Hubbry Logo
Push–pull trainPush–pull trainMain
Open search
Push–pull train
Community hub
Push–pull train
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Push–pull train
Push–pull train
from Wikipedia

In a push–pull train, locomotives at both ends of a train can be used at the same time, controlled by one driver.
When using a single locomotive, a control car with duplicate controls can be used when pushing.
A push–pull train with two control cars and a locomotive in the middle

Push–pull is a configuration for locomotive-hauled trains, allowing them to be driven from either end of the train, whether having a locomotive at each end or not.

A push–pull train has a locomotive at one end of the train, connected via some form of remote control, such as multiple-unit train control, to a vehicle equipped with a control cab at the other end of the train. This second vehicle may be another locomotive, or an unpowered control car. This formation meant that the locomotive would not have to run-around at the end of a journey before returning.

The trains were also historically knows as "motor trains" or "railmotors", but the term "railmotor" is now used to refer to trains where the locomotive was integrated into a coach. In the UK and some other parts of Europe, the control car is referred to as a driving trailer (or driving van trailer/DVT where there is no passenger accommodation); in the US and Canada, they are called cab cars and in Australia, they are called driving trailers.

Train formation

[edit]

Locomotive at one end

[edit]
Push–pull train in Austria (2004); note locomotive at the rear of the train.
Push–pull train in the Czech Republic (2016); note control car at the rear of the train.
Former Push–pull train of Deutsche Reichsbahn (control car out of function) after the unification of Germany
A modern driving van trailer in Ireland
Push–pull train in Slovakia

Historically, push–pull trains with steam power provided the driver with basic controls at the cab end, including the regulator, brake and train whistle. The cab would also be provided with a bell or other signalling code system to communicate with the fireman, who remained on the locomotive to tend to the fire, in order to pass commands to adjust controls not available in the cab.

At low speeds, some push–pull trains are run entirely from the engine with the guard operating bell codes and brakes from the leading cab when the locomotive is pushing the train.

Many mountain railways also operate on similar principles in order to keep the locomotive lower down than the carriage to prevent any opportunity for a carriage to run away from a train down the gradient and also so that even if the locomotive ever ran away, it would not take the carriage with it.

Modern train control systems use sophisticated electronics to allow full remote control of locomotives. Nevertheless, push–pull operation still requires considerable design care to ensure that control system failure does not endanger passengers and also to ensure that in the event of a derailment, the pushing locomotive does not push a derailed train into an obstacle, worsening the accident. The 1984 Polmont rail accident, in Scotland, occurred when a push–pull train struck a cow on the track.

When operating push–pull, the train can be driven from either the locomotive or the alternative cab. If the train is heading in the direction in which the locomotive end of the train is facing, this is considered 'pulling'. If the train is heading in the opposite direction, this is considered 'pushing' and the motorman or engine driver is located in the alternative cab. This configuration means that the locomotive never needs to be uncoupled from the train and ensures fast turnaround times at a railway station terminus.

Two locomotives

[edit]
A New Jersey Transit train with Bombardier ALP-46 locomotives on both ends and 11 cars in between, in New Jersey, United States

Alternatively, a push–pull train, especially a long one, may have a locomotive on each end so that there is always one locomotive pushing and one locomotive pulling. In this case, caution must be used to make sure that the two locomotives do not put too much stress on the cars from uneven locomotives. It is usual to arrange matters so that the trailing locomotive supplies less power, i.e. that the locomotive at the front does more pulling than the locomotive at the rear does pushing. Having an independent locomotive, as opposed to a power car at each end, is also known in the railway world as a top and tail. When this configuration is used in the US, only one locomotive (usually the front locomotive) is allowed to provide head end power (HEP: electricity supply for heating, air conditioning and lighting) to the train. The two-locomotive formation is used by the InterCity 125; its Australian equivalent, the XPT; Brightline; Amtrak's Acela; SNCF's TGV; Taiwan Railways Administration's E1000 series; and New Jersey Transit's longest Northeast Corridor Line multilevel trains.

This form of operation has not necessarily been a function of train length; sometimes it was the most convenient way to set up push–pull operation in pre-HEP days without converting coaches to cab control operation. A prime example of this was the Reading Company which converted its small fleet of streamstyled heavyweight medium-distance coaches for its non-electric commuter operation, with a pair of EMD FP7 diesels bracketing a single five-car train, to supplant the Reading's fleet of RDCs. This train normally operated a weekday peak-hour round trip between Reading Terminal, Philadelphia and Reading, Pennsylvania, from the late 1960s until 1981, with operation in the last five years by Conrail under contract to SEPTA.[1]

Locomotive in the middle

[edit]
Golden Pass Panoramic train in Switzerland with locomotive in the middle

A rare but possible configuration has a locomotive in the middle of the train with control cars at both ends, as was, for instance, used for a time on the Brussels–Amsterdam Benelux train when there were control cars but no three-voltage (3 kV DC, 1.5 kV DC, 25 kV 50 Hz) locomotives supporting the ERTMS train control system in use on the Belgian HSL 4 and the Dutch HSL-Zuid. The Class 28 TRAXX locomotives were later upgraded, and the service went back to "normal" push–pull operation.

A preserved GWR autotrain, running with the locomotive sandwiched between two driving coaches on the South Devon Railway.

Historically, the Great Western Railway ran Autotrains with two driving coaches sandwiching a steam locomotive.[citation needed]

Distributed power

[edit]

In this configuration, locomotives hauling a train are located other than at the front or the back. It may include remote control locomotives in the middle of a train. If operational considerations or economics require, trains can be made longer if intermediate locomotives are inserted in the train and are remotely controlled from the leading locomotive.

History

[edit]

Great Britain

[edit]

Steam

[edit]
A single GWR Autocoach capable of steam push–pull operation
Great Western Railway
[edit]

The first company to use the system was the Great Western Railway which, in 1904, equipped carriages and 0-6-0 locomotives as an autotrain to run on the Brentford Branch Line (between Southall and Brentford) as an experimental substitute for steam railcars. Control was by rodding and the mechanism allowed the driving compartment to be either one or two carriages-distant from the engine. With the engine in the middle of a formation, up to four carriages could be used. To reduce the surprise of a locomotive at the "wrong" end of its train, some were initially fitted with panelling painted in carriage livery.[2] The experiment was successful and the company's remaining railcars were gradually converted for autotrain use and purpose-built units constructed.

Other railways
[edit]

Other companies followed the lead in 1905: the North Eastern and London, Brighton & South Coast Railway using a compressed-air method of control and the Midland Railway, using a cable-and-pulley mechanism. The Great Central deployed the trains in 1906, using cable controls similar to that of the Midland. By the 1920s, most companies had them and they remained in use until they were replaced by diesel multiple units (DMUs) in the 1950s.[2]

Electric and diesel

[edit]
Network Rail Driving Brake Standard Open in October 2009

In 1967, the Southern Region, already familiar with operating electric multiple units, applied the technique to its services from London Waterloo to Bournemouth, which were operated by electro-diesel locomotives.[2][3]

In the early 1970s, the Scottish Region used a system with a Class 27 locomotive at each end of a rake of coaches that had been retrofitted with the necessary 'Blue Star' multiple working cables to control the remote unit; but some problems of delay in actuation were experienced. They were replaced in 1979 by a system in which a Driving Brake Standard Open (DBSO), converted from a Mark 2, could control the Class 47/7 locomotive via computerised time-division multiplex (TDM) signalling through the train lighting circuits. This had the added benefit that intermediate carriages needed no special equipment, and was found more satisfactory. Such trains became widely used on the intensive passenger service between Edinburgh Waverley and Glasgow Queen Street.[2][4] When the push–pull sets were replaced by multiple units, the DBSOs were transferred to operate on the Great Eastern Main Line between London Liverpool Street and Norwich, where they were modified to work with Class 86 electric locomotives.

The original system of using the Blue Star multiple working was later revived after privatisation as a way of allowing locomotive-hauled stock to replace multiple units on certain routes, thus increasing capacity without the complications of having to run around or drag a dead locomotive at the rear. It was used by First North Western and Wessex Trains with Class 31s, and by Abellio Greater Anglia, Arriva Trains Northern, Northern Rail and Arriva Rail North with Class 37s all with Mark 2 carriages.[5][6][7][8] The same system was also adopted by Network Rail for its track observation trains, although on many trains one locomotive has recently been replaced by a DBSO modified to work with Blue Star.[9]

Driving Van Trailers (DVTs)

[edit]
A GNER Mark 4 Driving Van Trailer at Alnmouth in June 2005

In 1988, 52 Mark 3 Driving Van Trailers were built by British Rail Engineering Limited to allow it to replace life expired electric locomotives on the West Coast Main Line. These operated with Mark 2 and Mark 3 sets.[10]

As part of the electrification of the East Coast Main Line, 31 Mark 4 Driving Van Trailers were built in the late 1980s by Metro-Cammell to operate with Mark 4s coaches at the south end of the InterCity 225 sets. Some of these passed to Transport for Wales Rail in 2021 to work on their Holyhead to Cardiff Premier Service.

In the 2000s, some Mark 3s have been modified to operate with Class 67 locomotives with Arriva Trains Wales, Chiltern Railways and Wrexham & Shropshire.

In 2019, new Mark 5 carriages, one of which has a cab, entered service with Class 68 locomotives for TransPennine Express, in a push–pull configuration.

Ireland

[edit]

Córas Iompair Éireann's first push–pull trains were conversions of their 2600 Class DMUs (Park Royal body, AEC motors) running with the long withdrawn 201 Class Metropolitan-Vickers Bo-Bo diesels re-engined with EMD 567 prime movers; the cars were subsequently renumbered in the 6100 series (Driving van trailers), 6200 series (trailer with "blind" cab end) and 6300 series (double-gangway intermediate car). In push–pull formation, they operated Dublin Suburban Rail services from 1971 until the inauguration of the DART EMU service in July 1984. The remaining push–pull trains operated on Dublin-Maynooth commuter services until they were supplanted by Cravens, and later by the modern 2600 Class DMUs.

Iarnród Éireann employs push–pull trains of two different kinds. The first of these were built in 1996. These are De Dietrich Ferroviaire–built Enterprise push–pull sets, jointly owned with Northern Ireland Railways for operation on the Dublin to Belfast route. These are powered by 201 Class locomotives.

The other type of push–pull train used in Ireland is the Mark 4 type (not to be confused with the British Rail Mark 4 type). These sets, delivered in 2005–2006, are used exclusively on the Dublin to Cork route, again operated by 201 Class locomotives.

Between 1980 and 2009, Iarnród Éireann operated push–pull sets based on the British Rail Mark 3 design, with a non-gangwayed driving cab fitted.[11] These were operated with 201 Class locomotives, although in the past 121 Class locomotives were also used. The sets originally operated in the Dublin outer-suburban area and on the Limerick to Limerick Junction shuttle, but were gradually moved to mainline InterCity routes out of Dublin Heuston after the introduction of railcar sets elsewhere. The entire Mark 3 fleet was withdrawn in September 2009 and scrapped in 2014.

France

[edit]

In June 1958, SNCF commenced operating steam trains in push–pull formation out of Gare de l'Est.[12]

North America

[edit]
A Metra train in push mode, with a non-locomotive passenger car in the front. Note the engineer's station in the upper level of the passenger car.

The first major application of push–pull operation using the modern single diesel configuration was on the Chicago & Northwestern Railroad, announced in 1958.[13] In 1959, the C&NW received its first Control Cab equipped Bilevel rail cars for commuter use. The extreme efficiency and success of these trains is why almost all of the commuter rail services in the United States and Canada utilize 100% push–pull operation on their locomotive-hauled trains.[citation needed] Examples include: Chicago (Metra); New York City (Metro-North, the Long Island Rail Road and New Jersey Transit); Philadelphia (SEPTA); the Washington, DC and Baltimore area (MARC and VRE); Boston (MBTA); Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex (Trinity Railway Express); the Greater Miami area (Tri-Rail); the San Francisco Bay Area (Caltrain and ACE); Southern California (Metrolink and Coaster); Toronto (GO Transit); Montreal (AMT); and the Wasatch Front in Utah (UTA FrontRunner). Most of these systems (except for SEPTA and Metro-North) continue to utilize some type of bi-level passenger cars for push–pull service, either partially or exclusively.

Amtrak has a number of converted Metroliner EMUs in service as cab cars on the Keystone Corridor, where they operate in conjunction with ACS-64 electric locomotives. In addition, many regional services, such as the Michigan Services, Downeaster, and Cascades, are operated with Non-Powered Control UnitsEMD F40PH locomotives converted to use as a cab control and baggage car, earning itself the nickname 'cabbage cars'. Similarly, the Capitol Corridor, San Joaquin, and Pacific Surfliner services in California are operated in push–pull configuration using purpose-built cab cars and diesel locomotives.

The Muskingum Electric Railroad was a private, coal-hauling railway in central Ohio that ran for more than 20 years with two driverless General Electric E50C electric locomotives that ran backwards from the coal-fired powerplant they served to the mine where their trains were loaded by affixing bogie trucks, a headlight, and a horn to the last freight car on each train.

Israel

[edit]
A GEC–Alsthom push–pull of Israel Railways (IR)

In 1996, Israel Railways began running GEC–Alsthom push–pull coaches. Since then, it has also acquired push–pull coaches from Bombardier and Siemens. As of 2016, the bulk of Israel Railways' passenger operations use push–pull coaches. All of them have one locomotive at one end and a control car at the other end.

Australia

[edit]

The New South Wales XPT long-distance passenger trains used by NSW TrainLink operate in a push–pull operation. In the past V/Line operated P class push–pulls on interurban services to Bacchus Marsh and Wyndham Vale until 2017. South Australian Railways' 2000 class DMUs could be found with at least one motor car and one cab car in a push–pull configuration until their withdrawal in 2016.

New Zealand

[edit]
D Class NZR no 197 at Lower Hutt, 1906 with motor train

In the first quarter of the 20th century up to 13 motor trains ran on NZR.[14]

Until 2015, the Auckland suburban network run by Transdev used rebuilt British Rail Mark 2 carriages in either four, five or six car configurations. Three to five SA class carriages and an SD class driving carriage, fitted with a cab, were coupled to a DC class (4- and 5-car) or DFT/DFB class (6-car) locomotive, leased from KiwiRail.

All SA and SD class cars were rebuilt by Hillside Workshops. Auckland also operated former Queensland Rail SX carriages in push–pull mode with two DBR class locomotives.

Following electrification of most of the Auckland suburban railway network, these diesel units have been replaced by a modern electrical fleet that consist of one or two sets of 3 car units (each of which have one carriage that can service passengers with disabilities).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A push–pull train is a type of rail configuration consisting of a at one end and a cab car—a equipped with a control cab—at the other, enabling the to be operated bidirectionally without detaching or repositioning the at terminals. In push mode, the propels the from the rear while the controls it from the leading cab car; in pull mode, the leads and draws the with the cab car trailing. This setup relies on electrical or radio-based multiple-unit control systems to transmit commands along the consist. The concept of push–pull operation originated in the steam era, where basic controls allowed limited remote operation from the trailing end, but it gained prominence in the mid-20th century with the advent of diesel and electric locomotives in networks. In the United States, push–pull services became widespread in the starting in the 1960s, evolving from earlier multiple-unit (MU) electric operations to diesel-powered systems that improved efficiency on busy suburban routes. By the early , approximately 64.5% of U.S. passenger miles—out of 8.3 billion annually—were operated in push–pull mode, split roughly evenly between push and pull configurations, serving networks like Amtrak's and various metropolitan systems. Push-pull configurations are used worldwide, particularly in and for efficient commuter and regional services. Push–pull trains offer key advantages for high-frequency services, including reduced turnaround times at endpoints by avoiding locomotive runarounds and increased capacity without additional locomotives. They are regulated under standards like those in 49 CFR Part 218, which govern shoving or pushing movements to ensure , including requirements for clear visibility and communication during push operations. Safety analyses indicate no significant difference in rates compared to traditional pull-only trains, though push mode has historically shown higher fatality risks in collisions due to cab car vulnerability, prompting advancements like crash energy management (CEM) designs that enhance survivability. Modern implementations, such as Amtrak's Airo electro-diesel sets, with the first trainset completed in 2025 and scheduled to enter service in 2026, and Mobility's Vectron-based push–pull concepts (such as Vectrain), incorporating digital controls, incorporate digital controls, battery options, and improved for speeds up to 125 mph (200 km/h).

Overview

Definition and principles

A push-pull train is a -hauled configuration designed for bidirectional operation, allowing the train to be controlled and driven from either end without requiring the locomotive to be repositioned or run around the consist at terminals. This setup typically features a powered locomotive at one end and a non-powered —such as a driving trailer or cab car—at the other, enabling efficient reversal of direction. The control car includes an operator's cab with instrumentation for safe forward visibility and command transmission to the locomotive. The core principles of push-pull operation revolve around alternating between pull and push modes to maintain leading-end control. In pull mode, the leads the and hauls the cars forward in a conventional manner, with the trailing at the rear. In push mode, the leads to provide the operator with a clear view ahead, while the at the rear propels the ; commands from the cab are relayed to the via through-train wiring or electrical cables that extend the length of the consist for , braking, and signaling functions. This system ensures the operator remains at the front regardless of direction, enhancing and operational fluidity on routes without turning facilities. Key components of a push-pull train include the , which supplies all (often diesel-electric for passenger services), intermediate cars for passengers or freight, and the leading equipped with a cab, control systems, and sometimes additional features like baggage space. Examples of control cars encompass cab cars used in North American commuter rail and Driving Van Trailers in British operations.

Advantages and disadvantages

Push–pull train operations offer several operational advantages over traditional locomotive-only configurations, primarily by enhancing efficiency at terminals and on busy routes. By eliminating the need for the locomotive to run around the train or turn at endpoints, push–pull setups significantly reduce turnaround times, allowing for quicker reversals of direction using a at the opposite end. This flexibility improves scheduling on congested lines, enabling higher train frequencies and better utilization of existing infrastructure without extensive modifications. Additionally, push–pull configurations provide cost savings compared to deploying full multiple-unit (MU) trains, as they allow for easier maintenance of locomotives and flexible coach arrangements while mimicking the bidirectional operation of MUs in diesel services. Despite these benefits, push–pull operations present notable disadvantages, particularly in and mechanical stress. risks are amplified in collisions, where cab cars—being lighter than —offer less protection to occupants, resulting in higher fatality rates (1.2 per billion passenger-miles in push mode versus 0.18 in pull mode and 0.07 in MU operations based on data from 1996–2005). The control systems required for remote operation from the cab car also introduce complexity, necessitating specialized diagnostics and reliability measures to ensure seamless communication between the and control elements. Economically and operationally, push–pull trains have demonstrated substantial impacts in commuter services, accounting for about 64.5% of U.S. commuter rail passenger-miles (with 32.5% in push mode) and serving 146,000–153,000 daily passengers through efficient equipment use as of the early 2000s. These operations yield time savings at terminals by avoiding locomotive repositioning, though prohibiting push mode could incur over $1.5 billion in additional costs for new locomotives and service disruptions. In comparison to MU trains, push–pull setups offer fuel efficiency gains in scenarios where locomotives can idle or shut down during non-peak operations, but they generally lag in overall energy use due to centralized power distribution, with MUs providing superior acceleration and lower consumption per passenger on electrified lines. Overall, while push–pull enhances operational throughput, its safety record remains excellent with no statistically significant increase in derailment likelihood post-collision, underscoring the value of complementary technologies like crash energy management.

Configurations

Single locomotive with control car

In the single locomotive with control car configuration, the train formation typically places the at one end—either leading or trailing—followed by a series of intermediate unpowered passenger coaches, and concludes with a dedicated at the opposite end. The , often referred to as a (DVT) in British systems or a cab car in North American terminology, features a fully equipped driver's cab that mirrors the locomotive's controls, including visibility provisions such as windscreens and headlights. This setup enables bidirectional operation, with the providing propulsion while the train is driven from the end during push mode, eliminating the need for locomotive run-arounds at terminals. Control integration relies on through-wiring systems that link the to the , allowing remote operation of key functions like , dynamic and air brakes, traction power, and signaling. A prominent example is the 27-way (MU) control cable, standardized in applications since the 1950s, which transmits electrical and pneumatic signals across the train consist via jumper connections between vehicles. This wiring enables the driver in the control car to manage the as if present in its cab, with adaptations for diesel, electric, or electro-diesel units, such as modifying Class 33 locomotives for pneumatic control via EMU-style signals. Diagrams of such consists often illustrate the linear layout: locomotive coupled to the first coach, intermediate cars with through-wired jumpers, and the DVT at the rear, highlighting the electrical conduits running the train's length. This configuration finds primary application in commuter and passenger services, where turnaround times at busy terminals are critical. In the UK, early implementations included the 1966 Oxted line service using Class 33 locomotives with 6TC trailer units and the 1980s Gatwick Express with Class 73 electro-diesels, achieving speeds up to 100 mph while maintaining stability in push mode. In the United States, it supports operations on networks like Metrolink (with 73 cab cars as of 2024) and Transit, as well as select intercity routes, enhancing efficiency by avoiding locomotive repositioning. Freight adaptations remain rare, as the setup is optimized for passenger flexibility rather than heavy load distribution.

Dual or multiple locomotives

In push-pull configurations employing dual or multiple locomotives, the train formation typically features powered units positioned at both ends of the consist, enabling simultaneous propulsion and traction from opposing directions to enhance overall pulling capacity. This setup, often referred to as a double-header push-pull, allows one locomotive to pull from the leading end while the other pushes from the trailing end, with control centralized in the cab of one unit to maintain directional consistency. Alternatively, configurations may integrate control capabilities within one locomotive to remotely operate the other, forming a cohesive unit without requiring a separate control car. Synchronization of multiple locomotives in these setups relies on multiple-unit (MU) train control systems, which link the units via standardized electrical and pneumatic connections to ensure coordinated , , and power distribution. In the U.S. standard, a 27-wire electrical transmits control signals—such as notches via solenoids and commands—at +74 V DC, while air hoses (e.g., BC for cylinder and ACT for automatic control) synchronize across units by propagating signals through valves. Advanced methods, including electronic supervision of longitudinal dynamics, further mitigate coupler forces and buff stresses by adjusting individual locomotive outputs in real-time, preventing overloads during or deceleration in long consists. This MU integration allows a single operator to command all locomotives as if they were a unified power unit, with trailing locomotives set to "" mode to receive directives without independent input. Such dual-locomotive push-pull arrangements are particularly suited for heavy freight services requiring substantial over extended hauls or challenging gradients, as well as long-distance passenger operations where added power supports higher speeds and heavier loads. For instance, is developing push-pull locomotives capable of hauling up to 22 non-AC coaches, inspired by high-speed Vande Bharat designs, to improve efficiency on busy routes by eliminating the need for locomotive run-arounds at terminals. In Amtrak's operations, dual-mode locomotives (capable of electric and diesel propulsion) are employed in push-pull configurations with multiple power units to handle intercity routes, providing redundancy and enhanced performance on electrified corridors like the Northeast. Despite these benefits, dual-locomotive push-pull systems introduce complexities in coupling procedures, requiring precise alignment of MU receptacles and hoses, as well as rigorous pre-departure power brake tests to verify and prevent asynchronous operation that could lead to derailments or coupler failures. adds further challenges, as mismatched locomotive outputs or electrical faults can exacerbate longitudinal forces, necessitating advanced monitoring to maintain , particularly in passenger services where the notes elevated occupant risks in cab-led configurations compared to traditional lead- setups.

Centralized and distributed power

In push-pull operations, centralized power configurations position the amid the train consist, flanked by s at both ends to enable bidirectional driving without repositioning the power unit. This setup allows the train to operate efficiently in either direction, with the cab controls in the leading directing the mid-train via multiple-unit (MU) cabling or radio links. Such arrangements are uncommon due to operational challenges, including the need for specialized mechanisms to maintain connectivity during shunting and the complexity of integrating passenger cars around the . An historical example is the Taff Vale Railway's 4-coach push-pull sets in early 20th-century Britain, powered by a Class 'C' 4-4-2T tank placed centrally between coaches, observed at Town station. Distributed power variants extend this concept by incorporating multiple booster locomotives or dedicated power cars spaced intermittently along the train length, all synchronized for push-pull functionality and controlled remotely from a lead cab or . These units, often unmanned, operate via radio-based systems such as GE's LOCOTROL or equivalent technologies that transmit , braking, and dynamic commands across the consist, ensuring coordinated traction and retardation. In passenger applications, this is less prevalent than in freight but appears in specialized long-haul or high-capacity services, such as certain Chinese Railway push-pull EMUs with distributed traction elements for enhanced performance. Advanced synchronization tools like Wabtec's (formerly GE) Trip Optimizer integrate with setups to optimize and handling by calculating real-time adjustments for speed, , and braking based on track profile and load. This maintains distributed units in harmony with the lead locomotive, reducing consumption by up to 10% in certified operations. Primarily applied in unit train formations for bulk freight, these configurations enhance overall train stability on challenging terrains. The primary advantages of both centralized and distributed power in push-pull trains include superior traction distribution on steep grades, where mid- or spaced units provide additional push to prevent wheel slip, and minimized slack action through even force application across the consist. This reduces coupler stress, wheel wear, and derailment risks while enabling longer consists without excessive in-train buff and draft forces.

Operations

Control and cab signaling

In push-pull train operations, control systems primarily rely on hardwired connections to enable the operator in the leading to remotely manage the trailing 's , braking, and other functions. The standard in is the 27-point multiple-unit (MU) trainline system, which uses jumper cables to transmit analog or digital signals for traction power, , and status indications between the and . These cables, operating at 74 VDC, connect via receptacles on both vehicles, ensuring synchronized operation as if the locomotive were leading; for instance, the "Black MU" configuration supports digital control from cab cars to diesel or electric locomotives. This setup is defined by the Association of American Railroads (AAR) S-512 standard and (APTA) Recommended Practice PR-E-RP-017-99, which specify conductor functions, pin assignments, and compatibility with freight equipment. Wireless control methods, such as radio-based train wire control (TWC), are emerging for passenger push-pull configurations, particularly in distributed power setups where locomotives at both ends communicate via radio links to reduce cable complexity and improve flexibility. However, hardwired systems remain dominant due to reliability in dense passenger services, with wireless options like the Federal Railroad Administration's (FRA) Wireless Digital Train Line (WiDTL) prototype focusing on adaptive multiplexing for end-to-end trainline functions without physical cables. Recent implementations, such as Amtrak's Airo push-pull trainsets entering service in 2025, incorporate advanced digital controls and wireless MU communication for enhanced precision and interoperability. Deadman pedals or vigilance devices in control cars mirror those in locomotives, requiring continuous operator input (e.g., periodic acknowledgment) to prevent unintended movement, integrated into the MU system for emergency braking if the operator is incapacitated. Cab signaling systems integrate seamlessly with push-pull controls by providing in-cab displays of track authority and speed restrictions to the operator in the leading vehicle, regardless of whether it is the or . In the United States, automatic train protection (ATP) or (ATC) overlays, such as those mandated by FRA Emergency Order 20 for cab car-forward operations, use cab signals to enforce wayside indications, with onboard receivers in the ensuring continuous supervision. In Europe, the (ETCS) Level 2 supports push-pull modes through radio block centers (RBCs) communicating via with the onboard unit (OBU) in the , delivering movement authorities directly to the driver's display without lineside signals; this is exemplified in retrofits for steering cars on networks like Belgian Railways. Communication protocols like AAR MU standards govern North American hardwired links, while ETCS specifications (SRS 3.6.0) define European interoperability, including ergonomics with duplicated -style interfaces for throttle, brakes, and signaling readouts. Evolution has progressed from basic hardwired MU to automated digital systems, enhancing precision in push mode where visibility from the trailing is limited.

Safety protocols

Safety protocols for push-pull trains emphasize measures to mitigate risks associated with the locomotive positioned at the rear during push mode, where the control cab leads the train. Enhanced rear-end protection is achieved through crash energy management (CEM) systems incorporated into cab cars and locomotives, which utilize controlled crush zones to absorb impact energy and protect occupied areas. Full-scale tests have demonstrated that CEM reduces intrusion into passenger compartments from 22 feet to 3 feet in collisions at 31 mph. Additionally, to address limited direct visibility of the train consist in push mode, cab cars often integrate mirror systems or closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras for monitoring the rear and sides, supplemented by periodic visual checks during operation. Automatic train stop (ATS) systems, where installed, provide overrides compatible with cab control, ensuring the operator can acknowledge signals while maintaining fail-safe braking if unresponsive. In the United States, the (FRA) enforces specific regulatory standards for cab cars in push-pull service under 49 CFR Part 238, requiring them to support an 800,000-pound longitudinal static load and feature strengthened collision and corner posts to enhance . Post-2000 designs must meet (APTA) standards that double corner post load capacity. In , the Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSI) for locomotives and passenger (LOC&PAS) mandate structural integrity for end elements in push-pull configurations, including energy absorption requirements up to 36 km/h for collision scenarios to prevent or intrusion. These standards align with the Common Safety Method for Risk Evaluation (CSM-RA) under EU Regulation 402/2013, requiring risk assessments for push-pull operations. Notable incidents underscore the importance of these protocols; for instance, the 2005 collision involved a Metrolink push-pull train striking a parked at a grade crossing, leading to a secondary collision with an oncoming and 11 fatalities, with eight occurring in the crushed cab car due to insufficient buffer strength. Analysis of 1996–2005 data showed push-mode trains had a slightly higher rate (1.38%) compared to pull mode (0.69%) in grade crossing collisions, prompting mitigations like CEM adoption and sealed corridor protections to limit exposure. In , while push-pull incidents are less documented in aggregate, Training requirements for push-pull operations focus on dual-cab proficiency and emergency response. In the , FRA's Passenger Train Emergency Preparedness rule (49 CFR Part 239) mandates crew including simulations for push-pull scenarios, with operators completing locomotive engineer qualification under 49 CFR Part 240 that covers handling and signal interpretation. In , Directive 2007/59/EC establishes a harmonized scheme for drivers, requiring supplementary competence certificates for specific push-pull types, including practical training on UIC cable-based control systems for safe traction and braking coordination.

Performance and efficiency

Push-pull trains generally exhibit rates comparable to traditional locomotive-hauled configurations, typically ranging from 0.5 to 1 m/s² for services, though the pushing mode can provide marginally better initial by compressing couplings and minimizing slack action. This performance allows for efficient operation on mixed-traffic lines, with representative examples including services where supports scheduled speeds up to 200 km/h without significant degradation. Fuel efficiency in push-pull operations benefits from eliminating the need for locomotives to run light on return trips, yielding savings of 5-15% compared to conventional round-trip configurations that require repositioning. These savings are particularly notable in commuter networks, where the design reduces overall diesel consumption by optimizing engine utilization across both directions. Key efficiency factors include minimized idling at terminals, as the enables immediate reversal without detaching or repositioning the , shortening turnaround times by up to 20-30 minutes per service. This contributes to higher track capacity, with push-pull setups increasing line throughput by 10-20% on busy corridors through faster cycle times and reduced occupancy of terminal tracks. In comparisons with diesel multiple units (DMUs) or electric multiple units (EMUs), push-pull trains offer lower consumption for longer consists due to centralized power, but they lag in —EMUs achieve up to 1.5 m/s² or more via distributed traction—making push-pull better suited for routes with fewer stops. Data from High Speed Train conversions to push-pull mode with driving trailers demonstrate sustained performance at 125 mph, with energy use 10-15% lower than equivalent DMU operations on similar routes due to optimized loading. Modern electric push-pull systems incorporate , where leading locomotives recover up to 20-30% of during deceleration, enhancing overall efficiency especially in urban-intercity hybrids. This feature, combined with lightweight control cars, supports net energy reductions of 15-25% over non-regenerative diesel counterparts in electrified networks.

History

Origins in steam era

The concept of push-pull operation with originated in early 20th-century Britain as an innovative response to the need for more flexible passenger services on lightly trafficked branch lines, building on earlier self-propelled experiments to eliminate the time-consuming process of detaching and reattaching locomotives at terminals. The Great Western Railway (GWR) led these developments, introducing steam railmotors in 1903—these were self-contained units with a at one end and passenger accommodation, allowing control from a cab at the opposite end for bidirectional running without turning the vehicle. The first GWR steam railmotor entered service on 12 October 1903, operating on the Stroud Valley line between Chalford and Stonehouse to counter competition from emerging trams and buses in rural and suburban areas. By 1904, the GWR had built prototypes and followed with a main batch, eventually producing 99 carriage units between 1903 and 1908, the largest fleet in Britain, which facilitated quicker turnarounds and reduced operating costs on short routes. A key advancement came with the transition from railmotors to dedicated push-pull autotrains around 1905, where conventional tank locomotives were paired with autocoaches—specialized trailers featuring a driving cab, controls linked to the locomotive via mechanical rods, chains, or later vacuum systems, and communication bells for signaling. This configuration allowed a single locomotive, such as the GWR's 517-class 0-4-2T, to haul or push up to four coaches at speeds exceeding the railmotors' 30 mph limit, enhancing capacity on growing branch line services without the complexity of integral steam units. Autotrains were particularly adopted for efficiency on routes like those in the West Country and Welsh valleys, where they replaced or augmented railmotors as passenger numbers increased, with conversions of older coaches into autotrailers beginning in 1906 to meet demand. The system's design emphasized simplicity, using existing locomotives to avoid the high maintenance costs of railmotors, which often struggled with gradients when adding trailers. Despite these innovations, early push-pull operations faced notable limitations, including poor visibility for the guard or in the leading autocoach when the was pushing, as exhaust and obscured the track ahead, necessitating careful route selection and speed restrictions. Controls were rudimentary, often relying on physical linkages that limited remote functionality to basic regulator and adjustments, with whistles and bells handling most coordination between the crew and cab. These challenges restricted widespread adoption to suitable light-traffic lines, though the GWR's success spurred similar developments elsewhere in Britain, such as on the . By the , the concept had spread across parts of , with French railways beginning to employ pneumatic controls for push-pull on some tank locomotives in the mid-. Adoption in British colonies occurred later in the .

Electric and diesel transitions

The transition to electric and diesel power in push-pull train operations during the mid-20th century was driven by the expansion of networks from the to and the widespread dieselization of rail systems from the 1940s to 1960s, as proved less efficient for frequent commuter services requiring bidirectional control. , particularly via third-rail systems, enabled smoother acceleration and in push mode, while dieselization offered greater flexibility on non-electrified routes without the need for and stops. A key motivator was the demand for reliable systems to manage the from the leading during push operations, reducing turnaround times at terminals. Key innovations included the development of diesel push-pull configurations using radio or wired , as demonstrated in U.S. experiments where locomotives were synchronized with cab cars for commuter runs. Electric locomotives paired with trailing cabs—control vehicles at the front of the train—allowed operators to maintain visibility and command without relocating the power unit, enhancing and on electrified lines. These adaptations addressed the limitations of steam-era mechanical linkages by incorporating electrical signaling for , , and alerts between the cab and . Notable milestones encompassed the United Kingdom's Southern Railway implementation of electric push-pull services in the on its expanding third-rail network, which integrated locomotive-hauled coaches with leading control trailers for suburban routes. Precursors to modern diesel driving van trailers (DVTs) emerged in the late 1950s and early 1960s through experiments with diesel-electric sets featuring remote-controlled cab cars, paving the way for standardized push-pull formations. In the U.S., the & North Western Railroad's 1956-1960 rollout of bilevel gallery cars with diesel locomotives marked a significant advancement in high-capacity push-pull commuter operations. Challenges in these transitions centered on reliable for , where electrical interference and signal latency in push mode risked operational errors, necessitating robust cabling and later radio systems to ensure . Standardization efforts by railway authorities focused on uniform control protocols and cab designs to facilitate across electric and diesel fleets, mitigating compatibility issues during the shift from . These solutions ultimately improved train handling, with push-pull configurations achieving up to 20-30% faster cycle times on busy lines compared to traditional repositioning.

Regional developments in Europe

In the , push-pull operations evolved from steam-era autotrains, where locomotives hauled or pushed specially fitted trailers with driver controls linked via vacuum brakes and signaling, primarily on branch lines to enhance without turning facilities. By the , this transitioned to diesel and electric configurations, exemplified by the introduction of Driving Van Trailers (DVTs) for high-speed services; the electric locomotives, part of the project, were paired with Mk4 coaches and DVTs to enable 140 mph (225 km/h) push-pull running on the from London King's Cross. High Speed Train (HST) power cars were also converted into interim DVTs during early trials with Class 91s, bridging the gap until dedicated Mk4 rakes were delivered in the late , improving turnaround times and operational flexibility on electrified routes. In Ireland, early diesel push-pull services emerged in the as part of the transition from , with locomotives like the 201 Class paired with driving trailer carriages for commuter operations on non-electrified lines, including the precursor to the (DART). These configurations allowed bidirectional running without shunting, supporting frequent services on routes like to Bray. Modern developments include DART extensions, where push-pull diesel sets have been integrated with electrified sections; for instance, de-engined railcars from the 2600 Class were converted for push-pull use in the 1970s to extend services southward to before full electrification in the , and recent bi-mode DART+ trains incorporate hybrid capabilities for seamless extensions beyond the wired network. France's has advanced push-pull systems for both high-speed and regional services, with variants employing power cars at both ends in a distributed push-pull setup to achieve operational speeds up to 320 km/h while maintaining flexibility for maintenance and fault isolation. For regional TER networks, control cars enable push-pull with locomotives like the BB 26000 series, as seen in double-deck VB 2N (Voiture de Banlieue à 2 Niveaux) rakes used on suburban lines around and other regions, increasing capacity and reducing turnaround times on mixed-traffic routes. These configurations, often with Corail coaches and B5uxh driving trailers, support efficient TER services across diverse terrains, though integration with high-speed lines remains limited due to differing electrification and signaling standards. In other European countries, Switzerland's SBB introduced the double-deck push-pull trains in the 1990s, utilizing Re 460 electric locomotives with control cars and double-deck coaches for services on routes like to St. Gallen, offering up to 200 km/h speeds and high passenger capacity through multi-level design. Germany’s DB employs the tilting ICE-T (Classes 411/415) in push-pull EMU configurations for curved, non-upgraded lines, enabling 230 km/h operations on international routes such as to Zurich or to , though their high-speed integration is constrained by the need for specialized tilting approval across borders. Emerging EU-wide standards, through Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs), are addressing cross-border challenges by harmonizing control systems and certification, facilitating push-pull operations like those with Vectron locomotives for seamless international services.

Developments in North America and beyond

In North America, push-pull operations gained prominence in the late 20th century through Amtrak's adoption of converted Metroliner multiple units as cab cars on the Northeast Corridor starting in the 1980s, enabling high-speed service without turning trains at terminals. These stainless-steel cab cars, originally built by Budd in the 1960s, were rebuilt in the 1980s for push-pull configurations, supporting operations up to 160 mph on electrified lines. On the Acela Express, push-pull setups with cab control cars at one end and locomotives at the other have been standard since the service's inception in 2000, allowing bidirectional running and reduced turnaround times at endpoints like Boston and Washington, D.C. In freight applications, distributed power units emerged in the 1980s, with railroads like Union Pacific deploying remote-controlled locomotives at mid-train or rear positions via radio links to improve traction and braking on heavy hauls, a practice that became widespread by the 1990s. Israel Railways integrated push-pull technology into its commuter services during the 1990s expansion of passenger lines, using JT 42BW diesel locomotives to haul control cars equipped with driver's cabs, which facilitated efficient operations on reopened routes without locomotive repositioning. This was complemented by Alstom-built push-pull sets introduced in 1996, featuring 37 units with five dedicated cab cars for high-frequency suburban runs, integrated with advanced signaling to enhance safety and capacity on lines like to coastal suburbs. In , diesel push-pull configurations emerged in regional services in the late as steam operations declined. New Zealand's advanced push-pull adoption through EMU conversions in the 2000s, transforming former Ganz-Mavag multiple units into SD-class driving trailers paired with diesel-electric locomotives for Auckland suburban services, enabling flexible formations and quicker platform dwell times until the network's 2014 electrification shift. Asia has seen notable push-pull innovations in recent decades, exemplified by India's trains launched in 2023, which employ dual WAP-5 electric locomotives—one pulling from the front and one pushing from the rear—for non-air-conditioned long-distance services reaching speeds of 130 km/h and halving turnaround times at major stations. In , the Taiwan Railways Administration's E1000 series electric push-pull trains, operational since the late but modernized post-2000, use South African-built locomotives with integrated cab cars for routes, supporting up to 150 km/h on the western trunk line while accommodating dining and sleeper configurations. Post-2000 global trends in push-pull trains emphasize digital enhancements, such as integrated radio-based systems for in freight operations, allowing synchronized and across multiple units to boost efficiency on intercontinental hauls. In passenger services, advancements include cab signaling interfaces and via onboard sensors, reducing downtime and enabling seamless integration with on networks like those in and , though some regions persist with outdated freight-focused setups lacking these upgrades. In 2025, Amtrak introduced the Airo push-pull trainsets on the , featuring cars with electro-diesel locomotives for enhanced capacity and speeds up to 160 mph (260 km/h).

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.