Hubbry Logo
Daniel's final visionDaniel's final visionMain
Open search
Daniel's final vision
Community hub
Daniel's final vision
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Daniel's final vision
Daniel's final vision
Daniel's final vision
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
"King of the North" redirects here. For the EP by Bugzy Malone, see King of the North (EP). For the album by Wolfheart, see King of the North (album). For the mayor of Greater Manchester, see Andy Burnham.
Chapters of the Book of Daniel
Daniel's Answer to the King by Briton Rivière

Additions to Daniel:

Chapters 10, 11, and 12 of the Book of Daniel in the Hebrew Bible and the Christian Old Testament comprise Daniel's final vision. The vision describes a series of coming conflicts between an unnamed "King of the North" and a "King of the South", ultimately leading to the "time of the end", when Israel will be vindicated. The dead will be raised: some to everlasting life, some to shame and everlasting contempt.

Some historians claim that, although set during the 6th century BC, the Book of Daniel was written in reaction to the persecution of the Jews by the Greek king Antiochus IV Epiphanes in 167–164 BC.[1] Its authors were the maskilim (the "wise"), of whom Daniel is one: "Those among the people who are wise shall make many understand ..."[2] Its fundamental theme is God's control over history.[3] The climax comes with the prophecy of the resurrection of the dead.[4] Daniel 7 speaks of the kingdom of the saints or "holy ones" of the Most High,[5] but Daniel 10–12 does not say that history will end with the coming of the Jewish kingdom; instead, the "wise" will be brought back to life to lead Israel in the new kingdom of God.[4]

In contemporary Christian millennialism, Daniel 11:36–45 is interpreted as a prophecy of the career and destruction of the Antichrist; Daniel 12 is interpreted as concerning the salvation of Israel and the coming kingdom of Jesus.[6]

Summary

[edit]

Chapter 10, a prologue: In the third year of Cyrus (the Persian conqueror of Babylon), after fasting for three weeks, Daniel sees a vision of a man clothed in linen, clearly a supernatural being, who tells him that he is currently engaged in a battle with the "prince of Persia", in which he is assisted by "Michael, your prince". He must soon return to the combat, but first he will tell Daniel what is written in the "book of truth".

Chapter 11, the report of the vision: The angel continues: there will be four kings of Persia, and the last will make war on Greece. After him will come a great king, but that king's empire will be broken up. There will be wars and marriages between the kings of the South and the North (described in great detail), and the king of the North will desecrate the Temple and set up "the abomination that causes desolation". At the end-time there will be a war between the king of the South and the king of the North, and the king of the North will meet his end "between the sea and the Holy Mountain".

Chapter 12, the epilogue: At the end-time, "Michael, the great prince who protects your people, will arise."[7] There will be great distress, but those whose names are written will be saved, the dead will awaken to everlasting shame or life. Daniel is instructed to seal the book until the time of the end. He asks how long it will be before these things are fulfilled and is told, "From the time that the daily sacrifice is abolished and the abomination that causes desolation is set up, there will be 1,290 days; blessed is the one who waits for and reaches the end of the 1,335 days". At the end of the vision, Daniel is told "Go your way", and promised his inheritance at the end of days.

Composition

[edit]
Wojciech Stattler, "Machabeusze" ("The Maccabees"), 1844
See also: Book of Daniel § Composition

It is generally accepted by modern scholars that the Daniel who appears as the hero of the Book of Daniel never existed, but that the authors reveal their true identity at the end of Daniel 12: they are the maskil, the "wise", of whom Daniel is one: "Those among the people who are wise shall make many understand ...".[8][2] The actual background to the book was the persecution of the Jews by the Greek king Antiochus IV Epiphanes in 167–164 BC, and there is a broad consensus that the book was completed shortly after that crisis ended.[1]

The first six chapters are folktales dating from the late Persian/early Hellenistic period, while the visions of chapters 7–12 date from between 167 and 164.[9] A probable outline of the composition is as follows:[10]

  • An original collection of folktales, currently chapters 1–6;
  • Addition of chapter 7 and revision of the earlier chapters;
  • Further revision and the addition of chapters 8–12.

Daniel is episodic rather than linear: it has no plot as such. It does, however, have a structure. Chapters 2–7 form a chiasm, a literary figure in which elements mirror each other: chapter 2 is the counterpart of chapter 7, chapter 3 of chapter 6, and chapter 4 of chapter 5, with the second member of each pair advancing the first in some way. Daniel 8 is then a new beginning, and the single vision contained in chapters 10–12 advances that argument further and gives it more precision.[11]

Within the three chapters of Daniel 10–12, Daniel 10 serves as prologue, chapter 11 as the report of the angelic vision, and chapter 12 as the epilogue.[12] P. R. Davies suggests that the text is "poor Hebrew, and may represent a rather poor translation from an Aramaic original".[13] The unit begins with a third-person introduction (10:1), and then switches to Daniel speaking in his own voice as one of the two primary characters, his angelic partner being the second—this is probably the angel Gabriel, although he is never identified.[14] Then follows Daniel 11, the "Book of Truth": much of the history it recounts is accurate down to the two successive Syrian invasions of Egypt in 170 and 168 BC, but there was no third war between Egypt and Syria, and Antiochus did not die in Palestine.[15]

The failure of prophecy helps pinpoint the date of composition: the author knows of the desecration of the Temple in December 167, but not of its re-dedication or of the death of Antiochus, both in late 164[15] The countdown of days remaining to the end-time in Daniel 12:11–12 differs from that in Daniel 8: it was most likely added after the original prediction failed to come to pass,[16] although it could also be understood by the author's use of competing calendars.[17]

Genre and themes

[edit]
The Archangel Michael weighing souls on Judgement Day. Hans Memling, 15th century.

The vision is an apocalypse in the form of an epiphany (appearance of a divine being) with an angelic discourse (revelation delivered by an angel) wherein a review of history is written in the guise of prophecy.[18] The discourse forms an ex eventu (after the event) prophecy, with close parallels with certain Babylonian works. The only true prophecy is the prediction of the death of Antiochus, which is probably based on Ezekiel's prophecy of Gog and Magog. The heroes of Daniel 11–12, the "wise", are based on the "Suffering Servant" of Isaiah 53.[19] Thus, based on the scriptures, Daniel paints an imaginative scenario of the kind of issue that God will ensure will come from present events and not a literal account of events before they take place.[20]

The fundamental theme of the Book of Daniel is God's control over history.[3] According to Deuteronomy 32:8–9 God assigned each nation its own divine patron; originally these were subordinate gods, but by the time Daniel came to be written they had been redefined as angels. In Daniel, Michael, the angel of Israel, is in battle with the "prince (i.e., angelic patron) of Persia", and this will be followed by further battle with the "prince of Greece"; the theological point being made is that the fate of nations is decided in heaven, not on earth. The same theme underlies the reference to the heavenly "Book of Truth" which is about to be revealed to Daniel, and which supposedly forms the content of chapter 11: both the past and the future are written already, and God is sovereign over all.[21]

The constant preoccupation of the vision chapters is Antiochus's replacement of the "tamid", the twice-daily burnt offering to the God of Israel, by the "abomination of desolation".[Notes 1] The predicted reversal of the blasphemy will usher in the end of history, the theme of the four earthly kingdoms first introduced in Daniel 2 and developed in Daniel 7 and 8; they will be replaced by the Kingdom of Heaven, a kingdom in which Israel will be given domination over the world.[22]

The climax comes with the prophecy of the resurrection of the dead[4] and although Daniel exhibits a clear belief in resurrection, the context of chapter 12 is an imaginative portrayal of the movement "from dust to kingship" of the covenant people and need not be read as a literal prediction.[23] Prior to the Babylonian exile, all the dead went to Sheol, irrespective of their good or bad deeds, but the idea that the righteous would be rewarded and the wicked punished began to appear in the 3rd century, and is clearly expressed in Daniel 12:2–3: "Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake..." (although the "many" implies that not all will be resurrected).[24][Notes 2] Chapter 7 spoke of the coming "kingdom of heaven", but Daniel 10–12 does not say that history will end with the coming of the Jewish kingdom.[4]

Historical background

[edit]
Coin of Antiochus IV Epiphanes. The reverse shows Zeus (King of the Gods) enthroned carrying the Goddess Nike(Victory).

Daniel's final vision is set in "the third year of Cyrus, king of Persia": this marks 70 years since Daniel's own captivity began (606 BC), and thus the fulfillment of Jeremiah's prophecy that the exile would last 70 years.[25] Chapter 11, the centre-piece of the revelation, gives a broad sweep of history from the 6th century BC to the 2nd, but the coverage is uneven: two centuries of Persian history plus Alexander the Great's conquests and the breakup of his empire, over two and a half centuries of history, are covered in three verses (2–4), but the century and a half of wars between the Ptolemies of Egypt and the Seleucids of Syria receive 16 verses (5–20), and the reign of Antiochus IV Epiphanes, which lasted less than ten years, gets 25 (21–45).[15]

Verses 20–39, the bulk of the historically accurate verses, deal with Antiochus, who reigned 175–164 BC. Verse 21 describes him as "the contemptible person to whom royal majesty has not been given", meaning that he came to the throne by questionable means. Verse 22 notes his removal of the High Priest Onias III, (Antiochus sold the priesthood twice over, first to a relative of Onias named Jason, and then to a rival of Jason's named Menelaus), and verses 23–24 apparently refer to his liberality in scattering the spoils among his supporters. Verses 25–28 describe his first war with Egypt, in 170 BC, in which he was largely but not entirely successful. In 169, on his way back to Syria, he stopped in Jerusalem to plunder the Temple (verse 28).[26]

In 168 Antiochus invaded Egypt again, but this time he was stopped by the Romans (the "ships of Kittim") and forced to retreat (verses 29–30).[Notes 3] Verses 30–31 describe the events that followed: passing once more through Jerusalem, Antiochus instituted a persecution of Jewish customs and religion, desecrated the Temple, and established a garrison there. Verses 32–39 describe the response of "the wise" (the group associated with the Book of Daniel) and "the many" (the population at large): the wise suffer and die so that the many will understand.[27][28] In time the faithful receive "a little help" (possibly, but not certainly, a reference to Judas Maccabeus, who led an armed revolt against the Greeks).[29] Verses 36–39 appear to carry Antiochus' history to the cosmic plane, detailing the blasphemy of the tyrant who considered himself a demi-god. He "spoke astonishing things against the God of gods" and gave "no heed to the god of his fathers".[30]

Verses 40–45 finish the chapter with the prophecy that the unnamed king would make war once again against many, and would die without support.[27] In Antiochus' case, there was no third war with Egypt and he died in Persia or in Babylon.[31] Alternatively, a minority of scholars suggests that these verses may be summarizing Antiochus's first two Egyptian campaigns (rather than predicting a third), and that the "end" referred to in Daniel 11:45 is not the death of Antiochus IV Epiphanes, but rather the conclusion of his oppression and the decline of Seleucid dominance—marked by the Jewish victory at the Battle of Emmaus, fought between Jerusalem and the sea. [32]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Daniel's final vision

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Daniel's final vision, detailed in chapters 10–12 of the , constitutes the book's concluding apocalyptic revelation, wherein an angelic figure discloses to Daniel a sequence of earthly conflicts between the "king of the South" and the "king of the North," escalating to a time of unparalleled distress, the of the temple, of the dead, and ultimate divine vindication of the righteous. The narrative frames this disclosure as occurring in the third year of king of Persia, circa 536 BCE, following Daniel's three-week fast and mourning beside the River, where he beholds a radiant man clothed in linen whose appearance evokes terror among human witnesses. This vision uniquely blends cosmic warfare—depicting angelic princes contending over nations—with precise geopolitical prophecies that align closely with the historical struggles between Ptolemaic and Seleucid from the fourth to second centuries BCE. Scholarly consensus attributes the composition of these chapters to the mid-second century BCE, during the Maccabean crisis under Seleucid ruler , rather than the sixth-century exilic context claimed internally, based on linguistic features like late and Hebrew forms, detailed "predictions" matching known events up to 164 BCE (such as the ), and the absence of verifiable sixth-century attestation. This late dating positions the vision as pseudepigraphic encouragement for Jewish fidelity amid Hellenistic , employing (prophecy after the event) for historical portions before transitioning to genuine eschatological outlook, including cryptic timelines like "a time, times, and half a time" for the tribulation's duration. Defining characteristics include its emphasis on and judgment—pioneering such motifs in —and dual focus on immediate historical deliverance alongside ultimate cosmic resolution, influencing subsequent apocalyptic traditions without empirical verification of its predictive elements beyond the Maccabean era. Controversies persist over its historicity and prophetic status, with conservative interpreters defending sixth-century authorship via alleged predictive accuracy, countered by critical analysis highlighting anachronisms and the text's canonical placement among Writings rather than Prophets in the , signaling post-exilic origins.

Textual Content

Vision Introduction and the Glorious Figure (Daniel 10)

In the third year of , of Persia—dated by scholars to approximately 536 BCE—Daniel, referred to as Belteshazzar, mourned for three full weeks while abstaining from choice food, meat, wine, and bodily anointing, engaging in supplication amid distress over his people's circumstances. On the twenty-fourth day of the first month, as he stood beside the great river Hiddekel, identified as the , a vision manifested, initiating the revelation that spans chapters 10 through 12 of the . This preparatory period of fasting and mourning underscores Daniel's spiritual discipline, aligning with textual emphasis on his role as an interpreter of divine messages during the early Persian period following the Babylonian exile. The vision featured a resplendent figure: a man clothed in with a belt of pure around his waist, his body resembling the gleam of beryl (or ), his face like the flash of , his eyes like flaming torches, his arms and feet like burnished , and his voice resounding like that of a great multitude. Daniel alone perceived this apparition, while his companions, gripped by an inexplicable terror despite seeing nothing, fled and hid themselves; overwhelmed, Daniel collapsed facedown in a deep, powerless sleep. A hand then touched him, raising him trembling to his hands and knees, after which the figure spoke words of reassurance, calling Daniel "greatly loved" and urging him to gain strength and stand, evoking parallels to other biblical theophanies through its overwhelming majesty and auditory power. The heavenly messenger revealed the cause of a 21-day delay in responding to Daniel's prayers: resistance from the "prince of the kingdom of Persia," a supernatural adversary who detained the envoy until Michael—one of the chief princes and designated protector of Daniel's people ()—provided assistance to enable the breakthrough. This account introduces a cosmic framework of , positing that angelic and demonic entities exert influence over terrestrial empires, with the prince of Persia understood in scholarly analyses as a high-ranking demonic power or assigned to the Persian domain, counterbalanced by Michael's role as Israel's advocate. The messenger further indicated an impending confrontation with the "prince of Greece" and affirmed Michael's singular alliance among such forces, framing the vision's prelude as a disclosure of unseen battles shaping historical events without detailing their outcomes.

Detailed Prophecies of Kings and Conflicts (Daniel 11)

Daniel 11:2–4 foretells three additional Persian kings after the first year of Darius, followed by a fourth who amasses great wealth and provokes the realm of , aligning with the reigns leading to (486–465 BCE), whose invasion of in 480 BCE marked heightened conflict. A mighty king then arises, conquering extensively but dying young without passing dominion to his posterity, with his empire divided toward the four winds—corresponding to the Great's conquests from 334–323 BCE, his death at age 32, and the subsequent partition among four generals, notably I establishing the in (the "king of the South") and Seleucus I founding the in and (the "king of the North") around 312 BCE. Verses 5–20 delineate over a dozen specific interactions, including the king of the South gaining ascendancy (), followed by a prince of the North surpassing him (), a marriage alliance for security that fails amid treachery ( wedding daughter to in 252 BCE, ending in assassinations), retaliatory invasions repelled, and a successor honoring a briefly before sudden death (, assassinated in 175 BCE after three years). These verses exhibit granular detail on bribes, betrayals, and outcomes matching Hellenistic records from the third century BCE. Verses 21–35 shift to a "contemptible person" rising through intrigue rather than rightful claim, overflowing fortresses, distributing spoil, and launching campaigns against the South deterred by arms from the north ( usurping the throne in 175 BCE, invading in 169 and 168 BCE but checked by Roman legate Popillius Laenas at Eleusis), then turning wrath against the holy covenant by desecrating the sanctuary, abolishing the daily sacrifice, and installing the in 167 BCE, while some apostatize for gain but the wise endure refinement until a determined end. The sequence tracks Antiochus IV's documented policies and the Maccabean revolt's onset with empirical precision. Verses 36–39 portray the king exalting himself above every god, blaspheming the , honoring a god of fortresses with precious metals, and employing a foreign to conquer strongholds—elements partially echoing Antiochus IV's syncretistic Zeus-Osiris but diverging in specifics like disregard for ancestral gods. Verses 40–45 describe an end-time clash where the king of the North surges against the South with chariots and ships, entering the Glorious Land with few escapes, extending dominion over many but perishing unaided between the seas and the holy mountain—events unfulfilled by Antiochus IV, who died in Persia in 164 BCE during an eastern campaign without invading terminally or meeting the prophesied demise. This pivot from verifiable history signals prophetic extension beyond ancient conflicts toward ultimate tribulations.

Climax of End Times, Resurrection, and Sealing (Daniel 12)

Daniel 12 depicts the culmination of the prophetic vision with a forecast of unprecedented tribulation for the people of , during which the Michael, described as the great prince who has charge over them, will arise to protect them. This period of distress is characterized as unparalleled since the existence of nations, yet deliverance will come to those whose names are found written in a divine . The chapter introduces the concept of bodily , stating that many who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake, with some attaining everlasting life and others facing shame and everlasting contempt. This differentiation underscores a final based on conduct, as those who are wise and lead many to are promised to shine like the brightness of the and stars forever. Such language marks a pivotal eschatological development in biblical , linking resurrection to eternal reward or punishment. Daniel receives instruction to seal the prophetic words until the time of the end, when increased knowledge and widespread inquiry will occur as people run to and fro. This sealing implies that full comprehension remains deferred, accessible only in the designated era, fostering a posture of amid partial . The vision concludes with enigmatic temporal specifications: from the cessation of the daily sacrifice and the establishment of the , 1,290 days will pass, and blessing awaits those who endure to 1,335 days. Daniel is urged to rest and await his own portion at the end of days, when he will arise to receive his , emphasizing perseverance for the faithful through trials leading to ultimate vindication. These precise day counts, extending beyond the earlier 1,260-day framework, suggest additional phases of fulfillment without immediate resolution.

Composition and Authorship

Traditional Sixth-Century Attribution to Daniel

The presents chapters 10–12 as a recounting visions received by Daniel himself, a Jewish noble exiled to in 605 BC following Nebuchadnezzar's siege of Jerusalem. The final vision is explicitly dated to "the third year of king of Persia" (Daniel 10:1), corresponding to approximately 536 BC, during Daniel's advanced age and service in the Persian court after the fall of in 539 BC. This internal testimony portrays Daniel as an interpreter of royal dreams and a recipient of divine revelations amid the transition from Babylonian to Persian rule, aligning with his described role as a high official under multiple monarchs. Historical details within the visions reflect accurate knowledge of sixth-century Chaldean customs, such as administrative practices and court protocols under Nebuchadnezzar and his successors, which a later pseudepigrapher would likely misrepresent given the scarcity of such specifics in second-century sources. Linguistic analysis supports this early composition: the sections (Daniel 2:4–7:28) exhibit features of Official or prevalent in the Neo-Babylonian and early Achaemenid eras, including vocabulary and syntax corroborated by contemporary inscriptions and fragments predating the . The Hebrew portions similarly evince pre-exilic and exilic influences, with rare terms like pəlōnî (:13) appearing in sixth-century contexts but not commonly later. Jewish tradition upholds Daniel's authorship, as evidenced by Flavius Josephus in Antiquities of the Jews (c. AD 93–94), who attributes the book's prophecies to the historical Daniel, citing their fulfillment in events like Alexander the Great's conquests and crediting Daniel with foreknowledge preserved in Babylonian records. The New Testament reinforces this view, with Jesus explicitly referencing "the abomination of desolation spoken of by the prophet Daniel" (Matthew 24:15), treating Daniel as a authoritative prophetic figure whose writings anticipated future eschatological events rather than merely recounting contemporary history. These attestations position the book as genuine sixth-century prophecy within early Jewish and Christian interpretive frameworks.

Critical Theories of Second-Century Pseudepigraphy

Critical scholars maintain that Daniel chapters 10–12 were pseudonymously authored circa 165 BCE by an anonymous Jewish scribe during the height of ' persecution, framing recent history as ancient to inspire resistance. This pseudonymity, common in apocalyptic texts, attributes the material to the sixth-century figure Daniel to evoke authority without asserting new divine revelation, thereby circumventing post-exilic norms against . The composition aligns with the , where Seleucid desecrations prompted writings encouraging fidelity amid enforced . A core argument rests on the chapter's apparent historical detail in Daniel 11:2–39, interpreted as vaticinium ex eventu—events recast as foretold after their occurrence. Verses 2–4 delineate four Persian kings followed by conquest and the division into southern (Ptolemaic ) and northern (Seleucid ) realms, matching and other records from 539 to circa 300 BCE. Subsequent verses chronicle four Ptolemaic-Seleucid wars (11:5–20), including I's daughter Berenice's failed marriage alliance (v.6, circa 252 BCE), IV's victory at Raphia (v.11–12, 217 BCE), and Antiochus III's campaigns (v.15–19, 198–198 BCE). The account peaks with "the contemptible person" (v.21–39), paralleling Antiochus IV's usurpation (175 BCE), Egyptian intrigues, Temple plunder (169 BCE), and (167 BCE), with specifics like 1,290 and 1,335 days (12:11–12) approximating the altar's pollution duration per 1:54; 4:52. Proponents, including , contend such granularity exceeds plausible prediction, necessitating composition proximate to these events. The theory falters, per advocates, at verses 40–45, where the northern king's final invasions and death "between the seas and the beautiful holy mountain" diverge from Antiochus's historical demise in Tabae, Persia (164 BCE, per 31.9), without the predicted sanctuary deliverance. This mismatch is viewed as an author's erroneous extrapolation of ongoing crises into unfulfilled , evidencing pre-death drafting around 165 BCE rather than sixth-century prescience. Linguistic markers reinforce the late date: the dialect approximates third–first-century papyri from and Idumea, distinct from earlier Official Aramaic; Greek loanwords (e.g., kinnoros and symphōnia in chapter 3, though visions proper lack them) suggest Hellenistic contact; and "ships of " (11:30) denotes Roman fleets rebuking Antiochus at Eleusina (168 BCE, per 44.29; 29.27), an anachronism for Babylonian exiles. Canonical evidence bolsters pseudonymity claims: the book's exclusion from the (Prophets) in the Jewish Tanakh, placing it in (Writings), implies composition after the prophetic corpus closed circa 400 BCE, as later texts like Daniel—blending wisdom, narrative, and —fit the residual category. Ben Sira's silence on Daniel (circa 180 BCE) further suggests its absence from earlier prophetic rosters. Motivations centered on pastoral exigency: under Antiochus's edicts banning , , and (1 Maccabees 1:41–50), the text consoles the maskilim (11:33, "wise teachers") by retrojecting divine oversight over history, urging endurance until vindication (11:32–35; 12:10), thus legitimizing non-violent fidelity and implicit revolt without prophetic hubris. Such theories, dominant in since Porphyry's third-century critique, prioritize naturalistic over foresight, though institutional academia's secular presuppositions may systematically discount early attestation like fragments.

Historical and Cultural Context

Setting in the Persian Period and Earlier Events

Daniel experienced deportation to in 605 BC as part of Nebuchadnezzar II's initial campaign against , marking the onset of the Babylonian exile for Judean elites including himself. He outlived the , witnessing its collapse under the Great's conquest of in 539 BC, which shifted control to Persian dominion and initiated policies favoring exiled peoples. The vision's setting falls in the third year of 's Persian kingship, circa 536 BC, during a period of personal mourning and fasting for Daniel amid ongoing uncertainties. Historical figures anchor this transition: , who issued a decree in 538 BC permitting Jewish returns and temple restoration, and , depicted as Belshazzar's successor in Daniel's accounts, likely corresponding to Gubaru (or Ugbaru), a official and Cyrus's governor over Gutium who administered post-conquest before Cyrus's formal entry. Exilic Jews faced persistent challenges, including partial repatriations under leaders like starting around 538–536 BC, yet temple rebuilding stalled due to regional opposition from and others, delaying completion until 516 BC despite foundational work in Cyrus's era. The vision's angelic "princes" of Persia and evoke territorial supernatural entities—patron spirits or divine agents over empires—aligning with ancient Near Eastern cosmologies where celestial hierarchies mirrored and influenced geopolitical powers, as evidenced in biblical precedents like Deuteronomy 32:8–9 and the motif of cosmic opposition in prophetic warfare imagery. This framework underscores Jewish struggles under foreign rule while linking to prior oracles: Isaiah's explicit naming of as Yahweh's anointed for captive release (Isaiah 44:28; 45:1) and Ezekiel's temple and national revival visions (; 40–48), portraying Daniel's era as a pivotal juncture in divine promises of restoration amid imperial flux.

Correlations with Hellenistic Conflicts and Antiochus IV

Daniel 11:2–4 describes a sequence beginning with Persian rulers followed by a "stern-faced " who arises to , conquers extensively, but whose dominion is not given to his descendants and is instead divided toward the four winds of heaven. This aligns with the historical rise of III of Macedon, who ascended the in 336 BC at age 20 and, through campaigns from 334 BC onward, defeated the Achaemenid Persian Empire by 330 BC, extending his control to , , and parts of before his sudden death in in June 323 BC without a designated heir. The ensuing (Successors), spanning 322–281 BC, fragmented Alexander's empire among his generals, resulting in four primary Hellenistic kingdoms by circa 301 BC: under Ptolemy I, the in Syria and the East under Seleucus I, Macedon under the Antigonids, and and Asia Minor under , matching the prophecy's depiction of division not enduring in Alexander's line. Subsequent verses in Daniel 11:5–20 detail protracted conflicts between the "king of the South" () and the "king of the North" (), including invasions, alliances, and betrayals that correspond to historical Ptolemaic-Seleucid Wars from the late through the early , such as I's gains in (circa 301 BC) and Antiochus III's campaigns against in 217 BC and 200–198 BC. The narrative intensifies in Daniel 11:21–35 with a "contemptible person" who acquires the northern throne through intrigue, seizes wealth, and desecrates the , events paralleling the reign of (r. 175–164 BC), who usurped power after his brother Seleucus IV's assassination in 175 BC, plundered the Jerusalem Temple treasury in 169 BC to fund wars, and in 167 BC erected an altar to Olympios within the Temple, sacrificing swine—an under Jewish law—while banning , observance, and to enforce . These sacrileges provoked the , initiated in 167 BC by the priest and his son , who led against Seleucid forces, recapturing and purifying the Temple by dismantling the profane altar and restoring Jewish rites; the rededication occurred on 25 (December) 164 BC, instituting the festival of commemorating the event. This resistance correlates with Daniel 11:32–35, portraying those who know their God strengthening themselves and prevailing against the oppressor amid refinement and purification. However, the vision's progression in Daniel 11:36–45 describes the northern king's unchecked , military thrusts against and the , and abrupt demise between the seas without burial, which diverges from Antiochus IV's historical death from illness in Persia in late 164 BC en route to suppress eastern revolts, suggesting the prophecy encompasses these Hellenistic fulfillments as precursors to further escalations unresolved by the Maccabean victories.

Interpretive Frameworks

Preterist Interpretations Focused on Ancient Fulfillments

Preterist interpretations of Daniel's final vision in chapters 10-12 emphasize its fulfillment in the Hellenistic era, particularly the Ptolemaic-Seleucid wars and the against in the second century BCE. These views align the prophecy's details with verifiable historical events, portraying the angelic discourse as retrospective encouragement for Judeans enduring rather than long-range prediction of distant eschatological crises. Daniel 11:2-20 maps precisely onto the succession of Persian kings after , the Great's conquest in 334-323 BCE and empire division, and the early between Ptolemaic (kings of the South) and the (kings of the North). Specific correspondences include the Fourth Syrian War (219-217 BCE), where defeated Antiochus III at the on May 22, 217 BCE (11:11-12), and Antiochus III's subsequent campaigns and defeat by at Magnesia in 190 BCE (11:18). Verses 21-35 depict Antiochus IV's usurpation in 175 BCE as the "contemptible person" who seizes power through intrigue (11:21), his invasions of in 169 and 168 BCE (11:25-29), and the subsequent desecration of the Temple in December 167 BCE, when Seleucid forces under Apollonius abolished the tamid daily offerings and installed the "," likely a or defiled cult object (11:31). The narrative anticipates resistance from the "wise" and "maskil" figures, aligning with the initial Maccabean insurgents who defied the edicts beginning in 167 BCE. The "time of the end" (11:40; 12:4,9) refers to the acute phase of this crisis from 167 to 164 BCE, resolved by Judas Maccabeus's victories over Seleucid generals like and Nicanor, culminating in the Temple's rededication on December 14, 164 BCE after approximately 1,150 days of desecration (cf. Dan 8:14; 12:11-12). The "time, times, and half a time" (12:7) corresponds to this 3.5-year span, symbolizing truncated tribulation under divine oversight, with the faithful's deliverance through military and spiritual fidelity. Daniel 12's resurrection and judgment motifs (12:1-3) are interpreted symbolically as the national revival and vindication of martyred , whose "awakening" reflects the Maccabean era's restoration of observance and cultic purity amid apparent annihilation, prioritizing historical consolation over literal . While some patristic writers like identified Antiochus's actions as partial fulfillments typing future antichrist figures, strict preterist readings subordinate typology to ancient closure, viewing the sealed (12:4,9) as encouragement literature composed amid unfolding events around 165 BCE. Modern critical scholars, such as , reinforce this by noting the text's vaticinium ex eventu precision up to the 167 BCE sacrilege, arguing against supernatural beyond contemporary horizons.

Futurist and Eschatological Readings for Future Events

Futurist interpretations posit that Daniel 11:36–45 primarily foretells events during a future period of global tribulation, with the "king who does as he pleases" (11:36) embodying an ultimate figure characterized by unparalleled self-exaltation, blasphemy against gods, and military conquests leading to his sudden destruction. This ruler's career aligns with depictions of a lawless end-time leader who opposes and deceives nations, distinct from partial historical precedents like Antiochus IV due to the scope of his claimed divinity and unchecked prosperity until divine intervention. The ensuing conflicts (11:40–45) describe invasions by a northern coalition—potentially involving revived empires or modern powers—against the Antichrist's southern stronghold, culminating in battles near that presage , rather than ancient Hellenistic wars. These passages form a dual prophecy framework, where ancient echoes exist but the core fulfillment awaits the "time of the end" (11:40; 12:4), tied to a seven-year tribulation derived from Daniel 9:27's "one week," halved into 1,260 days of intense persecution following the . explicitly references this abomination from Daniel (citing 9:27, 11:31, and 12:11) in :15 as a yet-to-occur sign prompting flight from , indicating unfulfilled even in the first century and linking it to preceding cosmic signs and the Son of Man's return. Similarly, :7–9 parallels Daniel 12:1's angelic protector Michael leading heavenly warfare against during unparalleled distress, protecting Israel's remnant amid end-time upheavals. Daniel 12:2–3 emphasizes a literal, bodily dividing the righteous to everlasting and the wicked to shame, occurring post-tribulation as the capstone of , with sealed knowledge (12:4,9) unveiling only at fulfillment. Dispensational premillennialists, drawing from apostolic precedents like Paul's expectation of a future and kingdom (1 Thessalonians 4:16–17; 1 Corinthians 15:51–52), argue these events inaugurate a millennial , contrasting amillennial dilutions by insisting on sequential, verifiable timelines including the 1,290 and 1,335 days as extensions beyond the core 1,260 for judgment and blessing phases. This reading underscores God's sovereignty over history, with empirical prophetic patterns (e.g., prior fulfillments in Daniel 11:2–35) supporting predictive accuracy for ultimate eschatological resolution.

Historicist and Idealist Approaches

The historicist approach interprets Daniel's final vision (chapters 10–12) as a panoramic outline of historical events unfolding sequentially from the prophet's era through successive world powers, with the protracted conflicts between the "king of the North" and "king of the South" (Daniel 11:5–45) extending beyond the ancient Greco-Syrian rivalries to later empires including , the Eastern Roman () Empire, Islamic caliphates, and Western ecclesiastical powers. In this framework, the prophecy transitions after verse 11:32 from literal Hellenistic kings to symbolic representations of ongoing geopolitical and spiritual struggles, culminating in end-time upheavals involving a northern power's final and downfall (Daniel 11:40–45). Protestant historicists, particularly during the , applied these motifs to the Roman Catholic papacy as the "king of the North," viewing its historical rise from the ruins of the around 538 CE—marked by Justinian's decree elevating the bishop of —and its dominance through the as fulfilling descriptions of desecration and opposition to God's people. Key figures among the Reformers, such as , explicitly linked the papacy to the typology in Daniel's prophecies, interpreting the "abomination that makes desolate" (Daniel 11:31; 12:11) not merely as Antiochus IV's temple profanation in 167 BCE but as recurring papal innovations like the as a propitiatory sacrifice and mandatory , which Luther condemned in his 1520 treatise and later of 1537. Luther further saw the "king of the South" as Muslim powers (e.g., the , who besieged in 1529), pushing against a northern papal entity in a broader historic continuum, while affirming the 1,260-day period of Daniel 12:7 (calculated as 1,260 years in the ) as spanning from the papacy's temporal supremacy to its prophesied decline. This method, prominent in works by later historicists like (who dated papal events from 756 CE onward in his Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel, published posthumously in 1733), emphasizes verifiable correlations with dated historical records, such as the papacy's loss of in 1798 under , as partial fulfillments leading to ultimate resolution. In the idealist approach, the vision's imagery conveys timeless archetypal principles of and divine triumph over evil, rather than a rigid historical timeline, portraying the angelic princes (Daniel 10:13, 20–21; 12:1) as emblems of perpetual cosmic contention between heavenly forces and earthly tyrants, recurrent across eras without fixed endpoints. motifs, such as the scattering of the holy people (Daniel 11:32–35; 12:7) and the time of distress (Daniel 12:1), symbolize universal patterns of opposition to faithfulness—exemplified historically by Antiochus IV's 3-year temple desecration (167–164 BCE) as a type, but applicable to any age's autocrats, from Roman emperors to modern totalitarian regimes—underscoring lessons of and eschatological vindication over chronological prediction. Idealists, drawing parallels to similar symbolism in , reject date-specific calculations for the 1,290 and 1,335 days (Daniel 12:11–12), instead viewing them as illustrative of prolonged tribulation yielding blessing, fostering ethical resilience amid recurring evil without endorsing speculative futurism or exhaustive . Both historicist and idealist lenses accommodate Antiochus as an initial antitype while positing layered fulfillments toward consummation, prioritizing scriptural patterns over institutional biases in interpretation.

Theological and Thematic Elements

Apocalyptic Structure and Angelic Warfare

The final vision in Daniel 10–12 embodies key hallmarks of apocalyptic genre, including revelatory content mediated through an otherworldly being—a resplendent angelic figure—who imparts symbolic imagery and cryptic timelines to the human seer, Daniel. This contrasts sharply with the earlier chapters' court tales and moral exempla, which emphasize historical narratives and ethical instruction through human protagonists. Apocalyptic elements here feature deterministic sequences of empires represented by beasts and horns, numerical symbols like "time, times, and half a time," and a dualistic cosmic order pitting divine forces against chaos, fostering a of transcendent amid temporal . Central to the vision's framework is the depiction of angelic warfare, portraying a structured spiritual hierarchy that undergirds human affairs. The interpreting recounts a 21-day delay in delivery caused by opposition from the "prince of the kingdom of Persia," overcome only with aid from Michael, identified as "one of the chief princes" and Israel's specific guardian (Daniel 10:13, 21). This conflict extends to the impending "prince of ," illustrating causality where terrestrial empires' rises and falls reflect battles among territorial angelic powers, with Michael uniquely positioned as Israel's defender against adversarial spiritual entities. Such portrayal underscores a realist : visible history as the outworking of invisible, hierarchical contests beyond human agency. The vision culminates in the command to "shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end" (Daniel 12:4, 9), signifying deliberate concealment of full meaning until a designated future era of increased and mobility. This sealing preserves the prophecy's against alteration while deferring comprehensive , thereby prioritizing communal and over individualistic in the present. The motif reinforces apocalyptic restraint, where partial revelation sustains resolve without resolving all enigmas prematurely.

Concepts of Divine Sovereignty, Resurrection, and Judgment

In Daniel's final vision, divine sovereignty manifests through the heavenly messenger's disclosure of fixed historical trajectories for earthly kingdoms, underscoring that empires rise and fall under permissive will despite spiritual hindrances to . The narrative portrays as orchestrating conflicts between kings of the north and south, affirming predestined outcomes even amid apparent chaos and delays attributed to oppositional forces like the "prince of Persia." This framework emphasizes causal control from heaven, where human events align with eternal purposes, countering perceptions of autonomous national power. The vision introduces a of bodily in Daniel 12:2, stating that "multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt," marking the Hebrew Bible's most explicit articulation of post-mortem revival for both righteous and wicked. This concept builds on antecedent motifs of divine vindication but innovates by linking awakening to differentiated eternal states based on earthly conduct and fidelity, influencing subsequent Jewish and early . Scholarly consensus identifies this as a pivotal shift toward individualized accountability, distinct from earlier shadowy depictions. Judgment in the vision hinges on and evangelistic impact, as Daniel 12:3 declares that "those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the sky above; and those who turn many to , like the stars forever and ever." This criteria rewards faithfulness amid with celestial exaltation, tying personal to communal influence in leading others toward covenant obedience, while implying condemnation for the unrepentant through perpetual disgrace. The sealed until "the time of the end" (Daniel 12:4,9) frames this as eschatological, where divine appraisal integrates deeds with cosmic resolution, without .

Debates and Criticisms

Challenges to Prophetic Precognition and Historicity

Critics argue that the contains historical inaccuracies, such as the portrayal of as a ruler who conquered in 539 BC and reigned for two years before , a figure absent from extrabiblical records like those of , , or Babylonian chronicles, which instead attribute the conquest directly to . This absence is interpreted as evidence of the author's confusion or fabrication, undermining claims of sixth-century BC authorship and prophetic authenticity. The detailed narrative in Daniel 11:2-35 aligns closely with known Hellenistic events from the Persian kings through the Ptolemaic-Seleucid wars up to ' desecration of the Jerusalem Temple in 167 BC, leading scholars like to propose a composition date around 165 BC as vaticinium ex eventu—prophecy crafted after the events to encourage resistance during the Maccabean crisis. Such precision, critics contend, exceeds plausible foresight and indicates retrospective rather than . Subsequent verses, particularly Daniel 11:40-45, describe the "king of the North" (identified with Antiochus IV) engaging in further campaigns against and meeting his end "between the seas and the glorious holy mountain" without aid, yet historical accounts record Antiochus dying in 164 BC during a Parthian expedition in Persia, far from , with no such localized demise or unassisted end. This discrepancy is cited as a failed , suggesting the author anticipated but misjudged the tyrant's fate, with later eschatological elements like serving as consolatory myths amid unfulfilled expectations. Higher criticism, rooted in Enlightenment and advanced by figures from Porphyry in the third century to nineteenth-century scholars, systematically rejects in favor of naturalistic causation, viewing Daniel's visions as pseudepigraphic works reflecting second-century BC Jewish apocalyptic responses to rather than divinely inspired foresight. This approach, dominant in academic , assumes methodological naturalism, often prioritizing extrabiblical analogies over the text's internal claims to antiquity.

Evidence for Early Dating and Supernatural Inspiration

The presence of eight distinct manuscripts of the among the Dead Sea Scrolls, including fragments from 1, 4, and 6, attests to its circulation by the late second century BCE, with the earliest copies (such as 4QDan^a and 4QDan^b) paleographically dated to approximately 125–100 BCE. These artifacts encompass sections of Daniel's final vision in chapters 10–12, demonstrating textual stability and authoritative status well before the Maccabean Revolt's climax around 167–164 BCE, which undermines claims of recent composition during that crisis. Linguistic examination of the Hebrew and Aramaic reveals archaic grammatical and lexical elements, particularly in Daniel 5:10–12, including rare verb forms and vocabulary patterns aligning with sixth-century BCE usage rather than deliberate archaizing in a second-century context. The book's integration into the , with Greek translations of Daniel evidencing familiarity by the second century BCE, further indicates recognition predating any purported Hellenistic forgery. Daniel 11:2–4 precisely delineates the succession of three Persian kings after , followed by a fourth () amassing unprecedented wealth and initiating conflict with , culminating in the meteoric conquests of a "mighty king" (, r. 336–323 BCE) whose empire fractures into four divisions upon his untimely death—events verifiable through Persian and Greek historical records like and , yet unfolding over two centuries beyond Daniel's exilic setting. This sequence's fulfillment, devoid of contemporaneous sources that could enable without anachronistic errors, exemplifies predictive precision unattainable by human foresight alone. New Testament authors treat Daniel as a sixth-century , with explicit references such as Matthew 24:15 invoking "the spoken of by the Daniel" and Hebrews 11:33–34 alluding to his narratives (, fiery furnace) as exemplary faith amid historical trials. The absence of ancient attestations to pseudepigraphy, coupled with empirical prophetic verification, logically entails agency, as natural causal chains—limited to extant knowledge and probabilistic conjecture—fail to originate such corroborated foresight absent divine intervention.

Enduring Impact

Role in Jewish and Christian Eschatology

In , Daniel's final vision in chapters 10–12 profoundly influenced apocalyptic frameworks, particularly in Second Temple literature like the Qumran texts. The Dead Sea Scrolls, including fragments of Daniel itself and derivative works such as the War Scroll (1QM), incorporate motifs of angelic conflict and end-time warfare mirroring Daniel 10's depiction of principalities battling over earthly kingdoms, framing a dualistic cosmic struggle culminating in God's triumph. Daniel 12's prophecy of —"many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt"—provided a foundational scriptural basis for beliefs in bodily and final judgment, shaping sectarian expectations of a purified remnant enduring tribulation before messianic deliverance. Rabbinic traditions extended these elements into messianic timelines, with Daniel's "time, times, and half a time" (12:7) and attendant periods of 1,290 and 1,335 days informing calculations of the eschatological age's duration, though not explicitly tied to the later-developed dual messiahs of ben (a suffering warrior) and ben . Instead, the vision's emphasis on divine sovereignty amid reinforced hopes for a cataclysmic intervention restoring , influencing midrashic interpretations that prioritize national vindication over individualized details. In , the vision undergirds doctrines of the and , with Daniel 11:36–45's "king who does as he pleases" interpreted as a prototype for the end-time opposer who exalts himself above gods and invades the glorious land, leading to his downfall by divine intervention. Chapter 12's and sealing of inform , paralleling 1 Thessalonians 4:16–17 and Revelation's of the righteous amid judgment. The (:15–21) directly alludes to Daniel's "abomination that causes desolation" (echoed in 11:31 and 12:11), warning of unprecedented distress preceding the Son of Man's return, thus emphasizing faithful endurance. Revelation's structure and symbols—beasts, 1,260 days, and Michael standing against the dragon—draw extensively from Daniel 10–12, portraying a unified arc of persecution, angelic protection, and ultimate vindication. Early Church Fathers bridged intertestamental apocalypticism to Christian application, as seen in Hippolytus of Rome's Commentary on Daniel (ca. 202–211 AD), the earliest extant Christian biblical commentary, which allegorized the vision's kings of north and south as Roman imperial tyranny, urging perseverance against persecution while anticipating Christ's parousia to shatter the eschatological foe. This interpretation fueled hopes during oppression, positioning Daniel as a template for viewing earthly empires as transient instruments in God's sovereign plan, distinct from later futurist elaborations like pre-tribulation rapture timelines derived inferentially from Daniel's chronologies.

Influence on Later Prophetic and Apocalyptic Literature

The final vision in Daniel 10–12, with its portrayal of angelic princes engaging in celestial warfare and a prophetic timeline culminating in , exerted significant influence on intertestamental apocalyptic texts. The Book of , composed between the third and first centuries BCE, expands upon Daniel's angelic hierarchies, depicting "watchers" as overseers of nations akin to the "prince of Persia" and "prince of Greece" in Daniel 10:13, 20, thereby developing a more elaborate cosmology of spiritual principalities contesting earthly empires. This framework of opposed heavenly powers recurs in other , framing human history as an extension of divine angelic contests. In the , direct allusions to Daniel's final vision shape eschatological motifs, particularly in Pauline and Johannine writings. The "man of lawlessness" who exalts himself in the temple in 2 Thessalonians 2:3–4 parallels the arrogant king of Daniel 11:36 who speaks against and prospers until divine indignation, providing a template for end-times deception. incorporates temporal markers from Daniel 12:7, 11–12, such as the 1,260 days and abomination causing desolation, into its beast imagery and little scroll ( 10–11, 13), while the sealed prophetic book in echoes the sealed words of Daniel 12:4, 9. These borrowings underscore Daniel's role as a foundational blueprint for apocalyptic structure, emphasizing sealed mysteries unveiled at . During the , drew on Daniel's depictions of the "little horn" and willful king to identify the papacy as the , interpreting the prophetic opposer in –8 and 11 as a historical power that alters times and laws through doctrinal innovations and temporal . Puritan exegetes, building on this historicist approach, applied the vision's northern king and desolator motifs to papal Rome's dominance, viewing events like the 1260-year prophetic period (Daniel 12:7) as spanning from the sixth century CE to the French Revolution's wounding of in 1798. In modern evangelical thought, dispensational premillennialism, popularized by the (first edition 1909), treats the unfulfilled portions of Daniel 11–12—such as the final northern king's invasion and the time of distress—as literal future events preceding Christ's return, distinguishing them from partially realized ancient fulfillments. This lens, emphasizing a gap in Daniel's 70 weeks and angelic announcements of end-time conflicts, has shaped contemporary scholarship affirming the vision's predictive precision despite academic skepticism from sources prone to naturalistic .

References

  1. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+10-12&version=ESV
  2. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+10%3A1-9&version=ESV
  3. https://enduringword.com/bible-commentary/daniel-10/
  4. https://evidenceunseen.com/old-testament/daniel/difficulties/authorship-of-daniel/
  5. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+11%3A21-12%3A7&version=ESV
  6. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/1192/
  7. https://www.galaxie.com/article/jodt11-34-02
  8. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel%2010:1-3&version=NIV
  9. https://walvoord.com/article/251
  10. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel%2010:4&version=NIV
  11. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel%2010:5-6&version=NIV
  12. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel%2010:7-9&version=NIV
  13. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel%2010:10-12&version=NIV
  14. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel%2010:13&version=NIV
  15. https://www.andrews.edu/library/car/cardigital/Periodicals/AUSS/1983-3/1983-3-04.pdf
  16. https://www.gotquestions.org/prince-of-Persia.html
  17. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel%2010:20-21&version=NIV
  18. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+11%3A2-4&version=ESV
  19. https://europe.factsanddetails.com/article/entry-165.html
  20. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+11%3A5-20&version=ESV
  21. https://walvoord.com/article/252
  22. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+11%3A21-35&version=ESV
  23. https://readingacts.com/2020/03/03/daniel-1121-35-concerning-antiochus-iv-epiphanes/
  24. https://christiancourier.com/articles/daniels-prophecy-of-antiochus-epiphanes
  25. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+11%3A36-39&version=ESV
  26. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+11%3A40-45&version=ESV
  27. https://evidenceforchristianity.org/what-is-the-meaning-of-the-prophecy-in-daniel-1140-45-is-it-about-antiochus-epiphanes/
  28. https://enduringword.com/bible-commentary/daniel-11/
  29. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel%2012&version=ESV
  30. https://walvoord.com/article/253
  31. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/148/
  32. https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=jigr
  33. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1133&context=pd
  34. https://walvoord.com/article/241
  35. https://www.spiritandtruth.org/teaching/documents/articles/34/34.htm?x=x
  36. https://evidenceunseen.com/old-testament/daniel/difficulties/authorship-of-daniel
  37. https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2022/08/18/top-ten-discoveries-related-to-the-book-of-daniel/
  38. https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/1980/01/is-the-aramaic-of-daniel-early-or-late
  39. https://jonathanmclatchie.com/the-authenticity-of-the-book-of-daniel-a-survey-of-the-evidence/
  40. https://jimhamilton.info/2010/11/26/josephus-on-alexander-the-great-and-the-book-of-daniel/
  41. https://biblehub.com/matthew/24-15.htm
  42. https://www.gmnf-inc.org/biblical-studies-articles/authorship-of-daniel
  43. https://www.thetorah.com/article/antiochus-iv-persecution-as-portrayed-in-the-book-of-daniel
  44. https://bible.org/article/introduction-book-daniel
  45. https://readingacts.com/2020/02/22/daniel-11-and-history/
  46. https://www.thetorah.com/article/chanukah-daniel-11-and-the-rabbis-limited-knowledge-of-history
  47. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3113&context=dissertations
  48. https://www.academia.edu/30247693/The_Greek_Loanwords_in_the_Book_of_Daniel_2015_
  49. https://www.academia.edu/8671131/The_HEBREW_and_the_ARAMAIC_of_DANIEL
  50. https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1735365/jewish/Why-Isnt-the-Book-of-Daniel-Part-of-the-Prophets.htm
  51. https://bible-history.com/map-babylonian-captivity/timeline-of-events
  52. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/herodotus/cyrus-takes-babylon/
  53. https://www.bible.com/bible/116/DAN.10.NLT
  54. https://www.stegozoeterno.org/aa-darius-the-mede
  55. https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/second-temple/
  56. https://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/bsac/daniel10.pdf
  57. https://www.biblicaltraining.org/learn/academy/guide-old-testament-ot300/prophecy-hebrew-prophets-ot300-25
  58. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/alexander_the_great.shtml
  59. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/alexander-great/
  60. https://www.livius.org/articles/concept/diadochi/diadochi-8-the-fourth-diadoch-war-2/
  61. https://greekreporter.com/2025/03/15/wars-alexander-the-great-succesors/
  62. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/encyclopaedia_romana/miscellanea/trivia/no-man.html
  63. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/827/the-maccabean-revolt/
  64. https://publicaciones.uap.edu.ar/index.php/davarlogos/article/view/1102/1095
  65. https://www.livius.org/articles/misc/daniel-11-in-context/
  66. https://israelmyglory.org/article/the-character-and-career-of-the-antichrist/
  67. https://biblicalelearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Harton-Dan11-GTJ.pdf
  68. https://www.gotquestions.org/tribulation-1260-1290-1335-days.html
  69. https://www.gotquestions.org/abomination-desolation.html
  70. http://www.daniel11prophecy.com/uploads/1/1/3/7/113721993/kings_of_the_south_and_the_north.pdf
  71. https://grani.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/download/1657/1633/
  72. https://www.bibleprophecytruth.com/the-antichrist/protestant-reformers
  73. https://www.whitehorsemedia.com/the-antichrist-and-the-protestant-reformation/
  74. https://www.semperreformanda.com/creeds/the-reformers-on-who-is-the-antichrist/
  75. https://www.foi.org/2022/06/17/5-ways-to-interpret-prophecy/
  76. https://cbtseminary.org/modified-idealist-revelation-1/
  77. https://www.forerunner.com/daniel/four-methods-of-interpretation
  78. https://puritanboard.com/threads/idealism-vs-historicism.70576/
  79. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/essay/introduction-to-old-testament-apocalyptic-literature/
  80. https://www.biblicaltraining.org/learn/institute/ot666-daniel/ot666-12-apocalyptic-literature-vs-prophecy
  81. https://readingacts.com/2020/02/26/daniel-10-who-is-the-prince-of-persia/
  82. https://enduringword.com/bible-commentary/daniel-12/
  83. https://biblehub.com/commentaries/daniel/12-4.htm
  84. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+10%3A12-14&version=ESV
  85. https://www.biola.edu/blogs/good-book-blog/2024/the-sovereignty-of-god-in-the-book-of-daniel
  86. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+10%3A13%2C20&version=ESV
  87. https://academic.oup.com/jts/article-abstract/62/2/680/1650274
  88. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+12%3A2&version=ESV
  89. https://ehrmanblog.org/daniel-and-a-new-doctrine-of-resurrection-from-the-dead/
  90. https://repository.sbts.edu/handle/10392/4532
  91. https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/afterlife-and-resurrection-beliefs-second-temple-period
  92. https://www.academia.edu/34143532/The_Resurrection_in_Daniel_12_2
  93. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+12%3A3&version=ESV
  94. https://journals.co.za/doi/10.17159/2312-3621/2024/v37n3a6
  95. https://christiancourier.com/articles/what-about-daniels-prophecy-of-the-general-resurrection
  96. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+12%3A4%2C9&version=ESV
  97. https://evidenceunseen.com/old-testament/daniel/difficulties/who-is-darius-the-mede
  98. https://defendinginerrancy.com/bible-solutions/Daniel_5.31.php
  99. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43719403
  100. https://www.samstorms.org/all-articles/post/introduction-to-daniel
  101. https://jamestabor.com/daniel-chapter-11-and-failed-predictions-some-hanukkah-thoughts/
  102. https://amazingdiscoveries.org/read/articles/higher-criticism-vs-historicism-interpreting-the-scriptures
  103. https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/1979/01/daniel-survives-the-critics-den
  104. https://krisispraxis.com/archives/2015/03/evangelical-faith-and-the-challenge-of-historical-criticism-part-1-2/
  105. https://www.biola.edu/blogs/good-book-blog/2022/who-wrote-the-book-of-daniel-part-4-five-positive-evidences-for-an-early-daniel1
  106. https://biblearchaeology.org/research/divided-kingdom/3193-new-light-on-the-book-of-daniel-from-the-dead-sea-scrolls
  107. https://www.academia.edu/57812213/Historical_in_accuracy_and_linguistic_archaism_in_Daniel_5
  108. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%253A3466003/view
  109. https://www.abc.net.au/religion/carbon-dating-dead-sea-scrolls-apocalyptic-visions-book-daniel/105534586
  110. https://www.spiritandtruth.org/teaching/Daniel_by_Andy_Woods/44_Daniel_11_2-4/20171203_44_daniel_11_2-4_transcript.html
  111. https://lifehopeandtruth.com/prophecy/understanding-the-book-of-daniel/daniel-11/
  112. https://wednesdayintheword.com/daniel-newtestament/
  113. https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/1961/11/daniel-eight-in-the-new-testament
  114. https://answersingenesis.org/bible-history/daniel-prophecy-or-pseudonymous-forgery/
  115. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=jlbts
  116. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/edcoll/9789004276093/B9789004276093-s004.pdf
  117. https://oxfordre.com/religion/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-152
  118. https://walvoord.com/article/118
  119. https://www.jesuswalk.com/daniel/9_resurrection.htm
  120. https://www.pergrazia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/0205_hippolytus_commentary-on-daniel_2010.pdf
  121. https://www.gorgiaspress.com/hippolytus-of-romes-commentary-on-daniel
  122. https://www.marquette.edu/maqom/daniel55.pdf
  123. https://kurtmahler.com/on-daniel-101-111/
  124. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1166&context=jats
  125. https://revelation-armageddon.com/2018/03/allusion-daniel-12-revelation-10-trumpets-6/
  126. https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/66236/is-the-scroll-book-revealed-in-revelation-58-9-the-same-scroll-book-that-was-se
  127. https://www.andrews.edu/library/car/cardigital/Periodicals/AUSS/1987-2/1987-2-03.pdf
  128. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3962&context=auss
  129. https://www.acton.org/religion-liberty/volume-35-number-2/ci-scofield-gods-self-made-man
  130. https://www.the-highway.com/Scofield.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.