Hubbry Logo
HyaenodonHyaenodonMain
Open search
Hyaenodon
Community hub
Hyaenodon
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Hyaenodon
Hyaenodon
from Wikipedia

Hyaenodon
Temporal range: Middle Eocene to Early Miocene (Bartonian to Burdigalian) 38–17 Ma
Mounted H. sp. skeleton, Science Museum of Minnesota
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Hyaenodonta
Superfamily: Hyaenodontoidea
Family: Hyaenodontidae
Subfamily: Hyaenodontinae
Tribe: Hyaenodontini
Leidy, 1869[1]
Genus: Hyaenodon
Laizer & Parieu, 1838
Type species
Hyaenodon leptorhynchus
Laizer and Parieu, 1838
Species
Synonyms[2]
synonyms of genus:
  • Gobipterodon (Lavrov, 1999)[3]
  • Macrohyaenodon (Lavrov & Emry, 1998)
  • Macropterodon (Lavrov, 1999)
  • Megalopterodon (Dashzeveg, 1964)
  • Microhyaenodon (Lavrov, 1999)[3]
  • Neohyaenodon (Thorpe, 1922)
  • Prohyaenodon (Lavrov, 1999)
  • Protohyaenodon (Stock, 1933)
  • Pseudopterodon (Schlosser, 1887)
  • Taxotherium (Blainville, 1841)
synonyms of species:
  • H. brachyrhynchus:
    • Canis brachyrhynchus (Blainville, 1841)
    • Hyaenodon brachyrhenchus (Lavrov, 1999)
    • Hyaenodon cuvieri (Pictet, 1853)[4]
    • Hyaenodon leptorhynchus (Dujardin, 1840)[5]
    • Hyaenodon parisiensis (Laurillard, 1845)[6]
    • Hyaenodon vulpinum (Filhol, 1877)
    • Hyaenodon vulpinus (Gervais, 1873)
    • Nasua parisiensis (Blainville, 1841)
    • Pterodon brachyrhynchus (Pomel, 1846)[7]
    • Pterodon cuvieri (Pomel, 1846)
    • Taxotherium parisiense (Blainville, 1841)
  • H. brevirostrus:
    • Hyaenodon brevirostris (Joeckel, 1997)[8]
    • Protohyaenodon brevirostrus (Mellett, 1977)
  • H. chunkhtensis:
    • Microhyaenodon chunkhtensis (Lavrov, 1999)
  • H. crucians:
    • Hyaenodon leptocephalus (Scott, 1888)[9]
    • Hyaenodon minutus (Douglass, 1902)
    • Hyaenodon paucidens (Osborn & Wortman, 1894)[10]
    • Protohyaenodon crucians (Mellett, 1977)
    • Prtohyaenodon crucians (Lavrov, 1999)
    • Pseudopterodon minutus (Douglass, 1902)
  • H. dubius:
    • Hyaenodon aymardi (Filhol, 1882)[11]
  • H. exiguus:
    • Hyaenodon exigus (Lavrov, 1999)
    • Pterodon exiguum (Gervais, 1873)
  • H. filholi:
    • Hyaenodon compressus (Filhol, 1876)
    • Hyaenodon vulpinus (Filhol, 1876)
    • Microhyaenodon filholi (Lavrov, 1999)
    • Pseudopterodon ganodus (Schlosser, 1887)
  • H. gervaisi:
    • Hyaenodon ambiguous
    • Hyaenodon ambiguus (Martin, 1906)
  • H. gigas:
    • Macropterodon zelenovi (Lavrov, 1999)
    • Neohyaenodon gigas (Lavrov, 1999)
  • H. heberti:
    • Hyaenodon arnaudi (Depéret, 1917)[12]
  • H. horridus:
    • Hyaenodon cruentus (Leidy, 1853)
    • Neohyaenodon horridus (Thorpe, 1922)
    • Neohyaenodon semseyi (Kretzoi, 1941)[13]
  • H. incertus:
    • Gobipterodon exploratus (Lavrov, 1999)
    • Hyaenodon exploratus (Polly, 1993)[14]
    • Neohyaenodon incertus (Lavrov, 1999)
    • Pterodon exploratus (Dashzeveg, 1985)
  • H. leptorhynchus:
    • Canis leptorhynchus (Blainville, 1841)
    • Hyaenodon bavaricus (Dehm, 1935)[15]
    • Hyaenodon cayluxi (Filhol, 1876)
    • Hyaenodon martini (Depéret, 1917)
    • Hyaenodon milloquensis (Martin, 1906)
    • Pterodon leptorhynchus (Pomel, 1846)
  • H. macrocephalus:
    • Neohyaenodon macrocephalus (Lavrov, 1999)
  • H. megaloides:
    • Neohyaenodon megaloides (Mellett, 1977)
  • H. microdon:
    • Microhyaenodon microdon (Lavrov, 1999)
    • Protohyaenodon microdon (Mellett, 1977)
  • H. milvinus:
    • Neohyaenodon milvinus (Lavrov, 1999)
  • H. minor:
    • Hyaenodon aimi (Cooper, 1926)[16]
    • Hyaenodon hantonensis (Lydekker, 1884)[17]
  • H. mongoliensis:
    • Epipterodon mongoliensis (Lavrov, 1999)
    • Megalopterodon mongoliensis (Dashzeveg, 1964)
    • Neohyaenodon mongoliensis (Morlo & Nagel, 2006)[18]
    • Pterodon mongoliensis (Van Valen, 1967)[19]
  • H. montanus:
    • Protohyaenodon montanus
    • Neohyaenodon montanus (Mellett, 1977)
  • H. mustelinus:
    • Hyaenodon mustilinius
    • Prohyaenodon mustelinus (Lavrov, 1999)
    • Protohyaenodon mustelinus (Scott, 1894)
  • H. pervagus:
    • Hyaenodon neimongoliensis (Huang & Zhu, 2002)[20]
  • H. pumilus:
    • Microhyaenodon pumilus (Lavrov, 1999)
  • H. raineyi:
    • Microhyaenodon raineyi (Lavrov, 1999)
    • Protohyaenodon raineyi (Gustafson, 1986)
  • H. requieni:
    • Hyaenodon heberti euzetensis (Depéret, 1917)
    • Pterodon requieni (Gervais, 1846)
  • H. venturae:
    • Hyaenodon exiguus (Stock, 1933)
    • Microhyaenodon venturae (Lavrov, 1999)
    • Protohyaenodon exiguus (Stock, 1933)
    • Protohyaenodon venturae (Mellett, 1977)
  • H. vetus:
    • Neohyaenodon vetus (Mellett, 1977)
    • Pterodon californicus (Stock, 1933)
  • H. yuanchuensis:
    • Hyaenodon yuanchüensis (Young, 1937)

Hyaenodon ("hyena-tooth") is an extinct genus of carnivorous placental mammals from the tribe Hyaenodontini, part of the subfamily Hyaenodontinae (which is within the family Hyaenodontidae), that belonged to the now extinct order Hyaenodonta.[21] The genus was found lived in Eurasia and North America from the Middle Eocene to the Early Miocene, from 38 to 17 million years ago, existing for 21 million years.[22] Hyaenodon first evolved in Asia,[23] probably evolving from Propterodon.[24]

The genus currently consists of at least 40 species,[24] although due to sexual dimorphism and intraspecific variation, there were likely fewer species within the genus.[23] The species within the genus ranged in size from H. filholi, which weighed 2 kg (4.4 lb), to H. gigas and H. mongoliensis, which were estimated to be similar in size to Hyainailouros. The largest species were likely the apex predators of their time, with fossil records suggesting they could have occasionally hunted smaller predators. Several species within the genus were cursorial predators, either being ambushing or pounce-pursuit predators. The canines of the animal mediolaterally compressed much like canids, landing shallow bites on their prey. Unlike canids such as wolves, they are thought to have been solitary predators.

The genus saw a decline during the Late Eocene to Early Oligocene, with only one species, H. weilini, being present in the Miocene. Initially, experts hypothesize their decline and extinction was the result of competition with carnivorans. However, over the recent years, this hypothesis has been questioned. Instead, experts now hypothesize the cause of their decline and eventual extinction was the inability to adapt to open environments.

Classification and phylogeny

[edit]

Taxonomy

[edit]
  • Tribe: †Hyaenodontini (Leidy, 1869)
    • Genus: †Hyaenodon (Laizer & Parieu, 1838)
      • Hyaenodon brachyrhynchus (Blainville, 1841)[25]
      • Hyaenodon chunkhtensis (Dashzeveg, 1985)[26]
      • Hyaenodon dubius (Filhol, 1873)[27]
      • Hyaenodon eminus (Matthew & Granger, 1925)[28]
      • Hyaenodon exiguus (Gervais, 1873)[29]
      • Hyaenodon filholi (Schlosser, 1887)[30]
      • Hyaenodon gervaisi (Martin, 1906)[31]
      • Hyaenodon heberti (Filhol, 1876)[32]
      • Hyaenodon leptorhynchus (Laizer & Parieu, 1838)[33]
      • Hyaenodon lingbaoensis (Li, 2025)[34]
      • Hyaenodon minor (Lange-Badré, 1979)[35]
      • Hyaenodon pervagus (Matthew & Granger, 1924)[36]
      • Hyaenodon pumilus (Lavrov, 2019)[37]
      • Hyaenodon requieni (Gervais, 1846)[38]
      • Hyaenodon rossignoli (Lange-Badré, 1979)
      • Hyaenodon weilini (Wang, 2005)[39]
      • Hyaenodon yuanchuensis (Young, 1937)[40]
      • Subgenus: †Neohyaenodon (paraphyletic subgenus) (Thorpe, 1922)[41]
        • Hyaenodon gigas (Dashzeveg, 1985)
        • Hyaenodon horridus (Leidy, 1853)[42]
        • Hyaenodon incertus (Dashzeveg, 1985)
        • Hyaenodon macrocephalus (Lavrov, 1999)[3]
        • Hyaenodon megaloides (Mellett, 1977)[43]
        • Hyaenodon milvinus (Lavrov, 1999)[3]
        • Hyaenodon mongoliensis (Dashzeveg, 1964)[44]
        • Hyaenodon montanus (Douglass, 1902)[45]
        • Hyaenodon vetus (Stock, 1933)[46]
      • Subgenus: †Protohyaenodon (paraphyletic subgenus) (Stock, 1933)
        • Hyaenodon brevirostrus (Macdonald, 1970)[47]
        • Hyaenodon crucians (Leidy, 1853)
        • Hyaenodon microdon (Mellett, 1977)
        • Hyaenodon mustelinus (Scott, 1894)[48]
        • Hyaenodon raineyi (Gustafson, 1986)[49]
        • Hyaenodon venturae (Mellett, 1977)

Description

[edit]
Skull of Hyaenodon horridus

Size

[edit]

The species within the genus vary in size, with most being small to medium-sized predators, while some were among the largest terrestrial carnivorous mammals of their time.[39] Intraspecific dimorphism has also been reported in the genus, although its ecological significance is unclear. H. crucians, from the early Oligocene of North America, was estimated to have weighed around 10–25 kg (22–55 lb). H. microdon and H. mustelinus, from the late Eocene of North America, were even smaller and weighed probably about 5 kg (11 lb).[50] H. filholi was the smallest European species and the smallest species within the genus, weighing 2 kg (4.4 lb). H. leptorhynchus, the type species, was estimated to have weighed 11 kg (24 lb).[51]

H. horridus was one of the largest North American species. While m1 regressions suggested it could have weighed 91.8 kg (202 lb),[52] regressions based on limb morphology suggest the species was instead a bit smaller, with adults weighing 41.42 kg (91.3 lb) on average, with the largest adults weighing no more than 60 kg (130 lb).[50] H. megaloides, the largest North American species, was three times heavier than H. horridus, weighing 30–120 kg (66–265 lb).[50] It has been suggested that the size decrease among North American Hyaenodon species may have been the result of competition with nimravids.[50] In Europe, the largest species known species was H. geravisi, weighing 50 kg (110 lb).[51] The largest species was H. gigas, followed by H. mongoliensis.[53] Both species had a skull length of 60 cm (2.0 ft) and were thought to have been larger than lions, potentially rivaling Hyainailouros in size.[54][53] H. weilini was another very large species, described to be similar in size to H. gigas and H. mongoliensis.[39]

Postcranial remains

[edit]

Postcranial remains have been recovered for Hyaenodon, although the fossil records within Eurasia are rather scarce compared to North America.[55] While the neck of the animal was relatively short, the body and tail were long.[55] Compared to Hyainailouros, the spine of Hyaenodon was longer and more robust, suggesting it didn't bore its head as low.[56][57] Cervical vertebrae of Hyaenodon was more relatively short and resembled that of a felid than a canid.[55]

The neural spines were prominent and was posterior projecting Hyaenodon in comparison to carnivorans. Within Hyaenodon, the transverse processes and neural spine of the thoracic vertebrae were larger and more robust than what is seen with carnivorans. The more developed spines would've supported a larger head with hypothetical nuchal ligament.[55]

The femur of Hyaenodon was found to have been nearly as long as the humerus, which was short and massive, supporting a large, rounded head. Compared to carnivorans, the greater tuberosity has a more irregular shape and faces anteromedially. It would've been an insertion site for the infraspinatous muscles, which isn't seen in carnivorans.[55] Despite this, the humerus of Hyaenodon was similar to that of wolves and hyenas. Compared to hyenas, it shows an anconeal fossa, a well-developed brachial flange and a similarly elongated trochlea shape. Despite this, the trochela shape of Hyaenodon is more similar in to the red fox.[55]

Compared to wolves, the radius and ulna of Hyaenodon are rather short. The anatomy of the radius suggests it lost any possible rotatory capabilities. The shaft of the radius was not as flattened as seen in carnivorans, although within the cross section it was quadratic, with the distal part being heavy. The ulna had a relatively long olecranon, along with a heavy shaft and a deep channel that runs into the radical notch to the styloid process.[55]

Paleobiology

[edit]
Reconstruction of Hyaenodon by Heinrich Harder (around 1920)

Predatory behavior

[edit]

The canines of Hyaenodon were mediolaterally compressed, similar to canids, this was ideal for slashing bites. This suggests Hyaenodon landed shallow bites on potential prey and likely didn't perform the killing bite seen in felids.[55] Hunter-Schreger bands observed in the tooth enamel of H. horridus are zigzag, suggesting that this species was osteophagous, whereas those of H. brevirostris and H. mustelinus transition from undulating at the base of the tooth to zigzag at the tip, indicating that these species were not as well adapted for feeding on bone.[58] However, dental microwear patterns suggests that North American Hyaenodon had a diet more similar to lions, suggesting it ate mostly meat with various intakes of bone. On the other hand, European Hyaenodon microwear were more similar to that of spotted hyenas, suggesting bone cracking was likely a major part of their diet.[59] The tooth wearing on P4 of H. gigas suggests the primary function of the tooth was for bone-cracking.[39] Despite having adaptations towards bone consumption, compared to Hyainailouros, the dentition of Hyaenodon was geared more towards shearing meat and less towards bone crushing.[60] A 2024 study found that canine bite mechanic efficiency increased with tooth macrowear in Hyaenodon.[61]

Ontogeny

[edit]

Studies on juvenile Hyaenodon specimens show that the animal had a very unusual system of tooth replacement. Juveniles took about 3–4 years to complete the final stage of eruption, implying a long adolescent phase. In North American forms, the first upper premolar erupts before the first upper molar, while European forms show an earlier eruption of the first upper molar.[62]

Locomotion

[edit]
Life reconstruction of H. horridus

Initially, Hyaenodon was thought to have been a semi-plantigrade walker, however other experts considered it to have been a digitigrade.[55][56] Due to the presence of relatively straight ungual phalanges, short phalanges, intermediate long metatarsals, cadually oriented olecranon, with a long olecranon, suggests Hyaenodon was a terrestrial animal.[55] A 2003 study found that based on elbow morphology H. horridus was a cursorial predator and was the most cursorially adapted Oligocene carnivore sampled within the study.[63] Furthermore, a 2025 study found that based on elbow morphology found that H. crucians and H. horridus were pounce-pursuit predators.[64] Much like H. horridus, H. eminus, H. gigas, and H. pervagus were recovered as cursorial predators.[65] On the other hand, analysis on the bony labyrinth of H. exiguus suggests this species was semi-arboreal.[22]

Despite being a cursorial predator, Hyaenodon probably still tended to hunt within short distances.[55][66]

Brain anatomy and senses

[edit]

While it has typically been assumed that Hyaenodon had a very massive skull, but a small brain, this has been called into question.[67] Flink and colleagues found that Hyaenodon, had encephalization quotient of 0.36-0.37 and 0.42-0.46, for H. horridus and H. crucians respectively. This similar to basal and some modern carnivorans such as cougars, Hesperocyon gregarius, Hoplophoneus primaevus, and striped hyena and exceeding jaguars, Daphoenus, Hoplophoneus primaevus, and Eusmilus bidentatus. Their discovery found that hyaenodonts had relative brain sizes that overlapped with both extinct and extant carnivorans.[68] The endocast of Hyaenodon stands out from other hyaenodontoids as they had relatively high EQ, in addition to relatively gyrencephalic and neocorticalized brains, however the cause of the increase in EQ for the genus is still unknown.[67] Despite having neocorticalized brains compared to other hyaenodonts, the neocortex of Hyaenodon was only moderately folded.[55]

The olfactory bulbs were found to have been large in Hyaenodon, suggesting smell was the primary method of finding prey.[55] However, compared to Neogene carnivorans of similar size, Hyaenodon sense of smell wasn't as acute, which would've been disadvantageous in prey detection.[69][55]

Social behavior

[edit]

Due the small size of the neocortex, some experts proposed that Hyaenodon probably didn't hunt in packs. Further evidence to suggest it was a solitary predator was fossil evidence of defecation, as defecating on food was an indication of a solitary predator.[55]

Paleoecology

[edit]

North America

[edit]

During the early Paleogene, North America consisted of subtropical swampy, densely forested habitats which supported predators such as oxyaenids. However, during the Middle Eocene, these habitats were replaced by more temperate, open forests.[70] Because of these environmental changes, hyaenodonts would replace oxyaenids, as well as mesonychians and miacoids.[66] Hyaenodon first appeared in North America during the Middle Eocene with the appearance of H. venturae,[23] likely the result of immigration from Asia.[56]

Reconstruction of H. horridus and Leptomeryx evansi by W. B. Scott (1913)

The most well known species, H. horridus, roamed North America from 36.5 to 31.4 Ma.[71] This species was found in the Calf Creek locality of Cypress Hills Formation.[72] The herpetofauna present within the locality suggests Calf Creek had a tropical or subtropical climate.[73] In this locality, Hyaenodon coexisted with hyaenodonts such as H. microdon and the hyainailourid Hemipsalodon grandis. Carnivorans that were present in this formation were daphoeninae amphicyonids Brachyrhynchocyon dodgei and Daphoneus, nimravids Dinictis and Hoplophoneus, hesperocyonine canid Hesperocyon gregarius, and the subparictid Parictis.[72][52][74] In addition, Hyaenodon also coexisted with the entelodont Archaeotherium. Herbivores present in this locality include the equid Mesohippus, the hyracodontid Hyracodon priscidens, rhinoceroses Subhyracodon occidentalis, Trigonias osborni, and Penetrigonias sagittatus, tapirid Colodon occidentalis, the brontothere Megacerops kuwagatarhinus, and the anthracothere Bothriodon advena.[74]

The predators present in Calf Creek likely practiced niche partitioning via different body sizes, with H. horridus focusing on prey that weighed 166 kg (366 lb) and faced little competition from carnivorans. While Hoplophoneus could've induced some competition pressure via pack hunting, H. horridus could still hunt prey outside of the most probable range of the carnivoran. On the other hand, H. microdon was thought to have faced intense competition from five contemporary carnivorans.[52]

Restoration of Archaeotherium eating roots. Several species of both taxa were contemporary with each other across North America

H. horridus was also found in Brule Formation of South Dakota.[75] The paleoenvironment of Brule Formation was believed to have been a woodland grassland and gallery forest, populated in part by hackberry trees (Celtis).[76] Contemporary predators would've included fellow species H. crucians, the nimravid Hoplophoneus, the amphicyonid Daphoneus, and the entelodont Archaeotherium mortoni. Herbivores present include the early horse Mesohippus, hypertragulid Hypertragulus calcaratus, leptomerycid Leptomeryx evansi, tapirs such as Protapirus simplex and Colodon occidentalis, the camel Poebrotherium wilsoni, anthracotheres Aepinacodon americanus and Heptacodon occidentale, oreodonts Merycoidodon culbertsonii and Miniochoerus affinis.[75]

Fossil evidence suggests that H. horridus could've predate on other predators such as Dinictis and juvenile Archaeotherium.[77][78][55] Despite being one of the top predators, it still probably lost its kills to an adult Archaeotherium.[55]

Pre-Grand Coupure Europe

[edit]
Palaeogeography of Europe and Asia during the middle Eocene with possible artiodactyl and perissodactyl dispersal routes.

From the early to middle Eocene, the climate of Europe was warm and humid, hosting tropical to subtropical closed forests. However, from MP17b to the end of the Eocene, the climate started to become more arid, turning forests into wooded savannas. Multiple groups of mammalian predators present on the continent include mesonychians, oxyaenids, hyaenodonts, and carnivoramorphs. The extinction of European mesonychians, oxyaenids, and viverravids were connected to the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum. This likely led to the diversification of hyaenodonts at the Ypresian-Lutetian boundary, resulting in them becoming the dominant group of predators in Europe.[79]

During the Bartonian and Priabonian stage, there was major restructuring of the predator guild, which marked the end of endemism. The restructuring was also marked by the appearance of hyaenodontines and hyainailourines, along with amphicyonids.[79] Hyaenodon first appears in the fossil records around MP17a of the Bartonian stage of the Eocene marked by the appearance of H. brachyrhynchus, H. minor, and H. requieni.[51] Their appearance was likely the result of Hyaenodon migrating into Europe from Asia.[79]

Reconstruction of Pterodon dasyuroides, a hyainailourine that was found in Western Europe and coexisted with Hyaenodon requieni. The appearance of hyainailourines, hyaenodontines, and amphyicyonids represented a major restructuring of the carnivore guild

H. requieni was found in La Debruge of France.[80] Mammalian predators present in this locality other than H. requieni included the hyainailourine Pterodon dasyuroides and the amphicyonine Cynodictis lacustris. Contemporary herbivores include perissodactyls (palaeotheres), endemic (amphimerycids, Anoplotheriidae, choeropotamids, and xiphodontids) and non-endemic artiodactyls (dichobunides, tapirulids, and anthracotheres). Other mammalian fauna includes primates (adapids and omomyids), rodents (ischyromyids, theridomyids, and glirids), soricomorphs (nyctitheriids), and tribosphenidans (Herpetotheriidae).[80]

Grand Coupure

[edit]
Anoplotherium, an iconic genus of the Western European endemic fauna. It was one of the many endemic artiodactyls that went extinct during the Grand Coupure

The boundary of the Eocene and Oligocene in Europe was marked by the Grand Coupure (MP20-MP21), which saw a transition from subhumid to cooler, semi-arid seasons, resulting in the reduction of forests, swamps, and mangroves. In Western Europe, the boundary is marked by the spread of conifers and temperate woodlands, and even savannas in some areas. The change in European flora suggests marked seasonality and open environments replacing forests.[79][81] The massive drop in temperature stemmed from the first major expansion of the Antarctic ice sheets that caused drastic pCO2 decreases and an estimated drop of ~70 m (230 ft) in sea level.[82]

During the Grand Coupure, the extinction rate of western European mammalian lineages increased to 60%.[83] The turnover saw the extinction of frugivorous/folivorous families of endemic artiodactyls such as xiphodontids and choeropotamids,[84] as well as the extinction of several hyaenodonts including H. requini and the hyainailourines.[85][86][79][87][88] The Grande Coupure event also marked a large faunal turnover would mark the arrivals of later anthracotheres, entelodonts, ruminants (Gelocidae, Lophiomerycidae), rhinocerotoids (Rhinocerotidae, Amynodontidae, Eggysodontidae), carnivorans (later Amphicyonidae, Amphicynodontidae, Nimravidae, and Ursidae), eastern Eurasian rodents (Eomyidae, Cricetidae, and Castoridae), and eulipotyphlans (Erinaceidae).[89][90][83][88] The arrivals of these animals was likely the result of the Turgai Strait receding, establishing a new land connection between Europe and Asia. The faunal turnover also marked the shift in dominance among predators, from hyaenodonts to carnivoraforms. However the transition was gradual as newcomers didn't appear in Europe until MP21, while the endemic hyaenodontoids and carnivoraforms disappeared between MP18-MP20.[79]

Post-Grand Coupure Europe

[edit]

The Rupelian stage corresponds with the peak floral changes that started in the Late Eocene. Despite seeing the extinction of some paleotropical elements and dispersal of deciduous trees, there was still evidence of warm Mediterranean to subtropical paleoenvironments. However, for most of Europe, there were arid conditions with relatively low mean annual temperatures, which is associated with (sub)desert to lightly forested habitats. Two million years after the Grand Coupure, the Bachitherium Dispersal Event saw some of the earliest ruminants in Europe.[79][91][59]

Palaeobiogeography of eastern Eurasian ruminants during the late Eocene-early Oligocene with dispersal routes to western Europe during the Grande Coupure (33.9 Ma) and Bachitherium Dispersal Event (31 Ma).

At the end of the Rupelian (MP24-MP25), saw the extinction of the nimravids, as well as the reduction in diversity among other mammalian groups such as rodents, likely the result of the increased aridity.[79] H. geravisi and H. leptorhynchus were found in Séon Saint-André, which was dated to MP26. The carnivorans present in this locality were amphicyonids Cynelos rugosidens and Pseudocyonopsis ambiguus. All predators within this locality are believed to have practiced some niche partitioning. H. leptorhynchus is believed to have hunted small artiodactyls such as Bachitherium and Mosaicomeryx.[51] However the larger predators would've hunted larger artiodactyls such as Anthracotherium cuvieri and Elomeryx borbonicus and perissodactyls such as Protaceratherium albigense and Ronzotherium romani. H. geravisi and Pseudocyonopsis were believed to competed for the same prey due to being similar in size to one another. Although, it is possible they preferred different environments as Hyaenodon was a cursorial predator and likely preferred open environments compared to amphicyonids, who preferred more closed environments.[51]

The end of the Oligocene was marked by increased seasonality, characterized by a dry season and open environments.[79][92] However, some experts found closed forests and temperate to subtropical climates still prevailed in Europe, although the humidity wasn't as high as the Priabonian.[93][79] The contradictions would suggest that Europe supported mosaic environments during the late stages of the Oligocene.[79] Around MP28, the Microbunodon Event saw the ruminants transition from wooded environments to more open environments, which was likely the result of the Late Oligocene Warming and Alpine orogeny.[94][79] MP27 to MP29 also saw the appearance of many caniforms such as mustelids and ailurids, and large amphicyonids. The appearance of large amphicyonids, such as Ysengrinia, suggests that Western Europe was a wooded savanna and environments were becoming more open.[79][51]

Asia

[edit]

In East Asia, H. gigas lived from Late Eocene to Early Oligocene.[23][53] The species was found within the Khoer-Dzan locality of the Ergilin Dzo Formation.[53] Based on the presence of brontotheres and the abundance of low crowned herbivores, it was initially thought that the climate was humid and it was warm, with the environment thought to have been relatively closed. However, the absence of primates and the rarity of crocodyliforms suggests the formation had some open areas and was more arid than contemporary formations across Eurasia.[95] Sedimentary analysis of Khoer-Dzan found the presence of root traces which suggests red soils, which is associated with floodplain environments, with no evidence of lacustrine environments.[96]

Within this locality, H. gigas coexisted with other predators like hyaenodonts H. eminus, H. incertus, H. mongoliensis, and H. pervagus, nimravids Eofelis and Nimravus intermedius, and entelodonts Brachyhyops trofimovi and Entelodon gobiensis. Contemporary herbivores include the anthracothere Bothriodon, the praetragulid Praetragulus electus, the brontothere Embolotherium andrewsi, the chalicothere Schizotherium avitum, and rhinocerotoids such as the paraceratheriid Urtinotherium parvum and rhinocerotid Ronzotherium orientale.[97]

Extinction

[edit]

From the middle to late Eocene, hyaenodonts experienced a decline in diversity with only one genus, consisting of a few species by the end of the Eocene in North America.[98] With H. brevirostrus being the last species in North America, which disappeared in the late Oligocene.[99] In Europe, the last species to go extinct, H. exiguus and H. leptorhynchus, were last known in MP30 of the late Oligocene.[51][100] The youngest species, H. weilini, lived during the Early Miocene of China, going extinct 17 Ma.[39]

The cause of their extinction has been debated by experts. Some experts argued due to the anatomy of the neocortex, Hyaenodon lacked the mental capacity to adjust to the changing environment and prey evolving larger brains. However, this has been contested as the degree of folding doesn't automatically apply to intelligence.[55] However, many argued that their extinction was due to competition with carnivorans, such as amphicyonids, hesperocyonines, hemicyonines, and hyenas.[66][98][101] Lang and colleagues theorize that the success of carnivorans compared to hyaenodonts was likely due to the retention of a basal morphotype throughout their evolutionary history. They also suggested that carnivorans possibly played a role in the extinction of hyaenodonts, probably due to the adaptive potential of their carnassials.[102]

Friscia and Valkenburgh argued that while "creodonts" didn't limit the evolution of carnivorans in North America, carnivorans may have limited the ecological evolution of creodonts, with the large hypercarnivorous ecomorphs being the "last stand" of the order.[98] Serio and colleagues found that North American creodonts had a significant degree of morphological differentiation until the middle Eocene, with disparity among carnivorans increasing around the same time. The authors also argue that carnivoran disparity may have negatively impacted the disparity of creodonts, supporting the hypothesis that carnivorans competitively replaced the hyaenodonts.[101]

However, competitive replacement in North America has been questioned by many experts, arguing their extinction correlated with abiotic changes in their environments.[64][52] Christison and colleagues found that only small hyaenodont, H. microdon, experienced significant competition with the five contemporary carnivorans. The largest hyaenodonts such as H. horridus and Hemipsalodon, didn't experience little to no competition from carnivorans. This suggests competition with carnivorans couldn't have been the driver of the extinction of North American hyaenodonts in the Late Eocene. Instead, they argued the highly specialized niche of hyaenodonts enhanced their extinction rates. The global cooling of the early Oligocene resulted in the extinction of large browsers such as brontotheres, as ecosystems became drier and more open. Brontotheres were replaced by equids and rhinoceroses, who were better adapted for open environments. But rhinoceroses wouldn't reach large sizes until the Miocene epoch, leaving the gap of accessible large herbivores for the large, hypercarnivorous hyaenodonts. Furthermore, hyaenodonts tend to have relatively short legs, which may have been a disadvantage in open environments and likely played a role in their extinction.[52] Castellanos, in their 2025 paper, found that despite hyaenodonts showing adaptations towards cursoriality, because of their short distal limbs, hyaenodonts couldn't exploit open environments as well as amphicyonids, which may have resulted in their extinction and in addition to the low diversity of the clade by the start of the Oligocene.[64]

There was also no evidence of Carnivorans competitively displacing hyaenodonts in Europe as hyaenodonts were more diverse than carnivorans up until the Grand Coupure.[79] In addition, it was found that Hyaenodon and amphicyonids preferred different environments, with the former presumably hunting in more open environments which would've limited competition between the two predators, suggesting climatic changes were responsible for their extinction.[51][103] MP30 and MN1 saw an increase in aridity, and was associated with a cooler climate.[104][105] It saw the extinction of other groups of animals such as Theridomorpha.[104] Despite being recovered as a cursorial predator, European Hyaenodon went extinct because of the expansion of open environments as it reduced the access to resources.[51]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Hyaenodon is an extinct of carnivorous placental mammals belonging to the Hyaenodontidae within the clade (formerly classified under the order ), known for their role as dominant predators during the . These mammals, whose name translates to "hyena ," were not closely related to modern but occupied similar ecological niches as hypercarnivores with specialized for shearing flesh. Species of Hyaenodon exhibited a wide range of body sizes, from small fox-like forms weighing around 10 kg to large lion-sized individuals approaching 100 kg, and displayed in some cases. The genus ranged temporally from the late Eocene to the early Miocene, spanning approximately 38 to 16 million years ago, likely originating in Asia, with fossils documenting its presence across North America, Europe, and Asia. In North America, Hyaenodon species were among the largest carnivores of the Oligocene, characterized by large heads, long slender legs suited for running, and powerful jaws adapted for bone-crushing and predation on medium to large ungulates. Eurasian records reveal diverse adaptations, including cursorial locomotion in larger forms and potentially semi-arboreal habits in smaller species, allowing them to exploit varied environments from forests to open plains. Around 30 species have been described, with notable examples including the small European H. exiguus and the massive North American H. horridus. Hyaenodon played a pivotal role in mammalian communities, often serving as apex predators and before being largely replaced by the rising order in the . Their morphology, including large maxillary sinuses and specialized paranasal structures, suggests efficient respiratory and sensory adaptations suited to terrestrial hunting, though with less acute olfaction than modern carnivorans. The evolutionary success of Hyaenodon highlights the of hyaenodonts following the Cretaceous-Paleogene , filling carnivorous guilds until environmental changes and competition led to their decline.

Taxonomy and phylogeny

Etymology and discovery

The genus name Hyaenodon derives from the Greek words hyaina () and odous (tooth), coined to highlight the superficial resemblance of its dentition to that of . The , H. leptorhynchus, was formally described in by French naturalists L. Laizer and J. de Parieu based on a lower fragment representing an unknown carnivorous . This (FSL 70000) originated from late deposits near Cournon-d'Auvergne in , . The initial description of Hyaenodon occurred amid a surge of early 19th-century fossil discoveries of mammals across , including and sites that revealed diverse carnivorous forms. These finds often led to initial misidentifications, with Hyaenodon's shearing and robust canines mistaken for those of extinct , reflecting limited understanding of mammalian evolution at the time. Subsequent explorations expanded the genus's known distribution, with American paleontologist Joseph Leidy reporting the first North American specimens in the 1850s, including H. cruentus from strata of the White River Formation in . These discoveries underscored Hyaenodon's transcontinental presence and prompted early comparisons between European and North American faunas.

Taxonomy

Hyaenodon is the of the , a family of extinct carnivorous mammals within the order , which is now recognized as a distinct sister to Carnivoraformes within the larger group Pan-Carnivora (mirorder ). Previously classified under the polyphyletic order , has been elevated to its own ordinal status based on phylogenetic analyses distinguishing it from other early carnivoramorphans. Within , Hyaenodon belongs to the subfamily Hyaenodontinae and tribe Hyaenodontini, characterized by specialized dentition adapted for shearing flesh. The is Hyaenodon leptorhynchus (Laizer and de Parieu, 1838), based on a lower jaw fragment ( FSL 70000) from the late of , exhibiting the 's characteristic elongated rostrum and robust . The encompasses approximately 20-30 valid distributed across , , and from the Eocene to , reflecting high taxonomic diversity with body sizes ranging from fox-like to bear-sized forms. Notable examples include H. horridus Leidy, 1853, the largest North American from the late Eocene to Oligocene White River Formation, estimated at 40-60 kg; H. gigas Dashzeveg, 1985, a giant Asian form from the of Mongolia, one of the largest in the ; and H. brachyrhynchus from the Eocene of , a smaller known from dental remains indicating a more gracile build. A recent addition is H. lingbaoensis Li et al., 2025, a small-bodied from the Middle Eocene Chuankou Formation in China's Lingbao Basin, represented by a partial preserving deciduous and that highlight early hyaenodontine dental evolution. Taxonomic revisions in the 2020s have resolved numerous junior synonyms through detailed morphometric and phylogenetic comparisons of cranial and . For instance, several North American taxa previously distinguished by minor size variations have been consolidated, reducing the number of valid species in the White River Group. The outdated inclusion of within has been critiqued and abandoned in favor of clade-based classifications emphasizing shared derived traits like sectorial premolars. Recent research from 2023 to 2025 has confirmed the validity of several Asian through new discoveries, including additional remains of H. eminus and H. pervagus from the of central , which provide better resolution of their dental and postcranial morphology. These updates underscore ongoing refinements to the genus's , integrating estimates and to clarify interspecies boundaries.

Phylogeny

Hyaenodon represents a derived within the Hyaenodontinae of the extinct order , positioned as part of a that includes closely related taxa such as Eurotherium and Proviverra. A 2019 phylogenetic analysis using cranial and dental characters recovered Hyaenodon as sister to a group encompassing Eurotherium species and certain proviverrine genera like Proviverra, emphasizing shared derived features in and morphology that distinguish this North American-Eurasian subclade from more basal hyaenodonts. This positioning highlights Hyaenodon's evolutionary advancement within Hyaenodontinae, characterized by hypercarnivorous adaptations that emerged during the Eocene. In broader mammalian phylogeny, Hyaenodonta is classified as a group of stem pan-carnivoramorphs within the mirorder , distinct from the crown group and more closely allied to pangolins (Pholidota) than to true carnivorans. The order diverged from its sister , the Oxyaenodonta, around the late , with molecular and clock estimates placing this split approximately 60-62 million years ago near the Paleocene-Eocene boundary. Hyaenodonta's placement as stem taxa is supported by parsimony-based cladistic analyses that recover the nested within , outside the Carnivoraformes, with consistency indices around 0.45-0.50 indicating moderate in character evolution. Key phylogenetic insights derive from a cladistic study of European hyaenodonts, which recovered the Hyaenodontoidea as a monophyletic uniting proviverrines and hyaenodontines, including , based on a matrix of 120 dental and cranial characters. Updates in , incorporating new Tanzanian fossils, refined basal divergences within to the early Eocene, emphasizing Afro-Arabian contributions to the clade's radiation while integrating Asian material to resolve polytomies in earlier trees. In cladograms, branches after the limnocyonine subfamily, reflecting a progressive increase in body size that paralleled ecological diversification into larger predatory niches during the late Eocene to . Ongoing debates center on Hyaenodonta's origins, contrasting an African cradle —supported by fossils like Lahimia from —with a Laurasian dispersal model favoring Asian or European ancestry based on early Eocene dispersals across continents. Recent 2025 discoveries of basal Hyaenodon species from Eocene deposits in China's Lingbao Basin bolster the Asian cradle , suggesting initial diversification in before westward and transatlantic dispersals, with parsimony analyses yielding retention indices of 0.65-0.70 for these revised topologies.

Description

Overall morphology and size

Hyaenodon species exhibited a carnivorous broadly resembling that of modern canids or ursids, with elongated skulls, robust limbs adapted for , and a posture transitioning from in ancestral or smaller forms to or semi-digitigrade in larger, more derived . These mammals, part of the extinct clade within Pan-Carnivora, were not closely related to (family Hyaenidae) despite superficial similarities in and build, instead representing an early divergent lineage of placental carnivorans specialized for hypercarnivory. Body size varied widely across the , reflecting ecological diversity; smaller species such as H. exiguus measured approximately 1–2 m in length and weighed 10–20 kg, akin to a in scale, while larger forms like H. horridus reached up to 3 m in length and 30–50 kg, comparable to a large . Overall body masses ranged from about 10 kg to nearly 100 kg, with estimates derived from limb dimensions and dental metrics establishing this scale. was minimal, though present, with males typically slightly larger than females based on cranial and postcranial variation. Proportions included a short , powerful for forceful movements, and a inferred to provide balance during agile pursuits or climbing in smaller taxa. Smaller displayed more generalized, semi-arboreal adaptations with features supporting scansorial habits, whereas larger North American species trended toward builds with elongated limbs for efficient terrestrial travel. North American Hyaenodon were generally larger on average than European counterparts, likely influenced by continental faunal dynamics and prey availability. Growth series from assemblages reveal pronounced ontogenetic size increases, with juveniles scaling up substantially to adult dimensions.

Skull and dentition

The of Hyaenodon features an elongated rostrum housing large maxillary sinuses that occupy 25-30% of the transitional skull area at the level of M1 and extend anteriorly to near P2, contributing to a adapted for olfactory and respiratory functions distinct from those in . A prominent rises along the cranium to anchor powerful temporalis muscles for jaw adduction, while the zygomatic arches are reduced in robustness, facilitating greater gape angles by minimizing masseteric stress during wide-mouth biting. The braincase is relatively small compared to the region, with a limited olfactory compartment and large frontal sinuses forming a prominent and supraorbital processes, but not extending beneath the . Adult Hyaenodon specimens exhibit a complete dentition of 44 teeth, following the formula I3/3, C1/1, P4/4, M3/3, typical of hyaenodontids and indicative of a hypercarnivorous lifestyle. The upper carnassials, primarily P4 and M1, form sectorial shearing blades with reduced protocones and simple paracones for slicing flesh, while the lower molars possess trenchant heels on their paraconids and protoconids to complement this action without specialized bone-crushing morphology seen in hyaenids. Premolars are sectorial and blade-like, incisors are conical for gripping, and the overall dentition lacks robust carnassial talonids or metaconids, emphasizing flesh-tearing over grinding or pulverizing. Tooth enamel in Hyaenodon is notably thick relative to comparably sized carnivorans like foxes, providing durability against wear from abrasive foods such as fragments and tendons, as evidenced by microwear patterns of heavy striations and pits. Variations occur across ; for instance, larger forms like H. gigas display proportionally enlarged canines suited to subduing bigger prey, contrasting with the more modest canines in smaller such as H. wyomingensis. Jaw mechanics in Hyaenodon support a powerful bite adapted for hypercarnivory, with lever arm models and morphofunctional analyses revealing high at the canines and , particularly as teeth wear to maintain shearing performance—unlike many extant carnivorans where efficiency declines. This configuration, driven by the elongated rostrum and robust crest, enables effective prey dispatch without the extreme durophagy of .

Postcranial skeleton

The axial skeleton of Hyaenodon consisted of a robust vertebral column with a flexible spine, characterized by flat zygapophyses that permitted a wide for agile terrestrial locomotion. This structure supported the genus's predatory lifestyle across diverse environments, with the tail being well-developed for balance during movement. The forelimbs were robustly built, featuring a with a prominent deltopectoral crest extending at least halfway down the shaft, which anchored strong muscles for powerful extension and flexion. The showed features like a tightly curved semilunar notch and anteriorly oriented radial facet, enhancing stability and , while the manus retained some dexterity with semi-opposable digits suited for or into prey. These adaptations reflect a generalized yet capable forelimb morphology, varying slightly with body size as noted in overall skeletal scaling. Hindlimbs in Hyaenodon displayed an elongated with a short neck and prominent , contributing to a build particularly in larger species, where the and tarsals like the astragalus featured a deeply grooved trochlea for stable parasagittal motion. The stance was , with reduced calcaneal asymmetry limiting mediolateral translation and promoting efficient forward propulsion on terrestrial substrates. Postcranial variations among Hyaenodon species reflected locomotor diversity, with smaller forms like H. exiguus showing scapular features such as a deep and evidence of musculus levator claviculae development indicative of capacity in semi-arboreal settings. In contrast, larger North American species exhibited more pronounced traits in limb proportions and thoracic structure, adapted for terrestrial pursuits.

Paleobiology

Predatory behavior

Hyaenodon species were primarily solitary or small-group ambush predators, relying on their cursorial limb adaptations for short pursuits in forested or woodland habitats during the Eocene and Oligocene. These mammals targeted medium-sized ungulates and smaller herbivores, such as early equids like Mesohippus and larger forms like Megacerops, with prey focus masses ranging from approximately 50 to 800 kg depending on species body size. Evidence from associated faunas in Eocene deposits indicates a preference for such prey in tropical to subtropical forest environments, where dense vegetation favored ambush tactics over prolonged chases. Feeding mechanics centered on powerful shearing bites delivered by specialized teeth, which sliced flesh and dismembered carcasses efficiently, as seen in the short, robust snouts and blade-like premolars and molars of specimens like Bastetodon syrtos. Microwear analysis reveals heavy gouging, pitting, and scratching on enamel surfaces, consistent with frequent consumption of tough, meaty tissues and occasional , supporting a hypercarnivorous diet exceeding 80% protein based on morphology and ecomorphological indices. Opportunistic scavenging of larger carcasses supplemented active , akin to modern hyaenids, with jaw wear patterns indicating repeated high-force bites throughout adulthood and even enhanced canine piercing efficiency in older individuals. Prey selection involved size-based niche partitioning to minimize competition with contemporaneous nimravids, where larger Hyaenodon species like H. grandis (over 400 kg) exploited bigger herbivores unavailable to smaller felid-like nimravids, while smaller H. microdon overlapped more but still focused on mid-sized mammals. This strategy allowed Hyaenodon to dominate apex predatory roles in North American and Eurasian ecosystems until the late .

Ontogeny and development

The of Hyaenodon is primarily inferred from juvenile , revealing a prolonged period of replacement that extended over approximately 3–4 years. In European specimens, the lower jaw eruption sequence proceeds as m1 → dp1 → m2 → i → p2 → c/p3/m3 → p4, with the permanent p4 erupting last after m3, while the upper jaw follows M1 → P1 → P2 → P4 → M2 → P3 → C. This sequence contrasts with North American Hyaenodon, where P1 erupts before M1 and the canine is among the last teeth to emerge. The delayed eruption of , particularly the replacement of dp4 by p4, postponed the development of full shearing capability for bone-crushing predation until late in . Growth during this phase involved a modest increase in size, with measuring 12–16% larger than their predecessors, as evidenced by comparisons in juvenile fossils. Thin sections of canines from North American specimens exhibit four incremental rings, supporting an extended juvenile period of 3–4 years before completing dental eruption. Although direct skeletal growth data are limited, the timing of dental maturation suggests was reached around 3–4 years, aligning with the cessation of replacement. Developmental variations appear among Hyaenodon species, with smaller forms potentially exhibiting accelerated maturation compared to larger ones, though specific timelines remain inferred from dental sequences across taxa. These patterns imply a prolonged period of dependency on parental provisioning, as the delayed onset of full predatory efficiency would have limited juvenile hunting success, suggesting some form of in Hyaenodon .

Brain anatomy

The brains of Hyaenodon displayed encephalization quotients (EQs) that were generally lower than those of modern carnivorans, which typically range around 1.0, reflecting a more primitive level of encephalization overall. For instance, calculations for Hyaenodon horridus yield an EQ of 0.37 using Jerison's (1973) method or 0.36 using Eisenberg's (1981) method, while Hyaenodon crucians shows values of 0.85 (Jerison) or 0.98 (Eisenberg). reconstructions indicate volumes of approximately 125 cm³ for H. horridus and 47 cm³ for H. crucians, with the significantly larger than the in both cases. Structurally, the featured expanded, thick, tube-shaped olfactory bulbs that comprised 6.0–8.2% of the total volume, underscoring a reliance on olfaction, alongside a highly convoluted marked by three prominent furrows per (lateral, suprasylvian, and ectosylvian). Sensory adaptations evident in Hyaenodon endocasts include prominent optic nerves (cranial II), suggesting enhanced visual processing potentially suited for low-light conditions, and a well-developed (cranial nerve VIII) indicative of adaptations for maintaining balance during agile pursuits. The relatively modest overall brain size and limited neocortical expansion compared to later mammals imply no evidence for advanced , consistent with the low EQ values. Evolutionary trends within , including Hyaenodon, show an increase in relative and cerebral complexity in later species, with the expanding disproportionately to the and additional sulci developing over time, possibly in response to increasingly complex paleoecvironments. Recent analyses using 2021 CT scans of related hyaenodont endocasts have revealed detailed vascular patterns, such as prominent dural sinuses and arterial impressions, further illuminating these trends in neural architecture. In comparisons to other groups, Hyaenodon brains appear more primitive than those of derived Carnivora, with less pronounced neocortical folding and lower EQs, but exhibit parallels to early miacids in the progressive expansion of the neocortex and overall encephalization through the Eocene and Oligocene. The enclosure of the brain within the robust skull, as seen in Hyaenodon, provided protection but limited further volumetric expansion relative to body size.

Distribution and paleoecology

Temporal and geographic range

Hyaenodon inhabited Laurasia during the middle Eocene to early Miocene, spanning approximately 42 to 16 million years ago, with the genus representing one of the most persistent predatory mammal lineages of the Paleogene. The earliest records of the genus date to the late Eocene in Europe and Asia, though a 2025 discovery of Hyaenodon lingbaoensis from the middle Eocene Chuankou Formation in China's Lingbao Basin suggests an Asian origin potentially extending back further, challenging previous timelines for hyaenodont diversification. In North America, the genus appeared by the late Eocene, likely via dispersal across the Bering land bridge from Asia. The latest occurrences are from the early Miocene in Asia, with North American records tapering off by the late Oligocene. Geographically, Hyaenodon was widespread across , , and , with over 20 documented from diverse localities reflecting faunal exchanges via the between and . Key fossil-bearing formations include the late Eocene Bridger Formation in , , where early hyaenodont relatives provide contextual records; the Quercy Phosphorites in , yielding abundant Hyaenodon jaws such as H. leptorhynchus; and the upper Eocene to Ardyn Obo (Ergilin Dzo) Formation in , home to like H. chunkhtensis. Rare records from northern indicate limited southward dispersal, possibly via Tethyan connections. Fossils of Hyaenodon are relatively abundant compared to other hyaenodonts, with hundreds of specimens known worldwide, predominantly isolated dentaries, maxillae, and teeth that highlight the genus's hypercarnivorous adaptations. Recent excavations in central have uncovered postcranial elements, enhancing understanding of locomotor anatomy beyond cranial material.

Habitat and faunal associations

Hyaenodon species inhabited a variety of paleoenvironments across the during the late Eocene to early Miocene, adapting to warm, humid conditions in forested settings early in their history and persisting into more seasonal landscapes later on. In the late Eocene, fossils from the Ergilin Dzo Formation in southeastern indicate fluvial deposits within subtropical forest ecosystems, where Hyaenodon coexisted with early perissodactyls and other mammals in a humid, conducive to dense vegetation.28[559:HCATHF]2.0.CO;2) During the Oligocene, Hyaenodon thrived in North American woodlands and floodplains, as preserved in the White River Group of South Dakota and surrounding regions, which consists of volcaniclastic sediments deposited in alluvial and lacustrine settings amid a cooling climate with increasing seasonality. These environments supported mixed biotas including early equids such as Mesohippus, oreodonts like Merycoidodon, rodents, lagomorphs, diverse birds (e.g., bathornithids), and reptiles, reflecting woodland habitats with access to water sources. In Europe, Oligocene specimens from the Quercy Phosphorites in France suggest similar adaptability to forested and open mixed landscapes, with karstic fissures preserving bones that indicate semi-arboreal niches tolerant of moderate aridity. In , Hyaenodon extended into the early within the Xianshuihe Formation of the Basin, , where fluvial deposits point to or habitats under a regime of seasonal aridity, allowing the genus to persist amid faunal turnover with northern Eurasian affinities. Taphonomic evidence from lagerstätten like the Uinta Formation in , part of the broader Green River lacustrine system, highlights exceptional preservation of associated vertebrates in anoxic lake bottoms, suggesting Hyaenodon frequented nearby riparian zones in these subtropical to temperate settings during the late Eocene transition.

Ecological role and interactions

Hyaenodon occupied a top in ecosystems, functioning as apex or mesopredators in the absence of advanced , with dental and cranial adaptations indicating a hypercarnivorous diet focused on prey. isotope analyses of co-occurring creodonts, including hyaenodonts, reveal elevated δ¹⁵N values consistent with a high trophic position, supporting their role as dominant predators rather than omnivores or . In European Eocene faunas, Hyaenodon filled a hyena-like niche, exerting predation pressure on medium to large herbivores and influencing community structure through selective foraging. Interactions among Hyaenodon and contemporary carnivores involved competition for shared prey resources, particularly with early carnivorans like miacids and nimravids such as . Evidence of includes puncture marks on a felina skull from the Brule Formation, attributed to bites from Hyaenodon based on tooth morphology and spacing, suggesting aggressive encounters that reduced competitor populations. Such conflicts likely intensified in resource-limited habitats, where overlapping prey preferences drove antagonistic behaviors. Niche partitioning among Hyaenodon species was facilitated by body size variation, enabling coexistence within diverse guilds; smaller forms (4–11 kg, e.g., Hyaenodon leptorhynchus) targeted diminutive and possibly , while larger individuals (up to 50 kg, e.g., Hyaenodon gervaisi) pursued bigger ungulates as hypercarnivores. This size-based differentiation minimized direct , as evidenced by sympatric assemblages in sites like Séon Saint-André, where multiple Hyaenodon taxa co-occurred with amphicyonids without apparent niche overlap. Dispersal across continents further reduced local by exploiting varied faunal assemblages. As primary predators, Hyaenodon exerted significant community impacts by shaping through sustained predation pressure, favoring traits like increased body size and defensive morphologies in Eocene ungulates. In North American and European faunas, hyaenodonts comprised a substantial portion of carnivorous diversity, representing up to 9% of total mammalian taxa on average across assemblages, with modeling of Eocene sites indicating predators accounted for 10–15% of estimated community biomass. This predatory dominance influenced trophic cascades, promoting balanced populations and stability during the .

Extinction

Patterns of decline

The genus Hyaenodon exhibited a gradual decline beginning in the late , with regional extinctions occurring in a staggered pattern across its range. In , the last records date to the early Arikareean land mammal age (late to earliest , approximately 25–23 Ma), after which the genus disappeared entirely by around 20 Ma. In , Hyaenodon vanished earlier, with final occurrences in the stage of the late (approximately 28–23 Ma). Asian populations persisted longer, with sparse fossils indicating survival into the early (approximately 20–17 Ma), marking the latest global records for the genus. Geographically, the decline showed early local extinctions in during the (around 25 Ma), as evidenced by fossils from the Nsungwe Formation in . This was followed by progressive contractions across , with North American and European populations extinguishing first, while Asian lineages represented holdouts into the , primarily in regions like the Lanzhou Basin in . The pattern lacked synchronized global die-offs, instead reflecting regional attrition tied to the broader fossil record. Notable last occurrences include H. brevirostris in North American sites during the late and H. leptorhynchus in European Chattian deposits. In , H. weilini represents a terminal species from early sediments (approximately 19–20 Ma) in the Xianshuihe Formation. Sparse records from , such as those attributed to H. gigas, are from the but remain fragmentary. Fossil abundance for Hyaenodon decreased markedly after the , with records shifting from relatively common isolated teeth and cranial elements in deposits to rare, fragmentary remains in contexts, indicating a substantial reduction in . Diversity also contracted sharply, from over 20 recognized species across the Eocene and to fewer than 10 persisting into the late stages, primarily as low-diversity relicts without evidence of mass mortality events.

Causes and hypotheses

The extinction of Hyaenodon is attributed to a combination of environmental changes and ecological pressures during the to early , particularly in where the genus persisted longest. Climatic cooling and increasing drove and shifts from forests to more open environments across . These changes reduced refugia essential for Hyaenodon's predation strategies, leading to decreased prey availability and population viability. Biotic factors, particularly the radiation of true Carnivora into Eurasian ecosystems during the Oligocene to early Miocene, further compounded these pressures through niche overlap and competitive exclusion. Amphicyonids (bear-dogs) and early felids, with superior cursorial adaptations for sustained pursuit in open terrains, outcompeted hyaenodonts in exploiting ungulate prey, while shared dentition features—such as sectorial carnassials for shearing flesh—intensified direct rivalry for hypercarnivorous roles. Although some analyses suggest indirect rather than head-on competition, the temporal correlation between carnivoran diversification and Hyaenodon decline supports a role for inter-guild displacement, especially as Carnivora exhibited greater locomotor efficiency and broader dietary flexibility. Additional hypotheses emphasize the vulnerability of hyaenodonts' dietary specialization, characterized by extreme hypercarnivory with limited capacity for omnivory or herbivory. Dental topographic analyses reveal a significant loss of dietary disparity within following the Eocene-Oligocene boundary, with incomplete recovery by the early , indicating reduced adaptability to fluctuating prey bases. Stable isotope studies of associated faunas, including carbon and ratios in , further demonstrate minimal isotopic shifts in hyaenodont diets over time, suggesting low behavioral plasticity in response to environmental stressors compared to more versatile carnivorans. Debates persist over the primacy of these factors, with no consensus on a single cause; instead, a multi-factorial model prevails, integrating climatic forcing with biotic interactions. The of Hyaenodon aligns with the early Miocene radiation of (encompassing modern ), which filled vacated apex and roles amid biome turnover in . The broader of occurred later, in the in .

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.