Hubbry Logo
SpongeSpongeMain
Open search
Sponge
Community hub
Sponge
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Sponge
Sponge
from Wikipedia

Sponges
Temporal range: Ediacaran-present;[1] probable Cryogenian record,[2] 544 –0 Ma
A stove-pipe sponge
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Porifera
Grant, 1836
Classes
Synonyms

Parazoa/Ahistozoa (sans Placozoa)[5]

Sponges or sea sponges are primarily marine invertebrates of the animal phylum Porifera[6] (/pəˈrɪfərəˌ pɔː-/; meaning 'pore bearer'),[7] a basal clade and a sister taxon of the diploblasts.[8] They are sessile filter feeders that are bound to the seabed, and are one of the most ancient members of macrobenthos, with many historical species being important reef-building organisms.

Sponges are multicellular organisms consisting of jelly-like mesohyl sandwiched between two thin layers of cells, and usually have tube-like bodies full of pores and channels that allow water to circulate through them. They have unspecialized cells that can transform into other types and that often migrate between the main cell layers and the mesohyl in the process. They do not have complex nervous,[9] digestive or circulatory systems. Instead, most rely on maintaining a constant water flow through their bodies to obtain food and oxygen and to remove wastes, usually via flagella movements of the so-called "collar cells".

Sponges are believed to have been the first outgroup to branch off the evolutionary tree from the last common ancestor of all animals,[8] with fossil evidence of primitive sponges such as Otavia from as early as the Tonian period (around 800 Mya). The branch of zoology that studies sponges is spongiology.[10]

Etymology

[edit]

The term sponge derives from the Ancient Greek word σπόγγος spóngos.[11] The scientific name Porifera is a neuter plural of the Modern Latin term porifer, which comes from the roots porus meaning "pore, opening", and -fer meaning "bearing or carrying".

Overview

[edit]
Sponge biodiversity and morphotypes at the lip of a wall site in 60 feet (20 m) of water. Included are the yellow tube sponge, Aplysina fistularis, the purple vase sponge, Niphates digitalis, the red encrusting sponge, Spirastrella coccinea, and the gray rope sponge, Callyspongia sp.

Sponges are similar to other animals in that they are multicellular, heterotrophic, lack cell walls and produce sperm cells. Unlike other animals, they lack true tissues[12] and organs.[13] Some of them are radially symmetrical, but most are asymmetrical. The shapes of their bodies are adapted for maximal efficiency of water flow through the central cavity, where the water deposits nutrients and then leaves through a hole called the osculum. The single-celled choanoflagellates resemble the choanocyte cells of sponges which are used to drive their water flow systems and capture most of their food. This along with phylogenetic studies of ribosomal molecules have been used as morphological evidence to suggest sponges are the sister group to the rest of animals.[14] A great majority are marine (salt-water) species, ranging in habitat from tidal zones to depths exceeding 8,800 m (5.5 mi), though there are freshwater species. All adult sponges are sessile, meaning that they attach to an underwater surface and remain fixed in place (i.e., do not travel). While in their larval stage of life, they are motile.

Many sponges have internal skeletons of spicules (skeletal-like fragments of calcium carbonate or silicon dioxide), and/or spongin (a modified type of collagen protein).[12] An internal gelatinous matrix called mesohyl functions as an endoskeleton, and it is the only skeleton in soft sponges that encrust such hard surfaces as rocks. More commonly, the mesohyl is stiffened by mineral spicules, by spongin fibers, or both. Most sponges (over 90% of all known species) are demosponges, which have the widest range of habitats (including all freshwater ones); they use spongin, silica spicules, or both, and some species have calcium carbonate exoskeletons. Calcareans have calcium carbonate spicules and, in some species, calcium carbonate exoskeletons; they are restricted to relatively shallow marine waters where production of calcium carbonate is easiest.[15]: 179  The fragile hexactinellids or glass sponges use "scaffolding" of silica spicules and are restricted to polar regions or ocean depths where predators are rare. Fossils of all of these types have been found in rocks dated from 580 million years ago. In addition Archaeocyathids, whose fossils are common in rocks from 530 to 490 million years ago, are now regarded as a type of sponge. The smallest class of extant sponges are homoscleromorphs, which either have calcium carbonate spicules like the calcereans or are aspiculate, and found in shaded marine environments like caves and overhangs.

Although most of the approximately 5,000–10,000 known species of sponges feed on bacteria and other microscopic food in the water, some host photosynthesizing microorganisms as endosymbionts, and these alliances often produce more food and oxygen than they consume. A few species of sponges that live in food-poor environments have evolved as carnivores that prey mainly on small crustaceans.[16]

Most sponges reproduce sexually, but they can also reproduce asexually. Sexually reproducing species release sperm cells into the water to fertilize ova released or retained by its mate or "mother"; the fertilized eggs develop into larvae which swim off in search of places to settle.[15]: 183–185  Sponges are known for regenerating from fragments that are broken off, although this only works if the fragments include the right types of cells. Some species reproduce by budding. When environmental conditions become less hospitable to the sponges, for example as temperatures drop, many freshwater species and a few marine ones produce gemmules, "survival pods" of unspecialized cells that remain dormant until conditions improve; they then either form completely new sponges or recolonize the skeletons of their parents.[15]: 120–127 

Cells of the protist choanoflagellate clade closely resemble sponge choanocyte cells. Beating of choanocyte flagella draws water through the sponge so that nutrients can be extracted and waste removed.[17]

The few species of demosponge that have entirely soft fibrous skeletons with no hard elements have been used by humans over thousands of years for several purposes, including as padding and as cleaning tools. By the 1950s, though, these had been overfished so heavily that the industry almost collapsed, and most sponge-like materials are now synthetic. Sponges and their microscopic endosymbionts are now being researched as possible sources of medicines for treating a wide range of diseases. Dolphins have been observed using sponges as tools while foraging.[18]

Distinguishing features

[edit]

Sponges constitute the phylum Porifera, and have been defined as sessile metazoans (multicelled immobile animals) that have water intake and outlet openings connected by chambers lined with choanocytes, cells with whip-like flagella.[15]: 29  However, a few carnivorous sponges have lost these water flow systems and the choanocytes.[15]: 39 [19] All known living sponges can remold their bodies, as most types of their cells can move within their bodies and a few can change from one type to another.[19][20]

Even if a few sponges are able to produce mucus – which acts as a microbial barrier in all other animals – no sponge with the ability to secrete a functional mucus layer has been recorded. Without such a mucus layer their living tissue is covered by a layer of microbial symbionts, which can contribute up to 40–50% of the sponge wet mass. This inability to prevent microbes from penetrating their porous tissue could be a major reason why they have never evolved a more complex anatomy.[21]

Like cnidarians (jellyfish, etc.) and ctenophores (comb jellies), and unlike all other known metazoans, sponges' bodies consist of a non-living jelly-like mass (mesohyl) sandwiched between two main layers of cells.[22][23] Cnidarians and ctenophores have simple nervous systems, and their cell layers are bound by internal connections and by being mounted on a basement membrane (thin fibrous mat, also known as "basal lamina").[23] Sponges do not have a nervous system similar to that of vertebrates but may have one that is quite different.[9] Their middle jelly-like layers have large and varied populations of cells, and some types of cells in their outer layers may move into the middle layer and change their functions.[20]

Sponges[20][22] Cnidarians and ctenophores[23]
Nervous system No/Yes Yes, simple
Cells in each layer bound together No, except that Homoscleromorpha have basement membranes.[24] Yes: inter-cell connections; basement membranes
Number of cells in middle "jelly" layer Many Few
Cells in outer layers can move inwards and change functions Yes No

Basic structure

[edit]

Cell types

[edit]

    Mesohyl
    Pinacocyte
    Choanocyte
    Lophocyte
    Porocyte
    Oocyte
    Archeocyte
    Sclerocyte
    Spicule
    Water flow
Main cell types of Porifera[25]

A sponge's body is hollow and is held in shape by the mesohyl, a jelly-like substance made mainly of collagen and reinforced by a dense network of fibers also made of collagen. 18 distinct cell types have been identified.[26] The inner surface is covered with choanocytes, cells with cylindrical or conical collars surrounding one flagellum per choanocyte. The wave-like motion of the whip-like flagella drives water through the sponge's body. All sponges have ostia, channels leading to the interior through the mesohyl, and in most sponges these are controlled by tube-like porocytes that form closable inlet valves. Pinacocytes, plate-like cells, form a single-layered external skin over all other parts of the mesohyl that are not covered by choanocytes, and the pinacocytes also digest food particles that are too large to enter the ostia,[20][22] while those at the base of the animal are responsible for anchoring it.[22]

Other types of cells live and move within the mesohyl:[20][22]

  • Lophocytes are amoeba-like cells that move slowly through the mesohyl and secrete collagen fibres.
  • Collencytes are another type of collagen-producing cell.
  • Rhabdiferous cells secrete polysaccharides that also form part of the mesohyl.
  • Oocytes and spermatocytes are reproductive cells.
  • Sclerocytes secrete the mineralized spicules ("little spines") that form the skeletons of many sponges and in some species provide some defense against predators.
  • In addition to or instead of sclerocytes, demosponges have spongocytes that secrete a form of collagen that polymerizes into spongin, a thick fibrous material that stiffens the mesohyl.
  • Myocytes ("muscle cells") conduct signals and cause parts of the animal to contract.
  • "Grey cells" act as sponges' equivalent of an immune system.
  • Archaeocytes (or amoebocytes) are amoeba-like cells that are totipotent, in other words, each is capable of transformation into any other type of cell. They also have important roles in feeding and in clearing debris that block the ostia.

Many larval sponges possess neuron-less eyes that are based on cryptochromes. They mediate phototaxic behavior.[27]

Glass sponges present a distinctive variation on this basic plan. Their spicules, which are made of silica, form a scaffolding-like framework between whose rods the living tissue is suspended like a cobweb that contains most of the cell types.[20] This tissue is a syncytium that in some ways behaves like many cells that share a single external membrane, and in others like a single cell with multiple nuclei.

Water flow and body structures

[edit]
Asconoid
Syconoid
Leuconoid
    Mesohyl
    Water flow
Porifera body structures[28]

Most sponges work rather like chimneys: they take in water at the bottom and eject it from the osculum at the top. Since ambient currents are faster at the top, the suction effect that they produce by Bernoulli's principle does some of the work for free. Sponges can control the water flow by various combinations of wholly or partially closing the osculum and ostia (the intake pores) and varying the beat of the flagella, and may shut it down if there is a lot of sand or silt in the water.[20]

Although the layers of pinacocytes and choanocytes resemble the epithelia of more complex animals, they are not bound tightly by cell-to-cell connections or a basal lamina (thin fibrous sheet underneath). The flexibility of these layers and re-modeling of the mesohyl by lophocytes allow the animals to adjust their shapes throughout their lives to take maximum advantage of local water currents.[20]: 83 

The simplest body structure in sponges is a tube or vase shape known as "asconoid", but this severely limits the size of the animal. The body structure is characterized by a stalk-like spongocoel surrounded by a single layer of choanocytes. If it is simply scaled up, the ratio of its volume to surface area increases, because surface increases as the square of length or width while volume increases proportionally to the cube. The amount of tissue that needs food and oxygen is determined by the volume, but the pumping capacity that supplies food and oxygen depends on the area covered by choanocytes. Asconoid sponges seldom exceed 1 mm (0.039 in) in diameter.[20]

Diagram of a syconoid sponge

Some sponges overcome this limitation by adopting the "syconoid" structure, in which the body wall is pleated. The inner pockets of the pleats are lined with choanocytes, which connect to the outer pockets of the pleats by ostia. This increase in the number of choanocytes and hence in pumping capacity enables syconoid sponges to grow up to a few centimeters in diameter.

The "leuconoid" pattern boosts pumping capacity further by filling the interior almost completely with mesohyl that contains a network of chambers lined with choanocytes and connected to each other and to the water intakes and outlet by tubes. Leuconid sponges grow to over 1 m (3.3 ft) in diameter, and the fact that growth in any direction increases the number of choanocyte chambers enables them to take a wider range of forms, for example, "encrusting" sponges whose shapes follow those of the surfaces to which they attach. All freshwater and most shallow-water marine sponges have leuconid bodies. The networks of water passages in glass sponges are similar to the leuconid structure.[20]

In all three types of structure, the cross-section area of the choanocyte-lined regions is much greater than that of the intake and outlet channels. This makes the flow slower near the choanocytes and thus makes it easier for them to trap food particles.[20] For example, in Leuconia, a small leuconoid sponge about 10 centimetres (3.9 in) tall and 1 centimetre (0.39 in) in diameter, water enters each of more than 80,000 intake canals at 6 cm per minute. However, because Leuconia has more than 2 million flagellated chambers whose combined diameter is much greater than that of the canals, water flow through chambers slows to 3.6 cm per hour, making it easy for choanocytes to capture food. All the water is expelled through a single osculum at about 8.5 cm per second, fast enough to carry waste products some distance away.[29]

Sponge with calcium carbonate skeleton.[20]
  •   Archeocytes and other cells in mesohyl
  •   Mesohyl
  •   Spicules
  •   Seabed / rock
  •   Water flow

Skeleton

[edit]

In zoology, a skeleton is any fairly rigid structure of an animal, irrespective of whether it has joints and irrespective of whether it is biomineralized. The mesohyl functions as an endoskeleton in most sponges, and is the only skeleton in soft sponges that encrust hard surfaces such as rocks. More commonly the mesohyl is stiffened by mineral spicules, by spongin fibers or both. Spicules, which are present in most but not all species,[30] may be made of silica or calcium carbonate, and vary in shape from simple rods to three-dimensional "stars" with up to six rays. Spicules are produced by sclerocyte cells,[20] and may be separate, connected by joints, or fused.[19]

Some sponges also secrete exoskeletons that lie completely outside their organic components. For example, sclerosponges ("hard sponges") have massive calcium carbonate exoskeletons over which the organic matter forms a thin layer with choanocyte chambers in pits in the mineral. These exoskeletons are secreted by the pinacocytes that form the animals' skins.[20]

Vital functions

[edit]
Spongia officinalis, "the kitchen sponge", is dark grey when alive.

Movement

[edit]

Although adult sponges are fundamentally sessile animals, some marine and freshwater species can move across the sea bed at speeds of 1–4 mm (0.039–0.157 in) per day, as a result of amoeba-like movements of pinacocytes and other cells. A few species can contract their whole bodies, and many can close their oscula and ostia. Juveniles drift or swim freely, while adults are stationary.[20]

Respiration, feeding and excretion

[edit]
Euplectella aspergillum, a glass sponge known as "Venus's flower basket"

Sponges do not have distinct circulatory, respiratory, digestive, and excretory systems – instead, the water flow system supports all these functions. They filter food particles out of the water flowing through them. Particles larger than 50 micrometers cannot enter the ostia and pinacocytes consume them by phagocytosis (engulfing and intracellular digestion). Particles from 0.5 μm to 50 μm are trapped in the ostia, which taper from the outer to inner ends. These particles are consumed by pinacocytes or by archaeocytes which partially extrude themselves through the walls of the ostia. Bacteria-sized particles, below 0.5 micrometers, pass through the ostia and are caught and consumed by choanocytes.[20] Since the smallest particles are by far the most common, choanocytes typically capture 80% of a sponge's food supply.[31] Archaeocytes transport food packaged in vesicles from cells that directly digest food to those that do not. At least one species of sponge has internal fibers that function as tracks for use by nutrient-carrying archaeocytes,[20] and these tracks also move inert objects.[22]

It used to be claimed that glass sponges could live on nutrients dissolved in sea water and were very averse to silt.[32] However, a study in 2007 found no evidence of this and concluded that they extract bacteria and other micro-organisms from water very efficiently (about 79%) and process suspended sediment grains to extract such prey.[33] Collar bodies digest food and distribute it wrapped in vesicles that are transported by dynein "motor" molecules along bundles of microtubules that run throughout the syncytium.[20]

Sponges' cells absorb oxygen by diffusion from water into cells as water flows through body, into which carbon dioxide and other soluble waste products such as ammonia also diffuse. Archeocytes remove mineral particles that threaten to block the ostia, transport them through the mesohyl and generally dump them into the outgoing water current, although some species incorporate them into their skeletons.[20]

Carnivorous sponges

[edit]
The carnivorous ping-pong tree sponge, Chondrocladia lampadiglobus[34]

In waters where the supply of food particles is very poor, some species prey on crustaceans and other small animals. As of 2014, a total of 137 species had been discovered.[35] Most belong to the family Cladorhizidae, but a few members of the Guitarridae and Esperiopsidae are also carnivores.[36] In most cases, little is known about how they actually capture prey, although some species are thought to use either sticky threads or hooked spicules.[36][37] Most carnivorous sponges live in deep waters, up to 8,840 m (5.49 mi),[38] and the development of deep-ocean exploration techniques is expected to lead to the discovery of several more.[20][36] However, one species has been found in Mediterranean caves at depths of 17–23 m (56–75 ft), alongside the more usual filter-feeding sponges. The cave-dwelling predators capture crustaceans under 1 mm (0.039 in) long by entangling them with fine threads, digest them by enveloping them with further threads over the course of a few days, and then return to their normal shape; there is no evidence that they use venom.[38]

Most known carnivorous sponges have completely lost the water flow system and choanocytes. However, the genus Chondrocladia uses a highly modified water flow system to inflate balloon-like structures that are used for capturing prey.[36][39]

Endosymbionts

[edit]

Freshwater sponges often host green algae as endosymbionts within archaeocytes and other cells and benefit from nutrients produced by the algae. Many marine species host other photosynthesizing organisms, most commonly cyanobacteria but in some cases dinoflagellates. Symbiotic cyanobacteria may form a third of the total mass of living tissue in some sponges, and some sponges gain 48% to 80% of their energy supply from these micro-organisms.[20] In 2008, a University of Stuttgart team reported that spicules made of silica conduct light into the mesohyl, where the photosynthesizing endosymbionts live.[40] Sponges that host photosynthesizing organisms are most common in waters with relatively poor supplies of food particles and often have leafy shapes that maximize the amount of sunlight they collect.[22]

A recently discovered carnivorous sponge that lives near hydrothermal vents hosts methane-eating bacteria and digests some of them.[22]

"Immune" system

[edit]

Sponges do not have the complex immune systems of most other animals. However, they reject grafts from other species but accept them from other members of their own species. In a few marine species, gray cells play the leading role in rejection of foreign material. When invaded, they produce a chemical that stops movement of other cells in the affected area, thus preventing the intruder from using the sponge's internal transport systems. If the intrusion persists, the grey cells concentrate in the area and release toxins that kill all cells in the area. The "immune" system can stay in this activated state for up to three weeks.[22]

Reproduction

[edit]

Asexual

[edit]
The freshwater sponge Spongilla lacustris

Sponges have three asexual methods of reproduction: after fragmentation, by budding, and by producing gemmules. Fragments of sponges may be detached by currents or waves. They use the mobility of their pinacocytes and choanocytes and reshaping of the mesohyl to re-attach themselves to a suitable surface and then rebuild themselves as small but functional sponges over the course of several days. The same capabilities enable sponges that have been squeezed through a fine cloth to regenerate.[20]: 239  A sponge fragment can only regenerate if it contains both collencytes to produce mesohyl and archeocytes to produce all the other cell types.[31] A very few species reproduce by budding.[20]: 90–94 

Gemmules are "survival pods" which a few marine sponges and many freshwater species produce by the thousands when dying and which some, mainly freshwater species, regularly produce in autumn. Spongocytes make gemmules by wrapping shells of spongin, often reinforced with spicules, round clusters of archeocytes that are full of nutrients.[20]: 87–88  Freshwater gemmules may also include photosynthesizing symbionts.[41] The gemmules then become dormant, and in this state can survive cold, drying out, lack of oxygen and extreme variations in salinity.[20] Freshwater gemmules often do not revive until the temperature drops, stays cold for a few months and then reaches a near-"normal" level.[41] When a gemmule germinates, the archeocytes round the outside of the cluster transform into pinacocytes, a membrane over a pore in the shell bursts, the cluster of cells slowly emerges, and most of the remaining archeocytes transform into other cell types needed to make a functioning sponge. Gemmules from the same species but different individuals can join forces to form one sponge.[20]: 89–90  Some gemmules are retained within the parent sponge, and in spring it can be difficult to tell whether an old sponge has revived or been "recolonized" by its own gemmules.[41]

Sexual

[edit]

Most sponges are hermaphrodites (function as both sexes simultaneously), although sponges have no gonads (reproductive organs). Sperm are produced by choanocytes or entire choanocyte chambers that sink into the mesohyl and form spermatic cysts while eggs are formed by transformation of archeocytes, or of choanocytes in some species. Each egg generally acquires a yolk by consuming "nurse cells". During spawning, sperm burst out of their cysts and are expelled via the osculum. If they contact another sponge of the same species, the water flow carries them to choanocytes that engulf them but, instead of digesting them, metamorphose to an ameboid form and carry the sperm through the mesohyl to eggs, which in most cases engulf the carrier and its cargo.[20]: 77 

A few species release fertilized eggs into the water, but most retain the eggs until they hatch. By retaining the eggs, the parents can transfer symbiotic microorganisms directly to their offspring through vertical transmission, while the species who release their eggs into the water has to acquire symbionts horizontally (a combination of both is probably most common, where larvae with vertically transmitted symbionts also acquire others horizontally).[42][43] There are four types of larvae, but all are lecithotrophic (non-feeding) balls of cells with an outer layer of cells whose flagella or cilia enable the larvae to move. After swimming for a few days the larvae sink and crawl until they find a place to settle. Most of the cells transform into archeocytes and then into the types appropriate for their locations in a miniature adult sponge.[20]: 77 [44]

Glass sponge embryos start by dividing into separate cells, but once 32 cells have formed they rapidly transform into larvae that externally are ovoid with a band of cilia round the middle that they use for movement, but internally have the typical glass sponge structure of spicules with a cobweb-like main syncitium draped around and between them and choanosyncytia with multiple collar bodies in the center. The larvae then leave their parents' bodies.[45]

Meiosis

[edit]

The cytological progression of porifera oogenesis and spermatogenesis (gametogenesis) is very similar to that of other metazoa.[46] Most of the genes from the classic set of meiotic genes, including genes for DNA recombination and double-strand break repair, that are conserved in eukaryotes are expressed in the sponges (e.g. Geodia hentscheli and Geodia phlegraei).[46] Since porifera are considered to be the earliest divergent animals, these findings indicate that the basic toolkit of meiosis including capabilities for recombination and DNA repair were present early in eukaryote evolution.[46]

Life cycle

[edit]
Bathymetrical range of some sponge species.[47] Demosponge Samus anonymus (up to 50 m), hexactinellid Scleroplegma lanterna (~100–600 m), hexactinellid Aulocalyx irregularis (~550–915 m), lithistid demosponge Neoaulaxinia persicum (~500–1700 m)

Sponges in temperate regions live for at most a few years, but some tropical species and perhaps some deep-ocean ones may live for 200 years or more. Some calcified demosponges grow by only 0.2 mm (0.0079 in) per year and, if that rate is constant, specimens 1 m (3.3 ft) wide must be about 5,000 years old. Some sponges start sexual reproduction when only a few weeks old, while others wait until they are several years old.[20]

Coordination of activities

[edit]

Adult sponges lack neurons or any other kind of nervous tissue. However, most species have the ability to perform movements that are coordinated all over their bodies, mainly contractions of the pinacocytes, squeezing the water channels and thus expelling excess sediment and other substances that may cause blockages. Some species can contract the osculum independently of the rest of the body. Sponges may also contract in order to reduce the area that is vulnerable to attack by predators. In cases where two sponges are fused, for example if there is a large but still unseparated bud, these contraction waves slowly become coordinated in both of the "Siamese twins". The coordinating mechanism is unknown, but may involve chemicals similar to neurotransmitters.[48] However, glass sponges rapidly transmit electrical impulses through all parts of the syncytium, and use this to halt the motion of their flagella if the incoming water contains toxins or excessive sediment.[20] Myocytes are thought to be responsible for closing the osculum and for transmitting signals between different parts of the body.[22]

Sponges contain genes very similar to those that contain the "recipe" for the post-synaptic density, an important signal-receiving structure in the neurons of all other animals. However, in sponges these genes are only activated in "flask cells" that appear only in larvae and may provide some sensory capability while the larvae are swimming. This raises questions about whether flask cells represent the predecessors of true neurons or are evidence that sponges' ancestors had true neurons but lost them as they adapted to a sessile lifestyle.[49]

Ecology

[edit]

Habitats

[edit]
Euplectella aspergillum is a deep ocean glass sponge, seen here at a depth of 2,572 metres (8,438 ft) off the coast of California

Sponges are worldwide in their distribution, living in a wide range of ocean habitats, from the polar regions to the tropics.[31] Most live in quiet, clear waters, because sediment stirred up by waves or currents would block their pores, making it difficult for them to feed and breathe.[32] The greatest numbers of sponges are usually found on firm surfaces such as rocks, but some sponges can attach themselves to soft sediment by means of a root-like base.[50]

Sponges are more abundant but less diverse in temperate waters than in tropical waters, possibly because organisms that prey on sponges are more abundant in tropical waters.[51] Glass sponges are the most common in polar waters and in the depths of temperate and tropical seas, as their very porous construction enables them to extract food from these resource-poor waters with the minimum of effort. Demosponges and calcareous sponges are abundant and diverse in shallower non-polar waters.[52]

The different classes of sponge live in different ranges of habitat:

Class Water type[22] Depth[22] Type of surface[22]
Calcarea Marine less than 100 m (330 ft) Hard
Glass sponges Marine Deep Soft or firm sediment
Demosponges Marine, brackish; and about 150 freshwater species[20] Inter-tidal to abyssal;[22] a carnivorous demosponge has been found at 8,840 m (5.49 mi)[38] Any

As primary producers

[edit]

Sponges with photosynthesizing endosymbionts produce up to three times more oxygen than they consume, as well as more organic matter than they consume. Such contributions to their habitats' resources are significant along Australia's Great Barrier Reef but relatively minor in the Caribbean.[31]

Defenses

[edit]
Holes made by clionaid sponge (producing the trace Entobia) after the death of a modern bivalve shell of species Mercenaria mercenaria, from North Carolina

Many sponges shed spicules, forming a dense carpet several meters deep that keeps away echinoderms which would otherwise prey on the sponges.[31] They also produce toxins that prevent other sessile organisms such as bryozoans or sea squirts from growing on or near them, making sponges very effective competitors for living space. One of many examples includes ageliferin, which has antibacterial action and causes biofilms to dissolve.

A few species, including the Caribbean fire sponge Tedania ignis, cause a severe rash in humans who handle them.[20] Turtles and some fish feed mainly on sponges. It is often said that sponges produce chemical defenses against such predators.[20] However, experiments have been unable to establish a relationship between the toxicity of chemicals produced by sponges and how they taste to fish, which would diminish the usefulness of chemical defenses as deterrents. Predation by fish may even help to spread sponges by detaching fragments.[22] However, some studies have shown fish showing a preference for non-chemically-defended sponges,[53] and another study found that high levels of coral predation did predict the presence of chemically defended species.[54]

Glass sponges produce no toxic chemicals, and live in very deep water where predators are rare.[32]

Predation

[edit]
Generalised food web for sponge reefs[55]

Spongeflies, also known as spongillaflies (Neuroptera, Sisyridae), are specialist predators of freshwater sponges. The female lays her eggs on vegetation overhanging water. The larvae hatch and drop into the water where they seek out sponges to feed on. They use their elongated mouthparts to pierce the sponge and suck the fluids within. The larvae of some species cling to the surface of the sponge while others take refuge in the sponge's internal cavities. The fully grown larvae leave the water and spin a cocoon in which to pupate.[56]

Bioerosion

[edit]

The Caribbean chicken-liver sponge Chondrilla nucula secretes toxins that kill coral polyps, allowing the sponges to grow over the coral skeletons.[20] Others, especially in the family Clionaidae, use corrosive substances secreted by their archeocytes to tunnel into rocks, corals and the shells of dead mollusks.[20] Sponges may remove up to 1 m (3.3 ft) per year from reefs, creating visible notches just below low-tide level.[31]

Diseases

[edit]

Caribbean sponges of the genus Aplysina suffer from Aplysina red band syndrome. This causes Aplysina to develop one or more rust-colored bands, sometimes with adjacent bands of necrotic tissue. These lesions may completely encircle branches of the sponge. The disease appears to be contagious and impacts approximately ten percent of A. cauliformis on Bahamian reefs.[57] The rust-colored bands are caused by a cyanobacterium, but it is unknown whether this organism actually causes the disease.[57][58]

Collaboration with other organisms

[edit]

In addition to hosting photosynthesizing endosymbionts,[20] sponges are noted for their wide range of collaborations with other organisms. The relatively large encrusting sponge Lissodendoryx colombiensis is most common on rocky surfaces, but has extended its range into seagrass meadows by letting itself be surrounded or overgrown by seagrass sponges, which are distasteful to the local starfish and therefore protect Lissodendoryx against them; in return, the seagrass sponges get higher positions away from the sea-floor sediment.[59]

Shrimps of the genus Synalpheus form colonies in sponges, and each shrimp species inhabits a different sponge species, making Synalpheus one of the most diverse crustacean genera. Specifically, Synalpheus regalis utilizes the sponge not only as a food source, but also as a defense against other shrimp and predators.[60] As many as 16,000 individuals inhabit a single loggerhead sponge, feeding off the larger particles that collect on the sponge as it filters the ocean to feed itself.[61] Other crustaceans such as hermit crabs commonly have a specific species of sponge, Pseudospongosorites, grow on them as both the sponge and crab occupy gastropod shells until the crab and sponge outgrow the shell, eventually resulting in the crab using the sponge's body as protection instead of the shell until the crab finds a suitable replacement shell.[62]

Sponge loop

[edit]
Sponge loop hypothesis. Steps of the sponge loop pathway: (1) corals and algae release exudates as dissolved organic matter (DOM), (2) sponges take up DOM, (3) sponges release detrital particulate organic matter (POM), (4) sponge detritus (POM) is taken up by sponge-associated and free-living detritivores.[63][64][65]

Most sponges are detritivores which filter organic debris particles and microscopic life forms from ocean water. In particular, sponges occupy an important role as detritivores in coral reef food webs by recycling detritus to higher trophic levels.[63]

The hypothesis has been made that coral reef sponges facilitate the transfer of coral-derived organic matter to their associated detritivores via the production of sponge detritus, as shown in the diagram. Several sponge species are able to convert coral-derived DOM into sponge detritus,[66][64] and transfer organic matter produced by corals further up the reef food web. Corals release organic matter as both dissolved and particulate mucus,[67][68][69][70] as well as cellular material such as expelled Symbiodinium.[71][72][63]

Organic matter could be transferred from corals to sponges by all these pathways, but DOM likely makes up the largest fraction, as the majority (56 to 80%) of coral mucus dissolves in the water column,[68] and coral loss of fixed carbon due to expulsion of Symbiodinium is typically negligible (0.01%)[71] compared with mucus release (up to ~40%).[73][74] Coral-derived organic matter could also be indirectly transferred to sponges via bacteria, which can also consume coral mucus.[75][76][77][63]

Sponge microbiome

[edit]
The sponge holobiont as a nested ecosystem. Key functions carried out by the sponge microbiome (colored arrows) influence holobiont functioning and, through cascading effects, subsequently influence community structure and ecosystem functioning.[78]

Besides a one to one symbiotic relationship, it is possible for a host to become symbiotic with a microbial consortium, resulting in a diverse sponge microbiome. Sponges are able to host a wide range of microbial communities that can also be very specific. The microbial communities that form a symbiotic relationship with the sponge can amount to as much as 35% of the biomass of its host.[79]

The term for this specific symbiotic relationship, where a microbial consortia pairs with a host is called a holobiotic relationship. The sponge as well as the microbial community associated with it will produce a large range of secondary metabolites that help protect it against predators through mechanisms such as chemical defense.[80] The sponge holobiont is an example of the concept of nested ecosystems. Environmental factors act at multiple scales to alter microbiome, holobiont, community, and ecosystem scale processes. Thus, factors that alter microbiome functioning can lead to changes at the holobiont, community, or even ecosystem level and vice versa, illustrating the necessity of considering multiple scales when evaluating functioning in nested ecosystems.[78]

Some of these relationships include endosymbionts within bacteriocyte cells, and cyanobacteria or microalgae found below the pinacoderm cell layer where they are able to receive the highest amount of light, used for phototrophy. They can host over 50 different microbial phyla and candidate phyla, including Alphaprotoebacteria, Actinomycetota, Chloroflexota, Nitrospirota, "Cyanobacteria", the taxa Gamma-, the candidate phylum Poribacteria, and Thaumarchaea.[80]

Systematics

[edit]

Taxonomy

[edit]

Carl Linnaeus, who classified most kinds of sessile animals as belonging to the order Zoophyta in the class Vermes, mistakenly identified the genus Spongia as plants in the order Algae.[81][further explanation needed] For a long time thereafter, sponges were assigned to subkingdom Parazoa ("beside the animals") separated from the Eumetazoa which formed the rest of the kingdom Animalia.[82]

The phylum Porifera is further divided into classes mainly according to the composition of their skeletons:[19][31]

  • Hexactinellida (glass sponges) have silicate spicules, the largest of which have six rays and may be individual or fused.[19] The main components of their bodies are syncytia in which large numbers of cell share a single external membrane.[31]
  • Calcarea have skeletons made of calcite, a form of calcium carbonate, which may form separate spicules or large masses. All the cells have a single nucleus and membrane.[31]
  • Most Demospongiae have silicate spicules or spongin fibers or both within their soft tissues. However, a few also have massive external skeletons made of aragonite, another form of calcium carbonate.[19][31] All the cells have a single nucleus and membrane.[31]
  • Archeocyatha are known only as fossils from the Cambrian period.[82]

In the 1970s, sponges with massive calcium carbonate skeletons were assigned to a separate class, Sclerospongiae, otherwise known as "coralline sponges".[83] However, in the 1980s, it was found that these were all members of either the Calcarea or the Demospongiae.[84]

So far scientific publications have identified about 9,000 poriferan species,[31] of which about 400 are glass sponges, about 500 are calcareous species, and the rest are demosponges.[20] However, some types of habitat, such as vertical rock and cave walls and galleries in rock and coral boulders, have been investigated very little, even in shallow seas, and may harbor many more species.[31]

Classes

[edit]

Sponges were traditionally distributed in three classes: calcareous sponges (Calcarea), glass sponges (Hexactinellida) and demosponges (Demospongiae). However, studies have now shown that the Homoscleromorpha, a group thought to belong to the Demospongiae, has a genetic relationship well separated from other sponge classes.[15]: 153–154  Therefore, they have recently been recognized as the fourth class of sponges.[85][86]

Sponges are divided into classes mainly according to the composition of their skeletons:[22] These are arranged in evolutionary order as shown below in ascending order of their evolution from top to bottom:

Class Type of cells[22] Spicules[22] Spongin fibers[22] Massive exoskeleton[31] Body form[22]
Hexactinellida Always mostly syncytia Silica
Individual or fused
Never Never Leuconoid
Demospongiae Single nucleus, single external membrane Silica In many species In some species
Made of aragonite, if present[19][31]
Leuconoid
Calcarea Single nucleus, single external membrane Calcite
individual or large masses
Never Common
Made of calcite, if present
Asconoid, syconoid, leuconoid or solenoid[87]
Homoscleromorpha Single nucleus, single external membrane Silica In many species Never Sylleibid or leuconoid

Phylogeny

[edit]

The phylogeny of sponges has been debated heavily since the advent of phylogenetics. Originally thought to be the most basal animal phylum, there is now considerable evidence that Ctenophora may hold that title instead.[88][89] Additionally, the monophyly of the phylum is now under question. Several studies have concluded that all other animals emerged from within the sponges, and usually recover that the calcareous sponges and Homoscleromorpha are closer to other animals than to demosponges.[90][91] The internal relationships of Porifera have proven to be less uncertain. A close relationship of Homoscleromorpha and Calcarea has been recovered in nearly all studies, whether or not they support sponge or eumetazoan monophyly.[90][8][86][85] The position of glass sponges is also fairly certain, with a majority of studies recovering them as the sister of the demosponges.[85][8][90] Thus, the uncertainty at the base of the animal family tree is probably best represented by the below cladogram.

Animalia

Evolutionary history

[edit]

Fossil record

[edit]
Raphidonema faringdonense, a fossil sponge from the Cretaceous of England
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1: Gap  2: Central cavity  3 Internal wall  4: Pore (all walls have pores)  5 Septum  6 Outer wall  7 Holdfast
Archaeocyathid structure
Nevadacoelia wistae, a fossil anthaspidellid demosponge from the early Ordovician of Nevada

Although molecular clocks and biomarkers suggest sponges existed well before the Cambrian explosion of life, silica spicules like those of demosponges are absent from the fossil record until the Cambrian.[92] An unsubstantiated 2002 report exists of spicules in rocks dated around 750 million years ago.[93] Well-preserved fossil sponges from about 580 million years ago in the Ediacaran period have been found in the Doushantuo Formation.[94] These fossils, which include: spicules; pinacocytes; porocytes; archeocytes; sclerocytes; and the internal cavity, have been classified as demosponges. The Ediacaran record of sponges also contains two other genera: the stem-hexactinellid Helicolocellus from the Dengying Formation[95] and the possible stem-archaeocyathan Arimasia from the Nama Group.[96] These genera are both from the "Nama assemblage" of Ediacaran biota, although whether this is due to a genuine lack beforehand or preservational bias is uncertain. Fossils of glass sponges have been found from around 540 million years ago in rocks in Australia, China, and Mongolia.[97] Early Cambrian sponges from Mexico belonging to the genus Kiwetinokia show evidence of fusion of several smaller spicules to form a single large spicule.[98] Calcium carbonate spicules of calcareous sponges have been found in Early Cambrian rocks from about 530 to 523 million years ago in Australia. Other probable demosponges have been found in the Early Cambrian Chengjiang fauna, from 525 to 520 million years ago.[99] Fossils found in the Canadian Northwest Territories dating to 890 million years ago may be sponges; if this finding is confirmed, it suggests the first animals appeared before the Neoproterozoic oxygenation event.[100]

Oxygen content of the atmosphere over the last billion years. If confirmed, the discovery of fossilized sponges dating to 890 million years ago would predate the Neoproterozoic Oxygenation Event.

Freshwater sponges appear to be much younger, as the earliest known fossils date from the Mid-Eocene period about 48 to 40 million years ago.[97] Although about 90% of modern sponges are demosponges, fossilized remains of this type are less common than those of other types because their skeletons are composed of relatively soft spongin that does not fossilize well.[101] The earliest sponge symbionts are known from the early Silurian.[102]

A chemical tracer is 24-isopropyl cholestane, which is a stable derivative of 24-isopropyl cholesterol, which is said to be produced by demosponges but not by eumetazoans ("true animals", i.e. cnidarians and bilaterians). Since choanoflagellates are thought to be animals' closest single-celled relatives, a team of scientists examined the biochemistry and genes of one choanoflagellate species. They concluded that this species could not produce 24-isopropyl cholesterol but that investigation of a wider range of choanoflagellates would be necessary in order to prove that the fossil 24-isopropyl cholestane could only have been produced by demosponges.[103] Although a previous publication reported traces of the chemical 24-isopropyl cholestane in ancient rocks dating to 1,800 million years ago,[104] recent research using a much more accurately dated rock series has revealed that these biomarkers only appear before the end of the Marinoan glaciation approximately 635 million years ago,[105] and that "Biomarker analysis has yet to reveal any convincing evidence for ancient sponges pre-dating the first globally extensive Neoproterozoic glacial episode (the Sturtian, ~713 million years ago in Oman)". While it has been argued that this 'sponge biomarker' could have originated from marine algae, recent research suggests that the algae's ability to produce this biomarker evolved only in the Carboniferous; as such, the biomarker remains strongly supportive of the presence of demosponges in the Cryogenian.[106][107][108]

Archaeocyathids, which some classify as a type of coralline sponge, are very common fossils in rocks from the Early Cambrian about 530 to 520 million years ago, but apparently died out by the end of the Cambrian 490 million years ago.[99] It has been suggested that they were produced by: sponges; cnidarians; algae; foraminiferans; a completely separate phylum of animals, Archaeocyatha; or even a completely separate kingdom of life, labeled Archaeata or Inferibionta. Since the 1990s, archaeocyathids have been regarded as a distinctive group of sponges.[82]

= skin
= flesh
Halkieriid sclerite structure[109]

It is difficult to fit chancelloriids into classifications of sponges or more complex animals. An analysis in 1996 concluded that they were closely related to sponges on the grounds that the detailed structure of chancellorid sclerites ("armor plates") is similar to that of fibers of spongin, a collagen protein, in modern keratose (horny) demosponges such as Darwinella.[110] However, another analysis in 2002 concluded that chancelloriids are not sponges and may be intermediate between sponges and more complex animals, among other reasons because their skins were thicker and more tightly connected than those of sponges.[111] In 2008, a detailed analysis of chancelloriids' sclerites concluded that they were very similar to those of halkieriids, mobile bilaterian animals that looked like slugs in chain mail and whose fossils are found in rocks from the very Early Cambrian to the Mid Cambrian. If this is correct, it would create a dilemma, as it is extremely unlikely that totally unrelated organisms could have developed such similar sclerites independently, but the huge difference in the structures of their bodies makes it hard to see how they could be closely related.[109]

Relationships to other animal groups

[edit]
Simplified family tree showing calcareous sponges as closest to more complex animals[112]
Simplified family tree showing Homoscleromorpha as closest to more complex animals[113]

In the 1990s, sponges were widely regarded as a monophyletic group, all of them having descended from a common ancestor that was itself a sponge, and as the "sister-group" to all other metazoans (multi-celled animals), which themselves form a monophyletic group. On the other hand, some 1990s analyses also revived the idea that animals' nearest evolutionary relatives are choanoflagellates, single-celled organisms very similar to sponges' choanocytes – which would imply that most Metazoa evolved from very sponge-like ancestors and therefore that sponges may not be monophyletic, as the same sponge-like ancestors may have given rise both to modern sponges and to non-sponge members of Metazoa.[112]

Analyses since 2001 have concluded that Eumetazoa (more complex than sponges) are more closely related to particular groups of sponges than to other sponge groups. Such conclusions imply that sponges are not monophyletic, because the last common ancestor of all sponges would also be a direct ancestor of the Eumetazoa, which are not sponges. A study in 2001 based on comparisons of ribosome DNA concluded that the most fundamental division within sponges was between glass sponges and the rest, and that Eumetazoa are more closely related to calcareous sponges (those with calcium carbonate spicules) than to other types of sponge.[112] In 2007, one analysis based on comparisons of RNA and another based mainly on comparison of spicules concluded that demosponges and glass sponges are more closely related to each other than either is to the calcareous sponges, which in turn are more closely related to Eumetazoa.[97][114]

Other anatomical and biochemical evidence links the Eumetazoa with Homoscleromorpha, a sub-group of demosponges. A comparison in 2007 of nuclear DNA, excluding glass sponges and comb jellies, concluded that:

  • Homoscleromorpha are most closely related to Eumetazoa;
  • calcareous sponges are the next closest;
  • the other demosponges are evolutionary "aunts" of these groups; and
  • the chancelloriids, bag-like animals whose fossils are found in Cambrian rocks, may be sponges.[113]

The sperm of Homoscleromorpha share features with the sperm of Eumetazoa, that sperm of other sponges lack. In both Homoscleromorpha and Eumetazoa layers of cells are bound together by attachment to a carpet-like basal membrane composed mainly of "typ IV" collagen, a form of collagen not found in other sponges – although the spongin fibers that reinforce the mesohyl of all demosponges is similar to "type IV" collagen.[24]

A comb jelly

The analyses described above concluded that sponges are closest to the ancestors of all Metazoa, of all multi-celled animals including both sponges and more complex groups. However, another comparison in 2008 of 150 genes in each of 21 genera, ranging from fungi to humans but including only two species of sponge, suggested that comb jellies (ctenophora) are the most basal lineage of the Metazoa included in the sample.[115][116][117][118] If this is correct, either modern comb jellies developed their complex structures independently of other Metazoa, or sponges' ancestors were more complex and all known sponges are drastically simplified forms. The study recommended further analyses using a wider range of sponges and other simple Metazoa such as Placozoa.[115]

However, reanalysis of the data showed that the computer algorithms used for analysis were misled by the presence of specific ctenophore genes that were markedly different from those of other species, leaving sponges as either the sister group to all other animals, or an ancestral paraphyletic grade.[119][120] 'Family trees' constructed using a combination of all available data – morphological, developmental and molecular – concluded that the sponges are in fact a monophyletic group, and with the cnidarians form the sister group to the bilaterians.[121][122]

A very large and internally consistent alignment of 1,719 proteins at the metazoan scale, published in 2017, showed that (i) sponges – represented by Homoscleromorpha, Calcarea, Hexactinellida, and Demospongiae – are monophyletic, (ii) sponges are sister-group to all other multicellular animals, (iii) ctenophores emerge as the second-earliest branching animal lineage, and (iv) placozoans emerge as the third animal lineage, followed by cnidarians sister-group to bilaterians.[123]

In March 2021, scientists from Dublin found additional evidence that sponges are the sister group to all other animals,[124] while in May 2023, Schultz et al. found patterns of irreversible change in genome synteny that provide strong evidence that ctenophores are the sister group to all other animals instead.[125]

Notable spongiologists

[edit]

Use

[edit]

By dolphins

[edit]

A report in 1997 described use of sponges as a tool by bottlenose dolphins in Shark Bay in Western Australia. A dolphin will attach a marine sponge to its rostrum, which is presumably then used to protect it when searching for food in the sandy sea bottom.[126] The behavior, known as sponging, has only been observed in this bay and is almost exclusively shown by females. A study in 2005 concluded that mothers teach the behavior to their daughters and that all the sponge users are closely related, suggesting that it is a fairly recent innovation.[18]

By humans

[edit]

Skeleton

[edit]

The calcium carbonate or silica spicules of most sponge genera make them too rough for most uses, but two genera, Hippospongia and Spongia, have soft, entirely fibrous skeletons.[15]: 88  Early Europeans used soft sponges for many purposes, including padding for helmets, portable drinking utensils and municipal water filters. Until the invention of synthetic sponges, they were used as cleaning tools, applicators for paints and ceramic glazes and discreet contraceptives. However, by the mid-20th century, overfishing brought both the animals and the industry close to extinction.[127]

Many objects with sponge-like textures are now made of substances not derived from poriferans. Synthetic sponges include personal and household cleaning tools, breast implants,[128] and contraceptive sponges.[129] Typical materials used are cellulose foam, polyurethane foam, and less frequently, silicone foam.

The luffa "sponge", also spelled loofah, which is commonly sold for use in the kitchen or the shower, is not derived from an animal but mainly from the fibrous "skeleton" of the sponge gourd (Luffa aegyptiaca, Cucurbitaceae).[130]

Medicinal compounds

[edit]
Halichondria produces the eribulin precursor halichondrin B

Sponges have medicinal potential due to the presence in sponges themselves or their microbial symbionts of chemicals that may be used to control viruses, bacteria, tumors and fungi.[131][132]

Lacking any protective shell or means of escape, sponges have evolved to synthesize a variety of unusual compounds. One such class is the oxidized fatty acid derivatives called oxylipins. Members of this family have been found to have anti-cancer, anti-bacterial and anti-fungal properties. One example isolated from the Okinawan Plakortis sponges, plakoridine A, has shown potential as a cytotoxin to murine lymphoma cells.[133][134]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Sponges are simple, sessile aquatic invertebrates belonging to the phylum Porifera, characterized by their porous bodies that facilitate the filtering of water for food and oxygen through specialized cells. The name "sponge" derives from the Ancient Greek σπόγγος (spóngos). They represent one of the earliest diverging lineages of multicellular animals, lacking true tissues, organs, or a nervous system, and instead relying on loosely organized cells that perform specialized functions. With approximately 9,800 living species (as of 2025), sponges exhibit diverse morphologies ranging from encrusting forms to branching or tubular structures, often displaying vibrant colors in marine environments. The body plan of sponges is optimized for filter feeding, featuring numerous tiny pores called ostia that draw in water, a central cavity known as the spongocoel, and a larger opening called the osculum for expelling filtered water. Water flow is driven by flagellated choanocytes, which trap bacteria and organic particles on collar-like structures, while amoebocytes transport nutrients throughout the mesohyl, a gelatinous middle layer containing skeletal elements such as spongin fibers or spicules made of silica or calcium carbonate. This cellular organization allows sponges to process vast volumes of water—up to several times their body volume per minute—supporting respiration, excretion, and digestion without complex organ systems. Porifera is divided into four classes: Demospongiae, which comprises about 90% of species and includes soft, spongin-based skeletons; Hexactinellida, or glass sponges, with siliceous spicules forming lattice-like structures; Calcarea, featuring calcareous spicules; and the rare Homoscleromorpha. Most sponges are marine, inhabiting depths from intertidal zones to abyssal plains exceeding 5 kilometers, though around 150 species occur in freshwater lakes and streams. Reproduction occurs both asexually through budding or fragmentation and sexually via broadcast spawning of eggs and sperm, producing free-swimming larvae that settle to form new individuals; some freshwater species produce resistant gemmules for dormancy. Ecologically, sponges play crucial roles as ecosystem engineers in aquatic environments, providing habitat and shelter for symbiotic organisms like shrimp and algae, while their filter-feeding activity helps maintain water quality by removing particles and pathogens. Their fossil record extends back over 600 million years to the Precambrian, underscoring their ancient origins and evolutionary significance as a basal metazoan group.

Introduction

Etymology

The word "sponge" originates from the Ancient Greek σπόγγος (spóngos), denoting an absorbent material, likely derived from a pre-Greek substrate language due to its phonetic characteristics unrelated to Indo-European roots. This term entered Latin as spongia, which emphasized the sea creature's capacity to absorb and retain water, influencing its adoption into Old English as spunge around the 10th century and evolving into the modern English "sponge" by the Middle English period. In ancient Greek texts, sponges were referenced extensively, with Aristotle in his History of Animals (circa 350 BCE) describing them as sessile marine organisms with a plant-like appearance but animal-like sensibility, marking early scientific inquiry into their nature. These references, also appearing in works by Homer and Plato, highlight sponges' practical use in daily life, such as for cleaning, which reinforced the term's association with absorbency. The evolution into modern scientific nomenclature occurred in the 19th century, when Robert Edmond Grant coined the phylum name Porifera in 1836, from Latin porus (pore) and ferre (to bear), reflecting the organisms' defining porous structure rather than their absorbent quality. This binomial system, formalized under Linnaean taxonomy, supplanted earlier descriptive terms and standardized classification for these simple multicellular animals. Common names for sponges vary across languages but often retain the Greek-Latin root, such as French éponge, Spanish esponja, and German Schwamm (from a related Proto-Germanic term meaning "sponge"), while in Arabic it is إسْفِنْجَة (isfinja) and in Mandarin Chinese 海绵 (hǎimián, literally "sea cotton"). Regional variations, like "sea wool" in some Indigenous Australian languages or "luffa" for plant-based analogs in South Asia, underscore cultural adaptations tied to local harvesting practices.

Overview

Sponges, members of the phylum Porifera, are simple, sessile metazoans that inhabit aquatic environments, primarily marine settings, and are distinguished by their porous bodies and absence of true tissues or organs. As the most basal lineage in the animal kingdom, they represent an ancient group with fossils dating back over 600 million years, predating the Cambrian explosion. These organisms rely on an aquiferous system—a network of pores, canals, and chambers—to facilitate water flow through their bodies, enabling filter-feeding on suspended particles such as bacteria and organic detritus. The phylum encompasses approximately 9,000 described species, classified into four main classes: Demospongiae, Hexactinellida, Calcarea, and Homoscleromorpha, with the vast majority being marine and only about 150 species found in freshwater habitats. Sponges vary dramatically in size, ranging from tiny encrusting forms measuring a few millimeters to massive specimens exceeding two meters in diameter, such as certain deep-sea glass sponges. Their body plans are adapted for attachment to substrates, often exhibiting shapes like tubes, barrels, or encrustations that maximize surface area for water exchange. Ecologically, sponges play a pivotal role in aquatic ecosystems as efficient filter feeders, capable of processing thousands of liters of water daily to remove bacteria and nutrients, thereby influencing water quality and carbon cycling on coral reefs and seafloors. They also provide habitat and refuge for diverse marine organisms, contributing to biodiversity in benthic communities.

Distinguishing Features

Sponges, or members of the phylum Porifera, are distinguished from other metazoans by their lack of organized tissues, organs, and body symmetry, instead featuring a loose aggregation of specialized cells within a mesohyl matrix. Unlike eumetazoans, which possess defined tissue layers and organ systems, sponges exhibit a parazoan grade of organization where cells perform functions without forming cohesive tissues, enabling high plasticity but limiting complex behaviors. A key feature is the presence of choanocytes, flagellated collar cells that line internal chambers and canals, uniquely adapted for generating water currents essential to their biology. Their skeletal structure further sets sponges apart, consisting of spicules—needle-like elements of silica or calcium carbonate—or fibrous spongin protein, which provide support without the rigid endoskeletons or exoskeletons of other invertebrates. Body forms vary among three primary grades: the simple asconoid plan, with a single spongocoel lined by choanocytes; the syconoid plan, featuring folded walls that increase surface area; and the complex leuconoid plan, with intricate canal systems for enhanced efficiency, representing evolutionary adaptations to diverse habitats. These configurations underscore sponges' role as efficient filter-feeders in aquatic environments, primarily marine. Adult sponges are sessile, attached to substrates and incapable of locomotion, relying entirely on ambient or self-generated water currents for nutrient acquisition, gas exchange, and waste removal, a trait that contrasts with the motility of most other metazoans. This immobility fosters their ecological niche as foundational benthic organisms, often dominating substrates in stable aquatic settings. A hallmark of sponge biology is cellular totipotency, where many cell types, including archaeocytes and choanocytes, retain the ability to dedifferentiate, transdifferentiate, and redifferentiate, facilitating extraordinary regeneration. Sponges can reconstitute entire functional organisms from dissociated cell suspensions or small fragments, a process involving cell aggregation, motility, and reorganization without a fixed body axis, distinguishing them as basal metazoans with unparalleled regenerative potential. This capacity, observed across Porifera classes, highlights their evolutionary significance in studies of stem cell biology and tissue plasticity.

Anatomy

Cell Types

Sponges (phylum Porifera) exhibit a remarkable diversity of specialized cell types that underpin their basic physiological functions, despite lacking true tissues or organs. These cells, primarily residing in the mesohyl (the gelatinous matrix between the outer and inner layers) or lining the aquiferous system, enable essential processes such as water movement, nutrient capture, and structural maintenance. The key cell types include choanocytes, pinacocytes, porocytes, amoebocytes, and archaeocytes, each with distinct morphologies and roles. Choanocytes are flagellated cells that line the internal chambers and canals of the sponge body, characterized by a collar of microvilli surrounding a central flagellum. These cells drive water flow through the aquiferous system by beating their flagella, creating currents that facilitate particle capture for feeding, while their collars trap bacteria and organic matter via van der Waals forces. In species like Ephydatia muelleri, choanocytes are squat (2.5–5 µm in diameter) with approximately 40 microvilli per collar and flagella up to 20 µm long. Pinacocytes form the epithelial-like outer covering (exopinacoderm) and inner linings (endopinacoderm) of the sponge, providing a protective barrier and contributing to body shape maintenance. These flat, polygonal cells (typically 3 µm thick and 30 µm across in exopinacocytes) are interconnected by junctions and can contract to alter the sponge's form, with subtypes like basopinacocytes and apopinacocytes specialized for different surfaces. They also play a role in nutrient absorption and waste expulsion across the body wall. Porocytes are specialized, tube-shaped cells that create the incurrent pores (ostia) in the sponge's body wall, allowing water to enter the internal canal system. Composed of a single cell with a central canal (up to 20 µm in diameter), they are anchored by filopodia and can contract via actin filaments to regulate inflow, ensuring efficient filtration without backflow. In freshwater sponges, porocytes often feature multiple openings and derive from pinacocyte transdifferentiation. Amoebocytes are motile, amoeba-like cells that wander through the mesohyl, performing transport functions such as distributing nutrients and removing wastes via phagocytosis. These versatile cells, including subtypes like polyblasts and cystencytes, also contribute to skeleton formation by secreting structural elements and support reproduction by transporting gametes. Their motility (approximately 0.2 µm/s) enables response to physiological needs. Archaeocytes, often considered totipotent stem cells, are large, spherical or amoeboid cells (with prominent nucleoli) residing in the mesohyl, capable of differentiating into other cell types for growth and repair. They store nutrients in granules, transport materials, and produce gametes (sperm or oocytes) during sexual reproduction, underscoring their pluripotency in maintaining sponge integrity. In demosponges, archaeocytes express genes for broad cellular plasticity, distinguishing them from more specialized amoebocytes.

Body Forms and Water Flow

Sponges exhibit three primary body plans that vary in complexity and correspond to their size and ecological niche: asconoid, syconoid, and leuconoid. The asconoid plan is the simplest, consisting of a tubular structure with a single large central cavity called the spongocoel, lined directly by choanocytes, and limited to small sponges typically under 10 cm in height due to constraints on water flow efficiency. Syconoid sponges feature folded walls that increase surface area, forming radial canals that lead to smaller flagellated chambers, allowing for moderately larger sizes than asconoids while maintaining a vase-like shape. The most complex leuconoid plan, found in the majority of sponge species including larger forms, involves a network of intricate chambers and canals where choanocytes are concentrated in numerous small, spherical flagellated chambers, enabling efficient filtration in diverse habitats. Central to all sponge body plans is the aquiferous system, a specialized network of pores, canals, and chambers that facilitates water circulation through the body. Water enters via numerous tiny incurrent pores known as ostia, located on the outer surface, and travels through incurrent canals into the flagellated chambers. Within these chambers, choanocytes use their flagella to generate currents that draw water through collars for filtration before it exits via excurrent canals to one or more oscula, the larger exhalant openings on the surface. This system ensures continuous renewal of internal water without relying on external currents. Water flow in sponges is driven by the coordinated beating of choanocyte flagella, creating pressure gradients that propel water through the aquiferous system at rates typically filtering 1-10 times the sponge's body volume per minute, depending on species and conditions. These rates support high-throughput processing while minimizing energy expenditure, with flow speeds reaching up to several millimeters per second in canals. Adaptations in the aquiferous system enhance efficiency across body sizes and environments; for instance, the simple asconoid design suits nutrient-rich, low-flow shallow waters but limits growth, whereas the branched leuconoid structure in larger sponges optimizes flow resistance and retention in deeper or variable-current habitats, allowing colonization of oligotrophic environments. In high-sediment areas, some leuconoid sponges adjust osculum contraction to regulate intake and prevent clogging, balancing filtration volume with particle selectivity.

Skeleton

The skeleton of sponges provides structural support and rigidity to their otherwise soft bodies, primarily composed of spicules and, in some taxa, spongin fibers. Spicules are microcrystalline elements that form the inorganic framework, while spongin serves as an organic reinforcement in certain classes. These components vary in composition and arrangement, contributing to the diversity of sponge morphologies. Spicules are needle-like or stellate structures ranging from a few micrometers to several centimeters in length, formed intracellularly within specialized cells known as sclerocytes, which are a type of amoebocyte. Siliceous spicules, composed of hydrated silica (opal), predominate in Demospongiae, Hexactinellida, and Homoscleromorpha, where they are biosynthesized via the enzyme silicatein that deposits silica around an organic axial filament. Calcareous spicules, made of calcium carbonate (often magnesium calcite), are characteristic of Calcarea and form through similar cellular templating but with calcium deposition. Common shapes include monaxons (single-rayed, rod-like forms for flexibility) and tetraxons (four-rayed, clathrate structures for rigidity), with more complex variants like hexactines (six-rayed) in glass sponges. These spicules assemble into tracts or networks embedded in the mesohyl, the gelatinous extracellular matrix between cell layers. Spongin is a fibrous, collagen-related protein matrix that interconnects spicules, providing elasticity and additional support; it is primarily found in Demospongiae, where it forms a dense, hierarchical network of fibrils. Composed mainly of short-chain collagens with high glycine and hydroxyproline content, spongin is secreted extracellularly by spongocytes, another amoeboid cell type, and can incorporate glycosaminoglycans or even chitin in some species for enhanced durability. In keratosan demosponges, spongin can constitute the primary skeletal element, fully substituting inorganic components in certain bath sponges. Unlike spicules, spongin is absent or minimal in Calcarea and Hexactinellida. The sponge skeleton plays key roles in protection against predators through sharp or abrasive spicules that deter grazing, in attachment to substrates via basal spongin layers or anchoring spicules, and in species identification, as spicule morphology and arrangement are diagnostic traits in taxonomy. For instance, the intricate, fused siliceous frameworks of glass sponges (Hexactinellida) create rigid, lattice-like structures that enhance deep-sea durability, contrasting with the flexible, spongin-reinforced skeletons of demosponges. Across classes, skeletal variations reflect evolutionary adaptations: Calcarea feature simple calcareous spicules without spongin for lightweight support in shallow waters, while Demospongiae combine siliceous spicules and spongin for versatile forms in diverse habitats.

Physiology

Feeding, Respiration, and Excretion

Sponges employ a filter-feeding mechanism powered by the aquiferous system, which draws in ambient water laden with suspended particles such as bacteria and plankton through numerous ostia. Inside the sponge, choanocytes—flagellated cells lining the internal chambers and canals—beat their flagella to generate a pumping current, propelling water through a network of fine filters formed by their microvillar collars coated in glycocalyx. These collars trap microbial prey with near-complete efficiency, after which the particles are engulfed and digested via phagocytosis directly by the choanocytes, providing the primary nutritional uptake for the organism. Respiration in sponges lacks specialized organs and relies on the passive diffusion of dissolved oxygen from the incoming water across the thin, porous body surface and into the internal tissues. As water circulates through the aquiferous system driven by choanocyte activity, it maintains a gradient that facilitates oxygen uptake by all cells, including those in the mesohyl; during periods of reduced pumping, such as osculum closure, surface diffusion alone sustains metabolic demands at rates around 1.44 μmol O₂ cm⁻² d⁻¹. Excretion primarily involves the release of ammonia, the main nitrogenous waste product from cellular metabolism, which diffuses into the exhalant water stream and exits via the osculum after filtration. Amoebocytes, mobile cells within the mesohyl, transport undigested residues and metabolic byproducts from digestive sites to the canals for expulsion, preventing accumulation and supporting overall homeostasis. The integrated nature of these processes underscores the efficiency of sponge physiology, with large specimens—such as the Caribbean barrel sponge Xestospongia muta—capable of filtering volumes up to 24,000 liters of water daily, thereby maximizing nutrient capture while simultaneously enabling gas exchange and waste removal.

Movement

Sponges, as members of the phylum Porifera, exhibit limited motility throughout their life cycle, with adults primarily sessile and larvae displaying active swimming capabilities. Adult sponges are fundamentally sessile, remaining attached to substrates such as rocks or coral via specialized structures including a basal disc or holdfast, which anchor them firmly and prevent displacement by water currents. This attachment ensures stability in their aquatic environments, though some species demonstrate slow creeping across the seabed at rates of 1–4 mm per day using amoeboid cells in the pinacoderm. In contrast, sponge larvae are motile and capable of swimming through the water column using flagella that propel them actively. These flagellated larvae, such as the parenchymula type, enable short-distance navigation before settlement. Sponges also exhibit contractile responses that contribute to localized movement and regulation of internal processes. The osculum, the primary exhalant opening, undergoes rhythmic pulsing and contractions to control water flow rates, with some species capable of independent osculum closure. Additionally, certain demosponge species perform coordinated whole-body contractions, resembling muscle-like activity, to expel debris or adjust body volume. These contractions can be triggered by environmental stimuli such as mechanical touch, sediment intrusion, or changes in water currents, eliciting responses like the "sneeze" behavior where the osculum contracts followed by canal inflation. Water flow passively influences sponge positioning by eroding sediment around the holdfast, aiding subtle reorientation without active locomotion.

Carnivorous Adaptations

While most sponges rely on filter-feeding to capture microscopic particles from seawater, a specialized subset has evolved carnivorous strategies to actively prey on larger organisms, primarily in nutrient-poor environments. These adaptations are most prominent in the family Cladorhizidae (Demospongiae: Poecilosclerida), with reports of similar predatory behaviors in certain deep-sea hexactinellids. Carnivorous sponges employ elongated filaments or pedunculate structures protruding from their body, often covered in adhesive mucus or armed with siliceous micro-hooks that entangle passing crustaceans, such as amphipods and copepods. Once ensnared, the prey is drawn toward the sponge's body and engulfed whole, initiating extracellular digestion where phagocytic cells migrate to the capture site, secreting enzymes to break down tissues into absorbable nutrients. This process contrasts with the intracellular digestion typical in filter-feeders and enables efficient nutrient extraction from sizable meals. These adaptations provide key evolutionary benefits in oligotrophic settings with sparse particulate organic matter, where filter-feeding yields insufficient energy; carnivory allows access to energy-dense macrofauna, supporting growth and reproduction in otherwise barren habitats. For instance, the reduction of aquiferous systems in these sponges reallocates resources toward predatory structures, enhancing survival in low-food fluxes. Prominent examples include Asbestopluma hypogea (Cladorhizidae), which deploys sticky filaments to immobilize and digest small crustaceans in its littoral cave habitats, demonstrating the family's versatility beyond abyssal depths. In 2025, explorers identified a novel cladorhizid species, informally named the "death-ball" sponge (Chondrocladia sp. nov.), from the Southern Ocean; its spherical form features orb-like appendages tipped with micro-hooks that trap prey, highlighting ongoing diversification of these predatory traits.

Endosymbionts and Microbiome

Sponges harbor diverse endosymbiotic microorganisms within their mesohyl tissues, including bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotic algae such as microalgae. These symbionts contribute significantly to the holobiont's biology, with microbial communities varying in abundance and composition across sponge species. Sponges are broadly categorized into high microbial abundance (HMA) and low microbial abundance (LMA) types based on symbiont density: HMA sponges contain 10⁸–10¹⁰ microorganisms per gram of tissue, accounting for 20%–35% of the sponge's biomass and featuring denser mesohyl with narrower canals, while LMA sponges exhibit densities of 10⁵–10⁶ bacteria per gram, comparable to surrounding seawater. HMA sponges host richer, more diverse communities dominated by phyla like Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Poribacteria, whereas LMA sponges are typically enriched with Proteobacteria or Cyanobacteria such as Synechococcus. The sponge microbiome provides essential functions that support host nutrition and defense. Symbiotic microbes enable carbon fixation through photosynthetic cyanobacteria or chemoautotrophy, supplying over 50% of the holobiont's energy requirements in some species and allowing utilization of dissolved inorganic carbon. Nutrient provision extends to nitrogen and phosphorus cycling, with microbes performing ammonia oxidation to process host waste and denitrification to recycle inorganic nutrients. Additionally, symbionts produce antibiotics and secondary metabolites, such as those from cyanobacterial associates, which deter pathogens and predators. These microbial contributions supplement sponge filter-feeding by converting dissolved organic matter into bioavailable forms. Recent advances highlight the therapeutic potential of sponge-associated microbes. In 2025, researchers isolated a Streptomyces sp. from the deep-sea sponge Lissodendoryx diversichela in the North Atlantic, identifying bioactive compounds with strong antibiotic activity against Aeromonas salmonicida, a bacterial pathogen causing furunculosis in salmonid aquaculture. This discovery, achieved through integrated genomics, metabolomics, and the One-Strain-Many-Compounds approach, emphasizes deep-sea sponges as reservoirs for novel antimicrobials amid rising antimicrobial resistance. Host-specificity shapes sponge microbiomes, with certain symbionts, including sponge-enriched bacterial clades, exhibiting fidelity to particular host species due to evolutionary co-adaptations. Transmission of these microbes involves both vertical (parent-to-offspring) and horizontal (environmental acquisition) routes, though vertical transmission is generally weak and inconsistent across species. Larvae share only about 1.4% of amplicon sequence variants with parents on average, with no strong sibling similarity, yet vertically acquired microbes more frequently belong to sponge-specific clusters than horizontally acquired ones.

Immune Responses

Sponges, as members of the phylum Porifera, lack an adaptive immune system and instead rely entirely on innate immunity to defend against pathogens and environmental stressors. This primitive immune framework evolved early in metazoan history and involves both cellular and humoral components tailored to their filter-feeding lifestyle, which exposes them to high microbial loads. Innate defenses in sponges prioritize rapid, non-specific recognition and elimination of invaders, without the immunological memory characteristic of adaptive systems. Cellular immunity in sponges is mediated primarily by archaeocytes, versatile mesohyl cells that perform phagocytosis to engulf and digest bacteria and other foreign particles. These macrophage-like cells, first observed by Metchnikoff in the late 19th century, respond to bacterial challenges such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by upregulating perforin-like proteins that lyse Gram-negative invaders. Lectin-mediated recognition complements this process, with sponge lectins—such as galectins and tachylectin-like proteins—binding to carbohydrate motifs on pathogen surfaces to facilitate identification and agglutination. For instance, lectins from Suberites domuncula exhibit antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria by targeting LPS, while those in Cliona varians inhibit growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis. Humoral defenses involve the production of secondary metabolites, including toxins and bioactive compounds, which provide broad-spectrum protection against microbial colonization and tissue damage. These metabolites, often synthesized by the sponge holobiont including its microbiome, deter pathogen invasion; for example, okadaic acid in Suberites domuncula acts as a potent immunosuppressant-like toxin that limits bacterial proliferation. Such chemical barriers are distributed throughout sponge tissues, enhancing resilience without relying on physical structures. Wound healing and allorecognition processes further underscore sponge innate immunity, particularly in tissue repair and self/non-self discrimination during fusion or rejection events. Upon injury, archaeocytes infiltrate the damaged site to phagocytose debris and promote regeneration, forming a new exopinacoderm without scarring, as observed in Callyspongia diffusa. In allorecognition, compatible autografts fuse seamlessly via exopinacoderm merging and mesohyl integration, while incompatible allografts trigger rejection through necrosis of tissue bridges and archaeocyte-lined barriers, preventing pathogen entry at contact zones. This system ensures colony integrity while excluding foreign tissues.

Reproduction and Life Cycle

Asexual Reproduction

Sponges exhibit several modes of asexual reproduction that facilitate rapid growth, colony expansion, and survival under adverse conditions, primarily through the proliferation of totipotent archaeocytes that enable regeneration from minimal tissue. Budding occurs when small outgrowths of cells form on the surface or internally within the parent's body, developing into genetically identical offspring that may remain attached to form colonies or detach to establish new individuals. External budding typically involves ectosomal or choanosomal cells proliferating into a protuberance that matures into a functional sponge, while internal budding produces structures embedded in the mesohyl before emergence. This process is prevalent in marine demosponges and contributes to localized population growth without requiring gamete production. Fragmentation is a common asexual strategy in which portions of the sponge body break off due to physical disturbances, such as wave action or predation, and subsequently regenerate into complete organisms. Detached fragments, often consisting of a few millimeters of tissue, settle on suitable substrates, reorganize their cells—including archaeocytes and sclerocytes—and grow into mature sponges, promoting dispersal and resilience in dynamic environments like coral reefs. This method dominates in erect, branching species and can account for nearly all propagation in some Caribbean populations. In freshwater sponges, particularly those in the family Spongillidae, gemmule formation provides a dormant stage for enduring harsh conditions, such as seasonal drying or freezing. Gemmules are compact, resistant capsules formed by aggregates of archaeocytes surrounded by a protective layer of spongin and spicules, which remain viable for months or years until favorable conditions prompt hatching into juvenile sponges. This adaptation ensures population persistence across fluctuating aquatic habitats. Asexual reproduction in sponges is often triggered by environmental cues, including temperature drops, reduced oxygen levels, or nutrient scarcity, which signal the need for dormancy or rapid propagation over sexual modes. For instance, gemmule production intensifies in response to cooling waters in temperate regions, while fragmentation may increase with mechanical stress from currents.

Sexual Reproduction

Sponges exhibit a range of sexual reproductive strategies, with most species being hermaphroditic, producing both oocytes and spermatozoa within the same individual. Hermaphroditism can be simultaneous, where male and female gametes mature concurrently, or sequential, where an individual functions first as one sex and later as the other, often producing oocytes before spermatozoa to promote cross-fertilization. A smaller number of species are gonochoric, with separate male and female individuals. Gametes typically arise from totipotent archaeocytes, which differentiate into oogonia and spermatogonia, although choanocytes can also contribute in some taxa. Sexual reproduction in sponges involves either broadcasting or brooding. In broadcasting species, which are primarily oviparous, mature oocytes and spermatozoa are released directly into the surrounding water column for external fertilization, a strategy more common in certain demosponges and calcareous sponges. Brooding, or viviparity, predominates in most species, particularly in the class Demospongiae, where oocytes are retained within the parental mesohyl and fertilized internally; the resulting zygotes develop into free-swimming larvae that are later released. This internal development provides protection from environmental stresses and predators. Sperm transfer occurs passively through water currents generated by the sponge's aquiferous system. Spermatozoa are ejected via the excurrent canals of a donor sponge and drawn into the inhalant pores of a recipient, where choanocytes capture them and transport them through the mesohyl to fertilize oocytes. Cross-fertilization is the norm, even in hermaphroditic species, as mechanisms such as temporal separation of gamete maturation or spatial barriers within the sponge body prevent self-fertilization, thereby enhancing genetic diversity. Reproductive timing in sponges is often seasonal, synchronized with environmental cues to optimize larval survival. In temperate and subtropical regions, gametogenesis and spawning typically peak in spring or summer, coinciding with rising water temperatures (often 15–25°C) and increased phytoplankton availability, which supports energy demands for reproduction. For instance, many Mediterranean demosponges initiate sexual cycles when temperatures exceed 18°C and food resources are abundant, though patterns vary by depth and latitude, with deeper-water species showing less pronounced seasonality due to stable conditions.

Meiosis and Development

In sponges (Porifera), meiosis occurs during gametogenesis to produce haploid gametes from diploid precursor cells, primarily archaeocytes, which serve as totipotent stem cells capable of differentiating into germ cells. Archaeocytes transform into oogonia or spermatogonia, undergoing reduction division through two meiotic cycles: the first involves homologous chromosome pairing and crossing over, mediated by conserved genes such as dmc1 and sycp1-3, while the second yields haploid spermatids or oocytes arrested in metaphase II until fertilization. This process ensures the halving of chromosome number, typically from 2n to n, as observed in demosponge species like Geodia barretti. Fertilization in sponges is typically internal or external, depending on the species, where sperm from one individual enters the mesohyl of another to fuse with an oocyte, forming a diploid zygote enclosed by a fertilization envelope that prevents polyspermy. Cleavage begins shortly after, as holoblastic and equal divisions of the zygote produce a series of blastomeres that rearrange into a compact, solid stereoblastula—a morula-like stage lacking a fluid-filled blastocoel, with cells packed densely and often containing nurse cell remnants or yolk. This stereoblastula forms within hours to days post-fertilization, as documented in species such as Spongia officinalis and haplosclerid demosponges. Early embryonic development in sponges proceeds through cell rearrangements without true gastrulation, as the stereoblastula undergoes delamination, ingression, or inversion to form larval structures like the parenchymella, involving migration of presumptive cell types (e.g., scleroblasts and choanoblast precursors) without establishing distinct germ layers. Unlike eumetazoans, sponge embryos lack ectoderm-endoderm differentiation during this phase, relying instead on totipotent archeocytes for flexible cell fate assignment via transdifferentiation. Meiotic recombination during gametogenesis contributes to genetic diversity by shuffling alleles through crossing over, promoting variability in offspring populations and adaptation in modular organisms like sponges, where sexual reproduction contrasts with prevalent asexual modes.

Life Cycle Stages

The life cycle of sponges (phylum Porifera) encompasses a sequence of developmental stages from the zygote through larval dispersal to adult maturity, characterized by a transition from a motile planktonic phase to a sessile benthic existence. Following sexual reproduction, the zygote develops into a free-swimming larva, which serves as the primary dispersal mechanism for these otherwise immobile organisms. Two primary larval types are recognized: the parenchymella larva, prevalent in demosponges (class Demospongiae), which features a solid mass of cells with an outer layer of flagellated cells for locomotion; and the amphiblastula larva, typical of calcareous sponges (class Calcarea), consisting of a hollow sphere with flagella on one hemisphere. Other larval forms include the cinctoblastula in homoscleromorphs and the trichimella in hexactinellids. These larvae are lecithotrophic, relying on yolk reserves rather than external feeding, and their swimming duration varies from several hours to a few days, enabling dispersal over distances of meters to kilometers depending on currents and species-specific competence. Upon reaching competence, the larva undergoes settlement, attaching to a suitable substrate via adhesive structures or secretions at its anterior pole. This initiates metamorphosis, a rapid reorganization process lasting hours to days, during which the larval ciliated epithelium inverts or transdifferentiates into functional adult tissues, including choanocyte chambers for filter-feeding. The posterior larval region forms the initial aquiferous system, while internal cells differentiate into pinacocytes, sclerocytes, and other specialized types, resulting in a juvenile sponge that resembles a miniature adult. This post-larval stage is vulnerable to environmental cues like bacterial biofilms or chemical signals that induce settlement, with success rates influenced by substrate texture and microbial communities. Juvenile sponges grow modularly through continuous cell division and budding of new choanocyte chambers, expanding via aquiferous canal systems without a fixed body plan. Growth rates vary widely by species, habitat, and nutrition, ranging from millimeters to centimeters per year, allowing some individuals to achieve large sizes over centuries. Notably, the giant barrel sponge Xestospongia muta exhibits slow linear growth, with maximum ages estimated at over 2,300 years based on growth modeling from size-increment data from tagged individuals, though these extrapolations carry high uncertainty. Sponge life cycles integrate both sexual and asexual phases, with the sexual larval stage alternating with asexual propagation in the adult form, such as fragmentation, budding, or gemmule formation in response to environmental stress. This duality enhances resilience and population persistence, as asexual reproduction allows local clonal expansion while sexual phases promote genetic diversity through gamete fusion and larval dispersal. The absence of a distinct juvenile phase in some species blurs boundaries, but the overall cycle emphasizes modular growth and regenerative capacity throughout adulthood.

Behavioral Coordination

Sponges (phylum Porifera) lack a nervous system yet achieve coordinated behaviors essential for survival, such as whole-body contractions that regulate water flow and expel waste. This functional unity relies on chemical signaling and propagating waves of cellular activity, enabling communication across their porous, multicellular structure. These mechanisms allow sponges to respond to environmental stimuli like mechanical disturbance or light changes, adjusting aquiferous system dynamics without centralized control. Chemical signaling plays a central role in coordinating contractions, primarily through nucleotides such as ATP. In the freshwater sponge Ephydatia muelleri, extracellular ATP triggers rapid expansion of excurrent canals and subsequent whole-body contractions in a dose-dependent manner (20–200 µmol L⁻¹), acting via purinergic P2X receptors. ADP similarly induces contractions, while AMP does not, highlighting specificity in nucleotide-mediated responses. Pharmacological blockade with PPADS inhibits these ATP- and glutamate-induced contractions, confirming purinergic signaling's involvement in propagating contractile waves downstream of initial stimuli. Although prostaglandins are present in some poriferans and implicated in ion transport and potential smooth muscle modulation in marine invertebrates, their direct role in sponge contraction remains less characterized compared to nucleotides. Calcium waves provide a key mechanism for osculum regulation, propagating signals that synchronize closure across the sponge body. In E. muelleri, these waves travel at 30–100 µm s⁻¹ through the choanosome, coordinating osculum contraction to reduce flow and expel particles in 30–40 minutes following mechanical stimulation. This process involves intracellular Ca²⁺ release, likely triggered by upstream chemical signals, and ensures efficient waste removal without neural oversight. Circadian rhythms further integrate behavioral coordination by modulating contraction frequency and gene expression in response to light-dark cycles. In the demosponge Tethya wilhelma, contractions exhibit diurnal patterns, with cycles lengthening during dark periods and overall rhythmicity influenced by ambient light levels. Gene expression of clock components like cryptochrome (AqCry2) and PAR domain protein A (AqPARa) oscillates diurnally in Amphimedon queenslandica, linking environmental light cues to physiological adjustments in pumping rates. These rhythms help optimize feeding and maintenance activities, with contractions more frequent at dawn to clear debris. In modular colonies, collective responses emerge through synchronization of individual rhythms post-fusion. Clonal individuals of T. wilhelma initially maintain independent contraction cycles but integrate into a unified rhythm within days after tissue fusion, forming a cohesive functional unit. This process underscores sponges' capacity for decentralized coordination, where chemical diffusion and calcium propagation align behaviors across modules to enhance colony-level efficiency, such as synchronized flow adjustments during environmental shifts.

Ecology

Habitats and Distribution

Sponges (phylum Porifera) are predominantly marine organisms, occurring in aquatic environments ranging from the intertidal zone to abyssal depths greater than 8,000 meters. While the vast majority thrive in saltwater habitats, a small fraction—over 150 species—are adapted to freshwater systems, including lakes, rivers, and streams worldwide. These animals exhibit broad zonation across marine ecosystems, colonizing coral reefs, marine caves, and peripheries of deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Substrate preferences differ among species; many encrust hard surfaces such as rocks and coral for attachment, whereas others embed in soft sediments for stability in deeper or unstable bottoms. Recent expeditions have expanded knowledge of sponge distribution in remote areas. In 2025, scientists identified a carnivorous "death-ball" sponge at approximately 3,600 meters depth in the Southern Ocean, highlighting the presence of specialized forms in polar deep-sea realms. Earlier, in 2023, the species Cladocroce pansinii was documented growing up to 20 cm in length within shadowed underwater caves in Ha Long Bay, Vietnam. Biogeographically, sponge diversity peaks in tropical latitudes, where environmental conditions support high species richness, but significant assemblages also occur at polar extremes, from the Arctic to Antarctic waters. Their sessile adult phase, reliant on larval dispersal, shapes these patterns by favoring settlement in geochemically suitable, stable substrates.

Role in Primary Production and Nutrient Cycling

Some marine sponges host photosynthetic endosymbionts, such as cyanobacteria, that contribute to primary production by fixing carbon through photosynthesis. For instance, in the sponge Chondrilla caribensis, these symbionts supply up to 52% of the holobiont's daily respiratory carbon demand (9.4 ± 4.1 μmol C cm⁻² sponge d⁻¹), although the sponge remains net heterotrophic overall with a photosynthesis-to-respiration ratio of 0.35 ± 0.08. In deeper environments, chemosynthetic endosymbionts enable primary production; deep-sea sponges like Hymedesmia methanophila and Iophon methanophila rely on methane-oxidizing bacteria that assimilate methane carbon via the ribulose monophosphate cycle, contributing 14–27% of the sponges' lipid carbon. Sponges play a pivotal role in nutrient cycling through the "sponge loop," where they efficiently convert dissolved organic matter (DOM)—a major carbon reservoir in oligotrophic waters—into particulate detritus that supports higher trophic levels. In this process, sponges rapidly filter and assimilate DOM, then shed choanocyte cells laden with organic material, producing detritus at rates comparable to gross primary production on coral reefs; for example, the cryptic sponge Halisarca caerulea exhibits high cell turnover, transferring labeled DOM to reef consumers within hours. This mechanism retains resources within reef ecosystems, bypassing limitations of the traditional microbial loop. Sponges facilitate nutrient regeneration by processing and releasing bioavailable forms of nitrogen and phosphorus, enhancing ecosystem productivity. They act as net sources of inorganic nitrogen (e.g., ammonium, nitrate, nitrite) through microbial transformations like nitrogen fixation, denitrification, and anammox mediated by endosymbionts, while filtering over 10,000 body volumes of seawater daily. For phosphorus, sponges release orthophosphate from organic matter and accumulate polyphosphate (25–40% of total tissue phosphorus) via symbionts, potentially sequestering it in biomass or sediments as apatite. In terms of carbon sequestration, sponges contribute by incorporating processed DOM into their biomass and producing more recalcitrant dissolved organic carbon that persists longer in the ocean, thus enhancing the efficiency of the benthic carbon pump. Deep-water glass sponge reefs, for instance, sequester bacterial carbon at rates of 2.27 × 10⁵ kg daily through grazing and burial in siliceous frameworks. This DOM transformation and biomass accumulation position sponges as key players in long-term carbon storage in marine sediments.

Defenses and Predation

Sponges employ a variety of chemical and physical defenses to deter predation, reflecting adaptations to diverse marine and freshwater environments. Siliceous spicules, needle-like silica structures embedded in many sponge tissues, serve as a primary physical barrier by making the sponge unpalatable or difficult to ingest, often causing irritation to predators' mouthparts or digestive systems. Toxic secondary metabolites, such as alkaloids and terpenoids produced by sponge cells or associated microbes, further enhance chemical deterrence, effectively repelling generalist fish and echinoderm grazers by inducing aversion or toxicity upon consumption. These metabolites are often concentrated in the outer layers of the sponge, optimizing defense without excessive energy expenditure. Physical defenses extend beyond spicules to include tough spongin fibers—a collagenous protein matrix that reinforces sponge structure in demosponge species—and encrusting growth forms that adhere closely to substrates, reducing accessibility for larger predators. Spongin contributes to overall tissue toughness, increasing the energetic cost of feeding for predators while minimizing damage from bites or scrapes. In some cases, these structural elements synergize with chemical defenses, amplifying deterrence; for instance, spicules may enhance the penetration or retention of toxins in a predator's tissues. Key predators of sponges include hawksbill sea turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata), which selectively graze on toxin-poor species in coral reef habitats, consuming up to 1.2 kg of sponge biomass daily and exerting significant pressure on undefended populations. Nudibranch mollusks, particularly dorid species like those in the genera Chromodoris and Peltodoris, target specific sponges through chemical cue detection, often sequestering prey toxins for their own defense while exhibiting higher feeding rates on symbiotic or nutrient-rich hosts. In freshwater systems, spongillid sponges face predation from sisyrid fly larvae (sponge flies), which pierce tissues to extract fluids, demonstrating selective foraging on accessible colonies. These predators often exhibit specialized behaviors, such as aggregating at high-density sponge patches or avoiding chemically defended individuals, which shapes community dynamics through selective grazing. An evolutionary arms race between sponges and predators has driven the development of inducible defenses, where chemical metabolite production ramps up following attack or wounding, linking external predation threats to internal immune responses. For example, in species like Dysidea avara, sublethal predation triggers rapid activation of defensive compounds, deterring further attacks and conserving resources until stimulated. This plasticity allows sponges to balance defense costs against varying predation pressures, fostering coexistence in diverse ecosystems.

Bioerosion Processes

Boring sponges, particularly those in the family Clionidae, are major contributors to bioerosion in marine ecosystems, where they excavate intricate networks of chambers and canals within calcium carbonate substrates such as coral skeletons, mollusk shells, and limestone. This process begins with larval settlement on the substrate surface, followed by penetration via specialized cells that enable both chemical and mechanical degradation. Chemical dissolution is the dominant mechanism, facilitated by etching cells (chamocytes) that extend filopodia into the substrate and release acidic vesicles with a pH of approximately 5 through exocytosis, creating locally undersaturated conditions that dissolve calcite or aragonite minerals. These cells, potentially involving carbonic anhydrase for proton transport and bicarbonate conversion to CO₂, solubilize CaCO₃ at rates where chemical erosion can account for up to 75% of total activity, as observed in species like Pione cf. vastifica. Mechanical chipping complements this by amoebocytes dislodging fine particles (15–85 μm in size) from the etched surfaces, which are then expelled as "sponge chips" through the excurrent system. Erosion rates vary with species, substrate type, and environmental factors like temperature and pCO₂, but documented values highlight their potency; for instance, Pione cf. vastifica erodes at 340 ± 170 g CaCO₃ m⁻² sponge year⁻¹, equivalent to 68 ± 34 g CaCO₃ m⁻² reef area year⁻¹, with chemical dissolution comprising the majority (260 g m⁻² year⁻¹). Other clionaid species, such as Cliona varians, exhibit similar patterns, with total rates reaching up to 2.23 kg CaCO₃ m⁻² year⁻¹ under ambient conditions, and linear penetration depths advancing several millimeters annually into coral or shell substrates. These rates can escalate under ocean acidification, as increased seawater pCO₂ enhances dissolution efficiency, potentially up to 0.5 mm year⁻¹ on vulnerable corals or shells in high-coverage scenarios. Ecologically, clionaid bioerosion drives reef turnover by dismantling dead coral frameworks, generating fine carbonate sediments that replenish beaches and lagoons while recycling bound nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen into bioavailable forms for reef productivity. The resulting cavities serve as microhabitats, fostering biodiversity by sheltering juvenile fish, invertebrates, and algae, and facilitating larval settlement on otherwise smooth surfaces. This nutrient release supports oligotrophic reef ecosystems, where sponge-derived chips contribute to detrital food webs and carbon cycling. Beyond natural substrates, boring sponges inflict notable damage on anthropogenic structures, including piers, oyster aquaculture beds, and historical artifacts such as submerged marble statues from the Blue Grotto and bronze components from the Antikythera shipwreck, where clionaid galleries weaken calcareous elements over decades. Their etching process adapts filter-feeding morphology, with chamocytes evolving from choanocyte-like cells to target solid substrates rather than suspended particles.

Diseases and Pathogens

Sponges are susceptible to a variety of infections caused by bacterial, viral, and fungal pathogens, which can disrupt their symbiotic microbiomes and lead to significant tissue damage. Common bacterial pathogens include strains from the genera Pseudomonas and Bacillus, which have been implicated in disease outbreaks through opportunistic infections following microbiome dysbiosis. Viruses and fungi also contribute, with fungal species potentially acting as emerging threats under certain environmental conditions, while cyanobacteria can exacerbate bacterial invasions in symbiotic sponges. A notable example is sponge white patch disease (SWP), which affects Caribbean species like Amphimedon compressa and is characterized by irregular white patches covering up to 20% of the sponge surface, often linked to unidentified bacterial agents. Symptoms of these infections typically manifest as bleaching, where sponge tissue loses pigmentation due to symbiont loss, and necrosis, involving tissue degradation and skeletal exposure that weakens structural integrity. These signs often begin with small discolored spots that progress to widespread lesions, triggered by factors such as pollution, which alters water quality and promotes pathogen proliferation, or warming temperatures that stress host defenses. In response, sponges may activate limited immune mechanisms, such as phagocytic cells, to combat invaders, though this is often insufficient against rapid dysbiosis. Mass mortality events highlight the severity of these diseases, with notable outbreaks in the Mediterranean during the 2010s causing extensive population declines. For instance, in 2008 and 2009, over 80% of Ircinia fasciculata specimens died off in areas like Cabrera National Park and Scandola Reserve, showing necrotic zones from initial yellowish spots, potentially tied to cyanobacterial decay amid elevated temperatures. Similar events struck the Adriatic in 2010, affecting horny sponges like Sarcotragus spinosulus and Ircinia variabilis, and the Aegean in the early 2020s, underscoring regional vulnerability. Sponge resistance to pathogens largely relies on their associated microbiomes, which form protective barriers by outcompeting invaders and producing antimicrobial compounds. Healthy microbiomes maintain stability against opportunistic bacteria, but disruptions from environmental stressors can lead to dysbiosis, allowing pathogens like Pseudomonas to dominate. This microbial shield is crucial for long-term survival, as evidenced in species with diverse symbionts that exhibit lower disease incidence.

Interactions with Other Organisms

Sponges engage in various commensal relationships with macro-organisms, where the associates benefit from shelter or resources without significantly impacting the host. Numerous species of alpheid shrimps, such as those in the genus Synalpheus, inhabit the internal canals of sponges, utilizing the structure for protection while feeding on detritus and small particles filtered by the sponge. Similarly, pea crabs (Pinnotheridae) and sponge crabs (e.g., Mithrax species) reside within sponge tissues or surfaces, gaining camouflage and refuge from predators. Branching sponge morphologies, such as those formed by species in the genus Ircinia, serve as nurseries for juvenile reef fish, providing complex habitats that enhance survival by offering hiding spots from predators and access to food resources. Mutualistic interactions between sponges and other organisms further highlight their ecological connectivity. Certain sponge species, particularly photosymbiotic ones like those in the genus Chondrilla, form mutualisms with algae such as zooxanthellae, where the algae conduct photosynthesis to supply organic compounds to the host, while the sponge provides a protected environment and nutrients like carbon dioxide. In biofouling communities on artificial structures or natural substrates, sponges often integrate with algae and sessile invertebrates, creating layered assemblages where mutual nutrient exchange and structural support benefit all participants, enhancing overall community resilience. Sponges also participate in competitive interactions with neighboring organisms, particularly through overgrowth mechanisms. In coral reef environments, sponges like those in the genus Xestospongia can overgrow corals, smothering them and reducing their access to light and space, with studies documenting up to threefold higher overgrowth rates in disturbed reefs. Similarly, sponges compete with macroalgae by encroaching on available substrata, altering community dynamics and favoring sponge dominance in nutrient-enriched conditions. Recent research in 2025 has illuminated the role of sponge-associated microbiomes in broader symbiotic networks, revealing how bacterial communities facilitate interactions with macro-organisms by modulating chemical defenses and nutrient availability. These microbiomes, while primarily internal endosymbionts, influence external associations such as those with commensal invertebrates.

Climate Change Impacts

Ocean acidification, driven by increasing atmospheric CO₂ levels, poses a significant threat to calcareous sponges by promoting the dissolution of their high-Mg calcite and aragonite spicules, which compromises skeletal integrity and overall structural support. This process reduces calcification rates and growth in affected species, particularly in shallow reef environments where pH levels are already declining. While siliceous sponges exhibit greater resilience due to their non-carbonate skeletons, the selective pressure on calcareous forms could alter community compositions in acidifying oceans. Rising ocean temperatures, exacerbated by global warming, have surpassed the 1.5°C threshold relative to pre-industrial levels, as evidenced by thermometry records from sclerosponge growth layers spanning 300 years. Marine heatwaves triggered by this warming have induced widespread bleaching events in temperate and tropical sponge populations, leading to tissue necrosis and mass mortality; for instance, over 90% of the abundant species Cymbastela lamellata bleached during the 2022 Fiordland heatwave in New Zealand.01769-9) Such events disrupt microbial symbioses essential for sponge health, amplifying vulnerability in reef ecosystems. Sea-level rise contributes to habitat shifts for shallow-water sponges by altering depth profiles, increasing sedimentation, and changing light availability, which can displace populations from optimal zones and favor more tolerant species. Climate-induced stress from warming and acidification also exacerbates disease susceptibility in sponges, with thermal anomalies promoting pathogen proliferation and leading to higher infection rates. Sponges in coral reef systems face heightened conservation challenges due to their vulnerability to cumulative climate stressors, prompting calls for enhanced protection measures. The 2025 World Sponge Conference emphasized the need for targeted restoration and monitoring of sponge-dominated habitats amid ongoing environmental changes, highlighting their role in maintaining reef resilience.

Systematics and Taxonomy

Taxonomic Classification

Sponges belong to the phylum Porifera, which is situated within the subkingdom Metazoa under the kingdom Animalia. This phylum encompasses multicellular, sessile, filter-feeding invertebrates characterized by a porous body structure lacking true tissues or organs. The classification adheres to the Linnaean hierarchical system, employing binomial nomenclature for species designation, where each species is assigned a unique genus and specific epithet based on the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). Type specimens, serving as the reference for taxonomic descriptions, are typically preserved and deposited in recognized natural history collections to ensure stability and verifiability in naming. The phylum Porifera is subdivided into four principal classes: Demospongiae, the largest and most diverse group comprising over 90% of sponge species with siliceous spicules or spongin skeletons; Hexactinellida, known for their glass-like siliceous spicules; Calcarea, featuring calcareous spicules; and Homoscleromorpha, a smaller class with simple siliceous spicules and lacking a distinct skeleton in some cases. This class-level division is based primarily on skeletal composition and microstructure, as established through morphological and molecular analyses. As of November 2025, the World Porifera Database recognizes 9,759 valid species within the phylum, though estimates suggest the true number could be significantly higher due to ongoing discoveries in under-explored marine habitats. Taxonomic challenges persist, particularly with cryptic species—morphologically indistinguishable forms that genetic studies reveal as distinct—often uncovered through DNA barcoding using markers like the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. Such molecular approaches have highlighted underestimation in sponge diversity, prompting revisions in classification to integrate both traditional morphology and phylogenetic data.

Major Classes

The phylum Porifera is divided into four major classes: Demospongiae, Hexactinellida, Calcarea, and Homoscleromorpha, each distinguished by unique skeletal structures, body organizations, and ecological adaptations. These classes encompass 9,759 described species, with Demospongiae dominating in diversity and abundance. Demospongiae represents the most species-rich class, accounting for approximately 90% of all known sponges, with 8,076 species described. Their skeletons typically consist of siliceous spicules—such as monaxon or tetraxon forms—combined with spongin, a flexible organic collagen fiber, though some species lack spicules entirely and rely solely on spongin or have no skeleton. This class includes a wide array of forms, from encrusting to massive or tubular shapes, and encompasses both marine and freshwater species, enabling broad distribution patterns across global aquatic environments. Notable examples include bath sponges used commercially and carnivorous species that actively capture prey with specialized filaments. Hexactinellida, commonly known as glass sponges, comprise 710 species and are characterized by their rigid, lattice-like skeletons formed from fused siliceous spicules with a distinctive six-rayed (hexactine) structure. These spicules often anchor the sponges to substrates and provide structural support in high-pressure environments. Exclusively marine and predominantly found in deep-sea habitats below 200 meters, Hexactinellida exhibit elongated, tubular, or fan-shaped morphologies adapted to low-light, cold waters, with some species forming reef-like aggregations. Calcarea, the calcareous sponges, include 837 species and feature skeletons composed entirely of calcium carbonate spicules, typically in the form of diactines, triactines, or quadricactines, without spongin. These spicules contribute to simple body plans, often asconoid (tubular with a single layer of choanocytes) or syconoid (folded walls), which facilitate efficient water flow in low-volume bodies. Restricted to marine environments, Calcarea are most common in shallow, temperate to tropical coastal waters, where they form small, vase- or sac-like structures on hard substrates. Homoscleromorpha is the smallest class, with 136 species, notable for their simple, tissue-like organization lacking a true basement membrane and featuring ciliated larvae for dispersal. Their skeletons, when present, consist of small siliceous spicules, though some families like Oscarellidae are aspiculate. These sponges exhibit encrusting or massive forms and are exclusively marine, often inhabiting coastal caves, overhangs, or coral reefs. In 2025, expeditions in the Southern Ocean documented over 30 new deep-sea sponge species, including a carnivorous "death-ball" form in the genus Chondrocladia (Demospongiae), highlighting ongoing discoveries in remote abyssal zones.

Phylogenetic Relationships

Molecular and morphological evidence consistently places the phylum Porifera as the sister group to all other Metazoa (animals excluding sponges), occupying a basal position in animal phylogeny. This topology has been robustly supported by large-scale phylogenomic analyses incorporating thousands of genes from diverse metazoan taxa, employing both maximum likelihood and Bayesian coalescent methods to resolve deep divergences. Such studies reject alternative hypotheses, such as Ctenophora as the earliest-branching animal lineage, due to long-branch attraction artifacts in earlier datasets, and affirm Porifera's position through site-heterogeneous models that account for compositional heterogeneity. Within Porifera, the four recognized classes—Calcarea, Demospongiae, Hexactinellida, and Homoscleromorpha—are each monophyletic, as evidenced by congruent signals from ribosomal DNA, mitochondrial genomes, and nuclear protein-coding genes. Inter-class relationships remain somewhat debated but are increasingly resolved by mitogenomic and phylogenomic approaches; recent analyses favor a monophyletic Porifera with Calcarea + Homoscleromorpha as one subclade and Demospongiae + Hexactinellida as its sister clade, reflecting shared siliceous spicule composition in the latter pair and epithelial organization in the former. This configuration contrasts with earlier views that sometimes rendered Porifera paraphyletic relative to Eumetazoa, but high-support trees from diverse sampling now prioritize the monophyletic hypothesis. Molecular clock calibrations, integrating fossil constraints and relaxed clock models on phylogenomic datasets, estimate the divergence of Porifera from other Metazoa at approximately 800 million years ago (Mya), aligning with the Tonian-Cryogenian transition and predating the Ediacaran biota. These timings derive from Bayesian analyses of concatenated alignments, with rates varying across lineages to accommodate heterotachy, and are corroborated by biomarker evidence. Complementing this, a 2025 study identified chemical fossils—specifically C31 steranes diagnostic of demosponge sterol biosynthesis—in Ediacaran rocks predating 541 Mya, providing direct lipid biomarker support for the early radiation of Demospongiae as a key poriferan lineage near the dawn of animal multicellularity.

Evolutionary History

Fossil Record

The fossil record of sponges (Porifera) is challenging to interpret due to their predominantly soft-bodied nature, which rarely preserves in the geological record; instead, siliceous or calcareous spicules—microscopic skeletal elements—provide the primary evidence of their ancient presence. Early sponges likely lacked robust spicules in the Precambrian, further hindering fossilization, as these structures only became widespread in the Cambrian. The oldest potential evidence for sponges comes from molecular biomarkers, such as sponge steranes, detected in Cryogenian rocks dating back to approximately 650 million years ago (Ma), suggesting the divergence of demosponges before the Ediacaran Period. However, these biomarkers remain controversial, with some analyses attributing them to algal sources rather than animals. More definitive body fossils appear in the early Cambrian, around 535 Ma, including the earliest known sponge spicule tufts reported in 2025 from the Lower Yanjiahe Formation in South China; these siliceous and phosphatic structures represent unequivocal biomineralized sponges from the Fortunian Stage. Sponges proliferated during the Ordovician Period (485–443 Ma), contributing significantly to reef ecosystems as early builders alongside microbes and algae. Phosphatic stromatoporoid sponges, key reef-formers, are documented from this time, with the oldest known examples dating to about 480 Ma in South China, marking their integration into Paleozoic marine communities. An extinct group, the archaeocyathids—vase-shaped, hypercalcified sponges—dominated as the first major reef-builders in the early Cambrian (around 530–515 Ma), constructing widespread biogenic structures in shallow tropical seas before their abrupt extinction by the mid-Cambrian. Following Paleozoic peaks, sponge diversity and reef-building roles declined in the Mesozoic Era (252–66 Ma), attributed to reduced oceanic silica availability, which limited siliceous spicule formation essential for many sponge groups. Lithistid and other hypercalcified sponges, once prominent, became rare after the Cretaceous, with overall fossil abundance dropping as scleractinian corals rose to dominance in reef systems.

Origins and Relationships to Other Animals

Sponges (phylum Porifera) represent the earliest diverging lineage of multicellular animals, with molecular evidence indicating that their unicellular ancestors were closely related to choanoflagellates, free-living protists that share morphological and genetic similarities with sponge choanocytes. Choanoflagellates, such as Monosiga brevicollis, possess a collar of microvilli surrounding a single flagellum, a structure homologous to the feeding cells in sponges, suggesting that the last common ancestor of choanoflagellates and metazoans was a filter-feeding unicellular organism. This relationship positions sponges as a key group for understanding the transition from unicellular to multicellular life, with genomic comparisons revealing that animal-specific genes for cell adhesion and signaling emerged after the divergence from choanoflagellates but before sponge diversification. A defining evolutionary innovation in sponges was the development of a specialized filtration system, enabling efficient particle capture from water currents through choanocyte chambers, which likely facilitated the advantages of multicellularity such as increased feeding efficiency and body size. Additionally, sponges exhibit precursors to epithelial tissues, particularly in the class Homoscleromorpha, where true epithelia with basement membranes, collagen IV, and belt-like junctions are present, features absent in other sponge classes but shared with eumetazoans. These traits represent early steps toward organized tissue formation, providing insights into the modular evolution of animal body plans without the complexity of nervous or muscular systems. The phylogenetic position of Porifera has been debated, with traditional views supporting monophyly as the sister group to all other animals (Eumetazoa + Ctenophora), while alternative hypotheses propose paraphyly or diphyly, particularly placing Homoscleromorpha as closer to Eumetazoa due to shared epithelial and developmental features. For instance, some molecular analyses recover Homoscleromorpha as the sister taxon to Eumetazoa, rendering the remaining Porifera paraphyletic and implying independent evolution of spicule-based skeletons in multiple lineages. However, recent phylogenomic studies, including a 2025 analysis integrating fossil-calibrated molecular data, strongly support Porifera monophyly and an Ediacaran origin, reconciling discrepancies by demonstrating independent spicule origins within a unified sponge clade; a further 2025 phylogenomic study provides additional evidence favoring sponges as the sister group to all other animals over ctenophores. This consensus highlights sponges' role in illuminating early metazoan innovations, such as epithelial precursors that predate bilaterian complexity, with a 2025 study validating demosponge biomarkers in Ediacaran rocks (~580 Ma).

Uses and Applications

Utilization by Animals

Certain cetaceans, particularly Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in Shark Bay, Australia, utilize marine sponges as foraging tools to probe seafloor sediments and uncover hidden prey such as fish. These dolphins select durable, cone-shaped sponges, which they wedge onto their rostrums to protect against abrasion and stings while digging into sandy substrates, a behavior observed in a small subpopulation and transmitted culturally from mothers to offspring. This tool use represents a rare example of object manipulation in cetaceans, potentially evolving through social learning to access otherwise inaccessible food resources in resource-poor environments. Sea turtles, especially hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata), exploit sponges primarily as a food source, consuming up to 95% of their diet from these organisms in coral reef habitats. By feeding on sponges, hawksbills help maintain reef health by preventing sponge overgrowth that competes with corals for space. Additionally, sponges provide shelter for juvenile turtles and various fish species, offering refuge from predators within their complex structures. Some reef fish also visit sponges as sites for ectoparasite removal, where symbiotic cleaner shrimps residing in the sponges feed on parasites and debris from the fish's body, benefiting both parties in a mutualistic interaction. Sponges serve as nurseries for numerous invertebrates, including polychaete worms and bivalves, which settle and develop within the sponges' porous bodies, gaining protection from predators and environmental stresses. Polychaete assemblages in sponges form stable, specialized communities rather than random associations, supporting high biodiversity and contributing to larval recruitment. Similarly, juvenile bivalves use sponges as settlement substrates, enhancing their survival rates in early life stages. These habitat provisions underscore sponges' role in facilitating the behavioral ecology of associated species, including the evolution of tool use in cetaceans through ecological pressures favoring innovative foraging strategies.

Human Uses of Skeletons

Human uses of sponge skeletons have been documented since ancient times, primarily for their absorbent and durable fibrous structure composed of spongin, a collagen-like scleroprotein that provides flexibility and strength. In ancient Greece, sea sponges were employed for personal hygiene, bathing, and cleaning households, with archaeological evidence indicating their routine application in daily life since the Minoan period around 1900–1750 BC. Similarly, ancient Romans integrated sponges into hygiene practices, using them for bathing and general cleaning after immersion in saltwater or vinegar solutions to maintain sanitation. The most prominent modern application involves harvesting sponge skeletons as bath sponges, valued for their natural absorbency and gentleness on skin. In the Mediterranean, species such as Hippospongia communis (honeycomb sponge) and Spongia officinalis (horse sponge) have been commercially extracted since antiquity, with divers using traditional methods like free-diving or hook-and-line until the introduction of diving suits in 1866 intensified yields. In the Bahamas, analogous species including Hippospongia lachne (Bahama sponge) and Spongia barbara were harvested extensively from the mid-19th century, peaking at over 1 million pounds exported in 1917 and comprising about 27% of global supply at the time. Beyond bathing, sponge skeletons serve industrial purposes as natural filters and abrasives due to their porous, fibrous network that traps particulates and polishes surfaces without scratching. For instance, they have been applied in water filtration to absorb pollutants like heavy metals, pesticides, and bacteria from industrial wastewater and coastal environments. In abrasive roles, the skeletons facilitate gentle scrubbing in polishing applications, such as in artisanal or light industrial cleaning processes. Efforts to promote sustainability include aquaculture initiatives to reduce pressure on wild populations. In the Federated States of Micronesia and Australia, larval culture of bath sponge species like Coscinoderma matthewsi has achieved high metamorphosis rates (up to 98%) and juvenile survival (18–30% over seven months), enabling closed-lifecycle farming tied to seasonal temperature cues for reproduction. Similar farming trials in Zanzibar and the Bahamas aim to regenerate stocks through selective cutting of mature sponges, allowing regrowth while providing economic alternatives to wild harvesting. Overharvesting has severely impacted sponge populations, particularly in the 20th century, leading to dramatic declines. In the Mediterranean, annual production surged to 350 tons during 1927–1932 but fell to 120 tons by 1977–1986 due to intensive fishing, with further crashes from a 1985–1989 disease epidemic that nearly eradicated stocks in regions like Tunisia (from 108 tons in 1920 to 9 tons by 1988). In the Bahamas, the industry collapsed after the 1930s from unsustainable practices, hurricanes, and red-tide diseases, reducing exports from peak levels and prompting shifts to aquaculture. These events underscore the vulnerability of slow-growing sponge species to exploitation, with recovery efforts now emphasizing regulated quotas and farming.

Medicinal and Biotechnological Compounds

Marine sponges produce a diverse array of bioactive secondary metabolites, including terpenes and alkaloids, which have shown significant potential in medicinal and biotechnological applications. Terpenes, such as sesquiterpenoids and sesterterpenoids, often exhibit cytotoxic and antimicrobial properties, while alkaloids demonstrate antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects. These compounds are primarily isolated from sponge tissues or their associated microorganisms, contributing to drug discovery efforts against cancer, infections, and inflammatory diseases. Prominent examples include avarol, a sesquiterpenoid hydroquinone isolated from the sponge Dysidea avara, which displays antiviral activity against HIV-1 and influenza viruses by inhibiting reverse transcriptase and viral replication. Manoalide, a sesterterpenoid from Luffariella variabilis, acts as a potent phospholipase A2 inhibitor, providing anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects useful in treating conditions like arthritis. In anticancer applications, discodermolide, a polyketide from Discodermia dissoluta, stabilizes microtubules similarly to paclitaxel and advanced to phase I clinical trials for solid tumors before discontinuation due to toxicity concerns. Additionally, sponge-associated microbes yield antibiotics; for instance, actinomycetes from deep-sea sponges produce compounds like manzamine alkaloids with broad-spectrum activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Recent advances from 2020 to 2023 have identified over 218 new metabolites from marine sponges, including 121 terpenoids with promising bioactivities such as SARS-CoV-2 inhibition (e.g., thorectidiol A, IC50 1.0 µM) and cytotoxicity against cancer cell lines (IC50 ≤10 µM). Sponge-associated microorganisms have contributed 270 secondary metabolites with antimicrobial potential, primarily polyketides (51.9%) and alkaloids (17.4%), effective against pathogens like MRSA and Candida species (MIC 0.97–25 µM). In 2025, discoveries from deep-sea sponges yielded novel antibiotics for aquaculture use, targeting resistant bacteria in fish farming. Sustainable sourcing remains a challenge due to overharvesting risks, prompting shifts toward aquaculture and chemical synthesis. Mariculture systems, such as integrated multi-trophic aquaculture in the Gulf of Taranto, have achieved 82.9–93.9% survival rates for Sarcotragus spinosulus over three years, enabling scalable production of bioactive polyprenyl hydroquinones via eco-friendly supercritical CO2 extraction (yield 0.56%). Total synthesis efforts, like those for discodermolide, provide alternatives to wild collection, ensuring long-term supply for biotechnological development.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.