Hubbry Logo
Northern Indo-Aryan languagesNorthern Indo-Aryan languagesMain
Open search
Northern Indo-Aryan languages
Community hub
Northern Indo-Aryan languages
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Northern Indo-Aryan languages
Northern Indo-Aryan languages
Northern Indo-Aryan languages
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Northern Indo-Aryan
Pahari
Geographic
distribution		Nepal and north-western India
Linguistic classificationIndo-European
Early forms
Subdivisions
Language codes
Glottologindo1310
Major Indo-Aryan languages of South Asia; Northern Aryan languages are in shades of brown

The Northern Indo-Aryan languages, also known as Pahāṛi languages, are a proposed group of Indo-Aryan languages spoken in the lower ranges of the Himalayas, from Nepal in the east, through the Indian states of Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and Punjab[1][2] (not to be confused with the various other languages with that name) was coined by G. A. Grierson.[3]

Classification

[edit]

The Pahari languages fall into three groups.

Eastern Pahari

[edit]
  • Nepali is spoken by an estimated 29,100,000 people in Nepal, 265,000 people in Bhutan, and 2,500,000 people in India. It is an official language in Nepal and India.[4]
  • Jumli is spoken by an estimated 40,000 people in the Karnali zone of Nepal.[5]
  • Doteli is spoken by an estimated 1 million people in far west Nepal.

Central Pahari

[edit]

Western Pahari

[edit]
Main article: Western Pahari

Comparison

[edit]
Nepali alphabets, transliteration and pronunciation
Language Comparison
  Khas-kura (Nepali) Kumauni Kashmiri
  Masc Fem Masc Fem Masc Fem
I am chhu chhu chik chu chus ches
You are chhas chhes chai chi chukh chekh
He is chha chhe ch chi chuh cheh

In Eastern and Central Pahari the verb substantive is formed from the root ach, as in both Rajasthani and Kashmiri. In Rajasthani its present tense, being derived from the Sanskrit present rcchami, I go, does not change for gender. But in Pahari and Kashmiri it must be derived from the rare Sanskrit particle *rcchitas, gone, for in these languages it is a participial tense and does change according to the gender of the subject. Thus, in the singular we have: – Here we have a relic of the old Khasa language, which, as has been said, seems to have been related to Kashmiri. Other relics of Khasa, again agreeing with north-western India, are the tendency to shorten long vowels, the practice of epenthesis, or the modification of a vowel by the one which follows in the next syllable, and the frequent occurrence of disaspiration. Thus, Khas siknu, Kumauni sikno, but Hindi sikhna, to learn; Kumauni yeso, plural yasa, of this kind.

Materials regarding Western Pahari are not so complete. The speakers are not brought into contact with Tibeto-Burman languages, and hence we find no trace of these. But the signs of the influence of north-western languages are, as might be expected, still more apparent than farther east. In some dialects epenthesis is in full swing, as in (Churahi) khata, eating, fern, khaiti. Very interesting is the mixed origin of the postpositions defining the various cases. Thus, while that of the genitive is generally the Rajasthani ro, that of the dative continually points to the west. Sometimes it is the Sindhi khë. At other times it is jo, where is here a locative of the base of the Sindhi genitive postposition jo. In all Indo-Aryan languages, the dative postposition is by origin the locative of some genitive one. In vocabulary, Western Pahari often employs, for the more common ideas, words which can most readily be connected with the north-western and Pisaca groups.[citation needed]

About

[edit]

The Himalayas run along Nepal, India and Pakistan. The word 'Pahad' means a 'mountain' in most local languages such as Nepalese, Hindi (Parbat being a synonym) as well as Urdu (Koh being a synonym). Due to its mass prevalence and usage in the Himalayan Region, the language is also known as Himalayan. Like all other languages of the region, the Pahari languages are also from the Indo-European, and in particular Indo-Iranian branch of languages. As mountains have the tendency of isolating communities from change, dialects in the mountains tend to have their own characteristics with some similarity to others mountain dialects while remaining isolated from one another – there does seem to be a dialect continuum. All of these dialects are commonly referred to as the 'Pahari' languages, and most people from the Himalayan range are known as Paharis.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Northern Indo-Aryan languages

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Northern Indo-Aryan languages, also known as the Pahari or hill languages, constitute a subgroup of the New Indo-Aryan branch within the Indo-European , primarily spoken in the lower Himalayan ranges across northern , , , and adjacent regions. These languages evolved from Middle Indo-Aryan Prakrits, particularly Sauraseni and Magadhi, and form a due to the absence of major geographical barriers, facilitating gradual linguistic variation and partial among speakers. With an estimated tens of millions of speakers collectively—led by Nepali with approximately 16 million native speakers as of 2021—they play a vital role in the cultural and ethnic identities of Himalayan communities, though many face pressures from dominant languages like and Nepali; as of 2025, varieties like Dogri exhibit declining usage despite official recognition. Classified into three main subgroups based on geographical and linguistic criteria, the Northern Indo-Aryan languages include:
  • Eastern Pahari: Primarily Nepali, the official language of , spoken by approximately 16 million native speakers as of 2021 in and .
  • Central Pahari: Encompassing Garhwali (around 2.3 million speakers as of 2011), Kumaoni (about 2.2 million speakers as of 2011), and related dialects like Jaunsari.
  • Western Pahari: Featuring Dogri (over 2.6 million speakers as of 2011), Kangri, Bilaspuri, and Mandeali, often transitional with neighboring Western Indo-Aryan varieties.
This classification, drawing from historical linguistics and dialectology, highlights their divergence from other New Indo-Aryan groups like the Central (e.g., ) or Eastern (e.g., Bengali) branches, while sharing broader Indo-Aryan traits such as SOV . Key phonological and grammatical features distinguish these languages, including the merger of Old Indo-Aryan into a single (often /s/ or /ʃ/), retroflex consonants influenced by regional substrates, and ergative-absolutive alignment in perfective tenses—where the subject of a takes an ergative marker (e.g., -ne in Nepali and Garhwali). Syntactically, they permit free word scrambling and in-situ wh-questions, reflecting analytic tendencies common in New Indo-Aryan evolution. Lexically, they exhibit high cognacy rates underscoring their continuum nature, though contact with in the east has introduced areal features like tone in some varieties. Despite their vitality in oral traditions and folklore, standardization efforts remain limited, with or Takri scripts used variably, contributing to ongoing debates in linguistic classification and preservation.

Overview

Definition and Scope

The Northern Indo-Aryan languages, also known as the Pahari languages, constitute a distinct northern zone within the broader of the , primarily spoken in the lower ranges and foothills of the across northern , , and parts of . This zone is geographically and linguistically differentiated from the Central, Eastern, Western, and Southern Indo-Aryan zones, which are associated with the Indo-Gangetic plains and other regions, due to shared innovations in , morphology, and vocabulary arising from their isolated mountainous habitat. The languages exhibit a influenced by local , with less direct Sanskritization compared to plains varieties, preserving more archaic Indo-Aryan features alongside substrate effects from pre-Indo-Aryan populations. The scope of Northern Indo-Aryan encompasses dozens of languages and dialects, often considered a or proposed para-genetic group within New Indo-Aryan rather than a strict genetic , emerging after the Middle Indo-Aryan period. Key examples include Nepali (Eastern Pahari), Garhwali and Kumaoni (Central Pahari), and Kangri (Western Pahari), which together illustrate the zone's diversity in gender systems, aspect marking, and script usage, such as the or Takri scripts. These languages are often mutually intelligible within subgroups but show progressive divergence eastward and westward along the Himalayan arc. The term "Pahari," used as a cover designation for this group, derives from the and word pahāṛa or / pahār, meaning "hill" or "mountain," reflecting their association with the elevated terrain of the and distinguishing them from the speech of the lowland (māī or gīrī) areas. This underscores the areal and cultural identity of the speakers, who apply it endonymically to denote varieties spoken "of the hills." As part of the Indo-Iranian branch of the Indo-European family, Northern Indo-Aryan languages trace their origins to Proto-Indo-Aryan, from which they diverged through the Old Indo-Aryan () phase around 1500–500 BCE, followed by Middle Indo-Aryan developments leading to the New Indo-Aryan stage by approximately 1000 CE. This evolution involved key phonological shifts, such as the treatment of aspirates and vowel systems, while maintaining close ties to as the nearest relatives within Indo-Iranian.

Geographic Distribution

The Northern Indo-Aryan languages, collectively referred to as Pahari languages, are predominantly spoken across the sub-Himalayan and lower mountainous regions spanning northwestern , , and parts of Jammu and Kashmir. These languages occupy the Himalayan foothills from the region in the northwest to in the southeast, with core areas in the Indian states of and . Regional variations align with the three main subgroups. Eastern Pahari languages, including Nepali and Kumaoni, are primarily found in and the of eastern , with Nepali extending into adjacent areas of and . Central Pahari languages, such as Garhwali and Jaunsari, prevail in the Garhwal and regions of central and western . Western Pahari languages, encompassing dialects like Kangri, Mandeali, Kului, and Dogri, are concentrated in —particularly in districts such as Mandi, , and Sirmaur—and extend into the region of Jammu and Kashmir. The rugged Himalayan terrain, characterized by isolated valleys and high-altitude barriers, has significantly influenced the and linguistic diversity of these languages, promoting dialectal isolation and variation across communities. Migration patterns have led to communities of speakers from , , and in urban centers of , such as , as well as in the and , settled for and .

Historical Development

Origins from Middle Indo-Aryan

The Northern Indo-Aryan languages trace their proto-historical roots to the Middle Indo-Aryan stage, primarily descending from , a midland dialect spoken in northern and , and evolving through the late Middle Indo-Aryan Apabhramsha forms between approximately 600 and 1000 CE. , documented in dramatic literature and inscriptions from the 3rd to 10th centuries CE, provided the foundational phonological and morphological base for these languages, sharing origins with other New Indo-Aryan varieties like Hindi-Urdu and Punjabi, as well as Dogri and the broader Pahari varieties. Apabhramsha, as a transitional , marked the erosion of earlier case endings and the simplification of consonant clusters, facilitating the shift toward New Indo-Aryan structures while retaining core Indo-Aryan features like aspectual verb distinctions. Evidence for this development comes from inscriptions and literary texts across northern , reflecting the gradual divergence from norms. Medieval inscriptions, such as those in the Nagari script emerging in northern in the 8th century, and Apabhramsha compositions from the 9th–10th centuries, illustrate dialectal variations in regions like , , and the . For example, early Apabhramsha works, including Jain narratives and dohas, document phonological shifts like the merger of nasals and the loss of final short vowels, which are preserved in modern Northern Indo-Aryan forms such as Dogri and Garhwali. Sanskritization significantly influenced early vocabulary retention during this period, introducing unmodified tatsama loanwords—such as prārthit ("requested") and praśna ("question")—into emerging vernaculars, particularly in formal and literary registers. This process, evident from the onward, reinforced abstract terms, pronouns (e.g., sa- forms), and gender markers (e.g., -ikā), drawing from to enrich the lexicon amid Prakrit-derived simplification. By around 1200 CE, these developments had coalesced into distinct New Indo-Aryan languages, with the earliest attestations of forms like and Old Punjabi appearing in texts and records, signaling the full emergence of the Northern zone.

Evolution and External Influences

The Northern Indo-Aryan languages underwent lexical transformations during the Mughal era (roughly 1500–1800 CE), primarily through contact with Persian and , which served as languages of administration, culture, and religion under Muslim rule. Persian, as the court language, introduced loanwords into northern languages, though hill Pahari varieties like those in the central and experienced lighter contact compared to lowland or border regions; examples include terms for and daily life in languages like Dogri. influences arrived indirectly via Persian, particularly in religious terminology, but were less pronounced in isolated hill communities. These borrowings were more evident in transitional zones, where facilitated exchange. In the Himalayan context, prolonged contact with has introduced areal features, including lexical borrowings and phonological traits like tone in some Eastern and Central Pahari varieties (e.g., certain Kumaoni dialects). This influence, stemming from ethnic interactions in and eastern since , contributed to divergences from other Indo-Aryan branches, such as non-nasalized vowels and substrate effects on syntax. British colonial rule (1800–1947) further shaped these languages through administrative policies and migration, notably promoting standardization among expatriate communities. In regions like and the northeastern hills under British India, Nepali (then often called Khas or Gorkhali) gained institutional recognition, with Calcutta University adopting it for examinations in 1918 and standardizing its name as "Nepali" by 1932, driven by Gorkha intellectuals like Parasmani Pradhan who advocated for its use in education and literature to unify hill communities. This promotion was tied to the recruitment of soldiers, which spread a standardized variety across regiments and diaspora settlements, enhancing its prestige and orthographic consistency in script. Meanwhile, colonial censuses and surveys often grouped diverse Northern Indo-Aryan varieties under broader categories, laying groundwork for later linguistic hierarchies. In the , the formation of nation-states amplified these trends, with Nepali elevated to official status in to foster national unity. A 1905 policy under Rana rule mandated Nepali for legal and governmental use, extended to by 1934, and formalized in the 1956 National Planning Commission report, which positioned it as the for integration across ethnic groups. In , post-independence linguistic reorganization integrated many Pahari languages—such as Kangri, Mandeali, and Jaunsari—into the sphere, where they were classified as dialects in censuses and official policies to consolidate as a link , reducing their recognition as distinct tongues and promoting -medium in states like and . This subsumption, affecting over 50 varieties under the "Hindi" umbrella, prioritized national cohesion over regional diversity. The 1947 disrupted dialect continua of Northern Indo-Aryan languages, particularly in the western zones, through mass migrations and border demarcations. In the Punjab-Jammu region, the affected transitions involving varieties like Dogri, isolating dialects while movements introduced variations, accelerating standardization but eroding rural gradients. These events, displacing over 14 million people, fragmented phonological and lexical continuums and spurred sociolinguistic shifts in border Himalayan areas.

Classification

Overall Structure

The Northern Indo-Aryan languages, also known as Pahari languages, are traditionally divided into three main areal subgroups—Eastern Pahari, Central Pahari, and —based on the classification proposed by George A. Grierson in his (1916). This framework organizes the languages geographically along the Himalayan foothills, with Eastern Pahari encompassing varieties like Nepali spoken primarily in and adjacent Indian regions; Central Pahari including Garhwali and related dialects in the central Himalayan areas of ; and comprising a diverse array of dialects such as Jaunsari, Sirmauri, Kulu, Kangri, and Bhadrawahi in and . Grierson's division emphasizes shared innovations and transitional features within these zones, though it prioritizes areal rather than strictly genetic criteria. A key debate in the classification concerns whether the Northern Indo-Aryan languages constitute a unified genetic or a . While Grierson viewed them as a coherent within New Indo-Aryan, emerging from Middle Indo-Aryan substrates with influences from Tibeto-Burman and other contact languages, subsequent analyses suggest they form part of a broader Indo-Aryan where isoglosses—such as phonological shifts in or morphological alignments—frequently cross boundaries without clear genetic breaks. Lexicostatistical studies reinforce this perspective, indicating no distinct "Pahari" but rather gradual divergences, with showing recent internal splits while aligning more closely with neighboring Rajasthani varieties. varies widely, often higher within s but limited across the entire set due to these transitional traits. The inclusion of Dardic languages within or adjacent to the Northern Indo-Aryan grouping remains contentious, with Kashmiri frequently cited as a borderline case. Grierson initially placed like Kashmiri, Shina, and in a Northwestern Indo-Aryan branch separate from core Pahari, due to their archaic features and Dardic-specific innovations such as tone systems and palatalized . However, modern scholarship recognizes strong Indo-Aryan affinities, including shared retroflex inventories and verbal morphology, leading some classifications to treat Dardic as a peripheral Northern subgroup or a distinct but closely related branch influenced by non-Indo-Aryan substrates like . Kashmiri, in particular, exhibits hybrid traits—such as verb-second syntax uncommon in other —prompting its occasional exclusion from strict Pahari categorization. In total, the Northern Indo-Aryan languages encompass numerous distinct varieties, though counts vary due to the dialectal nature and ongoing standardization efforts, with varying degrees of shaping their sociolinguistic boundaries.

Eastern Pahari Languages

The Eastern Pahari languages form a subgroup within the Northern Indo-Aryan branch, primarily spoken in the Himalayan foothills of western , with extensions into eastern in . This subgroup is characterized by its close genetic ties to other Pahari varieties, evolving from Middle Indo-Aryan forms with significant lexical and phonological retention from . Key languages include Nepali, the dominant member with approximately 16.5 million native speakers (as of 2021), serving as the official language of and also recognized in parts of ; , spoken by around 840,000 people mainly in the far-western districts of such as , Dadeldhura, and Baitadi ( 2021 census); and Jumli, with about 40,000 speakers in the of western . These languages exhibit prominent phonological features, including a robust inventory of retroflex consonants such as /ʈ/, /ʈʰ/, /ɖ/, and /ɖʱ/, produced with a degree of retroflexion posterior to the alveolar ridge, reflecting deep influence on their sound system. has profoundly shaped their vocabulary, with many core terms borrowed directly or adapted, particularly in literary and religious domains, alongside a system featuring 11 contrastive vowels (10 with nasal counterparts) without phonological length distinction. Literary traditions in Eastern Pahari, especially Nepali, trace back to the with early manuscripts in script, evolving through medieval Sanskritized poetry and prose into modern forms by the 19th century under figures like . Geographically centered in western Nepal's and Seti zones, these languages are used in daily communication, , and media, with Nepali achieving broader official status across and in Indian hill regions. is high with Central Pahari languages like Kumaoni and Garhwali, forming a along the Himalayan arc, but notably lower with varieties due to sharper phonological and lexical divergences.

Central Pahari Languages

The Central Pahari languages form a subgroup within the Northern Indo-Aryan family, primarily encompassing Garhwali and Kumaoni, which exhibit transitional linguistic traits bridging Eastern Pahari varieties like Nepali and Western Pahari dialects such as those in . These languages evolved from a common proto-Pahādi base around the , retaining unique orthographic and syntactic features influenced by regional . According to the , Garhwali has approximately 2.48 million speakers, Kumaoni about 2.08 million (as of 2011). Geographically, these languages are concentrated in the Garhwal and Kumaon divisions of , , where they serve as markers of ethnic and regional identity among the local populations. Phonologically, Central Pahari varieties display intermediate characteristics, such as shared gradation patterns and inventories that blend features from adjacent subgroups, including partial retention of aspirates and retroflex more prominent in while incorporating tonal elements akin to Eastern forms. For instance, both Garhwali and Kumaoni feature monosyllabic verb roots with CVC structures and lengthening for transitivity, reflecting a phonological bridge in the broader Pahari continuum. Culturally, Central Pahari languages sustain rich oral traditions, including folk songs that narrate religious stories, seasonal cycles, and social rituals, often performed by bards known as hurkiyas in Kumaon. These traditions are integral to festivals like and , where songs in Garhwali and Kumaoni reinforce community bonds and environmental awareness. In contemporary contexts, the languages appear in local media, such as radio broadcasts and community theater, though Hindi dominance poses challenges. Emerging standardization efforts include the integration of Garhwali and Kumaoni into curricula and digital apps for language learning, aimed at revitalizing usage among youth.

Western Pahari Languages

The languages form a within the Northern Indo-Aryan branch, characterized by a spoken primarily in the western Himalayan foothills. Key languages in this group include Kangri, Mandeali, Chambiali (also known as Chameali), and Bilaspuri, with transitional forms such as Hinduri and Jaunsari bridging toward neighboring varieties. These languages are mainly distributed across —particularly in districts like Kangra, Mandi, Chamba, and Bilaspur—and extend into parts of and in . According to recent estimates, Mandeali has approximately 621,000 speakers (as of 2022), while Kangri, Chambiali, and Bilaspuri each have hundreds of thousands, though underreporting is common as speakers often identify with . Linguistically, Western Pahari languages exhibit influences from regional substrata including Munda, Tibeto-Burman, and Rajasthani, reflected in typological features such as mirative constructions and specific genitive markings. They display high dialectal diversity, with numerous splintered varieties showing low across regions; for instance, Kangri dialects in the differ significantly from Mandeali in Mandi, often requiring in inter-dialectal communication. Phonologically, common traits include a six- to nine-vowel system, preservation of retroflex phonemes like /ɳ/ and /ɽ/, and occasional aspirated nasals (e.g., /nh-/ in initial positions), alongside morphological archaisms such as marking with the suffix -e and three-way distinctions in oblique pronouns. This diversity stems from historical layers of substrata, contributing to innovations that increase in complexity toward the northwest. Many languages face endangerment primarily due to the dominance of in , administration, media, and daily interactions, leading to among younger generations. In urbanizing areas of , parents increasingly use at home to facilitate children's integration, resulting in reduced transmission and the erosion of distinct dialects; assessments classify several, like Chambiali, as "definitely endangered." This pressure is exacerbated by the lack of standardized forms and official recognition, with speakers often subsumed under the "" category in censuses, further marginalizing these varieties.

Phonological Features

Consonant Inventory

Northern Indo-Aryan languages, particularly the Pahari subgroup, typically feature consonant inventories ranging from 28 to 36 phonemes, characterized by a series of voiceless and voiced stops with aspirated counterparts, retroflex consonants, and a limited set of fricatives. These inventories derive from Middle Indo-Aryan patterns but show innovations such as the phonemic status of aspiration across places of articulation. A representative inventory, as seen in Nepali (an Eastern Pahari language), includes the following phonemes:
Manner/PlaceLabialDental/AlveolarRetroflexPalato-alveolarVelarGlottal
Stops (voiceless unaspirated)ptʈk
Stops (voiceless aspirated)pʰtʰʈʰkʰ
Stops (voiced unaspirated)bdɖg
Stops (voiced aspirated)bʰdʰɖʰgʰ
Affricates (voiceless unaspirated)ts
Affricates (voiceless aspirated)tsʰ
Affricates (voiced unaspirated)dz
Affricates (voiced aspirated)dzʰ
Fricativessɦ
Nasalsmnŋ
Lateralsl
Rhoticsr
Approximantsj
This table illustrates the core structure, with 28 consonants in standard Nepali; some languages like Kumaoni (Central Pahari) expand to 36 by including additional fricatives or affricates, while Garhwali (also Central Pahari) has 31. Fricatives such as /f/ and /ʂ/ appear phonemically in certain dialects or through loanwords, but /s/ and /ɦ/ are ubiquitous; the retroflex nasal /ɳ/ is typically an allophone of /n/ after retroflex consonants. Subgroup variations distinguish the consonant systems across Northern Indo-Aryan. languages, such as Bhaderwahi, exhibit greater palatalization of non-palatal consonants, where velars like /k/ may palatalize to [tʃ] before front vowels, a feature less prominent in other subgroups. In contrast, Eastern Pahari languages like Nepali retain the full series of Sanskrit-derived aspirates more faithfully, maintaining phonemic distinctions for both voiceless and voiced aspirated stops without widespread deaspiration. Central Pahari languages, including Garhwali and Kumaoni, show intermediate patterns with expanded inventories that incorporate additional retroflex nasals (/ɳ/) as distinct phonemes in some analyses. Allophonic rules in these languages often involve aspiration and retroflexion. The aspiration contrast is robust but context-sensitive; voiced aspirates like /bʰ/ may lose breathy voice intervocalically, surfacing as plain voiced . Retroflex stops frequently alternate with flaps: in Nepali, /ɖ/ realizes as [ɖ] word-initially but as a flap [ɽ] intervocalically, a pattern echoed in Garhwali where retroflex flaps serve as allophones of /ɖ/ in non-initial positions. Phonemic contrasts emphasize voicing and aspiration in stops, creating a four-way distinction: voiceless unaspirated (e.g., /p/ pani 'water'), voiceless aspirated (/pʰ/ phul 'flower'), voiced unaspirated (/b/ bata 'road'), and voiced aspirated (/bʰ/ bʰai 'brother') in Nepali. Garhwali mirrors this voicing contrast in stops, with examples like /t/ vs. /d/ in tʰa 'from' versus dʰar 'hold', though its inventory includes fewer affricates. These contrasts are maintained across subgroups, underscoring the shared phonological heritage while allowing for dialectal divergence.

Vowel System and Prosody

The vowel systems of Northern Indo-Aryan languages typically feature 6 to 11 phonemic oral , with distinctions in , backness, and ; nasalized vowels add further contrasts. Common vowels include /i, u, e, o, a, ə/, with phonemic for /iː, uː, aː/ and marginal for mid vowels /e, o/. For instance, in Nepali and Kumaoni, the inventory centers on these 6-10 vowels, where serves as a primary phonemic feature, as in the minimal pair /kal/ 'yesterday' versus /kaːl/ 'tomorrow'. In Nepali, the system includes approximately 10-11 vowels when counting nasalized forms, with a basic oral set of 6-7 (/i, u, e, o, a, ə/). Kumaoni maintains around 10 oral vowels with contrasts for /iː aː uː/ and 6 nasalized vowels. Nasalization functions as a phonemic feature across these languages, creating additional contrasts through nasalized vowels derived historically from sequences involving nasal consonants. In Nepali, for example, nasalized vowels like /ĩ/ distinguish words such as /ɡĩna/ 'count' from /ɡina/ 'known'; /sɑ̃p/ 'snake' from /sɑp/ 'oath'. Kumaoni recognizes six nasalized vowels alongside its oral set, where nasalization can alter meaning, such as in verb forms like /gʰə̃r/ 'house' (nasalized) versus /gʰər/ 'surround'. This feature is widespread, resulting from Middle Indo-Aryan nasal spreading, and contributes to a richer suprasegmental layer without expanding the core inventory dramatically. Diphthongs are a standard component, primarily /ai/ and /au/, inherited from vowel sequences and retained as falling diphthongs in most Northern Indo-Aryan varieties. In Nepali and Kumaoni, /ai/ appears in words like /pɑ̃tsai/ 'five' and /au/ in /tɑur/ 'procession', functioning phonemically and sometimes monophthongizing to /eː/ or /oː/ in rapid speech. These diphthongs enhance the system’s expressiveness, often contrasting with monophthongs in lexical items. Prosody in Northern Indo-Aryan languages generally aligns with syllable-timed , but varieties exhibit stress-timed characteristics, where stressed syllables occur at more regular intervals, leading to reduction of unstressed vowels. Stress is typically non-phonemic and predictable, falling on heavy syllables (those with long vowels or codas) or the , as in Nepali /ɡəˈriːb/ 'poor'. In Punjabi and related Western forms, lexical tone overlays stress, creating a tone-timed with high, low, or rising-falling contours, such as high tone on /kõːɖ/ 'arm' versus low on /kõːɖ/ 'pit'. Some dialects, including certain Pahari varieties like Pothwari, feature three-way tonal contrasts (high, mid, low), while Kumaoni employs rising-falling intonational patterns in questions and emphasis, though lexical tone is absent; some Eastern Pahari varieties show incipient tonal features from Tibeto-Burman substrate influence. This tonal variation, linked to the historical loss of voiced aspirates, distinguishes Northwestern subgroups from syllable-timed Eastern and Central Pahari forms.

Grammatical Features

Nominal Morphology

Northern Indo-Aryan languages exhibit a simplified nominal morphology compared to earlier stages of Indo-Aryan, characterized by inflectional categories for , number, and case, primarily realized through suffixes and postpositions. Nouns, , and adjectives inflect to mark these categories, with adjectives and showing agreement with the head . This system reflects a reduction from the eight-case paradigm of Old Indo-Aryan, retaining a core direct-oblique distinction supplemented by postpositions for specific semantic roles. The in Northern Indo-Aryan languages is predominantly two-way, distinguishing masculine and feminine . is typically marked by stem-final vowels or suffixes on nouns, such as -o for masculine and -ī for feminine in Nepali, and it governs agreement on adjectives and verbs in past tenses. For example, in Nepali, the noun ghar '' is masculine, while a derived feminine form gharī 'small ' illustrates gender alternation via suffixation. In Kumaoni, is evident in adjective agreement, as in chhotū larkā 'small boy' (masculine) versus chhotī larkī 'small girl' (feminine). Number distinction is binary, contrasting singular and forms, with no retention of the dual category from earlier Indo-Aryan stages. marking occurs via suffixes that often interact with the , such as -harū in Nepali (ghar-harū 'houses') or -ū in Garhwali (ghor-ū 'horses' from the singular ghorā). Oblique forms are crucial for attaching postpositions, as in Kumaoni larki-yāṁ 'girls' (oblique of larkī). Adjectives agree in number, as seen in Nepali sāro ghar-harū 'all houses'. Case marking in Northern Indo-Aryan languages features an ergative alignment pattern, particularly in perfective transitive constructions, where the subject takes an ergative marker while the object remains unmarked or accusative. The system relies on a direct form for nominative and accusative uses, and an oblique form for all other cases, which hosts postpositions like -ko for dative-accusative (indicating direct objects or beneficiaries) in Nepali. For instance, in Nepali, rām-le kitāb paṛhyo means 'Ram read the ', with -le marking the ergative subject. In Garhwali, the ergative is -e, as in us-e kuttā māryo 'he hit the ', while Kumaoni uses -e similarly (mā-e kitāb paṛhya ' read the '). Genitive cases employ postpositions like -kō in Nepali or -rū in some varieties like Kangri. This ergative pattern briefly influences verbal agreement, where the verb may agree with the object in and number. In , postpositions may vary, such as -u for genitive in Kangri, reflecting transitional features with neighboring Western Indo-Aryan varieties.

Verbal Morphology and Syntax

Northern Indo-Aryan languages, particularly the Pahari subgroup, exhibit a verbal system characterized by tense-aspect marking that interacts closely with case alignment, displaying typical of many New Indo-Aryan varieties. In the , which often corresponds to , transitive subjects receive ergative marking (typically -le or -e), while the agrees in and number with the absolutive object rather than the subject. This contrasts with the (), where subjects are in the , and verbs agree with the subject in and number, following an accusative alignment. is generally formed analytically with or infinitival constructions, such as the stem plus a future marker like -gA or an auxiliary like hOnA ('to be'). The aspectual distinction between perfective and imperfective is central, with perfective forms emphasizing completed actions (e.g., in Kumaoni, the past perfective of 'go' is gayo for masculine singular, as in "woh gayo" meaning 'he went') and imperfective forms indicating ongoing or habitual actions (e.g., jaat rahyo 'is going'). is typically post-verbal with nahi, as in Kumaoni "woh nahi gayo" ('he did not go'), which applies across tenses without altering the core morphology. These patterns are consistent across Eastern, Central, and languages, though regional variations exist in auxiliary selection for compound tenses. Person agreement in verbs follows a three-way distinction (first, second, third person) with gender and number suffixes, often realized through portmanteau morphemes on the auxiliary or main verb stem. For instance, in imperfective transitive clauses, third-person singular masculine might end in -A (e.g., khanaa 'eats-masc'), while feminine uses -I (khani 'eats-fem'). In Eastern Pahari languages like Kumaoni, honorifics are marked by pluralizing the second-person form or using respectful auxiliaries, leading to distinct verb endings for addressee respect (e.g., plural -o or -au for honorific second person). This system ensures politeness levels integrated into verbal inflection, differing from simpler agreement in Western Pahari like Garhwali, where gender-number dominate without extensive honorific tiers. Syntactically, these languages adhere to a strict Subject-Object-Verb (SOV) order, with postpositions rather than prepositions governing noun phrases (e.g., in Garhwali, ram ghar ma caldi 'Ram goes in-the house'). Relativization commonly employs participial constructions, where a non-finite verb form (e.g., present participle -t- or past -i-) precedes the head noun, as in Garhwali caldu n^hnu 'the boy who is going'. This participial strategy allows for compact relative clauses without dedicated relative pronouns in many cases, though some varieties permit pronominal relativizers for emphasis. Basic sentence patterns thus prioritize verb-final positioning, with auxiliaries following participles in compound forms to encode aspectual nuances.

Writing Systems

Primary Scripts

The primary script used for writing most Northern Indo-Aryan languages, including the Pahari subgroup, is , an derived from ancient Brahmi that has been adapted to represent the phonetic inventory of these languages. This script consists of 47 primary characters—14 vowels and 33 consonants—that align well with the phonological features common to Northern Indo-Aryan tongues, such as the distinction between dental and retroflex consonants. For instance, in Nepali, a prominent Northern Indo-Aryan often classified within or adjacent to the Eastern Pahari group, was standardized and promoted as the official script during the Rana regime (1846–1951), reflecting efforts to unify administrative and educational practices across the region. Historically, the use of Brahmi-derived scripts in the Himalayan regions where Pahari languages are spoken dates back to inscriptions from the 8th to 12th centuries CE, when variants like Sharada were employed for recording local dialects and religious texts in areas of present-day , , and Jammu and Kashmir. These early scripts laid the groundwork for later adaptations, transitioning toward more standardized forms like by the medieval period as Northern Indo-Aryan languages evolved. In the case of Nepali, the script's adoption under the Rana regime not only solidified its role in governance and literature but also facilitated its integration into modern digital platforms through encoding, which supports the full range of glyphs for Nepali orthography since the standard's initial release in 1991. One key advantage of for Northern Indo-Aryan languages lies in its phonetic precision, particularly in accommodating retroflex consonants (e.g., ṭ, ṭh, ḍ, ḍh) and aspirated stops (e.g., kh, gh, ph, bh), which are hallmark features of these languages' sound systems and are distinctly represented without requiring extensive diacritics. This adaptation ensures a relatively consistent mapping between script and pronunciation, aiding literacy and preservation efforts among Pahari speakers.

Regional Variations and Adaptations

The , historically used for writing several languages in regions such as , evolved from the around the 10th–11th century CE and remained in active use until the mid-20th century, particularly for languages like Chambeali, Mandeali, and Gaddi in the former princely states of the . Colonial policies and post-independence standardization favoring led to its decline, but recent revival efforts in include digitization of Takri fonts since 2016 and cultural heritage projects to teach it in schools, aiming to preserve phonetic nuances not fully captured by Devanagari. Takri was encoded in 6.1 in 2012, facilitating digital use. In border dialects near , such as Kangri spoken in the Kangra and Una , the script is used, reflecting adaptations for Punjabi linguistic proximity, though tones are not explicitly marked. This influence arises from historical and cultural exchanges across the Punjab-Himachal boundary, where Devanagari's structure aids in representing shared Indo-Aryan phonological traits like aspirated stops. Romanization initiatives have emerged to support communities and digital accessibility, particularly for languages like Nepali, where tools convert Roman-script input to for easier typing on mobile apps and . These efforts, including open-source packages for Nepali text and names, facilitate informal communication among non-native script users abroad, though they often prioritize phonetic approximation over standardized orthography. Following the addition of Takri to the Unicode Standard in version 6.1 (2012), ongoing script reform efforts for endangered Northern Indo-Aryan languages, such as those in the Pahari group, focus on font development, phonetic adjustments, and educational programs to enable and revival, addressing challenges like script obsolescence. Advocates argue that without such reforms, including hybrid Devanagari-Takri systems, these languages risk further erosion in documentation and transmission.

Sociolinguistics

Speaker Demographics

The Northern Indo-Aryan languages, also known as Pahari languages, are collectively spoken by approximately 25-30 million people as first languages (L1), with the majority concentrated in , northern (particularly and ), and smaller communities in and elsewhere. Nepali, the largest language in this group, accounts for about 16 million L1 speakers, predominantly in where it serves as the . These figures draw from official data, though estimates vary due to dialectal overlaps and migration patterns. Speaker numbers break down across subgroups as follows: the Eastern subgroup, dominated by Nepali and related varieties like Doteli, totals around 17-18 million speakers; the Central subgroup, including Kumaoni (approximately 2.1 million speakers) and Garhwali (about 2.5 million), reaches roughly 5 million; and the Western subgroup, encompassing various Himachali Pahari languages (collectively over 3 million), accounts for 3-4 million. In , the 2011 recorded about 10.9 million speakers for key Northern Indo-Aryan languages, including 2.9 million for Nepali, 2.1 million for Kumaoni, 2.5 million for Garhwali, and 3.3 million under the broad "Pahari" category. In , the 2021 recorded 13,084,457 L1 speakers for Nepali (44.9% of the ), with other Northern Indo-Aryan varieties such as (494,864 speakers), Baitadeli (152,666), and Achhami (141,444) bringing the subgroup total to approximately 14.2 million. Demographic trends reveal variations by age, gender, and location. In rural Himalayan areas, female speakers outnumber males slightly, reflecting traditional roles where women maintain community and household use of these languages; for instance, 2011 Indian census data shows near parity overall but higher female proportions in Uttarakhand's rural districts for Kumaoni and Garhwali. Among youth, there is a notable shift toward dominant languages like in and Nepali or English in urban , driven by and media, leading to declining L1 transmission in younger generations (under 25). Census data from both countries highlights underreporting issues, with minority dialects often aggregated under broader categories like "Pahari" or "Other," potentially undercounting speakers by 10-20% in fragmented communities. The 2011 Indian census and 2021 Nepali census note inconsistencies in self-reporting and enumerator training, exacerbating gaps for smaller varieties like Jaunsari (136,000 speakers).

Language Status and Vitality

The vitality of Northern Indo-Aryan languages varies significantly across the group, with many facing endangerment due to intergenerational transmission challenges, while others maintain stability through official recognition. According to UNESCO's Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger, numerous languages, such as Kangri spoken in , are classified as definitely endangered, indicating that children no longer learn them as mother tongues in most communities. Similarly, Garhwali in is designated as vulnerable, with most children understanding it but not all speaking it regularly. In contrast, Nepali, the dominant language in the group with over 16 million speakers in and , is considered stable and not endangered, serving as a and . Policy frameworks play a crucial role in supporting these languages' status. In , Nepali was included in the Eighth Schedule of the in 1992, granting it official recognition alongside other scheduled languages and facilitating its use in education, administration, and media in regions like and . Dogri, a language, has been in the Eighth Schedule since 2003. In , the 2015 promotes , guaranteeing the right to mother-tongue instruction up to the secondary level and encouraging the preservation of indigenous languages through national policies that integrate local tongues into school curricula. However, implementation remains uneven for smaller Northern Indo-Aryan varieties, which lack similar constitutional protections, and demands continue for including Himachali Pahari languages in India's Eighth Schedule. Revitalization efforts are emerging, particularly through community-driven and digital initiatives. In , community stations like Mandakini Ki Awaaz (90.8 FM) broadcast in Garhwali, promoting folk songs, stories, and cultural programs to over 1,000 villages, thereby fostering oral transmission and . For Garhwali specifically, digital archives and AI-based projects are digitizing folk tales, , and dialects, creating accessible repositories to aid preservation and learning among younger generations. In 2025, the Indian government's Scheme for Protection and Preservation of Endangered Languages (SPPEL) continued documenting 117 endangered languages, including several Northern Indo-Aryan varieties, through digital archiving and community programs. Despite these measures, threats from urbanization and linguistic dominance persist, accelerating . Rapid urban migration in Himalayan regions exposes speakers to , the dominant medium in education and media, leading to reduced use of local varieties like languages among youth. In , Nepali's status as the similarly pressures minority Northern Indo-Aryan tongues, contributing to attrition in rural areas. These factors underscore the need for sustained policy support to mitigate vitality risks.

Comparative Analysis

Similarities with Other Indo-Aryan Branches

Northern Indo-Aryan languages exhibit significant lexical overlap with other Indo-Aryan branches, such as Central (e.g., -Urdu) and Eastern (e.g., Bengali), primarily through shared inheritance from Old and Middle Indo-Aryan stages, with detection rates for basic vocabulary often reaching 80-90% between and Northern languages like Kumaoni or Nepali. For instance, the word for "," pānī, derived from pānīya ("drinkable"), appears across branches, including pānī, Nepali pānī, and Bengali pani. This overlap extends to cultural domains, where terms like mātā ("mother") from matṛ and bhai ("brother") from bhrātr are retained in forms such as mātā and bhai, Nepali mā and bhai, and Marathi māī and bhai. Similarly, agricultural vocabulary shows continuity, with kṣetra ("field") evolving into khet, Gujarati khetar, and Nepali khet, and vrīhi ("rice") yielding chāwal and Bengali chāul. Grammatically, Northern Indo-Aryan languages align closely with other branches in adopting a predominant word order, a feature solidified in Middle Indo-Aryan and maintained across New Indo-Aryan varieties, as seen in us-ne kitāb paṛhī ("he read the book"). agreement is another shared trait, with most languages preserving a two-gender system (masculine and feminine) for nouns and adjectives, inherited from , exemplified by larkā (masculine "boy") versus larkī (feminine "girl"), paralleled in Nepali chhorā and chhorī. in past or perfective tenses, where transitive subjects take an ergative marker while the verb agrees with the object, is widespread, originating from Middle Indo-Aryan reanalysis of passive constructions; for example, us-ne khānā khāyā ("he ate food") mirrors patterns in Nepali (-le marker) and Marathi (-ne). Phonologically, these languages share aspirated stops and a series as hallmarks of Indo-Aryan inheritance from , with four-way contrasts in stops (voiceless unaspirated, voiceless aspirated, voiced unaspirated, voiced aspirated) common in Northern and Central branches, such as /p, ph, b, bh/ in phūl ("flower"). Retroflex sounds like /ṭ, ḍ, ṇ/, developed through Middle Indo-Aryan sound changes (e.g., palatal to retroflex), appear consistently in words like aṭh ("eight") from aṣṭa, akin to Nepali aṭh and Gujarati aṭh. These features underscore the branches' common phonological evolution, though with regional attenuations eastward.

Unique Distinctions

Northern Indo-Aryan languages show Persian-influenced fricatives such as /f/, /z/, and /ʃ/ to a lesser extent than Northwestern branches, primarily through indirect loanwords via Hindi-Urdu contact during medieval periods, rather than direct extensive adoption. In languages like Nepali and Kumaoni, these sounds appear in borrowed vocabulary (e.g., Nepali film with /f/), but are less integrated than in Urdu or Punjabi, with Northern varieties retaining more native Indo-Aryan phonology. Additionally, tonal elements distinguish some Northern dialects, particularly in Western Pahari varieties; certain Himachali Pahari languages feature three contrastive tones (high, mid, low) arising from historical phonological shifts, unlike the stress-based prosody dominant in Central and Eastern branches. For instance, some Western Pahari dialects employ tones interacting with stress, a feature less common in non-tonal Indo-Aryan languages further south. Grammatically, Northern Indo-Aryan languages display more elaborate verb forms than those in Central Indo-Aryan, often incorporating multiple degrees of respect through pronominal and verbal . In Nepali and Kumaoni, verbs conjugate with honorific markers (e.g., Nepali's tiered system for second- and third-person subjects), reflecting social hierarchies more intricately than the binary or simpler forms in Gujarati or Marathi. This elaboration extends to proliferation, where Northern varieties like and Dogri extensively mark experiencers with dative or genitive postpositions (e.g., mujhe bhookh lagi 'I am hungry'), a development from Middle Indo-Aryan case mergers that is more variable and widespread here than in Eastern branches favoring genitive dominance. Such constructions, influenced by regional substrates, highlight Northern ergative alignments in perfective tenses, contrasting with the nominative preferences in southern Indo-Aryan. The lexicon of Northern Indo-Aryan incorporates Tibeto-Burman borrowings, particularly for local flora and fauna, due to Himalayan proximity—a pattern less prominent in southern branches like Central or Eastern Indo-Aryan. In Nepali and Pahari languages, terms for regional plants and animals (e.g., Nepali vocabulary influenced by Bodo and Newari substrates) reflect this contact, enriching domains untouched by Dravidian or Austroasiatic loans prevalent elsewhere. Dialect diversity forms a steeper continuum in Northern Indo-Aryan, with gradual yet extensive transitions across the Himalayan hills (e.g., from like Dogri to Eastern like Nepali), fostering higher chains than the more isolated, phonologically divergent dialects of Eastern Indo-Aryan like Bengali, shaped by geographic barriers. This continuum underscores Northern innovation amid polyglotism, setting it apart from the sharper regional breaks in Bengali's and reductions.

References

  1. https://web.mit.edu/rbhatt/www/24.956/l1.pdf
  2. https://jolr.ru/files/%28190%29jlr2016-14-3-4%28227-258%29.pdf
  3. https://censusnepal.cbs.gov.np/results/files/result-folder/Language%20in%20Nepal.pdf
  4. https://www.dailyexcelsior.com/declining-percentage-of-dogri-speakers-in-census-figures-and-reality/
  5. https://www.ece.lsu.edu/kak/indic.pdf
  6. https://www.ahandfulofleaves.org/documents/The%20Indo-Aryan%20Languages_Masica.pdf
  7. https://jolr.ru/files/(190)jlr2016-14-3-4(227-258).pdf
  8. https://teachmint.storage.googleapis.com/public/c24defc3-3e6a-4b3b-bb78-c1edfa825805.pdf
  9. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/d13152p
  10. https://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol04/11/20.pdf
  11. https://www.martinchautari.org.np/storage/files/sinhas-vol1-no1-pratyoush-onta.pdf
  12. https://wpel.gse.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/Weinberg_28-1.pdf
  13. https://www.academia.edu/44516515/The_Language_Scene_in_India
  14. https://undergrad-language-research.org/1947-partition-between-india-and-pakistan-the-effect-of-cultural-trauma-on-language-attitude-and-use/
  15. https://bagichablog.com/2019/04/27/the-status-of-punjabi-after-1947/
  16. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/dardestan-ii-languages
  17. https://www.sil.org/resources/publications/entry/92594
  18. https://dsal.uchicago.edu/dictionaries/turner/frontmatter/introduction.html
  19. https://www.ethnologue.com/language/jml/
  20. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association/article/nepali/A887820E3B1293EFD43FBD3259D41F73
  21. https://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00urduhindilinks/txt_masica_languages_1991.pdf
  22. https://www.sil.org/system/files/reapdata/77/57/08/7757085651966375961408497823420166422/silesr2019_004.pdf
  23. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED010363.pdf
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270258676_On_the_Origin_of_the_Neo_Indo-Aryan_Pahadi_Language_of_Utarakhand_and_Western_Nepal_Himalaya
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270258676_On_the_Origin_of_the_Neo_Indo-Aryan_Pahadi_Language_of_Uttarakhand_and_Western_Nepal_Himalaya
  26. https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/42458/download/46089/C-16_25062018.pdf
  27. https://ideapublishers.org/index.php/jhsms/article/download/577/278/4680
  28. https://kuey.net/index.php/kuey/article/download/9179/6975/17536
  29. https://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2506225.pdf
  30. https://duy-heduk.org/downloads/project-profiles/Pahadi_Language_Learning_Apps_%28Kumaoni%2520Garhwali%29_in_Uttarakhand.pdf
  31. https://ruralindiaonline.org/te/library/resource/linguistic-survey-of-india---himachal-pradesh/
  32. https://pahari-languages.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Kullui-endangerment-2.pdf
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346443472_A_Preliminary_Study_of_Pahari_Language_and_its_Sound_System
  34. https://www.academia.edu/28676903/Segmental_Sounds_of_Kumauni_and_Garhwali_An_Analytical_Comparison
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341371622_Phonological_Description_of_Bhaderwahi
  36. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1912.01957
  37. https://www.academia.edu/9176631/Tone_and_stress_in_North_West_Indo_Aryan_A_survey
  38. https://roa.rutgers.edu/files/874-1006/874-DEO-0-0.PDF
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346443861_Ergativity_in_Pahari_Language
  40. https://journals.au.edu.pk/ojserevna/index.php/erevna/article/download/269/118/472
  41. https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-292
  42. https://ilkogretim-online.org/index.php/pub/article/download/6919/6687/13254
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mustanir-Ahmad/publication/362180503_The_Role_of_Case_Marking_in_Derivation_of_Pahari_Clauses_A_Minimalist_Analysis/links/62dab99ff3acdd5dc20eef46/The-Role-of-Case-Marking-in-Derivation-of-Pahari-Clauses-A-Minimalist-Analysis.pdf?origin=scientificContributions
  44. https://theswissbay.ch/pdf/Books/Linguistics/Mega%20linguistics%20pack/Indo-European/Indo-Aryan/Garhwali%2C%20A%20Syntactic%20Sketch%20of%20%28Chandola%29.pdf
  45. https://www.academia.edu/11307177/DEVANAGARI
  46. https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0900.pdf
  47. https://www.academia.edu/38080856/WRITING_SYSTEMS_IN_INDIA
  48. https://www.academia.edu/143651401/The_Phonetic_Sophistication_of_Devanagari_A_Testament_to_Ancient
  49. https://www.sil.org/system/files/reapdata/28/38/31/28383184858642773795922477294117747399/JLSR2022_003.pdf
  50. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0351z1vs/qt0351z1vs.pdf
  51. https://joktacademy.com/the-forgotten-tongues-of-himachal-endangered-pahari-languages-and-the-tankri-revival/
  52. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/himachal/digital-font-of-endangered-pahari-script-developed-350920/
  53. https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U11680.pdf
  54. https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.1.0/
  55. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/kangri.htm
  56. https://hpkangra.nic.in/language/
  57. https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/sadh/045/0146
  58. https://mylanguages.org/nepali_romanization.php
  59. https://github.com/Suraj1127/nepali-roman
  60. https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2009/09424-takri.pdf
  61. https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/lsnj/article/download/71562/54552/208250
  62. https://indianexpress.com/article/research/pahari-language-history-preservation-mountains-himachali-8th-schedule-9990755/
  63. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11596
  64. https://en.unesco.org/silkroad/silk-road-themes/languages-and-endanger-languages/garhwali
  65. https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/EighthSchedule_19052017.pdf
  66. https://www.unicef.org/nepal/stories/championing-linguistic-diversity
  67. https://mohitbangari.com/endangered-tribal-local-languages-of-uttarakhand-will-they-die-in-next-10-years/
  68. https://www.ceew.in/how-a-community-radio-station-is-leading-climate-disaster-preparedness-in-uttarakhand
  69. https://iipseries.org/assets/docupload/rsl20246DACF9680A02A37.pdf
  70. https://garhwalpost.in/initiative-planned-to-preserve-garhwali-kumaoni-jaunsari-languages-through-ai/
  71. https://www.pib.gov.in/FeaturesDeatils.aspx?NoteId=155013&ModuleId=2
  72. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1332&context=honorscollege_theses
  73. https://cphfs.in/download_pdf/IJLCR-0022.pdf
  74. https://chahalacademy.com/indian-express-editorial-analysis/16-may-2025/2071
  75. https://aclanthology.org/2019.gwc-1.51.pdf
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0024384120301315
  77. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279313505_Oblique_case-marking_in_Indo-Aryan_experiencer_constructions_Historical_roots_and_synchronic_variation
  78. https://asian.washington.edu/sites/asian/files/documents/research/the_dialectology_of_indic.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.