Hubbry Logo
I-beamI-beamMain
Open search
I-beam
Community hub
I-beam
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
I-beam
I-beam
from Wikipedia

An I-beam used to support the first floor of a house

An I-beam is any of various structural members with an Ɪ- (serif capital letter 'I') or H-shaped cross-section. Technical terms for similar items include H-beam, I-profile, universal column (UC), w-beam (for "wide flange"), universal beam (UB), rolled steel joist (RSJ), or double-T (especially in Polish, Bulgarian, Spanish, Italian, and German). I-beams are typically made of structural steel and serve a wide variety of construction uses.

The horizontal elements of the Ɪ are called flanges, and the vertical element is known as the "web". The web resists shear forces, while the flanges resist most of the bending moment experienced by the beam. The Euler–Bernoulli beam equation shows that the Ɪ-shaped section is a very efficient form for carrying both bending and shear loads in the plane of the web. On the other hand, the cross-section has a reduced capacity in the transverse direction, and is also inefficient in carrying torsion, for which hollow structural sections are often preferred.

History

[edit]
Mark di Suvero's Victor's Lament (foreground in red) on the campus of Muhlenberg College in Allentown, Pennsylvania, is an I-beam sculpture paying tribute to the rich history of steelmaking in the Lehigh Valley region of the eastern Pennsylvania.

In 1849, the method of producing an I-beam, as rolled from a single piece of wrought iron,[1] was patented by Alphonse Halbou of Forges de la Providence in Marchienne-au-Pont, Belgium.[2]

Bethlehem Steel, headquartered in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, was a leading supplier of rolled structural steel of various cross-sections in American bridge and skyscraper work of the mid-20th century.[3] Rolled cross-sections now have been partially displaced in such work by fabricated cross-sections.

Overview

[edit]
A typical cross-section of I-beams

There are two standard I-beam forms:

I-beams are commonly made of structural steel but may also be formed from aluminium or other materials. A common type of I-beam is the rolled steel joist (RSJ), sometimes incorrectly rendered as reinforced steel joist. British and European standards also specify Universal Beams (UBs) and Universal Columns (UCs). These sections have parallel flanges, shown as "W-Section" in the accompanying illustration, as opposed to the varying thickness of RSJ flanges, illustrated as "S-Section", which are seldom now rolled in the United Kingdom. Parallel flanges are easier to connect to and do away with the need for tapering washers. UCs have equal or near-equal width and depth and are more suited to being oriented vertically to carry axial load such as columns in multi-storey construction, while UBs are significantly deeper than they are wide are more suited to carrying bending load such as beam elements in floors.

I-joists, I-beams engineered from wood with fiberboard or laminated veneer lumber, or both, are also becoming increasingly popular in construction, especially residential, as they are both lighter and less prone to warping than solid wooden joists. However, there has been some concern as to their rapid loss of strength in a fire if unprotected.

Design

[edit]
An I-beam vibrating in torsion mode

I-beams are widely used in the construction industry and are available in a variety of standard sizes. Tables are available to allow easy selection of a suitable steel I-beam size for a given applied load. I-beams may be used both as beams and as columns.

I-beams may be used both on their own, or acting compositely with another material, typically concrete. Design may be governed by any of the following criteria:

  • deflection: the stiffness of the I-beam will be chosen to minimize deformation
  • vibration: the stiffness and mass are chosen to prevent unacceptable vibrations, particularly in settings sensitive to vibrations, such as offices and libraries
  • bending failure by yielding: where the stress in the cross section exceeds the yield stress
  • bending failure by lateral torsional buckling: where a flange in compression tends to buckle sideways or the entire cross-section buckles torsionally
  • bending failure by local buckling: where the flange or web is so slender as to buckle locally
  • local yield: caused by concentrated loads, such as at the beam's point of support
  • shear failure: where the web fails. Slender webs will fail by buckling, rippling in a phenomenon termed tension field action, but shear failure is also resisted by the stiffness of the flanges
  • buckling or yielding of components: for example, of stiffeners used to provide stability to the I-beam's web.

Design for bending

[edit]
Bending torque and resulting stress in case of bi-axial bending of a symmetric beam. The complex bending is the superposition of two simple bendings around the y and z axes (small deformation, linear behaviour). The largest stresses (𝜎xx) in a beam under bending are in the locations farthest from the neutral axis.

A beam under bending sees high stresses along the axial fibers that are farthest from the neutral axis. To prevent failure, most of the material in the beam must be located in these regions. Comparatively little material is needed in the area close to the neutral axis. This observation is the basis of the I-beam cross-section; the neutral axis runs along the center of the web which can be relatively thin and most of the material can be concentrated in the flanges.

The ideal beam is the one with the least cross-sectional area (and hence requiring the least material) needed to achieve a given section modulus. Since the section modulus depends on the value of the moment of inertia, an efficient beam must have most of its material located as far from the neutral axis as possible. The farther a given amount of material is from the neutral axis, the larger is the section modulus and hence a larger bending moment can be resisted.

When designing a symmetric I-beam to resist stresses due to bending the usual starting point is the required section modulus. If the allowable stress is σmax and the maximum expected bending moment is Mmax, then the required section modulus is given by:[4]

,

where I is the moment of inertia of the beam cross-section and c is the distance of the top of the beam from the neutral axis (see beam theory for more details).

For a beam of cross-sectional area a and height h, the ideal cross-section would have half the area at a distance h/2 above the cross-section and the other half at a distance h/2 below the cross-section.[4] For this cross-section,

.

However, these ideal conditions can never be achieved because material is needed in the web for physical reasons, including to resist buckling. For wide-flange beams, the section modulus is approximately

which is superior to that achieved by rectangular beams and circular beams.

Issues

[edit]

Though I-beams are excellent for unidirectional bending in a plane parallel to the web, they do not perform as well in bidirectional bending. These beams also show little resistance to twisting and undergo sectional warping under torsional loading. For torsion dominated problems, box beams and other types of stiff sections are used in preference to the I-beam.

Stiffeners

[edit]

It is possible to increase the shear capacity in a beam web by adding out of plane stiffness using transverse web stiffeners. These can be added to both sides of the web, or just one. They are usually steel plates welded into place, but bolting can be used.[5][6]

Standards

[edit]

Shapes and materials in the United States

[edit]
A rusty riveted steel I-beam

In the United States, the most commonly mentioned I-beam is the wide-flange (W) shape. These beams have flanges whose inside surfaces are parallel over most of their area. Other I-beams include American Standard (designated S) shapes, in which inner flange surfaces are not parallel, and H-piles (designated HP), which are typically used as pile foundations. Wide-flange shapes are available in grade ASTM A992,[7] which has generally replaced the older ASTM grades A572 and A36. Ranges of yield strength:

  • A36: 36,000 psi (250 MPa)
  • A572: 42,000–60,000 psi (290–410 MPa), with 50,000 psi (340 MPa) the most common
  • A588: Similar to A572
  • A992: 50,000–65,000 psi (340–450 MPa)

Like most steel products, I-beams often contain some recycled content.

The following standards define the shape and tolerances of I-beam steel sections:

European standards

[edit]
Cross section of a IPE steel beam

In Europe, the main available I-beam and H-beam profiles are IPE, IPN, and HE profiles, which are further broken down into HEA, HEB, and HEM. The primary difference between these profiles is the geometry of their flanges (the horizontal parts of the "I" or "H") and their dimensions, which affects their strength and weight.

IPE
Stands for I Profile European. IPE profiles have an I-shaped cross-section with parallel flanges. The web (the vertical part) is typically taller than the flange width, giving it a narrow, tall appearance. These beams are standardized according to the EN 10365 standard.
IPN
Stands for I Profile Normal. Like IPE, they have an I-shaped cross-section, but the key difference is their tapered flanges. The inner surfaces of the flanges are not parallel but rather inclined at a slope of 14%.
HE
HE profiles are a family of wide-flange beams with a distinct H-shaped cross-section. Unlike IPE and IPN, the flange width is significantly wider, often equal to the height of the beam up to a certain size. They are categorized into three main types based on their flange and web thickness: HEA (light), HEA (normal) and HEAM (heavy).

The profiles are managed by the following standards:

  • EN 10024, Hot rolled taper flange I sections – Tolerances on shape and dimensions.
  • EN 10034, Structural steel I and H sections – Tolerances on shape and dimensions.
  • EN 10162, Cold rolled steel sections – Technical delivery conditions – Dimensional and cross-sectional tolerances

AISC manual

[edit]

The American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) publishes the Steel Construction Manual for designing structures of various shapes. It documents the common approaches, Allowable Strength Design (ASD) and Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD), (starting with 13th ed.) to create such designs.

Other

[edit]

Designation and terminology

[edit]
The dimension of a wide-flange I-beam

In the United States, steel I-beams are commonly specified using the depth and weight of the beam. For example, a "W10x22" beam is approximately 10 in (254 mm) in depth with a nominal height of the I-beam from the outer face of one flange to the outer face of the other flange, and weighs 22 lb/ft (33 kg/m). Wide flange section beams often vary from their nominal depth. In the case of the W14 series, they may be as deep as 22.84 in (580 mm).[9]'

In Europe, steel profiles are named with a combination of their type designation and their nominal height in millimeters. The naming is straightforward: the letters are followed directly by the height of the beam's web. An IPE 200 beam has the following key dimensions and weight, based on European standards (EN 10365):

  • Height (h): 200 mm
  • Flange Width (b): 100 mm
  • Web Thickness (tw): 5.6 mm
  • Flange Thickness (tf): 8.5 mm
  • Weight: 22.4 kg per meter (kg/m)

In Canada, steel I-beams are now commonly specified using the depth and weight of the beam in metric terms. For example, a "W250x33" beam is approximately 250 millimetres (9.8 in) in depth (height of the I-beam from the outer face of one flange to the outer face of the other flange) and weighs approximately 33 kg/m (22 lb/ft; 67 lb/yd).[10] I-beams are still available in US sizes from many Canadian manufacturers.

In Mexico, steel I-beams are called IR and commonly specified using the depth and weight of the beam in metric terms. For example, a "IR250x33" beam is approximately 250 mm (9.8 in) in depth (height of the I-beam from the outer face of one flange to the outer face of the other flange) and weighs approximately 33 kg/m (22 lb/ft).[11]

In India, I-beams are designated as ISMB, ISJB, ISLB, ISWB. ISMB: Indian Standard Medium Weight Beam, ISJB: Indian Standard Junior Beams, ISLB: Indian Standard Light Weight Beams, and ISWB: Indian Standard Wide Flange Beams. Beams are designated as per respective abbreviated reference followed by the depth of section, such as for example ISMB 450, where 450 is the depth of section in millimetres (mm). The dimensions of these beams are classified as per IS:808 (as per BIS).[citation needed]

In the United Kingdom, these steel sections are commonly specified with a code consisting of the major dimension, usually the depth, -x-the minor dimension-x-the mass per metre-ending with the section type, all measurements being metric. Therefore, a 152x152x23UC would be a column section (UC = universal column) of approximately 152 mm (6.0 in) depth, 152 mm width and weighing 23 kg/m (46 lb/yd) of length.[12]

In Australia, these steel sections are commonly referred to as Universal Beams (UB) or Columns (UC). The designation for each is given as the approximate height of the beam, the type (beam or column) and then the unit metre rate (e.g., a 460UB67.1 is an approximately 460 mm (18.1 in) deep universal beam that weighs 67.1 kg/m (135 lb/yd)).[8]

Cellular beams

[edit]

Cellular beams are the modern version of the traditional castellated beam, which results in a beam approximately 40–60% deeper than its parent section. The exact finished depth, cell diameter and cell spacing are flexible. A cellular beam is up to 1.5 times stronger than its parent section and is therefore utilized to create efficient large span constructions.[13]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
An I-beam, also known as a wide-flange beam or H-beam, is a member characterized by a cross-section resembling the capital letter "I", featuring two parallel horizontal flanges connected by a vertical web. This configuration positions most of the material at the top and bottom flanges to optimize resistance to bending moments, while the web primarily handles shear forces. I-beams are typically fabricated from rolled and are essential components in modern construction for supporting heavy loads with minimal material use. The I-beam's design provides an efficient strength-to-weight ratio, making it ideal for applications requiring high flexural capacity, such as framing in buildings, bridges, warehouses, and . Its is maximized about the strong axis, allowing it to carry transverse loads effectively while minimizing deflection. Common dimensions include depths from 80 to 500 mm and weights ranging from 6 to 141 kg/m, with properties like elastic varying based on size to suit diverse engineering needs. The I-beam originated in the mid-19th century, with early development credited to Alphonse Halbou in 1849, who introduced the shape for iron beams, later refined by Henry Grey for production to enhance rigidity. By the 1850s, rolled I-beams became integral to fireproof in the United States, replacing wooden beams and enabling taller, more durable structures. Standards such as EN 10365 in Europe and the ANSI/AISC 360 Specification from the American Institute of Steel (AISC) in govern modern production (as of 2022), ensuring consistency in dimensions and properties like those for wide-flange (W) shapes.

History and Development

Origins and Early Use

The I-beam cross-section, resembling the letter "I," emerged in the mid-19th century amid the rapid expansion of railway and industrial construction in . Early forms appeared as girders in British railway bridges during the and , where the shape optimized resistance to bending moments by concentrating material in the flanges away from the . This design addressed the limitations of solid rectangular beams, offering greater stiffness with less weight. The pivotal advancement came in 1849, when Belgian engineer Alphonse Halbou patented a method for rolling I-beams from a single piece of at Forges de la Providence, enabling and standardization for structural applications. Early adoption of I-beams and I-shaped girders marked significant milestones in iconic 19th-century projects. In 1851, in utilized thousands of prefabricated I-girders to span its expansive glass-enclosed exhibition halls, supporting vast open spaces with minimal internal columns and showcasing the shape's efficiency for lightweight, modular construction. Similarly, the , completed in 1889 for the Universal Exposition, incorporated lattice members within its girders for the four inclined legs and upper structure, providing exceptional strength-to-weight ratios that allowed the 300-meter tower to withstand wind loads while using only 7,300 tons of material. These applications highlighted the I-beam's role in enabling unprecedented scales of iron-based architecture. The transition from and to rolled I-beams accelerated in the late 1800s, particularly in the United States. The first rolled I-beams were produced domestically in the by firms such as the Trenton Iron Company and Phoenix Iron Company, initially for fireproof institutional buildings like banks and warehouses. By the 1880s, Andrew Carnegie's steel operations at the Homestead Works and began rolling I-beams on a large scale, supplying structural shapes for pioneering skyscrapers such as Chicago's in 1885, the first to employ a metal skeleton frame. This shift reduced costs and improved tensile strength, further popularizing the profile. From the outset, engineers recognized the I-beam's key advantage: its high per unit weight, which minimized material requirements while maximizing load-bearing capacity in bending scenarios, fundamentally transforming beam design in bridges and buildings.

Evolution in the 20th Century

In the early , the formation of the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) in 1921 marked a pivotal moment in standardizing design and fabrication in the United States, promoting uniform practices for rolled I-beam sections that facilitated their widespread adoption in building construction. Initially established as the National Steel Fabricators' Association, the AISC influenced the evolution of I-beams by developing specifications that emphasized consistency in material properties and shapes, enabling more efficient engineering of frameworks. In the early 1900s, Henry Grey developed the universal rolling process for producing wide-flange beams, enhancing rigidity for taller structures. The 1920s also saw the advent of electric arc welding technologies, which allowed for the fabrication of I-beams from steel plates, offering greater flexibility in customizing beam sizes and shapes compared to traditional rolled sections. Automatic arc welding, invented by P.O. Nobel in 1920, utilized continuous electrode wire feeds and direct current to produce strong, seamless joints, leading to the construction of the first fully welded steel buildings by the late 1920s. This innovation reduced reliance on riveting, lowered costs, and expanded I-beam applications in industrial structures, though riveted rolled I-beams remained dominant until the mid-century. Iconic pre-war projects like the (completed in 1931) utilized thousands of riveted rolled I-beams to achieve its 102-story height, demonstrating the structural reliability of standardized sections. Following , a surge in global steel production—from about 190 million tonnes annually in 1950 to 347 million tonnes by 1960—drove the standardization and of rolled I-beam sections, supporting rapid and infrastructure development. In the United States, enhanced rolling mills produced deeper and wider I-beams with improved tolerances, integral to the skeletal frames of modern skyscrapers and bridges. The 1950s and 1960s introduced high-strength low-alloy s, such as ASTM A242 (developed in the 1940s but widely adopted post-war) and A440 (introduced in 1960), which offered yield strengths up to 50 ksi, significantly increasing I-beam load capacities without proportionally enlarging cross-sections. These materials allowed for lighter, more efficient designs in high-rise and long-span applications, with becoming the standard mild at 36 ksi yield strength by 1960. In , post-war reconstruction efforts heavily incorporated I-beams in bridges and buildings, utilizing prefabricated rolled and welded sections to rebuild swiftly; for instance, orthotropic steel decks on bridges emerged as a innovative use, combining I-beam girders with integrated for enhanced rigidity. This period's advancements solidified I-beams as a of resilient, scalable .

Structure and Properties

Definition and Cross-Section

An I-beam, also known as a wide-flange beam or universal beam, is a structural member characterized by an I- or H-shaped cross-section, consisting of two parallel horizontal flanges connected by a vertical web. This configuration is specifically engineered to optimize resistance to moments in and applications, where the flanges primarily handle compressive and tensile stresses while the web resists shear forces. The geometry of an I-beam cross-section is defined by key dimensions: the flange width bb (or bfb_f), the overall depth hh (or height between the outer faces of the flanges), the web thickness twt_w, and the flange thickness tft_f. Typical proportions emphasize wider flanges relative to the web for enhanced stability against , with flange widths often ranging from approximately 50% to 100% of the depth in standard sections, and web thicknesses much slimmer to conserve material. For example, in American wide-flange (W) shapes per ASTM A6 standards, a common section like W27×178 has a depth of 27.8 inches, flange width of 14.09 inches, web thickness of 0.725 inches, and flange thickness of 1.190 inches. Compared to rectangular beams, the I-shape achieves a higher II about its strong axis—the axis perpendicular to the web—with significantly less , as the bulk of the cross-section is concentrated in the flanges distant from the , thereby maximizing per unit weight. In contrast, a solid rectangular section distributes more uniformly, requiring greater to attain equivalent II. I-beams are manufactured either as rolled sections, hot-formed in mills to precise profiles, or as built-up sections, assembled by plates together for custom dimensions. They are conventionally oriented with the web vertical and flanges horizontal, aligning the strong axis to counter vertical loads effectively.

Mechanical Properties and Advantages

I-beams possess a high elastic section modulus, calculated as S=IymaxS = \frac{I}{y_{\max}}, where II is the second moment of area about the strong axis and ymaxy_{\max} is the distance from the neutral axis to the outermost fiber, enabling superior resistance to bending stresses in structural applications. This property arises from the strategic placement of material in the flanges, distant from the neutral axis, which maximizes II and thus enhances the beam's capacity to withstand flexural loads without excessive deformation. The vertical web provides axial stiffness through its substantial cross-sectional area, effectively resisting compressive and tensile forces along the beam's longitudinal direction during load-bearing. Additionally, torsional properties are governed by the St. Venant torsional constant ITI_T, which quantifies the beam's resistance to uniform twisting, though I-sections typically exhibit moderate performance in this regard compared to closed profiles. The primary advantages of I-beams stem from their material efficiency, as the I-shaped cross-section distributes steel primarily where it contributes most to bending resistance, requiring substantially less material—often around half the volume of a solid rectangular beam—for equivalent strength under flexural loading. This efficiency not only reduces weight and cost but also facilitates ease of connection, with the wide flanges allowing straightforward bolting, welding, or riveting to other structural elements without compromising integrity. Furthermore, I-beams offer versatility in composite construction, where the bottom flange can bond with concrete slabs to form hybrid systems that leverage the tensile strength of steel and compressive capacity of concrete for enhanced overall performance. Despite these strengths, I-beams have limitations in and torsion; the open web results in lower overall shear resistance compared to solid sections, primarily due to the thin web handling most shear forces, and flanges contribute to torsional warping, potentially leading to higher stresses or deformations without additional reinforcements. For instance, in a simply supported I-beam subjected to uniform distributed load, the high about the strong axis significantly reduces mid-span deflection relative to channel or sections of comparable weight, demonstrating the shape's optimized performance for typical flexural demands in building frameworks.

Design Principles

Bending and Load Analysis

The bending analysis of I-beams under transverse loads relies on the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, a foundational model developed in the that assumes plane sections perpendicular to the beam axis remain plane after deformation and neglects shear effects for slender members. This theory relates the beam's to the applied through the d2Δdx2=MEI\frac{d^2 \Delta}{dx^2} = \frac{M}{EI}, where Δ\Delta is the transverse deflection, xx is the position along the beam, MM is the internal , EE is the modulus of elasticity, and II is the second moment of area about the . For practical calculations, integrated forms of this equation yield deflections for common loading cases; for a simply supported I-beam with a central concentrated load PP over span LL, the maximum deflection at midspan is given by δ=PL348EI.\delta = \frac{PL^3}{48EI}. The corresponding distribution is linear across the cross-section, with the normal stress σ\sigma at a distance yy from the calculated as σ=MyI\sigma = \frac{My}{I}, where the maximum stress occurs at the extreme (y=cy = c, the distance to the farthest ). This assumes elastic behavior and is essential for ensuring stresses remain below yield limits, with MM obtained from . I-beams encounter primary load types such as concentrated loads, which apply a discrete at a point and cause a discontinuous jump in the diagram, and uniform distributed loads, which spread a constant intensity ww ( per unit ) across the span and produce a linearly varying with a parabolic moment profile. For design, and diagrams are constructed to identify critical sections, often using envelopes that bound the maximum positive and negative values across all load combinations to conservatively represent potential demands. The design process for I-beams under bending involves selecting a section whose nominal flexural strength MnM_n satisfies either the Allowable Strength Design (ASD) criterion, where the required moment MaM_a must not exceed Mn/ΩM_n / \Omega with a factor of safety Ω=1.67\Omega = 1.67 for flexure to account for load and resistance uncertainties, or the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) criterion, where the factored required moment MuM_u must not exceed ϕMn\phi M_n with a resistance factor ϕ=0.90\phi = 0.90. In both methods, MnM_n is determined from the section's properties (e.g., plastic modulus ZxZ_x and yield stress FyF_y) and loading conditions, with load combinations per ASCE 7 ensuring the selected I-section provides adequate capacity while meeting serviceability requirements like deflection limits. As an illustrative example, consider determining the minimum moment of inertia II for a simply supported steel I-beam spanning L=6L = 6 m under a central concentrated load P=50P = 50 kN, with deflection limited to L/360L/360 (a common serviceability criterion for beams supporting brittle finishes like plaster ceilings). Using E=200E = 200 GPa for steel, the allowable deflection is δ=L/360=6000/360=16.67\delta = L/360 = 6000/360 = 16.67 mm =0.01667= 0.01667 m. Rearranging the deflection equation gives IPL348Eδ.I \geq \frac{PL^3}{48 E \delta}. Substituting values: PL3=50×103×63=50×103×216=10.8×106PL^3 = 50 \times 10^3 \times 6^3 = 50 \times 10^3 \times 216 = 10.8 \times 10^6 N·m³, and 48Eδ=48×200×109×0.016671.60×101148 E \delta = 48 \times 200 \times 10^9 \times 0.01667 \approx 1.60 \times 10^{11} N·m², so I10.8×106/1.60×1011=6.75×105I \geq 10.8 \times 10^6 / 1.60 \times 10^{11} = 6.75 \times 10^{-5} m⁴ (or 67.5 × 10^6 mm⁴). A standard I-section with II exceeding this value, such as a W310×60, would then be checked for stress adequacy using σ=My/I\sigma = My/I.

Stability Issues and Mitigations

I-beams subjected to are prone to stability failures, primarily lateral-torsional (LTB) and local , which can lead to sudden capacity loss under compressive stresses. LTB occurs when the compression laterally and the beam twists about its longitudinal axis, particularly in unbraced spans where the unbraced length exceeds certain limits relative to the section properties. The critical moment for elastic LTB in a simply supported doubly symmetric I-beam is given by Mcr=πLEIyGJ+(πEL)2IyCw,M_{cr} = \frac{\pi}{L} \sqrt{E I_y G J + \left( \frac{\pi E}{L} \right)^2 I_y C_w},
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.