Hubbry Logo
Capitalism and FreedomCapitalism and FreedomMain
Open search
Capitalism and Freedom
Community hub
Capitalism and Freedom
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Capitalism and Freedom
Capitalism and Freedom
Capitalism and Freedom
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Capitalism and Freedom is a book by Milton Friedman originally published in 1962 by the University of Chicago Press which discusses the role of economic capitalism in liberal society. It has sold more than half a million copies since 1962 and has been translated into eighteen languages.[1]

Key Information

Friedman argues for economic freedom as a precondition for political freedom. He defines "liberal" in European Enlightenment terms, contrasting with an American usage that he believes has been corrupted since the Great Depression.

The book identifies several places in which a free market can be promoted for both philosophical and practical reasons. Among other concepts, Friedman advocates ending the mandatory licensing of physicians and introducing a system of vouchers for school education.

Context

[edit]

Capitalism and Freedom was published nearly two decades after World War II, a time when the Great Depression was still in collective memory. Under the Kennedy and preceding Eisenhower administrations, federal expenditures were growing at a quick pace in the areas of national defense, social welfare, and infrastructure. Both major parties, Democratic and Republican, supported increased spending in different ways. This, as well as the New Deal, was supported by most intellectuals with the justification of Keynesian economics. Capitalism and Freedom introduces the idea of how competitive capitalism can help to achieve economic freedom.[2]

The book drew inspiration from a series of lectures Friedman gave in June 1956 at Wabash College.[3]

Chapter summaries

[edit]
Introduction
The introduction lays out the principles of Friedman's archetypal liberal, a man who supports limited and dispersed governmental power. Friedman opts for the continental European, rather than American, definition of the term.
i. The Relation between Economic Freedom and Political Freedom
In this chapter, Friedman promotes economic freedom as both a necessary freedom and also as a vital means for political freedom. He argues that, with the means for production under the auspices of the government, it is nearly impossible for real dissent and exchange of ideas to exist. Additionally, economic freedom is important, since any "bi-laterally voluntary and informed" transaction must benefit both parties to the transaction. Friedman states that economic freedom protects minorities from discrimination since the market is apathetic to "their views or color".[4]
ii. The Role of Government in a Free Society
According to the author, the government of a liberal society should enforce law and order and property rights, as well as take action on certain technical monopolies and diminish negative "neighborhood effects". The government should also have control over money, as has long been recognized in the constitution and society.
iii. The Control of Money
He discusses the evolution of money in America, culminating in the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Far from acting as a stabilizer, the Federal Reserve failed to act as it should have in several circumstances. Friedman proposes that the Federal Reserve have a consistent rule to increase the money supply by 3–5% annually.
iv. International Financial and Trade Arrangements
This chapter advocates the end of the Bretton Woods system in favor of a floating exchange rate system and the end of all currency controls and trade barriers, even "voluntary" export quotas. Friedman says that this is the only true solution to the balance of trade 'problem'.
v. Fiscal Policy
Friedman argues against the continual government spending justified to "balance the wheel" and help the economy to continue to grow. On the contrary, federal government expenditures make the economy less, not more stable. Friedman uses concrete evidence from his own research, demonstrating that the rise in government expenditures results in a roughly equal rise in GDP, contrasting with the Keynesian multiplier theory. Many reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.
vi. The Role of Government in Education
The policy advocated here are vouchers which students may use for education at a school of their choice. The author believes that everyone, in a democracy, needs a basic education for citizenship. Though there is underinvestment in human capital (in terms of spending at technical and professional schools), it would be foolish of the government to provide free technical education. The author suggests several solutions, some private, some public, to stop this underinvestment.
vii. Capitalism and Discrimination
In a capitalist society, Friedman argues, it costs money to discriminate, and it is very difficult, given the impersonal nature of market transactions. However, the government should not make selective employment practices laws (eventually embodied in the Civil Rights Act of 1964), as these inhibit the freedom to employ someone based on whatever qualifications the employer wishes to use.
viii. Monopoly and the Social Responsibility of Business and Labor
Friedman states, there are three alternatives for a monopoly: public monopoly, private monopoly, or public regulation. None of these is desirable or universally preferable. Monopolies come from many sources, but direct and indirect government intervention is the most common, and it should be stopped wherever possible. The doctrine of "social responsibility", that corporations should care about the community and not just profit, is highly subversive to the capitalist system and can only lead towards totalitarianism.
ix. Occupational Licensure
Friedman takes a radical stance against all forms of state licensure. The biggest advocates for licenses in an industry are, usually, the people in the industry, wishing to keep out potential competitors. The author defines registration, certification, and licensing, and, in the context of doctors, explains why the case for each one of these is weaker than the previous one. There is no liberal justification for licensing doctors; it results in inferior care and a medical cartel.
x. The Distribution of Income
Friedman examines the progressive income tax, introduced in order to redistribute income to make things more fair, and finds that, in fact, the rich take advantage of numerous loopholes, nullifying the redistributive effects. It would be far more fair just to have a uniform flat tax with no deductions, which could meet the 1962 tax revenues with a rate only slightly greater than the lowest tax bracket at that time.
xi. Social Welfare Measures
Though well-intentioned, many social welfare measures don't help the poor as much as some think. Friedman focuses on Social Security as a particularly large and unfair system.
xii. Alleviation of Poverty
Friedman regarded welfare programs as misguided and inefficient. To replace them, he advocates a negative income tax, giving everyone a guaranteed minimum income.
xiii. Conclusion
The conclusion to the book centers on how, time and time again, government intervention often has an effect opposite of that intended. Most good things in the United States and the world come from the free market, not the government, and they will continue to do so. The government, despite its good intentions, should stay out of areas where it does not need to be.

Influence

[edit]

The effects of Capitalism and Freedom were great yet varied in the realm of political economics. Some of Friedman's suggestions are being tested and implemented in many places, such as the flat income tax in Estonia (since 1994) and Slovakia (since 2004), a floating exchange rate which has almost fully replaced the Bretton Woods system, and national school voucher systems in Chile (since 1981) and Sweden (since 1992),[5] to cite a few prominent examples. However, many other ideas have scarcely been considered, such as the end of licensing, and the abolition of corporate income tax (in favor of an income tax on the stock holder). Though politicians often claim that they are working towards "free trade", an idea the book supports, few American politicians have considered taking his suggestion of phasing out all tariffs in 10 years. Nevertheless, Friedman popularized many ideas previously unknown to most outside economics. This and other works helped Friedman to become a household name. The Times Literary Supplement called it "one of the most influential books published since the war".

Capitalism and Freedom, along with much of Friedman's writing, has influenced the movement of libertarian philosophy in America. Friedman's philosophy of economic and individual freedom has coincided with the emergence of political parties that have declared alignment with Friedman's ideas, such as the Libertarian Party.[6]

Capitalism and Freedom made the Intercollegiate Studies Institute's 50 Best Books of the 20th Century Archived August 1, 2018, at the Wayback Machine and also was placed tenth on the list of the 100 best non-fiction books of the twentieth century compiled by National Review. In 2011, the book was placed on Time magazine's top 100 non-fiction books written in English since 1923.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Capitalism and Freedom

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
is a book by American economist Milton Friedman, first published in 1962 by the University of Chicago Press, in which he argues that competitive capitalism serves as the indispensable basis for both economic and political freedom. The work posits economic freedom as a prerequisite for political freedom, emphasizing that voluntary exchange in free markets fosters individual liberty and limits coercive government intervention. Friedman applies these principles to contemporary issues, including the proper scope of government in areas such as monetary policy, education vouchers, alleviation of poverty through negative income tax, reduction of discrimination via market forces, control of monopoly, and reform of social welfare systems. The book's enduring significance lies in its rigorous defense of and market mechanisms against expanding state control, drawing on historical evidence that expansions in have paralleled advances in . It has sold nearly one million copies in English and been translated into eighteen languages, cementing its status as one of the most influential works of modern economic theory. Friedman's ideas profoundly shaped policy debates and implementations, serving as a foundational text for leaders like and , whose administrations pursued , , and monetary restraint in line with its advocacy for reducing coercion in favor of market incentives. Despite criticisms from interventionist perspectives alleging insufficient attention to market failures or inequality, empirical outcomes from freer economies—such as sustained growth and —have substantiated key predictions, including the promotion of broader through decentralized decision-making.

Overview

Publication History and Editions

was originally published in 1962 by the University of Chicago Press as a hardcover edition. The content stemmed from lectures Milton Friedman delivered in June 1956 at Wabash College in Crawfordsville, Indiana, during a conference sponsored by the Volker Fund. These lectures formed the core material, though the book underwent expansion and refinement before publication amid the Cold War tensions of the early 1960s, when economic policy debates contrasted free-market principles against expanding government intervention in Western economies. A paperback edition followed in 1962, with subsequent reprints maintaining the original text without substantive revisions. In 1982, a new preface by was added to an updated printing, addressing contemporary applications. The fortieth anniversary edition appeared in 2002, again from the , featuring an additional preface by that reaffirmed the book's foundational ideas in light of post-Cold War developments. This edition preserved the 1962 structure while including the prior prefaces. The book has remained in print continuously, with sales exceeding 500,000 copies in English alone and translations into 18 languages, approaching one million copies sold globally by the 2020s. No comprehensive revisions have altered the original arguments, emphasizing its status as a fixed rather than an evolving manual. Reprints and digital formats have sustained its availability through the and major retailers into the present decade.

Author and Intellectual Context

Milton Friedman (1912–2006) was an American economist and statistician who received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1976 for his achievements in consumption analysis, monetary history and theory, and for demonstrating the complexity of stabilization policy. As a leading figure in the Chicago School of economics, Friedman advanced monetarism, arguing that steady, predictable growth in the money supply—rather than discretionary fiscal interventions—best promotes economic stability, and emphasized free markets' efficiency in resource allocation over government controls. His empirical approach prioritized testable predictions and historical data over ideological assumptions, challenging the post-World War II consensus favoring expansive state roles. Friedman's Capitalism and Freedom (1962) built on his earlier methodological foundations, particularly the title essay in Essays in Positive Economics (1953), which advocated evaluating economic theories by their predictive accuracy against real-world outcomes rather than the realism of their underlying assumptions. This framework informed his pre-1962 critiques of interventionist policies, drawing on quantitative analyses of episodes like the , where he contended that the Federal Reserve's contractionary monetary stance from 1929 to 1933 intensified the downturn by allowing a one-third decline in the money stock, far beyond initial banking failures. Such work rejected simplistic causal narratives attributing depressions solely to market failures, instead highlighting policy-induced distortions through data on banking panics and liquidity shortages. The book emerged in an intellectual environment dominated by , which since had justified post-war welfare state expansions and countercyclical fiscal measures in Western economies, including the U.S. New Deal legacies and European social democracies. countered this milieu by applying rigorous empiricism to argue that competitive markets, via decentralized price signals, achieve superior coordination and innovation compared to centralized directives, which often distort incentives and concentrate power. His analysis privileged observable causal mechanisms—such as how government interventions erode voluntary exchange—over prevailing models assuming inherent market instabilities requiring perpetual state correction, reflecting a broader revival of classical liberal thought amid collectivist appeals.

Core Arguments

Economic Freedom as Foundation for Political Freedom

Milton Friedman contended that is a prerequisite for , as the structure of economic arrangements directly influences the distribution of power in . In a of competitive , individuals engage in voluntary exchanges through decentralized markets, which disperses across myriad private actors and prevents any single entity, including the state, from wielding coercive dominance over resources or decisions. This dispersion fosters individual autonomy, enabling people to pursue their interests without reliance on governmental approval or allocation. By contrast, socialist or heavily interventionist systems centralize economic control in the hands of government officials, who must direct production, prices, and distribution, thereby granting them unparalleled leverage to enforce . highlighted how such concentration historically paved the way for , as evidenced in the , where the Bolshevik Revolution's of industry from 1917 onward empowered the state to suppress political opposition, culminating in Stalin's purges and the system that imprisoned millions by the 1930s. Similar patterns emerged in , where extensive state oversight of the economy, despite private ownership facades, facilitated authoritarian control and the erosion of by the mid-1930s. Empirical studies corroborate this linkage, showing that higher degrees of —measured by factors like secure property rights, sound money, and freedom to trade internationally—consistently align with elevated political freedoms. For instance, data from the Fraser Institute's index reveal that countries in the top quartile of economic freedom scores, such as and in assessments through 2022, score markedly higher on political rights and metrics from organizations tracking democratic governance, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.6 in cross-national regressions. These associations hold after controlling for variables like income levels, underscoring that market-driven economies promote pluralism and tolerance by incentivizing and voluntary cooperation over state-enforced uniformity. Friedman's analysis rejects pursuits of outcome equality through mandates, as they necessitate coercive redistribution that undermines the voluntary basis of both economic and political , prioritizing instead the generated by incentives aligned with individual choice.

Limitations of Government in a Free Society

In Capitalism and Freedom, delineates government's essential functions in a free society as primarily negative: maintaining law and order to prevent , enforcing contracts to facilitate voluntary exchange, protecting against and monopoly not arising from market processes, and providing national defense against external threats. These roles establish and umpire the "rules of the game" for competitive enterprise without the state entering as a player, as competitive pressures in private markets incentivize and , whereas government lacks equivalent mechanisms to discipline waste or error. Friedman contends that extending government beyond these limits invites inefficiency, as bureaucrats face no profit-loss test and prioritize expanding authority over minimizing costs. Bureaucratic incentives exacerbate this tendency, with officials seeking larger budgets and domains to enhance prestige or , unmoored from or rivalry. This aligns with observations that government programs often concentrate benefits on narrow interests—such as subsidies to specific industries—while diffusing costs across taxpayers, fostering political support through despite net societal harm. Empirical instances post-New Deal illustrate such : regulatory bodies like the , established in 1887 but expanded under 1930s interventions, devolved into protecting incumbents from competition, raising prices for shippers and consumers as railroads lobbied for rate controls favoring their cartels. Similarly, the from 1938 shielded airlines from entry, stifling innovation until deregulation in 1978 reduced fares by over 30% in real terms. Friedman emphasizes dispersing government power—favoring local over central authority—to mitigate overreach, arguing that proximity heightens and reduces the scale of potential abuse. Yet he warns against romanticizing state benevolence, as historical expansions, like those during the , yielded persistent agencies prone to capture by regulatees, undermining the voluntary cooperation central to freedom. Such dynamics underscore why limiting government to harm prevention preserves individual liberty, contrasting with interventions that coerce resources and erode choice.

Critique of Collectivist Alternatives

contends that central , a hallmark of socialist systems, fundamentally disregards the essential for efficient , resulting in persistent shortages and misallocations. In socialist economies, the absence of market prices prevents planners from accurately gauging preferences and , leading to overproduction of unwanted and underproduction of necessities, as evidenced by chronic food and shortages in the and during the 1950s and 1960s. By contrast, Western capitalist economies experienced robust growth, with real GDP per capita in the United States rising from approximately $17,000 in 1950 to over $25,000 by 1960 (in constant dollars), driven by decentralized and incentives absent in planned systems. This manifests in logical inconsistencies where collectivist regimes promise equality but deliver and inefficiency, conflating outcome uniformity with while undermining human incentives for . highlights that erodes voluntary cooperation, replacing it with state compulsion, which historically correlates with suppressed political freedoms, as seen in the inability of Soviet citizens to openly criticize central unlike in capitalist societies where socialist thrives. Empirical validation of capitalist incentives appears in the post-1962 economic miracles of the Asian Tigers—, , , and —where market-oriented reforms spurred annual GDP growth exceeding 7% through the 1970s and 1980s, lifting millions from via export-led industrialization and private enterprise, in stark contrast to stagnant collectivist peers. Interventionist welfare states, often defended as humane alternatives to pure collectivism, foster fiscal unsustainability and dependency traps by distorting incentives and expanding government beyond viable limits. argues these systems prioritize redistribution over efficiency, leading to ballooning deficits and reduced work effort, as later borne out in the crisis where U.S. hit 13.5% in 1980 amid high , partly attributable to expansive fiscal policies and regulatory burdens that stifled growth. Such dependencies erode , with evidence from European welfare expansions showing rising public debt-to-GDP ratios—e.g., the UK's climbing from 50% in 1960 to over 90% by the late —culminating in economic rigidity and calls for reform.

Policy Recommendations

Monetary Framework for Stability

In Capitalism and Freedom, proposed replacing discretionary management with a rule mandating steady growth in the at a fixed annual rate, such as 3 to 5 percent, to align with the economy's long-term productive capacity and prevent ary distortions. This "k-percent rule" aimed to eliminate policy errors arising from human judgment, which argued inevitably amplify economic cycles through mis-timed interventions. The framework rests on the , expressed as MV = PY, where increases in (M) beyond growth in output (Y) lead to higher prices (P) if velocity (V) remains stable, establishing a direct causal mechanism from monetary expansion to . Friedman substantiated this with historical episodes of , such as Germany's in the early 1920s, where the money supply surged over 300-fold from 1918 to 1923, correlating closely with price levels that rose by a factor of , demonstrating how unchecked monetary issuance erodes value without corresponding output gains. Similar patterns in post-World War I and provided empirical validation, as rapid money creation—often to finance deficits—preceded and proportionally drove price explosions, refuting claims of non-monetary origins like supply shocks alone. These cases underscored 's assertion that " is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon," produced solely by faster money growth than economic expansion. Friedman critiqued the Federal Reserve's discretionary "easy money" policies in the 1960s, which expanded the money supply at accelerating rates—averaging over 7 percent annually from 1965 to 1969—fueling the onset of the Great Inflation, with consumer prices rising from 1.6 percent in 1965 to 5.7 percent by 1970. He rejected Keynesian fine-tuning as illusory, arguing that attempts to exploit short-run trade-offs between and ignored long-run neutrality, where excessive money growth only embedded higher without reducing permanently, as evidenced by the U.S. of the . Discretionary errors, including lagged effects of actions, compounded , whereas a fixed rule would enforce predictability and discipline fiscal excesses indirectly. Friedman's ideas gained traction in practice during Paul Volcker's tenure as Fed chairman from 1979 to 1987, when the adopted targets for non-borrowed reserves and growth in October 1979, marking a shift toward monetarist restraint that curbed double-digit —peaking at 14.8 percent in 1980—to below 4 percent by 1983 through aggressive tightening. Though not a pure k-percent implementation, Volcker's framework echoed Friedman's emphasis on controlling money aggregates to restore , validating the causal primacy of over discretionary activism. This approach broke the inflationary inertia built up in prior decades, highlighting the rule-based strategy's efficacy in anchoring expectations.

Market-Based Solutions in Education and Welfare

Milton Friedman proposed school vouchers to inject market competition into , enabling parents to direct public funds toward schools of their and thereby undermining the inefficiencies of government-operated monopolies. In his 1955 essay "The Role of Government in Education," he suggested issuing vouchers to parents equivalent to the state's per-pupil expenditure, redeemable at any accredited or private , with minimal government oversight limited to basic standards like and . This mechanism, elaborated in Capitalism and Freedom, leverages parental to drive quality improvements, as schools compete for students and , contrasting with centralized systems where bureaucratic inertia stifles —evidenced by U.S. rates that climbed to 91-97% in the North between 1800 and 1840 through decentralized, often private or voluntary efforts, before compulsory schooling dominated. Empirical analyses of and programs affirm competitive pressures enhance outcomes. A synthesis of studies finds that improves for participants, fosters in public schools via rivalry, and yields net fiscal savings, with 84% of over 200 examinations reporting positive effects on students, parents, and budgets. Specifically, nine evaluations document gains in test scores and attainment, attributing benefits to aligned incentives where providers respond to consumer preferences rather than top-down mandates. Friedman extended market principles to welfare via the (NIT), a streamlined system replacing fragmented in-kind aid with a that tapers gradually—such as at a 50% rate—against rising earnings, thereby minimizing administrative bloat and preserving labor incentives absent in traditional programs' sharp benefit cliffs. This approach harnesses individual responsibility by subsidizing shortfalls without penalizing productivity fully, as a earning below the threshold receives supplements covering the gap, phased out proportionally to avoid 100% effective marginal rates that deter work. 1970s U.S. experiments, including the Seattle-Denver Income Maintenance Experiment, validated NIT's incentive structure, revealing only modest labor supply reductions—around 5-10% for wives and negligible for husbands—compared to steeper disemployment expected from welfare traps, thus supporting cash over paternalistic provision for efficiency and . These pilots demonstrated reduced and comparable alleviation, underscoring how graduated transfers better align self-interest with social objectives than coercive redistribution.

Deregulation and Individual Responsibility

In Capitalism and Freedom, critiqued as a form of that primarily protects incumbents by erecting artificial , rather than safeguarding or safety. He argued that requirements for licenses in fields like barbering and inflate costs without commensurate improvements in service quality, as consumer feedback through market provides a more direct check on incompetence than state mandates. Empirical studies confirm this, showing that stricter licensing correlates with higher consumer prices—for instance, licensing in 9 out of 10 examined professions raises costs significantly—while evidence of enhanced quality remains scant, with no clear reduction in mishaps like medical errors or subpar haircuts. These barriers disproportionately burden lower-income individuals seeking upward mobility, as licensing prerequisites often demand costly or exams that deter entry-level workers, thereby perpetuating gaps and limiting job mobility. For example, states with more restrictive licensing see wages in licensed occupations rise by about 4% relative to non-licensing states for long-standing regulations, but this comes at the expense of reduced opportunities and slower labor market entry for the unskilled, distorting incentives and harming those regulations ostensibly aim to assist. , by contrast, fosters individual responsibility through voluntary certification and reputation-based competition, allowing workers to bear the risks and rewards of their choices without state-enforced cartels. Friedman extended this principle to military conscription, advocating its abolition in favor of an all-volunteer force to uphold personal liberty and align enlistment with genuine incentives rather than coercion. He contended that drafts undermine by treating citizens as means to ends, while market-driven recruitment would yield a more professional, motivated military capable of operating complex systems. The implemented this shift in , ending the draft and relying on volunteers, which empirically produced higher-quality recruits who met and aptitude targets even during the post-Vietnam transition and subsequent conflicts. This voluntary model has sustained operational effectiveness, with the all-volunteer force demonstrating resilience in maintaining standards amid challenges like the and wars, where it achieved recruiting goals without reverting to compulsion. By prioritizing enlistment based on individual choice and compensation, the system encourages personal accountability in service, reducing inefficiencies from unwilling draftees and promoting a force oriented toward voluntary cooperation over mandated participation. Such in allocation underscores Friedman's broader case that minimizing government intervention enhances both efficiency and .

Reception

Initial Reviews and Debates

Upon its publication in December 1962, Capitalism and Freedom garnered praise from libertarian and conservative intellectuals for its empirical defense of competitive as a prerequisite for political , contrasting sharply with prevailing Keynesian orthodoxies. The work, building on Friedman's 1961 article of the same title in the libertarian New Individualist Review, was lauded for systematically linking to broader individual autonomy through historical examples and economic reasoning. Critics from the Keynesian camp, including , rejected 's market-centric approach as overly ideological, arguing it downplayed the coercive power of large private enterprises and the necessity of to mitigate inequality and market failures. , in works like (1958), contended that affluent societies required expanded roles to counter dominance, a view directly challenged by emphasizing dispersed over concentrated government authority. The book prompted contemporaneous debates on measuring versus pursuing equality, particularly in academic and public forums during the late . countered egalitarian arguments by citing data on how free-market systems historically fostered greater overall prosperity and opportunity, rebutting claims that equality of outcomes should supersede voluntary exchange. Detractors maintained that such metrics ignored distributive injustices, prioritizing over 's liberty-focused indicators. 's university debates, such as one at the University of , highlighted these tensions without yielding consensus.

Academic Engagement and Citations

Capitalism and Freedom has been extensively cited in economics literature, with its ideas shaping debates on the interplay between economic systems and individual liberties. The book's advocacy for intervention and market mechanisms influenced the development of , as Friedman's emphasis on stable monetary rules challenged prevailing Keynesian paradigms. This scholarly uptake contributed to Friedman's receipt of the 1976 in Economic Sciences, awarded for his analyses of consumption, history of , and stabilization policy, elements echoed in the book's policy prescriptions. Academic engagement post-publication centered on testing 's hypotheses regarding government inefficiencies and market efficiency. In journals such as the , economists debated the empirical validity of Friedman's claims, particularly the superiority of decentralized markets over centralized planning in allocating resources. The 1970s episodes, characterized by high and amid oil shocks, provided data supporting Friedman's critique of interventionist policies, as Keynesian failed to resolve simultaneous and pressures, aligning with his predictions of monetary mismanagement's consequences. Friedman's skepticism of government's ability to achieve social goals without infringing freedoms found extensions in theory, which applies economic reasoning to political behavior, revealing incentives for bureaucratic expansion and that validate his warnings against expansive state roles. This framework underscored causal errors in models assuming benevolent actors, common in earlier collectivist approaches, by demonstrating how political processes amplify over public welfare. Empirical studies in public choice literature reinforced these insights, showing intervention often leads to unintended inefficiencies rather than optimal outcomes.

Criticisms

Ideological Objections from Egalitarians

Egalitarians object to the framework of Capitalism and Freedom on the grounds that free-market inevitably produces stark economic inequalities rooted in exploitation, where owners of capital extract from wage labor without equivalent contribution, as articulated in classical Marxian analysis. This perspective posits that market exchanges mask power imbalances, allowing the wealthy to accumulate resources at the expense of the , thereby rendering capitalist outcomes morally illegitimate regardless of voluntary participation. Such critiques, resonant in 1960s intellectual circles including thinkers who rejected liberal economic individualism, prioritize egalitarian ends— or condition—as superseding individual , viewing Friedman's emphasis on freedom as a for perpetuating class domination. A core egalitarian contention is that unadulterated market processes fail to deliver , as distributions reflect arbitrary initial endowments, inherited advantages, or unequal rather than merit alone, demanding state-mandated redistribution to rectify these injustices as an ethical . Proponents argue that progressive taxation, welfare provisions, and regulatory interventions are not merely pragmatic but morally required to achieve , countering the purported of 's vision by emphasizing communal and social rights over contractual . rebutted this by asserting that equality and stand in tension: coercive measures to equalize outcomes erode personal liberties and incentives, ultimately yielding neither true equality nor , whereas competitive , despite inequalities, promotes greater dispersion of and opportunity than hierarchical alternatives. Friedman further contended that egalitarian redistribution overlooks voluntary mechanisms for addressing need, noting that free societies foster higher levels of private charity through individual choice and prosperity generation. Data supports this, with market-oriented economies exhibiting stronger philanthropic traditions; for instance, in the 2022 World Giving Index, the —exemplifying capitalist institutions—ranked 6th in overall generosity (combining helping strangers, donating money, and volunteering time), while former socialist states like (93rd) and (79th) lagged, reflecting lower voluntary contributions per capita. Egalitarians counter that such charity is insufficient and unreliable compared to systemic , yet maintained it aligns better with human agency, avoiding the paternalism and inefficiency of compelled transfers.

Empirical Challenges and Counterexamples

Critics of capitalism as advocated by point to the persistence of income inequality in many market-oriented economies since the , where Gini coefficients have risen despite overall growth. For instance, in countries, the ratio of average for the richest 10% to the poorest 10% increased from 7:1 in the to about 9.5:1 by the , with the seeing its disposable income Gini rise from 0.34 in 1985 to 0.40 in 2013. Such trends are often attributed to market dynamics amplifying disparities through skill-biased and , challenging Friedman's emphasis on yielding broad prosperity without redistribution. The 2008 global is frequently cited as an empirical counterexample of unfettered capitalism's vulnerabilities, with deregulated financial markets fostering excessive risk-taking, asset bubbles, and systemic externalities like from implicit government guarantees. Proponents of intervention argue this event necessitated massive state bailouts, revealing markets' inability to self-correct without addressing information asymmetries and , thus undermining Friedman's case against heavy regulation. However, empirical data on global counters narratives of capitalism's inherent failure to uplift the masses. World Bank estimates show (below $2.15/day in 2017 PPP) fell from 38% of the global population in 1990 to around 8.5% by 2019, correlating with widespread market liberalizations in and elsewhere that accelerated growth in previously poor countries. This decline, from over 2 billion to about 700 million people, reflects absolute gains even amid rising within-country inequality, as poor-country GDP growth outpaced rich-country rates post-1980. Friedman's predictive successes further validate key aspects of his framework empirically. In the 1960s, he critiqued the Phillips curve's assumed stable trade-off between and , forecasting that expansionary policies would yield ; this materialized in the 1970s with U.S. peaking at 13.5% in alongside above 7%, vindicating monetary policy's primacy over fiscal fine-tuning. Causal evidence from specific liberalizations debunks claims that perpetuates . In , market-oriented reforms from the mid-1970s onward, including and , drove average annual GDP growth of 7% from 1985 to 1997 and halved rates by the 2000s, outperforming pre-reform stagnation. Similarly, India's 1991 liberalization dismantled license raj controls, boosting GDP growth from 3.5% annually pre-reform to over 6% thereafter, with dropping 15.7 percentage points between 2004 and 2012 amid accelerated private investment. These outcomes, tied to reduced state distortion rather than coincidence, affirm 's capacity for broad-based uplift when implemented.

Methodological Critiques of Friedman's Assumptions

Critics of Friedman's methodological framework, particularly his 1953 essay "The Methodology of Positive Economics," contend that prioritizing predictive success over realistic assumptions permits overly simplistic models of , such as the rational actor maximizing utility under and . This approach, while instrumentally useful for forecasting aggregate outcomes, neglects micro-level deviations that undermine the "as-if" presumption of . , emerging prominently after the 1970s, provides empirical evidence against these assumptions; for example, Kahneman and Tversky's (1979) documents how individuals overweight losses relative to gains and are influenced by decision framing, leading to choices inconsistent with expected utility theory central to Friedman's market efficiency claims. Objections also target Friedman's assertion of value-neutrality in positive economics, arguing that his selection of testable hypotheses and policy implications implicitly embeds libertarian priors favoring minimal state intervention. Economists like Daniel Hausman have critiqued this for conflating explanatory adequacy with mere prediction, suggesting that Friedman's dismissal of assumption realism allows normative preferences—such as skepticism toward government redistribution—to shape what counts as a "relevant" prediction without explicit justification. In Capitalism and Freedom, this manifests in deriving policy recommendations like school vouchers from positive analyses of market incentives, yet critics maintain the linkage relies on unstated ethical commitments to individual choice over collective equity. Defenders, including himself, counter that methodological strength lies in falsifiable predictions validated empirically, not descriptive fidelity; for instance, his monetarist framework accurately forecasted the 1970s as a monetary phenomenon, outperforming Keynesian models that underestimated inflation persistence from fiscal expansions. The adoption of monetarist-inspired tight money policy by Chairman from 1979 onward reduced U.S. inflation from 13.5% in 1980 to 3.8% by 1982, demonstrating the framework's practical superiority over alternatives assuming stable trade-offs. This track record, proponents argue, affirms the utility of abstracted assumptions in generating causal insights into economic dynamics, even amid behavioral irregularities.

Legacy

Policy Implementations and Outcomes

The Parental Choice Program, introduced in 1990, provided s to low-income students for attendance, embodying Friedman's advocacy for to enhance and outcomes. Empirical evaluations, including a 1997 NBER analysis, found positive effects on achievement for voucher recipients, with gains equivalent to about one-third of a standard deviation after three years. Later studies confirmed higher enrollment and degree attainment rates among participants compared to public school peers, with random-assignment evidence showing statistically significant improvements in scores. These results aligned with Friedman's prediction that market mechanisms would drive educational efficiency, though initial evaluations noted no overall achievement gains, highlighting implementation challenges. Friedman's (NIT) proposal, tested in U.S. experiments from 1968 to 1972, aimed to replace fragmented welfare with a tapering with , preserving work incentives. The trials revealed modest labor supply reductions among secondary earners but minimal overall disincentives, influencing the (EITC), enacted in 1975 as a targeted NIT variant for working . By the 1990s expansions, the EITC lifted approximately 5 million people out of annually, boosted among single mothers by 7-10 percentage points, and increased family without significant substitution away from work, validating Friedman's emphasis on simplifying aid to encourage . Monetarist principles from Capitalism and Freedom, advocating steady growth to curb , informed shifts. The U.S. under , starting in October 1979, targeted non-borrowed reserves to restrain monetary expansion, reducing from 13.5% in 1980 to 3.2% by 1983 amid a , achieving without reigniting spirals. Similarly, the Bundesbank's monetary targeting since 1975 prioritized money stock growth, limiting CPI to an average 2.5% annually from 1980 to 1998—below European peers—and fostering sustained low- growth through disciplined aggregate targeting. These implementations demonstrated monetarism's efficacy in prioritizing long-term stability over short-term output fluctuations. Chile's 1975 reforms, led by economists influenced by , liberalized trade, privatized industries, and deregulated markets, contracting GDP by 13% that year and elevating to 20%. Recovery followed, with average annual GDP growth of 6.5% from 1977 to 1997, outpacing Latin American averages by over 3 percentage points, and declining from 45% in 1987 to 21% by 2000 through export-led efficiency gains. Critics noted initial dislocations, including a 1982-83 with exceeding 30%, but long-term metrics—such as sustained 7% growth in the late 1980s and reduced inequality via social spending post-reform—supported Friedman's view that market freedoms yield superior despite transitional costs.
MetricPre-Reform (Early 1970s)Post-Reform Average (1980s-1990s)
Annual GDP Growth~1.5%~5-7%
Inflation Rate>300% (1973 peak)<20% by late 1980s
Unemployment PeakN/A30% (1983), then declining to ~7% by 1997
Overall, these adoptions yielded efficiency improvements and growth accelerations, with favoring Friedman's market-oriented prescriptions over interventionist alternatives, though short-term adjustments imposed verifiable hardships resolvable through adaptive policies.

Influence on Economic Theory and Practice

Friedman's Capitalism and Freedom (1962) reinforced the Chicago School's emphasis on empirical testing of policy outcomes, critiquing government interventions through data on and fiscal inefficiencies, which solidified the school's advocacy for competitive markets over centralized planning. The book's arguments, grounded in historical evidence like the inefficiencies of U.S. farm subsidies and programs, provided a theoretical framework that prioritized individual incentives and price signals, influencing subsequent Chicago economists such as in applying market logic to non-economic behaviors. In macroeconomic theory, the work countered Keynesian dominance by highlighting the instability of fiscal multipliers and the superiority of monetary rules, as evidenced by Friedman's analysis of the Great Depression's monetary contraction rather than deficient demand alone. This empirical challenge contributed to the 1970s crisis undermining Keynesian models, paving the way for frameworks; Robert Lucas's 1976 critique of econometric policy evaluation extended Friedman's warnings about adaptive expectations failing under systematic interventions, showing how anticipated policies neutralize Keynesian stabilizers. Friedman's insistence on long-run monetary neutrality, supported by cross-country data, shifted academic consensus toward rules-based , reducing reliance on discretionary . The book's portrayal of government as prone to bureaucratic expansion and interest-group capture anticipated public choice theory's formal models of political failure, influencing thinkers like by underscoring how democratic processes amplify over public interest. Though not a foundational text, Friedman's causal reasoning—that expanded public sectors erode voluntary exchange—provided for later analyses of and , empirically validated in studies of U.S. agencies post-New Deal. In practice, Capitalism and Freedom informed Ronald Reagan's 1981 Economic Recovery Tax Act, which cut marginal rates from 70% to 50%, and of industries like trucking and airlines, yielding measurable efficiency gains such as a 20-30% drop in airfares by 1985. Margaret Thatcher's 1979-1990 reforms, including of British Telecom and steel, drew directly from Friedman's and proposals, restoring profitability to state firms and contributing to GDP growth averaging 2.5% annually in the . These shifts dismantled interventionism, with from reduced union power correlating to falling from 11.9% in 1984 to 5.3% by 1989 in the UK. Globally, the book's principles permeated the framework articulated by John Williamson in 1989, advocating fiscal discipline, trade liberalization, and —policies implemented in over 50 developing economies, stabilizing macro variables where applied. Often labeled "neoliberal," these approaches demonstrated causal efficacy in halting hyperinflations: Bolivia's 1985 decree law, echoing Friedman's monetary restraint, slashed annual from 24,000% in 1984 to 11% by 1987 via expenditure cuts and dollar indexing; Israel's 1985 plan similarly reduced from 445% to 20% within a year through budget balancing and wage-price controls dismantled via market signals. Such outcomes refuted interventionist overreach by showing tight fiscal-monetary coordination, not expansionary policies, as the binding constraint, with cross-case studies confirming orthodox reforms succeeded in 75% of 20th-century hyperinflations.

Contemporary Relevance and Recent Applications

In the early 2020s, Milton Friedman's monetarist framework from Capitalism and Freedom regained prominence amid post-COVID surges, with U.S. CPI reaching 9.1% in June , echoing the 1970s he attributed to excessive growth. Analysts have invoked his emphasis on steady monetary rules to critique pandemic-era expansions, where grew at record annual rates exceeding 25% from 2020 to , fueling demand-pull pressures before subsequent contractions aided . This resurgence underscores Friedman's causal argument that remains a monetary , countering supply-side excuses prevalent in some academic and policy circles despite empirical correlations between aggregates and price levels. The Hoover Institution's 2024 podcast series, Capitalism and Freedom in the Twenty-First Century, applies Friedman's principles to contemporary policy debates, highlighting their enduring relevance to issues like fiscal restraint and individual liberties in an era of expanding government interventions. Episodes explore how market mechanisms can address modern challenges, from disruptions to regulatory overreach, affirming Friedman's thesis that underpins without relying on outdated collectivist alternatives. Friedman's advocacy for voluntary exchange and private currencies finds echoes in cryptocurrency debates, where and similar assets realize his 1999 prediction of internet-facilitated, non-government offering and efficiency beyond state monopolies. Proponents cite these as exemplars of decentralized systems that evade inflationary policies, aligning with his view that in would discipline central banks, though critics from interventionist perspectives question stability absent regulation. Amid calls for heightened state control to combat perceived inequalities, reveal capitalism's role in sustained global , with (under $2.15 daily) affecting 8.5% of the world population in 2022 after rebounding slightly from COVID impacts, continuing a decades-long trend driven by market liberalization in . This empirical pattern defends Friedman's contention that free markets expand opportunities, as evidenced by hundreds of millions lifted from destitution via trade and , rather than redistribution alone. Regulatory divergences illustrate Friedman's warnings against government impediments to : the U.S. outpaced the in GDP growth from 2008 to 2023 (87% versus 13.5%), with lighter-touch policies enabling tech sector dynamism while Europe's stringent rules correlate with subdued gains of under 1% annually since 2000. In AI and digital markets, U.S. approaches prioritizing have spurred , contrasting frameworks that impose preemptive compliance burdens, potentially stifling the voluntary Friedman deemed essential for progress.

References

  1. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo68666099.html
  2. http://pombo.free.fr/friedman2002.pdf
  3. https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/celebrating-famous-jews-from-ukraine-milton-friedman/
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0939362509000557
  5. https://oll.libertyfund.org/pages/friedman-on-capitalism-and-freedom
  6. https://www.amazon.com/Capitalism-Freedom-Phoenix-Milton-Friedman/dp/0226264017
  7. https://www.amazon.com/Capitalism-Freedom-Anniversary-Milton-Friedman/dp/0226264211
  8. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1976/ceremony-speech/
  9. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Monetarism.html
  10. https://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/fachbereich/bwl/pruefungs-steuerlehre/loeffler/Lehre/bachelor/investition/Friedman_the_methology_of_positive_economics.pdf
  11. https://www.pbs.org/fmc/interviews/friedman.htm
  12. https://www.frbsf.org/research-and-insights/publications/economic-letter/1997/01/nobel-views-on-inflation-and-unemployment/
  13. https://www.commentary.org/articles/james-nuechterlein/milton-friedman-by-lanny-ebenstein/
  14. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/economic-freedom-what-is-it-how-is-it-measured.pdf
  15. https://www.bruegel.org/blog-post/are-economic-and-political-freedoms-interrelated
  16. https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/articles/200512_vasquez.pdf
  17. https://miltonfriedman.hoover.org/internal/media/dispatcher/215033/full
  18. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/FreedomDemocracyEconomicWelfareCh2.pdf
  19. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/milton-friedman.asp
  20. https://www.econlib.org/body-snatchers-and-regulatory-capture/
  21. https://www.kropfpolisci.com/democracy.capitalism.friedman.pdf
  22. https://www.hoover.org/research/why-socialism-fails
  23. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/four-asian-tigers.asp
  24. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/5c7eaa0e-8a31-5726-ba94-f079c970c870/content
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800921001245
  26. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/08/1970-stagflation.asp
  27. https://www.hoover.org/research/milton-friedmans-long-run-impact
  28. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/k/k-percent-rule.asp
  29. https://www.cato.org/cato-journal/winter-2018/monetary-policy-uncertain-world-case-rules
  30. https://miltonfriedman.hoover.org/internal/media/dispatcher/214346/full
  31. https://www.econlib.org/the-quantity-theory-of-money-in-the-weimar-hyperinflation/
  32. https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/heritage-explains/the-real-story-behind-inflation
  33. https://files.stlouisfed.org/files/htdocs/wp/2007/2007-002.pdf
  34. https://www.mercatus.org/research/policy-briefs/what-would-milton-friedman-say-about-market-monetarism
  35. https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/2021/01/14/managing-a-new-policy-framework-paul-volcker-the-st-louis-fed-and-the-1979-82-war-on-inflation
  36. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/great-inflation
  37. https://www.cato.org/blog/milton-friedman-school-choice-pioneer
  38. https://www.independent.org/article/1996/07/01/the-spread-of-education-before-compulsion/
  39. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED543112
  40. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED517753
  41. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/NegativeIncomeTax.html
  42. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w9751/w9751.pdf
  43. https://www.bostonfed.org/-/media/Documents/conference/30/conf30.pdf
  44. https://www.hoover.org/research/occupational-licensing-bad-idea
  45. https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdf/10.1257/jep.14.4.189
  46. https://www.mercatus.org/research/public-interest-comments/effects-occupational-licensure-competition-consumers-and
  47. https://aier.org/research/occupational-licensing-harms-consumers-and-producers/
  48. https://www.ncarollo.net/s/occupational-licensing.pdf
  49. https://www.thecgo.org/research/how-does-occupational-licensing-affect-u-s-consumers-and-workers/
  50. https://ij.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Licensure_Report_WEB.pdf
  51. https://hope.econ.duke.edu/sites/hope.econ.duke.edu/files/Slaves%2520or%2520Mercenaries.pdf
  52. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9195.html
  53. https://press.armywarcollege.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2986&context=parameters
  54. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/journals/military-review/online-exclusive/2023-ole/cunningham/
  55. https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/article/3316678/all-volunteer-force-proves-successful-for-us-military/
  56. https://lawliberty.org/features/saluting-those-who-freely-serve/
  57. https://reason.com/2006/05/01/american-scold/
  58. https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/bitstreams/973eaccb-2acd-4af1-8a32-f8f0231d64b2/download
  59. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1976/friedman/facts/
  60. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bios/Friedman.html
  61. https://fee.org/articles/public-choice-theory-not-the-whole-story/
  62. https://home.uchicago.edu/~tginsburg/pdf/articles/WaysOfCriticizingPublicChoice.pdf
  63. https://oll.libertyfund.org/publications/liberty-matters/virgil-storr-marx-morality-capitalism
  64. https://www.alumniportal-deutschland.org/en/magazine/germany/karl-marx-and-his-criticism-of-capitalism/
  65. https://lanekenworthy.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/egalitariancapitalism-contentsintroduction.pdf
  66. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00346764.2020.1714072
  67. https://miltonfriedman.hoover.org/internal/media/dispatcher/215144/full
  68. https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-research/caf_world_giving_index_2022_210922-final.pdf
  69. https://www.econlib.org/charity-isnt-an-option-with-socialism/
  70. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2014/12/trends-in-income-inequality-and-its-impact-on-economic-growth_g17a2582/5jxrjncwxv6j-en.pdf
  71. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/income-distribution-within-countries-rising-inequality/
  72. https://www.cbpp.org/research/poverty-and-inequality/a-guide-to-statistics-on-historical-trends-in-income-inequality
  73. https://www.richmondfed.org/~/media/richmondfedorg/publications/research/economic_brief/2014/pdf/eb_14-12.pdf
  74. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/gdsmdp20101_en.pdf
  75. https://hbr.org/2013/11/what-weve-learned-from-the-financial-crisis
  76. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview
  77. https://ourworldindata.org/poverty
  78. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/18b74c59-dbfa-58ff-a4a4-49ee6a3cebe2
  79. https://nationalmedals.org/laureate/milton-friedman/
  80. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-68212006000100001
  81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25676352
  82. https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/twenty-five-years-indian-economic-reform
  83. https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/wp204.pdf
  84. https://trends.ufm.edu/en/article/indias-liberalization-1991/
  85. https://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Behavioral_Decision_Theory/Kahneman_Tversky_1979_Prospect_theory.pdf
  86. https://www.ejbmr.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/view/1053
  87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1057529
  88. http://www.sfu.ca/~boland/Friedman79.PDF
  89. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/history-of-macroeconomics-from-keynes-to-lucas-and-beyond/milton-friedman-and-the-monetarist-debate/E72475E0F070682E26D11F6CB6014FFC
  90. https://www.dallasfed.org/~/media/documents/research/pubs/ftc/bernanke.pdf
  91. https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/research/docs/22107-tavlas.pdf
  92. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w5964/w5964.pdf
  93. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1091&context=scdp
  94. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED662385.pdf
  95. https://eml.berkeley.edu/~saez/course131/rouse98.pdf
  96. https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/negative-income-tax-explained
  97. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/jeffreyliebman/files/ImpactofEITC_TaxPolicyandtheEconomy.pdf
  98. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/11rpchettyfriedmanrockoff.pdf
  99. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/anti-inflation-measures
  100. https://www.bu.edu/econ/files/2011/01/GKcr2005.pdf
  101. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304393299000094
  102. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1020.pdf
  103. https://pconway.web.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/11310/2016/01/Chilemac.pdf
  104. https://www.promarket.org/2021/09/12/chicago-boys-chile-friedman-neoliberalism/
  105. https://sites.duke.edu/honorsthesis2020/files/2020/04/The-Illusion-of-Competition-Ariadna-Chuaqui.pdf
  106. https://oxfordre.com/latinamericanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.001.0001/acrefore-9780199366439-e-99
  107. https://www.ilo.org/media/316086/download
  108. https://fagonza4.github.io/bgroups.pdf
  109. https://magazine.uchicago.edu/0712/features/friedman.shtml
  110. https://www.libertarianism.org/publications/essays/milton-friedman-chicago-school-economics
  111. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9491656/
  112. https://fee.org/articles/capitalism-and-freedom-a-50th-anniversary-tribute-to-milton-friedman/
  113. https://freedomandcitizenship.columbia.edu/syllabus/friedman
  114. https://www.[investopedia](/page/Investopedia).com/terms/m/milton-friedman.asp
  115. https://insidestory.org.au/the-free-markets-brilliant-frontman/
  116. https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2023-05/fischer_modern_hyper-inflations.pdf
  117. https://www.uni-ulm.de/fileadmin/website_uni_ulm/mawi.inst.150/lehre/ws1112/GundW/BernholzKugler.pdf
  118. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/261314
  119. https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2023/may/the-rise-and-fall-of-m2
  120. https://www.wellington.com/en/insights/revenge-of-the-monetarists
  121. https://www.hoover.org/news/capitalism-and-freedom-twenty-first-century-joins-hoover-network-podcasts
  122. https://www.hoover.org/podcast/capitalism-and-freedom
  123. https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/02/18/milton-friedmans-vision-and-bitcoin-a-free-market-economists-take/
  124. https://news.bitcoin.com/milton-friedmans-1999-vision-predicting-bitcoin-before-the-digital-age-dawned/
  125. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/poverty-prosperity-and-planet
  126. https://econofact.org/factbrief/fact-check-has-the-economic-gap-between-europe-and-the-united-states-increased-in-the-past-decade
  127. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/07/oecd-economic-surveys-european-union-and-euro-area-2025_af6b738a/full-report/strengthening-productivity-and-the-single-market_ecdfe548.html
  128. https://dcnglobal.net/posts/blog/us-vs-eu-ai-plans-a-comparative-analysis-of-the-us-and-european-approaches
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.