Hyperexponential distribution

Hyperexponential distributionMain

Community hub

8 pages, 0 posts

0 subscribers

Recent from talks

Be the first to start a discussion here.

Recent from talks

Be the first to start a discussion here.

Contribute something

About hubMembersContent overviewUpdatesRules

Main reference articles

Hyperexponential distribution

View on Wikipedia

from Wikipedia

Diagram showing queueing system equivalent of a hyperexponential distribution

In probability theory, a hyperexponential distribution is a continuous probability distribution whose probability density function of the random variable X is given by

f_{X}(x)=\sum _{i=1}^{n}f_{Y_{i}}(x)\;p_{i},

where each Y_i is an exponentially distributed random variable with rate parameter λ_i, and p_i is the probability that X will take on the form of the exponential distribution with rate λ_i.^[1] It is named the hyperexponential distribution since its coefficient of variation is greater than that of the exponential distribution, whose coefficient of variation is 1, and the hypoexponential distribution, which has a coefficient of variation smaller than one. While the exponential distribution is the continuous analogue of the geometric distribution, the hyperexponential distribution is not analogous to the hypergeometric distribution. The hyperexponential distribution is an example of a mixture density.

An example of a hyperexponential random variable can be seen in the context of telephony, where, if someone has a modem and a phone, their phone line usage could be modeled as a hyperexponential distribution where there is probability p of them talking on the phone with rate λ₁ and probability q of them using their internet connection with rate λ₂.

Properties

[edit]

Since the expected value of a sum is the sum of the expected values, the expected value of a hyperexponential random variable can be shown as

E[X]=\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }xf(x)\,dx=\sum _{i=1}^{n}p_{i}\int _{0}^{\infty }x\lambda _{i}e^{-\lambda _{i}x}\,dx=\sum _{i=1}^{n}{\frac {p_{i}}{\lambda _{i}}}

and

E\!\left[X^{2}\right]=\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }x^{2}f(x)\,dx=\sum _{i=1}^{n}p_{i}\int _{0}^{\infty }x^{2}\lambda _{i}e^{-\lambda _{i}x}\,dx=\sum _{i=1}^{n}{\frac {2}{\lambda _{i}^{2}}}p_{i},

from which we can derive the variance:^[2]

\operatorname {Var} [X]=E\!\left[X^{2}\right]-E\!\left[X\right]^{2}=\sum _{i=1}^{n}{\frac {2}{\lambda _{i}^{2}}}p_{i}-\left[\sum _{i=1}^{n}{\frac {p_{i}}{\lambda _{i}}}\right]^{2}=\left[\sum _{i=1}^{n}{\frac {p_{i}}{\lambda _{i}}}\right]^{2}+\sum _{i=1}^{n}\sum _{j=1}^{n}p_{i}p_{j}\left({\frac {1}{\lambda _{i}}}-{\frac {1}{\lambda _{j}}}\right)^{2}.

The standard deviation exceeds the mean in general (except for the degenerate case of all the λs being equal), so the coefficient of variation is greater than 1.

The moment-generating function is given by

E\!\left[e^{tx}\right]=\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }e^{tx}f(x)\,dx=\sum _{i=1}^{n}p_{i}\int _{0}^{\infty }e^{tx}\lambda _{i}e^{-\lambda _{i}x}\,dx=\sum _{i=1}^{n}{\frac {\lambda _{i}}{\lambda _{i}-t}}p_{i}.

Fitting

[edit]

A given probability distribution, including a heavy-tailed distribution, can be approximated by a hyperexponential distribution by fitting recursively to different time scales using Prony's method.^[3]

References

[edit]

^ Singh, L. N.; Dattatreya, G. R. (2007). "Estimation of the Hyperexponential Density with Applications in Sensor Networks". International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 3 (3): 311. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.78.4137. doi:10.1080/15501320701259925.
^ H.T. Papadopolous; C. Heavey; J. Browne (1993). Queueing Theory in Manufacturing Systems Analysis and Design. Springer. p. 35. ISBN 9780412387203.
^ Feldmann, A.; Whitt, W. (1998). "Fitting mixtures of exponentials to long-tail distributions to analyze network performance models" (PDF). Performance Evaluation. 31 (3–4): 245. doi:10.1016/S0166-5316(97)00003-5.

Probability distributions (list)

Discrete
univariate

with finite support	Benford Bernoulli Beta-binomial Binomial Categorical Hypergeometric Negative Poisson binomial Rademacher Soliton Discrete uniform Zipf Zipf–Mandelbrot
with infinite support	Beta negative binomial Borel Conway–Maxwell–Poisson Discrete phase-type Delaporte Extended negative binomial Flory–Schulz Gauss–Kuzmin Geometric Logarithmic Mixed Poisson Negative binomial Panjer Parabolic fractal Poisson Skellam Yule–Simon Zeta

Continuous
univariate

supported on a bounded interval	Arcsine ARGUS Balding–Nichols Bates Beta Generalized Beta rectangular Continuous Bernoulli Irwin–Hall Kumaraswamy Logit-normal Noncentral beta PERT Power function Raised cosine Reciprocal Triangular U-quadratic Uniform Wigner semicircle
supported on a semi-infinite interval	Benini Benktander 1st kind Benktander 2nd kind Beta prime Burr Chi Chi-squared Noncentral Inverse Scaled Dagum Davis Erlang Hyper Exponential Hyperexponential Hypoexponential Logarithmic F Noncentral Folded normal Fréchet Gamma Generalized Inverse gamma/Gompertz Gompertz Shifted Half-logistic Half-normal Hotelling's T-squared Hartman–Watson Inverse Gaussian Generalized Kolmogorov Lévy Log-Cauchy Log-Laplace Log-logistic Log-normal Log-t Lomax Matrix-exponential Maxwell–Boltzmann Maxwell–Jüttner Mittag-Leffler Nakagami Pareto Phase-type Poly-Weibull Rayleigh Relativistic Breit–Wigner Rice Truncated normal type-2 Gumbel Weibull Discrete Wilks's lambda
supported on the whole real line	Cauchy Exponential power Fisher's z Kaniadakis κ-Gaussian Gaussian q Generalized hyperbolic Generalized logistic (logistic-beta) Generalized normal Geometric stable Gumbel Holtsmark Hyperbolic secant Johnson's S_U Landau Laplace Asymmetric Logistic Noncentral t Normal (Gaussian) Normal-inverse Gaussian Skew normal Slash Stable Student's t Tracy–Widom Variance-gamma Voigt
with support whose type varies	Generalized chi-squared Generalized extreme value Generalized Pareto Marchenko–Pastur Kaniadakis κ-exponential Kaniadakis κ-Gamma Kaniadakis κ-Weibull Kaniadakis κ-Logistic Kaniadakis κ-Erlang q-exponential q-Gaussian q-Weibull Shifted log-logistic Tukey lambda

Mixed
univariate

continuous- discrete	Rectified Gaussian

Multivariate
(joint)

Discrete:
Ewens
Multinomial
- Dirichlet
- Negative
Continuous:
Dirichlet
- Generalized
Multivariate Laplace
Multivariate normal
Multivariate stable
Multivariate t
Normal-gamma
- Inverse
Matrix-valued:
LKJ
Matrix beta
Matrix normal
Matrix t
Matrix gamma
- Inverse
Wishart
- Normal
- Inverse
- Normal-inverse
- Complex
Uniform distribution on a Stiefel manifold

Directional

Univariate (circular) directional: Circular uniform; Univariate von Mises; Wrapped normal; Wrapped Cauchy; Wrapped exponential; Wrapped asymmetric Laplace; Wrapped Lévy
Bivariate (spherical): Kent
Bivariate (toroidal): Bivariate von Mises
Multivariate: von Mises–Fisher; Bingham

Degenerate
and singular

Degenerate: Dirac delta function
Singular: Cantor

Families

Revisions and contributors Edit on Wikipedia Read on Wikipedia

Hyperexponential distribution

View on Grokipedia

from Grokipedia

The hyperexponential distribution, also known as the H_k distribution, is a continuous probability distribution on the non-negative real line that models a random variable as a mixture of k independent exponential distributions, where each component is selected with probability p_i (summing to 1) and has rate parameter μ_i.^[1] Its probability density function is given by

f(t) = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i \mu_i e^{-\mu_i t}, \quad t > 0,

and the cumulative distribution function by

F(t) = 1 - \sum_{i=1}^k p_i e^{-\mu_i t}, \quad t \geq 0.

^[2] This structure allows it to approximate distributions with high variability, as its squared coefficient of variation satisfies

c^2 \geq 1

, contrasting with the exponential distribution's

c^2 = 1

.^[1] Key moments include the mean

E[X] = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i / \mu_i

and variance

\mathrm{Var}(X) = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i / \mu_i^2 - \left( \sum_{i=1}^k p_i / \mu_i \right)^2

, which can be matched to empirical data using just the first two moments for fitting purposes, particularly for the two-phase case (H_2) where parameters are solved to balance means across phases.^[2] The distribution is a special case of phase-type distributions, specifically an acyclic phase-type with parallel phases, and it exhibits a decreasing failure rate, with a monotonically decreasing hazard function.^[1] In applications, the hyperexponential distribution is widely used in queueing theory to model service times or interarrival processes with heavy tails and high variability, such as in M/H_k/1 queues where explicit solutions for performance measures like waiting times are available.^[3] It also appears in reliability engineering, software performance modeling, and call center analysis for customer patience times, providing robust fits to empirical traces when exponential assumptions fail due to overdispersion.^[4] For instance, in storage systems and network simulations, H_2 fits outperform other long-tail models like log-normal in capturing response time distributions.^[5]

Definition

Probability Density Function

The hyperexponential distribution is defined as a finite mixture, or convex combination, of

k

independent exponential distributions, where a random variable

X

is selected to follow the

i

-th exponential distribution with probability

p_i > 0

for

i = 1, \dots, k

, and

\sum_{i=1}^k p_i = 1

.^[2] This structure captures heterogeneity in stochastic processes by weighting multiple exponential components, each characterized by its own rate parameter

\lambda_i > 0

.^[1] The probability density function of the hyperexponential distribution is given by

f(x) = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i \lambda_i e^{-\lambda_i x}, \quad x \geq 0,

and

f(x) = 0

otherwise.^[1] The support of the distribution is the non-negative real line, reflecting the nature of the underlying exponential components.^[6] This distribution arises in the context of phase-type distributions as the absorption time in a continuous-time Markov chain with

k

parallel phases, where the process begins in phase

i

with probability

p_i

and is absorbed upon exiting that single phase at rate

\lambda_i

, without transitioning between phases.^[6] A practical interpretation occurs in telephony queueing models, where service times follow a hyperexponential distribution due to different customer types, such as voice calls (with one exponential rate) versus data sessions (with another), each selected probabilistically based on arrival proportions.

Cumulative Distribution Function

The cumulative distribution function of the hyperexponential distribution is given by

F(x) = \begin{cases} 1 - \sum_{i=1}^k p_i e^{-\lambda_i x} & x \geq 0, \\ 0 & x < 0, \end{cases}

where

p_i > 0

are the mixture weights with

\sum_{i=1}^k p_i = 1

and

\lambda_i > 0

are the rate parameters of the underlying exponential components.^[7]^[8] This form arises from integrating the probability density function over the interval

[0, x]

. Specifically,

F(x) = \int_0^x f(t) \, dt = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i \int_0^x \lambda_i e^{-\lambda_i t} \, dt = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i \left(1 - e^{-\lambda_i x}\right)

for

x \geq 0

, which simplifies to the expression above since

\sum_{i=1}^k p_i = 1

. The probability density function is the derivative of

F(x)

.^[7] The survival function, defined as

S(x) = 1 - F(x)

, takes the form

S(x) = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i e^{-\lambda_i x}, \quad x \geq 0,

which directly provides the probability that a random variable exceeds

x

and is particularly useful for evaluating tail probabilities in applications such as queueing theory and reliability analysis.^[8]^[7] The hyperexponential distribution is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure, possessing a density that is positive on

(0, \infty)

and an unbounded support on

[0, \infty)

.^[9]^[7]

Characteristic Functions

Characteristic Function

The characteristic function of a random variable

X

with a hyperexponential distribution is

\phi(t) = \mathbb{E}[e^{itX}]

for real

t

, given by

\phi(t) = \sum_{i=1}^k \frac{p_i \mu_i}{\mu_i - i t}.

This follows from the mixture structure, as the characteristic function of an exponential distribution with rate

\mu_i

\mu_i / (\mu_i - i t)

, and the overall function is the weighted sum. Unlike the moment-generating function, it is defined for all real

t

since the poles are off the real axis. The characteristic function encodes all moments via derivatives at

t=0

and is useful for proving limit theorems and central limit results for sums of hyperexponential variables. It relates to the moment-generating function via

\phi(t) = M(it)

, where

M

is the MGF.^[10]

Moment-Generating Function

The moment-generating function (MGF) of a random variable

X

with a hyperexponential distribution provides a compact representation that encodes all moments of the distribution and is particularly useful for analyzing sums of independent hyperexponential random variables. For a hyperexponential distribution defined as a mixture of

k

exponential distributions with rates

\mu_1, \dots, \mu_k > 0

and mixing probabilities

p_1, \dots, p_k > 0

satisfying

\sum_{i=1}^k p_i = 1

, the MGF is given by

M(t) = \sum_{i=1}^k \frac{p_i \mu_i}{\mu_i - t},

valid for

t < \min_i \{\mu_i\}

.^[7] This formula arises directly from the definition of the MGF and the probability density function (PDF) of the hyperexponential distribution,

f(x) = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i \mu_i e^{-\mu_i x}

for

x \geq 0

. Substituting into the MGF integral yields

M(t) = \int_0^\infty e^{tx} f(x) \, dx = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i \int_0^\infty \mu_i e^{-(\mu_i - t)x} \, dx.

The inner integral is the MGF of an exponential random variable with rate

\mu_i

, which evaluates to

\mu_i / (\mu_i - t)

for

t < \mu_i

, leading to the overall expression upon summation.^[7]^[11] The domain of convergence for the MGF is

t < \min_i \{\mu_i\}

, as the integral diverges beyond the smallest rate parameter, ensuring the expectation exists. Within this interval, the MGF is analytic, meaning it is infinitely differentiable and can be expanded in a Taylor series around

t = 0

, with coefficients corresponding to the moments of

X

. This analyticity guarantees the uniqueness of the hyperexponential distribution among all distributions on

[0, \infty)

sharing the same MGF, by the standard uniqueness theorem for moment-generating functions.^[7]^[12] The rational form of the MGF—a ratio of polynomials where the denominator is of degree

k

and the numerator of degree at most

k-1

—uniquely characterizes hyperexponential mixtures relative to other infinite-support distributions, facilitating identification in applications like fitting empirical data to phase-type models.^[7]^[13]

Laplace Transform

The Laplace-Stieltjes transform (LST) of a hyperexponential random variable

X

with parameters

p_i > 0

(

\sum_{i=1}^k p_i = 1

) and distinct rates

\mu_i > 0

(

i = 1, \dots, k

) is defined as

\tilde{f}(s) = \mathbb{E}[e^{-sX}]

for

\operatorname{Re}(s) \geq 0

. This transform evaluates to

\tilde{f}(s) = \sum_{i=1}^k \frac{p_i \mu_i}{\mu_i + s},

which follows directly from the mixture structure, as the LST of an exponential distribution with rate

\mu_i

\mu_i / (\mu_i + s)

, and the overall transform is the corresponding weighted sum.^[14] The LST relates to the moment-generating function (MGF)

M(t) = \mathbb{E}[e^{tX}]

via

\tilde{f}(s) = M(-s)

, where the domain restriction

\operatorname{Re}(s) \geq 0

ensures convergence for nonnegative

X

, mirroring the MGF derivation but emphasizing exponential decay for stability analysis in stochastic systems. At

s = 0

\tilde{f}(0) = 1

, confirming normalization as a proper distribution transform, while the derivative satisfies

\tilde{f}'(0) = -\mathbb{E}[X]

, providing a direct link to the mean without full inversion.^[15] Inversion of the LST for hyperexponential distributions typically employs partial fraction decomposition, exploiting the rational form with distinct poles at

s = -\mu_i

, to recover the mixture density

f(x) = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i \mu_i e^{-\mu_i x}

for

x > 0

. This method is particularly valuable in renewal theory, where the LST facilitates solving integral equations for quantities like the renewal function, whose transform is

1 / (s (1 - \tilde{f}(s)))

, enabling efficient computation of transient behaviors in phase-type renewal processes modeled by hyperexponential interarrival times.

Moments and Properties

Mean and Variance

The mean of a hyperexponential random variable

X

, which is a mixture of

k

independent exponential distributions with rates

\mu_i > 0

and mixing probabilities

p_i > 0

where

\sum_{i=1}^k p_i = 1

, is given by

E[X] = \sum_{i=1}^k \frac{p_i}{\mu_i}.

This formula arises from the law of total expectation, conditioning on the mixture component:

E[X] = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i E[X \mid \text{component } i] = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i \cdot \frac{1}{\mu_i}

, since each component follows an exponential distribution with mean

1/\mu_i

.^[16] Alternatively, the mean can be derived from the moment-generating function (MGF) of the hyperexponential distribution,

M(t) = \sum_{i=1}^k \frac{p_i \mu_i}{\mu_i - t}, \quad t < \min_i \mu_i.

Differentiating yields

M'(t) = \sum_{i=1}^k \frac{p_i \mu_i}{(\mu_i - t)^2}

, and evaluating at

t=0

gives

M'(0) = \sum_{i=1}^k \frac{p_i}{\mu_i}

, confirming the mean.^[17] The variance is

\text{Var}(X) = \sum_{i=1}^k \frac{2 p_i}{\mu_i^2} - \left( \sum_{i=1}^k \frac{p_i}{\mu_i} \right)^2.

This follows from the law of total variance:

\text{Var}(X) = E[\text{Var}(X \mid \text{component } i)] + \text{Var}(E[X \mid \text{component } i])

. The first term is

E[\text{Var}(X \mid i)] = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i \cdot \frac{1}{\mu_i^2}

, and the second is

\text{Var}(1/\mu_i) = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i (1/\mu_i)^2 - (E[X])^2 = \sum_{i=1}^k \frac{p_i}{\mu_i^2} - (E[X])^2

, yielding the total. Equivalently, from the MGF,

M''(t) = \sum_{i=1}^k \frac{2 p_i \mu_i}{(\mu_i - t)^3}

, so

E[X^2] = M''(0) = \sum_{i=1}^k \frac{2 p_i}{\mu_i^2}

, and

\text{Var}(X) = E[X^2] - (E[X])^2

.^[16]^[17] The coefficient of variation, defined as

CV = \sqrt{\text{Var}(X)} / E[X]

CV=Var(X)

/E[X], exceeds 1 for $k \geq 2$ (assuming distinct $\mu_i$ ), in contrast to the exponential distribution where $CV = 1$ . This high variability stems from the mixture structure, where the squared CV ranges from 1 (degenerate case) to $\infty$ as the mixing probabilities vary.^[2]^[16] For the two-phase case ( $H_2$ ) with probabilities $p$ and $1-p$ , and rates $\mu_1, \mu_2$ , the mean simplifies to $E[X] = p / \mu_1 + (1-p) / \mu_2$ , and the variance to $\text{Var}(X) = 2 \left[ p / \mu_1^2 + (1-p) / \mu_2^2 \right] - (E[X])^2$ . These expressions facilitate fitting to data with elevated variability.^[16]

Higher Moments

The

k

-th raw moment of a hyperexponential random variable

X

with

k

phases, mixing probabilities

p_i > 0

(

\sum_{i=1}^k p_i = 1

), and rates

\mu_i > 0

(

i=1,\dots,k

) is given by

E[X^k] = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i \frac{k!}{\mu_i^k},

for any positive integer

k

. This expression follows from the fact that the hyperexponential distribution is a finite mixture of exponential distributions, whose raw moments are weighted averages of the component moments.^[18] Central moments can be obtained from the raw moments using the relation

\mu_k = E[(X - E[X])^k] = \sum_{j=0}^k \binom{k}{j} (-E[X])^{k-j} E[X^j].

Cumulants are derived via the coefficients in the Taylor expansion of the logarithm of the moment-generating function evaluated at zero. These higher-order moments capture the shape of the distribution, with the third central moment determining skewness and the fourth relating to kurtosis.^[18] The skewness

\gamma_1

\gamma_1 = \frac{E[(X - E[X])^3]}{(E[(X - E[X])^2])^{3/2}} = \frac{E[X^3] - 3 E[X] E[X^2] + 2 (E[X])^3 }{ (E[X^2] - (E[X])^2)^{3/2} },

and the excess kurtosis

\gamma_2

\gamma_2 = \frac{E[(X - E[X])^4]}{(E[(X - E[X])^2])^2} - 3 = \frac{E[X^4] - 4 E[X] E[X^3] + 6 (E[X])^2 E[X^2] - 3 (E[X])^4 }{ (E[X^2] - (E[X])^2)^2 } - 3.

For the hyperexponential distribution, these measures typically exceed those of the single-phase exponential distribution (where

\gamma_1 = 2

and

\gamma_2 = 6

), reflecting greater asymmetry and peakedness with heavier tails due to the mixture structure.^[18] For large

k

, the

k

-th raw moment is asymptotically dominated by the phase with the smallest rate

\mu_{\min} = \min_i \mu_i

, as the term

p_j k! / \mu_{\min}^k

(for the corresponding

j

) grows fastest, where the slowest phase contributes most to the tail behavior.

Parameter Estimation

Method of Moments

The method of moments for estimating parameters of the hyperexponential distribution equates the sample mean and variance to the corresponding theoretical moments,

\mathbb{E}[X]

and

\mathrm{Var}(X)

, and solves the resulting system for the mixing probabilities

p_i

and rates

\mu_i

. This approach is particularly suited for low-order approximations, such as the two-phase case (H_2), where it yields efficient parameter fits based on the first two moments alone.^[2] For the H_2 distribution, closed-form solutions are obtained under the balanced means assumption, ensuring each exponential phase contributes equally to the overall mean. Given the sample mean

\hat{\mu} = \mathbb{E}[X]

and variance

\sigma^2 = \mathrm{Var}(X)

, let

c^2 = \sigma^2 / \hat{\mu}^2

denote the squared coefficient of variation (with

c^2 \geq 1

). The mixing probability

p

(for the slower phase) solves the quadratic equation derived from the moment conditions:

p^2 - p + \frac{1}{2(c^2 + 1)} = 0,

with the relevant root

p = \frac{1}{2} \left( 1 + \sqrt{\frac{c^2 - 1}{c^2 + 1}} \right).

p=21(1+c2+1c2−1

). The rates are then $\mu_1 = \frac{2p}{\hat{\mu}}, \quad \mu_2 = \frac{2(1 - p)}{\hat{\mu}},$ where $\mu_1 < \mu_2$ . This procedure provides explicit parameter values without iteration.^[2] The advantages of this method include its simplicity and lack of need for numerical optimization when $k = 2$ , making it computationally attractive for quick approximations. However, for $k > 2$ , matching only the first two moments results in non-unique solutions, as the system is underdetermined, often necessitating additional constraints or higher moments to resolve ambiguity.^[19] This estimation technique originated in queueing theory and has been widely adopted for approximating empirical service time distributions using known first two moments, enabling analytical tractability in performance modeling.^[20]

Maximum Likelihood Estimation

The maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for the parameters of a

k

-phase hyperexponential distribution, consisting of mixing probabilities

p_i > 0

with

\sum_{i=1}^k p_i = 1

and exponential rates

\mu_i > 0

, is based on an independent and identically distributed sample

x_1, \dots, x_n

from the distribution. The likelihood function is given by

L(\mathbf{p}, \boldsymbol{\mu}) = \prod_{j=1}^n \sum_{i=1}^k p_i \mu_i e^{-\mu_i x_j},

where the probability density function of the hyperexponential distribution appears in the sum. The corresponding log-likelihood is

\ell(\mathbf{p}, \boldsymbol{\mu}) = \sum_{j=1}^n \log\left( \sum_{i=1}^k p_i \mu_i e^{-\mu_i x_j} \right).

This log-likelihood is non-convex due to the mixture structure, making direct maximization challenging and prone to multiple local optima. To address this, the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm is commonly used, which treats the unobserved phase (mixture component) for each data point as a latent variable and iteratively maximizes a lower bound on the log-likelihood. In the E-step at iteration

t

, the posterior probability

\gamma_{ji}^{(t)}

that observation

x_j

arises from phase

i

is calculated as

\gamma_{ji}^{(t)} = \frac{ p_i^{(t)} \mu_i^{(t)} e^{-\mu_i^{(t)} x_j} }{ \sum_{m=1}^k p_m^{(t)} \mu_m^{(t)} e^{-\mu_m^{(t)} x_j} }.

In the M-step, the parameters are updated to maximize the expected complete-data log-likelihood:

p_i^{(t+1)} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{j=1}^n \gamma_{ji}^{(t)},

\mu_i^{(t+1)} = \frac{ \sum_{j=1}^n \gamma_{ji}^{(t)} }{ \sum_{j=1}^n \gamma_{ji}^{(t)} x_j }.

The E- and M-steps are alternated until the change in log-likelihood falls below a tolerance threshold, typically requiring hundreds to thousands of iterations for convergence. Despite its effectiveness, the EM algorithm for hyperexponential distributions faces numerical challenges, including sensitivity to initial parameter values, which can lead to convergence at suboptimal local maxima or saddle points, and computational expense in the E-step for large

k

n

. Initialization strategies often involve moment matching (e.g., equating the first two sample moments to those of the distribution) or multiple random starts to improve reliability, with convergence monitored via the log-likelihood or parameter stability. Implementations of the EM algorithm for hyperexponential fitting are available in statistical software; for example, the PhaseTypeR package in R supports parameter estimation for phase-type distributions, including the hyperexponential as a special case, using EM-based methods. In Python, custom EM routines can be implemented using libraries such as NumPy and SciPy for optimization and matrix operations.

Applications

In Queueing Theory

The hyperexponential distribution is frequently employed in queueing theory to model service times exhibiting high variability, particularly in M/H_k/1 queues with Poisson arrivals and k-phase hyperexponential service times. This setup effectively captures bursty traffic patterns, where the squared coefficient of variation of service times exceeds 1, reflecting real-world scenarios like variable workload intensities in communication networks.^[21] Similarly, in G/H_k/1 queues with general interarrival times, the hyperexponential service distribution accounts for heterogeneous processing demands, enabling approximate analysis of systems with non-Poisson inputs.^[22] A key analytical tool for M/H_k/1 models is the Pollaczek-Khinchine formula, which incorporates the Laplace-Stieltjes transform of the hyperexponential service time distribution to derive the mean queue length exactly. The transform for an H_k distribution takes the form of a convex combination of individual exponential transforms, ∑_{i=1}^k p_i μ_i / (s + μ_i), facilitating computations of steady-state performance metrics like waiting times and queue lengths under stability conditions (ρ < 1). For G/H_k/1 queues, approximations such as diffusion limits provide similar insights into transient queue behavior.^[23]^[3] Approximation techniques often involve fitting hyperexponential distributions to empirical traces of service times, such as web traffic logs, using methods like the expectation-maximization algorithm to match moments or tail behavior for performance prediction in complex queues. These fits enable scalable simulations or bounds on delay probabilities, improving accuracy over simpler exponential assumptions for high-variability data.^[24] For example, in telephony systems, the hyperexponential distribution models mixed call types—including short voice interactions and prolonged data sessions—allowing queueing models to predict congestion and staffing needs in multi-server environments with heterogeneous demands.^[25]

In Reliability Analysis

The hyperexponential distribution is employed in reliability analysis to model the failure times of heterogeneous systems, where components or subsystems exhibit varying exponential failure rates corresponding to different operational modes or types. This mixture model captures the overall system behavior as a weighted combination of phase-specific exponentials, providing a tractable representation for complex, non-homogeneous populations without assuming a constant hazard rate.^[1] A key application involves approximating heavy-tailed distributions such as the Weibull or lognormal, which are common in reliability for capturing wear-out or fatigue failures, using hyperexponential mixtures to facilitate analytical tractability in performance evaluation and system design. For distributions with decreasing failure rates, like certain Weibull shapes (

\gamma < 1

), the hyperexponential provides an effective fit by matching the complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF) at multiple points, ensuring accuracy for long tails that represent rare but critical extended lifetimes. This approximation is particularly valuable for simulating or verifying reliability metrics in scenarios where exact Weibull computations are computationally intensive.^[26]^[27] In these models, the mean time to failure (MTTF) is given by the expected value

\mathbb{E}[X] = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i / \lambda_i

, which quantifies the average operational duration before system failure, while the reliability function

R(t) = \sum_{i=1}^k p_i e^{-\lambda_i t}

represents the survival probability at time

t

, directly derived from the survival function of the mixture. For instance, in standby equipment with hyperexponential failure times, the MTTF equals

1/\lambda

under parameterized rates, enabling predictions of accumulated operating time to failure.^[28] An illustrative example is the modeling of failure rates in sensor networks, where devices of distinct types (e.g., varying power levels or environmental exposures) lead to heterogeneous exponential lifetimes; the hyperexponential distribution estimates parameters efficiently on resource-constrained nodes, supporting reliability assessments for network longevity and fault tolerance without excessive data transmission. This approach has been applied to environmental monitoring systems, where long-tailed failure patterns due to diverse sensor behaviors are captured to predict overall system dependability.^[29]

Phase-Type Distributions

Phase-type (PH) distributions model the time until absorption in a continuous-time Markov chain with a finite number of transient states and one absorbing state.^[30] These distributions generalize exponential distributions by allowing transitions among multiple exponential phases, enabling flexible modeling of stochastic processes with varying variability.^[30] The hyperexponential distribution emerges as a specific subclass of PH distributions characterized by parallel phases, where there are no transitions between phases, resulting in a mixture of independent exponential distributions.^[30] In this representation, the infinitesimal generator matrix

\mathbf{Q}

for a

k

-phase hyperexponential distribution

H_k

is a

k \times k

diagonal matrix with entries

q_{ii} = -\lambda_i

for

i = 1, \dots, k

, where

\lambda_i > 0

are the absorption rates from each phase.^[30] The initial probability vector

\boldsymbol{\alpha}

assigns probabilities

\alpha_i

to starting in phase

i

, and absorption occurs directly from any phase at rate

\lambda_i

.^[30] This structure ensures the hyperexponential distribution's probability density function aligns with the general PH form.^[30] PH distributions exhibit desirable closure properties: the convolution (sum) of independent PH random variables remains PH, as does any finite mixture of PH distributions.^[30] The hyperexponential distribution specifically corresponds to mixtures of exponential (one-phase PH) distributions, preserving the PH class while achieving squared coefficients of variation greater than one for high-variability scenarios.^[30] The matrix-exponential representation of PH distributions, including hyperexponential, facilitates computational analysis through efficient matrix operations, avoiding the numerical challenges of direct transform inversions and enabling scalable solutions in queueing and reliability models.^[30]

Hypoexponential Distribution

The hypoexponential distribution arises as the distribution of the sum of a finite number of independent exponential random variables with possibly distinct rates

\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \dots, \lambda_k > 0

, representing a series of sequential phases in a phase-type framework.^[31] This contrasts with the hyperexponential distribution, which models a parallel mixture of exponentials; the hypoexponential instead captures the convolution of these exponentials, suitable for processes with reduced variability. When all rates are identical,

\lambda_1 = \lambda_2 = \dots = \lambda_k = \lambda

, the hypoexponential distribution specializes to the Erlang distribution, a well-known light-tailed distribution used in modeling deterministic-like delays.^[31] The probability density function (PDF) of a hypoexponential random variable

Y = \sum_{i=1}^k X_i

, where each

X_i \sim \exp(\lambda_i)

and the

\lambda_i

are distinct, is given by

f_Y(y) = \sum_{j=1}^k \ell_j \lambda_j e^{-\lambda_j y}, \quad y > 0,

where the coefficients are

\ell_j = \prod_{\substack{i=1 \\ i \neq j}}^k \frac{\lambda_i}{\lambda_i - \lambda_j}.

^[31] This form emerges from the convolution of the individual exponential densities and highlights the distribution's phase-type nature, with absorption occurring only after traversing all phases in sequence. In the phase-type representation, the hypoexponential distribution corresponds to an absorbing continuous-time Markov chain starting in the first transient state, progressing through a linear chain of

k

states, and absorbing from the last state. The infinitesimal generator matrix

Q

for the transient states is upper bidiagonal (or triangular in structure), with diagonal entries

Q_{ii} = -\lambda_i

and superdiagonal entries

Q_{i,i+1} = \lambda_i

for

i = 1, \dots, k-1

, ensuring forward-only transitions between phases.^[32] The initial probability vector is

\boldsymbol{\alpha} = (1, 0, \dots, 0)

, reflecting the sequential start.^[32] This chain structure embodies the "dual" to the hyperexponential's parallel phases within the broader phase-type family, where the hypoexponential models light-tailed behaviors with squared coefficient of variation (CV) strictly less than 1. In comparison, the hyperexponential exhibits CV greater than 1, emphasizing heavier tails.^[31]

History

Media collections

Hyperexponential distribution

Recent from talks

Recent from talks

Contribute something

Contribute something

Media Pages

Timelines

Articles

Notes collections

Notes

Notes

Days in Chronicle

Hyperexponential distribution

Properties

Fitting

See also

References

Hyperexponential distribution

Definition

Probability Density Function

Cumulative Distribution Function

Characteristic Functions

Characteristic Function

Moment-Generating Function

Laplace Transform

Moments and Properties

Mean and Variance

Add your contribution

Related Hubs

Contribute something