Hubbry Logo
Sex-determination systemSex-determination systemMain
Open search
Sex-determination system
Community hub
Sex-determination system
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sex-determination system
Sex-determination system
from Wikipedia

Some chromosomal sex determination systems in animals

A sex-determination system is a biological system that determines the development of the organism's sex.[1] Most organisms that create their offspring using sexual reproduction have two common sexes, males and females, and in other species there are hermaphrodites, organisms that can function reproductively as either female or male, or both.[2]

There are also some species in which only one sex is present, temporarily or permanently. This can be due to parthenogenesis, the act of a female reproducing without fertilization, mostly seen in plant species. In some plants or algae the gametophyte stage may reproduce itself, thus producing more individuals of the same sex as the parent.

In some species, sex determination is genetic: males and females have different alleles or even different genes that specify their sexual morphology. In animals this is often accompanied by chromosomal differences, generally through combinations of XY, ZW, XO, ZO chromosomes, or haplodiploidy. The sexual differentiation is generally triggered by a main gene (a "sex locus"), with a multitude of other genes following in a domino effect.

In other cases, the sex of a fetus is determined by environmental variables (such as temperature). The details of some sex-determination systems are not yet fully understood.

Some species such as various plants and fish do not have a fixed sex and instead go through life cycles and change sex based on genetic cues during corresponding life stages of their type. This could be due to environmental factors such as seasons and temperature. In some gonochoric species, a few individuals may have conditions that cause a mix of different sex characteristics.[3]

Discovery

[edit]

The scientific understanding of sex determination has evolved significantly over the centuries through a series of landmark discoveries across plants, animals, and insects.

In 1694, German botanist Rudolf Jakob Camerarius conducted pioneering experiments on pollination, during which he identified the existence of distinct male and female reproductive structures in plants, including maize. His findings laid the groundwork for understanding plant reproduction and sexual differentiation .[4]

In 1866, Gregor Mendel, an Austrian monk and scientist, published his seminal work on the inheritance of traits in pea plants. These findings—now known as Mendelian inheritance—introduced the concept of heritable units (genes) passed from two gametes. Mendel's principles eventually became the foundation of modern genetics.[5]

In 1902, American zoologist C.E. McClung proposed that sex chromosomes played a central role in determining sex, based on cytological studies in insects. This was one of the earliest steps toward a chromosomal theory of sex determination.[6]

In 1903, American geneticist Nettie Stevens made a groundbreaking discovery while studying the mealworm (Tenebrio molitor), demonstrating that sex is determined by specific chromosomes, now known as X and Y chromosomes. Her findings provided the first concrete evidence for chromosomal sex determination.[7][8]

In 1917, botanist Charles Elmer Allen extended this understanding to the plant kingdom by discovering sex chromosomes in plants, confirming that the chromosomal mechanism is not exclusive to animals.[9][failed verification]

In 1922, geneticist Calvin B. Bridges introduced the Genic Balance Theory, based on experiments with Drosophila melanogaster (fruit flies). He proposed that the ratio of X chromosomes to sets of autosomes determines sexual development, adding complexity to the previously accepted XX/XY system.[10]

Finally, in 1928, Swiss biologist Fritz Baltzer was the first to describe environmental sex determination, showing that external environmental factors, such as temperature, could influence the development of sex in certain organisms. This discovery expanded the understanding of sex determination beyond purely genetic mechanisms.[11]

Chromosomal systems

[edit]

Among animals, the most common chromosomal sex determination systems are XY, XO, ZW, ZO, but with numerous exceptions.

According to the Tree of Sex database[12] (as of 2023), the known sex determination systems are:[13]

Sex determination systems in vertebrates, insects and angiosperms
Taxonomic group XY XO ZW ZO Other1 XO/XY ratio ZO/ZW ratio
Vertebrates 722 15 480 3 254 0.02 0.01
Insects 4415 1857 37 25 156 0.42 0.68
Angiosperms 23 0 1 0 19 0.00 0.00
Total 5160 1872 518 28 429 0.36 0.05

1. complex sex chromosomes, homomorphic sex chromosomes, or others

XX/XY sex chromosomes

[edit]
Drosophila sex-chromosomes
Human male XY chromosomes after G-banding

The XX/XY sex-determination system is perhaps the most familiar as it is found in humans and most other mammals, as well as in some insect species. In the XX/XY system, karyotypic females usually have two X chromosomes (XX), while karyotypic males usually have a single X and a single Y chromosome (XY). The X and Y sex chromosomes are different in shape and size from each other, unlike other chromosome pairs (autosomes), and are sometimes called allosomes. In some species, including humans, individuals remain phenotypically undifferentiated for some time during development (embryogenesis); in others, however, such as fruit flies, sexual differentiation occurs as soon fertilization occurs.[14]

Y-centered sex determination

[edit]

Some species (including humans) have a gene SRY on the Y chromosome that triggers development of the male phenotype. Members of SRY-reliant species can also have other chromosomal combinations such as XXY.[14] In humans, karyotypic sex is generally determined by the presence or absence of a Y chromosome with a functional SRY gene. If the SRY gene is present and activated during fetal development, cells create testosterone and anti-müllerian hormone which typically leads to male phenotypic development.[14] In embryos that lack a functioning SRY gene, such as most XX individuals, the individual develops phenotypically female.

In Y-centered sex determination, the SRY gene is the gene that triggers male phenotype development, however multiple genes are required for this process to complete. In XY mice, lack of the gene DAX1 on the X chromosome results in sterility, but in humans it causes adrenal hypoplasia congenita.[15] However, when an extra DAX1 gene is placed on the X chromosome, the result is phenotypically female, despite the existence of SRY, since it overrides the effects of SRY.[16] Even when there are functional X chromosomes in XX females, duplication or expression of SOX9 causes testes to develop.[17][18] Gradual sex reversal in developed mice can also occur when the gene FOXL2 is removed from females.[19] Even though the gene DMRT1 is used by birds as their sex locus, species who have XY chromosomes also rely upon DMRT1, contained on chromosome 9, for sexual differentiation at some point in their formation.[14]

X-centered sex determination

[edit]

Some species, such as fruit flies, use the presence of two X chromosomes to determine femaleness.[20] Species that use the number of Xs to determine sex are nonviable with an extra X chromosome.

Other variants of XX/XY sex determination

[edit]

Some fish have variants of the XY sex-determination system, as well as the regular system. For example, while having an XY format, Xiphophorus nezahualcoyotl and X. milleri also have a second Y chromosome, known as Y', that creates XY' females and YY' males.[21]

At least one monotreme, the platypus, presents a particular sex determination scheme that in some ways resembles that of the ZW sex chromosomes of birds and lacks the SRY gene. The platypus has sex chromosomes . The males have , while females have . During meiosis, 5 of X form one chain, and 5 of Y form another chain. Thus, they behave effectively as a typical XY chromosomal system, except each of X and Y is broken into 5 parts, with the effect that recombinations occur very frequently at 4 particular points.[22] One of the X chromosomes is homologous to the human X chromosome, and another is homologous to the bird Z chromosome.[23]

Although it is an XY system, the platypus' sex chromosomes share no homologues with eutherian sex chromosomes.[24] Instead, homologues with eutherian sex chromosomes lie on the platypus chromosome 6, which means that the eutherian sex chromosomes were autosomes at the time that the monotremes diverged from the therian mammals (marsupials and eutherian mammals). However, homologues to the avian DMRT1 gene on platypus sex chromosomes X3 and X5 suggest that it is possible the sex-determining gene for the platypus is the same one that is involved in bird sex-determination. More research must be conducted in order to determine the exact sex determining gene of the platypus.[25]

Heredity of sex chromosomes in XO sex determination

XX/X0 sex chromosomes

[edit]

In this variant of the XY system, females have two copies of the sex chromosome (XX) but males have only one (X0). The 0 denotes the absence of a second sex chromosome. Generally in this method, the sex is determined by amount of genes expressed across the two chromosomes. This system is observed in a number of insects, including the grasshoppers and crickets of order Orthoptera and in cockroaches (order Blattodea). A small number of mammals also lack a Y chromosome. These include the Amami spiny rat (Tokudaia osimensis) and the Tokunoshima spiny rat (Tokudaia tokunoshimensis) and Sorex araneus, a shrew species. Transcaucasian mole voles (Ellobius lutescens) also have a form of XO determination, in which both sexes lack a second sex chromosome.[16] The mechanism of sex determination is not yet understood.[26]

The nematode C. elegans is male with one sex chromosome (X0); with a pair of chromosomes (XX) it is a hermaphrodite.[27] Its main sex gene is XOL, which encodes XOL-1 and also controls the expression of the genes TRA-2 and HER-1. These genes reduce male gene activation and increase it, respectively.[28]

ZW/ZZ sex chromosomes

[edit]

The ZW sex-determination system is found in birds, some reptiles, and some insects and other organisms. The ZW sex-determination system is reversed compared to the XY system: females have two different kinds of chromosomes (ZW), and males have two of the same kind of chromosomes (ZZ). In the chicken, this was found to be dependent on the expression of DMRT1.[29] In birds, the genes FET1 and ASW are found on the W chromosome for females, similar to how the Y chromosome contains SRY.[14] However, not all species depend upon the W for their sex. For example, there are moths and butterflies that are ZW, but some have been found female with ZO, as well as female with ZZW.[27] Also, while mammals deactivate one of their extra X chromosomes when female, it appears that in the case of Lepidoptera, the males produce double the normal amount of enzymes, due to having two Z's.[27] Because the use of ZW sex determination is varied, it is still unknown how exactly most species determine their sex.[27] However, reportedly, the silkworm Bombyx mori uses a single female-specific piRNA as the primary determiner of sex.[30] Despite the similarities between the ZW and XY systems, these sex chromosomes evolved separately. In the case of the chicken, their Z chromosome is more similar to humans' autosome 9.[31] The chicken's Z chromosome also seems to be related to the X chromosome of the platypus.[32] When a ZW species, such as the Komodo dragon, reproduces parthenogenetically, usually only males are produced. This is due to the fact that the haploid eggs double their chromosomes, resulting in ZZ or WW. The ZZ become males, but the WW are not viable and are not brought to term.[33]

In both XY and ZW sex determination systems, the sex chromosome carrying the critical factors is often significantly smaller, carrying little more than the genes necessary for triggering the development of a given sex.[34][better source needed]

ZZ/Z0 sex chromosomes

[edit]

The ZZ/Z0 sex-determination system is found in some moths. In these insects there is one sex chromosome, Z. Males have two Z chromosomes, whereas females have one Z. Males are ZZ, while females are Z0.[35][36][37]

UV sex chromosomes

[edit]

In some bryophyte and some algae species, the gametophyte stage of the life cycle, rather than being hermaphrodite, occurs as separate male or female individuals that produce male and female gametes respectively. When meiosis occurs in the sporophyte generation of the life cycle, the sex chromosomes known as U and V assort in spores that carry either the U chromosome and give rise to female gametophytes, or the V chromosome and give rise to male gametophytes.[38][39]

Mating types

[edit]

The mating type in microorganisms is analogous to sex in multi-cellular organisms, and is sometimes described using those terms, though they are not necessarily correlated with physical body structures. Some species have more than two mating types. Tetrahymena, a type of ciliate, has 7 mating types

Mating types are extensively studied in fungi. Among fungi, mating type is determined by chromosomal regions called mating-type loci. Furthermore, it is not as simple as "two different mating types can mate", but rather, a matter of combinatorics. As a simple example, most basidiomycete have a "tetrapolar heterothallism" mating system: there are two loci, and mating between two individuals is possible if the alleles on both loci are different. For example, if there are 3 alleles per locus, then there would be 9 mating types, each of which can mate with 4 other mating types.[40] By multiplicative combination, it generates a vast number of mating types. For example, Schizophyllum commune, a type of fungus, has mating types.

Haplodiploid sex chromosomes

Haplodiploidy

[edit]

Haplodiploidy is found in insects belonging to Hymenoptera, such as ants and bees. Sex determination is controlled by the zygosity of a complementary sex determiner (csd) locus. Unfertilized eggs develop into haploid individuals which have a single, hemizygous copy of the csd locus and are therefore males. Fertilized eggs develop into diploid individuals which, due to high variability in the csd locus, are generally heterozygous females. In rare instances diploid individuals may be homozygous, these develop into sterile males. The gene acting as a csd locus has been identified in the honeybee and several candidate genes have been proposed as a csd locus for other Hymenopterans.[41][42][43] Most females in the Hymenoptera order can decide the sex of their offspring by holding received sperm in their spermatheca and either releasing it into their oviduct or not. This allows them to create more workers, depending on the status of the colony.[44]

Polygenic sex determination

[edit]

Polygenic sex determination is when the sex is primarily determined by genes that occur on multiple non-homologous chromosomes. The environment may have a limited, minor influence on sex determination. Examples include African cichlid fish (Metriaclima spp.), lemmings (Myopus schisticolor), green swordtail,[21] medaka,[21] etc. In such systems, there is typically a dominance hierarchy, where one system is dominant over another if in conflict. For example, in some species of cichlid fish from Lake Malawi, if an individual has both the XY locus (on one chromosome pair) and the WZ locus (on another chromosome pair), then the W is dominant and the individual has a female phenotype.[45]

The sex-determination system of zebrafish is polygenic. Juvenile zebrafishes (0–30 days after hatching) have both ovary-like tissue to testis tissue. They then develop into male or female adults, with the determination based on a complex interaction genes on multiple chromosomes, but not affected by environmental variations.[46][47]

Other chromosomal systems

[edit]

In systems with two sex chromosomes, they can be heteromorphic or homomorphic. Homomorphic sex chromosomes are almost identical in size and gene content. The two familiar kinds of sex chromosome pairs (XY and ZW) are heteromorphic. Homomorphic sex chromosomes exist among pufferfish, ratite birds, pythons, and European tree frogs. Some are quite old, meaning that there is some evolutionary force that resists their differentiation.[48] For example, three species of European tree frogs have homologous, homomorphic sex chromosomes, and this homomorphism was maintained for at least 5.4 million years by occasional recombination.[49]

The Nematocera, particularly the Simuliids and Chironomus, have sex determination regions that are labile, meaning that one species may have the sex determination region in one chromosome, but a closely related species might have the same region moved to a different non-homologous chromosome. Some species even have the sex determination region different among individuals within the same species (intraspecific variation).[50][51][52] In some species, some populations have homomorphic sex chromosomes while other populations have heteromorphic sex chromosomes.

The New Zealand frog, Leiopelma hochstetteri, uses a supernumerary sex chromosome. With zero of that chromosome, the frog develops into a male. With one or more, the frog develops into a female. One female had as many as 16 of that chromosome.[53]

Different populations of the Japanese frog Rana rugosa uses different systems. Two use homomorphic male heterogamety, one uses XX/XY, one uses ZZ/ZW. Remarkably, the X and Z chromosomes are homologous, and the Y and W as well. Dmrt1 is on autosome 1 and not sex-linked. This means that an XX female individual is genetically similar to a ZZ male individual, and an XY male individual is to a ZW female individual. The mechanism behind this is yet unclear, but it is hypothesized that during its recent evolution, the XY-to-ZW transition occurred twice.[54][55]

Clarias gariepinus uses both XX/XY and ZW/ZZ system within the species, with some populations using homomorphic XX/XY while others using heteromorphic ZW/ZZ. A population in Thailand appears to use both systems simultaneously, possibly because C. gariepinus were not native to Thailand, and were introduced from different source populations which resulted in a mixture.[56]

Multiple sex chromosomes like those of platypus also occurs in bony fish.[57] Some moths and butterflies have or .[58]

The Southern platyfish has a complex sex determination system involving 3 sex chromosomes and 4 autosomal alleles.[59][60]

Gastrotheca pseustes has C-banding heteromorphism, meaning that both males and females have XY chromosomes, but their Y chromosomes are different on one or more C-bands. Eleutherodactylus maussi has a system.[61][62]

Evolution

[edit]

See [63] for a review.

Origin of sex chromosomes

[edit]

Sexual chromosome pairs can arise from an autosomal pair that, for various reasons, stopped recombination, allowing for their divergence. The rate at which recombination is suppressed, and therefore the rate of sex chromosome divergence, is very different across clades.[48]

In analogy with geological strata, historical events in the evolution of sex chromosomes are called evolutionary strata. The human Y-chromosome has had about 5 strata since the origin of the X and Y chromosomes about 300 Mya from a pair of autosomes. Each stratum was formed when a pseudoautosomal region (PAR) of the Y chromosome is inverted, stopping it from recombination with the X chromosome. Over time, each inverted region decays, possibly due to Muller's ratchet.[64][65] Primate Y-chromosome evolution was rapid, with multiple inversions and shifts of the boundary of PAR.[66]

Among many species of the salamanders, the two chromosomes are only distinguished by a pericentric inversion, so that the banding pattern of the X chromosome is the same as that of Y, but with a region near the centromere reversed. (fig 7 [67]) In some species, the X is pericentrically inverted and the Y is ancestral. In other species it is the opposite. (p. 15 [67])

The gene content of the X chromosome is almost identical among placental mammals. This is hypothesized to be because the X inactivation means any change would cause serious disruption, thus subjecting it to strong purifying selection. Similarly, birds have highly conserved Z chromosomes.[55]

Neo-sex chromosomes

[edit]

Neo-sex chromosomes are currently existing sex chromosomes that formed when an autosome pair fused to the previously existing sex chromosome pair. Following this fusion, the autosomal portion undergoes recombination suppression, allowing them to differentiate. Such systems have been observed in insects, reptiles, birds, and mammals. They are useful to the study of the evolution of Y chromosome degeneration and dosage compensation.[68][69]

Sex-chromosome turnover

[edit]

The sex-chromosome turnover is an evolutionary phenomenon where sex chromosomes disappear or become autosomal, and autosomal chromosomes become sexual, repeatedly over evolutionary time. Some lineages have extensive turnover, but others don't. Generally, in an XY system, if the Y chromosome is degenerate, mostly different from the X chromosome, and has X dosage compensation, then turnover is unlikely. In particular, this applies to humans.[70][63][71]

The ZW and XY systems can evolve into to each other due to sexual conflict.[72]

Homomorphism and the fountain of youth

[edit]

It is an evolutionary puzzle why certain sex chromosomes remain homomorphic over millions of years, especially among lineages of fishes, amphibians, and nonavian reptiles. The fountain-of-youth model states that heteromorphy results from recombination suppression, and recombination suppression results from the male phenotype, not the sex chromosomes themselves. Therefore, if some XY sex-reversed females are fertile and adaptive under some circumstances, then the X and Y chromosomes would recombine in these individuals, preventing Y chromosome decay and maintaining long-term homomorphism.[73]

Sex reversal denotes a situation where the phenotypic sex is different from the genotypic sex. While in humans, sex reversal (such as the XX male syndrome) are often infertile, sex-reversed individuals of some species are fertile under some conditions. For example, some XY-individuals in population of Chinook salmon in the Columbia River became fertile females, producing YY sons. Since Chinook salmons have homomorphic sex chromosomes, such YY sons are healthy. When YY males mate with XX females, all their progeny would be XY male if grown under normal conditions.[74]

Support for the hypothesis is found in the common frog, for which XX males and XY males both suppresses sex chromosome recombination, but XX and XY females both recombine at the same rate.[75]

Environmental systems

[edit]

Temperature-dependent

[edit]
All alligators determine the sex of their offspring by the temperature of the nest.

Many other sex-determination systems exist. In some species of reptiles, including alligators, some turtles, and the tuatara, sex is determined by the temperature at which the egg is incubated during a temperature-sensitive period. There are no examples of temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) in birds. Megapodes had formerly been thought to exhibit this phenomenon, but were found to actually have different temperature-dependent embryo mortality rates for each sex.[76] For some species with TSD, sex determination is achieved by exposure to hotter temperatures resulting in the offspring being one sex and cooler temperatures resulting in the other. This type of TSD is called Pattern I. For others species using TSD, it is exposure to temperatures on both extremes that results in offspring of one sex, and exposure to moderate temperatures that results in offspring of the opposite sex, called Pattern II TSD. The specific temperatures required to produce each sex are known as the female-promoting temperature and the male-promoting temperature.[77] When the temperature stays near the threshold during the temperature sensitive period, the sex ratio is varied between the two sexes.[78] Some species' temperature standards are based on when a particular enzyme is created. These species that rely upon temperature for their sex determination do not have the SRY gene, but have other genes such as DAX1, DMRT1, and SOX9 that are expressed or not expressed depending on the temperature.[77] The sex of some species, such as the Nile tilapia, Australian skink lizard, and Australian dragon lizard, has an initial bias, set by chromosomes, but can later be changed by the temperature of incubation.[21]

It is unknown how exactly temperature-dependent sex determination evolved.[79] It could have evolved through certain sexes being more suited to certain areas that fit the temperature requirements. For example, a warmer area could be more suitable for nesting, so more females are produced to increase the amount that nest next season.[79] In amniotes, environmental sex determination preceded the genetically determined systems of birds and mammals; it is thought that a temperature-dependent amniote was the common ancestor of amniotes with sex chromosomes.[80]

Other environmental systems

[edit]

There are other environmental sex determination systems including location-dependent determination systems as seen in the marine worm Bonellia viridis – larvae become males if they make physical contact with a female, and females if they end up on the bare sea floor. This is triggered by the presence of a chemical produced by the females, bonellin.[81] Some species, such as some snails, practice sex change: adults start out male, then become female. In tropical clownfish, the dominant individual in a group becomes female while the other ones are male, and bluehead wrasses (Thalassoma bifasciatum) are the reverse.

Life cycle of clownfish

Clownfish live in colonies of several small undifferentiated fish and two large fish (male and female). The male and female are the only sexually mature fish to reproduce. Clownfish are protandrous hermaphrodites, which means after they mature into males, they eventually can transform into females. They develop undifferentiated until they are needed to fill a certain role in their environment, i.e., if they receive the social and environmental cues to do so.[82]

Some species, however, have no sex-determination system. Hermaphrodite species include the common earthworm and certain species of snails. A few species of fish, reptiles, and insects reproduce by parthenogenesis and are female altogether. There are some reptiles, such as the boa constrictor and Komodo dragon that can reproduce both sexually and asexually, depending on whether a mate is available.[83]

Others

[edit]

There are exceptional sex-determination systems, neither genetic nor environmental.

Cytoplasmic sex determination

[edit]

The Wolbachia genus of parasitic bacteria lives inside the cytoplasm of its host, and is vertically transmitted from parents to children. They primarily infect arthropods and nematodes. Different Wolbachia can alter the reproductive abilities of its host by a variety of means, including cytoplasmic incompatibility, parthenogenesis, feminization and embryonic male killing.[84]

Mitochondrial male sterility: In many flowering plants, the mitochondria can cause hermaphrodite individuals to be unable to father offspring, effectively turning them into exclusive females. This is a form of mother's curse. It is an evolutionarily adaptive strategy for mitochondria as mitochondria are inherited exclusively from mother to offspring.[85] The first published case of mitochondrial male sterility among metazoans was reported in 2022 in the hermaphroditic snail Physa acuta.[86]

Paternal genome elimination

[edit]

In some species of insects, springtails and mites, male offspring lose their paternal genome (in whole or in part) during development or in the germline. Males can either be diploid, diploid with missing sex chromosome, functionally haploid or truly haploid, depending on the mechanism of elimination.[87][85]

Monogeny

[edit]

In some species of Hymenoptera (ants, bees and wasps), flies and crustaceans, all offspring of a particular individual female are either exclusively male or exclusively female.[85] The underlying mechanisms are diverse and include maternally controlled paternal genome elimination and Mendelian inherited maternal sex-determining factors.[88]

Evolution

[edit]
The ends of the XY chromosomes in a human cell in metaphase, highlighted here in green, are all that is left of the original autosomes that can still cross over with each other.

Sex determination systems may have evolved from mating type, which is a feature of microorganisms.

Chromosomal sex determination may have evolved early in the history of eukaryotes.[89] But in plants it has been suggested to have evolved recently.[90]

The accepted hypothesis of XY and ZW sex chromosome evolution in amniotes is that they evolved at the same time, in two different branches.[91][92]

No genes are shared between the avian ZW and mammal XY chromosomes[31] and the chicken Z chromosome is similar to the human autosomal chromosome 9, rather than X or Y. This suggests not that the ZW and XY sex-determination systems share an origin but that the sex chromosomes are derived from autosomal chromosomes of the common ancestor of birds and mammals. In the platypus, a monotreme, the X1 chromosome shares homology with therian mammals, while the X5 chromosome contains an avian sex-determination gene, further suggesting an evolutionary link.[93]

However, there is some evidence to suggest that there could have been transitions between ZW and XY, such as in Xiphophorus maculatus, which have both ZW and XY systems in the same population, despite the fact that ZW and XY have different gene locations.[94][95] A recent theoretical model raises the possibility of both transitions between the XY/XX and ZZ/ZW system and environmental sex determination[96] The platypus' genes also back up the possible evolutionary link between XY and ZW, because they have the DMRT1 gene possessed by birds on their X chromosomes.[97] Regardless, XY and ZW follow a similar route. All sex chromosomes started out as an original autosome of an original amniote that relied upon temperature to determine the sex of offspring. After the mammals separated, the reptile branch further split into Lepidosauria and Archosauromorpha. These two groups both evolved the ZW system separately, as evidenced by the existence of different sex chromosomal locations.[92] In mammals, one of the autosome pair, now Y, mutated its SOX3 gene into the SRY gene, causing that chromosome to designate sex.[92][97][98] After this mutation, the SRY-containing chromosome inverted and was no longer completely homologous with its partner. The regions of the X and Y chromosomes that are still homologous to one another are known as the pseudoautosomal region.[99] Once it inverted, the Y chromosome became unable to remedy deleterious mutations, and thus degenerated.[92] There is some concern that the Y chromosome will shrink further and stop functioning in ten million years: but the Y chromosome has been strictly conserved after its initial rapid gene loss.[100][101]

There are some vertebrate species, such as the medaka fish, that evolved sex chromosomes separately; their Y chromosome never inverted and can still swap genes with the X. These species' sex chromosomes are relatively primitive and unspecialized. Because the Y does not have male-specific genes and can interact with the X, XY and YY females can be formed as well as XX males.[21] Non-inverted Y chromosomes with long histories are found in pythons and emus, each system being more than 120 million years old, suggesting that inversions are not necessarily an eventuality.[85] XO sex determination can evolve from XY sex determination with about 2 million years.[clarification needed][102]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A sex-determination system is the biological mechanism that governs the development of or traits in sexually reproducing organisms, encompassing a diverse array of genetic, environmental, and polygenic processes that ensure the production of distinct sexes. These systems are universal among most eukaryotes but exhibit remarkable variation across taxa, with genetic sex determination (GSD) relying on chromosomal or genic differences to trigger , while (ESD) responds to external cues like . In vertebrates, GSD often involves a single master regulatory that establishes a 1:1 , though polygenic systems involving multiple loci also occur. ESD, prevalent in reptiles such as and crocodiles, allows sex to be influenced by incubation during embryonic development, demonstrating the plasticity of these mechanisms. The evolution of sex-determination systems is characterized by frequent transitions between GSD and ESD, as well as shifts in the genetic triggers, driven by selective pressures that favor balanced sex ratios and reproductive success. For instance, in mammals, the XY system predominates, with the SRY gene on the Y chromosome acting as the primary male-determining factor, a specialization that has persisted through mammalian evolution. Birds and some reptiles employ a ZW system, where females are heterogametic (ZW) and males homogametic (ZZ). Invertebrates display even greater diversity, including haplodiploidy in insects like bees, where sex is determined by the number of chromosome sets (haploid males from unfertilized eggs, diploid females from fertilized ones). Notable exceptions and unusual systems further underscore the lability of sex determination, such as polygenic control in some and amphibians, or hybrid-driven innovations in where chromosomal inversions lead to new XY variants. Epigenetic modifications also play a role in fine-tuning these systems, integrating genetic and environmental signals to regulate during gonadal development. Overall, the rapid turnover of sex-determining genes and mechanisms reflects ongoing evolutionary dynamics, with implications for , conservation, and understanding disorders of sexual development in humans.

History

Early Observations

Early observations of sex determination began in antiquity, with providing one of the first systematic accounts in his treatise On the Generation of Animals (ca. 350 BCE). He theorized that the male semen supplied the active principle of form and soul to the , while the female contributed passive matter through menstrual , with the sex of the determined by the relative potency of the male contribution or external factors such as the heat of the womb—stronger heat favoring s and weaker favoring s. Aristotle also remarked on sex ratios, noting empirical patterns like a slight excess of male births in humans and variations across species, attributing these to nutritional and environmental influences rather than fixed inheritance. In the 19th century, advanced these ideas by focusing on —the morphological differences between sexes—and its evolutionary implications in The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (1871). Darwin observed that sex differences in coloration, size, and behavior were widespread across animals, suggesting they arose through natural and , with sex itself inherited stably but dimorphic traits developing post-conception. He documented cases of apparent biases in birds and mammals, influenced by breeding practices or environmental stresses, and hypothesized that sex determination occurred early in embryogenesis, though without a mechanistic explanation. These insights highlighted the adaptive significance of sex differences, bridging empirical breeding observations with evolutionary theory. The transition to the genetic era was marked by early 20th-century experiments linking inheritance patterns to sex. In 1900, independently rediscovered Mendel's laws while studying trait segregation in plants like (four o'clock), and extended these to sex determination, observing that sex in certain dioecious higher plants followed Mendelian ratios, with sex-linked traits inherited differently through male and female parents. This work demonstrated that sex could behave as a heritable factor governed by discrete units, challenging purely environmental theories. Reginald Punnett further illustrated sex-linked inheritance in animals through his 1905 studies on , particularly using barred in chickens (Gallus domesticus), where the trait appeared predominantly in females from specific crosses, revealing non-Mendelian ratios tied to sex. Early breeders had long noted anomalies in sex ratios and trait distributions during , such as unexpected female-biased expression of color patterns, which Punnett explained as due to genes located on sex-specific chromosomes. These observations in chickens provided practical evidence of , influencing agricultural practices. Concurrently, in 1905, cytologist Edmund Beecher Wilson published observations from insect , identifying chromosomal differences correlating with sex: males often possessed an odd number of chromosomes (e.g., XO system in hemipterans), while females had even numbers (XX), suggesting chromosomes as the physical basis for sex determination. Wilson's work in species like bed bugs and marked a pivotal cytological confirmation of sex as a chromosomal property, laying groundwork for understanding mechanisms.

Genetic Discoveries

In 1902, American zoologist Clarence Erwin McClung published observations on in grasshoppers, identifying an "accessory " that segregated differently from other and suggesting its potential role in sex determination, laying groundwork for the XO system where males lack a . This discovery highlighted chromosomal irregularities in sex differentiation, prompting further cytological studies in the that expanded understanding of the XO mechanism in various . Independently in 1905, American cytologist Nettie Stevens examined mealworm spermatogenesis and identified a small chromosome, termed the "X" or "accessory," present in half the sperm cells, concluding that its presence determined maleness when combined with an egg's X chromosome, thus establishing the XY system in insects. Concurrently, Edmund B. Wilson, in studies on hemipteran insects and nematodes, observed an unequal chromosome pair in males—one large (X) and one small (Y)—and proposed that the heterogametic male (XY) constitution dictated sex, while females were homogametic (XX), formalizing the chromosomal basis of sex determination. These findings shifted focus from environmental factors to genetic mechanisms, with Wilson's chromosomal model also applied to other systems, such as the ZW system in butterflies where females are heterogametic. Building on this, Thomas Hunt Morgan's experiments from 1910 to 1915 with confirmed sex-linked inheritance through the white-eye mutation, which appeared only in males and was traced to the , providing experimental evidence for genes residing on . These principles were later extended to mammals, with Painter confirming the XY system and the Y chromosome's role in male determination in 1921 via cytological studies influenced by Morgan's work. Early models in the 1920s, influenced by these works, posited heterogametic sex (XY males or ZW females) as the prevailing rule across taxa, with initial hypotheses on dosage compensation emerging to explain balanced despite chromosomal imbalances, such as Calvin Bridges' observations in suggesting regulatory adjustments for X-linked genes.

Chromosomal Sex-Determination Systems

XX/XY System

The XX/XY sex-determination system is the predominant chromosomal mechanism in mammals, where females possess two X chromosomes (XX, homogametic) and males have one X and one Y chromosome (XY, heterogametic). The presence of the Y chromosome typically determines male development, while its absence leads to female development. In this Y-centered system, the SRY (sex-determining region Y) gene on the Y chromosome acts as the primary master regulator of maleness. Discovered in 1990, SRY encodes a transcription factor that initiates testis differentiation by binding DNA and activating downstream targets during early gonadal development. One key downstream gene is SOX9, which SRY upregulates to promote Sertoli cell differentiation and suppress ovarian pathways, thereby committing the bipotential gonad to testicular fate. Although the Y chromosome dominates in most cases, rare X-centered variants exist where sex is influenced by X chromosome dosage or the absence of Y-specific factors. For instance, in certain mole voles (genus Ellobius), both sexes are XO, lacking a Y chromosome and SRY, with maleness determined by X-linked genes rather than Y presence. Similarly, some species exhibit XX/XY systems where sex depends on X chromosome count rather than Y, though such cases are atypical. XX males can also arise from SRY translocation to an X chromosome, resulting in female karyotypes expressing male traits due to ectopic SRY activation. To balance X-linked gene dosage between XX females and XY males, mammals employ X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) in females, silencing one per cell. Proposed by in 1961, this random process occurs early in embryogenesis, forming a condensed visible under . The , identified in 1991, is essential for XCI, as it coats the inactive in cis, recruiting silencing complexes like PRC2 to epigenetically repress genes. Variants in this system highlight its flexibility. In humans, (47,XXY) individuals are phenotypically male due to the but exhibit and from X dosage imbalance, despite partial . Conversely, (45,XO) results in female development with and ovarian dysgenesis, as the single X lacks dosage compensation and Y absence prevents maleness. In marsupials, which also use XX/XY, differences include an SRY-related SOX3 gene on the X chromosome serving as the evolutionary precursor to Y-linked SRY, with sex determination occurring earlier in development and less reliance on post-gonadal hormones. Over evolutionary time, the has undergone significant degeneration, losing most ancestral genes through recombination suppression and accumulating non-recombining regions. In humans, it retains only about 106 protein-coding genes, many multicopy and testis-specific, underscoring its specialized role in male determination amid progressive shrinkage.

ZW/ZZ System

The ZW/ZZ sex-determination system is a chromosomal mechanism prevalent in birds, many reptiles, and certain , where males possess two copies of the (ZZ) and females are heterogametic with one and one W (ZW). In this system, sex is primarily determined by the dosage of Z-linked genes, with the presence of the W in females promoting ovarian development, while higher Z dosage in males drives testis formation. Unlike the mammalian XY system, the is gene-rich and largely homologous between sexes, whereas the W is smaller and often degenerate, containing fewer functional genes. Central to this system are key regulatory genes, including the Z-linked DMRT1 (doublesex and mab-3-related 1), which acts as the primary male-determining factor by promoting testis differentiation through dosage effects—males express two copies compared to one in females. For female development, the autosomal gene FOXL2 (forkhead box L2) plays a crucial early role in ovarian formation by regulating differentiation and inhibiting male pathways, while W-linked genes such as FET1 (female expressed transcript 1) contribute to female-specific maintenance. These interactions highlight a balance between Z dosage activation of male traits and W- or autosomal-driven suppression of them in females. Dosage compensation in the ZW/ZZ system is incomplete and less effective than the X-inactivation mechanism in mammalian XX females, resulting in males typically exhibiting 1.2- to 1.6-fold higher expression of many Z-linked genes. This partial compensation occurs through mechanisms like modifications but does not fully equalize Z gene output between sexes, potentially influencing . In birds, for instance, the 2004 sequencing of the (Gallus gallus) by the International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium revealed over 1,000 Z-linked genes, including DMRT1, and confirmed the gene-poor nature of the W chromosome, providing foundational insights into avian sex chromosome evolution. Variants of the ZW/ZZ system occur across taxa, with the degree of W chromosome degeneration varying; in butterflies (Lepidoptera), the W often shows recent pseudogenization and repetitive element accumulation, while in snakes, W decay ranges from minimal in basal lineages to advanced heteromorphism in advanced groups like caenophidians. A notable example is the platyfish (Xiphophorus maculatus), where X chromosome dosage influences sex determination amid multiple sex chromosome variants, including W-bearing individuals (analogous to ZW systems). Uniquely, environmental factors like temperature can override genetic ZW signals in some reptiles, such as certain lizards and turtles, leading to sex reversal where high or low incubation temperatures alter gonadal fate despite underlying chromosomal predispositions, thereby linking this system to temperature-dependent sex determination.

XO and ZO Systems

The XO sex-determination system is a chromosomal mechanism found in various animals, where sex is determined by the number of X chromosomes relative to autosomes, with males typically possessing a single X chromosome (XO) and females two (XX). This system lacks a differentiated second sex chromosome like the Y, relying instead on X-chromosome dosage to trigger developmental pathways. In insects such as grasshoppers, females are XX and males XO, with the absence of a second X in males leading to male-specific gene expression without a Y-linked trigger. A well-studied example is the Caenorhabditis elegans, where the X-to-autosome (X:A) serves as the primary signal for sex determination. Animals with a high X:A of 1.0 (two X chromosomes to two sets of autosomes, or XX:2A) develop as , which function as self-fertilizing females, while a low of 0.5 (one X to two sets, or XO:2A) results in s. The master xol-1 interprets this : high X dosage represses xol-1 transcription in XX animals, promoting hermaphrodite development, whereas low dosage allows xol-1 expression, directing male fate. In the XO system, the lack of a pairing Y chromosome can lead to dosage effects from haploinsufficiency of X-linked genes, influencing . For instance, in humans, results from an XO in females, causing partial of X-linked genes and phenotypes such as , ovarian dysgenesis, and due to reduced without a second X to compensate. The ZO system is analogous but occurs in species with ZW-based heterogamy, where females are ZO (one Z chromosome) and males ZZ (two Z chromosomes), making females the heterogametic sex. This system is prevalent in certain , particularly some like wild silkmoths ( species), where Z-chromosome dosage determines , with ZO females developing via reduced Z compared to ZZ males. In the silk moth , while primarily ZW/ZZ, variants exhibit ZO-like features influenced by environmental factors such as , which can modulate ratios and interact with Z-linked dosage effects. Both XO and ZO systems are observed across approximately 10-15% of animal species, particularly in and nematodes, and are thought to evolve from XX/XY or ZW/ZZ systems through the degeneration and loss of the Y or W chromosome, respectively, simplifying sex determination to monosomy-based dosage.

Other Chromosomal Systems

In certain species of , such as and moths, a variant of the female-heterogametic chromosomal sex-determination system is observed, often denoted as the UV system, where females possess heteromorphic UV sex chromosomes and males have homogametic UU chromosomes; the U chromosome is homologous to the Z chromosome found in the standard ZW/ZZ system, while the V is analogous to the W, with partial genetic differentiation between the facilitating sex-specific development. This system, prevalent across much of the order, evolved through dynamic reshuffling, including fusions and fissions that contributed to multiple sex-chromosome configurations in some lineages, though the core mechanism remains tied to dosage of Z/U-linked genes. Multiple sex-chromosome systems occur in various taxa, adding complexity beyond simple heterogametic pairs. In some , such as the (Mus musculus), XYY individuals arise sporadically due to , resulting in 41 chromosomes total; these males are phenotypically normal but sterile owing to meiotic arrest from unpaired . Similarly, in fish like the platyfish (Xiphophorus maculatus), sex determination involves a polyfactorial system with multiple chromosome types, including XY, XXY, and variants akin to XY/XY1Y2 through autosomal fusions, where several loci on nascent sex chromosomes interact to determine male development and influence traits like pigmentation. These configurations highlight how chromosomal fusions can generate higher-order systems, often leading to reduced recombination and evolutionary divergence in sex-linked regions. In plants, chromosomal sex-determination systems are less common than polygenic mechanisms but occur in select dioecious lineages. The genus Rumex (dock plants) features an XY system in several species, such as Rumex acetosa and Rumex hastatulus, where the Y chromosome suppresses female organ development and shows degeneration through gene loss and accumulation of repetitive sequences, with some taxa exhibiting multiple Ys (XY1Y2) derived from autosome-Y fusions. In papaya (Carica papaya), a trioecious species, the nascent sex chromosomes harbor the S locus comprising two tightly linked genes: a dominant masculinizing gene (M) promoting stamen formation and a dominant carpel-suppressing gene (S); males carry MS on the Y (genotype XY with MS/MS+), hermaphrodites have M but lack dominant S (XYh with Ms/ms), and females are XX (ms/ms), enabling the three sex forms observed in cultivation. Unique chromosomal variants appear in other taxa, including amphibians. In the clawed frog Xenopus tropicalis, sex determination operates via multiple independent (W, Z, Y), yielding diverse combinations such as YZ or YW in males and ZW or WW in females, reflecting rapid turnover and coexistence of systems without a single dominant pair. Early cytological observations, including the 1905 identification of heteromorphic chromosomes in the Ascaris megalocephala during , laid foundational insights into sex-linked chromosomal differences, predating formal recognition of in many animals and highlighting dimorphic pairs as potential sex determinants.

Non-Chromosomal Genetic Systems

Haplodiploidy

is a sex-determination system in which males develop from unfertilized, haploid eggs and are automatically male, while females develop from fertilized, diploid eggs. This mechanism, prevalent in the insect order , relies on the fertilization status of the egg rather than , with queens or mated females controlling sex allocation by deciding whether to fertilize eggs with stored . In this system, haploid males produce by a modified that yields identical clones, ensuring genetic uniformity, whereas diploid females undergo standard . The genetic basis of in involves a single-locus complementary sex-determination system, exemplified by the complementary sex determiner (csd) gene in honeybees (Apis mellifera), identified in 2003. The csd gene contains multiple ; individuals heterozygous at this locus develop as females, while hemizygous (haploid) individuals develop as males. Diploid individuals homozygous for the same csd allele typically develop as males but are inviable or sterile, preventing the production of matched-haplotype diploids and reinforcing the system's stability. This allelic diversity, maintained by balancing selection, ensures that risks producing inviable diploid males rather than viable females. Haplodiploidy is characteristic of ants, bees, and wasps within the Hymenoptera, where it underpins eusocial colony structures; for instance, in honeybees and many ant species, diploid females serve as sterile workers that forgo reproduction to support the queen and males. This system facilitates kin selection, as workers are more closely related to sisters (relatedness coefficient of 0.75) than to their own offspring (0.5), promoting cooperative behaviors. A key outcome is the typical 3:1 female-to-male investment ratio in colonies, predicted by sex ratio theory under haplodiploidy, where equal relatedness to sisters and daughters balances the lower relatedness to brothers (0.25). Within , represents the standard form, producing haploid males from unfertilized eggs, while —a variant —allows unfertilized eggs to develop into diploid females, as seen in the honeybee (Apis mellifera capensis) and certain ants like Wasmannia auropunctata. enables all-female reproduction but can lead to reduced . Evolutionarily, haplodiploidy has arisen independently at least five times across insect orders, including , Thysanoptera (), and some Coleoptera (beetles), often linked to parthenogenetic origins. Due to male haploidy, no dosage compensation mechanisms are required, as all loci are hemizygous in males and the system lacks heteromorphic .

Polygenic Systems

Polygenic sex determination systems involve the collective action of multiple genes, typically located on autosomes, that promote either male or female development without reliance on specialized sex chromosomes. In these systems, sex is often determined through a threshold model, where the cumulative dosage or ratio of male-promoting and female-promoting alleles exceeds a genetic liability threshold, tipping development toward one sex or the other. This balance lacks a single master regulatory gene, allowing for flexible and sometimes labile sex ratios that can evolve rapidly in response to selective pressures. In animals, polygenic systems are documented in various species, where multiple quantitative trait loci (QTLs) contribute to gonadal differentiation. For instance, in the fish Astatotilapia burtoni, sex is controlled by several independently segregating alleles that interact additively, with no dominant sex-determining locus identified across the genome. Similarly, in the wood lemming (Myopus schisticolor), a variant suppresses the male-determining function of the Y chromosome, producing fertile XY females. These examples highlight how polygenic control enables deviations from strict 1:1 sex ratios, contrasting with where differences drive sex without such gene balances. Plant polygenic sex determination frequently manifests in the evolution of dioecy, where multiple autosomal genes regulate floral organ development to produce unisexual flowers. In species like garden asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) and Silene latifolia, sex arises from the interaction of at least two tightly linked loci: one suppressing female structures (carpels) and another promoting male structures (stamens), often building on extensions of the ABC model of floral organ identity. The ABC model, originally formulated in the early 1990s, posits combinatorial action of A, B, and C class genes to specify sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels; modifications in these genes, such as loss-of-function in B-class genes, can redirect development toward unisexuality in otherwise hermaphroditic lineages. Recent CRISPR-Cas9 studies in Arabidopsis thaliana, a model hermaphrodite, have targeted the EAR motif of SUPERMAN—a cadastral gene maintaining stamen-carpel boundaries—revealing how disruptions lead to increased stamen proliferation and ectopic spread of male reproductive fate into the gynoecium. These systems often intersect with environmental cues, amplifying genetic thresholds without fully supplanting them. In the snail Lymnaea peregra, polygenic inheritance underlies phally polymorphism (hermaphroditic vs. dioecious forms), but water pH modulates the threshold, with acidic conditions favoring maleness in genetically susceptible individuals. This interplay underscores the absence of a singular genetic switch, enabling adaptive plasticity in sex expression across taxa.

Mating Types

In fungi and , mating types represent a form of sex determination adapted to isogamous organisms, where s are morphologically similar but genetically distinguished by compatibility loci that prevent self-fertilization and promote . Unlike anisogamous systems with distinct male and female sexes, function through idiomorphic regions known as (mating-type) loci, which encode regulatory genes controlling cell identity, production, and fusion specificity. These loci ensure that only compatible partners of opposite can conjugate, analogous to but without gamete size differences. A well-studied example is the budding yeast , where the MAT locus exists as two : MATa and MATα. The MATa allele encodes the Mat a1 , while MATα encodes Mat α1 (an activator) and Mat α2 (a ), which together regulate haploid-specific genes for pheromones, receptors, and cell-type identity. Haploid cells switch via a programmed recombination event involving the HO endonuclease, encoded by the ho gene, which initiates double-strand breaks at the MAT locus, allowing silent cassettes (HML and HMR) to replace the active sequence and enable with the opposite type. This switching mechanism facilitates the transition from haploid to diploid phases in the life cycle. In basidiomycete fungi, such as mushrooms, are governed by two unlinked loci in the ancestral tetrapolar system: the HD (homeodomain) locus, which encodes bE/bW transcription factors for nuclear migration, and the P/R (/receptor) locus, which controls cell recognition via multiallelic pheromones and G-protein-coupled receptors. Compatibility requires different alleles at both loci, generating thousands of mating types per species. Bipolar systems evolve when these loci link genetically, reducing mating types to two but simplifying compatibility; unipolar systems, rarer, involve a single locus controlling without the other. Algae like exhibit a simpler bipolar system with two , MT+ and MT-, determined by a large, non-recombining MAT locus spanning over 1 Mb. The MT+ suppresses recombination and encodes genes for flagellar agglutinins, fusogens (e.g., Fus1), and zygote-specific functions, while MT- promotes activation; this ensures uniparental inheritance of organelles and prevents self-mating. The locus's idempotent structure, with rearranged gene orders between alleles, mirrors sex chromosome evolution. The genetic basis of mating-type loci involves non-recombining regions that evolve suppressed recombination, similar to , leading to sequence divergence, loss, and strata formation over time. In yeasts, the ho gene drives switching in non-recombining contexts, while in basidiomycetes, multiallelic expansions at P/R loci create vast compatibility diversity. This parallel underscores ' role in promoting genetic exchange without dimorphism. Unique to basidiomycetes, some species harbor over 17,000 , as revealed in shelf fungi like Trichaptum species, where P/R locus expansions yield hyper-diverse alleles, maximizing in sparse populations. A 2022 study on these fungi highlighted MAT locus expansions via gene duplications and rearrangements, addressing gaps in basidiomycete diversity and paralleling polygenic controls in other systems but emphasizing microbial .

Environmental Sex-Determination Systems

Temperature-Dependent Sex Determination

is an environmental mechanism in which the sex of offspring is determined by the experienced during a critical developmental period, rather than by genetic factors alone. This process is widespread among reptiles, including many , crocodilians, and some and , as well as certain and amphibians. During the thermosensitive period (TSP), typically early in gonadal differentiation, specific incubation temperatures trigger cascades of molecular events that direct the bipotential toward either ovarian or testicular development. Unlike chromosomal systems, TSD lacks a fixed genetic trigger, allowing temperature to act as the primary cue for sex fate. The molecular basis of TSD involves temperature-sensitive regulation of key genes and epigenetic modifications that influence signaling and cell differentiation. In many reptiles, higher temperatures upregulate the expression of cyp19a1 (), an that converts androgens to estrogens, promoting ovarian development and female differentiation. For instance, in , cooler temperatures enhance dmrt1 expression, which drives formation and testicular development, while warmer conditions suppress it. Epigenetic factors play a crucial role; in the (Trachemys scripta), the histone demethylase KDM6B is upregulated at male-producing temperatures (below ~28°C), where it removes repressive marks to activate Dmrt1 and promote testicular development, establishing a direct link between thermal cues and epigenetic control of sex determination. The TSP varies by species but often spans stages 15–23 in , during which temperature shifts can irreversibly alter gonadal fate. Representative examples illustrate TSD patterns, classified as Ia (low temperatures produce males, high produce females), II (low and high produce females, intermediate males), or others. In the turtle, a classic Ia pattern, the pivotal temperature is approximately 28°C, with incubation below this yielding predominantly males and above producing females; this dose-dependent response allows for mixed sex ratios near the pivot. Crocodilians like the (Alligator mississippiensis) follow pattern II, where temperatures below 31°C or above 33°C bias toward females, while ~32–33°C favors males, with signaling similarly pivotal during a TSP around days 10–21 of incubation. In , the pejerrey (Odontesthes bonariensis) exhibits an inverted pattern, with low temperatures (~18°C) producing females and high (~25°C) yielding males, though some populations show genotype-temperature interactions where genetic predispositions modulate thermal sensitivity. Climate change poses significant risks to TSD species, as rising global temperatures can skew sex ratios toward the temperature-favored sex, potentially leading to population declines. In reptiles like sea turtles and freshwater turtles, warmer nesting sites have resulted in increasingly female-biased hatchling ratios, with studies as of 2025 documenting up to 99% female production in some green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) rookeries due to prolonged heat exposure, though emerging research suggests possible local adaptations may partially mitigate these impacts. Similarly, modeling for crocodilians and fish predicts reduced male recruitment under projected warming scenarios of 2–4°C by 2100, exacerbating vulnerability in species without compensatory mechanisms. These impacts highlight TSD's sensitivity to environmental shifts, with ongoing research emphasizing conservation strategies like nest shading to mitigate feminization.

Other Environmental Factors

In addition to temperature, various non-thermal environmental factors, including , chemical cues, pollutants, and , can profoundly influence sex determination in certain , allowing adaptive adjustments to ecological conditions that differ from the relative stability of chromosomal or genetic systems. These mechanisms often involve hormonal or signaling pathways that respond to external stimuli, enabling phenotypic plasticity in sex ratios to optimize under varying habitats. Population density plays a key role in sex determination among cladocerans like Daphnia pulex, where crowding induces the production of male offspring. This process is mediated by the sesquiterpenoid hormone methyl farnesoate (MF), which is released under high-density conditions and activates downstream genetic pathways to shift from parthenogenetic female production to involving males. Studies have shown that MF concentrations as low as 1 μM can significantly increase male ratios in clonal lines, highlighting density as a cue for initiating sexual cycles in response to potential environmental stress. Chemical settlement cues determine sex in the marine echiuran worm Bonellia viridis, where free-swimming larvae settle on substrates and develop based on local conditions. Larvae that attach near an adult female's proboscis become dwarf males, induced by the green pigment bonellin secreted by the female, which acts as a masculinizing signal; in contrast, larvae settling on bare rocks or algae develop into females. This environmental sex determination (ESD) mechanism maintains a female-biased population structure while ensuring male availability for internal fertilization, with models indicating it enhances population persistence in patchy habitats. Anthropogenic chemicals, particularly endocrine disruptors, can disrupt these natural processes in aquatic vertebrates. In fish such as Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes), exposure to (BPA) at environmentally relevant concentrations (e.g., 1–100 μg/L) skews sex ratios toward females by upregulating estrogen-responsive genes like cyp19a1 and inducing conditions in genetic males. This feminization occurs through BPA's binding to receptors, mimicking endogenous hormones and altering gonadal differentiation during early development. In rotifers such as species, environmental cues like and photoperiod modulate male production during . High releases chemical signals that promote the production of mictic females, which produce haploid males or diapausing eggs to facilitate and under stressful conditions. This density-dependent shift allows rotifers to balance asexual and sexual modes, contrasting the fixed outcomes of genetic systems. These examples illustrate how chemical and social environmental factors enable dynamic , filling critical gaps in understanding impacts and ecological adaptability, while highlighting vulnerabilities in species reliant on such plasticity amid human-induced changes.

Alternative Mechanisms

Cytoplasmic Sex Determination

Cytoplasmic sex determination refers to mechanisms where is influenced by maternally inherited factors located in the or organelles, such as endosymbiotic or mitochondrial genomes, rather than nuclear chromosomes. These factors typically bias sex ratios toward females by inducing , of genetic s, or cytoplasmic incompatibility, which selectively reduces viability. For instance, cytoplasmic incompatibility occurs when sperm from infected s fertilizes uninfected eggs, leading to embryonic that disproportionately affects s in certain systems. A prominent example involves the endosymbiotic bacterium , which resides in the and manipulates host reproduction across diverse arthropods. In the woodlouse , induces feminization by converting genetic males (ZZ) into functional phenotypic females, a phenomenon first documented in the 1970s. This occurs through interference with androgenic gland activity, which normally promotes male development, resulting in ovaries and female morphology in infected individuals. Another case is male-killing by Spiroplasma bacteria in , where the symbiont toxin SpAID targets male embryos for death during early development, enhancing transmission through surviving female hosts. Mitochondrial genomes can also contribute to sex ratio skewing, often through interactions with nuclear genes that create epistatic effects influencing sex differentiation. In nematodes like Caenorhabditis species, mitonuclear mismatches have been linked to increased male frequencies and fertility, suggesting cytoplasmic elements can override or modify nuclear sex determination pathways. Such mechanisms highlight how organelle-encoded factors, inherited solely from the mother, can drive female-biased outcomes independent of environmental cues. and similar endosymbionts infect an estimated 40–60% of terrestrial species (estimates vary, e.g., 40% as of 2012 and 52% as of 2015), underscoring their widespread role in cytoplasmic sex determination. This prevalence fosters evolutionary conflicts between nuclear and cytoplasmic genomes, as cytoplasmic elements benefit from female-biased ratios to maximize maternal transmission, while nuclear genes evolve suppressors to restore balanced sex ratios and prevent population crashes. These intragenomic arms races can lead to rapid turnover in sex-determining mechanisms. Recent studies, such as those from 2022 on Caenorhabditis nematodes, have further elucidated mitonuclear , showing how mismatched mitochondrial-nuclear combinations alter production rates and address gaps in understanding bacterial symbiosis beyond . These findings emphasize the ongoing interplay between cytoplasmic factors and host in shaping sex determination.

Paternal Genome Elimination

Paternal elimination (PGE) is a reproductive mechanism in which fertilized diploid eggs develop into s that selectively discard or silence the paternal during development, resulting in males that are functionally haploid and transmit only maternally derived chromosomes to their offspring. This system contrasts with standard diploid inheritance by creating asymmetric transmission, where males effectively propagate only their maternal lineage, promoting matrilineal inheritance through the paternal line. PGE has evolved independently in at least six to eight lineages, often linked to sex determination and genomic conflict between parental contributions. In scale insects of the family and related groups like mealybugs (Pseudococcidae), males heterochromatinize the entire paternal set or a subset early in embryogenesis, rendering it transcriptionally inactive and leading to functional haploidy in the . This process, known as Comstockiella PGE in some eriococcids, ensures that during , only maternal chromosomes are packaged into sperm, while the heterochromatic paternal set is excluded. The mechanism was first cytologically observed in the , building on earlier studies, and involves epigenetic modifications that silence paternal chromatin without physical elimination. Sciarid flies (), such as Bradysia coprophila, exhibit germline-specific paternal elimination where paternal chromosomes, including limited or multiple X chromosomes, are discarded during early embryonic cleavages or male , producing males that inherit a maternally derived haploid set for transmission. This tissue-specific elimination—somatic retention of diploidy but reduction—results in males passing on only their mother's , a pattern first documented through cytological studies in the by C.W. Metz. In certain mites, such as those in the family Phytoseiidae, PGE manifests as , where the maternal is eliminated post-fertilization, leaving males with an exclusively paternal that they transmit clonally to , enabling strict patrilineal inheritance. This variant produces males as genetic clones of their fathers, contrasting with the maternal bias in most PGE systems and highlighting evolutionary flexibility in genome retention. A related variant occurs in some undergoing , where parthenogenetic females predominate, but rare males arise from fertilized eggs via partial PGE, deriving primarily from the paternal genome and contributing to occasional in cyclical parthenogens. This system maintains female-biased populations while allowing male production under specific environmental cues, similar to in fostering female kin cooperation.

Monogeny

Monogeny refers to sex-determination systems in which lineages produce offspring of only one sex, typically all females through parthenogenesis, with rare instances of all-male production; this contrasts with amphigony, which yields balanced sexes. Thelygeny, the predominant form, involves unfertilized eggs developing into females via mechanisms such as automixis, where meiotic products fuse to restore diploidy and maintain genetic diversity. In whiptail lizards (Aspidoscelis spp.), for example, all individuals are female and reproduce parthenogenetically through automixis, originating from hybridization events that fixed a homozygous state compatible with female development despite an underlying XX/XY chromosomal system. Arrhenogeny, the rarer all-male counterpart, occurs when females produce exclusively male offspring, often linked to environmental or parasitic influences overriding standard genetic cues, though it is less stable and infrequently evolves independently. Bdelloid rotifers represent an ancient example of thelygeny, having persisted as obligately asexual, all-female lineages for over 40 million years through ameiotic parthenogenesis, which bypasses meiosis to produce diploid daughters genetically similar to the mother. Similarly, many dandelion (Taraxacum) species exhibit parthenogenetic reproduction, where polyploid females generate seeds asexually via apomixis, involving suppression of meiosis (diplospory) and parthenogenesis, ensuring all-female propagation without pollen fertilization. These monogenic systems achieve evolutionary stability in part through mechanisms like gene conversion, which repairs DNA and reduces heterozygosity accumulation in asexual lineages, as observed in bdelloid rotifers where it facilitates recombination-like events without sex. By enabling long-term persistence without genetic exchange, monogeny addresses key challenges in asexual reproduction, such as the twofold cost of sex and mutational meltdown, allowing diversification into distinct species despite the absence of recombination. In extreme cases, monogeny can emerge from modifications to paternal genome elimination systems, where selective retention of maternal genomes results in obligate unisexuality.

Evolution

Origins of Sex Chromosomes

Sex chromosomes typically originate from a pair of autosomes that acquire a sex-determining , initiating a process of recombination suppression and subsequent genetic differentiation between the proto-X and proto-Y (or proto-Z and proto-W) chromosomes. In many vertebrates, this begins with the transposition or duplication of a key regulatory onto an autosome, which then becomes the master sex-determining locus; for instance, ancestors of the DMRT1 , originally autosomal transcription factors involved in development, have been co-opted independently across lineages to trigger male differentiation. Once established, selection favors the suppression of recombination around this locus to prevent the spread of sex-specific alleles to the opposite sex, leading to the accumulation of sexually dimorphic and progressive degeneration of the heteromorphic (Y or W). This evolutionary trajectory is evident in mammals, where the XY system emerged from autosomes in the common ancestor of therian mammals approximately 180 million years ago, with the proto-Y acquiring the SRY gene derived from the SOX3 autosomal precursor. In birds, the ZW system arose independently from a different autosomal pair around 150 million years ago, likely involving DMRT1 on the Z chromosome as the dosage-sensitive male-determining factor, without homology to mammalian sex chromosomes. Reptiles exhibit even greater diversity, with post-2020 phylogenomic analyses revealing multiple independent origins of sex chromosomes across squamate lineages, often from distinct autosomes, underscoring the labile nature of this transition in non-avian reptiles. Sexual antagonism—where alleles beneficial to one sex are deleterious to the other—plays a central role in driving this differentiation by promoting the expansion of recombination-suppressed regions to resolve intralocus conflicts, thereby linking sex-determining loci with sexually antagonistic genes. Following differentiation, dosage compensation mechanisms evolve to balance (or Z-linked) between sexes; in therian mammals, this occurred post-origin around 180 million years ago, with the RNA-mediated inactivation system arising later in eutherians to achieve female-specific X . In , sex chromosomes are often younger and more transient; for example, the XY system in (Carica papaya) differentiated from autosomes only about 2 million years ago, providing a snapshot of early-stage with minimal degeneration. These independent origins highlight how autosomes predisposed by dosage-insensitive genes or regulatory potential repeatedly evolve into across eukaryotes.

Turnover and Neo-Sex Chromosomes

Sex chromosome turnover refers to the process by which ancestral sex chromosomes are replaced by new ones, often involving the emergence of a sex-determining on an that suppresses recombination and recruits nearby genes into a new sex-determining region. This dynamic instability contrasts with the relative conservation of in some lineages and is particularly prevalent in poikilothermic vertebrates, where new sex-determining genes arise through mechanisms such as and transposition of autosomal genes to sex chromosomes or vice versa. In this process, the old sex-determining system may degenerate over time as the new one takes over, leading to the formation of neo-sex chromosomes that integrate autosomal material. A classic example of this mechanism is observed in medaka fish (Oryzias latipes), where the male-determining DMY (a duplicate of the autosomal DMRT1) emerged on a previously autosomal , establishing a new Y while the ancestral system was supplanted. Similarly, in , multiple independent origins of Y chromosomes have been documented, with over 10 distinct evolutionary events inferred across the order, including cases like the Akodont mice where new XY systems arose through recurrent fusions and gene recruitments. In , which employ a ZW system, rapid turnover is evident, with neo-ZW pairs replacing ancestral ones approximately every 1 to 10 million years, driven by autosomal translocations that introduce new sex-determining loci. Teleost fishes exhibit extraordinary turnover, with over 400 documented cases of sex chromosome systems across the group, involving numerous independent origins and transitions. In pseudoobscura, neo-X and neo-Y chromosomes formed through fusions of the ancestral X with autosomes (Müller elements), resulting in expanded that show and pseudogenization compared to autosomes. Recent studies have extended these observations to reptiles, such as in banded geckos (Coleonyx), where 2022 genomic analyses revealed a cis-regulatory transition to neo- via Robertsonian fusions that suppress recombination on previously autosomal regions, highlighting ongoing turnover in lineages. These examples underscore the recurrent nature of neo-sex chromosome evolution, often linked to the co-option of autosomal genes for sex determination.

Evolutionary Dynamics

Sex-determination systems exhibit remarkable evolutionary lability across taxa, with frequent transitions between genetic, environmental, and alternative mechanisms that reflect adaptations to ecological pressures and genetic constraints. In vertebrates, these systems are particularly dynamic in poikilotherms like fish and amphibians, where switches between genetic sex determination (GSD) and environmental sex determination (ESD), such as temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD), occur rapidly over evolutionary timescales. For instance, in teleost fish, over 20 independent transitions from gonochorism to hermaphroditism or ESD have been documented, driven by the polygenic nature of sex loci that allows quick evolutionary shifts. In contrast, therian mammals and birds maintain highly stable chromosomal systems (XY and ZW, respectively), with minimal turnover due to entrenched dimorphism and suppression of recombination on sex chromosomes, preserving ancient configurations for millions of years. Young sex chromosomes often retain high levels of recombination and homology—a pattern termed homomorphic sex chromosomes—preventing the degeneration seen in older systems. Central to these dynamics is the "fountain of youth" hypothesis, which posits that recurrent turnover of sex-determining loci rejuvenates sex chromosomes by introducing fresh genetic material, thereby avoiding the accumulation of deleterious mutations that plague non-recombining regions. This mechanism is evident in species where sex reversal or polygenic control facilitates occasional recombination between sex chromosomes, maintaining their viability and preventing heteromorphism. Trade-offs with sexual conflict further shape evolution, as alleles beneficial to one sex may harm the other, favoring the evolution of dedicated sex chromosomes to resolve intralocus conflicts, though this can lead to dosage compensation challenges. In systems like haplodiploidy, which evolved multiple times in Hymenoptera (ants, bees, wasps), the asymmetrical relatedness—sisters share 75% of genes—promotes worker sterility and eusociality, illustrating how sex-determination innovations resolve conflicts to enhance inclusive fitness. In , sex determination is often polygenic and prone to turnover, with dioecious species frequently shifting sex loci through translocations or gene duplications, as seen in willows where multiple independent origins maintain young, homomorphic chromosomes. This lability contrasts with systems, allowing plants to adapt to diverse pollinator and environmental cues without fixed dimorphism. Fungi, meanwhile, evolve mating types through gene duplications at the locus, suppressing recombination to maintain idiomorphy while enabling ; this process has led to bipolar or tetrapolar systems across and , with evolutionary strata building over time similar to . Protists bridge environmental and genetic systems, as exemplified by algae, where a mix of UV sex chromosomes and environmental cues (e.g., heat stress) determines , revealing an intermediate that highlights the plasticity of early eukaryotic sex . Recent studies as of 2025 have further elucidated mechanisms, such as recombination suppression in young XY systems of and stability of UV sex chromosomes in . Post-2020 analyses underscore how exacerbates these dynamics, with meta-reviews indicating that rising temperatures could skew sex ratios in TSD species like reptiles and by up to 100%, potentially driving shifts toward GSD for stability in over 400 affected taxa. These patterns collectively illustrate how sex-determination integrates genetic innovation with environmental responsiveness, fostering diversity across kingdoms while balancing reproductive costs and benefits.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.