Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
I-beam
View on Wikipedia
An I-beam is any of various structural members with an Ɪ- (serif capital letter 'I') or H-shaped cross-section. Technical terms for similar items include H-beam, I-profile, universal column (UC), w-beam (for "wide flange"), universal beam (UB), rolled steel joist (RSJ), or double-T (especially in Polish, Bulgarian, Spanish, Italian, and German). I-beams are typically made of structural steel and serve a wide variety of construction uses.
The horizontal elements of the Ɪ are called flanges, and the vertical element is known as the "web". The web resists shear forces, while the flanges resist most of the bending moment experienced by the beam. The Euler–Bernoulli beam equation shows that the Ɪ-shaped section is a very efficient form for carrying both bending and shear loads in the plane of the web. On the other hand, the cross-section has a reduced capacity in the transverse direction, and is also inefficient in carrying torsion, for which hollow structural sections are often preferred.
History
[edit]
In 1849, the method of producing an I-beam, as rolled from a single piece of wrought iron,[1] was patented by Alphonse Halbou of Forges de la Providence in Marchienne-au-Pont, Belgium.[2]
Bethlehem Steel, headquartered in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, was a leading supplier of rolled structural steel of various cross-sections in American bridge and skyscraper work of the mid-20th century.[3] Rolled cross-sections now have been partially displaced in such work by fabricated cross-sections.
Overview
[edit]
There are two standard I-beam forms:
- Rolled I-beam, formed by hot rolling, cold rolling or extrusion, depending on the material.
- Plate girder, formed by welding (or occasionally bolting or riveting) plates.
I-beams are commonly made of structural steel but may also be formed from aluminium or other materials. A common type of I-beam is the rolled steel joist (RSJ), sometimes incorrectly rendered as reinforced steel joist. British and European standards also specify Universal Beams (UBs) and Universal Columns (UCs). These sections have parallel flanges, shown as "W-Section" in the accompanying illustration, as opposed to the varying thickness of RSJ flanges, illustrated as "S-Section", which are seldom now rolled in the United Kingdom. Parallel flanges are easier to connect to and do away with the need for tapering washers. UCs have equal or near-equal width and depth and are more suited to being oriented vertically to carry axial load such as columns in multi-storey construction, while UBs are significantly deeper than they are wide are more suited to carrying bending load such as beam elements in floors.
I-joists, I-beams engineered from wood with fiberboard or laminated veneer lumber, or both, are also becoming increasingly popular in construction, especially residential, as they are both lighter and less prone to warping than solid wooden joists. However, there has been some concern as to their rapid loss of strength in a fire if unprotected.
Design
[edit]
I-beams are widely used in the construction industry and are available in a variety of standard sizes. Tables are available to allow easy selection of a suitable steel I-beam size for a given applied load. I-beams may be used both as beams and as columns.
I-beams may be used both on their own, or acting compositely with another material, typically concrete. Design may be governed by any of the following criteria:
- deflection: the stiffness of the I-beam will be chosen to minimize deformation
- vibration: the stiffness and mass are chosen to prevent unacceptable vibrations, particularly in settings sensitive to vibrations, such as offices and libraries
- bending failure by yielding: where the stress in the cross section exceeds the yield stress
- bending failure by lateral torsional buckling: where a flange in compression tends to buckle sideways or the entire cross-section buckles torsionally
- bending failure by local buckling: where the flange or web is so slender as to buckle locally
- local yield: caused by concentrated loads, such as at the beam's point of support
- shear failure: where the web fails. Slender webs will fail by buckling, rippling in a phenomenon termed tension field action, but shear failure is also resisted by the stiffness of the flanges
- buckling or yielding of components: for example, of stiffeners used to provide stability to the I-beam's web.
Design for bending
[edit]
A beam under bending sees high stresses along the axial fibers that are farthest from the neutral axis. To prevent failure, most of the material in the beam must be located in these regions. Comparatively little material is needed in the area close to the neutral axis. This observation is the basis of the I-beam cross-section; the neutral axis runs along the center of the web which can be relatively thin and most of the material can be concentrated in the flanges.
The ideal beam is the one with the least cross-sectional area (and hence requiring the least material) needed to achieve a given section modulus. Since the section modulus depends on the value of the moment of inertia, an efficient beam must have most of its material located as far from the neutral axis as possible. The farther a given amount of material is from the neutral axis, the larger is the section modulus and hence a larger bending moment can be resisted.
When designing a symmetric I-beam to resist stresses due to bending the usual starting point is the required section modulus. If the allowable stress is σmax and the maximum expected bending moment is Mmax, then the required section modulus is given by:[4]
- ,
where I is the moment of inertia of the beam cross-section and c is the distance of the top of the beam from the neutral axis (see beam theory for more details).
For a beam of cross-sectional area a and height h, the ideal cross-section would have half the area at a distance h/2 above the cross-section and the other half at a distance h/2 below the cross-section.[4] For this cross-section,
- .
However, these ideal conditions can never be achieved because material is needed in the web for physical reasons, including to resist buckling. For wide-flange beams, the section modulus is approximately
which is superior to that achieved by rectangular beams and circular beams.
Issues
[edit]Though I-beams are excellent for unidirectional bending in a plane parallel to the web, they do not perform as well in bidirectional bending. These beams also show little resistance to twisting and undergo sectional warping under torsional loading. For torsion dominated problems, box beams and other types of stiff sections are used in preference to the I-beam.
Stiffeners
[edit]It is possible to increase the shear capacity in a beam web by adding out of plane stiffness using transverse web stiffeners. These can be added to both sides of the web, or just one. They are usually steel plates welded into place, but bolting can be used.[5][6]
Standards
[edit]Shapes and materials in the United States
[edit]
In the United States, the most commonly mentioned I-beam is the wide-flange (W) shape. These beams have flanges whose inside surfaces are parallel over most of their area. Other I-beams include American Standard (designated S) shapes, in which inner flange surfaces are not parallel, and H-piles (designated HP), which are typically used as pile foundations. Wide-flange shapes are available in grade ASTM A992,[7] which has generally replaced the older ASTM grades A572 and A36. Ranges of yield strength:
- A36: 36,000 psi (250 MPa)
- A572: 42,000–60,000 psi (290–410 MPa), with 50,000 psi (340 MPa) the most common
- A588: Similar to A572
- A992: 50,000–65,000 psi (340–450 MPa)
Like most steel products, I-beams often contain some recycled content.
The following standards define the shape and tolerances of I-beam steel sections:
European standards
[edit]
In Europe, the main available I-beam and H-beam profiles are IPE, IPN, and HE profiles, which are further broken down into HEA, HEB, and HEM. The primary difference between these profiles is the geometry of their flanges (the horizontal parts of the "I" or "H") and their dimensions, which affects their strength and weight.
- IPE
- Stands for I Profile European. IPE profiles have an I-shaped cross-section with parallel flanges. The web (the vertical part) is typically taller than the flange width, giving it a narrow, tall appearance. These beams are standardized according to the EN 10365 standard.
- IPN
- Stands for I Profile Normal. Like IPE, they have an I-shaped cross-section, but the key difference is their tapered flanges. The inner surfaces of the flanges are not parallel but rather inclined at a slope of 14%.
- HE
- HE profiles are a family of wide-flange beams with a distinct H-shaped cross-section. Unlike IPE and IPN, the flange width is significantly wider, often equal to the height of the beam up to a certain size. They are categorized into three main types based on their flange and web thickness: HEA (light), HEA (normal) and HEAM (heavy).
The profiles are managed by the following standards:
- EN 10024, Hot rolled taper flange I sections – Tolerances on shape and dimensions.
- EN 10034, Structural steel I and H sections – Tolerances on shape and dimensions.
- EN 10162, Cold rolled steel sections – Technical delivery conditions – Dimensional and cross-sectional tolerances
AISC manual
[edit]The American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) publishes the Steel Construction Manual for designing structures of various shapes. It documents the common approaches, Allowable Strength Design (ASD) and Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD), (starting with 13th ed.) to create such designs.
Other
[edit]- DIN 1025-5
- ASTM A6, American Standard Beams
- BS 4-1
- IS 808 – Dimensions hot rolled steel beam, column, channel and angle sections
- AS/NZS 3679.1 – Australia and New Zealand standard[8]
Designation and terminology
[edit]
In the United States, steel I-beams are commonly specified using the depth and weight of the beam. For example, a "W10x22" beam is approximately 10 in (254 mm) in depth with a nominal height of the I-beam from the outer face of one flange to the outer face of the other flange, and weighs 22 lb/ft (33 kg/m). Wide flange section beams often vary from their nominal depth. In the case of the W14 series, they may be as deep as 22.84 in (580 mm).[9]'
In Europe, steel profiles are named with a combination of their type designation and their nominal height in millimeters. The naming is straightforward: the letters are followed directly by the height of the beam's web. An IPE 200 beam has the following key dimensions and weight, based on European standards (EN 10365):
- Height (h): 200 mm
- Flange Width (b): 100 mm
- Web Thickness (tw): 5.6 mm
- Flange Thickness (tf): 8.5 mm
- Weight: 22.4 kg per meter (kg/m)
In Canada, steel I-beams are now commonly specified using the depth and weight of the beam in metric terms. For example, a "W250x33" beam is approximately 250 millimetres (9.8 in) in depth (height of the I-beam from the outer face of one flange to the outer face of the other flange) and weighs approximately 33 kg/m (22 lb/ft; 67 lb/yd).[10] I-beams are still available in US sizes from many Canadian manufacturers.
In Mexico, steel I-beams are called IR and commonly specified using the depth and weight of the beam in metric terms. For example, a "IR250x33" beam is approximately 250 mm (9.8 in) in depth (height of the I-beam from the outer face of one flange to the outer face of the other flange) and weighs approximately 33 kg/m (22 lb/ft).[11]
In India, I-beams are designated as ISMB, ISJB, ISLB, ISWB. ISMB: Indian Standard Medium Weight Beam, ISJB: Indian Standard Junior Beams, ISLB: Indian Standard Light Weight Beams, and ISWB: Indian Standard Wide Flange Beams. Beams are designated as per respective abbreviated reference followed by the depth of section, such as for example ISMB 450, where 450 is the depth of section in millimetres (mm). The dimensions of these beams are classified as per IS:808 (as per BIS).[citation needed]
In the United Kingdom, these steel sections are commonly specified with a code consisting of the major dimension, usually the depth, -x-the minor dimension-x-the mass per metre-ending with the section type, all measurements being metric. Therefore, a 152x152x23UC would be a column section (UC = universal column) of approximately 152 mm (6.0 in) depth, 152 mm width and weighing 23 kg/m (46 lb/yd) of length.[12]
In Australia, these steel sections are commonly referred to as Universal Beams (UB) or Columns (UC). The designation for each is given as the approximate height of the beam, the type (beam or column) and then the unit metre rate (e.g., a 460UB67.1 is an approximately 460 mm (18.1 in) deep universal beam that weighs 67.1 kg/m (135 lb/yd)).[8]
Cellular beams
[edit]Cellular beams are the modern version of the traditional castellated beam, which results in a beam approximately 40–60% deeper than its parent section. The exact finished depth, cell diameter and cell spacing are flexible. A cellular beam is up to 1.5 times stronger than its parent section and is therefore utilized to create efficient large span constructions.[13]
See also
[edit]- C-beam, also known as a structural channel or Parallel Flange Channel (PFC)
- DIN 1025 – a DIN standard which defines the dimensions, masses and sectional properties of a set of I-beams
- Open web steel joist
- Reinforced concrete
- Steel design
- Structural angle
- T-beam
- Weld access hole
References
[edit]- ^ Forsyth, M. Structures and Construction in Historic Building Conservation. p. 179.
- ^ Thomas Derdak, Jay P. Pederson (1999). International directory of company histories. Vol. 26. St. James Press. p. 82. ISBN 978-1-55862-385-9.
- ^ "Forging America: The History of Bethlehem Steel". Morning Call Supplement. The Morning Call. 14 December 2003. Archived from the original on 27 April 2011. Retrieved 24 September 2010.
- ^ a b Gere and Timoshenko, 1997, Mechanics of Materials, PWS Publishing Company.
- ^ Quimby, T. Bartlett (30 July 2011). "Transverse Stiffeners for Shear". T. Bartlett Quimby. Retrieved 8 May 2025.
- ^ Beg, D. (16 April 2013). "Intermediate transverse stiffeners in stiffened plate girders" (PDF). Structural Stability Research Council, St. Louis, Missouri. Retrieved 8 May 2025.
- ^ ASTM A992?A992M Standard Specification for Structural Steel Shapes. American Society for Testing and Materials. 2006. doi:10.1520/A0992_A0992M-06A.
- ^ a b Hot rolled and structural steel products - Fifth edition OneSteel February 2010
- ^ AISC Manual of Steel Construction 14th Edition
- ^ Handbook of Steel Construction (9th ed.). Canadian Institute of Steel Construction. 2006. ISBN 978-0-88811-124-1.
- ^ IMCA Manual of Steel Construction, 5th Edition.
- ^ "Structural sections" (PDF). Corus Construction & Industrial. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 February 2010.
- ^ "Cellular Beams - Kloeckner Metals UK". kloecknermetalsuk.com. Retrieved 13 May 2017.
Further reading
[edit]- Ashby, M. F. (2005). Materials Selection in Mechanical Design (3rd ed.). Oxford; Boston: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 9780750661683. See chapter 8, sections 8.4 ("Floor joists: wood or steel?") and 8.5 ("Increasing the stiffness of the steel sheet").
External links
[edit]I-beam
View on GrokipediaHistory and Development
Origins and Early Use
The I-beam cross-section, resembling the letter "I," emerged in the mid-19th century amid the rapid expansion of railway infrastructure and industrial construction in Europe. Early forms appeared as cast iron girders in British railway bridges during the 1830s and 1840s, where the shape optimized resistance to bending moments by concentrating material in the flanges away from the neutral axis.[9] This design addressed the limitations of solid rectangular beams, offering greater stiffness with less weight. The pivotal advancement came in 1849, when Belgian engineer Alphonse Halbou patented a method for rolling I-beams from a single piece of wrought iron at Forges de la Providence, enabling mass production and standardization for structural applications.[5] Early adoption of I-beams and I-shaped girders marked significant milestones in iconic 19th-century projects. In 1851, the Crystal Palace in London utilized thousands of prefabricated wrought iron I-girders to span its expansive glass-enclosed exhibition halls, supporting vast open spaces with minimal internal columns and showcasing the shape's efficiency for lightweight, modular construction.[10] Similarly, the Eiffel Tower, completed in 1889 for the Paris Universal Exposition, incorporated wrought iron lattice members within its girders for the four inclined legs and upper structure, providing exceptional strength-to-weight ratios that allowed the 300-meter tower to withstand wind loads while using only 7,300 tons of material.[11] These applications highlighted the I-beam's role in enabling unprecedented scales of iron-based architecture. The transition from cast iron and wrought iron to rolled steel I-beams accelerated in the late 1800s, particularly in the United States. The first rolled wrought iron I-beams were produced domestically in the 1850s by firms such as the Trenton Iron Company and Phoenix Iron Company, initially for fireproof institutional buildings like banks and warehouses.[6] By the 1880s, Andrew Carnegie's steel operations at the Homestead Works and Edgar Thomson Steel Works began rolling steel I-beams on a large scale, supplying structural shapes for pioneering skyscrapers such as Chicago's Home Insurance Building in 1885, the first to employ a metal skeleton frame.[12] This shift reduced costs and improved tensile strength, further popularizing the profile. From the outset, engineers recognized the I-beam's key advantage: its high moment of inertia per unit weight, which minimized material requirements while maximizing load-bearing capacity in bending scenarios, fundamentally transforming beam design in bridges and buildings.[13]Evolution in the 20th Century
In the early 20th century, the formation of the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) in 1921 marked a pivotal moment in standardizing structural steel design and fabrication in the United States, promoting uniform practices for rolled I-beam sections that facilitated their widespread adoption in building construction.[14] Initially established as the National Steel Fabricators' Association, the AISC influenced the evolution of I-beams by developing specifications that emphasized consistency in material properties and shapes, enabling more efficient engineering of steel frameworks. In the early 1900s, Henry Grey developed the universal rolling process for producing wide-flange beams, enhancing rigidity for taller structures.[5] The 1920s also saw the advent of electric arc welding technologies, which allowed for the fabrication of I-beams from steel plates, offering greater flexibility in customizing beam sizes and shapes compared to traditional rolled sections.[15] Automatic arc welding, invented by P.O. Nobel in 1920, utilized continuous electrode wire feeds and direct current to produce strong, seamless joints, leading to the construction of the first fully welded steel buildings by the late 1920s.[16] This innovation reduced reliance on riveting, lowered costs, and expanded I-beam applications in industrial structures, though riveted rolled I-beams remained dominant until the mid-century.[17] Iconic pre-war projects like the Empire State Building (completed in 1931) utilized thousands of riveted rolled I-beams to achieve its 102-story height, demonstrating the structural reliability of standardized sections.[18] Following World War II, a surge in global steel production—from about 190 million tonnes annually in 1950 to 347 million tonnes by 1960—drove the standardization and mass production of rolled I-beam sections, supporting rapid urbanization and infrastructure development.[19] In the United States, enhanced rolling mills produced deeper and wider I-beams with improved tolerances, integral to the skeletal frames of modern skyscrapers and bridges. The 1950s and 1960s introduced high-strength low-alloy steels, such as ASTM A242 (developed in the 1940s but widely adopted post-war) and A440 (introduced in 1960), which offered yield strengths up to 50 ksi, significantly increasing I-beam load capacities without proportionally enlarging cross-sections.[20] These materials allowed for lighter, more efficient designs in high-rise and long-span applications, with A36 steel becoming the standard mild steel at 36 ksi yield strength by 1960.[21] In Europe, post-war reconstruction efforts heavily incorporated I-beams in bridges and buildings, utilizing prefabricated rolled and welded sections to rebuild infrastructure swiftly; for instance, orthotropic steel decks on bridges emerged as a innovative use, combining I-beam girders with integrated plating for enhanced rigidity.[22] This period's advancements solidified I-beams as a cornerstone of resilient, scalable structural engineering.[23]Structure and Properties
Definition and Cross-Section
An I-beam, also known as a wide-flange beam or universal beam, is a structural member characterized by an I- or H-shaped cross-section, consisting of two parallel horizontal flanges connected by a vertical web. This configuration is specifically engineered to optimize resistance to bending moments in construction and civil engineering applications, where the flanges primarily handle compressive and tensile stresses while the web resists shear forces.[24] The geometry of an I-beam cross-section is defined by key dimensions: the flange width (or ), the overall depth (or height between the outer faces of the flanges), the web thickness , and the flange thickness . Typical proportions emphasize wider flanges relative to the web for enhanced stability against buckling, with flange widths often ranging from approximately 50% to 100% of the depth in standard sections, and web thicknesses much slimmer to conserve material. For example, in American wide-flange (W) shapes per ASTM A6 standards, a common section like W27×178 has a depth of 27.8 inches, flange width of 14.09 inches, web thickness of 0.725 inches, and flange thickness of 1.190 inches.[25] Compared to rectangular beams, the I-shape achieves a higher second moment of area about its strong axis—the axis perpendicular to the web—with significantly less material, as the bulk of the cross-section is concentrated in the flanges distant from the neutral axis, thereby maximizing bending stiffness per unit weight. In contrast, a solid rectangular section distributes material more uniformly, requiring greater mass to attain equivalent . I-beams are manufactured either as rolled sections, hot-formed in mills to precise profiles, or as built-up sections, assembled by welding plates together for custom dimensions. They are conventionally oriented with the web vertical and flanges horizontal, aligning the strong axis to counter vertical loads effectively.[26]Mechanical Properties and Advantages
I-beams possess a high elastic section modulus, calculated as , where is the second moment of area about the strong axis and is the distance from the neutral axis to the outermost fiber, enabling superior resistance to bending stresses in structural applications.[27] This property arises from the strategic placement of material in the flanges, distant from the neutral axis, which maximizes and thus enhances the beam's capacity to withstand flexural loads without excessive deformation.[28] The vertical web provides axial stiffness through its substantial cross-sectional area, effectively resisting compressive and tensile forces along the beam's longitudinal direction during load-bearing.[1] Additionally, torsional properties are governed by the St. Venant torsional constant , which quantifies the beam's resistance to uniform twisting, though I-sections typically exhibit moderate performance in this regard compared to closed profiles.[29] The primary advantages of I-beams stem from their material efficiency, as the I-shaped cross-section distributes steel primarily where it contributes most to bending resistance, requiring substantially less material—often around half the volume of a solid rectangular beam—for equivalent strength under flexural loading.[30] This efficiency not only reduces weight and cost but also facilitates ease of connection, with the wide flanges allowing straightforward bolting, welding, or riveting to other structural elements without compromising integrity.[31] Furthermore, I-beams offer versatility in composite construction, where the bottom flange can bond with concrete slabs to form hybrid systems that leverage the tensile strength of steel and compressive capacity of concrete for enhanced overall performance.[32] Despite these strengths, I-beams have limitations in pure shear and torsion; the open web results in lower overall shear resistance compared to solid sections, primarily due to the thin web handling most shear forces, and flanges contribute to torsional warping, potentially leading to higher stresses or deformations without additional reinforcements.[29] For instance, in a simply supported I-beam subjected to uniform distributed load, the high moment of inertia about the strong axis significantly reduces mid-span deflection relative to channel or tee sections of comparable weight, demonstrating the shape's optimized performance for typical flexural demands in building frameworks.[28]Design Principles
Bending and Load Analysis
The bending analysis of I-beams under transverse loads relies on the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, a foundational model developed in the 18th century that assumes plane sections perpendicular to the beam axis remain plane after deformation and neglects shear effects for slender members. This theory relates the beam's curvature to the applied bending moment through the differential equation , where is the transverse deflection, is the position along the beam, is the internal bending moment, is the modulus of elasticity, and is the second moment of area about the neutral axis.[33] For practical calculations, integrated forms of this equation yield deflections for common loading cases; for a simply supported I-beam with a central concentrated load over span , the maximum deflection at midspan is given by [34] The corresponding bending stress distribution is linear across the cross-section, with the normal stress at a distance from the neutral axis calculated as , where the maximum stress occurs at the extreme fibers (, the distance to the farthest fiber). This formula assumes elastic behavior and is essential for ensuring stresses remain below yield limits, with obtained from structural analysis.[35] I-beams encounter primary load types such as concentrated loads, which apply a discrete force at a point and cause a discontinuous jump in the shear force diagram, and uniform distributed loads, which spread a constant intensity (force per unit length) across the span and produce a linearly varying shear force with a parabolic moment profile.[36] For design, shear force and bending moment diagrams are constructed to identify critical sections, often using envelopes that bound the maximum positive and negative values across all load combinations to conservatively represent potential demands.[37] The design process for I-beams under bending involves selecting a section whose nominal flexural strength satisfies either the Allowable Strength Design (ASD) criterion, where the required moment must not exceed with a factor of safety for flexure to account for load and resistance uncertainties, or the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) criterion, where the factored required moment must not exceed with a resistance factor .[38] In both methods, is determined from the section's properties (e.g., plastic modulus and yield stress ) and loading conditions, with load combinations per ASCE 7 ensuring the selected I-section provides adequate capacity while meeting serviceability requirements like deflection limits.[38] As an illustrative example, consider determining the minimum moment of inertia for a simply supported steel I-beam spanning m under a central concentrated load kN, with deflection limited to (a common serviceability criterion for beams supporting brittle finishes like plaster ceilings).[39] Using GPa for steel, the allowable deflection is mm m. Rearranging the deflection equation gives [34] Substituting values: N·m³, and N·m², so m⁴ (or 67.5 × 10^6 mm⁴). A standard I-section with exceeding this value, such as a W310×60, would then be checked for stress adequacy using .[35]Stability Issues and Mitigations
I-beams subjected to bending are prone to stability failures, primarily lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) and local buckling, which can lead to sudden capacity loss under compressive stresses. LTB occurs when the compression flange buckles laterally and the beam twists about its longitudinal axis, particularly in unbraced spans where the unbraced length exceeds certain limits relative to the section properties. The critical moment for elastic LTB in a simply supported doubly symmetric I-beam is given by where is the modulus of elasticity, is the moment of inertia about the weak axis, is the shear modulus, is the torsional constant, is the warping constant, and is the unbraced length; longer unbraced lengths significantly reduce , making LTB the governing limit state for slender beams.[40][41] Local buckling involves out-of-plane deformation of individual elements like the compression flange or web before the overall section yields, triggered by excessive slenderness. For I-beam flanges, the slenderness parameter (where is the flange width and the thickness) must be limited; in compact sections, to prevent local buckling prior to reaching the plastic moment, while non-compact limits extend to to avoid inelastic buckling. Similarly, web slenderness (clear distance between flanges over web thickness) is restricted to for compact behavior and up to for non-compact, ensuring the web contributes fully to flexural resistance without premature local failure.[38] Mitigations for these stability issues focus on enhancing torsional and lateral stiffness or reducing effective slenderness. Increasing section depth boosts and , raising for LTB resistance, while adding cover plates to the compression flange thickens it to lower local slenderness below critical thresholds. Lateral bracing at intervals shorter than the unbraced length (ideally for full plastic capacity) prevents LTB by restraining the compression flange, and full restraint via deck attachment or cross-frames provides continuous support. For local buckling, thicker elements or lip stiffeners on flanges maintain within compact limits without altering overall geometry.[38][42] A notable case study is the 2004 collapse of a temporarily braced steel girder during construction of a bridge widening project at the C-470 overpass on Interstate 70 in Colorado, where failure of the temporary bracing system due to installation deficiencies (including an out-of-plumb girder and improperly installed expansion bolts) led to instability and the girder falling, killing three people. Investigations by the NTSB revealed insufficient planning and oversight by contractors and the Colorado Department of Transportation; wind loads had minimal effect on stability. Post-incident recommendations included consistent standards for bracing design certified by a professional engineer and enhanced oversight of safety-critical construction activities, influencing updates to AASHTO guidelines for temporary restraints.[42][43]Stiffening Techniques
Stiffeners are secondary steel plates or sections attached to the web or flanges of I-beams to enhance resistance against local buckling, shear deformation, and concentrated loads.[44] These reinforcements are particularly essential in plate girders and deep beams where the web is slender and prone to instability.[38] The primary types of web stiffeners include transverse and longitudinal variants. Transverse stiffeners, oriented perpendicular to the beam's longitudinal axis, consist of intermediate transverse stiffeners for shear reinforcement and bearing stiffeners at support points or load application areas. Intermediate transverse stiffeners improve shear capacity by promoting tension field action in the web, while bearing stiffeners, often paired and fitted tightly to the flanges, distribute concentrated compressive forces to prevent local web yielding.[38] Longitudinal stiffeners, aligned parallel to the beam span, are used less frequently but provide continuous support against web buckling under compression, typically in deep girders where transverse stiffeners alone are insufficient.[44] Design of stiffeners focuses on adequate sizing and secure attachment to ensure effective load transfer. For width, transverse stiffeners must be at least two-thirds of the flange width, but not less than 4 inches (100 mm), while thickness is typically at least one-sixteenth of the stiffener width, but not less than 1/4 inch (6 mm) nor the web thickness to avoid slenderness issues (b/t ≤ 0.56 √(E/F_y_st)).[38] The width of each bearing stiffener adjacent to the web, plus half the web thickness, shall not be less than one-third the flange width. Attachment is commonly achieved through fillet welding along the full length of contact with the web and flanges, with minimum weld sizes per applicable codes (e.g., 6 mm for intermediate stiffeners), though bolting may be used in prefabricated assemblies for ease of installation.[44] Welds must terminate a distance of 4 to 6 times the web thickness from the flange-to-web junction to minimize stress concentrations.[38] These stiffening techniques significantly enhance I-beam performance by increasing the available shear strength (V_n) through post-buckling resistance mechanisms, potentially up to 60% in stiffened panels where the stiffener spacing-to-depth ratio (a/h) is ≤ 3.[38] They also prevent web crippling under concentrated loads by limiting local deformations and ensuring the web's effective length for buckling is reduced, thereby maintaining overall structural integrity.[44] In plate girders, intermediate transverse stiffeners are commonly spaced at approximately half the web depth (d/2) to control shear buckling, with the exact placement determined by the panel aspect ratio to optimize tension field development without excessive material use.[38]Materials and Shapes
Common Materials
The primary material for I-beams is structural steel, valued for its high strength-to-weight ratio and versatility in construction applications. Common grades include ASTM A36, a low-carbon steel with a minimum yield strength of 250 MPa, widely used in general building and engineering due to its good weldability and machinability.[45][46] Higher-strength options like ASTM A992, with a yield strength of 345 MPa, are preferred for demanding structural uses such as bridges and high-rise frames, offering improved toughness and weldability while maintaining cost-effectiveness.[47][48] Alloying elements like copper, chromium, and nickel are incorporated in some steels to enhance corrosion resistance, particularly in exposed environments.[49] Key mechanical properties of steel I-beams include a modulus of elasticity of approximately 200 GPa, which governs their stiffness under load, and high fatigue strength that allows endurance under cyclic stresses in dynamic applications like cranes or seismic zones.[50][51] Weldability is a critical advantage, enabling easy fabrication and on-site assembly without significant loss of integrity, though proper techniques are essential to avoid stress concentrations that could reduce fatigue performance.[52][47] For lightweight requirements, aluminum alloys such as 6061-T6 are used in I-beam forms, particularly in aerospace for components like wing spars and fuselage frames, where their modulus of elasticity around 70 GPa provides adequate stiffness at one-third the density of steel.[53][54] In hybrid configurations, composite materials like carbon fiber-reinforced polymers are integrated with steel or concrete cores to create I-beams with superior strength-to-weight ratios, applied in bridges and advanced structures for reduced material use and enhanced durability.[55][56] Material selection considers environmental exposure; for outdoor or marine settings, galvanizing applies a zinc coating to steel I-beams for sacrificial corrosion protection, extending service life by 50 years or more in moderate atmospheres.[57] Alternatively, weathering steels like Corten (ASTM A588) form a stable rust patina that inhibits further oxidation, ideal for unpainted bridges and architectural elements without additional coatings.[58][59]Standard Shapes by Region
In North America, particularly under the standards of the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), wide-flange beams designated as W shapes are the most common I-beam profiles, featuring parallel flanges and a web for efficient load distribution in building frameworks.[60] These shapes are specified in imperial units, with designations indicating nominal depth in inches and weight in pounds per foot; for instance, the W12x26 has a depth of 12.22 inches, flange width of 6.49 inches, and weighs 26 pounds per foot.[60] Complementary profiles include S shapes, which have tapered flanges sloping at 16.67% for enhanced shear resistance in lighter applications, and HP shapes, square-like H-piles with equal depth and flange width suited for piling and heavy bearing.[60] European standards, governed by EN 10365 and Eurocode 3, emphasize metric IPE (European Parallel Flange) and HE (Heavy Wide Flange) sections, which prioritize uniformity and ease of fabrication across member states.[61] IPE profiles feature parallel flanges with a slope of 8%, as in the IPE 300, which has a height of 300 mm, flange width of 150 mm, web thickness of 7.1 mm, flange thickness of 10.7 mm, and mass of 42.2 kg/m.[61] HE sections, including HEA (light), HEB (medium), and HEM (heavy) variants, offer wider flanges relative to height for greater moment capacity; representative dimensions for HEA 300 include a height of 290 mm, flange width of 300 mm, web thickness of 8.5 mm, flange thickness of 14 mm, and mass of 88.3 kg/m.[61] In Asia, Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS G 3192) define H-beam profiles with parallel flanges, often mirroring European designs but adapted for seismic resilience, such as the H 200x100 section with height 200 mm, flange width 100 mm, web thickness 5.5 mm, flange thickness 8 mm, and mass around 22 kg/m.[62] Chinese national standards under GB/T 11263-2017 specify hot-rolled H sections in metric sizes, with common profiles like HN 100x100 featuring height 100 mm, flange width 100 mm, web thickness 6 mm, flange thickness 8 mm, and mass of 17.2 kg/m, produced in grades like Q235B for general construction.[63] Modern I-beam designs increasingly incorporate tapered flanges in select profiles, such as AISC S shapes or Australian/New Zealand AS/NZS 3679.1 taper flange beams, to optimize material use by reducing weight while maintaining strength under bending loads.[64] This trend enhances efficiency in prefabricated structures, though parallel-flange variants remain dominant for standardization.[65]| Region | Profile Example | Height/Depth | Flange Width | Web Thickness | Flange Thickness | Mass/Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North America (AISC) | W12x26 | 12.22 in | 6.49 in | 0.23 in | 0.38 in | 26 lb/ft |
| Europe (EN) | IPE 300 | 300 mm | 150 mm | 7.1 mm | 10.7 mm | 42.2 kg/m |
| Japan (JIS) | H 200x100 | 200 mm | 100 mm | 5.5 mm | 8 mm | 22 kg/m |
| China (GB) | HN 100x100 | 100 mm | 100 mm | 6 mm | 8 mm | 17.2 kg/m |