Hubbry Logo
Red Cross parcelRed Cross parcelMain
Open search
Red Cross parcel
Community hub
Red Cross parcel
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Red Cross parcel
Red Cross parcel
Red Cross parcel
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

British Red Cross parcel from the First World War

Red Cross parcel refers to packages containing mostly food, tobacco and personal hygiene items sent by the International Association of the Red Cross to prisoners of war (POWs) during the First and Second World Wars,[1] as well as at other times. It can also refer to medical parcels and so-called "release parcels" provided during the Second World War.

The Red Cross arranged them in accordance with the provisions of the Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War (1929). During the Second World War these packages augmented the often-meagre and deficient diets in the prisoner-of-war camps, contributing greatly to prisoner survival and an increase in morale. Modern Red Cross food parcels provide basic food and sanitary needs for persons affected by natural disasters, wars, political upheavals or similar events.

More recent catastrophes involving delivery of Red Cross parcels include events in Georgia, Thailand and Great Britain.

First World War

[edit]

The Australian Red Cross reported dispatching a total of 395,695 food parcels and 36,339 clothing parcels to Allied POWs in Germany and Turkey during the course of the First World War.[2] Food parcels were also sent to needy civilians in Belgium and France.

British POWs during the First World War were supplied with food parcels by the British Central Prisoners of War Committee of the Joint War Organisation, the combined Red Cross and Order of St John. When the Central Powers refused to allow food to be sent to prisoners of war by the British government, the British Red Cross had stepped forward. Packages containing food and conveniences were sent fortnightly to POWs. Donations collected from the public for these parcels reached £674,908 19s 1d. A total of £5,145,458 16s 9d was spent.[3] By the end of the war, some 9,000,000 food parcels and 800,000 clothing parcels had been despatched by various organisations to British prisoners abroad.[4]

French POWs were required to pay for parcels sent to them through a French commission; these packages included potted chicken, various pâtés, and even bottled wine.[5] Indigent French POWs could receive parcels with lower-quality food for free, from the "Vetement du Prisonnier" which liaised actively with the Croix-Rouge française.

New Zealand

[edit]

New Zealand relatives had to buy parcels and were given a choice:

Relatives could send a specific parcel or a package made up of A & C or B & C[6] It is also noted that each POW was supplied with 400 cigarettes per month, provided by the Joint Council of the Order of St John and the New Zealand Red Cross Society. It was not permitted for private persons to send cigarettes or tobacco to POWs.[7]

American

[edit]

The American Red Cross commenced delivery of food parcels to American POWs in German camps in November 1917.[8] The first parcel received by a POW included the following items:

  • One pound (450 g) tin of corned beef
  • One pound (450 g) tin of roast beef
  • One pound (450 g) tin of salmon
  • Two pounds (900 g) of hash
  • One pound (450 g) of jam
  • One bar of soap
  • Four packages of tobacco
  • One overshirt
  • One undershirt
  • Two cans of pork and beans
  • One can each of tomatoes, corn and peas
  • One pair of drawers
  • Two pairs of socks
  • Three handkerchiefs
  • Two towels
  • One tube of toothpaste
  • Two pounds (900 g) of hard bread
  • 1 US pint (0.47 L; 0.83 imp pt) of evaporated milk
  • One pound (450 g) of sugar
  • One-half (225 g) pound of coffee
  • One toothbrush, comb, shaving brush and "housewife" kit (sewing kit), plus shaving soap.[9]

Thereafter, further parcels were sent once per week. These were rotated on a four-week schedule between packages labeled "A", "B", "C" and "D". Each parcel contained meat, fish, vegetable, bread and fruit items, together with eighty cigarettes or other tobacco products.[10] Items of clothing were also provided for American POWs through the American Red Cross.[11] Toward the end of the war, German camp guards and other personnel would sometimes steal the contents of these packages, often leaving only bread for the helpless prisoner. In such events, American camp representatives attempted to make up the loss through stores kept for this purpose in the POW camps.[12]

A special agreement between the YMCA and the American Red Cross resulted in the YMCA providing athletic equipment, books and games for American prisoners in German POW camps.[13]

Second World War

[edit]

Red Cross food parcels during the Second World War were mostly provided from the United Kingdom, Canada and America (after 1941). An Allied POW might receive any of these packages at any one given time, regardless of his or her own nationality. This was because all such packages were sent from their country of origin to central collection points, where they were subsequently distributed to Axis POW camps by the International Committee of the Red Cross.

For POWs held by Axis forces in Europe the parcel route through Lisbon required escorted ships to bring the crates of parcels, or for British, mail bags full of parcels, to Lisbon, there being no safe conduct agreement. In Portugal, parcels would be loaded onto Red Cross marked ships with many taken through the port of Marseilles, for onward freighting by rail to Geneva, from where they would be sent to various camps by the International Committee of the Red Cross.[14][15] Barcelona was also used as an Iberian transit port, with Toulon as an alternative French port.[16] The returning ships sometimes carried allied civilians and wounded being repatriated.[17]: 69 

The route from Iberia to the South of France was not safe. The Red Cross ship SS Padua was damaged by British bombing in Genoa in 1942 and then sunk by a mine outside Marseilles in October 1943. The SS Embla was bombed by British aircraft on 6 April 1944 causing a fire, and the same ship was attacked again on 20 April 1944, by American B-26 bombers, who this time sank the ship and killed the ICRC agent. On 6 May the "Christina" was attacked while at anchor in Sete. This latest act resulted in the ICRC suspending the route.[18] The Operation Dragoon invasion of Southern France, preliminary bombing in July and the actual invasion in August 1944 put a stop to rail transport[16] and then Marseilles being used by the Red Cross. The SS Vega sailed to the alternative port of Toulon with parcels in November 1944.

On 8 May 1945, it was reported that 7,000,000 parcels, weighing 35,000 tonnes (34,000 long tons; 39,000 short tons) were at sea or in warehouses in Britain, Lisbon, Barcelona, Marseilles, Toulon, Geneva and Gothenburg. A Red Cross representative said that they were not perishable and could be used for distressed civilians and as a flexible reserve.[19]

British food parcels

[edit]

During the Second World War, the British Joint War Organisation sent standard food parcels, invalid food parcels, medical supplies, educational books and recreational materials to prisoners of war worldwide. During the conflict, over 20 million standard food parcels were sent.[20] Typical contents of such a parcel included:

The Scottish Red Cross parcels were the only ones to contain rolled oats. Approximately 163,000 parcels were made up each week during the Second World War.

Sometimes, due to the shortage of parcels, two or even four prisoners would be compelled to share the contents of one Red Cross parcel.[21]

American food parcels

[edit]

The American Red Cross produced 27,000,000 parcels.[22] Even before America entered the war in late 1941, they were supplying, through Geneva, parcels to British, Belgian, French, Polish, Yugoslav, Dutch, Greek, Norwegian, and Soviet prisoners of war. The Philadelphia centre alone was producing 100,000 parcels a month in 1942.[23] A list of the contents of a typical Red Cross parcel received by an American airman held prisoner in Stalag Luft I near Barth, Germany on the Baltic Sea:

  • One pound (450 g) can of powdered milk
  • One package ten assorted cookies
  • One pound (450 g) can of oleo margarine
  • Eight-ounce (230 g) package of cube sugar
  • Eight-ounce (230 g) package of Kraft cheese
  • Six-ounce (170 g) package of K-ration biscuits
  • Four-ounce (110 g) can of coffee
  • Two D-ration chocolate bars
  • Six-ounce (170 g) can of jam or peanut butter
  • Twelve-ounce (340 g) can of salmon or tuna
  • One pound (450 g) can of Spam or corned beef
  • One pound (450 g) can of liver paté
  • One pound (450 g) package of raisins or prunes
  • Five packages of cigarettes
  • Seven vitamin-C tablets
  • Two bars of soap
  • Twelve-ounce (340 g) of C-ration vegetable soup concentrate.[24]

According to this airman, recipients of these parcels were permitted to keep only the cigarettes and chocolate bars; the remainder of the parcel was turned over to the camp cook, who combined them with the contents of other parcels and German POW rations (usually bread, barley, potatoes, cabbage and horse meat)[24] to create daily meals for the prisoners.[24]

Cigarettes in the parcels became the preferred medium of exchange within the camp, with each individual cigarette valued at 27 cents within Stalag Luft I.[24] Similar practices were followed in other POW camps, as well. Cigarettes were also used to bribe German guards to provide the prisoners with outside items that would otherwise have been unavailable to them.[24] Tins of coffee, which were hard to come by in Germany late in the war, served this same purpose in many camps.[21] Contents of these packages were sometimes pilfered by German guards or other camp personnel, especially toward the end of the war.[25]

Canadian food parcels

[edit]

The Canadian Red Cross reported assembling and shipping nearly 16,500,000 food parcels during the Second World War, at a cost of $47,529,000.[26] The Canadian Red Cross Prisoners of War Parcels Committee was led by Chairman Harold H. Leather, M.B.E., of Hamilton, Ontario and Vice Chairman John Draper Perrin of Winnipeg, Manitoba. Contents of the Canadian parcel included:

  • One pound (450 g) of milk powder
  • One pound (450 g) of butter
  • Four ounces (110 g) of cheese
  • Twelve ounces (340 g) of corned beef
  • Ten ounces (280 g) of pork luncheon meat
  • Eight ounces (230 g) of salmon
  • Four ounces (110 g) of sardines or kippers
  • Eight ounces (230 g) of dried apples
  • Eight ounces (230 g) of dried prunes or raisins
  • Eight ounces (230 g) of sugar
  • One pound (450 g) of jam or honey
  • One pound (450 g) of pilot biscuits
  • Eight ounces (230 g) of chocolate
  • One ounce (28 g) of salt and pepper (mustard, onion powder and other condiments were also sometimes enclosed)
  • Four ounces (110 g) of tea or coffee
  • Two ounces (57 g) of soap.[26]

Parcels did vary; those delivered to the Channel Islands by the SS Vega in 1945 contained slightly different quantities, both eight oz (230 g) raisins and six oz (170 g) prunes, and marmalade instead of jam.[14]

New Zealand food parcels

[edit]

The New Zealand Red Cross Society provided 1,139,624 parcels during the war period, packed by 1,500 volunteers.[27] Prisoners parcels included:

  • Six ounces (170 g) of tea
  • Nineteen-ounce (540 g) can of corned mutton
  • Fifteen-ounce (430 g) can of lamb and green peas
  • Eight ounces (230 g) of chocolate
  • Twenty ounces (570 g) of butter
  • Fifteen ounces (430 g) of coffee and milk
  • Ten ounces (280 g) of sugar
  • Nine ounces (260 g) of peas
  • One pound (450 g) of jam
  • One pound (450 g) of condensed milk
  • Fifteen ounces (430 g) of cheese
  • Six ounces (170 g) of raisins.[14]

Unlike the American and British parcels, Canadian and New Zealand Red Cross parcels did not include cigarettes or tobacco.

Indian food parcels

[edit]

Indian parcels, supplied by the Indian Red Cross Society, contained:

  • Eight ounces (230 g) fruit in syrup
  • One pound (450 g) lentils
  • Two ounces (57 g) toilet soap
  • One pound (450 g) flour
  • 8 biscuits
  • Eight ounces (230 g) margarine
  • Twelve ounces (340 g) Nestle's Milk
  • Fourteen ounces (400 g) rice
  • One pound (450 g) pilchard
  • Two ounces (57 g) curry powder
  • Eight ounces (230 g) sugar
  • One ounce (28 g) dried eggs
  • Two ounces (57 g) tea
  • One ounce (28 g) salt
  • Four ounces (110 g) chocolate[14]

Indian parcels did not contain meat or tobacco products.

Argentinian bulk parcel

[edit]

The Argentinian Red Cross provided parcels containing:

  • Three ounces (85 g) bully beef
  • Five ounces (140 g) meat and veg
  • Three ounces (85 g) ragout
  • Two ounces (57 g) corned mutton
  • Four ounces (110 g) pork and beans
  • Five ounces (140 g) butter
  • Two ounces (57 g) lard
  • Two ounces (57 g) honey
  • Five ounces (140 g) jam
  • Two ounces (57 g) milk jam
  • Four ounces (110 g) condensed milk
  • Eight ounces (230 g) sugar
  • Seven ounces (200 g) cheese
  • Eight ounces (230 g) biscuits
  • One ounce (28 g) pea and lentil flour
  • Three ounces (85 g) chocolate
  • Two ounces (57 g) cocoa
  • One ounce (28 g) tea
  • 1 soap
  • Three ounces (85 g) dried fruit[28]

South African parcels

[edit]

From the British South African Red Cross.[29][self-published source]

Invalid food parcels

[edit]

Invalid parcels were specifically designed for invalids, i.e. disabled or ill prisoners. The contents varied, but what appears to be a British one contained:

Food parcels in the Pacific theatre

[edit]

In 1942, permission was granted by Japan for a diplomatically neutral ship, after Japan refused to permit a Red Cross ship to be deployed, to be dispatched to distribute the parcels. A Swedish vessel, the MS Gripsholm delivered 20,000 Red Cross parcels from Canada, America and South Africa and in addition a consignment of 1,000,000 cigarettes. A second voyage was refused.[23]

The Japanese government in August 1942 announced that no neutral ship, even a Red Cross ship, would be allowed to enter Japanese waters. Red Cross parcels intended for Allied POWs in Japan were accordingly stockpiled in Vladivostok, Soviet Union, and a single ship was ultimately permitted to transport some of these to Japan in November 1944, which, in turn were carried by the Japanese vessel Awa Maru, carrying Red Cross markings, in March, 1945, to Singapore. How many of these actually reached the POWs is not known, and the sinking of the Awa Maru on the return trip by a US submarine prevented any future shipments from being made.[30]

At the Changi prison camp run by the Japanese in Singapore, an average POW received a fraction of one food parcel in the three-and-a half years that the camp was open.[31]

Food parcels in the German concentration camps

[edit]

In November 1943, the Red Cross received permission from Nazi German authorities to send Red Cross parcels to inmates of concentration camps, but only to those whose names and specific locations were known. By May 1945, 105,000 specific individuals had been identified. About 1,112,000 parcels containing 4,500 tons of food were ultimately sent to the camps,[32] including those at Dachau, Buchenwald, Ravensbrück, Sachsenhausen, Theresienstadt and Auschwitz. In addition to food, these parcels also contained clothing and pharmaceutical items.[33]

German POWs after the Second World War

[edit]

Three months after the surrender of Germany in May 1945, General Dwight Eisenhower issued an order classifying all surrendered soldiers within the American Zone of Occupation as Disarmed Enemy Forces, rather than Prisoners of War. Accordingly, the Red Cross was denied the right to visit German POWs in American prison camps, and delivery of Red Cross parcels to them was forbidden.[34] In the spring of 1946, the International Red Cross was finally allowed to provide limited amounts of food aid to prisoners of war in the U.S. occupation zone.[35]

Postwar study on Red Cross parcels and Canadian POWs

[edit]

The Canadian government conducted a detailed study of the effect of the Red Cross parcels on the health and morale of Canadian POWs shortly after the end of the Second World War. Over 5,000 former POWs were interviewed, and Canadian authorities determined that a significant number of soldiers did not get the intended one parcel per man per week; most had to make do with one-half of a parcel per week, or even less on some occasions. Soldiers were asked to state their preferences with regard to specific contents of the parcels: the most popular item turned out to be the biscuits, with butter a close second, followed (in order) by meat, milk (powdered and other), chocolate, cigarettes, tea, jam, cereals, cheese and coffee.[26] The Canadian parcel was preferred to British, American or New Zealand-issued parcels, claiming that the Canadian parcels had "greater bulk", "lasted longer", and/or had "more food".[26]

With regard to especially disliked foods, the Canadian respondents (over 4,200 of the interviewed POWs) expressed the greatest distaste for the vegetables and fish enclosed in the food parcels (about fifteen per cent of the total number of respondents), followed (in order) by condiments, egg powder, cereals, fat, cheese, desserts, sweets, beverages, jams, biscuits and milk. However, except for the first two items on that list, all of these were named by only a minuscule percentage of the total number of respondents.[26]

Parcels from Red Cross organisations in occupied countries

[edit]
  • Belgium sent parcels to their POWs and in addition, family members could send parcels.[36]
  • Denmark sent parcels to Danish citizens incarcerated in Nazi concentration camps.[37]
  • France sent parcels to their POWs and in addition, family members could send parcels.[36]

Red Cross medical kits

[edit]

American

[edit]

A second type of parcel delivered through the Red Cross during the Second World War was the Red Cross Prisoner of War First Aid Safety Kit, which was supplied by the American Red Cross for distribution through the International Committee. Such parcels generally held the following items:

  • A twelve-page booklet with instructions on the use of the enclosed medical supplies, printed in English, French, German, Polish and Serbo-Croatian
  • Ten packages of sterilised gauze, in two different sizes
  • One package containing 500 laxative pills
  • Two packages containing 500 aspirin tablets each
  • Twelve gauze bandages
  • Two cans of insecticide powder
  • Four tubes of boric acid antiseptic ointment
  • Two packages containing 500 sodium bicarbonate tablets each
  • Two tubes of Salicylic ointment (for treatment of athlete's foot and similar fungal diseases)
  • Two tubes of Mercuric antiseptic ointment
  • Four tubes of sulphur ointment (for treatment of skin diseases)
  • One box containing 100 Band-Aids
  • Two rolls of adhesive tape
  • Two 1-ounce (28 g) packages of absorbent cotton
  • Safety pins, forceps, soap, disinfectants and scissors.[25]

Other kits issued to some POWs through the American Red Cross contained a few differences in contents, but were generally similar to the above.[38]

British

[edit]

The British Red Cross also supplied Medical Parcels to Allied PoWs during the war. Prior to 15 June 1942, these kits generally consisted of:

  • A general parcel containing cotton wool, safety pins, soap, aspirin tablets and ointment
  • A disinfectant parcel
  • Special parcels containing thermometers and dressing scissors.

After 15 June 1942, the British kits' contents changed. The new kits contained:

  • An invalid food unit consisting of two parcels – milk and food
  • A medical stores unit consisting of four parcels:
"Medical 1" contained soap and disinfectant
"Medical 2" contained sodium bicarbonate, Dover's powder, lung balsam, ferric subsulfate solution, zinc ointment, cascara, zinc oxide powder, formalin throat tablets, ammoniated mercury ointment, flexoplast, lint, cotton wool, gauze, vitamin-C tablets, pile ointment, sulphapyridine tablets, magnesium trisilicate, and oxide plaster
"Medical 3 and 4" contained additional quantities of the supplies found in "Medical 2", adding to them kaoline poultice, vitamin A and vitamin D tablets, TCP (antiseptic), aspirin, Bemax, sulphanilamide and toilet paper.[39]

In addition, German and Italian authorities sometimes permitted British prisoner hospitals to procure equipment from England via the Red Cross, including microscopes, sterilisers, material for manufacturing artificial limbs, medical instruments, vaccines, drugs and even games and other recreational materials.[39]

Release parcels

[edit]

The American Red Cross provided a special "release parcel" to some Allied POWs upon their initial release from enemy captivity. These parcels included:

  • Razor
  • Razor blades
  • Shaving cream
  • Toothbrush
  • Toothpaste
  • Pencil
  • Comb
  • Socks
  • Cigarettes
  • Handkerchiefs
  • Playing cards
  • Stationery
  • Book
  • Hard candy
  • Chewing gum
  • Face cloth
  • Cigarette case with the American Red Cross emblem imprinted on it.[40]

These kits were distributed as follows: 71,400 to France; 10,000 to the Soviet Union; 9,500 to Italy; 5,000 to Egypt; and 4,000 to the Philippines.[41]

Modern Red Cross parcels

[edit]

Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, many pensioners in the newly independent nation of Georgia were left destitute by the resulting collapse of the Georgian economy and the inability of their small pensions to keep up with inflation. The Red Cross, with the financial support of the German government, assisted approximately 500,000 of these mostly elderly people with food parcels over a seven-year period during the 1990s. As of 2001, more than 12,000 were still dependent upon Red Cross food assistance.[42]

Food parcels were also distributed by the Red Cross of Thailand during Red Shirt Movement disturbances in 2006 in Bangkok,[43] and to British victims of flooding in Gloucestershire in 2007. The British package contained:[44]

  • Five tins of canned fruit
  • One loaf of longlife bread
  • Two packets of rye crackers
  • Three cartons of long-life milk
  • One jar of savoury spread
  • Three packets of plain biscuits
  • Three tins of fish
  • Three tins of meat
  • Five tins of potatoes
  • Two jars of sandwich spread
  • Two packs of cereal bars
  • One flashlight, batteries, toilet paper, and one tube of sanitiser hand gel.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Red Cross parcel

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A Red Cross parcel was a standardized relief package containing non-perishable foodstuffs, hygiene articles, and other necessities, assembled and distributed by national Red Cross societies in coordination with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to and civilian internees during the Second World War, with the primary objective of mitigating from deficient captor-provided rations. These parcels originated as a humanitarian response to reports of inadequate sustenance in prisoner camps, building on precedents from the First World War, and were systematically shipped from 1941 onward, with distribution routed through ICRC warehouses in to ensure neutrality amid belligerent blockades. The , as a major contributor, prepared and dispatched over 27 million such parcels to Allied prisoners held by Axis forces, aiming for one parcel per individual per week to deliver approximately 1,300 calories of supplemental nutrition. Typical contents of an American parcel included 12 ounces of canned or Spam, 8 ounces of or , 16 ounces of sweetened or , 8 ounces of , biscuits or canned , and smaller items like sugar, salt, coffee, raisins, and a , all chosen for durability and caloric density without requiring cooking facilities often absent in camps. While these shipments demonstrably reduced mortality from starvation among Western Allied prisoners in German captivity—where camp diets averaged under 1,000 calories daily—delivery interruptions from sinkings, aerial bombings, and occasional captor confiscations occurred, and the program reached far fewer Eastern Front or Soviet prisoners due to the Soviet Union's non-adherence to the 1929 Convention on prisoners of war until after the conflict. Post-liberation, surplus parcels totaling 9 million units were redirected to displaced persons across , underscoring the initiative's broader logistical scale and adaptability in addressing wartime humanitarian crises.

Origins in World War I

Development and Early Implementation

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) established the International Agency for Prisoners of War in on August 21, 1914, shortly after the outbreak of , to centralize records on captured soldiers and coordinate the forwarding of letters, money, and relief parcels from families and relief organizations to prisoners held by belligerent powers. This initiative addressed the immediate breakdown in communication and supply lines caused by the conflict, enabling neutral intermediaries to inspect and distribute under the provisions of the 1906 and 1907 Conventions, which permitted prisoners to receive packages while prohibiting items that could aid escape or combat. Early efforts focused on facilitating individual and ad hoc shipments, but as reports of in camps emerged—due to strained enemy and deliberate rationing—national Red Cross societies began systematizing parcel production to provide consistent nutritional supplements. By mid-October 1914, the ICRC agency had initiated organized parcel forwarding through neutral channels like , with shipments inspected at borders to ensure compliance with camp rules. Between mid-October 1914 and the end of June 1916 alone, the agency facilitated the delivery of over 30,400,000 parcels to prisoners across fronts, marking a rapid scale-up from sporadic family efforts to a structured humanitarian network that relied on reciprocal agreements between warring parties to allow entry into enemy-held territories. National societies, tasked by their governments when civilian access was blocked, developed early standardized contents tailored to caloric needs: the , for example, assembled parcels with beef extract, tea, cocoa, biscuits, cheese, dripping, , and cigarettes, designed to yield approximately 2,000 calories per package and stored in camps for weekly distribution. These were packed in durable tins or boxes to withstand long sea and rail journeys, often via routes like to for transshipment to . Implementation challenges in 1914–1915 included disrupting Atlantic convoys and initial German restrictions on parcel volumes, prompting the ICRC to negotiate camp stockpiles—such as authorizing up to 12,000 emergency British parcels in German facilities at any time. By 1916, reciprocal systems expanded, with the dispatching over 2.5 million parcels overall, while the , entering the war in , commenced targeted shipments to U.S. POWs in German camps that , supplying canned meats, chocolate, and toiletries via the ICRC for onward distribution. These efforts demonstrably mitigated risks, as POW survival rates improved where parcels arrived regularly, though uneven access persisted in remote or Eastern Front camps due to transport shortages.

National Contributions and Variants

The Society, in collaboration with the Order of St. John, formed the Central Prisoners of War Committee in August 1916 to systematize parcel distribution to British prisoners held by and , marking a key evolution in the WWI parcel program. Standard food parcels weighed approximately 10 pounds and included three tins of , one-quarter pound of , one-quarter pound of cocoa, two pounds of biscuits, two tins of cheese or preserved goods, one tin of , two bars of , one tin of sardines or salmon, one tin of milk, and a packet of raisins or prunes, sufficient to sustain two men for one week when combined with inadequate camp diets. These were dispatched fortnightly via neutral channels, with public donations totaling £674,908 19s 1d funding the effort, and the committee maintaining a stock of 12,000 emergency parcels for rapid response to new captures. Variants encompassed invalid parcels tailored for the ill or wounded, featuring softer foods like additional milk and invalid biscuits alongside basic medical supplies, and separate clothing parcels with underwear, socks, and toiletries to address shortages in harsh camp conditions. The initiated its parcel program after U.S. entry into the war in April 1917, focusing on supplementing rations for the roughly 4,000 American POWs in German camps by coordinating with the International Committee of the Red Cross for delivery. Parcels were rotated weekly to promote dietary variety and morale: the "A" parcel emphasized canned meats and fish; "B" included cheese, jam, and ; "C" featured , nuts, and condiments; and "D" provided , hard , , salt, coffee, and soap, with emergency stocks pre-positioned in camps like to greet newly arrived prisoners. This approach contrasted with British uniformity by prioritizing perishability mitigation through and diversification, reflecting U.S. industrial food production advantages, though distribution relied on British-established routes until late 1918. French Red Cross contributions, active from mid-1916, targeted over 1.4 million French POWs in German custody, often integrating family-sent supplements with -organized shipments of preserved meats, coffee, sugar, and hygiene items to counter reported in camps. Variants included specialized "comfort" parcels with and reading materials, though some shipments covertly incorporated escape aids like maps or tools hidden in baked goods, as discovered by German inspectors in 1917. Delivery volumes were substantial but fragmented compared to British centralization, with the leveraging neutral Swiss intermediaries amid blockades. Dominion nations augmented Allied efforts through their Red Cross branches: the Australian Red Cross dispatched parcels emphasizing , cocoa, and biscuits for Anzac prisoners in and , while Canadian chapters funded and packed similar variants with products and tinned fruits for troops under British command, ensuring cultural familiarity in contents. These national inputs fostered parcel customization—such as tea-dominant British kits versus coffee-focused American ones—while adhering to Convention guidelines, though logistical variances arose from differing supply chains and camp-specific restrictions imposed by captors.

Food Parcels in World War II

British and Commonwealth Parcels

The Joint War Organisation, comprising the Society and the Order of St John of Jerusalem, coordinated the production and dispatch of food parcels for British prisoners of war held by during . Approximately 20 million such parcels were sent from the to POWs in Nazi-occupied Europe and the Japanese-controlled , with production peaking at up to 163,000 parcels packed weekly. These parcels aimed to provide one per POW per week to offset nutritional deficiencies in camp rations, though logistical constraints—including shipping disruptions, attacks, and wartime shortages—frequently delayed or reduced deliveries, with some camps receiving parcels only sporadically. Typical contents emphasized compact, non-perishable British staples suited for long-distance transport, including tinned meats or fish (such as or sardines), biscuits, , tea, cheese, , sugar, and bars. and any included products proved particularly valuable, often functioning as informal for bartering within camps due to their scarcity and desirability. Parcels were routed through the International Committee of the Red Cross in for neutral inspection and forwarding to camps, where recipients signed acknowledgment cards returned via the same channel to verify delivery and enable ration adjustments. Commonwealth contributions augmented British efforts, with emerging as a major supplier for shared POW populations. The Canadian Red Cross, leveraging domestic production, dispatched 22,500 parcels weekly by October 1941, focusing on high-calorie items like canned meats, butter, and milk powder to support forces captured in , , and elsewhere. Over one million Canadian volunteers participated in assembly and , ensuring sustained supply despite transatlantic shipping risks. Other Dominion efforts, such as from and , provided supplementary parcels but on a smaller scale, prioritizing regional needs like Pacific theater captives. These combined initiatives mitigated risks, though uneven distribution persisted in remote or heavily bombed areas.

American Parcels

The initiated its prisoner-of-war food parcel program in 1941, prior to the ' formal entry into , coordinating with the International Committee of the Red Cross to supply Allied prisoners held by , primarily in German camps. These parcels, standardized as packages weighing approximately 11 pounds each, were designed to provide nutritional supplementation amid camp rations deficient in calories and protein, containing non-perishable items packed in sealed tins to prevent pilferage. By war's end, the organization produced and shipped over 27 million such parcels from facilities in the , valued at more than $152 million in total aid including surplus distributions. Standard contents included 12 ounces of , 12 ounces of luncheon meat or sausages, 11 ounces of , 8 ounces of soluble , 2 ounces of (often Klim brand), 8 ounces of biscuits or , 4 ounces of , 1 pound of such as prunes or raisins, 2 ounces of salt, and 4 ounces of or bars, supplemented by 50 cigarettes or equivalent products per parcel. These items were selected for high caloric density—averaging 10,000 calories per parcel—and shelf stability, with fats and proteins prioritized to combat observed in early repatriated POW reports; variations occurred based on supply availability, such as substituting or dehydrated beef hash for meats. Parcels were assembled by Red Cross volunteers in cities like and , then forwarded via neutral for transshipment to camps, adhering to Geneva Convention protocols that entitled each POW to one parcel weekly, though delivery disruptions reduced actual receipt to sporadic intervals. In addition to standard food parcels, the American Red Cross issued specialized variants, including Christmas packages in December 1944 with over 75,000 units shipped containing seasonal treats like extra candy and holiday cards, and medical kits with bandages, antiseptics, and vitamins for invalid prisoners. Distribution challenges included German interception for their own use, especially post-1944 as Allied bombing intensified supply lines, yet empirical records from repatriated POWs indicate parcels sustained survival rates, with many crediting them for preventing widespread starvation in camps like Stalag Luft III. Post-liberation, approximately 9 million surplus parcels were redirected to displaced persons in Europe, extending their utility beyond POWs.

Other Allied and Neutral Contributions

The Canadian Red Cross Society produced and dispatched approximately 16.5 million food parcels for prisoners of war between 1941 and 1945, supplementing efforts by other national societies and aiding Allied captives primarily in European camps. These parcels, packed in facilities including , contained standardized non-perishable items like canned meats, biscuits, and dairy products, and were forwarded via neutral ports for distribution under International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) oversight. Neutral countries contributed primarily through logistical and supervisory roles rather than large-scale production. , as the seat of the ICRC in , served as the central hub for receiving, inspecting, and dispatching parcels from Allied societies to Axis-held camps, ensuring compliance with Geneva Convention protocols amid wartime blockades. In late 1944, facilitated the rerouting of accumulated American parcels and mail via its ports after disruptions in traditional supply lines, enabling continued relief to POWs in . These neutral efforts were essential for maintaining and access, though production remained dominated by belligerent Allied nations.

Specialized Supplies in World War II

Medical Kits and Invalid Parcels

The , in coordination with the International Committee of the Red Cross, distributed specialized medical kits to Allied prisoners of war during to supplement inadequate camp medical facilities, which often lacked basic pharmaceuticals and dressings for treating common ailments like infections, digestive issues, and skin conditions. These kits addressed shortages that contributed to higher morbidity rates among POWs, providing group-level supplies rather than individual rations. One primary example was Medical Kit No. 4, revised in April 1944 and marked ARC 320, designed to serve approximately 100 men for one month or longer with essential remedies. Contents included aspirin tablets for pain relief, pills to combat from poor diets, for , boric and sulfur ointments for skin infections, iodine for antisepsis, rolls of and bandages for wounds, and insecticide powder to prevent lice-borne diseases like . Packaged in a compact measuring 10 inches by 10 inches by 5.25 inches, the kit featured instructions printed in five languages—English, French, German, Polish, and —to facilitate use by camp medical personnel or senior prisoners. A related Safety Kit offered individual-level items such as , phemerol solution, additional , bandages, safety pins, , and the same basic medications and ointments. Invalid parcels complemented medical kits by providing nutrition suited to sick, wounded, or disabled POWs who could not tolerate standard solid food parcels, focusing on easily digestible or liquid forms to aid recovery from malnutrition, dysentery, or surgical convalescence. These were arranged by national societies like the American and British Red Cross and forwarded via the International Committee of the Red Cross for delivery to camps, prioritizing prisoners certified as invalids by camp authorities. British efforts included invalid food units comprising milk-based parcels and specialized food parcels, integrated into broader medical stores units with four sub-parcels each, to support long-term invalid care. Distribution faced similar obstacles as food parcels, including shipping disruptions and camp confiscations, but reached thousands of recipients, reducing starvation-related complications in infirmaries.

Release and Bulk Parcels

The initiated production of specialized release in , intended for distribution to liberated American prisoners of war upon their or release from Axis captivity, to provide essential personal items for the journey home. These , coordinated through the International Committee of the Red Cross in , contained toilet articles such as a , , , , and ; and a ; handkerchiefs; and socks; as well as bars, cigarettes, and . An urgent request from prompted accelerated shipment of these , which addressed immediate and comfort needs amid the chaotic final months of the war in , when many POWs emerged from camps in malnourished and unkempt conditions. Neutral contributed bulk parcels to Allied POWs held in Axis camps, supplementing standard individual food parcels with larger-scale shipments packed under Red Cross auspices. These bulk parcels typically included 3 ounces of , 5 ounces of meat and vegetables, 3 ounces of , 2 ounces of cheese, 8 ounces of biscuits, 4 ounces each of and , 2 ounces of powder, and 1/2 ounce of , providing caloric density from preserved meats and staples to counter deficiencies in camp rations. 's shipments, often inscribed in English and numbering in the thousands weekly, leveraged the country's neutrality and agricultural surplus to aid distribution via ICRC channels, though delivery remained subject to Axis compliance with Convention protocols. Both release kits and bulk parcels represented adaptations to wartime exigencies, with release items prioritizing post-captivity recovery over nutrition, while bulk variants enabled efficient from neutral donors amid strained Allied production. Empirical records indicate these specialized supplies reached select recipients, but logistical disruptions—such as disrupted shipping in late 1944—limited overall impact compared to routine food parcels.

Distribution Challenges in Concentration Camps and Pacific Theater

In Nazi concentration camps, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) faced severe restrictions on parcel distribution due to German authorities' control over access and delivery. Although the ICRC dispatched over 122,000 food and relief parcels to various camps by May 1945, many failed to reach intended recipients, particularly Jewish deportees selected for immediate extermination upon arrival, as camp administrations prioritized guards and select prisoners while diverting or confiscating supplies. Proposals to send parcels specifically to Auschwitz were rejected by the , which argued that Jewish inmates were engaged in essential labor and ineligible under prevailing regulations, effectively blocking aid to extermination sites. Limited ICRC visits, such as the staged inspection of Theresienstadt in 1944, allowed minimal oversight, but systemic Nazi obfuscation— including falsified prisoner lists and prohibitions on direct distribution—prevented comprehensive delivery, with parcels often unloaded in neutral ports like only to be rerouted or withheld by SS overseers. Distribution in the Pacific Theater encountered even greater obstacles from Japanese non-compliance with Geneva Convention protocols, resulting in near-total blockage of Red Cross parcels to Allied POWs. Unlike in , where parcels reached camps routinely, Japanese authorities refused cooperation, stockpiling shipments in ports like or locking them in warehouses without distribution, as parcels arrived via neutral vessels but were denied passage into Japanese waters. When occasional deliveries occurred, such as in the in , Japanese camp commanders systematically removed high-value contents like drugs and supplies before partial to prisoners, exacerbating and disease in camps holding over 75,000 and after . This withholding stemmed from deliberate policy, including retaliation against Allied bombings and cultural disdain for surrender, leading to POWs relying on or bartering rather than standardized , with ICRC access limited to select Japanese camps but ineffective for occupied territories.

Postwar Uses and Studies

Parcels to German POWs and Surplus Distribution

Following the Allied victory in on May 8, 1945, millions of German prisoners remained in Western custody, with initial ICRC access to camps denied under policies treating them as rather than protected POWs under the Geneva Convention. Rations in facilities like the averaged below 1,000 calories daily amid logistical strains and food shortages across occupied territories. By April 1946, U.S. authorities permitted the ICRC to supply limited food parcels to prisoners in their occupation zone, marking the resumption of organized relief efforts after nearly a year of restrictions. In contrast, German POWs held by until mid-1948 and by the , where up to 3 million perished from neglect, received no comparable Red parcels due to prolonged denial of access. French camps supplemented provisions with sporadic ICRC post-1946, but deliveries remained inconsistent amid labor demands on prisoners. These efforts, though modest, provided critical calories from canned meats, dairy, and biscuits, averting worse outcomes in Western zones where mortality rates, while elevated, did not approach Eastern figures. With repatriations accelerating by late 1946, attention shifted to surplus parcels: the redirected 9 million undelivered POW packages, valued at over $152 million, to displaced persons across starting post-September 1945. These distributions targeted famine-struck regions, including western , where civilians and returning ex-POWs faced caloric deficits exceeding 1,000 daily amid ruined infrastructure and expulsions of 12 million ethnic Germans. Each parcel, containing items like spam, powdered milk, and , supplemented local rations, contributing to stabilization without which death tolls from could have rivaled wartime losses.

Empirical Studies on Impact

A Canadian government study conducted immediately following analyzed the effects of Red Cross parcels on the health and morale of Canadian prisoners of war held in German camps, concluding that the parcels provided essential nutritional supplementation that prevented severe and sustained physical condition, with researchers estimating that mortality rates would have been substantially higher without regular deliveries. The parcels, typically containing around 10,000 calories per case designed for weekly distribution to six men, supplied critical proteins, fats, and vitamins absent from camp diets averaging 1,500-2,000 calories daily from German rations alone. U.S. Army Medical Department reports from repatriated prisoners documented average weight losses of 28 pounds at Stalag IX-A and 39.1 pounds at Stalag IX-B after periods of captivity, with clinical examinations revealing deficiencies in vitamins and proteins that parcels mitigated in accessible camps through added intake of items like canned meat, cheese, and powdered milk. In contrast, prisoners in Pacific theater camps, where Japanese authorities systematically withheld or delayed parcels, experienced mortality rates exceeding 30 percent, compared to under 1 percent for Western Allied POWs in European camps who received consistent shipments, highlighting the parcels' role in reducing death from starvation and related diseases. The U.S. Department of ' Medical Examination Survey of former POWs, involving comprehensive health assessments of thousands of repatriates, found that European theater veterans—who benefited from parcel deliveries—had lower incidences of long-term conditions such as , , and relative to Pacific theater survivors, with multivariate analysis attributing improved outcomes partly to superior caloric and nutrient intake during captivity. Postwar cohort studies, including mortality follow-ups, corroborated these differences, showing standardized mortality ratios 1.2-1.5 times higher for prisoners, underscoring the causal link between parcel access and survival probabilities. These findings, drawn from and survivor records rather than self-reports, emphasize the parcels' empirical contribution to averting famine-scale losses amid logistical constraints.

Effectiveness and Causal Impact

Role in Mitigating Malnutrition and Boosting Morale

Red Cross food parcels significantly mitigated among Allied prisoners of war in German camps during by supplementing inadequate camp rations, which often fell short of 2,000 calories per day and lacked essential proteins, fats, and vitamins. Each parcel, intended for one man per week, included items such as canned , , cheese, biscuits, , jam, and bars, providing dense caloric and nutritional value to counteract deficiencies that caused , , and diseases like . Over 27 million such parcels were distributed to POWs in through International Red Cross channels, enabling prisoners to maintain body weight and resist infection where deliveries were consistent. Interruptions in supply, as occurred from onward due to Allied bombings and German shortages, led to rapid declines in health, underscoring the parcels' causal role in sustaining physical well-being. Beyond nutrition, the parcels elevated prisoner by serving as tangible evidence of external support and homeland concern, countering the isolation and despair of captivity. The contents, including non-food items like cigarettes and , facilitated bartering and social rituals that built communal resilience, while occasional enclosed letters reinforced psychological ties to and the war's eventual end. Eyewitness accounts from Luft camps describe heightened optimism and reduced suicide ideation upon parcel arrivals, attributing this to the psychological affirmation of not being forgotten. In environments where parcels reached prisoners reliably, such as western German stalags until late 1944, overall camp death rates remained low at under 2 percent, a stark contrast to theaters without effective delivery. This boost indirectly supported by encouraging in escapes and resistance, though primary benefits stemmed from nutritional stabilization enabling mental fortitude.

Comparative Outcomes Across Combatants and Theaters

In the European theater, Red Cross parcels significantly improved outcomes for Western Allied prisoners held by , where delivery was facilitated by relative adherence to Geneva Convention protocols for non-Soviet captives. The alone shipped over 27 million food parcels via the ICRC to Allied POWs, supplementing deficient German rations that often provided fewer than 1,500 calories daily and preventing widespread . This aid contributed to low mortality rates, with approximately 3-4% of American and British POWs dying in captivity, primarily from initial combat-related injuries or rather than . In stark contrast, Soviet POWs in German camps received no such parcels due to Nazi policies excluding them from protections and ICRC access, resulting in deliberate underfeeding and mortality exceeding 57% (around 3.3 million of 5.7 million captured). German POWs held by Western Allies experienced favorable outcomes independent of extensive parcel reliance, as captors provided rations comparable to their own troops (over 3,000 calories daily), yielding rates of 98-99%. The Pacific theater highlighted the parcels' limited impact due to Japanese non-cooperation, with shipments routinely withheld, confiscated, or delayed until late in the war, such as a single vessel allowed in after stockpiling. Allied POWs, including and British/ forces, subsisted on rice-based diets below 1,200 calories daily, leading to rampant beriberi, , and death rates 7-8 times higher than in German camps—approximately 27% for British POWs and up to 35% for some U.S. groups. Even when parcels arrived sporadically, Japanese authorities often removed high-value items like medicines, undermining nutritional benefits.
POW GroupCaptor(s)Parcel AccessApproximate Mortality RateKey Factor Influencing Outcome
Western Allies (U.S., )High1-4%Parcel supplementation of rations; ICRC oversight
SovietsNone>57%Policy-based exclusion from aid; forced labor/starvation
Allies (various)Minimal/withheld20-35%Withholding of parcels; tropical diseases/
Germans/ItaliansWestern AlliesLimited~1%Adequate captor-provided rations; camp conditions
These disparities underscore that parcel effectiveness hinged on captor compliance rather than supply volume, with cooperative environments yielding measurable advantages through caloric and boosts, while non-compliance amplified baseline hardships.

Controversies and Criticisms

Logistical Failures and Confiscations

The shipment of Red Cross parcels to prisoners of war faced significant logistical hurdles from the outset of , including a suspension of parcel-post service to announced on June 21, 1940, due to transportation restrictions imposed by wartime conditions. Deliveries were further stalled between June and October 1944, as surface mail and next-of-kin parcels previously routed through , , were halted amid intense fighting along the Mediterranean coast. The International Committee of the Red Cross aimed to provide one food parcel per per week, but persistent logistical difficulties—such as disrupted shipping routes, port blockades, and prioritization of military supplies—meant this target was rarely met throughout the conflict. As the war progressed into and , Allied bombing campaigns and the collapse of Axis infrastructure exacerbated delays, with parcels often failing to reach camps due to destroyed rail lines, bombed warehouses, and overwhelmed distribution networks in . Initial deliveries to many camps took months to materialize after captures, leaving prisoners reliant on inadequate camp rations during interim periods. These systemic transport failures contributed to uneven supplementation of prisoner diets, particularly in remote or eastern theaters where neutral routing through proved insufficient against escalating chaos. Confiscations compounded these issues, with isolated instances of German camp guards pilfering parcels intended for Allied prisoners, though systematic diversion was less documented for recognized POW camps adhering to Geneva Convention protocols. By , German authorities at some stalags began repackaging parcel contents into open dishes under supervision, a practice that raised concerns among senior prisoners about potential siphoning of durable goods like tins for military reuse amid domestic shortages. The systematically refused Red Cross involvement, denying access to its prison camps and prohibiting parcels for both Soviet POWs held by and Axis prisoners in Soviet custody, in violation of protections. This policy stemmed from Stalin's view of capture as treasonous, ensuring no reached Soviet captives—who numbered over 5 million and suffered mortality rates exceeding 50%—nor facilitated inspections that might expose camp conditions. Such refusals contrasted with partial Axis compliance for Western prisoners but highlighted enforcement asymmetries, as the Red Cross lacked leverage over non-signatory or non-cooperative powers.

ICRC Neutrality, Political Constraints, and Oversight Shortcomings

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) maintained a policy of strict neutrality during , which prohibited public denunciations of violations by any to preserve access for inspections and operations, including the shipment of parcels to prisoners. This approach, rooted in the organization's foundational principles and Swiss governmental oversight, prevented the ICRC from challenging Nazi Germany's exclusion of and other civilians from Geneva Convention protections, limiting parcel distributions primarily to recognized prisoners of war rather than concentration camp detainees. As a result, despite knowledge of mass persecutions gained through delegate reports as early as 1942, the ICRC refrained from advocating for expanded parcel aid to non-POW victims until late in the war, prioritizing operational continuity over moral imperatives. Political constraints further hampered ICRC efforts, as cooperation from was conditional on non-interference; Nazi authorities denied access to extermination camps like Auschwitz and restricted parcel deliveries to select facilities, often confiscating supplies for guards or German use. In the , a 1944 ICRC visit—intended to verify conditions for potential parcel relief—was deceived by Nazi staging of deportations and , leading delegates to report misleadingly favorable outcomes without probing deeper into unreached aid needs. Allied policies also imposed barriers, such as blockades that delayed shipments and the American Cross's reluctance to seek exemptions for humanitarian cargo, exacerbating shortages in Axis-held territories. These dynamics reflected the ICRC's dependence on state permissions, where insulated the organization from reprisals but constrained proactive oversight. Oversight shortcomings were evident in the ICRC's limited verification mechanisms for parcel distribution, with delegates unable to conduct unhindered audits in camps due to host restrictions and internal policies against . Reports indicate that of millions of parcels dispatched, many to reach intended recipients in Nazi facilities, diverted by camp administrations or lost to logistical breakdowns, yet the ICRC lacked enforcement tools beyond diplomatic appeals. ICRC admissions acknowledged these lapses, including a "moral " in addressing the Holocaust's scale despite partial awareness, which undermined the efficacy of relief programs and highlighted neutrality's trade-offs in enabling unchecked abuses. In the Pacific theater, similar issues arose with Japanese non-compliance, where parcels were outright refused or minimally distributed, underscoring systemic gaps in monitoring across theaters.

Modern Adaptations

Shifts from Traditional Parcels to Broader Aid

Following , the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, encompassing the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), began adapting aid delivery beyond physical food parcels due to logistical complexities, rising costs, and the need for beneficiary agency in diverse conflict and disaster settings. Traditional parcels, which involved shipping standardized packages of canned goods, chocolate, and toiletries to prisoners of war and civilians, proved inefficient for protracted crises where supply chains were disrupted and local markets persisted. By the 2010s, the Movement scaled up cash and voucher assistance (CVA), enabling recipients to purchase essentials locally, thereby stimulating economies and reducing dependency on imported goods. This shift gained momentum after 2010, with over half of IFRC emergency appeals incorporating CVA elements, rising to 85% in the first eight months of 2016 alone. The ICRC, focused on armed conflicts, integrated CVA into operations as early as 2012, disbursing nearly $6 million in cash and vouchers to assist 190,000 people across multiple countries, prioritizing multipurpose transfers that cover , , and needs over item-specific parcels. Institutional guidelines formalized this approach; the ICRC's Guidelines for Cash Transfer Programming, developed in collaboration with the IFRC, emphasize and risk mitigation to ensure CVA's appropriateness in volatile environments. Broader modalities now include digital transfers, local , and hybrid models combining CVA with in-kind support where markets fail, such as in acute sieges or remote areas lacking vendors. For instance, in Nigeria's conflict zones since 2016, the ICRC has implemented cash-based programs for thousands of displaced persons, replacing bulk food distributions to minimize visibility and theft risks associated with parcels. The IFRC's commitment to deliver 50% of humanitarian assistance via CVA by 2025 reflects of its cost-efficiency—often 20-30% lower than in-kind —and ability to address dynamic needs without pre-packaged assumptions. This prioritizes causal effectiveness, as cash empowers households to allocate resources based on immediate priorities, though it requires robust protection measures against or spikes.

Applications in Recent Conflicts and Disasters

In the Russia-Ukraine international armed conflict that began in February 2022, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has distributed parcels containing non-perishable items such as , , , and salt, designed to sustain one person for a month. By mid-2022, these efforts reached thousands in frontline areas, including 2,000 parcels and 20,000 liters of delivered to of in . Overall, as of operational updates through 2023, the ICRC and Ukrainian Red Cross Society provided parcels to 88,111 individuals, either directly or via local partners and institutions, amid challenges like restricted access near combat zones. In and regions, distributions continued into 2025, supporting 6,980 people with alongside items in conflict-affected communities. In the , ongoing since 2011, the ICRC and have employed food parcels—typically including rice, sugar, tea, oil, lentils, and beans—to aid displaced populations and those in besieged areas. In August 2025, 400 parcels were supplied to shelter sites in Al-Sahweh for displaced households. Earlier efforts included deliveries to central towns like Rastan, incorporating food parcels with medicine and hygiene kits for vulnerable groups such as pregnant women. In July 2025, 700 canned food parcels reached families displaced from Sweida to rural . These distributions, often in coordination with local authorities, have sustained over 25,750 people in quarterly phases since 2018, focusing on preventing service interruptions in protracted conflict zones. Beyond armed conflicts, adapted Red Cross parcel systems have supported disaster response, though often integrated into broader relief. Following the 2023 earthquakes in Turkey and Syria, the Syrian Arab Red Crescent distributed over 1.7 million relief items, including food provisions akin to parcel formats, aiding 2.5 million people with essentials like blankets and mattresses alongside nutrition. In such scenarios, parcels prioritize rapid, targeted delivery to mitigate immediate malnutrition risks, reflecting a shift from WWII-era standardization to context-specific kits amid logistical hurdles like border restrictions.

References

  1. https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/38779
  2. https://blogs.icrc.org/cross-files/the-icrc-during-world-war-ii/
  3. https://www.redcross.org/content/dam/redcross/National/history-wwii.pdf
  4. https://www.barbarahannon.com/the-red-crosss-impact-on-allied-pows-in-wwii-germany/
  5. https://thearrowheadclub.com/tag/world-war-ii-red-cross-food-parcels/
  6. https://www.icrc.org/en/publication/0937-international-prisoners-war-agency-icrc-world-war-one
  7. https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/red-cross/
  8. https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/prisoners-of-war/
  9. http://www.switzerland1914-1918.net/international-committee-of-the-red-cross.html
  10. https://vad.redcross.org.uk/medical-care-during-ww1/food-parcels-for-prisoners-of-war
  11. https://www.redcross.org/content/dam/redcross/National/history-wwi.pdf
  12. https://vad.redcross.org.uk/volunteering-during-the-first-world-war/fundraising-for-the-red-cross-in-wwi
  13. https://www.ggarchives.com/Military/WW1/Articles/FoodSuppliesForwardToGermanPrisonCamp-1918.html
  14. http://www.gutenberg-e.org/steuer/archive/chapter/14.html
  15. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/wwi_pow_camps/309/
  16. https://blogs.icrc.org/cross-files/the-icrc-during-world-war-i/
  17. https://lumberjacksoldiers.omeka.net/exhibits/show/when-war-comes-home/fundraising/red-cross-parcel
  18. https://museumandarchives.redcross.org.uk/objects/8944
  19. https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co8357418/copy-of-red-cross-food-parcel
  20. https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30080574
  21. https://www.redcross.org.uk/about-us/our-history/world-war-two
  22. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/what-life-was-like-for-pows-in-europe-during-the-second-world-war
  23. https://www.redcross.ca/blog/2013/11/remembering-canadian-red-cross-volunteers-in-wwii
  24. https://www.med-dept.com/articles/ww2-american-prisoner-of-war-relief-packages/
  25. https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/object/nmah_1092303
  26. http://www.mansell.com/pow_resources/red_cross_bulletins/ANRC_bulletins.html
  27. https://wartimecanada.ca/sites/default/files/documents/Canadian%2520Red%2520Cross%2520in%2520War%2520and%2520Peace%2520ca.%25201942.pdf
  28. https://www.redcross.org/local/georgia/about-us/news-and-events/news/packages-of-hope-from-the-red-cross-make-lifelong-impact-on-wwii.html
  29. https://www.facebook.com/graham.dutoit.7/photos/british-red-cross-medical-parcelsthe-british-red-cross-also-supplied-medical-par/2201876263296252/
  30. https://www.warhistoryonline.com/world-war-ii/incredible-role-international-red-cross-red-crescent-movement-wwii.html
  31. https://www.trailblazersww2.org/stalagXIIIcDocuments/redcrosspowbulletinjun45.pdf
  32. http://oflag64.us/ewExternalFiles/1945_february.pdf
  33. https://ww2talk.com/index.php?threads/contents-of-red-cross-parcels.38878/
  34. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/icrc-wwii-holocaust
  35. https://jewishjournal.com/culture/arts/books/223805/red-cross-holocaust/
  36. https://international-review.icrc.org/sites/default/files/irrc-888-farre.pdf
  37. https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/dispose-them-massacre-american-pows-philippines
  38. https://ia801908.us.archive.org/31/items/CrimesAndMerciesByJamesBacque1997/Crimes%2520and%2520Mercies%2520by%2520James%2520Bacque%2520%25281997%2529.pdf
  39. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Red_Cross_parcel
  40. https://achh.army.mil/history/book-wwii-internalmedicinevoliii-chapter10/
  41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27067639
  42. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK235977/
  43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33554646/
  44. https://museumandarchives.redcross.org.uk/objects/7854
  45. https://guestsofthethirdreich.org/camp-life/
  46. https://www.nationalww2museum.org/liberation-stalag-luft
  47. https://camp59survivors.com/2012/07/14/red-cross-parcels/
  48. https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/u/us-prisoners-war-civilian-american-citizens-captured.html
  49. https://japan-forward.com/pows-in-world-war-ii-a-common-but-erroneous-comparison/
  50. https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-survival-rate-of-World-War-II-prisoners-of-war-POW-in-Germany-or-Japan-How-many-escaped-how-many-tried-to-escape-etc
  51. https://www.facebook.com/PWRRQUEENSMUSEUM/posts/during-world-war-ii-red-cross-parcels-for-prisoners-of-war-pow-were-mostly-provi/3005330726182880/
  52. https://www.cwgc.org/our-work/blog/prisoners-of-war-ww2-facts/
  53. https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/what-life-was-like-for-pows-in-east-asia-during-the-second-world-war
  54. https://www.nytimes.com/1940/06/21/archives/transport-curbs-slow-war-relief-suspension-of-parcel-post-service.html
  55. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/stories/27/a1111627.shtml
  56. https://www.facebook.com/AndersonvilleNPS/posts/during-world-war-ii-the-american-red-cross-in-conjunction-with-the-international/4316598791728138/
  57. https://www.pegasusarchive.org/pow/S3B/cSt_3B_MilInt1Nov45.htm
  58. https://www.rferl.org/a/do-not-respond-did-the-soviet-government-abandon-its-wwii-prisoners-/29217414.html
  59. https://www.historynet.com/soviet-prisoners-of-war-forgotten-nazi-victims-of-world-war-ii/
  60. https://www.icrc.org/en/article/dialogue-past-icrc-and-nazi-death-camps
  61. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/red-cross-lost-moral-compass-in-war-but-says-drew-lessons-idUSKBN0NJ2HB/
  62. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1989/02/17/study-says-red-cross-did-too-little-to-help-jews-in-wwii/85c70ae0-2bd5-421f-95c9-f7a57ac5f5a5/
  63. https://www.ifrc.org/our-work/disasters-climate-and-crises/cash-and-voucher-assistance
  64. https://cashessentials.org/the-red-cross-makes-a-case-for-cash/
  65. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/china-jo-burton-cash-transfer-programming-interview-cgtn
  66. https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/external/doc/en/assets/files/other/icrc_002_mouvement-guidelines.pdf
  67. https://resources.peopleinneed.net/documents/594-4359-002-cash-transfer-programming-upd-1-11-2018-web-1-.pdf
  68. https://cash-hub.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2021/11/UpD_REM2021_555_CVA-Progress_ForExtranet.pdf
  69. https://twitter.com/ICRC/status/1530757386377601025
  70. https://twitter.com/ICRC_ua/status/1552331780472045574
  71. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/false-information-about-icrc-ukraine
  72. https://www.icrc.org/en/article/facts-and-figures-icrc-activities-donetsk-luhansk
  73. https://museumandarchives.redcross.org.uk/objects/46890
  74. https://www.icrc.org/en/article/syria-operational-update-icrc-response-southern-syria
  75. https://m.naharnet.com/stories/en/207853-second-aid-delivery-to-besieged-central-syria-town-says-red-cross
  76. https://www.facebook.com/ICRC/posts/-rural-damascus-syria-displaced-by-recent-violence-in-sweida-families-now-shelte/1215938933906554/
  77. https://www.dec.org.uk/article/syria-6-months-on
  78. https://civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu/where/middle-east-and-northern-africa/syria_en
  79. https://www.redcross.org/about-us/news-and-events/news/2023/red-crescent-teams-responding-to-earthquake-in-turkey-and-syria.html?srsltid=AfmBOord3NRhU3wfRVJjShvPcu7jeBM9nzxQG1N8_RVK63r3HVcicnZ6
  80. https://www.icrc.org/en/where-we-work/syria
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.