Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Anglerfish
View on WikipediaThis article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: Merge/Expand redundant sections, expand with content pertinent to the scope of the section. Try using material that pertains to all anglerfish, not just the deep sea forms. (March 2025) |
| Anglerfish Temporal range: Probable Cretaceous origin
| |
|---|---|
| Type species of 4 lophiiform suborders[a] | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Actinopterygii |
| Clade: | Percomorpha |
| Order: | Lophiiformes Sedgwick et. al., 1905[1] |
| Type species | |
| Lophius piscatorius | |
| Synonyms | |
The anglerfish are ray-finned fish in the order Lophiiformes (/ˌlɒfiɪˈfɔːrmiːz/).[2] Both the order's common and scientific name comes from the characteristic mode of predation, in which a modified dorsal fin ray acts as a lure for prey (akin to a human angler, and likened to a crest or "lophos"). The modified fin ray, with the very tip being the esca and the length of the structure the illicium, is adapted to attract specific prey items across the families of anglerfish by using different luring methods.
Anglerfish occur worldwide. The majority are bottom-dwellers, being demersal fish, while the aberrant deep-sea anglerfish are pelagic, (mostly) living high in the water column. Some live in the deep sea (such as the deep-sea anglerfish and sea toads), while others live in shallower waters, such as the frogfishes and some batfishes.
Anglerfish are notable for their sexual dimorphism, which is sometimes extremely pronounced; the males may be several orders of magnitude smaller in mass than females. This dimorphism has enabled a unique reproductive method in the deep-sea anglerfish; sexual parasitism is the attachment of male to the much larger female, sometimes fusing together as an example of natural parabiosis.
Taxonomy
[edit]
Anglerfish were first grouped in the family of Acanthopterygians with "pediculate pectoral [fin]s" (pectorales pédiculėes) by Cuvier in the 1829 edition of Le Règne Animal;[3] being characterized by possessing "a sort of arm supporting their pectorals, formed by an elongated carpal bone". Cuvier placed the genera Lophius (incl. Lophius piscatorius), Chironectes/Antennarius (incl. various subspecies of Lophius histrio), Malthe (incl. Lophius vespertilio), and Batrachus within this family.[3] Translations of this work into English and Latin renderred the family name as "Pectorales Pediculati";[4][5] which was eventually truncated into Pediculati or Pediculata (pediculate fish),[b] these names being used to classify anglerfish through 1926.[c] Though this term saw use in publications as late as the 1970s,[11] Pediculati has fallen out of use.[19]
The group Lophidia was conceived by Samuel Garman in 1899;[20] this group was subdivided into the Lophioids (incl. Lophius, Lophiomus, Melanocetus, Dolopichthys, Chaunax, and Chaunacops) and the Halieutoids (incl. Oncocephalus, Halieutaea, Halieutella, Halieutichthys, Halieutopsis, Halicmetus, Dibranchus, Dibranchichthys, and Malthopsis) based on the orientation of the ilicium's base.[20] By 1905, Lophiiformes came into use, at that time being a suborder of Pediculati.[1]
Classification
[edit]The following classification is based on Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes (2025):[21]
- Suborder Lophioidei Regan, 1912
- Family Lophiidae Rafinesque, 1810 (monkfishes and goosefishes)
- Suborder Ogcocephaloidei Pietsch, 1984
- Family Ogcocephalidae Gill, 1893 (batfishes)
- Suborder Antennarioidei Regan, 1912
- Family Antennariidae Jarocki, 1822 (frogfishes)[22]
- Subfamily Fowlerichthyinae Maile, Smith & Davis, 2025 (fanfin frogfishes)
- Subfamily Antennariinae Jarocki, 1822 (Fibonacci frogfishes)
- Subfamily Lophichthyinae Boeseman, 1964 (lophichthyin frogfishes)
- Subfamily Tathicarpinae Hart, Arnold, Alda, Kenaley, Pietsch, Hutchinson & Chakrabarty, 2022 (longfin frogfishes)
- Subfamily Tetrabrachiinae Regan, 1912 (tetrabrachiid frogfishes)
- Subfamily Histiophryninae Arnold & Pietsch, 2012 (starfingered frogfishes)
- Subfamily Rhycherinae Hart, Arnold, Alda, Kenaley, Pietsch, Hutchinson & Chakrabarty, 2022 (Balrog frogfishes)
- Subfamily Brachionichthyinae Gill, 1863 (handfishes)
- Family Antennariidae Jarocki, 1822 (frogfishes)[22]
- Suborder Chaunacoidei Pietsch & Grobecker, 1987
- Family Chaunacidae Gill, 1863 (gapers or sea toads)
- Suborder Ceratioidei Regan, 1912
- Family Caulophrynidae Goode & Bean, 1896 (fanfins)
- Family Neoceratiidae Regan, 1926 (spiny seadevils)
- Family Melanocetidae Gill, 1878 (black seadevils)
- Family Himantolophidae Gill, 1861 (footballfishes)
- Family Diceratiidae Regan & Trewavas, 1932 (double anglers)
- Family Oneirodidae Gill, 1878 (dreamers)
- Family Thaumatichthyidae Smith & Radcliffe, 1912 (wolftrap anglers)
- Family Centrophrynidae Bertelsen, 1951 (prickly seadevils)
- Family Ceratiidae Gill, 1861 (warty seadevils)
- Family Gigantactinidae Boulenger, 1904 (whipnose anglers)
- Family Linophrynidae Regan, 1925 (leftvents)
Alternatively, Lophiiformes may be treated as clade within Acanthuriformes; a 2025 paper defines Lophioidei as equivalent to the prior conception of Lophiiformes (the one depicted above) and converts the suborders into infraorders (as seen below).[23] Below are two phylogenetic trees; the left phylogeny elaborates on the relationships of the suborders within Lophiiformes as set out in Pietsch and Grobecker's 1987 Frogfishes of the World: Systematics, Zoogeography, and Behavioral Ecology,[24] while the right phylogeny is based on the 2025 study, where Maile et al combines the analysis of Ultra-Conserved Elements (UCE)s, mitochondrial DNA, and morphological evidence;[23]
|
|
Phylogenetic studies have consistently recovered the Lophiiformes as sister-group to the Tetraodontiformes,[23] with both within the larger clade Acanthuriformes as of 2025.[25] The Lophiiformes and Tetraodontiformes are united by several derived morphological features separating them from other Acanthuriformes, including restricted gill openings, along with the absence of multiple skeletal elements, such as spines supporting the anal fin, ribs, nasals, and basisphenoid.[23]
Evolution
[edit]The earliest fossils of anglerfish are from the Eocene, excavated from the Monte Bolca formation of Italy, and these already show evidence of diversification into the modern families that make up the order.[26] Given this, and their close relationship to the Tetraodontiformes which are known from Cretaceous fossils, they likely originated during the Cretaceous.[27][28]
A 2010 mitochondrial genome phylogenetic study suggested the anglerfishes diversified in a short period during the early to mid-Cretaceous, between 130 and 100 million years ago.[24] A 2023 preprint reduces this time to the Late Cretaceous, between 92 and 61 million years ago.[28] Other studies indicate that anglerfish only originated shortly after the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event as part of a massive adaptive radiation of percomorphs, although this clashes with the extensive diversity already known from the group by the Eocene.[28][29] A 2024 study found that all anglerfish suborders most likely diverged from one another during the Late Cretaceous and Paleocene, but the multiple families of deep-sea anglerfishes (Ceratioidei), as well as their trademark sexual parasitism, originated during the Eocene in a rapid radiation following the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum.[30] Adaptations to different ranges of depths may have driven the evolution of anglerfish species and families in prehistory.[23]
Anglerfish appear in the fossil record as follows:[31][32][33][34]

Anatomy
[edit]
Anglerfish are defined by gills that open behind the pectoral fins (as opposed to other fish whose pectorals lay behind the gill opening), depressible teeth that can hinge back, joints of the epiotic bone, the form of the pectoral fin radials, and the luring apparatus (see subsection).[35][23]
Anglerfish lengths can vary from 2–18 cm (1–7 in), with a few species larger than 100 cm (39 in).[36] The largest members are the European monkfish Lophius piscatorius (200 cm (6.6 ft) SL, 57.7 kilograms (127 lb)), the deep-sea warty anglerfish Ceratias holboelli (120 cm (3.9 ft) TL), the giant frogfish Antennarius commerson (45 cm (1.48 ft) TL), and the giant triangular batfish Malthopsis gigas (13.6 cm (0.45 ft)).[37][38][39][40]
Many suborders are sexually dimorphic, with the deep-sea anglerfish being the most extreme example; male C. holboelli can reach up to 16 centimetres (6.3 in) long (SL), while females are commonly around 77 centimetres (2.53 ft) TL,[38] potentially weighing an order of magnitude more than her mate.[41][42] Male Photocorynus spiniceps were measured to be 6.2–7.3 mm (0.24–0.29 in) at maturity, and were at one time claimed to be the smallest vertebrate known. However, due to not being free-living (being parasitic males) and the females being 50.5 mm (1.99 in), they are now often excluded from the records.[43][44][45][46] Sexual dimorphism is not as pronounced in other suborders; the Lophiid monkfish genus Lophiodes are quite similar in size between the genders (Mean for Males 113–133 millimetres (4.4–5.2 in) SL; Females 131–171 millimetres (5.2–6.7 in) SL),[47] and the same is true for Lophius itself (Males 68.50–129.50 centimetres (2.247–4.249 ft); Females 93.50–166.60 centimetres (3.068–5.466 ft)).[48]
Anglerfish are generally ambush predators, with shallow-water species such as frogfish often camouflaging as rocks, sponges or seaweed.[49] To blend in with the featureless dark depths they inhabit, deep-sea anglerfish are dark colored, with tints ranging from grey to brown.[36][better source needed]
In most species, a wide mouth extends all around the anterior (front) circumference of the head, and bands of inwardly inclined teeth line both jaws. The teeth can be depressed (swept back) so as to offer no impediment to prey gliding towards the stomach, but to still prevent its escape.[50][better source needed] Anglerfish are able to distend both their jaw and stomach to enormous size, since their bones are thin and flexible, which allows them to swallow prey up to twice as large as their entire bodies.[36][better source needed]
Esca and illicium
[edit]This section needs expansion with: these references on illicial muscles: [51][52][53]. You can help by adding to it. (May 2025) |

All anglerfish are carnivorous and are thus adapted for the capture of prey.[36] A character shared by all anglerfish suborders is the presence of a "lure" or "bait", unambiguously referred to as the esca. The esca is the tip of a fin ray, modified from the anterior (foremost) dorsal fin; this fin-ray is often referred to as the "fishing rod" or "fishing line", and is scientifically termed the illicium. The entire illicial apparatus consists of the illicial pterygiophore (the "base" of the structure), followed by a second short dorsal spine, and tipped with the bone of the illicium which ends with the esca proper; this appendage may slot into a groove that accommodates part or all of the illicial apparatus.[51]: 33–40 Both the esca and illicium are used in tandem to lure prey.[d] The illicium's length is highly variable across species, from not being visible at all in some species, to around 4.9 times SL (over 4 times the length of the rest of the body) in Gigantactis macronema (body length 354 mm (13.9 in)).[51]: 469 [56]
The illicial apparatus is most notable in the deep-sea anglerfish (Ceratioidei) as their esca contain bioluminescent bacteria, making them glow in the dark waters of the deeper pelagic zones.[57][58][59][55] In other species the esca possesses different luring mechanisms, such as emitting odoriferous chemicals that attract olfactory-driven prey (batfish, Ogcocephaloidei; possibly sea toads, Chaunacioidei), or by resembling prey attractive to small fish such as shrimp or worms (frogfish, Antennarioidei). When the prey is close enough, the anglerfish catches it using suction feeding, elongated sharp teeth, or both.[35][60][51]: 263 While sometimes reported to possess a bioluminescent esca, sea toads lack bioluminescent bacteria and do not actually possess this feature.[60][61]
In at least the triplewart seadevil, the illicium is moved back and forth by five distinct pairs of muscles: namely the shorter erector and depressor muscles that dictate movement of the illicial bone, along with inclinator, protractor, and retractor muscles that aid motion of the pterygiophore.[62]
Behavior
[edit]Predation
[edit]This section needs expansion with: Merging may be preferrable, but let's see if anyone can save it. You can help by adding to it. (May 2025) |

The name "anglerfish" derives from the species' characteristic method of predation. Anglerfish typically have at least one long filament sprouting from the middle of their heads, termed the illicium. The illicium is the detached and modified first three spines of the anterior dorsal fin. In most anglerfish species, the longest filament is the first. This first spine protrudes above the fish's eyes and terminates in an irregular growth of flesh (the esca), and can move in all directions. Anglerfish can wiggle the esca to make it resemble a prey animal, which lures the anglerfish's prey close enough for the anglerfish to devour them whole.[63] Some deep-sea anglerfish of the bathypelagic zone also emit light from their esca to attract prey.[64]
Because anglerfish are opportunistic foragers, they show a range of preferred prey with fish at the extremes of the size spectrum, whilst showing increased selectivity for certain prey. One study examining the stomach contents of threadfin anglerfish (Lophiodes spilurus) off the Pacific coast of Central America found these fish primarily ate two categories of benthic prey: crustaceans and teleost fish. The most frequent prey were pandalid shrimp. 52% of the stomachs examined were empty, supporting the observations that anglerfish are low energy consumers.[65] [66]
Movement and energy conservation
[edit]
All anglerfish are weak swimmers, including the pelagic deep-sea anglerfish. Demersal species often "walk" on the bottom upon their pectoral and pelvic fins. The pelvic fins were lost in the deep-sea anglers.[23][55]
The deep-sea anglers often drift without actively swimming; In situ observation of female Oneirodes and whipnose anglerfish (from ROVs) recorded that they often passively float in place or in a current, but they were sometimes observed to attempt to flee from the ROV, beating its pectoral fins in-phase while undulating its tail fin. The lethargic behavior of these ambush predators is suited to the energy-poor environment of the deep sea.[67][68]
The jaw and stomach of the anglerfish can extend to allow it to consume prey up to twice its size. Because of the limited amount of food available in the anglerfish's environment, this adaptation allows the anglerfish to store food when there is an abundance.[citation needed]
The sea toad Chaunax endeavouri has been observed to retain water in its gills for at least around 26 seconds and up to 4 minutes in some cases. This behavior is thought to be an energy-saving measure as respiration requires energy, thus the fish "holding its breath" may conserve enough energy for such a behavior to be beneficial.[69]
Reproduction
[edit]This section needs expansion with: information on frogfish and batfish[70] spawning. You can help by adding to it. (May 2025) |

The deep-sea anglerfish employ an unusual mating method: because individuals are locally rare, encounters between two of the same species are also very rare, and finding a mate can be problematic; this has led to the development of sexual parasitism in anglerfish, where the males latch onto their mates using their mouths, which may not be suitable or effective for prey capture.[71][42] When scientists first started capturing ceratioid anglerfish, they noticed that all of the specimens were female, and on some of these they had what appeared to be parasites attached to them, which turned out to be highly dimorphic male ceratioids. This is one of the few instances of naturally occurring parabiosis.[41] In some species of anglerfish, fusion between male and female when reproducing is possible due to the lack of immune system keys that allow antibodies to mature and create receptors for T-cells.[72]
The spawn of all anglerfish are enveloped by a gelatinous sheath, which has multiple terms referring to it.[23] The spawn of the Lophius anglerfish consists of a thin sheet of transparent gelatinous material 25 cm (10 in) wide and may be longer than 10 m (33 ft); this "egg mass" may contain over a million eggs.[73][48] The eggs in this sheet are in a single layer, each in its own cavity. The larvae are pelagic and have the pelvic fins elongated into filaments. It is thought that these egg masses effectively disperse their young over great distances and a large area.[48][50] A 77 millimetres (3.0 in) female Linophryne arborifera, with a 15 millimetres (0.59 in) parasitic male, was observed to have numerous eggs embedded in a gelatinous mass (the "egg raft" or "veil") protruding from the genital opening; the eggs, 0.6–0.8mm in diameter, are among the largest known for any ceratioid.[74][41]
Relation to humans
[edit]Classical interpretation
[edit]In the History of Animals, Aristotle described the "Fishing-Frog" (one of the local Lophius species, like L. piscatorius or L. budegassa) as an example of a marine species well adapted to their environment, those equipped with "ingenious devices" that it uses to capture prey, alongside the Torpedo. He noted that fishing-frogs that have lost their lure appeared to be thinner than those still intact.[75][76][23]
As food
[edit]Lophiidae, marketed as monkfish or goosefish, are of commercial interest with fisheries found in western Europe, eastern North America, Africa, and East Asia. In Europe and North America, the tail meat of fish of the genus Lophius, known as monkfish or goosefish (North America), is widely used in cooking, and is often compared to lobster tail in taste and texture.
In Africa, the countries of Namibia and the Republic of South Africa record the highest catches.[48] In Asia, especially Japan, monkfish liver, known as ankimo, is considered a delicacy.[77] Anglerfish is especially heavily consumed in South Korea, where it is featured as the main ingredient in dishes such as Agujjim.
Northwest European Lophius species are heavily fished and are listed by the ICES as "outside safe biological limits".[78] In 2010, Greenpeace International added the American angler (Lophius americanus), the angler (Lophius piscatorius), and the black-bellied angler (Lophius budegassa) to its seafood red list—a list of fish commonly sold worldwide with a high likelihood of being sourced from unsustainable fisheries.[79][51] Additionally, anglerfish are known to occasionally rise to the surface during El Niño, leaving large groups of dead anglerfish floating on the surface.[78][relevant?]
Captivity
[edit]
Various species of anglerfish are kept in captivity, such as frogfish and batfish,[80][70] though these are all species that inhabit shallow waters; deep-sea anglerfish have not been kept in captivity due to the challenges of keeping them alive through capture, transport, and a display that can repressurize them.[81][82][83]
Antennarius biocellatus is known by the common names brackish-water frogfish or freshwater frogfish; being euryhaline, it can live in freshwater for some time,[84][85] sometimes claimed to be the sole representative of the anglerfish to live in freshwater.[86] Like many frogfish, it has been displayed in public aquaria,[87][88] though unlike the other species A. biocellatus are sometimes kept in home aquaria by private aquarists.[89]
References
[edit]- ^ a b Sedgwick, Adam; Lister, Joseph Jackson; Shipley, Arthur Everett (1898–1909). A student's text-book of zoology. Vol. II. London: Swan Sonnenschein and co. p. 245. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Order Lophiiformes". FishBase. February 2006 version.
- ^ a b Cuvier, Georges; Latreille, Pierre André (1829–1830). Le règne animal distribué d'après son organisation, pour servir de base à l'histoire naturelle des animaux et d'introduction à l'anatomie comparée (in French) (Nouvelle édition rev. et aug. ed.). Paris: Paris Chez Déterville. pp. 249–254. Retrieved 21 March 2025.
- ^ Cuvier, Georges; Griffith, Edward; Smith, Charles Hamilton (1827–1835). The CLASS PISCES: arranged by the Baron Cuvier, with supplementary additions. The animal kingdom : arranged in conformity with its organization / Alternative: Classified index and synopsis of the animal kingdom Uniform: Règne animal (Translation, with additions, of: Le règne animal.)) (the First ed.). London: for G.B. Whittaker. pp. 245–250. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ Cuvier, Georges; McMurtrie, Henry (1831). The animal kingdom: arranged in conformity with its organization (the First ed.). New York: G. & C. & H. Carvill. pp. 183–186. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ Müller, J.P. (1839). Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Berlin: Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften. p. 249. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ "Pediculati ✝". Mindat.org. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ "Pediculati plural noun". www.merriam-webster.com. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ "order pediculati". wordnik.com. Wordnik. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ "Pediculate Definition". www.yourdictionary.com. LoveToKnow Media. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ a b Le Danois, Yseult (1976). Poissons Pédiculates Haploptérygiens: Lophiidae et Chaunacidae (PDF). Paris: Muséum National D'Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire d'Ichthyologie Génerale et Appliquée. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ Gill, Theodore (1863). "Descriptions of Some New Species of Pediculati, and on the Classification of the Group". Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 15: 88–92. JSTOR 4059748.
- ^ Annandale, Nelson; Jenkins, James Travis (1909–1910). Report on the fishes taken by the Bengal fisheries steamer "Golden Crown.". Calcutta: Indian Museum. pp. 17–21. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ Jaekel, Otto (1911). Die Wirbeltiere: eine Übersicht über die fossilen und lebenden Formen. Berlin: Verlag Gebrüder Borntraeger. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ Regan, C.T. (1912). "The classification of the teleostean fishes of the order Pediculati". Annals and Magazine of Natural History. Series 8. 9 (51): 277–289. doi:10.1080/00222931208693132.
- ^ Regan, Charles Tate (2 February 1925). "Dwarfed males parasitic on the females in oceanic angler-fishes (Pediculati ceratioidea)". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character. 97 (684): 386–400. doi:10.1098/rspb.1925.0006.
- ^ Breder Jr., C. M. (1926). Heterosomata to Pediculati from Panama to Lower California, in the Bulletin of the Bigham Oceanographic Collection (2 ed.). New York: New Haven Conn. pp. 52–53. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ Regan, C. Tate (1926). Pediculate fishes of the suborder Ceratioidea. Danish Dana Expeditions. Vol. 2. doi:10.1163/9789004629462.
- ^ Pietsch, T. W.; Bauchot, M. L.; Desoutter, M. (1986). "Catalogue critique des types de Poissons du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle". Bull. Mus. Natn. Hist, Nat., Paris. 4 (8). Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ a b Garman, S. (December 1899). "Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoölogy, at Harvard College, Cambridge, Mass". Harvard University. Museum of Comparative Zoology. XXIV: 75–107. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ Fricke, R.; Eschmeyer, W. N.; Van der Laan, R. (2025). "ESCHMEYER'S CATALOG OF FISHES: CLASSIFICATION". California Academy of Sciences. Retrieved 10 February 2025.
- ^ Maile, Alex J.; Smith, W. Leo; Davis, Matthew P. (2 May 2025). "A total-evidence phylogenetic approach to understanding the evolution, depth transitions, and body-shape changes in the anglerfishes and allies (Acanthuriformes: Lophioidei)". PLOS ONE. 20 (5) e0322369. Bibcode:2025PLoSO..2022369M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0322369. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 12047784. PMID 40315280.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Maile, Alex J.; Smith, W. Leo; Davis, Matthew P. (2 May 2025). "A total-evidence phylogenetic approach to understanding the evolution, depth transitions, and body-shape changes in the anglerfishes and allies (Acanthuriformes: Lophioidei)". PLOS. 20 (5) e0322369. Bibcode:2025PLoSO..2022369M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0322369. PMC 12047784. PMID 40315280.
- ^ a b c Miya, Masaki; Pietsch, Theodore W; Orr, James W; Arnold, Rachel J; Satoh, Takashi P; Shedlock, Andrew M; Ho, Hsuan-Ching; Shimazaki, Mitsuomi; Yabe, Mamoru; Nishida, Mutsumi (1 January 2010). "Evolutionary history of anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes): a mitogenomic perspective". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 10 (1): 58. Bibcode:2010BMCEE..10...58M. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-58. PMC 2836326. PMID 20178642.
- ^ Ghezelayagh, Ava; Harrington, Richard C.; Burress, Edward D.; Campbell, Matthew A.; Buckner, Janet C.; Chakrabarty, Prosanta; Glass, Jessica R.; McCraney, W. Tyler; Unmack, Peter J.; Thacker, Christine E.; Alfaro, Michael E.; Friedman, Sarah T.; Ludt, William B.; Cowman, Peter F.; Friedman, Matt; Price, Samantha A.; Dornburg, Alex; Faircloth, Brant C.; Wainwright, Peter C.; Near, Thomas J. (14 July 2022). "Prolonged morphological expansion of spiny-rayed fishes following the end-Cretaceous". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 6 (8). Nature: 1211–1220. Bibcode:2022NatEE...6.1211G. doi:10.1038/s41559-022-01801-3. PMID 35835827.
- ^ Pietsch, Theodore W.; Carnevale, Giorgio (2011). "A New Genus and Species of Anglerfish (Teleostei: Lophiiformes: Lophiidae) from the Eocene of Monte Bolca, Italy". Copeia. 2011 (1): 64–71. doi:10.1643/CI-10-080. ISSN 0045-8511.
- ^ Chanet, Bruno; Guintard, Claude; Betti, Eric; Gallut, Cyril; Dettai, Agnes; Lecointre, Guillaume (1 September 2013). "Evidence for a close phylogenetic relationship between the teleost orders Tetraodontiformes and Lophiiformes based on an analysis of soft anatomy/Des donnees d'anatomie molle corroborent l'etroite parente entre Tetraodontiformes et Lophiiformes". Cybium. 37 (3): 179–199.
- ^ a b c Miller, Elizabeth Christina; Faucher, Rose; Hart, Pamela B.; Rincon-Sandoval, Melissa; Santaquiteria, Aintzane; White, William T.; Baldwin, Carole C.; Miya, Masaki; Betancur-R, Ricardo (30 October 2023), Phylogenomics reveals the deep ocean as an accelerator for evolutionary diversification in anglerfishes, doi:10.1101/2023.10.26.564281, retrieved 21 December 2023
- ^ Alfaro, Michael E.; Faircloth, Brant C.; Harrington, Richard C.; Sorenson, Laurie; Friedman, Matt; Thacker, Christine E.; Oliveros, Carl H.; Černý, David; Near, Thomas J. (2018). "Explosive diversification of marine fishes at the Cretaceous–Palaeogene boundary". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2 (4): 688–696. Bibcode:2018NatEE...2..688A. doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0494-6. ISSN 2397-334X. PMID 29531346.
- ^ Brownstein, Chase D.; Zapfe, Katerina L.; Lott, Spencer; Harrington, Richard; Ghezelayagh, Ava; Dornburg, Alex; Near, Thomas J. (2024). "Synergistic innovations enabled the radiation of anglerfishes in the deep open ocean". Current Biology. 34 (11): 2541–2550.e4. Bibcode:2024CBio...34.2541B. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.04.066. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 38788708.
- ^ Sepkoski, Jack (2002). "A compendium of fossil marine animal genera". Bulletins of American Paleontology. 364: 560. Archived from the original on 23 July 2011. Retrieved 17 May 2011.
- ^ Carnevale, Giorgio; Theodore W. Pietsch; Gary T. Takeuchi; Richard W. Huddleston (2008). "Fossil Ceratioid Anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiformes) from the Miocene of the Los Angeles Basin, California" (PDF). Journal of Paleontology. 82 (5): 996–1008. Bibcode:2008JPal...82..996C. doi:10.1666/07-113.1. S2CID 129926776. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
- ^ Giorgio Carnevale; Theordore W. Pietsch (12 June 2009). "The deep-sea anglerfish genus Acentrophryne (Teleostei, Ceratioidei, Linophrynidae) in the Miocene of California" (PDF). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 29 (2): 372–378. doi:10.1671/039.029.0232. ISSN 0272-4634. Wikidata Q114229338.
- ^ Nazarkin, Mikhail V.; Theodore W. Pietsch (2020). "A fossil dreamer of the genus Oneirodes (Lophiiformes: Ceratioidei) from the Miocene of Sakhalin Island, Russia". Geological Magazine. 157 (8): 1378–1382. Bibcode:2020GeoM..157.1378N. doi:10.1017/S0016756820000588. S2CID 225386060. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
- ^ a b c Magbilang, Lila; Olson, Danielle. "Anglerfish Lure Prey Throughout the Ocean". ocean.si.edu. Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ a b c d "Anglerfish". National Geographic. 10 September 2010. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Lophius piscatorius". FishBase.
- ^ a b Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Ceratias holboelli". FishBase.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Antennarius commerson". FishBase.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Malthopsis gigas". FishBase.
- ^ a b c Pietsch, Theodore W. (August 2005). "Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes)". Ichthyological Research. 52 (3): 207–236. Bibcode:2005IchtR..52..207P. doi:10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2. ISSN 1341-8998. Retrieved 1 March 2025.
- ^ a b Isakov, Noah (2022). "Histocompatibility and Reproduction: Lessons from the Anglerfish". Life. 12 (1): 113. Bibcode:2022Life...12..113I. doi:10.3390/life12010113. ISSN 2075-1729. PMC 8780861. PMID 35054506.
- ^ "Scientists find 'smallest fish'". BBC News. 25 January 2006. Retrieved 23 May 2010.
- ^ "What is the smallest species of fish?". Amonline.net.au. 27 September 2013. Archived from the original on 20 February 2009. Retrieved 3 October 2013.
- ^ "Smallest fish compete for honours". BBC News. 31 January 2006. Retrieved 23 May 2010.
- ^ "Bragging Rights: The Smallest Fish Ever | LiveScience". Live Science. Archived from the original on 6 July 2008.
- ^ Pietsch, Theodore W.; Ross, Steve W.; Caruso, John H.; Saunders, Miles G.; Fisher, Charles R. (December 2013). "In-Situ Observations of the Deep-sea Goosefish Sladenia shaefersi Caruso and Bullis (Lophiiformes: Lophiidae), with Evidence of Extreme Sexual Dimorphism". Copeia. 2013 (4): 660–665. doi:10.1643/CI-13-023. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ a b c d Fariña, A. C; Azevedo, M; Landa, J; Duarte, R; Sampedro, P; Costas, G; Torres, M. A; Cañás, L (October 2008). "Lophius in the world: a synthesis on the common features and life strategies". ICES Journal of Marine Science. 65 (7): 1272–1280. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsn140.
- ^ Pembury Smith, Matilda Q. R.; Ruxton, Graeme D. (2020). "Camouflage in predators". Biological Reviews. 95 (5): 1325–1340. doi:10.1111/brv.12612. hdl:10023/19948. ISSN 1464-7931. PMID 32410297. S2CID 218649415.
- ^ a b One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Angler". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 2 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 15.
- ^ a b c d e Pietsch, Theodore W. (2009). Oceanic anglerfishes: extraordinary diversity in the deep sea. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-94255-4. OCLC 1298208235.
- ^ a b Hagio, Hanako; Nishino, Hirotaka; Miyake, Kenta; Sato, Nene; Sawada, Kei; Nakayama, Tomoya; Yamamoto, Naoyuki (October 2024). "Fish That Fish for Fish-A Peculiar Location of "Fishing Motoneurons" in the Striated Frogfish Antennarius striatus". J Comp Neurol. 532 (10) e25674. doi:10.1002/cne.25674. PMID 39380323.
- ^ a b Last, Peter R; Gledhill, Daniel (October 2009). "A revision of the Australian handfishes (Lophiiformes: Brachionichthyidae), with descriptions of three new genera and nine new species". Zootaxa. 2252. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.2252.1.1. Retrieved 24 March 2025.
- ^ Derouen, Valerie; Ludt, William B; Ho, Hsuan-Ching; Chakrabarty, Prosanta (March 2015). "Examining evolutionary relationships and shifts in depth preferences in batfishes (Lophiiformes: Ogcocephalidae)". Mol Phylogenet Evol. 84: 27–33. Bibcode:2015MolPE..84...27D. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.12.011. PMID 25554525.
- ^ a b c "Science > Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates > Fish > anglerfish fish". britannica.com. Britannica. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ "Genus: Chaunax, Frogmouths, Gaper, Gapers". biogeodb.stri.si.edu. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute. Retrieved 24 March 2025.
- ^ "Our Work Pacific Footballfish". calacademy.org. California Academy of Sciences.
- ^ Freed, Lindsay L.; Easson, Cole; Baker, Lydia J.; Fenolio, Danté; Sutton, Tracey T.; Khan, Yasmin; Blackwelder, Patricia; Hendry, Tory A.; Lopez, Jose V. (1 October 2019). "Characterization of the microbiome and bioluminescent symbionts across life stages of Ceratioid Anglerfishes of the Gulf of Mexico". FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 95 (10) fiz146. doi:10.1093/femsec/fiz146. ISSN 0168-6496. PMC 6778416. PMID 31504465.
- ^ Baker, Lydia J.; Freed, Lindsay L.; Easson, Cole G.; Lopez, Jose V.; Fenolio, Danté; Sutton, Tracey T.; Nyholm, Spencer V.; Hendry, Tory A. (1 October 2019). "Diverse deep-sea anglerfishes share a genetically reduced luminous symbiont that is acquired from the environment". eLife. 8 e47606. doi:10.7554/eLife.47606. ISSN 2050-084X. PMC 6773444. PMID 31571583.
- ^ a b Mundy, Bruce (6 January 2021). "The Mysterious Identity of the Bright-Red Sea Toad". fisheries.noaa.gov. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ "An alluring fish: The deep-sea anglerfish is a couch potato's hero". annualreport.mbari.org. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ Shimazaki, Mitsuomi; Nakaya, Kazuhiro (1 February 2004). "Functional anatomy of the luring apparatus of the deep-sea ceratioid anglerfish Cryptopsaras couesii (Lophiiformes: Ceratiidae)". Ichthyological Research. 51 (1): 33–37. Bibcode:2004IchtR..51...33S. doi:10.1007/s10228-003-0190-6. ISSN 1616-3915. S2CID 21508894.
- ^ Smith, William John (2009). The Behavior of Communicating: an ethological approach. Harvard University Press. p. 381. ISBN 978-0-674-04379-4.
Others rely on the technique adopted by a wolf in sheep's clothing—they mimic a harmless species. ... Other predators even mimic their prey's prey: anglerfish (Lophiiformes) and alligator snapping turtles Macroclemys temminckii can wriggle fleshy outgrowths of their fins or tongues and attract small predatory fish close to their mouths.
- ^ Piper, Ross (2007). Extraordinary Animals: An Encyclopedia of Curious and Unusual Animals, Greenwood Press.
- ^ Espinoza, Mario; Ingo Wehrtmann (2008). "Stomach content analyses of the threadfin anglerfish Lophiodes spilurus (Lophiiformes: Lophiidae) associated with deepwater shrimp fisheries from the central Pacific of Costa Rica". Revista de Biología Tropical. 4. 56 (4): 1959–70. doi:10.15517/rbt.v56i4.5772. PMID 19419094. Retrieved 4 October 2013.
- ^ Yasugi, Masaki; Hori, Michio (June 2016). "Predominance of parallel- and cross-predation in anglerfish". Marine Ecology. 37 (3): 576–587. Bibcode:2016MarEc..37..576Y. doi:10.1111/maec.12309.
- ^ Luck, Daniel Garcia; Pietsch, Theodore W. (4 June 2008). "Observations of a Deep-sea Ceratioid Anglerfish of the Genus Oneirodes (Lophiiformes: Oneirodidae)". Copeia. 2008 (2): 446–451. doi:10.1643/CE-07-075. S2CID 55297852.
- ^ Moore, Jon A. (31 December 2001). "Upside-Down Swimming Behavior in a Whipnose Anglerfish (Teleostei: Ceratioidei: Gigantactinidae)". Copeia. 4. 2002 (4): 1144–1146. doi:10.1643/0045-8511(2002)002[1144:udsbia]2.0.co;2. JSTOR 1448539. S2CID 85724627.
- ^ Meilan Solly (1 July 2019). "Coffinfish Can Hold Their Breath for Up to Four Minutes on the Ocean Floor". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ a b Christie, Barrett L.; Montoya, P. Zelda; Torres, Lyssa A.; Foster IV, John W. (2016). "THE NATURAL HISTORY AND HUSBANDRY OF THE WALKING BATFISHES (LOPHIIFORMES: OGCOCEPHALIDAE)". Drum and Croaker. Vol. 47. pp. 7–40. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
- ^ Pietsch, Theodore W. (8 March 1972). "A Review of the Monotypic Deep-Sea Anglerfish Family Centrophrynidae: Taxonomy, Distribution and Osteology". Copeia. 1972 (1): 17–47. doi:10.2307/1442779. JSTOR 1442779.
- ^ Deep-sea anglerfishes have evolved a new type of immune system
- ^ Prince, E. E. 1891. Notes on the development of the angler-fish (Lophius piscatorius). Ninth Annual Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland (1890), Part III: 343–348.
- ^ Bertelsen, E (1980). "Notes on Linophrynidae 5: a revision of the deepsea anglerfishes of the Linophryne arborifera-group (Pisces, Ceratoidei)". Steenstrupia. 6 (6): 29–70. ISSN 0375-2909. Retrieved 2 March 2025.
- ^ Thompson, D'Arcy Wentworth (transl.). "Part 37 of The History of Animals By Aristotle". classics.mit.edu. MIT. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
- ^ "The History of Animals Aristotle". trisagionseraph.tripod.com. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
- ^ "The world's 50 best foods". CNN. CNN Travel. 12 July 2017. Retrieved 27 March 2023.
- ^ a b Clover, Charles (2004). The End of the Line: How overfishing is changing the world and what we eat. London: Ebury Press. ISBN 978-0-09-189780-2.
- ^ Greenpeace sea-food red list
- ^ "Frogfish Antennariidae Lophiiformes". aquariumofpacific.org. Aquarium of the Pacific. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
- ^ "Deep-sea anglerfish Order Lophiiformes". montereybayaquarium.org. Monterey Bay Aquarium. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
- ^ "Black seadevil anglerfish Melanocetus johnsonii". montereybayaquarium.org. Monterey Bay Aquarium. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
- ^ "Fanfin anglerfish Caulophryne sp". montereybayaquarium.org. Monterey Bay Aquarium. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
- ^ Leander, N.J.S.; Torres, A.G.; Capuli, E. (2022). "Antennarius biocellatus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2022 e.T196304A2443685. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2022-1.RLTS.T196304A2443685.en. Retrieved 27 March 2024.
- ^ Andréfouët, Serge; Chen, Wei-Jen; Kinch, Jeff; Mana, Ralph; Russell, Barry C.; Tully, Dean; White, William T. (2019). "Antennarius biocellatus". zenodo.org. doi:10.5281/zenodo.10447059. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
- ^ "Freshwater Frogfish (Antennarius biocellatus)". aqua-imports.com. Aqua-Imports. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
- ^ "やんばるの川に棲む珍魚 日本初記録種「ピエロカエルアンコウ」展示". churaumi.okinawa (in Japanese). Okinawa Churaumi Aquarium. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
- ^ Zubi, Teresa. "Antennarius biocellatus (Cuvier, 1817)". frogfish.ch. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
- ^ "Search Results for: antennarius biocellatus". youtube.com. YouTube. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
Further reading
[edit]- Anderson, M. Eric, and Leslie, Robin W. 2001. Review of the deep-sea anglerfishes (Lophiiformes: Ceratioidei) of southern Africa. Ichthyological Bulletin of the J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology; No. 70. J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Rhodes University
External links
[edit]| External videos | |
|---|---|
- Tree of Life web project: Lophiiformes
- Video (02:37) – Anglerfish mating on YouTube
- Lu, D. Anglerfish immune system lets them fuse with their mate. New Scientist 247, 19 (2020).
Anglerfish
View on GrokipediaTaxonomy and Classification
Phylogenetic Position
Anglerfishes comprise the order Lophiiformes within the class Actinopterygii, the ray-finned fishes, specifically nested in the superorder Acanthomorpha and the diverse clade Percomorpha.[9] This placement is supported by extensive genomic-scale analyses, which confirm Lophiiformes as monophyletic under the unranked clade Lophioidei.[9] The order is morphologically distinguished from other percomorphs by the modification of the anteriormost dorsal fin ray into a free, mobile illicium bearing an esca, adapted for predatory luring, though this trait shows variation across suborders.[10] Molecular phylogenies have overturned prior morphology-driven classifications that allied Lophiiformes with paracanthopterygian groups like codfishes and toadfish (Batrachoidiformes), instead embedding them deeply within Percomorpha based on mitochondrial and nuclear data.[10] For instance, mitogenomic analyses of 75 teleost species rejected paracanthopterygian monophyly, positioning Lophiiformes closer to boarfishes (Caproidei) or pufferfishes (Tetraodontiformes).[10] More recent phylogenomic reconstructions using ultraconserved elements (UCEs) from hundreds of loci further refine this, identifying Lophiiformes as sister to Tetraodontoidei (encompassing pufferfishes, triggerfishes, and relatives), with the most recent common ancestor of extant anglerfishes dated to approximately 88 million years ago during the Late Cretaceous.[11] Within Percomorpha's bush-like topology, Lophiiformes maintain distinction from superficially convergent groups, such as certain benthic scorpaeniforms or batrachoidiforms, through combined genetic markers and synapomorphies like the illicium's structural homology, despite independent evolution of ambush predation in unrelated lineages.[11] Frogfishes (family Antennariidae), often contrasted with pelagic ceratioid anglerfishes, are phylogenetically nested within Lophiiformes as part of a benthic clade sister to deep-sea forms, underscoring the order's internal diversity resolved by UCE-based trees rather than superficial resemblances.[11] These findings emphasize cladistic evidence from large-scale datasets over traditional rankings, highlighting Percomorpha's rapid mid-Cretaceous radiation.[9]Families and Diversity
The order Lophiiformes encompasses 18 families within five suborders, containing 321 recognized species across 68 genera based on taxonomic assessments as of 2010.[10] More recent compilations report up to 363 species in 78 genera, reflecting ongoing verification of specimens from global collections.[12] Empirical diversity is documented primarily through museum specimens and deep-sea trawls, with FishBase cataloging families such as Antennariidae (frogfishes), Lophiidae (monkfishes), and Ceratiidae (seadevils).[13] The suborder Ceratioidei dominates in species richness, comprising approximately 162 species in 11 families that inhabit pelagic deep-sea environments.[14] This suborder includes families like Ceratiidae, known for warty, compressed-bodied females adapted to abyssal depths, and Himantolophidae (footballfishes), verified from midwater net captures.[15] In contrast, the Lophiidae family, encompassing goosefishes and monkfishes, features 25 species in four genera, primarily benthic forms from continental shelves with documented occurrences in temperate Atlantic and Indo-Pacific waters.[16] Morphological diversity spans extreme size disparities, particularly in ceratioids where free-living dwarf males measure 6–13 mm in standard length, while mature females in species like those of Lophiidae can exceed 1 meter and reach weights over 20 kg from verified fishery landings.[10] Such variations underscore the order's adaptive radiation, with shallower-water families like Antennariidae exhibiting ambush predation in coral reefs and deeper families displaying gelatinous, buoyant forms suited to low-oxygen zones.[17]Recent Taxonomic Developments
In 2024, ichthyologist Samantha Z. Rickle described Gigantactis paresca, a new species of deep-sea anglerfish from the Ceratiidae family, based on a single female specimen (65.7 mm standard length) collected in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone of the eastern North Pacific Ocean. The species is distinguished morphologically by an illicium lacking filaments until the emergence of a secondary illicial appendage, with the escal bulb featuring a pigmented posterior escal barbel and denticles on the posterior surface.[18] Genetic analysis supported the morphological distinctions, confirming its separation from congeners like G. holboelli and G. micronema.[19] This discovery highlights the ongoing revelation of biodiversity in polymetallic nodule fields threatened by deep-sea mining activities.[20] A new species of Himantolophus (Himantolophidae) was formally described in 2025 from a specimen captured off the east coast of New Zealand's North Island in the western South Pacific, marking the first record of the genus in that subregion. The description incorporated detailed morphometrics of the esca, dermal spinules, and pectoral radials, alongside comparisons to Indo-Pacific congeners, while questioning the validity of H. pseudalbinares based on overlapping diagnostic traits.[21] This revision expands the family's known range eastward, with the new taxon assigned to the H. macroceratoides species group pending further molecular validation.[21] Integrative taxonomy applied to the genus Lophiomus (Lophiidae) in 2024 uncovered previously unrecognized diversity, elevating the monotypic status to at least six species through combined evidence from two mitochondrial genes (COI and cytb), two nuclear markers (RAG1 and TMO-4C4), and morphometric analyses of 68 specimens across the Indo-West Pacific. Three new species were delimited and named: L. immaculioralis (characterized by immaculate oral lining and restricted distribution to Taiwan and southern Japan), L. nigriventris (with black ventral pigmentation and broader Indo-Pacific range), and L. carusoi (featuring distinct escal morphology and occurrence in the South China Sea). Additionally, Chirolophius lati-ceps was resurrected from synonymy with L. setigerus based on consistent genetic clustering and head shape differences.[22] This multiline approach resolved cryptic speciation driven by subtle osteological and soft-tissue variations, underscoring the limitations of prior morphology-only classifications in goosefishes.[23]Evolutionary History
Origins in Shallow Waters
The earliest definitive fossils attributable to the order Lophiiformes date to the early Eocene epoch, approximately 50 million years ago, primarily from the Monte Bolca lagerstätte in northern Italy, a site representing a shallow, tropical marine embayment with benthic habitats. These specimens, including representatives of frogfishes (Antennariidae) and batfishes (Ogcocephalidae), display dorsoventrally flattened bodies and illicia adapted for bottom-dwelling ambush predation, indicating that ancestral anglerfishes occupied demersal niches in coastal or shelf environments rather than open pelagic zones.[24][25] No earlier lophiiform fossils have been identified, suggesting the order's morphological radiation postdated the end-Cretaceous mass extinction.[8] Molecular clock analyses, calibrated using Bayesian relaxed-clock methods on mitochondrial genomes and fossil constraints, estimate the divergence of Lophiiformes from other percomorph teleosts around 100–120 million years ago during the mid-Cretaceous, with crown-group diversification accelerating in the late Cretaceous to early Paleogene (83–34 million years ago).[8] This timeline aligns with percomorph expansions following the breakup of Gondwana, where ancestral lineages likely retained shallow-water affinities before subordinal splits.[26] Phylogenetic reconstructions confirm a benthic shallow-water common ancestor for the order, with transitions to deeper habitats evolving independently in lineages like ceratioids.[27] Stratigraphic and geochemical records indicate that recurrent ocean anoxic events (OAEs), such as those in the Cretaceous, generated widespread hypoxia in shallow benthic zones, exerting selective pressure on oxygen-sensitive demersal fishes to exploit deeper refugia where ventilation and upwelling maintained higher dissolved oxygen levels.[28] For lophiiform ancestors, this causal mechanism—rooted in physiological intolerance to low-oxygen thresholds—likely facilitated initial depth gradients, as evidenced by the absence of pre-Eocene fossils amid OAE-correlated shallow-water die-offs in teleost records, prior to the order's documented Eocene persistence in oxygenated shelf deposits.[28] Such environmental forcing, rather than stochastic dispersal, underscores a deterministic pathway from coastal origins to progressively deeper distributions.Adaptations to Deep-Sea Conditions
Many deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes lack a functional swim bladder, avoiding the compression issues that would impair buoyancy control under hydrostatic pressures exceeding 100 atmospheres at depths beyond 1,000 meters.[29] Instead, they achieve neutral buoyancy through high water content (up to 85-95% in body tissues) and development of low-density gelatinous matrices that offset skeletal weight without requiring energy-intensive gas regulation.[30] These adaptations, including lightly ossified skeletons and watery flesh, minimize specific gravity close to seawater, enabling stationary hovering with minimal muscular effort and reducing overall energy expenditure in nutrient-poor environments.[31] In the absence of sunlight, anglerfishes rely on symbiotic bioluminescent bacteria housed within the esca, the bulbous tip of the illicium, to generate light via luciferin oxidation.[32] These bacteria, primarily from genera like Photobacterium, are environmentally acquired by larvae and exhibit extreme genome reduction (up to 50% smaller than free-living relatives), adaptations confirmed through genomic sequencing and culturing of isolates from dissected esca tissues.[33] The symbiosis provides a controlled light source without endogenous production costs, with bacterial cultures demonstrating sustained luminescence under anaerobic conditions mimicking deep-sea hypoxia.[3] Physiological tolerance to extreme pressures is facilitated by compressible soft tissues and absence of rigid gas-filled structures, preventing implosion or deformation; experimental pressure simulations on ceratioid specimens show skeletal flexibility absorbs forces up to 300 bars without rupture.[34] Metabolic rates are markedly reduced, as quantified in laboratory respirometry on Melanocetus johnsonii, where oxygen consumption drops to levels 4-5% of shallow-water teleosts at equivalent temperatures, scaling allometrically with body mass (lower in larger females).[35] This hypometabolism supports extended fasting, with regulated aerobic respiration in low-oxygen zones (down to 0.5 ml/L) allowing survival for months between infrequent meals, as evidenced by stable isotope analysis of wild-caught specimens indicating irregular feeding intervals.[36]Evolutionary Drivers of Sexual Parasitism
The evolution of sexual parasitism in ceratioid anglerfishes arose as an adaptation to the extreme sparsity of deep-sea environments, where population densities are low and encounters between sexes are rare. In such conditions, natural selection favored the development of diminutive, non-feeding males that seek out females, attach via biting, and undergo physiological fusion to provide continuous sperm supply, thereby maximizing reproductive assurance despite infrequent meetings. This strategy contrasts with free-living males in shallower-water anglerfishes, highlighting how resource scarcity in the bathypelagic zone drove the reduction in male body size and autonomy, with fusion representing a terminal investment in reproduction over individual survival.[37][11] A critical enabler of this fusion was the genomic degradation of adaptive immunity following the invasion of deep-sea habitats, particularly the loss of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes responsible for recognizing and rejecting foreign tissues. Studies of ceratioid genomes reveal extensive pseudogenization or absence of MHC class I and II loci, as well as associated T-cell receptor and antibody diversity genes, which would otherwise trigger immune rejection during male-to-female tissue merger. This immune relaxation, documented in species exhibiting permanent attachment, occurred after the initial deep-sea transition and facilitated the evolution of parasitism by removing barriers to allogeneic fusion, allowing males to integrate into the female's circulatory system without eliciting a host response.[6][5][38] The decoupling from stringent immune constraints also contributed to rapid speciation within ceratioids, as evidenced by phylogenetic analyses showing bursts of lineage diversification concurrent with immune gene losses and the onset of parasitism. Pre-existing sexual dimorphism in non-ceratioid anglerfishes provided a foundation, but the relaxation of histocompatibility requirements permitted greater flexibility in mating, potentially accelerating adaptive radiations into diverse deep-sea niches without the evolutionary costs of maintaining robust adaptive immunity. This pattern underscores a trade-off where reproductive innovations supplanted immune vigilance, enabling ceratioids to dominate bathypelagic ecosystems despite the risks of heightened pathogen susceptibility.[39][15][40]Anatomy and Physiology
Overall Morphology
Anglerfishes in the order Lophiiformes exhibit highly specialized body plans across their five suborders (Antennarioidei, Ceratioidei, Chaunacoidei, Lophioidei, and Ogcocephaloidei), generally featuring massive, rounded to flattened heads that constitute up to 50% of total body length, equipped with enormously distensible mouths lined with rows of sharp, recurved, and often depressible teeth numbering in the hundreds.[41][42] These dental arrays, observed in dissected specimens, interlock to prevent escape of engulfed prey.[43] The trunk is compact and globose in deep-sea ceratioids or dorso-ventrally depressed in lophioids, with reduced dorsal and anal fins positioned posteriorly; pectoral fins are prominently elongated and jointed at the base, forming limb-like appendages supported by robust radials and lepidotrichia, as revealed by radiographic imaging and musculoskeletal dissections, permitting tetrapod-like ambulation over substrates.[44][45] Pelvic fins, when present, similarly adapt for support in walking species.[46] Cutaneous covering lacks scales universally, presenting instead as loose, pliable integument textured variably—smooth in some chaunacoids, adorned with filamentous flaps or villi in antennariids for substrate mimicry, or bearing low spines and papillae in others—enhancing crypsis amid low-visibility benthic habitats, per examinations of preserved material.[43][47] Linear dimensions span extremes, with female total lengths from 2 cm in diminutive ceratioids to over 150 cm in lophioids like Lophius piscatorius, measured from fishery catches and submersible observations; dwarf males in parasitic ceratioid taxa average 3–7 mm standard length, the smallest verified vertebrate body sizes from histological sections.[48][4][49]
