as a respiratory aid, for colds, coughs, fevers, grippe, gas, blood strengthening, headaches and other pains, rheumatism, demulcent, nasal inflammation, anthelmintic, for the eyes, abortifacent, for the bones, antihemorrhagic, as a sedative, anaphrodisiac, swellings, urinary aid, gastrointestinal aid, as a hemostat, pediatric aid (such as for teething), and other unspecified or general uses.[49]

They use Hierochloe odorata (sweetgrass), Apocynum (dogbane), Betula papyrifera (paper birch), Fraxinus americana (white ash), Fraxinus nigra (black ash), Laportea canadensis (Canada nettle), a variety of Salix species, and Tilia americana (basswood, or American linden) var. Americana for making baskets, canoes, snowshoes, and whistles.[50] They use Hierochloe odorata and willow to make containers, Betula papyrifera to create containers, moose calls and other utilitarian pieces, and the bark of Cornus sericea (red osier dogwood) ssp. sericea for smoking.[51]

They also use Acer rubrum, Acornus calamus, an unknown Amelanchier species, Caltha palustris, Cardamine diphylla, Cornus canadensis, an unknown Crataegus species, Fragaria virginiana, Gaultheria procumbens, Osmunda cinnamomea, Phaseolus vulgaris, Photinia melanocarpa, Prunus virginiana, Rubus idaeus and another unknown Rubus species, Solanum tuberosum, Spiraea alba var. latifolia, Vaccinium angustifolium, and Zea mays as a tea, soup, jelly, sweetener, condiment, snack, or meal.[52]

The Abenaki use the gum of Abies balsamea for slight itches and as an antiseptic ointment.[53] They stuff the leaves,[54] needles and wood into pillows as a panacea.[55]

Population and epidemics

[edit]

Before the Abenaki, except the Pennacook and Mi'kmaq, had contact with the European world, their population may have numbered as many as 40,000. Around 20,000 would have been Eastern Abenaki, another 10,000 would have been Western Abenaki, and the last 10,000 would have been Maritime Abenaki. Early contact with European fishermen resulted in two major epidemics that affected Abenaki during the 16th century. The first epidemic was an unknown sickness occurring sometime between 1564 and 1570, and the second one was typhus in 1586. Multiple epidemics arrived a decade prior to the English colonization of Massachusetts in 1620, when three separate sicknesses swept across New England and the Canadian Maritimes. Maine was hit very hard during the year of 1617, with a fatality rate of 75 per, and the population of the Eastern Abenaki fell to about 5,000. The more isolated Western Abenaki suffered fewer fatalities, losing about half of their original population of 10,000.[5]

The new diseases continued to strike in epidemics, starting with smallpox in 1631, 1633, and 1639. Seven years later, an unknown epidemic struck, with influenza passing through the following year. Smallpox affected the Abenaki again in 1649, and diphtheria came through 10 years later. Smallpox struck in 1670, and influenza in 1675. Smallpox affected the Native Americans in 1677, 1679, 1687, along with measles, 1691, 1729, 1733, 1755, and finally in 1758.[5]

The Abenaki population continued to decline, but in 1676, they took in thousands of refugees from many southern New England tribes displaced by settlement and King Philip's War. Because of this, descendants of nearly every southern New England Algonquian tribe can be found among the Abenaki people. A century later, fewer than 1,000 Abenaki remained after the American Revolution.

In the 1990 US census, 1,549 people identified themselves as Abenaki. So did 2,544 people in the 2000 US census, with 6,012 people claiming Abenaki heritage.[3] In 1991 Canadian Abenaki numbered 945; by 2006 they numbered 2,164.[3]

Fiction

[edit]

Lydia Maria Child wrote of the Abenaki in her short story, "The Church in the Wilderness" (1828). Several Abenaki characters and much about their 18th-century culture are featured in the Kenneth Roberts' novel Arundel (1930). The film Northwest Passage (1940) is based on a novel of the same name by Roberts.

The Abenaki are featured in Charles McCarry's historical novel Bride of the Wilderness (1988), and James Archibald Houston's novel Ghost Fox (1977), both of which are set in the eighteenth century; and in Jodi Picoult's Second Glance (2003) and Lone Wolf (2012) novels, set in the contemporary world. Books for younger readers both have historical settings: Joseph Bruchac's The Arrow Over the Door (1998) (grades 4–6) is set in 1777; and Beth Kanell's young adult novel, The Darkness Under the Water (2008), concerns a young Abenaki-French Canadian girl during the time of the Vermont Eugenics Project, 1931–1936.

The first sentence in Norman Mailer's novel Harlot's Ghost makes reference to the Abenaki: "On a late-winter evening in 1983, while driving through fog along the Maine coast, recollections of old campfires began to drift into the March mist, and I thought of the Abnaki Indians of the Algonquin tribe who dwelt near Bangor a thousand years ago."

Non-fiction

[edit]

Letters and other non-fiction writing can be found in the anthology Dawnland Voices, edited by Siobhan Senier. Selections include letters from leader of the early praying town, Wamesit in Massachusetts Samuel Numphow,[clarification needed] Sagamore Kancamagus,[clarification needed] and writings on the Abenaki language by former chief of the reserve at Odanak in Quebec, Joseph Laurent, as well as many others.[citation needed]

Accounts of life with the Abenaki can be found in the captivity narratives written by women taken captive by the Abenaki from the early New England settlements: Mary Rowlandson (1682), Hannah Duston (1702); Elizabeth Hanson (1728); Susannah Willard Johnson (1754); and Jemima Howe (1792).[56]

Maps

[edit]

Maps showing the approximate locations of areas occupied by members of the Wabanaki Confederacy (from north to south):

Notable historic Abenaki people

[edit]

Please list living people under their First Nation or state-recognized tribe.

Notable contemporary Abenaki people

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Abenaki

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

The Abenaki are Indigenous peoples of the Northeastern Woodlands of , speaking closely related and historically occupying territories in what is now southern , , , western , and adjacent areas.
Divided into Eastern and Western subgroups, the Abenaki allied with neighboring , Maliseet, , and nations in the around 1680 to counter threats from the and European colonists, engaging in , warfare, and diplomacy that shaped regional power dynamics.
Their traditional economy centered on hunting, fishing, gathering wild plants, and maize-based , with distinctive cultural practices including birch-bark wigwams, ash-splint basketry, and oral traditions preserved through and ceremonies.
European contact from the onward brought devastating epidemics, military conflicts such as the and Father Rale's War, and coerced migrations, reducing populations drastically and confining survivors to missions like and Wôlinak in .
In the present day, Abenaki communities number around 3,800 registered members at the Quebec reserves, with approximately 5,300 individuals reporting Abenaki ancestry in per the 2021 census; in the United States, the Eastern Abenaki-affiliated Nation holds federal recognition in , while Western Abenaki groups in gained state recognition in 2011–2012 but were denied federal acknowledgment by the due to insufficient historical continuity, prompting disputes from federally recognized Abenaki in questioning the Vermont tribes' genealogical ties and authenticity based on recent genealogical studies.
Efforts to revitalize the endangered Abenaki languages and continue through tribal programs, museums, and , amid integration into modern economies.

Terminology

Etymology and Names

The name Abenaki originates from the Eastern Abenaki language term wapanahki, signifying "person of the dawn-land," which reflects the tribes' geographical position in the eastern woodlands where the sun rises first relative to other Algonquian groups. This underscores their identity tied to the orientation toward the dawn, a concept rooted in Algonquian linguistics where waban- denotes "east" or "white" (as in the light of dawn) and -aki refers to "people" or "land." Abenaki speakers themselves use terms such as Wôbanakiak or W8banaki as self-designations, directly translating to "People of the Dawn Land," emphasizing a linked to their ancestral territories in the Northeast. European colonists, including French and English settlers from the onward, adapted this into Abenaki or the syncope Abnaki to describe the Algonquian-speaking confederacy centered in what is now and adjacent regions, distinguishing them from western Algonquian nations. The term Wabanaki extends to a broader alliance including the Abenaki alongside related groups like the , Maliseet, and , all sharing linguistic and cultural ties under the "Dawn Land Peoples" designation, though Abenaki specifically denotes the core eastern and western bands. These names have persisted in historical records and modern self-identification, with variations arising from orthographic differences in colonial documentation rather than substantive shifts in meaning.

Subgroup Designations

The Abenaki people are historically classified into two primary subgroups: the Eastern Abenaki and the Western Abenaki, a division rooted in geographic territories, linguistic dialects, and colonial-era documentation from the 17th and 18th centuries. This binary categorization emerged as European explorers and settlers mapped indigenous populations along the northeastern seaboard, with the Eastern subgroup centered in coastal and riverine areas of present-day and the Western subgroup occupying inland valleys extending from and into southern . Linguistic evidence supports this split, as Eastern Abenaki dialects diverged from Western ones within the broader Algonquian family, reflecting adaptations to distinct environments and inter-band interactions. The Eastern Abenaki encompassed several bands tied to specific river systems and coastal zones, including the Penobscot (along the ), Kennebec ( valley), Arosaguntacook (upper ), and Pigwacket ( region in present-day and ). These groups maintained semi-autonomous villages but coordinated through shared kinship networks and seasonal migrations for , , and , with populations estimated at several thousand prior to intensive European contact around 1600. Historical records from French missionaries and English traders, such as those compiled in the early 1700s, document these bands' participation in alliances like the , though internal designations were fluid and based on leadership rather than rigid hierarchies. The Western Abenaki included bands such as the Sokoki ( valley), Missisquoi ( basin), Cowasuck (upper ), and Arsikantegok (northern areas), with the Pennacook sometimes affiliated due to overlapping territories in southern and . These groups adapted to forested uplands, emphasizing mobility for and warfare, and by the mid-18th century, many had relocated northward amid colonial encroachments, with remnants documented in missions like by 1700. Designations among Western bands were often ethno-geographic, derived from place names (e.g., Missisquoi from a local Abenaki term for "place where the grass grows"), and preserved in treaties and land deeds from the 1600s onward. Some historical accounts propose additional divisions, such as Maritime Abenaki along the and Saint John rivers, but these are typically subsumed under Eastern classifications in modern ethnological analyses due to linguistic and cultural overlaps with and groups. Overall, subgroup identities were not static ethnic boundaries but pragmatic alliances shaped by , , and conflict, with continuity evident in contemporary state-recognized bands in and as of 2012.

Geography

Traditional Territories

The traditional territories of the Abenaki, referred to as Ndakinna meaning "our land," extended across what is now , , , southern , northern , and parts of eastern New York. These lands featured river valleys, lakes, and mixed forests suited to seasonal hunting, fishing, and small-scale agriculture. The Abenaki are broadly divided into Western and Eastern groups, each with territories centered on key waterways. Western Abenaki domains included the valley from its upper reaches in southward, the basin in and into southern Quebec along the , and adjacent uplands. Subgroups such as the Sokoki occupied the upper area, the Missisquoi the shores of , the Cowasuck the Coos region of northern , and the Pennacook southern and Massachusetts borderlands. Eastern Abenaki territories lay primarily in interior between the and rivers, extending to the and drainages. The subgroup controlled the watershed, the the valley, the Arosaguntacook the upper , and the Pigwacket (Pequawket) the region near the border. These areas supported villages near fertile floodplains and provided access to coastal resources through alliances in the broader Wabanaki network.

Modern Settlements and Reservations

The principal modern Abenaki settlements are concentrated in two reserves in , , comprising the W8banaki Nation: (also known as Saint-François-de-Sales-de-la-Rivière-du-Sud) and Wôlinak (Becancour). , established in the late as a refuge for Abenaki displaced by colonial conflicts, maintains a registered population of 2,101 members as of recent tribal council reports. Wôlinak, founded around 1704 along the Bécancour River, has a registered population of 714 individuals as of 2024. These communities, totaling nearly 3,000 Abenaki residents in , preserve Abenaki language, governance, and cultural practices amid ongoing economic activities such as basketry and tourism. In the United States, Eastern Abenaki descendants primarily reside on the in , a federally recognized territory spanning approximately 4,000 acres along the near Old Town. This reservation serves as the sovereign seat of the Nation, with 758 residents recorded in the 2020 census and over 1,399 enrolled members statewide, many commuting to the island for governance and cultural events. The Penobscot maintain tribal courts, schools, and under a 1980 land claims settlement that affirmed their rights to the river and adjacent lands. Western Abenaki groups in lack federal recognition or designated reservations, instead operating through four state-recognized bands: the Abenaki Nation of Missisquoi, Elnu Abenaki Tribe, Nulhegan Band of the Coosuk-Abenaki Nation, and Koasek Traditional Band of the Koas Abenaki Nation. State recognition, granted between 2011 and 2012, affirms their historical presence and provides limited benefits such as cultural preservation funding but no land base or over territory. Members, numbering in the hundreds across these bands, live in dispersed communities primarily around and the valley, engaging in advocacy for ancestral land acknowledgment. Quebec-based Abenaki councils have contested these recognitions, citing 2025 genealogical analyses indicating that key Vermont figures possess at most 3.1% documented Indigenous ancestry, predominantly non-Abenaki, and urging revocation on grounds of insufficient tribal continuity. band leaders counter that indigeneity derives from intergenerational oral traditions, networks, and cultural continuity rather than solely DNA metrics, a position upheld under state law emphasizing historical documentation over genetic thresholds.

Language

Classification and Dialects

The Abenaki language belongs to the Eastern Algonquian subgroup of the Algonquian language family, which also includes languages such as Mi'kmaq, Maliseet-Passamaquoddy, and Delaware. This classification reflects shared grammatical structures, including animate-inanimate noun distinctions and complex verb conjugations typical of Algonquian languages. Abenaki comprises two main varieties—Eastern Abenaki and Western Abenaki—which differ in , such as the treatment of voiced versus voiceless consonants in Western forms, and in vocabulary, leading some linguists to classify them as separate though closely related languages. Eastern Abenaki dialects historically included , Kennebec (associated with ), Arosaguntacook (Androscoggin), and Pequawket (Pigwacket), each tied to specific tribal bands in what is now . remains the most documented and partially vital among these, with limited fluent speakers preserving elements of its and . Western Abenaki, spoken primarily by communities in and , features more unified local dialects linked to subgroups like the Sokoki, Missisquoi, and , though it maintains across its range. Efforts to document and distinguish these dialects draw on historical records and contemporary revitalization, highlighting phonological markers like notations unique to Western forms.

Revitalization and Current Status

The , comprising Western and Eastern dialects, is classified as critically endangered, with Western Abenaki used as a only by a small number of elderly speakers and Eastern Abenaki considered dormant, lacking any remaining communities. Estimates indicate approximately 14 speakers across dialects as of recent assessments, though fluent proficiency is limited to a handful, primarily in Western Abenaki, with no fully fluent Eastern speakers reported. Revitalization initiatives emphasize community-led immersion and digital resources to foster . For Western Abenaki, the Ndakinna Education Center, directed by fluent speaker Jesse Bruchac, provides audio and video lessons via westernabenaki.com, alongside bilingual children's books and cultural terminology preservation, such as terms for traditional crafts. Middlebury College's School of Abenaki, launched in 2020, offers free two-week immersion programs enforcing a Language Pledge for total usage, targeting beginners through co-learning with native speakers, classroom instruction, and activities like and ; the inaugural online session in 2020 enrolled 23 participants, mostly Abenaki descendants aged 18 to 75. The delivers co-taught courses, while Abenaki Online serves as a repository for remote immersive classes and grammar resources aimed at beginners. Eastern Abenaki efforts, centered on the Penobscot dialect, rely on the Nation's Cultural and Historic Preservation Department, which maintains an online dictionary with audio pronunciations, Unicode keyboard tools, and covering greetings, family terms, lunar names, and daily phrases to support classroom-based learning and technological integration. These programs prioritize full , as outlined in early frameworks, though progress remains constrained by the absence of fluent elders, shifting focus to archival reconstruction and youth engagement. Despite such endeavors, both dialects face ongoing attrition without broader fluent transmission, underscoring the reliance on semi-speakers and learners for cultural continuity.

History

Pre-Colonial Era

The Abenaki inhabited the northeastern woodlands, spanning present-day Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, and adjacent areas of Quebec and Massachusetts, prior to European contact around 1600 CE. Their territories, centered on river valleys such as the Connecticut and Champlain regions, supported a semi-sedentary lifestyle adapted to seasonal resource cycles. Archaeological sites, including those in the Champlain Valley and Upper Connecticut River, demonstrate continuous occupation dating back over 11,500 years, with evidence of structured settlements and resource management. Population estimates for the Abenaki at the time of early contact vary, with archaeological and ethnohistorical analogies suggesting 25,000 to 50,000 individuals across their range, at densities of 1 to 2 persons per . Villages typically housed hundreds to 1,000 people, organized into family bands that formed the core social units. occurred through councils of elders and chiefs, emphasizing collective decision-making that incorporated input from men, women, and youth, reflecting adaptations to local environmental pressures rather than rigid hierarchies. Subsistence relied on a diversified economy integrating , , , and gathering, with practices rooted in millennia of environmental knowledge. featured the "three sisters" crops—corn, beans, and squash—cultivated in fertile riverine soils, supplemented by managed nut orchards and maple sugaring, evident from 3,000 to 7,000 years . targeted large game like , deer, and during winter, while spring focused on anadromous species such as and shad; gathering wild and small game filled summer needs. Seasonal mobility was key: larger summer villages supported farming and , dispersing into smaller winter camps for in uplands. Material culture included birch-bark longhouses accommodating extended families of up to 40 individuals, year-round bases for villages near waterways that facilitated transport and food access. Tools encompassed stone implements like fluted points and scrapers, alongside cord-marked ceramics for storage and cooking, as found in burial and settlement contexts. Division of labor aligned with gender: women managed fields, processing, and crafts such as basketry, while men led hunting and fishing expeditions, enabling resilience in a landscape of variable climate and resources.

European Contact and Initial Interactions

The Abenaki first encountered Europeans indirectly through Basque, French, and English fishermen who frequented the and coastal waters during the , engaging in seasonal trade for furs, dried fish, and other goods without establishing permanent settlements. These interactions introduced devastating epidemics to Abenaki communities, including unidentified illnesses that significantly reduced populations prior to sustained colonization efforts. In 1604, English fishermen and traders began establishing seasonal operations on Damariscove Island off the coast of what is now Boothbay, , initiating direct contact with local Eastern Abenaki groups who referred to the island as Aquahega; these exchanges involved bartering fish and European goods for Native furs and provisions, though relations remained limited and opportunistic. French Jesuit missionaries arrived in the region as early as 1611, following initial explorations, and sought to foster alliances through and partnerships, viewing the Abenaki as potential buffers against expansion. A pivotal interaction occurred in July 1609 when French explorer navigated southern —known to the Abenaki as Bitawbagw—guided by Algonquian-speaking Natives, including Western Abenaki bands such as the Sokoki and Missisquoi, who shared knowledge of fertile corn fields on the eastern shores. joined a war party of Algonquians and Mahicans against Mohawk near Ticonderoga, using his to aid the allies, which solidified early French-Abenaki military cooperation and opened avenues for sustained , though it also escalated intertribal conflicts influenced by European rivalries. These initial encounters laid the foundation for Abenaki alliances favoring the French, driven by mutual interests in trade and defense, while English coastal presence grew but provoked tensions over land use.

Colonial Wars and Alliances

The Abenaki established alliances with French colonists in the late 17th century, driven by the lucrative fur trade and Jesuit missionary efforts that fostered mutual interests against English encroachment on traditional territories in present-day Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. French traders provided goods, firearms, and diplomatic support, while missionaries like Sébastien Rale at Norridgewock reinforced cultural and military ties, positioning the Abenaki as key participants in Franco-English rivalries. These alliances were pragmatic rather than subservient, with Abenaki leaders retaining autonomy in warfare and negotiations, often using French backing to conduct raids defending against settler expansion and Iroquois incursions allied with the English. During (1689–1697), the first major colonial conflict, Abenaki warriors allied with French forces launched raids on English settlements in northern , including attacks on Dover in July 1689 and Pemaquid in August 1689, contributing to broader frontier devastation that killed dozens of colonists and disrupted English colonization. In (1702–1713), Abenaki participation peaked in the February 29, 1704, , , where approximately 50 Abenaki among a force of 250 French and Native allies killed 47 settlers, captured 112 (many later ransomed or integrated into Native communities), and burned the village, highlighting their role in retaliatory strikes against land seizures. These actions stemmed from grievances over English treaties violating Abenaki , with French governors like Vaudreuil encouraging such operations to counter British advances. Father Rale's War, also known as (1722–1725), intensified Abenaki-French cooperation amid escalating land disputes; Governor Samuel Shute declared war in July 1722 after Abenaki attacks on English fishermen and traders. A pivotal event was the August 12, 1724, expedition of 208 soldiers against the mission, where forces killed Rale—viewed as a French agitator—and an estimated 20–80 Abenaki, destroying the village and prompting many survivors to flee to French Canada. The war ended with the 1725 Treaty of , forcing Abenaki concessions but failing to quell resistance, as ongoing migrations to missions like St. Francis solidified French alliances. In (1744–1748) and the (1754–1763), Abenaki from Canadian missions, numbering up to several hundred warriors at times, conducted raids on English frontiers, such as those supporting French captures of forts in , though internal divisions led some groups to seek neutrality or peace with the British by 1758. English policies, including bounties for scalps and alliances with the , exacerbated Abenaki losses, estimated in the hundreds across raids and counterattacks, ultimately contributing to territorial concessions after France's 1763 defeat in the Treaty of Paris, which left Abenaki without their primary European patron.

Post-Colonial Decline and Adaptation

Following the Treaty of Paris in 1783, which concluded the , Abenaki bands faced intensified pressure from American settlement and state land policies, exacerbating prior losses from colonial conflicts and epidemics. Western Abenaki groups in and , having already dispatched many members to Canadian refuges like during the Seven Years' War, encountered rapid non-native immigration that rendered traditional territories untenable for large-scale communal living. This demographic shift, coupled with legal disregard for by emerging state governments, prompted further out-migration or dispersal into remote areas. Eastern Abenaki nations, particularly the and in , formalized land cessions through treaties with —such as the agreement of 1794 and treaties in 1796, 1818, and 1833—which transferred millions of acres to state control in return for modest annuities, reserved tracts, and fishing rights. These instruments, negotiated from positions of military and numerical inferiority, accelerated the contraction of Abenaki land bases from pre-contact expanses across and to fragmented reservations totaling under 100,000 acres by the mid-19th century. Population estimates reflect this erosion: Western Abenaki numbers in the U.S. dwindled to scattered families by 1800, with most having joined Quebec missions, while Eastern groups hovered around 1,000-2,000 individuals amid ongoing intermarriage and dispersal. Adaptation strategies emphasized survivance over confrontation, including public assimilation via adoption of Euro-American dress, , and occupations like farming or to evade and land forfeiture. In , Abenaki families frequently relocated within the or passed as French-Canadian migrants, preserving ties and seasonal mobility while minimizing visibility to authorities. Canadian enclaves at and Wôlinak, swelled by refugees since the 1760s, evolved into stable villages reliant on , fur trade remnants, and mission economies, sustaining Abenaki governance under British protection. By the late , these tactics had stabilized core communities, though at the cost of linguistic erosion and diluted traditional practices, setting the stage for later revival efforts.

20th and 21st Century Recognition

In the 20th century, Eastern Abenaki groups such as the in retained federal recognition dating to earlier treaties but pursued land claim resolutions amid ongoing disputes over territory lost during colonial expansion. The Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980, enacted by , addressed these claims by providing $81.5 million to the , , and Houlton Band of Maliseet tribes, enabling the purchase of 300,000 acres of land and affirming limited sovereignty within the state while extinguishing broader . This settlement marked a significant acknowledgment of historical dispossession, though it restricted tribes' ability to pursue federal court claims without state consent. Western Abenaki communities in and faced greater challenges in securing formal status. The St. Francis-Sokoki Band of the Abenakis of submitted a for federal acknowledgment under the ' process in 1983, but the agency issued a final determination against recognition on July 2, 2007, concluding that while an Abenaki presence existed in northwestern through the late , there was insufficient evidence of continuous distinct community and political influence thereafter to meet the criteria. has not granted state or federal recognition to any Abenaki groups, leaving them without official tribal status amid historical assimilation pressures. Vermont extended state recognition to four self-identified Abenaki bands between 2011 and 2012: the Elnu Abenaki Tribe, Nulhegan Band of the Coosuk Abenaki Nation, Missisquoi Abenaki Tribe, and St. Francis-Sokoki Band, formalized by legislation signed on May 7, 2012, for the latter. These acknowledgments, which do not confer federal benefits or sovereignty, have been limited to cultural and educational support. However, Abenaki First Nations in Quebec, including Odanak and Wolinak—federally recognized reserves with documented continuity—have repeatedly challenged their legitimacy, presenting genealogical evidence in 2023 and 2024 alleging fabricated ancestry among Vermont leaders and characterizing the recognitions as enabling identity fraud without rigorous tribal verification. In July 2024, these Canadian communities raised the issue at the United Nations, advocating for stricter U.S. standards aligned with international Indigenous protocols. In , Abenaki bands at and Wolinak have pursued specific claims, such as reallocations from federal reserve distributions, reflecting ongoing efforts to rectify 19th- and 20th-century administrative inequities without broader federal re-recognition processes. These developments highlight persistent divisions over Abenaki identity and governance, with Vermont's state actions prioritizing self-identification over descent-based proofs demanded by federally recognized kin groups.

Culture and Society

Social Organization and Gender Roles

Abenaki social organization centered on small, kin-based bands or villages composed of extended families connected through bilateral ties, with descent traced through both maternal and paternal lines but a noted preference for patrilineal inheritance of family identities and hunting territories. These units lacked formal clans or moieties, distinguishing them from some neighboring Algonquian and Iroquoian groups, and emphasized flexible, consensus-driven governance over rigid hierarchies. Leadership typically fell to a civil chief—often a male figure selected for wisdom and mediation skills—who advised the group on matters like and , supported by informal councils of elders rather than coercive authority. Villages were semi-permanent settlements sited near rivers or lakes for access to fish and transportation, featuring birch-bark wigwams arranged in semi-circles around a central open space used for communal gatherings, ceremonies, and decision-making. Family hunting territories were key to economic independence, inherited patrilineally to ensure sustainable use, with bands dispersing in winter for small-group hunts and reconvening in summer for planting and trade. Gender roles exhibited a clear division of labor aligned with environmental demands, where men focused on hunting large game (such as moose and deer), fishing, warfare for defense or raiding, and external diplomacy or shamanic practices. Women handled agriculture—cultivating corn, beans, and squash in riverine fields—along with gathering wild plants, processing hides into clothing and shelter coverings, food preservation through drying or smoking, and primary childcare, which underpinned the band's subsistence stability. While patriarchal in leadership, women's economic centrality afforded them influence in village councils and resource decisions, as their labor sustained the group during men's absences; spiritual beliefs reinforced complementarity, with the Great Spirit ungendered and roles viewed as interdependent rather than hierarchical. This structure persisted into the colonial era, adapting to fur trade demands but eroding under population losses from disease and displacement.

Subsistence and Economy

The Abenaki maintained a diversified centered on , , , and gathering, adapted to the forested river valleys and coastal regions of northeastern . Women primarily managed small-scale , cultivating the "three sisters" crops—corn (Zea mays), beans (), and squash (Cucurbita spp.)—in fertile floodplains, often yielding enough to store surpluses for winter, while men focused on large game such as deer, , , and , as well as trapping smaller animals. supplemented these efforts, targeting anadromous like (Salmo salar) and sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus) in rivers such as the and Saint François, using weirs, spears, and hooks crafted from bone or wood; gathering included wild berries, nuts, maple sap for , and like fiddleheads. This seasonal mobility involved family bands shifting between inland villages for farming and hunting grounds, and coastal or riverine sites for , ensuring resilience against environmental variability. Pre-colonial trade networks exchanged surplus foods, tools, and prestige goods like (quahog shell beads) across territories, fostering intertribal alliances without centralized markets. European contact from the early 1600s introduced the fur trade, transforming subsistence patterns as Abenaki hunters supplied pelts to French and English traders in exchange for metal axes, kettles, cloth, and firearms, which increased efficiency but led to overhunting and defined family trapping territories by the mid-17th century. By the late 1600s, declining populations and shifting European demand reduced trade viability, exacerbating economic pressures amid colonial expansion and warfare. In contemporary times, Abenaki communities in (Odanak and Wolinak reserves) and integrate traditional practices like maple sugaring and craft production with wage labor in sectors such as , , and services, reflecting adaptation to broader economies while preserving cultural elements. Basketry from black ash (Fraxinus nigra), wood carvings, and moosehair embroidery remain economically significant, often marketed through cooperatives or tourism initiatives. 's state-recognized bands, including the Nulhegan and Missisquoi, leverage recognition for certified Native craft sales and limited resource rights like preferential access, though federal non-recognition limits larger ventures such as gaming. and gathering persist for cultural and supplemental purposes, supported by treaty-like agreements in , but face regulatory challenges from conservation laws.

Spiritual Beliefs and Mythology

The traditional spiritual beliefs of the Abenaki, an Algonquian-speaking people of the northeastern Woodlands, centered on an animistic worldview in which natural elements and beings possessed inherent spiritual powers, or manitous. They recognized a supreme known as Gichi Niwaskw, or the , who originated the world and its inhabitants. This creator was complemented by a multitude of spirits associated with animals, , the four winds, and celestial bodies, including personifications such as Mother Earth, Father Sky, Grandmother Moon, and Grandfather Sun, which were honored through reverence for the natural order. Abenaki mythology, preserved through oral traditions, features prominent figures like Gluskabe (also rendered as or Gluskabi), a benevolent and transformer who imparted essential knowledge to humanity. In creation narratives, Gluskabe formed the first humans by shooting arrows into ash trees, from which people emerged, and he adjusted the sizes of animals—such as rendering large for provision while making squirrels small to evade harm—based on their intended roles in human sustenance. He also taught skills in , building wigwams, and utilizing plants, while opposing chaotic forces like the wolf spirit Malsumsis to enforce cosmic balance. Other myths explain natural phenomena, such as the origins of , seasonal changes, and , emphasizing with the environment and the consequences of imbalance, like excessive human demands on . Additional mythological beings include Ojihozo (or Odzihózo), a transformer who shaped landscapes such as the , rivers, and mountains before petrifying into Rock Dunder near Shelburne Point, , symbolizing the enduring spiritual presence in geography. Trickster figures like the and introduce themes of mischief and cleverness, while darker entities such as giants (Giwakwa) and serpents (Tatoskok) represent challenges overcome by heroes. Creation stories often depict the earth arising on a turtle's back, retrieved by from primordial waters, with the First Mother sacrificing her body to yield corn, underscoring cycles of renewal and interdependence. These narratives, shared across peoples including the Abenaki, served to transmit moral values, , and through storytelling.

Material Culture and Practices

The Abenaki constructed traditional dwellings known as , featuring conical or dome-shaped frames formed by bending flexible saplings, which were then covered with sheets of , elm, or other softwood bark secured by spruce root ties. These structures provided portable and weather-resistant housing suited to their semi-nomadic lifestyle in the northeastern woodlands. Bark was harvested in large pieces during spring when it peeled easily from trees, reflecting seasonal practices tied to natural cycles. Transportation and utilitarian items emphasized birch bark and wood. canoes, essential for and lake , consisted of a single large sheet of bark (igua) stretched over cedar rib frames (wogino), lashed with roots (wadabal), and sealed with (pego). Variants included standard canoes (wigwaol), cargo models (odoalagwal), and larger war canoes (madobaolagwal). Snowshoes (ogenal), shaped like teardrops, were crafted from wood frames laced with rawhide, facilitating winter travel through deep . Baskets for storage and transport were woven from splints (mahlawks or wigebiak), often incorporating sweetgrass (walmogwkil) for decorative accents, with basketry evolving into a commercial industry by the late using similar materials. Clothing and tools drew from local resources including animal hides, bone, and stone. Garments such as moccasins and tunics were made from tanned deerskin or other furs, supplemented later by traded wool and beads, prioritizing functionality for hunting and farming. Tools encompassed stone scrapers, chipped implements, bows, arrows, and bone awls, with birch bark also used for containers and temporary coverings. Pottery, cradleboards, and decorative quillwork on hides represented additional crafts, blending utility with aesthetic elements derived from woodland materials. These practices persisted through adaptation, as evidenced by museum collections of Abenaki artifacts demonstrating continuity in craftsmanship.

Demography

Pre-Contact Population Estimates

Estimates of the Abenaki population before sustained European contact in the early remain approximate, derived from densities, environmental assessments, and extrapolations from early colonial records of village sizes and warfare participation. Scholarly analyses emphasize the challenges of such projections, including the Abenaki's seasonal migrations between coastal and inland territories, which dispersed populations and confounded static counts, as well as the absence of pre-contact censuses or written demographics. Gordon M. Day, drawing on ethnohistoric data from Western Abenaki bands such as the Sokoki and Missisquoi, posited a pre-contact figure of approximately 5,000 for the Western Abenaki, concentrated in the upper valley, , , and adjacent Quebec regions. Dean R. Snow, in his archaeological synthesis of Northeastern indigenous demographics, initially estimated the Western Abenaki at around 10,000 prior to epidemics, later revising upward to account for undercounted inland settlements and subsistence efficiencies in forested uplands supporting dispersed family bands of 50-200 per village. For the Eastern Abenaki, encompassing groups like the , Kennebec, and Pigwacket along Maine's rivers and coast, Snow identified 22 villages post-early 17th-century epidemics yielding about 10,000 survivors, implying a pre-epidemic total nearer 12,000-15,000 when back-projected from warrior ratios and habitat productivity. These figures align with broader ethnohistoric baselines around 1600-1610, when Eastern Abenaki numbered roughly 13,800 and Western about 12,000, before virgin-soil diseases reduced numbers by 50-90% in subsequent decades. Higher estimates, such as those incorporating regional totals exceeding 90,000 pre-epidemic, suggest Abenaki subsets could reach 20,000-30,000 combined if including peripheral affiliates, though these risk overextrapolation from coastal biases in European accounts. Lower bounds, like Day's conservative 5,000 for Western groups, prioritize direct band-level evidence over ecological models, reflecting debates over whether clusters indicate permanent villages or seasonal camps. Consensus holds that Abenaki densities were modest—1-2 persons per square kilometer—sustained by , , and swidden in a of limited , contrasting denser Mississippi Valley polities. Such variability underscores the tentativeness of pre-contact figures, with no single estimate commanding unqualified acceptance absent new paleodemographic data from skeletal analyses or .

Epidemics, Warfare, and Population Decline

The introduction of European diseases devastated Abenaki populations beginning in the early 17th century, as the tribes lacked prior exposure and immunity to pathogens such as , , , and . Mortality rates in affected communities reached 75-90%, with some estimates indicating up to 98% reductions in specific locales within decades of sustained contact. A particularly severe wave in 1617 inflicted 75% mortality on eastern Abenaki groups in , reducing their numbers to approximately 5,000, while western bands, more geographically isolated, fared somewhat better initially. Subsequent epidemics compounded the losses, including smallpox outbreaks documented in New England records from the 1630s onward and recurring waves through the mid-1600s that incorporated influenza and unidentified plagues. These demographic collapses prompted adaptive responses, such as absorbing refugees from decimated southern Algonquian tribes in 1676, which temporarily bolstered numbers but strained resources amid ongoing vulnerability to disease. Overall pre-contact Abenaki population estimates range from 20,000 to 25,000 across eastern and western divisions, plummeting to around 2,500 by the late 17th century due predominantly to these epidemics. Intertribal and colonial warfare accelerated the decline, particularly from the late 17th to mid-18th centuries, as Abenaki bands allied with French forces against English expansion in conflicts like (1689-1697) and (1722-1725). Raids and counter-raids resulted in direct combat casualties, village destructions, and forced migrations, with English scorched-earth tactics targeting Abenaki settlements along the frontier. These wars displaced thousands northward to and St. Francis, where refugees integrated into mission villages but faced continued exposure to disease and resource scarcity; by 1725, wartime refuges saw initial population influxes followed by attrition from combat and epidemics. By the mid-18th century, surviving Abenaki numbers in the upper basin hovered between 1,800 and 2,000, reflecting combined tolls from violence and prior depopulation. The synergistic effects of epidemics and warfare—causally linked through disrupted social structures, from abandoned farmlands, and heightened conflict over dwindling territories—reduced Abenaki presence in core homelands to under 1,000 by 1776, prompting further and cultural adaptations for survival. Historical accounts from Jesuit relations and colonial records, while potentially inflated for propagandistic purposes, consistently corroborate the scale of these losses through eyewitness reports of abandoned villages and mass graves.

Contemporary Population and Vital Statistics

The contemporary Abenaki population is concentrated in two federally recognized First Nations in , : the First Nation with 3,108 registered members and the Wôlinak First Nation with 710 registered members, totaling 3,818 as of September 2024. The recorded 5,320 individuals self-identifying with Abenaki ancestry nationwide. These communities represent the core of documented Abenaki descent, maintained through historical mission villages established in the 17th and 18th centuries, with ongoing cultural and linguistic continuity. In the United States, no Abenaki groups hold federal recognition, though four state-recognized bands in —the Abenaki Nation of Missisquoi, Nulhegan Band of the Coosuk Abenaki Nation, Koasek Traditional Band of the Koas Abenaki Nation, and Elnu Abenaki Tribe—collectively reported 2,611 enrolled members in 2011, with the majority affiliated with Missisquoi. Recent self-identification figures from the indicate approximately 1,257 individuals reporting Abenaki affiliation in 2021. These groups emphasize cultural revival and genealogical ties to historical Western Abenaki bands, but their claims face substantial challenges from leaders, who have released archival vital records and DNA-linked genealogies demonstrating that prominent tribal figures and many enrollees possess negligible or zero Abenaki ancestry, often tracing instead to French-Canadian, Irish, or other non-Indigenous lines—a pattern attributed to historical intermarriage and identity assertion amid low evidentiary standards for state recognition. Specific vital statistics for Abenaki populations remain limited due to small group sizes and aggregation within broader Indigenous categories, with no dedicated peer-reviewed studies isolating birth, death, or rates. General data for American Indian/Alaska Native populations show elevated (64% higher than the U.S. average in 2023) and gaps, but these do not disaggregate to Abenaki subgroups. Canadian Indigenous health metrics similarly lack Abenaki-specific breakdowns, though Quebec First Nations report rates aligned with national Indigenous averages of around 2.1 children per woman. Population stability in and Wôlinak reflects controlled enrollment criteria requiring documented descent, contrasting with fluid self-identification trends in U.S. censuses that have risen from 1,549 Abenaki identifiers in 1990 to over 2,500 by 2000, potentially inflated by contested claims.

Recognition and Controversies

Tribal Recognition Processes

The federal acknowledgment process for Indian tribes in the United States, administered by the (BIA) under 25 CFR Part 83, requires petitioners to demonstrate seven mandatory criteria, including continuous identification as an American Indian entity since 1900, maintenance of a distinct community, and exercise of political authority over members since historical times. Abenaki groups, particularly Western Abenaki bands in and , have sought this recognition but faced denials due to insufficient evidence of tribal continuity following 18th-century migrations to amid colonial pressures and epidemics, which led to assimilation and intermarriage with non-Indigenous populations. The St. Francis/Sokoki Band of Abenakis of submitted a documented on October 22, 1982, after a in , claiming descent from the historical Missisquoi Abenaki in northwestern . The BIA's proposed finding in 2001 and final determination on June 22, 2007, rejected acknowledgment, citing failures in criteria for distinct community and political influence post-1784, as historical records showed Abenaki dispersal to reserves like , with remnants lacking organized tribal structures. No other Abenaki-specific petitions from the region have succeeded federally, though the Penobscot Nation in , an Eastern Abenaki group, maintains federal status dating to treaties like the 1796 agreement, predating the modern process. State-level recognition processes vary and lack the federal criteria's evidentiary rigor, often serving cultural acknowledgment rather than . In , Act 164 of 2010 created the Commission on Native American Affairs to evaluate petitions based on historical presence and contemporary organization, without mandating genealogical descent or continuous tribal governance. This led to legislative recognition of four Western Abenaki bands—Elnu, Nulhegan Band of the Coosuk, Missisquoi (formerly St. Francis/Sokoki), and the Sovereign Republic of the Abenaki Nation—between 2011 and 2012, granting symbolic status but no federal benefits or land rights. Critics, including recognized Abenaki First Nations in , argue Vermont's process enables identity claims unsupported by ancestry, as a 2025 genealogical analysis of prominent Vermont claimants found at least 96.9% European heritage with non-Abenaki Indigenous links where present. lacks any formal tribal recognition mechanism and recognizes no Abenaki groups. In Canada, Abenaki recognition operates under the of 1876, which designates status bands through federal registration and reserve allocation, emphasizing descent from treaty-era lists rather than post-contact continuity proofs. The Abenaki of Wôlinak and (Saint-François) bands in hold this status, tracing to 17th-18th century refugees from , with populations of approximately 300 and 2,000 members respectively as of recent counts, enabling access to band and federal services. These groups have opposed U.S. state recognitions, asserting authority over Abenaki identity based on their documented historical continuity.

Identity Disputes and Genealogical Challenges

The primary identity disputes among Abenaki groups center on the authenticity of four tribes granted state recognition by between 2011 and 2012: the Elnu Abenaki Tribe, the Missisquoi Abenaki Tribe, the Nulhegan Band of the Coosuk Abenaki , and the Abenaki at Wobhanakiak. These recognitions, based on criteria emphasizing self-identification, historical narratives, and continuity rather than strict genealogical proof, have been contested by the federally recognized Abenaki First Nations of and Wôlinak in , , who argue that many enrollees lack verifiable Indigenous ancestry and are engaging in identity appropriation. The and Wôlinak nations, which maintain continuous documented ties to historical Abenaki communities dating to the , have raised these concerns at the , asserting that Vermont's process dilutes genuine Abenaki identity and undermines for historically verified groups. Genealogical challenges exacerbate these disputes, as historical disruptions from epidemics, warfare, and assimilation in the 18th and 19th centuries fragmented Abenaki records, making descent verification reliant on incomplete colonial documents, church registries, and oral traditions. Independent research, including a 2025 genealogical report commissioned by using Canadian archival databases, examined prominent leaders from and Abenaki groups and found no Abenaki ancestors; instead, lineages traced primarily to French-Canadian settlers with occasional pre-1650 Indigenous (non-Abenaki) or African admixture, but no evidence of Abenaki-specific descent within the required temporal or cultural parameters for tribal enrollment. Darryl Leroux's of similar trees, published in 2024, corroborated this by linking claimed Abenaki progenitors to European immigrant stock arriving post-Contact, without ties to known Abenaki bands like the Sokoki or Missisquoi. These findings highlight broader enrollment hurdles: Vermont's state criteria do not mandate DNA testing or minimum blood quantum, contrasting with federal standards under the , which require documented community continuity and genealogical substantiation often unattainable without preserved rolls from pre-1800 migrations to . Critics from estimate that up to 98% of members in Vermont's recognized groups show no Indigenous ancestry in reviewed records, prompting calls for or independent audits to prevent what they term "identity fraud" that could affect land claims and cultural representation. Proponents of the state-recognized tribes counter that rigid genealogy ignores survivance through assimilation and that Canadian challenges represent external gatekeeping, though they have not publicly released counter-genealogies refuting the archival discrepancies. The entrenched debate has influenced neighboring states, such as New Hampshire's 2025 legislative scrutiny of similar self-identified Abenaki commissions lacking ancestral proof.

Land Claims and Sovereignty Debates

The Abenaki have pursued land claims rooted in pre-colonial territories spanning present-day , , , and , often invoking historical treaties and occupancy, though success has varied by jurisdiction and recognition status. In , the Missisquoi Abenaki Tribe asserted to roughly 150 square miles in the northwest, including areas around Swanton, but the invalidated these claims on June 17, 1992, determining that historical evidence of abandonment, intermarriage, and land sales to settlers in the 18th and 19th centuries extinguished any continuous tribal possession sufficient under state law. This ruling aligned with earlier assessments, such as a 2003 response to federal recognition petitions, which highlighted fragmented historical records and lack of cohesive tribal organization post-Contact. Parts of the claimed Missisquoi Bay area, site of an ancient Abenaki village, were federally appropriated in the 1940s for the Missisquoi National Wildlife Refuge, displacing potential tribal use without compensation tied to aboriginal rights. In Maine, Eastern Abenaki groups like the federally recognized Penobscot Nation resolved extensive aboriginal land claims through the 1980 Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act, which extinguished prior claims in exchange for $81.5 million in federal funds, state bonds, and designation of approximately 4,900 acres as reservation land along the . However, the Act's terms subordinated tribal to state jurisdiction outside reservation boundaries, sparking disputes over off-reservation rights, including hunting, fishing, and timber harvesting. A key contention emerged in Penobscot Nation v. Frey (2021), where the U.S. First Circuit Court interpreted the settlement as granting the tribe regulatory authority over certain river main stem waters for subsistence and navigation, rejecting state arguments that the Act fully ceded such ; the case underscored tensions between treaty-era understandings of riverine territories and modern statutory limits. Sovereignty debates among Abenaki bands frequently intersect with federal and state recognition processes, as unrecognized status curtails land claim viability and authority. Vermont's four state-recognized Abenaki tribes—granted status via signed May 7, 2012—lack federal acknowledgment, limiting their ability to assert over lands or access federal trust mechanisms for claims, unlike Maine's Wabanaki Nations (including ), which hold federal status but face state-imposed restrictions unique among U.S. tribes due to the 1980 settlement's plenary authority clause. These limitations have prompted legislative pushes in Maine for expansions, such as enhanced over child welfare and environmental regulation, though critics argue they risk vetoes amid state-tribal frictions. Cross-border tensions exacerbate issues, with Quebec's federally recognized Abenaki First Nations at and Wôlinak asserting that 's state-recognized groups lack verifiable Abenaki descent, based on genealogical analyses showing predominant European or other non-Abenaki ancestry among claimed members, potentially constituting "race-shifting" that undermines collective land rights. leaders have expressed interest in pursuing U.S.-side land claims, viewing recognitions as barriers that dilute historical continuity arguments, while groups counter that such challenges aim to monopolize Abenaki identity and encroach on their territorial rights. This dispute, reignited by a 2025 genealogical report from and Wôlinak, highlights broader debates over evidentiary standards for indigeneity—favoring documented lineage versus self-identification—and their implications for , as federal recognition often hinges on proving uninterrupted cohesion amid colonial disruptions. Canadian Abenaki have raised these concerns at forums, calling for U.S. and Canadian support in resolving identity-based barriers to .

Notable Abenaki Individuals

Historical Figures

Grey Lock (c. 1670–c. 1750), whose Abenaki name was Wawanolet or Wawanotewat, emerged as a prominent Western Abenaki war leader affiliated with the Missisquoi and Sokoki bands. Operating from bases in the region and , he orchestrated multiple raids on English frontier settlements in and between 1704 and 1725, targeting areas like Deerfield and Northfield to counter colonial expansion and retaliate for encroachments on Abenaki lands. His tactics emphasized mobility and surprise, allowing small war parties to strike and withdraw before colonial militias could respond effectively, as seen in the 1724 expedition where he led 11 warriors southward, followed by larger groups totaling over 70 fighters. Nescambiouit (c. 1660–1727), an influential Abenaki war chief and spokesman from the Kennebec band in present-day , played a key role in aligning Abenaki interests with French colonial forces during the late 17th and early 18th centuries. He participated in raids against English settlements during (1702–1713) and acted as a diplomat, traveling to France in 1701 where he was received by King , symbolizing the strategic Franco-Abenaki partnership against British advances. His efforts helped sustain Abenaki military resistance, including contributions to the broader Wabanaki Confederacy's defense of traditional territories amid escalating colonial pressures. Kancamagus (fl. 1680s–1690s), grandson of the Pennacook Passaconaway and leader of Pennacook-Abenaki bands in the and southern , shifted from diplomacy to armed resistance following repeated English violations of treaties, land seizures, and mistreatment of Native captives. After inheriting leadership around 1680, he protested abuses to colonial authorities without success, culminating in retaliatory actions that escalated into open conflict by 1689, forcing many followers to abandon villages and relocate northward to St. Francis or other Abenaki refuges by the mid-1690s. His resistance highlighted the breakdown of early accommodations with settlers, contributing to the depopulation of southern Abenaki territories.

Modern Contributors

Joseph Bruchac, an author and storyteller of Abenaki descent, has published over 170 books since the 1970s, including works that preserve and adapt Abenaki oral traditions, folklore, and historical narratives for contemporary audiences, such as The First Strawberries (1993) and Bowman's Store (2001), which draws on his family's Abenaki heritage in . His efforts have extended to advocacy for Abenaki cultural recognition, including testimony before Vermont legislators in 2025 supporting state-recognized tribes amid disputes with Canadian Abenaki communities. Don Stevens, chief of the Nulhegan Band of the Coosuk Abenaki Nation since 2012, has led initiatives for cultural revitalization, environmental protection, and state recognition in , serving as chair of the Vermont Commission on Native American Affairs during the 2011 recognitions of the Nulhegan and Elnu tribes. As a political activist and , Stevens has produced birchbark crafts and advocated for Abenaki rights in and education, while navigating federal non-recognition and challenges from and Wôbanakiak leaders who question the genealogical continuity of Vermont groups. Vera Longtoe Sheehan, an enrolled citizen of the Nulhegan Abenaki Tribe, founded the Abenaki Arts & Education Center in 2015, where she serves as educator and artist, developing programs on , basketry, and storytelling to promote cultural transmission among youth and the public. Her activism includes policy work on Native representation in curricula and opposition to identity misrepresentation claims leveled by Canadian Abenaki councils. Jesse Bowman Bruchac, an enrolled Nulhegan Abenaki citizen and son of , instructs in the through immersion programs and performs as a traditional storyteller and , contributing to revitalization efforts via workshops and recordings that blend historical songs with modern media. These figures operate within Vermont's state-recognized Abenaki tribes, which Canadian and Missisquoi leaders have contested since 2012, alleging insufficient indigenous ancestry and cultural disconnection based on genealogical reviews, though the individuals maintain contributions grounded in self-identified heritage and community practices.

References

  1. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/abenaki
  2. https://www.uvm.edu/place/towns/greensborobend/abenaki.php
  3. https://fourdirectionsmaine.org/about-four-directions/wabanaki-tribes/
  4. https://www.bia.gov/sites/default/files/dup/assets/as-ia/ofa/petition/068_sfaben_VT/068_fd.pdf
  5. https://vtdigger.org/2023/11/14/a-false-narrative-abenaki-leaders-dispute-the-legitimacy-of-vermonts-state-recognized-tribes/
  6. https://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/local/vermont/2025/10/23/abenaki-in-canada-say-genealogy-study-proves-vt-tribes-arent-legit/86820233007/
  7. https://www.etymonline.com/word/Abenaki
  8. https://accessgenealogy.com/maine/abenaki-tribe.htm
  9. https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/4508665e-d55c-4fd3-b364-951f3cb1c37e/download
  10. https://hsccnh.org/education/resources-page/walldogs-kids/abenaki-for-kids/
  11. https://study.com/academy/lesson/abenaki-tribe-history-culture-people.html
  12. https://www.chesterfieldhistoricalsociety-nh.org/the-western-abenaki
  13. https://www.legendsofamerica.com/abenaki-tribe/
  14. https://indigenousnh.com/2020/01/31/indigenous-heritage-of-southern-new-hampshire-from-the-past-to-the-present/
  15. https://www.bia.gov/sites/default/files/dup/assets/as-ia/ofa/petition/068_sfaben_VT/068_pf.pdf
  16. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2007-07-02/pdf/E7-12727.pdf
  17. https://www.warpaths2peacepipes.com/indian-tribes/abenaki-tribe.htm
  18. https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/fullchapter/01/023
  19. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/state-offices/vermont/american-indianalaska-native-emphasis-program
  20. https://www.abenakialliance.org/
  21. https://www.vtarchaeology.org/wp-content/uploads/v12_ch1_reduced.pdf
  22. https://infomapsplus.blogspot.com/2020/10/native-american-territory-vermont.html
  23. https://www.everyculture.com/North-America/Abenaki-Orientation.html
  24. https://townline.org/up-and-down-the-kennebec-valley-native-americans-conclusion/
  25. https://abbemuseum.squarespace.com/s/People-of-the-First-Light-Map-Interactive-text-5-11-16-apc8.pdf
  26. https://www.newsweek.com/ben-jerrys-headquarters-abenaki-native-american-vermont-1811343
  27. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Abenaki
  28. https://www.quebec.ca/en/government/quebec-at-a-glance/first-nations-and-inuit/profile-of-the-nations/abenakis
  29. https://maine.hometownusa.com/penobscot-indian-island-reservation
  30. https://www.penobscotnation.org/
  31. https://vcnaa.vermont.gov/recognition/recognized-tribes
  32. https://vtdigger.org/2025/04/24/leaders-of-vermont-recognized-tribes-defiant-at-statehouse-panel-on-abenaki-identity/
  33. https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/abenaki
  34. https://people.umass.edu/ebach/papers/alnoprdm.htm
  35. http://www.native-languages.org/abna.htm
  36. https://www.cowasuck.org/language.html
  37. https://www.ethnologue.com/language/abe/
  38. https://www.ethnologue.com/language/aaq/
  39. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/abenaki.php
  40. https://sites.middlebury.edu/abenaki/western-abenaki-history-and-revitalization/
  41. https://www.middlebury.edu/language-schools/languages/abenaki
  42. https://abenakionline.com/
  43. https://www.penobscotnation.org/departments/cultural-historic-preservation/language-resources/
  44. https://hwpi.harvard.edu/files/hpaied/files/penobscot_language_rivitalization_program_a_new_dawn_a_new_hope.pdf
  45. https://www.vtarchaeology.org/wp-content/uploads/v12_ch2_reduced.pdf
  46. https://www.flowofhistory.org/native-americans-in-vermont-the-abenaki/
  47. https://vermonthistory.org/journal/misc/GreenMountainDiaspora.pdf
  48. https://vtdigger.org/2019/01/20/europeans-claimed-vermont-plagues-poxes-decimated-native-abenaki/
  49. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/first-meetings-unearthing-the-beginnings-of-abenaki-english-contact-in-maine-s-boothbay.htm
  50. https://theclio.com/entry/173798
  51. http://moses.creighton.edu/kripke/jesuitrelations/relations_01.html
  52. https://abenakination.com/missisquoi-history
  53. https://www.lcmm.org/explore/lake-champlain-history/contact-period-1609-1664/
  54. https://www.lcmm.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/8-QuadCurriculum_Champlain.pdf
  55. https://vermonthistory.org/freedom-unity-clash-of-cultures
  56. https://vermonthistory.org/journal/misc/FrenchAndAbenaki.pdf
  57. https://ago.vermont.gov/sites/ago/files/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/RESPONSE-to-Abenaki-Petition-Jan2003v.pdf
  58. https://www.canada.ca/en/parks-canada/news/2017/06/abenaki_migrationstonewfrance1675-1748.html
  59. https://www.colonialsociety.org/node/1869
  60. https://www.americanheritage.com/deerfield-massacre
  61. https://historyofmassachusetts.org/raid-on-deerfield/
  62. https://www.westfield.ma.edu/historical-journal/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Kidd-Summer-2002-complete.pdf
  63. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1308&context=mainehistoryjournal
  64. https://www.passamaquoddy.com/?page_id=24
  65. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/news/passamaquoddy-and-penobscot-withdrawal-maine-legislature
  66. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/restoring-abenaki
  67. https://vermonthistory.org/journal/misc/SurvivingTheDarkAges.pdf
  68. https://wabanaki.com/me_land_claims/
  69. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2007/07/02/E7-12727/final-determination-against-federal-acknowledgment-of-the-st-francis-sokoki-band-of-abenakis-of
  70. https://www.nhmagazine.com/new-hampshires-abenaki-people-are-still-here/
  71. https://abenakination.com/state-recognition
  72. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/heres-abenaki-leaders-canada-proves-085602133.html
  73. https://www.vermontpublic.org/local-news/2024-07-11/abenaki-nations-address-identity-fraud-again-un-us-canada-support-self-governance
  74. https://gcnwa.com/en/claims/
  75. https://abenakiheritage.org/
  76. https://www.everyculture.com/North-America/Abenaki-Kinship.html
  77. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/united-states-and-canada/north-american-indigenous-peoples/abnaki
  78. https://moose.nhhistory.org/units/Abenaki/learning
  79. https://gilmantonhistoricalsociety.org/native-americans-in-gilmanton/
  80. https://gcnwa.com/en/history-of-the-nation/
  81. https://www.everyculture.com/North-America/Abenaki-Economy.html
  82. https://www.mainememory.net/sitebuilder/site/774/display
  83. https://vermonthistoryexplorer.org/the-abenaki-and-the-europeans
  84. https://abenakitribe.org/state-recognition
  85. http://www.native-languages.org/abenaki-legends.htm
  86. https://vermonthistory.org/freedom-unity-abenaki-traditions
  87. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/2626/glooscap-tales/
  88. https://online.ucpress.edu/tph/article/47/2/77/209876/Deep-History-and-Continuing-PresenceStrawbery
  89. https://parks.canada.ca/culture/designation/evenement-event/vannerie-abenakise-abenaki-basket-making
  90. https://www.fws.gov/story/2023-11/second-life-indigenous-artifacts
  91. https://americanindian.si.edu/collections-search/object/NMAI_38024
  92. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Myths-and-methods-in-Abenaki-demography-%253A-Abenaki-Ghere/8beecf0cb80a1527c70c07e1c297b2a4b52d6e47
  93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/481256
  94. https://sharondewitte.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/jones-and-dewitte-2011-using-spatial-analysis-to-estimate-depopulation-for-native-american-populations-in-northeastern-north-america-ad-1616e280931645.pdf
  95. https://sanfacon.com/mascots/history_abenaki.html
  96. https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1530&context=etd
  97. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/language-and-linguistics/abenaki
  98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/483034
  99. https://pejepscothistorical.org/adaptation-and-resistance-exhibit/
  100. https://www.atowi.org/press/elnu-abenaki-move-forward-amid-questions
  101. https://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/2024/04/27/vermont-abenaki-actually-french-canadian-frauds-uvm/73469873007/
  102. https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/infant-health-and-mortality-and-american-indiansalaska-natives
  103. https://www.healthvermont.gov/about/our-vision-mission-values/indigenous-communities-and-health
  104. https://www.doi.gov/sites/default/files/archive/news/archive/07_News_Releases/070622a.html
  105. https://www.nhpr.org/nh-news/2025-03-20/house-bill-sparks-controversy-over-abenaki-identity-and-nh-native-american-commission
  106. https://vtdigger.org/2024/05/03/dispute-over-abenaki-identity-in-vermont-grows-more-entrenched/
  107. https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1k/k1kfiofo1g
  108. https://www.nhpr.org/nh-news/2023-05-22/review-of-genealogies-other-records-fails-to-support-local-leaders-claims-of-abenaki-ancestry
  109. https://www.wcax.com/2025/10/17/canadian-abenaki-council-releases-genealogical-report-challenging-vt-nh-tribal-claims/
  110. https://www.vermontpublic.org/local-news/2024-03-26/abenaki-nations-call-for-vermont-to-reconsider-state-recognition-is-getting-mixed-response
  111. https://edjcoalitionvt.org/blog/statement-on-vt-abenaki-and-the-odanak
  112. https://www.nytimes.com/1992/06/18/us/vermont-court-says-history-voids-land-claims-of-abenaki-indians.html
  113. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/we-are-riverine-people-penobscot-nation-maine
  114. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/130/482/634729/
  115. https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/penobscot-nation-v-frey/
  116. https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/documents/penobscot_v_frey21.html
  117. https://mainemorningstar.com/2025/06/23/why-maines-paradoxical-approach-to-tribal-sovereignty-wont-work/
  118. https://www.wabanakialliance.com/penobscot-nation/
  119. https://www.wcax.com/2025/10/22/vermont-abenaki-tribes-unite-refute-canadian-claims-race-shifting/
  120. https://vermonthistory.org/journal/misc/GrayLocksWar.pdf
  121. https://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/gray_lock_3E.html
  122. https://www.canada.ca/en/news/archive/2010/07/celebration-dominant-abenaki-figure-17th-18th-centuries.html
  123. https://moose.nhhistory.org/units/settling-new-hampshire/learning
  124. https://www.ofaplace.com/home/category/native-americans
  125. https://joebruchac.com/f/a-journey-to-state-recognition-the-vermont-abenaki-experience
  126. https://joebruchac.com/f/testimony-to-the-vermont-state-legislature
  127. https://www.sevendaysvt.com/arts-culture/chief-don-stevens-represents-a-new-era-of-abenaki-leadership-in-vermont-29751810
  128. https://abenakitribe.org/government
  129. https://abenaki-edu.org/contributors/
  130. https://abenakiart.org/category/speaker/
  131. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/abenaki-chief-odanak-quebec-u-s-tribes-1.7508360
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.