Hubbry Logo
Winged Victory of SamothraceWinged Victory of SamothraceMain
Open search
Winged Victory of Samothrace
Community hub
Winged Victory of Samothrace
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Winged Victory of Samothrace
Winged Victory of Samothrace
from Wikipedia

The Winged Victory of Samothrace
The Winged Nike
The Nike of Samothrace
Victoire de Samothrace
White marble sculpture of a female figure striding forward on a grey marble ships prow, with large wings extending behind her. The statue is missing its original arms and head.
Map
Yearc. 200–190 BC[1]
TypeParian marble
Dimensions244 cm (96 in)
LocationLouvre, Paris

The Winged Victory of Samothrace, or the Niké of Samothrace,[2] is a votive monument originally discovered on the island of Samothrace in the northeastern Aegean Sea. It is a masterpiece of Greek sculpture from the Hellenistic era, dating from the beginning of the 2nd century BC (190 BC). It is composed of a statue representing the goddess Nike (Victory), whose head and arms are missing, and a base in the shape of a ship's bow.

The total height of the monument is 5.57 metres (18 ft 3 in) including the socle; the statue alone measures 2.75 metres (9 ft 0 in). The sculpture is one of a small number of major Hellenistic statues surviving in the original, rather than Roman copies.

Winged Victory has been exhibited at the Louvre in Paris, at the top of the main staircase, since 1884.[3] Greece is seeking the return of the sculpture.[4]

Discovery and restorations

[edit]

In the 19th century

[edit]
Nike of Samothrace: the conserved parts of the statue, after Benndorf, 1880

In 1863, Charles Champoiseau (1830–1909), acting chief of the Consulate of France in Adrianopolis (now Edirne in Turkey), undertook from March 6 to May 7 the exploration of the ruins of the sanctuary of the Great Gods on the island of Samothrace. On April 13, 1863, he discovered part of the bust and the body of a large female statue in white marble accompanied by numerous fragments of drapery and feathers.[5] He recognised this as the goddess Niké, Victory, traditionally represented in Greek antiquity as a winged woman. In the same place was a jumble of about fifteen large grey marble blocks whose form or function was unclear: he concluded it was a funerary monument.[6] He decided to send the statue and fragments to the Louvre Museum, and to leave the large blocks of grey marble on site. Departing Samothrace at the beginning of May 1863, the statue arrived in Toulon at the end of August and in Paris on May 11, 1864.[7]

A first restoration was undertaken by Adrien Prévost de Longpérier, then curator of Antiquities at the Louvre, between 1864 and 1866. The main part of the body (2.14 m from the upper belly to the feet) is erected on a stone base, and largely completed by fragments of drapery, including the fold of himation that flares behind the legs on the Nike. The remaining fragments – the right part of the bust and a large part of the left wing – too incomplete to be placed on the statue, are stored. Given the exceptional quality of the sculpture, Longpérier decided to present the body alone, exhibited until 1880 among the Roman statues, first in the Caryatid Room, then briefly in the Tiber Room.[8]

Tetradrachm of Demetrios Poliorcetes (293–292 BC). Obverse: Nike before the ship; reverse: Poseidon.

Beginning in 1875, Austrian archaeologists who, under the direction of Alexander Conze, had been excavating the buildings of the Samothrace sanctuary since 1870, studied the location where Champoiseau had found the Victory. Architect Aloïs Hauser drew the grey marble blocks left on-site and apprehended that, once properly assembled, they would form the tapered bow of a warship, and that, placed on a base of slabs, they served as the basis for the statue.[9] Tetradrachmas of Demetrios Poliorcetes struck between 301 and 292 BC, representing a Victory on the bow of a ship, wings outstretched, give a good idea of this type of monument.[10] For his part, the specialist in ancient sculpture Otto Benndorf studied the body of the statue and the fragments kept in reserve at the Louvre and restored the statue blowing into a trumpet that she raises with her right arm, as on the coin.[11] The two men thus managed to make a model of the Samothrace monument as a whole.[12]

Champoiseau, informed of this research, undertook a second mission to Samothrace from August 15 to 29, 1879, for the sole purpose of sending the blocks of the base and the slabs of the Victory base to the Louvre.[13] He abandoned on the island the largest block of the base, unsculpted.[14] Two months later, the blocks reached the Louvre Museum, where in December an assembly test was carried out in a courtyard.[15]

The curator of the Department of Antiquities, Félix Ravaisson-Mollien, then decided to reconstruct the monument, in accordance with the model of Austrian archaeologists. On the body of the statue, between 1880 and 1883 he restored the belt area in plaster, placed the right part of the marble bust, recreated the left part in plaster, attached the left marble wing with a metal frame, and replaced the entire right wing with a plaster model.[16] But he did not reconstruct the head, arms or feet. The ship-shaped base is rebuilt and completed, except for the broken bow of the keel, and there is still a large void at the top aft. The statue was placed directly on the base. The entire monument was then placed from the front, on the upper landing of the Daru staircase, the main staircase of the museum.[17]

Champoiseau returned to Samothrace a third time in 1891 to try to obtain the Victory's head, but without success. He did however bring back debris from the drapery and base, a small fragment with an inscription and fragments of coloured plaster.[18]

In the 20th century

[edit]
Model of the Victory of Samothrace after Benndorf and Hauser, 1880.

The presentation of the Victory was modified in 1934 as part of a general redevelopment of the Daru museum and staircase, whose steps were widened and redecorated. The monument was staged to constitute the crowning of the staircase: it was advanced on the landing to be more visible from the bottom of the steps, and was put on a modern 45 cm-high block of stone, supposed to evoke a combat bridge at the bow of the ship.[19] This presentation remained unchanged until 2013.

At the declaration of the Second World War in September 1939, the Victory statue was moved along with other artefacts to the Château de Valençay (Indre) until the Liberation, and was replaced at the top of the stairs without damage in July 1945.

American excavators from New York University, under the direction of Karl Lehmann, resumed exploration of the sanctuary of the Great Gods in Samothrace in 1938. In July 1950, they associated Louvre curator Jean Charbonneaux with their work, who discovered the palm of the statue's right hand in the Victory site. Two fingers preserved at the Kunsthistorische Museum in Vienna since the Austrian excavations of 1875 were reattached to the palm.[20] The palm and fingers were then deposited in the Louvre Museum, and displayed with the statue in 1954.

Two pieces of grey marble that were used to moor fishing boats on the beach below the sanctuary were retrieved and reassembled at the museum in 1952. These were studied in 1996 by Ira Mark and Marianne Hamiaux, who concluded that these pieces, jointed, constitute the block of the base abandoned by Champoiseau in 1879.[21]

In the 21st century

[edit]
The Winged Victory of Samothrace after the restoration of 2014.
The Nike of Samothrace at the Louvre Palace in Paris, at the top of the main staircase.

An American team led by James R. McCredie digitized the entire sanctuary to allow its 3D reconstruction between 2008 and 2014. B. D. Wescoat led the resumption of the study of the Victory enclosure and the small basic fragments preserved in reserve.

In Paris, the Louvre Museum restored the entire monument with two objectives: to clean all the surfaces and to improve the general presentation. The statue came down from its base to undergo scientific examination (UV, infrared, x-rays, microspectrography, marble analysis):[22] traces of blue paint were detected on the wings and on a strip at the bottom of the mantle. The blocks of the base were disassembled one by one to be drawn and studied.[23] The 19th-century restoration of the statue was preserved with a few details (thinning of the neck and attachment of the left arm);[24] fragments preserved in reserve at the Louvre were added (feather at the top of the left wing, a fold at the back of the chitôn); and the metal vice behind the left leg was removed. Castings of small joint fragments preserved in Samothrace were integrated into the base. A cast of the large ship block left in Samothrace was replaced by a metal base on a cylinder ensuring the proper balance of the statue.[25] Once in place on the base, the colour contrast of the marbles of the two elements became obvious again. The whole was reassembled on a modern base, a little removed on the landing to facilitate the movement of visitors.

The Greek government considers the Winged Victory, like the Elgin Marbles, illegally plundered and wants it repatriated to Greece. "If the French and the Louvre have a problem, we are ready to preserve and accentuate the Victory of Samothrace, if they return it to us", Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Akis Gerondopoulos said in 2013.[26]

Description

[edit]

The statue

[edit]
2015 view

The statue, in white Parian marble, depicts a winged woman, the goddess of Victory (Niké), alighting on the bow of a warship.

The Nike is dressed in a long tunic (χιτών, chitôn) in a very fine fabric, with a folded flap and belted under the chest. It was attached to the shoulders by two thin straps (the restoration is not accurate). The lower body is partially covered by a thick mantle (ἱμάτιον, himation) rolled up at the waist and untied when uncovering the entire left leg; one end slides between the legs to the ground, and the other, much shorter, flies freely in the back. The mantle is falling, and only the force of the wind holds it on her right leg. The sculptor has multiplied the effects of draperies, between places where the fabric is plated against the body by revealing its shapes, especially on the belly, and those where it accumulates in folds deeply hollowed out casting a strong shadow, as between the legs. This extreme virtuosity concerns the left side and front of the statue. On the right side, the layout of the drapery is reduced to the main lines of the clothes, in a much less elaborate work.[27]

The goddess advances, leaning on her right leg. The two feet that were bare have not been found. The right touched the ground, the heel still slightly raised; the left foot, the leg strongly stretched back, was still carried in the air. The goddess is not walking, she is finishing her flight, her large wings still spread out backwards. The arms were also not found, but the right shoulder raised indicates that the right arm was raised to the side. With her elbow bent, the goddess made a victorious gesture of salvation with her hand: this hand with outstretched fingers held nothing (neither trumpet nor crown). There is no clue to reconstructing the position of the left arm, probably lowered, very slightly bent; the goddess may have held a stylis (a naval standard)[28] on this side, a kind of mast taken as a trophy on the enemy ship, as seen on coins. The statue is designed to be seen three quarters left (right for the spectator), from where the lines of the composition are very clear: a vertical from the neck to the right foot, and an oblique starting from the neck diagonally along the left leg. "The whole body is inscribed in a rectangular triangle, a simple but very solid geometric figure: it was necessary to support both the fulfilled shapes of the goddess, the accumulation of draperies, and the energy of movement".[29] Most recently the Alula feather was restored to the left wing in a flared position, as it would be for a bird landing.[30]

The art historian H. W. Janson has pointed out[31] that unlike earlier Greek or Near Eastern sculptures, the Nike creates a deliberate relationship to the imaginary space around the goddess. The wind that has carried her and which she is fighting off, straining to keep steady – as mentioned the original mounting had her standing on a ship's prow, just having landed – is the invisible complement of the figure and the viewer is made to imagine it. At the same time, this expanded space heightens the symbolic force of the work; the wind and the sea are suggested as metaphors of struggle, destiny and divine help or grace. This kind of interplay between a statue and the space conjured up would become a common device in baroque and romantic art, about two thousand years later. It is present in Michelangelo's sculpture of David: David's gaze and pose show where he is seeing his adversary Goliath and his awareness of the moment – but it is rare in ancient art.

The boat and the base

[edit]
The base in the form of a ship's prow.

These are carved from grey marble veined with white, identified as that of the quarries of Lartos, in Rhodes. The base has the shape of the bow of a Greek Hellenistic warship: long and narrow, it is covered at the front by a combat deck on which the statue is located. It has reinforced, projecting oar boxes on the sides that supported two rows of staggered oars (the oval oar slots are also depicted). The keel is rounded. At the bottom of the bow, at the waterline, a large triple-pronged spur would have been sculpted, and a little higher up, a smaller two-bladed ram that would have been used to smash the hull of the enemy ship would have been shown. The top of the bow was crowned by a high and curved bow ornament (the acrostolion). These missing elements have not been reconstructed, which greatly reduces the vessel's warlike appearance.[32]

Epigraphist Christian Blinkenberg[33] thought that this bow was that of a trihēmiolia, a type of warship often named in Rhodes inscriptions: the island's shipyards were renowned, and its war fleet important. But specialists in ancient naval architecture do not agree on the ascription of the trihemolia.[34] It can only be said that the Samothrace bow has boxes of oars and two benches of superimposed oars. Each oar being operated by several rowers, this can also be suitable for a quadrireme (4 files of rowers) or a quinquereme (5 files of rowers). These ships were widespread in all Hellenistic war fleets, including the Rhodian fleet.[35]

Dimensions and construction of the set

[edit]
Construction of the assembled monument, (drawing V. Foret).
  • Total height: 5.57 m
  • Statue height: 2.75 m with wings; 2.40 m body without head
  • Ship height: 2.01 m; length: 4.29 m; width max.: 2.48 m
  • Base height: 0.36 m; length: 4.76 m; width: 1.76 m

The Victory statue, about 1.6 times life size, is not cut from a single block of marble, but composed of six blocks worked separately: the body, the bust with the head, the two arms and the two wings. These blocks were assembled together by metal braces (bronze or iron). This technique, used for a long time by Greek sculptors for the protruding parts of statues, was used in Hellenistic times for the body itself, thus making it possible to use smaller pieces of marble, therefore less rare and less expensive. In the case of Victory, the sculptor optimized this technique by tilting the joint surfaces that connect the wings to the body by 20° forward, which ensured their cantilevered support in the back.[36] To the body-block were added smaller projecting pieces:[37] the end of the flying mantle at the back and the end of the fold falling to the ground in front of the left leg have been reattached; the right foot, the back of the left leg with the foot and a drapery fold in front of the legs are lost.

The ship is composed of 16 blocks divided into three increasingly wide assizes aft, placed on a rectangular base. The seventeenth block, which remained in Samothrace, completed the void at the back of the upper assembly, just under the statue. Its weight allowed the cantilever of the blocks of the protruding oar boxes to hold on the sides.[38] The baseboard of the statue was embedded in a basin dug on this block. Its contours, fully visible during the 2014 restoration, made it possible to determine the location of the statue very precisely.[39]

The statue and base are inseparable to ensure the balance of the monument, designed as a whole.

Architectural context

[edit]

The location

[edit]
General plan of the Samothrace temple complex. The Victory was situated above the theatre at No. 9.

The sanctuary of the Great Gods of Samothrace is located in a very narrow river valley. The buildings reserved for the Mysteries ceremonies occupied the entire bottom of the valley. From the 3rd century BC, the entrance to the site was a monumental propylaia to the east. To the west was a very long portico to house pilgrims (the stoa) and important offerings. The Victory Monument was located at the south end of the portico terrace, in a rectangular space dug into the hillside, and set back and raised from the theatre; facing north, it overlooks the entire sanctuary. In 1863 Champoiseau described and drew the monument surrounded on three sides by a limestone wall.[40] All that remains of this enclosure now are the foundations of the walls, surrounded at the bottom and sides by walls supporting the lands of the hill. The enclosure itself is 13.40 m wide by 9.55 m long, and we know from the surveys made by Hauser in 1876 that the Victory was arranged obliquely 14.5°[verification needed] from the back wall.[41] This arrangement highlights the left side of the statue for the observer from the terrace, which explains why the sculpture work is much more elaborate on this side than on the other. Large natural rocks are visible in the front part of the space. The foundation walls have been restored and the place of the monument artificially indicated[how?].

Interpretation

[edit]

The reconstructed whole has given rise to various interpretations. K. Lehmann hypothesized that the monument was placed in the basin of an open-air fountain, with water effects on the large rocks arranged for this purpose.[42] But they could not be part of the original layout since the palm of the right hand was found under one of them: Charbonneau thought they came from a later natural landslide.[43] The fountain hypothesis has been abandoned since the excavations of J. McCredie and B. Wescoat demonstrated that there was no water supply to the enclosure.

Recent research has not determined the exact nature of the Victory's architectural setting, more than 500 blocks of which have been reused in a Byzantine construction[which?] at the other end of the west hill. Fragments of coloured plaster and some elements of terracotta architectural decoration were found in the enclosure. Two 3D reconstructions have been proposed by B. Wescoat:[44] either low walls forming a peribolos around the open-air monument, or a covered building with columns and pediment of the naiskos type. The excellent state of conservation of the sculpture's surface suggests that it did not stay in the open air for long. The overall reconstruction of the sanctuary in 3D also highlighted that the statue of Victory was oriented along the axis of the river, which was the only unobstructed perspective of the sanctuary: the monument was thus clearly visible from the bottom of the valley.[45]

Another hypothesis was proposed by Jean Richer (archaeologist) who observed that the ship on which the statue is placed represents the constellation of the Argo: the ship's bow and the statue had been deliberately placed at an angle, within the important Sanctuary of the Great Gods of Samothrace, so that Victory looked northward: according to Richer, this direction shows the path that leads to the gate of the gods identified at Mount Hemos, and thus alludes to a spiritual victory; for, in this orientation, the momentum and gaze of the statue were directed at the northeast corner of the Anaktoron, seat of the Little Mysteries, where initiation was given. This angle was thus the most sacred of the building.[46]

Function, date and style

[edit]

An offering

[edit]
Naval monument in the agora of Cyrene

In the sanctuary of the Great Gods of Samothrace, as in all the great pan-Hellenic shrines, the faithful offered their ex-votos, from the most modest to the most sumptuous according to their wealth. It was a way to honour the gods and thank them for their benefits. In addition to a promise of a better spiritual life, the Cabeiri gods, including the Dioscuri, were reputed to ensure their protection to those who were initiated into their Mysteries if they were in danger at sea and in combat. Summoning them allowed their initiates to be saved from shipwreck and to obtain victory. In this context, a representation of Victory landing on a ship's bow can be interpreted as an offering to thank the Great Gods following an important naval victory.[47]

Several major naval offerings were known in the 3rd century BC. In the Greek world, such as the "bull monument" in Delos,[48] the naval monument of the agora in Cyrene[49] and Samothrace itself, the Neorion (No. 6 on the map),[50] which housed a ship about twenty meters long. In Rhodes, an offering of the same type as the base of Samothrace, but smaller,[51] was found in the sanctuary of Athena at the top of the acropolis of Lindos.

Dating

[edit]

The dedication inscription of the Victory Monument has not been found. Archaeologists are reduced to hypothesizing to define the historical context and to determine the naval victory justifying the erection of such an important ex voto. The difficulty lies in the fact that in the 2nd and 3rd centuries BC naval battles to dominate the Aegean Sea were very numerous,[52] first pitting the Antigonids and their Seleucid allies against the Lagids, then the Seleucids to the Rhodians and Pergamon.

Austrian archaeologists first considered that the monument of Samothrace is the one represented on the tetradrachma of Demetrios Poliorcetes. They conclude that, like the coin, he celebrated his victory against Ptolemy I at the Battle of Salamis at Cyprus in 306 BC. According to Benndorf, the Victory of Samothrace therefore dates from the last years of the fourth century BC. and may have been sculpted by a student of sculptor Scopas.

The construction of the monument was then related to the Battle of Cos (around 262–255 BC),[53][54] during which the King of Macedonia Antigonus II Gonatas defeated the Lagids, allied with Athens and Sparta during the Chremonidean War. Antigonus Gonatas is also credited with the dedication, at the same time, of his flagship in the Neorium in Delos.

The material of the base of the Victory of Samothrace was identified as early as 1905 as marble from the quarries of Lartos in Rhodes. The same is true of the small fragment found in 1891 by Champoiseau within the walls of the monument to Samothrace, bearing the end of an engraved name: [...]Σ ΡΟΔΙΟΣ.[55] In 1931, Hermann Thiersch[56] restored[how?] the name of the sculptor "Pythokritos son of Timocharis of Rhodes", active around 210–165 BC. He was convinced that the fragment belongs to the ship-shaped base: he therefore made this sculptor the author of the Victory of Samothrace. According to him, the monument was commissioned by the Rhodians, allies in the kingdom of Pergamos against Antiochus III, after their victory at the naval battles of Side and Myonnesos, on the Ionian coast, in 190 BC. Excavations[when?] revealed that the sculpture was positioned alighting on a flagship, that was set in the ground in a way that it looked as it was floating.[57] The definitive victory against the Seleucids came in 189 BC. at the Battle of Sipyla Magnesia. The monument was therefore reportedly erected in Samothrace shortly after that date. Jean Charbonneaux also admits the historical link between the Victory of Samothrace and the battles of Myonnesus and Magnesia, and makes it the dedication of King Eumene II.[58]

Based on the same arguments, Nathan Badoud in 2018[59] favoured the conflict that earlier pitted the Rhodians and the King of Pergamon against King Philip V of Macedonia. The Rhodians were first defeated at the naval Battle of Lade in 201 BC. Then Philip V was defeated at sea by the two allies at the Battle of Chios in 201 BC. Rhodes and Pergamon called on the Roman Republic for reinforcements, and Titus Quinctius Flamininus crushed the Macedonian army in Thessaly with the Battle of Cynoscephalae. The Rhodians reportedly dedicated the Victory Monument after that date, for their victory in Chios.

Other researchers have considered later occasions: the victory of the Romans at Pydna in 168 BC. over Perseus,[60] or a consecration of the kingdom of Pergamon at the same time,[61] or the victory of Pergamon and Rhodes against Prusias II of Bithynia in 154 BC.[62]

Style and workshop

[edit]

Although the supposed dedication inscription of the name of a Rhodian found at the Victory's base was very quickly contested because of its small size,[63] the entire monument remained attributed to the Rhodian sculpture school. This made it possible to put an end to previous doubts about the style of the statue. In 1955 Margarete Bieber[64] made him a major figure in the "Rhodian school" and the "Hellenic Baroque", next to the frieze of the Gigantomachy of the Great Altar of Pergamon, characterized by the strength of attitudes, the virtuosity of the draperies and the expressiveness of the figures. This style lasted in Rhodes until Roman times in complex and monumental creations such as the Laocoon group or Sperlonga sculptures attributed or signed by Rhodian sculptors.

The base blocks and the sculpture of the statue are not by the same hand. The two parts of the monument were designed together, but produced by two different workshops.[65] The marble base of Lartos was certainly made in Rhodes, where there are parallels. Moreover, the Rhodian sculpture in large marble is of high quality,[66] without being exceptional for its time, but there are no parallels for the virtuosity of the Nike, which remains unusual. The sculptor could also come from elsewhere, as was common in the ancient Greek world for great artists. The Victory of Samothrace is a grandiose adaptation of the moving statue of the Athena-Niké of the Cyrene monument:[67] the sculptor added wings, stretched out the front leg to express the flight, and modified the arrangement of the mantle with the floating panel at the back. He thus gave the statue of Samothrace a dynamic that brings it closer to the figures the Gigantomachy of the altar of Pergamon,[68] conceived shortly after in the same spirit.

Modern copies and derivative works

[edit]

Among the buried ruins of the Capitolium of Brixia, was found, in good state of preservation, an Ancient Roman bronze statue representing a winged victory.[69]

The Winged Victory of Samothrace copy, Caesars Palace Casino, Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S.
A copy at the Idaho State Capitol
A plaster copy of the Winged Victory in the National Museum of Fine Arts in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Numerous copies exist in museums and galleries around the world; one of the best-known copies stands outside the Caesars Palace casino in Las Vegas. The first FIFA World Cup Trophy, commissioned in 1930 and designed by Abel Lafleur, was based on the model. This statue was a favorite of architect Frank Lloyd Wright and he used reproductions of it in a number of his buildings, including Ward Willits House, Darwin D. Martin House and Storer House. The largest public sculpture based on Nike appears in a prominent position atop the massive Pennsylvania State Memorial at Gettysburg National Military Park in Pennsylvania. Philadelphia sculptor Samuel Murray, a student and intimate of painter Thomas Eakins, produced the 28-foot figure in 1911 with possible influence from Augustus Saint-Gaudens' Nike interpretation on the Sherman Memorial in New York City (1903). Saint-Gaudens depicts Nike with her right arm raised while it is thought the original Nike was not making such gesture. Saint-Gaudens' Nike also wears a laurel wreath on her head and bears a large olive branch in her left hand. Murray adapted the laurel wreath and olive branch innovations but also placed a sword in Nike's raised right hand.[70] Starting in 1962, Yves Klein produced a series of plaster replicas of the Nike coated in dry pigment of his signature International Klein Blue affixed by resin entitled La Victoire de Samatrace.[71][72] Swedish author Gunnar Ekelöf made Nike a central image in his poem Samothrace, written in 1941,[73] where the faceless deity, arms outstretched like sails, is made into a symbol of the fight and the coming victory against Nazism and the struggle for freedom throughout history. It also features in the Matthew Reilly novel Seven Ancient Wonders, where it is fictionally made part of the Statue of Zeus at Olympia. A full-size replica of the statue sits in The Ohio State University's Thompson Library in Columbus, Ohio.[74] Another full size replica stands in the lobby of Crouse College, home to the Setnor School of Music, at Syracuse University in Syracuse, New York. A 7-foot (2.1 m) replica of the sculpture stands at Connecticut College in New London, Connecticut. The second-largest replica of this statue in the United States stands at Calvary Catholic Cemetery in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and is 10 ft (3.0 m) high. Texas Woman's University in Denton, Texas has a replica which was purchased from the Louvre and shipped from Paris in 1982. This replica is actually a replacement of the original 1929 replica given to commemorate Armistice Day and the defeat of autocracy.[75][76] A replica of the statue sits overlooking the Veterans area of the Skylawn Memorial Park in San Mateo, California.[77] The Estrugamou Building in Buenos Aires, Argentina was built in four sections, arranged around a patio adorned with a bronze copy of the iconic Winged Victory of Samothrace. The Cape Town Cenotaph is topped by a replica of the Winged Victory of Samothrace by British sculptor Vernon March. Another plaster replica adorns the atrium of Technische Universität Berlin. The replica was a gift by French universities to the TU Berlin in 1956.[78] Augustus Saint-Gaudens' 1903 William Tecumseh Sherman statue of General William Tecumseh Sherman in Grand Army Plaza, New York City, depicts a robed, winged Nike leading Sherman while holding a palm branch, as a symbol of his victory in the Civil War and the peace to follow.[79] The Golden Nica Award presented by the Prix Ars Electronica is a replica of Winged Victory of Samothrace.[80] Graffiti artist Banksy created CCTV Angel in 2006 depicting a robed, winged figure with a CCTV camera for a head, as a statement on the overreach with security surveillance in society.[81] Several scenes in The Carters' (Beyoncé and Jay-Z) music video, APES**T are filmed in the Louvre museum in front of The Winged Victory of Samothrace.[82]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The is a from the depicting Nike, the ancient Greek goddess of victory, in a dynamic pose as she descends upon the prow of a . Dating to approximately 190 BC, the was likely commissioned by the Rhodians to honor their naval success against the Seleucid forces in the Battle of Myonnesos. Carved from for the figure and Lartian marble for the base, it originally stood over 5 meters tall including the ship's prow, though missing its head and arms. Unearthed in multiple fragments in April 1863 by French diplomat and archaeologist Charles Champoiseau during excavations at the Sanctuary of the Great Gods on the island of , the work was partially restored and installed in the Museum in 1884, where it commands the staircase. Renowned for its masterful rendition of movement and wind-swept drapery clinging to the form beneath, the sculpture captures a moment of triumphant arrival, embodying the emotional expressiveness and technical virtuosity of Hellenistic art. The figure's forward-leaning stance, outstretched wings, and billowing chiton evoke the rush of air and spray from a seafaring vessel, enhancing its thematic connection to maritime prowess. Positioned originally to overlook the Aegean Sea, the monument's design amplified an illusion of perpetual motion toward victory. As one of the few surviving large-scale Greek originals, it exemplifies the era's shift toward realism and pathos, influencing later perceptions of classical antiquity.

Discovery and Provenance

19th-Century Excavation

In April 1863, French diplomat Charles Champoiseau, then vice-consul in Adrianople (modern ), initiated excavations at the Sanctuary of the Great Gods on the Aegean island of , which was under Ottoman sovereignty at the time. Acting on behalf of the and with Ottoman permission via a , Champoiseau targeted the site's Western Hill, where workers uncovered fragments of a in a small rectangular niche cut into the hillside. The dig focused on an upper terrace near the southwest corner of the sanctuary, revealing pieces including the draped female , large wings, and sections of a ship's prow base amid surrounding architectural remnants. The statue fragments were discovered in a fragmentary yet well-preserved state, lacking a head, arms, and certain wing sections, but exhibiting fine detailing that indicated Hellenistic origins. Champoiseau initially mistook nearby marble blocks for an Egyptian-style but quickly identified the Nike figure's significance as a votive monument, likely from the Nike temple area. The excavation process involved manual digging by local laborers, with Champoiseau documenting the finds on-site before prioritizing their extraction for transport, recognizing the piece's exceptional scale—standing over two meters—and dynamic composition as hallmarks of Rhodian sculptural workshops. This 1863 campaign marked the first systematic exploration of the Nike monument, yielding approximately 80% of the surviving statue while leaving the site's friable sandstone architecture largely intact due to its seismic instability. Champoiseau's efforts, driven by antiquarian enthusiasm rather than formal archaeological training, nonetheless secured the artifacts' removal amid Ottoman-French diplomatic exchanges, underscoring the era's colonial dynamics in Aegean archaeology.

Initial Acquisition and Transport

In April 1863, French vice-consul Charles Champoiseau, stationed in Adrianople (modern , ), led excavations at the Sanctuary of the Great Gods on , an island then under control, where he uncovered fragments of the Nike statue, including the torso, wings, and parts of the ship's prow. Champoiseau secured approval from Ottoman authorities to export the artifacts, aligning with 19th-century practices where European diplomats and archaeologists obtained local permissions for removals from Ottoman territories, often without binding international agreements. The fragmented statue—comprising over 118 pieces—was loaded onto a French in early May 1863 for transport to France, leaving larger gray blocks from the base on-site due to their size. The voyage presented logistical challenges, including the risks of maritime travel in the era and the difficulties of securing and moving heavy, irregular fragments over distances exceeding 2,000 kilometers, resulting in a journey that lasted more than a year, with arrival in by late August 1863 and final delivery to on May 11, 1864. Upon reaching Paris, Champoiseau donated the fragments to the Museum, presenting them to curator Adrien de Longpérier, who oversaw initial assembly efforts to form a cohesive, albeit incomplete, figure, establishing legal ownership transfer under French imperial patronage and the absence of contemporary conventions. This acquisition reflected standard protocols for procurement in the mid-19th century, prioritizing scholarly access over site retention.

Physical Description and Construction

The Statue of Nike

The statue portrays the goddess Nike in mid-descent, her form captured in a dynamic, forward-thrusting pose that conveys the momentum of alighting from flight. Devoid of head and arms, the preserved elements encompass the torso, expansive wings, and lower body, displaying a modified with the right leg extended ahead and the left bearing primary weight, tensions in the musculature underscoring the strain of aerial propulsion. Draped in a originating from the left shoulder, the garment adheres closely to the figure's contours through a wet-drape technique, thinly veiling the breasts, , and legs to reveal underlying anatomical structure while pooling in heavier, wind-swept folds between the thighs, around the waist, and trailing rearward in billowing sheets that amplify the illusion of gusting winds. The wings project dramatically backward from slots carved into the back, their surfaces meticulously textured with overlapping feathers of varying lengths and incisions denoting individual barbs and quills, evoking the ruffled state induced by rapid motion. This detailing, combined with the torsion in the torso and the forward inclination, renders Nike as an embodiment of vigorous, wind-buffeted descent, optimized for viewing from a three-quarter on the left.

The Ship's Prow and Base

The ship's prow base forms an integral part of the monument, sculpted to represent the bow of a Hellenistic , with decorative volutes curling outward at the extremities and lateral protrusions functioning as oar boxes or locks, features consistent with or quadrireme designs of the period. This maritime form not only anchors the dynamically striding Nike figure but also imparts stability to the overall composition, counterbalancing the forward momentum implied by her pose and wings. Crafted from gray Lartos marble quarried on , the base contrasts sharply with the fine white of the statue, creating a deliberate visual and textural that underscores the naval theme while ensuring durability against environmental exposure in its original setting. The prow's evokes the triumphant surge of a vessel through sea waves, reinforced by carved elements suggesting spray and motion, which symbolically link the goddess's descent to a scene of maritime conquest. Although no dedicatory inscription survives on the base itself, the prow's explicit ship form provides clear of its votive intent to commemorate a naval , aligning with Hellenistic conventions for such dedications in sanctuaries associated with seafaring . The base survives in fragmentary condition, with key portions reconstructed in the late from debris recovered at the discovery site, limiting modern interpretations to archaeological rather than speculative additions. Debates over precise reconstruction details, such as the exact configuration of oar fittings or volute ornamentation, remain constrained by the paucity of matching fragments, emphasizing fidelity to extant material over hypothetical embellishments.

Materials, Dimensions, and Technical Features

The statue proper is carved from , a fine-grained, white variety sourced from the quarries of island, prized in antiquity for its translucency and suitability for detailed carving. The accompanying ship's prow and base employ gray Lartos marble from , providing contrast and structural durability for the monument's lower components. The figure stands 3.28 meters tall, with the ship's prow adding 2.00 meters and the base 0.36 meters, yielding a total height of 5.64 meters for the assembled monument; the base measures 1.78 meters wide by 4.67 meters deep, while the prow spans 2.58 meters wide by 4.29 meters deep. Estimated weights include approximately 2,000 kg for the statue and 32,000 kg overall, reflecting the scale of Hellenistic . Carved in the round (ronde-bosse technique), the sculpture features composite assembly: the bust and wings were executed separately and affixed via joint surfaces and metal armatures, as evidenced by attachment points at the right arm, left calf, right foot, and front drapery folds. Rear drapery panels were added independently to complete the form. The base comprises 16 blocks layered across three levels upon a socle of six juxtaposed slabs, with Greek inscription letters (alpha, beta, gamma, deltas, epsilon) marking individual components for alignment during erection. Surviving fragments indicate use of dowel-like joints and clamps for stability, consistent with large-scale Greek marble construction practices to manage weight and seismic risks on the island site.

Original Context and Setting

The Sanctuary of the Great Gods

The Sanctuary of the Great Gods on the island of constituted the central hub for a mystery cult venerating the Kabiri, chthonic deities linked to seafaring protection, fertility, and nocturnal initiation rites that promised divine safeguarding, particularly against maritime perils. Operational from at least the seventh century B.C. through the fourth century A.D., the site attracted initiates across the Hellenistic world, including rulers such as , drawn by the cult's reputation for conferring esoteric benefits irrespective of prior moral infractions. Archaeological artifacts, including seventh-century B.C. tankards and second-century B.C. coins depicting a , substantiate the cult's continuity and thematic emphases. Topographically, the sprawls across a terraced on the northeastern , shadowed by Mount Fengari and flanked by eastern and western hills, with its layout channeling processions along a toward the . Key structures encompass a propylon from the third century B.C., a theater accommodating roughly 1,500 spectators, and the Hall of Choral Dancers dating to circa 340 B.C., all integrated into the terrain's natural contours for progression. The niche housing the Nike statue occupied the Western Hill's summit, a steep hillside recess at the sanctuary's elevated southern extremity, bounded by fieldstone retaining walls that amplified its commanding vista over the complex. Oriented obliquely for optimal exposure, it aligned with the propylon and theater below, ensuring visibility from primary approach routes amid the site's undulating . Site surveys and excavations yield evidence of preservation through seismic events, notably earthquakes in 287 B.C., A.D. 50, and circa A.D. 200, the latter catastrophically entombing fragments in collapse debris with minimal subsequent alteration, as confirmed by stratigraphic analysis.

Architectural Integration and Placement

The Nike monument was constructed as a rectangular platform (krepis) measuring approximately 9.50 meters in width and 13.40 meters in length, with the statue mounted atop a prow-shaped base carved from Lartian blue-veined , integrated into a niche excavated into the hillside on the Western Hill of the . This elevated positioning at the site's highest point maximized visibility over the entire valley floor and potentially seaward approaches, directing viewer attention upward along the statue's dynamic forward stride and wings in a manner that empirical excavation plans from the 19th and 20th centuries confirm through preserved retaining walls of fieldstones framing the niche. Archaeological reconstructions prioritize the monument's alignment with natural terrain contours for axial prominence within the sanctuary's layout, as evidenced by fragment distributions and base measurements recovered during campaigns led by Charles Champoiseau (1863, 1879, 1891) and Karl Lehmann (1939–1952), avoiding unsubstantiated additions like roofing that lack material support. The prow base's rhomboidal blocks and the niche's configuration facilitated a processional ascent via adjacent paths or low steps, positioning approaching worshippers to experience the figure's alighting pose as an illusion of aerial descent, enhanced by the open exposure to Aegean winds that would tension the marble drapery against prevailing gusts from the northeast. Such integration leveraged the hillside's slope for dramatic vertical emphasis, with the total preserved height of 5.57 meters ensuring dominance over lower terraces without acoustic amplification features identified .

Function and Historical Interpretation

Votive Purpose and Symbolism

The Nike of Samothrace functioned as a votive dedication to the Great Gods of the Sanctuary on the island, exemplifying Hellenistic conventions where statues of the victory goddess were offered to deities to express gratitude for past favors or to invoke future protection in endeavors such as warfare or navigation. Such offerings were commonplace in Greek religious practice, particularly in mystery cults like that of Samothrace, where initiates sought divine safeguarding against perils, including those at sea, through ritual participation and material gifts. An inscription fragment associates the monument with Rhodian sponsorship, underscoring its role as a public, state-level ex-voto likely intended to honor the gods' perceived causal role in ensuring success amid maritime uncertainties. Symbolically, the figure's expansive wings represent the rapidity and inevitability of divine endorsement in human affairs, a motif rooted in Nike's mythological attributes as an agent of triumphant resolution rather than mere chance. Her dynamic, forward-leaning pose atop the ship's prow further embodies empirical mastery over elemental disorder—the sea's unpredictable forces—mirroring the sanctuary's emphasis on the Great Gods as guarantors of order and safety for devotees traversing hazardous waters. This maritime integration of form and theme thus served not as abstract but as a tangible affirmation of the cult's protective efficacy, reinforced by the prevalence of sea-related votives like anchors and ship models recovered from the site.

Commemoration of Naval Victory

The dynamic pose of the Nike figure, captured mid-descent with wings spread and drapery billowing as if propelled by sea winds, symbolizes the goddess alighting upon the prow of a victorious warship to confer divine triumph. This composition, integrated with a precisely carved ship's bow representing a trireme's ram and forecastle, directly evokes Hellenistic naval iconography where Victory personifications adorned dedications celebrating maritime successes. The monument's design aligns with Rhodian maritime prowess, as Rhodes maintained a dominant fleet in the Aegean, funding extensive votive offerings to sanctuaries like Samothrace following key battles. Archaeological evidence, including the statue's and stylistic parallels to Rhodian workshops, supports its dedication by as an for a early second-century BCE naval . The timing corresponds to the post-Second Punic War era, after Rome's 201 BCE defeat of , when Rhodian alliances with targeted Hellenistic rivals. Empirical correlates include other monuments, such as the Pergamene dedications at commemorating similar anti-Seleucid campaigns, which featured Nike figures atop symbolic prows or trophies. Primary hypotheses favor the Battle of Myonnesos in 190 BCE, where a Rhodian squadron decisively repelled Antiochus III's fleet during the Roman-Seleucid War, securing Roman naval superiority in the Aegean. This event's scale—over 80 Rhodian triremes engaged—and its strategic impact mirror the monument's grandeur, with the ship's prow details matching contemporary warship depictions in Rhodian coinage. An alternative, data-supported association is the 200 BCE Hellespont Pharos victory over Philip V of Macedon, inferred from tactical resemblances in fleet maneuvers and lighthouse-adjacent engagements, though stratigraphic dating from the sanctuary favors the later commemoration. Claims linking the statue to earlier events, like Demetrius I Poliorcetes' victories, contradict material analysis and lack inscriptional or contextual evidence.

Debates on Specific Events and Dating

Scholars generally date the Winged Victory of Samothrace to circa 190 BCE, placing it in the early second century BCE based on stylistic comparisons to contemporaneous Pergamene sculptures, such as those associated with the Great Altar of Pergamon, which exhibit similar dramatic movement and deep undercutting techniques. This chronology aligns with archaeological evidence from the Samothracian sanctuary, where fragments of the statue were recovered from niches with associated pottery sherds dating to the late third to early second century BCE, supporting an original dedication around the time of heightened Hellenistic naval activity. Debates persist, with proposed dates ranging from approximately 220 BCE (linked to earlier Rhodian engagements) to 160 BCE, influenced by varying interpretations of tool marks, such as drill usage indicative of evolving Hellenistic workshop practices, and marble sourcing that ties the grey Lartos quarries on Rhodes to the ship's prow, weighing roughly 30 tons and implying Rhodian maritime capability at its peak. The prevailing interpretation attributes the monument to a Rhodian dedication commemorating their naval victory over Antiochus III's fleet at the Battle of Myonnesus in 190 BCE, during the Roman-Seleucid War, as allied with against the ; this is bolstered by the prow's Rhodian marble, reflecting local pride in trihemiolia warship designs used in such campaigns, and the sanctuary's role as a site for allied dedications. An alternative event proposed by some is the Rhodian triumph at in 201 BCE, earlier in the Fifth Syrian War, though this faces critique for predating the statue's advanced stylistic features, which empirical analysis of surface tooling and drapery dynamics places post-200 BCE. Minority views challenge the Rhodian-Seleucid linkage, arguing instead for a dedication by Prusias II of around 155 BCE following his fleet's storm-induced destruction during an invasion of , interpreting the Nike as a votive for divine from maritime peril in line with Samothrace's mystery cult emphasis on salvation at sea; this theory draws on Bithynian quadrireme contributions to allied fleets and critiques the prow typology as mismatched to Rhodian light vessels. However, such attributions are weakened by the absence of Bithynian signatures and the monument's scale suiting a victorious rather than salvific narrative, with causal evidence favoring the 190 BCE Rhodian event due to direct material provenance and historical records of their post-Myonnesus dedications at pan-Hellenic sites. Earlier third-century proposals, like those tying it to Poliorcetes' victories circa 295 BCE, have been largely refuted by stratigraphic inconsistencies and the statue's Hellenistic vigor exceeding late Classical restraint. Ongoing excavations and recent cleanings continue to refine these debates, prioritizing empirical markers like quarry-specific veining over purely stylistic inference.

Artistic Style and Attribution

Hellenistic Characteristics

The Winged Victory of Samothrace exemplifies the Hellenistic departure from Classical Greek sculpture's emphasis on serene equilibrium and idealized proportions toward heightened expressiveness and implied kinetic energy. In contrast to the balanced of Classical figures like the , which conveys stable poise, the Nike employs an exaggerated, spiraling that suggests forward propulsion and descent, with her torso twisted and legs positioned as if alighting dynamically on the ship's prow. This dynamism is amplified by the treatment of , featuring deep undercutting and billowing folds that cling to the body's while projecting outward in wind-swept patterns, creating dramatic and a of atmospheric interaction absent in the smoother, less textured Classical chitons. Such techniques prioritize perceptual realism—mimicking fabric's response to motion and breeze—over abstract , fostering an of immediacy and vigor through empirical of form in space. The statue's theatricality extends to its emotional realism, where the interplay of wings, garment, and implied evokes tension, as if the figure embodies triumphant arrival amid turmoil, diverging from Classical detachment to engage viewers viscerally. Parallels appear in Pergamene art, such as the Great Altar of Pergamon's friezes, which similarly employ turbulent drapery and exaggerated poses to convey and motion, indicating a shared Hellenistic impulse toward intensity rooted in regional workshops' innovations.

Workshop and Sculptor Hypotheses

The attribution of the Winged Victory of Samothrace to a workshop derives primarily from stylistic affinities with known Rhodian , including dynamic folds and maritime motifs, as well as epigraphic evidence suggesting Rhodian patronage or production. A fragmentary inscription recovered near the sanctuary has been interpreted by some scholars as linking the monument to , potentially indicating a dedicatory context tied to Rhodian naval prowess around 190 BCE. Hypotheses proposing the sculptor Pythokritos, son of Timocharis, a documented Rhodian active circa 210–180 BCE, rest on this inscription's restoration as a : "Pythokritos fils de Timocharis, Rhodien, a fait." However, recent epigraphic rejects this reading, arguing the fragment more plausibly records a dedication to the Great Gods rather than an artist's mark, rendering the single-sculptor attribution speculative and unsupported by direct evidence. Technical examination reveals Hellenistic drilling techniques, such as fine-point drills for rendering fabric textures and struts for structural support, consistent with island-based workshops specializing in large-scale figures, though these features are widespread across Aegean production centers and do not uniquely pinpoint . Proportion systems employed—evident in the statue's elongated and stance—align with empirical canons adapted for dramatic effect in Rhodian exports, but lack inscriptional or tool-mark specificity to confirm a singular origin. Scholarly consensus critiques romanticized models of individual genius, emphasizing instead collaborative workshop practices in the , where master designers oversaw teams of specialists handling carving, polishing, and assembly for monumental commissions. Evidence from signed bases and production debris at sites like indicates divided labor, with no verified instances of solo execution for comparable over-life-size figures. This team-oriented approach better explains the Victory's integration of stylistic innovation with technical efficiency, prioritizing output for elite patrons over auteur attribution.

Modern History and Controversies

Louvre Display and Restorations

Upon its arrival at the in 1884, the Winged Victory of Samothrace was installed at the top of the Daru in the Denon Wing, a location chosen to maximize its dramatic visual impact as visitors ascend toward the ancient departments. The , constructed in the , provides an elevated vantage that emphasizes the statue's dynamic forward stride and outstretched wings, simulating the effect of Nike alighting on a ship's prow. The statue has undergone multiple restorations to stabilize and reconstruct missing elements, including the wings. The left wing, largely absent at discovery, was reconstructed in to mirror the surviving right wing, while other additions like parts of the employed similar techniques; these interventions, dating from the late 19th and early 20th centuries, aimed to restore structural integrity but have faced critique for potential inaccuracies in anatomical and stylistic fidelity. In the 2013-2014 conservation campaign, the monument was dismantled and meticulously cleaned to remove accumulated dirt, atmospheric pollutants, and residues from prior treatments such as yellowing varnishes and waxes, revealing the original Parian marble's translucency without altering the 19th-century reconstructions. This project, the first major effort since the early 20th century, incorporated non-invasive analytical techniques like to assess surface composition, confirming traces of ancient pigments such as on the wings. Two feather fragments and nine base pieces were reintegrated during this phase, enhancing authenticity based on empirical matching. ![Daru staircase with Winged Victory of Samothrace at the Louvre][float-right] The 2013-2014 work also addressed mounting stability, with the statue's 30-ton mass secured via updated fixings to withstand vibrations from heavy foot traffic on the staircase, though no major seismic-specific reinforcements were documented in that period. Post-restoration critiques have centered on the balance between preservation and interpretive additions, with some scholars arguing that plaster elements risk over-interpretation of the original form, yet these have been retained for display coherence absent contradictory archaeological evidence. The statue returned to public view in July 2014, brighter and more legible, underscoring the Louvre's commitment to empirical conservation over speculative redesign. Greece has pursued of the Winged Victory of Samothrace, asserting that its removal from the island in 1863 constituted a violation of rights, despite the excavation occurring under Ottoman administration when Samothrace was not part of the independent Greek state. Demands intensified in the late , with campaigns framing the statue as stolen property emblematic of broader losses during the Ottoman era, though no contemporary records indicate illicit export or Ottoman protests at the time. France maintains that the acquisition was lawful under the prevailing international norms and Ottoman practices of 1863, when French vice-consul Charles Champoiseau conducted excavations without facing legal impediments to removal, as the Ottoman Empire lacked explicit antiquities export restrictions until later regulations in 1869 and 1884. The Louvre purchased the fragments upon their arrival in Paris in 1864, establishing clear title through diplomatic channels and restoration efforts, distinct from cases like the Parthenon Marbles where direct disassembly from a standing monument under wartime occupation raised distinct provenance issues. No formal resolution has emerged from bilateral negotiations or international bodies like , where discussions on restitution emphasize evidentiary chains of ownership over retroactive sovereignty claims; evidentiary precedents favor retention when acquisitions predated modern heritage laws without proven illegality. Greek efforts persist amid politicized debates, but French courts and museum policies uphold the statue's status as legitimately held, prioritizing historical legal context over contemporary nationalistic interpretations.

Cultural Impact and Legacy

Reproductions and Derivative Works

Numerous plaster casts of the Winged Victory of Samothrace were produced in the shortly after its discovery in , enabling museums and universities to replicate the statue's intricate drapery folds and dynamic pose for pedagogical use without transporting the fragile original. These casts, often taken directly from the marble surface at the , were distributed across and , preserving details like the wind-swept and for art historical analysis. The at the University of holds a painted from the , crafted by German cast maker August Gerber in , which captures the statue's and partial wings in high fidelity. Similarly, the University of Michigan's collection includes a commissioned around 1920 by industrialist , underscoring the era's systematic reproduction of classical antiquities for academic collections. The Smithsonian Institution's version emphasizes the forward-striding stance on the ship's prow base, made from durable materials to withstand display. In the 20th and 21st centuries, derivative works expanded to include reduced-scale and bronze versions, often with foundry documentation verifying fidelity to measurements. The Wilcox Classical Museum at the displays a 1:3 scale copy, sourced from established ateliers to replicate the original's proportions. Greek firm Kiryakidis Marbles created a full-scale using Parian-like stone and modern quarrying techniques, complete with records tracing molds to the original. These adaptations, produced via resin, bonded , or cold-cast , bear maker marks from reputable workshops, ensuring authenticity against commercial counterfeits. No ancient Roman marble or bronze copies of this specific Samothrace Nike have been archaeologically documented, distinguishing it from more replicated Hellenistic types like the , though its winged motif influenced later imperial iconography.

Influence on Western Art and Iconography

The dramatic forward momentum and wind-swept of the exerted a tangible influence on neoclassical in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, serving as a model for depicting triumphant motion in figures. Sculptors drew upon its Hellenistic dynamism to evoke heroic advance in works commemorating military achievements, adapting the alighting pose to symbolize both success and peace. For example, the State Memorial at , constructed between 1909 and 1910 and dedicated on July 1, 1910, crowns its dome with a 21-foot-high Nike figure cast from melted Civil War cannons, with the sculptor citing the Samothrace statue as direct inspiration for its winged, striding form and attributes of sword and . This motif extended to other war memorials, where the statue's iconography reinforced themes of conquest through poised energy. Walter Allward's Victory figure on the in , executed in between 1904 and 1911, echoes the Nike's billowing garments and implied velocity to convey imperial triumph amid . Likewise, Australian sculptor Doble's Winged Victory for the Marrickville War Memorial, unveiled in 1922, incorporates aesthetic and conceptual elements from the Hellenistic prototype, linking local sacrifices to ancient ideals of Hellenistic victory statuary. The statue's visual vocabulary—a winged female embodying swift descent and dominance—has informed persistent iconographic conventions in Western representations of achievement, particularly in domains evoking speed and conquest like and competitive sports, where the prow-mounted pose analogs propulsion through air or arena. Such transmissions prioritize the empirical appeal of the sculpture's anatomy and over narrative embellishment, grounding later adaptations in the original's causal emphasis on observable physicality and strategic prowess rather than abstracted sentiment.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.