Hubbry Logo
MesocycloneMesocycloneMain
Open search
Mesocyclone
Community hub
Mesocyclone
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mesocyclone
Mesocyclone
Mesocyclone
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A mesocyclone (at left) in the Central Zone of the city of Piracicaba, in southeastern Brazil, on January 28, 2025.
Supercell diagram with the mesocyclone rotation in red.
Part of a series on
Weather
Temperate and polar seasons
Tropical seasons
Storms
Precipitation
Topics
Glossaries
icon Weather portal

A mesocyclone is a meso-gamma mesoscale (or storm scale) region of rotation (vortex), typically around 2 to 6 mi (3.2 to 9.7 km) in diameter, most often noticed on radar within thunderstorms. In the Northern Hemisphere, it is usually located in the right rear flank (back edge with respect to direction of movement) of a supercell, or often on the eastern, or leading, flank of a high-precipitation variety of supercell. The area overlaid by a mesocyclone’s circulation may be several miles (km) wide, but substantially larger than any tornado that may develop within it, and it is within mesocyclones that intense tornadoes form.[1][2]

Description

[edit]

Mesocyclones are medium-scale vortices of rising and converging air that circulate around a vertical axis. They are most often associated with a local region of low-pressure. Their rotation is (usually) in the same direction as low pressure systems in a given hemisphere: counter-clockwise in the northern, and clockwise in the southern hemisphere, with the only occasional exceptions being the smallest-scale mesocyclones. Mesoanticyclones that rotate in an opposite direction may accompany mesocyclones within a supercell but these tend to be weaker and often more transient than mesocyclones, which can be sustained for tens of minutes or hours, and also cyclically form in succession within a supercell. Mesoanticyclones are relatively common with left-moving supercells that split from parent supercells in certain vertical wind shear regimes.

A mesocyclone is usually a phenomenon that is difficult to observe directly. Visual evidence of rotation – such as curved inflow bands – may suggest the presence of a mesocyclone, but the cylinder of circulating air is often too large to be recognized when viewed from the ground, or may not carry clouds distinct enough from the surrounding calmer air to make the circulating air flow obvious.

Mesocyclones are identified by Doppler weather radar observations as a rotation signature which meets specific criteria for magnitude, vertical depth, and duration. On U.S. NEXRAD radar displays, algorithmically identified mesocyclones, such as by the mesocyclone detection algorithm (MDA), are typically highlighted by a yellow solid circle on the Doppler velocity display; other weather services may have other conventions.[citation needed]

Within thunderstorms

[edit]

They are of greatest concern when contained within severe thunderstorms, since mesocyclones often occur together with updrafts in supercells, within which tornadoes may form near the interchange with a downdraft.

Mesocyclones are localized, approximately 2 km (1.2 mi) to 10 km (6.2 mi) in diameter within strong thunderstorms.[3] Thunderstorms containing persistent mesocyclones are supercell thunderstorms (although some supercells and even tornadic storms do not produce lightning or thunder and thus are not technically thunderstorms). Doppler weather radar is used to identify mesocyclones. A mesovortex is a similar but typically smaller and weaker rotational feature associated with squall lines.

Formation

[edit]

One of the main ingredients for mesocyclogenesis is the presence of strong changes in wind speed over distance and direction with height, also known as horizontal and vertical wind shear. This shear classically coincides with the presence of a strong trough which may lead to an extratropical cyclone, a type of cyclone that forms through the interactions between cold and warm air, known as baroclinicity. The pressure and temperature gradients between warm and cold air cause these changes in the wind with height and over distance. The resulting sheared wind field is said to have horizontal vorticity, or the local tendency of the flowing fluid (here, air) to rotate, which is a property fundamental to any flow where velocity gradients exist.

The associated vorticity is often incorrectly depicted as a horizontally-rolling vortex that is directly tilted into the vertical by a rising updraft. However, in the majority of cases, the environment is horizontally homogenous with horizontal roll vortexes being absent. Horizontal vorticity can instead be thought as an imaginary paddle wheel that is set spinning by the winds that change with height. These winds move the top and bottom of the wheel at different speeds along the horizontal direction, causing it to twist along its axis.[4][5] This local tendency for rotation, or twisting, is what the updraft reorients, rather than a literal tube or vortex of rotating air. When an updraft forms in this environment, ascending air parcels encounter faster sheared air across height, which is entrained and turbulently mixed at the edge of the updraft, exchanging horizontal momentum. The rising air at the edge speeds up sideways faster than it's moving inward, forcing inner slower air to then also move faster horizontally. Air parcels then begin to curve as they move towards and overshoot the updraft's center of low pressure, following into a spiral as the process repeats. As the air parcels curve they also rotate about their axis due to the wind shear's twisting motion. This curving, spiraling or rotating motion of the wind can exist without the air necessarily spinning as a vortex.[6]

At this point, the updraft is then said to have differentially advected the momentum of the sheared flow; that is, the differences between the flowing air over a horizontal direction is translated to a vertical direction, resulting in curvature vorticity or the apparent curving and spiraling seen in the rising air (only when horizontal vorticity is streamwise, or parallel to the updraft's inflow). However only a segment of a vortex arises; the streamlines are not closed, and there are asymmetries as not all air parcels are rising equally or spiraling at the same rate and direction, so true uniform rotation does not yet exist. In order for organized rotation (an enclosed vortex) to exist, the resulting curvature vorticity must be partially converted to vertical shear vorticity.

The updraft's pressure field primarily aids in this process, working to reorganize the curvature vorticity so that as the rising and spiraling air moves towards the center of low pressure, adjacent air parcels flowing across the updraft's pressure gradient begin rotating at different rates relative to each other. This creates vertical shear vorticity that enhances further rising air motion. The older air now more easily escapes the updraft and the low pressure center strengthens, then contracts in response, tightening the pressure gradient and causing converging air to rise even higher and faster. The effect is that the updraft is "stretched" upward as it more efficiently sucks up air, with rotation then becoming more organized due to conservation of angular momentum. Since the updraft now pulls in air more strongly, it pulls in more mass and momentum from the surrounding environment, which is conserved in the updraft. In nature this process happens simultaneously with the advection of the wind shear's momentum.

As air parcels continue to converge towards the center of low pressure, parcels closer to the center rotate faster and so are tugged outward due to centrifugal forces, while outer slower moving parcels move inward. The inner faster rotating air exerts a pressure force against the slower moving air, and causes the slower air to speed up. This continues until most air parcels have reached a uniform rate of rotation. Curvature vorticity and vertical shear vorticity are now in balance, and the result is a single coherent vortex that emerges in the updraft. A mesocyclone has formed (spinning counterclockwise in the Northern Hemisphere, and clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere) and the incipient supercell storm fully matures.[6]

As the low-level mesocyclone continues to ingest horizontal vorticity, vorticity maximums or vortex patches (areas of slight rotation or transient vortices) may form alongside the boundary where the updraft and its downdrafts – the cool and moist forward flank downdraft (FFD) and the, often, warmer and more buoyant rear flank downdraft (RFD) – meet due to the interactions between the warmer and cooler air masses. Surges in the RFD often coincide with the consolidation of these vortex patches, and may lead to tornadogenesis as a result. This is visually indicated by the formation of a wall cloud or other low cloud structures near the surface as the updraft strengthens from its interactions with the RFD.[7]

The gallery below shows the three stages of development of a mesocyclone and a view of the storm relative motion on radar of a mesocyclone-producing tornado over Greensburg, Kansas on 4 May 2007. The storm was in the process of producing an EF5 tornado at the time of the image.

  • Wind shear (red) sets air spinning (green).
    Wind shear (red) sets air spinning (green).
  • The updraft (blue) 'tips' the spinning air upright.
    The updraft (blue) 'tips' the spinning air upright.
  • The updraft then starts rotating.
    The updraft then starts rotating.
  • Radar view of a mesocyclone. Note that at the time of this image, an EF5 tornado was on the ground.
    Radar view of a mesocyclone. Note that at the time of this image, an EF5 tornado was on the ground.

Identification

[edit]

The most reliable way to detect a mesocyclone is by Doppler weather radar. Nearby high values of opposite sign within velocity data are how they are detected.[8] Mesocyclones are most often located in the right-rear flank of supercell thunderstorms and when embedded within squall lines (whereas mesovortices most often form in the front flank of squall lines), and may be distinguished by a hook echo rotation signature on a weather radar map. Visual cues such as a rotating wall cloud or tornado may also hint at the presence of a mesocyclone. This is why the term has entered into wider usage in connection with rotating features in severe storms.

  • Mesocyclones are sometimes visually identifiable by a rotating wall cloud like the one in this thunderstorm over Texas.
    Mesocyclones are sometimes visually identifiable by a rotating wall cloud like the one in this thunderstorm over Texas.
  • Mesocyclone detection algorithm output on tornadic cells in Northern Michigan on July 3, 1999.
    Mesocyclone detection algorithm output on tornadic cells in Northern Michigan on July 3, 1999.

Tornado formation

[edit]
A tornado developing under a wall cloud within a mesocyclone near Falcon, Colorado.
See also: Tornado

Tornado formation is not completely understood, but often occurs in one of two ways.[9][10]

In the first method, two conditions must be satisfied. First, a horizontal spinning effect must form on the Earth's surface. This usually originates in sudden changes in wind direction or speed, known as wind shear.[11] Second, a cumulonimbus cloud, or occasionally a cumulus cloud, must be present.[11]

During a thunderstorm, updrafts are occasionally powerful enough to lift the horizontal spinning row of air upwards, turning it into a vertical air column. This vertical air column then becomes the basic structure for the tornado. Tornadoes that form in this way are often weak and generally last less than 10 minutes.[11]

The second method occurs during a supercell thunderstorm, in updrafts within the storm. When winds intensify, the force released can cause the updrafts to rotate. This rotating updraft is known as a mesocyclone.[12]

For a tornado to form in this manner, a rear-flank downdraft enters the center of the mesocyclone from the back. Cold air, being denser than warm air, is able to penetrate the updraft. The combination of the updraft and downdraft completes the development of a tornado. Tornadoes that form in this method are often violent and can last over an hour.[11]

Mesoscale convective vortex

[edit]
Main article: Mesoscale convective vortex

A mesoscale convective vortex (MCV), also known as a mesoscale vorticity center or Neddy eddy,[13] is a mesocyclone within a mesoscale convective system (MCS) that pulls winds into a circling pattern, or vortex, at the mid levels of the troposphere and is normally associated with anticyclonic outflow aloft, with a region of aeronautically troublesome wind shear between the upper and lower air. With a core only 30 to 60 miles (48 to 97 km) wide and 1 to 3 miles (1.6 to 4.8 km) deep, an MCV is often overlooked in standard weather maps. MCVs can persist for up to two days after its parent mesoscale convective system has dissipated.[13]

The orphaned MCV can become the seed of the next thunderstorm outbreak. An MCV that moves into tropical waters, such as the Gulf of Mexico, can serve as the nucleus for a tropical cyclone. An example of this was Hurricane Barry in 2019. MCVs can produce very large wind storms; sometimes winds can reach over 100 miles per hour (160 km/h). The May 2009 Southern Midwest Derecho was an extreme progressive derecho and mesoscale convective vortex event that struck southeastern Kansas, southern Missouri, and southwestern Illinois on 8 May 2009.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mesocyclone

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A mesocyclone is a storm-scale of , typically 2–6 miles (3–10 km) in diameter, consisting of a deep and persistent rotating within a . This cyclonically rotating vortex forms in convective storms and is characterized by significant vertical , distinguishing thunderstorms from ordinary cellular . Mesocyclones are primarily detected using , which identifies rotation patterns through criteria such as azimuthal shear, vertical depth, and duration, often via algorithms like the WSR-88D Mesocyclone Detection Algorithm. They play a critical role in , as the strong rotation can stretch and intensify low-level , creating conditions favorable for genesis, though not all mesocyclones produce tornadoes. In supercells, the mesocyclone often appears in the right rear flank relative to the storm's motion, contributing to the development of hook echoes on radar imagery. The formation of mesocyclones is driven by environmental factors including vertical , , and , which sustain the rotating against precipitation loading. indicates that mesocyclones are key precursors to the most destructive tornadoes, with studies emphasizing their quasi-steady nature and association with , , and damaging winds in environments.

Definition and Characteristics

Definition

A mesocyclone is defined as a cyclonically rotating vortex, around 2–10 km in diameter, within a convective storm, with associated in the range of or greater. This rotation manifests as a deep, persistent that distinguishes it as a key feature of , often spanning vertical depths of several kilometers and lasting 30 minutes or longer to meet observational criteria. As a mesoscale phenomenon, a mesocyclone operates on horizontal scales of 1–100 km, fitting within the broader meteorological classification of mesoscale convective systems while being smaller than synoptic-scale cyclones and larger than sub-mesoscale features like individual tornadoes, which typically measure under 1 km in diameter. This scale positions it as a storm-scale , integral to the dynamics of thunderstorms but not encompassing the full storm structure. The term "mesocyclone" originated in the early 1970s among U.S. meteorologists at institutions like the National Severe Storms Laboratory, coined to describe rotations revealed by pioneering observations of thunderstorms. Its basic structure typically includes a mid-level mesocyclone centered at altitudes of 3–7 km above ground level, where the primary rotation develops, potentially accompanied by a low-level mesocyclone below 3 km that enhances near-surface . Mesocyclones most commonly occur within thunderstorms, where the sustained rotation contributes to their severe potential.

Physical Properties

Mesocyclones typically exhibit horizontal diameters ranging from 3 to 10 kilometers, encompassing a meso-gamma scale region of organized rotation within severe thunderstorms. Their vertical extent often spans from near the surface up to altitudes of 10 to 15 kilometers, aligning with the depth of updrafts that sustain the vortex. The rotation in mesocyclones features tangential speeds generally between 20 and 50 meters per second, with peak velocities contributing to the storm's rotational . The detectable rotation in observations typically persists for at least 10 minutes, with overall mesocyclone lifetimes often exceeding 30 minutes. Structurally, these vortices are often tilted with height due to , with the axis of rotation shifting from more vertical at mid-levels to increasingly inclined aloft. Intensity of mesocyclones is quantified using the Mesocyclone Strength Index (MSI) and associated strength ranks, as implemented in radar algorithms, where ranks from 1 to 25 (with higher values indicating stronger ) help classify weak to violent vortices based on shear magnitude and depth. Mesocyclones predominantly rotate cyclonically, counterclockwise in the , accounting for approximately 90% of observed cases, while anticyclonic variants ( ) are rarer and typically occur in mirror-image left-moving supercells.

Context in Thunderstorms

Role in Supercell Development

The mesocyclone serves as the defining characteristic of thunderstorms, manifesting as a deep, persistent rotating that sets apart from other convective storms. This rotation arises from the tilting and stretching of environmental within the , enabling the storm to maintain and longevity far beyond typical multicell or storms. Supercells featuring mesocyclones are responsible for nearly all instances of very large and violent (EF4-EF5) tornadoes, underscoring their disproportionate impact on despite their relative rarity. Within the supercell lifecycle, the emerges prominently during the mature stage, where it drives key structural features such as the overhang through tilt and supports extensive production by suspending supercooled water droplets in a bounded weak echo region (BWER). As the storm evolves, the mesocyclone's sustained rotation persists for 1-4 hours, fueling the storm's deviation from linear propagation and promoting isolated development. This integration allows supercells to outlast non-rotating storms, often dominating local patterns. At the storm scale, the mesocyclone's organizes into distinct forward-flank and rear-flank downdrafts, which encircle and protect the main from entrainment of dry air and , thereby preserving its intensity. This partitioning enhances speeds exceeding 50 m/s in some cases, contributing to the supercell's overall vigor and potential for severe hazards.

Environmental Prerequisites

Mesocyclones typically form in environments characterized by high (CAPE), with values exceeding 2000 J/kg providing the necessary for robust updrafts that sustain . Low lifted levels (LCL) below 1500 m above ground level further favor development by allowing parcels to reach their level of free quickly, enhancing updraft intensity. Veering wind profiles with height, where winds shift clockwise from southeasterly at the surface to southwesterly aloft, generate storm-relative helicity (SRH) that supports persistent mesocyclonic . Vertical is critical, particularly 0-6 km bulk shear greater than 15 m/s, which tilts horizontal generated by the veering winds into the vertical axis, amplifying rotation within the . Abundant low-level , indicated by surface dewpoints above 15°C (60°F), supplies the fuel for intense , while mid-level dry air promotes evaporative cooling in rear-flank downdrafts, helping to separate from the and maintain organization. These conditions are most prevalent in the of the , known as , where synoptic patterns such as drylines—sharp boundaries between moist Gulf air and dry continental air—provide ideal lifting mechanisms and enhance low-level shear.

Formation Processes

Vorticity Dynamics

In mesocyclones, the initiation of rotation begins with the generation of horizontal , primarily through baroclinic processes driven by horizontal temperature gradients along boundaries such as gust fronts or drylines. These gradients create density contrasts that induce solenoidal circulations, producing horizontal aligned streamwise with the low-level inflow. For instance, in environments, the forward-flank gust front often features sharp gradients that generate magnitudes on the order of 10^{-2} s^{-1}, contributing to the rotational potential of the storm. This horizontal vorticity is then tilted into the vertical by the storm's , transforming it into vertical that establishes initial mid-level characteristic of the mesocyclone. The tilting occurs as inflow parcels ascend, reorienting vortex lines from horizontal to vertical orientations, typically at altitudes between 3 and 6 km where the is strongest. This mechanism is fundamental to mesocyclone development, as it converts ambient shear into organized without requiring initial vertical spin. The vertical component of vorticity, denoted as ζ\zeta, is mathematically expressed in Cartesian coordinates as ζ=∂v∂x−∂u∂y,\zeta = \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}, where uu and vv represent the zonal and meridional components, respectively. This initial spin-up manifests as weak , often quantified by storm-relative helicity (SRH) exceeding 150 m²/s² in the low levels, which measures the potential for updraft-relative streamwise and is derived from environmental profiles. Environmental vertical provides the necessary background for these processes, enhancing the efficiency of baroclinic generation.

Updraft Interaction

The interaction between the thunderstorm updraft and the mesocyclone primarily involves vertical stretching of filaments, which amplifies the rotational intensity. As the ascends, it draws in and elongates these elements, conserving and thereby increasing the Ω\Omega according to the relation Ω∝1r2\Omega \propto \frac{1}{r^2}, where rr is the radius of rotation. This stretching effect, often likened to an ice skater pulling in their arms, concentrates the rotation within a narrower column, typically strongest in the mid-levels where the acceleration peaks. Initial vertical arises from the tilting of environmental horizontal into the , setting the stage for this amplification. A loop emerges as the intensifying generates reductions at the mesocyclone core, further bolstering the . The produces centrifugal and effects that lower the perturbation pressure, drawing in more air parcels and sustaining a tighter, more organized vortex. This enhanced , in turn, promotes additional stretching and convergence, leading to smaller mesocyclone cores with intensified . The loop maintains the mesocyclone's coherence until disrupted by broader storm dynamics. Over time, the mid-level mesocyclone, initially centered around 3-6 km above ground level, undergoes descent, narrowing and intensifying as it interacts with lower-level inflows. This downward migration, driven by the updraft's persistence and rear-flank downdraft influences, can spawn a distinct low-level mesocyclone near 1 km altitude, completing a full rotating column from mid- to low levels. Mesocyclones typically persist for 30-60 minutes, aligned with the 's lifecycle, before as the weakens due to entrainment of drier environmental air or the incursion of cold outflow boundaries. Entrainment dilutes the 's , while outflows from evaporatively cooled downdrafts disrupt the inflow, halting the stretching process and allowing the rotation to decay.

Detection Methods

Radar-Based Identification

Mesocyclones are primarily detected using systems, which measure radial velocities to identify rotational signatures in Doppler velocity data that reveal couplets of inbound (negative) and outbound (positive) winds on opposite sides of the circulation center. These couplets typically exhibit differential velocities exceeding 25 m/s, with peak tangential velocities around 25 m/s at a core of approximately 3 km, indicating in thunderstorms. For a cyclonic mesocyclone, inbound winds appear on the left and outbound on the right relative to the radar's viewing direction, allowing forecasters to distinguish from linear wind patterns. The Mesocyclone Detection Algorithm (MDA), integrated into the (WSR-88D) network, automates detection by applying to identify symmetric regions of azimuthal shear in Doppler data across multiple angles. Key thresholds include tangential shear of at least 14.4 per hour (high shear mode) or 7.2 per hour (low shear mode), of at least 540 km² per hour (high) or 180 km² per hour (low), and features extending up to 8 km in height, with the mesocyclone base often at lower altitudes and the core typically between 3 and 7 km. The algorithm correlates two-dimensional shear features into three-dimensional rotations persisting over several radar volume scans, focusing on azimuthally coherent changes that confirm mesocyclone presence without relying on reflectivity alone. Mesocyclone intensity is quantified using the Mesocyclone Strength Rank (MSR), a nondimensional index ranging from 0 (very weak) to 25 (exceptionally intense), assigned based on the strongest continuous vertical core of two-dimensional features. For MSR 3, the core must consist of features with a two-dimensional strength rank of at least 3, span at least 3 km in half-beamwidth depth, and have its base below 5 km above level, corresponding to moderate rotational shear often exceeding 30 m/s over gate-to-gate distances of several kilometers. Higher ranks, such as MSR 5 or above, indicate intense mesocyclones with deeper cores and greater shear, enhancing warning potential. Advancements in NEXRAD technology, including the 2010s dual-polarization upgrade, enable detection of tornadic debris signatures associated with mesocyclones by analyzing particle shape and orientation through differential reflectivity (ZDR) and (CC), which reveal lofted non-meteorological debris in rotating updrafts. The New Mesocyclone Detection Algorithm (NMDA), introduced in 2019, improves upon the original MDA by incorporating azimuthal shear (AzShear > 0.006 s⁻¹), smoothed shear diameter (≥ 2 km), and velocity differences (≥ 5 km), reducing false alarms and better tracking circulations in real time. As of 2025, algorithms are being integrated to enhance predictions of mesocyclone intensity and associated tornado damage using velocity and strength data. Phased-array (PAR) implementations in the 2020s, such as NOAA's Advanced Technology Demonstrator, provide volume scans in under one minute—compared to 4-6 minutes for traditional —facilitating faster updates for mesocyclone evolution and supporting Warn-on-Forecast initiatives with higher-resolution data on storm rotation.

Observational Techniques

Observational techniques for mesocyclones extend beyond to include visual and in-situ methods, which provide complementary evidence of rotational features in thunderstorms. Visual cues such as a persistent —a localized, often abrupt lowering of the cloud base beneath the main —serve as key indicators of mesocyclone presence, particularly when the wall cloud exhibits sustained or rapid vertical motion. Additionally, a rotating base of the or striations—linear streaks of cloud or along the storm's flanks—can suggest underlying , as these features arise from organized inflow and in the mesocyclone. These visual signs, while not definitive on their own, help spotters identify potential mesocyclones during field observations. In-situ measurements further aid detection by capturing low-level wind dynamics associated with mesocyclones. Mobile mesonets, consisting of instrumented vehicles equipped with ground-based anemometers, , , and sensors, traverse near-storm environments to record surface shifts and convergence zones indicative of mesocyclone inflow. soundings, launched from mobile platforms or fixed sites in proximity to the , profile vertical variations, revealing low-level shear and directional changes that support mesocyclone development. These techniques provide direct thermodynamic and kinematic data, often validating indirect visual assessments. Storm chaser reports have historically played a vital role in mesocyclone documentation since the , when organized intercept programs began integrating visual observations with emerging data to confirm rotational structures. These efforts, including ground-based and time-lapse video, captured evolving cloud features like rotating updrafts, contributing to early understandings of dynamics. supplements such reports by detecting overshooting tops—dome-like protrusions above the anvil that signal intense updrafts linked to mesocyclones—offering broad-scale confirmation in data-sparse regions. Despite their utility, these non-radar techniques exhibit lower reliability for precise mesocyclone identification compared to radar signatures, as visual and in-situ methods often capture only indirect effects of the rather than the full three-dimensional structure. They are particularly valuable for in remote or radar-poor areas, where direct access allows for real-time environmental sampling.

Relation to Tornadoes

Tornadogenesis Mechanisms

Tornadogenesis typically begins with the intensification and descent of the mid-level mesocyclone to low levels near the surface, a process facilitated by the rear-flank downdraft (RFD). The RFD wraps around the mesocyclone, creating an occlusion signature that isolates a region of focused within the updraft base. This occlusion enhances vertical of as descending air parcels converge toward the ground, amplifying the rotational intensity and generating a low-level mesocyclone. The mechanism reorients baroclinically generated horizontal vorticity from the RFD into vertical vorticity, which is critical for concentrating sufficient to form a tornado. A key process in this descent is the dynamic pipe effect, where strong radial convergence at the base of the mesocyclone concentrates vorticity into a narrow vertical "pipe" aloft, drawing the vortex downward. This effect arises from the restriction of radial inflow by cyclostrophic balance, leading to progressive intensification of vorticity from mid-levels toward the surface. The circulation Γ\Gamma, defined as the line integral Γ=∮v⋅dl\Gamma = \oint \mathbf{v} \cdot d\mathbf{l} around a closed path, increases due to this convergence; for a circular vortex with tangential velocity VV, it simplifies to Γ=2πrV\Gamma = 2\pi r V. Numerical simulations indicate this descent can occur over approximately 18 minutes when buoyancy is concentrated mid-level, enabling the vortex to reach the surface and initiate tornadogenesis. Favorable environmental conditions significantly influence the likelihood of from mesocyclones, including low lifted condensation level (LCL) heights (typically ≤ 1000 m) and storm-relative helicity (SRH) exceeding 300 m²/s² in the 0-3 km layer. Low LCL heights promote a warmer, more buoyant RFD that sustains low-level updrafts without excessive cooling, while high SRH provides ample low-level shear to generate and maintain intense rotation. These parameters are particularly critical for surface-based supercells, where they enhance the dynamic lifting necessary for amplification. Recent (as of 2024) highlights additional factors like streamwise currents in the forward flank contributing to low-level mesocyclone development and . In strong mesocyclones, tornado formation occurs in approximately 20-30% of cases, with average warning lead times of about 18 minutes after initial detection of the mesocyclone signature on . This brief timeline underscores the rapid evolution from mid-level to surface , often marked by a sudden intensification of low-level winds.

Non-Tornadic Variants

Most mesocyclones, approximately 70-80% based on radar climatologies of supercell events, do not produce tornadoes and are classified as non-tornadic variants. These occur frequently in environments with weaker vertical , which limits the intensification of rotation necessary for . Key failure modes in non-tornadic mesocyclones include insufficient low-level stretching of , often due to elevated lifting condensation levels (LCLs) (typically > 1000 m), which hinder the descent of the rotating to the surface. Additionally, disruptions in the rear-flank downdraft (RFD), such as premature surges that occlude the mesocyclone and cut off inflow, prevent the concentration of required for tornado formation. Despite lacking tornadoes, non-tornadic mesocyclones remain hazardous, commonly generating severe exceeding 2 inches in and damaging straight-line winds over 58 mph (50 knots), though they do not produce tornadoes (surface vortices); clouds may form without reaching the ground. Such variants are prevalent in marginal supercells across the Midwest , particularly during nocturnal hours when stable boundary layers further suppress low-level convergence and rotation amplification.

Mesoscale Convective Vortex

A mesoscale convective vortex (MCV) is a mid-level, warm-core cyclonic circulation that emerges as a remnant feature following the decay of mesocyclones within a mesoscale convective system (MCS), characteristically spanning 100–300 km in diameter and persisting for 12–24 hours or longer after the parent convection dissipates. This vortex typically forms in the mid-troposphere (around 3–6 km altitude) within the stratiform precipitation region of the MCS, where divergent outflow aloft and convergent inflow below create a favorable environment for rotational development. The formation of an MCV involves the aggregation and amplification of generated by multiple embedded mesocyclones during the mature stage of the MCS, with diabatic heating from release in the stratiform area stretching vertical into a coherent mesoscale feature. As the convective cells weaken, the mesocyclone-induced is redistributed and balanced by the Coriolis effect, leading to a quasi-geostrophic response that sustains the vortex independently of ongoing deep . MCVs exert significant meteorological impacts by modulating the local environment, often triggering renewed along their outflow boundaries or within their circulation, which can lead to additional heavy rainfall episodes and prolong the overall life cycle of events. They are frequently observed in MCSs across the central and , with climatological analyses identifying them as a common outcome in systems featuring extensive stratiform coverage. Detection of MCVs relies on their subtler signatures compared to active mesocyclones, as they produce weaker rotational signals on conventional Doppler radar due to their elevated position and decoupled nature from surface features; instead, wind profilers and dual-Doppler radar networks are particularly effective for resolving the mid-level wind patterns and vorticity maxima. Satellite imagery can also reveal spiral cloud bands associated with the vortex, aiding in tracking its evolution post-MCS decay.

Comparisons to Other Rotational Features

Mesocyclones serve as parent circulations to tornadoes, featuring kilometer-scale rotations typically occurring at mid-levels within supercell thunderstorms, whereas tornadoes represent smaller-scale, surface-touching vortices on the order of tens to hundreds of meters in diameter that develop as concentrated extensions of this broader rotation. The mesocyclone's larger size, often 2–6 km in diameter, and its persistence driven by the storm's updraft distinguish it from the tornado's more intense but localized winds, which require additional low-level stretching for formation. In contrast to gustnadoes, which are shallow, short-lived whirlwinds forming as eddies along thunderstorm outflow boundaries in the planetary boundary layer, mesocyclones demand sustained deep updrafts and organized storm-scale rotation extending through much of the troposphere. Gustnadoes lack connection to cloud-base rotation or mesocyclonic circulations, remaining confined to near-surface levels with typical diameters under 100 m and durations of minutes, unlike the vertically extensive and radar-detectable structure of mesocyclones. Mesocyclones differ markedly from tropical cyclones in scale, embedding within individual convective storms as meso-gamma features (2–10 km diameter) with lifespans of minutes to hours, while tropical cyclones constitute synoptic-scale systems spanning hundreds to thousands of kilometers, originating over warm tropical waters with organized, surface-based circulations persisting for days. Tropical cyclones feature warm-core structures without fronts and rely on release across expansive rainbands, whereas mesocyclones arise from interactions in mid-latitude supercells, lacking the broad, symmetric organization of their larger counterparts. Early studies in the and often misidentified mesocyclone signatures as direct indicators due to limited resolution and sampling, leading to overestimations of tornadic potential—initial suggested up to 50% of mesocyclones produced tornadoes, but refined analyses in the and , including nationwide WSR-88D data, revised this to approximately 20–30% for mid-level detections, clarifying distinctions from surface vortices like "tight" low-level rotations. These confusions with compact, intense rotations were resolved through improved Doppler algorithms and multi- verification, emphasizing mesocyclones' role as precursors rather than equivalents to .

References

  1. https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/education/svrwx101/tornadoes/detection/
  2. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/151/9/MWR-D-22-0269.1.xml
  3. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/104/1/BAMS-D-22-0027.1.xml
  4. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/52890/noaa_52890_DS1.pdf
  5. https://www.noaa.gov/jetstream/appendix/weather-glossary-m
  6. https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/education/svrwx101/thunderstorms/types/
  7. https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/education/svrwx101/tornadoes/
  8. https://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Mesocyclone
  9. https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/~brooks/cooper/cooper.html
  10. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/13/2/1520-0434_1998_013_0304_tnsslm_2_0_co_2.pdf
  11. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/mesocyclone
  12. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/13/2/1520-0434_1998_013_0244_hoouow_2_0_co_2.xml
  13. https://www.faculty.luther.edu/~bernatzr/Courses/Sci123/comet/radar/severe_signatures/print_midlevel_mesocyclone.htm
  14. https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/publications/dopplerguide/chapter4.php
  15. https://www.faculty.luther.edu/~bernatzr/Courses/Sci123/comet/radar/severe_signatures/navmenu.php_printname_print_low_level_meso.htm_page_1.0.0.htm
  16. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/142/8/mwr-d-13-00240.1.xml
  17. https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=CYC
  18. https://www.weather.gov/media/zhu/ZHU_Training_Page/thunderstorm_stuff/splitting_supercells/Supercell_Structure.pdf
  19. https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/education/svrwx101/tornadoes/types/
  20. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/139/11/2011mwr3631.1.xml
  21. https://www.weather.gov/source/zhu/ZHU_Training_Page/convective_parameters/Sounding_Stuff/MesoscaleParameters.html
  22. https://www.weather.gov/lmk/indices
  23. https://www.weather.gov/media/lmk/soo/SvrWx_Fcstg_TipSheet.pdf
  24. https://twister.caps.ou.edu/MM2005/Chapter4.7.pdf
  25. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/151/11/MWR-D-22-0313.1.xml
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169809514001756
  27. http://twister.ou.edu/MM2005/DaviesJonesEtal2001.pdf
  28. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/66/3/2008jas2815.1.xml
  29. https://www.atmos.albany.edu/daes/atmclasses/atm401/spring_2016/ppts_pdfs/Thompson_et_al_2007.pdf
  30. https://physicstoday.aip.org/features/what-we-know-and-dont-know-about-tornado-formation
  31. https://sites.psu.edu/pmarkowski/how-tornadoes-form/
  32. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/74/9/jas-d-16-0364.1.xml
  33. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/124/1/1520-0493_1996_124_0097_damoma_2_0_co_2.pdf
  34. https://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/episodes/ROC/WSR-88D_algorithms/pdfs/mesocyclone_detection.pdf
  35. https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/44897.pdf
  36. https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/tools/radar/dualpol/
  37. https://hwt.nssl.noaa.gov/ewp/training_2019/2019_hwt_nmda_training.pdf
  38. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/aies/4/3/AIES-D-23-0113.1.xml
  39. https://inside.nssl.noaa.gov/nsslnews/2024/11/a-clear-vision-phased-array-radar-innovating-for-the-future/
  40. https://www.weather.gov/media/unr/SpottersGuide2011_fielduse.pdf
  41. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atot/13/5/1520-0426_1996_013_0921_ammffm_2_0_co_2.xml
  42. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/14/4/1520-0434_1999_014_0558_ahossi_2_0_co_2.xml
  43. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/127/7/1520-0493_1999_127_1693_oonllm_2.0.co_2.xml
  44. https://twister.caps.ou.edu/METR4403/lectures_2024/Tornadogenesis.pdf
  45. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/130/4/1520-0493_2002_130_0852_hearfd_2.0.co_2.xml
  46. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/54/1/1520-0469_1997_054_0113_twawad_2.0.co_2.xml
  47. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/105/5/BAMS-D-23-0201.1.xml
  48. https://www.wcnc.com/article/weather/what-is-a-mesocyclone/275-b082f3cb-95ec-4fe3-8cc6-2ca68603ad42
  49. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/28/5/waf-d-12-00119_1.xml
  50. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/20/4/waf864_1.xml
  51. http://www.meteor.iastate.edu/classes/mt417/powerpoint/417_wk12new.pdf
  52. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/66/3/2008jas2819.1.xml
  53. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/4/556
  54. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/128/10/1520-0493_2000_128_3396_llmvat_2.0.co_2.xml
  55. https://atmos.uw.edu/MG/PDFs/ROG04_houze_MCS.pdf
  56. https://oxfordre.com/climatescience/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228620-e-61
  57. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/mwre/135/6/mwr3398.1.xml
  58. https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=MESOCYCLONE
  59. https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=GUSTNADO
  60. https://training.weather.gov/wdtd/courses/rac/documentation/rac19-conv-storms-glossary.pdf
  61. https://www.ametsoc.org/ams/about-ams/news/fact-sheets/hurricane-and-tropical-cyclone-science/
  62. https://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Tropical_cyclone
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.