Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
German units of measurement
View on Wikipedia
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (February 2012) |
The units of measurement of German-speaking countries consist of a variety of units, with varying local standard definitions. While many were made redundant with the introduction of the metric system, some of these units are still used in everyday speech and even in stores and on street markets as shorthand for similar amounts in the metric system. For example, some customers ask for one pound (ein Pfund) of something when they want 500 grams.
The metric system became compulsory on 1 January 1872, in Germany, and on 1 January 1876, in Austria.[1]
Some obsolete German units have names similar to units that were traditionally used in other countries, and that are still used in a limited number of cases in both the United Kingdom (imperial units) and the United States (United States customary units).
German system
[edit]Before the introduction of the metric system in Germany, almost every town had its own definitions of the units shown below. Often, towns posted local definitions on a wall of the city hall. For example, the front wall of the old city hall of Rudolstadt (still standing) has two marks that show the "Rudolstädter Elle", the proper length of the Elle in that city. Supposedly, by 1810, there were 112 different standards for the Elle around Germany.[citation needed]
"... the measure of cloth, for example, was elle which in each region stood for a different length. An elle of textile material brought in Frankfurt would get you 54.7 cm of cloth, in Mainz 55.1 cm, in Nuremberg 65.6 cm, in Freiburg 53.5 cm ..."
Length
[edit]Meile (mile)
[edit]A German geographic mile (geographische Meile) is defined as 1⁄15 equatorial degrees, equal to 7,420.54 m (24,345.6 ft). A common German mile, land mile, or post mile (Gemeine deutsche Meile, Landmeile, Postmeile) was defined in various ways at different places and different times. After the introduction of the metric system in the 19th century, the Landmeile was generally fixed at 7500 m (the Reichsmeile), but before then there were many local and regional variants (of which some are shown below):
| Some kinds of Meile | ||
|---|---|---|
| Place | Metric equivalent |
Notes |
| Breslau (Wrocław) | 6700 m | Used in all Silesia[2][3] |
| Bavaria (Bayern) | 7415 m | Connected to a 1⁄15 equatorial degree as 25,406 Bavarian feet. |
| Württemberg | 7449 m | |
| Reichsmeile | 7500 m | 'imperial mile' – New mile when the metric system was introduced. Prohibited by law in 1908. |
| Anhalt | 7532 m | |
| Denmark, Prussia | 7532 m | 24,000 Prussian feet. Also known as "(Dänische/Preußische) Landmeile". In 1816, king Frederick William III of Prussia adopted the Danish mile at 7532 m, or 24000 Prussian feet. |
| Saxony (Sachsen) | 7500 m | In the 17th–18th century or so, 9062 m = 32000 (Saxon) feet; later 7500 m (as in Prussia and the rest of Germany). |
| Schleswig-Holstein | 8803 m | |
| Baden | 8000 m | 8889 m before 1810, 8944 m before 1871 |
| Hesse-Kassel | 9206 m | |
| Lippe-Detmold | 9264 m | |
| Saxony (Sachsen) | 9062 m | 32000 (Saxon) feet (in the 19th century 7500 m, see above). |
| Westfalia (Westfalen) | 11100 m | but also 9250 m |
| Oldenburg | 9894 m | |
| Rhineland (Rheinland) | 4119 m | |
| Palatinate (Pfalz) | 4630 m | |
| Osnabrück/France | 5160 m | |
| Wiesbaden | 1000 m | |
Wegstunde
[edit]One hour's travel, used up to the 19th century. In Germany 1⁄2 Meile or 3.71 km (2.31 mi). After 1722 in Saxony 1⁄2 post mile = 1000 Dresden rods = 4531 m.[4] In Switzerland 16,000 ft or 4.88 km.
Fuß (foot)
[edit]The Fuß or German foot varied widely from place to place in the German-speaking world, and also with time. In some places, more than one type of Fuß was in use. One source from 1830[5] gives the following values:
| Some kinds of Fuß | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Place | Name | Local equivalent | Metric equivalent |
| Aachen (Aix-la-Chapelle) | Feldmaßfuß | 1⁄6 Klafter | 282 mm |
| Aachen | Baufuß | 1⁄16 Ruthe | 288 mm |
| Aargau, Canton of | Fuß | 300 mm | |
| Aichstadt, Bavaria | old Fuß | 307 mm | |
| Altona, Holstein | Fuß | 286 mm | |
| Anspach, Bavaria | Werkfuß | 299 mm | |
| Appenzell, Canton of | Fuß | 313 mm | |
| Aschaffenburg, Bavaria | Fuß | 288 mm | |
| Augsburg, Bavaria | Werkschuh | 296 mm | |
| Baden | Reichsfuß | 10 Zoll, 1⁄10 Ruthe | 300 mm |
| Baireuth, Bavaria | Fuß | 298 mm | |
| Bamberg, Bavaria | Fuß | 303 mm | |
| Basel, Canton of | Stadtschuh | 304 mm | |
| Bavaria | Fuß | 292 mm | |
| Bergamo, Austria | Fuß | 1⁄6 Cavezzo | 435 mm |
| Berlin | Prussian Reichsfuß | 313.8536 mm[6] | |
| Bern, Canton of | gewöhnlicher Fuß | 12 Zoll | 298 mm |
| Bern, Canton of | Steinbrecherfuß | 13 Zoll | 317 mm |
| Bohemia | Fuß or Stopa | 296 mm | |
| Bozen, Austria | Tyroler-Fuß | 334 mm | |
| Braunschweig (Brunswick) | Fuß | 1⁄16 Ruthe | 285 mm |
| Bremen | Fuß | 1⁄16 Ruthe | 289 mm |
| Breslau | old Silesian Fuß | 1⁄16 Ruthe | 283 mm |
| Bünden, Canton of | churischer Fuß | 322 mm | |
| Calenberg Land | Fuß | 1⁄16 Ruthe | 292 mm |
| Carlsruhe (as Baden) | Fuß | 300 mm | |
| Cassel, Hessen | Fuß | 1⁄14 Ruthe | 287 mm |
| Cleve, Prussia | Fuß | 295 mm | |
| Cöln am Rhein (Cologne), Prussia | Fuß | 287 mm | |
| Cremona, Austria | old Fuß | 480 mm | |
| Danzig, Prussia | old Fuß | 1⁄2 Elle | 287 mm |
| Darmstadt | Hessian Reichsfuß | 10 Zoll | 250 mm |
| Darmstadt | old Darmstadt Fuß | 12 Zoll | 288 mm |
| Dordrecht, Netherlands | Fuß | 361 mm | |
| Dresden, Saxony | Fuß | 260 mm | |
| Duderstadt, Hanover | Fuß | 290 mm | |
| Durlach (as Baden) | Fuß | 300 mm | |
| Durlach | old Fuß | 291 mm | |
| Emden, Hanover | Fuß | 296 mm | |
| Erfurt, Prussia | old Fuß | 1⁄14 Feldruthe, 1⁄16 Bauruthe | 283 mm |
| Frankfurt am Main | Fuß | 285 mm | |
| Freiburg, Canton of | Werkfuß | 12 Zoll, 1⁄10 Werkklafter | 293 mm |
| Friedberg in der Wetterau, Oberhessen | Fuß | 291 mm | |
| Friedrichsstadt, Denmark | Fuß | 296 mm | |
| Fulda, Kurhessen | Werkfuß | 1⁄2 Elle | 250 mm |
| Genf (Geneva), Canton of | Fuß | 1⁄8 Ruthe | 325 mm |
| Gießen, Oberhessen | Fuß | 298 mm | |
| Glarus, Canton of | Fuß | 300 mm | |
| Glatz, Prussia | Werkfuß | 287 mm | |
| Göttingen, Hanover | Fuß | 291 mm | |
| Gotha, Saxe-Coburg-Gotha | Fuß | 287 mm | |
| Halle an der Saale, Prussia | Werkfuß | 288 mm | |
| Halle an der Saale, Prussia | Feldfuß | 433 mm | |
| Hamburg | Fuß | 1⁄6 Klafter, 1⁄16 Geestruthe | 286 mm |
| Hanau, Hessen | Fuß | 2⁄25 Ruthe | 285 mm |
| Hanover, capital of the Kingdom | Fuß | 1⁄2 Elle, 1⁄16 Ruthe | 292 mm |
| Heidelberg, Baden | Fuß | 278 mm | |
| Heilbronn, Württemberg | Fuß | 278 mm | |
| Heiligenstadt, Prussia | old Fuß | 283 mm | |
| Herford, Prussia | old Fuß | 295 mm | |
| Hildesheim, Hanover | Fuß | 1⁄16 Ruthe | 280 mm |
| Holstein | Fuß | 296 mm | |
| Innsbruck, Austria | Tyroler-Fuß | 317 mm | |
| Königsberg, Prussia | old Fuß | 1⁄15 Ruthe | 307 mm |
| Krakau | Fuß or Stopa | 356 mm | |
| Lausanne, Canton of Waadt | Fuß | 293 mm | |
| Leipzig, Saxony | gewöhnlicher Fuß | 1⁄2 Elle, 1⁄6 Klafter 1⁄16 Ruthe | 282 mm |
| Lemberg, Austria | Galizian Fuß | 297 mm | |
| Lemgo, Lippe | Fuß | 287 mm | |
| Lindau, Bavaria | Fuß | 307 mm | |
| Lindau, Bavaria | Feldmeßschuh, Bauschuh | 289 mm | |
| Linz, Austria | Fuß | Klafter | 303 mm |
| Lübeck | Fuß | 291 mm | |
| Lucern, Canton of | Fuß (for wood measure) | 314 mm | |
| Lucern, Canton of | Zimmerwerkschuh | 304 mm | |
| Lucern, Canton of | Bau- and Feldmeßschuh | 284 mm | |
| Milan, Austria | old Fuß | 398 mm | |
| Mainz, Hessen | Werkfuß | 314 mm | |
| Mainz, Hessen | Kameralfuß (for firewood) | 287 mm | |
| Mannheim, Baden | Fuß | 290 mm | |
| Mecklenburg | Fuß | 1⁄2 Elle, 1⁄16 Ruthe | 291 mm |
| Metz, France | old Fuß | 406 mm | |
| Mühlhausen, Prussia | Fuß | 1⁄16 Ruthe | 281 mm |
| Neufchatel, Principality of | Werkfuß | 293 mm | |
| Neufchatel, Principality of | Feldmeßfuß | 318 mm | |
| Nordhausen, Prussia | old Fuß | 292 mm | |
| Nuremberg, Bavaria | Stadtfuß | 1⁄16 Ruthe | 304 mm |
| Nuremberg, Bavaria | Artillery Fuß | 292 mm | |
| Oldenburg | Fuß | 1⁄20 Ruthe | 296 mm |
| Osnabrück, Hanover | Fuß | 279 mm | |
| Padua, Austria | Fuß | 1⁄6 Cavezzo | 428 mm |
| Prague, Austria | Bohemian Fuß or Česká stopa | 296 mm | |
| Prussia, Rheinland | Reichsfuß | 313.8536 mm[6] | |
| Ratzeburg, Mecklenburg-Schwerin | Fuß | 291 mm | |
| Regensburg, Bavaria | Fuß | 313 mm | |
| Rheinbaiern | Fuß | 12 Zoll, 1⁄3 metre | 333 mm |
| Rheinland | Rheinländischer Fuß | 313.8536 mm[6] | |
| Rostock, Mecklenburg-Schwerin | Fuß | 1⁄2 Elle, 1⁄16 Ruthe | 286 mm |
| Sanct Gallen, Canton of | Fuß | 313 mm | |
| Schaffhausen, Canton of | Fuß | 298 mm | |
| Silesia (Austrian part) | Fuß | 289 mm | |
| Solothurn, Canton of | Fuß | 293 mm | |
| Stade, Hanover | Fuß | 291 mm | |
| Stettin, Prussia | old Pomeranian Fuß | 285 mm | |
| Stralsund, Prussia | old Fuß | 291 mm | |
| Strassburg, France | Fuß | 289 mm | |
| Stuttgart | Reichsfuß | 1⁄2 Elle, 1⁄10 Ruthe | 286 mm |
| Tessin, Canton of | Fuß | 397 mm | |
| Thorn, Prussia | old Fuß | 297 mm | |
| Trento, Austria | Fuß | 366 mm | |
| Trier, Prussia | Land- and Werkfuß | 294 mm | |
| Trier, Prussia | Waldfuß | 310 mm | |
| Trier, Prussia | Zimmermannsfuß | 305 mm | |
| Tyrol, Austria | Fuß | 334 mm | |
| Udine, Austria | Fuß | 329 mm | |
| Ulm, Württemberg | Fuß | 289 mm | |
| Venice, Austria | Fuß | 1⁄5 Passo | 348 mm |
| Verden, Hanover | Fuß | 291 mm | |
| Verona, Austria | Fuß | 1⁄6 Cavezzo | 347 mm |
| Vienna, Austria | Fuß | 1⁄6 Klafter | 316 mm |
| Waadt, Canton of | Fuß | 10 Zoll, 1⁄10 Ruthe | 300 mm |
| Wallis, Canton of | Fuß | 325 mm | |
| Weimar | Fuß | 282 mm | |
| Wesel, Prussia | old Fuß | 236 mm | |
| Wetzlar, Prussia | old Fuß | 274 mm | |
| Wiesbaden, Nassau | Fuß | 288 mm | |
| Wismar, Mecklenburg-Schwerin | Fuß | 292 mm | |
| Wittenberg, Prussia | old Fuß | 283 mm | |
| Worbis, Prussia | old Fuß | 286 mm | |
| Württemberg | Reichsfuß | 1⁄2 Elle, 1⁄10 Ruthe | 286 mm |
| Würzburg, Bavaria | Fuß | 1⁄2 Elle | 294 mm |
| Zug, Canton of | Fuß | 301 mm | |
| Zug, Canton of | Steinfuß | 268 mm | |
| Zürich, Canton of | Fuß | 1⁄6 Klafter, 1⁄10 Ruthe | 301 mm |
| Except where noted, based on Niemann (1830).[5] The values of the other local units mentioned also varied widely. | |||
Rute (rod)
[edit]
The Rute or Ruthe is of Carolingian origin,[citation needed] and was used as a land measure. Many different kinds of Ruthe were used at various times in various parts of the German-speaking world. They were subdivided into differing numbers of local Fuß, and were of many different lengths. One source from 1830[5] lists the following:
| Some kinds of Ruthe | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Place | Name | Local equivalent | Metric equivalent |
| Aachen (Aix-la-Capelle) | Feldmeßruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.512 m |
| Baden | Ruthe | 10 Fuß | 3 m |
| Basel, Canton of | Ruthe | 16 Fuss | 4.864 m |
| Bern, Canton of | Ruthe | 10 Fuss | 2.932 m |
| Braunschweig (Brunswick) | Ruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.565 m |
| Bremen | Ruthe | 8 Ellen or 16 Fuß | 4.626 m |
| Calenberg | Ruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.677 m |
| Cassel, Hessen | Ruthe | 14 Fuß | 4.026 m |
| Hamburg | Geestruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.583 m |
| Hamburg | Marschruthe | 14 Fuß | 4.010 m |
| Hannover | Ruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.671 m |
| Lever, Oldenburg | Ruthe | 20 Fuß | 4.377 |
| Mecklenburg | Ruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.655 m |
| Nuremberg, Bavaria | Ruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.861 m |
| Oldenburg | Ruthe | 20 Fuß | 5.927 m |
| Prussia, Rheinland | Ruthe | 12 Fuß | 3.766 m |
| Saxony | Ruthe | 16 Leipziger Fuß | 4.512 m |
| Württemberg | Reichsruthe | 10 Fuß | 2.865 m |
| Württemberg | old Ruthe | 16 Fuß | 4.583 m |
| Zürich, Canton of | Ruthe | 10 Fuss | 3.009 m |
| Except where noted, based on Niemann (1830).[5] The value of the local Fuß also varied widely. | |||
Klafter
[edit]Typically 6 feet. Regional variants from 1.75 m in Baden to 3 m in Switzerland.
Lachter
[edit]The Lachter was the most common unit of length used in mining in German-speaking areas. Its exact length varied from place to place but was roughly between 1.9 and 2.1 m.
Elle (ell)
[edit]Distance between elbow and fingertip. In the North, often 2 feet, in Prussia 17⁄8 feet, in the South variable, often 2+1⁄2 feet. The smallest known German Elle is 402.8 mm (15.86 in), the longest 811 mm (31.9 in).
Zoll (inch)
[edit]Usually 1⁄12 foot, but also 1⁄11 and 1⁄10.
Linie
[edit]Usually 1⁄12 inch, but also 1⁄10.
Volume
[edit]Quent
[edit]Being 1/5 of any measure
Malter
[edit]Is a larger volume unit of around one large sack of wheat a person could carry. However, the exact volumetric size and weight was locally very different in each feudal state. For more details, see [1].
Klafter
[edit]For firewood, 2.905 m3 (102.6 cu ft)
Nösel
[edit]In general, the Nösel (also spelled Össel) was a measure of liquid volume equal to half a Kanne ("jar," "jug," "bottle," "can"). Volume often varied depending on whether it was beer or wine. Its subdivisions were the Halbnösel ("Half-Nösel") and the Viertelnösel ("Quarter-Nösel).
An Ahm was a measure used for wine or beer. An Eimer ("Bucket") was a container that was a fifth of an Ahm. A Viertel ("Fourth") was a fourth of an Eimer. A Stübchen ("Cozy Room") also a Stauf was a measure of wine or beer that was equal to two Kannen. It was the approximate amount of wine or beer that could serve an entire room in a tavern. A Kanne was a measure of wine or beer large enough to fill a humpen (tankard) or krug (wine flagon or beer pitcher). A Quartier ("quarter-measure") was a fourth of a Stübchen. A Nösel was a cup or mug of wine or beer.
Actual volumes so measured, however, varied from one state or even one city to another. Within Saxony, for example, the "Dresden jar" held approximately 1 US quart or 0.95 litres or 0.83 imperial quarts, so a nösel in Dresden was about 1 US pint (0.47 L; 0.83 imp pt). The full volume of a "Leipzig jar" measured 1.2 liters (1.3 U.S. qt; 1.1 imp qt); the Leipzig nösel was therefore 0.6 liters (0.63 U.S. qt; 0.53 imp qt).
- 1⁄320 Ahm = 1⁄64 Eimer = 1⁄16 Viertel = 1⁄8 Stübchen / Stauf = 1⁄4 Kannen = 1⁄2 Quartiers = 1 Nösel = 2 Halbnöseln = 4 Viertelnöseln
The nösel was used in minor commerce, as well as in the household to measure meal, grain, and such. These units of measure were officially valid in Saxony until 1868, when the metric system was introduced. Nevertheless, the old measures have continued in private use for decades.
One modification was introduced in Thuringia. There, the nösel was, by extension, also a measure of area; namely, the area of land which could be sown with one nösel of seed – or about 19.36 square yards (16.19 m2; 0.00400 acres)
Mass
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (September 2023) |
Pfund
[edit]Mark
[edit]1⁄2 Pfund. Equal to 233.856 g (Cologne).
Unze
[edit]1⁄16 Pfund. Roughly equal to 29.23 g.
Loth
[edit]1⁄32 Pfund, or 1⁄16 Mark. Equal to 14.606 g (Prussia).
Quentchen
[edit]1⁄96 Pfund. Roughly equal to 4.872 g.
Quint
[edit]1⁄128 Pfund. Roughly equal to 3.65 g.
Pfennig
[edit]1⁄512 Pfund. Roughly equal to 0.9135 g.
Gran
[edit]1⁄7690 Pfund. Roughly equal to 0.0609 g.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Barnard, Frederick Augustus Porter (1879). The Metric system of weights and measures. American Metric Bureau. pp. 220–2. Retrieved 27 February 2012.
- ^ Harasimowicz, Jan [in Polish]; Suleja, Włodzimierz [in Polish] (2000). Encyklopedia Wrocławia (in Polish) (Wyd. 1 ed.). Wrocław: Wydawn. Dolnośląskie. ISBN 9788370237493. OCLC 46420892.
- ^ Davies, Norman; Moorhouse, Roger (2002). Mikrokosmos : portret miasta środkowoeuropejskiego : Vratislava, Breslau, Wrocław (in Polish). Translated by Pawelec, Andrzej (Wyd. 1 ed.). Kraków: Wydawn. Znak. ISBN 9788324001729. OCLC 50928641.
- ^ "Historie der Postsäulen" (in German). Forschungsgruppe Kursächsische Postmeilensäulen e.V. und 1. Sächsischer Postkutschenverein e.V. Archived from the original on 5 February 2017. Retrieved 5 February 2017.
- ^ a b c d Niemann, Friedrich (1830) Vollständiges Handbuch der Münzen, Masse, und Gewichte aller Länder der Erde fur Kaufleute, Banquiers ...: in alphabetischer Ordnung. Quedlinburg und Leipzig, G. Basse. p. 286
- ^ a b c Tate (1868), p. 49
Bibliography
[edit]- François Cardarelli: Encyclopedia of Scientific Units, Weights and Measures. Their SI Equivalences and Origins. Springer, Berlin 2003. ISBN 1-85233-682-X
- Helmut Kahnt, Bernd Knorr: Alte Masse, Münzen und Gewichte. . Bibliographisches Institut Mannheim/Wien/Zürich 1987. (Lizenzausgabe von VEB Bibliographisches Institut Leipzig 1986) (in German)
- Wolfgang Trapp: Kleines Handbuch der Maße, Zahlen Gewichte und der Zeitrechnung. Von . Reclam Stuttgart, 2. Auflage 1996. ISBN 3-15-008737-6 (in German)
- Günther Scholz, Klaus Vogelsang: Kleines Lexikon: Einheiten, Formelzeichen. Fachbuchverlag Leipzig 1991 ISBN 3-343-00500-2 (in German)
- Johann Christian Nelkenbrechers Taschenbuch eines Banquiers und Kaufmanns: enthaltend eine Erklärung aller ein- und ausländischen Münzen, des Wechsel-Courses, Usos, Respect-Tage und anderer zur Handlung gehörigen Dinge; mit einer genauen Vergleichung des Ellen-Maaßes, Handels-, Gold- und Silber-Gewichts, auch Maaße von Getreide und flüssigen Sachen derer fürnehmsten europäischen Handels-Plätze. Nachdruck der Ausgabe 1769: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, Düsseldorf 2004. ISBN 3-936755-58-2 (in German)
- William Tate (1868). The Modern Cambist: Forming a Manual of Foreign Exchanges, in the Different Operations of Bills of Exchange and Bullion, According to the Practice of All Trading Nations, with Tables of Foreign Weights and Measures, and Their Equivalents in English and French.
External links
[edit]- Projekt zur Erschliessung historisch wertvoller Altkartenbestände Archived 2016-03-03 at the Wayback Machine (in German)
German units of measurement
View on GrokipediaOverview
Historical Development
The units of measurement in the Holy Roman Empire during the medieval period originated from a combination of Roman legacies and local Germanic customs, often deriving from natural references such as body parts or agricultural practices, including the foot based on human gait and the elle approximated by arm span.[6] These systems varied widely across the empire's fragmented territories, lacking centralized standardization and leading to inconsistencies that complicated trade and administration.[7] Efforts toward uniformity began in the late 15th century, exemplified by the 1495 Diet of Worms, where the Reichstag issued decrees on coinage.[8] In the 16th to 18th centuries, individual states pursued local reforms, though full implementation remained elusive amid ongoing territorial divisions. By the early 19th century, variability persisted, with records indicating 112 distinct elle lengths in Baden alone around 1810, underscoring the urgency for broader coordination.[9] The Napoleonic era prompted further action, culminating in Prussia's General Land Survey and the 1816 Maß- und Gewichtsordnung, which defined the Reichsfuß as a standardized length unit (approximately 313.8536 mm) to facilitate accurate mapping and economic integration across Prussian territories.[10] Under the German Confederation, efforts aimed to harmonize systems within the emerging customs union (Zollverein), though complete unification proved challenging due to state sovereignty. This momentum continued with the 1858 standards of the North German Confederation, which adopted the customs pound (500 grams) as the national weight, marking a pivotal step toward pre-metric consistency in northern states.[5]Regional Variations
The decentralized structure of the Holy Roman Empire, comprising over 300 semi-autonomous states, principalities, and free cities, fostered profound fragmentation in units of measurement, with local standards varying widely even within short distances to reflect regional economic, trade, and administrative priorities.[3] This led to notable differences in length units, such as the Fuß (foot), where the Prussian variant measured approximately 313.85 mm based on the Landmeile of 7,532 m comprising 24,000 feet, while the Bavarian Fuß was shorter at about 292 mm, derived from a Meile of 7,415 m equaling 25,406 feet.[3] In northern Germany, particularly among Hanseatic League cities, trade-oriented units like the Meile emphasized long-distance commerce along Baltic and North Sea routes, often aligning with Danish or Prussian standards for consistency in shipping and overland transport, such as the 7,532 m Prussian-Danish Meile.[3] Southern regions, including Bavaria, prioritized agricultural measures suited to farming and land division, with units like the Joch (yoke) for oxen-plowed fields influencing derived length standards in rural economies.[3] Following the proclamation of the Austrian Empire in 1804, variants persisted across Habsburg crownlands, including a pre-1818 Austrian Meile of 7,586.5 m that was later adjusted to 7,500 m, reflecting efforts to unify amid diverse territorial influences.[3] Mining regions like Saxony and the Harz Mountains employed specialized units such as the Lachter, equivalent to six feet and used to gauge shaft depths, tunnel lengths, and cross-sections, adapting local Fuß standards to the demands of ore extraction and water management systems.[11] In the Rhineland, Napoleonic occupation introduced metric influences through the French system, yet post-1815 Prussian administration preserved local variants like the Rute (rod), a surveying tool often around 3.76 m in the Rheinländische tradition, for land measurement and engineering.[3] Efforts to document and standardize these variations included Prussian initiatives in the early 19th century, such as the 1816 adoption of a unified Landmeile to reduce inconsistencies across annexed territories.[3] Public markers of local standards, etched on town halls and market buildings, served as reference points for commerce, exemplifying community-level enforcement of regional measures.[3]Length Measures
Long-Distance Units
Long-distance units in historical German-speaking regions were essential for navigation, trade, military operations, and postal services, reflecting the fragmented political landscape of the Holy Roman Empire and later states like Prussia. These units, primarily the Meile (mile) and Wegstunde (way-hour), were based on practical estimates of travel distances rather than precise scientific standards, leading to significant regional variations. The Meile, a geographic mile, typically ranged from about 6.7 to 9.2 kilometers, depending on local customs and decrees, while the Wegstunde represented the approximate distance covered in one hour of walking. These measures were widely used until the adoption of the metric system in the German Empire. The Meile served as the primary long-distance unit, with its length varying across territories due to differing definitions tied to local rods (Ruten) or feet (Fuß). Key standardized types included the Reichsmeile, fixed at 7.5 kilometers following the metric system's introduction in 1872, which became the official imperial mile but was prohibited by law in 1908. The Prussian Meile, adopted in 1816 by King Frederick William III based on the Danish mile, measured 7.532 kilometers (equivalent to 24,000 Prussian feet). In Silesia, the Breslau Meile, official from 1630 onward, was approximately 6.7 kilometers (11,250 ells). Other variations, such as the Bavarian Meile at 7.415 kilometers or the Baden Meile at 8 kilometers, highlight the diversity, with some reaching up to 9.2 kilometers in areas like Hessen-Kassel. The Danish Meile of 7.533 kilometers influenced Prussian standards and border regions due to shared measurement practices in northern territories. The Wegstunde, or walking hour, was standardized in Germany at approximately 3.71 kilometers, defined as half a Meile and based on the estimated distance of one hour's brisk walk, making it practical for estimating travel times. It was commonly used in postal routes, where post milestones marked distances in Wegstunden for courier services, and in military marches to gauge daily progress. Historically, this unit persisted into the 19th century, particularly in Saxony after 1722, where it was set at 1000 Dresden rods, approximately 4.531 km. Both units featured prominently in 18th-century cartography, with maps often scaling distances using 15 Meilen per degree of latitude to approximate Earth's curvature based on the geographische Meile (about 7.42 kilometers, or 1/15 of an equatorial degree). Postal systems relied on Meilen-marked milestones along roads, facilitating efficient relay services across principalities, while military applications included planning marches and fortifications. The variability complicated interstate trade until standardization efforts in the 19th century. With the formation of the German Empire, these units were abolished on January 1, 1872, in favor of the metric kilometer, though remnants lingered in rural and border areas influenced by neighboring Danish measurements.Medium-Length Units
Medium-length units in historical German measurement systems typically ranged from 2 to 5 meters and were essential for practical tasks in agriculture, construction, surveying, and mining, such as delineating field boundaries, spanning structural elements, and gauging subterranean depths. These units, including the Rute, Klafter, and Lachter, exhibited significant regional variations due to local standards and environmental factors, like terrain adjustments that favored longer measures in the flat landscapes of northern Germany. Their adoption reflected the decentralized nature of pre-metric Germany, where standardization efforts, such as those in Prussian reforms, aimed to harmonize practices across territories.[12][3] The Rute, also known as the rod, functioned primarily as an agricultural and surveying tool for dividing land into plots suitable for plowing and cultivation. Its length varied from 3 to 5 meters depending on the region, with the Prussian Rheinland Rute standardized at approximately 3.766 meters for consistent land assessment in the Rhineland territories. In contrast, the Baden Rute measured 3 meters, aligning with simpler decimal influences in southern practices. Relations to smaller units included equivalences like 1 Rute = 4 Elle or 5 Fuß in certain locales, facilitating integration with everyday measures.[12][2] The Klafter, translating to fathom, represented the span of outstretched arms and was widely employed in construction for measuring building widths and in forestry for stacking firewood into uniform bundles. Typically comprising 6 Fuß, it ranged from 1.8 to 3 meters regionally; the Prussian Klafter equaled 1.8831 meters, derived from the formula m, where 0.31385 m is the Prussian Fuß length. The Swiss Klafter extended to 3 meters, accommodating alpine stacking needs. This unit's versatility extended to volume applications, though its linear form emphasized structural and resource management.[13][2][3] In mining contexts, the Lachter denoted depths, tunnel advances, and ore body dimensions, often equivalent to 4 to 6 Fuß and measuring 1.9 to 2.1 meters. Regional specifics included variations in Saxony (approximately 7 local feet, around 1.98 meters) and Bohemia (4 ells, about 2.37 meters), tailored to rugged extraction environments. The Prussian mining law of 1865 established a uniform 2-meter Lachter to streamline operations across state-controlled mines, enhancing efficiency in silver and coal production. These adaptations underscored the Lachter's role in quantifying hazardous subsurface work.[14][15][16]Small-Length Units
Small-length units in historical German measurement systems provided the precision needed for crafts, tailoring, and fine work, typically on the scale of centimeters to decimeters, contrasting with larger units for construction like the Rute. These units derived from human body parts and were standardized regionally, often using brass prototypes in the 19th century to ensure consistency in trade and manufacturing.[17] The Fuß (foot) served as the foundational small-length unit, equivalent to the length of an adult foot and varying between 250 and 350 mm across German-speaking regions. In Prussia, the Reichsfuß was defined as 313.8536 mm, while the Rhineland Fuß measured 313.75 mm; both were subdivided into 12 Zoll for practical use in carpentry and everyday measurements.[17] The Elle (ell), based on the distance from the elbow to the fingertips, was primarily employed in tailoring for cloth measurement and ranged from 400 to 800 mm depending on the locality. The Cologne Elle standardized at 527 mm facilitated textile trade in the Rhineland, whereas the Viennese Elle measured approximately 0.777 m, reflecting Austrian influences; in many areas, the relation held approximately as 1 Elle ≈ 2 Fuß.[17] The Zoll (inch), a subdivision of the Fuß at 1/12, measured 22 to 30 mm and was essential for detailed work in crafts such as woodworking and metalworking, though some specialized trades used a 1/10 Fuß variant for convenience. In the Prussian system, 1 Zoll = 0.3138536 m / 12 ≈ 0.02615 m. The Linie, further dividing the Zoll at 1/12, ranged from 1.8 to 2.5 mm and found application in precision fields like optics and jewelry making. Prussian standards set the Linie at approximately 2.18 mm.[17][18] By the 19th century, brass standards for these units, such as etched rules and prototypes, were produced to promote uniformity amid regional variations, aiding industrialization before the metric system's adoption in 1872.[17]Area Measures
Primary Field Units
The Morgen served as the principal unit for measuring agricultural fields in historical German-speaking regions, representing the area that a team of oxen could plausibly plow in a single morning, typically ranging from 0.25 to 0.58 hectares depending on local standards. This unit emerged in medieval times as a practical measure for arable land, tied to the productivity of draft animals and soil conditions, and became central to land allocation and assessment across principalities. Its name derives from the German word for "morning," underscoring its basis in daily agricultural labor.[19] In Prussia, the standardized Morgen measured 2,553 m² (0.2553 ha), equivalent to 180 square Ruten, where the Rute was approximately 3.7638 meters. The Saxon Morgen was approximately 2,000 m² (0.2 ha), reflecting regional differences in linear measures and farming practices. North German variants, such as in Hanover, tended to be around 0.25 to 0.3 ha (2,500 to 3,000 m²), while South German ones, including in Bavaria and Württemberg, varied but often approximated 0.25 to 0.34 ha (2,500 to 3,400 m²), with Baden reaching 3,600 m² in some contexts. These discrepancies arose from decentralized standardization before metric adoption, influenced by local rod (Rute) lengths detailed in medium-length units.[20][2][19]| Region | Morgen Size (m²) | Equivalent (ha) | Square Ruten | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prussia | 2,553 | 0.255 | 180 | Wikipedia |
| Saxony/Franconia | ~2,000 | 0.2 | Varies | Wikipedia |
| Hanover | 2,600-2,621 | 0.26 | 120 | sizes.com |
| Bavaria | ~3,407 (as Tagwerk) | 0.34 | 400 | Wikipedia |
| Württemberg | 3,152 | 0.315 | 384 | sizes.com |
| Baden | 3,600 | 0.36 | 400 | sizes.com |
Derived Land Units
Derived land units in German measurement systems encompassed subdivisions and specialized area measures derived from primary field units like the Morgen, often tailored to specific agricultural or feudal contexts such as smaller plots or estate assessments. These units reflected regional agricultural practices and labor capacities, with sizes varying significantly across territories due to local customs and soil conditions.[21] The Juchart, also known as Juchert or Jauchart, was a common derived unit measuring approximately 0.25 to 0.35 hectares (2,500 to 3,500 m²), equivalent to 36 to 50 square Ruten in some areas, and was particularly prevalent in the Rhineland and Westphalia for smaller land parcels like vineyard plots.[20][22] The Tagwerk, meaning "day's work," represented the area a team of oxen could plow in one day, ranging from 0.3 to 0.5 hectares and used extensively in eastern German regions for assessing arable land productivity. In some areas, it approximated 1.5 Morgen, tying directly to serf labor requirements under feudal systems. The Bohemian variant measured around 0.34 hectares, adapted for local forest and field assessments.[23][20] Other derived units included the Schoof, a quarter of a Morgen used for subdividing larger holdings into manageable plots. These measures were integral to contexts like vineyard cultivation, where smaller subdivisions facilitated detailed plotting, and forest evaluations, where Tagwerks quantified labor-based yields. Their ties to feudal duties, such as allocating one Tagwerk per serf's daily labor, underscored their role in medieval land management beyond basic field benchmarking. The Hufe, as a large estate unit, typically encompassed 30 Morgen.[24][20]Volume and Capacity Measures
Dry Volume Units
Dry volume units in historical Germany were essential for measuring grain, flour, and other bulk dry commodities in agriculture, storage, and trade, often featuring heaped measures to account for loose materials. These units exhibited significant regional variations, influenced by local traditions and the need to standardize transactions in fragmented states before metrication in 1872. Capacities were typically defined using wooden or metal standards, with adjustments for grain type due to differences in density, such as rye requiring larger volumes than wheat for equivalent weight. In the 18th century, official prototypes like wooden barrels or boxes were crafted to maintain consistency in markets and tithe collections. The Malter served as a major unit for large quantities of grain, with capacities generally ranging from 100 to 200 liters across regions, though some systems defined it larger (up to ~660 L as 12 Scheffel in related areas). In Prussia, it was standardized at approximately 110 liters (2 Scheffel), equivalent to about one sack for transport and storage. The Hamburg Malter, used in northern trade hubs, measured around 139 liters, facilitating commerce in bulk dry goods like barley and oats.[25] Subdivisions included the Scheffel, commonly one-quarter of the Malter and used for market sales of grain, with volumes between 50 and 55 liters. For instance, the Berlin Scheffel held approximately 54.96 liters, aiding precise dealings in urban centers. The Viertel, a quarter of the Scheffel, ranged from 12 to 14 liters and was practical for smaller household or farm portions. In standard North German systems, these related as 1 Malter = 4 Scheffel = 16 Viertel, providing a hierarchical structure for scaling measurements.[26] These units played key roles in ecclesiastical tithes, where portions of harvests were assessed in Malter or Scheffel, and in commercial exchanges, where variations ensured fairness based on commodity density—rye measures often exceeded those for wheat by 10-20% to equalize value. Eighteenth-century standards, such as calibrated wooden vessels, were employed to verify volumes during inspections. A minor subdivision, the Quent, equaled one-quarter of the Viertel, used for fine dry goods like seeds.[27]Liquid Capacity Units
Liquid capacity units in historical Germany were essential for viticulture, brewing, and trade, particularly for wine and beer, where barrel-based measures facilitated storage, transport, and taxation. These units emphasized practical volumes suited to wooden cooperage, with sizes varying by region to accommodate local production and economic practices. Unlike dry measures, liquid units accounted for the containment properties of curved barrels, allowing for sloshing and incomplete filling, and were often defined by wagon loads or cart capacities for efficiency in commerce. Regional standardization was loose until the 19th century, leading to diverse applications in everyday and large-scale contexts. Some units like the Fuder persist in viticulture today with standardized capacities. The Fuder represented the primary large-scale unit, functioning as a substantial oak barrel for bulk liquids, with capacities generally ranging from 800 to 1200 liters depending on the era and locale. In the Rhineland (Rheinpfalz), the Fuder held 1,000 liters specifically for wine, while the Hessian variant measured 1170 liters, reflecting adaptations for denser regional yields. The Mosel Fuder standardized at 960 liters to suit steep vineyard logistics, whereas Austrian variants were larger at 1260 liters to match broader Central European trade norms. Originating as a two-horse wagon load, the Fuder was integral to viticulture for fermenting and aging wine, as well as brewing for beer maturation, and was subdivided for practicality: 1 Fuder equated to 30-40 Eimer, with each Eimer being a bucket of 20-30 liters used for filling or distribution.[28][29][30] Smaller subdivisions included the Ohme, equivalent to one-quarter Fuder and thus 200-300 liters, serving as an intermediate measure for partial loads in shipping or estate inventories. Taxation practices further underscored the Fuder's role; in the 16th century, wine duties were assessed by Fuder content, exemplified by the Heidelberg Tun—a massive 1591 barrel in the Palatinate designed to hold tithe wine revenues exceeding 130,000 liters across multiple Fuder equivalents. For domestic and tavern use, the Kanne provided a modest pot or jug of 1-2 liters, with the Prussian Kanne precisely at 1.145 liters, commonly employed for portioning ale in brewing contexts. Complementing this, the Nösel offered a diminutive 0.5-liter measure, often half a Kanne, for individual servings or precise recipes in household brewing and wine tasting.[31][32][33][34]| Unit | Approximate Capacity | Primary Use | Regional Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuder | 800-1200 L | Bulk wine/beer storage and transport | Rhineland: 1,000 L (wine); Hessian: 1170 L; Mosel: 960 L; Austrian: 1260 L |
| Ohme | 200-300 L | Intermediate trade/taxation | 1/4 Fuder |
| Eimer | 20-30 L | Filling and distribution buckets | 30-40 per Fuder |
| Kanne | 1-2 L | Serving pots/jugs | Prussian: 1.145 L (ale) |
| Nösel | 0.5 L | Small portions | Half Kanne |
Bulk and Wood Measures
Bulk and wood measures in historical German-speaking regions primarily encompassed units for irregular, stacked volumes of materials like firewood, stone, and mining rubble, distinct from standardized dry or liquid capacities. The Klafter served as the principal unit for such bulks, representing a stacked volume typically ranging from 2 to 4 cubic meters depending on regional definitions and the material's density. For firewood, the Klafter was calculated as the product of length, height, and depth, often standardized to ensure uniformity in trade; for example, in the Prussian system, dimensions approximated 1.883 meters in length by 1.883 meters in width by 0.941 meters in height (6 × 6 × 3 Fuß), yielding about 3.34 m³.[13] In Württemberg, the 1806 Maßordnung regulated the firewood Klafter as 6 × 6 × 3.5 local Schuh (approximately 1.68 m × 1.68 m × 1.05 m), equating to 3.554 m³, with variations for different locales like Aalen (3.809 m³ for pine wood) or Ulm (3.144 m³).[35] These measures accounted for seasonal factors, such as drier stacking in summer to reduce volume shrinkage, promoting fair commerce in fuel trade and construction aggregates.[36] The Quent functioned as a smaller bulk measure for commodities like salt or coal, typically 20 to 40 liters, often equivalent to one-eighth of a Scheffel in specific contexts. In trade settings, it facilitated portioning of irregular loads, with values varying by region; for instance, in some Old German systems, it subdivided larger units like the Malter into fractions suitable for small-scale sales.[37] Less common was the Ster, a rare historical precursor to the modern cubic meter for stacked wood, occasionally referenced in forestry records before metric standardization. In mining, the Lachter (a variant of Klafter) measured rubble volumes, such as 7 × 7 × 7 Schuh in Niedernhall (about 5.5 m³), supporting extraction and transport assessments.[35] Nineteenth-century regulations, like those in Württemberg's ordinances of 1557 and 1806, mandated uniform stacking to prevent disputes, ensuring the Klafter's dimensions were calibrated locally for consistency across fuel, stone, and bulk trades.[35] In Baden, the Klafter for firewood was standardized at 3.5 m³, often configured as 2.5 meters long by 1 meter high by 1.2 meters wide to accommodate typical log lengths.[38]Mass and Weight Measures
Large Weight Units
In the historical German system of measurement, large weight units facilitated bulk trade, industrial weighing, and commercial transactions, particularly for commodities like meat, stone, wool, and precious metals. These units, such as the Pfund and Mark, exhibited regional variations but maintained consistent relational structures, often divided into smaller subunits for precision. The Stein served as a multiple of the Pfund for heavier loads. Dual systems existed: a "gross" or commercial scale for everyday goods (typically heavier) and a "fine" or troy-like scale for valuables like gold and silver (lighter to reflect purity standards).[39] The Pfund, analogous to the pound, ranged from approximately 350 to 560 grams across German states, reflecting local standards before metrication. In Prussia, the Pfund was officially defined as 467.711 grams after the 1816 metrology reform, based on the weight of distilled water in a specific volume tied to the Prussian foot. Colloquially, especially in post-19th-century contexts, it approximated 500 grams for simplicity in markets. The Pfund comprised 32 Loth and was commonly applied in butchery for portioning meat and in general commerce.[40][41] The Mark equaled half a Pfund, thus weighing 175 to 280 grams, and played a central role in coinage and precious metal trade. The Cologne Mark, a prominent standard originating in the Rhineland, measured 233.856 grams and influenced monetary systems across German territories due to its use in silver valuation and minting. For instance, it underpinned the weight of silver thalers and marks in medieval and early modern commerce.[42][39] The Stein, employed for bulk materials like stone and wool, ranged from 8 to 40 Pfund, with significant regional differences; in Saxony, it was standardized at 20 Pfund for certain trades, while northern areas like Danzig used 34 Pfund and Königsberg 40 Pfund. This unit supported industrial and agricultural weighing, such as in quarrying or textile processing, where loads exceeded single Pfund capacities.[43][2] A key relational equation in the system was 1 Pfund = 2 Mark = 16 Unze, where the Unze (detailed in smaller weight units) varied slightly between gross (around 29 grams) and fine (approximately 30.08 grams) applications to distinguish bulk goods from precious substances. This structure ensured compatibility in trade while accommodating specialized uses.[39]Small Weight Units
Small weight units in historical German measurement systems provided the precision required for pharmacy, where accurate dosing of medicines was essential, and for minting, involving the weighing of precious metals like gold and silver. These units represented fine subdivisions of the Pfund, with regional variations reflecting local standards, particularly in Prussian territories. Brass weights for these units were standardized following the 1858 adoption of the Zollpfund across much of the German Customs Union, ensuring uniformity in commercial and specialized applications.[17][5] The Unze served as a primary small weight unit, defined as 1/16 of the Pfund and typically ranging from 25 to 30 grams depending on the regional Pfund value. In apothecary contexts, the Unze aligned closely with the troy ounce at 31.103 grams, facilitating precise measurements for pharmaceutical preparations.[17] Subdividing the Unze further, the Loth equaled 1/2 Unze, weighing 13 to 15 grams overall, with the Prussian Loth standardized at 14.606 grams. It was particularly employed in pharmacy for compounding drug recipes, where small quantities demanded reliability. The Quentchen, at 1/4 Loth and approximately 4 to 5 grams, supported detailed formulations in medical recipes.[17] The Gran represented the smallest common unit in apothecary contexts, at 0.05 to 0.06 grams, essential for the finest weighings in apothecary work. In commercial Prussian contexts, Gran served as a synonym for Pfennig, valued at 0.9135 grams. The rare Quint weighed about 0.06 grams. In the Prussian system, relations followed 1 Loth = 4 Quentchen = 16 Gran, where the 14.606-gram Loth equaled 16 Gran at 0.913 grams each, illustrating variations in unit application across specialized fields.[17]| Unit | Relation to Loth | Approximate Mass (g) | Primary Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unze | 2 Loth | 25–30 (apothecary: 31.103) | Pharmacy, general small weights |
| Loth | 1 Loth | 13–15 (Prussian: 14.606) | Drug recipes |
| Quentchen | 1/4 Loth | 4–5 | Medical formulations |
| Gran | 1/4 Quentchen (small); variable (larger synonym: Pfennig) | 0.05–0.06 (small); 0.9135 (some Pfennig) | Finest pharmacy, minting gold |
| Quint | N/A (rare) | ≈0.06 | Occasional precision use |
