Hubbry Logo
Moveable bridgeMoveable bridgeMain
Open search
Moveable bridge
Community hub
Moveable bridge
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Moveable bridge
Moveable bridge
Moveable bridge
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Madison Street Bridge, a bascule bridge over the Chicago River in Chicago, IL
The Rode Brug (Red Bridge) across the Vecht river in Utrecht, Netherlands
The Marine Parkway–Gil Hodges Memorial Bridge in New York City

A moveable bridge, or movable bridge, is a bridge that moves to allow passage for boats[1] or barges.[2] In American English, the term is synonymous with drawbridge, and the latter is the common term, but drawbridge can be limited to the narrower, historical definition used in some other forms of English, in which drawbridge refers to only a specific type of moveable bridge often found in castles.

An advantage of making bridges moveable is the lower cost, due to the absence of high piers and long approaches. The principal disadvantage is that the traffic on the bridge must be halted when it is opened for passage of traffic on the waterway. For seldom-used railroad bridges[3] over busy channels, the bridge may be left open and then closed for train passages. For small bridges, bridge movement may be enabled without the need for an engine. Some bridges are operated by the users, especially those with a boat, others by a bridgeman (or bridge tender); a few are remotely controlled using video-cameras and loudspeakers. Generally, the bridges are powered by electric motors, whether operating winches, gearing, or hydraulic pistons. While moveable bridges in their entirety may be quite long, the length of the moveable portion is restricted by engineering and cost considerations to a few hundred feet.

There are often traffic lights for the road and water traffic, and moving barriers for the road traffic.

In the United States,[4] regulations governing the operation of moveable bridges (referred to as drawbridges)[5] – for example, hours of operation and how much advance notice must be given by water traffic – are listed in Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations;[6] temporary deviations are published in the Coast Guard's Local Notice to Mariners.[7]

Types

[edit]
  • Double-beam drawbridge
  • Drawbridge (British English definition) – the bridge deck is hinged on one end
  • Bascule bridge – a drawbridge hinged on pins with a counterweight to facilitate raising; road or rail
    • Rolling bascule bridge – an unhinged drawbridge lifted by the rolling of a large gear segment along a horizontal rack
  • Folding bridge – a drawbridge with multiple sections that collapse together horizontally
  • Curling bridge – a drawbridge with transverse divisions between multiple sections that curl vertically
  • Fan Bridge – a drawbridge with longitudinal divisions between multiple bascule sections that rise to various angles of elevation, forming a fan arrangement.
  • Vertical-lift bridge – the bridge deck is lifted by counterweighted cables mounted on towers; road or rail
  • Table bridge – a lift bridge with the lifting mechanism mounted underneath it
  • Retractable bridge (Thrust bridge) – the bridge deck is retracted to one side
  • Submersible bridge – also called a ducking bridge, the bridge deck is lowered into the water
  • Tilt bridge – the bridge deck, which is curved and pivoted at each end, is lifted at an angle
  • Swing bridge – the bridge deck rotates around a fixed point, usually at the centre, but may resemble a gate in its operation; road or rail
  • Transporter bridge – a structure high above carries a suspended, ferry-like structure
  • Jet bridge – a passenger bridge to an airplane. One end is mobile with height, yaw, and tilt adjustments on the outboard end
  • Guthrie rolling bridge
  • Vlotbrug, a design of retractable floating bridge in the Netherlands
  • Linkspan
  • Ferry slip
  • Locks are implicitly bridges as well allowing ship traffic to flow when open and at least foot traffic on top when closed

Visual index

[edit]

Accidents

[edit]
  • April 23, 1853 – Rancocas Creek, New Jersey: Engineer of the Camden & Amboy's 2 p.m. train out of Camden, New Jersey missed stop signals and ran his train off an open drawspan at Rancocas Creek. There were 27 fatalities.
  • June 29, 1864 – St-Hilaire train disaster, Mont-St-Hilaire, Quebec, Canada: A Grand Trunk Railway passenger train failed to observe a red signal and ran through an open swing bridge over the Richelieu River. Ninety-nine were killed and 100 were injured.
  • November 7, 1916 – Summer Street Bridge Disaster, Boston, Massachusetts: a streetcar loaded with passengers ran off an open drawbridge into Fort Point Channel near downtown Boston killing 46 passengers.
  • September 15, 1958 – Newark Bay, New Jersey rail accident, Elizabethport, New Jersey: Central Railroad of New Jersey (CNJ) commuter train #3314 from Bay Head Junction to Jersey City ran a stop signal and an open derail protecting the Newark Bay 4-span lift bridge, and the train's two diesel locomotives and two of five passenger cars went into Newark Bay through one of the open spans. Four crewmen, including the engineer and fireman, and 44 passengers died by drowning.
  • September 22, 1993 – Mobile, Alabama, US: In heavy fog and low visibility, a disoriented towboat pilot made a wrong turn and entered a non-navigable waterway. Due to inexperience and improper radar training, the pilot did not realize he was off-course and struck an unfinished swing bridge over the Big Bayou Canot around 2:45AM, knocking it out of alignment by approximately three feet (one meter), although his initial supposition in the low visibility was that one of the barges had run aground. The rails kinked but did not break, so no fault was indicated for approaching trains. Approximately 8 minutes later, an Amtrak train carrying 220 passengers derailed at the kinked portion of the rails, killing 47 and injuring 103 more.
  • November 23, 1996 – Kearny, New Jersey, US: An Amtrak passenger and mail train derailed while crossing the Portal Bridge over the Hackensack River, sideswiping another passenger train in the process. Thirty-four people were injured. A broken rail joint on one pair of the bridge's movable rails at each end of the span caused a track misalignment, while still making electrical contact with the landward rails; thus signals were clear, derails closed, and a fault indication was not displayed.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Moveable bridge

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A movable bridge, also known as a moveable bridge, is a spanning a navigable or other pathway that incorporates at least one span designed to temporarily alter its position—through rotation, lifting, or retraction—to increase vertical or horizontal clearance for vessels, boats, or other obstructions passing underneath. These bridges serve a dual purpose, accommodating both land-based traffic (such as vehicles, pedestrians, or trains) when closed and maritime when opened, making them essential in urban or coastal environments where waterways intersect transportation routes. The primary types of movable bridges include bascule bridges, which rotate about a horizontal axis (often using trunnions or rolling mechanisms); vertical-lift bridges, which elevate the span vertically via cables and counterweights; swing bridges, which pivot horizontally around a central vertical axis; and retractile bridges, which slide or telescope along a horizontal plane. Less common variants, such as transporter or pontoon bridges, involve suspended platforms or floating sections for temporary or specialized use. designs typically integrate mechanical components like gears, , or wire ropes with electrical control systems to ensure safe and efficient operation, often requiring precise alignment and lubrication for longevity. Movable bridges trace their origins to ancient and medieval drawbridges but saw significant advancement in the 19th and early 20th centuries with industrialization and expanding canal systems, exemplified by early bascule designs dating to the 1890s. Today, they remain vital , with notable examples including the (the longest of its type at 558 feet) and numerous historic bascule spans in cities like , where preservation efforts balance operational demands with structural integrity. Modern iterations incorporate advanced and monitoring to minimize and enhance for multi-modal traffic.

Overview

Definition

A movable bridge is a solution designed to span a navigable or pathway while allowing temporary reconfiguration of its span to provide vertical or horizontal clearance for marine traffic, such as vessels or barges, to pass underneath. This reconfiguration typically occurs through mechanisms involving , vertical , or horizontal of one or more bridge sections, enabling the accommodation of both land-based vehicles and waterborne without permanent obstruction. Unlike fixed-span bridges, movable bridges prioritize dual functionality, maintaining load-bearing capacity in their operational state while facilitating intermittent movement to support maritime in constrained urban or riverine environments. In its closed configuration, a movable bridge must withstand the same structural loads— including live loads from and dead loads from its own components—as a conventional fixed bridge, ensuring safety and durability under normal use. During operation, it is engineered to move reliably across a range of environmental conditions, such as high winds, , and thermal fluctuations, which can affect mechanical precision and stability. Upon completion of the cycle, the bridge must realign accurately to within tolerances that prevent gaps or misalignments, often on the order of millimeters, to avoid operational disruptions or hazards; this demands robust integration of civil, mechanical, and electrical systems capable of handling dynamic stresses throughout the opening and closing processes. The terminology "movable bridge" (or "moveable bridge") gained prominence in 19th-century engineering literature to denote purpose-built structures addressing the expansion of inland navigation and port infrastructure, distinguishing them from earlier defensive drawbridges and emphasizing their adaptive role in modern transportation networks. Broadly, movable bridges are classified by their dominant mode of motion: pivoting systems that rotate around a fixed axis, lifting arrangements that raise spans vertically, and translating or floating configurations that shift laterally or submerge, each tailored to site-specific hydraulic and spatial demands without overlapping into detailed subtypes.

History

The earliest known movable bridges originated in ancient civilizations, with evidence of simple drawbridge mechanisms in dating as early as the , such as at the fortress around 1860 BC. In ancient Rome, timber-based pontoon bridges were used around the 1st century BCE, primarily for military applications to enable rapid deployment and retraction during campaigns. These early designs relied on basic counterweights and manual operation, setting the foundation for later defensive and navigational uses. During the medieval period in , movable bridges evolved as essential defensive elements for castles and towns, with drawbridges operated via counterweights and winches to control access over moats. By the 13th century, structures like the medieval incorporated drawbridge sections to accommodate river traffic, marking an early integration of navigability with fixed spans. In the era, innovations included Leonardo da Vinci's sketches of unequal-armed swing bridges around 1500, which used hand winches for rotation and foreshadowed more efficient pivot designs in low-water crossings. The in the transformed movable bridge construction through the adoption of and , allowing for longer spans and greater durability to support expanding rail and networks. Engineers developed shear pole and rim-bearing swing bridges to handle increasing rail traffic, while commerce necessitated federally regulated navigable spans following legal precedents like in 1824. In the , vertical-lift designs gained widespread adoption after , particularly for accommodating automobile traffic, with the first modern example patented by J.A.L. Waddell in 1893 and built in in 1894. Bascule mechanisms, including types, proliferated post-1890 for urban waterways, enhancing efficiency in high-traffic areas. Following , hydraulic and electric actuation systems became standard, with electrification of operations advancing in the mid-century to support heavier loads and faster cycles, as seen in upgrades during the . Recent developments through 2025 have focused on and integration to improve and , particularly in projects where aging is retrofitted with IoT-enabled monitoring. Advanced control systems now incorporate AI for real-time deflection assessment and , reducing downtime and enhancing safety in lifting bridges. These innovations, including embedded sensors for structural , have been applied in global projects to extend the lifespan of movable spans amid rising urban demands.

Types

Bascule bridges

A is a type of movable bridge in which one or more spans, known as leaves, rotate vertically about a horizontal axis to provide clearance for marine . The term "bascule" originates from the French word for , reflecting the rocking motion of the lifting span. This design balances the weight of the span using counterweights, enabling efficient operation with minimal power. Bascule bridges are particularly suited to urban waterways and ports where both and must share limited , offering advantages such as rapid opening times—often under one minute—and the absence of central piers that could obstruct navigation. The modern bascule bridge evolved from medieval drawbridges, which were manually raised using chains or ropes, but practical long-span designs became feasible with steam power in the mid-19th century. The earliest modern examples appeared in the 1890s: the Van Buren Street Bridge in (1893), a rolling lift type, and the in (1894), a double-leaf trunnion bascule. emerged as a hub for innovation due to its extensive river network and industrial demands, leading to the first trunnion bascule in 1902 at Clybourn Place. Key patents shaped the field, including William Scherzer's 1893 rolling lift mechanism, which allowed the span to retreat while lifting for greater clearance, and Strauss's 1903 for counterweights, which reduced costs by eliminating the need for deep pits and heavy iron. Other influential designs include John Page's trunnion bascule with integrated counterweights (1906) and Theodor Rall's hybrid roller-trunnion system (1914). By the early 20th century, bascule bridges proliferated in and , though their use declined mid-century with the rise of high-level fixed spans. Bascule bridges are classified into three primary types based on their pivot mechanisms: trunnion, rolling lift, and heel trunnion. The trunnion bascule, the most common, features fixed horizontal pivots (trunnions) mounted near the shore ends of the span, allowing the deck to rotate upward like a lever. It can be single-leaf for narrower channels or double-leaf, with opposing spans meeting at the center, providing unlimited vertical clearance when open. The rolling lift bascule, patented by Scherzer, uses a curved segmental girder or tread that rolls backward along a fixed track during lifting, combining rotation with translation to maximize navigational space without deep foundations. Heel trunnion bascules, a Strauss innovation, position the trunnion at the rear (heel) of the span with overhead or suspended counterweights, enabling longer spans up to 300 feet while maintaining balance through a parallel link system. Variants like the Rall bascule integrate rolling and trunnion elements for specialized applications, such as railroad crossings. These types share engineering principles focused on equilibrium, with counterweights—often concrete-filled for economy—positioned to offset 80-100% of the span's weight, reducing actuation demands. Operation relies on mechanical, hydraulic, or electric systems to initiate , typically lifting the span 70-90 degrees. Safety features include end lifts to secure the against vehicular loads, midspan locks for double-leaf designs, and centering devices to align the span precisely. Advantages include low costs for spans under 200 feet, minimal horizontal space requirements compared to swing bridges, and reliability in high-traffic areas, though they require regular maintenance for trunnions and linkages. Notable examples illustrate bascule diversity. The in , a double trunnion bascule, spans 800 feet total and opens over 1,000 times annually, powered originally by steam hydraulics. In , the (1920), a double-leaf trunnion design, connects the to the Loop across the , exemplifying urban integration with its . The Hanover Street Bridge in (1916), a Rall rolling lift, demonstrates early 20th-century adaptations for port access. Internationally, the Knippel Bridge in (1908), a Strauss heel trunnion bascule with a 106-foot main span, highlights cost-effective counterweight use.

Swing bridges

A is a movable bridge that rotates horizontally around a vertical pivot axis to open a navigable channel for marine traffic. The span typically aligns with the roadway in the and swings perpendicular to it when opening, supported by a central or abutments. This design provides full clearance over the without requiring vertical movement, making it suitable for locations with limited overhead space. The history of swing bridges traces back to medieval Europe, where early forms resembled simple drawbridges hinged at one end, though true rotational designs emerged in the in . By the mid-19th century, advancements in iron and steel construction enabled larger spans, with the first notable U.S. example completed in 1863 by engineer Wendel Bollman across the at . In , the in opened in 1857 as one of the earliest, followed by the Glebe Island Bridge in 1862, both reflecting British engineering influences during colonial expansion. Swing bridges proliferated from the 1890s to the 1920s as the dominant for rail and road crossings over busy waterways, but declined in favor after due to the rise of bascule and vertical-lift designs that avoided central pier obstructions. Engineering principles of swing bridges emphasize balance, low , and to handle both static loads and rotational stresses. The span rotates 90 degrees via a pivot mechanism, often powered by electric motors, hydraulic systems, or historically steam engines, with operation times as short as 46 seconds for modern examples. Two primary types exist: center-bearing swings, where the dead load rests directly on a central pivot pin for simpler on shorter spans up to about 100 meters; and rim-bearing swings, where the load distributes via rollers on a circular track around the pier's rim, allowing for longer spans and greater rigidity under . Balance wheels or arms ensure stability during rotation, while the framework—often Warren or Pratt types—distributes loads evenly to minimize bending moments when closed. Foundations must withstand uplift and shear forces, particularly in deep water, and the avoids counterweights, relying instead on the span's inherent balance for efficient power use. Notable examples include the in , a rim-bearing iron structure completed in 1902 that spans 96 meters and remains electrically operated for occasional vessel passage. The Glebe Island Bridge, also in and opened in 1903, features a double-leaf rim-bearing design with a 104-meter span, handling up to 5,499 openings annually in its early years before road traffic dominated; as of 2025, there is a renewed push to revive the heritage-listed structure, idle since 1995. In the U.S., the Northern Avenue in , a 1908 rim-bearing example, demonstrates early 20th-century steel fabrication, while the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Bridge in (1927), holds the record as the longest single-span swing bridge over the at 175 meters. These structures highlight the bridge's adaptability for rail, road, and pedestrian use in port areas. Swing bridges offer advantages such as minimal vertical obstruction, low operational friction leading to reduced wear, and even load distribution on the supporting , which simplifies compared to lifting types. They excel in environments with frequent but short-duration openings, providing clear spans without the need for tall towers or counterweights. However, disadvantages include the central pivot , which can pose a and construction challenge in deep or waters, as well as limited scalability for modern high-volume due to slower full openings and spatial requirements for . Retrofitting for increased loads often proves difficult, contributing to their replacement in many urban settings.

Vertical-lift bridges

A is a movable bridge type where the navigable span rises vertically while maintaining a parallel orientation to the fixed roadway deck, enabling passage of tall vessels underneath. The design features two towers flanking the span, which support the lifting apparatus and ensure the span remains horizontal throughout its travel. The origins of vertical-lift bridges trace back to early 19th-century , with initial designs appearing before 1840, including examples on the River in during the 1840s and in the in 1846. In , Whipple patented an early vertical-lift mechanism in 1873 for the , while J.A.L. Waddell advanced the modern form with his 1893 patent and the construction of the South Halsted Street Bridge in in 1894, featuring a 130-foot Pratt span that lifted 155 feet. Waddell's innovations emphasized balanced counterweights and wire-rope systems, leading to over 74 such bridges designed by his firms between 1887 and 1938, many of which remain in service. Structurally, vertical-lift bridges rely on towers to resist shear, torsion, and forces, with the movable span—often a —suspended by wire ropes or chains that run over sheaves at the tower tops and connect to counterweights. These counterweights achieve a 1:1 balance with the span's weight, reducing the needed for operation, while drive systems such as electric motors, hydraulic rams, or rack-and-pinion mechanisms power the lift. Alignment devices synchronize the span's ends to prevent skewing, ensuring level movement even during partial lifts for smaller vessels. Vertical-lift bridges offer advantages such as unlimited span lengths constrained only by simple-span limits, simpler compared to bascule or swing types, and the ability to handle heavy loads like railroads or double-deck configurations, while providing a single unobstructed channel. They also minimize waterway interference and allow for partial openings to optimize . However, drawbacks include limited vertical clearance for vessels—even when open—due to the towers, which must extend at least 18 meters above the required space, leading to higher loads, elevated costs for shorter spans, and demanding maintenance for the intricate machinery and tall structures. Prominent examples illustrate the design's versatility: the in (1910), with a 244-foot span and 110-foot lift; the between and New York (span 170 meters), accommodating rail traffic; and the Abbotsford Bridge in , (1928), featuring a 19.8-meter span in a second-generation design influenced by North American . These structures highlight the bridge type's enduring application in urban and riverine settings.

Retractile bridges

A retractile bridge, also known as a retractable or bridge, is a type of movable bridge where the deck slides or rolls horizontally to one side, retracting off the to allow marine traffic to pass without vertical or rotational movement. This is ideal for narrow channels or sites with overhead obstructions, as it requires no tall towers or pivots and provides full clearance when retracted. The concept dates to the , with early patents for sliding mechanisms in the United States. One of the first practical examples was the Holmes Retractile Bridge over the , designed by William Holmes and opened in 1887; it featured a 162-foot span that retracted along tracks using steam-powered winches. Retractile bridges gained popularity in the late 19th and early 20th centuries for urban rail and road crossings, particularly in , but their use waned with the advent of more efficient bascule designs due to the need for long approach tracks and potential alignment issues. Engineering principles focus on low-friction sliding via rollers or wheels on inclined tracks, with the span—typically a or plate —thrust backward by hydraulic rams, electric motors, or cables. Counterbalances or inclined planes assist retraction, enabling spans up to 200 feet, though most historical examples are shorter (50-150 feet) to minimize force requirements. includes locking pins for the extended position and buffers to absorb impact. Advantages encompass simple , no waterway obstruction when open, and suitability for seismic areas due to flexibility, but disadvantages involve high land requirements for retraction space and vulnerability to if tracks misalign. Notable surviving examples include the Carroll Street Bridge in , New York (1889), a hand-operated retractile span over the that remains in occasional use; and the 102nd Street Bridge in (1902), though most have been replaced. Modern retractile designs are rare but appear in specialized applications, such as the Retractable Footbridge at , (2005), which combines pedestrian access with aesthetic folding elements.

Transporter and pontoon bridges

Transporter bridges represent a specialized form of movable bridge designed to facilitate crossing over waterways without obstructing below. In this system, a fixed high-level span, supported by tall towers on each , remains stationary while a suspended or platform travels horizontally across it, carrying vehicles, pedestrians, or cargo. This configuration eliminates the need for elevating or pivoting the entire bridge deck, providing a clearance height typically exceeding 50 meters to accommodate tall vessels. The mechanism relies on a stiffening or boom spanning between the towers, along which a trolley runs on overhead rails; the hangs from this trolley via cables or rods and is propelled by electric that haul ropes over pulleys, achieving transit times of around 90 seconds for spans up to 200 meters. Engineering design emphasizes wind bracing on the —often through cross-bracing and lattice towers—to ensure stability, with live load capacities supporting up to 20 tons per crossing in historical examples. One of the earliest and most influential transporter bridges is the in , completed in 1893, which spans 375 meters with 55-meter towers and was engineered by Alberto Palacio to transport industrial goods across the Ría de Bilbao estuary. In the , the , opened in 1906, features a 197-meter main span between 74-meter towers constructed of lattice steel for reduced wind loading; its , powered by twin 35-horsepower motors, accommodates nine vehicles and up to 1,200 pedestrians per trip, operating until 1985 before preservation efforts, with closures for repairs as of 2021 and ongoing revamp plans. These structures highlight the bridge type's application in estuarine or low-lying areas where traditional bascule or swing designs would require costly embankments, though their rarity—fewer than 30 built worldwide, with approximately six operational as of 2024—stems from the rise of vehicle ferries and vertical-lift alternatives. Pontoon bridges, another category of movable bridge, utilize floating pontoons—watertight vessels or barges—as supports for the deck, enabling temporary or semi-permanent crossings over rivers, lakes, or bays that can be reconfigured to permit marine traffic. This type is particularly suited for shallow or variable-depth waters where fixed s are impractical, with the movable aspect achieved through swing or retractile mechanisms that shift the floating span aside. In a typical pontoon , the central floating section rotates horizontally around a pivot arm anchored to a fixed , creating a navigation channel while approach spans may incorporate lift mechanisms to align with the shifting deck; hydraulic cylinders or winches provide the actuation, ensuring controlled movement under tidal or current influences. Design principles prioritize distribution via multiple watertight compartments, corrosion-resistant materials like plating, and fender systems to protect against vessel impacts, with spans often limited to 100-200 meters to maintain stability. A representative example is the Grand Lake in , a 421-foot structure carrying two lanes of LA 384 over the since 1958; its 150-foot pontoon swing span, 28 feet wide and 9 feet deep with internal bulkheads, pivots via a hydraulic system to open a 125-foot-wide channel, complemented by two 15.5-foot apron lift spans that rise on counterweighted towers. In military or emergency contexts, pontoon bridges like the U.S. Army's M3 pneumatic model deploy rapidly using inflatable floats lashed together, supporting loads over spans up to 200 meters, though civil applications favor more durable welded- variants for longevity in navigational corridors. These bridges offer economic advantages in flood-prone or remote areas but require ongoing maintenance to counter and wave-induced fatigue.

Engineering Principles

Mechanical components

Movable bridges rely on a variety of mechanical components to enable their span to open and close reliably, accommodating while supporting vehicular and loads. These components typically include structural elements like trusses or girders, pivot mechanisms, counterbalancing systems, drive machinery, and locking devices, all designed to withstand dynamic forces, weather exposure, and repetitive motion. Materials such as high-strength for gears and shafts, for bearings, and for counterweights ensure and low , with designs adhering to standards like those from the American Association of and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Key shared components across movable bridge types include trunnions and bearings, which facilitate rotation or lifting. Trunnions serve as short axles in bascule bridges, mounted in or roller bearings to allow the span to pivot about a horizontal axis, minimizing and supporting the leaf's weight during operation. Bearings, often bronze-lined or anti-friction types, are engineered for clearances of about 0.001 inches per inch of diameter to prevent binding, with using grease or oil to reduce wear from misalignment or . In vertical-lift bridges, sheave bearings support wire ropes that raise the span, while swing bridges use pivot bearings at the center to rotate the 90 degrees. Gearing and drive systems transmit power from to move the span efficiently. Open spur or gears, made from forged with allowable stresses up to 60% of yield strength, engage pinions with racks to provide linear or rotational motion, achieving at least 80% tooth contact for smooth operation. Speed reducers enclose gears to alter torque and speed, often with a service factor exceeding 1.0 per American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA) standards. Pinions, as small driver gears, are critical in rack-and-pinion setups for bascule and swing bridges, lubricated with extreme-pressure grease to handle loads without excessive backlash, typically limited to ±0.003 inches. Hydraulic systems may supplement electric drives in some designs, providing redundant power for locking and movement. Counterweights balance the span's weight to reduce the energy required for operation, typically consisting of concrete blocks (up to 180 pounds per cubic foot) encased in steel for bascule and vertical-lift bridges. In bascule designs, they are positioned to counter the leaf's moment arm, often housed in pits above high water levels for drainage. Vertical-lift counterweights, suspended by wire ropes (e.g., 6x19 extra-improved plow steel with tensile strengths from 47,200 to 590,000 pounds), use sheaves (72- to 80-inch diameter) to equalize load distribution across multiple ropes. Swing bridges may employ balance wheels or rim bearings to distribute pivot loads, preventing uneven stress on the central pier. Live load shoes and locking mechanisms ensure stability when closed. Live load shoes, steel or concrete blocks on bascule piers, transfer traffic loads (up to design limits) without stressing the machinery, requiring precise alignment to avoid gaps exceeding 0.125 inches. Span locks, such as 4-inch by 6-inch bars in bascule bridges, engage to secure the span against or seismic forces, interlocked with for . Swing bridges use end lifts and center wedges to seat the span, while vertical-lift designs incorporate latching bars or brakes to hold positions, with all locks inspected for and operational integrity to prevent unintended movement. Maintenance of these components involves regular , alignment checks using feeler gauges, and non-destructive testing for cracks, as misalignment can lead to in trunnions or gear wear. For instance, bascule trunnions are tested at 10-degree intervals for balance drift, ensuring operational efficiency and longevity.

Power and actuation systems

Movable bridges require robust power and actuation systems to enable controlled movement of spans, accommodating varying loads, environmental conditions, and operational demands. These systems have evolved from manual mechanisms to sophisticated electro-mechanical and hydraulic setups, prioritizing reliability, precision, and minimal downtime. The choice of system depends on bridge type, span length, and site-specific factors such as power availability and access. Historically, early movable bridges relied on manual power, using human or animal labor to operate winches or levers, suitable only for small spans under 10 meters due to limited force output. By the early , mechanical drives supplanted manual systems, transitioning to electric motors and wire ropes for greater efficiency. In the , actuation emerged in to address electromechanical limitations in achieving smooth acceleration and short cycle times, marking a shift toward fluid-based power for larger structures. Today, most modern installations combine electric and hydraulic elements, with closed-loop hydraulics and electric linear actuators dominating for their energy efficiency and environmental compliance. Electric-mechanical systems form the backbone of many bascule, swing, and vertical-lift bridges, employing AC or DC motors to generate through gearboxes, shafts, and couplings. Key components include speed reducers for amplification, bevel gears for directional changes, and bearings to minimize , with motor outputs rated for at least 12 startups per hour to handle frequent operations. These systems excel in precise control and high —up to 132,000 pounds of in linear actuators—making them ideal for vertical-lift bridges where wire ropes and sheaves lift spans using counterweights. Advantages include energy efficiency (no power draw when idle) and low environmental impact from the absence of fluid leaks, though they require regular and alignment checks to prevent gear wear. For instance, electric actuators operate locking pins on bascule bridges, ensuring secure positioning with electronic overload protection. Hydraulic-mechanical systems provide smooth, powerful actuation for bridges demanding rapid or heavy-duty movement, such as swing and bascule types. They utilize cylinders for linear motion or rotary motors for pivoting, powered by pumps operating at 210-230 bar working pressure, with peak loads up to 1.5 times higher. Open-loop systems circulate large oil volumes for cooling, while closed-loop variants offer compact designs with integrated servo controls for precise speed regulation up to 20 inches per second. These systems handle reversing loads effectively in swing bridges via four single-acting cylinders and outperform pure electric drives in wind-prone areas, where spans exceed 60 meters and wind loads surpass 90% of operational forces. Benefits include a high power-to-weight ratio and variable speed control, though maintenance involves fluid filtration and leak prevention to avoid corrosion. A notable application is the A12 bascule bridge in the UK, retrofitted with direct hydraulic drives delivering up to 1,400,000 Nm torque. Electro-hydraulic hybrids represent a contemporary advancement, integrating electric motors with hydraulic actuators for optimized performance in harsh environments. These closed-loop systems enable synchronized multi-cylinder operation in lift bridges, with maximum heights under 10 meters, and facilitate easy of older electric setups. For example, conversions of traditional motor-driven bridges to hydraulic systems have reduced needs while enhancing controllability. features, such as brakes and pressure relief valves, are standard across all types to mitigate risks during power loss.

Operation and Safety

Opening procedures

In the United States, the opening of a movable bridge is initiated upon receiving a signal from an approaching vessel, as mandated by federal regulations requiring drawbridges over navigable waters to open promptly and fully unless otherwise specified. Vessels typically signal using one prolonged blast followed by one short blast on a horn or whistle, with the bridge operator acknowledging via a similar signal or five short blasts if a delay is anticipated. In cases of multiple consecutive bridges, the vessel signals the first upon approach, then each subsequent bridge after receiving acknowledgment from the prior one. Advance notice may be required for certain bridges, ranging from two to 48 hours depending on location, to facilitate scheduling. Procedures vary internationally, with different signaling and regulations in regions like Europe under local waterway authorities. Upon signal receipt, the bridge operator activates traffic control measures to halt land traffic and ensure safe clearance. Traffic signals switch to red, audible alarms such as bells or gongs sound, and movable gates or barriers descend to block vehicular and pedestrian access, typically positioned 15 meters (50 feet) or more from the span for high-speed roadways. systems, including cameras and sensors, verify that no vehicles, pedestrians, or hazards remain on the span before proceeding. With traffic secured, the operator releases mechanical locks—such as span locks, tail locks, or end locks—that secure the bridge in its closed position, often via interlock systems that prevent movement if locks are not fully disengaged. The span drive machinery then activates, powered by electric motors, hydraulic systems, or a combination, to move the structure. For bascule bridges, the leaves rotate upward around a shaft at the center of , balanced by counterweights to reduce required force; swing bridges pivot horizontally on a central or rim-bearing ; and vertical-lift bridges ascend via wire ropes and sheaves connected to counterweights. Brakes engage as needed to control speed and hold positions, with sensors automatically halting motion upon reaching the fully open configuration, providing adequate vertical clearance for vessels varying by bridge and requirements. The operator monitors the process in real-time and can override or emergency-stop if anomalies occur. Once the vessel passes, the sequence reverses: the span returns to alignment, locks re-engage, gates lift, alarms cease, and traffic signals turn green, restoring normal roadway use. Visual indicators, such as lights (green for open passage, red for closing), communicate status to mariners. These procedures ensure compliance with U.S. Coast Guard standards, prioritizing safe navigation while minimizing disruptions to land traffic.

Safety mechanisms and regulations

Movable bridges incorporate multiple safety mechanisms to prevent accidents during operation, ensuring the protection of vehicular, , and maritime traffic. These include mechanical locking systems that secure the bridge span in both open and closed positions, such as forged span locks that engage sockets to resist live loads and maintain structural integrity. , typically drum or disc types with spring-applied features, hold the span stationary during emergencies or , while air buffers provide controlled deceleration to avoid impacts at end positions. Interlock systems, comprising sensors and limit switches, prevent unintended movements by verifying that traffic gates are closed and no vessels are present before initiating closure. Modern movable bridges often integrate advanced control systems for enhanced safety, such as programmable logic controllers (PLCs) with redundant CPUs and emergency stop buttons that adhere to life safety protocols. features, including redundant cameras and thermal imaging, monitor for hazards like intrusions or fires, while intrusion detection systems alert operators to potential threats. Counterweights are precisely balanced to minimize mechanical stress, with regular testing to detect imbalances that could lead to failures, as demonstrated in incidents like the Michigan Avenue Bridge accident due to improper balance and lock engagement. Signaling systems play a critical role in operational safety, with visual and audible warnings required to alert users. Red and green navigation lights, compliant with U.S. standards, indicate bridge status to mariners, while flashing red lights and gongs warn vehicular of impending movement. barriers, such as gates and barriers, are interlocked with bridge controls to ensure they are in place before the span moves, and two-way communication systems, including public address and marine radio, facilitate coordination during openings. Regulations governing movable bridges emphasize regular inspections and to uphold safety. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) provides guidelines for operations, recommending periodic vulnerability assessments, cybersecurity measures like for control data, and operator training on cyber awareness. Preventive , including biennial reliability testing of gears, bearings, and locks, is mandated, with non-destructive evaluation techniques like used to detect cracks. Balance testing via drift tests or strain gauges ensures spans operate without excessive stress. In the United States, federal regulations under 33 CFR Part 117, administered by the , require drawbridges to open promptly on signal for navigation, with immediate priority for emergency vessels, and maintain operable machinery through periodic cycling. Clearance gauges and radiotelephone communication must be provided where necessary, and automated or remote operations must replicate on-site tender functions, including vessel detection to prevent closures over traffic. State agencies, such as the , supplement these with specific protocols for , alignment checks (e.g., 0.001 inches clearance per inch of shaft ), and logging of inspections. These standards collectively ensure reliable and safe bridge performance, aligning with broader bridge safety programs like those from the for rail crossings, though international equivalents exist under organizations like PIANC.

Applications and Examples

Advantages and disadvantages

Movable bridges offer several advantages over fixed bridges in locations where navigable waterways intersect transportation routes. Primarily, they enable unobstructed passage for marine traffic by temporarily opening the span, accommodating vessels of varying sizes without requiring excessively high fixed structures or lengthy approach ramps. This results in lower initial costs, as movable designs eliminate the need for tall piers and extensive elevated roadways. For instance, swing bridges minimize wind loads and preserve aesthetic views compared to vertical fixed spans. Despite these benefits, movable bridges present notable disadvantages, particularly in operational and demands. The presence of complex mechanical components, such as pivots, trunnions, and actuation systems, leads to higher long-term maintenance costs and requires specialized inspections to prevent failures. Operation disrupts land traffic, as vehicles must wait during openings, potentially causing delays in high-volume areas. Additionally, these bridges are challenging to widen for future traffic growth and exhibit poorer performance in seismic events due to . Bascule bridges, for example, face increased wind loads that necessitate robust machinery, while vertical-lift designs incur high costs for tall support towers.
TypeKey AdvantagesKey Disadvantages
SwingLow wind resistance; no counterweights needed; suitable for wide channelsSlow operation; on pivot; obstructs adjacent
BasculeQuick opening; collision protection for ; efficient for short spansHigh wind loads; wear on shear locks; larger footprint
Vertical-LiftUnlimited span length; supports heavy loads; partial lifts possibleExpensive towers; limited vertical clearance; slower vessel passage
Overall, the choice of a movable bridge balances navigational needs against increased lifecycle costs, with advantages most pronounced in constrained urban or port environments.

Notable structures

Movable bridges have been engineered for diverse environments, from urban waterways to international canals, showcasing innovations in types such as bascule, vertical-lift, swing, and transporter designs. The in , , is a renowned completed in 1894 after eight years of construction involving 432 workers and five major contractors. Designed by Sir Horace Jones and Sir John Wolfe Barry, it features two massive towers connected by high-level walkways and a central span that lifts via hydraulic bascules to accommodate river traffic, originally powered by steam and later converted to electro-hydraulics in 1974. Its Victorian and functional design make it a symbol of 19th-century engineering prowess. In , , the Bridge represents modern vertical-lift engineering, inaugurated in 2013 as Europe's longest such structure with a 110-meter main span. Engineered by the firm Egis, the 575-meter-long bridge lifts its 2,750-ton deck 53 meters in about 11 minutes using electric motors and counterweights, allowing passage for large vessels while carrying 43,000 vehicles daily across four lanes. This design balances urban mobility and port operations, exceeding initial projections with over 100 annual openings. The in , , stands as a post-World War II engineering milestone, constructed between 1957 and 1959 as the world's heaviest double-decked at 4,584,000 pounds. Featuring a 260-foot span with intermediate lift positions enabled by hydraulic rollers and movable supports, it accommodates both vehicular traffic on the upper deck and rail or pedestrian use below, utilizing 35,000 tons of and 7,000 tons of . Designated a National Historic Civil Engineering Landmark by the in 2022, it exemplifies mid-20th-century advancements in multi-modal bridge design. Another significant American example is the in , originally built in 1905 as a carrying a across the and modified in 1929 to a vertical-lift configuration. The 172-foot-high structure raises its 1,100-ton truss span 138 feet in 55 seconds via electric motors, facilitating nearly 800 ship passages annually while serving as an iconic gateway to the port. Listed on the , it highlights early 20th-century adaptations in lift-bridge technology for navigation. The (Puente Vizcaya) in , , is the world's oldest , operational since 1893 and designed by Alberto de Palacio Elissague with collaboration from Ferdinand Arnodin. Spanning 160 meters across the Nervión River estuary, it uses a suspended to ferry up to six vehicles or 200 pedestrians every 90 seconds via electric cables, preserving the original structure with minimal modifications. Recognized as a in 2006, it demonstrates pioneering 19th-century cable-suspended transport engineering for industrial ports. For swing bridges, the in holds distinction as one of the longest, with a 340-meter rotating span completed in 2001 to cross the . Engineered to pivot 90 degrees using hydraulic motors and counterweights, it allows two parallel rail tracks to open for ship traffic in under 10 minutes, supporting heavy freight loads up to 25 tons per . This structure underscores contemporary solutions for major international waterways, replacing an earlier 1940s version destroyed in conflict. These examples illustrate the evolution and global application of movable bridge technologies, from historical icons to modern feats that prioritize navigation and efficiency.

Incidents

Historical accidents

One of the most notable structural failures of a movable bridge occurred on October 7, 1941, when the north bascule span of the Sault Ste. Marie International Railroad Bridge in collapsed under the weight of a passing . The bridge, a large heel-trunnion bascule designed by the Strauss Bascule Bridge Company, buckled due to undetected and in the trunnion pins and supporting structure, leading to the span dropping into the St. Mary's River and halting rail traffic across the U.S.-Canada border. No fatalities were reported, but the incident disrupted vital wartime shipping through the for several days until repairs were completed. In 1959, the Michigan Avenue Bridge, a over the Buffalo River in New York, suffered a catastrophic collapse following a collision with the unmanned freighter SS Michael K. Tewksbury. On , gale-force winds and ice jams caused the 515-foot grain ship to break free from its mooring and drift downstream, striking the raised lift span broadside and demolishing both towers, which fell into the river and caused flooding over 18 blocks in Buffalo's First Ward. The accident resulted in no deaths but extensive property damage, including impacts to nearby elevators and buildings, and led to the bridge's complete reconstruction by 1960. Ship and barge collisions have been a recurring hazard for movable bridges, as documented in engineering analyses from the early onward. Mechanical and operational failures also contributed to significant accidents in the mid-. On February 24, 1977, the Memorial Bridge, a over the in , was severely damaged when a ship's electrical malfunction caused it to veer into the structure. The collision demolished the lift span, resulting in repair costs exceeding $7 million and a two-year closure, highlighting vulnerabilities in vessel control near movable spans. Similarly, in April 1977, the Union Avenue Bridge, a in , partially collapsed after a broken towline allowed to impact a and span, necessitating five to six months of repairs at $600,000 and underscoring risks from towing operations. Later in the century, the May 6, 1988, collision at the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge in exemplified ongoing collision risks for bascule designs. The inbound vessel Pontokratis struck the raised single-leaf bascule span, causing it to collapse and wrap around the ship, closing the river for 10 days. The U.S. deemed the structure unsafe post-incident, leading to the span's while preserving fixed approaches; no injuries were reported, but the event prompted enhanced fendering requirements for similar bridges.

Design improvements from failures

Failures in movable bridges, often resulting from structural overload, mechanical misalignment, or vessel collisions, have prompted key advancements in engineering practices to enhance safety and durability. For instance, the 1941 collapse of the north bascule span of the Sault Ste. Marie International Railroad Bridge occurred when it buckled under the weight of a passing freight locomotive, blocking access to critical wartime locks and disrupting navigation for several days. This incident highlighted vulnerabilities in bascule designs under dynamic loads, leading to the bridge's major reconfiguration in 1959, where the swing span was replaced with a vertical lift span to better distribute loads and reduce the risk of span failure during operation. Vessel collisions represent another primary failure mode for movable bridges, given their location over navigable waterways, with design errors and overload contributing to over 70% of such incidents alongside construction issues. In response, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) issued the Guide Specification for Vessel Collision Design of Highway Bridges in 1991, establishing risk-based criteria for piers and spans to withstand impact forces from barges and ships. For movable bridges specifically, the specifications mandate enhanced protections like cellular fenders, independent collision dolphins, and articulated bumpers to absorb and dissipate , preventing propagation of damage to operating mechanisms; these measures were developed from analyses of numerous historical allisions that caused partial or full span disruptions. Mechanical failures, such as excessive friction from thermal-induced misalignment in bascule or swing spans, have also driven refinements in component design and materials. Engineers now prioritize counterweight systems with materials matching the thermal expansion coefficients of structural steel to minimize binding during temperature fluctuations, alongside regular alignment adjustments during rehabilitation. Rehabilitation projects, like that of the Eleven Eleven Bascule Bridge, exemplify these improvements by replacing worn structural members and upgrading hydraulic cylinders to boost actuation reliability and prevent operational stalls from fatigue. Post-1988, no major collapses have been reported for U.S. movable bridges as of 2025, reflecting improved designs, though minor collisions continue to inform maintenance protocols. Overall, these changes emphasize redundant safety interlocks and predictive maintenance protocols to avert incidents before they escalate.

References

  1. https://www.fdot.gov/docs/default-source/maintenance/STR/BI/Reference-Manual/BMRM-Chapter-17.pdf
  2. https://wisconsindot.gov/dtsdManuals/strct/inspection/insp-fm-pt3ch1.pdf
  3. https://www.roads.maryland.gov/OPPEN/SECT_VI.pdf
  4. https://www.fdot.gov/docs/default-source/structures/structuresresearchcenter/final-reports/BD548_11.pdf
  5. https://www.nbpc2024.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/C12-Understanding-Movable-Bridges-Guide-to-Desing-and-Preservation-8-5-24.pdf
  6. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/maintenance/str/bi/reference-manual/chapter-17-movable-bridges.pdf?sfvrsn=dbf19abd_0
  7. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/NCHRP20-07Task424.pdf
  8. https://idot.illinois.gov/content/dam/soi/en/web/idot/documents/transportation-system/research/pavement-technology-advisories/maintenance-repair-and-rehabilitation-series/ptam5.pdf
  9. https://mm.nh.gov/files/uploads/dot/remote-docs/historic-movable-bridges-of-new-hampshire.pdf
  10. https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/kenwood/history-stories-kenwood/old-london-bridge/
  11. https://pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu/bridges-of-metropolitan-cleveland/chapter/movable-bridges/
  12. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/1/158
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386087074_Automation_and_Control_Systems_for_Lifting_Bridges
  14. https://www.architecture.org/online-resources/architecture-encyclopedia/trunnion-bascule-bridge
  15. https://dotd.la.gov/about/office-of-operations/structures-maintenance-and-inspection/movable-bridges/bascule/
  16. https://www.structuremag.org/article/joseph-b-strauss-bascule-bridge/
  17. https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/city/depts/zlup/Historic_Preservation/Publications/Historic_Chicago_Railroad_Bridges.pdf
  18. https://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/system/files/media/documents/2023/moveable-span-bridge-study-volume-2-bascule-and-swing-span-bridges-part-2_0.pdf
  19. https://dahp.wa.gov/sites/default/files/Bridge_Typology.pdf
  20. https://www.ncdot.gov/initiatives-policies/Transportation/bridges/historic-bridges/Pages/movable-bridges.aspx
  21. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-03/renewed-push-to-revive-sydney-glebe-island-bridge-after-30-years/105958342
  22. https://www.cedengineering.com/userfiles/S02-037%20-%20Structural%20Analysis%20and%20Design%20of%20Moveable%20Bridges%20-%20US.pdf
  23. https://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/system/files/media/documents/2023/moveable-span-bridge-study-volume-1-vertical-lift-span-bridges-part-1.pdf
  24. https://heavymovablestructures.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/0092.pdf
  25. https://www.chicagohistory.org/sites/default/files/bridges.pdf
  26. https://historicbridges.org/bridges/browser/?bridgebrowser=illinois/holmes/
  27. https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/infrastructure/movable-bridges.shtml
  28. https://historicbridges.org/bridges/browser/?bridgebrowser=newyork/carroll/
  29. https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Retractable_bridge
  30. https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/transporter-bridges-useful-or-just-beautiful
  31. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-39515192
  32. https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/huge-17m-revamp-wales-transporter-28809677
  33. https://dotd.la.gov/media/szqorira/grand-lake-pontoon-bridge-160729a_033760.pdf
  34. https://heavymovablestructures.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/00826.pdf
  35. https://wisconsindot.gov/dtsdManuals/strct/inspection/insp-fm-pt3ch8.pdf
  36. https://dotd.la.gov/media/rjjdxhcf/06-ch-6-mechanical-design.pdf
  37. https://heavymovablestructures.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Evolution-of-Modern-Hydraulic-Drive-Systems-for-Movable-Bridges.pdf
  38. https://heavymovablestructures.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/00219.pdf
  39. https://heavymovablestructures.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Hydraulic-Conversions-of-Movable-Bridges.pdf
  40. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-33/chapter-I/subchapter-J/part-117
  41. https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/city/depts/cdot/bridge/general/Chicago_Movable_Bridges/1%20CMBPP%20Text%20and%20Appendixes_Sept%202018%20fnl%20dft.pdf
  42. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-II/part-237
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/movable-bridges
  44. https://vtrc.virginia.gov/media/vtrc/vtrc-pdf/vtrc-pdf/98-r28.pdf
  45. https://www.webuildvalue.com/en/facts/movable-bridges.html
  46. https://www.towerbridge.org.uk/discover/history
  47. https://www.towerbridge.org.uk/discover/history/how-does-tower-bridge-work
  48. https://www.egis-group.com/projects/the-jacques-chaban-delmas-bridge-the-largest-vertical-lift-bridge-in-europe
  49. https://www.hardestyhanover.com/projects/jacques-chaban-delmas/
  50. https://www.mtu.edu/news/2022/06/rich-history-unique-design-make-lift-bridge-a-national-historic-civil-engineering-landmark.html
  51. http://www.dot.minnesota.gov/historicbridges/L6116.html
  52. https://npgallery.nps.gov/GetAsset/484a65d4-2597-49c6-9a14-30c0c7b85595
  53. https://duluthport.com/about-us/port-statistics/
  54. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1217/
  55. https://www.gondolaproject.com/2013/11/26/the-vizcaya-bridge-hanging-bridge/
  56. https://www.puentestransbordadores.com/en/bizkaia/
  57. https://structurae.net/en/structures/el-ferdan-swing-bridge
  58. https://structurae.net/en/structures/bridges/movable-bridges
  59. https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/master/pnp/habshaer/mi/mi0600/mi0638/data/mi0638data.pdf
  60. https://spectrumlocalnews.com/nys/buffalo/news/2024/08/20/a-look-back-at-buffalo-s-tewksbury-incident
  61. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/27742/chapter/6
  62. https://historicbridges.org/bridges/browser/?bridgebrowser=illinois/bocalumet/
  63. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/74807/dot_74807_DS1.pdf
  64. https://heavymovablestructures.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Eleveneleven.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.