Hubbry Logo
MakahMakahMain
Open search
Makah
Community hub
Makah
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Makah
Makah
Makah
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Makah (/məˈkɑː/; Makah: qʷidiččaʔa·tx̌) are an Indigenous people of the Pacific Northwest Coast living in Washington, in the northwestern part of the continental United States. They are enrolled in the federally recognized Makah Indian Tribe of the Makah Indian Reservation, commonly known as the Makah Tribe.[1]

Key Information

Linguistically and ethnographically, they are closely related to the Nuu-chah-nulth and Ditidaht peoples of the West Coast of Vancouver Island, who live across the Strait of Juan de Fuca in British Columbia, Canada.

Etymology and name

[edit]

The Makah people refer to themselves as the qʷidiččaʔa·tx̌, which translates to somewhere near to "the people who live by the rocks and seagulls". Other thought translations include "the people who live on the cape by the seagulls", and "people of the point", as well as several others. This has sometimes been anglicized as Kwih-dich-chuh-ahtx.

The English name, "Makah," is an exonym derived from the S'Klallam language name for the Makah, màq̓áʔa. It means "generous with food".[2][3]

History

[edit]

Pre-colonial

[edit]

Archaeological research suggests that Makah people have inhabited the area now known as Neah Bay for more than 6,000 years. Traditionally, the Makah lived in villages consisting of large longhouses made from western red cedar. These longhouses had cedar-plank walls which could be tilted or removed to provide ventilation or light. The cedar tree was of great value to Makah, who also used its bark to make water-resistant clothing and hats. Cedar roots were used in basket making. Whole trees were carved out to make canoes to hunt seals, gray whales and humpback whales.

Makah acquired much of their food from the ocean. Their diet consisted of whale, seal, fish, and a wide variety of shellfish. They would also hunt deer, elk, and bear from the surrounding forests. Women also gathered a wide variety of nuts, berries and edible plants and roots for their foods.

Japanese castaways

[edit]

In 1834, a dismasted, rudderless ship from Japan ran aground near Cape Flattery. The Makah took the three survivors of the broken ship and held them as slaves for several months before taking them to Fort Vancouver. From there, the United States transported them by ship to London and eventually China, but they never reached Japan again.[4][5]

Treaty of Neah Bay

[edit]
A Makah settlement, c. 1900

On January 31, 1855, government-selected Makah representatives signed the Treaty of Neah Bay with the U.S. federal government, ceding much of their traditional lands. The treaty required the Makah to be restricted to the Makah Reservation (at 48°19′20″N 124°37′57″W / 48.32222°N 124.63250°W / 48.32222; -124.63250 in Clallam County), banned slavery, and preserved the Makah people's rights to hunt whales and seals in the region.[6] The Makah language was not used during the negotiation of the treaty, and the government used the S'Klallam-language name to refer to the tribe, rather than the Makah-language endoynm.

Ozette village

[edit]
Main article: Ozette Indian Village Archeological Site

In the early 17th century, a mudslide engulfed part of a Makah village near Lake Ozette. The oral history of the Makah mentions a "great slide" which engulfed a portion of Ozette long ago. The mudslide preserved several houses and their contents in a collapsed state until the 1970s, when they were excavated by the Makah and archaeologists from Washington State University. Over 55,000 artifacts were recovered, representing many activities of the Makah, from whale and seal hunting to salmon and halibut fishing. Artifacts included toys, games, and bows and arrows.

Archaeological test pits were excavated at the Ozette site in 1966 and 1967 by Richard Daugherty.[7] However, it was not until 1970 that it became apparent what was buried there. After a storm in February 1970, tidal erosion exposed hundreds of well-preserved wooden artifacts. The excavation of the Ozette site began shortly after. University students worked with the Makah under the direction of archaeologists using pressurized water to remove mud from six buried long houses. The excavation went on for 11 years.

It produced more than 55,000 artifacts, many of which are on display in the Makah Cultural and Research Center. Opened in 1979, the museum displays replicas of cedar long houses as well as whaling, fishing, and sealing canoes.[8]

Culture

[edit]

Much of what is known about the traditional way of life of the Makah is derived from their oral traditions. Abundant archeological evidence excavated at the Ozette village site has also provided great insight into traditional Makah life.

Historically, the structure of Makah society is a class system; people in the middle or lower classes could gain better social status by marrying into the upper levels. The community was in mostly a cognatic descent structure.[9]

A Makah woman, c. 1900

The Makah traditional family consisted of parents and children living in a particular area.[10] Members of Makah families were ranked in society according to their relationship to the chief of the tribe.[9] There were no stratifications in gender roles, participating in the hunting of whales and other livestock. Although men were more fishermen and hunters, women's activities centered on gathering resources for the family.

Whaling

[edit]

Makah oral history relates that their tradition of aboriginal whaling has been suspended and re-established several times. Most recently, the practice was suspended in the 1920s because the commercial whaling industry had depleted the stocks of humpback and gray whales; all hunting was called off.[11]

After the gray whale was removed from the Endangered Species List, the Makah re-asserted their whaling rights. With the support and guidance of the United States government and the International Whaling Commission, the Makah successfully hunted a gray whale on May 17, 1999. According to federal law, the Makah are entitled to hunt and kill one baleen whale, typically a gray whale, each year. Archaeological records and oral history indicate a significant number of humpback whales were historically hunted as well. The Makah had gone over 70 years without catching a whale.[12]

Makah whalers, c. 1910
Makah whalers stripping the flesh from a whale, c. 1910.

The Makah whaling technique is difficult and labor-intensive. The men hunt from cedar canoes, each seating six to nine people and more recently, from small fishing vessels. They take these into the Pacific Ocean adjacent to their reservation territory. Various traditional criteria are used to determine the best whale to harvest. By counting the whale's exhalations, the hunters determine when the whale is about to dive, and determine from this the best time to strike. Approaching the whale's left side, the hunter strikes when the whale is 3–4 feet deep, to avoid the force of the whale's tail. The harpoon is 16–18 feet long, composed of two pieces of yew wood spliced together. Historically, hunters used a mussel shell tip, in conjunction with barbs from elk horns.

Since the late 20th century, hunters have used a steel "yankee style" head, but they have retained the yew wood shaft because of its flexibility, water resistance, and strength. Held fast to the whale, the harpoon shaft comes loose, to be recovered later, and a line is thrown from the canoe with seal skin floats attached, to provide drag to weaken the whale. In the past, a series of smaller lances were used to repeatedly strike the whale, gradually weakening and killing it, often over a period of hours, and in some cases, days. Recently, hunters have adopted use of a big-game rifle after the harpoon strike, to ensure a more efficient kill. The International Whaling Commission permits four cartridges in whaling: .458 Winchester Magnum, .460 Weatherby Magnum, .50 BMG, and the .577 Tyrannosaur, which the Makah fired in the 1999 hunt.[13]

Once the whale has been killed, a crew member called the "diver" jumps into the water and cuts a hole through the bottom and top of the whale's jaw, to which a tow line and float are attached. This holds the whale's mouth shut and prevents the carcass from filling with water and sinking. Hunters tow the whale to shore, where it is received by members of the village.

Traditional ceremonies and songs are performed to welcome the whale's spirit. Following this, the whale is divided in a precise and traditional fashion, with certain families having ownership of particular cuts. The "saddle piece" located midway between the center of the back and the tail is the property of the harpooner. It is taken to his home where a special ceremony is performed. The meat and oil are distributed to community members, and a great deal of it is consumed during a potlatch.

The Makah assert that their right to whaling is guaranteed in the 1855 Treaty of Neah Bay, which states in part: "The right of taking fish and of whaling or sealing at usual and accustomed grounds and stations is further secured to said Indians in common with all citizens of the United States."[14]

In September 2007, five members of the Makah tribe shot a gray whale using a .460 caliber rifle, similar to that used in hunting elephants, despite court-imposed regulations governing the Makah hunt. The whale died within 12 hours, sinking while heading out to sea after being confiscated and cut loose by the United States Coast Guard.[15] The tribal council denounced the killing and announced their intention to try the individuals in tribal court.[16]

Ethnobotany

[edit]

Makah women chew the roots and leaves of Viola adunca while giving birth.[17]

Contemporary culture

[edit]

In 1936, the Makah Tribe signed the Makah Constitution, accepting the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 and establishing an elected tribal government. The constitution provided for a five-member Tribal Council. Each year the council elects a Tribal Chairperson. The Council develops and passes laws for the Makah Reservation.

The Makah Tribe hosts its annual major public gathering, Makah Days, in late August. It features a grand parade and street fair as well as canoe races, traditional games, singing, dancing, feasting, and fireworks.

Many Makah tribal members derive most of their income from fishing. Makah fish for salmon, halibut, Pacific whiting, and other marine fish. This makes them particularly vulnerable to effects of global warming: ocean acidification disrupts the development of the shells of molluscs (the fishes' main food source) and warming waters the salmon run. In response, the Makah tribe is drawing on traditional knowledge to create action plans for climate resilience that center tribal socioeconomic priorities. With the Hoh, Quileute, and Quinault Indian Nation, as well as the scientific community, the Makah conduct climate research at and monitor the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary.[18]

Language

[edit]
Main article: Makah language
See also: Wakashan languages

The Makah language is the Indigenous language spoken by the Makah people. The endonym for the language is qʷi·qʷi·diččaq.[19]

Makah linguistically belongs to the Southern Nootkan branch of the Wakashan family of languages. It is also the only Wakashan language in the United States. Other tribes speaking Wakashan are located in British Columbia, Canada, immediately across the Strait of Juan de Fuca on the west coast of Vancouver Island, and northwards as far as that province's Central Coast region.

Makah has been extinct as a first language since 2002, when its last fluent native speaker died. However, it survives as a second language. The Makah Tribe is also working to revive the language, and has established preschool classes to teach its children.[20][21]

Reservation

[edit]
Main article: Makah Reservation

The Makah Tribe owns the Makah Indian Reservation on the northwest tip of the Olympic Peninsula; it includes Tatoosh Island. They live in and around the town of Neah Bay, Washington, a small fishing village.

Tribal census data from 1999 show that the Makah Tribe has 1,214 enrolled members; some 1,079 live on the reservation. The unemployment rate on the reservation is approximately 51%[citation needed].

Literary and cultural references

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Makah

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Makah are a federally recognized indigenous tribe of the , whose reservation occupies the remote northwestern tip of Washington's at Neah Bay, encompassing approximately 47 square miles of land and adjacent marine waters. With around 1,500 members living on or near the reservation out of a total enrolled population exceeding 3,000, the Makah maintain a culture profoundly shaped by the sea, featuring advanced maritime technologies and resource use derived from their environment. Historically, the Makah inhabited five permanent villages and practiced a seasonal economy centered on , sealing, , and gathering, with archaeological records attesting to cetacean hunting extending at least 1,500 years. The 1855 Treaty of Neah Bay ceded vast territories to the but preserved the tribe's explicit right to , seal, and at accustomed grounds, a treaty provision that underscores their sovereign status and has fueled legal assertions against post-20th-century restrictions. , involving ritual preparation and communal effort to harvest species like gray for meat, oil, and bone, represents not only subsistence but spiritual reciprocity with , a resumed in 1999 after commercial overharvesting depleted stocks, though subsequent hunts have encountered court challenges despite recovered whale populations and aboriginal subsistence quotas from bodies like the . Beyond , Makah society features cedar architecture, redistributive feasts, and a Wakashan linking them to kin across the border, with contemporary governance under a 1936 constitution balancing and federal relations.

Etymology and Identity

Name Origins and Variations

The name "Makah" is an exonym derived from the S'Klallam (a Salish language) term màq̓áʔa, bestowed by neighboring tribes and signifying "generous with food," reflecting the tribe's historical reputation for sharing resources such as seafood and other provisions. This designation gained formal recognition in the Treaty of Neah Bay, signed on January 31, 1855, between the and representatives of the tribe, which referred to them collectively as the "Makah" despite negotiations occurring partly in Salish rather than the Makah language. In contrast, the Makah's autonym, or self-designation, is qʷidiččaʔa·tx̌ (with orthographic variations including Qʷidiččaʔa•tx̌iq and qwi-dich-cha-at), which translates to "people who live by the rocks and seagulls" or "cape people," denoting their longstanding residence at Cape Flattery on the northwestern Olympic Peninsula in present-day Washington state. This endonym underscores their geographic and ecological ties to the rugged coastal environment, where rocky shores and seabird populations have been integral to their identity and subsistence practices for millennia.

Tribal Self-Perception and Relations to Neighbors

The Makah traditionally designate themselves as qʷidiččaʔa·tx̌ (or variants such as qwi-dich-cha-at or Kwih-dich-chuh-ahtx), a term translating to "the people who live by the rocks and seagulls" or "people who live near the rocks," underscoring their longstanding residence at on the northwestern , where rocky shores and seabirds defined their environment. This self-identification emphasizes a profound connection to the sea and coastal ecology, viewing themselves as adept maritime hunters and gatherers whose survival and identity intertwined with ocean resources like whales, seals, , and . The exonym "Makah," derived from neighboring Salish languages (e.g., S'Klallam màq̓áʔa), connotes "generous with food," reflecting perceptions of the Makah as providers of abundant marine bounty through and hospitality, though this label originated externally rather than from self-perception. Makah self-perception historically centered on a stratified society of aristocratic lineages, commoners, and slaves, organized into small chiefdoms led by hereditary chiefs, with social rank tied to prowess, generosity, and maritime exploits that conferred status and spiritual authority. They regarded themselves as resilient stewards of a resource-rich territory, practicing that allowed flexibility in family affiliations—uncommon among Northwest Coast tribes—enabling individuals to align with either maternal or paternal kin for economic or social advantage. This adaptability reinforced a as "people of the and ," balancing pelagic hunting with terrestrial , while emphasizing traditions that protected whaling grounds and defended against incursions. Culturally, they maintained distinctiveness from broader Nootkan groups despite linguistic ties, prioritizing localized practices tied to Neah Bay's unique over pan-regional affiliations. Relations with neighbors were multifaceted, blending kinship, commerce, conflict, and raiding. Closest kin were the (Nootka) peoples across the in present-day , sharing a Wakashan language that facilitated intermarriage, in furs, cedar products, and dried fish, and ceremonial exchanges, though the Makah asserted autonomy through separate dialects and territorial claims. To the south and east, interactions with Salish-speaking groups like the S'Klallam and Klallam involved reciprocal networks exchanging Makah sea mammal oils and shells for inland goods such as berries and textiles, but were occasionally strained by competition over coastal straits. With the to the southeast, relations were more adversarial; the tribes viewed each other as enemies, conducting slave raids—often targeting women and children for labor or adoption—and territorial skirmishes over fishing sites, yet periodic and intermarriages mitigated outright hostility, allowing cultural exchanges like shared canoe-building techniques. These dynamics positioned the Makah as dominant in maritime domains, leveraging superior seafaring canoes and expertise to control access to offshore resources while navigating alliances pragmatically to sustain their economy and security.

History

Pre-Contact Society and Economy

The Makah inhabited a hierarchical society divided into ranked classes, including aristocratic lineages led by chiefs, commoners, and an of slaves acquired through warfare or intertribal , with slaves comprising approximately 5% of the prior to European contact. This stratification was reinforced by success, which elevated the status of headmen and their , including granting ceremonial privileges and prestige to associated women. Extended resided in cedar-plank longhouses clustered in five permanent villages—Neah Bay, Ozette, Biheda, Tsoo-yess, and Waatch—each governed by a head who oversaw and . Individuals could affiliate with either maternal or paternal kin groups to maximize inherited rank, while potlatches publicly validated marriages, deaths, name , songs, and dances, thereby stabilizing social order amid status fluctuations from events like disgrace or alliances. The Makah economy relied on abundant marine and forest resources, with as the cornerstone subsistence activity practiced continuously for over 2,000 years, targeting migratory (primarily –May) using 36-foot cedar canoes crewed by eight men equipped with harpoons, lances, and floats. , , and oil supplied essential nutrition—potentially comprising up to 100% of the diet in whale-dependent periods—while also yielding non-perishable oil for dipping dried foods, rendering fats, and ceremonial uses; surplus products fueled trade networks exchanging oil, bones, and sinew for specialized goods from neighboring groups. Complementary pursuits included and via weirs, hooks, and spears; seals, sea lions, and otters with arrows and clubs; and gathering , berries, roots, and cedar-derived materials for tools, clothing, and housing. This diversified supported densities and , as evidenced by the Ozette village site's 50,000 artifacts, including over 3,400 bones (predominantly gray and humpback) and gear buried circa 1700, confirming surplus production and ritual processing like ceremonial blessings of beached whales. and resource specialization further enabled wealth accumulation, with chiefs distributing goods to affirm authority and foster alliances.

European Contact and Demographic Impacts

The first documented European contact with the Makah occurred in 1788, when British captain John Meares anchored off the coast near Neah Bay, initiating trade interactions that introduced metal goods and other items. In 1792, Spanish explorers established a short-lived settlement on Makah territory at Neah Bay, which the Makah forced to abandon after several months due to conflicts over resources and sovereignty. These early encounters, combined with indirect exposure through maritime trade networks, brought European-introduced pathogens to the region by the late 1700s, triggering epidemics that caused thousands of deaths among the Makah. Prior to sustained contact, Makah population estimates for the early 1800s ranged from approximately 2,000 to 4,000 individuals across their five primary villages. Successive outbreaks of diseases such as , , , and led to severe demographic collapse, with a particularly devastating epidemic in killing a substantial portion of the population and prompting the abandonment of villages like Biheda. This epidemic struck southern Makah villages hardest just before the 1855 Treaty of Neah Bay, exacerbating mortality rates already elevated by prior exposures. The demographic impacts extended beyond immediate mortality, disrupting social structures by severing intergenerational knowledge transmission, weakening family lineages, and eroding ceremonial practices due to the loss of elders and specialists. European trade goods, including firearms and alcohol, further strained traditional economies and status systems by the mid-19th century, as demands for furs and other resources intensified and altered subsistence patterns. Overall, these factors reduced Makah numbers to levels that hindered recovery, with lingering effects from infectious diseases contributing to long-term population stagnation into the reservation era.

Treaty Era and 19th-Century Changes

The Treaty of Neah Bay was signed on January 31, 1855, between representatives of the Makah Tribe and the United States, led by Washington Territory Governor Isaac Stevens. The agreement involved the Makah ceding most of their traditional territory, estimated at up to 700,000 acres, in exchange for $30,000, the establishment of a small reservation at Neah Bay on the Olympic Peninsula, and reserved rights to hunt whales, seals, and fish, as well as gather resources, in common with U.S. citizens. The treaty was ratified by the U.S. Senate on April 18, 1859, formalizing the Makah Reservation and introducing sustained federal government oversight into tribal affairs. In the decades following the , the Makah adapted to reservation boundaries while maintaining ocean-based subsistence and activities. The continued and expanded into commercial sealing and , incorporating European technologies such as schooners to participate in the fur seal trade and global markets, which temporarily bolstered their amid population recovery from earlier epidemics. However, the late saw disruptions from ongoing diseases, which reduced the Makah population and strained traditional practices like communal hunts. The reservation was enlarged through , including one on October 26, 1872, and additional ones on January 2 and October 21 of subsequent years, providing marginally more land amid increasing settler encroachment. Federal policies during this period initiated shifts toward assimilation, with the treaty's guaranteed resource rights offering limited protection against economic dependency on wage labor in canneries and , though the Makah retained cultural ties to marine harvesting. By the end of the century, the decline of populations due to overharvesting in the fur trade forced further economic pivots, diminishing one pillar of pre-treaty prosperity while persisted as a cultural mainstay until commercial overhunting impacted stocks in the early .

20th-Century Assimilation and Preservation Efforts

In the early , U.S. federal policies intensified assimilation efforts among the Makah, building on post-treaty () initiatives by Indian agents, missionaries, and educators to suppress traditional practices, including bans on potlatches, ceremonies, and the Makah language (qʷi·qʷi·daččʔaʔł). Boarding schools, transitioning from local day schools to off-reservation facilities by the and continuing into the mid-, enforced English-only environments where children faced for speaking their native , contributing to near-total language loss among younger generations by the 1970s. These institutions aimed to eradicate cultural distinctiveness, with enrollment compulsory under (BIA) oversight, resulting in disrupted transmission of oral traditions and subsistence knowledge. The cessation of by the 1920s, amid whale depletion and policy pressures, further eroded central cultural and spiritual practices tied to marine resource management. Mid-century shifts offered limited relief from assimilation. The of 1934 enabled tribal self-governance, leading the Makah to adopt a constitution in 1936 that established a tribal council, though federal control persisted through BIA supervision. U.S. citizenship granted to all Native Americans in 1924 marked nominal integration, celebrated annually at Makah Days, but did not halt cultural suppression; infrastructure like State Road 112 in 1931 increased external contacts, accelerating adoption of non-traditional economies and lifestyles. Despite these pressures, Makah communities covertly sustained elements of heritage, resisting complete erosion through familial oral histories. Late-20th-century federal self-determination policies facilitated preservation initiatives. The Makah Cultural and Research Center (MCRC), founded in the 1970s following Ozette excavations, centralized efforts to document and exhibit artifacts, fostering cultural reconnection. The Makah Language Program, integrated into the MCRC, developed curricula and teaching materials, with the tribe formally adopting a standardized in 1978 to support revival. These programs extended to elementary schools by the late 1970s, emphasizing elder-led instruction to counter assimilation-induced losses, though fluent speakers remained fewer than 20 by century's end. Such endeavors prioritized empirical recovery of linguistic and ceremonial knowledge, enabling partial revitalization amid ongoing treaty-based assertions of sovereignty.

Archaeological Discoveries at Ozette

In the winter of 1969–1970, a storm-induced slump along the coastal bank at Cape Alava exposed preserved wooden artifacts from an ancient Makah village at Ozette, prompting immediate archaeological attention from local residents and professionals. The site, buried by a massive mudslide approximately 300–400 years earlier around the late 17th century, created anaerobic conditions that preserved organic materials otherwise rare in Pacific Northwest archaeology. This event confirmed oral traditions of the Makah people regarding their ancestral village at Ozette, one of five major pre-contact settlements. Excavations, conducted primarily by the University of Washington from 1970 to 1981 over 11 field seasons, uncovered remains of at least four large cedar-plank longhouses spanning about 800 feet along the beach, along with a midden revealing occupation layers dating back over 1,900 years. The dig yielded over 55,000 artifacts, including meticulously crafted wooden implements such as whaling harpoons, fishhooks, bows, arrows, and paddles; cedar-bark baskets, mats, and storage boxes; and tools for woodworking and hunting. Whale bones dominated the faunal assemblage, comprising a significant portion of subsistence evidence and underscoring the centrality of whaling to Makah economy and culture for at least 2,000 years prior to European contact. These discoveries provided empirical validation of Makah maritime prowess, with artifacts demonstrating advanced technologies like composite harpoons and cordage from plant fibers, which paralleled ethnographic records but offered direct prehistoric evidence unfiltered by post-contact influences. The site's preservation of perishable items—such as sleeping platforms, toys, and ceremonial objects—offered unparalleled insights into daily life, social organization, and craftsmanship in a pre-industrial coastal society. Repatriated to the Makah Tribe, the collection forms the core of the Makah Cultural and Research Center's exhibits, emphasizing tribal sovereignty in interpreting their heritage. Archaeological analysis has since informed studies on Northwest Coast technological continuity, though interpretations prioritize Makah oral histories alongside material data to avoid over-reliance on external academic frameworks.

Whaling Tradition

Historical Techniques and Subsistence Role

The Makah utilized oceangoing canoes crafted from single western red cedar trunks, measuring approximately 35 feet in length, to pursue migrating eastern North Pacific gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) off Cape Flattery. Each canoe accommodated a crew of eight: a harpooner at the bow, a steersman at the stern, and six paddlers, with hunts led by whaling captains from specialized families who underwent rigorous spiritual and physical preparation, including fasting and purification rituals. Hunting commenced with the harpooner casting a featuring a detachable head of or iron tipped with horn barbs, connected to wooden shafts and lines of whale sinew or cedar bark ; sharpened shell blades and valves formed key components of the assembly, secured by cedar lanyards. Upon striking, the would dive, towing the , with inflated sealskin buoys attached to its flight; repeated strikes with additional harpoons and lances targeted vital areas until exhaustion and death, after which the carcass was towed ashore using the 's capacity for open-sea . These methods, honed over , also applied to humpback , though gray predominated due to migration patterns. Whaling sustained Makah subsistence for over 2,000 years, with active hunts documented for at least 1,500 years before European contact, providing a high-calorie resource amid seasonal scarcities. and formed roughly 50% of faunal intake at pre-contact sites like Ozette, yielding proteins, fats, and essential fatty acids, while rendered oil served as a dietary staple—dipped with or eggs—and storage medium in intestines or stomachs. Bones supplied for about 25% of tools, sinews for cordage, and surplus products enabled , though nutritional and material yields directly supported viability in the coastal . Archaeological yields from Ozette—exceeding 3,400 bones and artifacts—confirm this integral economic role.

Cultural and Spiritual Dimensions

Whaling constitutes a foundational element of Makah cultural identity, intertwining social structures, economic practices, and spiritual beliefs that have persisted for over 2,000 years, as evidenced by archaeological findings at sites like Ozette. The is regarded not as mere prey but as a sentient being with its own spirit, capable of choosing to yield to hunters who demonstrate proper respect through observance. Makah oral traditions and ethnographic accounts describe the whale voluntarily sacrificing itself if hunters undergo rigorous physical conditioning alongside spiritual preparations, including , bathing in smoke, and communal prayers to align with natural forces. Rituals preceding hunts emphasize invocation of ancestral and supernatural aid, with captains inheriting specialized songs, dances, and crest designs passed down through elite families or acquired via dreams featuring spirits. These ceremonies, performed in longhouses or on beaches, reinforce social hierarchies, as only initiated members of whaling lineages—often requiring years of —participate, fostering community cohesion and prestige. Success in historically conferred spiritual authority, with captains viewed as intermediaries between human and marine realms, a role documented in 19th-century ethnographies and contemporary tribal narratives. Post-hunt observances further highlight the reciprocal spiritual bond, involving the placement of symbolic offerings like eagle down or feathers into the whale's blowhole to thank its spirit and ensure safe passage to the , accompanied by feasting, , and distribution of whale products to affirm communal interdependence. Whale sinew, , and served not only subsistence needs but also ceremonial purposes, such as participants to imbue strength and protection, underscoring 's role in sustaining Makah cosmology where embodies ancestral power. Tribal documents assert that cessation of in the 20th century eroded these practices, prompting revitalization efforts to restore spiritual wholeness, though internal debates persist on ceremonial authenticity versus modern adaptations.

Mid-20th-Century Cessation

The Makah Tribe voluntarily ceased hunting in the after commercial by non-Native operations drastically reduced eastern North Pacific populations to near levels. By the early , sightings and successful hunts had become infrequent, prompting the to suspend the practice as a pragmatic response to resource scarcity rather than due to external mandates. Historical records indicate the last documented Makah whale hunts occurred sporadically between and the mid-1920s, with some accounts citing as the final year before full cessation. Commercial fleets, primarily from the and other nations, had harvested tens of thousands of gray s in the preceding decades, reducing the population to an estimated low of fewer than 2,000 individuals by . The Makah, observing this depletion firsthand, prioritized long-term by halting hunts, marking them as the first group to do so voluntarily amid ongoing international commercial exploitation. This interruption severed a central element of Makah and , as had provided meat, oil, and bone for food, tools, and trade, integral to tribal ceremonies and for millennia. Without legal at the time—the U.S. did not enact comprehensive protections until later—the decision reflected indigenous ecological awareness, though it coincided with broader shifts toward wage labor in and that diminished traditional practices. The cessation persisted through the mid-, unbroken until regulatory changes in the late allowed for potential resumption under subsistence quotas. Following the Makah Tribe's successful hunt of a single eastern North Pacific on May 17, 1999—the first in over 70 years, enabled by a five-year quota approved by the (IWC) in 1997—legal challenges from organizations halted further hunts. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Anderson v. Evans (2004), ruled that the (NMFS, now NOAA Fisheries) violated the (NEPA) by failing to prepare a full (EIS) for the hunt, despite concluding minimal population impacts on the non-endangered stock of approximately 26,000 individuals at the time. This decision, driven by claims of inadequate assessment of cumulative effects and ritual slaughter methods, effectively suspended the tribe's treaty-reserved rights under the 1855 Treaty of Neah Bay, which explicitly preserved the Makah's "right of taking fish and of or sealing at usual and accustomed grounds." Subsequent unauthorized attempts, such as a 2007 hunt by five tribal members resulting in arrests by the , underscored ongoing tensions and the tribe's condemnation of unsanctioned actions while pursuing legal avenues. Over the next two decades, the Makah engaged in protracted litigation and regulatory processes, including a 2021 federal court recommendation in affirming their rights after NEPA compliance via an EIS completed in 2015, though appeals delayed implementation. The Ninth Circuit's 2019 ruling further required adherence to the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) moratorium on takes, rejecting subsistence exemptions without a formal , despite empirical data showing eastern North Pacific populations exceeding 20,000—well above recovery thresholds under the Act. In May 2024, NOAA Fisheries finalized regulations granting the Makah a limited waiver of the MMPA moratorium, authorizing up to 25 over 10 years (averaging two to three annually) for ceremonial and subsistence purposes, contingent on annual permits, IWC quotas, and co-management with the IWC-recognized Makah Whaling Commission. This followed verification of cultural need, minimal ecological impact (strikes representing less than 0.01% of the population), and obligations, overriding objections from groups emphasizing despite stable whale abundances documented in NMFS stock assessments. By March 2025, the tribe applied for its first permit under the waiver, proposing hunts from July 1 to October 31 in 2025 and 2027, with public comments solicited until May 5, 2025; as of October 2025, no hunts had occurred pending final permit issuance and IWC quota extension beyond 2025. This framework balances aboriginal subsistence claims against federal conservation laws, prioritizing verifiable population data over unsubstantiated welfare narratives.

Controversies Surrounding Whaling Resumption

Treaty Rights vs. Federal Regulations

The Treaty of Neah Bay, signed on January 31, 1855, between the United States and the Makah Tribe (along with allied tribes), explicitly reserved the tribe's right to whale in Article 4, stating: "The right of taking fish and of whaling or sealing at usual and accustomed grounds and stations is further secured to said Indians in common with all citizens of the United States." This provision was negotiated to preserve traditional practices central to Makah sustenance and culture, amid the tribe's cession of vast territories encompassing over 27 million acres. Subsequent federal legislation, particularly the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) of 1972, established a general moratorium on the "take" of marine mammals, including whales, prohibiting hunting, harassing, or killing without permits or waivers. While the MMPA includes exemptions for certain Alaska Native subsistence uses under Section 101(b), the Makah—located in Washington state—fall under Section 101(a)(5), requiring demonstrations of minimal population impact, no domestic supply needs, and compliance with international obligations, such as quotas from the International Whaling Commission (IWC). U.S. courts, including the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, have upheld the Makah's treaty-secured whaling right as a reserved right under the U.S. Constitution but subordinated its exercise to MMPA regulations when not abrogated by Congress, emphasizing that the treaty does not confer an absolute exemption from conservation measures. The tension escalated after the Makah's 1999 hunt of one eastern North Pacific , conducted under a (NMFS) permit but later challenged in court; the permit was invalidated in 2002 for inadequate environmental review under the , prompting further litigation. In 2004, a federal district court ruled that the MMPA's moratorium applies to the Makah despite the , necessitating a , though the treaty right remains intact. Proponents of stricter federal oversight, including organizations, contend that treaty rights cannot supersede modern conservation laws or IWC aboriginal subsistence limits, which allocate the U.S. a quota of up to five gray whales annually (shared with the Makah). As of , NMFS granted the Makah a limited under the MMPA, authorizing up to three eastern North Pacific s per year for ceremonial and subsistence purposes over a decade, contingent on IWC quota negotiations and additional permitting. In March , the tribe submitted a formal permit application to NMFS for up to two such whales starting in , with public comments accepted until May 5, , reflecting ongoing federal scrutiny despite the treaty's explicit language. This process underscores the regulatory framework's requirement for environmental assessments and population viability analyses, even as the eastern North Pacific stock exceeds 20,000 individuals and has been removed from endangered status since 1994.

Animal Welfare and Environmental Arguments

Animal welfare advocates, including the Animal Welfare Institute, have opposed the Makah Tribe's resumption on grounds that it involves the deliberate killing of highly intelligent, socially complex cetaceans, arguing such practices cause undue suffering incompatible with modern ethical standards for sentient animals. These groups contend that exhibit advanced cognitive abilities, such as problem-solving and cultural transmission of behaviors, rendering their harvest morally akin to targeting other protected marine mammals, regardless of cultural claims. Critics highlight the 1999 Makah hunt, where a reportedly endured prolonged distress after initial strikes before succumbing to a shot, as evidence of inhumane methods that fail to ensure rapid death, contrasting with regulated humane slaughter standards applied to terrestrial . Environmental arguments against resumption emphasize vulnerabilities in the Eastern North Pacific (ENP) population, which experienced an Unusual Mortality Event (UME) from 2019 to 2023, with necropsies revealing widespread , , and entanglement scars as primary causes linked to prey shortages from climate-driven Arctic ecosystem shifts. Opponents, including Sea Shepherd, assert that even limited hunts—proposed at up to three whales annually—could exacerbate pressures on recovering stocks, particularly the Pacific Coast Feeding Group (PCFG) subset of approximately 212 individuals in 2020, which demonstrates site fidelity to nearshore habitats targeted by Makah hunters and shows higher mortality rates during the UME. These concerns cite broader anthropogenic threats like ship strikes and fisheries , arguing that adding cultural risks tipping fragile dynamics in a warming where abundance estimates fluctuated from around 19,000 in 2024 to lower calf production persisting into 2025. However, the National Marine Fisheries Service's 2023 Final concluded that the proposed ceremonial and subsistence harvest would have negligible effects on ENP viability, given the population's "least concern" status under IUCN criteria and pre-UME peaks exceeding 26,000 individuals, with no evidence of overhunting as a limiting factor compared to nutritional stress. The analysis incorporated modeling of strike limits co-managed with the , projecting sustainable removals below 0.1% of the population annually, while acknowledging that animal rights perspectives often elevate individual welfare over population-level conservation, potentially overlooking aboriginal subsistence precedents upheld in international quotas.

Stakeholder Perspectives and Empirical Data on Whale Populations

The eastern North Pacific (Eschrichtius robustus) population, which migrates past the at , reached a peak abundance of approximately 27,000 individuals in 2016 according to NOAA Fisheries surveys. However, counts have declined sharply since then, with NOAA estimating 14,770 whales in the 2022-2023 migration season and 12,950 in 2024-2025, representing the lowest numbers since the 1970s. This downturn follows an Unusual Mortality Event from 2019 to 2023, during which elevated strandings and poor calf production were observed, though the event was officially closed in January 2025 after stabilization efforts. The species was delisted from the U.S. Endangered Species Act in 1994 after recovering from near-extinction due to 19th- and early 20th-century commercial whaling, but recent data indicate nutritional stress and reduced recruitment rates, with only about 85 mother-calf pairs sighted in 2025 surveys. A subset of concern is the Pacific Coast Feeding Group (PCFG), a group of approximately 212 ENP gray whales (as estimated in ) that forages seasonally off the Washington coast rather than migrating to primary feeding grounds. This segment has shown slower recovery and higher vulnerability to local threats like vessel strikes and prey depletion, prompting debates over whether hunts should distinguish it from the broader ENP stock. The Makah Tribe maintains that the overall ENP population remains viable for a limited ceremonial and subsistence hunt, citing its recovery to sustainable levels post-delisting and the negligible impact of their proposed quota—averaging two to three whales annually, up to 25 over 10 years—on a stock exceeding 12,000 individuals. Tribal leaders argue that empirical data from NOAA and the support resumption under treaty rights reserved in the 1855 Treaty of Neah Bay, emphasizing that whaling historically sustained the tribe without depleting whales until external commercial pressures intervened in the . In 2024, NOAA granted a waiver under the Marine Mammal Protection Act permitting such hunts, affirming that the harvest would not impede stock recovery based on abundance models incorporating error margins. Opposing stakeholders, including the Animal Welfare Institute and , contend that the recent population decline—roughly halving since 2016—warrants caution, asserting that even small removals risk exacerbating vulnerabilities in the PCFG or disrupting migration patterns amid ongoing stressors like climate-driven prey shifts. These groups, often prioritizing individual over aggregate population metrics, have challenged permits legally, arguing that hunts could undermine long-term resilience despite the species' non-endangered status; an in 2021 rejected claims of imminent endangerment but noted ideological drivers in some opposition. Mainstream environmental organizations like have countered by supporting the Makah quota as compatible with conservation, highlighting that aboriginal subsistence has coexisted with ENP grays historically without causing collapse.

Language

Linguistic Features and Classification

The Makah language, known endonymically as qʷi·qʷi·diččaq, is classified within the Southern Nootkan (or Southern Wakashan) branch of the , which encompasses languages spoken primarily along the Northwest Coast of . This places Makah in close genetic relation to and Ditidaht, dialects of which are spoken on in , with shared innovations including extensive lexical suffixation and CV patterns. As the southernmost Wakashan language, Makah is unique in being indigenous exclusively to the territory of the present-day , specifically the . Makah exhibits a complex phonological inventory comprising 34 to 37 consonants, including ejectives (e.g., /p'/, /t'/), glottalized resonants, uvulars, and fricatives, alongside 6 to 12 vowels distinguished by length and quality, subject to processes like , , , and syncope. Morphologically polysynthetic, the language constructs words through agglutinative suffixation on roots (about 75% bound, requiring affixes), yielding an average of 3.66 morphemes per word; over 500 lexical suffixes divide into nuclear types that shift word classes (e.g., nominalizing -ʔa or verbalizing -či) and restrictive types specifying locatives (e.g., -ʔis 'in a '), paths (e.g., -q'in 'move out'), or instrumentals, often in ordered sequences of up to three. An elaborate aspectual system differentiates perfective forms (e.g., -ʔiš for completed actions) from imperfectives, including durative (-či), continuative (-x̣a), graduative (via CV templates), repetitive (with ), and iterative subtypes, while plurality employs (e.g., triple for distributives) or dedicated suffixes like -ʔač̣ʷ. Syntactically, Makah predicates initiate clauses, followed by flexible ordering of subject and object noun phrases, with marked accusatively but featuring hierarchy-sensitive passive-inverse constructions (via č̣ʔas) that promote patients or lower-ranking agents to subject when more topical than actors. Categories such as mood (e.g., indicative <č̣ʔa>), tense, possession, and pronominals attach as second-position in a rigid hierarchical sequence (e.g., before before passive-inverse), enabling serialization-like predicate combinations and noun incorporation. in referring phrases is conveyed by the article ʔiḥp, and ergative-absolutive patterns emerge in certain bound verb constructions.

Decline, Revitalization, and Current Proficiency

The Makah language, part of the Southern Wakashan branch, experienced profound decline starting in the through U.S. federal policies aimed at , such as off-reservation boarding schools that banned indigenous languages and punished their use. These measures disrupted intergenerational transmission, reducing fluent speakers from a community norm to isolated elders by the mid-20th century. The last fluent native speaker, Ruth E. Claplanhoo, died in 2002, marking the extinction of Makah as a . Revitalization efforts intensified in the 1970s amid broader indigenous language preservation movements, culminating in the 1979 founding of the Makah Cultural and Research Center (MCRC), which chartered the Makah Language Program as its core component. The program systematically documents archival audio recordings, develops pedagogical materials, and delivers instruction to foster restoration, with goals including full spoken fluency and scholarly competence among tribal members. By integrating language classes into Neah Bay's K-12 public schools, it exposes youth to vocabulary, grammar, and oral traditions, supported by community workshops and elder consultations. As of 2020, around 16 individuals spoke Makah, mainly as a heritage or , reflecting partial success in semi-speaker cultivation but ongoing challenges in achieving widespread fluency. Proficiency varies, with elders retaining conversational elements and younger learners demonstrating basic to intermediate skills through school-based immersion; however, no comprehensive tracks advanced speakers post-2002. Tribal initiatives prioritize empirical metrics, such as annual assessments of student output, to counter while adapting to a reservation population of approximately 1,500.

Culture and Practices

Social Organization and Ceremonies

Traditional Makah society was organized into small chiefdoms characterized by a stratified class system comprising aristocratic lineages, commoners, and slaves. Families operated under a single leader, typically male, with internal rankings mirroring noble hierarchies; status was hereditary but fluid, adjustable through deaths, disgraces, or strategic kin affiliations allowing individuals to join maternal or paternal lines for elevated position. Extended kin groups cohabited in large longhouses, enabling cooperative and labor division, while abundant marine and yields supported task specialization, such as artistry. Whaling profoundly shaped social structure, positioning successful whalers and headmen at the apex by furnishing kin and community with sustenance, materials, prestige, and security, thereby dictating wealth accumulation, elite marriages, and inheritance patterns. This hierarchy extended to ceremonial validation, where whalers' exploits reinforced authority through public displays and resource redistribution. Potlatch ceremonies constituted a cornerstone of social validation, entailing grand feasts to commemorate life events like marriages, deaths, name transfers, and acquisition of hereditary songs or dances; hosts lavishly distributed goods to guests and compensated witnesses to attest transactions, thereby affirming status and forging alliances amid inter-village exchanges. Whaling rituals demanded months of spiritual discipline—prayers, , ritual bathing—and culminated in silent hunts with yew-wood harpoons, followed by communal songs praising the whale's spirit, dances, and equitable sharing of the carcass to honor its sacrifice and bind the community. Ancient secret societies, involving initiations for spiritual potency, endured alongside guardian spirit quests pursued by men for prowess in hunts or warfare. Additional rites, including first salmon ceremonies and family events like namings, weddings, and memorials, incorporated to perpetuate cultural continuity.

Material Culture and Artifacts

The Makah people's material culture was predominantly shaped by the abundant western red cedar (Thuja plicata), which provided the primary resource for constructing longhouses, ocean-going canoes, tools, utensils, and ceremonial objects. Artisans employed adzes, chisels, wedges, mauls, knives, and gouges—crafted from stone, bone, and shell—to shape cedar into functional and decorative items, reflecting a deep integration of forest resources with maritime subsistence needs. Archaeological evidence from the Ozette village site, a Makah settlement buried by a mudslide circa 1750 and excavated between 1970 and 1981, has preserved over 55,000 artifacts in anaerobic conditions, offering unparalleled insight into pre-contact Makah technology and aesthetics. These include wooden house planks from six longhouses, fragments of large canoes up to 10 meters in length used for and , and intricate carvings on boxes and utensils featuring geometric and zoomorphic designs. Hunting and fishing implements formed a core of Makah artifacts, with whaling gear such as harpoons tipped with mussel shell or bone, floats made from seal intestines, and cedar paddles demonstrating specialized adaptations for pursuing gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus). Basketry, woven from cedar bark and roots, served for storage, cooking, and ceremonial purposes, often incorporating twined or coiled techniques for durability in wet environments. Over 400 Ozette items exhibit artistic elements, including incised patterns on tools and ritual masks, underscoring the blurred line between utility and symbolism in Makah craftsmanship. These artifacts, now housed and interpreted at the Makah Cultural and Research Center's museum in Neah Bay, reveal a society where material objects embodied spiritual and practical efficacy, with cedar's versatility enabling self-sufficient village life centered on sea and forest exploitation.

and Resource Management

The Makah have long relied on Western red cedar (), known as the "," for an extensive array of practical and cultural purposes, reflecting deep ethnobotanical knowledge honed over millennia. The decay-resistant wood was carved into canoes tailored for , , or travel; longhouses; poles; and tools such as spears and boxes. Bark provided waterproof , hats, roofing, and mats, while inner bark served as flexible material for baskets and storage containers; roots were split for watertight basketry, traps, and ropes; and leaves and branches contributed to medicines for ailments like and colds. Other terrestrial plants supplemented in Makah subsistence and . Salal (Gaultheria shallon) berries and leaves were layered with fish during storage to impart flavor and prevent spoilage, enhancing techniques. Huckleberries (Vaccinium spp.) yielded fruits for food and dyes, with bushes integrated into managed landscapes. Hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) boughs adorned ceremonial regalia, and roots from cedar, spruce, and willow species were twisted into cords for fishing gear and structural bindings; cattail (Typha latifolia) and tule (Schoenoplectus spp.) provided additional matting and basketry fibers. Medicinal applications included infusions from bark and leaves of cedar and other species for treating infections, pain, and purification rituals. Makah resource management integrated ethnobotanical practices with holistic ecological stewardship, emphasizing seasonal harvesting, selective cutting, and cultural protocols to maintain plant populations alongside fisheries and marine mammals. This approach sustained abundant yields without evident depletion prior to intensive European contact in the 19th century, as inferred from oral traditions and archaeological evidence of continuous use. Plants were gathered by specialized knowledge-holders, often women, who followed taboos against overharvesting and replanting protocols for roots and bulbs to regenerate stands. Contemporary efforts build on these traditions through initiatives like the Makah Ethnobotanical Garden, established by 2005, which cultivates species such as , hemlock, and cedar to preserve knowledge, support cultural teachings, and adapt to climate stressors like shifting and . Tribal climate adaptation plans, developed since 2015, incorporate into coordinated resource strategies, prioritizing resilience in terrestrial ecosystems amid ocean-focused rights.

Reservation and Modern Governance

Geography, Demographics, and Infrastructure

The Makah Indian Reservation occupies approximately 47 square miles at the northwestern tip of the Olympic Peninsula in Clallam County, Washington, centered around Neah Bay where the Strait of Juan de Fuca converges with the Pacific Ocean. This coastal location features rugged terrain, including beaches, dense forests, and river systems such as the Sooes River, which drains a significant portion of the reservation's land. The area's isolation contributes to its ecological richness but also exposes it to frequent severe weather, including storms and flooding that impact accessibility and resources. The reservation's population totals around 1,500 individuals, predominantly Makah tribal members, with U.S. Bureau data recording 1,519 residents as of the latest estimates, including a of ±170. Of these, approximately 1,168 are enrolled tribal members and 295 are non-Indians, reflecting a community where Neah Bay serves as the primary settlement. The tribe reports roughly 1,500 enrolled members living in and around the area, a figure consistent with prehistoric estimates of 2,000 to 4,000 before European contact. Infrastructure on the reservation supports essential services amid remoteness and environmental vulnerabilities. State Route 112 provides the sole road access but experiences frequent closures from flooding, prompting resilience projects to elevate and improve connectivity. Key facilities include the Neah Bay School District for K-12 , a tribal health clinic, water treatment plant, emergency services, and utilities like , which face disruptions from harsh weather affecting roadways and power systems. The Makah Tribe manages these assets to mitigate risks in the tsunami inundation zone, where such as schools and the museum are located.

Tribal Government Structure

The Makah Indian Tribal Council constitutes the primary governing body of the Makah Tribe, operating under the tribe's 1936 Constitution and Bylaws, which were ratified pursuant to the of 1934. The Council comprises five members elected by qualified tribal voters, defined as enrolled members aged 21 or older who have maintained at least one year of residency on the Makah Indian Reservation. Elections occur annually on the last Monday in December via , with members serving staggered three-year terms to promote institutional continuity; typically, two seats are contested each year, with one seat rotating every third year. From its membership, the Council annually selects a Chairman to preside over meetings and represent the tribe in external negotiations, along with a Vice Chairman; the positions of Secretary and Treasurer may be filled by individuals either from the Council or external to it, with the Council empowered to appoint additional officers or committees as needed. Regular meetings convene on the first Mondays of January, April, July, and October, supplemented by special sessions called by a majority vote, requiring a quorum of four members for official actions. The Council's enumerated powers include negotiating treaties and agreements with federal, state, and local governments; managing tribal economic enterprises and property; levying taxes and fees on tribal members and non-members within reservation boundaries; enacting ordinances for internal governance, subject to review by the Secretary of the Interior; and safeguarding tribal resources such as fisheries and lands. The Council's strategic oversight extends to key policy domains including infrastructure development, , treaty rights enforcement, public wellness, economic initiatives, and . Day-to-day administration falls under the Makah Tribal Administration, directed by a who coordinates program managers and staff across specialized departments responsible for services like , healthcare, housing, and public safety. This structure supports the tribe's as a federally recognized sovereign entity, with approximately 2,900 enrolled members as of recent federal records. As of 2025, Timothy J. Greene, Sr., holds the position of Chairman.

Economic Activities and Development Challenges

The Makah Tribe's economy centers on , leveraging treaty rights secured by the 1855 Treaty of Neah Bay to access salmon, groundfish including whiting (with a tribal quota), , and other marine species. Approximately 70% of the population derives income from activities, either fully or partially, supplemented by subsistence harvesting of and game that provides nutritional and cultural benefits. Efforts to resume ceremonial and subsistence hunting, halted commercially in the 1920s but pursued under provisions since a 1999 hunt, aim to restore nutritional resources like and , historically vital for household sustenance and trade in oil. Tribal enterprises, including the Makah Forestry Enterprise managing timber resources on reservation lands, generate revenue through sustainable harvesting. Tourism supports ancillary income via the Makah Cultural and Research Center, museum exhibits of archaeological artifacts, and regulated recreational access to trails and beaches requiring permits. Development challenges include persistently high , ranging from 40% to 60%, and elevated rates stemming from the reservation's remote location on the , which limits , transportation, and non-fisheries job opportunities. Heavy reliance on seasonal and weather-dependent exposes households to income volatility, exacerbated by environmental pressures such as declining and affecting and . Federal grants address some gaps, such as a $4.1 million allocation in December 2024 for wastewater infrastructure to enable and commercial expansion, while past initiatives like a wave energy project (2001–2008) demonstrated potential for diversification but stalled due to technical and funding hurdles. Legal and regulatory barriers to resumption further constrain cultural-economic revival efforts.

Contemporary Developments

Cultural Revival Initiatives

The Makah Cultural Education and Revitalization Program, established in the 1970s, serves as a central hub for preserving and teaching , including , history, and practices, while stewarding museum collections from sites like Ozette. This initiative transformed potential cultural erosion into opportunities for community engagement and assertion, integrating cultural education into tribal and public schools. Language revitalization efforts, coordinated through the Makah Language Program at the Makah Cultural and Research Center (founded 1979), aim to preserve the Makah language (qʷi·qʷi·diččaq), restore spoken fluency, and educate youth as proficient speakers. The Makah was formally adopted in 1978, facilitating standardized teaching materials and curricula that incorporate terms for cultural elements like whaling equipment. Lessons are embedded in Neah Bay schools, with archival recordings and oral histories supporting immersion and community classes. Whaling revival represents a cornerstone of cultural reclamation, rooted in the 1855 , which reserved the Makah's right to hunt whales. Efforts intensified in the following the gray whale's delisting from endangered status, linking the practice to spiritual, health, and communal values; a 2018 tribal survey found 96% support for continuing hunts. In June 2024, the U.S. government approved a under the , authorizing up to three eastern North Pacific gray whales annually for the next decade, enabling ceremonial hunts after a 1999 attempt was halted by legal challenges. Annual events like Makah Days, marking its 100th anniversary in 2024, feature traditional games, parades, and performances that reinforce and intergenerational transmission. These initiatives collectively bolster tribal cohesion, with the Cultural and Research Center promoting artifact-based education and community stewardship.

Health, Education, and Social Metrics

The , home to approximately 1,500 tribal members primarily in Neah Bay, faces persistent social challenges including high and linked to geographic isolation and limited economic diversification. Tribal data indicate that about 33% of on-reservation residents live below the federal level, with rates varying between 40% and 60%. U.S. Census figures for the reservation report a of $26,725, a household income around $56,974 in Neah Bay, and a rate of 18%, alongside a population where 61% identify as Native American. These metrics underscore broader American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) trends of elevated —averaging over 10% nationally but higher on reservations—and , often exacerbated by underinvestment in and job creation. Educational outcomes reflect structural barriers, with 5.7% of Makah adults having less than a ninth-grade education and 34.7% holding a or equivalent, per tribal planning estimates. Students attend schools in the School District, which serves Neah Bay and has historically been classified as low-achieving under state improvement programs, prompting interventions for Native student support. AIAN high school graduation rates nationwide stand at 74-75%, trailing the U.S. average of 87%, with tribal efforts focusing on cultural integration to boost retention amid remote location constraints. Health indicators align with AIAN-wide disparities, where diseases of the heart, , and unintentional injuries predominate as causes of death, alongside elevated rates that rose 71% for AIAN men and 139% for women since 1999. Reservation-specific data are limited, but and contribute to higher risks of chronic conditions like (prevalence up to 21% in some AIAN groups reporting fair/poor health) and substance use disorders. The Makah Tribal Health Clinic, supported by partnerships, addresses these through and prevention, though funding shortfalls and remoteness hinder comprehensive metrics and outcomes. The Makah Tribe's environmental engagements primarily revolve around marine resource management and conservation, particularly populations, informed by their treaty-reserved right to under the 1855 Treaty of Neah Bay, which explicitly preserves their "right of taking fish and of or sealing at usual and accustomed grounds and stations." The tribe participates in international co-management through the International Whaling Commission's aboriginal subsistence quota for eastern North Pacific (ENP) , advocating for sustainable harvests given the stock's estimated population of approximately 20,000 individuals, which is not depleted or endangered under U.S. law. Legal battles over whaling have centered on reconciling tribal treaty rights with federal statutes like the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) of 1972 and the of 1969. In Metcalf v. Daley (2000), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Makah must obtain an MMPA waiver for ceremonial and subsistence hunting, as the treaty right alone does not exempt them from the commercial whaling moratorium. Subsequent litigation, including Anderson v. Evans (2004), determined that the (NMFS, now NOAA Fisheries) violated NEPA by relying on an Environmental Assessment rather than a full for quota allocation, delaying hunts. These rulings required comprehensive environmental reviews, culminating in a Final EIS released in November 2023 analyzing alternatives, impacts on whale stocks, and cultural benefits. On June 13, 2024, NOAA Fisheries issued a waiver under the MMPA, authorizing the Makah up to 25 ENP gray whales over 10 years (averaging 2.5 annually, with the U.S. tribal share at approximately 1 per year), using traditional methods supplemented by modern humane killing techniques, subject to annual permit applications and restrictions avoiding endangered Western North Pacific stocks or entangled whales. In March 2025, the tribe submitted a permit request for a ceremonial and subsistence hunt targeting one migrating ENP gray whale in summer 2025, prompting a 47-day public comment period; as of June 2025, they awaited approval to assemble a whaling crew amid ongoing opposition from animal welfare organizations like Sea Shepherd, which argue the hunt risks population viability despite NOAA's assessments of negligible impact. Beyond , the Makah have pursued climate-related legal actions, filing a December 2023 lawsuit in King County Superior Court against and other companies, alleging their deception on climate risks exacerbates existential threats like , , and habitat loss affecting tribal fisheries and cultural sites at Neah Bay. The suit invokes law, seeking abatement rather than damages, and highlights empirical data on observed harms such as increased storm surges eroding reservation lands, reflecting the tribe's broader environmental advocacy for coastal resilience.

References

  1. https://tribalclimateadaptationguidebook.org/tribal-example/the-makah-indian-tribe/
  2. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/makah
  3. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/west-coast/marine-mammal-protection/makah-tribal-whale-hunt-chronology
  4. https://content.lib.washington.edu/aipnw/renker.html
  5. https://goia.wa.gov/tribal-government/treaty-neah-bay-1855
  6. https://www.historylink.org/file/5301
  7. https://makah.com/makah-tribal-info/whaling/
  8. https://iwc.int/management-and-conservation/whaling/aboriginal/usa/makah-tribe
  9. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/west-coast/marine-mammal-protection/makah-tribal-whale-hunt
  10. https://makah.com/makah-tribal-info/
  11. https://makah.com/
  12. https://nwifc.org/w/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/treaty-of-neah-bay.pdf
  13. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/united-states-and-canada/north-american-indigenous-peoples/makah
  14. https://makah.com/makah-tribal-info/about-history/
  15. https://medcraveonline.com/JHAAS/capitalists-and-whalers-the-makah-indians.html
  16. https://ais.washington.edu/research/publications/sea-my-country-maritime-world-makahs
  17. https://olympiccoast.noaa.gov/explore/original-peoples.html
  18. https://media.fisheries.noaa.gov/dam-migration/2005-makah-application-appxa.pdf
  19. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wa-treaties/5/
  20. https://www.historylink.org/File/5364
  21. https://projectwa.org/2016/08/02/its-complicated/
  22. https://digitalcollections.lib.washington.edu/digital/collection/lctext/id/1576/
  23. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/2015/07/16/makah-whaling-and-their-historical-relationship-to-the-sea/
  24. https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Makah_Indian_Reservation_%28Washington%29
  25. https://www.alamut.com/subj/the_other/misc/makahWhaling.html
  26. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED041688.pdf
  27. https://jackimccauley.wordpress.com/2014/10/24/boarding-schools/
  28. https://www.iwc.int/management-and-conservation/whaling/aboriginal/usa/makah-tribe
  29. https://content.lib.washington.edu/cmpweb/exhibits/makah/language.html
  30. https://makahpeopleofthepnwcoast.wordpress.com/2020/06/18/makah-cultural-revival/
  31. https://elcat.colo.hawaii.edu/lang/1930
  32. https://indigenousgov.hks.harvard.edu/publications/cultural-education-and-revitalization-program-makah-nation
  33. https://content.lib.washington.edu/cmpweb/exhibits/makah/arch.html
  34. https://magazine.wsu.edu/2015/11/06/ozette-excavating-a-makah-whaling-village/
  35. https://www.nps.gov/olym/learn/historyculture/timeline-of-human-history.htm
  36. https://uwapress.uw.edu/book/9780295994628/ozette/
  37. https://makahmuseum.com/about/ozette-archaeological-site/
  38. https://magazine.wsu.edu/2009/05/01/the-home-of-my-family-ozette-the-makahs-and-doc-daugherty/
  39. https://content.lib.washington.edu/cmpweb/exhibits/makah/intro.html
  40. https://pages.uoregon.edu/mmoss/makah.htm
  41. https://www.plu.edu/anthropology/makah-neah-bay/respect-makah-culture/
  42. https://www.yesmagazine.org/political-power/2025/04/02/makah-tribe-sacred-whaling
  43. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/us-tribe-wants-to-resume-whale-hunts-will-conservationists-support-them
  44. https://supportspl.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Cultural-Courage-by-the-Makah-Tribe-Easton-Calabria.pdf
  45. https://www.washington.edu/news/2010/10/21/of-tribes-and-whales-charlotte-cote-publishes-spirits-of-our-whaling-ancestors/
  46. https://www.historylink.org/File/9998
  47. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/1998/09/great-american-whale-hunt/
  48. https://www.inournaturemag.com/all/features/makah-spiritual-whaling-rights
  49. https://www.animallaw.info/case/anderson-v-evans
  50. https://nwifc.org/makah-tribe-condemns-unauthorized-whale-hunt/
  51. https://www.king5.com/article/tech/science/environment/makah-tribe-wins-legal-battle-over-gray-whale-hunting/281-bdebcb11-ac82-4f5a-92aa-b4be84aa6ad2
  52. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/west-coast/marine-mammal-protection/makah-tribal-whale-hunt-permitting
  53. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/formal-rulemaking-proposed-mmpa-waiver-and-hunt-regulations-governing-gray-whale-hunts-makah
  54. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/03/19/2025-04634/notice-of-receipt-of-the-makah-tribes-permit-request-for-a-ceremonial-and-subsistence-hunt-of
  55. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/west-coast/marine-mammal-protection/makah-tribal-whale-hunt-frequently-asked-questions
  56. https://www.wcu.edu/inwr/issues/makah_and_the_courts.html
  57. https://www.opb.org/article/2024/06/13/federal-approval-makah-whale-hunt/
  58. https://seashepherd.org/2025/04/10/urgent-block-the-return-of-whaling-in-u-s-waters/
  59. https://www.npr.org/2024/06/13/nx-s1-5004700/indigenous-makah-tribe-in-washington-allowed-to-resume-whaling-tradition
  60. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/feature-story/noaa-fisheries-seeks-comments-makah-whale-hunt-permit-application
  61. https://awionline.org/press-releases/noaa-greenlights-gray-whale-hunt-makah-tribe
  62. https://awionline.org/content/subsistence-whaling
  63. https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/whale-controversy
  64. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/feature-story/gray-whale-calf-count-remains-low-2024-population-slowly-emerges-multi-year-decline
  65. https://iwc.int/about-whales/intro-to-population-status/status-of-whales-graphics/summary-enp-gray
  66. https://www.opb.org/article/2025/06/18/gray-whales-along-the-pacific-west-coast-appear-to-be-in-trouble/
  67. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/final-environmental-impact-statement-makah-tribe-request-hunt-gray-whales
  68. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/west-coast/science-data/gray-whale-population-abundance
  69. https://www.facebook.com/NOAAFisheries/posts/the-eastern-north-pacific-population-of-gray-whales-that-migrates-along-the-west/1150660617106316/
  70. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-life-distress/2019-2023-eastern-north-pacific-gray-whale-ume-closed
  71. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/feature-story/eastern-north-pacific-gray-whales-continue-decline-after-downturn-during-unusual
  72. https://iucn-csg.org/emerging-concern-for-gray-whales-in-the-eastern-north-pacific/
  73. https://nwtreatytribes.org/makah-tribe-continues-pursuit-of-treaty-whaling-right/
  74. https://www.knkx.org/makah-tribe-waiver-noaa-whale-hunt-marine-mammal-act-washington
  75. https://awionline.org/press-releases/awi-opposes-judges-recommendation-allow-makah-tribe-hunt-gray-whales
  76. https://www.facebook.com/groups/491305800985444/posts/4375338329248819/
  77. https://www.nature.org/en-us/newsroom/makah-whaling-rights/
  78. https://makahmuseum.com/departments/makah-language-program/
  79. https://tacomacc.libguides.com/indigenous_languages_Washington/Makah
  80. https://arts-sciences.buffalo.edu/content/dam/arts-sciences/linguistics/AlumniDissertations/Davidson%20dissertation.pdf
  81. https://lingpapers.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2018/02/2010_Davidson_Werle.pdf
  82. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/makah.htm
  83. http://www.native-languages.org/makah.htm
  84. https://www.firstnations.org/gallery/makah-cultural-and-research-center/
  85. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44126735
  86. https://solve.mit.edu/solutions/33244
  87. http://medcraveonline.com/JHAAS/JHAAS-01-00023.pdf
  88. https://content.lib.washington.edu/cmpweb/exhibits/makah/tools.html
  89. https://www3.uwsp.edu/forestry/StuJournals/Pages/NA/hacker.aspx
  90. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20220605-ozette-the-us-lost-2000-year-old-village
  91. https://npshistory.com/publications/olym/oae-overview.pdf
  92. https://makahmuseum.com/visiting/exhibits/
  93. https://content.lib.washington.edu/cmpweb/exhibits/makah/index.html
  94. https://magazine.wsu.edu/web-extra/ozette-art-and-the-makah-canoe/
  95. https://makahmuseum.com/
  96. https://www.nps.gov/places/000/makah-cultural-institute-and-research-center.htm
  97. https://content.lib.washington.edu/cmpweb/exhibits/makah/plant.html
  98. http://nativeplantspnw.com/western-red-cedar-thuja-plicata/
  99. https://nwtreatytribes.org/makah-ethnobotanical-garden-sustains-tribe-in-many-ways/
  100. https://www.interpretivecenter.org/news/pacific-northwest-native-americans-and-salal
  101. https://content.lib.washington.edu/cmpweb/exhibits/makah/basketry.html
  102. https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article/77/7-8/2472/5905140
  103. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/Makah-Tribe-final-report_0.pdf
  104. https://tribalclimateguide.uoregon.edu/index.php/literature/makah-traditional-knowledge-and-cultural-resource-assessment-preliminary-framework
  105. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CZIC-ht393-w37-p32-1978/html/CZIC-ht393-w37-p32-1978.htm
  106. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/67089/dot_67089_DS1.pdf
  107. https://www.census.gov/tribal/?aianihh=2085
  108. https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food-to-usda/lfpacap/plus/signed-agreements/makah-indian-tribe-makah-indian-reservation
  109. https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2024-06/RAISE%25202024%2520Fact%2520Sheets.pdf
  110. https://mil.wa.gov/asset/5ba41ffa22b73
  111. https://www.narf.org/nill/constitutions/makahconst/makahconst.html
  112. https://makah.com/makah-tribal-info/governance/
  113. https://goia.wa.gov/tribal-directory/tribal-chair-contact-information
  114. https://www.imls.gov/sites/default/files/project-proposals/nae-246612-ols-20-proposal.pdf
  115. https://www.nws.usace.army.mil/Portals/27/docs/environmental/resources/2018EnvironmentalDocuments/App%2520A_Economic%2520Neah%2520Bay%2520Sec%2520107_reduced.pdf?ver=6AaWVEcIQkMse_pZuHMmxQ%253D%253D%253E
  116. https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/news/feb22/makah-ocean-out-of-balance.html
  117. https://www.tribalselfgov.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Issue-5-1995-Assumption-of-Federal-Programs-Makah-and-Penobscot-Indian-Nations-Show-How-its-Done.pdf
  118. https://www.oaalliance.org/news/launch-ocean-acidification-action-plan-at-2025-unoc
  119. https://www.eda.gov/news/press-release/2024/12/23/us-department-commerce-invests-41-million-wastewater-infrastructure
  120. https://www.energy.gov/indianenergy/makah-tribe-2017-project
  121. https://www.knkx.org/arts-culture/2024-08-29/100th-anniversary-of-makah-days-showcases-revived-native-culture-in-neah-bay
  122. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/214/1135/533474/
  123. https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.fisheries.noaa.gov/2023-11/makah-waiver-feis-110923.pdf
  124. https://www.climatecasechart.com/collections/makah-indian-tribe-v-exxon-mobil-corp-_6318df
  125. https://www.climateinthecourts.com/facing-existential-threats-from-climate-change-two-indian-tribes-sue-big-oil/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.