Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Fandom (website)
View on Wikipedia
Fandom[a] (formerly known as Wikicities and Wikia)[b] is a media conglomerate backed by the private equity firm TPG Capital. The website offers a platform for hosting wiki pages with social media features on various topics such as video games, movies, books, and TV series;[9] and other multimedia databases such as GameFAQs, Metacritic and ComicVine. The company also owns several entertainment outlets such as GameSpot and TV Guide, as well as online retailers such as Fanatical.
Key Information
The privately held for-profit Delaware company was founded in October 2004 by Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales and Angela Beesley.[1][10] Fandom was acquired in 2018 by TPG Inc. and Jon Miller through Integrated Media Co.[11]
Fandom uses MediaWiki, the same open-source wiki software used by Wikipedia. Unlike the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit organization that hosts Wikipedia, Fandom, Inc. operates as a for-profit company and derives its income from advertising and sold content, publishing most user-provided text under copyleft licenses.[12] The company also runs the associated Fandom editorial project, offering pop-culture and gaming news.[13] Fandom wikis are hosted under the domain fandom.com, which has become one of the top 50 most visited websites in the world, rapidly rising in popularity beginning in the early 2020s. It ranks as the 50th as of October 2023, with 25.79% of its traffic coming from the United States, followed by Russia with 7.76%, according to Similarweb.[14]
History
[edit]2004–2009: Early days and growth
[edit]Fandom was launched on October 18, 2004, at 23:50:49 (UTC) under the name Wikicities (which invited comparisons to Yahoo's GeoCities),[15] by Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia, and Angela Beesley Starling—respectively chairman emeritus and advisory board member of the Wikimedia Foundation. Wales' original idea was to use his Wikipedia idea for a place where people from the same city or other geographical place could come together.[16]
The project's name was changed to Wikia on March 27, 2006.[17] In the month before the move, Wikia announced a US$4 million venture capital investment from Bessemer Venture Partners and First Round Capital.[18] Nine months later, Amazon.com invested $10 million in Series B funding.[19] By September 2006, Wikia had approximately 1,500 wikis in 48 languages.[20] Over time, Wikia has incorporated formerly independent fan wikis such as LyricWiki, Nukapedia, Uncyclopedia, and WoWWiki.[21] Gil Penchina described Wikia early on as "the rest of the library and magazine rack" to Wikipedia's encyclopedia.[22] The material has also been described as informal, and often bordering on entertainment, allowing the importing of maps, YouTube videos, and other non-traditional wiki material.[23]
2010–2015: New management
[edit]By 2010, wikis could be created in 188 different languages.[12] In October 2011, Craig Palmer, the former CEO of Gracenote, replaced Penchina as CEO.[24] In February 2012, co-founder Beesley Starling left Wikia to launch a startup called ChalkDrop.com.[25] At the end of November 2012, Wikia raised $10.8 million in Series C funding from Institutional Venture Partners and previous investors Bessemer Ventures Partners and Amazon.com.[26] Another $15 million was raised in August 2014 for Series D funding, with investors Digital Garage, Amazon, Bessemer Venture Partners, and Institutional Venture Partners. The total raised at this point was $39.8 million.[27][28]
On March 4, 2015, Wikia appointed Walker Jacobs, former executive vice-president of Turner Broadcasting System, to the new position of chief operating officer.[29] In December 2015, Wikia launched the Fan Contributor Program.
2016–2018: Fandom brand
[edit]On January 25, 2016, Wikia launched a new entertainment news site named Fandom.[30] On October 4, Wikia itself was rebranded as "Fandom powered by Wikia", to better associate itself with the Fandom website. The parent company Wikia, Inc. remained under its then-current name until 2019, and the homepage of Wikia was moved to wikia.com/fandom and later to fandom.com.[8] In December, Wikia appointed Dorth Raphaely, former general manager of Bleacher Report, as chief content officer.[31]
On May 18, 2017, Fandom updated their branding with a refreshed logo, all-uppercase lettering, and a flat design instead of the previous green-blue gradients.[citation needed]
2018–present: Further acquisitions and changes
[edit]In February 2018, former AOL CEO Jon Miller, backed by private equity firm TPG Capital, acquired Fandom.[1] Miller was named co-chairman of Wikia, Inc., alongside Jimmy Wales,[32] and TPG Capital director Andrew Doyle assumed the role of interim CEO.[33] In July, Fandom purchased Screen Junkies from Defy Media,[34] and in December of that year, they had acquired Curse Media which included wiki farm Gamepedia and websites part of the Curse Network such as D&D Beyond, Futhead, Muthead, and StrawPoll.me.[35]
In February 2019, former StubHub CEO Perkins Miller took over as CEO,[33] and Wikia fully changed its domain name to fandom.com.[36] Various wikis had been tested with the new domain during 2018, with some wikis that focused on "more serious topics" having their domains changed to wikia.org instead.[37] In June, Fandom began an effort to rewrite its core platform, which was written based on MediaWiki version 1.19, to base it on a newer version of the software.[38] On March 11, 2020, Fandom released the Unified Community Platform (UCP), based on MediaWiki 1.33,[39] for newly created wikis.[40]
In 2020, Fandom sold Curse Network properties to Magic Find which includes communities and news websites.[41] In November, Fandom began to migrate Gamepedia wikis to a fandom.com domain as part of their search engine optimization strategy, with migrations continuing into 2021.[42][43]
In February 2021, Fandom acquired Focus Multimedia, the retailer behind Fanatical, an e-commerce platform that sells digital games, ebooks and other products related to gaming.[44] In late March, Fandom updated its terms of use policy to prohibit deadnaming transgender individuals across their websites.[45][46] This policy was in response to a referendum on the Star Wars wiki Wookieepedia to ban deadnaming, which triggered a debate around an article about the non-binary artist Robin Pronovost.[47] In response to the deadnaming controversy, Fandom also introduced new LGBT guidelines across its websites in late June 2021 which include links to queer-inclusive and trans support resources.[48]
In June 2021, Fandom began to roll out FandomDesktop, a redesigned theme for desktop devices,[49] with plans to retire its legacy Oasis and Hydra skins once the rollout was complete.[50] Two months later on August 3, Fandom rolled out a new look, new colors, new logo, and introduced a new tagline, "For the love of fans."[51] In late November/early December, all remaining wikis under the wikia.org domain migrated to the fandom.com domain.[52]
On April 13, 2022, Hasbro announced that it would acquire D&D Beyond from Fandom.[53][54] Fandom shut down StrawPoll.me in August.[55] On October 3, Fandom acquired GameSpot, Metacritic, TV Guide, GameFAQs, Giant Bomb, Cord Cutters News, and Comic Vine from Red Ventures.[56]
In early 2023, Fandom began laying off some of the team responsible for GameSpot, Metacritic and Giant Bomb.[57][58][59] In January 2024, the company would begin another round of layoffs for part of GameSpot's editorial team.[60] Later in October 2024, it was reported that Fandom had laid off approximately 11% of their staff,[61][62] including some of the team behind GameSpot UK and Honest Trailers as well as Fandom staff in charge of sales and management, this was prompted by the company's failure to hit revenue goals in 2024.[63]
In February 2025, Fandom launched a new product called "FanDNA Helix", an AI model trained on all the pages hosted on the site as well as users' social media posts in order to allow advertisers to serve ads to readers based on their interests and consumption habits on the site.[64] In May 2025, Fandom later sold Giant Bomb to the site's staff.[65]
In July 2025, Fandom announced that it was going to translate entire wikis using generative AI for non-English speakers.[66] In October 2025, Perkins Miller resigned as CEO of Fandom. An article published by The Verge stated that the company was struggling to meet revenue targets, leading to a massive restructuring and the layoff of a large percentage of Fandom's staff. The newspaper also clarified that although the IP-focused wikis hosted by the platform are popular, the ads and interface are quite invasive and cause the page to become unstable and "nearly unusable" when loading on certain devices.[67]
Services and features
[edit]Present
[edit]Wikis
[edit]The main purpose of articles in a Fandom community is to cover information and discussion on a particular topic in a much greater and more comprehensive detail level than what can be found in Wikipedia articles.[68]
Other examples of content that is generally considered beyond the scope of Wikipedia articles include Fandom information about video games and related video game topics, detailed instructions, gameplay details, plot details, and so forth. Gameplay concepts can also have their own articles. Fandom also allows wikis to have a point of view, rather than the neutral POV that is required by Wikipedia (although NPOV is a local policy on many Fandom communities).[69][70]
The image policies of Fandom communities tend to be more lenient than those of Wikimedia Foundation projects, allowing articles with much more illustration. Fandom requires all user text content to be published under a free license;[71] most use the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, although a few wikis use a license with a noncommercial clause (for instance Memory Alpha, Uncyclopedia and others[72]) and some use the GNU Free Documentation License.[c][73] Fandom's terms of use forbid hate speech, libel, pornography, or copyright infringement. Other material is allowed, as long as the added material does not duplicate existing wikis.[74]
Wikis are also not owned by their founders, nor does the founder's opinion carry more weight in disagreements than any other user's opinion. Consensus and cooperation are the primary means for organizing a community on Fandom.[74] However, Fandom may make decisions affecting the community even if there is no consensus at all.[75]
Technology
[edit]As of May 2023,[update] Fandom uses a heavily modified version[76] of the MediaWiki software, based on the version 1.39 of MediaWiki.[77] It has several custom extensions installed to add social features like blogs, chat, badges, forums, and multimedia,[78] but also remove features like advanced user options[79][80] or skins. The personal choice[81] of using the Monobook skin instead of the default custom skin was removed on May 25, 2018, alluding to GDPR compliance.[82]
In August 2016, Fandom announced it would switch to a service-oriented architecture.[83] It removed many custom extensions and functionality for specific wikis, and has created certain replacement features to fill those needs.[84]
Entertainment news
[edit]In 2016, Wikia launched Fandom, an online entertainment media website. The program utilizes volunteer contributors called "Fandom Contributors"[85] to produce articles, working alongside an editorial team employed by Wikia. In contrast to the blogging feature of individual wiki communities, Fandom focuses on pop culture and fan topics such as video games, movies, and television shows. The project features fan opinions, interviews with property creators, reviews, and how-to guides. Fandom also includes videos and specific news coverage sponsored or paid for by a property creator to promote their property.
In the same year, it was also announced that the entire Wikia platform would be rebranded under the Fandom name on October 4, 2016.[8] A leak from Fandom's Community Council was posted to Reddit's /r/Wikia subreddit in August 2018, confirming that Fandom would be migrating all wikis from the wikia.com domain, to fandom.com in early 2019, as part of a push for greater adoption of Fandom's wiki-specific applications on both iOS and Android's app ecosystems. The post was later deleted.[86]
Wiki partnerships
[edit]Fandom has created several official partnerships to create wikis, vetted by the corporation as being the "official" encyclopedia or wiki of a property. In 2012, Fandom partnered with Sony Online Entertainment to create the first "Wikia Official Community" for PlanetSide 2, with the game's wiki slated to receive exclusive content and support.[87][88] In 2014, Fandom partnered with Roddenberry Enterprises to create the Trek Initiative, a Fandom hosted wiki community site that features video interviews, promotions, and other material about Star Trek to celebrate its 50th anniversary.[89] Fandom made similar partnerships with 2K Games during the launch of Civilization: Beyond Earth[90] and Warner Bros Interactive for Shadow of Mordor.[91] Fandom also has partnerships with Lionsgate Media to promote Starz and Film franchises through wiki content, fandom articles, and advertisements.[citation needed]
Esports
[edit]In 2021 the United States Navy hired Fandom to manage and promote esports tournaments and streams on Twitch.[92]
Fandom Games (YouTube channel)
[edit]With Fandom's acquisition of Curse Media, the Curse Entertainment YouTube channel was renamed to Fandom Games. Fandom Games publishes Honest Game Trailers, which was previously published on the Smosh Games YouTube channel until Screen Junkies was acquired by Fandom.[93]
Past services
[edit]OpenServing
[edit]OpenServing was a short-lived Web publishing project owned by Fandom, founded on December 12, 2006,[94][95] and abandoned, unannounced, in January 2008.[96] Like Fandom, OpenServing was to offer free wiki hosting, but it would differ in that each wiki's founder would retain any revenue gained from advertising on the site.[94][97][98] OpenServing used a modified version of the Wikimedia Foundation's MediaWiki software created by ArmchairGM, but was intended to branch out to other open source packages.[94][99]
According to Fandom co-founder and chairman Jimmy Wales, the OpenServing site received several thousand applications in January 2007.[100] However, after a year, no sites had been launched under the OpenServing banner.[96]
Armchair GM
[edit]ArmchairGM was a sports forum and wiki site created by Aaron Wright, Dan Lewis, Robert Lefkowitz, and developer David Pean. Launched in early 2006, the site was initially US-based but sought to improve its links to sports associated with Britain over its first year. Its MediaWiki-based software included a Digg-style article-voting mechanism, blog-like comment forms with "thumbs up/down" user feedback, and the ability to write multiple types of posts (news, opinions, or "locker room" discussion entries).[citation needed]
In late 2006, the site was bought by Fandom for $2 million.[101] After the purchase was made, the former owners applied ArmchairGM's architecture to other Fandom sites.[102] However, Wikia had "dropped support" for the custom software innovations by ArmchairGM by January 2010. From September 2010 to February 2011, Fandom absorbed ArmchairGM's encyclopedia articles and blanked all of its old blog entries, effectively discontinuing ArmchairGM in its original form.[citation needed]
The software powering ArmchairGM was incrementally open-sourced starting in February 2008 with the public release of the SocialProfile MediaWiki extension.[103] This process was complete by August 2011, when the original ArmchairGM codebase (internally codenamed wikia-ny[104]) was released in full. Since 2008 the ArmchairGM innovations, nicknamed "social tools", have been developed by volunteer developers of the MediaWiki community and they are available under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later, which is a free and open-source software license. The source code is hosted on the Wikimedia Foundation's web servers and mirrored to the popular source code hosting platform GitHub.[105][106]
Search engines
[edit]Wikia, Inc. initially proposed creating a copyleft search engine; the software (but not the site) was named "Wikiasari" by a November 2004 naming contest.[d] The proposal became inactive in 2005.[citation needed] The "public alpha" of the Wikia Search web search engine was launched on January 7, 2008,[citation needed] from the USSHC underground data center.[108] This roll-out version of the search interface was roundly panned by reviewers in technology media.[109] The project was ended in March 2009.[110] Late in 2009, a new search engine was established to index and display results from all sites hosted on Fandom.[citation needed]
Questions and answers site
[edit]In January 2009, the company created a question and answer website named "Wikianswers" (not to be confused with the preexisting WikiAnswers).[111] In March 2010, Fandom re-launched "Answers from Wikia", where users could create topic-specialized knowledge market wikis based upon Fandom's own Wikianswers subdomain.[112]
Controversies
[edit]Relationship with Wikipedia
[edit]In the 2000s, Fandom, then called Wikia, was accused of unduly profiting from a perceived association with Wikipedia.[113][114] Although Fandom has been referred to in the media as "the commercial counterpart to the non-profit Wikipedia",[115][116] Wikimedia[117] and Fandom staff[118] call this description inaccurate.
In 2006, the Wikimedia Foundation shared hosting and bandwidth costs with Wikia, and received some donated office space from Wikia during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006. At the end of the fiscal year 2007, Wikia owed the foundation $6,000. In June 2007, two members of the foundation's board of directors also served as employees, officers, or directors of Wikia.[119] In January 2009, Wikia subleased two conference rooms to the Wikimedia Foundation for the Wikipedia Usability Initiative.[120] According to a 2009 email by Erik Möller, deputy director of the Wikimedia Foundation:
We obtained about a dozen bids... We used averaging as a way to arrive at a fair market rate to neither advantage nor disadvantage Wikia when suggesting a rate. The averaging also resulted in a rate that was roughly equivalent to the most comparable space in the running.[121]
Advertising controversies
[edit]Fandom communities have complained of inappropriate advertisements, resource-intensive advertisements, or advertising in the body text area. Users have also complained that the advertisements are so resource-intensive and hindering, that they have no choice but to use an ad-blocker to continue using the website.[122] The massive amount of ads alters the performance of the website, especially on mobile where the insertion of autoplay videos causes the page to refresh.[123] In a report published by Emarketer in mid-2025 about the marketshare of Fandom noted the presence of malvertising within the platform, where there were occasions when ads embedded in wiki pages could redirect to suspicious sites.[124]
The excessive monetization model of user-generated content has been criticized by several newspaper outlets, such as the British newspaper The Guardian, who argue that editors do not receive any benefits or rights in return for the content they contribute to the platform.[125] Likewise, the Journal of Student Research has called Fandom exploitative and argued that its practices have formed an informational monopoly, making it harder for other sites to compete with them.[126] Other concerns were also raised about Fandom's extensive commercialization of user-generated content, where the use of a for-profit model has undermined the quality of part of its database as well as trust in online spaces.[127]
In August 2024, the publishing company Adalytics released a report indicating the presence of major brand advertisements in wiki articles containing obscene material including articles containing racial slurs towards Black people and white supremacist material, as well as content promoting sexual assault[128] on several small wikis hosted by Fandom.[129][130] The AI system used by Fandom supplemented by DoubleVerify and Integral Ad Science was criticized for displaying ads on malicious content.[131][132]
Editorial interference
[edit]Fandom can alter user-generated content by incorporating obstructive elements without prior consultation with users, such as adding popups to customize ads, promoting unrelated articles, which may have questionable topics, and incorporation of unrelated quizzes to boost engagement.[133] In addition, Fandom may arbitrarily remove content without prior consultation with the editors involved.[134]
In 2017, Fandom started to incorporate autoplaying to different wikis about video game franchises such as Runescape[135] and Fallout,[136] this feature was implemented without prior consultation of the editors responsible for the maintenance of the wikis, these videos were criticized for undermining the quality standards of the site.[137]
In 2021, Fandom began removing and censoring adult material, including the deletion of entire wikis dedicated to documenting pieces of media with adult content. These measures were criticized by users as well as editors following the implementation of these guidelines without prior notice from the company.[138][139]
In 2022, Fandom merged several wikis specializing in documenting sexuality and gender, including the deletion of several pages without prior consultation by users. These actions were criticized after the incorporation of material offensive to intersex identities and changes in editorial direction to make it more “corporate friendly”.[140] Additionally, critics who voiced their disapproval after the merge of the LGBTQIA wikis were blocked on both social media as well as on the Fandom wiki following the controversy.[140] In the same year, the editorial team behind the Zelda Wiki clarified that one of the reasons they decided to move to an independent host was due to concerns about “corporate consolidation” and how their experience at Fandom had limited some of their editorial independence. In addition, the team of editors urged other communities to migrate some of their content and the creation of writers' union.[141]
In 2023, Fandom introduced AI Generated Content in the form of “Quick Answers” to different wikis, such content consisted of grammatical mistakes as well as factual errors[142][143] and was subsequently removed after public backlash by editors and users. In an article published by Game Developer, the editorial team behind the Hollow Knight Wiki explained that one of the reasons they chose to migrate their content was due to Fandom's attempts to introduce generative AI into their articles, causing them to contain misinformation with the aim of increasing revenue, as well as concerns that the company is opting to use Generative AI to replace human writers and artists.[144]
In May 2025, Fandom introduced “brand safety” guidelines to GiantBomb, such measures were criticized and mocked by the website staff in a podcast, which would later be removed by Fandom.[145][146]
Privacy concerns
[edit]Fandom has been subject to several lawsuits in the State of California following data collection in violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act, where the website shared user information without prior consent such as IP addresses[147][148][149] and viewing habits[150][151] to third party companies such as Meta. Lawsuits regarding privacy violations against Fandom began in 2022 following reports that the company was selling sensitive information to external platforms.[150] Later in 2023, a federal judge in California clarified that Fandom cannot evade lawsuits regarding data sharing filed by consumers.[152]
Copyright infringement
[edit]The company had previously been sued in several district courts in California for copyright infringement regarding the unauthorized use of images created from professional photographers on its website, including lawsuits by photographer Linda Matlow for the use of material from her professional catalog[153] and film director Michael Grecco for the use of promotional imagery taken for The X-Files.[154][155]
Paid promotions
[edit]In June 2023, McDonald's paid Fandom an undisclosed amount to temporarily replace the McDonald's Wiki's main page and exhaustive article on Grimace with an advertisement promoting the Grimace Shake and the character's 52nd anniversary. The article's primary contributor, Nathan Steinmetz, complained that the decision undermined his research and efforts and considered Fandom to have set a "really bad precedent" of IP holders' ability to suppress user-generated content with press releases.[156][157][158]
Wiki departures
[edit]A number of wikis have migrated away from Fandom, citing issues such as intrusive advertising and branding, a non-user-friendly site design, a lack of customizability and company cross-promotion which is often irrelevant to wiki content.[135][159] One of the earliest examples was the Transformers Wiki, which migrated in 2008 due to disagreements with Fandom—then Wikia—staff regarding intrusive advertising.[160] Other communities, such as the Zelda Wiki and Minecraft Wiki, have named the increasing "corporate consolidation" of wikis, alleged censorship, Fandom's "degraded" functionality and the Grimace controversy among their reasons for migrating.[159][161][162] Covering the Minecraft Wiki's departure for PC Gamer, Rich Stanton stated that most of the migrations began after the 2018 acquisition and Gamepedia's move to Fandom. He noted that the Minecraft Wiki would have to compete with Fandom's better search engine optimization (SEO) and would have a struggle to establish a wider audience after moving.[159] In 2023, Fandom CEO Perkins Miller told The Verge that he takes wiki migration "very seriously".[163]
Some of the more high-profile wikis which have migrated from Fandom include the RuneScape wiki in 2018,[135] the Zelda and Terraria wikis in 2022,[161][162][164] the Minecraft, Fallout and Hollow Knight wikis in 2023,[159][133][165] the South Park, Dead by Daylight and League of Legends wikis in 2024,[166] and the Warframe, Vampire Survivors,[167] Undertale/Deltarune, Nichijou and Balatro wikis[additional citation(s) needed] in 2025. Additionally, in that same year, the editorial team behind the Ys, Trails, Xanadu and Gagharv wikis decided to migrate their content en masse to independent platforms in order to create a more comprehensive repository of games developed by Nihon Falcom, citing issues such as intrusive advertisements on the platform.[168] Some wikis have received support from the creators of their topic areas during migration.[135][164][166][167]
Forking
[edit]There is no easy way for individual communities to switch to conventional paid hosting, as Fandom usually owns the relevant domain names. When a community leaves Fandom for new hosting, Fandom typically continues to operate the abandoned ("forked") wiki using its original name and content for advertising revenue as long as editing and viewership remains. This can adversely affect the new wiki's search rankings,[160] potentially also resulting in outdated or incorrect information being present and viewed more often than the information on the new wiki. Fandom allows only a message directing viewers to a discussion about whether to fork for as long as the discussion is active before the message is removed, and any administrators involved in the new wiki have their rights on the Fandom wiki removed.
Fandom, Inc.
[edit]
The overall parent company, Fandom, Inc., is headquartered at the Hallidie Building on 130 Sutter Street[169] in San Francisco, California.[170] The company was incorporated in Florida in December 2004 and re-incorporated in Delaware as Wikia, Inc. on January 10, 2006.[171]
Fandom has technical staff in the US, but also has an office in Poznań, Poland, where the primary engineering functions are performed.[20]
Fandom derives income from advertising. The company initially used Google AdSense[172] but moved on to Federated Media before bringing ad management in-house.[173] Alongside Fandom's in-house advertising, they continue to use AdSense as well as Amazon Ads and several other third-party advertising services. Fandom also gains income from various partnerships oriented around various sweepstake sponsorships on related wikis.
Fandom has several other offices.[174] International operations are based in Germany, and Asian operations and sales are conducted in Tokyo. Other sales offices are located in Chicago, Latin America, Los Angeles (marketing programming and content), New York City, and London.[175]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Stylized in all capital letters as FANDOM from 2017 to 2021[8]
- ^ Officially from 2006 to 2016; fully phased out between 2018 and 2021.
- ^ Most content on Wikia was licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License until June 19, 2009, at which point most wikis were relicensed to CC BY-SA.
- ^ The name was derived from the Hawaiian word for "quick" and asari, stem of the Japanese verb asaru, "to rummage".[107]
References
[edit]Attribution
[edit]- This article incorporates material derived from the "Forum:CT:Amendment to naming policy for real-world transgender individuals" article on the Wookieepedia at Fandom (formerly Wikia) and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License (2 April 2021).
- This article incorporates material derived from the "History: Robin Pronovost" article on the Wookieepedia at Fandom (formerly Wikia) and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License (2 April 2021).
Citations
[edit]- ^ a b c Kafka, Peter (March 12, 2018). "Digital media veteran Jon Miller, backed with money from TPG, is going shopping for websites". Vox. Vox Media, Inc. Archived from the original on April 26, 2022. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
- ^ "Media kit". Wikia. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ "Wikia Fan Studio FAQ". Archived from the original on October 20, 2016. Retrieved September 21, 2016.
- ^ "Wikia API Wiki". api.wikia.com. Archived from the original on May 14, 2016. Retrieved November 26, 2018.
- ^ "Fandom powered by Wikia". Archived from the original on February 8, 2014. Retrieved November 26, 2018.
- ^ "What Is Fandom". Fandom. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 11, 2023.
- ^ "Licensing". Fandom. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ a b c Palmer, Craig L. (September 26, 2016). "Wikia is now Fandom powered by Wikia". Community Central. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ Chmielewski, Dawn (January 25, 2016). "Wikia Launches Fandom, a New Place to Get Your Nerd On". Vox. Archived from the original on March 12, 2022. Retrieved March 12, 2022.
- ^ Pink, Daniel H. (March 13, 2005). "The Book Stops Here". Wired. Vol. 13, no. 3. Archived from the original on March 4, 2005. Retrieved August 1, 2007.
- ^ "About Fandom". Fandom powered by Wikia. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ a b John K Waters & Lester, John (2010). The Everything Guide to Social Media: All you need to know about participating in today's most popular online communities. Adams Media. p. 171. ISBN 9781440509469. Retrieved September 17, 2014.
Wikia is free.
- ^ "Fandom". Fandom powered by Wikia. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ "fandom.com Market Share, Revenue and Traffic Analytics". Similarweb. Archived from the original on May 11, 2019. Retrieved May 10, 2023.
- ^ Gussow, Dave (April 4, 2005). "Global villages convene in wiki town halls". St. Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on April 24, 2005. Retrieved April 7, 2005.
- ^ "Fandom runs some of the biggest communities on the internet — can CEO Perkins Miller keep them happy?". theverge.com. August 22, 2023. Archived from the original on August 23, 2023. Retrieved August 23, 2023.
- ^ Cashmore, Pete (March 28, 2006). Mashable (ed.). "Wikia – Build Your Own Wiki". Mashable. Archived from the original on September 5, 2015. Retrieved May 13, 2015.
- ^ Hinman, Michael (March 10, 2006). "Venture capitalists invest wiki-millions". Tampa Bay Business Journal. Archived from the original on March 12, 2007. Retrieved March 10, 2006.
- ^ "Jimmy Wales's Wikia Venture Gets Funding From Amazon". The Wall Street Journal. December 6, 2006. Archived from the original on December 25, 2016. Retrieved December 24, 2016.
- ^ a b Shannon, Victoria (September 28, 2006). "Wikipedia Founder Staffs For Profit Wikia Spinoff". International Herald Tribune. Archived from the original on October 21, 2006. Retrieved October 28, 2006.
- ^ Warschauer, Mark; Grimes, Douglas (2007). "Audience, Authorship, and Artifact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2.0". Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 27: 1–23. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.540.2850. doi:10.1017/S0267190508070013. S2CID 62103795.
- ^ Barton, Matthew & Cummings, Robert (2009). Wiki Writing: Collaborative Learning in the College Classroom. University of Michigan Press. p. 14. ISBN 978-0472024513. Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Retrieved September 17, 2014.
- ^ Safko, Lon (2010). The Social Media Bible: Tactics, Tools, and Strategies for Business Success. John Wiley & Sons. p. 491. ISBN 9780470912706. Retrieved September 18, 2014.
Wikia.
- ^ Marlowe, C. (October 13, 2011). "Wikia names ex-Gracenote Craig Palmer as CEO". DMWMedia.com. Archived from the original on October 16, 2011. Retrieved October 16, 2011.
- ^ Beesley, Angela (February 8, 2012). "Leaving Wikia". Community Central. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ Tsotsis, Alexia (November 30, 2012). "With 1B Pageviews Under Its Belt, UGC Giant Wikia Raises $10.8M From IVP, Bessemer & Amazon". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on July 5, 2017. Retrieved December 10, 2012.
- ^ Primack, Dan (August 28, 2014). "Term Sheet -- Thursday, August 28". Fortune Magazine. Archived from the original on September 5, 2014. Retrieved September 18, 2014.
- ^ Lunden, Ingrid (August 27, 2014). "User-Generated Content Portal Wikia Raises Another $15M To Crack Into Asia". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on July 7, 2017. Retrieved September 18, 2014.
- ^ PRNewswire (March 4, 2015). "Wikia Appoints Walker Jacobs Chief Operating Officer". PR Newswire (Press release). PR Newswire Association LLC. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved August 17, 2015.
- ^ Chmielewski, Dawn (January 25, 2016). "Wikia Launches Fandom, a New Place to Get Your Nerd On". Recode. Archived from the original on June 21, 2016. Retrieved June 15, 2016.
- ^ "Wikia, Inc. Announces New Senior Vice President of Content at Fandom, Dorth Raphaely". PR Newswire (Press release). Cision. Archived from the original on April 30, 2018. Retrieved April 30, 2018.
- ^ "Wikia, Inc.'s FANDOM Announces Investment Led by Media Veteran Jon Miller". www.prnewswire.com (Press release). Archived from the original on May 4, 2018. Retrieved May 2, 2018.
- ^ a b Spangler, Todd (February 6, 2019). "Fandom Names StubHub Exec Perkins Miller CEO (EXCLUSIVE)". Variety. Penske Business Media. Archived from the original on November 8, 2021. Retrieved November 8, 2021.
- ^ "Fandom Acquires Screen Junkies From Defy Media". Variety. July 2, 2018. Archived from the original on July 2, 2018. Retrieved July 5, 2018.
- ^ Sinclair, Brendan (December 13, 2018). "Twitch sells Curse Media". GamesIndustry.biz. Archived from the original on February 21, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2023.
- ^ Rhea, Brandon (August 15, 2018). "Wiki domains will be changing from wikia.com to fandom.com in early 2019". Community Central. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ "Fandom domain migration". Archived from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved April 12, 2019.
- ^ Kavanagh, Will (June 20, 2019). "Fandom is upgrading to a modern version of MediaWiki". Community Central. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on June 23, 2019. Retrieved June 23, 2019.
- ^ Kavanagh, Will. "Unified Community Platform: The Vision, Purpose, and Process". Community Central. Fandom, Inc. Archived from the original on January 8, 2021. Retrieved November 8, 2021.
- ^ Kavanagh, Will (March 12, 2020). "The first Unified Community Platform release is now live for NEW wikis". Community Central. Fandom, Inc. Archived from the original on March 13, 2020. Retrieved March 12, 2020.
- ^ "M.O.B.A. Network agrees to acquire the company Magic Find - a leading player within gaming streaming on YouTube and owner of several well-known gaming communities". News Powered by Cision. May 19, 2021. Archived from the original on February 23, 2023. Retrieved April 17, 2023.
- ^ Kavanagh, Will. "The Future of Gamepedia". Community Central. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved November 7, 2020.
- ^ Kavanagh, Will. "An update on Fandom and Gamepedia domain migrations". Community Central. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved November 7, 2020.
- ^ Rhea, Brandon (February 24, 2021). "Fandom Acquires Gaming E-Commerce Platform Fanatical". Community Central. Fandom, Inc. Archived from the original on March 2, 2021. Retrieved February 24, 2021.
- ^ Baron, Reuben (March 29, 2021). "Fandom Rules Against Deadnaming on Star Wars' Wookieepedia". CBR.com. Comic Book Resources. Archived from the original on March 29, 2021. Retrieved March 31, 2021.
- ^ Whitbrook, James (March 30, 2021). "How Star Wars' Biggest Fan Wiki Found Itself in a Fight Over Trans Identity". io9. Gawker Media. Archived from the original on March 31, 2021. Retrieved March 31, 2021.
- ^ "Forum:CT:Amendment to naming policy for real-world transgender individuals". Wookieepedia. Fandom. March 29, 2021. Archived from the original on April 2, 2021. Retrieved April 2, 2021.
- ^ Whitbrook, James (June 24, 2021). "Fandom Launches New LGBTQIA+ Guidelines for All Its Wikis". io9. Gizmodo. Archived from the original on June 27, 2021. Retrieved June 28, 2021.
- ^ Kavanagh, Will (July 1, 2021). "The Month at Fandom – June 2021". Fandom. Archived from the original on July 7, 2021. Retrieved July 2, 2021.
- ^ "User blog:MisterWoodhouse/Retirement of legacy designs | Community Central | Fandom". Archived from the original on August 30, 2021. Retrieved October 5, 2021.
- ^ "The Future of Fandom". Community Central. Archived from the original on April 26, 2022. Retrieved August 4, 2021.
- ^ Wikia.org domain migration Archived December 6, 2021, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved December 1, 2021
- ^ Vlessing, Etan (April 13, 2022). "Hasbro Buys D&D Beyond for $146.3M in Gaming Expansion". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on April 17, 2022. Retrieved April 17, 2023.
- ^ Vanjani, Karishma. "Hasbro Pushes for Digital Growth of Dungeons & Dragons With $146M Acquisition". barrons.com. Archived from the original on April 19, 2022. Retrieved April 17, 2023.
- ^ "August 2022: StrawPoll.me closure - Fandom". Archived from the original on April 17, 2023. Retrieved April 17, 2023.
- ^ "Fandom Acquires Leading Entertainment & Gaming Brands Including GameSpot, TV Guide and Metacritic". Fandom (Press release). October 3, 2022. Archived from the original on October 4, 2022. Retrieved October 3, 2022.
- ^ C, Andi (January 20, 2023). "Fandom Entertainment Company Drops Layoff Bomb: Gamespot, Metacritic, More Affected". Tech Times. Retrieved July 18, 2025.
- ^ Mehta, Ivan (January 20, 2023). "Fandom lays off employees across Giant Bomb, GameSpot and Metacritic". TechCrunch. Retrieved July 18, 2025.
- ^ "Layoffs Hit GameSpot, Giant Bomb Just Months After Fandom Buys Them". Kotaku. January 19, 2023. Retrieved July 18, 2025.
- ^ Sinclair, Brendan (January 31, 2024). "GameSpot lays off portion of staff". GamesIndustry.biz. Retrieved July 18, 2025.
- ^ "Fandom Cuts 11% of Workforce, Affecting GameSpot and Other Gaming Outlets". Silicon Valley Journals. October 31, 2024. Retrieved July 18, 2025.
- ^ Knapp, J. D. (October 30, 2024). "Fandom Lays Off More Staff in Latest Restructuring". TheWrap. Retrieved July 18, 2025.
- ^ Grayson, Nathan (October 30, 2024). "Fandom Lays Off 11 Percent Of Staff, GameSpot Affected - Aftermath". Aftermath. Retrieved July 18, 2025.
Chalking the layoffs up to a broader restructuring of the company in the face of market changes, as well as a failure to hit revenue goals
- ^ Sherry, Ben (February 18, 2025). "How Fandom Uses AI to Turn Your Obsessions Into Gold". Inc. Archived from the original on March 12, 2025. Retrieved July 18, 2025.
- ^ Middler, Jordan (May 10, 2025). "Giant Bomb has been sold by Fandom, will continue independently". VGC. Retrieved May 11, 2025.
- ^ "Introducing Fandom's Wiki Internationalization Experiment - A Gateway for Editors and Expanding the Fan Experience". Community Central. Retrieved July 18, 2025.
- ^ Pulliam-Moore, Charles (October 22, 2025). "Fandom's CEO has left the company". The Verge. Retrieved October 24, 2025.
- ^ McNichol, Tom (March 2007). "With Wikia, a Wikipedia founder looks to strike it rich". Business 2.0 Magazine. Archived from the original on July 25, 2008. Retrieved June 24, 2008.
- ^ Coubieres, Caroline; Roux, Sabine (2015). Wikia: Between Document Simulacra and Documented Fictions. Proceedings from 12th Annual Meeting of the Document Academy. Vol. 2. Archived from the original on December 25, 2016. Retrieved December 24, 2016.
- ^ Roth, Camille (October 21, 2007). Viable Wikis: Struggle for Life in the Wikisphere (PDF). WikiSym '07. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 25, 2016. Retrieved December 24, 2016.
- ^ "Licensing". Fandom. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on May 21, 2018. Retrieved May 21, 2018.
- ^ "PvXwiki | Fandom". Archived from the original on March 1, 2021. Retrieved March 2, 2021.
- ^ Beesley Starling, Angela. "Licensing update June 19, 2009". Fandom Community Central. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ a b "Community Creation Policy". Fandom. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ "Fandom network operations – a new concept to understand relations between Wikia staff and communities". Fandom Community Central. May 2, 2017. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ Garczewski, Lucas (June 12, 2012). "MediaWiki Upgrade". Community Central Wikia. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ "Help:Update to MediaWiki 1.39". Fandom Community Central. Retrieved July 19, 2024.
- ^ "Tour of Wikia Features". Community Central. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ "What happened to thumbnail image size in my preferences?". Community Central Wikia. Archived from the original on January 31, 2016. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ "UserPreferencesV2 extension code". GitHub code repository. Archived from the original on January 30, 2016. Retrieved August 4, 2015.
- ^ "Wikia's new look – FAQ". Community Central Wikia. Wikia, Inc. September 15, 2010. Archived from the original on June 13, 2018. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ Quievryn, Tim (May 21, 2018). "The Future of Monobook on FANDOM". Community Central. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ Quievryn, Tim (August 29, 2016). "Introducing Service-Oriented Architecture, A New Approach to Software Development". Community Central. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ Quievryn, Tim (January 13, 2016). "Introducing New Moderator Opportunities For Community Administration". Community Central. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ "Fan Contributor". Fandom. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ "Wikia will be changing ALL wiki URL to .fandom.com at the start of 2019". Reddit. Archived from the original on August 13, 2018. Retrieved August 13, 2018.
- ^ "MMORPG". Archived from the original on October 5, 2016.
- ^ "Sony Online Entertainment Breaks New Ground With First 'Wikia Official Community' For Upcoming Massively Multiplayer Online First-Person Shooter Video Game PlanetSide®2". CNBC. October 10, 2012. Archived from the original on January 28, 2023. Retrieved January 28, 2023.
- ^ "Mashable". Mashable. July 31, 2014. Archived from the original on October 5, 2016.
- ^ "PR Newswire" (Press release). Archived from the original on October 5, 2016.
- ^ "Shadow of Mordor Wiki". Shadow of Mordor Wiki. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ Gault, Matthew (March 3, 2021). "Navy Returns to Twitch, But You Can't Ask About War Crimes in Chat". Vice. Archived from the original on July 20, 2021. Retrieved July 20, 2021.
- ^ Spangler, Todd (July 2, 2018). "Fandom Acquires Screen Junkies From Defy Media". Variety. Archived from the original on July 2, 2018. Retrieved April 17, 2023.
- ^ a b c "Wikipedia founder remakes Web-publishing economics". Reuters/USA Today. December 12, 2006. Archived from the original on February 15, 2008. Retrieved October 4, 2007.
- ^ "Wikia Announces Free Wiki Hosting". TechCrunch. December 11, 2006. Archived from the original on May 15, 2008. Retrieved May 12, 2008.
- ^ a b "Wikia's OpenServing Project Dies a Quiet Death". Mars Magazine. October 10, 2007. Archived from the original on January 13, 2008. Retrieved May 12, 2008.
- ^ "Wikipedia to share collaborative software". Daily Times. December 18, 2006. Archived from the original on May 28, 2014. Retrieved May 28, 2014.
- ^ "Wikia Unveils OpenServing – the Mother of All Freebies". Business Wire. December 11, 2006. Archived from the original on December 31, 2007. Retrieved May 26, 2009.
- ^ "Wikipedia founder to share collaborative software". AFP. December 2006. Archived from the original on December 31, 2007.
- ^ "Wikis can succeed on newspaper sites, claims Wikipedia founder". Online Journalism News, Journalism.co.uk. January 19, 2007. Archived from the original on December 31, 2007. Retrieved October 4, 2007.
- ^ Blitstein, Ryan (December 6, 2006). "Amazon puts faith – and money – in Wikia". MercuryNews.com. Archived from the original on January 5, 2007. Retrieved February 18, 2007.
- ^ "Wikia opens new "magazine rack" websites". Wikia, Inc. February 13, 2007. Archived from the original on May 12, 2008.
- ^ Pean, David (February 29, 2008). "[Wikitech-l] Extension:SocialProfile". Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Retrieved June 3, 2022.
- ^ "ArmchairGM source code". Archived from the original on May 17, 2021. Retrieved June 3, 2022.
- ^ "Social tools". Archived from the original on June 17, 2022. Retrieved June 3, 2022.
- ^ "SocialProfile MediaWiki extension README file". Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Retrieved June 3, 2022.
- ^ Cashmore, Pete (December 23, 2006). "Wikiasari – Wikipedia Founder Launching a Google Rival". Mashable. Archived from the original on February 8, 2022. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
- ^ Miller, Rich (January 7, 2008). "Wikia Search Launches From Iowa Data Bunker". Data Center Knowledge. Archived from the original on May 11, 2010. Retrieved April 26, 2010.
- ^ Manjoo, Farhad (January 7, 2008). "Wikipedia founder's search engine gets bad reviews". Salon.com. Archived from the original on April 23, 2012. Retrieved January 7, 2008.
- ^ Needleman, Rafe (March 31, 2009). "Wales giving up on Wikia Search". Webware. CNet. Archived from the original on April 3, 2009. Retrieved July 17, 2009.
- ^ Schonfeld, Erick (January 31, 2009). "Jimmy Wales Quietly Launches Wikianswers". Techcrunch.com. Archived from the original on March 4, 2009. Retrieved July 17, 2009.
- ^ "Free wiki hosting company Wikia to let you create your own question and answer sites". Digital.venturebeat.com. March 17, 2010. Archived from the original on March 30, 2010. Retrieved December 3, 2011.
- ^ "Wikipedia: Special Treatment for Wikia and some other Wikis" Archived August 3, 2017, at the Wayback Machine. TechCrunch. April 28, 2007.
- ^ "Living in the Digital Age – Shift – DW (Arabia) – 25.09.12 – DW.DE". DW.DE. Archived from the original on August 8, 2014. Retrieved December 4, 2012.
- ^ "Wikipedia founder says to challenge Google, Yahoo". Reuters. March 9, 2007. Archived from the original on December 20, 2008. Retrieved July 3, 2017.
- ^ "Community websites take wiki path". BBC News. BBC. December 12, 2006. Archived from the original on March 11, 2008. Retrieved February 26, 2008.
- ^ "Wikia, Inc. is not the commercial counterpart to Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation". Wikimedia Foundation. Archived from the original on November 25, 2011. Retrieved February 26, 2008.
- ^ "Wikimedia". Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
- ^ Wikimedia Foundation 2006-2007 Audit Archived February 17, 2008, at the Wayback Machine page 9 says "The Organization shared hosting and bandwidth costs with Wikia, Inc., a for-profit company founded by the same founder as Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Included in accounts receivable at June 30, 2007, is $6,000 due from Wikia, Inc. for these costs. The organization received some donated office space from Wikia Inc. during the year ended June 30, 2006, valued at $6,000. No donation of the office space occurred in 2007. Through June 30, 2007, two members of the organization's board of directors also serve as employees, officers, or directors of Wikia, Inc."
- ^ "A note on the Wikipedia Usability Initiative". Blog.wikimedia.org. January 21, 2009. Archived from the original on September 6, 2009. Retrieved July 17, 2009.
- ^ "Foundation-l: Wikia leasing office space to WMF". Lists.wikimedia.org. January 23, 2009. Archived from the original on June 21, 2014. Retrieved July 17, 2009.
- ^ Finkelstein, Seth (September 25, 2008). "Read me first: Wikipedia isn't about human potential, whatever Wales says". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on September 27, 2008. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
- ^ Litchfield, Ted (May 24, 2025). "Indie Fallout wiki joins forces with the best Elder Scrolls site online, ensuring a bright future for looking up RPG lore uninterrupted by half-page video ads". PC Gamer. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
Fandom wikis tend to be saddled with enough ads that they become slow to load, particularly on mobile, with autoplay videos taking up half the screen—and that's when they load in after a delay, partially resetting the page.
- ^ "Fandom deepens Gen Z targeting with new data tools". EMARKETER. Retrieved October 5, 2025.
- ^ Thomas, Paul A. (July 30, 2024). The Information Behavior of Wikipedia Fan Editors: A Digital (Auto)Ethnography. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 184. ISBN 978-1-6669-4194-4.
- ^ Lim, Justin; Lawrence, Samantha (September 15, 2020). "To What Extent Does Fandom Wikia Act as a Model for Labor Exploitation?". Journal of Student Research. 9 (1). doi:10.47611/jsrhs.v9i1.1237. ISSN 2167-1907.
- ^ Wirzburger, Andrew (2024). The Video Game Industries' Hidden Curriculum: People Power and the Politics of Insurgent Consumerism (Thesis). University of Pennsylvania. p. 71.
Any internet search for "fandom ads" yields results replete with complaints from various communities and message boards about how intensely Fandom has commercialized the labor of thousands of fans
- ^ ""AI" brand safety technology". adalytics.io. Retrieved August 30, 2025.
- ^ Doerrer, Brandon (August 9, 2024). "Adalytics report finds programmatic ads running next to racist, sexual content". Campaign Live. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
- ^ "Fortune 500 brand ads seen next to porn & racial slurs, with IAS & DoubleVerify in the mix". The Drum. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
- ^ Gach, Ethan (May 1, 2025). "Giant Bomb Escapes Fandom, Goes Independent". Kotaku. Retrieved August 30, 2025.
Fandom's ad business faced scrutiny following a 2024 analytics report that questioned the brand safety of some of the content the company was running ads against across its user-generated wiki pages.
- ^ Swant, Marty (August 7, 2024). "New Adalytics report raises new questions about use of AI systems for brand safety". Digiday. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
- ^ a b Stanton, Rich (July 11, 2023). "Official Minecraft wiki editors so furious at Fandom's 'degraded' functionality and popups they're overwhelmingly voting to leave the site". PC Gamer. Archived from the original on July 15, 2023. Retrieved November 1, 2023.
- ^ Bumas, Adam. "How Fans Saved Sexypedia From Being Erased From the Internet". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved July 18, 2025.
Once the decision was made, the site was taken down with no consultation or warning given to the site's staff, who had thought they were in compliance.
- ^ a b c d Jackson, Gita (September 28, 2018). "Video Game Wikis Abandon Their Platform After Year Of Problems". Kotaku. Archived from the original on November 1, 2023. Retrieved November 1, 2023.
- ^ "Fan-made Fallout wiki struggles with host Fandom over autoplay videos". TechSpot. June 20, 2018. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
- ^ "Fallout Fans Resist Wikia's Attempt To Pivot To Video". Kotaku. September 12, 2017. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
- ^ Jackson, Gita (November 16, 2021). "Community Dedicated to Hot Monster Girls Deleted for 'Fetish Material'". VICE. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
- ^ "Monster Girl Encyclopedia Wiki Will Be Sacked By Host Due To 'Fetish' Content". Kotaku. November 16, 2021. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
- ^ a b Holmes, Juwan J. (February 22, 2022). "What's Happening with the LGBTQIA+ Wiki?". INTO. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
- ^ "Legend of Zelda Wiki "reclaims independence."". news.com.au. October 20, 2022. Retrieved August 29, 2025.
- ^ Ong, Jie Yee (August 21, 2023). "FANDOM Wiki Criticised For AI-Generated Answers Riddled With Mistakes". The Chainsaw. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
- ^ David, Emilia (February 12, 2024). "Fan wiki hosting site Fandom rolls out controversial AI features". The Verge. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
- ^ Nakash, Calen (May 20, 2024). "What a community-led shift to independent fan wikis means for game developers". Game Developer. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
- ^ Macgregor, Jody (May 11, 2025). "After conflict between the staff of gaming site Giant Bomb and owner Fandom, 'Giant Bomb is now owned by the people who make Giant Bomb'". PC Gamer. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
Conflict between Fandom and the opiniated editors of Giant Bomb arose this year when the publication of new content was put on hold as part of a "strategic reset and realignment" of Fandom's brands.
- ^ Gach, Ethan (May 1, 2025). "Giant Bomb Escapes Fandom, Goes Independent". Kotaku. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
- ^ Brown, Christopher (October 24, 2024). "Users Advance Fandom 'Pen Register' Suit Over IP Address Sharing". Bloomberg Law. Retrieved July 16, 2025.
- ^ Landis, Blake (October 25, 2024). "Ninth Circuit Ruling Shows How CIPA Applies to Internet Tracking". The National Law Review. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
- ^ "Proposed class says Fandom illegally tracked IP addresses". The Daily Journal. Retrieved July 18, 2025.
- ^ a b Brown, Christopher (July 30, 2023). "Consumer's Video Privacy Class Action Against Fandom Can Proceed". Bloomberg Law. Retrieved July 16, 2025.
- ^ Rizzi, Corrado (August 2, 2022). "Fandom Disclosed Users' Video-Viewing Habits to Meta Without Consent, Class Action Says". Classaction.org. Retrieved July 17, 2025.
- ^ Nilsson, Henrik. "Fandom Can't Duck Meta Data Sharing Suit, Calif. Judge Rules - Law360". www.law360.com. Retrieved October 24, 2025.
- ^ "Linda Matlow v. Fandom, Inc. et al". Justia Legal Database. Retrieved August 4, 2025.
- ^ "Michael Grecco Productions, Inc. v. Fandom, Inc., et al". Justia Legal Database. Retrieved August 4, 2025.
- ^ "Michael Grecco Productions, Inc. v. Fandom, Inc., et al" (PDF). Central District of California Court. 2025. Retrieved April 8, 2025.
- ^ Dodgson, Lindsay. "McDonald's upset a Grimace superfan by replacing his exhaustive wiki page for the character with an ad". Insider. Archived from the original on September 9, 2023. Retrieved July 17, 2023.
- ^ "McDonalds & Fandom Replaced A Wiki Page With An Advertisement". Kotaku. June 19, 2023. Archived from the original on July 16, 2023. Retrieved July 17, 2023.
- ^ Razali, Izzatul (June 20, 2023). "Man Behind Grimace's Wiki Page Gets Upset As Page Is Replaced by McDonald's Ads". IGN Southeast Asia. Archived from the original on July 17, 2023. Retrieved July 17, 2023.
- ^ a b c d Stanton, Rich (October 4, 2023). "Minecraft wiki completes exit from Fandom, gets ready to fight its own zombified corpse". PC Gamer. Archived from the original on October 23, 2023. Retrieved November 1, 2023.
- ^ a b Finkelstein, Seth (July 31, 2008). "How will Wikia cope when the workers all quit the plantation?". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on December 1, 2016. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
- ^ a b Bailey, Dustin (October 21, 2022). "The biggest Zelda wiki goes independent to fight "corporate consolidation," urging others to follow suit". GamesRadar+. Archived from the original on December 12, 2023. Retrieved November 1, 2023.
- ^ a b Winslow, Levi (October 21, 2022). "Massive Zelda Wiki Reclaims Independence Six Months Before Tears of the Kingdom". Kotaku. Archived from the original on November 11, 2023. Retrieved November 1, 2023.
- ^ Patel, Nilay (August 23, 2023). "Fandom runs some of the biggest communities on the internet — can CEO Perkins Miller keep them happy?". The Verge. Archived from the original on October 6, 2023. Retrieved November 1, 2023.
I'm actively engaged. I take it very seriously. I work very hard every day to try to make sure that we build a good platform that people can use, that's stable and has great tools. And I think we're someplace that I think is really community-focused, and I think we've got the right values. So I really take it seriously if a community says, "Look, we're going to go somewhere else."
- ^ a b Bailey, Dustin (March 14, 2022). "The official Terraria wiki is no longer official". PCGamesN. Archived from the original on November 1, 2023. Retrieved November 1, 2023.
- ^ Jones, Ali (November 1, 2023). "Hollow Knight Silksong community follows WoW, Minecraft, and Fallout as it abandons its wiki over advertising frustrations". GamesRadar+. Archived from the original on November 7, 2023. Retrieved November 6, 2023.
- ^ a b Beschizza, Rob (October 10, 2024). "Fan wikis wanting to escape the Fandom/Wikia sinkhole have a new ally". BoingBoing. Retrieved October 11, 2024.
- ^ a b Bailey, Dustin (March 13, 2025). "Vampire Survivors devs launch official wiki "free of ads, banners, and all of the junk that gets in your way," joining Stardew Valley and Terraria in community wikis with minimal intrusions". GamesRadar+. Retrieved March 14, 2025.
- ^ Bailey, Dustin (August 28, 2025). "JRPG lovers are "migrating away from Fandom" to unite the Trails and Ys communities in an independent wiki, following in the footsteps of Zelda and Silksong fans before them". GamesRadar+. Retrieved August 29, 2025.
- ^ "Privacy Policy". Fandom. Archived from the original on April 4, 2022. Retrieved April 3, 2022.
- ^ "San Mateo-Based Wikia Lands Investment from Amazon.com". Silicon Valley Wire. December 6, 2006. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved March 8, 2007.; California Business Portal, Agent for service of process address Archived July 23, 2012, at the Wayback Machine; Go Daddy, Registered domain address[permanent dead link].
- ^ "Detail by Entity Name Florida Profit Corporation WIKIA, INC". Division of Corporations. Florida Department of State. December 21, 2004. Archived from the original on December 30, 2021. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ Lashinksy, Adam; Scott, Jagon (August 30, 2006). "For-profit wiki". Marketplace. Archived from the original on August 7, 2008. Retrieved June 19, 2009.
- ^ "Community Central:Advertising on Wikia". Community Central. Wikia, Inc. January 8, 2008. Archived from the original on May 22, 2018. Retrieved February 9, 2010.
- ^ "About". Fandom. Wikia, Inc. Archived from the original on May 21, 2018. Retrieved May 21, 2018.
- ^ "Wikia, Inc.'s Fandom Announces Investment Led by Media Veteran Jon Miller". www.prnewswire.com (Press release). Archived from the original on May 4, 2018. Retrieved August 8, 2021.
External links
[edit]Fandom (website)
View on GrokipediaOrigins and Historical Development
2004–2009: Founding as Wikia and Initial Expansion
Wikia, Inc. was established as a for-profit wiki hosting service in October 2004 by Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia, and Angela Beesley Starling, a former Wikimedia Foundation board member.[1] The platform launched publicly on October 18, 2004, under the initial name Wikicities, drawing analogies to GeoCities for its model of hosting user-created communities centered on niche topics, particularly fandoms in entertainment, gaming, and pop culture.[9] Unlike the non-profit Wikipedia, Wikicities operated as a commercial venture, providing free wiki software based on MediaWiki while planning eventual advertising revenue to sustain operations.[1] Early growth focused on attracting volunteer editors to build content for underrepresented subjects, starting with approximately 1,500 pages contributed by initial enthusiasts.[1] In 2005, the platform expanded through organic community migration and targeted acquisitions, including Memory Alpha, a Star Trek wiki originally independent since 2003, which integrated to leverage Wikicities' infrastructure.[10] Wookieepedia, dedicated to the Star Wars universe, emerged as a flagship project around this period, demonstrating the site's appeal to dedicated fanbases by compiling detailed lore and media references.[1] By March 27, 2006, amid reaching nearly 1,000 hosted wikis, the service rebranded from Wikicities to Wikia to better reflect its wiki-centric identity and broader ambitions.[9] This period saw continued proliferation of specialized wikis, such as those for video games and anime, capitalizing on the rising popularity of online fan communities in the mid-2000s. Wookieepedia, for instance, surpassed 50,000 articles by 2007, gaining recognition even from official Star Wars production teams as a reference resource.[1] The expansion emphasized scalability, with Wikia introducing features like integrated search tools in early 2005 to enhance discoverability across its growing ecosystem.[10]2010–2015: Leadership Transitions and Platform Maturation
In October 2011, Wikia appointed Craig Palmer, the former CEO of Gracenote, as its new chief executive officer, succeeding Gil Penchina who had served in the role since June 2006.[11] [12] Palmer's tenure emphasized scaling the platform's entertainment and gaming communities, leveraging his experience in metadata and digital content management to drive user engagement and traffic growth.[13] Under his leadership, Wikia reported a 90% increase in entertainment site traffic between 2010 and 2011, positioning it as one of the fastest-growing U.S. entertainment platforms.[14] Platform maturation during this era included the rollout of the Monaco skin as the default interface in late 2010, replacing earlier designs like Monobook and Quartz with features such as collapsible sidebars, customizable modules, and enhanced visual navigation to improve editor and reader usability.[15] [16] This update facilitated better community customization while maintaining MediaWiki compatibility, contributing to higher retention on fan-driven wikis focused on video games, television, and pop culture.[15] Wikia also expanded its gaming vertical, achieving 25.7 million unique visitors in December 2011 alone—a 50.7% monthly increase—and ranking as the second-largest gaming network online by early 2012.[17] These developments reflected Wikia's shift toward a more polished, ad-supported ecosystem, with over 50 million monthly users by 2011 supporting collaborative content creation across thousands of wikis.[12] Palmer's strategic focus on monetization through targeted advertising and partnerships helped sustain operations amid competitive pressures from ad-free alternatives, though it drew some community criticism over intrusive ad placements.[18] By 2015, these efforts had solidified Wikia's role as a major hub for fandom content, setting the stage for further rebranding and acquisitions.2016–2018: Rebranding to Fandom and Strategic Shifts
On January 25, 2016, Wikia launched Fandom as an entertainment news site that aggregated content from its wiki repositories while introducing original articles, videos, and fan-focused features to create a centralized hub for pop culture enthusiasts.[19] This initiative marked an early strategic pivot toward positioning Wikia as a broader destination for fandom engagement beyond wiki hosting alone.[20] The full rebranding occurred on October 4, 2016, when Wikia, Inc. renamed its core platform to "Fandom powered by Wikia," applying the new branding across international sites and redirecting the primary domain from wikia.com to fandom.com.[21] This change reflected a deliberate effort to unify the company's identity around the concept of fandom, emphasizing community-driven content and entertainment discovery amid growing competition in digital media spaces.[22] During 2017 and 2018, Fandom continued refining its strategy by phasing out the "powered by Wikia" suffix by June 2018 and initiating domain migrations from subdomains like x.wikia.com to x.fandom.com starting in October 2018, streamlining user access and reinforcing the independent Fandom brand. These shifts prioritized enhanced user experience and brand cohesion, though they coincided with internal reflections on adapting to evolving online community dynamics.[22] No major leadership transitions occurred in this period, maintaining continuity from prior management under CEO Gil Penchina.2018–2025: Acquisitions, AI Integration, and Recent Leadership Changes
In 2018, Fandom acquired ScreenJunkies, a video content producer focused on entertainment reviews and commentary, to expand its media offerings beyond wikis.[23] The following year, in 2019, the company purchased Curse Media, which included gaming community assets like CurseForge for mods and add-ons, enhancing its appeal to video game enthusiasts.[24] These moves diversified Fandom's portfolio into user-generated content tools and community platforms, aligning with its fan-centric model. A significant expansion occurred in October 2022, when Fandom acquired digital assets from Red Ventures, including GameSpot, Metacritic, TV Guide, GameFAQs, Giant Bomb, Cord Cutters News, and Comic Vine, in a deal valued at approximately $50–55 million.[25][26] This acquisition integrated established review and database sites, adding millions of monthly users and bolstering Fandom's position in gaming and entertainment aggregation. In 2021, Fandom had also acquired Fanatical, an e-commerce platform for video games, further extending into direct sales and revenue streams.[24] Fandom began incorporating artificial intelligence in 2024 to streamline content moderation and user experience, partnering with Coactive AI for automated image categorization and filtering, which reportedly reduced moderation time by 74%.[27] The platform introduced generative AI features such as Quick Answers—dropdown Q&A summaries for character pages—and AI-assisted image reviews, though these faced backlash from users concerned about accuracy and over-reliance on automation.[28] By June 2025, Fandom launched Fandom Helix, an AI-powered data product integrating first-party fan insights with external datasets for targeted advertising, in collaboration with Experian via Audigent.[29] Leadership saw notable shifts starting in February 2019, when Perkins Miller, formerly of StubHub, was appointed CEO to guide strategic growth amid expanding acquisitions.[30] Under Miller, Fandom pursued aggressive media integrations and tech enhancements. In October 2025, Miller departed after six years, with no immediate successor announced, marking a transition amid ongoing platform evolution.[31] The company had bolstered its executive team in early 2025 with hires in community, product, and revenue roles to support global operations.[32]Corporate Ownership and Economic Model
Ownership History and Governance
Fandom, Inc. was founded on October 4, 2004, as Wikia, Inc., a for-profit Delaware corporation established by Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia, and Angela Beesley Starling, a British web entrepreneur, to provide wiki hosting services distinct from the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation.[33][1] Early funding came from venture investors including Amazon.com, Idinvest Partners, Delta-v Capital, and angel investor Marc Andreessen, supporting initial expansion without a change in foundational control.[34][35] In February 2018, following its rebranding to Fandom, the company secured a major investment led by media executive Jon Miller and backed by TPG Capital through Integrated Media Company, marking a pivotal shift in ownership as Miller assumed a controlling interest.[36][37] This transaction positioned TPG Capital as the primary backer, with the firm retaining influence over strategic direction amid Fandom's growth into a media conglomerate focused on fan communities.[38] No subsequent public ownership changes have occurred, maintaining Fandom as a privately held entity under TPG's umbrella as of 2025.[35] Governance operates through a standard private company structure, with day-to-day leadership under CEO Perkins Miller, who assumed the role in February 2019 to oversee operations, product development, and revenue strategies.[39][40] Co-founder Jimmy Wales retains an ongoing role as president or advisor, contributing to strategic oversight, while key executives such as CFO Ed Lu and Chief Technology & Product Officer Adil Ajmal handle financial and technical governance.[41][40] The board of directors includes investor representatives like those from TPG, though detailed public composition remains limited, reflecting the opacity typical of private equity-backed firms.[42] Decisions emphasize commercial sustainability, with investor priorities shaping expansions like acquisitions and AI integrations since 2018.[35]Revenue Generation and Sustainability Mechanisms
Fandom's primary revenue stream derives from digital advertising displayed across its wiki pages and associated platforms, capitalizing on high traffic from fan communities. The company sells ad inventory including display banners, video ads, and sponsored content placements, with formats adhering to IAB standards for brand safety.[43] In 2021, Fandom launched Fandomatic, a self-serve advertising platform aimed at expanding revenue through programmatic ad buying, particularly targeting global gaming audiences.[44] This model generates an estimated annual revenue of $130-175 million, supported by subsidiaries such as Fanatical, which offers game bundles and affiliate deals to diversify income.[45][46][6] Sustainability is maintained through reliance on volunteer-generated content, which incurs minimal production costs while driving organic traffic—over 400 million monthly unique visitors as of recent reports—and enabling scalable ad monetization.[6] Unlike nonprofit models such as Wikipedia, Fandom operates as a for-profit entity without compensating contributors or accepting wiki-specific donations, ensuring stable, low-overhead hosting in exchange for platform control over ads and features.[47] This approach has drawn criticism for profiting from unpaid labor, yet it sustains operations by leveraging network effects in niche fandom markets, where Fandom holds a near-monopolistic position.[48] Additional mechanisms include strategic partnerships with media entities for content syndication and data-driven ad targeting, though these remain secondary to core advertising.[49]Platform Features and Technological Backbone
Core Wiki Hosting and Editing Tools
Fandom hosts wikis on its platform using a customized implementation of the MediaWiki software, version 1.43.1, which serves as the foundational engine for page creation, storage, and retrieval.[50] [51] This hosting model supports unlimited article pages, file uploads, and revisions without requiring users to manage servers, operating as a free, ad-supported service focused on fan communities for topics like video games, films, and television.[50] Core MediaWiki features enable structured content management through namespaces, which segregate content types such as main articles, templates, categories, and user pages to maintain organization and prevent conflicts.[51] [52] Editing occurs via two primary interfaces: the VisualEditor, a WYSIWYG tool that displays changes in real-time mirroring the published page layout, and the source editor for direct manipulation of wikitext markup.[53] [54] The VisualEditor, accessible by default upon clicking the "Edit" button, includes a toolbar for inserting links (via keyboard shortcuts like Ctrl+K), citations, media files, tables, and templates, with features like spell-checking and preview diffs to facilitate precise modifications.[53] In contrast, the source editor supports advanced users in writing raw wikitext, such as bolding with '''text''' or internal links via [[Page]], enabling granular control over formatting and logic via parser functions.[54] Both interfaces integrate revision history for tracking changes, rollback capabilities, and talk pages for discussion, enforcing collaborative editing under a user rights system that assigns permissions like anonymous editing, autoconfirmed status, or administrator privileges.[51] Templates form a cornerstone of content structuring, consisting of pages in the Template namespace that are transcluded onto articles using {{TemplateName}} syntax to ensure consistency across wikis.[55] Creation involves editing a new page prefixed with "Template:", where parameters—denoted as {{{param|default}}}—allow customization, such as populating infoboxes with character details or navigation boxes.[55] Updates to a template propagate automatically to all transcluding pages, reducing redundancy and aiding maintenance; common uses include standardized sidebars, citation formats, and data tables.[55] Categories, added via [[Category:Topic]] at page bottoms, enable hierarchical organization and dynamic navigation, with templates often embedding category tags to automate inclusion based on parameters.[55] These tools, augmented by MediaWiki extensions for Fandom-specific enhancements like job queues for background processing, underpin the platform's scalability for large-scale, community-maintained encyclopedias.[51]Media Integration and Additional Services
Fandom supports the upload and integration of images into wiki pages through multiple methods, including drag-and-drop functionality in the visual editor, direct uploads via Special:Upload, and batch handling in Special:NewFiles.[56] Supported file formats encompass PNG, GIF, JPG, WebP, SVG, and others, with a maximum file size of 10 MB and image resolution capped at 12.5 million pixels to ensure platform stability.[56] Users must be logged in to upload, and files require wiki-relevant content, licensing selection, and optional descriptions or sources for proper attribution.[56] Video integration occurs primarily through the video embed tool, enabled by default across Fandom wikis, which allows embedding from supported external providers by pasting URLs into Special:NewFiles.[57] Uploaded videos can be filtered and searched in galleries, then inserted into articles, galleries, or image-supporting elements using standard editors, with smaller videos (under 400px width) playable in a media lightbox.[57] This feature facilitates richer content without direct hosting of all videos, reducing storage demands while enabling seamless playback.[57] Additional services extend beyond core wiki functionality to foster engagement. Quizzes and trivia modules, introduced experimentally and expanded platform-wide by June 2022, permit creators to design interactive multiple-choice assessments on wiki topics, enhancing immersion in fictional universes.[58][59] Discussions serve as a dedicated social forum for each wiki, enabling threaded conversations on content and topics, accessible via a centralized board that supports community interaction separate from article edits.[60] The Fandom mobile application, released in October 2017, provides access to personalized feeds aggregating wiki pages, news, videos, and social updates tailored to user interests in TV, movies, games, and anime.[61] Available on iOS and Android, it simplifies wiki navigation with one-tap access and faster loading compared to browsers, though editing capabilities remain limited to web interfaces.[62][63] Social media elements, such as embedding Twitter timelines, further integrate external platforms into wiki pages for real-time updates.[64]Advertising Technologies and Data Utilization
Fandom utilizes a range of advertising formats, including IAB-standard display units, custom interactive ads, and video placements, available through direct deals or programmatic channels.[43] These technologies enable high-impact placements across its 250,000 communities and 50 million content pages, targeting engaged users during peak fandom activity.[65] The platform collects user data such as identifiers (e.g., IP addresses, device IDs), browsing history, interests, and behavioral signals to fuel personalized advertising.[66] This includes first-party data from 350 million monthly visitors, aggregated into cookieless segments using 2 billion device IDs for targeting by demographics, interests, and behaviors without relying on third-party cookies.[43] Cookies, pixel tags, and similar trackers monitor online activity, including cross-device usage and page interactions, to deliver behavior-based ads.[66] Fandom's FanDNA system analyzes user behavior across its ecosystem to create audience intelligence profiles, informing ad recommendations and expansions into niche segments.[43] In August 2025, it launched Momentum, an AI-driven tool within FanDNA Helix that predicts cultural trends by processing trillions of behavioral signals from wiki traffic surges and events, enabling real-time ad activation with reported lifts of up to 72% in purchase intent for campaigns.[65] Complementing this, the Helix contextual targeting solution, introduced in November 2024, employs machine learning to taxonomize content in real-time across 50 million pages, connecting advertisers to non-obvious audience segments for precise, contextually relevant placements.[67] Data is shared with third-party ad platforms like Google and Facebook for custom audiences and retargeting, including services such as Google Ads Customer Match.[66] Partnerships enhance capabilities, such as with Intent IQ in March 2025 for identity resolution to access iOS users via bid enhancement, and Audigent in July 2025 for privacy-compliant third-party data activation targeting Gen Z fans.[68][4] Users can opt out of certain tracking and data sales through designated tools, though core ad personalization relies on inferred interests from site interactions.[66]AI-Driven Enhancements and Innovations
In 2023, Fandom implemented generative AI for internal tools such as ImageReview, which automates the detection and flagging of policy-violating or low-quality images uploaded to wikis, reducing manual moderation workload for staff and creators.[69] Another early application involved AI-assisted generation of JSON table structures to streamline data formatting in wiki articles, enabling more efficient content organization without requiring advanced coding skills from editors.[69] By February 2024, Fandom expanded public-facing AI enhancements with the launch of Quick Answers, a feature that generates concise, AI-curated Q&A dropdowns on wiki pages—often for character profiles or key topics—drawing from existing content to provide instant summaries without requiring full article reads.[70][28] Complementary tools included AI-driven image management for automated tagging, selection, and optimization during uploads, alongside content recommendation algorithms that prioritize relevant wiki pages and media based on user behavior and topical similarity.[70] These innovations aimed to accelerate content creation and improve navigation across Fandom's approximately 45 million wiki pages, though they rely on training data derived from user-generated content, raising questions about accuracy in niche fandom contexts.[70] In August 2025, Fandom introduced Momentum, an AI-powered ad targeting solution within its FanDNA Helix data product, which analyzes fandom-specific trends and user interests to deliver contextually relevant advertisements, indirectly enhancing platform sustainability by boosting revenue without altering core editorial tools.[65] Experimental efforts in mid-2025 explored AI for wiki internationalization, employing machine translation to prototype non-English versions of popular wikis, potentially broadening editor participation and global fan access, though initial tests focused on select communities to evaluate translation fidelity.[71]Community Ecosystem and External Relations
User Contributions and Engagement Patterns
Fandom's content is predominantly created and maintained by volunteer users, often dedicated fans of specific media franchises, games, films, or television series, who contribute articles, images, and discussions without financial compensation. These contributions form the core of the platform's value, with users employing wiki syntax to build encyclopedic entries on niche topics ranging from plot summaries to character analyses and lore expansions. The platform hosts over 250,000 community-driven wikis as of October 2024, reflecting the scale of decentralized, fan-led knowledge production.[72][73] User engagement metrics indicate substantial passive consumption alongside selective active participation. In 2025, Fandom reported nearly 350 million monthly unique visitors and approximately 30 billion annual page views, underscoring its role as a primary resource for fan research and discovery.[4] Contributions, however, exhibit power-law distributions typical of collaborative online platforms, where a minority of highly active editors account for the majority of edits across analyzed wikis. A 2022 study of over 6,000 Fandom wikis found that participation levels follow skewed empirical distributions, with most users making few or no edits, while core contributors sustain content quality and volume through repeated revisions and expansions.[74] Engagement patterns often correlate with external events, such as media releases or franchise announcements, leading to spikes in both views and edits; for instance, wikis tied to popular influencers garnered over 40 million page views in 2024 alone.[72] Fandom has pursued initiatives to bolster editor retention and growth, including tools for easier onboarding and community incentives, resulting in reported increases in active editor numbers.[75] Despite this, the platform's reliance on volunteer labor exposes it to challenges like editor burnout and migration to independent hosts, as observed in high-profile wiki departures, though aggregate metrics show sustained overall activity driven by enduring fan interest in evergreen topics.[76]Partnerships with Media and Entertainment Sectors
Fandom's Wiki Partner Program establishes collaborations with media and entertainment entities, including game developers, streaming services, and movie studios, to create designated "Official Wikis" for their intellectual properties. These partnerships involve providing official assets, access, and materials to Fandom's community editors, resulting in wikis featuring a verified badge that signals authenticity to users and drives deeper fan immersion and retention.[77] The program targets sectors where fan knowledge bases enhance product engagement, with Fandom's platform trusted by 87% of consumers for reliable information on franchises.[77] Specific examples in gaming, a key entertainment vertical, include official wikis for Cult of the Lamb, Escape from Tarkov, and Valheim, where developers supply in-game data and artwork to support comprehensive, up-to-date coverage.[77] These initiatives allow partners to curate content that aligns with official narratives, fostering affinity among dedicated audiences. Fandom's Community Partnerships team assists in wiki development, ensuring alignment with brand goals while leveraging volunteer contributions for scalability.[78] Beyond wiki hosting, Fandom extends partnerships into experiential and promotional realms, such as sponsoring original content like the Emmy-nominated Honest Trailers series, which analyzes films and TV shows to capitalize on traffic spikes during releases—up to 110% increases in wiki visits.[43] In 2023, Fandom launched a year-long deal with DreamHack, investing in live event programming to bridge online communities with in-person activations, including convention integrations and ticketed launches for new titles.[79] These efforts enable IP owners to surround cultural moments with targeted advertising and custom experiences, utilizing Fandom's first-party data from 2 billion device IDs.[43] Such alliances prioritize mutual benefits, with entertainment partners gaining verified fan hubs that reduce misinformation and boost loyalty, while Fandom accesses premium inventory for brand-safe monetization. However, the program's emphasis on gaming over traditional film or TV studios reflects gaming's higher reliance on community-driven resources for complex mechanics and lore.[77]Responses to Community Feedback and Departures
In response to persistent community complaints about intrusive advertising, Fandom provides a reporting mechanism for problematic ads, evaluated on a case-by-case basis to potentially remove them from specific wikis.[80] However, users frequently report that sidebar and overlay ads obscure content, contributing to broader dissatisfaction with site performance and usability.[81] The rollout of the FandomDesktop skin in June 2021, intended to unify the desktop experience by retiring legacy Oasis and Hydra themes, incorporated prior user feedback from Fandom and Gamepedia wikis but faced significant backlash for reducing customization options, such as limiting custom CSS and JavaScript for non-staff users.[82]) Critics argued the changes prioritized ad integration over editor preferences, with no permanent opt-out available after initial testing, exacerbating perceptions of top-down control.[83] Fandom maintained that the skin improved accessibility and mobile alignment, but community forums documented widespread frustration, including readability issues and enforced uniformity.[84] Departures of prominent wikis intensified in 2023, driven by cumulative grievances over ads, popups, and platform rigidity. The official Minecraft Wiki, for instance, voted overwhelmingly to migrate after editors cited degraded functionality and intrusive elements hindering editing and navigation.[85] Similarly, the Hollow Knight Wiki relocated to an independent host in October 2023, highlighting Fandom's mobile theme and ad-heavy design as barriers to user retention.[86] Other migrations, such as the Death Battle Wiki to Miraheze in 2025, pointed to inadequate vandalism controls and theme limitations as catalysts.[87] Fandom's handling of migrations includes retaining forked wikis active on its platform to sustain ad revenue, prompting updated forking policies in late 2023 that prohibit site notices or templates directing users to alternatives.[88] This approach allows dissenting editors to remain while the original content persists, but communities view it as undermining their autonomy, with non-profits like Miraheze attracting departures for ad-free hosting and greater customization.[5] Despite these tensions, Fandom has not reversed core monetization strategies, leading to ongoing cycles of feedback and selective exits among larger gaming and fandom wikis.[89]Disputes, Legal Matters, and Ethical Debates
Monetization Conflicts and User Experience Complaints
Fandom's primary monetization strategy relies on advertising revenue generated from traffic to its hosted wikis, including self-serve platforms like Fandomatic launched in September 2021 to expand ad sales globally.[44] This for-profit model, which leverages volunteer-contributed content, has sparked ongoing tensions with users who argue that aggressive ad placements prioritize revenue over accessibility and readability. Community forums and user reports frequently highlight intrusive formats such as autoplaying video ads, pop-up overlays, and banners that obscure text or expand dynamically, contributing to slower page load times and a cluttered interface that hinders navigation.[5][90] These advertising practices have fueled widespread user dissatisfaction, with complaints dating back to at least 2012 when unregistered visitors encountered up to seven flashing ad spots per page, described as "outrageous" for disrupting the wiki experience.[91] More recent critiques, amplified on platforms like Reddit and Fandom's own community central, decry the "inhuman amount" of animated ads that move across pages or preempt content loading, rendering sites "unusable" especially on mobile devices without ad blockers.[92][93] Fandom maintains strict policies against malicious ads, but users contend that even compliant placements—driven by dependency on ad networks—erode trust, as wiki administrators lack control over ad density or positioning, leading to perceptions of content exploitation without community input.[80] The cumulative impact has manifested in high-profile wiki migrations, signaling acute conflicts between Fandom's revenue imperatives and user demands for an ad-minimal environment. In October 2022, the Zelda Wiki community forked to an independent host, zeldawiki.wiki, citing "incompatible" ideals with Fandom's evolving practices, including ad proliferation and unconsulted design overhauls like the Unified Community Platform introduced in early 2021.[94] Similarly, the Minecraft Wiki completed its exodus to minecraft.wiki in September 2023, hosted by Weird Gloop, promising "fewer ads," faster performance, and editable features absent on Fandom, with subsequent moves by non-English versions in November 2024.[95] Other communities, such as WoWWiki (to wiki.gg in 2023) and Hollow Knight Wiki, followed suit, attributing departures to longstanding issues like restricted customization and AI-influenced errors exacerbating ad-related frustrations.[5] While Fandom has experimented with layout tweaks to mitigate backlash, these exits underscore a core rift: users view the platform's ad-centric evolution as antithetical to the collaborative, content-focused ethos of fan wikis.[5]Editorial Interventions and Content Control Issues
In March 2021, Fandom staff intervened in a community vote on Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki, after editors approved a policy allowing deadnames—pre-transition names of transgender individuals—in article titles for real-world contributors like actors and writers when those names were historically prominent.[96] Fandom overruled the decision, stating that such usage violated its Terms of Use against harassment, and extended the prohibition on deadnaming real-life individuals across all hosted wikis unless justified for fictional characters.[97] This action included banning two Wookieepedia administrators for alleged bullying and intimidation during the dispute, prompting accusations from some editors of top-down content control overriding local consensus.[98][99] The intervention aligned with Fandom's broader Gender Identity Guidelines, formalized in spring 2021, which mandate redirects for preferred names and disallow deadnaming to prevent harm, as determined by platform staff.[97] In June 2021, Fandom expanded these into comprehensive LGBTQIA+ guidelines for all wikis, emphasizing avoidance of misgendering and deadnaming through editorial practices like title changes and content revisions.[100] Critics, including affected wiki communities, argued this represented ideological enforcement rather than neutral moderation, as it prioritized staff-interpreted harm over factual historical references or community standards.[101] Fandom's content control extends to its Offensive Terms Policy, enforced since at least 2020, requiring the censorship or removal of slurs and derogatory language, even in quoted source material or historical contexts, with allowances only for heavily obscured versions (e.g., first letter visible).[102] Staff and designated moderators perform these edits, often flagging content via the Edit Review system, which scans for potential violations like harmful or disruptive changes.[103] This has led to interventions in user-generated pages, such as altering dialogue in media wikis to comply, drawing complaints from editors who view it as sanitizing original content for advertiser-friendly standards or inconsistent application.[104] Additionally, Fandom restricts real-world political content, prohibiting wikis dedicated to ideologies, politicians, or partisan discussions to maintain focus on fandom topics, with staff intervening to delete or redirect violating pages.[105] Enforcement has sparked debates over bias, particularly in sensitive areas like election-related claims or conservative viewpoints, where users report uneven moderation compared to apolitical or left-leaning fan content, though Fandom attributes decisions to uniform Terms of Use compliance.[106] These mechanisms balance platform liability and user safety but have fueled perceptions of centralized control eroding wiki autonomy, especially when staff judgments on "harm" diverge from empirical or community-driven standards.AI Implementation Backlash and Technological Risks
In February 2024, Fandom rolled out generative AI features including "Quick Answers," which provide automated summaries to user queries drawn from wiki content, following a pause after initial testing in August 2023 due to reported inaccuracies such as grammatical errors and irrelevant information pulls.[28][107] Community editors criticized these outputs for degrading the reliability of fan-sourced knowledge, with examples including erroneous responses on wikis like Hollow Knight that confused game lore with unrelated details.[108] Fandom's July 2025 Wiki Internationalization Experiment further intensified backlash by employing AI large language models to translate opted-in English wiki pages into languages like German, positioning it as a pilot to expand accessibility but prompting accusations of violating prior commitments against AI-generated content replacement.[109][110] Editors argued that AI translations fail to preserve fandom-specific nuances, emotional tone, and contextual subtleties inherent in fan communities, potentially eroding the human-curated authenticity of wikis.[111] Over 390 editor signatures on petitions opposed the initiative, highlighting fears of automated errors supplanting volunteer efforts.[112] Technological risks associated with these implementations include AI "hallucinations"—fabricated details not grounded in source material—which amplify misinformation risks in niche fandom contexts where fanon (speculative content) already blurs with canon, as seen in cases where Fandom-sourced data fed into external AI systems propagated false narratives like fabricated disaster events.[113] Such errors could cascade through interconnected fan ecosystems, undermining trust in wikis as authoritative references and complicating moderation, since AI outputs resist straightforward editing by non-experts. Additionally, reliance on proprietary large language models introduces dependencies on opaque training data, raising concerns over biased or incomplete representations of global fandom perspectives, though Fandom claims post-translation human evaluation mitigates this.[109] Despite opt-out options for features like Quick Answers, critics contend that platform-wide AI integration erodes user agency and incentivizes quantity over quality in content maintenance.[28]Copyright, Privacy, and Infringement Allegations
Fandom, as a platform hosting user-generated wikis, relies on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) safe harbor provisions to limit liability for copyrighted material uploaded by users, provided it promptly removes infringing content upon receiving valid takedown notices.[114] The company maintains a designated DMCA agent and policy requiring complainants to submit notices via email to [email protected], asserting compliance shields it from direct infringement suits.[115] However, this process has faced scrutiny in Michael Grecco Productions, Inc. v. Fandom, Inc., where a photographer alleged that between November 2023 and April 2024, Fandom failed to remove 28 copyrighted images uploaded to fan wikis despite 30 emailed notices, claiming the platform's requirement for a separate support account—distinct from standard DMCA procedures—invalidated the submissions and disqualified safe harbor protection.[116][117] The case highlights disputes over procedural hurdles potentially enabling persistent infringement, though Fandom contends its account verification prevents spam and upholds safe harbor eligibility under 17 U.S.C. § 512.[116] Allegations of copyright infringement on Fandom often stem from fans uploading images, screenshots, or media without permission, with the platform defending fair use for encyclopedic descriptions while enforcing takedowns for non-transformative copies.[118] No large-scale shutdown lawsuits have succeeded against Fandom for systemic infringement, attributed to its DMCA adherence, though critics argue the volume of user content creates ongoing exposure risks.[119] Privacy allegations against Fandom primarily involve unauthorized data sharing via embedded tracking technologies. In 2022, a class action lawsuit accused Fandom of violating the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) by disclosing users' personally identifiable information and video-viewing habits to Meta Platforms through tracking pixels without consent or notification, prompting claims of federal privacy breaches.[120] A California federal court denied Fandom's motion to dismiss in July 2023, allowing the suit to proceed on grounds that such disclosures constituted "knowing" violations under the VPPA.[121] Similarly, in Shah v. Fandom, Inc. (filed 2024), plaintiffs alleged breaches of California's Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) via third-party tracking software that captured and shared IP addresses—treated as "pen register" data—without informed consent, with the Northern District of California advancing the claims in October 2024 amid broader Ninth Circuit scrutiny of website analytics practices.[122][123] Fandom has argued these practices align with standard web operations and user agreements, but courts have rejected dismissals, citing insufficient evidence of opt-in consent.[124] Ongoing investigations and suits underscore tensions between Fandom's data utilization for advertising and user privacy expectations.[125]High-Profile Promotional Controversies
In June 2023, Fandom faced significant backlash after allowing McDonald's to pay an undisclosed sum to temporarily override the content of the Grimace wiki page on the McDonald's Wiki, replacing fan-contributed historical details, appearances, and citations with promotional material for the Grimace Shake and a character's "birthday meal" campaign.[126][127] The original page, maintained by dedicated fans including a self-described "superfan" who had invested years in documenting the character's evolution since its 1971 debut as a milkshake-stealing antagonist before its rebranding as a friendly mascot, was effectively erased to prioritize advertising, with edits reverting to the sponsored version blocked by Fandom's protections.[128][126] Community outrage centered on the perceived violation of wiki principles, where user-generated encyclopedic content yielded to commercial interests, compromising the site's role as a neutral fan resource.[85] The incident amplified existing tensions over Fandom's monetization practices, with critics arguing it exemplified a shift from community-driven knowledge preservation to profit-driven interventions, eroding trust among editors who viewed the platform as increasingly prioritizing revenue over editorial integrity.[127][85] Fandom defended the arrangement as a standard paid promotion disclosed via labeling, but this did little to quell accusations of ethical lapses, particularly as the Grimace Shake had recently surged in viral popularity through ironic TikTok horror memes, heightening the stakes of the tie-in.[128] The controversy contributed to broader wiki migrations, including high-profile departures like the official Minecraft Wiki, where editors cited the Grimace incident alongside intrusive ads and functionality degradations as catalysts for forking content to independent hosts.[85] Over 80% of Minecraft Wiki voters supported the move in a July 2023 poll, reflecting how such promotional overrides underscored Fandom's commercial model—acquired by TPG Capital in 2018—potentially at the expense of user autonomy and content reliability.[85] While Fandom has hosted sponsored content previously, the Grimace case stood out for its direct alteration of core wiki articles, prompting debates on the sustainability of for-profit platforms in fan ecosystems.[127]Broader Influence and Critical Assessment
Contributions to Fan-Driven Knowledge Dissemination
Fandom serves as a centralized platform for fans to collaboratively compile and disseminate encyclopedic knowledge on niche topics, hosting around 250,000 wikis with over 40 million content pages available in more than 80 languages.[1] This structure enables users to contribute detailed entries on elements like character backstories, plot analyses, and lore expansions for franchises in gaming, film, television, and literature, where official documentation may be limited or inconsistent.[1] Fans exercise editorial control through wiki syntax and community discussions, aggregating dispersed expertise into accessible, searchable resources that extend beyond primary media sources.[129] Notable instances highlight the platform's role in knowledge preservation and application; for example, Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki, contains hundreds of thousands of articles and functions as a reference tool for the franchise's production team.[1] The Doctor Who wiki similarly maintains over 110,000 articles chronicling the series' expansive universe, while communities like the Elder Scrolls wiki draw 700,000 to 800,000 daily views on weekdays, peaking higher during content releases.[130][131] These efforts demonstrate how fan contributions fill informational voids, such as comprehensive episode guides or fan-verified trivia, which gain authority through iterative editing and citation of canonical materials. The platform's dissemination extends via high-volume traffic—Fandom wikis collectively log approximately 2.5 billion monthly pageviews—and features like mobile accessibility and search engine optimization, broadening reach to casual audiences and researchers alike.[132] This model promotes causal knowledge flows from individual observations to communal verification, as seen in sites like Lostpedia, where wiki tools structured fan participation to map complex narratives collaboratively.[133] By design, Fandom incentivizes ongoing updates tied to media events, ensuring dynamic relevance while mitigating obsolescence through user vigilance, though reliant on volunteer motivation for accuracy.[74]Economic and Cultural Impacts on Online Communities
Fandom's economic model predominantly relies on advertising, which constitutes a significant portion of its revenue, supported by a vast repository of volunteer-generated content spanning over 200,000 wikis and 45 million pages.[8] With approximately 350 million monthly visitors, half of whom access via mobile, the platform derives income from both endemic ads tailored to fan interests and non-endemic partnerships, enabling multimillion-dollar annual earnings through diversified streams including acquisitions like GameSpot and TV Guide.[8][6] This approach monetizes unpaid editorial labor without compensating contributors, fostering tensions as communities perceive their efforts as exploited for corporate gain.[6] The economic pressures of ad-driven revenue have manifested in degraded user experiences, characterized by intrusive placements that disrupt navigation and readability, leading to community migrations such as the Minecraft Wiki's fork to independent hosting in pursuit of ad-free environments.[6] Fandom counters these issues by prioritizing engagement metrics—such as increased pageviews per session—to sustain revenue without proliferating ad units, claiming this reduces clutter via consolidated formats like mobile drawers.[134] Nonetheless, persistent complaints highlight a causal link between profit imperatives and diminished accessibility, eroding volunteer retention and prompting forks that fragment collective knowledge bases.[8] Culturally, Fandom has amplified fan communities' role in preserving and disseminating specialized media lore, enabling collaborative documentation that shapes discourse around franchises and influences broader pop culture narratives through searchable, community-curated archives.[8] By centralizing niche expertise, it has empowered enthusiasts to engage in interpretive debates and lore expansion, contributing to the evolution of participatory fandoms where users co-create authoritative references absent from mainstream sources.[6] However, the overlay of commercial elements, including data sharing with over 300 partners, has instilled skepticism regarding content autonomy, with editorial interventions perceived as prioritizing advertiser-friendly narratives over unfiltered fan perspectives, thereby commodifying cultural production and straining communal trust.[6] This dynamic underscores a tension between scalable knowledge dissemination and the preservation of grassroots authenticity in online subcultures.[8]Comparative Analysis with Non-Profit Alternatives
Non-profit alternatives to Fandom primarily include wiki farms like Miraheze, which operates as a non-profit organization providing free, ad-free hosting for community-driven wikis using MediaWiki software.[135] Miraheze emphasizes user control and sustainability through donations, hosting thousands of wikis focused on niche topics such as fandoms, games, and encyclopedic projects, without the commercial pressures that define Fandom's operations. In contrast to Fandom's for-profit model reliant on advertising revenue exceeding $100 million annually as of recent financial disclosures, Miraheze's structure avoids intrusive ads, prioritizing content accessibility and editor autonomy.[136] A core distinction lies in monetization and user experience: Fandom integrates extensive advertisements, video players, and promotional content that often disrupt navigation and mobile viewing, leading to widespread community dissatisfaction and migrations to ad-free platforms.[137] Miraheze, by design, eliminates such elements, resulting in cleaner interfaces and faster load times, as reported in user comparisons where non-profit hosts scored higher on usability metrics like page simplicity and distraction-free reading.[138] This shift has prompted high-profile departures, such as discussions within the Minecraft community in 2023 to fork from Fandom to an independent or non-profit host, citing ad overload and layout impositions as key drivers.[139] Governance models further diverge: Fandom, as a corporate entity, retains rights to editorial interventions for compliance with monetization policies, including forced content integrations or feature removals, which have eroded trust among volunteer editors.[140] Non-profit alternatives like Miraheze delegate decision-making to community consensus via meta-wikis and grants, fostering greater transparency but requiring active donor support to maintain infrastructure; Miraheze has sustained operations since 2015 through volunteer sysops and periodic funding campaigns, avoiding profit-driven pivots.[141] Independent self-hosted wikis, often using open-source MediaWiki on non-profit or personal servers, offer maximal control but demand technical expertise, contrasting Fandom's hosted ease-of-entry that appeals to less experienced users despite its drawbacks.[142]| Aspect | Fandom (For-Profit) | Miraheze (Non-Profit) |
|---|---|---|
| Ads & Monetization | Heavy ads, video embeds; revenue-focused | Ad-free; donation-funded |
| Customization | Limited by corporate templates and policies | Extensive via extensions and skins |
| Community Control | Corporate oversight possible | Volunteer-driven governance |
| Scalability | Hosts 250,000+ wikis with commercial backing | Thousands of wikis; reliant on donations |
| User Experience | Often cluttered, mobile-challenged | Clean, customizable, faster loading |
References
- https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Skin:Monaco
- https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Fandom
- https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Wb42lheo32uo843t
