Hubbry Logo
Caesium standardCaesium standardMain
Open search
Caesium standard
Community hub
Caesium standard
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Caesium standard
Caesium standard
Caesium standard
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A caesium atomic fountain used as part of an atomic clock

The caesium standard is a primary frequency standard in which the photon absorption by transitions between the two hyperfine ground states of caesium-133 atoms is used to control the output frequency. The first caesium clock was built by Louis Essen in 1955 at the National Physical Laboratory in the UK[1] and promoted worldwide by Gernot M. R. Winkler of the United States Naval Observatory.

Caesium atomic clocks are one of the most accurate time and frequency standards, and serve as the primary standard for the definition of the second in the International System of Units (SI), the modern metric system. By definition, radiation produced by the transition between the two hyperfine ground states of caesium-133 (in the absence of external influences such as the Earth's magnetic field) has a frequency, ΔνCs, of exactly 9192631770 Hz. That value was chosen so that the caesium second equaled, to the limit of measuring ability in 1960 when it was adopted, the existing standard ephemeris second based on the Earth's orbit around the Sun.[2] Because no other measurement involving time had been as precise, the effect of the change was less than the experimental uncertainty of all existing measurements.

While the second is the only base unit to be explicitly defined in terms of the caesium standard, the majority of SI units have definitions that mention either the second, or other units defined using the second. Consequently, every base unit except the mole and every named derived unit except the coulomb, gray, sievert, radian, and steradian have values that are implicitly at least partially defined by the properties of the caesium-133 hyperfine transition radiation. And of these, all but the mole, the coulomb, and the dimensionless radian and steradian are implicitly defined by the general properties of electromagnetic radiation.

Technical details

[edit]

The official definition of the second was first given by the BIPM at the 13th General Conference on Weights and Measures in 1967 as: "The second is the duration of 9192631770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom." At its 1997 meeting the BIPM added to the previous definition the following specification: "This definition refers to a caesium atom at rest at a temperature of 0 K."[3]

The BIPM restated this definition in its 26th conference (2018), "The second is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the caesium frequency ∆νCs, the unperturbed ground-state hyperfine transition frequency of the caesium 133 atom, to be 9 192 631 770 when expressed in the unit Hz, which is equal to s−1."[4]

The meaning of the preceding definition is as follows. The caesium atom has a ground state electron state with configuration [Xe] 6s1 and, consequently, atomic term symbol 2S1/2. This means that there is one unpaired electron and the total electron spin of the atom is 1/2. Moreover, the nucleus of caesium-133 has a nuclear spin equal to 7/2. The simultaneous presence of electron spin and nuclear spin leads, by a mechanism called hyperfine interaction, to a (small) splitting of all energy levels into two sub-levels. One of the sub-levels corresponds to the electron and nuclear spin being parallel (i.e., pointing in the same direction), leading to a total spin F equal to F = 7/2 + 1/2 = 4; the other sub-level corresponds to anti-parallel electron and nuclear spin (i.e., pointing in opposite directions), leading to a total spin F = 7/2 − 1/2 = 3. In the caesium atom it so happens that the sub-level lowest in energy is the one with F = 3, while the F = 4 sub-level lies energetically slightly above. When the atom is irradiated with electromagnetic radiation having an energy corresponding to the energetic difference between the two sub-levels the radiation is absorbed and the atom is excited, going from the F = 3 sub-level to the F = 4 one. After some time the atom will re-emit the radiation and return to its F = 3 ground state. From the definition of the second it follows that the radiation in question has a frequency of exactly 9.19263177 GHz, corresponding to a wavelength of about 3.26 cm and therefore belonging to the microwave range.

Note that a common confusion involves the conversion from angular frequency () to frequency (), or vice versa. Angular frequencies are conventionally given as s−1 in scientific literature, but here the units implicitly mean radians per second. In contrast, the unit Hz should be interpreted as cycles per second. The conversion formula is , which implies that 1 Hz corresponds to an angular frequency of approximately 6.28 radians per second (or 6.28 s−1 where radians is omitted for brevity by convention).

Parameters and significance in the second and other SI units

[edit]

Suppose the caesium standard has the parameters:

Time and frequency

[edit]

The first set of units defined using the caesium standard were those relating to time, with the second being defined in 1967 as "the duration of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom" meaning that:

  • 1 second, s, = 9,192,631,770 ΔtCs
  • 1 hertz, Hz, = 1/s = ⁠ΔνCs/9,192,631,770⁠
  • 1 becquerel, Bq, = 1 nuclear decay/s = ⁠1/9,192,631,770⁠ nuclear decays/ΔtCs

This also linked the definitions of the derived units relating to force and energy (see below) and of the ampere, whose definition at the time made reference to the newton, to the caesium standard. Before 1967 the SI units of time and frequency were defined using the tropical year and before 1960 by the length of the mean solar day[5]

Length

[edit]

In 1983, the meter was, indirectly, defined in terms of the caesium standard with the formal definition "The metre is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second. This implied:

  • 1 metre, m, = ⁠c s/299,792,458⁠ = ⁠9,192,631,770/299,792,458⁠ c ΔtCs = ⁠9,192,631,770/299,792,458⁠ ΔλCs
  • 1 radian, rad, = 1 m/m = ΔλCs/ΔλCs = 1 (dimensionless unit of angle)
  • 1 steradian, sr, = 1 m2/m2 = ΔλCs2/ΔλCs2 = 1 (dimensionless unit of solid angle)

Between 1960 and 1983, the metre had been defined by the wavelength of a different transition frequency associated with the krypton-86 atom. This had a much higher frequency and shorter wavelength than the caesium standard, falling inside the visible spectrum. The first definition, used between 1889 and 1960, was by the international prototype meter.[6]

Mass, energy, and force

[edit]

Following the 2019 revision of the SI, electromagnetic radiation, in general, was explicitly defined to have the exact parameters:

  • c = 299,792,458 m/s
  • h = 6.62607015×10−34 J s

The caesium-133 hyperfine transition radiation was explicitly defined to have frequency:

  • ΔνCs = 9,192,631,770 Hz[7]

Though the above values for c and ΔνCs were already obviously implicit in the definitions of the metre and second. Together they imply:

  • ΔtCs = ⁠1/ΔνCs⁠ = ⁠s/9,192,631,770⁠
  • ΔλCs = c ΔtCs = ⁠299,792,458/9,192,631,770⁠ m
  • ΔECs = h ΔνCs = 9,192,631,770 Hz × 6.62607015×10−34 J s = 6.09110229711386655×10−24 J
  • ΔMCs = ⁠ΔECs/c2⁠ = ⁠6.09110229711386655×10−24 J/89,875,517,873,681,764 m2/s2⁠ = ⁠6.09110229711386655/8.9875517873681764×1040⁠ kg

Notably, the wavelength has a fairly human-sized value of about 3.26 centimetres and the photon energy is surprisingly close to the average molecular kinetic energy per degree of freedom per kelvin. From these it follows that:

  • 1 kilogram, kg, = ⁠8.9875517873681764×1040/6.09110229711386655⁠ ΔMCs
  • 1 joule, J, = ⁠1024/6.09110229711386655⁠ ΔECs
  • 1 watt, W, = 1 J/s = ⁠1014/5.59932604907689089550702935⁠ ΔECs ΔνCs
  • 1 newton, N, = 1 J/m = ⁠2.99792458×1022/5.59932604907689089550702935⁠ ΔECs/ΔλCs
  • 1 pascal, Pa, = 1 N/m2 = ⁠2.6944002417373989539335912×1019/4.73168129737820913189287698892486811451620615⁠ ΔECs/ΔλCs3
  • 1 gray, Gy, = 1 J/kg = ⁠1/89,875,517,873,681,764⁠ ΔECs/ΔMCs = ⁠c2/89,875,517,873,681,764⁠
  • 1 sievert, Sv, = the ionizing radiation dose equivalent to 1 gray of gamma rays

Prior to the revision, between 1889 and 2019, the family of metric (and later SI) units relating to mass, force, and energy were somewhat notoriously defined by the mass of the International Prototype of the Kilogram (IPK), a specific object stored at the headquarters of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in Paris, meaning that any change to the mass of that object would have resulted in a change to the size of the kilogram and of the many other units whose value at the time depended on that of the kilogram.[8]

Temperature

[edit]

From 1954 to 2019, the SI temperature scales were defined using the triple point of water and absolute zero.[9] The 2019 revision replaced these with an assigned value for the Boltzmann constant, k, of 1.380649×10−23 J/K, implying:

  • 1 kelvin, K, = 1.380649×10−23 J/2 per degree of freedom = ⁠1.380649×10−23 × 1024/2/6.09110229711386655⁠ ΔECs per degree of freedom = ⁠1.380649/1.21822045942277331⁠ ΔECs per degree of freedom
  • Temperature in degrees Celsius, °C, = temperature in kelvins − 273.15 = ⁠1.21822045942277331 × kinetic energy per degree of freedom − 377.12427435 ΔECs/1.380649 ΔECs⁠

Amount of substance

[edit]

The mole is an extremely large number of "elementary entities" (i.e. atoms, molecules, ions, etc). From 1969 to 2019, this number was 0.012 × the mass ratio between the IPK and a carbon 12 atom.[10] The 2019 revision simplified this by assigning the Avogadro constant the exact value 6.02214076×1023 elementary entities per mole, thus, uniquely among the base units, the mole maintained its independence from the caesium standard:

  • 1 mole, mol, = 6.02214076×1023 elementary entities
  • 1 katal, kat, = 1 mol/s = ⁠6.02214076×1014/9.19263177⁠ elementary entities/ΔtCs

Electromagnetic units

[edit]

Prior to the revision, the ampere was defined as the current needed to produce a force between 2 parallel wires 1 m apart of 0.2 μN per meter. The 2019 revision replaced this definition by giving the charge on the electron, e, the exact value 1.602176634×10−19 coulombs. Somewhat incongruously, the coulomb is still considered a derived unit and the ampere a base unit, rather than vice versa.[11] In any case, this convention entailed the following exact relationships between the SI electromagnetic units, elementary charge, and the caesium-133 hyperfine transition radiation:

  • 1 coulomb, C, = ⁠1019/1.602176634⁠ e
  • 1 ampere, or amp, A, = 1 C/s = ⁠109/1.472821982686006218⁠ e ΔνCs
  • 1 volt, V, = 1 J/C = ⁠1.602176634×105/6.09110229711386655⁠ ΔECs/e
  • 1 farad, F, = 1 C/V = ⁠6.09110229711386655×1014/2.566969966535569956⁠ e2/ΔECs
  • 1 ohm, Ω, = 1 V/A = ⁠2.359720966701071721258310212×10−4/6.09110229711386655⁠ ΔECs/ΔνCs e2 = ⁠2.359720966701071721258310212×10−4/6.09110229711386655⁠ h/e2
  • 1 siemens, S, = 1/Ω = ⁠6.09110229711386655×104/2.359720966701071721258310212⁠ e2/h
  • 1 weber, Wb, = 1 V s = ⁠1.602176634×1015/6.62607015⁠ ΔECs ΔtCs/e = ⁠1.602176634×1015/6.62607015⁠ h/e
  • 1 tesla, T, = 1 Wb/m2 = ⁠1.43996454705862285832702376×1012/5.59932604907689089550702935⁠ ΔECs ΔtCs/e ΔλCs2 = ⁠1.43996454705862285832702376×1012/5.59932604907689089550702935⁠ E/e c ΔλCs
  • 1 henry, H, = Ω s = ⁠2.359720966701071721258310212×106/6.62607015⁠ h ΔtCs/e2

Optical units

[edit]

From 1967 to 1979 the SI optical units, lumen, lux, and candela are defined using the incandescent glow of platinum at its melting point. After 1979, the candela was defined as the luminous intensity of a monochromatic visible light source of frequency 540 THz (i.e ⁠6000/1.02140353⁠ that of the caesium standard) and radiant intensity ⁠1/683⁠ watts per steradian. This linked the definition of the candela to the caesium standard and, until 2019, to the IPK. Unlike the units relating to mass, energy, temperature, amount of substance, and electromagnetism, the optical units were not massively redefined in 2019, though they were indirectly affected since their values depend on that of the watt, and hence of the kilogram.[12] The frequency used to define the optical units has the parameters:

  • Frequency: 540 THz
  • Time period: ⁠50/27⁠ fs
  • Wavelength: ⁠14.9896229/27⁠ μm
  • Photon energy: 5.4×1014 Hz × 6.62607015×10−34 J s = 3.578077881×10−19 J
  • luminous efficacy, KCD, = 683 lm/W
  • luminous energy per photon, , = 3.578077881×10−19 J × 683 lm/W = 2.443827192723×10−16 lm s

This implies:

  • 1 lumen, lm, = ⁠106/2.246520349221536260971⁠ ΔνCs
  • 1 candela, cd, = 1 lm/sr = ⁠106/2.246520349221536260971⁠ ΔνCs/sr
  • 1 lux, lx, = 1 lm/m2 = ⁠8.9875517873681764×102/1.898410313566852566340456048807087002459⁠ ΔνCs/ΔλCs2

Summary

[edit]

The parameters of the caesium-133 hyperfine transition radiation expressed exactly in SI units are:

  • Frequency = 9,192,631,770 Hz
  • Time period = ⁠1/9,192,631,770⁠ s
  • Wavelength = ⁠299,792,458/9,192,631,770⁠ m
  • Photon energy = 6.09110229711386655×10−24 J
  • Photon mass equivalent = ⁠6.09110229711386655×10−40/8.9875517873681764⁠ kg

If the seven base units of the SI are expressed explicitly in terms of the SI defining constants, they are:

  • 1 second = ⁠9,192,631,770/ΔνCs⁠
  • 1 metre = ⁠9,192,631,770/299,792,458⁠ c/ΔνCs
  • 1 kilogram = ⁠8.9875517873681764×1040/6.09110229711386655⁠ h ΔνCs/c2
  • 1 ampere = ⁠109/1.472821982686006218⁠ e ΔνCs
  • 1 kelvin = ⁠13.80649/6.09110229711386655⁠ h ΔνCs/k
  • 1 mole = 6.02214076×1023 elementary entities
  • 1 candela = ⁠1011/3.82433969151951648163130104605⁠ h ΔνCs2 KCD/sr

Ultimately, 6 of the 7 base units (all but the dimensionless mole) notably have values that depend on that of ΔνCs, which appears far more often than any of the other defining constants. However, the derived unit of one coulomb, which is an ampere-second, is a dimensionful unit defined purely in terms of the elementary charge and hence is independent of ΔνCs.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Caesium standard

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The caesium standard is the internationally agreed-upon primary frequency standard for the SI unit of time, the second, defined by fixing the unperturbed ground-state hyperfine transition frequency of the caesium-133 atom, Δν_Cs, at exactly 9,192,631,770 Hz, such that one second equals the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of its ground state at 0 K and zero magnetic field. This definition, adopted in 1967 by the 13th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM), replaced earlier ephemeris-based definitions and provides a reproducible atomic basis for timekeeping with uncertainties as low as 1 × 10⁻¹⁶ in modern realizations. The standard underpins Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) and International Atomic Time (TAI), enabling atomic clocks that maintain accuracy to within one second over tens of millions of years. The development of the caesium standard traces back to the mid-20th century, when physicist Isidor Rabi's molecular beam experiments in the 1940s demonstrated the potential for using atomic transitions to measure frequency precisely. In 1955, Louis Essen at the UK's National Physical Laboratory (NPL) constructed the first practical caesium atomic beam clock, which achieved stability accurate to within every 300 years and marked the birth of atomic timekeeping. By 1958, comparisons between NPL and U.S. National Bureau of Standards (NBS, now NIST) clocks refined the hyperfine frequency value, leading to the 1967 CGPM redefinition that anchored the second to caesium-133's transition at 9.2 GHz. NIST's early contributions included the NBS-1 clock in 1959, the U.S. official standard with an accuracy of 1 part in 10^{11}, followed by improved models like NBS-4 in 1968, which supported UTC's inception in 1972. Realization of the caesium standard occurs through primary and secondary frequency standards, primarily caesium fountain clocks that cool atoms to near absolute zero using laser technology to minimize motion-induced errors like the Doppler effect. In these devices, a beam or cloud of caesium-133 atoms is interrogated by microwaves tuned to the hyperfine transition; the frequency is locked to the point of maximum transition probability, with corrections applied for second-order Doppler shifts, cavity pulling, and blackbody radiation effects to achieve fractional uncertainties below 10⁻¹⁵. Notable examples include NIST-F1 (operational since 1999), NIST-F2 (since 2014), and NIST-F4 (since 2025), which contribute to TAI with stabilities of 10⁻¹⁶ over a month, ensuring global time synchronization. Secondary standards, often commercial caesium beam tubes, provide everyday UTC dissemination but with slightly higher uncertainties around 10⁻¹³. The standard's precision has revolutionized fields beyond , including GPS navigation, , and scientific research, where timing errors below 1 are critical. It forms the backbone of the (GPS), where satellite clocks must align with ground standards to accuracies of 10⁻¹⁴, and supports financial transactions requiring sub-microsecond synchronization. As of 2025, while optical lattice clocks based on ions or neutral atoms demonstrate potential for 10⁻¹⁸ accuracy, the standard remains the SI definition, with redefinition discussions targeting the 2030s pending international consensus on optical standards' .

Historical Development

Origins in Atomic Timekeeping

The foundations of atomic timekeeping trace back to the work of Isidor I. Rabi, who in 1938 developed the molecular beam magnetic resonance method at . This technique involved passing a beam of molecules through a and applying oscillating radio-frequency fields to induce transitions between hyperfine energy levels, allowing precise measurement of nuclear magnetic moments. Rabi's team observed the first resonance signals in Li and Cl nuclei, naming the phenomenon (NMR). Rabi's method laid the groundwork for using atomic transitions as standards by demonstrating how frequencies could serve as stable references independent of external perturbations. Post-World War II, this approach was extended to atomic beams for practical timekeeping applications, with researchers adapting the technique to measure hyperfine splitting in atoms like , which offered a suitable around 9 GHz. A key advancement came in 1949 when Norman F. Ramsey at introduced the separated oscillatory fields method, an on Rabi's single-field setup. In this technique, atoms experience brief interactions with oscillating fields at the entrance and exit of a uniform magnetic field region, effectively increasing the interrogation time and narrowing the linewidth to enable higher precision—typically reducing it from hundreds of Hz to below 50 Hz at frequencies. These theoretical and experimental developments culminated in the construction of the first practical caesium atomic clock by Louis Essen and J.V.L. Parry at the UK's National Physical Laboratory (NPL) in 1955. Using a caesium-133 beam tube and Ramsey's method, the clock resonated at a hyperfine transition frequency of 9,192,631,830 Hz, achieving an accuracy of about 1 part in 10^9 and outperforming standards by a factor of 100. This device provided a stable frequency reference that closely approximated the modern value, demonstrating atomic timekeeping's potential to surpass astronomical methods like , which relied on Earth's irregular rotation. The reliability of such caesium standards prompted international standardization efforts, leading to the 13th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) in 1967 adopting the caesium hyperfine transition as the basis for the second. The resolution defined the second as "the duration of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the of the caesium 133 atom," explicitly replacing the ephemeris second and noting that the definition applied to an unperturbed atom at rest relative to the clock, with realization subject to measurement uncertainties. This marked the shift from celestial to atomic timekeeping, ensuring a reproducible unit tied to fundamental physical constants.

Establishment as the SI Second

The 13th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) in 1967 marked a pivotal shift in the definition of the second, adopting the atomic transition as its basis while ensuring continuity with the prior standard. Previously, the second had been defined by the 11th CGPM in 1960 as 1/31,556,925.9747 of the for 1900 January 0 at 12 hours (ET), a measure derived from astronomical observations to achieve greater stability than the solar day. Resolution 1 of the 13th CGPM redefined the second as the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the of the caesium-133 atom, with this specific value selected through international measurements to precisely match the length of the existing second. This adoption reflected the superior of atomic transitions over astronomical timekeeping, enabling more precise scientific and technological applications. In 1968, the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) formalized the practical realization of this new definition, specifying conditions for the transition such as the atom being at rest, in a zero , and unperturbed by external influences to ensure accurate measurement of the hyperfine frequency. Early implementations of standards quickly followed, with the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, then the National Bureau of Standards) incorporating compact beam clocks developed by in 1964 into its timekeeping ensemble, building on the foundational NBS-1 apparatus from the 1950s that had already demonstrated atomic frequency stability. Similarly, the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) in Germany brought its first primary clock, CS1, into operation in 1969, contributing to global efforts in atomic time realization. These initial devices realized the second with accuracies sufficient for international synchronization, paving the way for standardized atomic time scales. The standard played a central role in establishing (TAI) and (UTC) during this period. In 1967, the recommended an atomic time scale based on caesium frequencies, leading to the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) and the International Bureau of Time (BIH) computing a provisional atomic scale from existing caesium clocks; this was officially designated as TAI by the 14th CGPM in 1971, retroactively starting from 1 January 1958 to maintain continuity. UTC, which combines atomic uniformity with solar day alignment through occasional leap seconds, had its coordination framework initiated in 1960 and was formally adopted in 1963, relying on caesium-based frequency standards for its atomic component. Synchronization of global clocks was facilitated by radio signals such as those from NIST's WWV station, which broadcast time markers derived from caesium atomic clocks starting in the early 1960s to distribute UTC with millisecond precision. By the 1970s, these caesium realizations achieved initial accuracies of about 1 part in 10^{13}, equivalent to a drift of less than one second over approximately 300,000 years, supporting the nascent atomic time systems.)

Impact of the 2019 SI Redefinition

The 26th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM), held in November 2018, adopted Resolution 1 revising the (SI), which took effect on 20 May 2019. This revision fixed the numerical value of the caesium-133 ground-state hyperfine transition frequency at exactly 9,192,631,770 Hz, defining the second as the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to this transition in an unperturbed caesium-133 atom at rest at a temperature of 0 and with zero . This redefinition marked a shift from a realization-dependent definition—where the numerical value was based on the best available measurement of the hyperfine transition—to a fixed-value approach, aligning the second with other SI base units defined by exact constants. The change ensures long-term stability in by eliminating any uncertainty in the defining frequency itself, allowing future refinements in technology to improve realization accuracy without necessitating redefinitions. As a result, discrepancies between different realizations now solely reflect experimental uncertainties, enhancing the and universality of time measurements worldwide. In response to the redefinition, the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) updated its Mise en pratique for the realization of in 2019, providing guidance on primary and secondary frequency standards. For caesium-based primary standards, this includes detailed budgets addressing systematic effects such as second-order Doppler shifts, cavity pulling, and , achieving relative standard uncertainties as low as 1 × 10^{-16}. These updates reduce overall in practical realizations by focusing solely on experimental limitations, supporting higher precision in applications like fundamental physics tests and . The redefinition had no immediate impact on established time scales such as (TAI) and (UTC), which continued to be based on ensembles of atomic clocks calibrated to the pre-2019 caesium standard. However, the exact fixed value enhances the precision of future calibrations and adjustments, including potential refinements to insertions in UTC to maintain synchronization with .

Physical and Technical Principles

Hyperfine Transition in Caesium-133

The of the caesium-133 atom features an electron configuration of [Xe] 6s¹, corresponding to the ^2S_{1/2} term with total electron J = 1/2. The nucleus of caesium-133 has a spin I = 7/2, leading to hyperfine coupling between the nuclear spin and the electron spin, which splits the into two levels characterized by the total quantum numbers F = I + J = 4 and F = |I - J| = 3. This hyperfine interaction arises primarily from the coupling, with the F = 4 level being the higher energy state due to the positive hyperfine constant A ≈ 2.298 GHz for the . The defining transition is the microwave excitation between the upper hyperfine level (F = 4, m_F = 0) and the lower hyperfine level (F = 3, m_F = 0) of caesium-133 atoms at temperature and zero , with the atoms at rest relative to the laboratory frame. This unperturbed ground-state hyperfine transition frequency, denoted Δν_Cs, is exactly 9,192,631,770 Hz by definition in the (SI). The corresponding hyperfine splitting energy is given by ΔE = h Δν_Cs, where h is Planck's constant, establishing the quantum mechanical foundation for the SI second. In practical realizations, the observed transition frequency deviates from this defined value due to environmental perturbations. The second-order Zeeman shift, arising from the quadratic magnetic field dependence in the Breit-Rabi formula for weak fields, is expressed as Δν_Z = 427.45 B^2 Hz, where B is the strength in gauss; this shift must be calibrated and corrected using auxiliary measurements of the field-independent (F = 4, m_F = ±4) to (F = 3, m_F = ±3) transitions. Relativistic corrections include the second-order Doppler shift from atomic motion, given by Δν / Δν_Cs = -v^2 / (2c^2), where v is the root-mean-square of the atoms and c is the ; for thermal atoms at , this contributes a fractional shift on the order of 10^{-13}, requiring velocity distribution modeling in beam or fountain clocks. Blackbody radiation (BBR) induces an ac Stark shift on the hyperfine levels, with the differential shift for the clock transition approximated as Δν_BBR / Δν_Cs = β (T / 300)^4 [1 + ε (T / 300)^2], where T is the temperature in kelvin, β = (-1.49 ± 0.07) × 10^{-14} is the static polarizability coefficient, and ε ≈ 1.4 × 10^{-2} accounts for dynamic corrections; at 300 K, this yields a fractional shift of approximately -1.5 × 10^{-14}, necessitating temperature uniformity and theoretical evaluation for high-accuracy standards.

Principles of Caesium Atomic Clocks

Caesium atomic clocks measure time by stabilizing an oscillator to the hyperfine transition frequency of caesium-133 atoms, achieving high precision through coherent interrogation techniques. The core mechanism involves preparing a beam of caesium atoms, subjecting them to fields to probe the transition, and detecting the resulting state changes to generate a feedback signal for correction. Key components include an atomic beam source, such as an oven that vaporizes and collimates it into a beam; state selection magnets (A and B magnets) that filter atoms into the desired hyperfine state, typically the |F=3, m_F=0⟩ ground state; a where the atoms interact with the oscillating field; and a detector for state analysis. A uniform (C-field) is maintained in the interaction region to define the quantization axis and minimize Zeeman shifts. The primary interrogation method is , which uses two spatially separated fields to create a coherent superposition of atomic states, allowing the phase to accumulate freely during transit between them. In this separated fields approach, atoms enter the first field for a short interaction time, evolving in a field-free region where the phase difference accumulates based on any detuning from , and then interact with the second field, leading to interference that manifests as narrow Ramsey fringes. The probability of transition from the initial state |0⟩ to the |1⟩ is given by P=12(1−cos⁡(2πδντ)),P = \frac{1}{2} \left(1 - \cos(2\pi \delta\nu \tau)\right), where δν\delta\nu is the frequency detuning from the hyperfine resonance and τ\tau is the interrogation time, corresponding to the free evolution period. This sinusoidal pattern enables resolution far narrower than the natural linewidth, with fringe width inversely proportional to τ\tau. Frequency locking employs a servo loop that modulates the microwave frequency around the atomic resonance and extracts an error signal from the detected transition probability. The state after interrogation is determined via fluorescence detection or magnetic deflection, where atoms in the |4,0⟩ state are separated and counted, providing feedback to adjust the local oscillator—typically a quartz crystal multiplied to the 9.192 GHz hyperfine frequency—thus stabilizing it to the atomic transition. Several sources contribute to frequency uncertainty, requiring corrections for optimal accuracy. The cavity phase shift arises from unequal propagation phases at the cavity ends due to losses or asymmetries, introducing a that can be measured by reversing the atomic beam direction and is typically corrected to below 3 × 10^{-13}. The distributed cavity phase effect, a first-order Doppler-like shift from phase gradients across the cavity experienced by moving atoms, is minimized through symmetric cavity design or feed configurations and evaluated via Rabi interrogation at varying powers, with residual uncertainties around 10^{-15} in modern systems. Doppler effects, primarily second-order due to the transverse beam geometry, contribute shifts on the order of 3 × 10^{-13}, calculated as δν/ν≈(v/c)2/2\delta\nu / \nu \approx (v/c)^2 / 2 where vv is the atomic velocity and cc the , and are negligible after velocity selection; first-order shifts from misalignment are avoided by precise beam alignment.

Variations in Caesium Clock Designs

Caesium atomic clocks have evolved through distinct architectural designs, each optimizing trade-offs between stability, size, and operational complexity to meet diverse precision timing needs. Traditional continuous beam clocks form the backbone of commercial standards, directing a thermal beam of atoms linearly through microwave interrogation regions. These designs typically employ either the Rabi method, with a single interaction zone for direct excitation, or the Ramsey method, featuring separated oscillatory fields to achieve narrower resonance linewidths and reduced sensitivity to magnetic field inhomogeneities. The Ramsey configuration enhances resolution by allowing longer effective interaction times without increasing beam transit duration, making it prevalent in high-performance variants. Commercial implementations, such as the 5060A, prioritize portability and reliability, achieving short-term fractional frequency stability on the order of 10−13τ−1/210^{-13} \tau^{-1/2} (where τ\tau is the averaging time in seconds), suitable for and systems. A significant advancement came with atomic clocks, which leverage to launch caesium atoms into , enabling vertical Ramsey interrogation over extended periods. In these systems, atoms are first cooled to microkelvin temperatures using lasers, forming a slow-moving cloud that is tossed upward to traverse a twice during its . This geometry extends the interrogation time τ\tau to approximately —far longer than the milliseconds typical in beam clocks—yielding superior phase coherence and reduced . The resulting accuracy reaches 10−1510^{-15} in fractional frequency uncertainty, positioning fountain clocks as primary frequency standards for international timekeeping. Recent variants of fountain clocks incorporate refined optical pumping techniques to minimize collisional frequency shifts, a key limitation arising from atom-atom interactions during free fall. By optimizing laser parameters for state-selective preparation, these designs achieve lower atomic densities, reducing spin-exchange collisions that perturb the hyperfine transition. For instance, the NIST-F1 caesium fountain, which operated from 2000 to 2015, exemplifies this evolution through enhanced molasses cooling and vertical beam expansion, enabling operation at densities that suppress collisional shifts to negligible levels while maintaining interrogation times near 1 second. Such improvements have sustained the role of caesium fountains in realizing the SI second with uncertainties below 10−1510^{-15}. A more recent example is the NIST-F4 cryogenic caesium fountain clock, operational since April 2025, which further advances precision in contributions to (TAI).

Role in Defining SI Units

Foundation for the Second

The second, symbol s, is the of time, defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the caesium frequency Δν_Cs, the unperturbed ground-state hyperfine transition frequency of the caesium-133 atom, to be exactly 9,192,631,770 when expressed in hertz (Hz), which is equivalent to cycles per second. This definition, established following the 2019 revision of the (SI), specifies that the realization occurs for atoms at rest relative to the standard, at a of 0 , and in a of zero magnitude. Consequently, one second corresponds to the duration of exactly 9,192,631,770 periods of the associated with this hyperfine transition, providing an invariant atomic anchor for time measurement independent of or mechanical standards. Equivalently, the second is defined as 1/ΔνCs1 / \Delta \nu_\text{Cs}, where ΔνCs=9 192 631 770\Delta \nu_\text{Cs} = 9\,192\,631\,770 Hz, anchoring the hertz as the SI unit of to precisely one . This fixed relationship ensures that frequency measurements worldwide are traceable to the same atomic transition, facilitating uniform realization of the second in primary frequency standards such as caesium fountain clocks. The implications extend to all time-dependent quantities in physics, as the second serves as the foundational unit from which durations, rates, and periodicities are derived without reliance on variable astronomical phenomena. The Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) maintains the scale of (TAI) as an ensemble average of approximately 450 atomic clocks from over 80 national metrology institutes and laboratories, with primary caesium frequency standards providing periodic calibrations to align TAI with the SI second. These calibrations evaluate and correct any deviations in TAI's scale unit, ensuring its long-term stability and accuracy at the level of parts in 101610^{16}. (UTC), derived from TAI, incorporates adjustments decided by the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) to keep UTC within 0.9 seconds of UT1, based on 's rotation; the most recent was inserted on 31 December 2016, and in November 2022, the 27th General Conference on Weights and Measures adopted a resolution to discontinue adjustments starting no later than 2035 to avoid disruptions in global systems. Under the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA), realization of the second requires primary frequency standards to achieve relative standard uncertainties below 10−1610^{-16}, enabling international equivalence through key comparisons and traceability to the caesium hyperfine transition. These guidelines emphasize comprehensive uncertainty budgets that account for environmental perturbations, relativistic effects, and frequency shifts, with only a select number of caesium-based standards meeting this threshold for contributions to TAI. Such precision ensures the second's role as a robust foundation for the SI, supporting advancements in metrology and fundamental constants.

Derivation of Length and Velocity Units

The , the SI unit of , is defined as the distance travelled by in during a time interval of exactly 1/299 792 458 of a second. This definition, established by fixing the numerical value of the in cc to exactly 299 792 458 metres per second, directly links length to the caesium-based second without reliance on any physical artefact. As a result, the metre achieves universal reproducibility, as light propagation in vacuum is an invariant property governed by fundamental constants. This approach marked a significant historical shift in 1983, when the 17th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) redefined the to tie it explicitly to , which had itself been defined in 1967 using the caesium-133 hyperfine transition . Prior to 1983, the was realized through the of krypton-86 emission, an atomic standard that still required material references; the new eliminated such artefacts, enhancing precision and stability by anchoring length solely to time and the invariant . The 2019 revision of the SI further solidified this by explicitly fixing both the caesium (9 192 631 770 Hz) and cc as defining constants, ensuring the 's realization remains invariant under the full SI framework. The derivation extends naturally to velocity units, such as the (m/s), which are now directly derived from the fixed and second without additional constants or artefacts. For instance, any vv is expressed as v=d/tv = d / t, where dd is in metres and tt in seconds; the exact value of cc provides a fundamental benchmark, allowing velocities to be measured with precision limited only by practical realizations of time and light propagation. This kinematic linkage ensures consistency in applications like GPS and high-speed physics, where velocity scales are calibrated against cc. In practice, the metre is realized through optical interferometry using frequency-stabilized lasers, such as the helium-neon (HeNe) laser at 633 nm, where the vacuum wavelength λ\lambda is calculated as λ=c/ν\lambda = c / \nu and the frequency ν\nu is locked and measured relative to caesium-derived frequency standards. This method achieves uncertainties below 10^{-11}, enabling traceable length measurements in laboratories worldwide by counting interference fringes over a known distance.

Connections to Mass, Energy, Temperature, and Amount of Substance

The 2019 redefinition of the SI units anchored the to the exact value of Planck's constant, h=6.62607015×10−34h = 6.62607015 \times 10^{-34} J s, where the joule is defined as J=kg⋅m2⋅s−2\text{J} = \text{kg} \cdot \text{m}^2 \cdot \text{s}^{-2}. This establishes a direct link between and , as the hyperfine transition frequency ΔνCs=9 192 631 770\Delta \nu_{\text{Cs}} = 9\,192\,631\,770 Hz defines exactly, with the hertz expressed as s−1^{-1}. Consequently, the can be realized through expressions involving hh, the cc, and ΔνCs\Delta \nu_{\text{Cs}}, such as 1 kg=hΔνCsc21 \, \text{kg} = \frac{h \Delta \nu_{\text{Cs}}}{c^2}, underscoring 's foundational role in deriving from quantum constants. The connection to energy and force arises primarily through the , which equates mechanical power (involving mass, length, and time) to electrical power for precise realization of the . In this method, electrical voltage is generated via the , where the voltage VV across a junction relates to frequency ff by V=nh2efV = n \frac{h}{2e} f, with ff traceable to the caesium standard; resistance is set by the , yielding R=hie2R = \frac{h}{i e^2} for integer ii. These quantum effects tie electrical units to the second's frequency, enabling the watt (J s−1^{-1}) and thus the newton (kg m s−2^{-2}) to depend on caesium-based timekeeping for their practical measurement. For temperature, the is defined by fixing the at k=1.380649×10−23k = 1.380649 \times 10^{-23} J K−1^{-1} , linking to scales. Since the joule incorporates via s−2^{-2}, the inherits this temporal dependence, as expressed in 1 K=hΔνCs[k](/page/K)1 \, \text{K} = \frac{h \Delta \nu_{\text{Cs}}}{[k](/page/K)}. Measurements of kk, such as through acoustic gas thermometry, rely on frequency standards calibrated against caesium clocks to achieve the precision required for the redefinition. The mole, unit of amount of substance, is tied to the fixed Avogadro constant NA=6.02214076×1023N_{\text{A}} = 6.02214076 \times 10^{23} mol−1^{-1} , defining one mole as exactly this number of entities. It interconnects with mass via the relation for molar mass M=m/(nNA)M = m / (n N_{\text{A}}), where mm is in kilograms and nn in moles, thus propagating the second's influence through the kilogram's definition. This linkage ensures that chemical quantities like atomic masses align with the quantum-based SI framework stabilized by caesium frequency standards. Overall, these interdependencies highlight the second's central role in the revised SI, where standards underpin measurements of hh and kk via Josephson and quantum Hall effects, fostering a cohesive across mechanical, , and chemical domains.

Influence on Electromagnetic and Optical Units

The standard underpins the realization of the through the 2019 SI redefinition, which fixes the at e=1.602176634×10−19e = 1.602176634 \times 10^{-19} C exactly. Electric current is defined as I=dQdtI = \frac{dQ}{dt}, where charge QQ is an integer multiple of ee and time tt is measured in seconds derived from the caesium-133 hyperfine transition of exactly 9,192,631,770 Hz. In practice, national institutes realize the using single-electron transport devices, which pump or tunnel individual electrons at rates traceable to this fixed ee and the caesium-based second, achieving relative uncertainties below 10−810^{-8}. The volt and ohm are realized via quantum electrical effects that directly incorporate frequency standards locked to caesium clocks. For the volt, the in superconducting junctions produces quantized voltage steps according to V=nh[f](/page/Frequency)2[e](/page/E!)V = n \frac{h [f](/page/Frequency)}{2[e](/page/E!)}, where nn is an , hh is the , and [f](/page/Frequency)[f](/page/Frequency) is the supplied by a phase-locked to a atomic clock. With hh and [e](/page/E!)[e](/page/E!) fixed, this yields the exact relation 2[e](/page/E!)h=483597.848416984\frac{2[e](/page/E!)}{h} = 483597.848416984 GHz/V, enabling voltage standards with uncertainties as low as 10−1010^{-10} in laboratories like those at NIST and PTB. Similarly, the is realized through the , where Hall resistance plateaus occur at RH=hν[e](/page/E!)2R_H = \frac{h}{\nu [e](/page/E!)^2} for filling factor ν\nu, with the exact value h[e](/page/E!)2=25812.8074593045\frac{h}{[e](/page/E!)^2} = 25812.8074593045 Ω; here, caesium-referenced ensure precise current and voltage ratios in or GaAs-based devices. These realizations maintain international consistency through key comparisons coordinated by the BIPM. Optical units, particularly the , derive from the second via a fixed in the . The is defined such that the of at exactly 540 × 10^{12} Hz (green light at approximately 555 nm) is Kcd=683K_{cd} = 683 /. This , expressed in , ties directly to the caesium standard, as 1 Hz = 1 . labs realize the by calibrating detectors or sources against this efficacy value, often using cryogenic radiometers for absolute radiant power measurements and applying the ; typical uncertainties are around 0.3% for standards. The further connects electromagnetic units to the mole, defined exactly as F=NAeF = N_A e, where NA=6.02214076×1023N_A = 6.02214076 \times 10^{23} mol^{-1} is the . In electrochemical realizations, such as constant-current , the is determined from n=QzFn = \frac{Q}{z F}, with charge Q=ItQ = I t measured using ampere standards and time intervals from caesium clocks, yielding relative uncertainties of about 2×10−52 \times 10^{-5}. The fixed plays a key role in these quantum-based realizations of electrical units.

Realization, Accuracy, and Maintenance

Primary Frequency Standards

Primary standards are atomic clocks that realize the defined of the caesium-133 ground-state hyperfine transition with a relative standard uncertainty of 10−1510^{-15} or better, ensuring to the unperturbed transition without reliance on external references. These standards must incorporate corrections for systematic effects to achieve metrological validation, enabling their use in defining the SI second with high precision. Prominent examples include the (PTB)'s CSF1 caesium fountain clock, which operates in a laser-cooled atomic fountain configuration, and the National Physical Laboratory (NPL)'s NPL-CsF2, both contributing to international time scales. To minimize noise and perturbations, these standards employ environments (typically below 10−1010^{-10} Pa) to reduce atomic collisions and magnetic shielding to suppress external fields, ensuring the atoms experience conditions close to ideal free-flight. The uncertainty budget for primary caesium standards accounts for major systematic shifts, including the second-order from residual magnetic fields (contributing around 10−1610^{-16}), cavity pulling due to field inhomogeneities (up to 10−1510^{-15}), and relativistic effects such as second-order Doppler shifts from atomic motion (approximately 10−1610^{-16}). The total relative standard uncertainty is typically maintained below 5×10−165 \times 10^{-16}, as demonstrated in evaluations of standards like CSF1 and NPL-CsF2. The Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) facilitates validation through key comparisons, where primary standards contribute to the (TAI) scale every few years via satellite links like GPS or Two-Way Satellite Time and Frequency Transfer (TWSTFT), with linking uncertainties of $1toto7 \times 10^{-16}$. These periodic assessments ensure consistency across global realizations of .

Accuracy Evaluations and International Comparisons

Accuracy evaluations of caesium atomic clocks primarily rely on statistical measures of frequency stability and noise characterization to quantify performance. The Allan variance, denoted as σy(τ)\sigma_y(\tau), is a fundamental metric used to assess short- and long-term stability by analyzing phase fluctuations over averaging time τ\tau, enabling identification of dominant noise types such as white frequency noise or flicker noise in caesium beam or fountain clocks. Phase noise measurements, typically expressed in dBc/Hz at specific offsets from the carrier frequency (e.g., 9.192 GHz for caesium hyperfine transition), evaluate the purity of the interrogation signal, with low phase noise essential to minimize contributions to overall clock uncertainty from synthesizer imperfections. International comparisons of standards ensure global consistency and are conducted using -based and link techniques. GPS common-view methods synchronize clocks by simultaneously observing the same signals from multiple sites, achieving picosecond-level time transfer accuracy after corrections for ionospheric and orbital effects, as detailed in BIPM . Two-way time and (TWSTFT) provides bidirectional comparisons via geostationary satellites, offering sub-nanosecond precision for linking distant primary frequency standards. The BIPM publishes monthly offsets in Circular T, compiling results from these techniques to report deviations of national time scales from (TAI), facilitating ongoing calibration and validation. Historical advancements have dramatically enhanced clock accuracy, driven by refinements in systems, control, and atomic manipulation. In the 1970s, commercial caesium beam clocks achieved fractional frequency accuracies around 10−1310^{-13}, limited by second-order Doppler shifts and cavity phase variations. By the 2000s, caesium fountain clocks incorporating reached uncertainties near 10−1610^{-16}, as atoms are slowed to reduce relativistic effects and interrogation times extended, exemplified by NIST-F1's performance in 1999. The (TAI) scale plays a central role in global , formed as a weighted average of over 400 atomic clocks from more than 80 institutions worldwide, with weights assigned based on each clock's Allan variance-derived stability to optimize long-term predictability. This approach mitigates individual clock instabilities, providing a reference with stability superior to any single caesium standard while primary frequency standards contribute to its accuracy calibration.

Recent Developments in Caesium Realizations

In April 2025, as evaluated in a Metrologia publication, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) reported a fractional uncertainty of 2.2 × 10^{-16} for its NIST-F4 fountain clock, positioning it among the world's most precise primary frequency standards. This advancement incorporates enhanced techniques to better prepare the atoms for , minimizing velocity distribution effects, and refined corrections for shifts through improved thermal shielding and modeling. These upgrades build on the clock's reactivation after a period of maintenance, enabling routine operation with short-term stability suitable for international time comparisons. At the Système de Référence Temps-Espace (SYRTE) laboratory, operated by the French National Laboratory of Metrology and Testing (LNE) in collaboration with the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), the caesium fountain ensemble has seen enhancements to long-term performance, including refinements in the interrogation for better stability in the FO1, FO2 (), and FO3 fountains. These modifications have supported more frequent contributions to the (TAI) scale, with evaluations showing reduced systematic uncertainties in distributed cavity phase shifts. In June 2025, the (JRC) at , , integrated its timing infrastructure with an ultra-precise network linked to the European Quantum Communication Infrastructure (EuroQCI), marking the first such connection for an EU Commission site. This setup utilizes caesium-based primary standards from the Italian National Metrology Institute (INRIM) to synchronize over fiber-optic links, enabling secure, timestamped communications with sub-nanosecond precision for applications. Commercial caesium standards have also seen refinements, exemplified by Microchip Technology's 5071B primary frequency standard, which received updates to its internal in recent years to incorporate modern microprocessors and components, ensuring long-term supply chain reliability. These enhancements maintain the clock's accuracy at < 5.0 × 10^{-13} and provide 100 ns holdover capability for over two months in GNSS-denied environments, supporting applications in and defense. Ongoing research in 2025 addresses challenges in space-based clocks, particularly the mitigation of relativistic effects such as and due to orbital velocities, as demonstrated by the European Space Agency's Ensemble in Space (ACES) mission. Launched in April 2025 to the , ACES incorporates the PHARAO cold-atom fountain clock, achieving fractional uncertainties around 10^{-15} and enabling precise in-orbit corrections for testing and future deep space navigation applications.

Applications and Future Prospects

Timekeeping in Navigation and Synchronization

Caesium atomic clocks play a pivotal role in the (GPS) by providing the high-precision time base necessary for satellite to (UTC). Although modern GPS satellites primarily employ atomic clocks for onboard timing due to their compactness and power efficiency, caesium standards serve as the primary frequency references on the ground for calibrating and maintaining the system's overall accuracy. The (PRN) codes broadcast by GPS satellites are synchronized to UTC, enabling receivers to calculate precise positions and times; this achieves an accuracy of better than 40 nanoseconds relative to UTC(USNO) 95% of the time, ensuring positional errors remain minimal even over long durations. UTC itself is derived from (TAI), a weighted average of numerous caesium-based atomic clocks worldwide. In , particularly for networks, standards underpin the primary reference time clocks (PRTCs) and enhanced PRTCs (ePRTCs) that deliver the stringent required for time-division duplexing (TDD) operations and . infrastructure demands phase synchronization accuracy of 3 microseconds or better between cells to minimize interference and support features like coordinated multipoint transmission. atomic clocks, locked to UTC via GNSS receivers in grandmaster clocks, provide the stable and time references for stratum-1 servers, enabling network-wide holdover capabilities during GNSS disruptions and achieving end-to-end timing errors below 1.5 microseconds in fronthaul links. This precision is essential for low-latency applications, such as massive , where even sub-microsecond deviations can degrade signal quality across urban deployments. For power grid stability, caesium standards ensure microsecond-level timing in phasor measurement units (PMUs) that monitor and protect electrical networks through synchrophasor . PMUs require synchronization accuracy of 1 or better to capture synchronized voltage and current phasors across wide-area grids, enabling real-time detection of oscillations and faults. The (PTP, IEEE 1588) distributes this timing over fiber-optic networks, with caesium atomic clocks serving as autonomous references in grandmaster devices to maintain accuracy during GPS outages, supporting holdover periods of hours with drift below 1 . In applications, this facilitates dynamic line rating and renewable integration by providing phase-coherent data for grid-wide control systems. Advancements in have led to commercial chip-scale atomic clocks (CSACs) derived from caesium beam and vapor cell technologies, making high-precision timing accessible for portable and devices. These CSACs, such as cesium vapor cell oscillators, achieve short-term stabilities comparable to caesium standards (around 10^{-11} for 1-hour averaging) in volumes under 15 cm³, enabling battery-powered operation in rugged environments like GPS receivers and mobile telecom testers. Unlike traditional bulky caesium fountains, CSACs warm up in seconds and consume less than 150 mW, supporting applications in handheld synchronizers for ad-hoc networks where GNSS is unavailable. Commercial models, including those from Microchip and VIAVI, integrate seamlessly with PTP and GPS disciplined oscillators for portable devices, providing holdover accuracy better than 1 per day.

Contributions to Fundamental Physics

Caesium atomic clocks, with their exceptional frequency stability and accuracy, serve as precision tools for probing fundamental theories in physics, particularly through measurements of and variations in fundamental constants. These standards enable stringent by quantifying gravitational effects on clock rates, while their hyperfine transitions provide benchmarks for predictions. Additionally, networks of caesium clocks facilitate searches for by detecting potential oscillations in coupling constants induced by exotic fields. One key application is in testing via , where the frequency shift of caesium hyperfine transitions due to differing gravitational potentials is measured. At NIST, comparisons of caesium fountain clocks at varying heights have determined the relativistic redshift correction with an uncertainty of 3 × 10^{-17}, confirming Einstein's prediction of in Earth's gravitational field to this precision. This modern analogue to the Hafele-Keating experiment uses laser-cooled caesium atoms in fountains to achieve sensitivities unattainable with earlier beam standards, validating the and clock rate differences over baselines of tens of meters. Caesium standards also contribute to constraints on the temporal variation of the α, by serving as stable references in ratios with optical clocks. Comparisons between caesium hyperfine and optical transitions in ions like Yb^+ or Al^+ over multi-year baselines yield limits on the fractional rate of change |\dot{α}/α| < 10^{-17} per year, improving prior bounds by factors of up to 20 and ruling out significant drifts predicted by some beyond-Standard-Model theories. These measurements leverage the insensitivity of the caesium ground-state hyperfine splitting to α variations relative to certain optical clocks, allowing differential sensitivities that probe cosmological evolution of constants. In , the ground-state hyperfine anomaly—arising from the finite nuclear size and magnetization distribution—has been empirically determined and compared to theoretical predictions. Recent precision of the 6s ^2S_{1/2} hyperfine interval in ^{133}Cs and ^{135}Cs isotopes measures the differential anomaly ε = (−228 ± 16) × 10^{-6}, agreeing with QED calculations incorporating the Bohr-Weisskopf effect to within 10^{-10} in fractional terms for the overall hyperfine splitting. This concordance validates many-body QED in heavy atoms and refines nuclear models used in atomic parity violation searches. Furthermore, clock networks enable searches by monitoring anomalous frequency modulations from couplings. Analysis of six years of hyperfine frequency comparisons from the dual caesium-rubidium fountain FO2 at SYRTE detects no evidence for an oscillating massive candidate, setting limits on the scalar-electron coupling y_e < 10^{-21} - 10^{-12} over masses 10^{-19} - 10^{-16} eV. Global networks of such clocks enhance sensitivity to spatial gradients in the field, providing complementary bounds to direct detection experiments.

Challenges and Potential Shift to Optical Standards

Caesium atomic fountains, the current realization of the primary frequency standard, face inherent limitations due to their reliance on transitions at approximately 9.2 GHz. This relatively low frequency restricts the interrogation time in Ramsey to about 1 second, constrained by the ballistic flight height of cooled atoms under , which limits the coherence time and thus the achievable short-term stability compared to higher-frequency optical transitions. Additionally, standards are susceptible to environmental perturbations, notably the (BBR) shift, which introduces a fractional uncertainty scaling quadratically with temperature deviations as approximately 1.7 × 10^{-14} per K² around . This shift arises from the dynamic induced by , and while corrections are applied, residual uncertainties contribute around 10^{-16} to the overall clock error budget in state-of-the-art fountains. Furthermore, fountains require substantial infrastructure, including large vacuum chambers, systems operating at millikelvin temperatures, cavities, and significant electrical power for magnetic shielding and atom manipulation, making them bulky (often room-sized) and resource-intensive to operate and maintain. Optical lattice clocks, based on transitions in ions or neutral atoms such as strontium (⁸⁷Sr) or ytterbium (¹⁷¹Yb) at optical wavelengths around 400–500 THz, offer 100 to 1,000 times better stability and accuracy than caesium standards, with demonstrated fractional uncertainties below 10^{-18}. For instance, strontium clocks have achieved accuracies of 6.4 × 10^{-18}, while ytterbium systems have reached instabilities of 5.4 × 10^{-18} after 4,500 seconds of averaging, enabling precision measurements that probe variations in fundamental constants and geopotential differences at parts in 10^{18}. These advancements stem from the higher transition frequencies, which allow for narrower linewidths and longer interrogation times in optical lattices that mitigate Doppler effects. The International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) outlines options for redefining using optical transitions, including a single fixed frequency (Option 1, e.g., a specific ⁸⁷Sr or ²⁷Al⁺ transition) or a weighted average of multiple optical frequencies (Option 2), with retained as a secondary standard post-redefinition to ensure continuity in time scales like UTC. The Consultative Committee for Time and Frequency (CCTF) roadmap, endorsed by the 27th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) in 2022, targets validation by the 28th CGPM in 2026 and potential ratification at the 29th CGPM in 2030, provided optical standards meet criteria such as 10^{-18} uncertainty and international comparability through fiber networks and satellite links. If consensus is not achieved by 2030, postponement to post-2034 is anticipated, with hybrid approaches maintaining fountains alongside optical systems to preserve during the transition. While optical standards promise superior precision for applications in fundamental physics and , their adoption requires rigorous validation against caesium equivalents at the 10^{-18} level to confirm equivalence and mitigate risks to global timekeeping . Challenges include achieving consensus on the specific transition (e.g., avoiding over-reliance on a single ) and addressing limitations in long-distance comparisons, such as those via GNSS, which currently offer only 10^{-15} accuracy unsuitable for optical validation. Nonetheless, ongoing international networks of optical clocks across six countries have demonstrated synchronized stabilities at 10^{-18}, paving the way for a seamless shift that enhances the SI second's accuracy by two orders of magnitude.

References

  1. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/41489667/SI-App2-second.pdf/3c76fec8-04d9-f484-5c3c-a2e280a0f248
  2. https://www.bipm.org/en/history-si/second
  3. https://www.nist.gov/pml/time-and-frequency-division/time-realization/cesium-fountain-atomic-clocks
  4. https://www.nist.gov/atomic-clocks/brief-history-atomic-time
  5. https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co855/caesium-atomic-clock-1955
  6. https://www.viksnewsletter.com/p/a-brief-history-of-timekeeping-atomic-clocks
  7. https://www.nist.gov/pml/time-and-frequency-division/time-services/brief-history-atomic-clocks-nist
  8. https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2025/04/new-atomic-fountain-clock-joins-elite-group-keeps-world-time
  9. https://www.ptb.de/cms/fileadmin/internet/fachabteilungen/abteilung_4/4.4_zeit_und_frequenz/pdf/2003_Bauch_MST_CAC_VF_author_version.pdf
  10. https://www.nrc.canada.ca/en/certifications-evaluations-standards/canadas-official-time/what-cesium-atomic-clock
  11. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/273113378/3_CCTF_TE_28042025_Peik/92c3fd48-d393-3516-aa00-9d6267ab6927
  12. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1944/rabi/facts/
  13. https://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/10.pdf
  14. https://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/1530.pdf
  15. https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cg/cgpm/13-1967/resolution-1
  16. https://www.nist.gov/si-redefinition/second-past
  17. https://www.ptb.de/cms/en/ptb/fachabteilungen/abt4/fb-44/fragenzurzeit/fragenzurzeit11.html
  18. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/time-from-earth-rotation-to-atomic-physics/international-atomic-time-tai/BCDAA947B5499772E0C0DC94AFE6B051
  19. https://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/65.pdf
  20. https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cg/cgpm/26-2018/resolution-1
  21. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/41483022/SI-Brochure-9-EN.pdf
  22. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/41489667/SI-App2-second.pdf
  23. https://steck.us/alkalidata/cesiumnumbers.1.6.pdf
  24. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2022.959343/full
  25. https://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/2228.pdf
  26. https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0310085
  27. https://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/215.pdf
  28. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/ramsey-lecture.pdf
  29. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/723/1/012002/pdf
  30. https://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/3156.pdf
  31. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2022.970030/full
  32. https://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/1968.pdf
  33. https://phys.org/news/2025-04-atomic-fountain-clock-elite-group.html
  34. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.330-2019.pdf
  35. https://www.bipm.org/en/time-metrology
  36. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/28437367/working-document-ID-3643/74ad20bc-c1df-2b7b-223d-fd8be2d194c4
  37. https://webtai.bipm.org/ftp/pub/tai/annual-reports/bipm-annual-report/annual_report_2016.pdf
  38. https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cg/cgpm/27-2022/resolution-d
  39. https://www.nist.gov/pml/time-and-frequency-division/time-realization/leap-seconds
  40. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1681-7575/aaa302
  41. https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cg/cgpm/17-1983/resolution-1
  42. https://www.bipm.org/en/history-si/metre
  43. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/41489670/SI-App2-metre.pdf/0e011055-9736-d293-5e56-b8b1b267fd68
  44. https://www.bipm.org/en/measurement-units/si-defining-constants
  45. https://www.nist.gov/si-redefinition/kilogram-kibble-balance
  46. https://www.nist.gov/si-redefinition/ampere/ampere-quantum-metrology-triangle
  47. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/41489676/SI-App2-ampere.pdf
  48. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2070959/CCEM%2BGuidelines%2Bfor%2BImplementation%2Bof%2Bthe%2B%25E2%2580%2598Revised%2BSI%25E2%2580%2599.pdf/1d4ad52d-5fca-6c15-dc4d-7b0a74e3816e
  49. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/41489685/SI-App2-candela.pdf
  50. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/41489679/SI-App2-mole.pdf
  51. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.03362
  52. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0026-1394/48/5/007
  53. https://www.ptb.de/cms/fileadmin/internet/fachabteilungen/abteilung_4/4.4_zeit_und_frequenz/pdf/2001_Weyers_-_Metrologia_38_neu.pdf
  54. https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.2412
  55. https://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/3294.pdf
  56. https://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/2738.pdf
  57. https://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/1457.pdf
  58. https://www.ursi.org/proceedings/procGA02/papers/p0577.pdf
  59. https://webtai.bipm.org/ftp/pub/tai/annual-reports/bipm-annual-report/annual_report_2020.pdf
  60. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/28438285/working-document-ID-1237/c32bb49a-d2ba-038f-84d6-0639fb205e41
  61. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1681-7575/adc7bd
  62. https://www.[researchgate](/page/ResearchGate).net/publication/223963203_Progress_in_atomic_fountains_at_LNE-SYRTE
  63. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/58355060/Annual_Review_2020_FINAL.pdf/0a7107f3-4b22-9939-40c9-4ce7400fa646
  64. https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/jrc-news-and-updates/jrc-ispra-links-atomic-clock-and-quantum-backbone-2025-06-10_en
  65. https://www.pulse-z.eu/quantum-time-how-jrc-ispra-is-plugging-europe-into-the-future-of-ultra-secure-communication/
  66. https://www.microchip.com/en-us/products/clock-and-timing/components/atomic-clocks/atomic-system-clocks/cesium-time/5071B
  67. https://chronos.uk/product/time-frequency-distribution/5071b-cesium-atomic-clock/
  68. https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/ACES_Atomic_Clock_Ensemble_in_Space
  69. https://cnes.fr/en/projects/pharao
  70. https://www.nist.gov/atomic-clocks/how-atomic-clocks-work/clocks-galore
  71. https://ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/timing/gpsrole.pdf
  72. https://www.ericsson.com/en/reports-and-papers/ericsson-technology-review/articles/5g-synchronization-requirements-and-solutions
  73. https://www.microchip.com/en-us/about/media-center/blog/2023/synchronizing-5g-networks-with-timing-design-and-management-one
  74. https://www.nec.com/en/global/solutions/5g/Blog_Maximizing_the_value_of_5G_transport_networks_with_precise_timing.html
  75. https://www.nist.gov/document/tcsgspeakersprelimpdf
  76. https://www.naspi.org/sites/default/files/reference_documents/tstf_electric_power_system_report_pnnl_26331_march_2017_0.pdf
  77. https://www.viavisolutions.com/en-us/products/chip-scale-atomic-clock-gpsdo-csac
  78. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apr/article/5/3/031302/123951/Chip-scale-atomic-devices
  79. https://www.microchip.com/en-us/products/clock-and-timing/components/atomic-clocks/embedded-atomic-oscillators/csac
  80. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.053001
  81. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.061301
  82. https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2017/12/29/chen_thesis_main.pdf
  83. https://theses.hal.science/tel-00007074v1
  84. https://www.nist.gov/atomic-clocks/how-atomic-clocks-work/optical-clocks-future-time
  85. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24463513/
  86. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1681-7575/ac99e4
  87. https://www.bipm.org/en/faq-redefinition-second
  88. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.14141
  89. https://www.optica.org/about/newsroom/news_releases/2025/unprecedented_optical_clock_network_lays_groundwork_for_redefining_the_second/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.