Hubbry Logo
Jolo, SuluJolo, SuluMain
Open search
Jolo, Sulu
Community hub
Jolo, Sulu
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Jolo, Sulu
Jolo, Sulu
Jolo, Sulu
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Jolo, officially the Municipality of Jolo ([hoˈlo]; Tausug: Kawman sin Tiyanggi; Tagalog: Bayan ng Jolo; Chavacano: Municipalidad de Jolo), is a municipality and capital of the province of Sulu, Philippines. According to the 2024 census, it has a population of 152,067 people.[6]

Key Information

Etymology

[edit]

According to Dr. Najeeb M. Saleeby (1908) and in old maps such as the Velarde map, "Joló" was the historical Spanish spelling of the word "Sulu" that now refers to the province and the whole Sulu Archipelago, which the early Spaniards historically spelt as "Xoló", with the initial letter most likely formerly pronounced with the Early Modern Spanish [ʃ] sound, with [ʃoˈlo] the Spanish pronunciation of Sulu, but later evolved into the Modern Spanish [x], leading to its modern pronunciation [xoˈlo]. In many dialects, the initial sound is glottal, yielding [hoˈlo]. The Spanish version Joló is still used to pertain Sulu (both province, archipelago, and ancient sultanate) in Spanish writings. Meanwhile, the word "Sulu" itself comes from Tausug: Sulug, an older form of Tausug: Sūg, lit. 'sea current'.[7]

History

[edit]

Pre-Colonial period

[edit]

In the 14th century, Arab traders landed on the island to introduce and convert its inhabitants to Islam. The native inhabitants on the island are the Tausūg people. The Tausugs are part of the larger Moro group which dominates the Sulu Archipelago. The Moro had an independent state known as the Sultanate of Sulu, which was politically and economically centered on Jolo, the residence for Sulu Sultanates. The Seat of the Royal Sultanate of Sulu was in Astana Putih, which is Tausug for ‘White Palace’ in Umbul Duwa in the municipality of Indanan on Jolo Island, later on, the capital was moved in Maimbung during the 1800s.[8]

Spanish Colonial Period

[edit]

The Spanish failed to conquer and convert the Muslim areas in Mindanao. After colonising the islands in the north, they failed to take over the well-organized sultanates in the south.

Trading center

[edit]

The Sulu economy relied on the network of nearby trading partners. The Sultanate benefited from importing rice from northern Philippines, as the Sulu region had a chronic rice shortage. The Sultanate was unable to bring agriculture to its full potential because the area was prone to erratic rainfall and drought.

Chinese immigration

[edit]

Since the 15th century, the Sulu Sultanate traded local produce with neighbors and with countries as far as China by sea. Most of the import and export trade was done with Singapore which was estimated to be worth half a million dollars annually. In 1870, the Tausug lost much of their redistributive trade to the Chinese because of the Spanish cruising system and Chinese immigration from Singapore. Mostly originating from the Fujian province, most of the Chinese in Jolo worked as craftsmen, skilled and unskilled laborers and domestic servants for wealthy Tausugs and Chinese. Singapore served as a training ground from which they learned the Malay language and became experienced in dealing with Southeast Asians. It was these Chinese who eventually dominated trade in Jolo and benefited greatly from Jolo's status as an entrepot, and exercised profound influence over the Sulu Sultanate. However, the Sultanate was not keen on the Chinese monopoly. By 1875, Sultan Jamal ul-Azam wanted an English merchant to establish himself in order to break the monopoly at Jolo.

Chinese who lived in Sulu ran guns across a Spanish blockade to supply the Moro Datus and Sultanates with weapons to fight the Spanish, who were engaging in a campaign to subjugate the Moro sultanates on Mindanao. A trade involving the Moros selling slaves and other goods in exchange for guns developed. The Chinese had entered the economy of the sultanate, taking control of nearly the entire Sultanate's economy in Mindanao and dominating the markets. Though the Sultans did not like their economic monopoly, they did business with them. The Chinese set up a trading network between Singapore, Zamboanga, Jolo and Sulu.

The Chinese sold small arms like Enfield and Spencer rifles to the Buayan Datu Uto. They were used to battle the Spanish invasion of Buayan. The Datu paid for the weapons in slaves.[9] The population of Chinese in Mindanao in the 1880s was 1,000. The Chinese ran guns across a Spanish blockade to sell to Mindanao Moros. The purchases of these weapons were paid for by the Moros in slaves in addition to other goods. The main group of people selling guns were the Chinese in Sulu. The Chinese took control of the economy and used steamers to ship goods for exporting and importing. Opium, ivory, textiles, and crockery were among the other goods which the Chinese sold.

The Chinese on Maimbung sent the weapons to the Sulu Sultanate, who used them to battle the Spanish and resist their attacks. A Chinese-Mestizo was one of the Sultan's brothers-in-law, the Sultan was married to his sister. He and the Sultan both owned shares in the ship (named the Far East) which helped smuggled the weapons.[10]

The Spanish launched a surprise offensive under Colonel Juan Arolas in April 1887 by attacking the Sultanate's capital at Maimbung in an effort to crush resistance. Weapons were captured and the property of the Chinese was destroyed and the Chinese were deported to Jolo.[11]

Spanish control

[edit]
Gates of Jolo, circa 1899

In 1876, the Spanish attempted to gain control of the Muslims by burning Jolo and were successful.[8] In March 1877, The Sulu Protocol was signed between Spain, England and Germany which recognized Spain's rights over Sulu and eased European tensions in the area. The Spanish built the smallest walled city in the world in Jolo. The Spanish and the Sultan of Sulu signed the Treaty of Peace on July 22, 1878, in which the sultan accepted Spanish sovereignty over Sulu and Tawi-Tawi[12][13] but Sulu and Tawi-tawi remained partially ruled by the Spanish as their sovereignty was limited to military stations and garrisons and pockets of civilian settlements.

Trading decline

[edit]

Trade suffered heavily in 1892 when three steamers used for trade were lost in a series of storms on the trade route between Singapore and Jolo. The traders in Singapore lost so heavily as a result that they refused to accept trade unless it was paid for in cash. Along with the fear of increased taxation, many Chinese left to other parts of the Archipelago as Jolo lost its role as the regional entrepot. The Tausug had already abandoned trading when the Chinese arrived. Thus, Jolo never fully gained its previous trading status. However, the Chinese continued to dominate trade throughout the Archipelago and Mindanao.[14]

American Colonial Period

[edit]
Aerial view of Jolo, 1936

In 1899 following the Treaty of Paris of 1898, sovereignty over the Philippines was transferred from Spain to the United States who attempted to forcibly incorporate the Muslim areas into the Philippine state. The American colonizers eventually took over the southern regions with force (see Moro Rebellion). The Sultanate of Sulu was abolished in 1936.

Independence

[edit]

As a center of regional commerce, Sulu and Jolo became very prosperous and progressive in the years after the end of World War II and the establishment of the Third Philippine Republic.[15] By 1970, the province ranked 37rd in the Philippines in terms of number of households with piped water, and 38th in terms of households with electricity.[16] As the capital of the province, Jolo even saw international trade with countries like China and Russia.[16] This changed suddenly after the 1974 Siege of Jolo,[15] which destroyed infrastructure and led to capital flight and brain drain.[16] By 1990 Jolo had dropped to 52nd in terms of number of households with piped water and 73rd in terms of households with electricity.[16]

In 1974, Jolo was occupied by members of the Moro National Liberation Front, and put under siege by the Philippine Army in the Battle of Jolo. The town suffered extensive damage, with Filipino forces bombarding it from the air.[citation needed]

Geography

[edit]

The town of Jolo is located on the north-west side of the Jolo Island, which is located south-west of the tip of Zamboanga Peninsula on Mindanao island. The island is situated between the provinces of Basilan and Tawi-Tawi, bounded by Sulu Sea to the north and Celebes Sea to the south.

Jolo is a volcanic island, which lies at the center of the Sulu Archipelago covering 890 square kilometres (340 sq mi). The Sulu Archipelago is an island chain in the Southwest Philippines between Mindanao and Borneo, which is made up of 900 islands of volcanic and coral origin covering an area of 2,688 square kilometres (1,038 sq mi). There are numerous volcanoes and craters around Jolo with the last known activity (an earthquake assumed resulting from a submarine eruption from an undetermined location) taking place on September 21, 1897, causing devastating tsunamis in the archipelago and western Mindanao.[17][18][8]

Barangays

[edit]

Jolo is politically subdivided into 8 barangays . Each barangay consists of puroks while some have sitios.

  • Alat
  • Asturias
  • Bus-Bus
  • Takut Takut
  • Tulay
  • San Raymundo
  • Chinese Pier
  • Walled City

Climate

[edit]

Jolo has a consistently very warm to hot, oppressively humid, and wet tropical rainforest climate (Köppen Af).

Climate data for Jolo, Sulu
Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year
Mean daily maximum °C (°F) 27
(81) 		27
(81) 		27
(81) 		28
(82) 		28
(82) 		28
(82) 		28
(82) 		28
(82) 		28
(82) 		28
(82) 		28
(82) 		28
(82) 		28
(82)
Mean daily minimum °C (°F) 27
(81) 		26
(79) 		27
(81) 		27
(81) 		28
(82) 		28
(82) 		27
(81) 		27
(81) 		27
(81) 		27
(81) 		27
(81) 		27
(81) 		27
(81)
Average rainfall mm (inches) 170
(6.7) 		130
(5.1) 		125
(4.9) 		122
(4.8) 		229
(9.0) 		286
(11.3) 		254
(10.0) 		248
(9.8) 		182
(7.2) 		257
(10.1) 		233
(9.2) 		188
(7.4) 		2,424
(95.5)
Average rainy days 18.3 15.3 15.2 14.6 22.8 24.0 24.3 23.3 20.5 22.6 21.9 19.3 242.1
Source: Meteoblue (modeled/calculated data, not measured locally)[19]

Demographics

[edit]
Population census of Jolo
YearPop.±% p.a.
1903 44,718—    
1918 20,230−5.15%
1939 12,571−2.24%
1948 18,282+4.25%
1960 33,259+5.11%
1970 46,586+3.42%
1975 37,623−4.19%
1980 52,429+6.86%
1990 53,055+0.12%
1995 76,948+7.21%
2000 87,998+2.92%
2007 140,307+6.65%
2010 118,307−6.02%
2015 125,564+1.14%
2020 137,266+1.89%
2024 152,067+2.49%
Source: Philippine Statistics Authority[20][21][22][23][24]

Languages

[edit]
Tulay Central Mosque, the largest mosque in Sulu

The majority of people who live in Jolo speak Tausug. English is also used, especially in schools and different offices. Hokkien and Malay are also spoken by some traders. Other languages include Sama and Yakan, while Chavacano is also spoken by Christian and Muslim locals who maintain contacts and trade with the mainland Zamboanga Peninsula and Basilan.

According to the 2000 Philippine census by the Philippine Statistics Authority, the Tausug language ranks number 14 with 1,022,000 speakers all over the country, the speakers mainly in the Western Mindanao area to which Sulu belongs.

Religion

[edit]

About 99%[25] of the people living in Jolo practice Islam, but there is also a significant Christian minority consisting of Roman Catholics and Protestants. Tausugs were the first Filipinos to adopt Islam when the Muslim missionary Karim ul-Makhdum came to Sulu in 1380. Other missionaries included Rajah Baguinda and the Muslim Arabian scholar Sayid Abu Bakr, who became the first Sultan of Sulu. The family and community relations are based on their understanding of Islamic law. The Tausug are also heavily influenced by their pre-Islamic traditions.

Tulay Central Mosque is the largest mosque in town and in the province. There are also numerous mosques located in different areas and barangays around Jolo. Our Lady of Mount Carmel Cathedral is a Roman Catholic cathedral located in the town center and is the biggest church in town. "Jolo Alliance Evangelical Church" (formerly known as Jolo Evangelical Church) of the Christian and Missionary Alliance Churches of the Philippines (CAMACOP) also co-exist along with the Catholic Church since the 1900s, making it the first Protestant church in the archipelago.

Culture

[edit]
Tausug woman in traditional garb, performing the Pangalay

Bangsamoro or Moroland is the homeland of the Moro, which is a Spanish term used for Muslims. The majority of Jolo's people are Tausugs – the ethnic group that dominates the Sulu Archipelago. Tausug derives from the words tau meaning “man” and sug meaning “current”, which translates to “ people of the current”, because they were known to be seafarers with military and merchant skills. The Tausugs are known as the warrior tribe with excellent fighting skills.[26]

Before the Tausugs adopted Islam, the Tausugs were organized into kauman and were governed by a patriarchal form of government with the individual datus as heads of their own communities. The source of law was the Adat which the Tausugs followed strictly.[27]

The Tausug arts and handicrafts have a mix of Islamic and Indonesian influences. Pangalay is a popular celebratory dance at Tausug weddings, which can last weeks depending on the financial status and agreement of the families. They dance to the music of kulintangan, gabbang, and agong. Another traditional dance of courtship is the Pangalay ha Agong. In this dance, two Tausug warriors compete for the attention of a woman using an agong (large, deep, brass gong) to demonstrate their competence and skill.[26]

A large portion of the population in Jolo is of Chinese descent. Between 1770 and 1800, 18,000 Chinese came from South China to trade and many of them stayed. In 1803, Portuguese Captain Juan Carvalho reported that there were 1,200 Chinese living in the town. The reorientation of the Sulu trade patterns caused an influx of Chinese immigrants from Singapore.[14]

Economy

[edit]

Poverty Incidence of Jolo

10
20
30
40
50
60
2000
43.02
2003
39.14
2006
43.30
2009
46.11
2012
48.37
2015
40.68
2018
58.94
2021
53.14

Source: Philippine Statistics Authority[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]

Downtown Jolo

Industry

[edit]

In Jolo, most of the residents are in the agriculture industry. Agricultural products include coconut, cassava, abaca, coffee, lanzones, jackfruit, durian, mangosteen and marang. Jolo is the only municipality in Sulu that does not farm seaweed. Fishing is the most important industry; otherwise people engage in the industries of boat building, mat weaving, coffee processing, and fruit preservation.[36]

Banking

[edit]

There were different banks operating in Jolo and serving the people of Jolo for their needs. These included the Philippine National Bank, Metrobank, Allied Bank, Al-Amanah Islamic Bank, Land Bank and Development Bank of the Philippines. Automated teller machines (ATMs) are also available in selected bank branches.

Economic growth

[edit]
View of Jolo, with USNS Mercy in the background.

Economic development in Jolo has been hampered by instability, violence and unrest caused by the presence of several Islamist separatist groups in the Bangsamoro. The long-running separatist insurgency has made these Muslim-dominated islands some of the poorest regions in the nation.[37] Jolo has faced a large degree of lawlessness and poverty.[38] Jolo is once the main stronghold for the Al-Qaeda-linked Abu Sayyaf terror group, and these conditions are ideal for militant recruitment. However, the situation has improved especially after 2024 since the US contribution to the Operation Enduring Freedom – Philippines and involvement of foreign investors from other countries to improve social condition and developing the region's economy together with increased military operations and security from the Philippine authorities that greatly weaken the Abu Sayyaf and deplete their former source of income from criminal activities.[39][40][41]

In 2007, United States Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Karen Hughes and US Ambassador Kristie Kenney visited Jolo to learn about US government-sponsored projects for ‘development, peace and prosperity’ in the region. The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has funded a ‘farm-to-market’ road between Maimbung and Jolo to help farmers transport agricultural produce to the market. On her visit, Kenney announced the $3 million plan to improve the Jolo Airport.[42] Since 1997, USAID has spent $4 million a year in the region.[43] Other institutions involved are the World Bank, JICA and AusAID.

The Filipino government has spent over P39 million for development and infrastructure in Sulu.[44] In October 2008, the Provincial Government of Sulu in cooperation with the Local Water Utilities Administration (LWUA), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Mindanao Economic Development Council (MEDCO) and the Jolo Mainland Water District (JMWD) started the construction of a 54 million pesos project to upgrade the water supply system in Jolo.[45]

Peace and order

[edit]

Clan feud

[edit]
Main article: Rido

In present-day Sulu, there is a degree of lawlessness and clan-based politics. These clan lines are based along family ties, which started after Arthur Amaral proposed marriage to a woman from a rival clan. The rejected proposal caused a family feud which forced families to take sides. There are 100,000 rifles circling the Sulu archipelago. Almost every household owns a gun, and the clans often settle disputes with violence. Most of the disputes between clans revolve around land. The clan-based society makes it extremely difficult for police to impose law. There are several gun shootings and the Filipino Army is often called in to settle disputes.[46] In April 2008, the Jolo Zone of Peace, which was supported by the Geneva-based Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue (CHD), was established where firearms were restricted in mediating conflicts between clans. The Sulu government is attempting to spread this zone of peace into the countryside.[47]

Abu Sayyaf

[edit]

The island was considered dangerous for foreigners, especially Americans, as militants threatened to shoot or abduct them on the spot. Much of the anger comes from when American colonizers killed 1000 men, women and children, who had retreated up Mount Dajo in 1906 after refusing to pay taxes, in the First Battle of Bud Dajo during the Philippine–American War.[48] However, the American image has improved since American development plans for the region were carried out.

The most radical separatist Islamic group Abu Sayyaf claims to be fighting for an Islamic state independent of the Roman Catholic Philippine government. The group has strongholds in Jolo and Basilan. Driven by poverty and high rewards, a significant number of local residents are suspected to work for them. The Abu Sayyaf has committed a series of kidnappings. On April 23, 2000, the Abu Sayyaf raided the Malaysian resort island of Sipadan and kidnapped 21 tourists from Germany, France, Finland and South Africa and brought them back to Jolo, asking for $25 million in ransom money. The Abu Sayyaf has also kidnapped several journalists and photographers in Jolo. The US has already spent millions of dollars for information leading to the arrest of militants; and offered up to $5 million in bounty with Manila as much as P10 million reward for information leading to the capture of Abu Sayyaf leaders.

Sulu governor Benjamin Loong supported the US Special Forces projects “Operation Smiles” of providing medical care, and building roads and schools. The US Special Forces and Governor Loong hopes that winning respect and alleviating poverty from the people will stop terrorist recruitment. Governor Loong claimed that many residents have turned away Abu Sayyaf and Jemaah Islamiah members.[48]

War on terror

[edit]
The damage of the cathedral on January 28, 2019.

Three months after the September 11 attacks, George W. Bush announced the US was opening a second front in the war on terror in the Philippines. The Archipelago became the testing grounds for the Philippine anti-terror plan “Clear, Hold and Develop”. In August 2006, Operation Ultimatum was launched and 5,000 Philippine marines and soldiers, supported by the US Special Forces began clearing the island of Jolo, fighting against a force of 400 guerillas. By February 2007, the town of Jolo was deemed cleared of terrorists.

2019 cathedral bombings

[edit]

On 27 January 2019, two bombings took place at the Cathedral of Our Lady of Mount Carmel. The bombings led by an unknown bandit but not exactly group Abu Sayyaf were widely condemned by local people in Jolo. The bombing caused at least few people killed or wounded during that day.[citation needed]

2020 town plaza bombings

[edit]

On 24 August 2020, at around 12:00 pm, a bomb exploded in front of the Paradise Food Plaza in Barangay Walled City. At least five civilians and four soldiers were killed, while several others were wounded. A second bomb exploded at around 1:00 pm near the Cathedral of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, which was the same site of two bombings last year. One civilian was killed while two others were injured. Philippine Red Cross Chief Richard Gordon said that a motorcycle loaded with an improvised explosive device exploded near a military truck.[49][50][51]

Political and societal significance

[edit]
Sulu Provincial Capitol

The Moros are geographically concentrated in the Southwest of the Philippines. Moros identify mostly with the majority Muslim nations of Indonesia and Malaysia because of their geographic proximity, and linguistic and cultural similarities. Moros have faced encroachments from the Spanish, Americans and now face the national Philippine government. Thus, the struggle for the Moro independent state has existed for over 400 years.

Jolo has been the center of this conflict. Between 1972 and 1976, Jolo was the center of the Muslim Separatist Rebellion between the Muslim militants and the Marcos regime which killed 120,000 people. In 1974, fighting broke out when the government troops stopped the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) from taking over the town.[52]

Currently, the Moro National Liberation Front is the ruling party of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM). In 1996, the MNLF was granted leadership of the ARMM in response to the calls for Muslim autonomy. Abdusakur Tan is the governor of Sulu and Edsir Tan is the mayor of Jolo. Politicians in these regions rose to power with the help of clan connections.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Jolo, Sulu

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Jolo, officially the Municipality of Jolo, is a 1st class municipality and capital of Province in the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao, , encompassing the primary settlement on Island within the . According to the 2020 census, its population stood at 137,266, predominantly Tausug Muslims with deep-rooted Islamic heritage dating to the establishment of the Sulu Sultanate in the mid-15th century under Sharif ul-Hashim. The town served as the sultanate's capital, fostering a maritime economy centered on trade, fishing, and pearl diving, though historically entangled with piracy and slave-raiding expeditions that expanded influence across while provoking repeated conflicts with Spanish, Dutch, and later American forces. In the , Spanish expeditions culminated in the 1876 burning of fortified Jolo, yet resistance persisted until U.S. pacification campaigns in the early subdued Moro juramentados and fortified strongholds. Post-independence, Jolo has grappled with chronic insurgencies from Moro separatist factions, including the , , and Group, manifesting in bombings, kidnappings for ransom, and beheadings that have entrenched , displacement, and military operations despite peace accords elsewhere in . These dynamics underscore Jolo's strategic position astride vital sea lanes, its cultural resilience amid underdevelopment, and the causal interplay of historical autonomy, clan-based , and external interventions in perpetuating volatility.

Etymology

Name origins and historical usage

The name "Jolo" derives from the Tausug term sulug or sūg, an archaic word denoting strong sea currents, alluding to the powerful tidal flows and surrounding coral reefs that define the island's maritime geography. This linguistic root reflects the Tausug people's historical adaptation to the challenging waters of the , where navigation relied on understanding local currents for trade and fishing. Earliest documented references to appear in Chinese historical records from the 13th and 14th centuries, transcribed as "Su-lu," portraying it as a key trading facilitating exchanges between Chinese merchants and Southeast Asian polities during the (1271–1368). These mentions, found in annals detailing tribute missions and commerce, highlight Jolo's pre-Sultanate prominence in regional spice, pearl, and slave trades, with archaeological evidence of corroborating sustained contact by the late 1300s. With the establishment of the Sulu Sultanate around 1450 under Sharif ul-Hashim, the name Sūg (rendered as in Arabic-influenced documents) was formalized as the official designation for the island and its central settlement in sultanate charters and diplomatic correspondences, solidifying Jolo's status as the political and economic core of the realm. This usage persisted in treaties with neighboring powers like , where Jolo served as the primary venue for negotiations over maritime boundaries and tribute rights.

History

Pre-colonial and Sultanate era

The Sulu Sultanate was established around 1450 CE by Sharif ul-Hashim, an Arab sayyid also known as Sayyid Abu Bakr, who arrived in the Sulu Archipelago and married into local leadership to found the polity blending Islamic governance with indigenous Tausug customs and kinship structures. Jolo, the principal settlement on Jolo Island, emerged as a central hub early in the sultanate's history, serving as a key administrative and economic center after initial capitals like Maymbung and Bwansa. The sultanate's rulers, titled sultans, consolidated authority over the archipelago through alliances, religious propagation, and maritime prowess, fostering a multi-ethnic society of Tausug core groups alongside Sama-Bajau seafarers and imported laborers. Economic prosperity underpinned the sultanate's regional dominance, driven by maritime trade networks linking Sulu to , , and beyond. Pearl diving in Sulu's reefs supplied high-value pearls exported primarily to Chinese markets, while sea cucumber (trepang) and shark fins were harvested for similar lucrative trade. The slave trade formed a critical component, with raids yielding captives used for diving, , and resale, integrating Visayan, native, and other ethnic groups into the economy as dependent laborers. Imports included Chinese porcelain, textiles, and metalware, alongside Arabian influences via intermediaries, enhancing elite status and state revenues through tariffs and . Naval capabilities enabled expansive raids on coastal settlements in the Spanish-controlled and northern , securing slaves, tribute, and territorial influence without yielding to external . These operations, conducted via swift prahu vessels crewed by warrior-traders, asserted independence and extended Sulu's sway over trade routes in the , peaking in the 18th-19th centuries before colonial pressures. Such activities not only bolstered manpower and wealth but also reinforced the sultanate's identity as a , deterring rivals through demonstrated military reach.

Spanish colonial period

In 1578, Spanish Governor-General Francisco de Sande dispatched Captain Esteban Rodríguez de Figueroa with a fleet and troops to subdue the , including Jolo, aiming to establish vassalage over the Sultanate and counter Moro raids on Christian settlements. The expedition captured temporary footholds but faced fierce resistance from Tausūg warriors, who leveraged knowledge of local waters and terrain for ambushes, forcing a withdrawal without securing lasting control due to overstretched supply lines and high casualties from combat and disease. Subsequent campaigns, such as the 1635–1646 efforts under Governor-General Sebastián Hurtado de Corcuera, temporarily occupied with garrisons and forts but collapsed amid relentless Moro counterattacks and logistical strains, including vulnerability to supply disruptions across the sea lanes from . By the , intensified sieges culminated in the 1876 expedition led by Admiral José Malcampo, involving over 7,000 troops and naval bombardment that razed 's defenses, including the Sultan's fort and Datu Daniel's stronghold, compelling Sultan Jamalul Azam to sign a acknowledging Spanish . Yet effective dominion remained limited to coastal forts like those encircling town, as Tausūg forces reverted to —employing swift boat raids and in the archipelago's mangroves and islands—which exploited Spanish overextension and unfamiliarity with the environment, preventing inland pacification. Spanish naval blockades curtailed Jolo's role as a regional for pearls, slaves, and spices, redirecting commerce and eroding the Sultanate's economic base, though persisted via agile praus evading patrols. Concurrently, Chinese surged in the late 1800s, with settlers from establishing merchant communities in under Spanish tolerance, drawn by tobacco plantations like Hacienda Gomantong (1884–1889) and acting as intermediaries in that buffered direct confrontations between garrisons and Moro heartlands. This demographic layer, numbering in the hundreds by , complicated full conquest by fostering hybrid economic zones less amenable to total militarization.

American colonial period

Following the Spanish evacuation, United States forces established control over on , 1899, as part of the broader campaign to secure the Philippine archipelago after the Spanish-American War. The Bates Treaty of August 1899 with Sultan ostensibly secured Moro neutrality by promising respect for Islamic customs and internal autonomy, but American authorities pursued disarmament and administrative integration, sparking sustained resistance in the . This culminated in the (1902–1913), characterized by fierce guerrilla warfare from Moro fighters employing fortified cottas (strongholds) and juramentado suicide attacks against U.S. troops. American pacification relied on overwhelming military superiority, including and organized , to dismantle Moro resistance despite the terrain's challenges and warriors' fanaticism. Key engagements included the Battle of Bud Dajo in March 1906, where forces under Major General assaulted a stronghold, resulting in over 600 Moro deaths, including non-combatants, effectively shattering large-scale organized opposition on Jolo. Under Brigadier General , who served as governor of from 1909, U.S. troops enforced a 1911 law mandating surrender of firearms and bladed weapons, confiscating thousands and prompting final holdouts. The in June 1913 saw Pershing's forces eliminate nearly 500 entrenched Moros, marking the rebellion's effective end. Pershing's administration suppressed juramentado attacks—fanatical charges by Moro warriors seeking martyrdom—through policies emphasizing immediate lethal force without capture or negotiation, drastically reducing their frequency. Complementing coercion, U.S. efforts introduced vital for control: roads penetrated remote interiors, facilitating troop movement and , while schools and public markets promoted and , fostering gradual acceptance among the populace. These measures, grounded in respecting Moro Islamic practices while asserting , transitioned governance from to oversight by 1914, securing long-term stability through combined force and development.

Post-independence developments

Upon the ' attainment of independence on July 4, 1946, Jolo and the were integrated into the republic, overriding longstanding Moro autonomy under the and earlier petitions to the opposing such incorporation. This assimilation sowed seeds of resentment, as national policies emphasized centralized governance and Christian migration to , marginalizing Moro land rights and cultural distinctiveness without effective mechanisms for Moro . Escalating grievances fueled the (MNLF) uprising in the early 1970s, with Jolo emerging as a focal point of resistance against perceived dominance. The February 1974 Battle of Jolo saw MNLF forces seize key areas, prompting a fierce Philippine military counteroffensive that razed much of the town through artillery and naval bombardment, resulting in an estimated 1,000–20,000 deaths, the destruction of over 80% of structures, and mass displacement of Tausug residents. President Ferdinand Marcos's declaration of on September 23, 1972, extended to , intensifying operations that displaced tens of thousands of Tausug civilians and triggered refugee flows to neighboring , . These upheavals, compounded by internal fractures among Moro factions unable to unify beyond short-term alliances, perpetuated cycles of violence and eroded Jolo's pre-war role as a trade hub, fostering chronic economic underdevelopment marked by collapsed , disrupted pearl and marine economies, and persistent poverty rates exceeding 70% in province by the 2000s. Efforts at resolution, such as the granting limited autonomy, faltered amid MNLF divisions and government non-compliance, prolonging stagnation. The 2019 established the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM) as a concession to broader Moro separatist aspirations elsewhere in , but Sulu's rejection in the January plebiscite—by a margin of 54% against inclusion—excluded the province, reflecting deep-seated distrust of diluted autonomy and elite rivalries that prioritized provincial control over regional federation. This outcome, affirmed by the in 2024, left outside BARMM's framework, sustaining vulnerabilities to insecurity and underinvestment while exposing the causal limits of top-down integration absent genuine of power to address Moro identity and economic disparities.

Geography

Physical features and location

Jolo is a situated at the center of the in the southwestern , with approximate coordinates of 6°03′N 121°00′E. It occupies a strategic position between to the north and to the southwest, facilitating control over vital sea lanes in the that historically supported trade between and the Pacific. This remote maritime location, isolated from the Philippine mainland by over 200 kilometers of open water, contributed to the island's rugged autonomy by limiting external interference and enabling self-reliant maritime economies centered on fishing and inter-island commerce. The island spans approximately 850 square kilometers, characterized by scattered volcanic mountains rather than continuous ranges, with fertile coastal plains and inland valleys. Its highest peak, Mount Dahu, rises to 812 meters, part of the Jolo Group of Volcanoes that includes young cinder cones, explosion craters, and evidence of past eruptions. Surrounding coral reefs protect natural harbors, such as those at the main port of Jolo town, which have enabled historical seafaring activities despite the archipelago's exposure to seismic disturbances from the nearby . Geologically active due to its position on the , Jolo experiences frequent earthquakes, with historical records noting seismic tides and shocks linked to volcanic unrest. The terrain's elevation and coastal features offer some buffering against typhoons, though the region remains vulnerable to tropical storms tracking through the , which can exacerbate erosion on the volcanic slopes. This combination of isolation and natural defenses reinforced the island's strategic independence, as difficult access by land or sea deterred large-scale invasions while permitting agile naval defenses.

Administrative divisions

Jolo is administratively subdivided into eight barangays: Alat, , Bus-bus, Chinese Pier, San Raymundo, Takut-takut, Tulay, and Walled City. As of the 2020 census, these barangays had the following populations:
BarangayPopulation (2020)
Alat11,368
26,997
Bus-bus38,650
Chinese Pier7,718
San Raymundo17,051
Takut-takut8,123
Tulay14,891
Walled City12,468
The barangays of Bus-bus, Chinese Pier, and Walled City form the contiguous urban core along the coast, encompassing denser settlement and key infrastructure, including the historical walled area and piers. In contrast, barangays such as Alat and Takut-takut lie on the periphery, featuring more dispersed, semi-rural layouts extending into the island's interior. Certain barangays overlap with military installations due to ongoing security operations; Bus-bus, for instance, hosts the Joint Task Force Sulu headquarters and related defense facilities. This administrative structure, with its limited number of small units, aligns with Sulu's clan-dominated social dynamics, where influential families and datus maintain de facto control over barangay-level governance, reinforcing localized power amid weak central authority.

Climate and environment

Jolo experiences a (Köppen Af), with consistently high temperatures averaging between 24°C and 32°C year-round, rarely dropping below 22°C, and oppressive humidity levels often exceeding 80%. The island receives abundant rainfall, totaling approximately 2,500 mm annually, distributed relatively evenly throughout the year with no pronounced dry season, contributing to lush vegetation but also frequent flooding risks. High humidity and maritime influences from the surrounding exacerbate the hot, overcast conditions, fostering a stable but challenging environment for and settlement. Ecologically, Jolo's environment features volcanic soils supporting limited upland forests, though from traditional slash-and-burn (kaingin) practices has reduced tree cover, leading to and watershed degradation across the . The surrounding hosts rich marine biodiversity, including coral reefs, seagrass beds, and diverse fish stocks within the Coral Triangle , historically renowned for natural pearl oyster beds that sustained trade until diminished yields. However, excessive and destructive methods, such as blast and techniques, have caused habitat degradation, declining catches, and , underscoring the risks of overreliance on marine resources without sustainable management. These pressures, compounded by coastal development, threaten long-term in the region.

Demographics

The population of Jolo underwent severe disruption during the 1974 Battle of Jolo, when Philippine government forces clashed with rebels, resulting in the near-total destruction of the town and massive civilian casualties estimated between 1,000 and 20,000 deaths, alongside the displacement of approximately 40,000 residents, leaving only about 5,000 people in the ruins immediately afterward. This event, part of the broader Moro insurgency that intensified in the early , triggered long-term stagnation in , as recurring deterred return migration and economic recovery, with subsequent clashes involving groups like further exacerbating out-migration and hindering natural increase compared to national averages. Census data reflect this muted trajectory: Jolo's grew modestly from 44,718 in 1903 to 137,266 by the 2020 , a far below the Philippine national figure over the same period. Ongoing security challenges in province have perpetuated displacement patterns, though Jolo as the provincial capital has periodically seen net inflows of internally displaced persons from rural municipalities fleeing localized violence, contributing to episodic upticks amid baseline stagnation. Demographically, Jolo mirrors Sulu province's pronounced youth bulge, with a 2010 median age of 19.1 years—meaning half the was younger than this threshold—and fertility rates elevated above the national average of around 2.0 births per woman, sustained by factors including early prevalent in Muslim communities, where one in six girls in Sulu marries before age 18. This structure amplifies pressure on local resources while conflict continues to disrupt stable growth.

Ethnic and linguistic composition

The population of Jolo is predominantly composed of the Tausūg ethnic group, which forms the core of the island's demographic makeup as the primary inhabitants of the . In Province, encompassing Jolo as its capital and principal municipality, Tausūg individuals accounted for 85.27% of the household population in the 2000 census conducted by the . Jolo itself exhibits an even higher concentration of Tausūg residents, given its status as the historical and cultural center of the group, with minorities including and smaller numbers of migrants from other Philippine regions. Linguistically, Tausūg (also known as Bahasa Sug) dominates as the mother tongue for over 90% of Jolo's residents, functioning as the local with dialects such as Parianun along the coastal areas including the town proper and Gimbahanun in the interior highlands. Filipino, based on Tagalog, serves as the national for inter-regional communication and official purposes. Minority languages include Sinama spoken by communities and Zamboangueño , a Spanish-based creole remnant of colonial trade links with ports, used as a by some residents engaged in . English proficiency remains low among the populace, with studies of local university students revealing significant challenges in speaking and comprehension that limit access to national economic opportunities and integration.

Religious demographics


The population of Jolo is overwhelmingly Muslim, with surveys and ecclesiastical estimates indicating that Muslims comprise over 95% of residents in the municipality and surrounding areas of Sulu province. This high proportion reflects the historical dominance of Islam in the Sulu Archipelago, where the faith was introduced through trade and missionary activities starting in the 14th century. Islam in Jolo adheres to the Sunni tradition, specifically the Shafi'i school of , which became entrenched via the Sultanate of Sulu's adoption of orthodox Sunni practices influenced by broader Southeast Asian Islamic networks. The Shafi'i , emphasizing scriptural sources and analogical reasoning, shapes local interpretations of Islamic law, though adherence varies with traditional and reformist influences. A small Christian minority, primarily Roman Catholics, accounts for approximately 1.6% of the population in the Apostolic Vicariate of Jolo, which includes and islands as of 2023. This group descends largely from colonial-era migrations and conversions, maintaining a presence despite historical claims of under the sultanate, contrasted by periodic sectarian tensions evidenced in attacks on Christian sites. Other religious affiliations, such as animist beliefs among indigenous groups, are negligible in contemporary demographics.

Culture and Society

Tausug cultural practices

The of the maintain several indigenous cultural practices rooted in their Austronesian heritage, emphasizing craftsmanship, music, and maritime traditions that trace back to pre-Islamic eras before the widespread adoption of in the 14th century. These customs reflect adaptation to island environments, with skills in and boat construction supporting daily sustenance and across seas. Traditional weaving among the Tausūg involves intricate techniques using local materials like pandan leaves and abaca fibers to produce items such as mats, sashes, and the pis syabit, a patterned textile often used for male headgear measuring about 1 meter in length. This craft, known as baluy or hablon weaving, features geometric motifs symbolizing natural elements and social status, passed down matrilineally among women as a form of economic self-reliance predating colonial influences. The kulintangan ensemble represents a core musical tradition, comprising a row of bossed gongs (kulintangan proper), paired gongs (duwahan), a large suspended (tungallan), and barrel drums (gandang), arranged to produce layered melodies imitating natural sounds like waves or bird calls. Performed during communal gatherings, this gong-based music originated from ancient Southeast Asian gong-chime traditions shared among Austronesian groups, with performances emphasizing and rhythmic interlocking patterns. Maritime practices center on the construction of vinta outrigger boats, hand-built from narra wood with colorful, triangular sails adorned in patterns denoting clan or voyage purpose, enabling fishing, inter-island raids, and trade vital to Tausūg survival in the archipelago. Boat-building rituals invoke ancestral spirits for seaworthiness, embedding folklore of sea guardians and migratory epics that underscore the Tausūg identity as "people of the current." Hospitality norms dictate immediate offering of betel nut (mama) and food to guests upon arrival, regardless of prior tensions, as a codified adat (custom) enforcing social reciprocity in tight-knit communities where resource scarcity demands alliance-building over overt conflict. This practice, observed in ethnographic accounts, fosters temporary truces through ritualized generosity, with hosts providing shelter and provisions for up to three days without inquiry into the visitor's intent.

Islamic influences and traditions

Islam reached the Sulu Archipelago, including Jolo, in the late 13th to early 14th century through Arab and Malay traders, with Sheikh Makhdum Karim establishing the first Muslim settlement around 1380. The Sultanate of Sulu, founded circa 1450 by Sharif ul-Hashim, formalized Islamic rule in Jolo, integrating Sharia with local governance structures and promoting conversion among the Tausug people. Traditional Tausug Islam in Jolo exhibits syncretic features, blending Quranic orthodoxy with pre-Islamic animist elements such as beliefs in multiple souls departing the body after death and spirit veneration, which persist in folk rituals despite orthodox prohibitions. These adaptations arose from gradual conversion processes where Islam overlaid rather than eradicated indigenous customs, leading to localized practices like incorporating ancestral spirits into protective amulets. In contrast, purist revivals influenced by reformist since the have emphasized scriptural fidelity, critiquing as deviation and advocating stricter adherence to Hanafi jurisprudence dominant in the region. Mosques, such as the historic Masjid Tulay in —constructed through communal efforts in the early —function as central hubs for daily prayers, sermons delivered in Tausug, and social gatherings, reinforcing communal solidarity. Adjacent madrasas provide formal Quranic instruction alongside informal learning circles (halaqah) focused on and , serving as key institutions for transmitting Islamic knowledge to youth. Ramadan in Jolo involves rigorous communal fasting from dawn to dusk, with meals shared in mosques and homes, heightening spiritual reflection and charity; the 2025 observance began on March 2 following moon sighting confirmations by authorities. Historical ties to persist, as Tausug elites from Jolo have undertaken the pilgrimage to since the sultanate era, fostering connections with global networks despite logistical challenges. endowments, including lands dedicated to mosque maintenance, support community welfare by funding and , embodying Islamic principles of perpetual charity adapted to local agrarian economies.

Social structures and clan dynamics

Tausug society in Jolo centers on extended kinship networks organized into clans, where land ownership is collective and stewardship falls to datus, hereditary who command through , , and martial alliances among families. These datus, drawn from noble lineages tracing back to the Sulu Sultanate era, mediate internal disputes and forge inter-clan bonds via strategic marriages and pacts of mutual defense, sustaining a stratified of nobles, freemen, and dependents. Such alliances prioritize agnatic and honor-bound reciprocity, enabling clans to function as semi-autonomous polities amid geographic isolation. Rido, or protracted clan , stem from breaches of these honor codes—such as insults to or unpaid —where vengeance is culturally mandated to restore equilibrium, outlasting colonial and postcolonial interventions due to entrenched normative imperatives rather than mere resource or foreign influence. Feud cycles perpetuate through generational obligations, with clans mobilizing kin and allies for retaliation unless offset by compensatory rituals like sagop (protective ) or blood money payments calibrated to the offense's severity. Marriage alliances serve as a primary endogenous tool for rido resolution, binding feuding lineages through that diffuses enmity and redistributes obligations, often brokered by datus to avert escalation while preserving prestige. This practice underscores the adaptive resilience of Tausug kinship, where affinal ties supplement descent groups to forge broader coalitions. The archipelago's rugged terrain and maritime dispersal have historically limited Manila's administrative reach into , permitting clans to uphold customary authority with minimal state oversight and fostering in and resource control. Consequently, honor-driven dynamics endure, as national legal frameworks encounter resistance from entrenched loyalties that view external impositions as threats to traditional .

Economy

Traditional and primary industries

Fishing constitutes the cornerstone of Jolo's traditional economy, leveraging the biodiverse , which harbors abundant stocks of commercially valuable species including (Thunnus albacares), (Thunnus obesus), and (Katsuwonus pelamis). These fisheries support municipal-scale operations using artisanal methods such as handlines and gillnets, with catches processed locally or transported to regional markets. Data from the National Stock Assessment Program indicate that juvenile tunas (40-70 cm fork length) form a notable portion of Jolo-area landings, though overreliance on smaller fish raises concerns about stock sustainability amid unregulated effort. Historically, pearl oyster harvesting dominated marine extraction, with Jolo exporting approximately 730 tonnes of pearl shell annually in the early , fueling trade with and via diverse diving techniques employed by local communities. Contemporary pearl farming persists on a smaller scale in nearby Sulu municipalities like , yielding cultured South Sea pearls, but production has shifted toward more controlled sites outside the archipelago due to environmental pressures and security factors. Agriculture remains subsistence-oriented, dominated by coconut (Cocos nucifera) cultivation across roughly 66,900 hectares in province, generating as the highest-value output despite variable yields influenced by typhoons and aging palms. Root crops, particularly (Manihot esculenta), thrive on the province's fertile, non-fertilized soils, serving as a staple with production bolstered by the crop's resilience to local conditions; studies in Talipao municipality report energy inputs of about 2,273 MJ/ha for cultivation. Livestock activities, including and rearing, are curtailed by chronic feed shortages stemming from imported concentrate dependency and seasonal forage deficits, confining output to household levels without commercial viability.

Modern economic activities

The primary forms of commerce in Jolo revolve around small-scale retail and informal trading, with sari-sari stores—ubiquitous neighborhood convenience outlets selling daily essentials like food, beverages, and —serving as the backbone of local distribution. These micro-enterprises, often family-run, cater to immediate community needs amid limited formal retail . Wet markets, such as the central public market in Jolo, facilitate the exchange of fresh seafood, produce, and imported commodities through informal and cash transactions, reflecting the archipelago's maritime networks that persist from historical patterns into contemporary informal economies. Remittances from overseas Filipino workers (OFWs), particularly those employed in , , constitute a critical economic lifeline, funding household consumption and sustaining service-oriented activities in Jolo. Proximity to has driven migration from since historical displacements, with workers contributing to sectors like plantations and , channeling funds back to support local spending on . This external stream has propelled provincial service sector growth, including accommodation and services, which expanded by 33.1 percent in in 2022, though it underscores a dependence on earnings over localized productive . Tourism, despite Jolo's coastal appeal and cultural sites, remains negligible due to entrenched security risks, including and threats from groups operating in the . Multiple international advisories, such as those from the Foreign Office and , explicitly warn against all travel to Sulu province, citing high probabilities of attacks and limiting visitor inflows to near zero. This reputation hampers service sector diversification, confining economic activities to subsistence-level commerce bolstered by remittances rather than visitor-driven revenue.

Challenges and development prospects

Jolo's economy is constrained by chronic shortcomings, particularly in transportation and logistics, which hinder trade and market access in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM). These deficits include underdeveloped ports and roads, limiting the efficient movement of goods and exacerbating isolation from broader Philippine markets, as evidenced by ongoing regional development initiatives targeting such gaps. Persistent , including activities by Group affiliates, acts as a major barrier by deterring foreign and domestic investment, disrupting supply chains, and elevating operational risks for businesses in Sulu province. Corruption in public procurement and local administration compounds these issues, diverting funds from productive investments and undermining governance efficiency, though specific metrics for remain limited amid broader Philippine challenges. Development prospects center on untapped , with Sulu's coastal waters offering high potential for , particularly eucheumatoid , which thrives in the archipelago's favorable conditions and could diversify beyond capture fisheries. BARMM has prioritized port enhancements, including the 2025 completion of a P13.8 million at Port to streamline handling, alongside over P109 million in related transportation facilities to bolster connectivity and trade facilitation. These efforts, if sustained with reduced regulatory hurdles and security stabilization, could catalyze growth in fisheries exports and logistics-dependent sectors.

Governance

Local administration

Jolo's local administration is governed by the Philippine Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. 7160), which establishes an elective municipal council comprising a , vice mayor, and eight members responsible for legislative functions, ordinance-making, and oversight of executive implementation. Elective positions are filled through direct popular vote every three years, with incumbents limited to three consecutive terms to promote turnover and accountability. The current , Edsir Q. Tan, was proclaimed following the May 2025 elections and assumed office in July 2025, succeeding Kherkhar S. Tan; the vice mayor is Khumaidy Tan. Funding for municipal operations primarily derives from the national (IRA), distributed based on population, land area, and equal-sharing formulas, which constituted the bulk of revenues nationwide in recent fiscal years. , as a first-class with approximately 125,000 residents across eight barangays, receives IRA shares proportional to these criteria, though exact 2025 figures for the locality are not publicly detailed in national budget documents, reflecting transparency challenges in remote areas. These funds support core functions like , public safety, and basic services, but allocation decisions often prioritize visible projects over systemic improvements. Patronage networks dominate local in Jolo, where clan loyalties (known as wattah) and familial ties influence candidate selection, voter mobilization, and resource distribution, undermining merit-based administration as politicians exchange favors for political support. This clan-centric system, rooted in Tausug social structures, fosters competition among dominant families like the Tans, perpetuating inefficiencies as appointments and contracts favor kin over qualified personnel. Service delivery exhibits persistent gaps, particularly in and , despite IRA inflows. Healthcare provision suffers from acute shortages of skilled personnel and inadequate facilities, with rural units in Sulu, including , reporting barriers like maldistribution of health workers and fragile that limit access to . In education, over 40% of schools in the lack basic services, and 21% want hygienic facilities, contributing to low enrollment and completion rates in Jolo's barangays where deficits exacerbate learning disruptions. These shortcomings stem partly from patronage-driven budgeting, where funds are diverted to clientelist projects rather than addressing empirical needs identified in local assessments.

Integration into Bangsamoro Autonomous Region

The (BOL), enacted on July 27, 2018, and ratified via plebiscite in January and February 2019, replaced the (ARMM) with the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM), aiming to grant expanded self-governance to Moro-majority areas including province, where serves as the capital. , previously under ARMM since 1989, was slated for inclusion under the BOL's territorial provisions, which envisioned BARMM encompassing the provinces of , , , , and , plus and select barangays. However, in Sulu's plebiscite on February 6, 2019, voters rejected the BOL with 163,526 "no" votes against 18,757 "yes," reflecting widespread local reservations about ceding control to BARMM's proposed structure dominated by the (MILF). Despite the rejection, Sulu's initial administrative placement under BARMM persisted until the ruled on September 9, 2024, that its exclusion was constitutionally mandated under Article X, Section 18 of the 1987 Constitution, which requires affirmative plebiscite approval for territorial inclusion in autonomous regions. The Court affirmed the BOL's validity overall but struck down Sulu's forced inclusion, citing the plebiscite outcome as binding and preventing violations of local sovereignty. In response, President Jr. issued an on August 2, 2025, reassigning —including —to Region IX () for administrative purposes, ensuring continuity of national government services while severing ties to BARMM funding and governance. BARMM's revenue-sharing framework, outlined in the BOL, allocates to the region a five percent share of national internal revenue es and a 75 percent portion of block grants from national wealth derived from its territory, alongside local taxation powers—mechanisms intended to bolster fiscal but which Sulu forfeited upon exclusion. For Jolo and , this meant forgoing potential inflows estimated in billions of pesos annually for and services, as BARMM's 2025 budget included 5.9 billion in tax shares alone; however, integration could have exacerbated gaps, given BARMM's reliance on interim MILF-led appointees without elected oversight until parliamentary polls. Sulu's rejection highlighted trade-offs: enhanced self-rule risked entrenching clan-based and prevalent in Moro politics, as evidenced by ARMM's historical underperformance despite similar fiscal perks, versus national integration's stricter audits but diluted cultural representation. BARMM's first parliamentary elections, originally deferred from 2022 to May 2025 under Republic Act No. 11593, faced further postponement by order on October 1, 2025, due to invalid districting laws (Bangsamoro Autonomy Acts 58 and 77), nullifying seven seats previously allocated to and underscoring governance delays that avoided through exclusion. This deferral, pushing polls beyond 2025, amplifies critiques of BARMM's transitional authority lacking democratic checks, potentially mirroring ARMM's inefficiencies where funds often fueled rather than development—issues 's non-integration shields it from, albeit at the cost of region-specific Islamic and . Overall, 's preserves national mechanisms but limits access to BARMM's projected PHP 80+ billion annual block grants, balancing fiscal independence against entrenched local power imbalances.

Security and Conflicts

Historical insurgencies and separatism

The Moro insurgency in Sulu, with Jolo as a primary stronghold due to its Tausug population and strategic port, escalated following the formation of the (MNLF) on October 21, 1972, by and allies in exile. The MNLF framed its separatist campaign for an independent republic as a response to historical dispossession and against , prominently invoking the of March 1968, where up to 200 Moro recruits reportedly mutinied during secretive training on Island for a potential Sabah operation and were massacred by Philippine forces; Philippine military records disputed the scale, claiming only 27 deaths from fratricide or , rendering the event's role as a singular trigger subject to ongoing historical debate. Intensified clashes marked as a focal point, exemplified by the February 1974 battle, during which MNLF guerrillas numbering around 500 launched coordinated assaults on military installations, including the airport and , prompting Philippine forces under to deploy naval and air bombardments that razed over 80% of the town, killed an estimated 1,000-5,000 civilians alongside combatants, and displaced nearly the entire population of 40,000. The destruction, often attributed to disproportionate government retaliation but also to MNLF tactics embedding in civilian areas, underscored the insurgency's early reliance on in densely populated zones, fueling recruitment while alienating potential moderates. Libyan-mediated talks yielded the Tripoli Agreement on December 23, 1976, between the Marcos administration and MNLF, conceding autonomy over 13 provinces—including —with Muslim control of , courts applying Shari'a in family matters, and economic resources, while explicitly barring and retaining Philippine . Implementation via the 1977 Batasang Pambansa for an Autonomous Region in ten provinces fell short of MNLF expectations for veto-proof regional powers and full inclusion of all claimed territories, as maximalist insistence on de facto clashed with Manila's limits, precipitating ceasefire breakdowns and renewed fighting by 1977. Persistent doctrinal rifts and strategic disappointments from unyielding separatist goals fragmented the MNLF by the early , culminating in the MILF's emergence on , 1984, under Hashim Salamat, who criticized Misuari's secular nationalism and negotiation pliancy, advocating stricter Islamic governance within a Moro homeland; this splintering diluted unified pressure on , prolonging in as factions vied for influence amid declining external patronage.

Rise and operations of Abu Sayyaf

The Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) emerged in 1991 on Basilan Island, founded by Abdurajak Abubakar Janjalani as a radical splinter from the Moro National Liberation Front, rejecting the latter's negotiated peace with the Philippine government in favor of establishing an independent Islamic state through armed jihad. Janjalani, a Tausūg who had fought Soviet forces in Afghanistan and received training in Libya and Peshawar, drew inspiration from global Salafi-jihadist networks, positioning ASG as a vehicle for transnational Islamist militancy rather than localized separatism. Early activities focused on assassinations of moderate Muslim leaders, bombings of civilian and military targets, and extortion to build operational capacity and enforce ideological purity among Moro communities. Following Janjalani's death in a 1998 clash with Philippine forces, leadership fragmented among commanders like and Sabaya, prompting a pivot to high-profile kidnappings for as a primary funding mechanism to sustain jihadist operations amid resource shortages. This criminal turn, often mischaracterized as mere , integrated profit motives with ideological goals, enabling ASG to procure weapons, recruit fighters, and expand influence across the , including , where porous maritime borders facilitated cross-border raids. A emblematic operation occurred on April 23, 2000, when ASG militants abducted 21 hostages—10 of them Western tourists—from the Sipadan dive resort off , , transporting them to and bases; s totaling millions of dollars were negotiated and paid, with hostages released incrementally over 2000–2001, though some faced execution or beheading for non-payment or . Such tactics, including filmed beheadings of captives like American Jeffrey Schilling in 2000, amplified ASG's terror profile while generating funds estimated in tens of millions from similar raids through the early 2000s. ASG's operational base in , leveraging Jolo's rugged terrain and clan networks for sanctuary, evolved from opportunistic rackets to overt , with mid-level cadres blending , drug trafficking, and bombings to advance Salafi-jihadist aims like imposition and attacks on perceived apostates. Explanations attributing ASG's rise primarily to overlook its ideological core—rooted in Janjalani's Wahhabi-influenced rejection of secular governance—and empirical patterns showing among non-impoverished clansmen drawn by power, revenge, and religious fervor rather than economic desperation alone. By 2014, amid global ascendancy, ASG factions under leaders like pledged bay'ah (allegiance) to the , rebranding localized kidnappings and bombings as contributions to a , which facilitated foreign fighter inflows and escalated ambitions toward establishing wilayat in Mindanao-Sulu. This alignment intensified beheading videos and suicide attacks, distinguishing ASG from profit-only criminals despite persistent ransom dependencies for sustainability.

Clan feuds and internal violence

Clan feuds, locally termed rido among the Tausug inhabitants of Sulu including , manifest as intergenerational cycles of retaliatory violence between extended groups, frequently ignited by disputes over land ownership, political influence, or honor (maratabat), where perceived slights demand vengeance (mamauli) to restore family prestige. These conflicts escalate through alliances and use, displacing communities and hindering development, with land scarcity and competition for internal revenue allotments exacerbating tensions in areas around . From the 1930s to 2005, studies recorded 145 rido incidents in alone, part of 1,266 cases across that caused over 5,500 deaths and widespread displacement, underscoring the scale of internal violence independent of broader insurgencies. Recent examples include a 50-year between two Tausug clans in , resulting in at least 100 fatalities and numerous injuries before reconciliation in March 2024, and a 27-year conflict in Indanan municipality resolved via a peace pact involving local authorities. Traditional resolution mechanisms center on pagpati'ut () by respected elders or datus, often culminating in payment of diat— or indemnification—for murders, injuries, or to symbolize and communal healing under Tausug . Despite such practices, succeeds in only about 36% of cases, undermined by pervasive availability, absent dominant leadership, and feeble state enforcement of justice, which allows vendettas to recur without legal deterrence. In Sulu's remote barangays near , limited infrastructure and government reach further perpetuate avoidance behaviors, such as families rerouting daily paths to evade rivals, entrenching social fragmentation.

Major terrorist incidents

On January 27, 2019, twin bombings targeted Cathedral during Sunday Mass in , killing at least 20 people and wounding dozens more. The attacks involved pipe bombs detonated in close succession, with the claiming responsibility via its . Philippine authorities identified Indonesian nationals among the perpetrators, linking the operation to ISIS-aligned networks. On August 24, , two explosions struck crowded areas near a and a market in , killing 14 people—including soldiers, police, and civilians—and injuring 75 others. The first blast used a , followed by a in the second attack, attributed to the Group (ASG), an Islamist militant faction with ties to . In April 2000, ASG militants abducted 21 hostages, including foreign tourists and resort workers, from Island off , , transporting them to bases in province near for ransom demands. The kidnappings, involving high-profile captives held for months, resulted in ransoms paid for releases and underscored ASG's use of as a operational hub for Islamist and . In 2024, a Philippine convicted 17 ASG members to for their roles in the incident.

Counterterrorism measures and recent progress

The Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), particularly the 11th Infantry Division, conducted intensified ground operations and intelligence-driven campaigns against remnants in province, including areas around , from 2020 onward, focusing on clearing terrorist influence in 52 affected barangays. These efforts involved coordinated patrols, targeted raids, and community engagement to dismantle ASG networks, resulting in the neutralization of fighters and seizure of weapons caches. By mid-2023, several Sulu municipalities, such as Luuk in August and earlier that year, were declared ASG-free by local task forces ending local armed conflict (), marking progressive territorial gains in the province's campaign. On September 7, 2023, the Sulu Provincial Task Force-ELAC and Provincial Peace and Order Council formally declared the entire province, encompassing , as ASG-free, citing the absence of active terrorist operations and influence after years of sustained military pressure. Complementary deradicalization initiatives under the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM) provided incentives for ASG surrenders, including livelihood support and amnesty pathways, facilitating the yielding of fighters in , such as six members in April 2024 who turned over firearms to AFP units. This combination of kinetic operations and non-kinetic rehabilitation contributed to a documented decline in ASG-linked violence in and adjacent areas by late 2022, enabling shifts toward development and .

Historical and Contemporary Significance

Legacy of the Sulu Sultanate

The Sulu Sultanate, established circa 1450 by the Arab-Malay Sharif ul-Hashim through alliances with local datus, maintained sovereignty over the —including , , and —along with coastal extensions into northeastern and , spanning until its effective end in 1899. This control facilitated dominance over vital sea lanes in the Sulu and Celebes Seas, enabling the extraction of tribute from subordinate polities in and the conduct of maritime raids that supplemented legitimate commerce in pearls, trepang, and jungle products. The sultanate's efficacy derived from a decentralized yet cohesive structure where sultans delegated authority to warrior datus, who mobilized fleets for offensive operations, yielding economic gains through captured slaves sold in regional markets and protection rackets on trade routes. In warfare, the sultanate demonstrated sustained resilience, repelling multiple Spanish incursions from 1578 onward via guerrilla tactics and naval superiority, with notable victories such as the 1635 defense of that inflicted heavy losses on invaders and preserved for over three centuries. These successes stemmed from adaptive strategies prioritizing mobility over fixed defenses, allowing Tausug forces to harass supply lines and extract ransoms, which funded further armament acquisitions like cannons from European traders. Diplomatically, sultans forged pragmatic ties with regional powers, including tributary relations with Ming China from the early that secured prestige and goods exchange, and intermittent pacts with for mutual defense against , while negotiating tribute cessations with in 1646 and 1737 to avert total subjugation. The sultanate's eventual decline accelerated after the mid-19th century, attributable to internal fragmentation from rivalries and disputed successions—exemplified by the 1840s civil strife under Sultan Muhammad—eroding centralized command and diverting resources into kin-based feuds rather than unified resistance. External pressures compounded this, as intensified Spanish naval blockades from restricted inflows of arms and , while the 1878 bombardment and occupation of by 2,500 troops under Malcampo dismantled core strongholds, though sporadic sultanate revival attempts persisted until U.S. formalization of control in 1899. This confluence of endogenous disunity and exogenous military encirclement underscores the sultanate's legacy as a precolonial entity whose longevity hinged on balancing predatory with selective alliances, yet faltered when internal undermined .

Role in regional politics and identity

Jolo, as the historical seat of the Sulu Sultanate and a focal point of Tausug , embodies enduring symbols of Moro resistance against colonial and postcolonial domination, integral to narratives of advanced by organizations like the (MILF). In MILF discourse, events such as the 1974 Battle of Jolo are invoked to underscore a collective Moro struggle for , positioning the municipality as a of defiance that informs broader claims to a unified homeland encompassing diverse ethnolinguistic groups. However, this symbolic role contrasts with practical political divergences, as Sulu Province—centered on Jolo—overwhelmingly rejected ratification of the in the January 21, 2019, plebiscite, with 72.66% voting against inclusion in the (BARMM). The Philippine Supreme Court's September 9, 2024, ruling to exclude from , affirming the plebiscite outcome, has reshaped regional dynamics, depriving the autonomous region of a key historical province and altering power balances ahead of the inaugural parliamentary elections scheduled for May 2025. This exclusion positions the 2025 polls as a pivotal test for 's institutional stability, particularly for MILF-led structures like the United Bangsamoro Justice Party, which must navigate reduced territorial scope and potential shifts in voter coalitions without Sulu's 4 legislative districts and approximately 823,000 residents. Jolo's political influence thus highlights tensions between aspirational Bangsamoro nationalism and localized identities prioritizing autonomy over centralized integration. Efforts to reintegrate Sulu, such as the Moro National Liberation Front's June 2025 petition urging its return to territory, evoke revanchist impulses to reclaim a "complete" entity but overlook Sulu's expressed preference for separation from MILF-dominated governance, risking deepened factionalism rather than reconciliation. Assertions linking Jolo's Moro identity to global jihadist networks remain fringe interpretations, disconnected from the predominantly nationalist orientation of mainstream movements, which emphasize territorial self-rule over transnational ideologies. Sustained stability in regional politics demands respecting plebiscitary outcomes to avoid inflaming identity-based grievances, fostering pragmatic federal arrangements over irredentist reversals.

References

  1. https://www.philatlas.com/mindanao/barmm/sulu/jolo.html
  2. https://www.protectionclusterphilippines.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/UNHCR_MPP_Sulu_Jolo.pdf
  3. https://suluonlinelibrary.wordpress.com/history-2/timelines/padduman-salsila-sin-lupah-sug/sultanate-history-timeline-1450-1915/
  4. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/41771/41771-h/41771-h.htm
  5. https://historyofsulu.wordpress.com/2014/09/17/chapter-i-town-of-jolo/
  6. https://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/philippines/guzman01.html
  7. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA406868.pdf
  8. https://seasia.co/2025/04/30/philippines-jolo-island-and-the-historic-sulu-sultanate
  9. http://unitasust.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/UNITAS-89-2-05-Anne-Ensomo-The-Toponymic-Inscription.pdf
  10. https://sultanateofsulu.ecseachamber.org/history1/index-1.htm
  11. https://www.academia.edu/6450603/Origination_and_Formation_of_Sulu_Sultanate_during_the_14th_Century_Southeast_Asia
  12. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/15148/14239028-MIT.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
  13. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4740&context=etd
  14. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004469655/BP000022.xml
  15. https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/bitstream/2433/56629/1/KJ00000131991.pdf
  16. https://s3.us-west-1.wasabisys.com/p-library/books/a41d3bb788871a264df9d8b348cbe615.pdf
  17. https://suluonlinelibrary.wordpress.com/the-sulu-sea-pirates-of-empire-chapter2/
  18. https://kahimyang.com/kauswagan/articles/1144/today-in-philippine-history-may-23-1578-governor-francisco-de-sande-sent-off-an-officer-to-subdue-the-sulu-islands
  19. https://suluonlinelibrary.wordpress.com/major-events/1876-spanish-expedition-to-sulu/
  20. https://uca.edu/politicalscience/home/research-projects/dadm-project/asiapacific-region/united-statesphilippines-1898-1946/
  21. https://www.philippineupdate.com/Bates.htm
  22. https://history.army.mil/Research/Reference-Topics/Army-Campaigns/Brief-Summaries/Philippine-Insurrection/
  23. http://www.worldwar1.com/dbc/pdf/philippinesmoros.pdf
  24. https://time.com/archive/6604531/territories-terror-in-jolo/
  25. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/697914/historical-significance-of-july-4-1946-to-moros
  26. https://uca.edu/politicalscience/home/research-projects/dadm-project/asiapacific-region/philippinesmoro-national-liberation-front-1968-present/
  27. https://ijaps.usm.my/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/IJAPS-192_Art3.pdf
  28. https://www.rappler.com/philippines/mindanao/remembering-jolocaust-burning-jolo-february-12-2024/
  29. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/martial-law-and-tausug
  30. https://unpo.org/sulu/
  31. https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/sc-upholds-validity-of-bangsamoro-organic-law-declares-sulu-not-part-of-bangsamoro-region/
  32. https://verafiles.org/articles/fact-sheet-why-sulu-is-no-longer-part-of-barmm
  33. https://www.britannica.com/place/Jolo-island-Philippines
  34. https://www.philatlas.com/physical/islands/jolo.html
  35. https://www.ucanews.com/directory/dioceses/philippines-jolo/469
  36. https://www.volcanodiscovery.com/jolo.html
  37. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/island-areas/1903/philippine-bulletin-3-volcanoes.pdf
  38. https://pubs.usgs.gov/cp/43/plate-1.pdf
  39. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1164163
  40. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia-pacific/philippines/306-southern-philippines-tackling-clan-politics-bangsamoro
  41. https://weatherspark.com/y/136479/Average-Weather-in-Jolo-Philippines-Year-Round
  42. https://www.pagasa.dost.gov.ph/information/climate-philippines
  43. https://suluarchipelagoanditspeople.wordpress.com/chapter-1-the-land/the-climate/
  44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15083654/
  45. http://basilanandjolobiodiversity.blogspot.com/2015/
  46. https://www.coraltriangleinitiative.org/sites/default/files/resources/SuluSulawesi-TDA_Final.pdf
  47. https://www.nytimes.com/1974/02/23/archives/fight-in-philippine-town-leaves-rubble-and-death-battle-for-a.html
  48. https://mindanews.com/mindaviews/2025/04/commentary-addendum-to-the-jolo-siege-of-1974-half-a-century-hence/
  49. https://psa.gov.ph/statistics/population-and-housing/node/43801
  50. https://www.unicef.org/philippines/press-releases/culture-religion-and-poverty-among-key-drivers-child-marriage-sulu-and-tawi-tawi
  51. https://www.prb.org/resources/report-population-health-and-environment-issues-in-the-philippines-a-profile-of-autonomous-region-in-muslim-mindanao-armm/
  52. https://psa.gov.ph/content/sulu-had-average-household-size-6-persons-results-2000-census-population-and-housing-nso
  53. https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/15295/rp
  54. http://www.ethnicgroupsphilippines.com/ethnic-groups-in-the-philippines/tausug/
  55. https://bcpch.bangsamoro.gov.ph/sulu/
  56. https://www.facebook.com/orgsabahan.ca/posts/globaljolo-sulu-jolo-officially-the-municipality-of-jolo-taus%25C5%25ABg-lupah-s%25C5%25ABg-filipi/1795166163944434/
  57. https://www.ejournals.ph/article.php?id=27722
  58. https://icceph.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/SPEAKING-PROBLEMS-IN-THE-ENGLISH-LANGUAGE-AMONG-COLLEGE-STUDENTS-AT-MINDANAO-STATE-UNIVERSITY-SULU.pdf
  59. https://ncca.gov.ph/about-ncca-3/subcommissions/subcommission-on-cultural-communities-and-traditional-arts-sccta/central-cultural-communities/the-history-of-the-muslim-in-the-philippines/
  60. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/intro/islam-shafii.htm
  61. https://kwpublications.com/papers_submitted/5789/the-development-of-islam-and-mazhab-al-syafii-during-the-post-arrival-of-islam-in-the-malay-archipelago.pdf
  62. https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2006/71355.htm
  63. https://fieldsupport.dliflc.edu/products/tausug/tx_co/website/tausug.pdf
  64. https://www.yodisphere.com/2022/09/Tausug-Tribe-Culture-Sulu.html
  65. https://mindanawersgroup2020.wordpress.com/2020/08/22/context-tausug-baluy-weaving/
  66. https://tausugbyfvelasco.wordpress.com/visual-arts-and-crafts/
  67. https://tausugbyfvelasco.wordpress.com/performing-arts/
  68. https://folkways-media.si.edu/docs/folkways/artwork/SFW40593.pdf
  69. https://www.parangal.org/tausug
  70. https://www.outlooktraveller.com/destinations/international/the-last-of-the-shipwrights-the-philippines-wooden-boat-makers-who-refuse-to-let-history-sink
  71. https://fieldsupport.dliflc.edu/products/tausug/tx_co/website/default.html?type=chapter%25index=3&moduleID=0&taskID=2
  72. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/22924013/tausug-cultural-orientation-philippine-culture
  73. https://historyofsulu.wordpress.com/2014/07/17/introduction-of-islam-and-the-rise-of-the-sultanate-of-sulu-1380-1450/
  74. https://suluonlinelibrary.wordpress.com/history-2/the-coming-of-islam-to-sulu/
  75. https://fieldsupport.dliflc.edu/products/tausug/tx_co/website/default.html?type=chapter%25index=2&moduleID=0&taskID=1
  76. https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol9iss9/9922_Jumla_2019_E_R.pdf
  77. https://pssc.org.ph/wp-content/pssc-archives/Institute%2520of%2520Philippine%2520Culture/Research%2520Reports%2520and%2520Monographs/Sulu%2520Studies%25203.pdf
  78. https://bangsamoro.gov.ph/news/feature-story/the-heart-of-jolo-masjid-tulays-legacy-of-faith-and-resilience/
  79. https://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_7_No_4_April_2017/17.pdf
  80. https://bangsamoro.gov.ph/news/latest-news/bangsamoro-mufti-announces-start-of-ramadhan-on-march-2/
  81. https://royalhouseofsulu.yourwebsitespace.com/history_of_the_sultanate_of_sulu.html
  82. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Tausug
  83. https://www.everyculture.com/East-Southeast-Asia/Tausug-Sociopolitical-Organization.html
  84. https://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Rido-Clan-Feuding-and-Conflict-Management-in-Mindanao_Philippines.pdf
  85. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/seas/10/2/10_295/_pdf
  86. https://www.prif.org/fileadmin/Daten/Publikationen/Prif_Reports/2005/prif71.pdf
  87. https://meetings.wcpfc.int/file/2035/download
  88. https://www.fao.org/4/ag122e/AG122E04.htm
  89. https://www.panaynews.net/development-of-the-countrys-fishing-industry/
  90. https://ru.scribd.com/document/135321104/Coconut-Industryd7215b868a875f8
  91. https://www.bswm.da.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/Sulu.pdf
  92. https://xianshiyoudaxuexuebao.com/dashboard/uploads/8.8260544.pdf
  93. https://journal.ijresm.com/index.php/ijresm/article/view/1284
  94. https://www.philstar.com/business/agriculture/2019/04/07/1907845/year-round-supply-feeds-livestock-under-study
  95. https://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Trade-in-the-Sulu-Archipelago-Informal-Economies-Amidst-Maritime-Security-Challenges.pdf
  96. https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/395661498616337079/117354-REVISED-PUBLIC-Philippines-Jobs-Report-FINAL.pdf
  97. https://rssobarmm.psa.gov.ph/content/sulu-economy-posts-43-percent-2022
  98. https://www.ismu.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Mapid_BrickbyBrick_Baggio.pdf
  99. https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/philippines/safety-and-security
  100. https://travel.gc.ca/destinations/philippines
  101. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/philippines-travel-advisory.html
  102. https://bangsamoro.gov.ph/news/latest-news/new-motc-facilities-in-sulu-to-boost-infrastructure-development/
  103. https://www.msiworldwide.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Violent-Extremism-and-Insurgency-Philippines.pdf
  104. https://www.grantthornton.com.ph/insights/articles-and-updates1/opinion/economic-effects-of-corruption/
  105. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304377023000827
  106. https://tribune.net.ph/2025/03/12/p10921-m-new-motc-facilities-in-sulu
  107. https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/eleksyon/2025/results/local/REGION%2BIX/SULU/JOLO/
  108. https://ph.rappler.com/elections/2025/local-race/sulu/jolo
  109. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia-pacific/philippines/225-philippines-local-politics-sulu-archipelago-and-peace-process
  110. https://www.crisisgroup.org/sites/default/files/225-the-philippines-local-politics-in-the-sulu-archipelago-and-the-peace-process_0.pdf
  111. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8132581/
  112. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391845620_HEALTH_AND_WELL-BEING_PRACTICES_AMONG_SELECTED_RESIDENTS_IN_LUUK_SULU
  113. https://knowsulu.ph/the-untold-sulu-story/isolated-or-independent-the-new-ambiguity-of-sulus-position-outside-of-barmm
  114. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1232948
  115. https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/regions/954593/marcos-transfers-sulu-to-region-ix-following-sc-decision-on-barmm/story/
  116. https://parliament.bangsamoro.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Annex-Q.pdf
  117. https://www.dbm.gov.ph/index.php/the-secretary-2/speeches/3572-sustaining-peace-and-prosperity-in-barmm-through-coordination-and-collaboration
  118. https://understandingconflict.sgp1.digitaloceanspaces.com/dashboard/%2528IPAC_Report_101%2529-PHILIPPINES-THE-IMPACT-OF-SULU%2527S-EXCLUSION-FROM-BARMM-%25281%2529.pdf.pdf
  119. https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/press-briefer-october-1-2025/
  120. https://www.newmandala.org/how-bangsamoros-political-transition-got-stuck/
  121. https://www.inquirer.net/456666/sc-pushes-back-barmm-polls/
  122. https://pcij.org/2024/11/04/sulu-exit-shakes-up-bangsamoro-scenarios-2025-elections/
  123. https://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Philippines-StateofConflictandViolence.pdf
  124. https://irp.fas.org/world/para/mnlf.htm
  125. https://www.hdcentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/The-Tripoli-Agreement-1976.pdf
  126. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA298651.pdf
  127. https://mappingmilitants.org/files/group-profiles/moro_national_liberation_front.pdf
  128. https://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=pjcis/asg_jua_gia_gspc/asg.pdf
  129. https://ctc.westpoint.edu/the-sources-of-the-abu-sayyafs-resilience-in-the-southern-philippines/
  130. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/399610/summary
  131. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=2227&context=nwc-review
  132. https://doj.gov.ph/news_article.html?newsid=X6tiV0R8qCGap-9g8I23k8tPOs6LKlLB89FaOmlmNBs
  133. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Completed_Inquiries/pjcis/AQAP_6_terrorist_orgs/report/appendixg
  134. https://www.odni.gov/nctc/terrorist_groups/asg.html
  135. https://www.refworld.org/reference/annualreport/usdos/2017/en/117903
  136. https://www.csis.org/analysis/abu-sayyaf-group
  137. https://hdcentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/54MediatingViolenceinSulu_web1-April-2012.pdf
  138. https://www.philstar.com/nation/2024/03/19/2341747/warring-sulu-clans-end-50-year-bloody-rido
  139. https://bangsamoro.gov.ph/news/latest-news/barmm-partners-end-27-year-rido-in-sulu-thru-peace-pact/
  140. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/27/world/asia/philippines-jolo-cathedral-bombing.html
  141. https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/27/asia/philippines-church-explosion
  142. https://www.npr.org/2019/01/27/689127406/at-least-20-dead-dozens-injured-after-two-bombs-target-southern-philippines-cath
  143. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/one-casualty-jolo-bombing-indonesian-philippine-trust
  144. https://apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-international-news-islamic-state-group-asia-pacific-c23ac98f9ecb64eb8d610c304a95d43c
  145. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/24/world/asia/-philippines-explosions-jolo-sulu.html
  146. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/8/24/14-killed-in-jolo-twin-bombings-in-southern-philippines
  147. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/twin-bombings-kill-15-wound-scores-in-philippine-south-idUSKBN25K0LN/
  148. https://www.nytimes.com/2000/04/25/news/20-kidnapped-from-malaysian-resort-island.html
  149. https://www.voanews.com/a/philippine-court-jails-17-militants-for-life-for-mass-kidnapping-of-tourists/7830482.html
  150. https://army.mil.ph/alakdan/index.php/press-releases/957-sulu-now-is-asg-free-gears-towards-lasting-peace-and-sustainable-development
  151. https://aseanconflict.substack.com/p/sulu-province-declared-free-of-abu
  152. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1828264/ph-army-officially-declares-sulu-province-abu-sayyaf-free
  153. https://army.mil.ph/alakdan/index.php/press-releases/945-additional-municipality-declares-asg-free
  154. http://retiredanalyst.blogspot.com/2023/08/sulu-town-declared-as-asg-free.html
  155. https://bangsamoro.gov.ph/news/latest-news/sulu-now-abu-sayyaf-free-provincial-peace-and-order-council-declares/
  156. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1829559/govt-body-declares-sulu-abu-sayyaf-free
  157. https://www.facebook.com/YourPhilippineArmy/posts/army-newssix-abu-sayyaf-members-yield-in-suluoperating-troops-of-the-1102nd-infa/757588283230740/
  158. https://understandingconflict.sgp1.digitaloceanspaces.com/dashboard/793455f9bd1c811b97a3fc1d03c26d6b.pdf
  159. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/philippines/history-sulu-sultanate.htm
  160. https://tufs.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/155/files/ISEA22_session_2-2%255BAsiri%2520Abubakar%255D.pdf
  161. https://brill.com/view/journals/dipl/6/2/article-p284_005.xml
  162. https://www.luwaran.com/news/article/2791/from_armed_struggle_to_social_movement__the_milf_s_evolving_role_in_the_bangsamoro__
  163. https://www.philstar.com/nation/2024/09/09/2384031/supreme-court-sulu-not-part-barmm
  164. https://www.bworldonline.com/the-nation/2025/06/05/677493/mnlf-wants-return-of-sulu-to-barmm-territory/
  165. https://smallwarsjournal.com/2011/09/21/the-bangsamoro-insurgency-an-international-history/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.