Hubbry Logo
NeologismNeologismMain
Open search
Neologism
Community hub
Neologism
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Neologism
Neologism
Neologism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In linguistics, a neologism (/niˈɒləˌdʒɪzəm/, /nioʊˈloʊ-/;[1] also known as a coinage) is any newly formed word, term, or phrase that has gained popular or institutional recognition and is becoming accepted into mainstream language.[2]

Neologisms are one facet of lexical innovation, i.e., the linguistic process of new terms and meanings entering a language's lexicon. The most precise studies into language change and word formation, in fact, identify the process of a "neological continuum": a nonce word is any single-use term that may or may not grow in popularity; a protologism is such a term used exclusively within a small group; a prelogism is such a term that is gaining usage but is still not mainstream; and a neologism has become accepted or recognized by social institutions.[3][4]

Neologisms are often driven by changes in culture and technology.[5][6] Popular examples of neologisms can arise and be found in nearly all aspects of human life and culture, from science to technology, to the arts, to fiction (notably science fiction), to films, to television, to commercial branding, to literature, to jargon, to cant, to linguistics and to popular culture.

Examples

[edit]

Examples of neologisms are sorted by time and they include the tags to their source:

Types of neologisms
Acronym
From words foreign to the coiner
From words native to the coiner
From an onomatopeia
Portmanteau
From a personal name
From scratch

19th century (and earlier)

[edit]
  • utopia (1516), from Ancient Greek οὐ (ou, 'no') and τόπος (tópos, 'place') [from words foreign to the coiner]
  • typhoon (1588) from Chinese 台风 ('hurricane') [from words foreign to the coiner][dubious – discuss]
  • compute (1631) from Latin com- ('with') and putare ('to prune') [from words foreign to the coiner]
  • origami (1880) from Japanese 折り紙 ('paper folding') [from words foreign to the coiner]

20th century (and later)

[edit]
  • robot (1921), from Czech writer Karel Čapek's play R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots);[7] [from words foreign to the coiner]
  • agitprop (1930), from Russian агитпроп, a portmanteau of агитация (agitatsija, 'agitation') and пропага́нда (propaganda, 'propaganda').[8] [from words foreign to the coiner]
  • laser (1960), an acronym of "light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation" [from an acronym]
  • ruguanxue (2019), from Chinese 入关学 (rùguānxué, 'breakthrough studies') [from words foreign to the coiner]

Background

[edit]

Neologisms are often formed by combining existing words (see compound noun and adjective) or by giving words new and unique suffixes or prefixes.[9] Neologisms can also be formed by blending words, for example, "brunch" is a blend of the words "breakfast" and "lunch", or through abbreviation or acronym, by intentionally rhyming with existing words or simply through playing with sounds. A relatively rare form of neologism is when proper names are used as words (e.g., boycott, from Charles Boycott), including guy, dick, Chad, and Karen.[9]

Neologisms can become popular through memetics, through mass media, the Internet, and word of mouth, including academic discourse in many fields renowned for their use of distinctive jargon, and often become accepted parts of the language. Other times, they disappear from common use just as readily as they appeared. Whether a neologism continues as part of the language depends on many factors, probably the most important of which is acceptance by the public. It is unusual for a word to gain popularity if it does not clearly resemble other words.

History and meaning

[edit]

The term "neologism" is first attested in English in 1772, borrowed from the French "néologisme" (1734).[10] The French word derives from the Greek νέο (néo), meaning "new", and λόγος (lógos), meaning "speech, utterance".

In an academic sense, there are no professional neologists, because the study of such things (e.g., of cultural or ethnic vernacular) is interdisciplinary. Anyone such as a lexicographer or an etymologist might study neologisms, how their uses span the scope of human expression, and how, due to science and technology, they now spread more rapidly than ever.[11]

The term "neologism" also has a broader meaning, of "a word which has gained a new meaning".[12][13][14] Sometimes the latter process is called "semantic shifting"[12] or "semantic extension".[15][16] Neologisms are distinct from a person's idiolect, one's unique patterns of vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation.

Neologisms are usually introduced when a concept is lacking a term, or when an existing term lacks detail, or when a speaker is unaware of the existing term.[17] The law, governmental bodies, and technology have a relatively high frequency of acquiring neologisms.[18][19] Another motive for the coining of a neologism is to disambiguate a term that has multiple meanings.[20]

Literature

[edit]

Neologisms may come from a word used in the narrative of fiction such as novels and short stories. Examples include "grok" (to intuitively understand) from the science fiction novel about a Martian entitled Stranger in a Strange Land by Robert A. Heinlein; "McJob" (precarious, poorly-paid employment) from Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture by Douglas Coupland; "cyberspace" (widespread, interconnected digital technology) from Neuromancer by William Gibson[21] and "quark" (Slavic slang for "rubbish"; German for a type of dairy product) from James Joyce's Finnegans Wake.

The title of a book may become a neologism, for instance, Catch-22 (from the title of Joseph Heller's novel).[22] Alternatively, the author's name may give rise to the neologism, although the term is sometimes based on only one work of that author. This includes such words as "Orwellian" (from George Orwell, referring to his dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four) and "Kafkaesque" (from Franz Kafka).

Names of famous characters are another source of literary neologisms. Some examples include: Quixotic, referring to a misguided romantic quest like that of the title character in Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes;[23] Scrooge, a pejorative for misers based on the avaricious main character in Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol;[24] and Pollyanna, referring to people who are unfailingly optimistic like the title character of Eleanor H. Porter's Pollyanna.[25]

Scientific literature

[edit]

Neologisms are often introduced in technical writing, so-called Fachtexte or 'technical texts' through the process of lexical innovation. Technical subjects such as philosophy, sociology, physics, etc. are especially rich in neologisms. In philosophy, as an example, many terms became introduced into languages through processes of translation, e.g., from Ancient Greek to Latin, or from Latin to German or English, and so on. So Plato introduced the Greek term ποιότης (poiotēs), which Cicero rendered with Latin qualitas, which subsequently became our notion of 'quality' in relation to epistemology, e.g., a quality or attribute of a perceived object, as opposed to its essence. In physics, new terms were introduced sometimes via nonce formation (e.g., Murray Gell-Man's quark, taken from James Joyce) or through derivation (e.g. John von Neumann's kiloton, coined by combining the common prefix kilo- 'thousand' with the noun ton). Neologisms therefore are a vital component of scientific jargon or termini technici.

Cant

[edit]
Main article: Cant (language)

Polari is a cant used by some actors, circus performers, and the gay subculture to communicate without outsiders understanding. Some Polari terms have crossed over into mainstream slang, in part through their usage in pop song lyrics and other works. Example include: acdc, barney, blag, butch, camp, khazi, cottaging, hoofer, mince, ogle, scarper, slap, strides, tod, [rough] trade (rough trade).

Verlan (French pronunciation: [vɛʁlɑ̃]), (verlan is the reverse of the expression "l'envers") is a type of argot in the French language, featuring inversion of syllables in a word, and is common in slang and youth language. It rests on a long French tradition of transposing syllables of individual words to create slang words.[26]: 50  Some verlan words, such as meuf ("femme", which means "woman" roughly backwards), have become so commonplace that they have been included in the Petit Larousse.[27] Like any slang, the purpose of verlan is to create a somewhat secret language that only its speakers can understand. Words becoming mainstream is counterproductive. As a result, such newly common words are re-verlanised: reversed a second time. The common meuf became feumeu.[28][29]

[edit]

Neologism development may be spurred, or at least spread, by popular culture. Examples of pop-culture neologisms include the American alt-Right (2010s), the Canadian portmanteau "Snowmageddon" (2009), the Russian parody "Monstration" (c. 2004), Santorum (c. 2003).

Neologisms spread mainly through their exposure in mass media. The genericizing of brand names, such as "coke" for Coca-Cola (or any cola, or any soda in some parts of the United States), "Kleenex" for any brand of facial tissue, and Xerox for copy machines, all spread through their popular use being enhanced by mass media.[30]

However, in some limited cases, words break out of their original communities and spread through social media.[citation needed] "DoggoLingo", a term still below the threshold of a neologism according to Merriam-Webster,[31] is an example of the latter which has specifically spread primarily through Facebook group and Twitter account use.[31] The suspected origin of this way of referring to dogs stems from a Facebook group founded in 2008 and gaining popularity in 2014 in Australia. In Australian English it is common to use diminutives, often ending in –o, which could be where doggo-lingo was first used.[31] The term has grown so that Merriam-Webster has acknowledged its use but notes the term needs to be found in published, edited work for a longer period of time before it can be deemed a new word, making it the perfect example of a neologism.[31]

Translations

[edit]
In Danish a bag-in-box wine is known as papvin literally meaning "cardboard wine". This neologism was first recorded in 1982.[32]

Because neologisms originate in one language, translations between languages can be difficult.

In the scientific community, where English is the predominant language for published research and studies, like-sounding translations (referred to as 'naturalization') are sometimes used.[33] Alternatively, the English word is used along with a brief explanation of meaning.[33] The four translation methods are emphasized in order to translate neologisms: transliteration, transcription, the use of analogues, and loan translation.[34]

When translating from English to other languages, the naturalization method is most often used.[35] The most common way that professional translators translate neologisms is through the think aloud protocol (TAP), wherein translators find the most appropriate and natural sounding word through speech.[citation needed] As such, translators can use potential translations in sentences and test them with different structures and syntax. Correct translations from English for specific purposes into other languages is crucial in various industries and legal systems.[36][37] Inaccurate translations can lead to 'translation asymmetry' or misunderstandings and miscommunication.[37] Many technical glossaries of English translations exist to combat this issue in the medical, judicial, and technological fields.[38]

Other uses

[edit]

As a symptom

[edit]

In psychiatry and neuroscience, the term neologism is used to describe words that have meaning only to the person who uses them, independent of their common meaning.[39][40] This can be seen in schizophrenia, where a person may replace a word with a nonsensical one of their own invention (e.g., "I got so angry I picked up a dish and threw it at the gelsinger").[41] The use of neologisms may also be due to aphasia acquired after brain damage resulting from a stroke or head injury.[42]

In social media

[edit]

In social media, the term neologism is used to describe words made by a user. This can be seen in memes, user biographies and posts where a person creates a sensical one of their own invention.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Neologism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A neologism (/niːˈɒlədʒɪzəm/; from Ancient Greek νέο- (néo-) 'new' + λόγος (lógos) 'speech'), also known as a coinage, is a relatively new or isolated term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but has not yet been fully accepted into mainstream language. The term itself originated in French as néologisme in 1734, with the meaning "new word or expression" entering English usage in 1803. Neologisms form through diverse morphological and semantic processes that adapt existing linguistic resources to contemporary needs. Common methods include compounding, where two or more words are joined (e.g., smartphone from smart + phone); blending, merging parts of words (e.g., brunch from breakfast + lunch); derivation, adding affixes to roots (e.g., blogger from blog + -er); clipping, shortening words (e.g., ad for advertisement); and borrowing, adopting terms from other languages (e.g., sushi from Japanese). These processes enable languages to expand efficiently, often driven by technological advancements, cultural shifts, or global interactions. In linguistic evolution, neologisms serve as vital indicators of societal transformation, enriching vocabulary and facilitating communication about emerging realities. They reflect changes in technology, politics, and daily life, such as selfie (a clipped form of self-portrait) or hashtag (from social media conventions). Scholars model their propagation as epidemic-like cycles, with rapid rises in usage followed by peaks, decays, and varying degrees of retention, influenced by collective human behavior and media dissemination. This dynamic underscores neologisms' role in maintaining language vitality and cultural transmission, as seen in the surge of terms related to digital innovation and global events like the COVID-19 pandemic, or recent examples such as rage bait (a compound of rage + bait, referring to online content designed to provoke anger).

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Definition

A neologism is a newly coined word, phrase, or expression, or a new meaning assigned to an existing word, that enters a language and gains some degree of recognition or usage. These linguistic innovations often arise to describe emerging concepts, technologies, or social phenomena, reflecting the dynamic nature of vocabulary expansion. For instance, the term "selfie," referring to a self-portrait photograph typically taken with a smartphone, originated around 2002 in Australia as a blend of "self" and the diminutive suffix "-ie," and rapidly entered mainstream English by the 2010s. Key characteristics of neologisms include their inherent novelty, as they introduce fresh lexical elements not previously standardized in the . They possess the potential for widespread adoption, becoming integrated into everyday speech if they resonate with speakers, or for if they fail to persist beyond initial contexts. Neologisms play a crucial role in linguistic evolution by filling lexical gaps and adapting to societal changes, thereby maintaining its vitality and responsiveness. Neologisms differ from related terms such as archaisms, which are outdated words or expressions revived from earlier historical periods but no longer in common use. Unlike portmanteaus, which represent a specific formation method involving the blending of word parts (e.g., "brunch" from "breakfast" and "lunch"), neologisms encompass a broader category of lexical innovations that may or may not involve such blending. They are distinct from nonce words, which are invented for temporary, single-occasion use without broader acceptance. Additionally, neologisms contrast with barbarisms, which are nonstandard or erroneous usages, often involving foreign elements perceived as violations of linguistic norms rather than intentional innovations.

Etymology and Historical Meaning

The term neologism originates from the Greek roots neo- ("new") and logos ("word" or "speech"), combined to denote innovation in language or thought. It entered English in the late 18th century, borrowed from the French néologisme, with the earliest attested use in 1772 referring to the practice of inventing or applying new words or senses to existing ones. This linguistic adoption reflected broader Enlightenment interests in lexical evolution, though the word itself emerged as a meta-term for describing such innovations. Historically, neologism initially bore a connotation, especially in religious and theological contexts, where it described the introduction of novel doctrines or interpretations perceived as deviations from traditional orthodoxy. In 18th-century German Protestant theology, it was synonymous with neology, a rationalist movement that sought to reconcile with emerging scientific and philosophical ideas, often criticized by conservatives as heretical innovation. By the 1790s, during the , the term extended to critique radical political and ideological "neologisms"—new concepts or terminologies associated with dechristianization and secular reforms, viewed by opponents as dangerously unorthodox disruptions to established social and . This theological and ideological usage underscored suspicions of novelty as a threat to stability. By the early 19th century, the term's meaning shifted toward a more neutral linguistic sense, denoting simply a new word or expression, as evidenced by its 1803 application in English dictionaries. A key milestone was its formal recognition in major lexicographical works; for instance, the cites usages around 1827 for the theological sense of rationalizing new doctrines, marking its transition into standard reference alongside the emerging lexical definition. Philosophers like further influenced this evolution, explicitly endorsing neologism in 1820 as a vital tool for linguistic adaptation, arguing it should serve as a root for terms like neology and neologist to enrich English expression. These developments solidified neologism as a descriptor of creative verbal rather than doctrinal .

Historical Development

Ancient and Medieval Origins

The development of writing by the Sumerians around 3000 BCE in represents one of the earliest documented instances of linguistic innovation through the creation of a , primarily to address emerging economic and administrative needs. This logo-syllabic script evolved from pictographic symbols used on clay tokens and seals for tracking trade goods like , textiles, and livestock, with new signs developed to record and describe transactions that previous oral traditions could not precisely capture. For example, tablets from include notations for specific measures of grain or exchange values, allowing for the formalization of complex trade networks across ancient Near Eastern societies. In , Greek philosophers further advanced neologistic practices by adapting existing words to novel abstract concepts in . , writing in the 4th century BCE, repurposed the term idea (from the verb idein, "to see") to denote immutable, ideal forms beyond the physical world, a semantic shift that distinguished his metaphysical theory from everyday usage referring to visible shapes or notions. This innovation not only enriched Greek philosophical discourse but also influenced subsequent thinkers like , who coined or refined terms such as energeia (activity or actuality) to articulate ideas of potentiality and realization. Roman contributions to neologism, particularly in the 1st century BCE, focused on adapting Greek philosophical vocabulary into Latin to support intellectual translation and cultural assimilation. Cicero, in works like De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum, systematically created Latin equivalents for Greek terms, such as qualitas for poiotes (quality) and essentia for ousia (essence), thereby establishing a robust philosophical lexicon that enabled Romans to engage with Hellenistic ideas without relying on Greek. These coinages addressed the limitations of classical Latin in expressing nuanced concepts, fostering a bridge between Greek and Roman thought. Medieval developments saw neologisms proliferate in both and Latin contexts amid scientific and theological advancements. In the , around the 9th century CE, scholars like Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi coined al-jabr ("restoration" or "completion of parts") in his treatise Kitab al-Jabr wa-l-Muqabala, introducing a systematic term for solving equations that integrated Greek, Indian, and Persian mathematical traditions. Similarly, in Latin from the 11th to 13th centuries, ecclesiastical writers developed terms like transsubstantiatio () to articulate doctrines of the , as refined by in , where it described the substantial change of bread and wine into Christ's body and blood. These innovations were driven by imperatives, such as rendering Aristotle's works into and Latin; technological progress, including advancements in mathematics and scriptural ; and cultural exchanges along trade routes and scholarly centers like and .

Modern Evolution

The invention of the by around 1440 dramatically accelerated the creation and dissemination of neologisms during the and Enlightenment periods by enabling the and widespread distribution of books, which facilitated the rapid sharing of innovative language among scholars, authors, and readers across . This technological advancement increased book production from a few hundred copies to thousands, lowering costs and boosting rates, thereby allowing new words coined in literary and scientific works to enter common usage far more quickly than in manuscript eras. For instance, is credited with introducing or popularizing over 1,700 words into English, including "eyeball" from his 1598 play , which exemplified the era's linguistic creativity in drama and poetry. The in the late 18th and early 19th centuries further propelled neologism formation as rapid technological and social changes necessitated terminology for new inventions, machinery, and urban phenomena, marking a shift toward more utilitarian and descriptive coinages. Terms like "," first recorded in and widely adopted by the following the opening of the in 1825, captured the essence of this era's transformative infrastructure, blending existing words to describe iron tracks for steam-powered transport. This period saw neologisms emerge primarily from engineers, inventors, and journalists documenting industrialization, contrasting with the more artistic focus of the . The 20th and 21st centuries witnessed surges in neologisms driven by global conflicts, technological revolutions, and health crises, with adoption rates exploding due to interconnected world events. , for example, popularized military terms like "" (meaning "lightning war" in German), which entered English in 1940 to describe Germany's rapid armored invasions of , including . The computing boom of the mid-20th century introduced "" in 1974, coined by and Bob Kahn in their seminal paper on internetworking protocols, reflecting the shift to digital connectivity. More recently, the 2019 emergence of the prompted the to coin "" as an acronym for "coronavirus disease 2019," which quickly became a global standard term amid widespread media coverage. Mass media, including newspapers, radio, television, and digital platforms, combined with , have exponentially increased neologism adoption by exposing diverse populations to new terms in real time, often leading to their rapid and . This dynamic has resulted in dictionaries like incorporating over 500 new words annually in the 2020s—for instance, 535 in April 2020 and 370 in September 2022—many originating from global events and viral trends amplified through interconnected media networks. Scholarly analyses highlight how such channels democratize evolution, allowing neologisms to spread across borders via cultural exchange and online discourse, far surpassing the slower diffusion of earlier eras.

Formation Processes

Methods of Coinage

Neologisms are created through various coinage methods that draw on existing linguistic elements or imitate sounds to form novel words. These techniques include borrowing from other languages, blending parts of words, forming acronyms, and other processes such as clipping, , and . Borrowing, or the adoption of loanwords, involves incorporating terms directly from foreign languages into the target , often with minimal phonetic . This method enriches by introducing concepts absent in the receiving language. For instance, "," referring to a Japanese dish of vinegared rice and seafood, entered English in 1875 from Japanese. Blending, also known as portmanteau formation, combines segments of two or more words to create a new term that merges their meanings and sounds. This technique is particularly productive for concise expression of hybrid concepts. The word "," denoting a mixture of and in polluted air, was coined in 1905 by Dr. H.A. des Voeux as a blend of "" and "." Acronyms and initialisms produce neologisms by taking the initial letters or parts of a phrase to form a pronounceable word or abbreviation. Acronyms are read as words, while initialisms are spelled out, but both simplify complex nomenclature. "Laser," standing for "light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation," originated as an acronym in 1960, patterned after similar scientific terms like "maser." Other methods encompass clipping, which shortens existing words by removing syllables; back-formation, which derives a new word by subtracting an assumed ; and echoic words or , which imitate sounds. Clipping yields informal variants, such as "" from "advertisement," attested in 1841. creates verbs from nouns, like "edit" from "editor," first recorded in 1791. forms words mimicking auditory phenomena, exemplified by "buzz," which echoes the sound of and dates to the late . The success of a neologism in gaining widespread adoption depends on factors such as phonetic appeal, cultural relevance, and media exposure. Phonetic appeal involves ease of pronunciation and phonological transparency, which facilitate recognition and processing, as seen in blends with high formal appeal scores correlating with usage frequency (r=0.522, p=0.009). Cultural relevance ties the word to timely trends or events, enhancing semantic transparency and extralinguistic motivation, though its predictive power varies by language. Media exposure, particularly through social media and high-frequency online dissemination, accelerates diffusion, with neologisms like "glampsite" showing significantly higher page views in peak periods (t=2.261, p=0.034). These elements interact in a feedback loop of usualisation and spread, determining long-term integration.

Morphological and Semantic Types

Neologisms are classified into morphological types based on their structural formation, which involves alterations to existing word forms to create novel expressions. Derivational neologisms arise through affixation, where prefixes or suffixes are added to base words to modify their meaning or ; for instance, "unfriend," formed by attaching the prefix "un-" to "friend," emerged in 2009 to describe removing someone from a contact list. Compounding represents another key morphological type, combining two or more existing words into a single new term, as in "," which merges "smart" and "phone" and was first coined by in 1997 to denote advanced mobile devices integrating computing capabilities. Semantic types of neologisms focus on shifts in meaning rather than form, often repurposing existing words for new contexts. Semantic extension, or broadening, occurs when a word's meaning expands beyond its original scope; the term "," traditionally referring to atmospheric phenomena, broadened in 2006 to encompass remote and services with the launch of Amazon's Elastic Compute Cloud. Narrowing, conversely, specializes a word's meaning to a more restricted domain; "tweet," originally denoting a bird's chirping sound, narrowed by 2006 to specifically refer to short messages posted on the platform. Value shifts include pejoration, where a word acquires a negative , and amelioration, where it gains a positive one; these processes are evident in neologisms that adapt neutral terms to evaluative contexts, such as emerging where everyday words develop derogatory or elevated senses to reflect social attitudes. Hybrid types blend morphological and semantic changes, notably functional shifts, where words change without formal alteration, often through zero derivation. A prominent example is "," which shifted from a naming the search engine to a verb meaning "to search online" by 2006, as recognized in the . These shifts facilitate rapid adaptation in usage, allowing nouns to function as verbs in dynamic linguistic environments. Corpus linguistics studies reveal how these morphological and semantic types underscore language , defined as the potential for generating new forms and meanings. Analyses of large , such as those employing hapax legomena (unique word types) to measure neologism frequency, demonstrate that derivational and processes exhibit high productivity in English, enabling speakers to innovate efficiently; for example, Baayen's quantitative models show that affixation patterns in like the yield predictable yet creative outputs, reflecting the language's morphological flexibility. Similarly, semantic shifts in neologisms, tracked via diachronic , highlight productivity through meaning extension, as seen in technology-driven terms like "tweet," which proliferated rapidly post-2006, illustrating how corpus data quantifies the integration of novel senses into everyday .

Applications in Language and Society

In Literature and Arts

Neologisms have long served as vital tools in and , enabling authors and artists to innovate expression, evoke new realities, and challenge linguistic conventions for aesthetic and conceptual purposes. In and , writers employ neologisms to construct immersive worlds, blending familiar roots with inventive forms to heighten emotional and thematic depth. This creative coinage often draws on morphological processes like portmanteaus or semantic extensions, allowing artists to transcend everyday while mirroring the fluidity of human experience. Lewis Carroll's 1871 poem "," from Through the Looking-Glass, exemplifies this through its portmanteau neologisms such as "slithy" (slimy + lithe) and "mimsy" (flimsy + miserable), which create a of playful that invites readers to infer meaning from context and sound. These inventions not only drive the narrative's fantastical tone but also demonstrate how neologisms can function as both linguistic puzzles and emotional anchors in verse. Similarly, James Joyce's 1922 novel Ulysses features hundreds of lexical innovations, including blends like "portmanteaus" and nonce words such as "proteiform," which reflect the characters' stream-of-consciousness and enrich the text's modernist experimentation with as a dynamic, evolving entity. In fiction, neologisms facilitate the building of imaginary worlds, as seen in J.R.R. Tolkien's (1954–1955), where constructed Elvish terms like "" and "" (complete invented languages with their own grammars and vocabularies) immerse readers in Middle-earth's mythology, emphasizing themes of cultural preservation and linguistic invention. Beyond prose, artistic movements have embraced neologisms in manifestos and performance; the 1916 founding of Dadaism in Zurich coined the term "" itself—a nonsensical neologism selected randomly from a dictionary to symbolize rebellion against rationalism and war, encapsulating the movement's ethos in visual and literary works. In theater, Samuel Beckett's sparse neologisms, such as his self-coined "dramaticules" for short plays like Come and Go (1965), underscore and existential isolation, using invented brevity to distill dialogue into fragmented, evocative forms that probe human disconnection. The impact of literary neologisms often hinges on their potential for permanence versus ephemerality, with many fading into obscurity while others embed in cultural lexicon through resonance and repetition. George Orwell's 1949 novel provides a seminal case: the neologism "Big Brother," denoting omnipresent , has achieved lasting permanence, entering global usage as a for authoritarian control and appearing in dictionaries like the OED due to its prophetic alignment with real-world political shifts. In contrast, most artistic neologisms remain ephemeral, confined to their original contexts to preserve interpretive ambiguity, yet collectively they illustrate how and arts propel language evolution by prioritizing innovation over standardization.

In Science and Technology

In science and , neologisms emerge to encapsulate concepts, enabling precise communication among experts and facilitating the dissemination of groundbreaking ideas. These terms often arise from deliberate coinage by researchers to describe discoveries that challenge existing paradigms, such as subatomic particles or molecular structures, and they gain traction through peer-reviewed publications and international standards bodies. Unlike informal , scientific neologisms prioritize clarity and universality, often drawing from Latin, Greek , or acronyms to ensure across global collaborations. Their rapid integration into technical lexicons underscores the dynamic nature of production in these fields. A seminal example in physics is the term "quark," coined by Murray Gell-Mann in 1963 to denote hypothetical fundamental particles smaller than protons and neutrons, inspired by a whimsical line—"Three quarks for Muster Mark!"—from James Joyce's Finnegans Wake. This neologism, initially proposed in Gell-Mann's work on the classification of hadrons, was formalized in his 1964 paper and quickly adopted following experimental confirmation at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center in the late 1960s. The term's playful origin belies its role in revolutionizing particle physics, earning Gell-Mann the 1969 Nobel Prize in Physics for the quark model. Similarly, in biology, the acronym "DNA" for deoxyribonucleic acid became emblematic of a transformative discovery when James Watson and Francis Crick elucidated its double-helix structure in 1953, building on earlier uses of the full term but cementing the abbreviation in scientific discourse through their seminal Nature publication. This neologism not only simplified reference to the genetic material but also propelled molecular biology forward by providing a concise label for heredity's molecular basis. Technological neologisms often evolve from historical roots to adapt to contemporary innovations, as seen with "," derived from the name of the 9th-century Persian mathematician Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi, whose treatise introduced systematic methods for arithmetic and using Hindu-Arabic numerals. The term "" entered Latin in the via translations of his work, gradually morphing into "" by the to denote step-by-step computational procedures, and expanding in the to encompass modern applications in and . In a more recent instance, "" emerged in 2008 alongside Satoshi Nakamoto's whitepaper, which described a as a "chain of blocks" to enable secure, electronic transactions without intermediaries; the compound term rapidly standardized to refer to this decentralized technology, influencing fields from finance to . The formation and standardization of such terms in science and frequently involve international conventions to ensure consistency, particularly in chemistry where the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) establishes rules for new compounds, such as substitutive naming based on parent chains and functional groups. For instance, IUPAC guidelines, outlined in the Blue Book (2013) and updated periodically, dictate the creation of terms like "methoxymethane" for , preventing ambiguity in global research and filings. These neologisms achieve rapid adoption in scientific journals through citation networks and editorial policies; a study of lexical innovation in earth sciences found that portmanteau terms, such as "," propagate swiftly via high-impact publications like , often within months of proposal, due to their efficiency in capturing interdisciplinary concepts. This velocity is evident in how "," an for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, transitioned from a 2012 paper to ubiquitous use in gene-editing discussions by 2013. Despite their utility, scientific and technological neologisms face challenges from driven by shifts, where terms tied to superseded hardware or theories fade from active use. The "," introduced in the as a flexible medium holding up to 1.44 MB, exemplifies this; by the 2000s, it became archaic with the rise of optical discs and solid-state drives, yet lingers in metaphors like computer "save" icons. Such attrition highlights the provisional nature of technical vocabulary, necessitating ongoing lexicographical updates in fields like to reflect evolving standards.

In Slang and Subcultures

Neologisms in slang and subcultures often emerge within specific social groups to express informality, creativity, and shared experiences, evolving rapidly to reflect changing dynamics. For instance, the term "cool," originally denoting low temperature, underwent a semantic shift in the 1930s within African American jazz circles to signify something fashionable or admirable, as popularized by saxophonist Lester Young. Similarly, "ghosting," referring to abruptly ceasing communication in romantic contexts, gained prominence in the early 2010s amid the rise of online dating, marking a new way to describe relational avoidance. These examples illustrate how subcultural neologisms adapt existing words to capture novel social behaviors. Cant and argot represent specialized forms of slang used historically by marginalized groups for secrecy and solidarity. In 16th-century , "canting crews"—bands of thieves, beggars, and vagabonds—developed , a cryptolect documented in Thomas Harman's 1566 treatise A Caveat or Warning for Common Cursetors, which included terms like "angter" for a to evade detection by authorities. In modern contexts, hacker subcultures coined "phishing" in the mid-1990s, adapting "fishing" to describe fraudulent attempts to lure sensitive information online, first noted in AOL hacking communities around 1995. Such argots function as in-group codes, blending neologisms with altered spellings or metaphors to maintain exclusivity. Subcultural neologisms spread through oral traditions in tight-knit communities and, increasingly, via online forums, exhibiting high turnover due to cultural . Terms like "," shorthand for charisma in romantic persuasion, originated on Twitch streams by influencer around 2021 before exploding on in 2023, demonstrating how digital platforms accelerate dissemination while terms fade quickly as novelty wanes. This rapid evolution contrasts with stability, as adapts to immediate social needs rather than enduring codification. From a sociolinguistic perspective, these neologisms play a key role in signaling group identity and enforcing exclusion, fostering cohesion among insiders while distancing outsiders. reinforces social bonds by marking affiliation, as seen in subcultures where unique terms affirm membership and subtly reject mainstream norms. This boundary-drawing function underscores 's distinctiveness from , prioritizing relational dynamics over universal accessibility.

Cultural and Global Dimensions

Neologisms originating in often emerge from media innovations and entertainment phenomena, rapidly disseminating through mass consumption and influencing everyday discourse. The term "meme," coined by evolutionary biologist in his 1976 book to describe a unit of cultural transmission analogous to a gene, initially served as a scientific concept but gained widespread traction in the via platforms like and image-sharing sites, where it evolved to denote viral humorous content. Similarly, "binge-watch," referring to consuming multiple episodes of a television series in one sitting, arose in the context of streaming services like ; while early uses date to the late 1990s, it entered common parlance around 2013 as on-demand viewing became prevalent, reflecting shifts in media consumption habits. In entertainment, neologisms from films, television, and music frequently embed themselves in cultural lexicon, extending beyond their fictional or performative origins. The word "," denoting a noble warrior order in the Star Wars franchise, was invented by filmmaker for the 1977 film Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope, drawing possible inspiration from the Japanese term for historical dramas, and has since permeated global language to describe anyone embodying disciplined expertise. In music, "twerk," a verb describing a provocative hip-shaking dance, traces its modern usage to the early New Orleans scene but exploded in popularity in 2013 following Miley Cyrus's performance at the , transforming it from niche to a broadly recognized term despite earlier 19th-century roots in "twirk" meaning a twisting motion. Social media accelerates the viral spread of these pop culture neologisms, often leading to measurable spikes in usage that highlight their rapid adoption. For instance, epidemiological models of language evolution show how terms like "meme" exhibit growth patterns akin to infectious diseases, with internet data revealing exponential increases in frequency during the 2010s, as tracked by tools like Google Ngram Viewer, which documents surges in printed occurrences correlating with online virality. This digital dissemination not only amplifies reach but also mutates meanings, as seen with "binge-watch," whose Ngram frequency rose sharply post-2013, underscoring social media's role in embedding entertainment-derived words into daily communication. Pop culture neologisms create a feedback loop with mainstream , where successful terms integrate into dictionaries and vernacular while others fade as transient fads. Linguists note that cultural phenomena drive this integration, with pop-derived words like "Jedi" and "twerk" achieving permanence through repeated media exposure and community adoption, influencing broader linguistic norms without always retaining original connotations. Conversely, many viral neologisms dissipate quickly if they fail to resonate beyond initial trends, illustrating the selective nature of evolution in response to cultural shifts.

Cross-Linguistic and Translational Aspects

Neologisms often traverse linguistic boundaries through processes of and , enabling the expression of novel concepts across cultures while navigating the unique morphological and semantic structures of target languages. One common mechanism is the , or loan translation, where the components of a source-language term are directly translated into the receiving to form a new word. For instance, the English term "," denoting a tall building, has been calqued into numerous languages, including French gratte-ciel ("scrapes-sky"), Italian grattacielo ("scrapes-sky"), and Russian neboskreb ("sky-scraper"). This approach preserves the original imagery while integrating the neologism into the target language's grammar, as seen in broader patterns of Romance and Slavic adaptations of English architectural terms. Global challenges arise when neologisms, particularly those from , resist easy due to script differences or cultural specificity. The term "hashtag," coined in 2007 for tagging, exemplifies this: it is widely borrowed directly into languages worldwide, often retaining its English form even in non-Latin scripts like or Chinese, where it is transliterated (e.g., هاشتاغ in ). However, challenges persist with accented characters or diacritics in languages such as French or Turkish, as hashtags typically avoid special symbols to ensure searchability, leading to simplified or anglicized adaptations that can dilute phonetic accuracy. In multilingual digital contexts, this borrowing strategy facilitates global communication but raises issues of accessibility in low-resource languages without robust norms. Case studies highlight diverse approaches to neologism creation in constructed and revitalized languages. In Esperanto, a planned international auxiliary language, neologisms are systematically formed through compounding and derivation to maintain semantic transparency and universality; for example, komputilo ("computer") combines komputi ("to compute") with the suffix -ilo for tools, allowing speakers to generate terms like varmenerg'o ("thermal energy") from existing roots. Similarly, the Hawaiian language revival, gaining momentum in the 1970s amid cultural renaissance efforts, has involved the invention of over 6,500 neologisms since 1983 by the Hawaiian Lexicon Committee to address modern concepts absent in pre-contact vocabulary. Terms such as pahu ho‘olele leo ("box that broadcasts voice") for "radio" and liliuewe ("evolutionary lineage") for "biological evolution" are crafted by combining native roots, extending meanings, or drawing from related Polynesian languages, supporting immersion programs and community use. Translational strategies in international , such as those employed by the , balance borrowing and invention to ensure terminological equivalence across languages. Borrowing direct loans or calques is preferred for efficiency in technical domains, as with "chlorofluorocarbons" (CFCs) adapted via loan translations in official multilingual documents, while invention through derivation or compounding creates culturally resonant equivalents when borrowing risks opacity. guidelines advocate collaborative policies involving linguists and experts to evaluate these methods, favoring neologisms that enhance clarity in global discourse, such as Persian APLL-coined terms like nofe ("") over unexplained borrowings in scientific translations. This dual approach mitigates untranslatability while promoting linguistic equity in organizations handling diverse languages.

Specialized Contexts

In Linguistics and Lexicography

In linguistics, Ferdinand de Saussure's early 20th-century distinction between langue—the abstract, collective system of a language—and parole—individual acts of speech—has profoundly influenced the study of neologisms as indicators of evolving langue, where new words emerge from innovative parole and may integrate into the shared linguistic structure over time. This framework underscores neologisms not merely as isolated inventions but as dynamic elements reflecting synchronic stability alongside potential diachronic shifts in language systems. Lexicographers document neologisms through rigorous processes emphasizing evidence of sustained usage across diverse contexts, as seen in the (OED), which historically applied a guideline requiring a word's appearance over two to three years in multiple sources before consideration for print editions, though modern digital updates prioritize broader currency without a fixed timeline. Major dictionaries like the OED and Merriam-Webster do not accept direct submissions of personally coined words; instead, new words are added based on evidence of widespread and sustained public usage in publications and media. The OED accepts contributions of usage evidence, such as quotations, through their contributing guidelines, and maintains a "watch list" database where potential entries are monitored via crowdsourced submissions, reading programs, and automated analysis, with inclusion hinging on verifiable quotations from newspapers, academic texts, and demonstrating widespread adoption. Merriam-Webster editors monitor usage across various sources and can be contacted via their FAQ to flag potential words, but inclusion requires sufficient citations demonstrating broad adoption. To increase chances of inclusion, promoting heavy usage of the term online and in print is recommended. Tools like the Ngram Viewer further aid this by enabling frequency tracking of candidate neologisms across digitized corpora spanning centuries, revealing emergence patterns from rarity to prevalence. Research in this domain relies heavily on , where large-scale text collections are analyzed to quantify neologism frequency and diffusion, often identifying candidates through metrics like sudden spikes in occurrence or novel collocations. For instance, the has been used to examine extra-linguistic sources of neologisms, such as blends or acronyms, by comparing their distributional patterns against established . Specialized databases support this work; the Neoveille platform, for example, processes newspaper corpora in seven languages to automatically detect and catalog neologisms based on morphological novelty and usage trends, facilitating cross-linguistic comparisons. Debates in center on neologism longevity, with scholars questioning whether initial surges reliably predict persistence, as many fade despite early traction due to factors like cultural relevance or competition from alternatives. Modeling approaches, such as epidemiological simulations of word spread, highlight that success depends on diffusion rates and routinization, yet empirical studies show alone often fails as a longevity indicator, prompting calls for integrated psycholinguistic metrics. Relatedly, purism debates arise around institutional resistance to neologisms, exemplified by the Académie Française's efforts to preserve French integrity by proposing native equivalents for foreign borrowings and critiquing anglicisms as pollutants, though this stance has been challenged for stifling natural evolution.

In Computing and Digital Media

Neologisms in and have proliferated rapidly due to the field's innovative pace and the interactive nature of online platforms, where technical necessities and cultural trends intersect to coin new terminology. Early examples include foundational terms that standardized handling, such as "byte," which refers to a unit of digital information typically comprising eight bits. The term was coined in June 1956 by Werner Buchholz, a German-American working on IBM's Stretch computer project, as a deliberate alteration of "bite" to describe a sequence of bits encoding a character, distinguishing it from the smaller "bit." In digital communication, visual and expressive neologisms like "" emerged to enhance text-based interactions on mobile devices. Originating in in 1999, when designer created the first set of 176 pixelated icons for NTT DoCoMo's service to convey emotions and ideas succinctly in early mobile , "" derives from the Japanese words for "picture" (e) and "character" (moji). The term and its global adoption accelerated in the 2010s following Unicode's inclusion of emojis in 2010, enabling cross-platform standardization and widespread use in and messaging apps. Semantic extensions from to digital contexts have also shaped media , notably "viral," which shifted in the from denoting infectious diseases to describing content that spreads rapidly online via sharing mechanisms. This usage gained traction with early phenomena like forwards and the 1996 Hotmail campaign, where free signatures promoted the service organically, marking one of the first instances of "." By the late , terms like "" applied to clips such as the 1997 "badday.mpg," an early example of user-shared media propagating through nascent web forums and . Social media's rise in the introduced neologisms tied to online influence and economy, including "influencer," denoting individuals who leverage on platforms like and to shape consumer behavior. The term's modern prominence dates to the early , evolving from platform-specific labels (e.g., "") amid the of user content, with its entry into mainstream dictionaries like in 2019 reflecting widespread adoption. Technological evolution continues to spawn specialized terms, particularly in emerging fields like and . In AI, "prompt engineering" emerged around 2022 as a discipline for crafting precise inputs to large language models like to optimize outputs, driven by the public release of tools such as and the need for systematic interaction techniques beyond simple queries. Similarly, in , "HODL"—a misspelling of "hold" that became a advocating long-term retention of assets despite volatility—originated in a December 18, 2013, Bitcointalk forum post by user GameKyuubi during a market dip, quickly evolving into for resilient investing. Privacy concerns in digital spaces have yielded neologisms like "doxxing," the act of publicly revealing someone's personal information without consent, often for . The term, a blend of "documents" (docs) and "-xing" from hacker slang "dropping dox," solidified in the mid-2000s within online gaming and activist communities, building on practices among hackers to expose rivals' identities. The unique dynamics of and accelerate neologism creation through on platforms like and , where algorithmic amplification favors novel expressions, and rapid iteration in embeds terms into global lexicons almost instantaneously. This process, analyzed in linguistic studies of corpora from 2019–2023, shows neologisms forming via blending, acronymy, and clipping at rates far exceeding traditional language evolution, often propelled by viral trends and community adoption.

References

  1. https://www.etymonline.com/word/neologism
  2. https://englishexplorations.check.uni-hamburg.de/neologisms-formation-processes/
  3. https://pressbooks.openedmb.ca/wordandsentencestructures/chapter/word-formation-processes/
  4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381322548_Ways_of_neologism_formation_in_English
  5. https://science-technology.uz/index.php/journal/article/view/250
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7857598/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8410579/
  8. https://corp.oup.com/news/the-oxford-word-of-the-year-2025-is-rage-bait/
  9. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/neologism
  10. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/neologism
  11. https://quillbot.com/blog/rhetoric/neologism/
  12. https://www.etymonline.com/word/selfie
  13. https://www.globallanguageservices.co.uk/what-is-a-neologism/
  14. https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/imag_file/p-34-36.pdf
  15. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/english-grammar-usage/neologisms
  16. https://literaryterms.net/archaism/
  17. https://www.scribbr.com/rhetoric/portmanteau/
  18. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/nonce-word-explained
  19. https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/scin/article/view/46376
  20. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/neology
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272250502_Caught_Between_Neologism_and_the_Unmentionable_The_Politics_of_Naming_and_Non-naming_in_1790s_France
  22. https://www.scss.tcd.ie/Khurshid.Ahmad/Research/OntoTerminology/2000_NeologismNonceWordFormation.pdf
  23. https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/03-16-02-0152
  24. https://smarthistory.org/cuneiform/
  25. https://plato-dialogues.org/lexicon.htm
  26. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-metaphysics/
  27. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-ciceros-philosophy/cicero-and-the-creation-of-a-latin-philosophical-vocabulary/9C19ECB6DED96F0A5EACD416E43BFB11
  28. https://www.academia.edu/121991631/From_Greek_to_Latin_The_development_of_the_Latin_philosophical_vocabulary
  29. https://www.etymonline.com/word/algebra
  30. https://www.etymonline.com/word/transubstantiation
  31. https://www.persee.fr/doc/alma_0994-8090_2013_num_71_1_1252
  32. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1632/the-printing-revolution-in-renaissance-europe/
  33. https://www.shakespeare.org.uk/explore-shakespeare/shakespedia/shakespeares-words/
  34. https://www.etymonline.com/word/railway
  35. https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/fall06/cos561/papers/cerf74.pdf
  36. https://jcom.sissa.it/article/pubid/JCOM_1905_2020_A01/
  37. https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/new-words-in-the-dictionary-april-2020
  38. https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/new-words-in-the-dictionary-september-2022
  39. https://www.academia.edu/65820836/Non_morphematic_word_formation_processes_a_multi_level_approach_to_acronyms_blends_clippings_and_onomatopoeia
  40. https://www.etymonline.com/word/sushi
  41. https://www.etymonline.com/word/smog
  42. https://www.etymonline.com/word/laser
  43. https://www.etymonline.com/word/ad
  44. https://www.etymonline.com/word/edit
  45. https://www.etymonline.com/word/buzz
  46. https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/28760/1/Link_Sabrina_Vanessa.pdf
  47. https://blog.oup.com/2009/11/unfriend./
  48. https://www.textedly.com/blog/smartphone-history-when-were-smartphones-invented
  49. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/cloud-computing
  50. https://www.businessinsider.com/the-origin-of-the-word-tweet-2013-7
  51. https://traugott.people.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj28616/files/media/file/traugott2017a.pdf
  52. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/google_v2
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285247011_Corpus_linguistics_in_morphology_Morphological_productivity
  54. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53s3w4r5
  55. https://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol01/09/15.pdf
  56. https://www.adamrose.us/public/documents/Adam_Rose-Lewis_Carrolls_Jabberwocky_Non_sense_Not_Nonsense.pdf
  57. https://uvadoc.uva.es/bitstream/handle/10324/58600/TFG_F_2022_050.pdf?sequence=1
  58. https://www.theartstory.org/movement/dada/
  59. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/769388/summary
  60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371745971_NEOLOGISMS_FORMATION_AND_USE_IN_THE_NOVEL_1984_BY_G_ORWELL
  61. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1969/gell-mann/interview/
  62. https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/50-years-quarks-43351
  63. https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/Deoxyribonucleic-Acid-Fact-Sheet
  64. https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/spotlight/sc/feature/doublehelix
  65. https://theconversation.com/why-are-algorithms-called-algorithms-a-brief-history-of-the-persian-polymath-youve-likely-never-heard-of-229286
  66. https://ioinformatics.org/journal/v11si_2017_71_74.pdf
  67. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/blockchain
  68. https://iupac.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Organic-Brief-Guide-brochure_v1.1_June2021.pdf
  69. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03091333241263859
  70. https://webdesignerdepot.com/obsolete-technologies/
  71. https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/10-obsolete-technologies
  72. https://www.visualthesaurus.com/cm/wordroutes/when-cool-got-cool/
  73. https://www.dictionary.com/e/word-of-the-day/ghosting-2018-10-31/
  74. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/thieves-cant-dictionaries-etymology
  75. https://www.etymonline.com/word/phishing
  76. https://www.vox.com/culture/23989120/rizz-definition-oxford-word-of-the-year-colloquial
  77. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mila.12530
  78. https://jonuns.com/index.php/journal/article/download/1774/1766
  79. https://www.britannica.com/topic/meme
  80. https://www.wired.com/story/richard-dawkins-memes/
  81. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/binge-watch
  82. https://blog.collinsdictionary.com/language-lovers/etymology-corner-binge-watch/
  83. https://www.etymonline.com/word/Jedi
  84. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/twerk_n
  85. https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-33265370
  86. https://www.wired.com/2011/01/strange-findings-from-googles-new-ngram-tool-procrastinators-take-note/
  87. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/6/171
  88. https://news.syr.edu/2025/07/25/how-new-words-enter-our-language-a-linguistics-expert-explains/
  89. https://www.oed.com/information/using-the-oed/oed-event-recordings/the-oed-and-research/the-influence-of-pop-culture-on-mainstream-language/
  90. https://unbabel.com/thats-what-she-said-the-impact-of-pop-culture-on-language/
  91. http://courses.logos.it/EN/3_36.html
  92. https://www.cs.jhu.edu/~kevinduh/papers/wu21etymology.pdf
  93. https://nuancefidelis.com/en/hashtags-in-other-languages/
  94. https://journals.openedition.org/angles/4489
  95. http://www.klausschubert.de/material/Schubert1993SemanticCompositionality.pdf
  96. https://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~jar/ILR/ILR-10.pdf
  97. https://www.termnet.org/downloads/english/projects/IFAP/14_termtrain2005_sauberer_guidelines_ci2005.pdf
  98. https://www.cibtech.org/sp.ed/jls/2015/02/45-JLS-S2-045-FATEMEH-VOCABULARY.pdf
  99. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/linguistics/
  100. https://premium.oxforddictionaries.com/us/words/how-do-new-words-enter-oxford-dictionaries
  101. https://www.oed.com/information/using-the-oed/contributing-to-the-oed/
  102. https://www.oed.com/information/editorial-policy/how-words-enter-the-oed/
  103. https://www.merriam-webster.com/help/faq-words-into-dictionary
  104. https://research.google/blog/enhancing-linguistic-search-with-the-google-books-ngram-viewer/
  105. https://www.scitepress.org/Papers/2018/71887/71887.pdf
  106. https://knowledgecenter.ubt-uni.net/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4826&context=conference
  107. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-01977-4
  108. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271746101_%27Les_anglicismes_polluent_la_langue_francaise%27_Purist_attitudes_in_France_and_Quebec
  109. https://cacm.acm.org/practice/the-life-of-a-data-byte/
  110. https://www.wired.com/story/guide-emoji/
  111. https://www.rivier.edu/academics/blog-posts/history-of-viral-marketing/
  112. https://www.wired.com/story/history-of-the-first-viral-video/
  113. https://www.vice.com/en/article/how-the-word-influencer-lost-all-meaning/
  114. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04438
  115. https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2019/02/02/the-history-of-hodl
  116. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/03/doxing-an-etymology/284283/
  117. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378892142_EVOLUTION_OF_COMPUTER_LEXIS_A_LOOK_AT_NEOLOGISMS_2019-2023
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.