Hubbry Logo
Edwin Howard ArmstrongEdwin Howard ArmstrongMain
Open search
Edwin Howard Armstrong
Community hub
Edwin Howard Armstrong
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Edwin Howard Armstrong
Edwin Howard Armstrong
from Wikipedia

Edwin Howard Armstrong (December 18, 1890[2] – February 1, 1954[3]) was an American radio-frequency engineer and inventor who developed FM (frequency modulation) radio and the superheterodyne receiver system.

Key Information

He held 42 patents and received numerous awards, including the first Medal of Honor awarded by the Institute of Radio Engineers (now IEEE), the French Legion of Honor, the 1941 Franklin Medal and the 1942 Edison Medal. He achieved the rank of major in the U.S. Army Signal Corps during World War I and was often referred to as "Major Armstrong" during his career.[4] He was inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame and included in the International Telecommunication Union's roster of great inventors. He was inducted into the Wireless Hall of Fame posthumously in 2001.[5] Armstrong attended Columbia University, and served as a professor there for most of his life.

Armstrong is also noted for his legal battles with Lee de Forest and David Sarnoff, two other key figures in developing the early radio industry in the United States. The prolonged litigation took a toll on Armstrong's health and finances, which led to a breakdown in his marriage, followed by his suicide in 1954. Thereafter, his estate's legal cases were pursued by his widow, Marion, who won several successful suits and settlements.

Early life

[edit]
Armstrong's boyhood home, overlooking the Hudson River in Yonkers, New York, c. 1975

Edwin Howard Armstrong was born on December 18, 1890, in Chelsea, New York City, the eldest of three children of John Armstrong and Emily Smith.[1] His father began working at a young age at the American branch of the Oxford University Press, which published bibles and standard classical works, eventually advancing to the position of vice president.[3] His parents first met at the North Presbyterian Church, located at 31st Street and Ninth Avenue. His mother's family had strong ties to Chelsea, and an active role in church functions.[6] When the church moved north, the Smiths and Armstrongs followed, and in 1895 the Armstrong family moved from their brownstone row house at 347 West 29th Street to a similar house at 26 West 97th Street on the Upper West Side.[7] The family was comfortably middle class.

At the age of eight, Armstrong contracted Sydenham's chorea (then known as St. Vitus' Dance), an infrequent but serious neurological disorder precipitated by rheumatic fever. For the rest of his life, Armstrong was afflicted with a physical tic exacerbated by excitement or stress. Due to this illness, he withdrew from public school and was home-tutored for two years.[8] To improve his health, the Armstrong family moved to a house overlooking the Hudson River, at 1032 Warburton Avenue in Yonkers. The Smith family subsequently moved next door.[9] Armstrong's tic and the time missed from school led him to become socially withdrawn.

From an early age, Armstrong showed an interest in electrical and mechanical devices, particularly trains.[10] He loved heights and constructed a makeshift backyard antenna tower that included a bosun's chair for hoisting himself up and down its length, to the concern of neighbors. Much of his early research was conducted in the attic of his parents' house.[11]

In 1909, Armstrong enrolled at Columbia University in New York City, where he became a member of the Epsilon Chapter of the Theta Xi engineering fraternity, and studied under Professor Michael Pupin at the Hartley Laboratories, a separate research unit at Columbia. Another of his instructors, Professor John H. Morecroft, later remembered Armstrong as being intensely focused on the topics that interested him, but somewhat indifferent to the rest of his studies.[12] Armstrong challenged conventional wisdom and was quick to question the opinions of both professors and peers. In one case, he recounted how he tricked a visiting professor from Cornell University that he disliked into receiving a severe electrical shock.[13] He also stressed the practical over the theoretical, stating that progress was more likely the product of experimentation and reasoning than on mathematical calculation and the formulae of "mathematical physics."

Armstrong graduated from Columbia in 1913, earning an electrical engineering degree.[4]

During World War I, Armstrong served in the Signal Corps as a captain and later a major.[4]

Following college graduation, he received a $600 one-year appointment as a laboratory assistant at Columbia, after which he nominally worked as a research assistant, for a salary of $1 a year, under Professor Pupin.[14] Unlike most engineers, Armstrong never became a corporate employee. He set up a self-financed independent research and development laboratory at Columbia, and owned his patents outright.

In 1934, he filled the vacancy left by John H. Morecroft's death, receiving an appointment as a professor of Electrical Engineering at Columbia, a position he held the remainder of his life.[15]

Early work

[edit]

Regenerative circuit

[edit]
Armstrong's "feed back" circuit drawing, from Radio Broadcast vol. 1 no. 1 1922.

Armstrong began working on his first major invention while still an undergraduate at Columbia. In late 1906, Lee de Forest had invented the three-element (triode) "grid Audion" vacuum-tube. How vacuum tubes worked was not understood at the time. De Forest's initial Audions did not have a high vacuum and developed a blue glow at modest plate voltages; De Forest improved the vacuum for Federal Telegraph.[16] By 1912, vacuum tube operation was understood, and regenerative circuits using high-vacuum tubes were appreciated.

While growing up, Armstrong had experimented with the early temperamental, "gassy" Audions. Spurred by the later discoveries, he developed a keen interest in gaining a detailed scientific understanding of how vacuum tubes worked. In conjunction with Professor Morecroft he used an oscillograph to conduct comprehensive studies.[17] His breakthrough discovery was determining that employing positive feedback (also known as "regeneration") produced amplification hundreds of times greater than previously attained, with the amplified signals now strong enough so that receivers could use loudspeakers instead of headphones. Further investigation revealed that when the feedback was increased beyond a certain level a vacuum-tube would go into oscillation, thus could also be used as a continuous-wave radio transmitter.

Beginning in 1913 Armstrong prepared a series of comprehensive demonstrations and papers that carefully documented his research,[18] and in late 1913 applied for patent protection covering the regenerative circuit. On October 6, 1914, U.S. patent 1,113,149 was issued for his discovery.[19] Although Lee de Forest initially discounted Armstrong's findings, beginning in 1915 de Forest filed a series of competing patent applications that largely copied Armstrong's claims, now stating that he had discovered regeneration first, based on a notebook entry made on August 6, 1912, while working for the Federal Telegraph company, prior to the date recognized for Armstrong of January 31, 1913. The result was an interference hearing at the patent office to determine priority. De Forest was not the only other inventor involved – the four competing claimants included Armstrong, de Forest, General Electric's Langmuir, and Alexander Meissner, who was a German national, which led to his application being seized by the Office of Alien Property Custodian during World War I.[20]

Following the end of WWI Armstrong enlisted representation by the law firm of Pennie, Davis, Martin and Edmonds. To finance his legal expenses he began issuing non-transferable licenses for use of the regenerative patents to a select group of small radio equipment firms, and by November 1920, 17 companies had been licensed.[21] These licensees paid 5% royalties on their sales which were restricted to only "amateurs and experimenters". Meanwhile, Armstrong explored his options for selling the commercial rights to his work. Although the obvious candidate was the Radio Corporation of America (RCA), on October 5, 1920, the Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company took out an option for $335,000 for the commercial rights for both the regenerative and superheterodyne patents, with an additional $200,000 to be paid if Armstrong prevailed in the regenerative patent dispute. Westinghouse exercised this option on November 4, 1920.[22]

Legal proceedings related to the regeneration patent became separated into two groups of court cases. An initial court action was triggered in 1919 when Armstrong sued de Forest's company in district court, alleging infringement of patent 1,113,149. This court ruled in Armstrong's favor on May 17, 1921. A second line of court cases, the result of the patent office interference hearing, had a different outcome. The interference board had also sided with Armstrong, but he was unwilling to settle with de Forest for less than what he considered full compensation. Thus pressured, de Forest continued his legal defense, and appealed the interference board decision to the District of Columbia district court. On May 8, 1924, that court ruled that it was de Forest who should be considered regeneration's inventor. Armstrong (along with much of the engineering community) was shocked by these events, and his side appealed this decision. Although the legal proceeding twice went before the US Supreme Court, in 1928 and 1934, he was unsuccessful in overturning the decision.[23]

In response to the second Supreme Court decision upholding de Forest as the inventor of regeneration, Armstrong attempted to return his 1917 IRE Medal of Honor, which had been awarded "in recognition of his work and publications dealing with the action of the oscillating and non-oscillating audion". The organization's board refused to allow him, and issued a statement that it "strongly affirms the original award".

Superheterodyne circuit

[edit]
Armstrong in his Signal Corps uniform during World War I

The United States entered WWI in April 1917. Later that year, Armstrong was commissioned as a captain in the U.S. Army Signal Corps, and assigned to a laboratory in Paris, France to help develop radio communication for the Allied war effort. He returned to the US in the autumn of 1919, after being promoted to the rank of Major.[10] (During both world wars, Armstrong gave the US military free use of his patents.)

During this period, Armstrong's most significant accomplishment was the development of a "supersonic heterodyne" – soon shortened to "superheterodyne" – radio receiver circuit.[3] This circuit made radio receivers more sensitive and selective and is used extensively today. The key feature of the superheterodyne approach is the mixing of the incoming radio signal with a locally generated, different frequency signal within a radio set. That circuit is called the mixer. The result is a fixed, unchanging intermediate frequency, or I.F. signal which is easily amplified and detected by following circuit stages. In 1919, Armstrong filed an application for a US patent of the superheterodyne circuit which was issued the next year. This patent was subsequently sold to Westinghouse.[24] The patent was challenged, triggering another patent office interference hearing.[25] Armstrong ultimately lost this patent battle; although the outcome was less controversial than that involving the regeneration proceedings.[26]

The challenger was Lucien Lévy of France who had worked developing Allied radio communication during WWI. He had been awarded French patents in 1917 and 1918 that covered some of the same basic ideas used in Armstrong's superheterodyne receiver. AT&T, interested in radio development at this time, primarily for point-to-point extensions of its wired telephone exchanges, purchased the US rights to Lévy's patent and contested Armstrong's grant. The subsequent court reviews continued until 1928, when the District of Columbia Court of Appeals disallowed all nine claims of Armstrong's patent, assigning priority for seven of the claims to Lévy, and one each to Ernst Alexanderson of General Electric and Burton W. Kendall of Bell Laboratories.[27]

Although most early radio receivers used regeneration Armstrong approached RCA's David Sarnoff, whom he had known since giving a demonstration of his regeneration receiver in 1913, about the corporation offering superheterodynes as a superior offering to the general public.[28] (The ongoing patent dispute was not a hindrance, because extensive cross-licensing agreements signed in 1920 and 1921 between RCA, Westinghouse and AT&T meant that Armstrong could freely use the Lévy patent.) Superheterodyne sets were initially thought to be prohibitively complicated and expensive as the initial designs required multiple tuning knobs and used nine vacuum tubes. In conjunction with RCA engineers, Armstrong developed a simpler, less costly design. RCA introduced its superheterodyne Radiola sets in the US market in early 1924, and they were an immediate success, dramatically increasing the corporation's profits. These sets were considered so valuable that RCA would not license the superheterodyne to other US companies until 1930.[25]

Super-regeneration circuit

[edit]
Armstrong explaining the superregenerative circuit, New York, 1922

The regeneration legal battle had one serendipitous outcome for Armstrong. While he was preparing apparatus to counteract a claim made by a patent attorney, he "accidentally ran into the phenomenon of super-regeneration", where, by rapidly "quenching" the vacuum-tube oscillations, he was able to achieve even greater levels of amplification. A year later, in 1922, Armstrong sold his super-regeneration patent to RCA for $200,000 plus 60,000 shares of corporation stock, which was later increased to 80,000 shares in payment for consulting services. This made Armstrong RCA's largest shareholder, and he noted that "The sale of that invention was to net me more than the sale of the regenerative circuit and the superheterodyne combined".[29] RCA envisioned selling a line of super-regenerative receivers until superheterodyne sets could be perfected for general sales, but it turned out the circuit was not selective enough to make it practical for broadcast receivers.

Wide-band FM radio

[edit]

"Static" interference – extraneous noises caused by sources such as thunderstorms and electrical equipment – bedeviled early radio communication using amplitude modulation and perplexed numerous inventors attempting to eliminate it. Many ideas for static elimination were investigated, with little success. In the mid-1920s, Armstrong began researching a solution. He initially, and unsuccessfully, attempted to resolve the problem by modifying the characteristics of AM transmissions.

One approach used frequency modulation (FM) transmissions. Instead of varying the strength of the carrier wave as with AM, the frequency of the carrier was changed to represent the audio signal. In 1922 John Renshaw Carson of AT&T, inventor of Single-sideband modulation (SSB), had published a detailed mathematical analysis which showed that FM transmissions did not provide any improvement over AM.[30] Although the Carson bandwidth rule for FM is important today, Carson's review turned out to be incomplete, as it analyzed only (what is now known as) "narrow-band" FM.

In early 1928 Armstrong began researching the capabilities of FM. Although there were others involved in FM research at this time, he knew of an RCA project to see if FM shortwave transmissions were less susceptible to fading than AM. In 1931 the RCA engineers constructed a successful FM shortwave link transmitting the Schmeling–Stribling fight broadcast from California to Hawaii, and noted at the time that the signals seemed to be less affected by static. The project made little further progress.[31]

Working in secret in the basement laboratory of Columbia's Philosophy Hall, Armstrong developed "wide-band" FM, in the process discovering significant advantages over the earlier "narrow-band" FM transmissions. In a "wide-band" FM system, the deviations of the carrier frequency are made to be much larger than the frequency of the audio signal which can be shown to provide better noise rejection. He was granted five US patents covering the basic features of the new system on December 26, 1933.[32] Initially, the primary claim was that his FM system was effective at filtering out the noise produced in receivers, by vacuum tubes.[33]

Armstrong had a standing agreement to give RCA the right of first refusal to his patents. In 1934 he presented his new system to RCA president Sarnoff. Sarnoff was somewhat taken aback by its complexity, as he had hoped it would be possible to eliminate static merely by adding a simple device to existing receivers. From May 1934 until October 1935 Armstrong conducted field tests of his FM technology from an RCA laboratory located on the 85th floor of the Empire State Building in New York City. An antenna attached to the building's spire transmitted signals for distances up to 80 miles (130 km).[34] These tests helped demonstrate FM's static-reduction and high-fidelity capabilities. RCA, which was heavily invested in perfecting TV broadcasting, chose not to invest in FM, and instructed Armstrong to remove his equipment.[35]

Denied the marketing and financial clout of RCA, Armstrong decided to finance his own development and form ties with smaller members of the radio industry, including Zenith and General Electric, to promote his invention. Armstrong thought that FM had the potential to replace AM stations within 5 years, which he promoted as a boost for the radio manufacturing industry, then suffering from the effects of the Great Depression. Making existing AM radio transmitters and receivers obsolete would necessitate that stations buy replacement transmitters and listeners purchase FM-capable receivers. In 1936 he published a landmark paper in the Proceedings of the IRE that documented the superior capabilities of using wide-band FM.[36] (This paper would be reprinted in the August 1984 issue of Proceedings of the IEEE.)[37] A year later, a paper by Murray G. Crosby (inventor of Crosby system for FM Stereo) in the same journal[38] provided further analysis of the wide-band FM characteristics, and introduced the concept of "threshold", demonstrating that there is a superior signal-to-noise ratio when the signal is stronger than a certain level.

In June 1936, Armstrong gave a formal presentation of his new system at the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) headquarters. For comparison, he played a jazz record using a conventional AM radio, then switched to an FM transmission. A United Press correspondent was present, and recounted in a wire service report that: "if the audience of 500 engineers had shut their eyes they would have believed the jazz band was in the same room. There were no extraneous sounds." Moreover, "Several engineers said after the demonstration that they consider Dr. Armstrong's invention one of the most important radio developments since the first earphone crystal sets were introduced." Armstrong was quoted as saying he could "visualize a time not far distant when the use of ultra-high frequency wave bands will play the leading role in all broadcasting", although the article noted that "A switchover to the ultra-high frequency system would mean the junking of present broadcasting equipment and present receivers in homes, eventually causing the expenditure of billions of dollars."[39]

Armstrong arranged for the construction of a transmission tower in Alpine, New Jersey, near New York City, and financed demonstration operation of W2XMN, the first FM radio station. W2XMN's antenna is mounted between the top two tiers, visible as a vertical line at the far upper right.[40]

In the late 1930s, as technical advances made it possible to transmit on higher frequencies, the FCC investigated options for increasing the number of broadcasting stations, in addition to ideas for better audio quality, known as "high-fidelity". In 1937 it introduced what became known as the Apex band, consisting of 75 broadcasting frequencies from 41.02 to 43.98 MHz. As on the standard broadcast band, these were AM stations but with higher quality audio – in one example, a frequency response from 20 Hz to 17,000 Hz +/- 1 dB – because station separations were 40 kHz instead of the 10 kHz spacings used on the original AM band.[41] Armstrong worked to convince the FCC that a band of FM broadcasting stations would be a superior approach. That year he financed the construction of the first FM radio station, W2XMN (later KE2XCC) at Alpine, New Jersey. FCC engineers had believed that transmissions using high frequencies would travel little farther than line-of-sight distances, limited by the horizon. When operating with 40 kilowatts on 42.8 MHz, the station could be clearly heard 100 miles (160 km) away, matching the daytime coverage of a full power 50-kilowatt AM station.[42]

FCC studies comparing the Apex station transmissions with Armstrong's FM system concluded that his approach was superior. In early 1940, the FCC held hearings on whether to establish a commercial FM service. Following this review, the FCC announced the establishment of an FM band effective January 1, 1941, consisting of forty 200 kHz-wide channels on a band from 42 to 50 MHz, with the first five channels reserved for educational stations.[43] Existing Apex stations were notified that they would not be allowed to operate after January 1, 1941, unless they converted to FM.[44]

Although there was interest in the new FM band by station owners, construction restrictions that went into place during WWII limited the growth of the new service. Following the end of WWII, the FCC moved to standardize its frequency allocations. One area of concern was the effects of tropospheric and Sporadic E propagation, which at times reflected station signals over great distances, causing mutual interference. A particularly controversial proposal, spearheaded by RCA, was that the FM band needed to be shifted to higher frequencies to avoid this problem. This reassignment was fiercely opposed as unneeded by Armstrong, but he lost. The FCC made its decision final on June 27, 1945.[45] It allocated 100 FM channels from 88 to 108 MHz, and assigned the former FM band to 'non government fixed and mobile' (42–44 MHz), and television channel 1 (44–50 MHz), now sidestepping the interference concerns.[45] A period of allowing existing FM stations to broadcast on both low and high bands ended at midnight on January 8, 1949, at which time any low band transmitters were shut down, making obsolete 395,000[46] receivers that had already been purchased by the public for the original band. Although converters allowing low band FM sets to receive high band were manufactured, they ultimately proved to be complicated to install, and often as (or more) expensive than buying a new high band set outright.[47]

Armstrong felt the FM band reassignment had been inspired primarily by a desire to cause a disruption that would limit FM's ability to challenge the existing radio industry, including RCA's AM radio properties that included the NBC radio network, plus the other major networks including CBS, ABC and Mutual. The change was thought to have been favored by AT&T, as the elimination of FM relaying stations would require radio stations to lease wired links from that company. Particularly galling was the FCC assignment of TV channel 1 to the 44–50 MHz segment of the old FM band. Channel 1 was later deleted, since periodic radio propagation would make local TV signals unviewable.

Although the FM band shift was an economic setback, there was reason for optimism. A book published in 1946 by Charles A. Siepmann heralded FM stations as "Radio's Second Chance".[48] In late 1945, Armstrong contracted with John Orr Young, founding member of the public relations firm Young & Rubicam, to conduct a national campaign promoting FM broadcasting, especially by educational institutions. Article placements promoting both Armstrong personally and FM were made with general circulation publications including The Nation, Fortune, The New York Times, Atlantic Monthly, and The Saturday Evening Post.[49]

In 1940, RCA offered Armstrong $1,000,000 for a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use his FM patents. He refused this offer, because he felt this would be unfair to the other licensed companies, which had to pay 2% royalties on their sales. Over time this impasse with RCA dominated Armstrong's life. RCA countered by conducting its own FM research, eventually developing what it claimed was a non-infringing FM system. The corporation encouraged other companies to stop paying royalties to Armstrong. Outraged by this, in 1948 Armstrong filed suit against RCA and the National Broadcasting Company, accusing them of patent infringement and that they had "deliberately set out to oppose and impair the value" of his invention, for which he requested treble damages. Although he was confident that this suit would be successful and result in a major monetary award, the protracted legal maneuvering that followed eventually began to impair his finances, especially after his primary patents expired in late 1950.[50]

FM radar

[edit]

During World War II, Armstrong turned his attention to investigations of continuous-wave FM radar funded by government contracts. Armstrong hoped that the interference fighting characteristic of wide-band FM and a narrow receiver bandwidth to reduce noise would increase range. Primary development took place at Armstrong's Alpine, NJ laboratory. A duplicate set of equipment was sent to the U.S. Army's Evans Signal Laboratory. The results of his investigations were inconclusive, the war ended, and the project was dropped by the Army.

Under the name Project Diana, the Evans staff took up the possibility of bouncing radar signals off the moon. Calculations showed that standard pulsed radar like the stock SCR-271 would not do the job; higher average power, much wider transmitter pulses, and very narrow receiver bandwidth would be required. They realized that the Armstrong equipment could be modified to accomplish the task.[51][52] The FM modulator of the transmitter was disabled and the transmitter keyed to produce quarter-second CW pulses. The narrow-band (57 Hz) receiver, which tracked the transmitter frequency, got an incremental tuning control to compensate for the possible 300 Hz Doppler shift on the lunar echoes. They achieved success on January 10, 1946.

Death

[edit]

The numerous protracted patent fights caused Armstrong's health to suffer and his behavior grew erratic. On one occasion he came to believe that someone had poisoned his food and insisted on having his stomach pumped. According to They Made America – authored by Sir Harold Evans and others – Armstrong was oblivious to the toll his struggle was taking on Marion. Marion spent months in a mental hospital after she threw herself into the East River.[53]

The legal battles also brought Armstrong to the brink of financial ruin. On November 1, 1953, Armstrong told Marion that he had used up almost all his financial resources.[54] In better times, funds for their retirement were put in her name, and he asked her to release a portion of those funds so he could continue litigation. She declined, and suggested he consider accepting a settlement. Enraged, Armstrong picked up a fireplace poker, striking her on the arm. Marion left the apartment to stay with her sister and never saw Armstrong again.[55][3][54]

After just under three months of separation from Marion, sometime during the night of January 31 – February 1, 1954, Armstrong jumped to his death from a window in his 12-room apartment on the 13th floor of River House in Manhattan, New York City.[56] The New York Times described the contents of his two-page suicide note to his wife: "he was heartbroken at being unable to see her once again, and expressing deep regret at having hurt her, the dearest thing in his life." The note concluded, "God keep you and Lord have mercy on my Soul."[3][57]

David Sarnoff disclaimed any responsibility, telling Carl Dreher directly that "I did not kill Armstrong."[58] After his death, a friend of Armstrong estimated that 90 percent of his time was spent on litigation against RCA.[3] U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy (R-Wisconsin) reported that Armstrong had recently met with one of his investigators, and had been "mortally afraid" that secret radar discoveries by him and other scientists "were being fed to the Communists as fast as they could be developed".[59]

Following her husband's suicide, Marion Armstrong took charge of pursuing his estate's legal cases. In late December 1954, it was announced that through arbitration a settlement of "approximately $1,000,000" had been made with RCA. Dana Raymond of Cravath, Swaine & Moore in New York served as counsel in that litigation. Marion Armstrong was able to formally establish Armstrong as the inventor of FM following protracted court proceedings over five of his basic FM patents,[60] with a series of successful suits, which lasted until 1967, against other companies that were found guilty of infringement.[61]

Legacy

[edit]

It was not until the 1960s that FM stations in the United States started to challenge the popularity of the AM band, helped by the development of FM stereo by General Electric, followed by the FCC's FM Non-Duplication Rule, which limited large-city broadcasters with AM and FM licenses to simulcasting on those two frequencies for only half of their broadcast hours. Armstrong's FM system was also used for communications between NASA and the Apollo program astronauts.

A US Postage Stamp was released in his honor in 1983 in a series commemorating American Inventors.[62]

Armstrong has been called "the most prolific and influential inventor in radio history".[63] The superheterodyne process is still extensively used by radio equipment. Eighty years after its invention, FM technology has started to be supplemented, and in some cases replaced, by more efficient digital technologies. The introduction of digital television eliminated the FM audio channel that had been used by analog television, HD Radio has added digital sub-channels to FM band stations, and, in Europe and Pacific Asia, Digital Audio Broadcasting bands have been created that will, in some cases, eliminate existing FM stations altogether.[64] However, FM broadcasting is still used internationally, and remains the dominant system employed for audio broadcasting services.

Personal life

[edit]
Armstrong and his new wife Esther Marion McInnis in Palm Beach in 1923. The radio is a portable superheterodyne that Armstrong built as a present for her.

In 1923, combining his love for high places with courtship rituals, Armstrong climbed the WJZ (now WABC) antenna located atop a 20-story building in New York City, where he reportedly did a handstand, and when a witness asked him what motivated him to "do these damnfool things", Armstrong replied "I do it because the spirit moves me."[65] Armstrong had arranged to have photographs taken, which he had delivered to David Sarnoff's secretary, Marion McInnis.[66] Armstrong and McInnis married later that year.[11] Armstrong bought a Hispano-Suiza motor car before the wedding, which he kept until his death, and which he drove to Palm Beach, Florida for their honeymoon. A publicity photograph was made of him presenting Marion with the world's first portable superheterodyne radio as a wedding gift.[10]

He was an avid tennis player until an injury in 1940, and drank an Old Fashioned with dinner.[10] Politically, he was described by one of his associates as "a revolutionist only in technology – in politics he was one of the most conservative of men."[67]

In 1955, Marion Armstrong founded the Armstrong Memorial Research Foundation, and participated in its work until her death in 1979 at the age of 81. She was survived by two nephews and a niece.[68]

Awards

[edit]
Country Year Institute Award Citation Ref.
United States 1917 Institute of Radio Engineers IRE Medal of Honor "In recognition of his work and publications dealing with the action of the oscillating and non-oscillating audio" [69]
United States 1940 ASME Holley Medal [70]
United States 1941 Franklin Institute Franklin Medal "Invention of the superheterodyne circuit, the super-regenerator, and a system of wide-swing frequency modulation for communications" [71]
United States 1942 AIEE AIEE Edison Medal "For distinguished contributions to the art of electric communication, notably the regenerative circuit, the superheterodyne, and frequency modulation" [72]
United States 1951 Western Society of Engineers Washington Award "For outstanding inventions basic to radio transmission and reception, and notable service to his country" [73]

Commemorations

[edit]

In 1980, Armstrong was inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame, and appeared on a U.S. postage stamp in 1983. The Consumer Electronics Hall of Fame inducted him in 2000, "in recognition of his contributions and pioneering spirit that have laid the foundation for consumer electronics."[74] He was posthumously inducted into the Wireless Hall of Fame in 2001.[75] Columbia University established the Edwin Howard Armstrong Professorship in the School of Engineering and Applied Science in his memory.[1]

Philosophy Hall, the Columbia building where Armstrong developed FM, was declared a National Historic Landmark. Armstrong's boyhood home in Yonkers, New York was recognized by the National Historic Landmark program and the National Register of Historic Places, although this was withdrawn when the house was demolished.[76][77]

Armstrong Hall at Columbia was named in his honor. The hall, located at the northeast corner of Broadway and 112th Street, was originally an apartment house but was converted to research space after being purchased by the university. It is currently home to the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, a research institute dedicated to atmospheric and climate science that is jointly operated by Columbia and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. A storefront in a corner of the building houses Tom's Restaurant, a longtime neighborhood fixture that inspired Susanne Vega's song "Tom's Diner" and was used for establishing shots for the fictional "Monk's diner" in the "Seinfeld" television series.

A second Armstrong Hall, also named for the inventor, is located at the United States Army Communications and Electronics Life Cycle Management Command (CECOM-LCMC) Headquarters at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

In 2005, Armstrong's regenerative feedback circuit and superheterodyne and FM circuits were inducted into the TECnology Hall of Fame, an honor given to "products and innovations that have had an enduring impact on the development of audio technology."[78]

Patents

[edit]

E. H. Armstrong patents:

[79] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Database Search

The following patents were issued to Armstrong's estate after his death:

[80]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Edwin Howard Armstrong (December 18, 1890 – January 31, 1954) was an American electrical engineer and inventor whose innovations formed the foundation of modern radio technology, including the , , and wide-band (. Born in and educated at , where he earned a degree in in 1913, Armstrong developed the regenerative receiver as an undergraduate, enabling significant amplification of weak radio signals. During service with the U.S. Army in , he invented the , which converted incoming radio frequencies to a fixed for improved selectivity and sensitivity, becoming the dominant architecture for radio and television tuners. His 1933 breakthrough in wide-band FM transmission provided clearer audio with reduced static and interference compared to prevailing (AM) systems, though it faced resistance from established broadcasters invested in AM infrastructure. Armstrong's achievements were overshadowed by decades of acrimonious litigation, including a prolonged dispute with over regeneration rights—ultimately resolved in Armstrong's favor after three rulings—and later battles with RCA over FM infringement, which exhausted his finances and health. Despondent amid these unending legal struggles, he died by in 1954, jumping from his New York apartment; his widow Marion pursued and won vindication in the FM suits years later, securing royalties that affirmed his pioneering contributions.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Family Background

Edwin Howard Armstrong was born on December 18, 1890, in New York City's Chelsea district to Armstrong and Emily Smith Armstrong. His father served as the American representative for , while his mother had worked as a schoolteacher prior to marriage. The family, of genteel Presbyterian stock and both parents native New Yorkers, resided initially at 247 West 29th Street. Armstrong was the eldest of three children in a prosperous household. As a young child, Armstrong contracted , which left him with a facial and fostered a reclusive disposition, often leading him to play in solitude atop the family's rooftop. In 1902, at around age 12, the family relocated to , where they occupied a that Armstrong would inhabit until 1923. This move provided a suburban setting conducive to his emerging technical pursuits. During his attendance at Yonkers High School from approximately 1905 to 1910, Armstrong demonstrated early aptitude for electrical experimentation by erecting a 125-foot antenna mast on the family lawn to explore . By age 14, he had resolved to pursue invention as a , constructing homemade devices that foreshadowed his lifelong focus on radio technology. These youthful endeavors, unassisted by formal guidance, reflected an innate drive rooted in self-directed empirical inquiry rather than institutional influence.

Columbia University Studies and Early Influences

Armstrong enrolled in 's School of Engineering in September 1909, following his graduation from high school in June of that year, to pursue a degree in . His admission came at a time when and early radio experiments were gaining traction, aligning with his preexisting fascination with sparked by childhood experiments and reading scientific texts. At Columbia, he studied in an environment rich with pioneering work in , utilizing facilities like the Hartley Laboratories for hands-on electrical research. A pivotal influence during his undergraduate years was Professor Michael I. Pupin, a renowned and inventor whose lectures on electrical oscillations and profoundly shaped Armstrong's approach to radio . Pupin's emphasis on practical applications of electromagnetic theory, drawn from his own patents in long-distance , encouraged Armstrong to experiment extensively with amplifiers beyond classroom assignments. By his third year, around , these influences culminated in Armstrong's independent development of the regenerative feedback circuit while working in his dorm room, a breakthrough that amplified weak radio signals by feeding output back into the input, dramatically improving receiver sensitivity. This invention, patented shortly after, demonstrated how university resources and mentorship fostered his innovative mindset, though it also highlighted tensions with conventional teaching by prioritizing empirical tinkering over theoretical abstraction. Armstrong completed his Bachelor of Science degree in in June 1913, having maintained strong academic performance despite health setbacks from childhood that limited his and reinforced his indoor focus on laboratory work. Early faculty interactions, including with Pupin, not only provided technical guidance but also instilled a commitment to patenting practical inventions, influencing Armstrong's lifelong pursuit of radio advancements amid emerging interests. These formative years at Columbia thus bridged his self-taught radio enthusiasm with rigorous engineering principles, setting the stage for wartime contributions.

World War I Inventions

Regenerative Circuit Development

Edwin Howard Armstrong developed the regenerative circuit in 1912 as an undergraduate student at Columbia University, building on Lee de Forest's 1906 Audion vacuum tube. By incorporating positive feedback—routing a portion of the tube's output current back to its input grid—Armstrong achieved substantial amplification of weak radio signals, enabling reception previously unattainable with contemporary detectors. This feedback mechanism increased receiver sensitivity by creating a self-reinforcing loop within the Audion, which functioned as a triode with filament, plate, and grid elements. Armstrong filed a patent application for the circuit in October 1913, with the U.S. Patent Office issuing it on October 6, 1914, as an improved Audion receiver configuration. The design not only enhanced detection but, at higher feedback levels, induced oscillations for signal transmission, laying groundwork for continuous-wave radio operations essential to early broadcasting and communication systems. De Forest contested the patent, claiming prior incidental discovery of feedback effects, sparking litigation that spanned two decades; initial courts favored Armstrong, though the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately awarded de Forest the foundational feedback patent in 1934, recognizing Armstrong's specific circuit innovation as distinct. During , Armstrong, commissioned as a major in the U.S. Army Signal Corps and stationed in from 1917, permitted royalty-free military use of his regenerative amid urgent needs for reliable radio intelligence, such as detecting enemy shortwave transmissions. The circuit's amplification proved foundational for direction and signal interception, addressing the era's challenges with faint, long-distance signals in conditions, though Armstrong's concurrent superheterodyne work further advanced these applications. Its deployment underscored the transition from crystal detectors to vacuum-tube amplifiers, revolutionizing military radio sensitivity and selectivity.

Superheterodyne Receiver Innovation

During World War I, Edwin Howard Armstrong, serving in the U.S. Army Signal Corps laboratory in Paris starting in 1917, developed the superheterodyne receiver to address the limitations of existing tuned radio frequency (TRF) receivers in detecting weak, high-frequency shortwave signals from enemy communications. Assigned to enhance radio intelligence capabilities, Armstrong sought a method to amplify signals at higher frequencies where vacuum tube performance degraded, leading him to experiment with heterodyne principles already known from Reginald Fessenden's work but applied innovatively for reception. By early 1918, he devised a circuit that generated a local oscillator signal to mix with the incoming radio frequency (RF), producing a fixed intermediate frequency (IF) for subsequent amplification and detection, vastly improving sensitivity and selectivity over direct amplification methods. The core innovation lay in the superheterodyne's architecture: the RF signal is heterodyned with a tunable local oscillator to shift the spectrum to a constant IF band—typically around 455 kHz in later designs—where multiple stages of amplification could be optimized without retuning, enabling sharper filtering and rejection of adjacent signals. Armstrong constructed prototype receivers in Paris, demonstrating their ability to receive signals previously inaudible, which proved critical for military applications in intercepting German transmissions. Due to wartime secrecy, details remained classified until after the armistice; Armstrong filed his first patent application in France on December 23, 1918, followed by a U.S. application on February 28, 1919, with the patent (U.S. Patent 1,342,885) granted on June 8, 1920. Post-war, Armstrong refined and commercialized the superheterodyne, introducing portable versions by 1923 that incorporated the circuit into compact, battery-powered units weighing about 25 pounds, capable of outperforming stationary sets in sensitivity. This receiver type addressed inherent TRF drawbacks like ganging multiple tuned circuits for selectivity, which often resulted in poor image rejection and alignment issues; the superhet's single IF stage simplified tuning to one dial controlling both mixer and oscillator in parallel. By the mid-1920s, it became the in broadcast receivers, underpinning modern radio and tuners due to its superior gain distribution and stability.

1920s Radio Advancements

Superregenerative Detection

In 1922, Edwin Howard Armstrong developed the superregenerative detection method as an advancement over his earlier , achieving significantly higher sensitivity in radio receivers through periodic of . This technique addressed limitations in continuous regeneration, such as unwanted and interference, by introducing a low-frequency signal that intermittently resets the amplifier's gain cycle, enabling average amplification gains exceeding 100,000 in practical implementations. Armstrong filed for the patent on June 27, 1921, and it was granted as U.S. Patent 1,424,065 on July 25, 1922, covering a signaling system that utilized this principle for detection. The core mechanism involves a with for regeneration, augmented by a quenching oscillator operating at an (typically 10-100 kHz) that modulates the tube's bias to alternate between amplifying and non-amplifying states. During the amplifying phase, the circuit builds up oscillations from weak input signals; the quench then collapses these, discharging stored energy and restarting the cycle, which demodulates the signal via nonlinear mixing while suppressing continuous carrier oscillation. This results in superior sensitivity for weak signals compared to standard regenerative detectors, particularly in the , though it introduces quench-related audio "hiss" as a . Armstrong demonstrated the circuit's efficacy in tests, reporting detection of signals at microvolt levels unattainable by prior methods. Superregenerative receivers found early applications in low-cost, high-gain shortwave communication devices during the 1920s, including sets and early wireless telephony experiments, before being largely supplanted by superheterodyne architectures for broadcast use. Armstrong licensed the technology to the Radio Corporation of America (RCA) in June 1922, receiving substantial royalties that contributed to his financial independence by 1923. The invention underscored Armstrong's focus on first-principles optimization of receiver dynamics, prioritizing causal signal amplification over empirical trial-and-error common in contemporaneous designs.

Technical Challenges in Receiver Sensitivity

In the early 1920s, as commercial expanded, receiver sensitivity emerged as a critical bottleneck, with weak signals from distant stations (often below 1 microvolt) overwhelmed by atmospheric static, man-made interference, and inherent thermal noise in amplifiers. Tuned radio frequency (TRF) designs, employing cascaded stages, typically achieved gains of 10,000 to 100,000 but approached practical limits due to tube interelectrode capacitances, which reduced high-frequency response and introduced instability. Regeneration, Armstrong's earlier innovation, augmented sensitivity by recirculating output signals to the input, yielding effective gains up to 1 million through nearing the threshold; however, exceeding this point triggered uncontrolled , producing audible "howling" at audio frequencies and rendering the receiver unusable for faithful signal reproduction. Armstrong addressed these constraints in by inventing the superregenerative receiver, which boosted sensitivity by factors of 10 to 100 beyond standard regeneration—enabling detection of signals as weak as 0.01 —through a oscillator operating at 10,000 to 50,000 Hz. This mechanism periodically interrupted the regenerative buildup by damping the circuit's free vibrations within microseconds, preventing sustained oscillation while averaging higher gain over the quench cycle; the process exploited nonlinear mixing to produce an intermediate beat frequency proportional to the input signal strength. Yet, implementation demanded precise quench waveform control, as irregular damping introduced harmonic distortion in the demodulated audio, with quench rates too low causing incomplete reset and residual carrier beats, or too high risking loss of logarithmic signal response. Further challenges arose from the circuit's operation, which sacrificed selectivity (Q factors below 10 versus 100+ in designs), allowing to degrade weak-signal performance amid the growing congestion from stations spaced 10 kHz apart. Superregenerative action also generated strong reradiation—equivalent to a local transmitter output of milliwatts—propagating up to a mile and desensitizing nearby receivers or triggering reciprocal interference; Armstrong mitigated this via shielded coils and grid-leak but acknowledged it as a principal limitation for multi-set environments. Observations of chaotic dynamics, including period-doubling bifurcations in feedback loops, further complicated tuning stability, requiring empirical adjustments to tube biases and inductances for consistent operation across varying signal conditions. These hurdles confined superregeneration to specialized uses like shortwave experimentation rather than mass-market broadcast receivers, underscoring the trade-offs between raw sensitivity and practical reliability.

Frequency Modulation Breakthrough

Origins of Wideband FM in 1933

In the early 1930s, Edwin Howard Armstrong sought to address the persistent problem of static and noise interference in amplitude modulation (AM) radio broadcasting, which degraded audio quality particularly during adverse atmospheric conditions. Recognizing the limitations of AM, where signal amplitude variations were susceptible to noise, Armstrong explored frequency modulation (FM) as an alternative, building on earlier narrowband FM concepts used primarily for telegraphy. By mid-1932, he initiated experiments in his Columbia University laboratory to extend FM for high-fidelity audio transmission, hypothesizing that increasing the frequency deviation proportionally to the modulating signal—far beyond narrowband limits—would capture useful signal energy while rejecting noise outside the intended bandwidth. This approach required a wide channel spacing of approximately 160 kHz, with peak deviations up to 75 kHz for a 15 kHz audio bandwidth, yielding a high modulation index that theoretically improved signal-to-noise ratio by 30-40 dB over AM under equivalent power. Armstrong's breakthrough crystallized in through iterative circuit designs and empirical testing, including a balanced discriminator for FM detection that converted frequency variations back to audio without sensitivity. He filed four foundational applications between July 1930 and January , refining ideas on modulation and techniques, which culminated in five U.S. patents issued simultaneously on December 26, , including U.S. Patent 1,941,066 for a "Radio Signaling System" detailing the wideband FM transmitter and receiver architecture. These patents described a system where the carrier was swung symmetrically around a center value in proportion to the audio input, enabling noise suppression via the demodulator's limited passband response to frequency errors. Laboratory demonstrations that year confirmed the system's immunity to AM-style fading and static, with audio fidelity surpassing existing AM receivers even at distances up to 50 miles from a low-power transmitter. The innovation's origins lay in Armstrong's first-principles analysis of noise mechanisms: primarily affects instantaneous , but in FM, pre-emphasis of higher audio frequencies and the in limiters further marginalized perturbations, confining noise to phase/frequency domains where wideband design traded for . Unlike prior narrowband FM efforts, which achieved only marginal improvements due to low deviation ratios, Armstrong's wideband variant demanded regulatory allocation of higher frequencies (above 40 MHz) to avoid interference, foreshadowing FM's eventual VHF placement. Initial field tests in 1933, conducted atop Columbia's Hall, validated these principles with receivers showing negligible in thunderstorms, marking the practical genesis of modern .

Engineering Principles and Superiority over AM

Armstrong's wideband (FM) system encoded audio signals by varying the instantaneous frequency of a around a , while maintaining constant , in contrast to (AM), which varied the carrier's amplitude proportional to the audio signal. This approach stemmed from Armstrong's recognition that most radio interference, such as atmospheric static from or man-made electrical noise, predominantly manifested as amplitude fluctuations rather than frequency shifts, allowing FM receivers to employ limiters to suppress such distortions before . In practice, Armstrong generated wideband FM indirectly by first producing a narrowband FM signal with small deviations, then applying frequency multipliers—nonlinear circuits that proportionally scaled both the carrier frequency and deviation—to achieve the desired wide swings, typically up to a maximum deviation of 75 kHz for audio frequencies up to 15 kHz. This multiplier chain, often involving stages that quadrupled or more the deviation, enabled a high β = Δf / f_m ≈ 5, where Δf is the peak deviation and f_m the maximum modulating frequency, far exceeding narrowband FM's β < 1 and permitting efficient use of the FM signal's inherent noise resilience. The superiority of Armstrong's wideband FM over AM arose primarily from its quadratic improvement in (SNR) under strong signal conditions, derived from the fact that demodulated FM noise decreases inversely with the square of the deviation while signal scales linearly, yielding a net SNR gain of approximately 20 log(β) dB over equivalent AM systems after accounting for bandwidth expansion. Specifically, AM signals suffered direct corruption from additive amplitude noise, which passed through the unattenuated, whereas FM's frequency discriminator rejected amplitude noise via the stage and further suppressed through the wideband , wherein a sufficiently strong FM signal overwhelmed adjacent interferers by the receiver's selectivity. Empirical demonstrations, such as Armstrong's 1935 setup atop the transmitting to receivers 80 miles away, revealed FM reception free of the static that plagued AM under identical conditions, with audio fidelity approaching that of direct wire lines due to the extended and reduced from multipath , which caused less severe errors than amplitude errors. Bandwidth trade-offs underscored the engineering rationale: while AM confined signals to roughly twice the audio bandwidth (e.g., 30 kHz for 15 kHz audio), wideband FM required about 200 kHz per channel per Carson's bandwidth rule (2(Δf + f_m)), trading spectrum efficiency for noise performance, yet delivering usable SNR improvements of 25-30 dB in practice over AM in noisy environments like urban areas or mobile reception. Armstrong augmented this with pre-emphasis—boosting high audio frequencies before modulation and de-emphasizing post-demodulation—to further mitigate FM's residual high-frequency noise rise, achieving overall distortion levels below 1% at modulation indices near 5, unattainable in AM without excessive power or bandwidth. These principles not only rendered FM impervious to the impulsive noise dominating AM broadcast bands but also enabled higher transmitter power efficiency, as constant-amplitude FM avoided the linear amplifier inefficiencies of AM's varying envelope.

World War II Applications

FM-Based Radar Systems

During , Edwin Howard Armstrong developed continuous-wave frequency-modulated (FM) radar systems under contracts with the U.S. , beginning around 1939. These systems diverged from prevailing pulse radar technologies by employing continuous transmission with frequency modulation to measure range and velocity, leveraging the for enhanced target discrimination. Collaborating with engineers John Bose and Robert Hull, Armstrong modified existing equipment, such as the SCR-271 radar set, at Camp Evans, , to create an experimental FM Doppler radar with a narrow receiver bandwidth synchronized to the transmitter, improving and rejection of clutter. The FM-based approach offered superior performance over pulse , including extended search ranges, greater sensitivity, and the ability to differentiate stationary from moving targets through frequency shifts. By 1945, Armstrong, Bose, and Hull had produced a functional system, which Armstrong made available to the U.S. royalty-free for wartime applications, including mobile communications and detection. This royalty-free provision facilitated rapid deployment, contributing to advancements in anti-aircraft and proximity detection technologies, though specifics remained classified. A related (U.S. No. 794,608) was filed in December 1947, formalizing the FM radar innovations developed during the war effort.

Secrecy and Military Deployment

During , Edwin Howard Armstrong granted the U.S. military royalty-free access to his (FM) patents, enabling widespread adoption for tactical communications that outperformed (AM) systems in noisy environments. In 1938, U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Roger B. Colton mandated FM for all future military radios, prompting Armstrong to advise at laboratories, where he participated in conferences and field tests. From late 1940 through spring 1941, () FM equipment was developed for tactical vehicles, tanks, and infantry, replacing less reliable AM sets. A prime example of deployment was the backpack transceiver, the first portable FM radio for U.S. , operating in the 40-48 MHz band with a reliable 5-mile range even in rugged terrain. Introduced in 1943, the —often called the ""—facilitated real-time coordination for invasions, armored assaults, and in and the Pacific theaters, credited with saving thousands of Allied lives by enabling fluid maneuver previously impossible with AM radios susceptible to interference. Over 50,000 units were produced and fielded by war's end, demonstrating FM's superiority in short-range, line-of-sight operations under combat conditions. Armstrong's FM research extended to radar under classified Signal Corps contracts, focusing on continuous-wave FM systems that achieved greater detection ranges than contemporary pulse radar through frequency-shift analysis of echoes. Collaborating with engineers like John Bose and Robert Hull, he conducted experiments at his laboratory, but details remained highly classified for decades post-war due to their strategic sensitivity. These efforts complemented mobile FM communications by applying modulation principles to proximity detection, though primary radar deployment emphasized communications reliability over radar until postwar refinements. The secrecy surrounding FM radar limited public disclosure, with final reports submitted as late as 1952 under military oversight.

Patent Wars and Corporate Opposition

Litigation Against Lee de Forest

In 1913, Edwin Howard Armstrong developed and publicly demonstrated the , a feedback mechanism using the to amplify radio signals by reinjecting a portion of the output back into the input, enabling significant improvements in receiver sensitivity and selectivity. Armstrong filed for U.S. Patent 1,113,149 on October 29, 1913, which was granted on October 20, 1914, explicitly describing the controlled regeneration process that produced both amplification and potential oscillation when pushed to extremes. , inventor of the triode in 1906, had earlier achieved unintentional feedback effects in his circuits but lacked a clear understanding of the underlying principles, as evidenced by his initial descriptions attributing results to mere amplification without recognizing the oscillatory feedback dynamics. The patent conflict escalated into litigation when Armstrong, backed by Westinghouse Electric, sued the De Forest Radio Telephone and Telegraph Company in 1920 for infringement of his regeneration patent. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled in Armstrong's favor on May 17, 1921, validating his and awarding , with the affirming that Armstrong had first invented and understood the feedback mechanism deliberately. De Forest and his assignees, including and later RCA, contested this through interference proceedings in the and appeals, arguing priority based on de Forest's earlier but ambiguously documented experiments from 1912–1913, where feedback occurred accidentally during oscillator tests without full comprehension of its receiver applications. Subsequent appeals saw mixed rulings, including a 1928 U.S. upholding aspects of de Forest's feed-back claims in a related case, prioritizing findings over Armstrong's technical demonstrations. A 1933 U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision temporarily favored Armstrong, declaring his patent valid against de Forest's challenges. However, the U.S. reversed this in Radio Corporation of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories on May 21, 1934, sustaining de Forest's patents (Nos. 1,507,016 and 1,507,017, granted September 2, 1924) and awarding him priority for the invention, reasoning that de Forest's earlier filings and experiments, despite incomplete theoretical grasp, established sufficient inventive act under patent law. The Court refused to reopen the case on October 9, 1934, finalizing the nearly two-decade dispute described as among the most protracted in radio history. The ruling shocked many engineers, who contended that de Forest's serendipitous feedback lacked Armstrong's rigorous analysis and control mechanisms, as Armstrong's work first mathematically modeled the circuit's behavior, distinguishing amplification from —insights absent in de Forest's contemporaneous records. Legally, the decision invalidated key claims in Armstrong's , forcing him to his technologies under de Forest's umbrella and contributing to ongoing royalty disputes with RCA, though Armstrong maintained the technical superiority of his contributions in subsequent writings and testimonies. This outcome exemplified tensions between legal priority based on filing dates and empirical invention, with critics noting the Patent Office's deference to de Forest despite of Armstrong's prior independent development and public disclosure in 1913.

Conflicts with RCA and David Sarnoff

Armstrong's relationship with , president of RCA, began as a professional alliance in the 1910s, with Sarnoff facilitating tests of Armstrong's early inventions using RCA facilities. By the 1930s, however, tensions arose over Armstrong's wideband (FM) system, which he patented starting in 1933 and demonstrated to Sarnoff in late 1933 at . Sarnoff initially expressed enthusiasm but RCA declined to pursue exclusive rights, prioritizing (AM) broadcasting and emerging television technologies that aligned with its investments in (NBC) stations. RCA's opposition intensified as FM gained traction; in 1940, the company proposed a $1 million non-exclusive, royalty-free license for Armstrong's FM patents, which he rejected to maintain control and seek fair compensation. RCA simultaneously developed its own narrowband FM variants, avoiding infringement while lobbying regulators. A pivotal action occurred in 1945 when, at RCA's urging citing potential interference with television signals, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) reallocated the FM band from 42–50 MHz to 88–108 MHz, rendering approximately 400,000 existing receivers obsolete and stalling FM adoption. In July 1948, Armstrong filed suit against RCA and in federal court, alleging on his FM technologies and a deliberate to suppress the system by discouraging manufacturer royalties and influencing FCC policies to limit FM channels. RCA countersued, claiming its systems did not infringe and asserting . The litigation, entangled with Armstrong's broader patent portfolio disputes, spanned years amid appeals and expert testimonies on FM's technical merits. On December 15, 1953, RCA offered a $200,000 settlement—roughly equivalent to Armstrong's annual legal fees—but he rejected it as inadequate, viewing it as insufficient recognition of FM's value and RCA's role in delaying its commercialization. Armstrong publicly accused Sarnoff of leading a "secret " involving broadcasters to undermine FM, efforts that included congressional and investigations, though these yielded no regulatory reversals. Sarnoff maintained RCA's actions stemmed from legitimate concerns over efficiency and market readiness, not malice, as FM's superior noise rejection threatened RCA's AM dominance without immediate revenue offsets. The disputes eroded their long-standing friendship, with Armstrong's legal expenditures exceeding $1 million by the early 1950s, funded through personal loans and FM equipment sales. Following Armstrong's death on January 31, 1954, his widow Marion pursued the cases, securing over $10 million in settlements from RCA and others by the mid-1960s.

Economic and Psychological Toll

The protracted patent litigation, particularly against RCA and its executives including , imposed severe financial burdens on Armstrong, as he expended much of his personal fortune on legal fees and related expenses over decades. His battles originated with challenges to Lee de Forest's claims in the 1910s and 1920s, escalating to FM-related infringement suits filed against RCA and in July 1948, which involved exhaustive pretrial proceedings lasting more than five years. In one instance, Armstrong rejected RCA's 1940 offer of $1 million for a non-exclusive, royalty-free to his FM patents, prioritizing full control and royalties that he believed were rightfully his. By late 1953, just weeks before his death, he had initiated 21 separate infringement lawsuits, further straining his resources amid stalled proceedings and mounting interrogations. RCA eventually settled with Armstrong's estate in December 1954 for approximately $1 million, providing posthumous vindication but no relief during his lifetime. The economic devastation compounded psychological distress, transforming Armstrong into what contemporaries described as "a man possessed" by his legal crusade, diverting him from inventive pursuits and eroding his health. By 1953, the endless litigation had induced desperation and obsession, pushing him toward a nervous breakdown amid perceived betrayals by former allies like Sarnoff. This strain extended to his , culminating in a violent altercation with his wife Marion on January 30, 1954, after which she departed their apartment; hours later, on January 31, Armstrong took his own life by jumping from the 13th-floor window of his residence, leaving a note expressing profound regret and heartbreak over the losses. The cumulative toll of financial ruin and unrelenting corporate opposition thus shattered his resolve, despite his technical triumphs.

Personal Life

Marriage and Family Dynamics

Edwin Howard Armstrong married Esther Marion MacInnes on December 1, 1923, in , following their courtship at the Radio Corporation of America (RCA), where MacInnes served as secretary to RCA president . Born in 1898 in Merrimac to parents Angus and Annie E. MacInnes, she had relocated to for her RCA position, during which Armstrong's frequent visits facilitated their meeting. The couple honeymooned in , where Armstrong presented MacInnes—whom he affectionately called "Mary Ann"—with a portable he had constructed as a wedding gift. The marriage, which lasted approximately 30 years until Armstrong's death, was marked by MacInnes's understanding of her husband's intense dedication to invention and litigation, providing emotional support amid his professional obsessions. Armstrong, described as a private individual who permitted few close relationships, nonetheless expressed deep affection for his wife, though his fixation on advancing radio and protracted patent disputes often overshadowed personal matters. The couple had no children, centering their family life around Armstrong's work, including summers spent in Rye Beach, . Tensions emerged in the marriage's later years due to the psychological and financial toll of Armstrong's legal battles, particularly against RCA, culminating in a quarrel on Thanksgiving night, 1953, after which MacInnes departed to reside with relatives. Despite this strain, her loyalty persisted; following Armstrong's on January 31, 1954, MacInnes pursued and ultimately prevailed in his remaining suits, securing victories and settlements by the mid-1960s with assistance from attorney Dana Raymond. She died on August 8, 1979, in .

Social and Professional Relationships

Armstrong's early professional relationships were rooted in his academic environment at , where he studied from 1909 to 1913 and later served as an assistant professor. There, he worked under mentor Michael I. Pupin, who provided laboratory space in Philosophy Hall and defended Armstrong's research against faculty skepticism, facilitating key experiments on radio circuits. During , Armstrong was commissioned as a captain and later promoted to major in the U.S. Army , serving in to develop radio detection technologies, including early tests for intercepting enemy shortwave signals. This military service established ties with personnel and earned him the French Chevalier de la Légion d’Honneur for his contributions. A significant early friendship formed with in 1914, when Armstrong demonstrated his regenerative receiver to the Marconi executive, fostering collaboration as Sarnoff rose in RCA. Initially supportive, their relationship deteriorated in the 1930s over FM radio; Sarnoff, prioritizing RCA's AM and television interests, opposed wideband FM adoption, leading Armstrong to sue RCA and in 1948 for patent interference and conspiracy to suppress FM. This rift ended their 40-year association, with Sarnoff testifying against FM spectrum allocation in 1936. Armstrong's professional rivalries included prolonged patent litigation with over the feedback oscillator, beginning after their 1910s meeting at an conference and culminating in a 1934 U.S. ruling favoring de Forest despite Armstrong's prior invention. In World War II, Armstrong advised the , visiting laboratories from 1938 and collaborating with Maj. Gen. Roger B. Colton, who mandated FM for military radios that year, and John J. "Jack" Kelleher on VHF FM equipment from 1940 to 1941; he donated patents royalty-free for wartime use. Socially, Armstrong was known as "the Major" among friends in engineering circles, though his intense focus on invention limited broader social engagements, with personal strains emerging from legal battles rather than wide networks.

Final Years and Death

In the late 1940s, Armstrong's patent conflicts with RCA reached a critical juncture, culminating in a major lawsuit filed on July 22, 1948, against RCA and NBC in federal court in Wilmington, Delaware. The suit charged infringement of his five fundamental FM patents and accused RCA of systematically retarding FM's development to favor amplitude modulation and emerging television technologies. Pretrial proceedings extended over five years, demanding the bulk of Armstrong's attention and halting his research endeavors. The financial burden intensified as Armstrong mobilized a team of 14 lawyers to counter RCA's 10, incurring escalating legal fees that eroded his royalties from earlier inventions like the . In December 1953, amid dwindling income and widespread unlicensed FM use, he filed 21 additional infringement suits against various parties, amplifying the resource drain on his personal fortune. RCA proposed a $1 million settlement, which Armstrong dismissed for not crediting him as FM's originator, thereby sustaining the litigation's momentum. By 1954, these unrelenting disputes had plunged Armstrong into severe debt, as soaring expenses outpaced his patent revenues and isolated him from productive work. RCA settled posthumously with his estate for $1,040,000 in December 1954, but the prior year's pressures had already exacted an irreversible toll.

Suicide on January 31, 1954, and Aftermath

On January 31, 1954, Edwin Howard Armstrong took his own life by jumping from the window of his 13th-floor apartment at 52 East 52nd Street in , falling to his death on the street below. He had removed an air conditioner from the window prior to the act and left a two-page addressed to his , Esther Marion Armstrong, expressing profound despair amid ongoing personal and professional struggles. Armstrong had spent the preceding and alone, isolated by the toll of protracted legal battles that had eroded his finances and health. The suicide stemmed directly from the cumulative effects of over two decades of patent litigation, particularly against RCA and figures like Lee de Forest, which drained Armstrong's resources—estimated at millions in legal fees—and led to erratic behavior and deepening depression in his final years. Just one month prior, he had initiated 21 new infringement lawsuits against major broadcasters, including RCA and , alleging theft of his FM and superheterodyne technologies, but these compounded his exhaustion without immediate resolution. His inventions, foundational to modern radio, yielded royalties overshadowed by corporate opposition, leaving him financially ruined despite their widespread adoption. Following Armstrong's death, his widow pursued the outstanding lawsuits with determination, securing vindication for his patents. By 1967, the cases were resolved in her favor, affirming Armstrong's claims against infringers like RCA and resulting in substantial settlements that validated his innovations posthumously. These outcomes, detailed in archival records and later disclosures such as Armstrong's personal papers released in 1978, underscored the legitimacy of his contributions amid what had been portrayed as contentious disputes. The settlements provided financial relief to the estate but could not reverse the inventor's tragic end, highlighting the human cost of prolonged corporate-legal conflicts in early 20th-century technology development.

Technical Legacy

Impact on Modern Radio and Communications

Armstrong's , developed in 1918 and patented in 1920, established the dominant architecture for radio by mixing the incoming radiofrequency with a to produce a fixed for amplification and , vastly improving sensitivity and selectivity over contemporary designs. This method remains integral to non-software-defined radio receivers, including those in AM/FM broadcast sets, shortwave equipment, and traditional tuners, as it enables efficient filtering and gain distribution that direct conversion architectures struggle to match without additional complexity. His frequency modulation (FM) system, patented in December 1933 (U.S. 1,941,182), overcame amplitude modulation's susceptibility to static and noise by encoding audio signals through frequency deviations within a wide bandwidth, delivering higher fidelity and robustness in urban or mobile settings. Adopted commercially after following FCC allocation of the 88–108 MHz band in 1941 and equipment standardization in 1945, FM became the standard for music due to its capacity for transmission introduced in 1961, powering thousands of stations worldwide that prioritize audio quality over AM's propagation advantages. These innovations extended beyond broadcasting to underpin radar systems during , where superheterodyne principles facilitated precise target detection, and influenced early receivers, with Armstrong's circuits forming the basis for signal handling in analog until digital transitions. Collectively, they enabled the mass proliferation of reliable communications, from consumer radios to foundational telecom infrastructure, sustaining core methodologies amid evolving digital overlays.65205-7/fulltext)

Enduring Adoption of Core Inventions

Armstrong's , patented in 1918, established the dominant architecture for radio reception by converting incoming signals to a stable for amplification, yielding enhanced sensitivity and selectivity essential for weak-signal detection. This design supplanted earlier tuned-radio-frequency receivers and became integral to commercial AM radios by the 1920s, with widespread licensing to manufacturers like RCA. Its principles endure in contemporary applications, including FM radios, tuners, and shortwave receivers, where heterodyning facilitates precise control amid crowded spectra. The regenerative circuit, patented in 1914, amplified signals via positive feedback in vacuum tubes, enabling long-distance reception with rudimentary equipment during World War I. Though embroiled in legal challenges over priority with Lee de Forest, it informed early audio amplification techniques and persists in niche, low-power designs such as crystal sets and simple amateur receivers, albeit largely superseded by more stable superheterodyne methods for commercial viability. Armstrong's wideband frequency modulation (FM), developed and demonstrated in 1933, addressed AM's vulnerabilities to static and noise by varying carrier frequency proportional to audio amplitude, achieving audio fidelity rivaling wired transmission. Despite initial resistance from AM interests, the FCC's 1941 allocation of the 42–50 MHz band (shifted to 88–108 MHz in 1945) spurred adoption; by 1948, over 500 FM stations operated in the U.S., expanding to thousands postwar as FM proved superior for music broadcasting. FM now predominates global VHF audio distribution, underpinning high-quality stereo and digital hybrids like .

Recognition and Honors

Lifetime Awards and Inductions

In 1917, Armstrong received the inaugural from the Institute of Radio Engineers (IRE, predecessor to the IEEE) for his pioneering publications on the action of oscillating and non-oscillating audions, recognizing foundational contributions to radio amplification circuits. The awarded him the Holley Medal in 1940 for meritorious achievements in the invention of mechanisms or devices, specifically citing his development of the and associated radio technologies. In 1941, the presented Armstrong with the , one of the highest scientific honors in the United States, for his invention of the feedback circuit (regenerative receiver), affirming its originality amid prior legal disputes. The (AIEE) granted him the Edison Medal in 1942 for distinguished contributions to the art of electrical communication, encompassing his regenerative, superregenerative, and superheterodyne circuits that transformed radio reception. Armstrong was further honored with the Washington Award in 1951 by the Western Society of Engineers for his wide influence on through inventions advancing human welfare, particularly in frequency modulation broadcasting. No formal hall of fame inductions occurred during Armstrong's lifetime, though these awards from leading engineering bodies underscored his era's recognition of his innovations despite ongoing patent litigations.

Posthumous Tributes Including 2025 Hall of Fame

Following Armstrong's death on January 31, 1954, several institutions recognized his contributions to radio technology through posthumous inductions into halls of fame. In 1980, he was inducted into the for his invention of FM radio, as documented in U.S. Patent No. 1,342,885, which revolutionized broadcast quality by mitigating static interference. In 2000, the Consumer Electronics Association inducted Armstrong into its Hall of Fame, honoring his pioneering spirit and foundational role in developing the and wideband FM transmission systems that enabled clearer audio reception. On August 2025, Armstrong was inducted into the Hi-Fi Hall of Fame, acknowledging his inventions of three core radio technologies—the , , and FM modulation—that laid the groundwork for modern high-fidelity broadcasting and audio reproduction. This induction, announced publicly in September 2025, emphasized his status as the inventor of broadcast radio fundamentals, distinct from incremental improvements by contemporaries.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.