Hubbry Logo
HalibutHalibutMain
Open search
Halibut
Community hub
Halibut
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Halibut
Halibut
Halibut
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Atlantic halibut

Halibut is the common name for three species of flatfish in the family of right-eye flounders. In some regions, and less commonly, other species of large flatfish are also referred to as halibut.

The word is derived from haly (holy) and butte (flat fish), for its popularity on Catholic holy days.[1] Halibut are demersal fish and are highly regarded as a food fish as well as a sport fish.[1][2][3][4]

Species

[edit]

A 2018 cladistic analysis based on genetics and morphology showed that the Greenland halibut diverged from a lineage that gave rise to the Atlantic and Pacific halibuts. The common ancestor of all three diverged from a lineage that gave rise to the genus Verasper, comprising the spotted halibut and barfin flounder.[5]

Fishermen in Seward, Alaska, with a fresh catch of halibut
Photo of several, near human-sized white fish. Two people hold halibuts.
Halibut caught off the coast of Raspberry Island, Alaska, in 2007: The two fish being held up are 18 to 23 kg (40 to 50 lb)
Halibut tend to be a mottled dark brown on their upward-facing side and white on their underside
Filleting a Pacific halibut taken in Cook Inlet, Alaska. A halibut yields four large fillets, with the yield percentage higher than for most fish. Round halibut cheeks may provide additional meat

Physical characteristics

[edit]

The Pacific and Atlantic halibut are the world's largest flatfish, with debate over which grows larger.[6][7][8] Halibut are dark brown on the top side with a white to off-white underbelly and have very small scales invisible to the naked eye embedded in their skin.[9] Halibut are symmetrical at birth with one eye on each side of the head. Then, about six months later, during larval metamorphosis one eye migrates to the other side of the head. The eyes are permanently set once the skull is fully ossified.[10] At the same time, the stationary-eyed side darkens to match the top side, while the other side remains white. This color scheme disguises halibut from above (blending with the ocean floor) and from below (blending into the light from the sky) and is known as countershading.

The IGFA size record for halibut was apparently broken off the waters of Norway in July 2013 by a 234-kilogram (515-pound), 2.62-metre (8-foot-7-inch) fish. This was awaiting certification as of 2013.[11] In July 2014, a 219-kilogram (482 lb) Pacific halibut was caught in Glacier Bay, Alaska; this is, however, discounted from records because the halibut was shot and harpooned before being hauled aboard.[12]

Diet

[edit]

Halibut feed on almost any fish or animal they can fit into their mouths. Juvenile halibut feed on small crustaceans and other bottom-dwelling organisms. Animals found in their stomachs include sand lance, octopus, crab, salmon, hermit crabs, lamprey, sculpin, cod, pollock, herring, and flounder, as well as other halibut. Halibut live at depths ranging from a few meters to hundreds of meters, and although they spend most of their time near the bottom,[1] halibut may move up in the water column to feed. In most ecosystems, the halibut is near the top of the marine food chain. In the North Pacific, common predators are sea lions, killer whales, salmon sharks and humans.

Sex-determining genes

[edit]

Halibut species vary in sex determination systems.[13] The Atlantic halibut went down a purely XX/XY route, with the male being heterogametic, around 0.9 to 3.8 million years ago. The sex-determining gene for the Atlantic halibut is likely to be gsdf on chromosome 13.[13] The Pacific halibut went down a ZZ/ZW route, with the female being heterogametic, around 4.5 million years ago.[13][14] The master sex-determining gene of the Pacific halibut is located on chromosome 9 and it is likely to be bmpr1ba.[15] The gene sox2 is likely to play the same role in the Greenland halibut.

Halibut fishery

[edit]

The North Pacific commercial halibut fishery dates to the late 19th century and today is one of the region's largest and most lucrative. In Canadian and US waters, long-line fishing predominates, using chunks of octopus ("devilfish") or other bait on circle hooks attached at regular intervals to a weighted line that can extend for several miles across the bottom. The fishing vessel retrieves the line after several hours to a day. The effects of long-line gear on habitats are poorly understood, but could include disturbance of sediments, benthic structures, and other structures.

International management is thought to be necessary, because the species occupies waters of the United States, Canada, Russia, and possibly Japan (where the species is known to the Japanese as ohyo), and matures slowly. Halibut do not reproduce until age eight, when about 80 cm (30 in) long, so commercial capture below this length prevents breeding and is against US and Canadian regulations supporting sustainability. Pacific halibut fishing is managed by the International Pacific Halibut Commission.

For most of the modern era, halibut fishery operated as a derby. Regulators declared time slots when fishing was open (typically 24–48 hours at a time) and fishermen raced to catch as many pounds as they could within that interval. This approach accommodated unlimited participation in the fishery while allowing regulators to control the quantity of fish caught annually by controlling the number and timing of openings. The approach led to unsafe fishing, as openings were necessarily set before the weather was known, forcing fishermen to leave port regardless of the weather. The approach limited fresh halibut to the markets to several weeks per year when the gluts would push down the price received by fishermen.[citation needed]

Individual fishing quotas

[edit]

In 1995, US regulators allocated individual fishing quotas (IFQs) to existing fishery participants based on each vessel's documented historical catch. IFQs grant to holders a specific proportion of each year's total allowable catch (TAC). The fishing season is about eight months. The IFQ system improved both safety and product quality by providing a stable flow of fresh halibut to the marketplace. Critics of the program suggest, since holders can sell their quota and the fish are a public resource, the IFQ system gave a public resource to the private sector. The fisheries were managed through a treaty between the United States and Canada per recommendations of the International Pacific Halibut Commission, formed in 1923.

A significant sport fishery in Alaska and British Columbia has emerged, where halibut are prized game and food fish. Sport fisherman use large rods and reels with 35–70 kg (80–150 lb) line, and often bait with herring, large jigs, or whole salmon heads. Halibut are strong and fight strenuously when exposed to air. Smaller fish will usually be pulled on board with a gaff and may be clubbed or even punched in the head to prevent them from thrashing around on the deck. In both commercial and sport fisheries, standard procedure is to shoot or otherwise subdue very large halibut over 70–90 kg (150–200 lb) before landing them.[citation needed]

Overfishing and population decline

[edit]

The Atlantic halibut has been a major target of fishing since the 1840s with overfishing causing the depletion of the species in the Georges Bank in 1850, then all the way up to the Canadian Arctic in 1866. In the 1940s the American fishing industry collapsed but the Canadian fishing industry remained until there was a decline in Canadian halibut fishery in the 1970s and 1980s. This allowed the halibut population to briefly rebound before collapsing in the 1990s. Since a low point in the early 2000s, the population has rebounded once again and may be stabilizing, but the species is not nearly as abundant in most locations as it was in the early 1800s.[16]

Atlantic halibut population

[edit]

Currently, Atlantic halibut is managed as two stocks in Canadian waters, which are the Atlantic Continental Shelf stock and the Gulf of St. Lawrence stock.[17] The Atlantic halibut has two other stocks in the Northwest Atlantic, those being the Gulf of Maine-Georges Bank stock controlled by the United States and one controlled by France near the Saint-Pierre and Miquelon Archipelago. The Georges Bank stock is still considered to be depleted and it is listed as a species of concern in the United States.[16] In the two main populations of Atlantic halibut there are many subpopulations, but many have been lost due to patches of extreme overfishing and the populations remain depleted as a whole from what they were in the 1800s.

Pacific and Greenland halibut populations

[edit]

The Pacific halibut and Greenland halibut have not had this level of fragmentation, and their population is far larger in the United States' waters, with North Pacific halibut and groundfish fisheries extracting the largest volume of catch out of all United States fishery areas.[18][19] Sometimes the California halibut is mistaken for a subspecies, but they are not, and are not even a true halibut species.[20] In the North Atlantic, observation of migration indicates that there are only two major populations of Greenland halibut that both stretch vast distances. Those populations being the Northeast one stretching from the Kara Sea to Greenland, and the Northwest one stretching from Newfoundland to Baffin Bay.[21] These stocks had been previously thought to be four different populations, but migration has indicated that they are only two different populations, and that fishing has not fragmented them. New research also indicates that the Greenland halibut originally came from the Pacific Ocean and spread into the Arctic Basin when the Bering Strait opened for a second time around 3 million years ago, and thus the Pacific halibut is its closest living relative.[22]

Evolutionary diversification of fragmented populations

[edit]

In the Atlantic halibut studies have shown that the Atlantic Continental Shelf stock and the Gulf of St. Lawrence stock have begun to differentiate genetically from each other due to low connectivity between populations, low rates of exchange, and subsequent adaptation to local environments. Some adaptations can show up as changes in life-history trait parameters, which can change on a faster time scale than evolution and cause behavioural segregation. This can occur even in areas with enough genetic mixing to prevent genetic divergence.[16][17] One small but significant observed adaptation difference in the Atlantic halibut has been that the fish in the warmer Scotian Shelf have a faster growth rate than the halibut in the colder southern Grand Banks.[16] The Pacific halibut population remains largely genetically homologous throughout their range, but there is some variation of life-history traits on a geographic gradient.[16] Despite its large range, the populations of Greenland halibut remain largely homogenous due to a lack of barriers for gene flow between its four major populations.[19] There are small differences between subpopulations due to differing environmental factors, such as salinity and temperature gradients, but not to the degree seen in Atlantic halibut, as gene flow and migration continues throughout many different stocks.

As food

[edit]
Hot smoked Pacific halibut
Halibut, Atlantic and Pacific, raw
Nutritional value per 100 g (3.5 oz)
Energy380 kJ (91 kcal)
0 g
Sugars0 g
Dietary fiber0 g
1.3 g
18.6 g
Vitamins and minerals
VitaminsQuantity
%DV†
Vitamin A67 IU
Thiamine (B1)
4%
0.05 mg
Riboflavin (B2)
2%
0.03 mg
Niacin (B3)
41%
6.5 mg
Vitamin B6
32%
0.55 mg
Folate (B9)
3%
12 μg
Vitamin B12
46%
1.1 μg
Vitamin C
0%
0 mg
Vitamin D
24%
190 IU
Vitamin E
4%
0.61 mg
MineralsQuantity
%DV†
Calcium
1%
7 mg
Iron
1%
0.2 mg
Magnesium
5%
23 mg
Manganese
0%
0.01 mg
Phosphorus
19%
236 mg
Potassium
15%
435 mg
Selenium
83%
45.6 μg
Sodium
3%
68 mg
Zinc
4%
0.4 mg
Other constituentsQuantity
Water80.3 g
Cholesterol49 mg
Link to USDA Database entry
†Percentages estimated using US recommendations for adults,[23] except for potassium, which is estimated based on expert recommendation from the National Academies.[24]

Nutrition

[edit]

Raw Pacific or Atlantic halibut meat is 80% water and 19% protein, with negligible fat and no carbohydrates (table). In a 100-gram (3+1⁄2-ounce) reference amount, raw halibut contains rich content (20% or more of the Daily Value, DV) of protein, selenium (65% DV), phosphorus (34% DV), vitamin D (32% DV), and several B vitamins: niacin, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 (42–46% DV).

Cooked halibut meat – presumably through the resulting dehydration – has relatively increased protein content and reduced B vitamin content (per 100 grams), while magnesium, phosphorus, and selenium are rich in content.[25]

Food preparation

[edit]
A picture pf Halibut with miso marinade on a corn and mushroom succotash
Pacific halibut with miso marinade on a corn and mushroom Succotash

Halibut yield large fillets from both sides of the fish, with the small round cheeks providing an additional source of meat.[26] Halibut are often boiled, deep-fried or grilled while fresh. Smoking is more difficult with halibut meat than it is with salmon, due to its ultra-low fat content. Eaten fresh, the meat has a clean taste and requires little seasoning. Halibut is noted for its dense and firm texture. Halibut have historically been an important food source to Alaska Natives and Canadian First Nations, and continue to be a key element to many coastal subsistence economies. Accommodating the competing interests of commercial, sport, and subsistence users is a challenge.

As of 2008, the Atlantic population was so depleted through overfishing that it might be declared an endangered species. According to Seafood Watch, consumers should avoid Atlantic halibut.[27] Most halibut eaten on the East Coast of the United States is from the Pacific.[citation needed]

Steamed halibut in black bean sauce

In 2012, sport fishermen in Cook Inlet reported increased instances of a condition known as "mushy halibut syndrome". The meat of the affected fish has a "jelly-like" consistency. When cooked it does not flake in the normal manner of halibut but rather falls apart. The meat is still perfectly safe to eat but the appearance and consistency are considered unappetizing. The exact cause of the condition is unknown but may be related to a change in diet.[28][29]

Other species sometimes called "halibut"

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Halibut

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Halibut are large, demersal belonging to the family , primarily comprising the Hippoglossus stenolepis () in the North and Hippoglossus hippoglossus () in the North . These right-eyed flounders feature both eyes on the upper (ocular) side, a flattened body adapted for bottom-dwelling, small embedded scales, and a large equipped with strong teeth for preying on , crustaceans, and other . , the largest , can exceed 2.4 meters in length and 230 kilograms in weight, while may reach up to 4.7 meters, though such extremes are rare. Halibut inhabit regions from shallow coastal waters to depths over 1,000 meters, with juveniles preferring nearshore areas and adults migrating to deeper offshore grounds; they favor sandy, gravelly, or muddy bottoms where they prey by lying camouflaged. Both species exhibit , with females growing larger and more slowly than males, and they spawn pelagic eggs in deep waters during winter or spring, depending on the . Their life history includes a protracted larval stage before into asymmetrical juveniles, contributing to their slow growth and late maturity, which renders populations vulnerable to . Commercially, halibut rank among the most valuable fisheries due to their firm, white flesh prized for markets, supporting directed longline fisheries in , the U.S. , and Atlantic coasts, with quotas set by bodies like the International Pacific Halibut Commission to sustain stocks. fisheries yield millions of pounds annually, integral to indigenous subsistence, recreational , and export economies, while Atlantic stocks face ongoing recovery efforts from historical depletion.

Taxonomy and Species

Primary Species

The halibut comprises large flatfishes in the family , known as right-eyed flounders due to the ocular migration where both eyes position on the right side in adults. The name "halibut" originates from halybutte, combining haly ("holy") and butte ("flatfish"), reflecting its historical role as a food fish consumed on religious holy days. The primary species are the Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) and (Hippoglossus stenolepis), both classified in the Hippoglossus based on shared morphological traits such as , , and scale patterns, corroborated by genetic analyses distinguishing them as separate . The Atlantic halibut attains maximum lengths of approximately 300 cm and weights exceeding 300 kg, positioning it among the largest flatfishes. reach up to 267 cm in length and over 200 kg, with females typically larger than males. Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides), while in the same family , belongs to a distinct and is taxonomically separated by differences in structure, pigmentation, and genetic markers, though it is commercially grouped with true halibuts due to similar exploitation.

Genetic and Evolutionary Aspects

Halibut exhibit low overall , consistent with large historical effective population sizes and minimal bottlenecks, as evidenced by allozyme surveys showing an average of 0.0002 ± 0.0007 among (Hippoglossus stenolepis) samples across broad geographic ranges, with 98.7% of total diversity residing within populations. sequencing of the genome, estimated at 602 Mb with chromosome-level assembly, further reveals structured variation despite this homogeneity, including subtle differentiation in peripheral stocks such as those in the [Aleutian Islands](/page/Aleutian Islands), attributable to limited rather than recent admixture. Sex determination in halibut is primarily genetic, operating under a ZW heterogametic female system in Pacific halibut, where genome-wide association studies have identified sex-linked loci and a putative master sex-determining (MSD) gene candidate within a defined chromosomal region. In Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus), quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping pinpoints a major sex-determining locus on linkage group 13, explaining significant phenotypic variance and supporting polygenic influences overlaid on primary genetic control, though environmental factors like temperature exert limited modulation compared to other flatfishes. This genetic architecture underscores resilience to selection, as halibut maintain balanced sex ratios amid variable rearing conditions in aquaculture trials, without the pronounced temperature-dependent shifts seen in species reliant on sdY-like mechanisms. Evolutionary divergence in halibut populations reflects post-glacial recolonization dynamics, with genomic scans detecting weak but significant structure in , including differentiation between cohorts and broader North Atlantic groups, driven by ancient structural variants and isolation in refugia during Pleistocene glaciations. Similarly, display fine-scale divergence in fragmented habitats, where oceanographic barriers post-glaciation fostered local adaptations without eroding baseline low diversity, enabling persistence under fluctuating pressures through standing variation rather than novel mutations. This pattern aligns with causal inheritance from ancestral lineages, where bilateral and genes predate genus-specific radiations, conferring robustness to demographic shifts.

Biology and Ecology

Physical Characteristics


Halibut belong to the family Pleuronectidae and display the typical flatfish asymmetry, with both eyes migrating to the right (dorsal) side during larval metamorphosis, enabling the fish to lie flat on the seafloor with the eyed side upward. The body is strongly compressed laterally, featuring a large mouth equipped with strong, conical teeth and a concave caudal fin, while small, embedded scales provide a smooth skin texture. This dextral orientation distinguishes them from left-eyed flatfish, and the ventral side remains unpigmented for camouflage. Females exhibit pronounced , attaining larger sizes than males; (Hippoglossus stenolepis) reach maximum lengths of 2.5 m and weights over 200 kg, with rapid early growth slowing after several years. (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) similarly grow to 2.5 m and exceed 300 kg, with longevity surpassing 50 years in both species, though females often outlive males. Sensory adaptations include oversized eyes on the dorsal side, optimized for detecting prey in dim conditions, complemented by an arched system that senses hydrodynamic disturbances and vibrations from nearby . Chromatophores in the skin allow rapid color changes for substrate matching, enhancing predation efficiency.

Habitat and Distribution

(Hippoglossus stenolepis) primarily inhabit the northeastern , extending from coastal waters off northward through the and into the . Juveniles reside in shallow nearshore environments at depths of 10-70 meters and temperatures of 7-10.5°C, gradually migrating to deeper waters with age. Adults occupy bathydemersal positions up to approximately 550 meters in depth during summer, occasionally reaching 900 meters, within cold temperate waters generally ranging from 4-10°C. Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) are distributed throughout the North Atlantic, ranging from the and southward to on the western side, and eastward across to and the . They exhibit similar bathydemersal lifestyles on , gravel, or clay substrates at depths from 50 to 2000 meters, with survey data indicating concentrations at 25-200 meters and temperatures of 4-13°C. Both favor soft sedimentary bottoms, such as and , which facilitate for predation. Halibut demonstrate migratory behaviors tied to life stages, with adults seasonally relocating from shallower summer feeding areas to deeper offshore sites for winter spawning.

Diet and Predation

Halibut exhibit a carnivorous diet that varies with and . Juvenile (Hippoglossus stenolepis) in nearshore Alaskan waters primarily consume small crustaceans, including amphipods and copepods, with fishes comprising a minor portion during early summer months. Adult diets shift to larger prey, dominated by fishes such as walleye pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) and other gadoids, cephalopods including and octopuses, and crustaceans like Tanner crabs (), which account for approximately 6% of stomach content weight in samples. Similarly, (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) adults feed on , , and crabs, reflecting opportunistic predation in demersal environments. Halibut employ an predation strategy suited to their flattened morphology and benthic lifestyle. They lie camouflaged on the , blending with substrates via mottled pigmentation on their eyed side, and detect prey visually before executing rapid strikes with powerful, asymmetrical jaws capable of crushing hard-shelled organisms. This tactic targets schooling fishes and mobile passing overhead or nearby, with feeding efficiency enhanced in low-light conditions where remains effective down to irradiance levels of 10^{-4} μmol m^{-2} s^{-1}. In demersal food webs, halibut function as apex predators, occupying a mean of approximately 4.0 based on aggregated diet studies across populations. Stomach content analyses from reveal fishes contributing 50-60% or more of diet in deeper waters (>350 m), underscoring their role in regulating mid-trophic like , though cephalopods increase in importance at certain depths and sizes. This predatory dominance positions halibut as key regulators in ecosystems, with limited vulnerability to predation beyond early juvenile stages due to size and cryptic habits.

Reproduction and Life Cycle

Halibut reproduction occurs in deep offshore waters during winter and early spring, with spawning depths typically exceeding 200 meters. (Hippoglossus stenolepis) spawn from November through March, peaking between late December and mid-January, while (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) spawn from December to March, with peaks from late January to early February. Females are batch spawners, releasing eggs in multiple events over the season to distribute risk, with males accompanying to fertilize externally. Fecundity scales with female body size, ranging from 0.5 million eggs for smaller individuals (e.g., around 23 kg) to 4 million for larger ones (e.g., over 113 kg), reflecting an adaptive strategy to offset high early-life mortality. Eggs are buoyant and pelagic, after 12-20 days at temperatures of 5-8°C, yielding larvae approximately 6-7 mm in length. The larval phase persists for 6-12 months, during which they drift in ocean currents, undergoing into juveniles before benthic settlement, a prolonged period marked by extreme vulnerability to predation and . Sexual maturity is delayed, with males reaching it at 7-8 years (around 80 cm length) and females at 8-14 years (90-120 cm), often later in Atlantic populations. This aligns with K-selected traits, including slow somatic growth, exceeding 50 years, and extended generation times, which prioritize individual survival and quality over quantity of despite high egg production. Juvenile survival remains low, with empirical fisheries data indicating recruitment success from eggs to exploitable age below 1%, driven by density-independent factors like and availability during the pelagic stage, thus limiting population renewal to sporadic strong year classes. These dynamics causally link high reproductive output to compensatory mechanisms against attrition, yet render populations sensitive to sustained adult removals before maturity cohorts replenish .

Fisheries and Harvesting

Historical Development

(Hippoglossus stenolepis) has been exploited for subsistence by indigenous coastal peoples of and the for centuries, using wooden or bone hooks to target the species in nearshore waters. Similarly, (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) supported indigenous and early European settler fisheries in Norwegian and North Atlantic coastal communities through hook-and-line methods, with records indicating targeted harvesting as part of mixed catches by the . Commercial exploitation of emerged in the late , with the first major established in during the 1880s, driven by demand for fresh and salted product in East Coast U.S. markets; initial efforts involved sailing deploying longlines from dories. Sporadic commercial attempts date to 1870, but systematic operations scaled up post-1880 via fleets homeporting in ports like Ketchikan by the early 1900s. In , early industrial halibut fishing paralleled this timeline, with hook-and-line vessels targeting Atlantic stocks for export by the 1880s, fueled by improvements enabling fresh market access. By the early , unregulated expansion led to stock declines, prompting the U.S. and to sign the Convention for the Preservation of the Halibut Fishery of the Northern and on March 2, 1923, establishing the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) as the first for deep-sea fishery conservation; it entered force in 1924, implementing seasonal closures and research to rebuild . IPHC management enabled catch expansions through the mid-century, with steam-powered vessels enhancing efficiency in longline operations; post-World War II, fisheries shifted further toward selective longlining over to minimize waste and , sustaining booms into the 1980s when Pacific harvests peaked amid improved stock assessments and gear technology. Atlantic fisheries followed analogous patterns, with longline dominance by the mid-1980s replacing earlier trawl-heavy phases in regions like the .

Management Frameworks

The International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC), established by a bilateral convention between the and in 1923, serves as the primary regulatory body for management, setting science-based total constant exploitable yields (TCEY) derived from annual stock assessments incorporating estimates, data, and exploitation rates. The IPHC's framework emphasizes sustainable harvest levels, with the 2025 TCEY fixed at 29.72 million pounds across regulatory areas 2A through 4E, reflecting precautionary adjustments to observed declines in mature female spawning while targeting long-term yield stability. This approach prioritizes empirical data over fixed quotas, allowing annual recalibration to maintain harvests near levels consistent with (MSY) principles, where exploitation rates are adjusted to avoid as defined by spawning potential ratios. In the United States, particularly Alaska's fixed-gear , the North Pacific Fishery Management Council recommended individual quotas (IFQs) in 1991, with implementation by the beginning in , allocating harvest privileges as property-like to qualifying participants based on historical participation. This market-oriented system replaced prior derby-style open seasons, which compressed effort into dangerously short periods—often just days—leading to high risks of vessel accidents, gear conflicts, and inefficient capital ; post-IFQ, seasons extended, fatality rates dropped markedly, and operational costs stabilized as fishers paced harvests to market conditions rather than racing competitors. Economically, IFQs enhanced revenues through quota leasing and transfers, fostering in quality processing and reducing discards, while the assignment of enduring incentivized conservation, evidenced by participants' support for compliance and lower violation rates compared to pre-IFQ eras. Catch-sharing arrangements under the IPHC convention allocate portions of the TCEY between the two nations and domestic sectors (commercial, recreational, subsistence, and tribal), with U.S. plans specifying fixed percentages or pounds per area—such as Area 2A's division among Washington, , , and tribal entities—enforced through bilateral adherence to monitored landings and overage penalties. These mechanisms promote accountability by linking allocations to verifiable catch data, aligning incentives with MSY objectives through harvest control rules that cap exploitation when biomass falls below reference points, thereby sustaining yields without the volatility of unregulated effort. Empirical outcomes include consistent quota attainment rates exceeding 90% in most areas post-implementation, underscoring the efficacy of rights-based approaches over command-and-control regulations in curbing excess capacity.

Commercial Operations

Commercial halibut harvesting relies predominantly on bottom longline gear, which deploys a primary line with hundreds to thousands of baited hooks targeting halibut on the seafloor. This method exhibits higher selectivity for legal-sized halibut compared to bottom trawling, as hooks capture fish actively biting bait, minimizing capture of undersized individuals and non-target species, thereby lowering bycatch rates to under 5% in directed Pacific halibut fisheries. Operations in the primary fishery, managed by the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC), feature guided seasonal openings from March to July, with closures triggered by quota fulfillment in each regulatory area to prevent overharvest. The 2025 season commenced on March 20 across IPHC areas, while West Coast (Area 2A) directed commercial fisheries opened in June, concluding by July 24 after harvesting approximately 120 metric tons. Vessels are classified into categories A through H by length, from under 26 feet (Class H) to over 100 feet (Class A), determining eligibility and quota shares under individual transferable quota systems that allocate harvest rights based on historical participation. Pacific halibut production is concentrated in and , which together comprise 70-80% of global output, with Alaska's fisheries yielding the majority through longline deployments tracking catch per unit effort (CPUE) metrics such as standardized skate-per-set or weight-per-skate to assess gear and stock responsiveness. In recent assessments, Alaskan Area 2C CPUE has risen, indicating sustained , while Area 3A metrics reflect stable but variable yields tied to biomass surveys.

Recreational and Subsistence Fishing

Recreational fishing for Pacific halibut features strict bag limits to manage localized harvests, typically one to two fish per day per angler depending on regulatory areas. In waters, the standard daily limit is two halibut of any size unless inseason restrictions apply. regulations enforce a one-fish daily limit with no minimum size and a six-fish annual possession cap. The 2025 recreational quota stood at 79,772 pounds, reflecting efforts to balance participation with stock sustainability. Subsistence halibut fishing in targets rural residents and Alaska Native members, requiring a Subsistence Halibut Registration Certificate (SHARC) for direct personal or family consumption, sharing, or customary trade. This fishery preserves cultural practices in coastal communities, where halibut serves as a traditional staple for and ceremonies without commercial intent. Recreational harvests represent 10-15% of total removals across management areas, influencing local through angler participation and release practices. The "Every Halibut Counts" program, developed by the Sea Grant, educates anglers on minimizing injury during catch-and-release to reduce post-capture mortality and support sustainable yields.

Conservation and Population Dynamics

Stock Assessments and Empirical Data

The International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) conducts annual stock assessments for (Hippoglossus stenolepis) using fishery-independent setline surveys, commercial catch data, and an ensemble of four age-structured population models to estimate exploitable , spawning , and . The 2024 assessment determined that the stock is not overfished, with female spawning estimated at 147 million pounds (66,678 metric tons), down from approximately 190 million pounds two years prior, reflecting a continuing decline since the late 1990s peak. Recruitment indices from these models indicate fluctuations, with average estimated at 53-59% higher during favorable environmental conditions compared to unfavorable periods, though recent cohorts remain below historical highs. In response to the 2024 assessment's projection of low , the IPHC set 2025 coastwide total allowable catch (TAC) at 29.72 million pounds (13,483 metric tons), a reduction exceeding 15% from the 2024 level of 35.25 million pounds, prioritizing harvest rates aligned with model-recommended constants for . Exploitable indices from IPHC surveys show a post-2012 stabilization following earlier declines, with harvest occurring at levels deemed appropriate by the models despite the downward spawning trend. For (Hippoglossus hippoglossus), assessments by agencies including (DFO) and the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) rely on stratified random surveys and indices to evaluate stock status, often finding exploitable below reference targets but demonstrating stability under quota regimes. In the (NAFO 4RST), the 2024-2025 update reported a three-year mean exploitable index supporting TAC advice, with stocks managed to avoid further depletion through closed-loop . NAFO-area assessments similarly indicate persistent low relative to targets but no acute collapse, with variability tracked via survey data informing annual quotas.

Management Successes and Property Rights Approaches

The implementation of individual quotas (IFQs) in the in 1995 marked a shift toward property rights-based management, assigning fishermen exclusive, transferable shares of the total allowable catch (TAC) set by the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC). This approach ended the prior "race to fish" style, extending the season from days to eight months and aligning incentives for long-term stewardship over short-term maximization. Empirical outcomes included reduced lost gear and ghost , with reports indicating lost gear became rare and associated mortality minimal due to decreased competitive haste. IFQs enhanced by lowering operational costs through optimized fleet utilization and steady supply chains, while catch per unit effort (CPUE) rose and discards fell, reflecting improved handling and selectivity. Compliance strengthened, with TACs not exceeded in the initial five years, fostering stability in quota-allocated areas via data-informed harvest controls rather than blanket restrictions. Property rights embedded in IFQs promoted causal stewardship, as quota holders bore the of , evidenced by sustained levels contrasting pre-IFQ volatility. The IPHC's TAC framework, operational since the but refined post-IFQ, has demonstrably averted by capping harvests based on annual surveys and models estimating exploitable . This adaptive, science-driven policy maintained population stability for decades, enabling recoveries in surveyed cohorts through precise, enforceable limits that incentivized participation in monitoring. Unlike unregulated eras prone to boom-bust cycles, TACs integrated property-like exclusivity via IFQs, yielding verifiable gains in resource resilience and harvest predictability.

Challenges Including Bycatch and Allocation Disputes

Halibut fisheries encounter significant challenges from in non-directed groundfish trawl operations, where incidental capture exceeds prohibited species catch (PSC) limits, necessitating discards that result in economic waste. In the and , the 2025 PSC limit for the Amendment 80 trawl sector stands at 1,309 metric tons, a reduction from prior years to curb mortality of undersized or non-commercial halibut. These limits, enforced by the North Pacific Fishery Management , halt directed fishing when reached, but historical data indicate persistent discards, with trawl bycatch mortality reaching peaks like 17.5 million pounds in 1990 before caps were tightened. Such waste undermines resource utilization, as discarded halibut—often viable for harvest in directed fisheries—contributes to forgone revenue without benefiting or markets. Allocation disputes between commercial, recreational, and subsistence sectors exacerbate inefficiencies, with evidence suggesting imbalances favor less productive uses amid fixed total allowable catches. In , the Catch Sharing Plan allocates portions of the quota, but growth in charter and private recreational demand has prompted reallocations, such as quota transfers from commercial individual fishing quotas (IFQs) to sectors via leasing programs initiated around 2016. Commercial operators argue that recreational allocations, which prioritize catch-and-release or limited retention, yield lower overall biomass harvest efficiency compared to directed longline fisheries optimized for . These tensions, evident in where similar intersector conflicts have stalled cooperative solutions, highlight how static allocations ignore differential sector productivity, potentially inflating operational costs and reducing net economic returns from the . Empirical assessments indicate that fishing pressure, rather than climate variability alone, drives controllable declines in halibut metrics like size-at-age, underscoring the efficacy of controls over exogenous factors. size-at-age has fallen markedly—from over 120 pounds for 20-year-olds in 1988 to under 45 pounds by 2013—attributable more to density-dependent effects from exploitation than isolated shifts. While interannual variability influences somatic growth and , stock assessments by the International Pacific Halibut Commission prioritize adjustable rates to buffer against such fluctuations, as evidenced by stabilized cohorts under quota reductions despite ocean warming. This causal emphasis on anthropogenic enables targeted management, distinguishing it from less malleable drivers, though integrated models reveal synergies where amplifies environmental stressors. The (Hippoglossus stenolepis) stock has declined coastwide since the late 1990s, with continuous reductions in through approximately 2012 and ongoing low levels in subsequent years, including a drop in estimated female spawning to 147 million pounds in the 2024 assessment. Despite these trends, the stock is not overfished, as determined by the 2024 integrated stock assessment, which incorporates fishery-dependent and independent data. The International Pacific Halibut Commission set 2025 total allowable catch quotas at reduced levels—reflecting persistent recruitment shortfalls and low juvenile abundance—to maintain amid a 40% probability of further stock decline. Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) populations in U.S. and Canadian waters, including the and divisions 4RST in the , persist at low levels well below target biomass thresholds but show signs of slow recovery under restrictive management. The 2024 management track assessment for the northwestern Atlantic coast updated indices of abundance through 2023, indicating stable but subdued trends with fishing mortality controlled to support gradual rebuilding. In Canadian areas like 4RST, total allowable catches increased by 25% for the 2024-2025 season, signaling cautious optimism based on recent survey data and indices, though full recovery remains protracted due to the ' slow growth and historical . Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) stocks in Arctic and Northwest Atlantic regions, such as NAFO Subarea 1 and divisions 4RST, have maintained stable over the past 20 years, consistently above levels associated with . Fishing mortality rates have remained below reference points for throughout this period, with 2024 assessments projecting no medium-term decline below limit thresholds, attributable to lower pressure and the ' deep-water distribution limiting exploitation intensity relative to shallower-water congeners.

Economic and Cultural Significance

Commercial Value and Market Dynamics

Commercial landings of in 2023 totaled approximately 22 million pounds, valued at $90 million ex-vessel, underscoring its dominant role in North American fisheries compared to the much smaller sector, where U.S. landings reached 77,800 pounds valued at $493,500. These values reflect quota-driven harvests, with Pacific allocations managed under the International Pacific Halibut Commission, contributing to broader ex-vessel revenues exceeding $2 billion annually, though halibut specifically drives premium pricing due to its size and quality. Halibut enters international markets primarily as fresh or frozen fillets, with major export destinations including the and Asian countries such as , , and South Korea, where demand for high-value whitefish sustains trade volumes. In South Korea, halibut is imported primarily from the North Pacific or Atlantic regions and is regarded as a premium, high-priced seafood item, though less common than locally produced flatfish such as the olive flounder. Ex-vessel prices typically range from $5 to $10 per pound, influenced by supply constraints; for instance, 2025 Pacific quotas were reduced by 18% to 19.7 million pounds commercially, leading to elevated prices amid slower initial landings and tighter availability. Such fluctuations demonstrate causal links between assessments, quota reductions, and market premiums, as lower supply volumes amplify value per unit without corresponding contraction. Processing occurs mainly in and , where facilities handle filleting and freezing to meet export standards, supported by systems under (MSC) certification for U.S. North Pacific and Canadian Atlantic fisheries. This certification facilitates premium market access by verifying sustainable sourcing, reducing risks from claims and enabling chain-of-custody tracking from vessel to consumer, which bolsters economic stability in volatile global seafood trade.

Contributions to Local Economies

The drives multiplier effects in local economies, amplifying initial landings through processing, supply chains, and . In 2019, each dollar (or equivalent in Canadian dollars) of commercial landings generated more than four dollars in total economic output across the and , encompassing direct harvest value, indirect business inputs, and induced household expenditures. This ratio, derived from multiregional input-output modeling, highlights cross-jurisdictional flows benefiting coastal harvest regions and inland processing and distribution hubs. In , halibut fishing integrates into the broader sector, supporting employment in vessel crews, processing plants, and ancillary services in rural communities. The state's industry, including halibut contributions, sustained 37,400 jobs and $2.2 billion in labor income in , with halibut's role evident in its share of ex-vessel values and associated shoreside activities. The commercial halibut fleet alone generated an estimated $325 million in total U.S. economic impacts, distributing benefits beyond through national markets and value-added products. Recreational halibut angling further bolsters regional economies via angler expenditures. In Oregon, the 2024 sport halibut season produced about $3.4 million in economic activity from costs like fuel, bait, and tackle, sustaining jobs in charter operations and marine services. Similar patterns occur in California, where limited quotas support localized spending in northern ports, though precise quantification remains challenging due to variable participation and data gaps in recreational valuations. These activities underscore halibut's role in diversifying income streams for communities dependent on marine resources.

Culinary and Nutritional Uses

Nutritional Composition

Halibut flesh provides a lean profile of high-quality protein with moderate fat content, primarily from polyunsaturated fatty acids including omega-3s. According to USDA data for cooked Pacific halibut (dry heat), a 100-gram serving contains approximately 111 kilocalories, 23.96 grams of protein, 1.33 grams of total fat (of which about 0.4 grams are EPA and DHA combined), and negligible carbohydrates. The low fat content classifies halibut as a white fish, with seasonal variations in lipid levels influenced by spawning cycles, typically peaking slightly higher in pre-spawning periods but remaining under 3 grams per 100 grams year-round in wild specimens. Key micronutrients include (approximately 47 micrograms per 100 grams, exceeding 85% of the daily value), (1.6 micrograms, about 67% daily value), (270 milligrams, 22% daily value), and niacin (6.2 milligrams, 39% daily value), supporting metabolic and functions. Omega-3 fatty acids, particularly EPA (0.18 grams) and DHA (0.23 grams) per 100 grams, contribute benefits, though at lower levels than fattier like .
Nutrient (per 100g cooked)Amount% Daily Value*
Calories111 kcal-
Protein23.96 g48%
Total Fat1.33 g2%
Omega-3 (EPA + DHA)~0.41 g-
47 85%
1.6 67%
270 mg22%
*Based on a 2,000-calorie diet; sourced from USDA FoodData Central. Mercury concentrations in halibut average 0.241 parts per million (ppm), lower than in albacore tuna (0.350 ppm) but higher than light tuna (0.128 ppm), positioning it as a moderate-risk option for frequent consumption per FDA monitoring (1990-2012). Farmed halibut is rare, comprising less than 1% of supply, with nutritional profiles similar to wild but potentially higher in total due to controlled feeds; wild halibut predominates and aligns with the above values.

Preparation and Consumption Practices


Halibut preparation begins with filleting the fish to yield large, boneless portions or bone-in steaks, leveraging its firm flesh for versatile cuts that maintain structural integrity during cooking. These cuts are typically skinned and portioned to remove any remaining bones, ensuring clean presentation. Common cooking methods prioritize moisture retention to counter the fish's lean nature, including pan-searing at high heat for a crisp exterior while targeting an internal of 130-135°F to achieve flakiness without dryness. at 375°F with coverings like foil or , over medium-high heat, and in aromatic liquids or oils—such as low-heat or —further preserve tenderness, with times of 8-10 minutes sufficing for fillets. Overcooking beyond 145°F risks toughness, so precise thermometry is recommended. Traditional practices among indigenous Alaskan communities and Nordic cultures often involve smoking halibut, using dry brines followed by hot-smoking at controlled temperatures for preservation and flavor infusion, or cold-smoking below 85°F for subtler smokiness. In contemporary global applications, halibut commands demand as a premium whitefish, adapted to techniques like Asian-inspired with ginger and for subtle enhancement. Safety considerations address potential parasites, such as nematodes, prevalent in marine fish; thorough cooking to 140°F for at least one minute eliminates viable larvae, rendering consumption empirically low-risk when handled properly from catch to plate. Freezing at -4°F for seven days prior to raw uses, though uncommon for halibut, provides an alternative safeguard. Proper filleting and immediate minimize during processing.

Species Commonly Misidentified as Halibut

The California halibut (Paralichthys californicus), a species endemic to the eastern Pacific from California to Baja California, is frequently misidentified as true halibut despite belonging to the family Paralichthyidae rather than Pleuronectidae. Unlike true halibut, which are consistently right-eyed with both eyes on the right side, California halibut are predominantly left-eyed, though rare right-eyed individuals occur; this asymmetry arises from different metamorphic patterns in their development. Morphologically, they exhibit a more rounded body shape compared to the diamond-like form of Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis), attain smaller maximum sizes (typically under 60 pounds versus over 500 pounds for Pacific halibut), and possess fewer dorsal fin rays (around 77 versus 80 or more). Their dentition is less prominent, lacking the large, canine-like teeth characteristic of true halibut, which aids in distinguishing fillets or whole specimens. The , commonly known as fluke (Paralichthys dentatus), native to the western Atlantic from to , represents another frequent case of mislabeling as halibut due to superficial similarities. Like , fluke are left-eyed members of Paralichthys, featuring a laterally compressed body with eyes and mouth on the left side, contrasting the right-eyed orientation of true halibut genera such as Hippoglossus. Key differentiators include fluke's smaller average size (up to 20 pounds), more arched mouth profile with smaller teeth, and distinct coloration patterns with prominent spots or stripes absent in most halibut. These traits enable identification via eye placement and , essential for avoiding confusion in markets where visual similarity prompts substitution. Other flounders, such as (Paralichthys olivaceus) or rock sole (Lepidopsetta spp.), occasionally substitute for halibut in commerce, often detected through revealing mismatches in mitochondrial COI gene sequences. Empirical studies indicate variable mislabeling rates for halibut, with outlets showing up to 77% substitution by cheaper flounders like , though broader market surveys report lower overall fraud around 20-30% when acceptable market names are considered. These findings underscore morphological keys—eye sidedness, body proportions, and fin ray counts—as reliable for differentiation, reducing risks from economic incentives for substitution with less valuable taxa.

References

  1. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/pacific-halibut
  2. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/atlantic-halibut
  3. https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/aqspecies/2542/en
  4. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/3100/noaa_3100_DS1.pdf
  5. https://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/Assets/ecosystems/climate/images/species-results/pdfs/Atlantic_Halibut.pdf
  6. https://www.iphc.int/fisheries/commercial-fisheries/
  7. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/feature-story/7-reasons-why-size-matters-halibut
  8. https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=halibut.main
  9. https://www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/public/public/web/NEROINET/prot_res/CandidateSpeciesProgram/Atlantic%2520halibut%2520final%2520fact%2520sheet_032107.pdf
  10. https://www.britannica.com/animal/halibut
  11. https://www.etymonline.com/word/halibut
  12. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/halibut
  13. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/Hippoglossus-hippoglossus
  14. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/514
  15. https://www.hi.no/en/hi/temasider/species/halibut
  16. https://wdfw.wa.gov/species-habitats/species/hippoglossus-stenolepis
  17. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/f84-127
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9541706/
  19. https://www.iphc.int/research/population-genetics/
  20. https://academic.oup.com/jhered/article/109/3/326/4609799
  21. https://thefishsite.com/articles/mapping-the-sex-determination-locus-in-atlantic-halibut-using-rad-sequencing
  22. https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article/78/7/2371/6333511
  23. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/f88-001
  24. https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/education/wns/pacific_halibut.pdf
  25. https://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/pdf-content/fish-bull/norcross.pdf
  26. https://www.iphc.int/uploads/2023/10/IPHC-1997-TR036.pdf
  27. https://www.iphc.int/uploads/pdf/sr/IPHC-2006-SR082.pdf
  28. https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=halibut.printerfriendly
  29. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00008255
  30. https://apps-afsc.fisheries.noaa.gov/Publications/AFSC-TM/NOAA-TM-AFSC-22.pdf
  31. https://www.iphc.int/uploads/2023/10/IPHC-2008-TR052.pdf
  32. https://aksalmonco.com/blogs/learn/atlantic-halibut-facts
  33. https://www.fishalaskamagazine.com/alaska-halibut/
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226853148_Divergent_foraging_strategies_of_three_co-occurring_north_Pacific_flatfishes
  35. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/Hippoglossus-hippoglossus.html
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/A-Orlov-2/publication/253542546_Feeding_habits_of_Pacific_halibut_Hippoglossus_stenolepis_in_the_western_North_Pacific/links/0deec51f91f95ca50b000000/Feeding-habits-of-Pacific-halibut-Hippoglossus-stenolepis-in-the-western-North-Pacific.pdf
  37. https://iphc.int/uploads/pdf/tech0059.pdf
  38. https://iphc.int/uploads/pdf/sr/IPHC-1984-SR070.pdf
  39. https://www.iphc.int/research/pacific-halibut-stock-status-biology/
  40. https://iphc.int/uploads/pdf/tr/IPHC-1973-TR009.pdf
  41. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23308249.2021.1948502
  42. https://www.iphc.int/uploads/pdf/sr/IPHC-1983-SR067.pdf
  43. https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=halibut.uses
  44. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2024.1424002/full
  45. https://globalseafoods.com/blogs/news/history-pacific-halibut-fishing
  46. https://www.nationalfisherman.com/110-years-of-halibut-and-heritage-the-legacy-of-the-fishing-vessel-owners-association
  47. https://www.iphc.int/about/the-commission/
  48. https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article/73/4/1104/2458915
  49. https://www.undercurrentnews.com/2025/01/31/iphc-slashes-2025s-pacific-halibut-tcey-by-18/
  50. https://www.npfmc.org/fisheries-issues/catch-shares-allocations/ifq/
  51. https://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/11391_alaska-ifq.pdf
  52. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/03/21/2025-04803/pacific-halibut-fisheries-catch-sharing-plan-2025-annual-management-measures
  53. https://www.pcouncil.org/documents/2025/01/2025-pacific-halibut-catch-sharing-plan.pdf/
  54. https://www.iphc.int/data/fishery-limits-2025/
  55. https://sustainablefisheries-uw.org/seafood-101/commercial-fishing-methods/
  56. https://www.seachoice.org/info-centre/fisheries/fishing-gear-types/
  57. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/2025-west-coast-pacific-halibut-directed-commercial-fishery
  58. https://www.regulations.gov/document/NOAA-NMFS-2025-0014-0001
  59. https://www.iphc.int/uploads/pdf/economics/2021/iphc-2021-econ-02.pdf
  60. https://www.alfafish.org/halibut
  61. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/alaska/recreational-fishing/sport-fishing-halibut-alaska
  62. https://wdfw.wa.gov/fishing/regulations/halibut/puget-sound
  63. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/alaska/sustainable-fisheries/subsistence-halibut-fishing-alaska
  64. https://www.iphc.int/fisheries/subsistence-fisheries/
  65. https://homerhalibuthunters.com/every-halibut-counts/
  66. https://www.iphc.int/research/stock-assessment/
  67. https://www.iphc.int/uploads/2024/12/IPHC-2025-AM101-11-Data-overview-and-stock-assessment.pdf
  68. https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1161221826009718&id=100063657336513
  69. https://www.seafoodnews.com/Story/1296716/IPHC-Cuts-Pacific-Halibut-Catch-Limits-By-More-than-15-percent-Coastwide-for-2025
  70. https://sportfishingbc.com/threads/2024-25-halibut-stock-assessment.97608/
  71. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2025/mpo-dfo/fs70-7/Fs70-7-2025-008-eng.pdf
  72. https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/Publications/ScR-RS/2024/2024_007-eng.html
  73. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2025/mpo-dfo/fs70-6/Fs70-6-2025-013-eng.pdf
  74. https://www.nafo.int/Portals/0/PDFs/rb/2024/redbook2024_final.pdf
  75. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/development-individual-fishing-quota-ifq-program-sablefish-and-halibut-longline
  76. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-04-487t.pdf
  77. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/downloads/9z903071n
  78. https://www.resources.org/archives/catching-market-efficiencies-quota-based-fisheries-management/
  79. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/60/10/780/231477
  80. https://alaskafish.news/12/2024/npfmc-redux-more-on-bering-sea-halibut-and-snow-crab-bycatch-for-2025/
  81. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/03/18/2025-04406/fisheries-of-the-exclusive-economic-zone-off-alaska-bering-sea-and-aleutian-islands-final-2025-and
  82. https://www.npfmc.org/fisheries-issues/bycatch/halibut-bycatch/
  83. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08920753.2019.1564954
  84. https://www.rff.org/documents/1742/RFF-DP-16-39.pdf
  85. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/17051/noaa_17051_DS1.pdf
  86. https://skemman.is/bitstream/1946/12800/4/Ryan%2520O%2527Connell%2520-%2520Reconciling%2520participants%2520values%2520in%2520the%2520BC%2520Pacific%2520halibut%2520allocation%2520dispute%2520%2528Skemman%2529.pdf
  87. https://www.uaf.edu/cfos/research/projects/fishery-climate-and-eco/
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8752724/
  89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783622003174
  90. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/03/18/2024-05481/pacific-halibut-fisheries-catch-sharing-plan-2024-annual-management-measures
  91. https://www.seafoodnews.com/Story/1301723/ANALYSIS-The-2025-Pacific-Halibut-Season-Begins-Amid-Quota-Reductions-and-Tariff-Uncertainty
  92. https://apps-st.fisheries.noaa.gov/sis/docServlet?fileAction=download&fileId=9875
  93. https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/Publications/ResDocs-DocRech/2024/2024_001-eng.html
  94. https://www.nafo.int/Portals/0/PDFs/sc/2024/scr24-022REV.pdf
  95. https://www.nafo.int/Portals/0/PDFs/Advice/2024/ghl01.pdf
  96. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/2023-pacific-halibut-directed-commercial-fishery
  97. https://www.msc.org/what-you-can-do/eat-sustainable-seafood/foodies-guides/sustainable-halibut
  98. https://www.nationalfisherman.com/pacific-halibut-fishery-gets-off-to-a-slow-start-with-high-prices
  99. https://www.seafoodnews.com/Story/1317487/ANALYSIS-Pacific-Halibut-Market-Facing-Tight-Quotas-Low-Landings-and-High-Prices
  100. https://fisheries.msc.org/en/fisheries/us-north-pacific-halibut-and-sablefish/
  101. https://fisheries.msc.org/en/fisheries/canada-atlantic-halibut/
  102. https://www.seafoodsource.com/news/environment-sustainability/halibut-sablefish-earn-msc-re-certification
  103. https://iphc.int/uploads/pdf/economics/2022/iphc-2022-econ-01.pdf
  104. https://www.iphc.int/uploads/pdf/srb/srb020/iphc-2022-srb020-09.pdf
  105. https://www.alaskaseafood.org/wp-content/uploads/MRG_ASMI-Economic-Impacts-Report_final.pdf
  106. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165783622002260
  107. https://myodfw.com/articles/2024-sport-halibut-newsletter
  108. https://www.pcouncil.org/documents/2024/07/socioeconomic-analyses-for-the-2025-26-harvest-specifications-and-management-measures.pdf
  109. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/pacific-halibut/seafood
  110. https://seafood.oregonstate.edu/sites/agscid7/files/snic/omega-3-content-in-fish.pdf
  111. https://www.fda.gov/food/environmental-contaminants-food/mercury-levels-commercial-fish-and-shellfish-1990-2012
  112. https://qualityseafooddelivery.com/halibut/wild/
  113. https://www.fishalaskamagazine.com/how-to-fillet-halibut/
  114. https://snakeriverfarms.com/blogs/srf-journal/how-to-cook-halibut
  115. https://feelgoodfoodie.net/recipe/pan-seared-halibut/
  116. https://delivisor.com/blog/4-steps-to-baking-halibut-without-drying-it-out/
  117. https://wildalaskancompany.com/blog/how-to-poach-halibut
  118. https://globalseafoods.com/blogs/news/smoked-pacific-halibut
  119. https://www.oakbayseafood.com/fish-tales/posts/halibut-and-cold-smoked-fish-easy-seafood-to-use
  120. https://biancaosbourne.com/2019/04/asian-style-poached-halibut-how-to-poach-fish
  121. https://www.ndow.org/blog/fish-parasites/
  122. https://www.food.gov.uk/business-guidance/freezing-fish-fishery-products-and-treatment-for-parasites
  123. https://owlcation.com/stem/halibut-facts-large-and-strange-saltwater-fish
  124. https://www.norcalkayakanglers.com/index.php?topic=103578.0
  125. https://thestonesoupcook.com/2024/04/24/california-halibut-or-calibut-pacific-halibut-arugula-and-beet-salad-and-my-abundant-market-continued/
  126. https://www.reddit.com/r/Fishing/comments/1buqgsq/what_is_the_difference_between_fluke_flounder_and/
  127. https://aksalmonco.com/blogs/learn/halibut-vs-flounder
  128. https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/bait-and-switch-ucla-study-finds-fish-fraud-runs-rampant
  129. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28075039/
  130. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373571706_DNA_barcoding_revealed_a_high_percentage_of_mislabeling_in_commercial_fish_products_the_first_empirical_survey_in_South_Texas
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.