Hubbry Logo
SepikSepikMain
Open search
Sepik
Community hub
Sepik
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sepik
Sepik
Sepik
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Sepik
Sediment plumes at the mouth of the Sepik (right) and Ramu (left) rivers
Sepik River watershed (Interactive map)
Location
CountryPapua New Guinea, Indonesia
RegionSandaun, Papua, East Sepik
Physical characteristics
Source 
 • locationVictor Emanuel Range
 • coordinates5°13′S 141°49′E / 5.217°S 141.817°E / -5.217; 141.817
 • elevation2,170 m (7,120 ft)
Mouth 
 • location
Bismarck Sea, Papua New Guinea
 • coordinates
3°50′30″S 144°32′30″E / 3.84167°S 144.54167°E / -3.84167; 144.54167
 • elevation
0 m (0 ft)
Length1,126 km (700 mi)[1]
Basin size80,321 km2 (31,012 sq mi)[1]
Width 
 • average400–500 m (1,300–1,600 ft)[2]
Depth 
 • minimum2 m (6 ft 7 in)[3]
 • average8–14 m (26–46 ft)[2]
 • maximum35–55 m (115–180 ft) (Angoram)[4][3]
Discharge 
 • locationAngoram
 • average5,000 m3/s (180,000 cu ft/s)[5]
Discharge 
 • locationAmbunti
 • average3,615 m3/s (127,700 cu ft/s)[6]
Basin features
ProgressionBismarck Sea
River systemSepik River
Tributaries 
 • leftIram, Brucken, Oklip, Hauser, Horden, North, Yellow, Sanchi, Yimi, Nagam
 • rightHak, August, May, Seniap, Frieda, Wario, Wagamush, April, Karawari, Yuat, Keram, Bien

The Sepik (/ˈsɛpɪk/)[7] is the longest river on the island of New Guinea, and the third largest in Oceania by discharge volume after the Fly and Mamberamo.[8] The majority of the river flows through the Papua New Guinea (PNG) provinces of Sandaun (formerly West Sepik) and East Sepik, with a small section flowing through the Indonesian province of Papua.

The Sepik has a large catchment area, and landforms that include swamplands, tropical rainforests and mountains. Biologically, the river system is often said to be possibly the largest uncontaminated freshwater wetland system in the Asia-Pacific region.[9] But, in fact, numerous fish and plant species have been introduced into the Sepik since the mid-20th century.

Name

[edit]

In 1884, Germany asserted control over the northeast quadrant of the island of New Guinea, which became part of the German colonial empire. The colony was initially managed by the Deutsche Neuguinea-Kompagnie or German New Guinea Company, a commercial enterprise that christened the territory Kaiser-Wilhelmsland. The first European ship to enter the Sepik estuary was the Samoa in May 1885. But the river, in fact, did not yet have a European name. It was thus termed Kaiserin Augustafluß by the explorer and scientist Otto Finsch, after the German Empress Augusta.

The word Sipik was first reported by A. Full[10] as one of two names for the watercourse—the other being Abschima—used by the natives living at the mouth of the river. A few years later, Leonhard Schultze applied the term Sepik to the entire watercourse, and it took, although Schultze also noted another name for the river, Azimar.[11] William Churchill, writing in the Bulletin of the American Geographical Society, said "These are not names of the river, they are but names for small stretches of the river as known to the folk of this or that hamlet. We cannot reckon how many such names there may be in the course of more than 600 miles [970 km] of the system." Since "there is no indigenous name for the whole stream", Churchill concluded that "This is clearly a case where a European designation may properly be applied." He advocated for Kaiserin-Augusta, but that name faded with the German loss of colonial control over the territory after World War I. The word Sepik henceforth became the official name of the river.

Of course, each language group had one or more names of its own for the river. For example, the Iatmul people call the river Avusett, a compound of "bone" (ava) and "lake" (tset).[12]

Fresh/Saline water interface in the sea 80 km (50 mi) from the Sepik River mouth

Description

[edit]

The river originates in the Victor Emanuel Range in the central highlands of Papua New Guinea. From its mountain headwaters near Telefomin, it travels north-west and leaves the mountains abruptly near Yapsei. From there it flows into Indonesian Papua, before turning back north-east, for the majority of its journey following the great Central Depression. Along its course it receives numerous tributaries from the Bewani and Torricelli Mountains to the north and the Central Range to the south, including the Yuat River formed by the Lai and the Jimmi.[13]

For most of the Sepik's length, the river winds in serpentine fashion, like the Amazon, to the Bismarck Sea off northern Papua New Guinea. Unlike many other large rivers, the Sepik has no delta whatsoever, but flows straight into the sea, about 100 km (62 mi) east of the town of Wewak. It is navigable for most of its length.

Hydrology

[edit]

The river has a total length of over 1,100 km (680 mi) and has a drainage basin of over 80,000 km2 (31,000 sq mi).[1] Its meandering bed is 250–500 m (820–1,640 ft) wide and averages 8–14 m (26–46 ft) deep.[2] There is a 5-to-10-kilometre-wide (3.1 to 6.2 mi) belt of active meanders along most of its course, that has created a floodplain up to 70 kilometres (43 mi) wide, with extensive backwater swamps.[9] There are around 1,500 oxbow and other lakes in the floodplain, the largest of which are the Chambri Lakes. Its annual sediment load is estimated at 115 million tonnes.[9][14]

The Sepik basin is largely an undisturbed environment, with no major urban settlements, or mining and forestry activities, in the river catchment. April Salome Forest Management Area is located in Sepik River basin.

Its catchment is classified as type Af (tropical rainforest) according to Köppen climate classification, with a rainfall of 3,390 mm.[15]

Discharge

[edit]
Sepik River at gauged stations
Year, period Min (m3/s) Mean (m3/s) Max (m3/s) Ref.
Estuary

3°50′33.1404″S 144°32′35.4156″E / 3.842539000°S 144.543171000°E / -3.842539000; 144.543171000

1979—2015 4,565 [16]
1979/1980 7,000 [17][4]
1972/1973 4,363 7,663 10,963 [18]
4,800 [19]
Angoram

4°3′45.7308″S 144°4′29.1″E / 4.062703000°S 144.074750°E / -4.062703000; 144.074750

1968—1980 5,000 [5]

[6]

Ambunti

4°13′8.0976″S 142°49′32.5308″E / 4.218916000°S 142.825703000°E / -4.218916000; 142.825703000

1980—1984 2,836.75 4,208 4,598.75 [20]
1978—1987 3,099.7 [6]
1970—1992 934.7 3,643.5 8,938.8 [2]
1966—1997 2,600 3,664 4,730 [21]
1966—1994 1,702 3,615 5,448* [6]
1963/1964 3,398 5,316 7,038 [22]
Kubkain

4°18′42.9264″S 142°19′43.1508″E / 4.311924000°S 142.328653000°E / -4.311924000; 142.328653000

1994—1999,

2008—2015

1,274.3 3,338.7 6,022 [2]
Iniok

4°17′17.6676″S 142°1′4.0944″E / 4.288241000°S 142.017804000°E / -4.288241000; 142.017804000

1994—1999,

2008—2015

707.1 2,367.9 4,524.1 [2]
May River

4°15′15.1344″S 141°53′42.7488″E / 4.254204000°S 141.895208000°E / -4.254204000; 141.895208000

1994—1999,

2008—2015

514.7 1,559.4 3,047.8 [2]
Green River

3°56′7.4364″S 141°16′23.34″E / 3.935399000°S 141.2731500°E / -3.935399000; 141.2731500

1971—2000 1,119.4 [23]
1970—1993 436 1,297 3,573 [6]
1969—1996 841 1,191 1,550 [21]
1963/1964 2,117 2,505 3,144 [22]
Telefomin

5°10′5.7432″S 141°36′54.9432″E / 5.168262000°S 141.615262000°E / -5.168262000; 141.615262000

1975—1994 40 54.4 66.8 [21]
1970—1993 15 51 1,576 [6]
1963/1964 235 636 1,538 [22]

*1969/1970 water year 8,964 m3/s.

Sepik River discharge (m3/s) at Ambunti station (period from 1963—1994):
Water year Min Mean Max Water year Min Mean Max
1963/64 3,398 5,316 7,038 1979/80 2,009 4,080 5,509
1964/65 1980/81 1,632 3,850 5,602
1965/66 1981/82 1,142 3,310 5,465
1966/67 2,429 3,390 4,331 1982/83 1,509 4,060 5,999
1967/68 1,242 3,080 4,883 1983/84 1,828 3,360 4,703
1968/69 1,821 3,740 5,606 1984/85 2,111 3,680 5,232
1969/70 2,696 4,950 8,964 1985/86 999 3,190 4,808
1970/71 1,822 3,040 4,240 1986/87 932 3,080 5,502
1971/72 1,074 3,320 4,757 1987/88 2,736 3,880 5,008
1972/73 2,326 4,540 7,081 1988/89 1,448 3,790 6,203
1973/74 1,082 3,010 4,893 1989/90 1,907 3,870 5,809
1974/75 1,452 3,730 5,989 1990/91 1,482 3,210 4,926
1975/76 1,183 3,220 5,164 1991/92 1,747 3,350 4,938
1976/77 2,205 4,030 5,622 1992/93 1,320 3,180 5,017
1977/78 1,538 3,830 5,636 1993/94 2,825 4,020 5,061
1978/79 1,153 3,450 5,606
Source:[6][22][20]

Tributaries

[edit]
The main tributaries from the mouth:
Left tributary Right tributary Length (km) Basin size (km2) Average discharge (m3/s)
Sepik 1,126 80,386.2 5,000

Lower Sepik

Bien

103

1,344.8 67.7
Middle Sepik
Keram

335

5,598.7 306.9
Nagam

195

1,757.2 41.9
Yuat 373.4 11,952.5 625.4
Pasik 655.1 15.1
Karawari

209

7,565.9 376.3
Hambili 132 1,036.7 31.1
Atilem 84 954.6 23.1
Kwatit (Parchee) 112 611.3 15
Upper Sepik
Screw

191

3,204.3 87.8
Black River—Huastein

94

917 64.4
Sanchi

105

1,468.3 77.4
Namblo

122

663.4 36.5
Wagasu 1,068.8 59.4
April

152

2,552.2 226.8
Wagamush

74

964.7 81.6
Wario 1,893.6 279.9
Nopan 992.5 60.1
Frieda 120 1,466 271.9
Seniap

42

538.9 57.7
May

180

3,301.4 405.5
Wanibe Creek 1,618.4 98
Yula 479.5 31.4
Yellow

131

1,769.8 111.2
North

115

1,995.8 123.7
Horden

165

2,103.1 124.1
Fanngi (Green River)

61

750.8 41.4
Idam

65

440.4 35.2
Hauser

60

1,149.3 74.1
August (Yapsiei)

109

1,838 208.5
October

129

604.3 44.5
West 529.4 46.8
Raadsel 269 39.7
Hollander 269.4 40.4
Oklip

54

1,042 193.4
Brucken 465.8 76.4
Iugum (Casuarina) 201.4 32
Hak (East)

43

464.3 54.7
Elip (Donner) 227.6 26.6
Iram 388.7 64.9
Nong 176.6 23.8
Source:[24][23]

Peoples and languages

[edit]

From the headwaters to the mouth, the river basin flows through the territories of spoken of dozens of Sepik languages,[25] each corresponding to one or more culture regions of related villages that exhibit similar social characteristics. The largest language and culture group along the river is the Iatmul people.

The Sepik-Ramu basin is home to the Torricelli, Sepik, Lower Sepik-Ramu, Kwomtari, Leonhard Schultze, Upper Yuat, Yuat, Left May, and Amto-Musan language families, while local language isolates are Busa, Taiap, and Yadë.[26][27] Torricelli, Sepik, and Lower Sepik-Ramu are by far the three most internally diverse language families of the region.

History

[edit]

Local villagers have lived along the river for many millennia and the river has formed the basis for food, transport and culture. There are at least 100 distinct villages and hamlets along the river, and most likely more.[28]

Australian anthropologist Ernest Chinnery, at work in the middle Sepik

Early exploration

[edit]

European contact with the river started in 1885, shortly after Germany established colonial control over German New Guinea or Kaiser Wilhelmsland. The river was named by Otto Finsch, Kaiserin Augusta, after the German Empress Augusta. The colony was initially managed by the German New Guinea Company (Neuguinea-Kompagnie). Finsch, in the ship Samoa, entered only the estuary. He returned a year later, and the Samoa launched a smaller vessel that navigated about 50 kilometres (31 mi) upstream from its mouth.[29] For the most part, German interest in the river was mainly to explore its economic potential, to collect artifacts, and to recruit native laborers to work on coastal and island copra plantations.[30]

In 1886 and 1887, further expeditions by steam boat were conducted by the Germans and over 600 kilometres (370 mi) were explored.[29] In 1887, the Samoa returned with another scientific expedition as well as a dozen Malays, eight men from the island of New Britain, and two members of the Rhenish Missionary Society.[31] In the 1890s, missionaries from the Society of the Divine Word or SVD begin to proselytize along the river.[32]

Europeans now increased their travels and presence along the river.[33] In the early twentieth century, several major expeditions to the river include the Südsee-Expedition sponsored by the Hamburg Academic of Science, the German-Dutch Border Expedition and the Kaiserin-Augusta-Fluss-Expedition[34] These expeditions, mainly German, collected flora and fauna, studied local tribes, and produced the first maps. The station town of Angoram was established in 1913 as a base on the lower Sepik for explorations, but with the beginning of World War I, the explorations ceased.[29]

After the first World War the Australian government took trusteeship of the German colony, creating the Territory of New Guinea, and the Sepik region came under their jurisdiction. During this period the Australians established a station on the middle Sepik at Ambunti to conduct further explorations.[29]

In 1923 journalist Beatrice Grimshaw attached herself to an expedition, and claimed to be the first white woman to ascent the Sepik, commenting on the widespread use of "pidgen-English" as a lingua franca.[35] In 1935 Sir Walter McNicoll, the new administrator of the Territory of New Guinea, travelled up length of the Sepik to "have a look at the river people and the kind of country along the banks".[36]

Modern 'explorers'

[edit]
East Sepik area, Maprik District, in a Haus Tambaran, Ingo Kühl, Tomulopa Deko and indigenous men, 2012

Despite the thorough exploration of the Sepik and the river basin by Europeans starting with the 1880s, and the extraordinarily keen knowledge of the region by local people and communities, many travelers today still see their tourism in the area as heroic efforts.

Part of this fantasy is that the river tribes are often said to have "little contact with the modern world," as the Los Angeles Times put it as late as 2017.[37] But that is just not true, and certainly not for a sizable tourist vessel operated by Coral Expeditions. Traveling the river is said to be "one of the last great adventures on earth".[38]

For example, in 2010 Clark Carter and Andrew Johnson traveled the length of the Sepik River from source to sea. They hiked to the source from Telefomin and kayaked down the upper reaches in an inflatable kayak. After nearly drowning in a section of rapids near Telefomin, they decided to walk through the jungle, following the river until it was calm enough to take a dugout canoe the remaining 900 kilometres (560 mi) to the Bismarck Sea. The expedition took six weeks. "The Sepik really appealed to me," said Carter, "because it conjures up images of remote tribes and wild animals. Probably the most alluring thing for me though, is just how un-travelled the area is."[39]

Also in 2010, the painter Ingo Kühl, accompanied by the local artist Tomulopa Deko, traveled from Goroka via Madang, Wewak and Maprik to Pagwi and from there on the Sepik upriver to Ambunti and to the villages of Maliwai, Yambon and Yessan. He described his experiences in an illustrated book.[40] In 2012 he repeated this expedition together with his wife and Tom Deko. They reached the settlements of Oum Number 1 and Oum Number 2 and the April River, a tributary of the Sepik.

World War II

[edit]

The Japanese held the area throughout most of the Second World War. By the end of the war, though, the Japanese had been completely surrounded after Hollandia and Aitape in Netherlands New Guinea were captured by Allied forces in April 1944 during Operations Reckless and Persecution.[41][42] The Aitape-Wewak campaign, the battle to defeat the remaining forces by the Australian Army, was hard-fought and drawn out due to the terrain, lasting until the end of the war in August 1945.[43]

The Australians eventually pushed the Japanese back to the village of Timbunke on the middle Sepik in July 1945. After an Australian RAAF plane landed 10 kilometres (6 mi) from Timbunke the Japanese suspected that the villagers had collaborated with the Australians and proceeded to massacre 100 of the villagers.[44]

Artwork

[edit]
Garamut ritual drum

The Sepik is one of the most profuse and diverse art-producing regions of the world. The numerous different tribes living along the river produce magnificent wood carvings, clay pottery and other art and craft. Different areas along the Sepik produce distinct art styles so an experienced curator will be able to visually distinguish individual styles. The Sepik area is well known for its sculptures,[45] masks,[46] shields[47] and other artifacts. Many tribes use garamut drums in rituals; the drums are formed from long hollowed-out tree trunks carved into the shape of various totem animals.[48][49][50]

[edit]
  • Korogo Village, Sepik River, PNG, 1975. Franz Luthi
    Korogo Village, Sepik River, PNG, 1975. Franz Luthi
  • A black-capped lory perching on a boy's head at Kaminabit village, Middle Sepik
    A black-capped lory perching on a boy's head at Kaminabit village, Middle Sepik
  • A warm welcome to foreign visitors
    A warm welcome to foreign visitors
  • Snapshot of the daily life of the villagers
    Snapshot of the daily life of the villagers

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sepik

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Sepik is the longest river in and on the island of , stretching approximately 1,126 kilometers from its source in the northern highlands to its mouth on the , draining a vast basin of about 77,700 square kilometers that encompasses diverse ecosystems including tropical rainforests, swamps, 1,500 lakes, and mangroves. This largely unpolluted and free-flowing river system, one of the largest intact freshwater basins in the region, supports exceptional , including two ecoregions, multiple centers of plant , and threatened species such as the New Guinea harpy eagle and . The Sepik region is home to around 430,000 indigenous people who speak over 300 languages, representing one of the world's most linguistically and culturally diverse areas, with communities deeply reliant on the river for transportation, fishing, production, and spiritual practices tied to totems like crocodiles. Famed for its artistic traditions, including elaborate wood carvings, gabled spirit houses known as haus tambaran, and ceremonial rituals, the Sepik's cultural heritage reflects a mosaic of tribal societies that have maintained ancient customs amid relative isolation. The river's geography shapes the lives of its inhabitants, with navigable sections allowing canoe travel for over 900 kilometers and serving as a vital lifeline through remote, mountainous terrain rising to 3,800 meters in elevation. Ecologically, the basin's wetlands and forests harbor immense marsupial diversity and serve as critical habitats for migratory waterbirds, underscoring its proposed status as a Ramsar Wetland of International Importance and a tentative UNESCO World Heritage site. Culturally, the Sepik's peoples, including groups like the Iatmul and those along the middle and upper reaches, produce intricate artifacts such as masks, drums, and canoe prows that embody mythological and ancestral themes, often featured in global collections of Melanesian art. Despite its remoteness, the region faces emerging threats from proposed mining and hydropower projects on tributaries like the Frieda River, which could pollute this pristine ecosystem and disrupt traditional livelihoods without adequate community consent.

Geography

Physical Characteristics

The Sepik River is the longest river on the island of New Guinea, with a total length of 1,126 km. Its drainage basin encompasses approximately 80,000 km², representing about 17% of Papua New Guinea's total land area. The basin primarily lies within Papua New Guinea's Sandaun (West Sepik) and East Sepik provinces, with a short segment extending into Indonesia's Papua province near the border. The river originates on the slopes of the Victor Emanuel Range in Papua New Guinea's central highlands near Telefomin at coordinates 5°13′S 141°49′E and an elevation of approximately 2,170 m above . From there, it flows generally northwest through rugged terrain before turning east to discharge into the on New Guinea's northern coast, approximately 100 km east of Wewak. Unlike many major rivers, the Sepik lacks a delta at its mouth; instead, its substantial sediment load is dispersed offshore by strong coastal currents, forming a divergent plume that bypasses shallow accumulation. Characterized by pronounced serpentine meandering, especially in its middle and lower sections, the Sepik carves extensive across low-lying terrain below 100 m elevation. This morphology has produced over 1,500 and other lakes scattered throughout the floodplain, the largest being the Chambri Lakes. In the upper reaches, the river traverses narrow gorges and valleys amid mountains over 2,000 m high, while downstream it widens to around 500 m and reaches depths of up to 35 m in places. Average depths range from 8 to 14 m, though flood events can deepen channels in areas. These physical traits contribute to the river's by for much of its length, influencing patterns of along its banks.

Course and Basin

The Sepik River originates in the Victor Emanuel Range of the central highlands of , near Telefomin, at an elevation of approximately 2,170 m. In its upper course, the river flows northwestward through rugged, steep highlands characterized by gorges and mountainous terrain, crossing briefly into Indonesian territory before re-entering . This section traverses landscapes formed from coralline , with the river descending rapidly from highland sources toward lower elevations. As the river enters its middle course near Ambunti, it transitions into lowland valleys at altitudes of 121–300 meters, widening significantly to become navigable for canoes and small vessels. Here, the terrain flattens, giving way to extensive swamps and meandering channels that form complex systems. The middle basin occupies about 30% of the river's altitudinal range, with the river's path becoming less incised and more influenced by surrounding valleys. In the lower course, the Sepik meanders eastward through vast floodplains toward Angoram, then turns north to discharge into the , approximately 100 km east of Wewak, at near-sea level (0–120 meters). This section, comprising about 10% of the altitudinal profile, features low-gradient plains where tidal influences extend several kilometers upstream, causing flow reversal during high tides due to strong tidal mixing in the and plume region. The river's meandering has created approximately 1,500 lakes and wetlands connected to the main channel. The Sepik's drainage basin spans approximately 80,000 square kilometers, with roughly 77,000 square kilometers within and a minor portion in . It is divided topographically into an upper mountainous basin (altitudes >1,500 meters, 23% of the area), a middle valley basin (301–1,500 meters, 37%), and a lower basin (0–300 meters, 40%), reflecting the river's progression from highland erosion zones to lowland deposition areas. Key geographic features include extensive floodplains covering about 10% of the basin (approximately 8,000 square kilometers), prone to seasonal inundation, alongside formations in the highlands and a network of swamps and oxbow lakes that enhance the basin's hydrological connectivity. The basin lies primarily within , with headwaters in (formerly West Sepik) and the outflow also in , encompassing diverse terrains from alpine heaths to coastal mangroves across a north-south gradient.

Hydrology

Flow and Discharge

The Sepik River exhibits a dynamic hydrological regime characterized by substantial average discharges that vary along its course. At the Ambunti gauging station in the middle reaches, with a of approximately 41,000 km², the mean annual discharge is 3,615 m³/s based on records from 1967 to 1994. Near the at Angoram, encompassing the full basin of about 78,000 km², the average discharge increases to approximately 7,700 m³/s, reflecting contributions from major tributaries and runoff. These flows support the river's role as one of Papua New Guinea's largest freshwater systems, with long-term monitoring at key sites including Ambunti, Angoram, and Aiambak providing essential data for understanding basin-wide . Seasonal variations in flow are pronounced, driven by the region's with annual rainfall averaging 2,500 to 3,500 mm across the basin, concentrated during the from to April. During this period, discharges peak due to heavy monsoonal rains and southeast , with maximum recorded flows reaching 8,964 m³/s at Ambunti in July 1990, and estimates suggesting up to 11,000 m³/s at the mouth during extreme events. In contrast, the from May to November sees reduced flows, with minima as low as 932 m³/s at Ambunti, occasionally leading to localized droughts that affect water availability in upper reaches. Annual flooding is a defining feature, inundating extensive floodplains and depositing nutrient-rich that sustains the surrounding ecosystems. These floods typically rise gradually over weeks due to the large catchment's slow response time, peaking between and before receding. The river lacks a major delta at its mouth, as strong tidal currents and wave action scour sediments offshore, directing much of the load into a rather than building coastal landforms. The Sepik is hydrologically linked to the Ramu River system via seasonal channels like the September-October channel, which can divert flow during high floods. The Sepik's remains largely uncontaminated by anthropogenic pollutants, maintaining freshwater conditions with neutral levels typically ranging from 7.0 to 7.9 across most reaches, in line with regional environmental guidelines. loads are low in the upper reaches ( 0–23 NTU, 3–19 mg/L), increasing downstream through inputs to higher levels ( up to 364 NTU, TSS 46–2,210 mg/L) during wet seasons, which enhances transport but also contributes to natural . Trace metals from geological sources occur naturally, with elevated concentrations near upland deposits, but overall, the river supports high ecological without significant industrial contamination.

Tributaries

The Sepik River is fed by numerous tributaries that originate in the highlands and mountain ranges of northern Papua New Guinea, many of which are seasonal and influenced by swampy floodplains, contributing to the river's high sediment load and variable flow regime. These tributaries join the main stem at various points along its course, with several draining areas near the border with Indonesia's Papua province. Left-bank tributaries include the August River, which enters the upper Sepik in the western highlands, the Yuat River—the largest tributary that joins near Ambunti in the middle course and contributes over half of the Sepik's total discharge due to its large in the central highlands—and the Keram River, which merges in the lower floodplains. The Hagogo River also feeds into the from the southern highlands. Right-bank tributaries comprise the Frieda River, which joins the Sepik in the middle course and is notable for its mineral-rich waters associated with potential developments that could introduce pollutants. Other right-bank feeders include the Wogamus River and the , part of a broader that enhances the river's volume during wet seasons. Overall, these tributaries collectively amplify the Sepik's annual discharge, which is influenced by patterns and integrated into the main river's flow dynamics.

Ecology and Environment

Biodiversity

The Sepik River basin represents one of the largest and most intact uncontaminated freshwater systems in the region, spanning approximately 77,000 km² and featuring extensive floodplains that foster a of habitats including swamps, lakes, and forested wetlands. These floodplains, influenced by seasonal inundation, create dynamic environments that support high levels of ecological diversity, with over 1,500 lakes and wetlands serving as critical refugia for aquatic and semi-aquatic life. The basin's pristine condition underscores its global significance as a , encompassing two ecoregions and three centers of plant diversity. The fauna of the Sepik is notably diverse, particularly in its aquatic and riparian components. The river and its tributaries host around 70 native fish species, many of which are endemic to the Sepik-Ramu system, including the Niugini black bass (Lutjanus goldiei), a hardy predator adapted to both freshwater and estuarine conditions. Avian life is abundant, featuring iconic species such as the northern cassowary (Casuarius unappendiculatus), azure kingfisher (Alcedo azurea), and various birds of paradise that inhabit the surrounding rainforests. Mammals are represented by 76 species, including arboreal forms like the Matschie's tree kangaroo (Dendrolagus matschiei) and reptiles such as the estuarine saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) and monitor lizards (Varanus spp.), which utilize the floodplain's varied niches. Amphibians, while less documented, include several endemics like certain microhylid frogs adapted to the cyclical flooding, enabling them to exploit temporary pools and swamp edges during wet seasons. Vegetation along the Sepik transitions from dense tropical rainforests fringing the upper and middle riverbanks—dominated by dipterocarp and myrtaceous trees—to mangrove forests at the estuary, where species like Rhizophora and Avicennia stabilize coastal sediments. In the expansive swampy floodplains, sago palms (Metroxylon sagu) form monodominant stands, providing structural habitat and serving as a key component of the wetland ecosystem. Oxbow lakes and backwaters support floating aquatic flora, including water lilies (Nymphaea spp.) and emergent reeds, which contribute to nutrient cycling and oxygenate the shallow waters during low-flow periods. This floral diversity not only enhances habitat complexity but also reflects adaptations to the basin's hydrological regime of prolonged flooding and drying cycles. Endemic species highlight the Sepik's evolutionary uniqueness, with numerous fish taxa—such as certain melanotaeniid rainbowfishes and synbranchid eels—restricted to the basin's freshwater habitats and exhibiting morphological adaptations like robust fins for navigating flood-prone channels. Amphibians have evolved direct development strategies to survive the unpredictable environments, bypassing aquatic larval stages vulnerable to . These underscore the basin's role as a , where isolation by mountainous terrain and riverine barriers has driven . Human interventions have introduced non-native species that impact the native biota. In the mid-20th century, Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) was introduced to the Sepik in the 1950s for aquaculture, rapidly establishing populations that compete with endemic fishes for resources and alter food webs. Similarly, water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), first detected in the lower Sepik in the 1980s, proliferates in slow-moving waters, reducing oxygen levels and shading out native aquatic plants, thereby disrupting habitat structure and native species balances. These introductions exemplify ongoing challenges to the ecosystem's integrity despite its relative isolation.

Conservation and Threats

The Sepik River basin is recognized as a globally significant area for conservation, encompassing diverse ecosystems that support unique and . The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) has led the Integrated River Basin Management (IRBM) project since the early 2010s, collaborating with government and local stakeholders to develop a sustainable framework for water, land, and resource management across the basin. This initiative emphasizes coordinated planning to balance conservation with development, addressing challenges like and . In October 2025, the and Papua New Guinea's Conservation and Environment Protection Authority (CEPA) supported community-based conservation in the Hunstein Range Area, focusing on protection and sustainable resource use for local indigenous groups. Major threats to the Sepik ecosystem include proposed mining activities, particularly the Frieda River copper-gold project, which as of late 2025 is still undergoing environmental assessment and has sparked debates from 2023 onward over potential from and . operations in the upper basin have intensified conflicts, with 2023 reports documenting community divisions and violent resistance against encroaching companies that clear forests for timber extraction. exacerbates these pressures by altering flood patterns, increasing variability in river discharge and heightening risks of inundation in the areas. Introduced species pose ongoing ecological risks, with water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) invading the lower Sepik since the 1980s, forming dense mats that clog waterways, hinder , and disrupt aquatic habitats. has similarly depleted native fish stocks, with current harvest levels deemed unsustainable and threatening long-term in the river system. Recent conservation efforts include government commitments in 2025 to enforce stringent environmental standards for the Frieda project, including ongoing environmental impact assessments to mitigate risks. Anti-mine campaigns have gained momentum through cultural , with 2023 initiatives leveraging traditional beliefs—such as river spirits and ancestral ties—to unite communities against development threats, as highlighted in studies on indigenous resistance strategies. Protected areas within the basin, such as the Hunstein Range Wildlife Management Area in the upper reaches, provide critical safeguards for forested habitats, while broader zones in the lower Sepik contribute to preservation efforts.

Peoples and Culture

Indigenous Peoples and Languages

The Sepik River basin in supports a population of approximately 430,000 indigenous , with denser settlements concentrated in the middle and lower reaches where the river's floodplains provide fertile land for gardening and fishing. These communities include numerous distinct ethnic groups, reflecting the region's extraordinary cultural mosaic. Prominent among them are the Iatmul, who inhabit the middle Sepik and number around 10,000 individuals across about two dozen villages; the Abelam of the Maprik area, with an estimated 40,000 in the inland foothills; and the Sawos of the lower reaches, comprising roughly 6,000 speakers. Other notable groups include the Kambaramba along the lower river oxbows and the Watam near the mouth, alongside more than 20 additional tribes such as the Kwoma and , each maintaining unique identities shaped by their riverine environment. Linguistic diversity in the basin is profound, with over 300 languages spoken, many belonging to the Sepik-Ramu phylum (including the Iatmul language of the Ndu family) or the Torricelli phylum, while others fall into isolates or smaller families like the Kwoma-Nukuma. Iatmul, for instance, is part of the Ramu-Lower Sepik branch and serves as a in middle Sepik trade networks. A significant portion of these languages—estimated at dozens—are endangered due to intergenerational toward and English, driven by and mission influences. Settlement patterns emphasize adaptation to the river's seasonal floods, with villages typically constructed on in the expansive floodplains or on higher riverbanks, facilitating transport via canoes and supporting subsistence economies reliant on , , and cultivation. varies but often centers on clan-based systems; among the Iatmul, patrilineal clans (ngaiva) form the core of social and ritual life, paired into moieties with totemic associations to river features like islands, fish, and ancestral spirits that embody the Sepik's dynamic . These structures reinforce kinship ties and , underscoring the river's role as both a physical and spiritual lifeline for basin peoples.

Traditional Art and Practices

The traditional art of the Sepik River communities, particularly among the Iatmul and Abelam peoples, is renowned for its intricate wood carvings that serve as embodiments of and social hierarchies. Iatmul artisans craft figures, often in the form of suspension hooks or house posts, from durable woods like kwila (), featuring bold, stylized human forms with exaggerated features to symbolize spiritual power and status. These carvings, placed in ceremonial men's houses (haus tambaran), incorporate triangular motifs representing gender duality and fertility, while masks—carved with open mouths and fierce expressions—depict totemic beings that guard sacred spaces and invoke protection. Abelam carvings, similarly executed in kwila and other local hardwoods, include elongated figures (nggwalndu) adorned with fiber headdresses, symbolizing spirits and used in rituals to connect the living with the supernatural realm. Symbolic motifs of serpents and birds, incised or painted in curvilinear patterns, evoke the river's dynamic , with serpents representing watery origins and birds signifying and vigilance. Ceremonial objects further highlight the artistic prowess of these riverine groups, integrating functionality with symbolism. Shields, carved by Iatmul warriors from kwila wood and painted in red to denote blood and vitality, feature interlocking serpent-like designs that allude to defensive power and mythic battles, often displayed in warfare simulations or initiations. Spears, similarly adorned with and motifs, serve as status symbols in exchanges and dances, their hafts incised to recount clan histories. Garamut slit , hollowed from large tree trunks and beaten with mallets during ceremonies, produce resonant tones that signal gatherings or accompany dances; in the Middle Sepik, Iatmul and neighboring groups engrave them with ancestral faces to invoke spiritual presence in initiations and feasts. These objects, crafted using adzes and natural pigments derived from clay and plants, underscore the communities' deep environmental attunement, transforming raw materials into conduits for social cohesion and supernatural dialogue. Cultural practices intertwined with this art preserve oral histories and enforce social bonds, often centered on the river's mythic landscape. Among the Abelam, yam ceremonies celebrate the harvest of long yams (up to 3.5 meters), treated as living entities akin to initiates; these tubers are decorated with and , paraded in exchanges that affirm male prestige and clan alliances, with carvings of spirit figures overseeing the rituals to ensure fertility and abundance. Iatmul practices include scarification, a where young men endure incisions on their torsos to mimic skin, symbolizing rebirth from maternal ties and emulation of the river's powerful totems—cuts are rubbed with clay and oil, healing into raised scars that mark adulthood and resilience. , performed around garamut rhythms or during house post raisings, weaves river myths where serpents and birds guide human origins, embedding ecological knowledge and moral lessons into communal memory. These arts and practices function as repositories of cosmological knowledge, encoding totemic lineages, gender roles, and within carved forms and rituals that reinforce community identity. However, modernization—through missionization, urban migration, and economic shifts—has led to a decline in traditional production, with sacred carvings increasingly adapted into tourist-oriented items lacking deeper totemic layers. Recent efforts, including cultural festivals and cooperatives, foster revival by channeling back into authentic practices, sustaining motifs of serpents and birds as symbols of enduring riverine heritage.

History

Early Exploration and Contact

The Sepik River has served as a vital artery for indigenous navigation and for thousands of years, facilitating the exchange of goods such as , tools, shells, and foodstuffs among diverse village-based societies along its length. These communities, characterized by decentralized, kin-based structures without centralized states, relied on dugout canoes to traverse the river's meandering course, enabling inter-village alliances and ritual exchanges that sustained social and economic networks. Archaeological evidence from sites near the river indicates continuous human occupation and routes linking coastal and inland groups in . European contact with the Sepik began in 1885 when German naturalist Otto Finsch led the first documented expedition up the river aboard the steamer , navigating approximately 50 kilometers inland from the estuary and naming it the Kaiserin-Augusta-Fluss in honor of German Empress Augusta. This venture, sponsored by the Neuguinea-Kompagnie, aimed to assess the region's potential for colonization and resource extraction, marking the initial European penetration into the interior. Follow-up German expeditions in and extended exploration further, covering over 600 kilometers upriver by and documenting the river's vast watershed for the first time. By the early , following Australia's administration of the region after , patrols from coastal outposts began mapping the upper reaches starting in the 1910s, with joint Dutch-German efforts in 1910 delineating borders near the river's headwaters. However, these incursions were severely limited by endemic , dense swampy terrain, and logistical challenges, restricting sustained presence to brief forays. Indigenous responses to these early outsiders varied, with coastal and lower communities often engaging in initial of carved artifacts, feathers, and foodstuffs for metal tools and cloth, fostering tentative economic exchanges. In more remote upper reaches, however, groups exhibited resistance through ambushes and avoidance, viewing intruders as threats to territorial autonomy and spiritual domains associated with the river.

Colonial Period and World War II

The German colonial administration of , established in 1884, encompassed the northern coastal regions including the Sepik River basin, which was renamed the Kaiserin-Augusta-Fluss in honor of Empress Augusta following explorations by Otto Finsch in the . During this period from 1884 to , German authorities focused on initial surveys and limited economic ventures, such as prospecting for minerals along the river, but administrative control remained tenuous due to the challenging terrain and sparse European presence. Following the outbreak of in 1914, Australian forces occupied , transitioning to a formal Class C mandate in 1920 that placed the territory under Australian administration. During the 1920s, Australian officials officially renamed the river the Sepik, adopting a local term to replace the German nomenclature and reflecting efforts to standardize geographic naming in the mandated territory. Under this mandate in the 1920s and 1930s, Australia established key administrative patrol posts at Angoram on the lower Sepik and Ambunti further upstream, serving as bases for kiaps (patrol officers) to enforce colonial policies, conduct censuses, and mediate local disputes among indigenous communities. The Sepik River played a central role in colonial economic activities, particularly as a vital artery for , the dried coconut meat processed for oil export, with riverine steamers and canoes facilitating the movement of goods from inland plantations to coastal trading posts during the interwar years. Missionary efforts also intensified along the river; the (SVD), a German Catholic order, established stations such as Tumleo in 1896 and Marienberg in 1913, using the waterway for evangelization and education, though their work was interrupted by the and resumed under Australian oversight post-1920. During , Japanese forces invaded northern in early 1942, occupying the Sepik region as part of their southward expansion, establishing bases at Wewak and using the river for logistics and troop movements until Allied counteroffensives in 1944. The Battle of -Wewak, from November 1944 to August 1945, saw Australian troops of the 6th Division advance eastward from along the northern coast, crossing the Sepik River multiple times to outflank Japanese positions, with the waterway serving as both a and a supply route for Allied forces in their push to isolate and destroy the 18th Japanese Army. After the war, in 1946, the former mandate became a United Nations Trust Territory administered by Australia, continuing colonial structures in the Sepik region with enhanced development initiatives until Papua New Guinea achieved self-government in 1973 and full independence on September 16, 1975.

Post-Independence Developments

Papua New Guinea's transition to self-governance in 1975 ushered in a new era for the Sepik region, integrating it into national development frameworks while emphasizing local autonomy and basic infrastructure improvements. Early post-independence efforts prioritized riverine connectivity, with the expansion of the Sepik Highway and construction of key bridges, such as the Amaku Bridge in Maprik, facilitating access along the East Sepik corridor during the 1980s. These initiatives aimed to link remote villages to provincial centers like Wewak, supporting trade and mobility in a region historically reliant on river transport. The 1990s and 2000s saw a mix of social challenges and economic opportunities in East Sepik, including the resurgence of tribal fighting in areas like Yangoru, which disrupted communities along the East Sepik Highway and highlighted ongoing tensions over and resources. Concurrently, to cultural sites grew significantly, peaking from the late 1980s through the mid-1990s and continuing into the 2000s, as visitors were drawn to traditional villages, haus tambaran spirit houses, and artisanal carvings, boosting local economies through guided river tours and cultural exchanges. This period reflected broader national trends in promoting PNG's diverse heritage amid internal conflicts. In recent years, the Sepik region has grappled with divisions stemming from resource extraction, particularly logging operations that intensified community disputes in 2023 over land rights and benefit distribution, often leading to and opposition from affected landowners. By 2025, however, leaders from East and West Sepik demonstrated unity in supporting the Frieda River copper-gold project, a move commended by on November 3 as a mature, collaborative effort to balance with environmental safeguards. This shift underscores evolving regional consensus on large-scale development under national oversight. Ongoing development programs have targeted rural enhancement, notably the European Union-funded STREIT PNG initiative, launched with preparatory studies in 2017 and active through the 11th (2014-2020), which focuses on in East and West Sepik by strengthening cocoa, vanilla, and fisheries value chains for over 33,000 farmers. The program has improved rural access through infrastructure like the rehabilitation of the Bonohoi–Asanakor road, benefiting 1,900 families by connecting them to markets, , and health services, while empowering women's groups and small enterprises for sustainable livelihoods.

Economy and Modern Significance

Resource Use and Agriculture

The Sepik River basin supports a vital subsistence for approximately 400,000 people, primarily through traditional methods such as paddling dugout canoes equipped with gill nets, spears, and traps to access and riverine habitats. Local communities harvest a variety of native and introduced species, including (Oreochromis mossambicus) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio), alongside freshwater prawns, eels, , and sago grubs from palm swamps, which contribute significantly to protein intake at an average of 11.4 kg per resident annually. Annual yields range from 3,000 to 5,000 tons across the catchment, with most catches consumed locally and limited commercial potential due to inadequate processing infrastructure and low overall productivity compared to other tropical rivers. Agriculture in the Sepik region centers on harvesting in swampy lowlands, where communities extract as a by felling mature palms and processing the , often integrating it with cultivation for self-sufficiency. In floodplains and higher grounds, smallholder farmers grow root crops like yams and for subsistence, while cash crops such as cocoa, , and provide income through exports to coastal markets. Cocoa production in East Sepik has seen notable growth, with exports reaching new markets like in 2025 and contributing to national revenues exceeding K1.2 billion in 2024, driven by global price surges and provincial initiatives to boost smallholder output. Forestry practices emphasize sustainable use of timber from the upper basin for crafting dugout canoes essential for river navigation and fishing, as well as for traditional carvings that support cultural exchanges. Small-scale operations, often community-led with portable mills, target selective harvesting to meet local needs while adhering to principles estimated at around 21,000 cubic meters annually in West Sepik areas. Alluvial along riverbanks and tributaries provides supplementary income for communities, with an estimated 600 people engaged in manual extraction using pans and sluices, serving as a key economic activity amid limited formal employment. These artisanal activities involve tens of thousands of local miners using panning, sluicing, and small dredges to extract from riverbeds, contributing to rural livelihoods with annual national alluvial output of approximately 120,000 ounces (as of 2024). Historically, during the late German colonial period ending in 1914, there was optimism about the Sepik's mineral potential, including and prospects, though systematic was limited compared to agricultural pursuits. The Sepik River itself facilitates transport of agricultural goods, fish, and timber via canoes and small boats to coastal markets, linking inland producers to broader trade networks. These renewable resources contribute to Papua New Guinea's non-resource sector, which grew through agricultural production including cocoa and coffee in 2024-2025, supporting over 80% of the rural population. Under the Medium Term Development Plan IV (2023-2027), the Greater Sepik region is positioned as a potential agriculture hub, with investments exceeding K1 billion in rice, livestock, and processing to elevate the sector's GDP share to 14.2% by 2027.

Mining Projects and Infrastructure

The Frieda River Project is a proposed open-pit copper-gold mine located on the Frieda River, a 320 km tributary of the Sepik in the rugged highlands of Sandaun and East Sepik provinces, Papua New Guinea. Developed by Frieda River Limited, a subsidiary of PanAust, the project targets the Horse-Ivaal-Trukai-Ekwai-Koki (HITEK) porphyry deposit, estimated to contain 12 million tonnes of copper and significant gold resources. Negotiations advanced in 2023 when the Papua New Guinea Mineral Resources Authority granted PanAust six exploration licenses for the site, enabling further feasibility studies and stakeholder consultations. By 2025, landowner groups urged the government to progress the project beyond exploration, while regional leaders from East and West Sepik signed a position paper endorsing development under strict environmental conditions. The mine is projected for a 33-year lifespan, with average annual production of 175,000 tonnes of copper and 230,000 ounces of gold in concentrate. Associated infrastructure forms the Sepik Infrastructure Project, integrating with . A key component is the Frieda River Hydroelectric Project, a planned 490 MW to generate clean power for over a century, primarily for mine operations but also for export to support Papua New Guinea's energy needs. This would be complemented by approximately 120 km of new access roads to connect remote highland areas to coastal facilities, facilitating of personnel and materials. Maritime ports are envisioned along the Sepik River, including upgrades for transport of concentrates from upstream sites like the Frieda or May River ports to loading points near Angoram for export. Beyond large-scale initiatives, in the Sepik region includes small-scale alluvial operations, particularly in the upper reaches and Maprik area of . The Frieda River Project has sparked significant controversies, highlighted by the 2023 anti-mine campaign led by the Save the Sepik initiative and Project Sepik, which mobilized communities through declarations emphasizing cultural and ecological threats to the river basin. This opposition culminated in calls for a total ban, drawing on traditional beliefs and chiefs' endorsements to reject downstream waste impacts. In contrast, 2025 saw provincial leadership from East and West Sepik express support, conditional on robust environmental safeguards like no riverine disposal and international-standard design to mitigate and contamination risks. commended this unity, affirming development to the highest environmental management standards. Economically, the project promises substantial benefits for , including a projected increase of over K90 billion (US$28 billion) in national real GDP over its lifespan, driven by taxes, royalties, and export revenues estimated at K29 billion for the government and landowners. It could create over 5,000 full-time jobs at peak operations, with 90% reserved for Papua New Guinean nationals, fostering skills in , , and . However, risks include losses and potential concerns from for over 100,000 local residents along the Sepik, with physical relocation affecting a limited number of upstream communities, underscoring the need for comprehensive mitigation.

References

  1. https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5065/
  2. https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?3515466/20th-Century-thinking-will-sacrifice-the-Sepik-river
  3. https://sacredland.org/sepik-river-basin-papua-new-guinea/
  4. https://journals.openedition.org/jso/8868?lang=en
  5. https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/ap_river_bigwins.pdf
  6. https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Sepik
  7. https://navyhistory.au/occasional-paper-96-ran-encounters-with-papua-new-guineas-big-rivers/
  8. https://www.mindat.org/feature-2084373.html
  9. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/552071c7-e9f2-4e9f-8556-90d9c0b6f6a4/content
  10. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2023JC020272
  11. https://openknowledge.fao.org/bitstreams/51183230-ad34-4f33-854b-419227f0b280/download
  12. https://www.bom.gov.au/water/about/waterResearch/document/sepik.pdf
  13. https://openknowledge.fao.org/bitstreams/552071c7-e9f2-4e9f-8556-90d9c0b6f6a4/download
  14. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/4c36eae4-ba29-4188-8dd2-77da9f729647/content
  15. https://www.friedariver.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Appendix-7a-Water-Quality-Sediment-Quality-and-Aquatic-Ecology-Baseline.pdf
  16. https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/598331468144541501/pdf/E24290v20P10771ed0Social0Assessment.pdf
  17. https://www.jubileeaustralia.org/storage/app/uploads/public/604/d9d/f5b/604d9df5bcd83276685706.pdf
  18. https://wwf.panda.org/discover/knowledge_hub/where_we_work/new_guinea_forests/conservation_new_guinea_forests/sites_new_guinea_forests/sepik_papua_new_guinea
  19. https://png-data.sprep.org/system/files/Fish%20and%20Fisheries%20of%20the%20Fly%20River%2C%20Papua%20New%20Guinea.pdf
  20. https://www.ecosystem-guides.com/sepik-river.html
  21. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-5269-9_14
  22. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/f1e5a9fe-bb0c-48e3-871a-79033a8eb646/content
  23. http://museum.wa.gov.au/research/records-supplements/records/ichthyological-survey-sepik-river-papua-new-guinea
  24. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10745-023-00460-7
  25. https://www.gisp.org/downloadpubs/gispAsia.pdf
  26. https://wwf.panda.org/?uProjectID=PG0036
  27. https://www.biodiversitychallengefunds.org.uk/project/DAR13012
  28. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/undp-papua-new-guinea_sdg13-sdg15-activity-7384372308926394368-MsnG
  29. https://www.jubileeaustralia.org/news/latest-news-post/frieda-river-mine-and-threat-sepik-river-papua-new-guinea
  30. https://savethesepik.org/report-the-river-is-not-ours/
  31. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-03-09/how-the-second-amazone-became-battleground-sepik-png/102062130
  32. https://www.jubileeaustralia.org/news/blog/post/frieda-river-mine-summary-recent-developments
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393645605_Riverine_Flood_Susceptibility_Analysis_Through_Frequency_Ratio_Model_-A_Case_Study_in_the_Sepik_River_Basin_Papua_New_Guinea
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229995984_Exotic_species_fisheries_and_conservation_of_freshwater_biodiversity_in_tropical_Asia_The_case_of_the_Sepik_River_Papua_New_Guinea
  35. https://www.thenational.com.pg/frieda-mine-undergoing-environment-assessment/
  36. https://pngmining.com/frieda-river-committed-to-sustainability/
  37. https://news.mongabay.com/2023/04/power-of-traditional-beliefs-lies-at-the-heart-of-an-anti-mine-campaign-in-png/
  38. https://www.encyclopedia.com/places/australia-and-oceania/pacific-islands-political-geography/iatmul
  39. https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/abelam
  40. https://search.proquest.com/openview/d1ca83ce2dbc135b22be60496d5d5e44/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1819511
  41. https://www.art-pacific.com/artifacts/nuguinea/sepikriv/sepiklow/kambaram.htm
  42. https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/15888/PP
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285954493_Language_contact_along_the_Sepik_River_Papua_New_Guinea
  44. https://journals.openedition.org/jso/8148?lang=en
  45. https://www.academia.edu/61498481/Language_endangerment_in_the_Sepik_area_of_Papua_New_Guinea
  46. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/709965
  47. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/b233fd19d9a742afa35324e17d880360
  48. https://eksilverman.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Gender-of-the-Cosmos.pdf
  49. https://digitalcollections.byuh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2213&context=pacific-studies-journal
  50. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2024/02/papua-new-guinea-sculpture-garden
  51. https://shs.cairn.info/revue-journal-de-la-societe-des-oceanistes-2018-1-page-151?lang=fr
  52. https://www.britannica.com/art/Oceanic-art/The-Sepik-River-regions
  53. https://hoodmuseum.dartmouth.edu/objects/990.54.27850
  54. https://www.bowers.org/index.php/collections-blog/living-music-garamut-drums-of-the-middle-sepik-river
  55. https://www.art-pacific.com/artifacts/nuguinea/sepikriv/sepikmrv.htm
  56. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/311328
  57. https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-45297699
  58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40331454
  59. https://journals.openedition.org/jso/8354
  60. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstreams/4eae6c78-f718-455c-ab09-8ef03d00520f/download
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343880537_Rock_art_and_long-distance_prehistoric_exchange_behavior_A_case_study_from_Auwim_East_Sepik_Papua_New_Guinea
  62. https://www.ancient-origins.net/premium-preview/sepik-river-0017388
  63. https://geraldrknight.com/2021/06/18/mailu-and-other-pre-contact-melanesian-trade-centers/
  64. https://australian.museum/blog-archive/science/our-global-neighbours-bismarcks-imperial-commissioner/
  65. https://www.bernarddegrunne.com/usr/library/documents/publications1/sepik-bernard-de-grunne-tefaf-2017.pdf
  66. https://www.oceanicartsociety.org.au/pdf-library/oas-journals/OAS_Journal_Vol20_4.pdf
  67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331683181_The_Sepik_River_Papua_New_Guinea_Nourishing_Tradition_and_Modern_Catastrophe
  68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25701189
  69. https://repository.naturalis.nl/document/570956
  70. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstreams/367fe336-cf8f-4749-95f8-e5af29652dd1/download
  71. https://www.oceanicartsociety.org.au/a-brief-history-of-the-sepik-continued/
  72. https://www.colorado.edu/anthropology/sites/default/files/attached-files/islan_rivers_book.pdf
  73. https://digitalcollections.byuh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2013&context=pacific-studies-journal
  74. https://www.jstor.org/stable/645636
  75. https://anzacportal.dva.gov.au/resources/aitape-wewak-1944-1945
  76. https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/awm-media/collection/RCDIG1070671/document/5519954.PDF
  77. https://history.state.gov/countries/papua-new-guinea
  78. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/16/papua-new-guinea-1975-independence-remembering-png-first-moments
  79. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24467308
  80. https://eksilverman.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/From-Cannibal-Tours-to-Cargo-Cult.pdf
  81. https://www.postcourier.com.pg/pm-marape-commends-sepik-leaders-for-unity-on-frieda-river-project/
  82. https://www.fao.org/in-action/eu-streit-png/en
  83. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/0f4e443d-5efd-479f-b89d-3eede3a34e50/content
  84. https://www.communityeconomies.org/sites/default/files/2024-06/SARWPSR%2520Report_June2024.pdf
  85. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sagopalm/13/1/13_1/_pdf
  86. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard-Bourke/publication/313997347_Agricultural_Systems_of_Papua_New_Guinea_Working_Paper_No_3_West_Sepik_Province_Text_Summaries_Maps_Code_Lists_and_Village_Identification/links/58b12140a6fdcc6f03f61c5e/Agricultural-Systems-of-Papua-New-Guinea-Working-Paper-No-3-West-Sepik-Province-Text-Summaries-Maps-Code-Lists-and-Village-Identification.pdf
  87. https://png-data.sprep.org/system/files/Food%2520and%2520Agriculture_whole_book_Part_1.pdf
  88. https://www.nbc.com.pg/post/24425/east-sepik-eyes-first-cocoa-export-to-shandong-province
  89. https://devpolicy.org/png-cocoa-information-goes-mobile-20250709/
  90. https://encyclocraftsapr.com/canoes/
  91. https://www.forest-trends.org/wp-content/uploads/imported/6-wes-pdf.pdf
  92. https://actnowpng.org/blog/blog-entry-frieda-river-mine-will-destroy-lives-and-livelihoods
  93. https://mra.gov.pg/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/MINISTERIAL-UPDATE-ON-THE-MINING-SECTOR.pdf
  94. https://www.thenational.com.pg/life-dictated-by-a-rivers-mood-and-character/
  95. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099062625004022566/pdf/P506957-007e2dee-b90b-43d0-a9c7-380f5f59a7f3.pdf
  96. https://www.mtdp.gov.pg/MTDP%20IV/MTDP%20IV%202023-2027.pdf
  97. https://www.mining-technology.com/projects/frieda-river-copper-gold-mine-guinea/
  98. https://www.friedariver.com/
  99. https://www.pngbusinessnews.com/articles/2023/7/panaust-receives-exploration-licenses-for-frieda-river-project
  100. https://panaust.com.au/landowners-urge-government-and-frieda-river-limited-to-advance-copper-gold-project/
  101. https://www.thenational.com.pg/benefits-of-frieda-river-copper-mine/
  102. http://13.238.245.243/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Executive-Summary-English.pdf
  103. https://savethesepik.org/
  104. https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/chiefs-of-pngs-sepik-spirit-houses-call-for-frieda-river-mine-to-be-banned/
  105. https://pnghausbung.com/pm-marape-commends-sepik-leaders-for-unity-on-frieda-river-project/
  106. https://www.thenational.com.pg/frieda-revenue-for-govt-and-los-expected-to-hit-k29bil/
  107. https://pngresourcesweek.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/4.1_Frieda-River-Limited.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.