Hubbry Logo
GNSS augmentationGNSS augmentationMain
Open search
GNSS augmentation
Community hub
GNSS augmentation
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
GNSS augmentation
GNSS augmentation
GNSS augmentation
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Augmentation of a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) is a method of improving the navigation system's attributes, such as precision, reliability, and availability, through the integration of external information into the calculation process. There are many such systems in place, and they are generally named or described based on how the GNSS sensor receives the external information. Some systems transmit additional information about sources of error (such as clock drift, ephemeris, or ionospheric delay), others provide direct measurements of how much the signal was off in the past, while a third group provides additional vehicle information to be integrated in the calculation process.

Satellite-based augmentation system

[edit]

Service areas of satellite-based augmentation systems (SBAS)
A list of GNSS and SBAS satellites received by a smartphone

Satellite-based augmentation systems (SBAS) support wide-area or regional augmentation through the use of additional satellite-broadcast messages. Using measurements from the ground stations, correction messages are created and sent to one or more satellites for broadcast to end users as differential signal. SBAS is sometimes synonymous with WADGPS, wide-area differential GPS.[1]

The SBAS that have been implemented or proposed include:

Ground-based augmentation system

[edit]

Ground-based augmentation system (GBAS) provides Differential GPS (DGPS) corrections and integrity verification near an airport, providing approaches e.g. for runways that do not have ILSs. Reference receivers in surveyed positions measure GPS deviations and calculate corrections emitted at 2 Hz through VHF data broadcast (VDB) within 23 nmi (43 km). One GBAS supports up to 48 approaches and covers many runway ends with more installation flexibility than an ILS with localizer and glideslope antennas at each end. A GBAS can provide multiple approaches to reduce wake turbulence and improve resilience, maintaining availability and operations continuity.[9]

In December 2008, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey invested $2.5 million to install a GBAS at Newark Airport (EWR) with Continental (now United) equipping 15 aircraft for $1.1 million while the FAA committed $2.5 million to assess the technology. Honeywell’s SLS-4000 GBAS design was approved by the FAA in September 2009 and is still the only one. It offers Cat. 1 instrument landings with a 200 ft (61 m) decision height and can be upgraded to a 100 ft (30 m) Cat. 2 with real-time monitoring of ionospheric conditions through SBAS, while the more precise Cat. 3 SLS-5000 is waiting for compatible airliners. The first installations were approved in EWR in 2012 and Houston / IAH in 2013. The Port Authority recommends a GBAS for New York JFK and LaGuardia (LGA) to alleviate congestion. Newark and Houston GBAS were upgraded to Cat. 2, Seattle-Tacoma, San Francisco SFO, JFK and LGA are expected next.[9]

Among the 20 Honeywell GBAS installations worldwide, the other U.S. installations are: Honeywell's test facility in Johnson County, Kansas; the FAA Technical Center at Atlantic City International Airport, New Jersey; Boeing's test facility in Grant County, Washington; the B787 plant in Charleston International, South Carolina; and Anoka County–Blaine Airport near Minneapolis. Airports equipped in Europe are Bremen, Frankfurt, Málaga and Zurich. in Asia-Pacific, airport with installations are Chennai, Kuala Lumpur, Melbourne, Seoul-Gimpo, Shanghai-Pudong and Sydney. Other locations are St. Helena in the South Atlantic, Punta Cana in the Dominican Republic and Rio de Janeiro–Galeão. There are around 100 Cat. 1 GBAS landing systems (GLS) installations in Russia with Russian-specific technology.[9]

In the US, GBAS was previously known as the Local-area augmentation system while a SBAS with a ground references network providing GPS corrections is called WAAS.

In the US, there were more WAAS LPV approaches reaching 200 ft (61 m) than Cat. 1 ILS approaches by March 2018. 1 GBAS costs $3–4 million; and $700,000 more for Cat. 2.[9]

By Spring 2018, Boeing delivered 3,500 GLS-capable airliners, with 5,000 on order: GLS Cat. 2/3 is standard on the Boeing 747-8, 787 and 777 while GLS Cat. 1 is optional on the 737NG/MAX and GLS Cat. 2/3 will be offered from 2020. Airbus offers GLS Cat. 1 with autoland on the A320, A330, A350 and A380.[9]

The FAA's NextGen promotes GBAS and GLS to increase airport capacity and to lower noise and weather delays. Boeing prefers FAA support than funding while the National Air Traffic Controllers Association argues rigid approaches will lower traffic management flexibility, losing throughput and capacity, a viewpoint shared by Delta Air Lines. Some ICAO members vetter[clarification needed] GBAS Approach Service Types-D (GAST-D) supporting Cat. 2/3 approach and landing.[9]

There are stricter Safety requirements on GBAS systems relative to SBAS systems since GBAS is intended mainly for the landing phase where real-time accuracy and signal integrity control is critical, especially when weather deteriorates to the extent that there is no visibility (CAT-I/II/III conditions) for which SBAS is not intended or suitable.[10]

Beyond airfields

[edit]

The US Nationwide Differential GPS System (NDGPS) was an augmentation system for users on U.S. land and waterways. It was replaced by[dubious – discuss] NASA's Global Differential GPS (GDGPS) system, which supports a wide range of GNSS networks beyond GPS. The same GDGPS system underlies WAAS and A-GNSS implementation in the US.[11]

Ground stations may also be used to accumulate continuous GNSS observations to achieve post-hoc correction of data to the centimeter level. Two example systems are the US Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) and the International GNSS Service (IGS).[11]

The National Association of Broadcasters has sponsored development of the Broadcast Positioning System (BPS) over ATSC 3.0 television signals as an augmentation system.[12]

Aircraft-based augmentation system (ABAS)

[edit]

The augmentation may also take the form of additional information from navigation sensors being blended into the position calculation, or internal algorithms that improve the navigation performance. Many times the additional avionics operate via separate principles from the GNSS and are not necessarily subject to the same sources of error or interference. A system such as this is referred to as an aircraft-based augmentation system (ABAS) by the ICAO. The most widely used form of ABAS is receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM), which uses redundant GPS signals to ensure the integrity of the position solution, and to detect faulty signals.[13]

Additional sensors may include:

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

GNSS augmentation

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
GNSS augmentation encompasses systems and techniques designed to enhance the performance of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), such as GPS, Galileo, and , by improving key attributes including accuracy, integrity, , and continuity. These augmentations mitigate inherent GNSS limitations, such as ionospheric and tropospheric delays, multipath errors, and satellite inaccuracies, thereby enabling precise positioning for applications ranging from aviation precision approaches to maritime and terrestrial . Primarily developed to support safety-of-life services, GNSS augmentation systems provide differential corrections, integrity monitoring, and ranging enhancements, achieving accuracies from meters to centimeters depending on the method. Augmentation systems are broadly categorized into three types: satellite-based, ground-based, and aircraft-based. Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS) utilize geostationary satellites to broadcast wide-area corrections and integrity information derived from a network of ground reference stations, offering regional coverage with horizontal accuracies better than 1 meter and support for aviation Category I precision approaches. Notable examples include the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) in the United States, which enhances GPS for North American airspace, and the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS), which augments GPS and Galileo across Europe. Ground-Based Augmentation Systems (GBAS), in contrast, provide localized enhancements through ground stations that compute and transmit corrections via VHF data links, enabling high-precision operations like Category III aircraft landings with sub-meter accuracy over distances up to 23 nautical miles from an airport. Differential GNSS techniques, a subset of ground-based methods, further refine positioning by using fixed reference stations to correct real-time errors, with variants like Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) delivering centimeter-level precision for short baselines under 15 kilometers. The development of GNSS augmentation has been driven by international standards from organizations like the (ICAO), ensuring and safety for . These systems not only bolster civilian and commercial uses but also support emerging applications in autonomous vehicles, , and surveying, with ongoing advancements focusing on multi-constellation compatibility and integration with other sensors.

Overview

Definition and Objectives

GNSS augmentation encompasses systems and methods that supplement the core signals from global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), such as GPS, Galileo, , and , to enhance navigation performance beyond standalone GNSS capabilities. These augmentations integrate external correction data, monitoring, and error bounds into the user receiver's position solution, improving key attributes including accuracy from meters to centimeters, through detection of hazardous errors, as the percentage of time requirements are met, and continuity to ensure uninterrupted service. While basic GNSS suffices for general positioning, augmentation is essential for applications demanding higher precision and reliability, distinguishing it from unaugmented standalone operations. The primary objectives of GNSS augmentation center on meeting stringent performance requirements for safety-critical and precision-dependent uses, particularly in where it supports (RNP) standards defined by the (ICAO). In , augmentation ensures sub-meter horizontal accuracy for approach and phases, with integrity metrics like the Horizontal Protection Level (HPL) providing statistical bounds on position errors to limit the risk of undetected faults to levels such as 10^{-7} per hour. It also mandates a time-to-alert of 6 seconds, allowing rapid pilot notification of system failures to prevent hazardous misleading information during critical maneuvers. Availability targets exceed 99.9% for en-route , rising to near 100% for precision approaches, while continuity risks remain below 10^{-4} per hour to sustain operations without interruption. Beyond , GNSS augmentation pursues similar enhancements for non-safety-critical sectors, enabling centimeter-level accuracy in for tasks like automated planting and variable-rate fertilizer application to optimize yields and reduce inputs. In autonomous driving, particularly for agricultural or off-road vehicles, real-time kinematic (RTK) augmentation supports sub-centimeter positioning to navigate uneven and maintain precise paths, improving and . These objectives align with broader goals of across GNSS constellations, categorized broadly into satellite-based (SBAS), ground-based (GBAS), and aircraft-based (ABAS) systems.

Historical Development

The development of GNSS augmentation systems emerged from the foundational limitations of the (GPS), initially conceived in the 1970s as a U.S. military tool to provide precise positioning during the era. The U.S. Department of Defense prioritized military applications through the 1980s, achieving full operational capability in 1995, but civilian use was hampered by Selective Availability (SA), a deliberate signal degradation that limited accuracy to approximately 100 meters for non-military users. Post- shifts in the early amplified civilian demands, particularly in and maritime sectors, necessitating enhancements to GPS reliability and integrity beyond inherent error sources like SA. This culminated in President Bill Clinton's 2000 directive to permanently discontinue SA on May 1, boosting civilian GPS horizontal accuracy to 3-5 meters and spurring augmentation initiatives. Key milestones in satellite-based augmentation systems (SBAS) began with the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) 1994 announcement of the (WAAS), aimed at correcting GPS errors for precision approaches across . WAAS achieved initial operational capability for en-route navigation in 2002, enabling its use in procedures. Europe's (EGNOS) followed, with its open service declared available on October 1, 2009, providing basic augmentation over Europe and marking the first SBAS certification for non-safety-critical applications. Regional expansions included Japan's MTSAT Satellite-based Augmentation System (MSAS), which reached initial operational capability in September 2007 for use in the region. India's (GAGAN) system was certified by the of on December 30, 2013 for en-route and non-precision approach operations. Ground-based and aircraft-based augmentations paralleled SBAS progress, driven by (ICAO) standards in Annex 10, which incorporated GNSS requirements for aeronautical telecommunications starting in the late 1990s to ensure global interoperability. Ground-Based Augmentation (GBAS) trials commenced in the 1990s under FAA and programs to support local precision landings, with an initial operational trial at starting in late 2006. Aircraft-Based Augmentation (ABAS) advanced through (RAIM) algorithms, standardized in the early 1990s to enable fault detection within GPS receivers without external aids. By the mid-2010s, GNSS augmentation integrated with emerging constellations, including the start of Galileo's initial operational services in 2016, with full operational capability achieved by 2020, which allowed SBAS providers like EGNOS to incorporate Galileo signals for improved accuracy and availability. China's achieved global coverage in 2020, leading to the BeiDou Satellite-Based Augmentation System (BDSBAS) rollout for regional integrity services by 2021, extending augmentation to and beyond. By 2025, advancements include SouthPAN's initial operational capability in 2023 and BDSBAS entering trial operations, contributing to over 90% global landmass coverage with multi-GNSS compatibility. These developments expanded global SBAS coverage to over 90% of the world's landmass by 2025, supporting multi-constellation operations and fostering among GPS, Galileo, , and regional systems.

Fundamental Principles

Sources of GNSS Errors

Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) are susceptible to various error sources that degrade positioning accuracy, often resulting in errors ranging from meters to tens of meters without correction. These errors arise from imperfections in signals, through the atmosphere, environmental reflections, and receiver limitations, collectively contributing to the user equivalent range error (UERE). Prior to the discontinuation of Selective Availability (SA) in 2000, intentional signal degradation added up to 32 meters of pseudorange error to users, reducing overall accuracy to approximately 100 meters at 95% confidence; post-removal, unaugmented pseudorange errors improved to about 3-8 meters (RMS). Propagated errors originate from the satellite segment and include clock biases and inaccuracies. Satellite clock errors stem from drifts in the atomic clocks onboard, typically contributing 0.5-3 meters to the range error, as the clocks are monitored and corrected via ground uploads but still exhibit small instabilities. errors arise from inaccuracies in the orbital parameters broadcast by satellites, with radial components around 1-3 meters RMS due to prediction models valid for several hours. Together, these propagated errors can total 5-10 meters in unaugmented systems. Atmospheric delays represent a major error category, affecting signal propagation speed. Ionospheric refraction, caused by charged particles in the Earth's , introduces delays of 3-30 meters vertically, with peaks up to 10-20 meters in equatorial regions during high solar activity; the GPS Klobuchar model provides a basic correction but leaves residuals of several meters. Tropospheric delays, from neutral gases in the lower atmosphere, add 2-25 meters, split into predictable dry components (about 2.3 meters ) and variable wet components (tens of centimeters), influenced by conditions. These delays vary with solar cycles, exacerbating ionospheric scintillation during peaks like . Signal propagation issues at the receiver end include multipath reflections and . Multipath occurs when signals bounce off surfaces like or terrain, causing errors up to 5 meters, particularly severe in urban environments where reflections distort the direct path. Receiver , from effects and quantization in the hardware, contributes 0.1-0.7 meters RMS, depending on receiver quality. These errors are amplified in obstructed settings, such as cities, where multipath dominates. Finally, geometric dilution of precision (GDOP) quantifies how satellite geometry worsens s, as poor distribution (e.g., clustered satellites) inflates position uncertainty; for instance, a horizontal dilution of precision (HDOP) of 1.4 can increase effective from 9 meters UERE to 12.6 meters. These combined s necessitate augmentation techniques like differential corrections to achieve sub-meter accuracy in critical applications.

Augmentation Techniques

Augmentation techniques in GNSS systems primarily address errors in pseudorange measurements, which form the basis for position estimation, by providing corrections that mitigate common-mode errors such as satellite clock biases, ephemeris inaccuracies, ionospheric delays, and tropospheric effects. These methods enhance positioning accuracy from standalone GNSS levels of several meters to sub-meter or centimeter precision, depending on the approach. Pseudorange corrections, often implemented differentially, are computed at the reference station as the difference between the observed pseudorange and the geometrically computed pseudorange based on the station's known position. This correction is broadcast to the user receiver, which applies it to its observed pseudoranges to cancel shared errors like clock and biases. Ionospheric modeling counters signal delays caused by the using either dual-frequency measurements, which exploit the dispersive nature of ionospheric effects to estimate , or grid-based models that broadcast regional delay maps. Tropospheric estimation typically relies on surface meteorological data, such as , , and , to model non-dispersive delays and apply mapping functions for elevation angles. Integrity monitoring establishes error bounds through protection levels, ensuring that residual uncertainties do not exceed alert limits for safety-critical applications. Key concepts in these techniques distinguish between wide-area corrections, which use networked reference stations to model errors over large regions for broad coverage, and local corrections from single stations for higher precision in confined areas. Carrier-phase processing achieves centimeter-level accuracy by resolving ambiguities in the continuous carrier signal, contrasting with code-phase methods that yield meter-level results but are simpler and more robust to cycle slips. Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) algorithms detect and exclude faults by comparing subsets of satellite measurements, using statistical tests like solution separation or chi-squared methods to identify and isolate erroneous signals. The core of differential corrections is captured in the formula for the pseudorange correction: δ=ρbase, observed−ρbase, computed\delta = \rho_{\text{base, observed}} - \rho_{\text{base, computed}} where ρbase, observed\rho_{\text{base, observed}} is the pseudorange measured at the and ρbase, computed\rho_{\text{base, computed}} is the pseudorange computed geometrically from the 's known position; the user then forms the corrected pseudorange as ρuser, corrected=ρuser, observed+δ\rho_{\text{user, corrected}} = \rho_{\text{user, observed}} + \delta This method leverages spatial correlation of errors, with residual differences primarily from unshared effects like multipath, often achieving horizontal accuracies better than 1 meter under good geometric conditions. Trade-offs in augmentation include latency versus accuracy, where real-time corrections demand low-delay transmission but may sacrifice precision compared to post-processed methods, and coverage area impacts, as wider regions introduce decorrelation, limiting accuracy to meters rather than centimeters in local setups.

Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems

Architecture and Operation

Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS) employ a wide-area consisting of a network of ground reference stations, central processing facilities, and geostationary (GEO) satellites to provide differential and information for GNSS signals over large regions, typically continental scales. The core components include a distributed network of monitoring stations—often dozens spread across the service area with precisely known positions—that continuously track GNSS satellites to measure errors in pseudoranges, orbits, clocks, and ionospheric delays. These data are relayed to a central processing facility, where algorithms compute wide-area , including fast and slow for satellite orbits and clocks, ionospheric grid point delays modeled on a grid (e.g., 5° x 5° /), and tropospheric via user-applied models. monitoring is integrated, generating protection levels such as Horizontal and Vertical Protection Levels (HPL/VPL) based on User Differential Range (UDRE) and Grid Ionospheric Vertical (GIVE), ensuring fault detection and exclusion with an risk below 1 in 10 million approaches as per ICAO standards. In operation, the processing center aggregates measurements from the monitoring network, estimates error models using techniques like least-squares adjustment, and formats corrections into SBAS messages compliant with ICAO Annex 10 and RTCA DO-229 standards. These messages, broadcast via GEO satellites on the L1 frequency (1575.42 MHz) using a GPS-like signal structure with unique PRN codes (PRN 120-158), include ranging functions for signal acquisition, correction data (e.g., Type 1-6 messages for orbits, clocks, ionosphere), integrity information (Type 7-18), and fast corrections, updated every 6 seconds. Users, such as aircraft receivers, decode the SBAS signal alongside GNSS, apply corrections to mitigate errors—reducing ionospheric delays without dual-frequency, achieving horizontal accuracies better than 1 meter (95%) and vertical guidance for precision approaches—and compare protection levels against alert limits to ensure safe navigation. This enables en-route, terminal, and approach operations, including Localizer Performance with Vertical Guidance (LPV) down to 200 feet minima, with system availability exceeding 99.9%. SBAS evolved from early differential GPS concepts in the 1990s, standardized globally for interoperability among implementations.

Major SBAS Implementations

The (WAAS), operated by the (FAA), became operational for aviation use in 2002 and provides coverage across , including the continental , , , and parts of and . It supports (RNP) procedures, enabling precision approaches with vertical guidance equivalent to (LPV) minima as low as 200 feet, which has facilitated over 4,000 such procedures at more than 2,000 airports. In the , WAAS underwent upgrades to incorporate L5 signals, with the GEO-7 satellite launched in 2020 and dual-frequency operations achieving limited operational capability around 2026 to enhance accuracy and robustness. The (EGNOS), managed by the (ESA) in collaboration with the and , utilizes Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) satellites and was certified for open service in 2009, with safety-of-life certification for aviation in 2011. It covers and extends to parts of , providing augmentation primarily for to support aviation applications like approach procedures. EGNOS supports dual-constellation augmentation for both GPS and Galileo through its V3 evolution, initiated in the 2020s, which introduces multi-constellation compatibility and dual-frequency (L1/E1 and E5a) services by 2028 to improve performance in challenging environments. In , the MTSAT Satellite-based Augmentation System (MSAS), operated by Japan's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), entered operational service on September 27, 2007, using Multifunctional Transport Satellite (MTSAT) platforms and later transitioning to the (QZSS) GEO satellite QZS-3 in 2020. It covers Japan and surrounding regions, supporting en-route and non-precision approaches with horizontal guidance for . The (GAGAN) system, a joint effort between the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) and (AAI), achieved en-route certification in December 2013 and full operational phase for approach with vertical guidance (APV1) services in 2015. It provides coverage over the Indian , extending to the and parts of the , enhancing GPS accuracy for all phases of flight in . Russia's System for Differential Correction and Monitoring (SDCM), developed under , became operational in 2012 and integrates with the constellation to augment both GPS and signals. It covers the entire Russian Federation with seamless L1 service and dual coverage in central areas, providing integrity monitoring and differential corrections for high-reliability positioning. The BeiDou Satellite-Based Augmentation System (BDSBAS), developed by , provides single-frequency (SF) services since 2020 and dual-frequency multi-constellation (DFMC) services as of 2025, augmenting (BDS) and . It covers the Chinese mainland and surrounding regions (10°N–55°N, 75°E–135°E), supporting en-route and approach operations with improved accuracy and integrity. As of 2025, major SBAS implementations collectively offer near-global coverage with significant overlaps, such as between WAAS and EGNOS over the North Atlantic, enabling seamless transitions for users. Many systems, including EGNOS and SDCM, demonstrate multi-GNSS compatibility, supporting GPS alongside regional constellations like Galileo and , with ongoing dual-frequency upgrades further promoting interoperability.

Ground-Based Augmentation Systems

Architecture and Operation

Ground-Based Augmentation Systems (GBAS) employ a localized centered around a single deployed at each to deliver precision corrections for GNSS signals, enabling high-accuracy positioning within a limited service volume. The core components include a multi-antenna reference receiver —typically comprising at least three precisely surveyed GNSS antennas—to measure satellite signals and compute differential corrections, a central processing system that generates pseudorange corrections and integrity parameters, and a VHF Data Broadcast (VDB) transmitter operating on VHF Mode 4 (VDL Mode 4) in the 108–117.975 MHz band to disseminate this data to . Additionally, monitor stations oversee system performance and GNSS constellation integrity by detecting faults in real-time, ensuring compliance with safety requirements. In operation, the continuously tracks GNSS satellites and calculates real-time differential corrections for pseudoranges, which apply to mitigate local errors such as atmospheric delays without requiring explicit ionospheric modeling, as the differential approach inherently cancels common errors between reference and user receivers. These corrections, along with bounds and approach path definitions, are broadcast via the VDB link twice per second, supporting up to 48 simultaneous precision approaches within a service range of approximately 23 nautical miles (NM) from the airport. Carrier-smoothing techniques enhance the precision of these corrections by integrating code and carrier-phase measurements, while is maintained through fault detection algorithms that monitor differential corrections and alert if errors exceed protection levels defined by ICAO standards, such as an integrity risk of less than 1 in 10 million operations. This workflow enables Category I (CAT I), II (CAT II), and III (CAT III) precision approaches, with CAT III support via the GAST-D standard. GBAS evolved from the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) concept developed in the , transitioning to the standardized GBAS nomenclature with VHF-based broadcasting to align with global ICAO standards, including Annex 10 Volume I and RTCA documents DO-246 and DO-253. The system achieves sub-meter positioning accuracy and 99.999% availability for precision approaches, providing a robust alternative to traditional instrument landing systems (ILS) for airport-centric operations.

Deployments and Extensions

Ground-Based Augmentation Systems (GBAS) have seen progressive deployment primarily at major airports to enhance precision approaches. The first public operational use in the United States occurred at Newark Liberty International Airport in 2012, with full Category I (Cat I) services approved by 2013, enabling approaches down to 200 feet decision height. In Europe, Frankfurt Airport achieved regular GBAS operations in September 2014, becoming the first major European hub to implement the system for multiple runways using a single VHF Data Broadcast station. Sydney Airport followed with operational GBAS in July 2014, supporting precision landings across its runways after initial testing as early as 2007. By 2025, over 20 GBAS installations operate worldwide, including sites at Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport, San Francisco International Airport, Malaga-Costa del Sol Airport, and others in Europe and Asia, predominantly for Cat I operations, with Cat II operational at sites such as Frankfurt Airport since 2022, and ongoing trials for Cat III capabilities to support low-visibility landings. Recent additions include a NEC-supplied GBAS system operational in Japan since February 2025. Extensions of GBAS beyond traditional airfield environments have explored maritime applications, particularly for vessel traffic management in harbors. Experimental GBAS prototypes, such as the Galileo-based at Research Port in , demonstrate high-precision differential corrections for safe in port approaches, reducing reliance on traditional aids like . In urban settings, GBAS adaptations target heliports and vertiports for , with concepts like Urban GBAS (U-GBAS) deploying networked reference stations to provide centimeter-level accuracy for helicopter and operations in dense cityscapes. Integration with networks further enables non-aviation uses, such as precise drone landing zones, where GBAS corrections combine with 5G's low-latency communication for beyond-visual-line-of-sight operations in controlled urban areas. Expanding GBAS faces challenges, including signal interference from urban multipath effects and jammers in non-airport environments, which can degrade integrity monitoring and require robust mitigation algorithms. Regulatory approvals, governed by ICAO Annex 10 standards for GNSS augmentation, demand rigorous certification of ground stations and airborne receivers to ensure global interoperability. Global adoption is driven by initiatives from , which has supported European deployments for over 20 years through SESAR projects, and the FAA, promoting GBAS as a cost-effective alternative to multiple instrument landing systems. Installation costs typically range from $3-5 million per site, covering ground equipment, spares, and integration, making it economically viable for high-traffic locations.

Aircraft-Based Augmentation Systems

Components and Functionality

Aircraft-Based Augmentation Systems (ABAS) enhance Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) performance by leveraging onboard equipment to provide monitoring and error mitigation without relying on external ground or satellite infrastructure. This approach integrates multiple sensors and algorithms to detect and exclude faulty signals, ensuring reliable positioning for applications in areas where other augmentation systems are unavailable, such as oceanic or remote regions. ABAS operates through in sensor data and computational methods, allowing aircraft to maintain (RNP) standards independently. The core components of ABAS include multi-constellation GNSS receivers, which track signals from systems like GPS, , Galileo, and to increase satellite visibility and geometric diversity, thereby improving accuracy and fault detection capabilities. Inertial navigation systems (INS), comprising gyroscopes and accelerometers, provide short-term position estimates during GNSS outages or signal degradation, with typical drift rates of less than 1 per hour in modern fiber-optic gyro units. Additional sensors such as barometric altimeters and radio altimeters contribute altitude data for vertical integrity cross-checking, while onboard (RAIM) and fault detection and exclusion (FDE) algorithms process these inputs to identify anomalies. These elements form a self-contained augmentation framework, often integrated into the aircraft's (FMS). Functionality in ABAS centers on techniques, primarily using Kalman filters to combine GNSS pseudorange measurements with INS data for real-time error estimation and covariance analysis, enabling the system to cross-validate position solutions and detect discrepancies exceeding predefined thresholds. For instance, RAIM employs statistical tests like the least-squares residual method to identify and exclude malfunctioning satellites, ensuring that the remaining meets protection level requirements for . This process relies on rather than external corrections, with thresholds tuned to dynamics and mission phases, such as approach or en route . The Kalman filter's state prediction and update cycles, typically running at 1 Hz or higher, mitigate multipath and ionospheric errors through predictive modeling based on historical data. ABAS achieves aviation-grade through metrics like the probability of hazardous misleading (PHMI), maintained below 10^{-7} per hour to meet standards for critical operations. This supports RNP 0.3 levels, allowing precise with horizontal accuracy around 10 meters in standalone mode, sufficient for oceanic and remote where SBAS or GBAS coverage is absent. However, performance is inherently limited by dependence on aircraft quality, with accuracy degrading to 10-20 meters over extended periods due to INS drift, compared to sub-meter precision in infrastructure-supported systems. These constraints necessitate periodic GNSS reacquisition to bound errors, highlighting ABAS's role as a complementary rather than primary augmentation method in equipped .

Integration and Standards

Aircraft-Based Augmentation Systems (ABAS) integrate with Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS) and Ground-Based Augmentation Systems (GBAS) to form a multi-layer framework, where ABAS serves as a backup to enhance overall GNSS reliability in safety-critical applications. This hybrid approach leverages SBAS for wide-area corrections and GBAS for localized precision, while ABAS provides onboard monitoring to detect and mitigate faults independently, ensuring continuous . ABAS also incorporates (INS) aiding to maintain positioning during GNSS outages, supporting multi-sensor fusion that allows operations for up to 15 minutes without GNSS signals while meeting (RNP) standards. In such configurations, INS provides dead-reckoning capabilities with position error growth limited to less than 2 nautical miles over 15 minutes, transitioning seamlessly to GNSS upon signal recovery. Key standards governing ABAS include the (ICAO) (RAIM) requirements established in 1998, which mandate fault detection and exclusion to achieve GNSS integrity levels of 10^{-7} per flight hour for en-route and terminal navigation. The (RTCA) DO-229 standard specifies minimum operational performance for airborne GNSS equipment, incorporating RAIM algorithms for standalone GPS operations without augmentation. Integration of Galileo's Open Service Navigation Message Authentication (OS-NMA), operational since July 2025, enhances ABAS by providing cryptographic authentication of navigation data to counter spoofing threats in receivers. OS-NMA enables airborne systems to verify signal authenticity, complementing RAIM by adding a layer of for multi-constellation operations. Advancements in ABAS include the development of Advanced RAIM (ARAIM) during the , extending traditional RAIM to multi-GNSS environments like GPS, Galileo, and for improved availability and vertical guidance support. As of 2025, ARAIM is in the final stages of development and , with ongoing work toward operational for multi-constellation vertical guidance. ARAIM incorporates constellation-specific parameters and fault probabilities, achieving global coverage for approach operations with dual-frequency signals. For (UAM) applications, ABAS certification aligns with FAA and EASA roadmaps initiating processes for powered-lift aircraft starting in 2025, incorporating GNSS integrity requirements under performance-based standards like 14 CFR Part 23 amendments. These guidelines ensure ABAS-equipped drones and eVTOLs meet safety levels for low-altitude operations in urban environments. Global harmonization of ABAS is advanced through FAA/EASA collaboration in the NextGen and SESAR programs, which align GNSS navigation standards for interoperable and , including RAIM/ARAIM implementation across transatlantic routes. This includes joint development of dual-frequency multi-constellation (DFMC) specifications to support future PBN procedures.

Additional Augmentation Methods

Differential GNSS

Differential GNSS (DGNSS) is a foundational augmentation method that enhances GNSS accuracy by employing ground-based reference stations with precisely surveyed positions to detect and correct common errors in satellite signals, such as clock biases, inaccuracies, and ionospheric/tropospheric delays. A receiver continuously measures pseudoranges to visible satellites and computes the residuals as the difference between the observed pseudorange and the theoretically computed geometric range, denoted as Δρ = measured pseudorange - computed range. These pseudorange correction (PRC) values, representing the aggregate errors, are formatted into standard messages (e.g., RTCM) and broadcast to receivers within line-of-sight range. Rovers apply these corrections to their own pseudorange measurements, effectively canceling correlated errors and yielding improved position estimates without requiring modifications to the core GNSS constellation. The technique relies exclusively on code-phase pseudorange data for differential corrections, avoiding the need for carrier-phase ambiguity resolution and thus simplifying implementation compared to more advanced methods. Operations occur in real time, with corrections updated and transmitted at rates supporting latencies under 1 second via dedicated communication links like VHF/UHF radio or medium-frequency (MF) broadcasts (e.g., 283.5–325 kHz). This low-latency design suits dynamic applications, while typical horizontal accuracies range from 0.5 to 2 under nominal conditions, influenced by factors such as satellite geometry and multipath. Vertical accuracy is generally 1.5–3 times poorer, but the method excels in mitigating spatially correlated errors over short to moderate distances. DGNSS configurations vary by baseline length—the distance between base and rover—to optimize error correlation and coverage. Short-baseline systems, limited to under 10 km, exploit near-identical error environments for sub-meter accuracy (typically <1 m horizontal), ideal for localized surveying or precision agriculture. Long-baseline networks employ multiple synchronized reference stations to generate interpolated corrections, extending reliable service over hundreds of kilometers while maintaining 1–5 m accuracy, as seen in continental-scale deployments. Maritime variants, such as the U.S. Nationwide DGPS (NDGPS), historically used coastal and inland transmitters for wide-area coverage, achieving ~1–3 m accuracy for vessel navigation until system decommissioning. Following decommissioning in 2020, maritime users have transitioned to satellite-based augmentation systems such as WAAS for comparable accuracy and integrity. Prominent examples include the U.S. Coast Guard's NDGPS, operational from the mid-1990s to June 2020, which broadcast corrections from over 40 sites via MF radio to support safe maritime and inland waterway across the continental U.S., , , and . The NOAA Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) network, comprising hundreds of stations, facilitates long-baseline DGNSS for scientific, engineering, and GIS applications nationwide. Internationally, the International GNSS Service (IGS) global network of over 500 stations provides foundational reference data enabling DGNSS-like corrections for research and precise positioning worldwide.

Real-Time Kinematic Positioning

Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) positioning is an advanced GNSS augmentation technique that achieves centimeter-level accuracy by leveraging carrier-phase measurements, extending the principles of differential GNSS with higher precision through phase-based differencing. Developed in the mid-1980s, RTK enables real-time relative positioning between a fixed and a mobile rover by resolving integer ambiguities in the carrier-phase observations, allowing for rapid surveys with sub-decimeter errors. The core principle of RTK relies on carrier-phase measurements, which track the phase of the GNSS signal's , offering precision on the order of the λ, approximately 19 cm for the GPS L1 . Unlike pseudorange measurements used in basic differential systems, carrier-phase data includes an integer N, representing the unknown number of whole wavelengths between the and receiver. This must be resolved to millimeter-level accuracy to unlock the full potential of phase measurements. Integer fixing is typically performed using least-squares estimation methods, such as the Least-squares AMBiguity Decorrelation Adjustment () approach, which decorrelates ambiguities to enable fast and reliable integer solutions. The ambiguity resolution equation is derived from the carrier-phase observation model, approximated as: N=ϕ−ρλN = \phi - \frac{\rho}{\lambda} where φ is the measured carrier phase in cycles, ρ is the pseudorange in meters, and λ is the in meters (ignoring secondary effects like ionospheric delay and multipath for the initial approximation). Full models incorporate double-differencing between base and to eliminate common errors, followed by to fix N as an . Successful resolution of N, often to within λ/2, yields precise baseline vectors between stations. In operation, RTK employs a at a known location that computes and transmits differential corrections to the via radio links, using standardized RTCM (Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services) messages, such as those in RTCM 3.x format, which include pseudorange, carrier-phase, and data. For single-base RTK, the baseline distance is typically limited to under 20 km to minimize atmospheric errors; longer distances require networked bases for atmospheric modeling. Initialization, or ambiguity fixing, occurs on-the-fly and takes 5-30 seconds under good conditions, assuming continuous tracking of at least four satellites, after which fixed solutions provide real-time updates at 1-10 Hz. RTK delivers centimeter-level positioning accuracy, with typical horizontal errors of 1-2 cm and vertical errors of 2-3 cm (at 95% ) plus 1 ppm of baseline length, making it ideal for applications like surveying and . However, it remains vulnerable to cycle slips—sudden losses of phase lock due to signal obstructions—which can disrupt ambiguity resolution and require reinitialization, potentially degrading performance in obstructed environments.

Applications Across Sectors

Aviation Navigation

GNSS augmentation systems are essential for supporting safe and precise navigation in , particularly during approach and en-route phases where high accuracy and reliability are paramount to mitigate risks in challenging environments such as low visibility or remote . By correcting GNSS signal errors and providing integrity monitoring, these augmentations enable performance-based procedures that align with international standards, allowing to follow optimized flight paths while maintaining separation and reducing reliance on traditional ground-based aids. Key procedures facilitated by GNSS augmentation include (LPV) approaches via Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS), which deliver precision equivalent to (ILS) Category I operations with decision heights as low as 200 feet above touchdown. Ground-Based Augmentation Systems (GBAS) support Category III landings, enabling operations in zero-visibility conditions by providing differential corrections localized to the airport vicinity. For en-route navigation over oceanic and remote regions, Aircraft-Based Augmentation Systems (ABAS), often incorporating (RAIM), underpin (RNP) procedures such as RNP 2, ensuring aircraft adhere to tight lateral and vertical tolerances without continuous ground support. These aviation procedures adhere to rigorous requirements outlined in ICAO Annex 10, mandating a Probability of Hazardous Misleading Information (PHMI) no greater than 10−710^{-7} per hour to safeguard against undetected errors, alongside continuity requirements ensuring system performance within specified limits for at least 99.999% of the time during critical phases. For instance, the U.S. (WAAS), an SBAS implementation, has enabled 4,184 published LPV approaches as of May 2025. The adoption of GNSS augmentation yields significant benefits, including reduced ground infrastructure needs compared to ILS deployments, which lowers installation and maintenance costs while simplifying scalability across global airports. It also drives fuel savings—estimated in the billions of gallons annually across the U.S. fleet—through direct routing, minimized holding patterns, and optimized descent profiles enabled by precise . Furthermore, integration with standards like ensures standardized data exchange between GNSS receivers and flight management systems, promoting and across diverse fleets. A notable case study is the impact of WAAS following its initial operational use and certification in 2003, which transformed U.S. efficiency by enabling LPV approaches at over 1,000 additional sites within a decade, significantly reducing weather-related delays at equipped airports and facilitating fuel-efficient operations that have saved airlines billions of gallons cumulatively.

Non-Aviation Uses

GNSS augmentation systems extend beyond to support precision operations in maritime, land-based, and diverse sectors, enabling enhanced accuracy for economic and . In maritime applications, Differential GNSS (DGNSS) and Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) techniques provide corrections to improve positioning for harbor and vessel maneuvering. According to (IMO) performance standards, augmentation systems achieve differential accuracy better than 10 meters (95% confidence) for combined GPS and operations, supporting safe port approaches and collision avoidance. These methods have facilitated trials of autonomous ships in the , such as the Autonomous Ship project, which relied on GNSS for real-time across open seas. In land surveying and , RTK augmentation delivers centimeter-level precision essential for efficient . RTK systems achieve positioning accuracy of 2.5 to 10 centimeters, enabling variable rate application of fertilizers and pesticides to optimize crop yields while minimizing environmental impact. For instance, John Deere's RTK networks integrate with tractors for automated guidance, significantly reducing overlap in planting and supporting precision farming practices. Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS), such as Europe's EGNOS, further enhance reliability in rural areas, including multi-constellation support for improved availability, and qualify for subsidies under the European Union's (CAP) to promote sustainable practices like yield monitoring. Beyond these domains, GNSS augmentation supports autonomous vehicles through Precise Point Positioning RTK (PPP-RTK) integration, providing global centimeter-level accuracy without local base stations. Services like Hexagon's PointPerfect PPP-RTK enable robust navigation for self-driving cars in urban environments, fusing with inertial sensors for continuous positioning. In , augmented GNSS timing ensures synchronization for networks, where primary reference time clocks derive from GNSS signals corrected via augmentation to meet sub-microsecond requirements for time-division duplexing. For , extensions of Ground-Based Augmentation Systems (GBAS) principles adapt differential corrections for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), enabling precise mapping and search operations in affected areas, as demonstrated in landslide monitoring deployments. By , the satellite-based GNSS augmentation market is estimated at USD 12.62 billion, with significant growth in non-aviation applications driven by and autonomous systems.

Challenges and Future Directions

Technical and Operational Challenges

One significant technical challenge in GNSS augmentation systems is ionospheric scintillation, particularly in equatorial regions and during periods of , where rapid fluctuations in electron density cause signal amplitude and phase variations that disrupt receiver tracking loops and degrade positioning accuracy. These effects are exacerbated by ionospheric delays, leading to cycle slips and increased measurement noise in augmentation corrections. In urban environments, poses another key issue, as signals reflect off buildings and other structures, introducing errors that augmentation systems struggle to fully mitigate without additional local modeling. Furthermore, the integration of multi-constellation signals introduces interference challenges, where disruptions can affect multiple GNSS bands simultaneously, complicating the processing of augmentation data from diverse satellite systems. Operationally, coverage gaps remain a persistent problem, especially in polar regions, where sparse ground monitoring and limited visibility hinder the delivery of reliable augmentation signals. Jamming and spoofing vulnerabilities have intensified in the 2020s due to geopolitical conflicts, with thousands of incidents reported annually that disrupt augmentation integrity and force reliance on methods. High costs also constrain deployment, as establishing and maintaining SBAS networks requires investments exceeding hundreds of millions of dollars globally, limiting expansion in underserved areas. Regulatory hurdles include the need for harmonization between agencies like the FAA and EASA, where differing standards for augmentation performance and interference mitigation create inconsistencies in international operations. delays for new augmentation technologies further compound these issues, often extending timelines by years due to rigorous safety validations and alignment with evolving GNSS standards. As of , SBAS provides approximately 93% global coverage for aviation navigation at levels, enabling precision approaches over major continents but leaving oceanic and remote routes partially unserved. In contrast, cm-level augmentation via RTK is constrained by the need for dense reference station networks primarily in developed regions, while PPP enables global coverage with centimeter-level accuracy after convergence times of several minutes, though real-time services with consistent performance are more limited outside well-monitored areas. Recent advancements in GNSS augmentation emphasize multi-constellation integration to enhance reliability and accuracy. The Advanced (ARAIM) algorithm supports combined use of GPS, Galileo, and signals, providing significant improvements in integrity risk allocation and availability for and other safety-critical applications, with studies demonstrating up to tenfold gains in integrity performance compared to single-constellation systems. Complementing this, the Galileo High Accuracy Service (HAS), which began initial rollout in January 2023, delivers free worldwide corrections via satellite broadcast, achieving horizontal positioning accuracy better than 20 cm and vertical accuracy of 40 cm at 95% confidence levels after convergence times under 20 minutes. Innovative techniques are bridging gaps in global coverage and precision. Hybrid Precise Point Positioning-Real-Time Kinematic (PPP-RTK) methods combine global satellite orbit and clock corrections with regional atmospheric modeling, enabling centimeter-level accuracy without reliance on dense local base stations, as demonstrated in real-world trials achieving sub-5 cm horizontal positioning in seconds. and models are increasingly applied for error prediction, such as deep neural networks forecasting satellite orbital deviations in Galileo systems, reducing positioning errors by up to 72% in real-time offline scenarios. Additionally, integration with networks and low-Earth orbit (LEO) constellations offers augmentation potential; for instance, trials with satellites have shown their downlink signals can enhance GNSS positioning, , and timing (PNT) resilience in challenged environments. Efforts to bolster resilience against threats and environmental challenges are gaining traction. Controlled Reception Pattern Antennas (CRPAs) mitigate jamming through adaptive null-steering, providing up to 50 dB of anti-jam protection for GNSS receivers in contested settings like urban or operations. Quantum sensors, including gravimeters and magnetometers, serve as unjammable backups, with shipboard tests achieving accuracy 50 times superior to conventional inertial systems during GPS outages. In urban canyons, vision-aided approaches fuse camera-derived 3D mapping with GNSS real-time kinematic (RTK) processing to exclude non-line-of-sight signals, improving positioning convergence and reducing errors by identifying sky visibility constraints. Looking to 2025-2030, the GNSS sector is projected to expand significantly, with the global market reaching approximately $453 billion by 2030, driven by augmentation demands in autonomous systems and IoT. Standards for drones and (UAM) are evolving, incorporating GNSS augmentation requirements for integrity and redundancy in low-altitude operations, as outlined in emerging FAA and EASA frameworks. Furthermore, space-based monitors using LEO satellites are under development to provide global integrity augmentation, detecting GNSS faults from orbit and broadcasting alerts to enhance overall system trustworthiness.

References

  1. https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php/GNSS_Augmentation
  2. https://www.gps.gov/augmentation-systems
  3. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/APAC/GBAS-SBAS/Introduction-to-GBAS-SBAS.pdf
  4. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/13292/chapter/14
  5. https://web.stanford.edu/group/scpnt/gpslab/pubs/books/Chapter14SBAS.pdf
  6. https://insidegnss.com/gnss-and-precision-farming/
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375522001058
  8. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_90-100A.pdf
  9. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/news/cyber-vault/2019-07-17/navigation-gps-warfare
  10. https://www.gps.gov/selective-availability
  11. https://www.ion.org/newsletter/upload/ION_Newsletter_WorldofWAAS_3_parts.pdf
  12. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/about/history/1997-2020_FAA_Historical_Chronology.pdf
  13. https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php/EGNOS_Services
  14. https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php/MSAS_General_Introduction
  15. https://insidegnss.com/india-certifies-gagan-for-en-route-and-npa-flight-operations/
  16. https://www.airservicesaustralia.com/wp-content/uploads/Airservices_Annual_Report_2006-2007.pdf
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291317913_RAIM_performance_in_the_post_SA_era
  18. https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php/SBAS_Systems
  19. https://navi.ion.org/content/68/2/405
  20. https://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/icg/2019/ait-gnss/AIT2019_14b.pdf
  21. https://indico.ictp.it/event/a12180/session/8/contribution/5/material/0/0.pdf
  22. https://novatel.com/an-introduction-to-gnss/gnss-error-sources
  23. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/60049
  24. https://www.princeton.edu/~alaink/Orf467F07/GNSS.pdf
  25. https://www.ion.org/publications/pdf.cfm?articleID=19491
  26. https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/PUBS_LIB/NGSRealTimeUserGuidelines.v2.1.pdf
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4801563/
  28. https://www.aoe.vt.edu/content/dam/aoe_vt_edu/people/faculty/joerger/publications/Fault_Detection_and_Exclusion_Using_Solution_Separation_and_Chi_Squared_RAIM.pdf
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5375793/
  30. https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/PUBS_LIB/GPSCarrierPhase.pdf
  31. https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/PUBS_LIB/NGSGuidelinesForRealTimeGNSSNetworksV2.2.pdf
  32. https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php/SBAS_General_Introduction
  33. https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php/SBAS_Fundamentals
  34. https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/techops/navservices/gnss/waas
  35. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/SBAS_Worldwide_08072025.pdf
  36. https://prod-01-alb-www-gps.woc.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/CGSICMeetings_Lawrence_Sept2024.pdf
  37. https://www.esa.int/Applications/Satellite_navigation/EGNOS/What_is_EGNOS
  38. https://egnos.gsc-europa.eu/news-events/news/egnos-workshop-2025-europes-first-satellite-navigation-service-enters-new-era
  39. https://www.isro.gov.in/SatelliteNavigationServices.html
  40. https://www.unoosa.org/res/oosadoc/data/documents/2016/stspace/stspace67_0_html/st_space_67E.pdf
  41. https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php/SDCM
  42. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/13/11/494
  43. https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/techops/navservices/gnss/laas/howitworks
  44. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/APAC/Documents/edocs/CNS/GBAS-APAC-Implementation-Guidance-Document-July-2024-Edition-1.pdf
  45. https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/techops/navservices/gnss/laas/news
  46. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7121258/
  47. https://www.internationalairportreview.com/article/20017/frankfurt-airport-pioneers-active-noise-abatement/
  48. https://australianaviation.com.au/2014/07/gbas-launched-at-sydney-airport/
  49. https://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/non_federal/gbas
  50. https://www.aviationtoday.com/2022/07/26/dfs-declares-global-debut-gbas-cat-ii-operations-frankfurt-airport/
  51. https://www.nec.com/en/press/202502/global_20250228_01.html
  52. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11134794.pdf
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225025961_Installation_of_an_Experimental_Galileo_GBAS_at_Research_Port_Rostock
  54. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13272-024-00749-3
  55. https://www.unmannedairspace.info/uncategorized/how-5g-technology-could-contribute-to-the-safe-integration-of-drones/
  56. https://navi.ion.org/content/71/3/navi.657
  57. https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2013/FCC-13-106A1.html
  58. https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/advisory_circular/ac20-138a.pdf
  59. https://www.eurocontrol.int/concept/ground-based-augmentation-systems
  60. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/avs/140424_PARCGBASReportRecs.pdf
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309428689_Avionics-Based_GNSS_Integrity_Augmentation_Synergies_with_SBAS_and_GBAS_for_Safety-Critical_Aviation_Applications
  62. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC%2020-138B.pdf
  63. https://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/icg/activities/2007/icg2/presentations/38.pdf
  64. https://standards.globalspec.com/std/14281994/rtca-do-229
  65. https://www.gsc-europa.eu/galileo/services/galileo-open-service-navigation-message-authentication-osnma
  66. https://www.horizon-europe.gouv.fr/highly-automated-atm-all-airspace-users-39138
  67. https://scpnt.stanford.edu/research-focus/current-and-continuing-pntgps-research/multi-constellation-gnss/advanced-raim
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0273117713001385
  69. https://www.nstb.tc.faa.gov/reports/2023_Q2_araim_report_v1.0.pdf
  70. https://www.faa.gov/air-taxis/NAA-Network-Roadmap-Advanced-AirMobility-Aircraft-Type-Certification-Edition-April2025.pdf
  71. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2022-06/NextGen-SESAR_State_of_Harmonisation.pdf
  72. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/103200_103299/10324601/01.02.01_60/ts_10324601v010201p.pdf
  73. https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php/Differential_GNSS
  74. https://novatel.com/an-introduction-to-gnss/resolving-errors/differential-gnss
  75. https://www.e-education.psu.edu/geog862/node/1837
  76. https://dynamic-positioning.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/TECHOP-D-06-Rev1-Jan21-DGNSS-POSITION-REFERENCE-SENSORS.pdf
  77. https://www.fig.net/pub/fig2014/papers/ts09b/TS09B_okorocha_olajugba_7005.pdf
  78. https://geodesy.noaa.gov/CORS/
  79. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/03/21/2018-05684/discontinuance-of-the-nationwide-differential-global-positioning-system-ndgps
  80. https://www.gps.gov/systems/waas/
  81. https://www.workboat.com/government/coast-guard-discontinues-differential-gps
  82. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/2814
  83. https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php/RTK_Fundamentals
  84. https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php/Carrier_Phase_in_GNSS
  85. https://www.rtcm.org/publications
  86. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/SatNavNews_vol79_Spring_2025.pdf
  87. https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2022/papers/ts08c/TS08C_zalewski_11352.pdf
  88. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MSCResolutions/MSC.401%2895%29.pdf
  89. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/21/5291
  90. https://www.chcnav.com/about/news/2025/rtk-precision-agriculture
  91. https://www.euspa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Report%2520on%2520Agriculture%2520and%2520Forestry%2520User%2520Needs%2520and%2520Requirements.pdf
  92. https://sparkle-project.eu/moodle/pluginfile.php/5178/mod_folder/content/0/20200928_Agriculture_UPM.pdf?forcedownload=1
  93. https://www.euspa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-03/euspa_market_report_2024.pdf
  94. https://www.the-innovation.org/article/doi/10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2023.100039
  95. https://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/2023/09/ppp-rtk-gnss-augmentation-correction-solutions-for-autonomous-vehicles-robotics/
  96. https://www.microchip.com/en-us/about/media-center/blog/2021/do-i-really-need-gnss-timing-receivers
  97. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19475705.2024.2366374
  98. https://www.researchnester.com/reports/satellite-based-gnss-augmentation-system-market/3882
  99. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2022SW003362
  100. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/23/6089
  101. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/19/4209
  102. https://www.ion.org/gnss/upload/files/2157_Septentrio_GNSS_Interference_A5_LR.pdf
  103. http://web.stanford.edu/group/scpnt/gpslab/pubs/papers/Reid_IONGNSS_2015_GNSS_Integrity_in_the_Arctic.pdf
  104. https://gard.no/insights/gps-interference-in-geopolitical-conflict-zones/
  105. https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/satellite-based-augmentation-systems-sbas-market-A10209
  106. https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/faa-and-easa-pledge-strong-cooperation-address-aviation-challenges-next-decade
  107. https://interactive.aviationtoday.com/avionicsmagazine/march-2019/european-operators-regulators-working-on-new-ads-b-implementation-plan/
  108. https://spaceambition.substack.com/p/high-precision-navigation-the-future
  109. https://purl.stanford.edu/kp285rv1410
  110. https://www.esa.int/Applications/Satellite_navigation/New_Galileo_service_set_to_deliver_20_cm_accuracy
  111. https://www.gpsworld.com/ppp-gnss-delivers-real-time-positioning-with-centimeter-accuracy/
  112. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10291-025-01890-0
  113. https://people.engineering.osu.edu/media/document/2024-10-12/kassas_starlink_for_pnt_a_trick_or_a_treat.pdf
  114. https://www.spirent.com/blogs/crpa-antennas-explained-choosing-and-testing-the-best-anti-jam-solutions-for-gps-gnss-resilience
  115. https://spectrum.ieee.org/quantum-gravity-sensor
  116. https://navi.ion.org/content/70/3/navi.590
  117. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/global-navigation-satellite-system-gnss-141300538.html
  118. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20190026762/downloads/20190026762.pdf
  119. https://elib.dlr.de/208717/1/2024__ION__LEO_Augmentation.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.