Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Streptococcus agalactiae
View on Wikipedia
| Streptococcus agalactiae | |
|---|---|
| Scientific classification | |
| Domain: | Bacteria |
| Kingdom: | Bacillati |
| Phylum: | Bacillota |
| Class: | Bacilli |
| Order: | Lactobacillales |
| Family: | Streptococcaceae |
| Genus: | Streptococcus |
| Species: | S. agalactiae
|
| Binomial name | |
| Streptococcus agalactiae Lehmann and Neumann, 1896
| |
Streptococcus agalactiae (also known as group B streptococcus or GBS) is a gram-positive coccus (round bacterium) with a tendency to form chains (as reflected by the genus name Streptococcus). It is a beta-hemolytic, catalase-negative, and facultative anaerobe.[1][2]
S. agalactiae is the most common human pathogen of streptococci belonging to group B of the Rebecca Lancefield classification of streptococci. GBS are surrounded by a bacterial capsule composed of polysaccharides (exopolysaccharide). The species is subclassified into ten serotypes (Ia, Ib, II–IX) depending on the immunologic reactivity of their polysaccharide capsule.[1][3][4]
The plural term group B streptococci (referring to the serotypes) and the singular term group B streptococcus (referring to the single species) are both commonly used synonymously with S. agalactiae even though S. halichoeri and S. pseudoporcinus are also group B Streptococci. These species test positive as group B, but are not frequently carried by humans, and only rarely cause disease.[5]
In general, GBS is a harmless commensal bacterium being part of the human microbiota colonizing the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract of up to 30% of healthy human adults (asymptomatic carriers). Nevertheless, GBS can cause severe invasive infections especially in newborns, the elderly, and people with compromised immune systems.[6]
S. agalactiae is also a common veterinary pathogen, because it can cause bovine mastitis (inflammation of the udder) in dairy cows. The species name agalactiae meaning "of no milk", alludes to this.[7]



Laboratory identification
[edit]GBS grows readily on blood agar plates as colonies surrounded by a narrow zone of β-hemolysis. GBS is characterized by the presence in the cell wall of the antigen group B of Lancefield classification (Lancefield grouping) that can be detected directly in intact bacteria using latex agglutination tests.[8][9] The CAMP test is also another important test for identification of GBS. The CAMP factor produced by GBS acts synergistically with the staphylococcal β-hemolysin inducing enhanced hemolysis of sheep or bovine erythrocytes.[8] GBS is also able to hydrolyze hippurate and this test can also be used to identify presumptively GBS.[8] Hemolytic GBS strains produce an orange-brick-red non-isoprenoid polyene (ornithine rhamnolipid) pigment (granadaene)[10] when cultivated on granada medium that allows its straightforward identification.[11] GBS can also be identified using MALDI-TOF (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight) instruments.[12] GBS colonies can additionally be identified tentatively after their appearance in chromogenic agar media, nevertheless GBS-like colonies that develop in chromogenic media should be confirmed as GBS using additional reliable tests (e.g.latex agglutination or the CAMP test) to avoid potential mis-identification.[9][13][14] A summary of the laboratory techniques for GBS identification is depicted in Ref 7. [9]
GBS colonization
[edit]GBS is a normal component of the intestinal and vaginal microbiota in some people; GBS is an asymptomatic (presenting no symptoms) colonizer of the gastrointestinal tract and vagina in up to 30% of otherwise healthy adults, including pregnant women.[3][15] GBS colonization may be permanent, intermittent or temporary. In different studies, GBS vaginal colonization rate ranges from 0% to 36%, most studies reporting colonization rates in sexually active women over 20%.[16] It has been estimated that maternal GBS colonization worldwide is 18%, with regional variation from 11% to 35%.[17] These variations in the reported prevalence of asymptomatic GBS colonization could be related to the detection methods used, and differences in populations sampled.[15][18]
Virulence
[edit]As other virulent bacteria, GBS harbors an important number of virulence factors (virulence factors are molecules produced by bacteria that enhances their capacity to infect and damage human tissues), the most important being the capsular polysaccharide (rich in sialic acid)[3][19] and a pore-forming toxin, β-hemolysin.[19][20][21] Today it is considered that GBS pigment (granadaene) and hemolysin are identical or closely related molecules.[22][23][24][25]
Sialic acid is a notable virulence factor in S. agalactiae despite being found normally in humans and many other animals. By expressing an unusually high amount of sialic acid on the bacterial cell surface, S. agalactiae can subvert the innate immune system, convincing leukocytes that the bacteria are human cells.[26][27]
GBS infection in newborns
[edit]GBS colonization of the vagina usually does not cause problems in healthy women, nevertheless during pregnancy it can sometimes cause serious illness for the mother and the newborn. GBS is the leading cause of bacterial neonatal infection in the baby during gestation and after delivery with significant mortality rates in premature infants. GBS infections in the mother can cause chorioamnionitis (a severe infection of the placental tissues) infrequently, postpartum infections (after birth) and it had been related with prematurity and fetal death.[28] GBS urinary tract infections (UTI) may also induce labor and cause premature delivery.[3] In the western world, GBS (in the absence of effective prevention measures) is the major cause of several bacterial infections of the newborn neonatal infection sepsis, pneumonia, and meningitis, which can lead to death or long-term sequelae.[3]
GBS neonatal infection typically originates in the lower reproductive tract of infected mothers. GBS infections in newborns are separated into two clinical syndromes, early-onset disease (EOD) and late-onset disease (LOD).[29] EOD manifests from 0 to 7 living days in the newborn, most of the cases of EOD being apparent within 24h of birth.[3][30][31] The most common clinical syndromes of EOD are sepsis without apparent focus, pneumonia, and less frequently meningitis. EOD is acquired vertically (vertical transmission), through exposure of the fetus or the baby to GBS from the vagina of a colonized woman, either intrautero or during birth after rupture of membranes. Infants can be infected during passage through the birth canal, nevertheless newborns that acquire GBS through this route can become only colonized, and these colonized infants habitually do not develop EOD. Roughly 50% of newborns to GBS colonized mothers are also GBS colonized and (without prevention measures) 1–2% of these newborns will develop EOD.[32]
In the past, the incidence of EOD ranged from 0.7 to 3.7 per thousand live births in the US[3] and from 0.2 to 3.25 per thousand in Europe.[18] In 2008, after widespread use of antenatal screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), the CDC reported an incidence of 0.28 cases of EOD per thousand live births in the US.[33] Multistate surveillance 2006-2015 shows a decline in EOD from 0.37 to 0.23 per 1000 live births in the US but LOD remains steady at 0.31 per 1000 live births.[34] In 2021 had been estimated a total of 1970 deaths ((0.59/100,000 population) in the US caused by GBS neonatal infections. It was estimated that 226 infants (49 per 100,000) in the United States had a clinically significant GBS infection, and that approximately 11 (2.4%) of those cases resulted in death.[35]
It has been indicated that where there was a policy of providing IAP for GBS colonized mothers the overall risk of EOGBS is 0.3%.[36]
Though maternal GBS colonization is the key determinant for EOD, other factors also increase the risk. These factors include onset of labor before 37 weeks of gestation (premature birth), prolonged rupture of membranes (≥18h before delivery), intra-partum fever (>38 °C, >100.4 °F), amniotic infections (chorioamnionitis), young maternal age, and low levels of GBS anticapsular polysaccharide antibodies in the mother.[3][30][31] Nevertheless, most babies who develop EOD are born to GBS colonized mothers without any additional risk factor.[30][31] A previous sibling with EOD is also an important risk factor for development of the infection in subsequent deliveries, probably reflecting a lack of GBS polysaccharides protective antibodies in the mother. Heavy GBS vaginal colonization is also associated with a higher risk for EOD.[30] Overall, the case–fatality rates from EOD have declined, from 50% observed in studies from the 1970s to 2 to 10% in recent years, mainly as a consequence of improvements in therapy and management. Fatal neonatal infections by GBS are more frequent among premature infants.[3][30][31][37]
GBS LOD affects infants from 7 days to 3 months of age and is more likely to cause bacteremia or meningitis. LOD can be acquired from the mother or from environmental sources. Hearing loss and mental impairment can be a long-term sequela of GBS meningitis.[3][38][39] In contrast with EOD, the incidence of LOD has remained unchanged at 0.26 per 1000 live births in the US.[40] S. agalactiae neonatal meningitis does not present with the hallmark sign of adult meningitis, a stiff neck; rather, it presents with nonspecific symptoms, such as fever, vomiting and irritability, and can consequently lead to a late diagnosis.[2]
Prevention of neonatal infection
[edit]The only reliable way to prevent EOD currently is intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), that is to say administration of antibiotics during delivery. It has been proved that intravenous penicillin or ampicillin administered for at least 4 hours before delivery to GBS colonized women is very effective at preventing vertical transmission of GBS from mother to baby and EOD. Intravenous penicillin remains the agent of choice for IAP, with intravenous ampicillin as an acceptable alternative.[3][30][31] For penicillin allergic women, the laboratory requisitions for ordering antepartum GBS screening cultures should indicate clearly the presence of penicillin allergy.[31] Cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin are used to prevent EOD in infants born to penicillin-allergic mothers.[30][31] Intravenous vancomycin is recommended for IAP in women colonized with a clindamycin-resistant Group B Streptococcus strain and a severe penicillin allergy.[29][31]
There are two ways to identify female candidates to receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis: a risk-based approach or a culture-based screening approach. The culture-based screening approach identifies candidates to receive IAP using lower vaginal and rectal cultures obtained between 36 and 37 weeks' gestation[30][31] (32–34 weeks of gestation for women with twins[41]) and IAP is administered to all GBS colonized women. The risk-based strategy identifies candidates to receive IAP by the aforementioned risk factors known to increase the probability of EOD without considering if the mother is or is not a GBS carrier.[3][42]
IAP is also recommended for women with intrapartum risk factors if their GBS carrier status is not known at the time of delivery, for women with GBS bacteriuria during their pregnancy, and for women who have had an infant with EOD previously.[citation needed]
The risk-based approach for IAP is in general less effective than the culture-based approach because in most of the cases EOD develops among newborns, which are born to mothers without risk factors.[18]
In 2010, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in collaboration with several professional groups, issued its revised GBS prevention guidelines.[30]
In 2018, the task of revising and updating the GBS prophylaxis guidelines was transferred from the CDC [43] to ACOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists), the American Academy of Pediatrics and to the American Society for Microbiology.[14][29][31]
The ACOG committee issued an update document on Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Early-Onset Disease in Newborns in 2019.[31] This document does not introduce important changes from the CDC guidelines. The key measures necessary for preventing neonatal GBS early onset disease continue to be universal prenatal screening by culture of GBS from swabs collected from the lower vagina and rectum, correct collection and microbiological processing of the samples, and proper implementation of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. The ACOG now recommends performing universal GBS screening between 36 and 37 weeks of gestation. This new recommendation provides a five-week window [44] for valid culture results that includes births that occur up to a gestational age of at least 41 weeks.
The culture-based screening approach is followed in most developed countries[45] such as the United States,[29][30][31] France,[46] Spain,[47] Belgium,[48] Canada, Argentina,[49] and Australia. The risk-based strategy is followed in the United Kingdom,[41][50] and the Netherlands.[18][51]
Screening for GBS colonization
[edit]Though the GBS colonization status of women can change during pregnancy, cultures to detect GBS carried out ≤5 weeks before delivery predict quite accurately the GBS carrier status at delivery.[citation needed]
In contrast, if the prenatal culture is performed more than five weeks before delivery it is unreliable for predicting accurately the GBS carrier status at delivery.[30][31][44][52][53]
The clinical specimens recommended for culture of GBS at 36–37 weeks' gestation, this recommendation provides a 5-week window for valid culture results that includes births that occur up to a gestational age of at least 41 weeks [31] (32–34 weeks of gestation for women with twins[41]) are swabs collected the lower vagina (near the introitus) and then from the rectum (through the anal sphincter) without use of a speculum.[30][31] Vaginal-rectal samples should be collected using a flocked swab preferably, since flocked swabs releases samples and microorganisms more effectively than fiber swabs.[14]
Following the recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of United States (CDC) these swabs should be placed into a non-nutritive transport medium and later inoculated into a selective enrichment broth, Todd Hewitt broth with selective antibiotics (enrichment culture).[30] After incubation the enrichment broth is subcultured to blood agar plates and GBS like colonies are identified by the CAMP test or using latex agglutination with GBS antisera. After incubation the enrichment broth can also be subcultured to granada medium agar [11] where GBS grows as pink-red colonies or to chromogenic agars, where GBS grows as colored colonies.[9][30] GBS-like colonies that develop in chromogenic media should be confirmed as GBS using additional reliable tests to avoid mis-identification.[9]
Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA hybridization probes have been developed for identifying GBS directly from recto-vaginal samples, but they have a high false negative rate, and still cannot replace antenatal culture for the most accurate detection of GBS carriers. This technology to detect GBS must be improved and simplified to make the method cost-effective and useful as a point-of-care test. Nevertheless These tests can also be used to detect GBS directly from broth media, after the enrichment step, avoiding the subculture of the incubated enrichment broth to an appropriate agar plate.[14]


Vaccination
[edit]Though IAP for EOD prevention is associated with a large decline in the incidence of the disease, there is, however, no effective strategy for preventing late-onset neonatal GBS disease.[54]
Vaccination is considered an ideal solution to prevent not only EOD and LOD but also GBS infections in adults at risk.[55] Nevertheless, though research and clinical trials for the development of an effective vaccine to prevent GBS infections are underway, no vaccine was available in 2023.[56][57][58][59] The capsular polysaccharide of GBS is not only an important GBS virulence factor but it is also an excellent candidate for the development of an effective vaccine.[18][60][61][62] Protein-based vaccines are also in development.[56][63][58][64]
GBS infection in adults
[edit]GBS is also an important infectious agent able to cause invasive infections in adults. Serious life-threatening invasive GBS infections are increasingly recognized in the elderly and individuals compromised by underlying diseases such as diabetes, cirrhosis and cancer.[65] GBS infections in adults include urinary tract infection, skin and soft-tissue infection (skin and skin structure infection) bacteremia, osteomyelitis, meningitis and endocarditis.[6] GBS infection in adults can be serious and related with high mortality. In general penicillin is the antibiotic of choice for treatment of GBS infection.[66][67] Gentamicin (for synergy with penicillin G or ampicillin) can also be used in patients with life-threatening invasive GBS.[66]
Non-human infections
[edit]Streptococcus agalactiae was historically studied as a disease of cattle that harmed milk production, leading to its name "agalactiae" which means "absence of milk". Strains of bovine and human bacteria are generally interchangeable, with evidence of transmission from animals to humans and vice versa.[68]
Cattle
[edit]GBS is a major cause of mastitis (an infection of the udder) in dairy cattle and an important source of economic loss for the industry. GBS in cows can either produce an acute febrile disease or a subacute more chronic condition. Both lead to diminishing milk production (hence its name: agalactiae meaning "of no milk").[69] Outbreaks in herds are common, so this is of major importance for the dairy industry, and programs to reduce the impact of S. agalactiae disease have been enforced in many countries over the last 40 years.[7][68]
Other animals
[edit]GBS also causes severe epidemics in farmed fish, causing sepsis and external and internal hemorrhages, having been reported from wild and captive fish involved in epizootics in many countries.[70][71] Vaccination is an effective method to prevent pathogenic diseases in aquaculture and different kinds vaccines to prevent GBS infections have been developed recently.[72]
GBS has also been found in many other animals, such as camels, dogs, cats, crocodiles, seals, elephants and dolphins.[73][74]
References
[edit]- ^ a b Whiley RA, Hardie JM (2009). Genus I. Streptococcus Rosenbach 1884. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology: Vol 3: The Firmicutes (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 655–711. ISBN 978-0-387-95041-9.
- ^ a b Ryan KJ, Ray CG, et al., eds. (2004). Sherris Medical Microbiology (4th ed.). McGraw Hill. pp. 286–8. ISBN 978-0-8385-8529-0.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Edwards MS, Nizet V (2011). Group B streptococcal infections. Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant (7th ed.). Elsevier. pp. 419–469. ISBN 978-0-443-06839-3.
- ^ Slotved HC, Kong F, Lambertsen L, Sauer S, Gilbert GL (2007). "Serotype IX, a proposed new Streptococcus agalactiae serotype". J Clin Microbiol. 45 (9): 2929–2936. doi:10.1128/jcm.00117-07. PMC 2045254. PMID 17634306.
- ^ "Guidelines for the Detection and Identification of Group B Streptococcus" (PDF). The American Society for Microbiology. July 23, 2021.
- ^ a b Edwards MS, Baker CJ (2010). "Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococcus)". In Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (eds.). Principles and practice of infectious diseases (7th. ed.). Elsevier. pp. Cap. 202. ISBN 978-0-443-06839-3.
- ^ a b Keefe GP (1997). "Streptococcus agalactiae mastitis: a review". Can Vet J. 38 (7): 199–204. PMC 1576741. PMID 9220132.
- ^ a b c Tille P. (2014). Bailey & Scott's Diagnostic Microbiology (13th ed.). Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-323-08330-0.
- ^ a b c d e Rosa-Fraile M, Spellerberg B (2017). "Reliable Detection of Group B Streptococcus in the Clinical Laboratory". J Clin Microbiol. 55 (9): 2590–2598. doi:10.1128/JCM.00582-17. PMC 5648696. PMID 28659318.
- ^ Rosa-Fraile M, Rodríguez-Granger J, Haidour-Benamin A, Cuerva JM, Sampedro A (2006). "Granadaene: Proposed Structure of the Group B Streptococcus Polyenic Pigment". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 72 (9): 6367–6370. Bibcode:2006ApEnM..72.6367R. doi:10.1128/AEM.00756-06. PMC 1563658. PMID 16957264.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Rosa-Fraile M, Rodriguez-Granger J, Cueto-Lopez M, Sampedro A, Biel Gaye E, Haro M, Andreu A (1999). "Use of Granada medium to detect group B streptococcal colonization in pregnant women". J Clin Microbiol. 37 (8): 2674–2677. doi:10.1128/JCM.37.8.2674-2677.1999. PMC 85311. PMID 10405420.
- ^ To KN, Cornwell E, Daniel R, Goonesekera S, Jauneikaite E, Chalker V, Le Doare K (2019). "Evaluation of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for the Identification of Group B Streptococcus". BMC Res. Notes. 12 (1): 85. doi:10.1186/s13104-019-4119-1. PMC 6376729. PMID 30764872.
- ^ El Aila NA, Tency I, Claeys G, Saerens B, Cools P, Verstraelen H, Temmerman M, Verhelst R, Vaneechoutte M (2010). "Comparison of different sampling techniques and of different culture methods for detection of group B streptococcus carriage in pregnant women". BMC Infectious Diseases. 10: 285. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-10-285. PMC 2956727. PMID 20920213.
- ^ a b c d Filkins L, Hauser J, Robinson-Dunn Tibbetts R, Boyanton B, Revell P. "Guidelines for the Detection and Identification of Group B Streptococcus. March 10, 2020" (PDF). American Society for Microbiology. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 June 2021. Retrieved 7 January 2021.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Barcaite E, Bartusevicius A, Tameliene R, Kliucinskas M, Maleckiene L, Nadisauskiene R (2008). "Prevalence of maternal group B streptococcal colonization in European countries". Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 87 (3): 260–271. doi:10.1080/00016340801908759. PMID 18307064. S2CID 25897076.
- ^ Pignanelli S, Pulcrano G, Schiavone P, Di Santo A, Zaccherini P (2015). "Selectivity evaluation of a new chromogenic medium to detect group B Streptococcus". Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 58 (1): 45–7. doi:10.4103/0377-4929.151186. PMID 25673591.
- ^ Russell NJ, Seale AC, O'Driscoll M, O'Sullivan C, Bianchi-Jassir F, Gonzalez-Guarin J, Lawn JE, Baker CJ, Bartlett L, Cutland C, Gravett MG, Heath PT, Le Doare K, Madhi SA, Rubens CE, Schrag S, Sobanjo-Ter Meulen A, Vekemans J, Saha SK, Ip M (2017). "Maternal Colonization With Group B Streptococcus and Serotype Distribution Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses". Clinical Infectious Diseases. 65 (Suppl 2): S100 – S111. doi:10.1093/cid/cix658. PMC 5848259. PMID 29117327.
- ^ a b c d e Rodriguez-Granger J, Alvargonzalez JC, Berardi A, Berner R, Kunze M, Hufnagel M, Melin P, Decheva A, Orefici G, Poyart C, Telford J, Efstratiou A, Killian M, Krizova P, Baldassarri L, Spellerberg B, Puertas A, Rosa-Fraile M (2012). "Prevention of group B streptococcal neonatal disease revisited. The DEVANI European project". Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 31 (9): 2097–2114. doi:10.1007/s10096-012-1559-0. hdl:11380/1168706. PMID 22314410. S2CID 15588906.
- ^ a b Rajagopal L (2009). "Understanding the regulation of Group B Streptococcal virulence factors". Future Microbiol. 4 (2): 201–221. doi:10.2217/17460913.4.2.201. PMC 2691590. PMID 19257847.
- ^ Armistead B, Oler E, Adams Waldorf K, Rajagopal (2019). "The Double Life of Group B Streptococcus: Asymptomatic Colonizer and Potent Pathogen»". J. Mol. Biol. 431 (16): 2914–2931. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.035. PMC 6646060. PMID 30711542.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Armistead B, Whidbey C, Iyer LM, Herrero-Foncubierta P, Quach P, Haidour A, Aravind L, Cuerva JM, Jaspan HB and Rajagopal L (2020). "The cyl Genes Reveal the Biosynthetic and Evolutionary Origins of the Group B Streptococcus Hemolytic Lipid, Granadaene". Front. Microbiol. 10: 3123. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.03123. PMC 6985545. PMID 32038561.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Rosa-Fraile M, Dramsi S, Spellerberg B (2014). "Group B streptococcal haemolysin and pigment, a tale of twins". FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 38 (5): 932–946. doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12071. PMC 4315905. PMID 24617549.
- ^ Whidbey C, Harrell MI, Burnside K, Ngo L, Becraft AK, Iyer LM, Aravind L, Hitti J, Waldorf KM, Rajagopal L (2013). "A hemolytic pigment of Group B Streptococcus allows bacterial penetration of human placenta". J Exp Med. 210 (6): 1265–1281. doi:10.1084/jem.20122753. PMC 3674703. PMID 23712433.
- ^ Whidbey C, Vornhagen J, Gendrin C, Boldenow E, Samson JM, Doering K, Ngo L, Ezekwe EA Jr, Gundlach JH, Elovitz MA, Liggitt D, Duncan JA, Adams Waldorf KM, Rajagopal L (2015). "A streptococcal lipid toxin induces membrane permeabilization and pyroptosis leading to fetal injury". EMBO Mol. Med. 7 (4): 488–505. doi:10.15252/emmm.201404883. PMC 4403049. PMID 25750210.
- ^ Leclercq SY, Sullivan MJ, Ipe DS, Smith JP, Cripps AW, Ulett GC (2016). "Pathogenesis of Streptococcus urinary tract infection depends on bacterial strain and β-hemolysin/cytolysin that mediates cytotoxicity, cytokine synthesis, inflammation and virulence". Sci. Rep. 6 29000. Bibcode:2016NatSR...629000L. doi:10.1038/srep29000. PMC 4935997. PMID 27383371.
- ^ Landwehr-Kenzel, Sybille; Henneke, Philipp (2014-10-29). "Interaction of Streptococcus agalactiae and Cellular Innate Immunity in Colonization and Disease". Frontiers in Immunology. 5: 519. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00519. ISSN 1664-3224. PMC 4212683. PMID 25400631.
- ^ Severi, Emmanuele; Hood, Derek W.; Thomas, Gavin H. (2007-09-01). "Sialic acid utilization by bacterial pathogens". Microbiology. 153 (9): 2817–2822. doi:10.1099/mic.0.2007/009480-0. ISSN 1350-0872. PMID 17768226.
- ^ Muller AE, Oostvogel PM, Steegers EA, Dörr PJ (2006). "Morbidity related to maternal group B streptococcal infections". Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 85 (9): 1027–1037. doi:10.1080/00016340600780508. PMID 16929406. S2CID 11745321.
- ^ a b c d Puopolo KM, Lynfield R, Cummings JJ, AAP COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, AAP COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES. (2019). "Management of Infants at Risk for Group B Streptococcal Disease" (PDF). Pediatrics. 144 (2): e20191881. doi:10.1542/peds.2019-1881. PMID 31285392. S2CID 195843897. Retrieved 7 January 2021.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ (2010). "Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: revised guidelines from CDC, 2010" (PDF). MMWR Recomm Rep. 59(RR-10): 1–32.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o ACOG. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2019). "Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Early-Onset Disease in Newborns: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 782". Obstetrics & Gynecology. 134 (1): e19 – e40. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003334. PMID 31241599. S2CID 195659363.
- ^ Boyer KM, Gotoff SP (1985). "Strategies for Chemoprophylaxis of GBS Early-Onset Infections". Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Infections. Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. Vol. 35. pp. 267–280. doi:10.1159/000410380. ISBN 978-3-8055-3953-1. PMID 3931544.
- ^ CDC. "Group B Strep (GBS)-Clinical Overview". Retrieved 27 Oct 2015.
- ^ Nanduri SA, Petit S, Smelser C, Apostol M, Alden NB, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Vagnone PS, Burzlaff K, Spina NL, Dufort EM, Schaffner W, Thomas AR, Farley MM, Jain JH, Pondo T, McGee L, Beall BW, Schrag SJ. (2019). "Epidemiology of Invasive Early-Onset and Late-Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease in the United States, 2006 to 2015: Multistate Laboratory and Population-Based Surveillance". JAMA Pediatr. 173 (3): 224–233. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4826. PMC 6439883. PMID 30640366.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Report, Emerging Infections Program Network, Group B Streptococcus, 2021" (PDF). Retrieved 14 July 2024.
- ^ Russell NJ, Seale AC, O'Sullivan C, Le Doare K, Heath PT, Lawn JE, Bartlett L, Cutland C, Gravett M, Ip M, Madhi SA, Rubens CE, Saha SK, Schrag S, Sobanjo-Ter Meulen A, Vekemans J, Baker CJ (2017). "Risk of Early-Onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease With Maternal Colonization Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses". Clin Infect Dis. 65, Suppl 2 (suppl_2): S152 – S159. doi:10.1093/cid/cix655. PMC 5850448. PMID 29117325.
- ^ Edmond KM, Kortsalioudaki C, Scott S, Schrag SJ, Zaidi AK, Cousens S, Heath PT (2012). "Group B streptococcal disease in infants aged younger than 3 months: systematic review and meta-analysis" (PDF). Lancet. 379 (9815): 547–556. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61651-6. PMID 22226047. S2CID 15438484.
- ^ Libster, R; Edwards, KM; Levent, F; Edwards, MS; Rench, MA; Castagnini, LA; Cooper, T; Sparks, RC; Baker, CJ; Shah, PE (July 2012). "Long-term outcomes of group B streptococcal meningitis". Pediatrics. 130 (1): e8–15. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-3453. PMID 22689869. S2CID 1013682.
- ^ Kohli-Lynch M, Russell NJ, Seale AC, Dangor Z, Tann CJ, Baker CJ, Bartlett L, Cutland C, Gravett MG, Heath PT, Ip M, Le Doare K, Madhi SA, Rubens CE, Saha SK, Schrag S, Sobanjo-Ter Meulen A, Vekemans J, O'Sullivan C, Nakwa F, Ben Hamouda H, Soua H, Giorgakoudi K, Ladhani S, Lamagni T, Rattue H, Trotter C, Lawn JE (2017). "Neurodevelopmental Impairment in Children After Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses". Clinical Infectious Diseases. 65 (Suppl. 2): S190 – S199. doi:10.1093/cid/cix663. PMC 5848372. PMID 29117331.
- ^ Baker CJ (2013). "The spectrum of perinatal group B streptococcal disease". Vaccine. 31 (Suppl 4): D3 – D6. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.030. PMID 23973344.
- ^ a b c Huges RG, Brocklehurst P, Steer PJ, Heath P, Stenson BM (2017). "Prevention of Early-onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease Green-top Guideline No. 36 September 2017". BJOG. 124 (12). Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: e280 – e305. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14821. PMID 28901693.
- ^ Clifford V, Garland SM, Grimwood K (2011). "Prevention of neonatal group B streptococcus disease in the 21st century". J Paediatr Child Health. 48 (9): 808–815. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02203.x. PMID 22151082. S2CID 36906520.
- ^ CDC. "Prevention Guidelines. 2019 Guidelines Update". Retrieved 4 March 2021.
- ^ a b Yancey MK, Schuchat A, Brown LK, Ventura VL, Markenson GR (1996). "The accuracy of late antenatal screening cultures in predicting genital group B streptococcal colonization at delivery". Obstetrics & Gynecology. 88 (5): 811–815. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(96)00320-1. PMID 8885919.
- ^ Le Doare K, O'Driscoll M, Turner K, Seedat F, Russell NJ, Seale AC, Heath PT, Lawn JE, Baker CJ, Bartlett L, Cutland C, Gravett MG, Ip M, Madhi SA, Rubens CE, Saha SK, Schrag S, Sobanjo-Ter Meulen A, Vekemans J, Kampmann B, et al. (GBS Intrapartum Antibiotic Investigator Group) (2017). "Intrapartum Antibiotic Chemoprophylaxis Policies for the Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review". Clin Infect Dis. 65 (Suppl.2): S143 – S151. doi:10.1093/cid/cix654. PMC 5850619. PMID 29117324.
- ^ Agence Nationale d'Accreditation et d'Evaluation en Santé. "Prévention anténatale du risque infectieux bactérien néonatal précoce. 2001" (PDF). Retrieved 22 December 2017.
- ^ Alós Cortés JI, Andreu Domingo A, Arribas Mir L, Cabero Roura L, Cueto Lopez M, López Sastre J, Melchor Marcos JC, Puertas Prieto A, de la Rosa Fraile M, Salcedo Abizanda S, Sánchez Luna M, Sánchez Pérez MJ, Torrejón Cardoso R (2012). "Prevención de la infección perinatal por estreptococo del grupo B. Recomendaciones españolas revisadas 2012" (PDF). Rev Esp Quimioter. 25 (1): 79–88. PMID 22488547. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
- ^ Belgian Health Council. "PREVENTION OF PERINATAL GROUP B STREPTOCOCCAL INFECTIONS. Guidelines from the Belgian Health Council, 2003" (PDF). Retrieved 22 December 2017.
- ^ Ministerio de Salud de la Nación. Dirección Nacional de Salud Materno Infantil. Argentina. "Recomendaciones para la prevención, diagnóstico y tratamiento de la infección neonatal precoz por Estreptococo β Hemolítico del Grupo B (EGB)" (PDF). Retrieved 2 December 2019.
- ^ RCOG and GBSS UK. "Group B Streptococcus (GBS) in pregnancy and newborn babies" (PDF). Retrieved 7 January 2021.
- ^ M Trijbels-Smeulders, G A de Jonge, P C M Pasker-de Jong, L J Gerards, A H Adriaanse, R A vanLingen, L A A Kolle´e (2007). "Epidemiology of neonatal group B streptococcal disease in theNetherlands before and after introduction of guidelines for prevention". Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 92 (4): F271 – F276. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.088799. PMC 2675425. PMID 17227807.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Valkenburg-van den Berg AW, Houtman-Roelofsen RL, Oostvogel PM, Dekker FW, Dorr PJ, Sprij AJ (2010). "Timing of group B streptococcus screening in pregnancy: a systematic review". Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 69 (3): 174–183. doi:10.1159/000265942. PMID 20016190. S2CID 26709882.
- ^ Virranniemi M, Raudaskoski T, Haapsamo M, Kauppila J, Renko M, Peltola J, Risteli L, Laatio L (2019). "The effect of screening-to-labor interval on the sensitivity of late-pregnancy culture in the prediction of group B streptococcus colonization at labor: A prospective multicenter cohort study". Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 98 (4): 494–499. doi:10.1111/aogs.13522. PMID 30578547. S2CID 58106301.
- ^ Jordan HT, Farley MM, Craig A, Mohle-Boetani J, Harrison LH, Petit S, Lynfield R, Thomas A, Zansky S, Gershman K, Albanese BA, Schaffner W, Schrag SJ (2008). "Revisiting the need for vaccine prevention of late-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease: a multistate, population-based analysis". Pediatr Infect Dis J. 27 (12): 1057–1064. doi:10.1097/inf.0b013e318180b3b9. PMID 18989238. S2CID 1533957.
- ^ Edwards MS, Rench MA, Rinaudo CD, Fabbrini M, Tuscano G, Buffi G, Bartolini E, Bonacci S, Baker CJ, Margarit I (2016). "Immune Responses to Invasive Group B Streptococcal Disease in Adults". Emerg Infect Dis. 22 (11): 1877–1883. doi:10.3201/eid2211.160914. PMC 5088039. PMID 27767008.
- ^ a b Heath PT (2016). "Status of vaccine research and development of vaccines for GBS". Vaccine. 34 (26): 2876–2879. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.12.072. PMID 26988258.
- ^ Davies HG, Carreras-Abad C, Le Doare K, Heath PT (2019). "Group B Streptococcus: Trials and Tribulations" (PDF). Pediatr Infect Dis J. 38 (6S Suppl 1): S72 – S76. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000002328. PMID 31205250.
- ^ a b Carreras-Abad C, Ramkhelawon L, Heath PT, Le Doare K. (2020). "A Vaccine Against Group B Streptococcus: Recent Advances". Infect Drug Resist. 13: 1263–1272. doi:10.2147/IDR.S203454. PMC 7196769. PMID 32425562.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Madhi SA (June 2023). "Potential for Maternally Administered Vaccines for Infant Group B Streptococcus". New England Journal of Medicine. 389 (3): 215–227. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2116045. hdl:2263/94684. PMID 37467497. S2CID 259995252.
- ^ Baker CJ, Carey VJ, Rench MA, Edwards MS, Hillier SH, Kasper DL, Platt R (2014). "Maternal Antibody at Delivery Protects Neonates From Early Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease". J Infect Dis. 209 (5): 781–788. doi:10.1093/infdis/jit549. PMC 3923540. PMID 24133184.
- ^ Edwards MS, Gonik B (2013). "Preventing the broad spectrum of perinatal morbidity and mortality throughgh group B streptococcal vaccination". Vaccine. 31S: D66–71. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.046. PMID 23200934.
- ^ Madhi, Shabir A; Cutland, Clare L; Jose, Lisa; Koen, Anthonet; Govender, Niresha; Wittke, Frederick; Olugbosi, Morounfolu; Meulen, Ajoke Sobanjo-ter; Baker, Sherryl; Dull, Peter M; Narasimhan, Vas; Slobod, Karen (2016). "Safety and immunogenicity of an investigational maternal trivalent group B streptococcus vaccine in healthy women and their infants: a randomised phase 1b/2 trial". The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 16 (8): 923–934. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00152-3. ISSN 1473-3099. PMID 27139805.
- ^ Song JY, Lim JH, Lim S, Yong Z, Seo HS (2018). "Progress toward a group B streptococcal vaccine". Hum Vaccin Immunother. 14 (11): 2669–2681. doi:10.1080/21645515.2018.1493326. PMC 6314413. PMID 29995578.
- ^ Dominguez K, Randis TM. (2022). "Toward the development of a protein-based group B Streptococcus vaccine". Cell Rep Med. 3 (2) 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100536. doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100536. PMC 8861943. PMID 35243427.
- ^ Elena Graux, Maya Hites, Delphine Martiny, Evelyne Maillart, Marc Delforge, Pierrette Melin, Nicolas Dauby. (2020). "Invasive group B Streptococcus among non-pregnant adults in Brussels-Capital Region, 2005-2019". Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 173 (Sep 17, 1–9): 224–233. doi:10.1007/s10096-020-04041-0. PMC 6439883. PMID 30640366.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Edwards MS; . Baker CJ (2005). "Group B streptococcal infections in elderly adults". Clin Infect Dis. 41 (6): 839–847. doi:10.1086/432804. PMID 16107984.
- ^ Farley MM (2001). "Group B Streptococcal Disease in Nonpregnant Adults". Clinical Infectious Diseases. 33 (4): 556–561. doi:10.1086/322696. PMID 11462195.
- ^ a b Crestani, Chiara; Forde, Taya L.; Lycett, Samantha J.; Holmes, Mark A.; Fasth, Charlotta; Persson-Waller, Karin; Zadoks, Ruth N. (2021). "The fall and rise of group B Streptococcus in dairy cattle: Reintroduction due to human-to-cattle host jumps?". Microbial Genomics. 7 (9). doi:10.1099/mgen.0.000648. PMC 8715428. PMID 34486971.
- ^ Ruegg PL. (2017). "A 100-Year Review: Mastitis detection, management, and prevention". J. Dairy Sci. 100 (10381–10397): 10381–10397. doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13023. PMID 29153171. Retrieved 22 November 2019.
- ^ Evans JJ, Klesius PH, Pasnik DJ, Bohnsack JF (2009). "Human Streptococcus agalactiae isolate in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)". Emerg Infect Dis. 15 (5): 774–776. doi:10.3201/eid1505.080222. PMC 2687030. PMID 19402966.
- ^ Liu G, Zhang W, Lu C (2013). "Comparative genomics analysis of Streptococcus". BMC Genomics. 14: 775. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-775. PMC 3831827. PMID 24215651.
- ^ Liu G, Zhu J, Chen K, Gao T, Yao H, Liu Y, Zhang W, Lu C (2016). "Development of Streptococcus agalactiae vaccines for tilapia". Dis Aquat Org. 122 (2): 163–170. doi:10.3354/dao03084. PMID 28000606.
- ^ Delannoy CMJ, Crumlish M, Fontaine MC, Pollock J, Foster G, Dagleish MP, Turnbull JF, Zadoks RN (2013). "Human Streptococcus agalactiae strains in aquatic mammal and fish". BMC Microbiology. 13: 41. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-13-41. PMC 3585737. PMID 23419028.
- ^ Eisenberg T, Rau J, Westerhüs U, Knauf-Witzens T, Fawzy A, Schlez K, Zschöck M, Prenger-Berninghoff E, Heydel C, Sting R, Glaeser SP, Pulami D, van der Linden M, Ewers C (2017). "Streptococcus agalactiae in elephants. A comparative study with isolates from human and zoo animal and livestock origin". Vet. Microbiol. 204: 141–150. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.04.018. PMID 28532793.
External links
[edit]Streptococcus agalactiae
View on GrokipediaBiology and Classification
Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Streptococcus agalactiae is a Gram-positive, facultative anaerobic coccus belonging to the genus Streptococcus in the family Streptococcaceae and the phylum Bacillota.[5] It is characterized by its chain-forming arrangement and beta-hemolytic activity on blood agar.[1] This classification places it among the pyogenic streptococci, distinguished by itsLancefield grouping based on cell wall antigens.[6] The bacterium was first identified in 1887 by Nocard and Mollereau as the causative agent of bovine mastitis, initially termed "Streptococcus de la mammite."[7] In 1896, Lehmann and Neumann formally named it Streptococcus agalactiae, reflecting its association with agalactia, a form of mastitis that prevents lactation in cows. This nomenclature highlights its historical veterinary significance, though it later emerged as a human pathogen.[8]- S. agalactiae* is designated as Lancefield Group B Streptococcus (GBS) due to a specific polysaccharide antigen in its cell wall, composed of rhamnose, galactose, N-acetylglucosamine, and glucitol.[6] This antigen differentiates it from other beta-hemolytic streptococci, such as Group A (S. pyogenes), which has a distinct carbohydrate structure.[1] The Group B antigen is universally present in GBS strains and serves as a key diagnostic marker.[9]
Morphology and Physiology
Streptococcus agalactiae is a Gram-positive coccus measuring 0.6 to 1.2 μm in diameter, typically appearing as spherical or ovoid cells arranged in pairs or short chains in clinical specimens and longer chains in laboratory culture.[13] The bacterium features a thick peptidoglycan layer in its cell wall, characteristic of Gram-positive organisms.[6] The species is non-motile and catalase-negative, distinguishing it from other cocci such as staphylococci.[14] S. agalactiae is surrounded by a polysaccharide capsule that enables classification into serotypes Ia, Ib, II–IX based on antigenic variation, with serotype III commonly associated with neonatal infections (detailed serotyping methods are covered in the Identification and Diagnosis section).[1] On sheep blood agar, S. agalactiae displays beta-hemolysis, manifesting as clear zones around colonies due to the production of hemolysins, including the CAMP factor that synergistically enhances hemolysis when in proximity to Staphylococcus aureus.[1][15] As a facultative anaerobe, S. agalactiae grows optimally at 35–37°C under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, forming small, translucent colonies on enriched media like blood agar.[13] It does not grow in 6.5% NaCl broth, unlike enterococci, but some strains may show limited tolerance; the bacterium is negative for bile-esculin hydrolysis, failing to grow or hydrolyze esculin in the presence of bile salts.[16] Biochemically, S. agalactiae ferments carbohydrates such as lactose, salicin (variable), and trehalose, producing acid but not sorbitol.[17] Regarding antibiotic susceptibility, S. agalactiae is generally susceptible to penicillin G and ampicillin, serving as the primary therapeutic agents, though nonsusceptibility to penicillin has been reported in certain regions as of 2025; however, resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin has increased in certain strains, particularly those from colonized pregnant women, necessitating susceptibility testing for alternative therapies.[1][18][19]Identification and Diagnosis
Laboratory Identification Methods
Laboratory identification of Streptococcus agalactiae, also known as Group B Streptococcus (GBS), relies on a combination of culture-based isolation and confirmatory biochemical or antigen detection tests to distinguish it from other streptococci and commensal flora in clinical samples. Standard protocols emphasize enrichment culture to enhance sensitivity, particularly for colonization screening, followed by subculture on selective or differential media. These methods are outlined in guidelines from authoritative bodies such as the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).[20] Common sample types include vaginal-rectal swabs for antenatal colonization screening in pregnant individuals, typically collected at 36-37 weeks gestation using a single flocked swab placed in Amies transport medium and processed within 24 hours. For invasive disease, samples such as blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or amniotic fluid are used, often with direct plating if bacterial load is high. To address low-burden infections, samples are first inoculated into selective enrichment broth, such as Todd-Hewitt broth supplemented with gentamicin (8 mg/L) and nalidixic acid (15 mg/L), and incubated at 35-37°C for 18-24 hours before subculture. This step improves detection rates to over 96% sensitivity by allowing GBS growth while inhibiting competing flora.[9] Isolation proceeds by streaking the enriched broth onto nonselective sheep blood agar, which reveals small, translucent colonies with beta-hemolysis (clear zones around colonies due to the organism's hemolysin), or onto selective chromogenic media such as Granada agar or Brilliance GBS agar. On Granada agar, GBS typically produces distinctive orange-pigmented colonies within 24-48 hours of incubation at 35-37°C in 5% CO2, enabling presumptive identification with sensitivities exceeding 95% in validated studies; non-pigmented variants require further testing. Blood agar incubation under the same conditions yields beta-hemolytic colonies in 24-48 hours, though chromogenic media reduce false positives from other beta-hemolytic streptococci. Suspect colonies are then Gram-stained to confirm Gram-positive cocci in chains.[9][21] Confirmatory biochemical tests are essential for definitive identification. The CAMP test, performed on sheep blood agar by streaking a beta-hemolytic Staphylococcus aureus perpendicular to the suspect GBS streak, yields a characteristic arrowhead-shaped enhanced hemolysis zone after 24 hours at 35°C, with high specificity (over 95%) for GBS. Hippurate hydrolysis is positive, detected by enzymatic breakdown of hippurate to glycine (confirmed via ninhydrin reagent), a trait shared by few other streptococci. The pyrrolidonyl arylamidase (PYR) test is negative for GBS, aiding differentiation from Group A Streptococcus. Unlike Group A, GBS is resistant to bacitracin (no inhibition zone on disk diffusion), further supporting identification. These tests, when combined, provide robust confirmation from pure cultures.[22][9] Rapid antigen detection via latex agglutination targets the Group B polysaccharide antigen extracted from colonies or enriched broth. In this assay, bacterial extracts are mixed with latex particles coated with Group B-specific antibodies; visible agglutination within minutes confirms GBS with specificities near 100%, though it requires prior culture for optimal sensitivity (around 90%). Direct testing from primary specimens is not recommended due to insufficient sensitivity (less than 50% for colonization). For intrapartum rapid detection when antenatal screening status is unknown (e.g., preterm labor), nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) such as real-time PCR (e.g., Xpert Xpress GBS) can be used directly on vaginal-rectal swabs, providing results in 30-60 minutes with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 95%. However, NAATs are not recommended for routine antenatal screening due to cost and lack of antimicrobial susceptibility testing capability; culture remains the gold standard. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) offers an alternative rapid method, providing species-level identification from colonies in under 10 minutes with accuracy exceeding 99%, but it necessitates pure isolates and specialized equipment.[9][23][24] Limitations of these methods include potential overgrowth by normal vaginal or rectal flora in mixed cultures, necessitating selective enrichment and careful subculturing to avoid false negatives. Non-hemolytic or pigment-negative GBS strains may evade presumptive detection on chromogenic media, requiring biochemical confirmation. Additionally, while culture remains the gold standard for enabling antimicrobial susceptibility testing, delays of 24-48 hours can impact timely clinical decisions in invasive cases.[9]Serotyping and Molecular Typing
Serotyping of Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus, GBS) is primarily based on the antigenic variation in its capsular polysaccharide (CPS), which defines 10 distinct serotypes: Ia, Ib, and II through IX.[25] These serotypes are determined by the structure of polysaccharides encoded by the cps operon, a genomic locus responsible for capsule biosynthesis. Traditional phenotypic methods, such as latex agglutination using antisera specific to each CPS type, have been the standard for serotyping, offering rapid identification but limited by issues like non-typeable strains (up to 10-15% of isolates) due to poor capsule expression or antigenic cross-reactivity. Genotypic approaches, including multiplex PCR targeting cps genes (e.g., cpsA for serotype identification and specific primers for subtypes), provide higher resolution and accuracy, with concordance rates exceeding 95% compared to phenotypic methods, and are particularly useful for non-typeable isolates.[26] Globally, serotypes Ia, III, and V predominate in human infections, accounting for approximately 19%, 25%, and 17-25% of maternal colonization and invasive disease isolates, respectively (as of a 2020 systematic review), though distributions remain largely stable in recent surveillance data and vary by region and population (e.g., higher serotype VI-IX prevalence in Asia).[25][27] Molecular typing methods have largely supplanted or complemented serotyping since the early 2000s, enabling finer-scale strain differentiation for epidemiological tracking. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST), established in 2003, sequences alleles of seven housekeeping genes (adhP, pheS, atr, glnA, sdhA, glcK, and tkt) to assign sequence types (STs) and define clonal complexes (CCs), revealing population structure with high reproducibility. For instance, CC17, predominantly serotype III, is a hypervirulent lineage associated with neonatal meningitis and late-onset disease, characterized by enhanced invasiveness due to specific virulence factors like the hypervirulent GBS adhesin (HvgA).[28] This shift from phenotypic to genotypic typing post-2000s improved resolution, as MLST identifies outbreak clones and host-specific adaptations (e.g., CC67 in bovine isolates) that serotyping alone cannot distinguish, with over 500 STs cataloged in public databases.[29] Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) represents an emerging, comprehensive approach for GBS typing, integrating serotype, MLST, and additional markers like pilus islands and antimicrobial resistance genes for surveillance. WGS identifies the three main pilus islands—PI-1 (present in ~70% of isolates, aiding adhesion), PI-2a (~79%, linked to early-onset neonatal disease), and PI-2b (~21%, enriched in CC17 and late-onset cases)—which are genomic islets encoding surface pili critical for host colonization and immune evasion.[30] It also detects resistance determinants, such as erm genes for macrolide resistance, facilitating outbreak investigations with near-perfect concordance (99.8%) to PCR-based methods.Epidemiology
Human Colonization Patterns
Streptococcus agalactiae, commonly known as group B Streptococcus (GBS), colonizes the rectovaginal tract asymptomatically in 10-30% of healthy non-pregnant adults worldwide, with primary reservoirs in the gastrointestinal and genitourinary sites.[31] In pregnant women, colonization prevalence is higher, ranging from 18% globally to 10-35% when screened at 35-37 weeks gestation, reflecting an increase in carriage during late pregnancy.[32] These rates are derived from rectovaginal swabbing, the standard method for detection, though colonization can be intermittent.[33] Risk factors for GBS colonization include African ancestry, with higher rates observed among Black or African populations compared to other groups, potentially linked to genetic or environmental factors.[32] Other contributors encompass previous GBS infection, which elevates recurrence risk, and diabetes, where gestational diabetes correlates with a 16% higher odds of rectovaginal carriage.[34] Lower socioeconomic status also plays a role, as limited access to hygiene and healthcare may facilitate persistence in vulnerable populations.[35] Colonization dynamics are typically transient, lasting from weeks to months, with acquisition and clearance influenced by host microbiota and environmental exposures; sexual transmission occurs but is not the primary mode, as GBS is not classified as a sexually transmitted infection.[36] Vertical transmission from colonized mothers to newborns happens in approximately 50% of cases during birth, primarily through the genital tract.[35] Globally, prevalence varies, with higher rates in sub-Saharan Africa (up to 35%, e.g., 33.7% in Gambia) compared to Europe (10-20%, e.g., 11-21% in Western Europe), attributable to regional differences in sanitation, climate, and population genetics.[37] Despite its prevalence, GBS colonization remains largely asymptomatic in carriers, rarely causing issues in healthy individuals but serving as a reservoir for potential transmission.[31]Global Disease Burden
Streptococcus agalactiae, commonly known as Group B Streptococcus (GBS), imposes a substantial global health burden, particularly affecting neonates and vulnerable adults. Updated estimates for 2020 indicate over 390,000 cases of invasive GBS disease in infants annually, resulting in approximately 91,000 infant deaths and 46,000 GBS-attributable stillbirths worldwide.[38] Additionally, GBS is linked to around 518,000 preterm births each year, with the heaviest burden concentrated in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where sub-Saharan Africa alone accounts for about 50% of cases and deaths despite comprising only 15% of the global population.[38] In high-income settings, the burden is lower due to preventive measures, but gaps in screening and prophylaxis in LMICs exacerbate morbidity and mortality.[39] Neonatal GBS disease is categorized into early-onset disease (EOD, 0-6 days) and late-onset disease (LOD, 7-89 days). In high-income countries implementing intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), EOD incidence has fallen to 0.1-0.5 per 1,000 live births, while LOD rates remain at 0.2-0.5 per 1,000 live births.[40] In high-burden LMIC areas, stillbirth rates associated with GBS approximate 1 per 1,000 pregnancies, reflecting limited access to screening and care.[39] Among non-pregnant adults, invasive GBS cases—often manifesting as bacteremia or urinary tract infections—are rising, with incidence rates of approximately 25 per 100,000 in the elderly population aged 65 years and older in the United States as of 2015.[2] Trends in GBS disease show a marked decline in EOD incidence of over 80% since the 1990s, attributable to widespread IAP adoption in high-income countries, while LOD rates have remained stable.[40] In contrast, invasive GBS cases in adults have increased by 20-30% over the past decade, driven by aging populations and comorbidities.[41] The economic impact is significant, compounded by long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae affecting 20-50% of meningitis survivors, leading to ongoing healthcare and productivity losses. As of 2023, the latest available data indicate continued low EOD rates in the US at 0.2 per 1,000 live births, with no major updates to global estimates beyond 2020.Pathogenesis and Virulence
Key Virulence Factors
Streptococcus agalactiae, also known as group B Streptococcus (GBS), possesses several key virulence factors that contribute to its pathogenicity in humans. The polysaccharide capsule is a primary antiphagocytic structure, composed of sialylated polysaccharides that define 10 serotypes (Ia, Ib, II-IX). This capsule inhibits complement deposition on the bacterial surface by mimicking host sialic acid residues, thereby evading phagocytosis by neutrophils and macrophages. [44] The sialic acid component specifically binds to inhibitory Siglec receptors on immune cells, further dampening the host response. [44] Pili and adhesins play crucial roles in host cell attachment and biofilm formation. The two main pilus types, PI-1 and PI-2 (including subtypes PI-2a and PI-2b), are encoded by distinct pil gene clusters and consist of backbone protein PilB, tip adhesin PilA, and anchor protein PilC. PI-1 promotes adhesion to epithelial cells, while PI-2 facilitates biofilm production and stable colonization, such as in the vaginal mucosa when both PI-1 and PI-2a are present. [44] Toxins produced by S. agalactiae enable direct damage to host tissues. The beta-hemolysin/cytolysin, encoded by the cylE gene within the cyl operon, is a pore-forming toxin that disrupts eukaryotic cell membranes, leading to hemolysis and cytotoxicity. [44] Complementing this, the CAMP factor (encoded by cfb) synergizes with host sphingomyelinase to enhance membrane perforation, although it is not essential for overall virulence. [44] Immune evasion is further supported by specialized modulators. The C5a peptidase (ScpB), a surface serine protease, cleaves the complement fragment C5a, preventing neutrophil chemotaxis and recruitment to infection sites; it also binds fibronectin to aid epithelial invasion. [45] Hyaluronidase (HylB) degrades hyaluronic acid in host extracellular matrices, facilitating bacterial spread and tissue invasion while inhibiting reactive oxygen species production by immune cells. [44] Certain strains exhibit hypervirulence due to genetic variations. Clonal complex 17 (CC17) isolates, predominantly serotype III, often carry mutations in the cpsK gene of the capsule biosynthesis locus, which enhance tropism for the central nervous system and increase the risk of neonatal meningitis. [44] Expression of these virulence factors is tightly regulated by environmental cues in the host. The two-component system CovRS, consisting of the sensor kinase CovS and response regulator CovR, controls the transcription of multiple genes, including those for the capsule, cytolysin, and C5a peptidase; for instance, CovR represses cylE under neutral pH but derepresses it in acidic host conditions like those in the bladder or blood. [46] This system modulates ~150 genes, adapting virulence to host niches such as fever or inflammation. [46]Mechanisms of Infection
Streptococcus agalactiae, commonly known as group B Streptococcus (GBS), initiates infection through colonization of mucosal surfaces, primarily in the female genital tract. Adhesion to host epithelial cells is mediated by surface pili structures, such as pilus island 1 (PI-1) and PI-2a, which bind to extracellular matrix components like collagen and laminin, facilitating stable attachment and initial colonization.[44] Hyaluronidase enzyme (HylB) further aids invasion by degrading hyaluronic acid in the extracellular matrix, enabling bacterial ascension from the vagina to the uterus and amniotic membranes during pregnancy. Once adhered, GBS employs multiple strategies for immune evasion to persist and proliferate. The polysaccharide capsule, rich in sialic acid, mimics host cell surfaces to resist phagocytosis by neutrophils and macrophages through interaction with inhibitory Siglec receptors. Complement C5a peptidase (ScpB) cleaves the chemotactic peptide C5a, reducing neutrophil recruitment and dampening the inflammatory response at the infection site. Additionally, the HvgA protein promotes adhesion to and internalization by macrophages.[47] Systemic dissemination occurs primarily through bacteremia, where GBS enters the bloodstream during labor or via placental crossing, leading to widespread seeding of organs. In neonates, specific adhesins like HvgA enable crossing of the blood-brain barrier by binding to α5β1 integrins on brain endothelial cells, facilitating meningitis.[48][49] Recent studies indicate that hypervirulent GBS strains like CC17 can also infect the blood-CSF barrier, an alternative entry route to the CNS.[50] Tissue tropism is influenced by virulence factors such as cytolysin (β-hemolysin/cytolysin), which lyses epithelial and immune cells to promote pneumonia or necrotizing fasciitis in susceptible tissues. Biofilm formation, mediated by fibrinogen-binding proteins like FbsC, allows persistence on indwelling medical devices in adults, contributing to chronic infections.[51] Host factors significantly modulate infection susceptibility, particularly in neonates where immature immunity limits transplacental IgG transfer and impairs effective opsonization and phagocytosis. Strain-specific differences further drive pathogenesis; hypervirulent clones, such as clonal complex 17 (CC17) with serotype III, exhibit enhanced endothelial adhesion and invasion capabilities, accelerating meningitis onset compared to non-hypervirulent strains.[52]Clinical Infections in Humans
Neonatal and Perinatal Infections
Streptococcus agalactiae, commonly known as group B Streptococcus (GBS), has been a major cause of neonatal sepsis since its recognition in the 1970s, when early mortality rates reached up to 55% in affected newborns.[53] Prior to widespread preventive measures, GBS accounted for approximately 8,000 cases of early-onset infection annually in the United States, with an incidence of about 2 per 1,000 live births.[54] In perinatal infections, GBS ascending from the maternal genital tract can cause chorioamnionitis, characterized by maternal fever and uterine tenderness, which increases the risk of preterm delivery by approximately 2-fold in cases of GBS bacteriuria.[40] This condition contributes to about 10% of early preterm births and is associated with stillbirths and neonatal morbidity.[55] Neonatal GBS infections are classified as early-onset disease (EOD), occurring within the first 7 days of life, or late-onset disease (LOD), from 7 to 89 days. EOD typically presents as sepsis or pneumonia due to intrapartum aspiration of colonized maternal secretions, with key risk factors including maternal GBS colonization, prolonged rupture of membranes exceeding 18 hours, intrapartum maternal fever, and prematurity.[4][40] LOD more commonly manifests as meningitis in approximately 30% of cases and is linked to household transmission, often from maternal sources such as breast milk.[4][56] Common symptoms in newborns include respiratory distress, lethargy, and seizures, particularly in cases involving sepsis or meningitis.[4] Outcomes for EOD include a mortality rate of 5-10%, higher in preterm infants at up to 19%, while LOD meningitis survivors face 20-50% risk of neurodevelopmental impairments such as cerebral palsy or hearing loss.[4][40][57] Diagnosis relies on blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures, which are positive in 70-90% of confirmed cases, though sensitivity can be lower in low-bacterial-load scenarios; polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays provide rapid detection with high sensitivity and specificity for GBS.[58][59] Maternal colonization serves as the primary source for vertical transmission leading to these infections.[40]Infections in Adults and Immunocompromised
Infections caused by Streptococcus agalactiae, also known as group B Streptococcus (GBS), in non-pregnant adults and immunocompromised individuals represent a significant and growing health concern, particularly among those with underlying comorbidities. These infections often manifest as invasive disease, with common sites including bacteremia (approximately 51% of invasive cases), bone and joint infections (20%), and skin and soft tissue infections (12%). Less frequent but serious manifestations include endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and meningitis, which occurs in about 5-10% of invasive cases.[60][1] Vulnerable populations are disproportionately affected, with over 50% of cases occurring in individuals aged 65 years or older, reflecting the role of age-related immune decline. Key risk factors include diabetes mellitus (present in 59% of hospitalized adults and associated with a risk ratio of approximately 12 for GBS-associated hospitalization), liver disease, malignancy (17-22%), and other immunocompromising conditions such as chronic renal disease or HIV. Incidence is notably higher among those with multiple comorbidities, and cases have risen among non-pregnant women, driven by increasing prevalence of diabetes and obesity. Symptoms typically include fever, chills, localized pain or swelling (e.g., cellulitis or septic arthritis), and systemic signs like mental status changes in severe cases. Complications such as septic shock can develop, contributing to high morbidity.[60][1][61] The incidence of invasive GBS disease in adults has increased by approximately 25% since 2010 in high-income countries, rising from 8.1 to 10.9 cases per 100,000 population in the United States between 2008 and 2016 (as of 2016), with continued rises reported in subsequent years and serotype V predominating in adult cases compared to serotype III in neonates.[62][2][63] Diagnosis relies on blood cultures, which are positive in 40-60% of invasive infections, supplemented by imaging (e.g., MRI for osteomyelitis or echocardiography for endocarditis) to identify deep-seated foci. Outcomes remain poor, with overall mortality rates of 10-20% for invasive disease and up to 35% in immunocompromised patients, often due to delays in recognition or underlying frailty; in-hospital mortality is around 3-6%, but 1-year rates reach 23%.[62][2][1]Prevention and Management
Screening and Prophylaxis Strategies
The primary strategy for preventing early-onset Group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease in newborns involves universal antenatal screening of pregnant women to detect maternal colonization, followed by targeted intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) for those at risk. According to the 2020 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines, endorsed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), all pregnant women should undergo vaginal-rectal swabbing at 36 0/7 to 37 6/7 weeks of gestation for GBS culture or nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT).[40][64] Positive results indicate colonization, which occurs in approximately 10-30% of pregnant women globally.[65] For women with positive screening results, a history of GBS bacteriuria during the current pregnancy, or a previous infant with invasive GBS disease, IAP is recommended during labor or after membrane rupture to prevent vertical transmission. The preferred regimen is intravenous penicillin G, administered as 5 million units initially, followed by 2.5 million units every 4 hours until delivery.[40][66] For penicillin-allergic patients without anaphylactic history, an initial dose of cefazolin 2 grams intravenously followed by 1 gram every 8 hours is advised; those with anaphylaxis history should receive clindamycin 900 mg intravenously every 8 hours or vancomycin 20 mg/kg intravenously every 8 hours, adjusted for renal function.[40][66] If screening status is unknown at delivery and intrapartum risk factors are present—such as preterm labor (<37 weeks), prolonged rupture of membranes (≥18 hours), or maternal intrapartum temperature ≥100.4°F (38°C)—IAP should be initiated pending culture results.[40] This screening-based approach replaced earlier risk-based strategies following the 2002 CDC guidelines, which favored universal screening over relying solely on clinical risks due to superior prevention of early-onset disease (EOD).[67] Implementation of IAP has reduced EOD incidence by more than 80%, from 1.7 cases per 1,000 live births in 1993 to 0.18 per 1,000 live births in 2023, with IAP administered to about 85% of at-risk births in the United States.[40][3][27] Challenges to effective implementation include false-negative screening results in 5-10% of cases, potentially due to intermittent colonization or suboptimal sampling, as well as emerging concerns over antibiotic resistance from widespread IAP use, though GBS remains highly susceptible to penicillin.[68][65] In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), implementation gaps persist due to limited access to screening, laboratory infrastructure, and national policies, resulting in higher EOD burdens.[69] For newborns exposed to GBS risk factors, routine antibiotic administration is not recommended unless clinical signs of infection are present; instead, observation or limited evaluation is advised per 2019 American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines.[58]Vaccine Development and Treatment
The treatment of Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus, GBS) infections relies primarily on beta-lactam antibiotics, with penicillin G or ampicillin as first-line agents due to universal susceptibility and low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs typically ≤0.12 μg/mL).[66][70] For severe cases such as endocarditis or meningitis, combination therapy with gentamicin is recommended to achieve synergistic bactericidal effects, particularly in neonates or adults with complicated infections.[71] Treatment durations vary by infection site: 10-14 days of intravenous therapy for uncomplicated bacteremia, and 21 days or longer for osteomyelitis to ensure source control and prevent relapse.[71][72] Antibiotic resistance in GBS remains low for beta-lactams and vancomycin, but macrolide resistance is a growing concern, with global erythromycin resistance rates averaging 20-40% and marked regional variability (e.g., up to 78% in some high-burden areas).[73][74] Clindamycin resistance often co-occurs at similar levels due to shared mechanisms like ermB gene expression, necessitating susceptibility testing for penicillin-allergic patients.[73] Vancomycin MIC creep has been observed in isolated cases, with MICs occasionally rising to 1-2 μg/mL, though clinical resistance remains rare; ongoing surveillance is advised to guide alternative therapies like linezolid in refractory infections.[75][76] As of 2025, no GBS vaccine is licensed for human use, though several candidates are advancing through clinical trials to prevent invasive disease via maternal immunization.[77] Pfizer's GBS6 (previously PF-06760805), a hexavalent capsular polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccine targeting serotypes Ia, Ib, II, III, V, and VI, completed Phase 2 trials in pregnant women and is now in Phase 3 (BEATRIX trial), demonstrating robust immunogenicity with geometric mean fold rises of 10- to 59-fold in IgG responses post-booster and efficient maternal-to-infant antibody transfer (ratios 0.4-1.3).[78][79][80] MinervaX's MVX-GBS (also known as GBS-NN/NN2 or AlpN), a fusion protein vaccine based on the alpha-like protein family, has completed multiple Phase 2 trials and is preparing for Phase 3, showing promising safety and immunogenicity in pregnant women without reliance on serotype-specific polysaccharides.[81][82] Vaccine targets focus on capsular polysaccharides conjugated to carriers like tetanus toxoid to elicit T-cell-dependent responses, administered to pregnant individuals at 27-36 weeks' gestation to facilitate transplacental IgG transfer and protect neonates for the first 3-6 months of life.[79] Ongoing trials emphasize efficacy in pregnant women across diverse populations, including those with HIV, with the World Health Organization prioritizing prequalification by 2026 under the Defeating Meningitis by 2030 roadmap to address 90% of the global GBS burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).[83] Key challenges include achieving broad serotype coverage, as pentavalent formulations (Ia, Ib, II, III, V) protect against approximately 80-90% of invasive strains, necessitating multivalent designs for comprehensive protection.[84][85] Adjunctive therapies like intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) have been explored for neonatal GBS sepsis, with meta-analyses showing potential mortality reductions (odds ratio 0.51), though evidence is limited by small trials and inconsistent results, restricting its routine use.[86]Infections in Animals
Bovine Mastitis
Streptococcus agalactiae, also known as group B Streptococcus (GBS), is a primary causative agent of contagious mastitis in dairy cattle, predominantly manifesting as subclinical infections that lead to persistent udder colonization.[87] In subclinical cases, the disease is characterized by elevated somatic cell counts in milk exceeding 200,000 cells/mL, indicating inflammation without overt clinical signs, and is associated with gradual reductions in milk yield and quality.[87] Clinical mastitis, though less common with GBS, presents with visible udder swelling, abnormal milk consistency, fever, and lethargy in affected cows, and often requires immediate intervention.[87] Transmission of S. agalactiae occurs primarily through contagious spread within herds during milking, facilitated by contaminated milking equipment, teat lesions, or direct contact with infected udders, allowing the bacterium to colonize the mammary gland indefinitely.[88] Outbreaks can result in herd prevalence rates ranging from 10% to 50%, with higher incidences reported in regions like North America and Europe where dairy farming is intensive.[88] The pathogenesis involves S. agalactiae forming biofilms within the udder cisternae and teat canals, which protect the bacteria from host immune responses and antibiotics, promoting chronic infection.[87] Bovine-adapted strains, such as those in the ST103 clonal complex, predominate in cattle and differ genetically from human-associated lineages like ST-17 or ST-23, reflecting host-specific adaptations that enhance mammary gland persistence.[89]- S. agalactiae* mastitis contributes to substantial losses in the US dairy industry, with bovine mastitis overall estimated at over $2 billion annually, driven by decreased milk production, discarded milk during treatment periods, and premature culling of chronically infected cows.[90] Infected herds face additional costs from veterinary services and reduced herd productivity, with subclinical cases alone accounting for up to 70% of total mastitis-related economic burdens.[91]
Infections in Other Species
Streptococcus agalactiae, commonly known as group B Streptococcus (GBS), infects a variety of non-bovine animal species, ranging from aquaculture fish to domestic mammals and wildlife, often causing septicemia, mastitis, and localized infections. In fish, particularly tilapia (Oreochromis spp.), GBS is a major pathogen in global aquaculture, leading to high mortality rates during outbreaks exacerbated by high temperatures. Affected fish exhibit lethargy, anorexia, exophthalmia, abdominal distention, and internal hemorrhages in organs like the liver and spleen, with economic losses estimated at 150-250 million USD annually as of 2000-2008. Other fish species impacted include seabream (Sparus aurata), mullet (Liza klunzingeri), yellowtail (Seriola quinqueradiata), and catfish, where similar systemic signs and meningoencephalitis occur.[93] In camels, GBS primarily causes clinical and subclinical mastitis, with sequence type ST-616 predominating among isolates from infected udders, often associated with capsular type III. This results in reduced milk production and udder inflammation, with tetracycline resistance conferred by the tetM gene on a Tn916-like element in many strains, complicating treatment. Wound infections are also reported, highlighting GBS as an emerging issue in camelid husbandry in regions like Kenya and the Middle East.[94] Among companion animals, GBS infections are infrequent but documented in dogs and cats. In dogs, it has been linked to endocarditis with embolization, neonatal bacteremia causing high puppy mortality, and mixed infections involving wounds or systemic spread. Cats experience rare uterine infections and bacteremia, with isolates showing quinolone resistance in some cases, potentially from pet-human transmission dynamics. Horses yield GBS isolates resembling human strains, though specific clinical syndromes like septicemia or joint infections remain underreported. Guinea pigs have historical associations with experimental infections, but natural occurrences are limited.[95][96][97][98][99] In elephants, particularly captive individuals, GBS acts as a pyogenic agent causing pododermatitis, abscesses, and wound infections, often in the feet and skin; a 2025 study identified a novel sublineage in zoo elephants in Germany, with isolates showing distinct lineages and frequent tetracycline resistance, differing from human and livestock strains. Llamas and alpacas in South America have experienced outbreaks with abscesses and septicemia-like symptoms, with isolates resistant to tetracycline.[100][101][102] Emerging reports indicate GBS involvement in pigs, with respiratory disease, septicemia, and lung lesions on Italian farms linked to contaminated bovine whey, showing resistance to erythromycin and tetracycline in sequence type ST-103 isolates. In wildlife, infections occur in marine mammals like bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) with necrotizing fasciitis and seals (Halichoerus grypus, Arctocephalus gazella) with bronchopneumonia and septicemia, potentially zoonotic from human or fish sources. Wild porcupines in Italy exhibit severe respiratory signs and abscesses from the same ST-103, suggesting environmental transmission and expanding the host range. Frogs and other amphibians have yielded isolates, underscoring cross-species potential. Zoonotic risks persist across these hosts, with shared strains between animals, humans, and fish raising food safety and occupational concerns.[103][104]References
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38749511/
- https://www.cdc.gov/group-b-strep/php/[surveillance](/page/Surveillance)/index.html