Hubbry Logo
Olivet DiscourseOlivet DiscourseMain
Open search
Olivet Discourse
Community hub
Olivet Discourse
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Olivet Discourse
Olivet Discourse
Olivet Discourse
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Christian eschatology
Contrasting beliefs
The Millennium
Biblical texts
Pseudepigrapha
Key terms
Christianity portal

The Olivet Discourse or Olivet prophecy is a biblical passage found in the Synoptic Gospels in Matthew 24 and 25, Mark 13, and Luke 21. It is also known as the Little Apocalypse because it includes the use of apocalyptic language, and it includes Jesus's warning to his followers that they will suffer tribulation and persecution before the ultimate triumph of the Kingdom of God.[1] The Olivet discourse is the last of the Five Discourses of Matthew and occurs just before the narrative of Jesus's passion beginning with the anointing of Jesus.

In all three synoptic Gospels this episode includes the Parable of the Budding Fig Tree.[2]

It is unclear whether the tribulation Jesus describes is a now past, present, or future event.[3]: p.5  Preterists believe the passage largely refers to events surrounding the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem[4][5] and as such is used to date the Gospel of Mark around the year 70.[4][6] Futurists believe the prophecy is broken into different parts, and partly “refers to events that are still yet to come”.[5]

Setting

[edit]

The discourse is widely believed by scholars to contain material delivered on a variety of occasions.[4]

In the Gospel of Matthew[7] and the Gospel of Mark,[8] Jesus spoke this discourse to his disciples privately on the Mount of Olives, opposite Herod's Temple. In the Gospel of Luke, Jesus taught over a period of time in the Temple and stayed at night on the Mount of Olives.[9]

Biblical narrative

[edit]
Events in the
Life of Jesus
according to the canonical gospels
Life of Jesus
Early life
Ministry
Passion
Resurrection
In rest of the New Testament
Portals: Christianity Bible
The Siege and Destruction of Jerusalem, by David Roberts (1850)

According to the narrative of the synoptic Gospels, an anonymous disciple remarks on the greatness of Herod's Temple.[10] Jesus responds that not one of those stones would remain intact in the building, and the whole thing would be reduced to rubble.[11]

The disciples asked Jesus, "When will this happen, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?" Jesus first warns them about things that would happen:[11]

  • Some would claim to be Christ (see also Antichrist);
  • There would be wars and rumours of wars.

Then Jesus identifies "the beginnings of birth pains":[11]

Next he described more birth pains which would lead to the coming Kingdom:[11]

Jesus then warned the disciples about the abomination of desolation "standing where it does not belong".

After Jesus described the "abomination that causes desolation", he warns that the people of Judea should flee to the mountains as a matter of such urgency that they shouldn't even return to get things from their homes. Jesus also warned that if it happened in winter or on the Sabbath fleeing would be even more difficult. Jesus described this as a time of "Great Tribulation" worse than anything that had gone before.

Jesus then states that immediately after the time of tribulation people would see a sign, "the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken".[15]

The statements about the Sun and Moon turning dark sound quite apocalyptic, as it appears to be a quote from the Book of Isaiah.[16] The description of the Sun, Moon and stars going dark is also used elsewhere in the Old Testament. Joel wrote that this would be a sign before the great and dreadful Day of the Lord.[17] The Book of Revelation also mentions the Sun and Moon turning dark during the sixth seal of the seven seals, but the passage adds more detail than the previous verses mentioned.[18]

Jesus states that after the time of tribulation and the sign of the Sun, Moon, and stars going dark the Son of Man would be seen arriving in the clouds with power and great glory. The Son of Man would be accompanied by the angels and at the trumpet call the angels would "gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other".(Matthew 24:31)

Those who subscribe to the doctrine of the "rapture" (a view popular in American Evangelicalism) find support in this verse, reading this as meaning that people would be gathered from Earth and taken to heaven. This directly relates to a quotation from the Book of Zechariah in which God (and the contents of heaven in general) will come to Earth and live among the elect, who by necessity are gathered together for this purpose.[19]

Imminence

[edit]
See also: Christian eschatology and Historical Jesus § Apocalyptic prophet

In the Olivet Discourse, Jesus was reported to have told his disciples,

"Truly I tell you, this generation [greek: genea] will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away."

— Matt. 24:34-35; Mark 13:30-31; Luke 21:32-33

There is considerable debate about the correct translation of the word genea. The most common English translation is currently "generation",[20] which seem to suggest that the author of the olivet discourse expected Jesus' second coming to be witnessed by Jesus' contemporaries. In most German Bibles however, genea is instead translated as "family/lineage" (geschlecht).[21] Likewise for Danish, Swedish and Norwegian (slægt, släkte and slekt, respectively).[22][23][24] The Danish linguist Iver Larsen argues that the word "generation" as it was used in the English King James Version of the Bible (1611) had a much wider meaning than it has today, and that the correct current translation of genea (in the specific context of the second coming story) should be "kind of people." (specifically the "good" kind of people; the disciple's kind of people, who, like the words of Jesus, will endure through all the tribulations). In Psalm 14, the King James version clearly uses "generation" in this now outdated sense, when it declares that "God is in the generation of the righteous."[25] According to Larsen, the Oxford Universal Dictionary states that the latest attested use of genea in the sense of "class, kind or set of persons" took place in 1727. Larsen concludes that the meaning of "generation" in the English language has narrowed considerably since then.[26]

Bible scholar Philip La Grange du Toit argues that genea is mostly used to describe a timeless and spiritual family/lineage of good or bad people in The New Testament, and that this is the case also for the second coming discourse in Matthew 24. In contrast to Larsen however, he argues that the word genea here denotes the "bad" kind of people," because Jesus had used the word in that pejorative sense in the preceding context (chapter 23.) He also lists the main competing translation alternatives, and some of the scholars that support the different views:

  • "This generation" refers to Jesus' contemporaries who would witness "all these things" [πάντα ταῦτα] as outlined in verses 4–31, including Jesus' second coming (Davies & Allison 1997:367–368; Hare 1993:281; Maddox 1982:111–115). Because Jesus' contemporaries did not witness his second coming, some contend that Jesus erred in his predictions (Luz 2005:209; cf. Schweitzer 1910:356–364).
  • "This generation" refers to Jesus' contemporaries who would witness "all these things" as outlined in verses 4–22 or 4–28, pointing to the destruction of the temple in 70 CE and everything leading up to it. Jesus' second coming (vv. 29–31) is thus excluded from "all these things" (Blomberg 1992:364; Carson 1984:507; France 2007:930; Hagner 1995:715).
  • "This generation" points to the Ἰουδαῖοι (Jews or Judaeans), implying that they as a race would last until the Parousia (Hendriksen 1973:868–869; Schweizer 1976:458).
  • In patristic opinion, "this generation" points to the church against which the gates of Hades would not prevail (cf. Chrysostom, Hom. Matt. 77:1; Eusebius, Frag. in Lc. ad loc).
  • "This generation" points to some future generation, from Matthew's perspective, that sees "all these things" (Bock 1996:538–539; Conzelmann 1982:105).
  • The words "take place" or "have happened" [γένηται] is interpreted as an ingressive aorist: "to begin" or "to have a beginning". In other words, "all these things" would start to happen in the generation of Jesus' present disciples, but would not necessarily finish in their time (Cranfield 1954:291; Talbert 2010:270).
  • "This generation" points to a certain kind of people in accordance with the pejorative connotations to "generation" [γενεά] elsewhere in the gospel (Morris 1992:613; Nelson 1996:385; Rieske 2008:225; see, e.g., Mt 11:16; 12:39, 41–42, 45; 16:4; 17:17; 23:36). While DeBruyn (2010:190) and Lenski (1943:953) interpret the expression in a similar way, they connect "this generation" to a certain kind of people from the Ἰουδαῖοι who resisted Jesus (cf. view 3 discussed earlier).[27]

In the First Epistle to the Thessalonians, Paul envisages that he and the Christians to whom he was writing would see the resurrection of the dead within their own lifetimes: "For this we declare to you by a word from the Lord, that we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. (ESV)",[28] though he would consider the possibility of his death prior to Jesus’ return later in life.[29] The Gospel of John however seems to downplay a rumor that one disciple (John) would live to see the second coming:

"So the rumor spread in the community that this disciple would not die. Yet Jesus did not say to him that he would not die, but, 'If it is my will that he remain until I come, what is that to you?'"

— John 21:23

Christian eschatology

[edit]

There are four quite different Christian eschatological views. Preterism is the belief that all of these predictions were fulfilled by the time Jerusalem fell in 70 CE.[30] Preterism[3] considers that most, if not all, prophecy has been fulfilled already, usually in relation to the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 CE.

  • Partial preterism says that most (but not all) Bible prophecy, including everything within Matthew 24, Daniel, and Revelation up to chapters 19 or 20, has already been fulfilled when Jerusalem was destroyed.[31] Since it still includes belief in a future physical Second Coming of Christ, the resurrection of the dead, and the last judgment, partial preterism falls within the parameters of orthodoxy because it conforms to the early Christian creeds.
  • Full preterism says all biblical prophecy was fulfilled by 70 CE. It does not hold to a future judgment, return of Christ, or resurrection of the dead (at least not for non-Christians). Due to the belief that all biblical prophecy has been fulfilled, it is sometimes considered "radical" and usually described as "unorthodox" because it goes against the ecumenical creeds of early Christianity.

Historicism considers that most prophecy has been or will be fulfilled during the present church age. It was the chief view of Protestants from the Reformation until the mid-19th century. Only among Seventh-day Adventists is historicism applied to current conservative Christian interpretation of Tribulation understanding.[3]

Futurism is the belief that the future Jesus predicted is the unfolding of events from trends that are already at work in contemporary human society.[32]

Futurism typically holds that all major unfulfilled prophecies will be fulfilled during a global time of catastrophe and war known as the Great Tribulation, in which many other prophecies will be fulfilled during or after the Millennium Reign of Jesus Christ. According to many futurists, many predictions are currently being fulfilled during the Church Age, in which lawlessness and apostasy are currently plaguing secular society. This is seen as a major sign of the approaching fulfillment of all other prophecies during the Tribulation. Within evangelical Christianity over the past 150 years, futurism has come to be the dominant view of prophecy. However, around the 1970s evangelical preterism—the polar opposite of futurism—was seen as a new challenge to the dominance of futurism, particularly within the Reformed tradition. Yet, futurism continues as the prevalent view for the time being.[3]: p.7 

Futurists anticipate many coming events that will fulfill all eschatological prophecy: the seven-year period of tribulation, the Antichrist's global government[33] the Battle of Armageddon, the Second Coming of Jesus, the millennial reign of Christ, the eternal state, and the two resurrections.

In his popular book, The Late Great Planet Earth, first published in 1970, evangelical Christian author Hal Lindsey argued that prophetical information in Matthew 24 indicates that the "generation" witnessing the "rebirth of Israel" is the same generation that will observe the fulfillment of the "signs" referred to in Matthew 24:1–33—and that would be consummated by the second coming of Christ in approximately 1988. He dated it from the "rebirth of Israel" in 1948, and took a generation to be "something like forty years."[34] Lindsey later stretched his forty-year timetable to as long as one hundred years, writing that he was no longer certain that the terminal "generation" commenced with the rebirth of Israel.[35][full citation needed]

Another detailed analysis, one written by evangelical pastor Ray Stedman, calls it the "Olivet Prophecy: The most detailed prediction in the Bible". According to Stedman: "There are many predictive passages in both the Old and New Testaments, but none is clearer or more detailed than the message Jesus delivered from the Mount of Olives. This message was given during the turbulent events of the Lord's last week before the cross".[32]

The Idealist sees the prophecy as pertaining to the entirerty of the interadvental period rather than a specific event. Idealists see prophetic passages as being of great value in teaching truths about God to be applied to present life. Many idealists see the destruction of the temple as typological of the entire Church Age that will culminate in the Second Coming of Christ and the Judgment of the whole created order.[3]

Within conservative, evangelical Christian thought, two opposite viewpoints of the Great Tribulation have been expressed in a debate between theologians Kenneth L. Gentry and Thomas Ice.[3]: 197–99 

Tribulation as a past event (Dr. Gentry)
  • The Great Tribulation occurred during the 1st century.
  • Those events marked the end of God's focus on and exaltation of Israel.
  • Jesus' prophecies marked the beginning of the Christian era in God's plan.
  • The Tribulation is God's judgment on Israel for rejecting the Messiah.
  • The Tribulation judgments will be centred on local events surrounding ancient Jerusalem, and also somewhat affecting other portions of the former Roman Empire.
  • The Tribulation judgments are governed by Jesus as the Christ to reflect his judgment against Israel, thus showing that he is in heaven controlling those events.
Tribulation as a future event (Dr. Ice)
  • The Great Tribulation is still to come and is rapidly approaching prospect.
  • Those events marked the beginning of God's focus on and exaltation of Israel.
  • The prophecy says the Christian era will be concluded just after the church is taken from the world.
  • Rather than being God's judgment on Israel, it is the preparation of Israel to receive her Messiah.
  • The judgments involve catastrophes that literally will affect the stellar universe and impact the entire planet.
  • The coming of Christ in the Tribulation requires his public, visible and physical presence to conclude those judgments.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Olivet Discourse

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Olivet Discourse is a prophetic address by to his disciples on the , recorded in the as comprising :1–25:46, :1–37, and Luke 21:5–36. Prompted by the disciples' questions regarding the destruction of the Temple, the sign of ' coming, and the consummation of the age, the discourse outlines a sequence of events including deceptive false christs, international conflicts, natural disasters as "birth pains," persecution of followers, the proclamation of worldwide, the desecration known as the in the holy place, a surpassing prior or future calamities, and cosmic signs preceding the visible return of on clouds with power and glory to gather the elect. Jesus emphasizes vigilance amid these signs, likening the era to the budding fig tree indicating summer's nearness and urging recognition that "this generation will not pass away until all these things take place," while cautioning against precise date-setting since the day and hour remain unknown even to the . The discourse concludes with parables illustrating preparedness—the faithful versus wicked servants, the ten virgins, the talents—and a of final separating sheep from goats based on deeds toward the least brethren. A defining feature is ' prediction of the Temple's total ruin, stating "not one stone here will be left on another," uttered when the Temple stood as an architectural marvel deemed indestructible by contemporaries; this foresaw its fulfillment in the Roman destruction of in under , corroborated by eyewitness accounts of horrors including famine, intra-city slaughter, and Temple conflagration matching the prophesied tribulation's scale. Interpretive controversies persist over whether the discourse primarily anticipates this first-century cataclysm (as in preterist readings tying "this generation" to ' audience) or encompasses dual near-term and ultimate eschatological fulfillments (as futurists contend, distinguishing Temple destruction from parousia via shifts in context like fleeing to mountains), with empirical alignment to events underscoring the prophecy's precision amid skeptical dismissals in secular scholarship.

Biblical Context

Historical Setting

The Olivet Discourse took place on the , a ridge east of Jerusalem's , during the Tuesday of Passion Week in ' final days before his crucifixion, circa AD 30. This location provided a direct view of the city and temple complex, prompting the disciples' inquiry about the temple's grandeur and future after predicted its destruction. The event occurred amid ' public ministry in , following his and confrontations with religious authorities in the temple courts. Judea formed a under prefect Pontius Pilate's administration from AD 26 to 36, characterized by direct Roman oversight after the client kingdom of fragmented following his death in 4 BC. Pilate, stationed primarily in Caesarea but residing in during festivals like to maintain order, enforced taxation and , which exacerbated Jewish resentment due to perceived idolatrous practices and economic burdens. Incidents such as Pilate's introduction of imperial standards into around AD 26 and funding like an aqueduct from temple treasury funds without consent fueled periodic unrest and appeals to higher Roman authorities. The Second Temple, originally rebuilt after the Babylonian but massively expanded by starting around 19 BC, stood as Judaism's religious and national centerpiece by AD 30, with construction ongoing for decades as noted in contemporary accounts. Jewish society anticipated a messianic deliverer amid Roman domination, drawing from prophetic traditions of restoration, while sects like , , and vied for influence, heightening tensions during pilgrimage festivals. ' discourse addressed disciples Peter, James, John, and Andrew privately, against this backdrop of eschatological expectation and political volatility.

Synoptic Accounts and Textual Analysis

The Olivet Discourse is preserved in the as follows: :1–25:46, which includes the core prophecy followed by parables of judgment; :1–37, the most concise version; and Luke 21:5–38, emphasizing historical events surrounding . These parallel accounts stem from a shared oral or written , with approximately 90% overlap in content such as the temple destruction prediction, birth pains of wars and famines, the , and calls to vigilance. Verbal similarities, especially between Mark and the parallels in Matthew and Luke, indicate Markan priority in this , where Matthew and Luke independently adapt Mark's framework while adding distinct material. Key parallels include Jesus' response to the disciples' questions about the temple's end, his signs (false christs, earthquakes, persecutions), and the abrupt "this generation will not pass away" statement (:34; :30; Luke 21:32), tying the prophecy to near-term fulfillment. The "" reference (:15; :14), drawn from Daniel 9:27, appears in Mark and Matthew but is rephrased in Luke 21:20 as armies surrounding , reflecting contextual adaptation without altering the core warning of desecration. Such agreements underscore a unified originating from ' teaching, transmitted through early Christian communities before the Gospels' composition circa 60–80 CE. Differences arise from each evangelist's theological emphases and audience. Matthew expands with eschatological parables (e.g., talents, sheep and goats in chapter 25), absent in Mark and Luke, to stress accountability for Jewish hearers. Luke uniquely details a with "Jerusalem surrounded by armies" (Luke 21:20) and distress among nations, aligning with Roman tactics in 66–70 CE, while omitting Matthew's cosmic signs until after the temple's fall (compare Luke 21:25–28 with :29–31). Mark's account, likely the earliest, focuses on immediacy and endurance amid tribulation (:9–13), with terse warnings against date-setting (:32). These variations do not indicate contradiction but selective emphasis: Matthew heightens apocalyptic urgency, Luke historicizes for Gentiles, and Mark prioritizes core exhortation. Textual criticism reveals high stability across manuscripts, with no significant variants altering the discourse's prophetic structure or key phrases; minor differences, such as word order in the "fig tree" (Matthew 24:32; Mark 13:28; Luke 21:29), align with scribal harmonization typical of Synoptic transmission. Critical scholars, including those employing , affirm the sayings' authenticity to due to Aramaic underpinnings and Palestinian , though some post-70 CE redaction is posited for Luke's details. Evangelical analyses, conversely, resist extensive , viewing differences as complementary eyewitness perspectives harmonized in the traditions. Overall, the accounts' coherence supports their reliability as a unified prophetic unit, despite evangelistic adaptations.

Core Teachings

Prediction of the Temple's Destruction

In the Olivet Discourse, initiates the prophecy by foretelling the destruction of the Second . As recorded in the , while departing the temple complex, the disciples draw attention to its magnificent structures, prompting to declare that not one stone would be left upon another. This statement appears in :1-2: " left the temple and was walking away when his disciples came up to him to call his attention to its buildings. 'Do you see all these things?' he asked. 'Truly I tell you, not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.'" Parallel accounts in Mark 13:1-2 and Luke 21:5-6 convey the same prediction, emphasizing the complete demolition of the temple's edifices. The temple, rebuilt by starting around 20-19 BC and still under expansion in ' time, represented the religious and national heart of . ' pronouncement, dated to circa AD 30-33 based on chronologies, stunned the disciples, who associated the temple's permanence with divine favor. This prediction sets the stage for the broader on ensuing tribulations and eschatological signs, linking immediate historical judgment to apocalyptic themes. Historical records confirm the fulfillment of this prophecy during the First Jewish-Roman War. In AD 70, Roman forces under besieged , culminating in the temple's destruction on August 10 (). Eyewitness Flavius , a Jewish historian who defected to the Romans, details in how Roman soldiers set the temple ablaze despite ' orders to preserve it, with molten gold from the structure causing stones to be uprooted and overturned during salvage efforts. estimates over 1.1 million deaths and 97,000 captives from , with the temple's sanctuary and outer courts razed, leaving only parts of the retaining walls intact. The in depicts the looting of temple treasures, corroborating the event's scale. Archaeological evidence, including burn layers and stones at sites like the tunnels, aligns with ' account of systematic demolition. While the prophecy's specificity—preceding the event by roughly 40 years—has prompted debate on predictive authenticity versus post-event composition in some scholarly circles, the textual placement within pre-70 AD traditions supports its originating as an unfulfilled forecast at the time of utterance. Primary sources like , unmotivated by , provide independent verification of the temple's total ruin, fulfilling the condition of no stones left in their original superstructure positions.

Signs of the End Times

In the Olivet Discourse, delineates a sequence of signs preceding the end of the age, framed as "the beginning of birth pains" in the . These include widespread deception by false messiahs, escalating wars and rumors of wars among nations, famines, earthquakes, and other calamities, alongside persecution of believers, the global preaching of , the of the temple, a period of unparalleled tribulation, and cosmic disturbances. The accounts in :4-29, :5-25, and Luke 21:8-26 parallel closely, though Luke emphasizes Jerusalem's encirclement by armies as a signal for flight. These signs are presented not as immediate precursors to the final consummation but as preliminary indicators, with instructing disciples to endure without alarm, as "the end is not yet." Deception emerges as the initial sign, with Jesus warning, "Watch out that no one deceives you. For many will come in my name, claiming, 'I am the Messiah,' and will deceive many." Parallel warnings appear in Mark and Luke, specifying false claims of messianic arrival or that "the time is near." Historical instances, such as self-proclaimed messiahs like (Acts 5:36) and false prophet (Acts 21:38) in the first century, align with this pattern, though Jesus frames it as ongoing until the end. Geopolitical and natural upheavals follow, including "wars and rumors of wars," with nation rising against nation and kingdom against kingdom, accompanied by famines and earthquakes in various places. Jesus qualifies these as inevitable but not conclusive of the end, likening them to labor pains intensifying over time. Biblical parallels in Luke add pestilences and great earthquakes, portending widespread distress. These descriptions echo prophetic motifs, such as 19:2 for national conflicts and Joel 2:30-31 for terrestrial signs, but are uniquely sequenced in the discourse as eschatological harbingers. Persecution intensifies the signs, as believers face betrayal, hatred by all nations, and martyrdom for Jesus' name, leading some to fall away and others to false prophecy. Yet, the gospel must first be proclaimed to all nations as a testimony, after which "the end will come." This universal mission underscores endurance amid apostasy, with Matthew noting intra-community betrayals and Luke highlighting delivery to synagogues and prisons. The pivotal sign is the "abomination of desolation" referenced from Daniel 9:27, 11:31, and 12:11, standing in the holy place, prompting immediate flight from Judea to mountains, avoiding rooftops or fields. Luke interprets this as Jerusalem surrounded by armies, signaling its desolation. This triggers the "great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now," with false signs deceiving nearly all, culminating in cosmic signs: the sun darkened, moon failing to shine, stars falling, heavenly bodies shaken. These immediately precede the Son of Man's appearance, drawing from Daniel 7:13 and Isaiah 13:10, 34:4.

The Parousia and Final Judgment

In the Olivet Discourse, describes the parousia—the visible, glorious return of —as a cosmic event following tribulation, marked by signs in the heavens and the gathering of the . 24:29-31, immediately after the distress of those days, "the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken," at which point "they will see coming on of , with power and great glory," sending angels with a loud to gather the from the four winds. This imagery draws from Daniel 7:13-14, portraying a divine figure approaching to receive everlasting , emphasizing and finality rather than a hidden or spiritualized advent. Mark 13:24-27 parallels this, specifying the Son of Man's coming "on clouds with great power and glory" to dispatch angels for the 's collection, underscoring a public, observable event distinguishable from the temple's destruction. Luke 21:25-28 adds cosmic disturbances and the Son of Man's appearance "in a cloud with power and great glory," instructing believers to "stand up and lift up your heads, because your redemption is drawing near." The discourse transitions to the final judgment in Matthew 25:31-46, depicting the Son of Man arriving in glory with all angels to sit on his throne, where "all the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats." The sheep, representing the righteous, inherit the kingdom prepared from the foundation of the world for acts of mercy toward "the least of these my brothers," such as feeding the hungry and visiting the imprisoned, earning eternal life. Conversely, the goats, symbolizing the unrighteous, face eternal punishment in the fire prepared for the devil and his angels for neglecting such deeds, with the criterion rooted in response to Christ's brethren rather than mere belief. This judgment motif aligns with Old Testament precedents like the shepherd-king imagery in Ezekiel 34, where God judges between sheep and goats for faithfulness, but uniquely ties works of compassion to eternal outcomes in a eschatological framework. No direct parallel exists in Mark or Luke's accounts, though Luke 21:34-36 warns of sudden judgment on the unprepared, urging watchfulness. Scholars note the parousia's emphasis on unpredictability and visibility contrasts with secretive apocalypses in contemporary Jewish texts like 1 Enoch, positioning it as a climactic vindication for the faithful amid and tribulation. The final judgment's ethical focus—deeds as evidence of allegiance—avoids or works-righteousness by framing actions as outgrowths of relationship to Christ, consistent with broader teachings in James 2:14-26 on without works being dead. Interpretations attributing this solely to AD 70 events overlook the cosmic scale and implications absent from historical records of that siege, as documents no such celestial signs or global gathering despite detailing the temple's fall in 70 AD. Thus, the discourse presents parousia and judgment as culminating divine interventions, distinct from interim judgments, with eternal stakes hinging on moral response to .

Parables of Vigilance

In the concluding parables of the Olivet Discourse recorded in , illustrates the imperatives of vigilance, , and righteous conduct in anticipation of his parousia, emphasizing that the precise timing remains unknown and demands constant readiness. These three parables—the Ten Virgins, the Talents, and —transition from warnings of tribulation to personal accountability, portraying rewards for faithfulness and consequences for neglect. The (Matthew 25:1–13) likens the kingdom of heaven to ten virgins awaiting a with lamps. Five wise virgins carry extra oil, enabling them to join the procession when the arrives unexpectedly at midnight, while five foolish ones, whose lamps extinguish during the delay, are excluded after futilely seeking oil elsewhere. exhorts, "Watch therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour wherein the cometh," highlighting the suddenness of the eschatological arrival and the insufficiency of last-minute preparations. The oil symbolizes sustaining spiritual resources, such as genuine or the Spirit's indwelling, which cannot be borrowed or hastily acquired. The (:14–30) depicts a man traveling abroad who entrusts varying sums—five talents to one servant, two to another, and one to a third—according to their abilities. Upon return, the first two servants invest productively, doubling their amounts and receiving commendation: "Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things." The third, fearing loss, buries his talent and is rebuked as "wicked and slothful," with his portion reassigned and himself cast into . This narrative stresses of God-given abilities, time, and resources, with faithfulness yielding eternal increase and unfaithfulness inviting , irrespective of initial endowment. The Parable of the Sheep and the Goats (Matthew 25:31–46) envisions the Son of Man enthroned in glory, separating gathered nations as a shepherd divides sheep from goats, placing the sheep at his right for inheritance of the kingdom prepared from the foundation of the world. The righteous sheep are commended for feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, visiting the imprisoned, and aiding the stranger—deeds equated with service to Christ himself—while the goats at the left are condemned to everlasting fire for omitting these acts of mercy. Though framed as works, the distinction evidences underlying heart allegiance, as true disciples unconsciously reflect Christ's compassion, whereas neglect reveals absence of relational union with him; this culminates the discourse's eschatological judgment theme.

Interpretive Frameworks

Preterist Interpretation

Preterism interprets the Olivet Discourse, recorded in , , and Luke 21, as a prophecy primarily fulfilled in the destruction of and the Second Temple by Roman forces in . Proponents, including partial preterists like L. and , contend that ' predictions of the temple's desolation—not one stone left upon another (:2)—directly correspond to the historical event where Titus's legions razed the structure on August 10, , during the First Jewish-Roman War. This view emphasizes the discourse's immediate context, triggered by the disciples' question about the temple's fate and the "end of the age" (:3), interpreting "this generation will not pass away" (:34) as referring to the contemporaries of who witnessed the fulfillment within their lifetime, spanning roughly 40 years from AD 30 to . Central to the preterist case are the "signs of the times" outlined by , such as false christs, wars, rumors of wars, famines, earthquakes, and the (:4–15; :5–14; Luke 21:8–20). These align with documented events preceding and during the siege: Jewish historian records multiple false prophets and messianic claimants, including and an Egyptian pseudo-prophet, who deceived multitudes in the 40s and 50s AD; widespread famines under (Acts 11:28); and seismic activity reported in the region. Luke's parallel explicitly identifies the abomination as compassed by armies (Luke 21:20), matching the Roman encirclement in AD 66–70, which describes as involving over 1.1 million deaths from , , and combat, with survivors sold into . Preterists argue these tribulations culminated in the temple's profanation, where Roman soldiers sacrificed to their standards within its courts, fulfilling the desecration prophecy akin to Daniel 9:27. The cosmic imagery of the sun darkened, moon not giving light, and stars falling (Matthew 24:29) is viewed not as literal astronomical events but as apocalyptic language symbolizing the fall of a world power, drawn from precedents like 13:10 for Babylon's overthrow or 32:7 for Egypt's judgment. Gentry maintains this "coming on the clouds" (Matthew 24:30) depicts Christ's vindication through divine judgment on apostate , evidenced by the Roman victory as instrument of God's wrath, rather than a physical parousia. While full preterists extend fulfillment to include the second advent and as spiritual events in , partial preterists like DeMar affirm a future bodily return but see the discourse's core—judgment on the old covenant system—historically realized, preserving against charges of denying eschatological hope. This interpretation underscores the discourse's role in urging first-century flight from (Matthew 24:16), a warning Eusebius credits with enabling Christians to escape to before the siege.

Futurist Interpretation

The futurist interpretation maintains that the Olivet Discourse, as recorded in Matthew 24–25, Mark 13, and Luke 21, primarily describes eschatological events culminating in the Second Coming of Christ, with many prophecies remaining unfulfilled beyond the partial foreshadowing of the temple's destruction in AD 70. Proponents, particularly within dispensational premillennialism, argue that Jesus' responses to the disciples' questions distinguish between the near-term sign of Jerusalem's fall (Matthew 24:1–2) and the broader "end of the age" (Matthew 24:3), with the latter focusing on a future seven-year tribulation period marked by unprecedented global distress. This view emphasizes a literal reading of prophetic elements, such as the "abomination of desolation" (Matthew 24:15; cf. Daniel 9:27, 11:31, 12:11), interpreted as a future desecration of a rebuilt Jewish temple by the Antichrist, distinct from historical Roman actions in AD 70 due to the prophecy's ties to end-times resurrection and judgment motifs in Daniel. Key signs outlined in the discourse—false christs, wars, famines, earthquakes, and persecutions (:4–14)—are seen as "birth pains" intensifying toward the tribulation's midpoint, rather than exhaustive fulfillments in the first century, given their escalating cosmic scope (e.g., the sun darkened, moon not giving light, stars falling; :29). The phrase "this will not pass away until all these things take place" (:34) is understood to refer to the future witnessing the tribulation's signs, not ' contemporaries, preserving the prophecy's imminence for that era while aligning with unfulfilled cosmic disturbances observable only at the parousia. The visible "coming of on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory" (:30) denotes the literal, bodily return of Christ to gather the elect (:31), followed by judgment parables (:1–46) that underscore readiness amid tribulation, with the sheep-and-goats separation (:31–46) depicting a millennial kingdom inauguration. Theologians like John F. Walvoord, former president of , articulate this framework by linking the discourse to Daniel's seventy weeks (Daniel 9:24–27), positing a prophetic gap after the sixty-ninth week, with the seventieth week as the future tribulation unleashing seals, trumpets, and akin to Revelation's judgments. Similarly, dispensational scholars such as Thomas Ice contend that Luke's account (Luke 21:20–24) addresses AD 70's "times of the Gentiles," transitioning to post-tribulation cosmic signs (Luke 21:25–28), ensuring hermeneutical consistency across synoptic parallels without conflating local judgments with global . Critics of preterist views within highlight empirical mismatches, such as the absence of recorded cosmic signs or universal visibility of Christ's "coming" in , arguing that first-century historiography (e.g., ) documents siege horrors but not the discourse's full prophetic trajectory. This interpretation undergirds expectations of a pretribulational for the church, followed by Israel's tribulation refinement, culminating in Christ's earthly reign, though variants exist on precise timings like mid- or post-tribulational rapture positions.

Partial Preterist and Historicist Views

Partial preterists maintain that the Olivet Discourse primarily prophesies the destruction of the Temple in AD 70 by Roman forces under , fulfilling predictions in :1–35, :1–30, and Luke 21:5–24. They identify signs such as false messiahs, wars, famines, earthquakes, and persecution as corresponding to first-century events, including the Jewish-Roman War from AD 66–70, with the "" linked to Roman desecration or the flight of Christians from as instructed in the text. The phrase "this generation will not pass away until all these things take place" (:34) is interpreted as referring to ' contemporaries, who witnessed the fulfillment within approximately 40 years of the prophecy. This view distinguishes the events from the future parousia, arguing that cosmic language in :29–31 (e.g., darkened sun and , stars falling) employs apocalyptic imagery symbolizing national judgment rather than literal astronomical phenomena, akin to prophecies against or . Proponents like Kenneth L. Gentry and contend that while the discourse addresses the disciples' questions about the temple's end and the end of the age, the former was consummated in , transitioning to future eschatological elements post-verse 35. They cite historical records, such as ' accounts of over 1.1 million deaths in and the temple's burning on August 10, , as empirical validation. Historicists interpret the Olivet Discourse as outlining a continuous progression of prophetic signs through the church age, from the apostolic era to the final consummation, rather than a singular event. Wars, rumors of wars, false prophets, and (Matthew 24:6–21) are seen as recurring patterns in history, such as the fall of , barbarian invasions, medieval plagues, and modern conflicts, serving as "birth pains" leading to Christ's return. The is applied to various historical figures or events embodying opposition, like papal claims during the or revolutionary upheavals. Reformation-era commentators, including and John Calvin's successors, adopted historicist lenses for apocalyptic texts, viewing the discourse's signs as unfolding providentially across centuries, with the gospel preached to all nations (Matthew 24:14) progressively fulfilled through missionary expansion since the first century. Unlike partial preterism's emphasis on closure for initial signs, historicism posits no strict temporal boundary, allowing for layered fulfillments where earlier events prefigure greater end-time realities, culminating in visible cosmic signs and the Son of Man's coming. This approach critiques overly localized interpretations by emphasizing the discourse's integration with broader biblical , such as and 12, applied historically.

Theological Implications

Connections to Old Testament Prophecies

The Olivet Discourse draws extensively on prophetic motifs, particularly apocalyptic imagery depicting on nations and cities, as seen in the prophets' descriptions of historical cataclysms like the fall of or . This rhetorical style, characterized by hyperbolic cosmic signs and tribulation language, frames ' predictions within a where such elements symbolize political upheaval and temple desecration rather than literal astronomical events. A central connection is Jesus' explicit reference to the "abomination of desolation" in Matthew 24:15 (paralleled in Mark 13:14), which directly invokes Daniel 9:27, 11:31, and 12:11, where it signifies a profane intrusion into the temple sanctuary preceding severe judgment. Scholars note this as Jesus repurposing Daniel's typology—originally linked to Antiochus IV's desecration in 167 BCE—to foreshadow events tied to Jerusalem's fate. The ensuing "" described in :21 mirrors Daniel 12:1's unparalleled distress for , amplifying themes of national purification through suffering. Cosmic upheavals in :29—the sun darkened, moon refusing light, and stars falling—echo 13:10 (against ), :4, Joel 2:10 and 2:31 (), and 32:7 (against ), where similar phenomena herald God's intervention in human affairs. These parallels underscore a in prophetic of using astral collapse to denote the collapse of imperial powers. Finally, the "Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory" in :30 alludes to :13, portraying a heavenly figure receiving dominion amid judgment on earthly kingdoms, thus linking ' self-identification to messianic vindication over Israel's oppressors. Such interconnections position the discourse as a synthesis of Danielic and Isaianic , applying covenantal curses from Deuteronomy 28 and Leviticus 26 to first-century .

Role in Christian Eschatology

The Olivet Discourse represents Jesus' primary extended prophetic teaching on eschatological matters, comprising his responses to the disciples' inquiries about the Temple's destruction, signs of the end of the age, and his coming. Found in –25, , and Luke 21, it describes sequential events including wars, famines, earthquakes, persecution of believers, the , , and cosmic signs heralding the Son of Man's visible return on clouds with power and glory. This framework has established it as a for Christian doctrines of the Parousia, final judgment, and kingdom consummation, emphasizing themes of divine sovereignty over history's end. Within evangelical scholarship, the discourse encapsulates core eschatology, integrating motifs from Daniel and other prophets to outline tribulation, , and accountability before Christ. Its parables of the fig tree, watchful servants, ten virgins, talents, and sheep and goats reinforce ethical imperatives tied to end-time readiness, influencing soteriological and ecclesiological emphases on perseverance and . These elements underscore a realized yet anticipatory hope, where partial historical fulfillments, such as the AD 70 Temple destruction, point toward ultimate cosmic resolution without negating future expectations. The discourse's role extends to testing and refining eschatological systems, serving as a scriptural benchmark for premillennial, amillennial, and other views on timing and sequence of end-time events. By prioritizing observable signs and Christ's personal intervention, it counters speculative timelines, grounding in first-century apostolic witness and fostering a of vigilant endurance amid tribulation. This integrative function links it inextricably to Revelation's imagery, affirming a unified biblical narrative of judgment, renewal, and eternal reign.

Debates and Criticisms

Imminence and Timing Issues

The Olivet Discourse includes explicit temporal indicators that have fueled debates over the prophecy's timeframe, particularly :34, where states, "Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place." The Greek term genea, translated as "generation," typically denotes contemporaries sharing a lifespan, roughly 30 to 40 years, as evidenced by its usage elsewhere in the Gospels to refer to ' immediate audience, such as in Matthew 11:16 and 23:36. This phrasing implies events unfolding within the disciples' lifetime, aligning with first-century expectations but challenging interpretations that extend fulfillment millennia into the future. Preterist interpreters, emphasizing the discourse's audience relevance, argue that "this generation" points to Jesus' contemporaries, with the prophecy's core—tribulation, , and Jerusalem's fall—culminating in the Roman siege of , approximately 40 years later. They contend this resolves imminence by fulfilling signs like wars, famines, and false messiahs within that span, viewing cosmic language (e.g., Matthew 24:29) as apocalyptic for political upheaval rather than literal astronomy. However, full preterists extend this to include the Parousia, positing a spiritual "coming" in judgment on , though this lacks empirical cosmic disruption observable in AD 70 records. Futurist views counter that genea can flexibly mean "race" or "kind," referring to the enduring Jewish or the future cohort witnessing the signs' onset, thus decoupling timing from the first century. Proponents like John MacArthur argue the discourse shifts post-Matthew 24:36 ("that day and hour no one knows"), distinguishing near-term Temple destruction from distant end-time events, avoiding failed charges by positing dual layers. Partial preterists blend these, seeing AD 70 as a typological precursor to ultimate fulfillment, but this introduces ambiguity in verses like Mark 13:30 paralleling Matthew without clear demarcation. Skeptical critiques highlight unresolved tensions: the discourse's seamless narrative from Temple warnings to universal cosmic signs (Matthew 24:3-31) suggests unified imminence, unfulfilled literally after two millennia, undermining prophetic reliability absent symbolic reinterpretations. Secular analyses, often from historically critical scholarship, treat such delays as evidence of early Christian apocalyptic disappointment, reflected in New Testament adjustments (e.g., 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3), though these sources may reflect institutional biases favoring naturalistic explanations over supernatural claims. Empirical data confirms localized fulfillments like Jerusalem's siege but no global celestial events, pressing interpreters toward contextual or telescopic readings without consensus.

Historical Evidence for AD 70 Fulfillment

The siege of by Roman forces under began in the spring of , with legions encircling the city as described in Luke 21:20 of the Olivet Discourse, where warned of armies surrounding as a sign to flee. Flavius , a Jewish and eyewitness who initially fought for the rebels before defecting to the Romans, records in that four Roman legions positioned themselves around the walls starting on the 14th of Artemisius (April/May ), trapping approximately 1.1 million people inside during season. This encirclement initiated a prolonged blockade that matches the Discourse's prediction of tribulation prompting flight from . Intense famine gripped the city, fulfilling descriptions of great distress and people fleeing to the mountains (Matthew 24:15-21; Mark 13:14). Josephus details how inhabitants endured so severe that they consumed , dung, and old shoes boiled for sustenance, with over 600,000 perishing from hunger alone by his estimate. A particularly harrowing account involves a noblewoman named Mary, daughter of , who, driven mad by desperation, killed, cooked, and ate her own nursing infant before offering the remains to fellow sufferers, an event emblematic of the unprecedented tribulation prophesied. Roman historian corroborates the famine's extremity in Histories, noting the city's population swelled by pilgrims and then succumbed to want amid internal strife. The temple's destruction on the 10th of Lous (August AD 70) aligns with ' prophecy that no stone would be left upon another (:2). recounts how Roman soldiers, against ' orders, set fire to the temple during the assault, with flames consuming the structure despite attempts to extinguish them; the intense heat caused massive gold fittings to melt and flow into cracks, leading to systematic dismantling of stones to retrieve the metal, effectively razing the sanctuary. While notes that parts of the and three towers remained standing for strategic reasons, the temple complex itself was utterly demolished, with its gates and inner courts left in ruins, fulfilling the specific prediction of total desolation. Archaeological evidence, including the exposure of and burn layers in excavations, supports this account of comprehensive destruction. Pre-siege portents reported by parallel signs in the heavens and false prophets foretold in the Discourse (:4-7, 29). He describes visions of chariots wheeling through clouds, celestial armies, and prophetic figures deceiving the people with promises of deliverance, contributing to the chaos that prevented timely escape. These events, occurring amid earthquakes and internal factional wars among Jewish leaders, underscore the multifaceted fulfillment in , as chronicled by a source with direct access to both Jewish and Roman perspectives.

Challenges from Skeptical and Secular Perspectives

Skeptical scholars contend that the Olivet Discourse reflects ' expectation of an imminent apocalyptic consummation that empirically failed to occur, positioning him as a failed akin to other first-century Jewish eschatological figures. In particular, the declaration in :34—"Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened"—is interpreted by critics like Bart Ehrman as binding the predicted events, including the "coming of " (:30), to Jesus' own contemporaries, yet no such visible cosmic intervention transpired within that timeframe, spanning roughly 30-100 CE. This view draws on the discourse's emphasis on urgency, such as warnings against delay (:28-29), which aligns with broader first-century apocalyptic rhetoric but lacks verifiable fulfillment beyond sociopolitical upheavals. From a historical-critical standpoint, the text's composition postdates the destruction of the Temple, suggesting elements like the temple's desolation (:15) were retroactively attributed to to lend prophetic authority amid known events documented by , rather than originating as precise foresight. Secular analysts note parallels to intertestamental Jewish literature, such as the War Scroll from , indicating the discourse draws from generic eschatological motifs—wars, famines, earthquakes (:6-7)—common to the era's turbulent conditions under Roman rule, without unique predictive power. These features, critics argue, reflect adaptive editing in the , composed circa 70-100 CE, to address the interpretive crisis of unfulfilled expectations, as evidenced by later adjustments like 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3 tempering imminence. Empirical scrutiny of the prophesied cosmic signs further undermines supernatural claims: descriptions of the sun darkening, moon failing to give light, and stars falling (:29; :24-25) find no corroboration in Roman, Jewish, or astronomical records around AD 70, contrasting with verifiable events like the temple's siege on August 10, 70 CE. Skeptics such as , in his 1906 analysis, highlighted this literal apocalyptic framework as evidence of Jesus' erroneous timeline, influenced by Danielic imagery but detached from causal historical outcomes. While academic consensus on dating supports post-event redaction, secular perspectives attribute the discourse's endurance to theological retrofitting rather than evidential , noting institutional biases in religious that prioritize over falsification.

References

  1. https://www.gotquestions.org/Olivet-discourse.html
  2. https://cbs.mbts.edu/2018/05/08/jesus-and-the-future-an-introduction-to-the-olivet-discourse/
  3. https://cbs.mbts.edu/2018/05/10/jesus-and-the-future-a-closer-look-at-the-olivet-discourse/
  4. https://www.logos.com/grow/witw-olivet-discourse-views/
  5. https://www.bartehrman.com/pontius-pilate/
  6. https://rsc.byu.edu/behold-lamb-god/discipleship-olivet-discourse-marks-gospel
  7. https://biblicalreadercommunications.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/olivet_discourse.pdf
  8. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2382&context=masters
  9. https://www.gospelparallels.com/
  10. https://revelationbyjesuschrist.com/little-apocalypse-support/
  11. https://khouse.org/personal_update/articles/2005/resolving-olivet-discourse
  12. https://cf.sbts.edu/equip/uploads/2014/02/SBJT-16.3-Berry.pdf
  13. https://wednesdayintheword.com/olivet-discourse-chart/
  14. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2024:1-2&version=NIV
  15. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark%2013:1-2&version=NIV
  16. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2021:5-6&version=NIV
  17. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2024&version=NIV
  18. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/war-6.html
  19. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/maps/primary/josephussack.html
  20. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-destruction-of-the-second-temple
  21. https://www.ritmeyer.com/2013/07/06/evidence-for-the-destruction-of-jerusalem-in-70ad/
  22. https://josephus.org/causeofDestruct.htm
  23. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24%3A4-29%3B+Mark+13%3A5-25%3B+Luke+21%3A8-26&version=ESV
  24. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24%3A6&version=ESV
  25. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24%3A4-5%3B+Mark+13%3A5-6%3B+Luke+21%3A8&version=ESV
  26. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts+5%3A36%3B+Acts+21%3A38&version=ESV
  27. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24%3A6-8%3B+Mark+13%3A7-8%3B+Luke+21%3A9-11&version=ESV
  28. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah+19%3A2%3B+Joel+2%3A30-31&version=ESV
  29. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24%3A9-14%3B+Mark+13%3A9-13%3B+Luke+21%3A12-19&version=ESV
  30. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24%3A15-29%3B+Mark+13%3A14-25%3B+Luke+21%3A20-28%3B+Daniel+9%3A27%2C11%3A31%2C12%3A11%3B+Isaiah+13%3A10%2C34%3A4&version=ESV
  31. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24%3A29-31&version=ESV
  32. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+7%3A13-14&version=ESV
  33. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+13%3A24-27&version=ESV
  34. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+21%3A25-28&version=ESV
  35. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+25%3A31-46&version=ESV
  36. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezekiel+34&version=ESV
  37. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+2%3A14-26&version=ESV
  38. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/sermon/the-olivet-discourse-matthew-24-25-part-2/
  39. https://walvoord.com/article/121
  40. https://www.gotquestions.org/parable-ten-virgins.html
  41. https://jesusplusnothing.com/series/post/explain-parable-10-virgins-and-those-without-oil
  42. https://sljinstitute.net/gospel-of-matthew/jesus-teaches-on-the-second-advent/the-parable-of-the-talents-matthew/
  43. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/2003/08/parables-of-jesus-the-parable-of-the-talents?lang=eng
  44. https://www.gotquestions.org/parable-sheep-goats.html
  45. https://postmillennialworldview.com/2022/08/05/understanding-the-olivet-discourse/
  46. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9478260-the-olivet-discourse-made-easy
  47. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=pretrib_arch
  48. https://theolivetdiscourse.com/the-witness-of-jewish-historian-josephus-validates-the-fulfillment-of-the-olivet-discourse/
  49. https://americanvision.org/7865/flavius-josephus-and-preterism/
  50. https://www.tektonics.org/esch/olivet01.php
  51. https://postmillennialworldview.com/2023/02/28/1-thess-4-and-the-olivet-discourse/
  52. https://growrag.wordpress.com/2023/03/19/full-preterism-partial-preterism-gary-demar-and-various-heresies/
  53. https://www.theshepherds.church/blog/how-the-book-of-revelation-proves-postmillennialism
  54. https://walvoord.com/article/116
  55. https://www.pre-trib.org/pretribfiles/pdfs/Dean-MappingTheSecondHalfOfTheOlivetDiscourse.pdf
  56. https://bible.org/seriespage/christ%25E2%2580%2599s-olivet-discourse-end-age-%25E2%2580%2594-part-i
  57. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/sermon/the-olivet-discourse-matthew-24-25-part-3/
  58. https://walvoord.com/article/119
  59. https://seminary.bju.edu/files/2024/04/JBTW4.2_Article01_FuturistInterpretation.pdf
  60. https://truthsaves.org/articles/partial-preterism/
  61. https://cerebralfaith.net/why-im-partial-preteris/
  62. https://puritanboard.com/threads/partial-preterist-view-of-the-end-of-the-age-in-matthew.113071/
  63. https://theofaith.org/2025/02/03/816/
  64. https://neohistoricism.net/2018/04/16/the-olivet-discourse-worth-another-look/
  65. https://tentsofshem.wordpress.com/2022/01/28/historicists-on-matthew-24/
  66. https://www.blueletterbible.org/Comm/ice_thomas/Mat24-25/Mat24-25_Part16.cfm
  67. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/1282/
  68. https://www.bible.ca/pre-mt24-prophetic-language.htm
  69. https://walvoord.com/article/118
  70. https://endtimessimplified.com/part-5-5-comparing-the-prophets-to-the-olivet-discourse-framework/
  71. https://www.joeledmundanderson.com/jesus-and-the-olivet-discourse-the-son-of-man-coming-on-the-clouds-of-heaven-it-doesnt-mean-what-you-think-it-means-part-5-the-jewish-war-series/
  72. https://reformedperspectives.org/articles/jon_menn/jon_menn.BE08.html
  73. https://www.logos.com/grow/hall-the-olivet-discourse/
  74. https://www.galaxie.com/article/bsac113-450-08
  75. https://seminary.bju.edu/viewpoint/overlooked-under-preached-eschatology-six-points-for-pastors-unpacking-the-olivet-discourse/
  76. https://tms.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/tmsj13f.pdf
  77. https://www.chafer.edu/CTS-Journal-The-Olivet-Discourse-A-Resolution-of-Time-by-Ron-J-Bigalke-Jr
  78. https://dbts.edu/tag/eschatology/
  79. https://americanvision.org/posts/does-john-macarthur-make-his-case-on-the-olivet-discourse/
  80. https://www.academia.edu/34057739/PRETERISM_AND_THIS_GENERATION_
  81. https://www.rjgeib.com/thoughts/desolation/josephus.html
  82. http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/jewishtemple.htm
  83. https://www.avande1.sites.luc.edu/jerusalem/sources/wars6.htm
  84. https://ehrmanblog.org/the-heart-of-jesus-message/
  85. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUdMaaKmgEc
  86. https://ehrmanblog.org/my-response-to-a-book-that-responded-to-my-book-how-jesus-became-god/
  87. https://lutherwasnotbornagaincom.wordpress.com/2023/07/05/did-matthew-embellish-the-olivet-discourse-to-cover-up-jesus-failed-prophecy/
  88. https://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3238
  89. https://mlhartke.wordpress.com/2013/02/04/the-olivet-discourse-was-jesus-wrong/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.