Hubbry Logo
Computer-mediated communicationComputer-mediated communicationMain
Open search
Computer-mediated communication
Community hub
Computer-mediated communication
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Computer-mediated communication
Computer-mediated communication
Computer-mediated communication
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Computer-mediated communication (CMC) is defined as any human communication that occurs through the use of two or more electronic devices.[1] While the term has traditionally referred to those communications that occur via computer-mediated formats (e.g., instant messaging, email, chat rooms, online forums, social network services), it has also been applied to other forms of text-based interaction such as text messaging.[2] Research on CMC focuses largely on the social effects of different computer-supported communication technologies. Many recent studies involve Internet-based social networking supported by social software.

Forms

[edit]

Computer-mediated communication can be broken down into two forms: synchronous and asynchronous.[3] Synchronous computer-mediated communication refers to communication that occurs in real-time. All parties are engaged in the communication simultaneously; however, they are not necessarily all in the same location.[4] Examples of synchronous communication are video chats and audio calls. On the other hand, asynchronous computer-mediated communication refers to communication that takes place when the parties engaged are not communicating in unison. In other words, the sender does not receive an immediate response from the receiver. Most forms of computer-mediated technology are asynchronous.[4] Examples of asynchronous communication are text messages and emails.

Scope

[edit]
Example of emoticon use, a paralinguistic aspect of computer-mediated communication.

Scholars from a variety of fields study phenomena that can be described under the umbrella term of computer-mediated communication (CMC) (see also Internet studies). For example, many take a sociopsychological approach to CMC by examining how humans use "computers" (or digital media) to manage interpersonal interaction, form impressions and maintain relationships.[5][6] These studies have often focused on the differences between online and offline interactions, though contemporary research is moving towards the view that CMC should be studied as embedded in everyday life.[7] Another branch of CMC research examines the use of paralinguistic features such as emoticons,[8] pragmatic rules such as turn-taking[9] and the sequential analysis and organization of talk,[10] and the various sociolects, styles, registers or sets of terminology specific to these environments (see Leet). The study of language in these contexts is typically based on text-based forms of CMC, and is sometimes referred to as "computer-mediated discourse analysis".[11]

The way humans communicate in professional, social, and educational settings varies widely, depending upon not only the environment but also the method of communication in which the communication occurs, which in this case is through computers or other information and communication technologies (ICTs). The study of communication to achieve collaboration—common work products—is termed computer-supported collaboration and includes only some of the concerns of other forms of CMC research.

Popular forms of CMC include e-mail, video, audio or text chat (text conferencing including "instant messaging"), bulletin board systems, list-servs, and MMOs. These settings are changing rapidly with the development of new technologies. Weblogs (blogs) have also become popular, and the exchange of RSS data has better enabled users to each "become their own publisher".

Characteristics

[edit]

Communication occurring within a computer-mediated format has an effect on many different aspects of an interaction. Some of those that have received attention in the scholarly literature include impression formation, deception, group dynamics, disclosure reciprocity, disinhibition and especially relationship formation.

CMC is examined and compared to other communication media through a number of aspects thought to be universal to all forms of communication, including (but not limited to) synchronicity, persistence or "recordability", and anonymity. The association of these aspects with different forms of communication varies widely. For example, instant messaging is intrinsically synchronous but not persistent, since one loses all the content when one closes the dialog box unless one has a message log set up or has manually copy-pasted the conversation.[contradictory] E-mail and message boards, on the other hand, are low in synchronicity since response time varies, but high in persistence since messages sent and received are saved. Properties that separate CMC from other media also include transience, its multimodal nature, and its relative lack of governing codes of conduct.[12] CMC is able to overcome physical and social limitations of other forms of communication and therefore allow the interaction of people who are not physically sharing the same space.

Technology would be a powerful tool when defining communication as a learning process that needs a sender and receiver.[4] According to Nicholas Jankowski in his book The Contours of Multimedia, a third party, like software, acts in the middle between a sender and receiver. The sender is interacting with this third party to send. The receiver interacts with it as well, creating an additional interaction with the medium itself along with the initially intended one between sender and receiver.[4]

The medium in which people choose to communicate influences the extent to which people disclose personal information. CMC is marked by higher levels of self-disclosure in conversation as opposed to face-to-face interactions.[13] Self disclosure is any verbal communication of personally relevant information, thought, and feeling which establishes and maintains interpersonal relationships.[13] This is due in part to visual anonymity and the absence of nonverbal cues which reduce concern for losing positive face. According to Walther’s (1996) hyperpersonal communication model, computer-mediated communication is valuable in providing a better communication and better first impressions.[5] Moreover, Ramirez and Zhang (2007) indicate that computer-mediated communication allows more closeness and attraction between two individuals than a face-to-face communication.[14] Online impression management, self-disclosure, attentiveness, expressivity, composure and other skills contribute to competence in computer mediated communication.[15] In fact, there is a considerable correspondence of skills in computer-mediated and face-to-face interaction[16] even though there is great diversity of online communication tools.

Anonymity and in part privacy and security depends more on the context and particular program being used or web page being visited. However, most researchers in the field acknowledge the importance of considering the psychological and social implications of these factors alongside the technical "limitations".

Language learning

[edit]
Main article: Language learning software

CMC is widely discussed in language learning because CMC provides opportunities for language learners to practice their language.[17] For example, Warschauer[18] conducted several case studies on using email or discussion boards in different language classes. Warschauer[19] claimed that information and communications technology “bridge the historic divide between speech...and writing”. Thus, considerable concern has arisen over the reading and writing research in L2 due to the booming of the Internet. In the learning process, students, especially kids, need cognitive learning, but they also need social interaction, which enhances their psychological needs. Although technology has its powerful effect in assisting the English language learners to learn, it can not be a comprehensive way that covers different aspects of the learning process.[20]

Benefits

[edit]

The nature of CMC means that it is easy for individuals to engage in communication with others regardless of time, location, or other spatial constraints to communication.[21] In that CMC allows for individuals to collaborate on projects that would otherwise be impossible due to such factors as geography,[22] it has enhanced social interaction not only between individuals but also in working life.[23] In addition, CMC can also be useful for allowing individuals who might be intimidated due to factors like character or disabilities to participate in communication. By allowing an individual to communicate in a location of their choosing, a CMC call allows a person to engage in communication with minimal stress.[24] Making an individual comfortable through CMC also plays a role in self-disclosure, which allows a communicative partner to open up more easily and be more expressive. When communicating through an electronic medium, individuals are less likely to engage in stereotyping and are less self-conscious about physical characteristics. The role that anonymity plays in online communication can also encourage some users to be less defensive and form relationships with others more rapidly.[25]

Disadvantages

[edit]

While computer-mediated communication can be beneficial, technological mediation can also inhibit the communication process.[26][self-published source?] Unlike face-to-face communication, nonverbal cues such as tone and physical gestures, which assist in conveying the message, are lost through computer-mediated communication.[26] As a result, the message being communicated is more vulnerable to being misunderstood due to a wrong interpretation of tone or word meaning. Moreover, according to Dr. Sobel-Lojeski of Stony Brook University and Professor Westwell of Flinders University, the virtual distance that is fundamental to computer-mediated communication can create a psychological and emotional sense of detachment, which can contribute to sentiments of societal isolation.[27]

Crime

[edit]

Cybersex trafficking[28][29][30] and other cyber crimes involve computer-mediated communication. Cybercriminals can carry out the crimes in any location where they have a computer or tablet with a webcam or a smartphone with an internet connection.[30] They also rely on social media networks, videoconferences, pornographic video sharing websites, dating pages, online chat rooms, apps, dark web sites,[31] and other platforms.[32] They use online payment systems[31][33][34] and cryptocurrencies to hide their identities.[35] Millions of reports of these crimes are sent to authorities annually.[36] New laws and police procedures are needed to combat crimes involving CMC.[37]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Computer-mediated communication

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Computer-mediated communication (CMC) is an umbrella term that encompasses various forms of facilitated through networked computers, including synchronous and asynchronous exchanges of text, audio, video, or other media in one-to-one, one-to-many, or many-to-many configurations. This mode of interaction relies on digital technologies such as , , social networking sites, video conferencing tools, and online forums to connect individuals regardless of physical proximity, often transforming traditional social, professional, and educational exchanges. Emerging in the late with the advent of the and early networks, CMC has evolved from text-based systems like bulletin board services to multimodal platforms integrating and . Early research on CMC, dating back to the 1970s and 1980s, focused on how technological mediation alters social processes compared to face-to-face communication, often highlighting the absence of nonverbal cues and its potential to reduce social presence. Seminal theories, such as social information processing theory, proposed by Joseph Walther, argue that users adapt over time to these limitations, enabling the development of impressions, relationships, and even hyperpersonal interactions that can exceed those in unmediated settings through selective self-presentation and extended message editing. Key characteristics of CMC include its , allowing diverse formats like emojis, GIFs, and voice notes to compensate for missing cues; its scalability for global connectivity; and its asynchronous nature, which permits flexible timing but can introduce delays in feedback. Notable aspects of CMC encompass its role in , where users manage impressions via profiles and avatars; on platforms like ; and collaborative decision-making in distributed teams. While CMC democratizes access to information and fosters cross-cultural exchanges, it also raises concerns such as digital divides, spread, and issues due to persistent digital footprints. Today, with the integration of AI-driven features like chatbots and automated , CMC continues to blur boundaries between virtual and physical interactions, influencing fields from to .

Definition and History

Definition

Computer-mediated communication (CMC) refers to human-to-human interaction facilitated by computer networks and digital technologies, encompassing exchanges through text, audio, video, or other forms. This process relies on electronic devices and software to transmit messages, enabling communication across distances without requiring physical proximity. At its core, CMC is characterized by technological mediation, where digital platforms serve as intermediaries for encoding, transmitting, and decoding messages; the absence of physical co-presence among participants; and dependence on user interfaces such as screens, keyboards, or voice inputs for interaction. These elements distinguish CMC from traditional modes by prioritizing networked connectivity over direct sensory engagement. Unlike face-to-face communication, which conveys rich nonverbal cues through , facial expressions, and tone, CMC typically lacks these immediate signals unless augmented by features like emoticons, emojis, or elements. This reduction in cues can alter message interpretation but allows for deliberate self-presentation and asynchronous pacing. The concept evolved from early theoretical foundations, such as Walter Ong's notion of "secondary orality" introduced in the 1980s, which described how revived oral-like immediacy in literate societies, later extended to digital interactions. Contemporary definitions increasingly include AI-assisted interactions, where intelligent agents modify or generate content on behalf of users, broadening CMC to hybrid human-AI dynamics.

Historical Development

The historical development of computer-mediated communication (CMC) traces its roots to visionary ideas and early technological experiments in the mid-20th century. In 1960, articulated the concept of "man-computer symbiosis" in a seminal paper, envisioning a collaborative partnership between humans and computers that would enable seamless information processing and exchange, laying the intellectual groundwork for networked communication systems. This vision materialized in the 1960s with pioneering projects like the PLATO system, developed at the University of Illinois in 1960 as an educational platform, with interactive messaging and note-sharing features added in the early 1970s via terminals, marking one of the first instances of multi-user computer-based interaction. Concurrently, the , funded by the U.S. Department of Defense's Advanced Research Projects Agency, achieved its first successful computer-to-computer message transmission in 1969 between UCLA and the Stanford Research Institute, establishing packet-switching networks that enabled rudimentary and among researchers. The 1970s and 1980s saw the expansion of asynchronous CMC through decentralized systems accessible to hobbyists and academics. Bulletin Board Systems (BBS), first created in 1978 by Ward Christensen using a simple setup in , allowed users to dial in, post messages, and exchange files on shared electronic boards, fostering early online communities despite limited connectivity. Building on this, emerged in 1979 at , initiated by Tom Truscott and Jim Ellis as a distributed discussion system using protocols to link university computers, enabling threaded, asynchronous conversations across global newsgroups that grew to millions of users by the late 1980s. Email standardization advanced with the (SMTP) defined in RFC 821 in 1982 by Jonathan Postel, providing a reliable framework for inter-host message relay that became foundational for email. The marked the mainstreaming of CMC with the advent of the graphical web and real-time tools. proposed the in 1989 at and launched the first in 1991, integrating hypertext and multimedia to facilitate global information sharing and user interactions via browsers. Synchronous chat gained traction with Internet Relay Chat (IRC), developed in 1988 by at the and widely adopted in the for multi-user, real-time text conversations in channels. Entering the 2000s, platforms transformed CMC into multimedia, user-centric networks. launched in 2004 by at Harvard, initially for college students, evolving into a platform for profile-based sharing, messaging, and real-time updates that connected billions worldwide. followed in 2006, introducing with 140-character posts and hashtags, enabling instantaneous public discourse and viral information spread. The 2010s and 2020s accelerated mobile and AI-driven innovations; , founded in 2009 by and , popularized end-to-end encrypted mobile messaging with voice and video features, reaching over 2 billion users by 2020. The triggered a video conferencing boom, with Zoom—launched in 2011—experiencing a surge from 10 million daily participants in late 2019 to over 300 million by April 2020, as and became essential. In the 2020s, AI integration advanced CMC through chatbots like those powered by large language models, such as released in 2022, enabling conversational agents for automated, context-aware interactions in customer service and social platforms. In the years following, advancements continued with the integration of multimodal AI in communication tools and the rise of immersive VR/AR platforms, such as launched in 2024, further evolving CMC capabilities as of 2025.

Types and Forms

Synchronous Communication

Synchronous communication within computer-mediated communication (CMC) involves real-time interactions among participants, characterized by minimal delays that approximate the immediacy of in-person exchanges. This form of CMC, often termed synchronous CMC (SCMC), enables instantaneous exchanges via digital networks, distinguishing it from delayed modes by emphasizing temporal simultaneity. According to a by , SCMC encompasses environments such as text chat, audio chat, and video chat, where users engage in live, reciprocal dialogue to foster participation and content production. Key platforms for synchronous CMC include instant messaging tools like Slack and , which support real-time text exchanges in channels or direct messages for group coordination. Video calling applications such as Zoom and provide audio-visual modalities, allowing participants to share screens and nonverbal cues during live sessions. Additionally, online gaming chats within platforms like and live streaming services like Twitch facilitate immediate interactions through in-game voice or text overlays and audience chat during broadcasts. The underlying mechanics of synchronous CMC prioritize low-latency transmission to minimize delays, ensuring fluid and conversational rhythm akin to oral . Presence indicators, such as "online" or "typing" statuses in applications like Slack, signal user and activity, aiding in interaction initiation. Real-time feedback loops are integral, with immediate acknowledgments, emojis, or visual responses in video formats providing cues that sustain engagement and mutual understanding. Notable examples include virtual meetings on Zoom, which surged in adoption during the for , enabling distributed teams to conduct live discussions and decision-making amid global shifts to hybrid environments. Similarly, live collaborative via supports synchronous co-authoring, where multiple users view and modify content in unison, with cursor highlights and instant revisions enhancing joint productivity. These applications underscore SCMC's role in bridging geographical barriers while demanding concurrent availability, in contrast to asynchronous alternatives.

Asynchronous Communication

Asynchronous communication in computer-mediated communication (CMC) involves interactions where messages are exchanged without requiring participants to be online simultaneously, allowing responses to occur at the recipients' convenience and decoupling the exchange from real-time constraints. This form emphasizes flexibility, enabling users to engage across different time zones or schedules while maintaining the continuity of dialogue through stored messages. In contrast to synchronous CMC's focus on immediacy, asynchronous modes support deferred participation that can enhance reflection and accessibility. Common platforms for asynchronous CMC include email systems, online forums like , social media posts on sites such as (now X), and discussion boards integrated into learning management systems. serves as a foundational tool for one-to-one or group messaging with attachments and subject lines for organization, while forums and social media posts enable public or semi-public threads where users contribute over extended periods. Messaging applications like or can function asynchronously when read receipts and delivery notifications allow delayed replies without expectation of instant response. The mechanics of asynchronous communication typically feature threaded conversations, which structure replies in a nested or linear to preserve and sequence, alongside archiving capabilities that permit indefinite storage and retrieval of messages for future reference. Time-stamped entries further aid in tracking the chronology of exchanges, helping participants reconstruct timelines and attribute contributions accurately, even after significant delays. These elements collectively support persistent, searchable records that differentiate asynchronous CMC from ephemeral synchronous interactions. Representative examples illustrate the practical application of these mechanics: academic discussion boards, such as those in platforms like or , where students post queries and instructors or peers respond over days or weeks to build collaborative knowledge. Professional email chains facilitate project coordination among remote teams, with threads evolving through iterative replies and attachments to document decisions and progress. Similarly, blog commenting systems on platforms like allow readers to engage in ongoing debates via timestamped replies, fostering community discourse without temporal synchronization. In forums like , users initiate posts that spawn threaded sub-discussions, archived for community review and upvoting over time.

Key Characteristics

Technical Features

Computer-mediated communication (CMC) relies on foundational internet protocols such as the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) suite, which ensures reliable data transmission by breaking information into packets, routing them across networks, and reassembling them at the destination. This provides error-checking and ordered delivery, essential for applications like and where is critical. Client-server architectures further underpin CMC by separating user interfaces (clients) from centralized (servers), allowing multiple users to interact with shared resources efficiently, as seen in platforms like web-based chat services. enhances scalability in modern CMC systems by distributing workloads across virtual servers, enabling real-time handling of large-scale interactions such as video conferences without single-point failures. Key technical features of CMC include varying bandwidth requirements depending on the medium; for instance, text-based asynchronous communication like demands minimal bandwidth, often under 1 Mbps, while synchronous video calls require 1-2 Mbps per participant for standard definition to support smooth transmission. Encryption protocols secure these exchanges, with providing transport-layer security for web-based CMC by encrypting data in transit using TLS, preventing interception in public networks. For enhanced privacy in messaging apps, schemes like the ensure that only endpoints can decrypt content, as implemented in the Signal application through the Double Ratchet algorithm for . Interoperability standards such as XMPP (Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol) facilitate cross-platform communication by defining open XML-based formats for real-time messaging, allowing diverse clients to exchange data seamlessly. The evolution of CMC infrastructure has progressed from dial-up modems in the 1990s, which offered speeds up to 56 kbps and limited text-only interactions due to constraints, to networks in the 2020s that deliver multi-gigabit speeds and low latency, enabling high-quality, immersive video and communications. This shift supports richer media without interruptions, transforming CMC from basic connectivity to bandwidth-intensive applications. Accessibility tools integrate into these systems to promote inclusivity; screen readers like JAWS convert text-based CMC interfaces into synthesized speech for visually impaired users, navigating emails or chat logs via semantic markup. In video platforms, automated captions generated through speech-to-text algorithms provide real-time subtitles, aiding deaf or hard-of-hearing participants in synchronous discussions.

Social and Psychological Aspects

Computer-mediated communication (CMC) profoundly shapes social interactions by altering perceptions of identity, accountability, and interpersonal dynamics, often leading to behaviors that differ markedly from face-to-face encounters. in CMC, facilitated by technical features such as pseudonyms and untraceable accounts, reduces perceived accountability and fosters the , where users exhibit lowered inhibitions in their expressions. This disinhibition can manifest positively through increased openness but more commonly results in negative outcomes like online trolling, where anonymous individuals engage in aggressive or harassing behaviors without fear of real-world repercussions. For instance, experimental studies have shown that higher levels of situational directly correlate with increased trolling intentions in online chats, as participants feel detached from social norms. Impression management in CMC allows users to engage in selective self-presentation, curating idealized versions of themselves through profiles, text, and avatars to influence how others perceive them. Unlike in-person interactions, where nonverbal cues are immediate and hard to control, CMC provides opportunities for editing and strategic disclosure, enabling users to emphasize desirable traits while omitting flaws. Research on platforms demonstrates that participants strategically manage their self-presentation by choosing photos and bios that enhance attractiveness and compatibility signals, often leading to more favorable initial impressions than in unmediated settings. Avatars further extend this by permitting fantastical or exaggerated representations, such as idealized body images in virtual worlds, which users select to align with social or romantic goals. Group dynamics in CMC facilitate the rapid formation of virtual communities, where shared interests bind members across geographic barriers, but also promote echo chambers that reinforce homogeneous viewpoints. Virtual communities emerge through sustained interactions on platforms like forums or groups, attracting participants based on common goals, identities, or experiences, which fosters a of belonging and efficacy. However, algorithmic curation on exacerbates echo chambers by prioritizing content that aligns with users' existing beliefs, limiting exposure to diverse perspectives and intensifying . Comparative analyses of polarized online communities, such as political discussion groups, reveal that these dynamics amplify and , potentially deepening societal divides. Psychological impacts of CMC include both challenges and benefits, particularly in mitigating for introverted individuals through controlled and less intimidating interaction modes. Studies from the indicate that introverts often experience reduced anxiety in text-based CMC compared to face-to-face settings, as the absence of immediate visual feedback allows for thoughtful responses and gradual engagement. Online therapy programs, leveraging CMC for cognitive behavioral interventions, have demonstrated significant reductions in social anxiety symptoms among participants, with long-term follow-ups showing sustained improvements over five years post-treatment. For example, internet-delivered for adults with yielded moderate to large effect sizes in symptom alleviation, highlighting CMC's role in making therapeutic support more accessible and less stigmatizing for those with interpersonal fears.

Theoretical Frameworks

Social Information Processing Theory

Social Information Processing (SIP) theory, developed by Joseph Walther in , posits that individuals engaging in computer-mediated communication (CMC) can form impressions and develop relationships comparable to those in face-to-face (FtF) interactions, provided they have sufficient time to exchange messages and compensate for the absence of nonverbal cues. The theory emerged as a response to earlier research suggesting that CMC inherently leads to impersonal or task-oriented exchanges due to reduced social cues, arguing instead that users adapt by slowing the rate of information processing and relying on extended verbal exchanges to build relational depth. Central to SIP theory are the concepts of cue reduction and temporal extension. In CMC environments like text-based messaging, the lack of immediate nonverbal signals—such as expressions or tone—initially limits the bandwidth for social information, leading to shallower impressions in short-term interactions. However, over time, users engage in deeper cognitive processing, accumulating verbal cues through repeated interactions to form accurate and intimate relational outcomes that equal or exceed FtF levels. This adaptation occurs because CMC allows for selective self-presentation and focused attention on message content, fostering impressions based on anticipated future interactions rather than transient physical presence. Key mechanisms in SIP include verbal compensation and iterative message refinement. Users compensate for missing nonverbal elements by emphasizing explicit verbal descriptions of emotions, intentions, and personal details, which recategorize initial stereotypes into more nuanced understandings. Additionally, the asynchronous or editable nature of many CMC channels enables participants to refine messages iteratively—revising drafts, anticipating responses, and building on prior exchanges—which enhances relational clarity and intimacy compared to the spontaneity of FtF. Empirical support for SIP theory comes from longitudinal studies demonstrating stronger relational bonds in text-based CMC groups. For instance, a 2004 field experiment involving unacquainted pairs interacting over six sessions via CMC or FtF found that CMC participants reported greater intimacy and engaged in more self-disclosure and intimate topics, with relational development surpassing FtF outcomes by the study's end. This aligns with Walther's original experimental evidence from 1992, where multi-session CMC groups exhibited increased socioemotional orientation and intimacy relative to FtF counterparts after initial sessions. Such findings underscore SIP's prediction that extended CMC enables relational equivalence or superiority through adaptive information processing. SIP theory also underpins the hyperpersonal model, which extends these ideas to explain intensified online intimacies under certain conditions.

Hyperpersonal Model

The Hyperpersonal Model, proposed by Joseph B. Walther in 1996, extends the Social Information Processing (SIP) theory by positing that computer-mediated communication (CMC) can foster interpersonal impressions and relationships that are more intense and idealized than those in face-to-face (FtF) interactions, particularly in lean media environments lacking nonverbal cues. This model arises from observations that early CMC, such as or text-based chat, allows users to develop exaggerated perceptions due to the absence of immediate feedback, leading to "hyperpersonal" outcomes where intimacy and attraction exceed FtF equivalents. The model delineates four interconnected components that drive this amplification. First, selective self-presentation enables senders to craft highly controlled, positive messages, emphasizing desirable traits while omitting flaws, thus optimizing their appeal. Second, over-attribution occurs as receivers, with limited information, fill gaps by projecting idealized similarities or traits onto the sender, often assuming greater affinity than exists. Third, the channel characteristics of CMC, such as asynchronicity, facilitate reciprocity by allowing users to edit responses for maximum impact, enhancing mutual disclosure without real-time pressures. Finally, these elements create feedback loops where positive attributions and presentations reinforce each other, escalating relational intensity over time. Illustrative examples include romantic relationships formed on dating apps, where text-based messaging before meeting amplifies attraction compared to video calls, as users selectively present idealized selves and over-attribute compatibility based on profiles. Similarly, intense online friendships in anonymous forums or chat groups often develop through reciprocal, edited exchanges that build rapid emotional bonds surpassing casual FtF acquaintances. Recent in the 2020s has scrutinized the model's applicability amid richer media (e.g., video, emojis), finding mixed support: while core processes persist in text-dominant CMC, visual cues may moderate over-attribution, prompting calls for refinements to account for multimodal platforms. Updates also explore AI's role in hyperpersonalizing interactions, as algorithms in apps curate matches and suggest responses, potentially intensifying selective and feedback loops.

Applications

Education and Learning

Computer-mediated communication (CMC) has transformed educational practices by enabling interactive, scalable, and accessible learning environments that extend beyond traditional classrooms. In educational settings, CMC facilitates the exchange of ideas, resources, and feedback among students, instructors, and global peers, fostering collaborative knowledge construction and paths. Key tools in CMC-supported education include Learning Management Systems (LMS) such as , an open-source platform launched in 2002 that integrates asynchronous discussions, resource sharing, and assessment features to support diverse pedagogical needs. Similarly, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) like , which debuted in 2012, leverage video lectures, forums, and peer assessments to deliver courses to millions worldwide, emphasizing scalable CMC for broad access. Collaborative platforms, including wikis, enable students to co-edit content in real-time, promoting collective authorship and iterative refinement in group projects. Asynchronous CMC tools, such as online forums, allow learners time for thoughtful reflection and deeper processing of concepts, accommodating varied schedules and enhancing retention through repeated engagement. In contrast, synchronous tools like webinars provide immediate interaction via live chats and polls, building community and clarifying doubts in real-time to mimic face-to-face dynamics. In language learning, CMC applications like , introduced in 2011, employ gamified elements—such as progress badges and daily streaks—integrated with interactive exercises to motivate consistent practice and skill acquisition. Virtual exchanges further enrich this domain by connecting learners across cultures through text, video, or audio chats, promoting authentic immersion and intercultural competence without physical travel. A pivotal is the rapid shift to during the 2020 , when 77% of U.S. public schools transitioned to distance learning formats reliant on CMC tools like video platforms and forums, accelerating adoption of digital pedagogies. As of 2025, hybrid models blending in-person and online elements have persisted and expanded, with many institutions integrating CMC for flexible, inclusive experiences that sustain pandemic-era gains in .

Professional and Organizational Use

Computer-mediated communication (CMC) plays a central role in modern professional environments, facilitating coordination among distributed teams through specialized tools designed for enterprise use. Enterprise chat platforms, such as launched in 2017, enable real-time messaging, , and integration with productivity suites to streamline daily interactions. like supports asynchronous task assignment, progress tracking, and workflow automation, allowing teams to manage complex projects without constant synchronous oversight. Remote desktop sharing features, often embedded in these tools, permit collaborative editing and troubleshooting by granting temporary access to another user's screen, enhancing and joint problem-solving in virtual settings. The adoption of CMC has profoundly impacted organizations by enabling virtual teams that transcend geographical boundaries, broadening talent pools for global hiring. Empirical studies indicate that CMC fosters team cohesiveness and productivity in virtual setups, where members rely on digital channels for interaction. In the , this shift accelerated post-pandemic, with approximately 28 percent of the global workforce engaging in by 2023, including hybrid models that leverage CMC for flexible operations. Such structures allow companies to recruit specialized skills from diverse regions, reducing relocation costs while maintaining operational continuity through persistent digital collaboration. Key collaboration mechanics in professional CMC include shared documents for simultaneous editing, video conferencing for virtual meetings, and AI-assisted summarization to distill lengthy discussions. Platforms like integrate video calls with screen sharing to simulate in-person meetings, supporting real-time feedback and decision-making across hierarchies. AI tools within these systems, such as Copilot in Teams, automatically generate summaries of chats and meetings, helping teams quickly capture action items and insights without manual note-taking. These features promote efficiency in knowledge-intensive industries, where rapid drives and project velocity. Despite these benefits, asynchronous CMC tools introduce challenges like coordinating across time zones, which can delay responses and fragment team rhythms in global organizations. Teams often mitigate this by establishing clear protocols for updates and using tools with timestamped notifications, yet misaligned schedules may still hinder urgent handoffs. This issue underscores the need for hybrid approaches blending asynchronous and synchronous elements to balance with inclusivity.

Advantages

Enhanced Accessibility

Computer-mediated communication (CMC) significantly enhances accessibility by incorporating features that accommodate diverse user needs, particularly for individuals with disabilities and those in resource-limited environments. Text-to-speech (TTS) technologies integrated into CMC platforms convert written messages into audible output, enabling visually impaired or reading-disabled users to participate in real-time interactions without relying solely on visual input. Multilingual support in CMC tools, such as automatic and language selection options, further democratizes access by allowing non-native speakers to engage in cross-lingual exchanges, reducing linguistic barriers in global dialogues. Additionally, low-bandwidth options like text-based messaging and compressed video formats ensure that users in areas with poor internet infrastructure can still communicate effectively, making CMC viable for low-resource settings. These features have a profound impact on marginalized groups, facilitating remote participation for rural residents and individuals with disabilities who might otherwise be excluded from social, educational, or professional networks. In the 2020s, services delivered via CMC platforms have enabled rural patients to consult specialists without travel, improving healthcare access in underserved areas. Similarly, people with disabilities have benefited from expanded utilization, with studies showing higher adoption rates among this group during the post-COVID era, allowing for home-based consultations that accommodate mobility limitations. According to reports, CMC contributes to digital inclusion efforts amid a global offline population of approximately 2.6 billion people as of , many in rural or low-income regions, by providing scalable, low-cost communication alternatives that bridge connectivity gaps. Practical examples illustrate this: video relay services (VRS) enable deaf users to communicate via (ASL) through video interpreters connected to standard phone lines, transforming telephone interactions into accessible visual exchanges. In popular applications like , adaptive interfaces such as live captions for voice messages and compatibility support users with hearing or visual impairments, ensuring seamless integration into everyday messaging.

Global Connectivity

Computer-mediated communication (CMC) has revolutionized global connectivity by linking billions of individuals across geographical boundaries through digital platforms, fostering networks that transcend national borders. As of Q3 2025, platforms like demonstrate this scale, with 1.414 billion monthly active users primarily in but extending internationally, enabling users to form and sustain cross-border relationships via , social sharing, and multimedia exchanges. This vast user base exemplifies how CMC platforms aggregate diverse populations, allowing real-time interactions that were previously constrained by distance and limitations. A key enabler of this connectivity is the cultural exchange facilitated by advanced translation technologies integrated into CMC tools. Real-time translation features, such as those powered by Google Translate's in messaging applications like and Business Messages, automatically detect and convert text across over 100 languages, thereby diminishing linguistic barriers and promoting inclusive global dialogue. These integrations allow users from non-English speaking regions to engage fluidly in multinational conversations, enhancing mutual understanding and collaboration in virtual spaces. CMC's global reach is vividly illustrated through its role in international activism and . During the 2011 Arab Spring uprisings, served as a pivotal tool for coordinating protests and amplifying voices across the , with millions of tweets facilitating the rapid spread of information and mobilization among dispersed participants. Similarly, has empowered diaspora communities to preserve cultural identities and maintain homeland connections; for instance, groups formed by Zimbabwean and African diasporas in the United States use the platform to share news, organize events, and support transnational solidarity. On the economic front, CMC underpins global trade and labor markets by integrating communication into and freelancing ecosystems. Platforms such as Alibaba employ built-in chat systems like AliWangWang for real-time negotiations between international buyers and sellers, supporting a global market projected to exceed $6 trillion in 2025. Likewise, remote freelancing sites like connect over 18 million freelancers from more than 180 countries with clients worldwide, enabling borderless project collaborations and through asynchronous and synchronous messaging tools.

Challenges

Miscommunication Risks

Computer-mediated communication (CMC) often lacks nonverbal cues such as tone of voice, facial expressions, and , which are essential for conveying intent and in face-to-face interactions. This absence frequently leads to misinterpretation, particularly with ambiguous elements like or humor, where senders overestimate recipient understanding due to egocentric biases. For instance, in textual exchanges, a statement intended as ironic may be perceived as literal, escalating minor disagreements into conflicts. Research highlights that without paralinguistic signals, messages in CMC require additional clarification to avoid such errors, as the medium's reduced bandwidth limits the natural disambiguation provided by vocal inflections or gestures. These interpretive challenges contribute to phenomena like flame wars, where heated online arguments devolve into aggressive exchanges devoid of restraint. in CMC, facilitated by and the dilution of personal , amplifies this by aligning user more closely with group norms rather than , often resulting in escalated hostility. Similarly, thrives in such environments, as perpetrators exploit the perceived distance from victims to engage in repeated without immediate social repercussions. The Social Identity model of Effects (SIDE) explains how visual in platforms enhances to antisocial norms, turning isolated comments into widespread conflicts. Empirical studies from the through the demonstrate that miscommunication rates in and text-based CMC are substantially higher than in voice or face-to-face communication. In a seminal experiment, senders predicted around 89-97% accuracy for sarcastic intent in messages, but recipients correctly interpreted only about 50%, compared to 75% in voice recordings; overall understanding in was 62.8%, versus 73.3% in voice. More recent surveys indicate that nearly 90% of employees have experienced miscommunications via , underscoring persistent vulnerabilities despite technological advances. These findings establish that CMC's text-centric nature increases error rates relative to auditory media, particularly in emotional or nuanced contexts. To mitigate these risks, modern platforms have integrated visual aids like emojis and GIFs, which serve as proxies for nonverbal cues and significantly improve intent clarification. Emojis, for example, improve detection in written messages by serving as markers of emotional valence, reducing in or casual exchanges. In the 2020s, norms have evolved to encourage explicit clarifications, such as follow-up questions or threaded replies, further minimizing misunderstandings; studies show reciprocal emoji use enhances perceived rapport and lowers conflict in interpersonal CMC. GIFs similarly convey dynamic expressions, compensating for static text in real-time chats on platforms like or .

Digital Divide

The digital divide in computer-mediated communication (CMC) refers to the unequal access to and effective use of digital technologies and networks that enable online interactions, such as , , and video conferencing, thereby reinforcing broader social inequalities. This divide manifests across multiple dimensions, limiting participation in CMC for marginalized groups and hindering their ability to engage in virtual communities, remote collaboration, and information sharing. According to the (ITU), approximately 2.6 billion people—about 32% of the global population—remained offline in 2024, with projections indicating persistent gaps into 2025 despite incremental progress in connectivity. As of mid-2025, ITU projections indicate the offline population remains around 2.6 billion, with slow progress in closing gaps. Socioeconomic factors significantly contribute to the digital divide, particularly the disparity between urban and rural areas where infrastructure and affordability differ starkly. In 2024, 83% of urban residents worldwide used the , compared to only 48% in rural regions, leaving rural populations with limited access to CMC tools essential for economic and social exchange. Age-related divides further exacerbate this issue, as older adults, often referred to as non-digital natives, face barriers in adopting CMC due to lower familiarity and device ownership; for instance, in the United States, 79% of individuals aged 65 and older owned smartphones in 2024, compared to 98% of those aged 18-29, a trend mirrored globally in reduced online participation among seniors. Gender disparities are especially pronounced in developing regions, where women encounter additional sociocultural and economic hurdles; ITU data from 2024 shows that while global internet usage stands at 70% for men versus 65% for women, the gap widens to over 20 percentage points in parts of and , restricting women's involvement in CMC for networking and . These inequalities in CMC access have profound consequences, excluding affected populations from critical opportunities in education and employment. Without reliable internet, individuals in underserved areas miss out on e-learning platforms that became vital during global disruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic, where millions were sidelined from remote education due to the digital divide. Similarly, the lack of CMC access bars people from online job markets and remote work, deepening economic gaps; the World Bank cites estimates that digital exclusion has cost economies up to $1 trillion in lost GDP by amplifying inequalities in skill development and labor participation. In unequal contexts, this divide can also heighten miscommunication risks, as those offline rely on intermediaries who may filter or distort information. Efforts to address the digital divide in CMC have gained momentum in the 2020s through targeted infrastructure initiatives. Satellite-based broadband projects like , launched by in 2019 and expanded globally, aim to provide high-speed to remote and rural areas, potentially connecting millions previously excluded from CMC; by 2025, it has been integrated into U.S. federal programs like the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) initiative, which allocates $42.5 billion to subsidize such technologies for underserved communities. These interventions seek to promote equitable access, though challenges in affordability and adoption persist.

Societal Impacts

Ethical Concerns

Computer-mediated communication (CMC) raises significant ethical concerns related to , as platforms routinely collect vast amounts of user data for commercial purposes, often without explicit or transparency. The 2018 Cambridge Analytica scandal exemplified this issue, where the firm harvested from up to 87 million users through a third-party app, enabling targeted political that influenced elections without users' knowledge. This incident highlighted the risks of data commodification, leading to regulatory actions such as the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's 2019 order prohibiting from misrepresenting its privacy practices. Furthermore, the concept of surveillance capitalism, as articulated by , describes how tech giants like and extract behavioral data to predict and influence user actions, transforming personal experiences into marketable commodities and eroding individual autonomy. Authenticity in CMC is another ethical flashpoint, undermined by deceptive practices that erode trust in online interactions. , where individuals create false identities on or dating platforms to deceive others—often for emotional or financial gain—exploits the of digital environments, leading to psychological harm and relational breakdowns. In the 2020s, advancements in AI have amplified these concerns through deepfakes, that convincingly fabricate audio, video, or images of individuals saying or doing things they did not. These technologies facilitate and impersonation, as seen in political deepfakes that manipulate public perception and diminish confidence in . Equity ethics in CMC are challenged by algorithmic biases in recommendation systems, which can perpetuate social inequalities by prioritizing certain demographics or viewpoints. For instance, biases in social media algorithms often amplify content from majority groups while marginalizing underrepresented voices, reinforcing echo chambers and discriminatory outcomes in information access. Such biases arise from training data that reflects historical inequities, leading to unfair amplification or suppression of diverse perspectives in platforms like YouTube or Twitter. To address these ethical dilemmas, frameworks like the European Union's (GDPR), enacted in 2018, establish standards for data handling in CMC by mandating , data minimization, and user rights to access or delete personal information. GDPR promotes ethical data practices by requiring transparency in processing and imposing fines for violations, influencing global standards to balance innovation with privacy protections.

Crime and Security Threats

Computer-mediated communication (CMC) has enabled various criminal activities, including , attacks delivered via , and online fraud schemes. involves deceptive messages sent through , , or messaging apps to trick users into revealing sensitive information such as credentials or financial details. , a form of , is often disseminated through malicious attachments or links in CMC platforms, encrypting victims' data and demanding payment for decryption keys, with attackers targeting both individuals and organizations. Online fraud, particularly scams prevalent in the 2020s, exploits CMC channels like and investment forums to lure victims into fake schemes promising high returns, resulting in significant financial losses. Harassment in CMC extends to severe forms such as doxxing and , especially within online gaming communities. Doxxing entails the unauthorized public disclosure of private , such as home addresses or phone numbers, often gathered from gaming chats or profiles to intimidate or harm targets. , a dangerous escalation, involves perpetrators using doxxed information to make false emergency calls—such as reporting a hostage situation—to dispatch armed police to the victim's location, frequently originating from rivalries in multiplayer games like Call of Duty or Counter-Strike. The scale of these CMC-facilitated crimes is substantial, with the FBI's 2024 report documenting $16.6 billion in reported losses, a 33% increase from 2023, driven largely by email and online communication vectors. topped complaints at 193,407 cases with over $70 million in losses, while investment fraud—including crypto scams—accounted for $6.6 billion across 47,919 incidents, and contributed $12.5 million from 3,156 complaints, many initiated via CMC. Business email compromise, another CMC-dependent fraud, led to $2.8 billion in losses from 21,442 reports. To counter these threats, security measures in CMC include two-factor authentication (2FA), which adds a second verification step—such as a code sent to a —beyond passwords to prevent unauthorized access in phishing attempts. Blockchain technology enhances secure transactions by providing immutable, decentralized ledgers that verify transfers and reduce fraud risks in online dealings. AI detection tools analyze patterns in CMC traffic, such as anomalous email behaviors or scam indicators in crypto platforms, to proactively identify and block threats in real-time.

References

  1. https://www.academia.edu/3695836/Thorne_S_L_2008_Computer_Mediated_Communication_In_N_Hornberger_and_N_Van_Duesen_Scholl_eds_Encyclopedia_of_Language_and_Education_2nd_Edition_Volume_4_Second_and_Foreign_Language_Education_pp_325_336_New_York_Springer
  2. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/009365096023001001
  3. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44217-024-00187-7
  4. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/computer-mediated-communication/book225026
  5. https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/25/1/4/5736586
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293453285_Computer-Mediated_Communication_Systems
  7. https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/22/1/18/3976923
  8. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10919399509540258
  9. https://monoskop.org/images/d/db/Ong_Walter_J_Orality_and_Literacy_2nd_ed.pdf
  10. https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/25/1/89/5714020
  11. https://groups.csail.mit.edu/medg/people/psz/Licklider.html
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11695957/
  13. https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/interpersonalcommunication/chapter/12/
  14. https://spectrum.ieee.org/social-medias-dialup-ancestor-the-bulletin-board-system
  15. https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/613/534
  16. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-177r1.pdf
  17. https://web.augsburg.edu/~erickson/edc220/history_www.html
  18. https://textbooks.whatcom.edu/dutton210/chapter/8-1-technology-and-communication/
  19. https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5423/4466
  20. https://opentext.ku.edu/interpersonal/chapter/cmc/
  21. https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/10412/8319
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8165498/
  23. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1472875.pdf
  24. https://www.apple.com/apple-vision-pro/
  25. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition/article/synchronous-computermediated-communication-and-interaction/F05E29E42457059532258158B93167D7
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324782831_Using_Slack_for_computer-mediated_communication_to_support_higher_education_students%27_peer_interactions_during_Master%27s_thesis_seminar
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351067803_Synchronous_video_computer-mediated_communication_in_English_language_teaching
  28. http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s13260.pdf
  29. https://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2010/yanguas.pdf
  30. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1143474.pdf
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9219809/
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364961416_Challenges_Encountered_During_Synchronous_Online_Collaborative_Writing_via_Google_Docs
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3392955/
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/computer-mediated-communication
  35. https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/12/4/1322/4583006
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254360140_Effective_Use_of_CMC_Tools_in_Interactive_Online_Learning
  37. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3661&context=etd-project
  38. https://cdn.aaai.org/ojs/14122/14122-28-17640-1-2-20201228.pdf
  39. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00312.x
  40. https://kmi.open.ac.uk/publications/pdf/kmi-04-9.pdf
  41. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstreams/1a3089d0-29eb-4df9-8f76-64a9c7f26023/download
  42. https://www.techtarget.com/searchnetworking/definition/TCP-IP
  43. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/system-design/client-server-model/
  44. https://www.krasamo.com/cloud-computing-fundamental-concepts/
  45. https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/broadband-speed-guide
  46. https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ssl/what-is-https/
  47. https://xmpp.org/about/technology-overview/
  48. https://www.infosysbpm.com/blogs/digital-business-services/5g-technology-evolution.html
  49. https://www.w3.org/WAI/people-use-web/tools-techniques/
  50. https://www.wgbh.org/foundation/services/ncam/tools-resources/accessible-digital-media-guidelines-tools-for-access
  51. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/cyber.2022.0005
  52. https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/11/2/415/4617726
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322070029_Avatars_and_computer-mediated_communication_A_review_of_the_definitions_uses_and_effects_of_digital_representations
  54. https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/10/1/JCMC10110/4614455
  55. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5131349/
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3260965/
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3221374/
  59. https://www.jmir.org/2019/1/e11566/
  60. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/009365092019001003
  61. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00290.x
  62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100001
  63. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12312
  64. https://moodle.com/about/the-moodle-story/
  65. https://d3.harvard.edu/platform-digit/submission/coursera-the-past-and-future-of-online-learning-platforms/
  66. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1475939X.2014.948041
  67. https://corp.kaltura.com/blog/9-benefits-of-synchronous-and-asynchronous-e-learning/
  68. https://bernardmarr.com/the-amazing-ways-duolingo-is-using-artificial-intelligence-to-deliver-free-language-learning/
  69. https://www.itdl.org/Journal/Dec_08/article02.htm
  70. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/annualreports/topical-studies/covid/
  71. https://www.kennesaw.edu/coles/centers/education-economics-center/national-hybrid-schools-survey-2025.pdf
  72. https://www.ciodive.com/news/microsoft-launches-teams-a-fully-integrated-office-365-chat-platform/429590/
  73. https://asana.com/
  74. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/business-insights-ideas/resources/10-reasons-to-use-video-conferencing
  75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4376576_Impact_of_computer-mediated_communication_on_virtual_Teams%27_Performance_An_empirical_study
  76. https://www.statista.com/topics/6565/work-from-home-and-remote-work/
  77. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/the-impact-of-computermediated-communication-on-organizational-culture-17026.html
  78. https://www.viewsonic.com/library/business/business-benefits-of-video-conferencing/
  79. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/what-s-new-in-microsoft-teams-d7092a6d-c896-424c-b362-a472d5f105de
  80. https://www.library.hbs.edu/working-knowledge/global-talent-local-obstacles-why-time-zones-matter-in-remote-work
  81. https://www.turing.com/resources/how-to-address-different-time-zone-challenges-in-remote-work-setting
  82. https://www.accessibilitychecker.org/blog/text-to-speech-accessibility/
  83. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-80322-2_9
  84. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~io/publications/old-pubs/web.pdf
  85. https://www.ruralhealth.us/nationalruralhealth/media/documents/nrha-impact-of-telehealth-policy-on-rural-health-access-2024.pdf
  86. https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/d70dae84a7988837d3819529988d4919/telehealth-disability-ib.pdf
  87. https://www.broadbandcommission.org/un-broadband-commission-marks-15-years-of-promoting-global-connectivity-and-digital-inclusion/
  88. https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/video-relay-services
  89. https://faq.whatsapp.com/3614672068767202
  90. https://www.prnewswire.com/apac/news-releases/tencent-announces-2025-third-quarter-results-302614403.html
  91. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/wechat-statistics/
  92. https://cloud.google.com/translate
  93. https://developers.google.com/business-communications/business-messages/trainings/tutorials/translate
  94. https://www.washington.edu/news/2011/09/12/new-study-quantifies-use-of-social-media-in-arab-spring/
  95. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311983.2022.2027598
  96. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362204187_Facebook_Communities_of_African_Diasporas_and_Their_US_Embassies_A_Content_Analysis_Study
  97. https://www.demandsage.com/upwork-statistics/
  98. https://web-docs.stern.nyu.edu/pa/kruger_email_ego.pdf
  99. https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/21/2/105/4065362
  100. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563210001627
  101. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0091
  102. https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelwells/2023/12/31/to-email-or-not-90-of-workplace-misunderstandings-start-via-email/
  103. https://preply.com/en/blog/modern-workplace-communication/
  104. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ip-2024-5002/html
  105. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02654075231219032
  106. https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/Pages/PR-2024-11-27-facts-and-figures.aspx
  107. https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/2024/11/10/ff24-internet-use/
  108. https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/2024/11/10/ff24-internet-use-in-urban-and-rural-areas/
  109. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/
  110. https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/2024/11/10/ff24-the-gender-digital-divide/
  111. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/scaling-digital-learning-and-skills-worlds-most-populous-countries-drive-education-recovery
  112. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099631003072338051/pdf/IDU1116c98a914ebc14dc31a47a1495a00553bae.pdf
  113. https://spacenews.com/us-rural-broadband-shift-opens-door-wider-for-starlink/
  114. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election
  115. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2019/12/ftc-issues-opinion-order-against-cambridge-analytica-deceiving-consumers-about-collection-facebook
  116. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/oct/04/shoshana-zuboff-surveillance-capitalism-assault-human-automomy-digital-privacy
  117. https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/anthropology-in-practice/catfishing-the-truth-about-deception-online/
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12305536/
  119. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-02079-x
  120. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8802245/
  121. https://gdpr.eu/what-is-gdpr/
  122. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600834.2019.1573501
  123. https://www.cisa.gov/topics/cyber-threats-and-advisories/malware-phishing-and-ransomware
  124. https://www.fbi.gov/how-we-can-help-you/scams-and-safety/common-frauds-and-scams/ransomware
  125. https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/2025-crypto-crime-report-introduction/
  126. https://www.naag.org/attorney-general-journal/the-escalating-threats-of-doxxing-and-swatting-an-analysis-of-recent-developments-and-legal-responses/
  127. https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/security/glossary/what-is-swatting/
  128. https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/fbi-releases-annual-internet-crime-report
  129. https://www.ic3.gov/AnnualReport/Reports/2024_IC3Report.pdf
  130. https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/07/06/ai-and-blockchain-synergies-mitigate-risk-of-deepfakes-in-kyc/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.