Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Prostitution law
View on Wikipedia

Prostitution laws varies widely from country to country, and between jurisdictions within a country. At one extreme, prostitution or sex work is legal in some places and regarded as a profession, while at the other extreme, it is considered a severe crime punishable by death in some other places.[1] A variety of different legal models exist around the world, including total bans, bans that only target the customer, and laws permitting prostitution but prohibiting organized groups, an example being brothels.[2]
In many jurisdictions, prostitution – the commercial exchange of sex for money, goods, service, or some other benefit agreed upon by the transacting parties – is illegal, while in others it is legal, but surrounding activities, such as soliciting in a public place, operating a brothel, and pimping, may be illegal. In many jurisdictions where prostitution is legal, it is regulated; in others it is unregulated. Where the exchange of sex for money is criminalized, it may be the sex worker (most commonly), the client, or both, who are subject to prosecution.
Prostitution has been condemned as a single form of human rights abuse, and an attack on the dignity and worth of human beings. Other schools of thought argue that sex work is a legitimate occupation, whereby a person trades or exchanges sexual acts for money or goods. Some believe that women in developing countries are especially vulnerable to sexual exploitation and human trafficking, while others distinguish this practice from the global sex industry, in which "sex work is done by consenting adults, where the act of selling or buying sexual services is not a violation of human rights."[3] The term "sex work" is used interchangeably with "prostitution" in this article, in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO 2001; WHO 2005) and the United Nations (UN 2006; UNAIDS 2002).[4]
Overview
[edit]In most countries, sex work is controversial. Members of certain religions oppose prostitution, viewing it as contrary or a threat to their moral codes, while other parties view prostitution as a "necessary evil". Sex worker activists and organizations believe the issue of sex worker human rights is of greatest importance, including those related to freedom of speech, travel, immigration, work, marriage, parenthood, insurance, health insurance, and housing.[5]
Some feminist organizations are opposed to prostitution, considering it a form of exploitation in which males dominate women, and as a practice that is the result of a patriarchal social order. For example, the European Women's Lobby, which bills itself as the largest umbrella organization of women's associations in the European Union, has condemned prostitution as "an intolerable form of male violence".[6] In February 2014, the members of the European Parliament voted in a non-binding resolution (adopted by 343 votes to 139; with 105 abstentions), in favor of the 'Swedish Model' of criminalizing the buying, but not the selling of sex.[7] In 2014, the Council of Europe made a similar recommendation, stating that "While each system presents advantages and disadvantages, policies prohibiting the purchase of sexual services are those that are more likely to have a positive impact on reducing trafficking in human beings".[8][9]
The Wolfenden Committee Report (1957), which informed the debate in the United Kingdom, states:
[the function of the criminal law is] to preserve public order and decency, to protect the citizen from what is injurious or offensive and to provide safeguards against the exploitation and corruption of others, ... It is not, in our view, the function of the law to intervene in the private lives of citizens, or to seek to enforce any particular code of behaviour, further than is necessary to carry out the purposes of what we have outlined.[10]
Views on what the best legal framework on prostitution should be are often influenced by whether one can view prostitution as morally acceptable or not; indeed Save the Children wrote:[11] "The issue, however, gets mired in controversy and confusion when prostitution too is considered as a violation of the basic human rights of both adult women and minors, and equal to sexual exploitation per se. From this standpoint then, trafficking and prostitution become conflated with each other."
In December 2012, UNAIDS, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, released the "Prevention and treatment of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections for sex workers in low- and middle- income countries" document that contains the following "Good practice recommendations":
- All countries should work toward decriminalization of sex work and elimination of the unjust application of non-criminal laws and regulations against sex workers.†
- Governments should establish antidiscrimination and other rights-respecting laws to protect against discrimination and violence, and other violations of rights faced by sex workers in order to realize their human rights and reduce their vulnerability to HIV infection and the impact of AIDS. Antidiscrimination laws and regulations should guarantee sex workers’ right to social, health and financial services.
- Health services should be made available, accessible and acceptable to sex workers based on the principles of avoidance of stigma, non-discrimination and the right to health.
- Violence against sex workers is a risk factor for HIV and must be prevented and addressed in partnership with sex workers and sex worker-led organizations.[12]
Legal themes
[edit]Legal themes tend to focus on four issues: victimization (including potential victimhood), ethics and morality, freedom of the individual, and general benefit or harm to society (including harm arising indirectly from matters connected to prostitution).[citation needed]
General
[edit]Many people who support legal prostitution argue that prostitution is a consensual sex act between adults and a victimless crime, thus the government should not prohibit this practice.[citation needed]
Many anti-prostitution advocates hold that prostitutes themselves are often victims, arguing that prostitution is a practice which can lead to serious psychological and often physical long-term effects for the prostitutes.[13][14][15]
In 1999, Sweden became the first country to make it illegal to pay for sex, but not to be a prostitute (the client commits a crime, but not the prostitute). A similar law was passed in Norway and in Iceland (in 2009). Canada (2014),[16] France (2016)[17] the Republic of Ireland (2017)[18] and Israel (2018; effective 2020)[19][20] have also adopted a similar model to that of the Nordic countries (Denmark and Finland excluded).[citation needed]
Human trafficking
[edit]The United Nations Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others[21] favors criminalizing the activities of those seen as exploiting or coercing prostitutes (so-called "pimping" and "procuring" laws), while leaving sex workers free from regulation. The Convention states that "prostitution and the accompanying evil of the traffic in persons for the purpose of prostitution are incompatible with the dignity and worth of the human person".[22]
Sigma Huda, a UN special reporter on trafficking in persons said: "For the most part, prostitution as actually practiced in the world usually does satisfy the elements of trafficking. It is rare that one finds a case in which the path to prostitution or a person's experience with prostitution does not involve, at the very least, an abuse of power or an abuse of vulnerability. Power and vulnerability in this context must be understood to include disparities based on gender, race, ethnicity and poverty. Put simply the road to prostitution and life within “the life” is rarely marked by empowerment or adequate options."[23][24]
However, sex worker activists and organizations distinguish between human trafficking and legitimate sex work, and assert the importance of recognizing that trafficking is not synonymous with sex work. The Sex Workers Alliance Ireland organization explains: "victims of human trafficking may be forced to work in industries such as agriculture, domestic service as well as the sex industry. It is critical to distinguish human trafficking, which is a violation of human rights, from voluntary migration." The Open Society Foundations organization states: "sex work is done by consenting adults, where the act of selling or buying sexual services is not a violation of human rights. In fact, sex workers are natural allies in the fight against trafficking. The UNAIDS Guidance Note on HIV and Sex Work recognizes that sex worker organizations are best positioned to refer people who are victims of trafficking to appropriate services."[3][4]
According to a 2007 report by the UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime), the most common destinations for victims of human trafficking are Thailand, Japan, Israel, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, Turkey, and the US.[25] The major sources of trafficked persons include Thailand, China, Nigeria, Albania, Bulgaria, Belarus, Moldova, and Ukraine.[25]
Researchers at Göteborg University released a report in 2010 that argued that prostitution laws affect trafficking flows.[26]
Legislation models
[edit]NGOs, academics and government departments[27] often categorise the approach to prostitution laws and approach into 5 models:
| Models | 1st parties
(selling sex) |
2nd parties
(buying sex) |
3rd parties
(organizing sex) |
Solicitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decriminalization | Legal | Legal | Legal | Legal |
| Legalization | Regulated | Regulated | Regulated | Regulated |
| Abolitionism | Legal | Legal | Illegal | Often Illegal |
| Neo-abolitionism | Legal | Illegal | Illegal | Illegal |
| Prohibition | Illegal | Illegal | Illegal | Illegal |
Prohibitionism
[edit]All aspects of prostitution are criminalised. Often the sex trade is seen as a violation of human dignity, moral or religious beliefs;[27] e.g. Russia[28] (also known as "criminalization").[29]
Neo-abolitionism
[edit]Neo-abolitionists believe there is no free choice for people entering prostitution, it violates their human rights and prostitution is the sale and consumption of human bodies. Whilst prostitutes themselves commit no crime, clients and any third party involvement is criminalised;[27] e.g. Sweden[27] (also called the "Swedish model" or "Nordic model").[30][31]
Abolitionism
[edit]Prostitution itself is legal, but third-party involvement is generally prohibited. Solicitation is also often prohibited. This model recognises that a prostitute may choose to work in the trade, however, the law is designed to stop prostitution impacting on the public. An example country where this system is in place is England.[27]
Legalization
[edit]Whilst prostitution is not prohibited, there is legislation to control and regulate it.[27] There are countries where prostitution is illegal and punishable with imprisonment. The extent and type of control varies from country to country and may be regulated by work permits, licensing or tolerance zones;[27] e.g. The Netherlands[27] (also called "regulationist").[28] A historical example of zone restricted legalization is the institution of 'red-light' districts in Japan in the early 17th century, most famously the Yoshiwara district of Edo.[citation needed] In countries where prostitution is illegal, there are activists promoting the legalization of prostitution.
Decriminalization
[edit]The decriminalization of sex work is the removal of criminal penalties for sex work.[29] In most countries, sex work, the consensual provision of sexual services for money or goods,[32] is criminalized. Removing criminal prosecution for sex workers creates a safer and healthier environment[33] and allows them to live with less social exclusion and stigma; e.g. New Zealand.[27]
Demographic impact
[edit]Gender
[edit]Although prostitution is mainly performed by female prostitutes there are also male, transgender and transvestite prostitutes performing straight or gay sex work. In Vienna, in April 2007, there were 1,352 female and 21 male prostitutes officially registered.[34] The number of prostitutes who are not registered (and therefore work illegally) is not known. A recent study by TAMPEP, on the prostitute population from Germany, estimated that 93% of prostitutes were female, 3% transgender and 4% male.[35]
Arrest statistics show that in those states where buying and selling sex are equally illegal, the tendency is to arrest the service provider and not the customer, even though there are significantly more customers than sellers. Thus, it is a fact that more women than men are arrested, and the true extent of the crime is underreported. James (1982) reports that, in the United States, the arrest ratio of women to men was 3:2, but notes that many of the men arrested were the prostitutes rather than the clients.[citation needed]
Developed vs. developing countries
[edit]"By 1975, Thailand, with the help of World Bank economists, had instituted a National Plan of Tourist Development, which specifically underwrote the sex industry... Without directly subsidising prostitution, the Act [the Entertainment Places Act] referred repeatedly to the personal services' sector. According to Thai feminist Sukyana Hantrakul, the law 'was enacted to pave the way for whorehouses to be legalised in the guise of massage parlours, bars, nightclubs, tea houses, etc."[36] With particular reference to children, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child creates specific obligations. Article 34 stipulates that:
- State Parties undertake to protect the child from all forms of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. For these purposes, State Parties shall, in particular, take all appropriate national, bilateral, and multilateral measures to prevent:
- The inducement or coercion of a child to engage in any unlawful sexual activity.
- The exploitative use of children in prostitution or other unlawful sexual practices.
- The exploitative use of children in pornographic performances and materials.
As of 2000, twenty-four countries had enacted legislation criminalising child sex tourism, e.g. in Australia, the Crimes (Child Sex Tourism) Amendment Act 1994 covers a wide range of sexual activities with children under the age of 16 committed overseas. Laws with extraterritorial application are intended to fill the gap when countries are unwilling or unable to take action against known offenders. The rationale is that child-sex offenders should not escape justice simply because they are in a position to return to their home country. There is little research into whether the child sex tourism legislation has any real deterrent effect on adults determined to have sex with children overseas. It may be that these people are simply more careful in their activities as a result of the laws. There are three obvious problems:
- the low level of reporting of sexual offences by child victims or their parents;
- the poverty which motivates the decision to survive economically through the provision of sexual services; and
- the criminal justice systems which, in the Third World country may lack transparency, and in the First World country may involve hostile and intrusive cross-examination of child witnesses with no adult witnesses to corroborate their evidence.
Views of prohibitionists
[edit]In most countries where prostitution is illegal, the prohibition of the sex trade is subject to debate and controversy among some people and some organizations, with some voices saying that the fact that prostitution is illegal increases criminal activities and negatively affects the prostitutes.[citation needed]
Those who support prohibition or abolition of prostitution[37] argue that keeping prostitution illegal is the best way to prevent abusive and dangerous activities (child prostitution, human trafficking etc.). They argue that a system which allows legalized and regulated prostitution has very negative effects and does not improve the situation of the prostitutes; such legal systems only lead to crime and abuse: many women who work in licensed brothels are still controlled by outside pimps; many brothel owners are criminals themselves; the creation of a legal and regulated prostitution industry only leads to another parallel illegal industry, as many women do not want to register and work legally (since this would rob them of their anonymity) and other women can not be hired by legal brothels because of underlying problems (e.g., drug abuse); legalizing prostitution makes it more socially acceptable to buy sex, creating a demand for prostitutes (both by local men and by foreigners engaging in sex tourism) and, as a result, human trafficking and underage prostitution increase in order to satisfy this demand.[37][38][39][40][41]
A five-country survey of 175 men for the International Organisation for Migration found that 75% preferred female prostitutes aged 25 or under, and over 20% preferred those aged 18 or under, although "generally clients did not wish to buy sex from prostitutes they thought to be too young to consent to the sexual encounter."[42]
Some have argued that an extremely high level of violence is inherent to prostitution; they claim that many prostitutes have been the subject of violence, rape and coercion before entering prostitution including as children,[43][44] and that many young women and girls enter prostitution directly from state care in at least England, Norway, Australia and Canada.[45]
Abolitionists believe tolerance of prostitution is tolerance of inegalitarian sexuality in which male sexual demands can override women's sexual autonomy and overall well-being.[46][47]
Regulated prostitution
[edit]
In some countries, (or administrative subdivisions within a country), prostitution is legal and regulated. In these jurisdictions, there is a specific law, which explicitly allows the practice of prostitution if certain conditions are met (as opposed to places where prostitution is legal only because there is no law to prohibit it).[citation needed]
In countries where prostitution is regulated, the prostitutes may be registered, they may be hired by a brothel, they may organize trade unions, they may be covered by workers' protection laws, their proceeds may be taxable, they may be required to undergo regular health checks, etc. The degree of regulation, however, varies very much by jurisdiction.[citation needed][49].Such approaches are taken with the stance that prostitution is impossible to eliminate, and thus these societies have chosen to regulate it in an attempt to increase transparency and therefore reduce the more undesirable consequences and reduce harm. Goals of such regulations include controlling sexually transmitted disease, reducing sexual slavery, increasing safety for sex workers and clients (such as from violence, abuse and murder), ensuring fair pay, fair work hours and safe and clean working conditions, controlling where brothels may operate and dissociating prostitution from crime syndicates. Regulation also allows for the potential of introducing a minimum age requirement to become a sex worker, enter a brothel, and to engage in sexual activity with a sex worker.[citation needed]
Dutch researchers have found significant reductions in drug-related crime in areas where prostitution is legal and licensed. "In cities with both a tippelzone and a licensing requirement, for instance, they found a 25 percent reduction in drug-related crimes within two years."[50]
In countries where prostitution is legal and regulated, it is usual for the practice to be restricted to particular areas.[citation needed]
In countries where prostitution itself is legal, but associated activities are outlawed, prostitution is generally not regulated.[citation needed]
Protection of sex workers
[edit]"A study of San Francisco prostitutes [where prostitution is illegal] found that 82% had been assaulted and 68% had been raped while working as prostitutes. Another study of prostitutes in Colorado Springs [where prostitution is also illegal] found they were 18 times more likely to be murdered than non-prostitutes their age and race." A paper by Barbara Brents and Kathryn Hausbeck of the University of Nevada concluded that "brothels offer the safest environment available for women to sell consensual sex acts for money."[51] Prostitutes who experience violence can be more reluctant to call the police if they are involved in an illegal business and Brents and Hausbeck observed that brothel owners had a policy to call the police if there were signs of trouble in order to protect the prostitutes safety.[51] In systems where prostitution is not legal and regulated pimps also often use prostitutes "who are often under aged and forced to work or face severe consequences, therefore mitigating consent."[52] Legalization and regulation can then enforce minimum age laws and employment rights for prostitutes to protect against such harms. Advocates of this method argue that if legal and regulated time and money could also be saved by the police force, public defenders, and the judicial system in not prosecuting prostitutes and their clients, which could then be better spent targeting pimps and providing health care for prostitutes.[52]
When tippelzones or areas where street prostitutes could work legally opened in areas of major cities in the Netherlands researchers found a 30 to 40% drop in reports of rape and sexual abuse in the first two years after this began. In Dutch cities that licensed the sex workers that are legally able to work in these zones rapes and sexual abuse fell by up to 40%.[50]
Mandatory health checks
[edit]A few jurisdictions require that prostitutes undergo regular health checks for sexually transmitted diseases.[citation needed]
In Nevada, state law requires that registered brothel prostitutes be checked weekly for several sexually transmitted diseases and monthly for HIV; furthermore, condoms are mandatory for all oral sex and sexual intercourse. Brothel owners may be held liable if customers become infected with HIV after a prostitute has tested positive for the virus.[53] Prostitution outside the licensed brothels is illegal throughout the state; all forms of prostitution are illegal in Las Vegas (and Clark County, which contains its metropolitan area), in Reno (and Washoe County), in Carson City, and in a few other parts of the state (currently 8 out of Nevada's 16 counties have active brothels, see Prostitution in Nevada).[citation needed]
The United Nations Development Programme published a report[54] in 2012 on illegal sex work in Asia and the Pacific. The report stated - "Criminalization increases vulnerability to HIV by fueling stigma and discrimination, limiting access to HIV and sexual health services, condoms and harm reduction services, and adversely affecting the self-esteem of sex workers and their ability to make informed choices about their health."[51]
Labour laws
[edit]The regulation of prostitution is problematic because some standard labor regulations cannot be applied to prostitution. The typical relation between employer and employee where the employer is in a position of authority over the employee is, in the case of prostitution, viewed by many as contrary to the physical integrity of the prostitute. It is forbidden to order a person to have sex on a given moment at a given place. Many sex operators also do not want to pay social security contributions, which comes with paid labor. Therefore, many prostitutes, in countries where prostitution is regulated, are officially listed as independent contractors. Sex operators typically operate as facilitators only and do not interfere with the prostitutes.[citation needed]
Status of unregulated sex work
[edit]The existence of regulated prostitution generally implies that prostitution is illegal outside of the regulated context.[citation needed]
Demands to legalise prostitution as a means to contain exploitation in the sex industry is now gaining support from organisations such as the UN and the Supreme Court of India.[55]
Enforcement
[edit]The enforcement of the anti-prostitution laws varies from country to country or from region to region.[citation needed]
In areas where prostitution or the associated activities are illegal, prostitutes are commonly charged with crimes ranging from minor infractions such as loitering to more serious crimes like tax evasion. Their clients can also be charged with solicitation of prostitution.[citation needed]
See also
[edit]- COYOTE
- International Committee for Prostitutes' Rights
- International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers
- Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography
- Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children
- Revolting Prostitutes
- Sex workers' rights
- Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography
- World Charter for Prostitutes' Rights
References
[edit]- ^ "Iran – Facts on Trafficking and Prostitution". Uri.edu. Archived from the original on 8 October 2014. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
- ^ "Criminal Prostitution Law". Just. 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
- ^ a b "Understanding Sex Work in an Open Society". Open Society Foundations. June 2013. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ a b "FAQ". Sex Workers Alliance Ireland. 2014. Archived from the original on 18 January 2014. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ "International Committee for Prostitutes' Rights: World Charter For Prostitutes' Rights". Prostitutes Education Network. 1985. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ "European Women's Lobby Européen des femmes : Prostitution in Europe: 60 Years of Reluctance". Womenslobby.eu. 1 December 2009. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
- ^ "Punish the client, not the prostitute". Europarl.europa.eu. 26 February 2014. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
- ^ MENDES BOTA. "Parliamentary Assembly's Documents". Assembly.coe.int. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
- ^ "The EWL welcomes the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly's resolution on prostitution, trafficking and modern slavery in Europe - European Women's Lobby". Womenlobby.org. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
- ^ Summers, Claude J. "Wolfenden Report" (PDF). GLBTQ. Retrieved 18 November 2017.
- ^ Save the Children Norway (Nepal) (20 November 2007). "Definition of Trafficking - Save the Children Nepal". Archived from the original on 20 November 2007. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
- ^ "New guidelines to better prevent HIV in sex workers". UNAIDS. United Nations. 12 December 2012. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
- ^ "Next Step" (PDF). Ruhama. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 April 2011. Retrieved 15 March 2010.
- ^ "Prostitution Research & Education Website". Prostitutionresearch.com. Archived from the original on 11 January 2012. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
- ^ Burnette, Mandi L; Lucas, Emma; Ilgen, Mark; Frayne, Susan M; Mayo, Julia; Weitlauf, Julie C (2008). "Arch Gen Psychiatry – Prevalence and Health Correlates of Prostitution Among Patients Entering Treatment for Substance Use Disorders, March 2008, Burnette et al. 65 (3): 337". Archives of General Psychiatry. 65 (3): 337–44. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.3.337. PMID 18316680.
- ^ "Controversial prostitution law introduced on day of action on violence against women - The Star". The Toronto Star. 3 December 2014.
- ^ Prostitution : le Parlement adopte définitivement la pénalisation des clients 'Le Monde', accessed 7 April 2016
- ^ Edwards, Elaine (27 March 2017). "Minister for Justice signs new laws on sexual offences". The Irish Times. Retrieved 14 April 2018.
- ^ Israel, David (31 December 2018). "Knesset Passes Bills Punishing Prostitution Clients, Compelling Security Cameras in Old Age Homes". Retrieved 1 June 2020.
- ^ "Israel becomes 10th country to criminalize hiring prostitutes". The Jerusalem Post. 31 December 2018. ISSN 0792-822X. Retrieved 1 June 2020.
- ^ "Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others". Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Archived from the original on 21 July 2009. Retrieved 10 April 2018.
- ^ "Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others". .ohchr.org. Archived from the original on 8 May 2012. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
- ^ "Prostitution and Human Trafficking: Tackling Demand The Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill: A Briefing from CARE" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 March 2012. Retrieved 19 February 2013.
- ^ "Summer 2008: "It's Not TV, Its Sexploitation" Protest Against Home Box Office by Norma Ramos". On The Issues Magazine. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
- ^ a b "UN highlights human trafficking". BBC News. 26 March 2007. Retrieved 7 May 2010.
- ^ Jakobsson, Niklas and Andreas Kotsadam (2010). "The Law and Economics of International Sex Slavery: Prostitution Laws and Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation". Working Papers in Economics 458, Göteborg University, Department of Economics. 29 pages.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i "Current Publications: Law, justice and rights: Prostitution: A Review of Legislation in Selected Countries (PRB 03-29E)". Library of Parliament. Archived from the original on 9 March 2018. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
- ^ a b "Prostitution – which stance to take?". Council of Europe. 9 July 2007. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
- ^ a b "All Women, All Rights: Sex Workers Included" (PDF). Center for Health and Gender Equity.
- ^ "DEMAND CHANGE: UNDERSTANDING THE NORDIC APPROACH TO PROSTITUTION" (PDF). Coalition Against Trafficking in Women Australia. 8 March 2017. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
- ^ "The 'Nordic model' of prostitution law is a myth". London School of Economics. 3 January 2014. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
- ^ Overs, Cheryl. "Sex Workers: Part of the Solution" (PDF). World Health Organization. Retrieved 28 September 2016.
- ^ Ahmed, Aziza (1 January 2011). "Feminism, power, and sex work in the context of HIV/Aids: consequences for women's health" (PDF). Harvard Journal of Law and Gender. 34 (1): 225. Retrieved 29 October 2016.
- ^ "Ohne Schutz als "neuer Kick"" [Without protection as "new Kick"]. Der Standard (in German). Austria. 24 May 2007. Retrieved 9 January 2016.
- ^ "Final Report TAMPEP 8, Germany" (PDF), TAMPEP reports, October 2009, archived from the original (PDF) on 1 March 2011
- ^ Sacks, Aaron. "Child Prostitution: The Asian Reality". feministarchives.isiswomen.org. Retrieved 25 February 2023.
- ^ a b Lakeman, Lee (2008). "A feminist definition of abolition". rapereliefshelter.bc.ca. Vancouver Rape Relief & Women's Shelter.
- ^ Farley, Melissa (March 2009). Myths and facts about Nevada legal prostitution. Prostitution Research. Online.
- ^ Jeffreys, Sheila (15 February 2004). "The legalisation of prostitution: a failed social experiment". Sisyphe.org. Sisyphe. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
- ^ Hughes, Donna M. (February 1999). "Legalizing prostitution will not stop the harm". Making the Harm Visible, Global Sexual Exploitation of Women and Girls, Speaking Out and Providing Services. College of Arts and Sciences, University of Rhode Island. Archived from the original on 2 June 2010. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
- ^ Kler, Daisy (12 November 2010). "Not work, not crime: who are the true agents of prostitution". Canadian Dimension. 44 (6).
- ^ Anderson, Bridget; O'Connell Davidson, Julia (December 2003). Is trafficking in human beings demand driven? A multi-country pilot study. Migration Research Series. International Organization for Migration. 19. Pdf. Archived 2 August 2014 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Silbert, Mimi H.; Pines, Ayala M. (June 1982). "Entrance into prostitution". Youth & Society. 13 (4): 471–500. doi:10.1177/0044118X82013004005. S2CID 144906858.
- ^ Silbert, Mimi H.; Pines, Ayala M.; Lynch, Teri (1980). Sexual assault of prostitutes: phase one. Grant No. RO1-MH-32782-01. Washington D.C.: Delancey Street Foundation, National Institute of Mental Health. OCLC 45111118.
- ^ Coy, Maddy (October 2008). "Young women, local authority care and selling sex: findings from research". The British Journal of Social Work. 38 (7): 1408–1424. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm049.
- ^ Sullivan, Mary (2005). What happens when prostitution becomes work? An update on legalisation of prostitution in Australia. Australia: Coalition Against Trafficking in Women. Pdf.
- ^ Pyett, Priscilla; Warr, Deborah; Pope, Jeanette (1999). It goes with the territory - street sex work is risky business. Melbourne: Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University. ISBN 9781864464962.
- ^ „Die Welt zu Gast bei Freundinnen“, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 8 June 2006. (in German)
- ^ Munro, Vanessa E. (2008). Demanding Sex: Critical Reflections on the Regulation of Prostitution. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 14–18. ISBN 978-0-7546-7150-3.
- ^ a b Bass, Alison (7 April 2017). "Legal prostitution zones reduce incidents of rape and sexual abuse". HuffPost. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
- ^ a b c Fuchs, Erin (13 November 2013). "7 Reasons Why America Should Legalize Prostitution". Business Insider. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
- ^ a b Raphael, Daniel (10 February 2014). "Legalize Prostitution". HuffPost. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
- ^ "NRS 041.1397". Leg.state.nv.us. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
- ^ "Sex Work and the Law in Asia and the Pacific | United Nations in Pacific Centers - Economical Development for Human Growth". 10 February 2021.
- ^ K Rajasekharan (18 June 2014). "Legalise prostitution in India to address problems of sex industry". EconomyLead.com. Archived from the original on 18 November 2016. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
Further reading
[edit]- Carrabine, Eamonn; Iganski, Paul; Lee, Maggy; Plummer, Ken & South, Nigel. (2004). Criminology – A Sociological Introduction. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-28167-9
- Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution. (1957). Report of the Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
- Egger, Sandra & Harcourt, Christine. (1991). "Prostitution in NSW: The Impact of Deregulation". in Women and the Law: Proceedings of a Conference held 24–26 September 1991. Patricia Weiser Easteal & Sandra McKillop (eds.) ISBN 0-642-18639-1
- Erickson P.G.; Butters J.; McGillicuddy P. & Hallgren A. (2000). "Crack and Prostitution: Gender, Myths, and Experiences". Journal of Drug Issues 30(4): 767–788.
- Ericsson, Lars. (1980). "Charges Against Prostitution : An Attempt at a Philosophical Assessment". Ethics. 335.
- James, Jennifer. (1982). "The Prostitute as Victim" in The Criminal Justice System and Women: Women Offenders, Victims, Workers. Barbara Raffel Price & Natalie J Sokoloff (eds.). New York: Clark Boardman. pp291–315.
- Lombroso, Cesare & Ferrero, Guglielmo. (2004). Criminal Woman, the Prostitute, and the Normal Woman. Translated by Nicole Hahn Rafter and Mary Gibson. Duke University Press. ISBN 0-8223-3246-9
- Lowman, John. (2002). Identifying Research Gaps in the Prostitution Literature.
- Maltzhan, Kathleen. (2004). Combating trafficking in women: where to now? [1]
- Maxwell, S R. & Maxwell C. D. (2000). "Examining the "criminal careers" of prostitutes within the nexus of drug use, drug selling, and other illicit activities". Criminology 38(3): 787–809.
- Outshoorn, Joyce (ed.). (2004). The Politics of Prostitution: Women's Movements, Democratic States and the Globalisation of Sex Commerce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-54069-0
- Peoples’ Union for Civil Liberties, Karnataka (PUCL-K). (2003). Human Rights Violations against the Transgender Community: A Study of Kothi and Hijra Sex Workers in Bangalore, India. [2]
- Pinto, Susan; Scandia, Anita & Wilson, Paul. (2005). Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No. 22: Prostitution laws in Australia. ISBN 0-642-15382-5 [3]
- Rajeshwari Sunder Rajan (1999). "4 The Prostitution Question(s): Female Agency, Sexuality and Work" (PDF). The scandal of the state: women, law, and citizenship in postcolonial India. Duke University Press. p. 117. ISBN 978-0822330486. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 1 February 2016.
- Sanchez, Lisa. (1999). "Sex, Law and the Paradox of Agency and Resistance in the Everyday Practices of Women in the "Evergreen" Sex Trade", in Constitutive Criminology at Work. Stuart Henry and Dragon Milovanovic (eds.). New York: State University of New York. ISBN 0-7914-4194-6
- Schur, Edwin M. (1965) Crimes Without Victims: Deviant Behavior and Public Policy: Abortion, Homosexuality, Drug Addiction. Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-192930-5
- "Sex Workers, HIV and AIDS". Avert (Global information and advice on HIV & AIDS). 20 July 2015. Retrieved 28 October 2018.
- Sullivan, Barbara. (1995) "Rethinking Prostitution" in Transitions: New Australian Feminisms Caine, Barbara. & Pringle, Rosemary (eds.). Sydney: Allen & Unwin. pp. 184–197. ISBN 0-312-12548-8 [4]
- Sullivan, Barbara. (2000). Rethinking Prostitution and 'Consent' [5]
- Weitzer, Ronald (23 April 2012). "Why Prostitution Should Be Legal". CNN. Archived from the original on 26 April 2012. Retrieved 11 November 2012.
External links
[edit]- Paul Armentano, The Case for Legalized Prostitution
- bayswan.org: Prostitution Law Reform: Defining Terms
- The laws that sex workers really want. TED (conference) (website). Alternate YouTube link. Published January 2016 on ted.com and June 2016 on YouTube.
Prostitution law
View on GrokipediaDefinitions and Scope
Core definitions
Prostitution, in legal contexts, refers to the act of engaging, agreeing to engage, or offering to engage in sexual conduct with another person in exchange for compensation, typically monetary.[7] [8] This definition encompasses not only completed acts but also preparatory agreements or solicitations, as codified in statutes across multiple U.S. jurisdictions, where the exchange must involve sexual activity as a business or for a fee.[9] [10] Jurisdictions distinguish prostitution from non-commercial sexual relations by requiring the presence of remuneration, which may include money, goods, or services of economic value, though exact thresholds and what constitutes "sexual conduct" (e.g., intercourse, oral sex, or manual stimulation) vary by local law.[11] [12] Related core terms include brothel, defined as any premises or structure principally or regularly used for prostitution, providing shelter or seclusion for such activities.[13] [14] Brothels may encompass houses, apartments, massage parlors, or other venues where multiple instances of prostitution occur, and their operation is often separately criminalized to target organized facilitation rather than individual acts.[15] Pimping and pandering denote third-party involvement in prostitution. Pimping involves deriving financial benefit from a prostitute's earnings, such as receiving proceeds from their sexual services without direct participation in the act.[16] [17] Pandering, by contrast, entails procuring, inducing, or encouraging another to become or remain a prostitute, including arranging clients or coercing participation.[18] [19] These distinctions aim to penalize exploitation while definitions emphasize knowing intent and economic gain, with penalties often harsher than for prostitution itself due to the facilitation of ongoing commercial activity.[20]Distinctions from related activities
Prostitution is legally defined in numerous jurisdictions as the act of engaging, agreeing, or offering to engage in sexual conduct with another person in exchange for a fee or compensation.[7][8] This definition emphasizes the direct bilateral exchange of sexual activity for monetary or economic value, distinguishing it from activities lacking such an explicit quid pro quo involving penetrative or intimate sexual acts.[11][9] A primary legal distinction exists between prostitution and pornography production, where the latter involves compensation for performing sexual acts before a camera or audience primarily for recording and distribution, rather than for the direct gratification of an individual client.[21] In jurisdictions like the United States, pornography is often shielded by free speech protections under the First Amendment, provided it does not meet obscenity standards, whereas prostitution lacks this expressive element and is treated as a transactional public order offense.[22][23] Courts have upheld this divide by viewing pornographic performers as actors paid for a product, not participants in one-on-one sexual commerce.[24] Escort services differ from prostitution in that they entail paid companionship, such as accompanying clients to social events or providing non-sexual conversation, without an agreement for sexual conduct.[25] Legally permissible in many areas where prostitution is banned, escorting crosses into criminal territory only if sexual services are explicitly offered or performed for additional payment.[26][27] This boundary is enforced through statutes focusing on intent and agreement, with prosecutors often relying on evidence like advertisements or communications to prove solicitation of sex.[28] Stripping or exotic dancing is differentiated from prostitution as a form of performative entertainment involving dance and partial nudity, without direct sexual contact or intercourse for hire.[29] In regulated venues, such activities are licensed as adult entertainment, subject to zoning and conduct rules that prohibit "extras" like lap dances escalating to sexual acts, which would reclassify them under prostitution laws.[30] The legal focus here is on public performance versus private transaction, with violations hinging on whether compensation incentivizes sexual gratification beyond visual or theatrical elements.[31] Human trafficking, particularly sex trafficking, is legally distinct from voluntary prostitution by the presence of force, fraud, coercion, or involuntariness, rendering the activity non-consensual regardless of any fee exchange.[32] While prostitution statutes presume agency and agreement among adults, trafficking laws—such as those under the U.S. Trafficking Victims Protection Act—target exploitation, including debt bondage or threats, treating victims as commodities rather than willing participants.[33][34] Empirical distinctions in prosecution emphasize evidence of control or lack of autonomy, though critics note overlaps where coerced individuals may appear to consent under duress.[35]Historical Development
Ancient and pre-modern regulations
In ancient Mesopotamia, the Code of Hammurabi (c. 1754–1750 BCE) regulated prostitution through provisions on inheritance and marital rights for temple-dedicated women, including nadītu priestesses and sekertu prostitutes, who were barred from bearing children to preserve temple endowments.[36] These laws treated prostitutes as a distinct social class subject to economic restrictions, such as limited dowry claims, while sacred prostitution in Inanna's temples involved ritual intercourse to invoke fertility, blending religious duty with regulated sexual commerce.[37] Prostitution in ancient Greece was legalized and state-regulated during the Archaic Period (c. 800–479 BCE), with brothels (porneia) taxed and operated primarily by slaves or metics to shield citizen women from involvement, as free Athenian females faced severe social stigma for such activities.[38] Athenian laws, as referenced in oratory like Aeschines' speeches, prohibited the procurement or sale of freeborn children into prostitution, imposing penalties to protect citizen lineage while permitting non-citizen participation.[39] Elite courtesans (hetairai) operated semi-independently but under implicit oversight to avoid disrupting civic order. Roman law permitted and licensed prostitution empire-wide, requiring prostitutes—predominantly female slaves or freedwomen—to register with magistrates and wear distinctive clothing for identification, a practice codified under emperors like Claudius.[40] Emperor Caligula (r. 37–41 CE) instituted the first empire-wide prostitution tax (vectigal meretricium), collected by military agents at 2% of earnings, which funded public works and underscored state profiteering from the trade.[41] Brothels (lupanaria) were confined to urban fringes, with archaeological evidence from Pompeii revealing multi-room facilities equipped for commercial sex, though exploitation of slaves blurred lines between consent and coercion.[42] In medieval Europe, the Catholic Church doctrinally condemned prostitution as fornication but pragmatically tolerated it as a "necessary evil" to avert worse sins like rape or clerical incontinence, a view articulated by Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century.[43] Secular authorities regulated rather than prohibited it, mandating brothels in designated districts—such as London's Stew in Southwark, licensed by the Bishop of Winchester from the 12th century—and enforcing curfews or health checks, while deriving revenue through fines and rents.[44] Enforcement varied by locale, with cities like Paris confining prostitutes to the Left Bank under royal ordinances by the 13th century to segregate vice from respectable society.[45] Ancient Indian texts, including the Kama Sutra (c. 3rd–4th century CE), categorized prostitutes into tiers like ganikas—educated courtesans taxed and licensed by kings for public performances and companionship—distinguishing them from lower veshyas while subjecting all to state oversight for revenue and moral order.[46] Vedic and post-Vedic laws emphasized procreation within marriage, penalizing extramarital sex but permitting regulated courtesan roles in royal courts, where ganikas underwent training in arts and faced fines for unlicensed operation.[47] Pre-modern Islamic jurisprudence classified prostitution as zina (illicit intercourse), punishable by 100 lashes for unmarried offenders or stoning for adulterers, with evidentiary hurdles requiring four witnesses to uphold hudud penalties.[48] The Quran (24:33) explicitly prohibited compelling female slaves into prostitution for profit, framing it as exploitation contrary to chastity ideals, though Ottoman records from the 16th–19th centuries show inconsistent enforcement, with urban brothels tolerated under guild-like oversight amid slavery's prevalence.[49]19th and 20th century shifts
In the early 19th century, France formalized a regulationist approach to prostitution under Napoleonic law, establishing police oversight through the 1804 decree that required registration of sex workers, mandatory health inspections, and licensed brothels known as maisons closes to contain venereal diseases and maintain public order in urban centers like Paris, where an estimated 3,000 to 5,000 registered prostitutes operated by mid-century.[50] This model, viewing prostitution as a necessary evil for male sexual outlets, influenced other European states but faced criticism for entrenching exploitation without addressing root causes like poverty.[51] Britain adopted a targeted regulatory system via the Contagious Diseases Acts of 1864, 1866, and 1869, which empowered police in port and garrison towns to forcibly examine and register women suspected of prostitution for venereal disease control among soldiers, leading to over 16,000 examinations by 1870 but applying no equivalent measures to men.[52] Opposition from abolitionist groups, including Josephine Butler's Ladies National Association formed in 1869, highlighted the acts' gender double standard and state complicity in vice, culminating in partial suspension in 1883 and full repeal in 1886, marking a pivot toward criminalizing solicitation without licensed oversight.[53] In the United States, prostitution remained largely unregulated and tolerated in urban areas through the mid-19th century, with brothels operating openly in cities like New York, where the 1830s saw an estimated 500 such establishments amid rapid immigration and industrialization.[54] The Progressive Era (circa 1890–1920) brought moral reform campaigns against "white slavery," fueled by exposés claiming thousands of women were coerced into brothels annually, prompting state-level nuisance abatement laws and the federal Mann Act of 1910, which banned interstate transport for "immoral purposes" and shifted policy toward prohibitionism.[55][56] The 20th century saw international abolitionist momentum through the League of Nations, established in 1920, which formed committees in 1921 and 1924 to combat "traffic in women," endorsing the 1921 International Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Women and Children and pressuring signatory states to dismantle regulated systems as morally corrosive and ineffective against exploitation.[57] Influenced by the International Abolitionist Federation since 1875, this framework led countries like France to close licensed brothels in 1946 amid postwar scandals, though clandestine markets persisted, while others, such as the Netherlands, retained elements of regulation.[58] These shifts prioritized moral eradication over pragmatic control, often correlating with rises in unreported street-level activity but lacking empirical validation for reduced overall prostitution.[59]Post-1945 global evolution
The United Nations General Assembly approved the Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others on December 2, 1949, which entered into force on July 25, 1951, after ratification by 12 states.[60] This treaty required signatories to repeal laws tolerating brothels, abolish licensed prostitution systems, and penalize procurement, trafficking, and exploitation for prostitution, while treating prostitutes as victims rather than criminals.[61] By emphasizing prostitution's incompatibility with human dignity, it promoted an abolitionist framework globally, influencing over 80 ratifications by the early 21st century and prompting shifts away from pre-war regulatory models in Europe and elsewhere.[62] In Europe during the 1950s and 1960s, many nations aligned with the UN convention by adopting abolitionist policies that criminalized third-party involvement while decriminalizing the act of selling sex. The United Kingdom's Street Offences Act 1959 consolidated prior laws, prohibiting soliciting, loitering for prostitution, and kerb-crawling to reduce visibility without directly criminalizing the exchange.[63] France repealed its Napoleonic-era regulation in 1946, moving to penalize pimping and brothels under abolitionist principles. By the 1990s, divergences emerged: Sweden pioneered the "Nordic model" in 1999 by criminalizing the purchase of sex (up to one year imprisonment for buyers) while exempting sellers, framing demand as the root of exploitation and evaluating its effects through government reports showing reduced street prostitution.[64] This approach spread to Norway in 2009 and Iceland in 2009. Contrasting trends appeared in legalization efforts. The Netherlands lifted its brothel ban on October 1, 2000, permitting regulated operations with municipal oversight, age restrictions, and health checks to integrate prostitution into the economy.[65] Germany followed with the Prostitution Act of 2002, which recognized sex work contracts, decriminalized voluntary adult prostitution, and aimed to improve workers' access to social benefits, though subsequent 2017 reforms added mandatory registration amid trafficking concerns. In Oceania, New Zealand's Prostitution Reform Act 2003 fully decriminalized prostitution, brothels, and solicitation for adults over 18, emphasizing occupational safety, health protections, and rights to refuse clients, with parliamentary reviews confirming improved worker agency.[66] In the United States, federal law under the 1910 Mann Act continued prohibiting interstate transport for prostitution, reinforced post-1945 by anti-vice campaigns amid Cold War moral panics, with no nationwide decriminalization. State-level prohibitions persisted in 49 states, though Nevada authorized licensed brothels in rural counties starting in 1971 under strict zoning and testing regimes. Globally, the 2000 UN Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons (Palermo Protocol) supplemented earlier conventions by broadening anti-trafficking measures, ratified by over 170 states, yet it distinguished consensual adult sex work from exploitation, allowing varied national models amid rising debates on health, migration, and crime links.[67]Legal Models
Prohibitionism
Prohibitionism refers to a legal model that criminalizes all facets of prostitution, including the sale and purchase of sexual services as well as third-party involvement such as pimping or brothel operation.[68] Under this framework, participants face penalties including fines, imprisonment, or administrative sanctions, with the intent to eradicate the practice by deterring supply and demand through comprehensive enforcement.[69] This contrasts with partial criminalization models by targeting sex workers alongside clients and facilitators, viewing the transaction itself as inherently illicit rather than distinguishing exploitative elements.[1] The rationale for prohibitionism often stems from moral, public health, and protective concerns, positing that prostitution perpetuates gender inequality, objectification, and links to organized crime or trafficking.[70] Advocates argue it upholds societal norms against commodifying intimacy and reduces overall incidence by increasing risks of detection and punishment for all parties.[71] Enforcement typically involves police raids on suspected venues, sting operations for solicitation, and surveillance of high-risk areas, though outcomes vary by jurisdiction due to resource constraints and evasion tactics like online facilitation.[10] Prominent implementations include the United States, where prostitution is illegal in 49 states, classified as a misdemeanor or felony with penalties up to one year in jail and fines exceeding $1,000 in many locales, except in licensed Nevada brothels confined to specific counties.[70] In China, the 1991 Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress strictly prohibits prostitution and related activities, authorizing up to 15 days of detention and fines up to 5,000 yuan ($700), supplemented by campaigns against facilitation.[72] Similar full bans prevail in countries like Japan, where laws impose criminal liability on sellers and buyers alike, often with heightened penalties for organized elements.[73] Peer-reviewed analyses indicate that prohibitionist regimes correlate with heightened vulnerability for sex workers, including elevated rates of violence, inconsistent condom use due to rushed encounters, and barriers to healthcare from fear of arrest.[4] A synthesis of global data found criminalization associated with poorer safety and health metrics compared to decriminalized settings, though causation remains debated amid confounding factors like poverty and migration.[4] Proponents counter that such laws curb demand effectively, citing persistent underground persistence as evidence of incomplete enforcement rather than policy failure, while critics highlight selective application that disproportionately burdens marginalized sellers over buyers.[71][2]Abolitionism and neo-abolitionism
Abolitionism emerged in the late 19th century as a movement opposing state-regulated prostitution systems, particularly in Europe, where regulated brothels were seen as enabling exploitation under the guise of public health controls. Originating in England around 1869, it was led by figures like Josephine Butler, who argued that regulation stigmatized women while protecting male clients and procurers, treating prostitutes as victims of moral and social failings rather than criminals.[74] The approach advocated decriminalizing the act of selling sex but criminalizing related activities such as brothel-keeping, pimping, and public solicitation, with the goal of eradicating prostitution through social reform and moral suasion rather than outright prohibition.[75] By the early 20th century, abolitionist principles influenced international agreements, such as those under the League of Nations, which pressured countries to repeal regulationist laws in favor of penalizing third-party involvement.[63] Neo-abolitionism represents a contemporary evolution, often termed the "Nordic model" or "Equality Model," which explicitly criminalizes the purchase of sex to target demand while decriminalizing sellers, positioning prostitution as a form of gender-based violence and inequality rather than consensual work. Sweden pioneered this framework with legislation enacted on May 1, 1999, prohibiting clients from buying sex under penalty of fines or up to six months' imprisonment, justified by parliamentary findings that prostitution constitutes harm to women and undermines gender equality.[76] The model views buyers and profiteers as perpetrators, offering exit programs and social services to sellers without criminal sanctions, drawing from radical feminist critiques that frame all prostitution as exploitative due to power imbalances rooted in patriarchy and economic disparity.[77] Proponents, including Swedish authorities, claim it reduces street prostitution by 50% in the decade following implementation and deters trafficking inflows compared to neighboring regulationist countries like Denmark.[78] This approach has spread to other jurisdictions, with Norway adopting it in 2009, Iceland in 2009, France in 2016 (criminalizing purchase with fines up to €1,500 for first offenses), and Canada in 2014 via its Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act, which similarly penalizes purchasing while protecting sellers from prosecution for related offenses.[75][79] Neo-abolitionist policies often integrate anti-trafficking measures, arguing that demand reduction disrupts organized exploitation networks, though implementation varies, with some countries like Ireland (2017) extending penalties to third-party advertisers.[80] Critics from sex worker advocacy groups contend the model stigmatizes voluntary participants and pushes transactions underground, but supporters cite empirical evaluations, such as Sweden's government reports, showing sustained low visibility of prostitution and minimal identified victims post-1999.[81][78]Legalization and regulation
Legalization and regulation of prostitution establishes the activity as a lawful occupation subject to governmental oversight, including licensing requirements, mandatory health screenings, zoning restrictions to designated areas or brothels, and taxation as a commercial service. This model seeks to integrate prostitution into the formal economy, enabling state control over working conditions, client verification, and revenue collection while aiming to mitigate underground exploitation. Regulations typically mandate age verification (often 18 or 21), condom use, and periodic medical examinations to curb sexually transmitted infections.[82][83] In the Netherlands, prostitution was fully legalized on October 1, 2000, under the Toleration Policy formalized into law, permitting operations in licensed venues such as window brothels in red-light districts, escort services, and massage parlors, with municipal authorities enforcing zoning and business permits. Sex workers must register with local authorities in some cities, and operators are required to ensure safe conditions, though enforcement varies, leading to ongoing debates about efficacy amid reports of persistent coercion. The system generates tax revenue through value-added taxes and income declarations, but critics note that it has not eliminated illegal activities, prompting proposals in 2022 for stricter age limits and permit systems.[82][75] Germany implemented the Prostitution Act (Prostitutionsgesetz) on January 1, 2002, recognizing prostitution as a contractual service and removing penalties for consenting adults, followed by the 2017 Prostitute Protection Act (Prostituiertenschutzgesetz), which introduced mandatory registration for sex workers, annual health counseling sessions, and operator obligations for hygiene and exit support programs. Brothels require permits, and clients must use condoms, with fines for non-compliance up to €50,000 for establishments. This framework taxes earnings and aims to empower workers through labor rights, yet implementation challenges include under-registration and regional variations in enforcement.[83] In the United States, Nevada authorizes regulated brothels in 10 rural counties under state law dating to 1971, excluding populous areas like Clark County (Las Vegas), with operators obtaining county licenses and workers undergoing weekly STI testing, mandatory condom use, and background checks. The Nevada Administrative Code mandates quarantine for positive tests and limits brothel operations to isolated facilities, generating local tax revenue from a percentage of gross receipts. This model confines legal prostitution to approximately 20 licensed brothels, emphasizing containment and health protocols over broad decriminalization.[84][85] Other jurisdictions adopting similar approaches include Switzerland (licensed brothels), Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Austria, Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, Uruguay, Panama, and others, with models featuring government oversight like permits, taxation, registration, and health checks. Belgium incorporates regulatory elements through decriminalization with labor protections since 2022, while New Zealand employs a decriminalized framework with worker rights and brothel regulations. As of 2025-2026, no major global changes have been reported, maintaining these ongoing legalization models.[86] Certain Australian states like New South Wales, where legalization since 1995 allows licensed brothels and private work with health and safety standards, and Uruguay, which regulated prostitution nationally in 2020, requiring registration and medical checks for workers over 18, also exemplify this approach. These systems prioritize formalization to enhance oversight, though empirical assessments reveal mixed results in reducing illicit markets or improving worker autonomy, often depending on rigorous enforcement.[75]Decriminalization
Decriminalization removes criminal penalties for consensual adult prostitution, including solicitation, purchasing, operating brothels, and deriving income from sex work, while upholding bans on coercion, child exploitation, and trafficking. Unlike legalization models that impose occupational licensing or zoning, decriminalization applies standard labor, health, and safety laws without bespoke regulations for the industry.[87][88] New Zealand enacted comprehensive decriminalization via the Prostitution Reform Act 2003, effective June 2003, which safeguards sex workers' rights to set conditions, refuse clients, and access dispute resolution while excluding minors and undocumented migrants from onshore work.[89] New South Wales in Australia achieved a similar framework through the Disorders of Prostitution Act 1995 amendments, decriminalizing street work and brothels subject to local planning laws.[75] Belgium partially advanced toward decriminalization in June 2022 by granting sex workers labor contract rights and social security access, though full implementation faces enforcement hurdles.[90] The model's rationale centers on harm reduction, positing that criminal sanctions deter sex workers from seeking police protection or medical care, exacerbating violence and disease transmission. In New Zealand, a 2005-2006 Ministry of Justice evaluation reported sex workers were 55% more likely to report client violence post-reform, with 92% feeling able to demand condom use compared to 76% pre-reform.[91] A 2008 Prostitution Law Review Committee assessment concluded the Act met its objectives, noting improved occupational health practices and no underground shift, though street-based workers faced persistent stigma.[89] Empirical data on safety shows gains in self-reported agency but varies by work type; indoor workers in decriminalized settings experienced 30-40% lower violence rates in longitudinal New Zealand surveys, yet street workers reported marginal improvements due to visibility.[92] Health outcomes include stabilized STI notifications, with gonorrhea incidence dropping 40% in affected cohorts, attributed to normalized health service uptake.[4] On trafficking, New Zealand authorities identified 18 potential cases from 2003-2008, fewer per capita than in regulated peers, but critics argue under-detection persists as decriminalization signals market tolerance without robust border controls.[89] Cross-national analyses link full decriminalization to stable or reduced trafficking inflows compared to prohibition, though conflation with legalization muddies causality, and high-income contexts show amplified demand effects.[5][93] Overall, while decriminalization correlates with enhanced worker protections in monitored jurisdictions, it does not eradicate exploitation risks, prompting debates on supplementary measures like client vetting.[90]Empirical Impacts
Effects on public health and sex worker safety
Empirical evidence indicates that criminalization of prostitution correlates with elevated risks of violence and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) for sex workers, as underground operations hinder access to health services and encourage avoidance of law enforcement. Studies across high-income countries show sex workers in prohibitive regimes experience higher incidences of HIV, STIs, and condomless sex due to fear of arrest, which disrupts consistent health monitoring and outreach programs.[4][94] In contrast, decriminalization models demonstrate reductions in these harms; for instance, a Rhode Island policy decriminalizing indoor prostitution from 2003 to 2009 led to a 31% decrease in reported rape offenses and a 39% drop in female gonorrhea rates, attributed to expanded market visibility enabling better safety negotiations and health access.[95][96] New Zealand's 2003 Prostitution Reform Act, which decriminalized sex work while imposing health and age regulations, yielded measurable safety gains. Post-implementation evaluations found sex workers reported improved ability to refuse unsafe clients and increased police cooperation without arrest fears, correlating with fewer violence incidents and enhanced STI screening uptake; a longitudinal review confirmed no rise in sex work volume but better worker wellbeing and reduced exploitation risks.[87][97][92] Critics note persistent stigma, yet quantitative data from health clinics showed sustained declines in chlamydia and gonorrhea prevalence among sex workers through 2013.[98] Under the Nordic model, which criminalizes clients while decriminalizing sellers, sex worker safety deteriorates as transactions shift to riskier, clandestine settings, reducing visibility and negotiation power. Prospective cohort studies in Canada post-2014 implementation revealed heightened barriers to health services and elevated violence exposure, with workers avoiding STI testing due to client deterrence fears; qualitative accounts from Sweden similarly document rushed encounters increasing injury and assault risks without mitigating demand-driven harms.[99][100][101] Legalization regimes, such as Germany's 2002 Prostitution Act and the Netherlands' brothel licensing, facilitate mandatory health checks and workplace standards, potentially curbing STI transmission in regulated venues. Dutch tippelzones (prostitution zones) implemented in the 1990s-2000s reduced local rape and sexual abuse by 30-40% within two years by channeling activity into monitored areas, though cross-border data indicate higher STI positivity (15.5%) among workers visiting German sites compared to Dutch ones (10.2%).[102][103] However, unregulated segments persist, with a 2024 German analysis linking partial compliance to elevated untreated STIs and injuries among migrant workers, suggesting incomplete regulation fails to fully mitigate underground risks.[104][105] Overall, while legalization improves formal sector health outcomes, it does not uniformly enhance safety across all workers, as evidenced by persistent violence reports in non-compliant operations.[106]Influence on human trafficking and organized crime
Empirical analyses indicate that legalization of prostitution correlates with higher inflows of human trafficking compared to prohibitionist regimes. A cross-country study examining data from 116 nations found that countries permitting prostitution, particularly through regulated brothels, experience significantly elevated trafficking rates, as the expanded market scale outweighs any potential substitution away from coerced labor.[3][107] This pattern holds after controlling for factors like GDP per capita and governance quality, suggesting a causal link via heightened demand drawing traffickers.[5] In the Netherlands, following full legalization in 2000, human trafficking for sexual exploitation persisted and reportedly intensified, with organized networks exploiting the legal framework's ambiguities to operate under the guise of regulated establishments.[106][108] German legalization via the 2002 Prostitution Act similarly failed to curb trafficking, yielding estimated inflows 30 to 40 times higher than in Sweden, where buyer criminalization prevails; post-reform evaluations revealed entrenched exploitation in legal brothels by Eastern European syndicates.[106][109] Abolitionist approaches, such as Sweden's 1999 law criminalizing purchase while decriminalizing sellers, correlate with reduced visible prostitution and anecdotal declines in street-level trafficking, though comprehensive data on indoor or online shifts remain contested due to potential underreporting.[80] Critics argue this model displaces rather than eliminates organized crime, fostering evasion tactics, yet quantitative comparisons show lower trafficking victimization rates relative to legalized systems.[110] New Zealand's 2003 decriminalization yielded no clear reduction in trafficking, with U.S. State Department assessments maintaining its Tier 2 status for persistent gaps in victim identification and prosecution, amid reports of sustained organized recruitment from Asia.[111][112] Regarding organized crime, legalization often integrates criminal networks into formal markets, as seen in Dutch and German cases where pimping and coercion adapted to licensing loopholes, sustaining violence and debt bondage.[113] Conversely, prohibitionist enforcement disrupts syndicates by elevating risks, though it may concentrate control among resilient groups; empirical reviews link illegal status to higher intra-trafficker violence but lower overall market expansion fueling crime inflows.[114][115]Economic and demographic consequences
In jurisdictions with legalized or regulated prostitution, such as Nevada's brothel system, the industry generates measurable economic contributions through taxes, licensing fees, and tourism. As of recent estimates, legal brothels contribute approximately $60 million annually to the state's economy, including direct revenue and indirect effects from employment in rural counties.[116] This formalized sector contrasts with illegal activities elsewhere in the state, which evade taxation and impose enforcement costs estimated in the billions.[117] Decriminalization models, like New Zealand's 2003 Prostitution Reform Act, emphasize financial flexibility for workers without expanding overall industry size. Surveys indicate over 90% of sex workers entered the trade for economic reasons, such as covering household expenses (73%) or funding luxuries (61.5%), with 82% citing similar motives for remaining, alongside benefits like flexible hours enabling savings for assets (59%).[91] This stability avoids disproportionate growth in sex work participation, preserving broader labor market dynamics.[91] Legalization efforts in Germany under the 2002 Prostitution Act aimed to integrate the sector into the formal economy via contracts and social insurance, but uptake remained low, with only 1% of surveyed workers holding employment contracts and most (72.8%) operating freelance. Tax registrations increased due to clarified income classification, yet limited enforcement of remuneration claims and operator reluctance hindered full economic formalization. Theoretical analyses suggest net benefits from legalization, including billions in potential U.S.-wide tax revenue ($14.2 billion federally) and reduced prosecution costs ($271 million), outweighing regulation expenses ($43 million), though these assume effective oversight.[118] Under prohibitionist or Nordic models, such as Sweden's 1999 law criminalizing buyers, economic effects include reduced visible prostitution—street activity reportedly halved—potentially lowering associated social costs like policing and health expenditures, though underground persistence incurs ongoing enforcement expenses without tax gains. There is no rigorous empirical support from mainstream economics or sociology for the hypothesis that banning prostitution boosts economic productivity by increasing the "cost" of sex and motivating greater work effort, despite its appearance in informal discussions; instead, sex industry proliferation—whether legalized or underground—often involves worker exploitation, health hazards such as HIV transmission, economic distortions including corruption and capital flight, with unregulated economies generating greater societal costs than benefits.[119] Demographic shifts appear minimal across models, with no verified evidence of broad population-level changes like altered fertility or migration patterns directly attributable to laws; instead, regulated systems may concentrate foreign workers in urban areas without formal integration.[91]Enforcement and Implementation
Practical enforcement mechanisms
In prohibitionist jurisdictions, such as most U.S. states, enforcement primarily relies on undercover sting operations where police officers pose as clients or sex workers to solicit and arrest individuals for solicitation or related offenses. These operations often involve posting advertisements on websites or apps, leading to arrests upon agreement to exchange sex for money, with over 5,000 such arrests reported annually in operations like those conducted by the FBI's paradigm shift initiatives targeting traffickers alongside prostitutes.[120] Additional mechanisms include street-level patrols, raids on suspected brothels, and vehicle seizures for curb-crawling, though these disproportionately target sex workers over clients in practice.[121] Under the Nordic model, implemented in Sweden since 1999, enforcement focuses asymmetrically on penalizing buyers through fines up to 63 times the offense's value or imprisonment for repeat violations, utilizing surveillance of high-traffic areas, analysis of hotel bookings, and witness statements from sex workers to build cases without criminalizing sellers. Swedish police reported a 50% reduction in street prostitution visibility post-law, attributing it to deterrent patrols and public awareness campaigns warning potential clients of legal risks, though indoor enforcement remains challenging due to reliance on voluntary reporting.[122] In Norway, similar measures since 2009 include mobile surveillance units and data from online platforms to prosecute purchases, yielding around 200 convictions annually by 2020.[123] Legalization regimes, exemplified by the Netherlands since 2000, enforce regulations via mandatory licensing for brothels and window workers, periodic police inspections for compliance with age verification, health standards, and anti-trafficking protocols, such as checking worker documentation and prohibiting coercion. Municipal zoning restricts operations to designated areas like Amsterdam's De Wallen, where enforcement includes closing unlicensed venues and fining operators for violations, though audits reveal limited detection of underground abuses due to scheduled rather than random checks.[124] In Germany, post-2002 legalization, enforcement involves labor inspectorate oversight of registered sex workers' contracts and tax compliance, supplemented by raids on non-compliant establishments, resulting in thousands of closures for exploitation since 2017.[125] Decriminalization models, as in New Zealand under the 2003 Prostitution Reform Act, shift enforcement away from consensual acts toward protecting labor rights and addressing coercion through civil mechanisms like brothel operator certifications, health and safety audits by the Labour Inspectorate, and police-assisted reporting of client refusals or exploitation without fear of arrest for workers. Offenses such as inducing minors or unsafe practices incur fines up to NZ$10,000, enforced via complaints-driven investigations rather than proactive policing of sex work itself, leading to a reported 95% compliance rate among operators by 2018 evaluations.[126] This approach emphasizes sex workers' ability to seek police intervention for crimes like robbery, contrasting with criminalized systems where fear of arrest deters cooperation.[98]Challenges including corruption and evasion
Enforcement of prostitution laws faces significant obstacles from corruption within law enforcement and evasion by participants in the sex trade. In prohibitionist and criminalization models, underground operations incentivize bribery and protection rackets, as officers may accept payments or sexual favors to overlook violations. For instance, in 2021, a Village of Brewster, New York, police officer was charged with accepting free sexual services in exchange for shielding a sex trafficking organization from arrests, leading to a 36-month prison sentence in 2024. Similarly, in Lewisville, Texas, in 2024, 11 officers were disciplined for misconduct during a prostitution sting, including inappropriate physical contact, prompting the dismissal of charges against 28 suspects. A 2023 analysis of U.S. cases from 2005 to 2017 documented patterns of police using authority to coerce sex workers, exacerbating distrust and non-reporting of crimes. These incidents illustrate how criminalization can erode enforcement integrity, as low conviction rates and high operational secrecy foster opportunities for abuse.[127][128][129] Evasion tactics further complicate regulation across models. In illegal markets, participants shift to disguised venues like illicit massage parlors, online platforms, and hotels to avoid detection, with a 2014 Urban Institute study of eight U.S. cities estimating the underground commercial sex economy at $290 million to $1.1 billion annually, sustained by adaptive marketing such as coded advertisements. Pimps and operators respond to targeted stings by relocating or innovating, as evidenced by displacement effects in enforcement data. In legalized systems, such as Nevada's brothel regulations, unlicensed operations evade licensing through under-the-radar services, while organized crime infiltrates oversight, controlling 76-100% of sex enterprises globally per a 2013 assessment. Corruption amplifies evasion in trafficking contexts, where border officials and police facilitate movement for bribes, as noted in a UNODC report linking graft to 20-30% of trafficking cases in affected regions.[130][131][132][133] These challenges persist due to the clandestine nature of the trade and varying jurisdictional capacities. In developing countries, systemic corruption—such as in parts of Southeast Asia and Eastern Europe—undermines raids, with officers colluding with syndicates for shares of profits estimated at billions annually. Even in decriminalized settings like New Zealand post-2003, evasion occurs via migrant workers bypassing registration to avoid deportation risks, leading to incomplete health and tax compliance. Empirical reviews indicate that no model fully eliminates these issues, as economic incentives drive innovation and graft, with policies often corroding enforcement without addressing root demand or supply dynamics.[133][134]Societal Perspectives and Debates
Moral and religious arguments
Moral opposition to prostitution frequently centers on the commodification of human sexuality and the erosion of personal dignity. Philosophers such as Immanuel Kant argued that prostitution inherently objectifies participants by treating the body as a mere means to an end, violating the categorical imperative against using persons instrumentally rather than as ends in themselves.[135] This view posits that exchanging sexual intimacy for payment undermines mutual respect and reduces individuals to objects, irrespective of consent, as true autonomy cannot coexist with such transactional dehumanization.[136] Critics of legalization contend that even voluntary participation perpetuates broader societal harms, including the normalization of exploitation and the reinforcement of gender inequalities, where women disproportionately bear the psychological and social costs.[71] Proponents of a permissive moral stance emphasize individual autonomy and consensual exchange, asserting that adults possess the right to contract their bodies freely without state moral interference.[137] This liberal perspective, rooted in Enlightenment principles of self-ownership, argues that moral wrongness arises only from coercion or harm, not from the act itself if all parties consent knowingly and without duress.[138] However, detractors counter that consent in prostitution is often compromised by economic desperation or power imbalances, rendering it illusory and morally equivalent to exploitation rather than genuine liberty.[139] Religious arguments against prostitution are uniformly prohibitive across major Abrahamic traditions, viewing it as a violation of divine commands on sexual purity and marital exclusivity. In Christianity, biblical texts such as 1 Corinthians 6:15-20 condemn uniting the body—regarded as a temple of the Holy Spirit—with prostitution, equating it to fornication and idolatry that defiles the soul.[140] Islamic doctrine prohibits zina (extramarital sex), categorizing prostitution as a grave sin punishable under Sharia, with Quranic verses like Surah An-Nur 24:2 emphasizing chastity and severe penalties to deter societal corruption.[141] Judaism, per Talmudic sources, decries prostitution as degrading and forbidden, with texts like Leviticus 19:29 warning against profaning daughters through harlotry, though rabbinic debates historically distinguished between voluntary and forced acts while upholding prohibitions.[142] These faiths frame legalization not merely as permitting vice but as enabling moral decay that invites divine judgment and communal breakdown, prioritizing collective holiness over individual choice.[143]Economic and individual liberty views
Economists favoring the decriminalization or legalization of prostitution argue that prohibition distorts markets, driving the activity underground and imposing enforcement costs on society while preventing the collection of tax revenue from a persistent demand.[144] Nobel laureate Milton Friedman advocated for the legalization of prostitution alongside drugs, viewing criminalization as ineffective and counterproductive, as it fails to eliminate the practice but instead fosters black markets vulnerable to organized crime.[145] In jurisdictions like Nevada, where regulated brothels operate legally, state and local governments derive significant revenue from licensing fees and taxes, estimated at millions annually, demonstrating potential fiscal benefits absent under prohibition.[144] From an individual liberty perspective, proponents contend that consensual adult transactions for sex represent a voluntary exchange free from coercion, akin to other personal services, and that state intervention violates principles of autonomy and the harm principle articulated by John Stuart Mill, which limits legitimate prohibition to acts harming non-consenting parties.[146] Libertarian organizations, such as the Cato Institute, assert that criminal laws against prostitution infringe on personal freedoms without commensurate public benefit, exacerbating risks to participants through stigma and restricted access to legal protections rather than enhancing safety.[147] The Libertarian Party platform explicitly supports decriminalization, emphasizing the rights of consenting adults to engage in sex work without governmental interference, positioning it as a matter of self-ownership over moral paternalism.[148] These views prioritize market mechanisms and personal agency, positing that legalization would channel the industry into regulated frameworks, reducing externalities like disease transmission and violence—evidenced by lower STI rates in decriminalized settings per some analyses—while respecting individual choice over collectivist concerns about commodification.[149] Critics from within economics note potential scale effects expanding demand and associated ills, yet advocates counter that empirical evidence from places like New Zealand post-2003 decriminalization shows improved worker bargaining power and health outcomes without disproportionate trafficking surges.[107][97]Feminist and human rights contentions
Feminist perspectives on prostitution laws divide primarily between abolitionist and sex-positive approaches. Abolitionists, often rooted in radical feminist theory, contend that prostitution constitutes a form of gender-based exploitation and violence, inherently incompatible with women's equality, and advocate for models like the Nordic approach that criminalize purchasing sex while decriminalizing sellers to reduce demand and trafficking.[73][150] This view posits that all commercial sex transactions reinforce patriarchal subordination, with empirical support drawn from studies showing high rates of trauma among prostituted women, including childhood abuse histories in up to 45-60% of cases in various jurisdictions.[151] Critics of this stance, including some liberal feminists, argue it overlooks agency and conflates voluntary sex work with coercion, potentially stigmatizing workers further.[152] Sex-positive feminists frame prostitution as legitimate labor, emphasizing individual autonomy and the right to bodily self-determination, supporting full decriminalization to enhance safety through regulation and access to labor protections.[153] They cite evidence from decriminalized settings, such as New Zealand post-2003, where sex workers reported improved ability to refuse clients and report violence, though aggregate violence rates remain debated.[154] However, abolitionists counter with data from legalized markets like Germany and the Netherlands, where trafficking inflows increased post-reform—e.g., Germany's brothel numbers rose from 500 in 2002 to over 3,000 by 2018—suggesting legalization expands the industry rather than empowering workers.[155] Human rights organizations like Human Rights Watch advocate decriminalization, arguing criminal laws drive sex workers underground, heightening risks of violence, HIV transmission, and rights abuses, with studies in countries like Kenya and Cambodia showing arrest rates correlating with unmet health needs.[156][157] Conversely, abolitionist human rights advocates, such as those from the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women, assert that decriminalizing the sex trade normalizes exploitation, violating women's rights to dignity and freedom from sexual violence, and point to Nordic implementations where street prostitution dropped 50% in Sweden from 1999-2017 alongside stable or reduced indoor activity.[71][158] These contentions highlight tensions between harm reduction and structural critiques, with empirical outcomes varying by context and implementation rigor.[159]Recent Developments
Global trends since 2010
Since 2010, a significant global trend in prostitution legislation has been the expansion of the "Nordic model," which criminalizes the purchase of sexual services to reduce demand while decriminalizing the act of selling sex and providing support services to sex workers. This approach, first implemented in Sweden in 1999, gained traction amid concerns over human trafficking and exploitation, with several countries enacting similar laws. Canada passed the Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act in 2014, making purchasing sex illegal with penalties up to five years imprisonment for first offenses.[75] Northern Ireland followed in 2015 with the Human Trafficking and Exploitation (Further Provisions and Support for Victims) Act, imposing fines and up to one year in prison for buying sex. France adopted the model in 2016 via a law fining clients up to 1,500 euros, and Ireland in 2017 with the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act, criminalizing payment for sex with penalties of up to 12 months imprisonment.[75] Israel implemented it in 2020, prohibiting the purchase of sex with fines escalating for repeat offenses.[160]| Country | Year | Key Provisions |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2014 | Criminalizes purchase; exemptions for disabilities; support for exiting.[75] |
| Northern Ireland | 2015 | Fines clients; anonymous reporting; victim support funds. |
| France | 2016 | 1,500 euro fine for clients; anti-pimping measures strengthened.[75] |
| Ireland | 2017 | Up to 12 months jail for buying; buyer education programs.[75] |
| Israel | 2020 | Fines for clients; closure of prostitution ads; rehabilitation focus.[160] |