Hubbry Logo
CoulometryCoulometryMain
Open search
Coulometry
Community hub
Coulometry
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Coulometry
Coulometry
Coulometry
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In analytical electrochemistry, coulometry is the measure of charge (coulombs) transfer during an electrochemical redox reaction.[1] It can be used for precision measurements of charge, but coulometry is mainly used for analytical applications to determine the amount of matter transformed.[2]

There are two main categories of coulometric techniques. Amperostatic coulometry, or coulometric titration keeps the current constant using an amperostat. Potentiostatic coulometry holds the electric potential constant during the reaction using a potentiostat.

History

[edit]

The term coulometry was introduced in 1938 by Hungarian chemist László Szebellédy and Zoltan Somogyi.[3] Coulometry is the measure of charge, thus named after its unit the coulomb.

Michael Faraday, known for his work in electricity and magnetism, made critical contributions to the field of electrochemistry. He discovered the laws of electrolysis, and in his recognition is the eponym of the Faraday constant. In the earliest developments of coulometry, Faraday proposed the first instrument to measure charge by utilizing the electrolysis of water.[4]

Surface coulometry, the method of determining metallic layers or oxide films on metals, was first applied by American Chemist G. G. Grower in 1917 by checking the quality of tinned copper wire.[5]

Coulometric methods were used widely in the middle of the twentieth century but voltammetric methods and non-electrochemical analytical methods took over decreasing the use for coulometry, but one method widely used today is the Karl Fischer method.[6]

Potentiostatic coulometry

[edit]

Potentiostatic coulometry utilizes a constant electric potential and is a technique most commonly referred to as "bulk electrolysis". Also called direct coulometry, the analyte is oxidized or reduced at the working electrode without intermediate reactions.[6] The working electrode is kept at a constant potential and the current that flows through the circuit is measured. This constant potential is applied long enough to fully reduce or oxidize all of the electroactive species in a given solution. As the electroactive molecules are consumed, the current also decreases, approaching zero when the conversion is complete. The sample mass, molecular mass, number of electrons in the electrode reaction, and number of electrons passed during the experiment are all related by Faraday's laws. It follows that, if three of the values are known, then the fourth can be calculated.

Bulk electrolysis is often used to unambiguously assign the number of electrons consumed in a reaction observed through voltammetry. It also has the added benefit of producing a solution of a species (oxidation state) which may not be accessible through chemical routes. This species can then be isolated or further characterized while in solution.

The rate of such reactions is not determined by the concentration of the solution, but rather the mass transfer of the electroactive species in the solution to the electrode surface. Rates will increase when the volume of the solution is decreased, the solution is stirred more rapidly, or the area of the working electrode is increased. Since mass transfer is so important the solution is stirred during a bulk electrolysis. However, this technique is generally not considered a hydrodynamic technique, since a laminar flow of solution against the electrode is neither the objective nor outcome of the stirring.

The extent to which a reaction goes to completion is also related to how much greater the applied potential is than the reduction potential of interest. In the case where multiple reduction potentials are of interest, it is often difficult to set an electrolysis potential a "safe" distance (such as 200 mV) past a redox event. The result is incomplete conversion of the substrate, or else conversion of some of the substrate to the more reduced form. This factor must be considered when analyzing the current passed and when attempting to do further analysis/isolation/experiments with the substrate solution.

An advantage to this kind of analysis over electrogravimetry is that it does not require that the product of the reaction be weighed. This is useful for reactions where the product does not deposit as a solid, such as the determination of the amount of arsenic in a sample from the electrolysis of arsenous acid (H3AsO3) to arsenic acid (H3AsO4).

Coulometric titration

[edit]

Coulometric titrations under a constant current system quantifies the analyte by measuring the duration that current passes through the sample. In indirect or secondary coulometry, the working electrode produces a titrant that reacts with the analyte. When the analyte is completely consumed, endpoint detection is employed, preferably with an instrumental method for higher precision.[6] The total charge that has flowed through the sample can be determined from the magnitude of the current (in amperes) and the duration of the current (in seconds). Using Faraday's Law, total charge can be used to determine the moles of the unknown species in solution. When the volume of the solution is known, the molarity of the unknown species can be determined.

Advantages of Coulometric Titration

Coulometric titration has the advantage that constant current sources for the generation of titrants are relatively easy to make.

  • The electrochemical generation of a titrant is much more sensitive and can be much more accurately controlled than the mechanical addition of titrant using a burette drive. For example, a constant current flow of 10 μA for 100 ms is easily generated and corresponds to about 10 micrograms of titrant.
  • The preparation of standard solutions and titer determination is no longer necessary.
  • Chemical substances that are unstable or difficult to handle because of their high volatility or reactivity in solution can also very easily be used as titrants. Examples are bromine, chlorine, Ti3+, Sn2+, Cr2+, and Karl Fischer reagents (iodine).
  • Coulometric titration can also be performed under inert atmosphere or be remotely controlled e.g. with radioactive substances.
  • Complete automation is simpler.[6]

Applications

[edit]

Karl Fischer reaction to determine water content

[edit]
Karl Fischer Coulometer Auto Titrator

The Karl Fischer reaction uses a coulometric titration to determine the amount of water in a sample. It can determine concentrations of water on the order of milligrams per liter. It is used to find the amount of water in substances such as butter, sugar, cheese, paper, and petroleum.

The reaction involves converting solid iodine into hydrogen iodide in the presence of sulfur dioxide and water. Methanol is most often used as the solvent, but ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol also work. Pyridine is often used to prevent the buildup of sulfuric acid, although the use of imidazole and diethanolamine for this role are becoming more common. All reagents must be anhydrous for the analysis to be quantitative. The balanced chemical equation, using methanol and pyridine, is:

In this reaction, a single molecule of water reacts with a molecule of iodine. Since this technique is used to determine the water content of samples, atmospheric humidity could alter the results. Therefore, the system is usually isolated with drying tubes or placed in an inert gas container. In addition, the solvent will undoubtedly have some water in it so the solvent's water content must be measured to compensate for this inaccuracy.

To determine the amount of water in the sample, analysis must first be performed using either back or direct titration. In the direct method, just enough of the reagents will be added to completely use up all of the water. At this point in the titration, the current approaches zero. It is then possible to relate the amount of reagents used to the amount of water in the system via stoichiometry. The back-titration method is similar, but involves the addition of an excess of the reagent. This excess is then consumed by adding a known amount of a standard solution with known water content. The result reflects the water content of the sample and the standard solution. Since the amount of water in the standard solution is known, the difference reflects the water content of the sample.

Determination of film thickness

[edit]

Coulometry can be used in the determination of the thickness of metallic coatings. This method is called surface coulometry and is performed by measuring the quantity of electricity needed to dissolve a well-defined area of the coating. The film thickness is proportional to the constant current , the molecular weight of the metal, the density of the metal, and the surface area :

The electrodes for this reaction are often platinum electrode and an electrode that relates to the reaction. For tin coating on a copper wire, a tin electrode is used, while a sodium chloride-zinc sulfate electrode would be used to determine the zinc film on a piece of steel. Special cells have been created to adhere to the surface of the metal to measure its thickness. These are basically columns with the internal electrodes with magnets or weights to attach to the surface. The results obtained by this coulometric method are similar to those achieved by other chemical and metallurgic techniques.

Coulometry in Healthcare

[edit]

Determination of Chloride Levels

[edit]

A type of clinical chemistry is measuring chloride levels in blood samples through a Cotlove chloridometer. Kidneys are responsible for the reabsorption of chloride to maintain electrolyte homeostasis. Measuring chloride levels allows for electrolyte stability, without this feature diseases such as hyperchoremia and hypochloremia would be harder to detect leaving body functions compromised.[7]

Determination of Antioxidant Capacity in Human Blood

[edit]

Coulometry can be used to measure the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in blood and plasma through electrogenerated bromide. A method was developed that used TAC blood sampled from patients with chronic renal disease going through hemodialysis to research changes in TAC levels that could then be applied in clinics. [8]

Coulometers

[edit]

Electronic coulometer

[edit]

The electronic coulometer is based on the application of the operational amplifier in the "integrator"-type circuit. The current passed through the resistor R1 makes a potential drop which is integrated by operational amplifier on the capacitor plates; the higher current, the larger the potential drop. The current need not be constant. In such scheme Vout is proportional of the passed charge. Sensitivity of the coulometer can be changed by choosing of the appropriate value of R1.

Electrochemical coulometers

[edit]
Main article: voltameter

There are three common types of coulometers based on electrochemical processes:

"Voltameter" is a synonym for "coulometer".

Coulometric Microtitrators

[edit]

An acid-base microtitorator utilizes the electrolysis of water, where protons or hydroxide ions are produced at the working electrode. The analyte reacts with the generated reagent, buffering the overall rate of reagent generation. A pH gradient forms from the diffusion of these reagents, where a pH sensor will determine the endpoint.[6]

Some advantages of using a microtitrator include the fast completion time of the titration due to the micro-scale. Additionally, a negligibly small amount of the sample is consumed, so titrations can be repeatedly analyzed with the same sample. On the contrary, microtitrators require calibration because diffusion is variable, and thus this method is not absolute.[6]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Coulometry

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Coulometry is an electrochemical measurement principle in which the required to carry out a known electrochemical reaction is measured, with the proportional to the charge according to Faraday’s laws of electrolysis. This technique enables the quantitative determination of analytes by exhaustive electrolysis, where the substance is completely oxidized or reduced at an . As a primary reference method, coulometry requires no against standards, making it highly accurate for absolute measurements of electroactive . The fundamental principle of coulometry relies on Faraday's first law of , which states that the mass of a substance altered at an during is directly proportional to the of transferred, and Faraday's second law, which relates the masses of different substances produced by the same of to their equivalent weights. Mathematically, the nn (in moles) is given by n=QneFn = \frac{Q}{n_e F}, where QQ is the total charge passed (in coulombs), nen_e is the number of electrons transferred per mole of , and FF is the (9.64853321×1049.64853321 \times 10^4 C mol−1^{-1}). The charge QQ is typically measured as the product of current and time (Q=itQ = i t) in controlled-current modes or by integration (Q=∫i dtQ = \int i \, dt) in controlled-potential setups. Coulometry encompasses two primary variants: controlled-potential coulometry, where a constant is applied to ensure selective and complete reaction of the , and controlled-current coulometry (also known as coulometric ), where a generates a titrant electrochemically for reaction with the . In controlled-potential coulometry, the current decays over time as the is depleted, often requiring 30–60 minutes for exhaustive , while controlled-current methods accelerate analysis to under 10 minutes by maintaining 100% current efficiency through mediators or back-. Both approaches demand careful control of mass transport, typically via stirring or , to achieve quantitative conversion. Applications of coulometry span , including the determination of organic reducing agents like ascorbic acid and thiols, inorganic cations such as , mercury, and , and trace via Karl Fischer coulometric . Its advantages include high sensitivity for microgram-level samples, in situ generation of unstable reagents, and suitability for due to rapid analysis times. Coulometry also finds use in for in water and in pharmaceutical for active ingredients, leveraging its precision and to fundamental constants.

Principles

Definition and Basic Concepts

Coulometry is an electrochemical technique for quantitative chemical analysis that determines the amount of an by measuring the total passed through an to achieve complete of the substance. This absolute method relies on the direct proportionality between the charge and the extent of the reaction, without requiring curves, as the charge corresponds to the electrons transferred during the oxidation or reduction of the analyte. The fundamental principle stems from the stoichiometric relationship between the charge QQ and the moles of electrons involved, given by the equation Q=nFnAQ = n F n_A where nn is the number of electrons transferred per mole of , FF is the , and nAn_A is the number of moles of the analyte. This relation, rooted in , allows the concentration or amount of the substance to be calculated directly from the measured charge. In coulometric measurements, an typically consists of a , where the undergoes ; a counter , which completes the electrical circuit by providing the opposing reaction; and often a to maintain a stable potential at the . The setup ensures that the applied current or potential drives the quantitative conversion of the , with the commonly made of or mercury to facilitate the process. A central concept is exhaustive electrolysis, wherein the entire quantity of the analyte is fully oxidized or reduced at the working electrode, or it reacts completely with an electrogenerated reagent, until the reaction is complete and the current approaches zero. The total charge is determined by integrating the current over the duration of the electrolysis: Q=∫0tI dtQ = \int_0^t I \, dt For cases of constant current, this simplifies to Q=ItQ = I t, where II is the current in amperes and tt is the time in seconds, yielding QQ in coulombs. The , defined as F=96,485.33212 C/molF = 96{,}485.33212 \, \text{C/mol}, quantifies the charge associated with one mole of electrons, bridging the electrical measurement to the chemical quantity of the . This value enables precise conversion from coulombs to moles, ensuring the accuracy of coulometric determinations.

Faraday's Laws

form the cornerstone of coulometry, quantifying the direct relationship between electrical charge and the extent of chemical change in electrochemical reactions. These laws, derived from systematic experiments on electrolytic in the , enable the precise determination of substance amounts by measuring the total charge passed through an . Faraday's states that the mass mm of a substance produced or consumed at an is directly proportional to the quantity of QQ transferred during the reaction. This relationship is expressed mathematically as m=QnFMm = \frac{Q}{n F} M where FF is the (96,485.3321296{,}485.33212 C/mol), MM is the of the substance, and nn is the number of electrons transferred per mole of substance. The second law states that, for the same quantity of electricity passed through different electrolytes, the masses of substances produced or consumed are proportional to their equivalent weights, defined as M/nM/n. From these laws, the electrochemical equivalent zz of a substance— the mass altered per unit charge— is derived as z=M/(nF)z = M / (n F), such that m=zQm = z Q. In coulometry, QQ is obtained by integrating current over time (Q=∫I dtQ = \int I \, dt), allowing direct calculation of mm without reliance on solution concentrations or external standards. This makes coulometry an absolute analytical method with high precision by avoiding dependencies on or concentration gradients inherent in techniques like . For example, the complete reduction of 1 mol of \ceAg+\ce{Ag+} to \ceAg\ce{Ag} (where n=1n = 1) requires a charge Q=nF=96,485.33212Q = n F = 96{,}485.33212 C (as of 2022 CODATA).

History

Early Developments

The foundations of coulometry trace back to Michael Faraday's pioneering experiments on in the early , where he systematically quantified the masses of substances deposited or liberated at electrodes during electrolytic processes. Faraday's work, detailed in his Experimental Researches in series published between 1831 and 1834, demonstrated that the amount of material involved in an electrochemical reaction is directly proportional to the quantity of electricity passed through the , establishing the empirical basis for later charge-based analytical methods. In the mid-19th century, advancements in electrogravimetry further bridged electrolytic principles toward quantitative analysis, with Oliver Wolcott Gibbs playing a central role. Gibbs, an American chemist at Harvard's Lawrence Scientific School, published the seminal paper "On the Electrolytic Precipitation of and as a Method of Analysis" in 1864, describing the first systematic electrogravimetric determinations by depositing metals onto electrodes and weighing the precipitates for accurate quantification. This technique, refined by contemporaries like Carl Luckow who introduced improvements such as deposition from dilute solutions in 1865, relied on controlled to achieve high precision but still required mechanical weighing of deposits, limiting its efficiency for routine analysis. By the early , the recognition of direct charge measurement for analytical and standardization purposes gained prominence, exemplified by the silver coulometer's adoption as a primary tool. In , the International Electrical Congress in officially endorsed the silver coulometer for defining the , specifying that one ampere deposits 0.001118 grams of silver per second from a silver nitrate solution, enabling precise of electrical units in laboratories worldwide. This device, featuring a platinum cathode bowl and silver anode in a 15% silver nitrate electrolyte, was routinely employed in physics laboratories during the for accurate current in experiments involving electromagnetic phenomena and electrical standards, offering reproducibility to within 1 part in 5,000 under controlled conditions. The formal establishment of coulometry as a distinct analytical discipline occurred in the late and , shifting emphasis from gravimetric weighing to integrated electrical charge . Hungarian chemists László Szebellédy and Zoltán Somogyi introduced the term "coulometry" in 1938, pioneering coulometric titration as a substitute for volumetric methods by generating titrants electrochemically and quantifying them via total charge passed, in accordance with Faraday's laws. This innovation addressed a key limitation of electrogravimetry—errors from mechanical weighing and deposit handling—by relying on electrical integration of current over time for direct, calibration-free determination of amounts, enhancing accuracy and sensitivity for trace-level . In the , American James J. Lingane further advanced the field through his development of controlled-potential coulometry, as detailed in his 1945 publication, which enabled selective without interference from side reactions.

Key Milestones

The development of controlled-potential coulometry in the and , pioneered by James J. Lingane, represented a major breakthrough by allowing selective of specific analytes in mixtures through the application of a fixed potential, ensuring 100% current efficiency and minimizing interference from co-existing species. This technique, building on the 1942 invention of the electronic potentiostat by Archie Hickling, enabled quantitative determination with high accuracy, typically achieving errors below 0.1% for metal ions like and . During the 1960s, the introduction of automated coulometric titrators revolutionized routine laboratory analysis, facilitating precise trace-level determinations by electrogenerating titrants on demand and incorporating feedback mechanisms for endpoint detection, which enhanced reproducibility to levels of 0.01-0.1% relative standard deviation. These instruments, often applied to Karl Fischer water titrations, addressed limitations of manual methods and supported high-throughput operations in industrial quality control. A key event in the 1970s was the standardization of coulometric constants by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), particularly the refinement of the Faraday constant to 96487 C/mol in 1973, which minimized inter-laboratory variability in quantitative analyses to better than 0.01% by establishing a unified value for charge-to-mole conversions. This effort, following earlier proposals, ensured consistent application across global standards for electrochemical measurements. In the 1980s, advancements in microcoulometry emerged to handle small sample volumes (microliter scale), driven by the growing demand for of pollutants such as total organic in water, where oxidative followed by coulometric detection provided detection limits as low as 1-10 μg/L. This miniaturization improved portability and sensitivity for field applications, reducing reagent consumption while maintaining accuracy comparable to macro-scale methods. The 2000s saw the integration of coulometry with and electrochemical sensors, enabling the creation of portable devices for , such as systems for glucose or detection using integrated electrodes for in-channel coulometric measurements. These hybrid platforms reduced analysis time to minutes and sample volumes to nanoliters, enhancing accessibility in remote healthcare settings with limits of detection reaching nanomolar concentrations. Post-2010 milestones include the coupling of coulometry with in hybrid methods, such as spectroelectrochemical systems combining controlled-potential coulometry with UV-visible or , allowing simultaneous structural identification and absolute quantification of reaction intermediates in complex matrices like battery electrolytes. These interdisciplinary approaches have addressed limitations in traditional coulometry by providing molecular-level insights, with applications in energy research achieving resolution of transient at concentrations below 1 μM. In the 2020s, further innovations have focused on solid-state coulometric designs using for improved kinetics, enabling analysis of a broader range of electroactive species. Automated coulometric Karl Fischer titrators have seen enhancements in software and compactness for high-throughput , while constant-current coulometry has been applied to screen total antioxidants in essential oils, offering micromolar detection limits and supporting applications in and pharmaceutical as of 2025.

Techniques

Controlled-Potential Coulometry

Controlled-potential coulometry, also known as potentiostatic coulometry, involves the application of a fixed potential to the of an using a potentiostat, which drives the exhaustive of the while maintaining precise control over the . This technique ensures that only the target species undergoes reaction by selecting a potential corresponding to its specific electrochemical couple, thereby enhancing selectivity in complex matrices. The procedure begins with the immersion of the working electrode, typically a platinum or mercury electrode, in the sample solution containing the analyte and a supporting electrolyte. A constant potential is then applied, initiating the electrolysis, and the resulting current is monitored and integrated over time using the relation Q=∫I dtQ = \int I \, dt, where QQ is the total charge passed. Electrolysis proceeds until the current decays to a negligible baseline level, typically 0.1-1% of the initial value, signifying the complete conversion of the analyte to its product. The quantity of the electroactive species is subsequently determined from Faraday's law as n=QNFn = \frac{Q}{N F}, where nn is the number of moles, NN is the number of electrons transferred, and FF is Faraday's constant (96485 C/mol). One key advantage of this method is its high selectivity for multi-component samples, as the applied potential can be tuned to target specific processes while avoiding interference from other species with differing reduction or oxidation potentials; for instance, it minimizes side reactions that could occur in uncontrolled conditions. This selectivity is particularly valuable in trace analysis, where it allows for the determination of analytes at concentrations as low as 10^{-6} M without prior separation. However, the technique has limitations, including slower analysis times for species with sluggish electron-transfer kinetics, and it requires preliminary voltammetric studies, such as , to identify the appropriate potential for the analyte's event. A representative example is the determination of copper in alloys, where the sample is dissolved and subjected to reduction at -0.3 V versus the saturated calomel electrode (SCE), selectively depositing Cu^{2+} as Cu metal while the current integration yields the copper content with an accuracy of ±0.5%.

Controlled-Current Coulometry

Controlled-current coulometry employs a constant current to drive the exhaustive electrolysis of the analyte in an electrochemical cell, with the electrolysis time measured until an endpoint is reached, such as through a potential jump at the indicator electrode. This approach ensures complete conversion of the analyte, and the total charge passed is used to quantify the substance via Faraday's laws of electrolysis. The procedure involves a galvanostatic setup using an amperostat to maintain a fixed current between working and counter electrodes in a simple two-electrode cell. Electrolysis proceeds until the endpoint, detected by techniques like amperometric monitoring of excess current or a sudden potential change, at which point the charge Q=I×tQ = I \times t is calculated directly, where II is the constant current and tt is the measured time. To achieve 100% current efficiency, a suitable mediator, such as cerium(III) for iron(II) oxidation, is often added to facilitate the reaction without side processes. This method provides key advantages, including significantly faster analysis times—typically under 10 minutes—compared to controlled-potential techniques, due to the steady current flow that avoids the need for integrating a decaying current profile. It is well-suited for straightforward systems with a single or favorable kinetics, where precise potential control is not required, and requires less complex . In some setups, back-electrolysis can be performed by reversing the current direction to regenerate the original species, allowing multiple measurements from the same sample without replenishment. Limitations include reduced selectivity, as the varies dynamically to sustain the constant current, which can lead to co-electrolysis of interfering species in complex sample matrices and lower current efficiency without mediators. A representative application is the determination of oxygen content in metals, where dissolved oxygen is reduced at a constant current of 10 mA until the endpoint, enabling precise quantification based on the electrolysis time.

Coulometric Titration

Coulometric titration is an electrochemical analytical technique in which the titrant is generated in situ through controlled electrolysis, with the quantity of titrant produced being stoichiometrically proportional to the electric charge passed, as governed by Faraday's laws. This method allows for precise determination of the analyte by measuring the charge required to reach the equivalence point, where the generated titrant fully reacts with the sample. For instance, a common anodic reaction involves the oxidation of iodide to produce iodine as the titrant: 2I−→I2+2e−2I^- \rightarrow I_2 + 2e^-, which then reacts with reducing analytes like arsenite. The technique typically employs constant-current electrolysis, where a steady current generates the titrant at a rate determined by the applied current, and the electrolysis time until the endpoint provides the total charge. Endpoint detection methods include biamperometric detection, which uses twin indicator electrodes polarized at a small voltage to monitor current changes due to the disappearance of the analyte or excess titrant, and amperometric detection, which measures the diffusion-limited current at a single working electrode as a function of titrant addition. These detection approaches enable sensitive monitoring of the titration progress without direct volume measurements. In the procedure, the solution is placed in an cell containing the titrant precursor, and a constant current (often 5–20 mA) is applied between working electrodes to generate the titrant incrementally. The charge QQ is calculated as Q=I×tQ = I \times t, where II is the current and tt is the time to endpoint; the analyte concentration is then derived from the : moles of analyte = Q/(nF)Q / (n F), with nn as the number of electrons transferred per mole of titrant and FF as Faraday's constant (96,485 C/mol). This approach ensures exact titrant dosing and is particularly effective for trace-level analyses. A major advantage of coulometric titration is the elimination of the need to prepare and standardize titrant solutions, as the generated amount is directly quantified by charge, enabling high accuracy (typically 0.1–0.3%) even for unstable reagents that are difficult to store. It excels in handling dilute samples, with effective concentration ranges from 10−510^{-5} to 10−210^{-2} M, making it ideal for microscale determinations where volumetric methods falter due to dilution errors. However, the method demands 100% current efficiency during , requiring rapid generation kinetics to prevent incomplete reactions or gas evolution that could skew results. Limitations also include potential interference from non-reacting species that alter endpoint signals, such as those causing , and the need for inert atmospheres to avoid side reactions in sensitive systems. An illustrative example is the acid-base coulometric , where hydroxide ions are generated cathodically by water reduction: 2H2O+2e−→H2+2OH−2H_2O + 2e^- \rightarrow H_2 + 2OH^- These OH−^- ions neutralize the acid , with the endpoint detected potentiometrically or by indicators, allowing accurate in non-aqueous media where traditional bases are unstable.

Applications

Water Content Analysis

Coulometry plays a crucial role in water content analysis through the application of the Karl Fischer (KF) reaction in coulometric titration, enabling precise determination of trace moisture levels in various samples. In this method, iodine (I₂) is generated electrochemically from iodide ions (I⁻) in a methanol-based anolyte containing sulfur dioxide (SO₂), a base (such as or , denoted as RN), and (HI). The generated I₂ then reacts stoichiometrically with (H₂O) present in the sample, following the simplified KF reaction equation: H2O+I2+3SO2+3RN→2RI+3RSO3N+2H+\mathrm{H_2O + I_2 + 3SO_2 + 3RN \rightarrow 2RI + 3RSO_3N + 2H^+} This reaction consumes exactly one mole of I₂ per mole of H₂O, with the stoichiometry allowing direct calculation of water content from the charge passed, based on Faraday's laws where 2 moles of electrons are required to generate one mole of I₂. The process regenerates HI, which is oxidized at the anode to perpetuate the reaction until all water is depleted. The procedure involves injecting the sample into a sealed cell containing the KF reagent, typically via for liquids or through an vaporizer for solids to ensure complete release. A (often 10–400 mA) is applied between generator , producing I₂ at a controlled rate until the is fully reacted. The endpoint is detected by a sharp drop in the indicator electrode current (e.g., at 50 mV potential), signaling excess I₂, at which point ceases. The total charge (Q = I × t) is integrated to quantify the using the relation mH2O=Q×18.0152×96485m_{\mathrm{H_2O}} = \frac{Q \times 18.015}{2 \times 96485}, where 18.015 g/mol is the of and 96485 C/mol is Faraday's constant. This absolute method requires no pre-calibration of reagent , simplifying operation. Key advantages of coulometric KF titration include its exceptional sensitivity, capable of detecting at parts-per-billion (ppb) levels (equivalent to 0.1–10 µg in typical sample volumes), making it ideal for trace analysis without the need for reagent preparation or standardization. It is widely applied in pharmaceuticals for ensuring stability by monitoring below 0.1% and in food industries to assess shelf-life factors like hygroscopicity in powders or oils. Accuracy is typically ±1–2 µg H₂O, with relative standard deviations under 2% for samples in the 10–100 µg range, complying with standards such as ASTM E1064. However, limitations exist, particularly interferences from aldehydes and ketones, which can react with the solvent to form acetals or ketals, consuming additional I₂ and overestimating ; specialized non- reagents or diaphragm-separated cells mitigate this. For solid samples, oven-assisted at 100–200°C is often necessary to liberate bound , though volatile interferents may still pose issues. The method is also restricted to samples with up to 10 mg , as higher amounts prolong analysis and risk side reactions from excessive current.

Film Thickness Determination

Coulometry provides a precise electrochemical technique for determining the thickness of thin metallic films and coatings through controlled dissolution, leveraging . In this method, the film, typically a metal layer such as or , serves as the in an , where a is applied to dissolve it anodically until complete removal. The total charge passed during dissolution is measured, as it corresponds directly to the amount of material removed, allowing calculation of the film's mass and, subsequently, its thickness assuming known material properties. The procedure involves preparing the sample by masking a defined area (typically 1-10 mm²) to limit dissolution to a small, localized spot, minimizing overall sample damage. An solution compatible with the film material, such as for , is applied, and a constant anodic current (often 0.5-2 mA) is passed between the sample and a counter . Dissolution continues until the underlying substrate is exposed, detected by a sudden change in (e.g., from anodic to cathodic values). The charge Q is integrated over time using a coulometer, providing the total coulombs required for complete stripping. This localized approach enables high spatial resolution, with measurements accurate to within 1-5% for films as thin as 50 nm. The film thickness dd is derived from the charge via Faraday's first law, relating the mass mm of dissolved material to Q=nFmMQ = \frac{n F m}{M}, where nn is the number of electrons transferred per metal atom, FF is the (96485 C/mol), and MM is the . The volume V=m/ρV = m / \rho (with ρ\rho) then yields thickness as: d=Q×MnFρAd = \frac{Q \times M}{n F \rho A} where AA is the exposed area. For example, in films (M=63.55M = 63.55 g/mol, n=2n = 2, ρ=8.96\rho = 8.96 g/cm³), approximately 2.72 C/cm² corresponds to 1 µm thickness. This equation assumes uniform current efficiency and complete dissolution, validated experimentally against gravimetric or optical methods. Applications of coulometric film thickness determination span , particularly in studies where the technique quantifies protective layers on metals like aluminum or exposed to aggressive environments. In manufacturing, it measures thicknesses on printed circuit boards (PCBs), ensuring compliance with standards like IPC-6012 for trace widths and reliability, with typical layers of 18-35 µm. Another key use is in evaluating anodized aluminum films, where the growth rate—often 1.2-1.8 nm/V in electrolytes—is assessed by integrating charge during formation or stripping, aiding in corrosion-resistant coating design for components. The method excels for thin layers below 1 µm, offering superior accuracy over non-destructive techniques like for multi-layer systems, and its small probe area provides micrometer-scale resolution suitable for heterogeneous samples. However, it is inherently destructive to the measured spot, requires conductive films or underlayers (limiting use on insulators), and assumes uniform dissolution rates, which may vary with film composition or , necessitating for alloys.

Healthcare Diagnostics

Coulometry plays a significant role in healthcare diagnostics by enabling precise quantification of biomarkers in biological fluids such as sweat and blood, often through controlled electrochemical reactions that measure charge transfer to determine analyte concentrations. One prominent application is the determination of chloride levels in sweat for screening cystic fibrosis (CF), a genetic disorder affecting chloride ion transport across epithelial cells. In this method, sweat is collected via pilocarpine iontophoresis and analyzed using coulometric titration, where silver ions (Ag⁺) are galvanostatically generated at a constant current to react with chloride ions (Cl⁻), and the total charge passed until the endpoint is proportional to the Cl⁻ concentration. Normal sweat chloride levels are <30 mM for infants under 6 months and <40 mM for individuals 6 months and older; values of 30-59 mM indicate intermediate risk requiring further testing, while ≥60 mM confirm CF diagnosis, making this test a gold standard due to its high accuracy and low sample volume requirements (typically 10-15 µL). The ChloroChek Chloridometer exemplifies this approach, employing coulometric endpoint detection for rapid, reliable Cl⁻ measurement in clinical settings. Another key application involves assessing antioxidant capacity in blood, which provides insights into oxidative stress-related conditions such as and . Coulometric methods electrolyze s, including , at a fixed potential, where the total charge consumed reflects the sample's ability to scavenge electrogenerated oxidants like , yielding a measure equivalent to (ORAC). For instance, , a major blood , undergoes oxidation, and the integrated charge quantifies total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in plasma or with high sensitivity, often expressed in ORAC units for comparability with other assays. This technique has been applied to evaluate TAC in patients with conditions like AIDS, revealing reduced levels compared to healthy individuals, thus aiding in monitoring disease progression and therapeutic efficacy. Coulometric sensors offer distinct advantages in healthcare diagnostics, including portability for real-time monitoring and the ability to operate with minimal sample volumes on the order of microliters, facilitating without extensive laboratory infrastructure. These features make them ideal for bedside or field use, as seen in sweat tests that provide results in under 5 minutes. However, limitations include electrode from protein adsorption in complex biological matrices, which can degrade performance over time, and the need for frequent to account for matrix effects like varying or interferents in sweat or . Post-2020 developments have advanced coulometric principles through integration with wearable devices for indirect continuous glucose monitoring, where enzymatic oxidation of glucose generates charge measured coulometrically, though often combined with amperometric detection for enhanced sensitivity. Systems like the FreeStyle strip-based meters employ osmium-mediated coulometric glucose oxidation, while continuous monitors such as the FreeStyle Libre series use amperometric detection for real-time interstitial glucose tracking with improved accuracy (MARD ~9-10%) and extended wear times up to 14 days. This progression addresses gaps in real-time by reducing user burden while maintaining the quantitative precision inherent to coulometry.

Industrial and Environmental Uses

In , coulometry plays a key role in determining sulfur content in fuels and products, ensuring compliance with emission standards. The method involves high-temperature of the sample to convert sulfur compounds to (SO₂), which is then quantitatively titrated using a coulometric detector that generates ions electrochemically for reaction with SO₂. This approach provides high accuracy for trace levels, typically down to parts per million, and is widely used in refineries for of , diesel, and derivatives. As of 2025, advancements include AI-enhanced coulometric sensors for real-time sulfur monitoring in refineries. In , coulometry enables sensitive detection of trace mercury in bodies, critical for assessing from industrial effluents and activities. Trace mercury is preconcentrated via amalgamation onto a or surface, followed by anodic stripping coulometry where the amalgamated mercury is oxidized at a controlled potential, and the resulting charge is measured to quantify concentrations as low as 0.2 μg/L. This technique supports regulatory enforcement, such as U.S. EPA limits of 2 μg/L for mercury in and lower thresholds for surface waters, by providing precise, interference-resistant analysis in field and lab settings. Similarly, for air quality assessment, CO₂ levels are monitored through absorption into a basic solution forming , which is then acidified to release CO₂ gas for coulometric , achieving detection limits below 1 ppm suitable for atmospheric sampling. Post-2015 advancements have extended coulometry to , where it quantifies ions (Li⁺) in spent lithium-ion batteries by measuring the charge passed during electrochemical stripping or deposition, aiding material recovery and reducing waste. This application addresses the growing volume of batteries, allowing non-destructive assessment of inventory with precision better than 1% relative standard deviation, supporting goals in the energy sector. in these systems enables high-throughput processing, processing hundreds of samples daily while meeting international recycling mandates like the EU Battery Directive. Despite these benefits, coulometry in environmental applications faces limitations due to the need for extensive sample pretreatment in complex matrices like , where organic interferents and particulates can foul electrodes or suppress signals. Pretreatment steps, such as , , or acidification, are essential to isolate analytes like sulfides or halides but can introduce errors or extend analysis time to hours per sample. These challenges are particularly pronounced in high-salinity or turbid effluents, necessitating robust protocols to maintain accuracy below 5% relative error.

Instrumentation

Electronic Coulometers

Electronic coulometers are instruments that quantify total by integrating current over time using purely electronic circuits, independent of any electrochemical processes. The fundamental principle relies on capacitive or inductive integrators, where the input current is converted into voltage pulses across a feedback or , and the resulting signal is counted or accumulated to determine the total charge QQ. In a typical capacitive integrator, the charge accumulates on the capacitor plates according to the relationship Q=C×VQ = C \times V, where CC is the and VV is the developed voltage; this voltage is then monitored or digitized to yield the charge value. This approach ensures high precision without the need for chemical or cells, making it suitable for direct . Two primary types of electronic coulometers exist: analog and digital. Analog versions, often based on circuits configured as integrators with RC feedback networks, continuously accumulate charge by ramping the output voltage proportional to the of the current. These were common in earlier systems, providing straightforward integration but susceptible to baseline drift from component imperfections. Digital integrators, utilizing microprocessors or voltage-to-frequency converters, sample the current at discrete intervals and compute the total charge via the Q=∑(I×Δt)Q = \sum (I \times \Delta t), where II is the measured current and Δt\Delta t is the time interval; this method enhances accuracy through digital and error correction. In applications, electronic coulometers are employed in metrology labs for calibrating current standards, where a reference current is passed for a known duration to verify the integrated charge against established values, achieving accuracies up to 0.01%. They are also used in testing to measure charge in capacitors or transient events. A notable advantage is their freedom from chemical reactions, enabling reliable, reagent-free operation and portability for on-site measurements in field environments. However, limitations include restriction to low currents, generally below 1 A, due to saturation in integrating components and increased at higher levels; analog models further suffer from drift due to thermal effects or leakage currents. Commercial examples include Keithley electrometers, such as the Model 6517B, which operate as electronic coulombmeters for precise charge integration in testing and research, resolving charges as low as 1010 fC and up to 2.1 μ\muC with minimal voltage burden.

Electrochemical Coulometers

Electrochemical coulometers quantify through electrochemical reactions in solution, providing a chemical basis for measuring current or total charge passed during . These devices rely on , where the altered at an is directly proportional to the quantity of transferred. Unlike electronic methods, they offer to fundamental chemical standards, making them essential for precise applications. The classical silver coulometer, developed in the late , involves the electrolytic deposition of silver from a (AgNO₃) solution onto a . In this setup, a bowl serves as the , filled with a neutral of AgNO₃ (typically 15 parts to 85 parts by weight), while a silver anode is suspended in the . A is passed for a sufficient duration (at least 0.5 hours), reducing Ag⁺ ions at the cathode to form metallic silver deposits. After electrolysis, the cathode is removed, the solution drained, and the deposit washed with and alcohol before drying at 160°C and weighing. The mass of silver deposited, mAgm_{\text{Ag}}, allows calculation of the total charge QQ using the relation derived from Faraday's : Q=mAg×FMAgQ = \frac{m_{\text{Ag}} \times F}{M_{\text{Ag}}} where FF is the (approximately 96,485 C/mol) and MAgM_{\text{Ag}} is the of silver (107.87 g/mol). This yields the electrochemical equivalent of silver as about 0.001118 g/C, enabling determination of average current as mass deposited divided by time multiplied by this equivalent. The method was standardized by the International Electrical Congress in 1893 for measurements due to its high accuracy, typically within 1 part in 5,000. Gas coulometers represent another classical variant, measuring charge by quantifying the volume of (H₂) or oxygen (O₂) gas evolved during , again governed by Faraday's laws. In a typical hydrogen-oxygen gas coulometer, an acidic such as dilute is used, with electrodes; H₂ forms at the and O₂ at the in a 2:1 volume ratio. The gases are collected over mercury or in a , and their combined volume at is measured, with 1 mole of H₂ or 0.5 mole of O₂ corresponding to 96,485 C. A modified hydrogen-nitrogen version employs to produce only H₂, avoiding oxygen-related errors and improving accuracy for small charge quantities (5–20 C). These devices were historically used for verifying electrochemical equivalents but are less common today due to handling challenges with gases. Modern electrochemical coulometers incorporate , often using constant-current in cells with optical endpoints for real-time detection. For instance, digitally controlled galvanostats apply a fixed current while monitoring color changes via photometric sensors, such as RGB LEDs paired with photodiodes, to signal reaction completion in titrations or depositions. This setup, integrated with microcontrollers like for data logging, achieves reproducibilities below 1% (e.g., 0.4% for ascorbic determinations) and enables low-cost (around $200 total). Such variants extend classical principles to practical, endpoint-driven analyses without manual mass measurements. Electrochemical coulometers excel in direct traceability to chemical standards like atomic masses and Faraday's constant, supporting absolute current measurements in metrology. They played a key role in pre-2019 SI unit calibrations, such as determining the Faraday constant via silver deposition to link electrical and mass standards. However, limitations include time-consuming post-electrolysis disassembly and washing for weighing, as well as sensitivity to impurities like copper or nitrites that can alter deposition efficiency.

Coulometric Microtitrators

Coulometric microtitrators are specialized, compact instruments that perform automated coulometric titrations on microscale samples, facilitating precise quantitative analysis in limited volumes. These devices generate titrants electrochemically within the titration cell, eliminating the need for external reagent addition and enabling high accuracy for trace-level determinations. Primarily developed for applications requiring minimal sample consumption, they integrate advanced control systems to streamline operations in both and routine settings. The design of coulometric microtitrators centers on an integrated titration cell that houses a generator electrode for electrolytic titrant production, paired with detector electrodes for endpoint monitoring, all overseen by a microprocessor for precise current regulation in the range of 1-100 mA. In prototypical research models, the cell employs a sandwich configuration with planar gold generator and counter electrodes, a ruthenium dioxide pH-sensing electrode, and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode, fabricated on a printed circuit board for miniaturization, yielding channel volumes of approximately 3.75 µL. Commercial variants, such as those from Mettler Toledo, incorporate similar integrated cells with platinum generator electrodes and dual platinum indicator electrodes, optimized for diaphragm-free operation to reduce maintenance. The microprocessor automates current pulsing and drift compensation, ensuring stable electrolysis conditions. In operation, these microtitrators automate the generation of reagents, such as iodine via anodic oxidation in Karl Fischer methods or protons/hydroxide ions through water in acid-base titrations, directly within the sample matrix. Endpoint detection is typically achieved via biamperometry, where a small polarizing voltage applied to twin indicator electrodes monitors current changes indicative of excess titrant, though pH-sensitive electrodes like RuO₂ are used in specialized microscale setups for direct potentiometric readout. Sample volumes range from 10-100 µL, with the process involving injection, conditioning to remove background drift, and controlled until the endpoint, often completing in under 5 minutes for trace analyses. Key advantages include exceptional precision for trace-level analysis, achieving relative standard deviations (RSD) of 0.1% or better in optimized conditions, which supports reliable quantification down to parts-per-million levels. Their compact, portable form factor—often under 10 kg with battery options—enables deployment in field environments or space-constrained labs, minimizing use and waste while handling precious or limited samples efficiently. Despite these benefits, limitations persist, such as fouling from organic interferents that can degrade performance over repeated uses in complex matrices, necessitating cleaning protocols. Additionally, frequent —often daily—is required to account for electrode drift and ensure accuracy, particularly in portable units exposed to varying conditions. A representative example is the C20SX Compact Coulometer (as of 2025), employed in pharmaceutical R&D for Karl Fischer water content analysis, which handles 10-100 µL samples with automated biamperometric detection and microprocessor control for currents up to 100 mA, delivering results compliant with USP and Ph. Eur. standards. Recent models, such as the Metrohm OMNIS Coulometer launched in April 2024, offer modular automation for trace moisture analysis with enhanced safety and integration capabilities.

References

  1. https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/09159
  2. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Northeastern_University/CHEM_1000%3A_General_Chemistry/11%3A_Electrochemical_Methods/11.3%3A_Coulometric_Methods
  3. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2018-0109
  4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376396768_COULOMETRY_FUNDAMENTALS_AND_APPLICATIONS
  5. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128143957000131
  6. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Analytical_Chemistry/Analytical_Chemistry_2.1_(Harvey)/11:_Electrochemical_Methods/11.03:_Coulometric_Methods
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0123693977001047
  8. https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?eqf
  9. https://knowledge.electrochem.org/estir/history.htm
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/coulometry
  11. https://knowledge.electrochem.org/encycl/art-p05-pillars-of-ec.htm
  12. http://www.elch.chem.msu.ru/rus/wp/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Electrogravimetry_Bull_Hist_Chem_num7-p17-19.pdf
  13. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/bulletin/01/nbsbulletinv1n3p349_A2b.pdf
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5181856/
  15. https://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/sites/default/files/Chapter%252022%2520%25281%2529.pdf
  16. https://escholarship.org/content/qt14n8w9q0/qt14n8w9q0_noSplash_24e0146304b9d74b388f97315d3bca03.pdf?t=p06nh2
  17. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/093/3/V93-3.pdf
  18. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac60166a010
  19. https://www.mt.com/dam/MT-NA/KarlFischerHelpPage/KF_Guide_1.pdf
  20. http://publications.iupac.org/pac/45/2/0125/pdf/index.html
  21. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/TN/nbstechnicalnote543.pdf
  22. https://www.pjoes.com/pdf-87365-21224?filename=Modern%20trends%20in.pdf
  23. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA136594.pdf
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S092540051731897X
  25. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470027318.a9811
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267022005797
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167273825002206
  28. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01154
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363301176_Constant-Current_Coulometry_with_Electrogenerated_Titrants_as_a_Novel_Tool_for_the_Essential_Oils_Screening_Using_Total_Antioxidant_Parameters
  30. http://bard.cm.utexas.edu/resources/Bard-Reprint/31.pdf
  31. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/downloads/ng451m30b
  32. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Analytical_Chemistry/Analytical_Chemistry_2.1_(Harvey)/11%3A_Electrochemical_Methods/11.03%3A_Coulometric_Methods
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/coulometric-titration
  34. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1970/an/an9709500387
  35. https://www.mt.com/dam/mt_ext_files/Editorial/Generic/8/Coulometry_UserCom7_article_0x000248d2000262f2000a96c1_files/usercom7_coulometer.pdf
  36. https://www.metrohm.com/content/dam/metrohm/shared/documents/application-bulletins/AB-137_6.pdf
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0039914068800943
  38. https://www.hitachi-hightech.com/global/en/sinews/technical_explanation/080306/
  39. https://www.mt.com/us/en/home/applications/Application_Browse_Laboratory_Analytics/Application_fam_browse_main/kf-titration-principle.html
  40. https://jmscience.com/pages/coulometric-karl-fischer-titrators
  41. https://www.news-medical.net/life-sciences/Advantages-and-Limitations-of-Karl-Fischer-Titration.aspx
  42. https://www.helmut-fischer.com/applications/solutions/coulometric-measuring-method
  43. https://erichsen.de/en/products/surface-testing/film-application-and-coating-thickness/galvanotest/
  44. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/1.2428909
  45. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/1.2425446
  46. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pediatrics/articles/10.3389/fped.2018.00133/full
  47. https://sflung.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Diagnostic-Sweat-Testing-Guidelines.pdf
  48. https://macroductadvanced.com/chlorochek-chloridometer.php
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0039914005003395
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18970393/
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281359648_Coulometric_estimation_of_blood_antioxidant_capacity_at_AIDS_patients
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10831843/
  53. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr068069y
  54. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44337-025-00273-1
  55. https://www.uicinc.com/sulfur-coulometer/
  56. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-12/documents/7472.pdf
  57. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267001936529
  58. https://www.uicinc.com/carbon-dioxide-coulometer/
  59. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01976
  60. https://www.biologic.net/documents/high-precision-coulometry-hpc-battery-application-note-53/
  61. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1179/000705971798323720
  62. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/624798
  63. https://download.tek.com/manual/6517B-900-01B_August_2022_User.pdf
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6640611/
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267000899080
  66. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ed043p306
  67. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/19/7541
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267000007650
  69. https://www.mt.com/dam/MT-TW/PDFs/%25E5%25AF%25A6%25E9%25A9%2597%25E5%25AE%25A4%25E5%2588%2586%25E6%259E%2590%25E5%2584%2580%25E5%2599%25A8%25E6%2593%258D%25E4%25BD%259C%25E6%2589%258B%25E5%2586%258A/%25E6%25B0%25B4%25E4%25BB%25BD%25E5%2584%2580/C20_C30_en.pdf
  70. https://gwb.fi/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Manuaali-Mettler-Toledo-KF-C30S-C20S-C10S.pdf
  71. https://www.mt.com/us/en/home/library/videos/lab-analytical-instruments/coulometric-titration.html
  72. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320079454_A_portable_low_cost_coulometric_micro-titrator_for_the_determination_of_alkalinity_in_lake_and_sediment_porewaters
  73. https://www.mt.com/us/en/home/products/Laboratory_Analytics_Browse/Product_Family_Browse_titrators_main/karl-fischer-titrators.html
  74. https://www.mt.com/us/en/home/products/Laboratory_Analytics_Browse/Product_Family_Browse_titrators_main/titrators/titrator-coulometric-kf-c20sx.html
  75. https://www.metrohm.com/en/discover/news/2024/omnis-coulometer-and-sample-robot-oven-launched.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.