Hubbry Logo
Palembang SultanatePalembang SultanateMain
Open search
Palembang Sultanate
Community hub
Palembang Sultanate
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Palembang Sultanate
Palembang Sultanate
Palembang Sultanate
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

The Sultanate of Palembang Darussalam (Malay: كسلطانن ڤلمبڠ دارالسلام, romanized: Kesultanan Palembang Darussalam) was a sultanate in Indonesia whose capital was the city of Palembang in the southern part of the Indonesian island of Sumatra.[2] It was proclaimed in 1659 by Susuhunan Abdurrahman (1659–1706) and dissolved by the colonial government of the Dutch East Indies on 7 October 1823. In 1825, its last ruler, Sultan Ahmad Najamuddin, was arrested and sent into exile on the island of Banda Neira in the Moluccas.

History

[edit]

Establishment and early records

[edit]
Replica of the throne of the Palembang Sultanate.

According to the story of Kidung Pamacangah and Babad Arya Tabanan[3] it was said that a figure from Kediri named Arya Damar who was a "regent of Palembang" joined Gajah Mada, ruler of Majapahit in conquering Bali in 1343. Historian C.C. Berg thought that Arya Damar was identical to Adityawarman.[4] The name Palembang was also mentioned in Nagarakretagama as one of the conquered lands of Majapahit. Gajah Mada also mentioned the name Palembang in Pararaton as one of the regions that he conquered.[4]

A Chinese chronicle Chu-fan-chi written in 1178 by Chou-Ju-Kua recorded the name Pa-lin-fong, a reference to Palembang. Around 1513, Tomé Pires an adventurer from Portugal mentioned Palembang, a kingdom which is led by a patron who was appointed from Java and was then referred to as the Sultanate of Demak and participated in the invasion of Portuguese Controlled Melaka. In 1596, Palembang was attacked and razed by the Dutch East India Company. In 1659, the name Sri Susuhunan Abdurrahman was recorded as sovereign of the Palembang Sultanate. Records of connection with the VOC have been mentioned since the year 1601.[5]

Kraton Kuto Gawang

[edit]

At the beginning of the 17th century, Palembang became one of the centers of Islam in Indonesia. The precursor of the sultanate in Palembang was founded by Ki Gede ing Suro, a nobleman from the Demak Sultanate, who took refuge in friendly Palembang during the troubles following the death of Trenggana of Demak. On the north bank of the Musi River, he and the nobilities established a kraton, the Kuto Gawang. It was located quite strategically on the riverfront of the Musi, in the present 2-Ilir District, within what is now the complex of PT. Pupuk Sriwidjaja, a state-run fertilizer manufacturer. The Kraton of Kuto Gawang was surrounded by a square-shaped fortification made of 30 centimetres (12 in) thick ironwood and ulin wood. It is described to be about 290 Rijnlandsche roede (1093 meters) in length and width. The height of the wooden ramparts is more than 24 feet (7.3 m). The Kraton stretches between what is now Plaju and Pulau Kemaro, a small island located in the middle of the Musi River.[6]

The Kraton of Kuto Gawang was sketched by Joan van der Laen in 1659. The sketch shows a fortified city facing the Musi River with the Rengas River running through the middle part of the city from north to south. The Taligawe River is located to the east of Kuto Gawang, while to the west is the Buah River. In the middle of Kuto Gawang is a structure, possibly a mosque, located to the west of the Rengas River. The Kraton was described to also have three stone bastions. Foreigners (e.g. the Chinese and Portuguese) were known to settle on the banks of the Musi River opposite of the Kraton, to the west of the mouth of the Komering River.[6]

In 1659, the Dutch of the Dutch East India Company attacked and razed Kraton Kuto Gawang. The Susuhunan (king) Abdurrahman later moved his court to a new site called Beringin Janggut.[6]

Kraton Beringin Janggut

[edit]
Map of the mouth of Musi River, part of Palembang Sultanate.

After the Kuto Gawang was destroyed by the Dutch East India Company forces in 1659, Susuhunan Abdurrahman ordered the court to move to the new Kraton, the Beringin Janggut, which was located in the vicinity of the Old Mosque (now Jalan Segaran). There is no written record of how is the shape, size, or existence of Beringin Janggut.[6]

The area of the Kraton Beringin Janggut was known to be surrounded by a network of canals: the Musi River to the south, the Tengkuruk River to the west, Penedan canal to the north, and Rendang or Karang Waru River to the east. The Penedan Canal was connected with the Kemenduran, Kapuran, and Kebon Duku canals. The network of canals was the main mode of transportation for people during this period of the Sultanate.[6]

Kraton Kuto Tengkuruk

[edit]
Ancient map of Palembang, possibly dated to 1650s.

During the reign of Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin I, the fifty-hectares wide Kraton Kuto Tengkuruk or Kuto Lamo (lit. 'old palace') became the main center of the Palembang Sultanate. Kraton Kuto Tengkuruk was bordered with Kapuran River (now Pasar Cinde) to the north, Tengkuruk River to the east (in what is now the complex of Pupuk Sriwidjaja Palembang), River Musi to the south, and Sekanak River (now Lambidaro River in 36 Ilir) to the west. The landmarks of Kraton Kuto Tengkuruk were the domed Great Mosque and the palace proper of Kuto Batu / Kuto Tengkuruk.[6] Sultan Muhammad Bahauddin (reigned 1776–1803) had Kuto Besak's palace built. In 1821, the Dutch attacked Palembang again and annexed the city. The sultanate is dissolved and the fort of Kuto Tengkuruk, deconstructed. The Dutch have built in its place an administrative residence which is now the Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II museum.

Kraton Kuto Besak (1797–1823)

[edit]
Main article: Kuto Besak
The main portal to Kuto Besak, the Kuto Lawang.

During the reign of Sultan Muhamad Bahaudin (1776–1803), the Kraton Kuto Besak (lit. 'great palace') was built, and was completed in 1797. It is the largest kraton the Palembang Sultanate had built and the only remaining kraton today. Renovations over time have altered the appearance of the kraton. Kuto Besak was located to the west of the site of old Kuto Tengkuruk. The site of Kuto Besak has a length of 288.75 meters, width of 183.75 meters, wall heightof 9.99 meters, and wall thickness of 1.99 meters which ran long east–west direction (upstream-downstream Musi). In every corner of the fortification wall are bastions, and the portal to the fortified city is located on the eastern, southern, and western sides. The southern portal is the main gate, known as Lawang Kuto. The secondary portals are known as Lawang Buratan, one portal still exists to the west of the Kuto Besak in present time.[6]

Map of Palembang and the Musi River, c. 1821.

Following the Palembang War of 1821 and the dissolution of the Sultanate on 7 October 1823, the Kuto Tengkuruk was demolished.

Palembang Residentiehuis, now Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Museum.

Following the deconstruction Kuto Tengkuruk, under the order of van Sevenhoven,[7] a new building was constructed and was established as the residence of the Regeering Commissaris. The building is now Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Museum.

Conflicts Involved

[edit]

The Sultanate of Palembang was involved in skirmishes with the Dutch Colonial Empire and the private joint-stock companies such as the Dutch East India Company. After losing control of Palembang following a series of skirmishes and ambushes with Sultanate forces,[8] the Dutch gave way briefly to the British installed government of Indonesia.

Specific Conflicts include the 1811 attack on a Dutch Fort garrison off the cost of the Musi River led by Sultanate forces.[9] There was an investigation carried out by Dutch officials to determine whether British official Thomas Stamford Raffles coordinated with Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II to conduct the operation. Results found copies letters between Raffles and Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II but without unquestionable evidence.[8][9]

A depiction of the naval Battle of Palembang before Dutch Colonial forces land. Made by J.A. Lutz 1822–1823.

The First Expedition to Palembang in 1819 resulted in the defeat of Dutch forces invading Palembang in 1819. Leaders of the conflict included Constantijn Johan Wolterbeek and Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II. Accounts from Johan Wolterbeek mention that the heavily fortified coasts of the rivers of Palembang prevented Naval assault, thus halting the expedition. Neither side of the conflict obtained casualties in direct relation to combat on either side.

The Second Expedition to Palembang in 1821 resulted in the defeat of the Sultanate of Palembang defending against Dutch forces. Leaders of the conflict included Hendrik Merkus de Kock and Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II. In collaboration with information gathered by Wolterbeek, the Second Expedition was successful. The political result would be the transfer of power from the Sultanate to the Dutch Colonial Government and in 1823, the dissolvement of the Sultanate in total.

Dutch rule would last from June 1821 to December 27, 1949.[10]

Policy changes resulting in the end of the Palembang War

[edit]

Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II would be removed from his position by Dutch authority and replaced by his son, Sultan Ahmad Najamuddin III,[11] who would maintain slight political power for 4 years until his status as Sultan was revoked by Dutch officials after he had attempted to escape to the Bengkulu region. In 1821 the Dutch implemented a Bureaucracy with an appointed governor and regional heads of authority to manage assigned districts of the area. They were considered a higher power than of that of the Sultan. Islamic religious courts were not altered.[12]

When the Sultanate was abolished, so was the allowance given to Palembang nobles by the Dutch government. Regional control and influence of the Sultanate and its officials would decrease over time and be directly influenced by Dutch decisions and policy. Ports were to be opened and improved to promote trade to other countries as the Sumatra region hosted a center for peppers.[13] There would be an increase to the immigration as a result, primarily Chinese and Arab merchants.[11] The Dutch oil company Shell moved into Palembang in 1904 to begin production.

Today

[edit]

Currently, there are two separate claimants to the sultanate, each running their own courts.

In 2003, the Palembang Sultanate Custom Community Council (Indonesian: Majelis Adat Kesultanan Palembang Darussalam) recognized Raden Haji Muhammad Syafei Prabu Diradja, a retired police officer, as a descendant of Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II and proceeded to elect him as Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin III. The coronation took place in Lawang Kidul Mosque, near the tomb of Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin I (reigned 1724–1756).[14] The elderly Mahmud Badaruddin III later died on 8 September 2017, and was succeeded by his youngest son and heir apparent Raden Muhammad Fauwaz Diradja, who reigned as Mahmud Badaruddin IV.[15]

In 2006, Haji Raden Mahmud Badaruddin, chairman of Palembang Sultanate Lineage Association (Indonesian: Himpunan Zuriat Kesultanan Palembang Darussalam), was crowned Sultan Iskandar Mahmud Badaruddin following an adat deliberation. He is a direct male-line descendant of Prince Purboyo, son of Sultan Muhammad Mansyur, and the daughter of Mahmud Badaruddin I. The Palembang Sultanate was formally abolished in 1825, the sultans hold no authority beyond cultural and customary duties.[16]

Lists of Sultans of Palembang

[edit]

Sultanate of Palembang Darussalam (1659–1823)

[edit]
  • Sri Susuhunan Abdurrahman (1659–1706), founder of the Sultanate, brother of Prince Sedo ing Rajek, the previous ruler of Palembang
  • Sultan Muhammad Mansyur Jayo Ing Lago (1706–1718), son of Abdurrahman
  • Sultan Agung Komaruddin Sri Teruno (1718–1724), son of Abdurrahman
  • Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin I Jayo Wikramo (1724–1757), son of Muhammad Mansyur
  • Sultan Anom Alimuddin (1724–1727), jointly ruled with his half-brother Mahmud Badaruddin I until was driven out
  • Sultan Ahmad Najamuddin I Adi Kusumo (1757–1776), son of Mahmud Badaruddin I
  • Sultan Muhammad Bahauddin (1776–1803), son of Ahmad Najamuddin I
  • Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II (1803–1812, 1813, 1817–1821), son of Muhammad Bahauddin
  • Sultan Ahmad Najamuddin II (1812–1813, 1813–1817, 1821–1823), son of Muhammad Bahauddin
  • Sultan Ahmad Najamuddin III (1819–1821), son of Mahmud Badaruddin II
  • Sultan Ahmad Najamuddin IV Prabu Anom (1821–1823), son of Ahmad Najamuddin II

Descendants of Mahmud Badaruddin II (2003 – present day)

[edit]
  • Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin III Prabu Diradja Al-Hajj (2003–2017)[14]
  • Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin IV Djaya Wikrama (2017–now)

Family Tree

[edit]
Family Tree of Palembang Sultans
Abdurrahman
(1)
r. 1659–1704
Muhammad
Mansyur
(2)
r. 1704-1709		Agung
Komaruddin
(3)
r. 1714-1724
Mahmud
Badaruddin I
(4)
r. 1724-1758
Ahmad
Najamuddin I
(5)
r. 1758-1776
Muhammad
Bahauddin
(6)
r. 1776-1804
Mahmud
Badaruddin II
(7)
r. 1804-1812,
1813,
1818-1821		Ahmad
Najamuddin II
(8)
r. 1813-1818
Ahmad
Najamuddin III
(9)
r. 1819-1821		Ahmad
Najamuddin IV
(10)
r. 1821-1823
[edit]
  • Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin III (2003–2017)
    Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin III (2003–2017)
  • Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin IV (2017–now)
    Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin IV (2017–now)

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Cited works

[edit]
  • Berg, C.C. (1985). Penulisan Sejarah Jawa. Jakarta: Bhratara.
  • Kartodirdjo, Sartono; Poesponegoro, Marwati Djoened; Notosusanto, Nugroho (1975). Sejarah nasional Indonesia: Jaman pertumbuhan dan perkembangan kerajaan-kerajaan Islam di Indonesia. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Palembang Sultanate

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Palembang Sultanate, formally Kesultanan Palembang Darussalam, was an Islamic sultanate centered in the city of on the Musi River in southeastern , , founded in 1659 by Sultan Susuhunan Abdurrahman upon declaring independence from Javanese overlords and lasting until its forcible dissolution by Dutch colonial forces in 1823. Emerging as a successor to earlier Malay polities influenced by the ancient empire, it controlled vital trade routes through the river delta, deriving wealth primarily from pepper exports and regional commerce that extended influence over vassal territories in . The sultanate fostered a vibrant Malay-Islamic intellectual tradition, with networks and Sufi orders like Sammaniyah promoting scholarship, as evidenced by the extensive royal library amassed under Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II (r. 1804–1821), much of which was looted or destroyed during European interventions. Key achievements included architectural legacies such as the Grand Mosque (built 1738–1748) and the Kuto Besak Palace, symbols of its cultural and religious authority, alongside intermittent suzerainty over British interests during the (1811–1814, 1818–1821). Defining conflicts arose from Dutch ambitions to monopolize trade, culminating in the 1821 Palembang War, where Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II's resistance led to the sultanate's military defeat and the exile of its rulers, marking the onset of direct colonial administration. This era of expansion and defiance against European powers underscored the sultanate's role as a regional powerhouse, though its downfall highlighted the causal dynamics of superior naval and economic coercion by colonial entities.

Origins and Early History

Pre-Islamic Foundations and Transition to Islam

Palembang's historical prominence traces back to its role as the capital of the maritime empire, which flourished from the 7th to the 13th centuries CE, dominating trade routes across the and beyond. Archaeological evidence, including the dated 682 CE discovered near Palembang, attests to its early organization as a thalassocratic center reliant on riverine networks for commerce in spices, aromatics, and forest products. Chinese records from the , such as those by Yijing in 671 CE, describe Palembang (referred to as Bo-luo or Palembang) as a bustling hub hosting Buddhist scholars and merchants, underscoring continuity in its function as a multicultural despite shifts in imperial control. Srivijaya's decline accelerated after devastating invasions by the of in 1025 and 1068 CE, which disrupted its naval dominance and tributary networks, though itself persisted as a local power. By the , internal fragmentation—exacerbated by succession disputes and rival chieftains—weakened resistance to external pressures, including Javanese incursions from the empire. In 1377 CE, forces under King launched a against a rebellion, sacking the city and imposing tributary status, which further devolved authority to autonomous Malay warlords governing riverine domains. This era saw persistent trade but under decentralized rule, with no unified polity emerging until later Islamic consolidation. The transition to Islam occurred gradually from the mid-15th century, driven by demographic influxes of Muslim traders from the —itself founded by exiles from around 1400 CE—and the Javanese , who integrated into local networks via intermarriage and economic incentives. These merchants, leveraging control over pepper and cloth trades, propagated Islamic practices among elites, with conversion accelerating due to the religion's alignment with maritime commerce rather than coercive conquest. Local noble Ki Gede Ing Suro, active in the early , played a pivotal role by converting chieftains and establishing Islamic governance precedents, as evidenced by the mid-16th-century Geding Suro cemetery complex containing noble burials. Pre-1659 demographics reflected hybrid influences: a core Malay population augmented by Javanese administrators from legacies and Chinese merchants documented in Ming records, fostering adaptive, trade-oriented polities that bridged Hindu-Buddhist traditions with emerging Islamic norms without abrupt cultural rupture.

Establishment as Sultanate in 1659

The Sultanate of Palembang was formally proclaimed in 1659 by Sri Susuhunan Abdurrahman, who ruled until 1706 and is recognized as its founder. A son of Pangeran Seda ing Pasarean, Abdurrahman succeeded his brother, Pangeran Sedo ing Rajek, the prior ruler of the Palembang kingdom, amid a period of regional instability that had weakened the pre-sultanate polity. This establishment marked a pivotal shift from a traditional kingdom to an Islamic sultanate, with Abdurrahman adopting the title Susuhunan Abdurrahman Khalifatul Mukminin Sayyidul Imam, emphasizing religious legitimacy through Islamic titulature and support from local . Traditional accounts, including Malay manuscripts associated with Palembang's royal tradition, affirm this transition as rooted in the integration of Malay-Islamic political customs. The proclamation occurred against a backdrop of prior devastations affecting , including conflicts that had disrupted the old order, enabling Abdurrahman to consolidate authority. Between 23 and 26 1659, the political center relocated to the Beringin Janggut area in 16 Ilir, establishing the initial kraton known as Kuto Gawang along the Musi River. This site was strategically positioned to dominate trade flows in southeast , leveraging the river's access to inland pepper-producing regions and maritime routes. The move underscored pragmatic governance focused on economic control rather than expansive territorial claims. From inception, the sultanate maintained economic ties with the (VOC), inheriting and upholding prior arrangements for pepper exports, which formed the core of Palembang's commerce. The VOC had secured a monopoly on Palembang's pepper trade through a 1642 treaty, a framework that persisted into Abdurrahman's reign, with documented shipments exceeding 1.8 million pounds annually by the late . These relations evidenced interdependence, as the sultanate granted trade access in exchange for de facto recognition and revenue, prioritizing fiscal stability over unqualified .

Territorial and Administrative Development

Geography and Capitals

The Palembang Sultanate's territory centered on the Musi River basin in southern , with direct control extending from the river delta upstream to the city of on both banks. The river's navigable course, interconnected with tributaries, shaped the sultanate's riverine orientation, enabling defense through natural barriers and facilitating access to coastal areas. This conferred resilience against overland incursions but exposed the realm to seasonal flooding, influencing and like canals for drainage and transport. The sultanate also held authority over the offshore Bangka and islands, prized for tin deposits, which fell under Palembang's rule from at least the late . Direct territorial extent remained confined to these riverine and insular holdings, with broader influence exercised via vassals rather than administrative incorporation, countering aggrandized depictions in some local chronicles that portray expansive dominion unsupported by contemporary maps or fiscal records. Palembang served as the fixed capital throughout the sultanate's existence, though the royal kraton relocated multiple times within the city due to environmental and structural challenges. The initial seat at Kuto Gawang preceded shifts to Beringin Janggut in the late and Kuto Tengkuruk in the 18th, culminating in Kuto Besak as the final fortified . Constructed between 1780 and 1797 under Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin I, Kuto Besak featured robust brick walls enclosing a rectangular compound approximately 274 by 183 meters, positioned to overlook the Musi for strategic oversight and flood mitigation. This design prioritized defensive utility and environmental adaptation over ceremonial expanse, underscoring the sultanate's pragmatic response to its locale. Supporting infrastructure included the Great Mosque of Palembang, erected between 1738 and 1748, which anchored administrative and communal life while integrating with the river network for accessibility. These elements bolstered trade logistics and , with the Musi serving as both economic artery and defensive moat against naval threats.

Government Structure and Social Order

The government of the Palembang Sultanate was a centralized under the , who exercised absolute authority over administration, delegating responsibilities to princes and appointed officials for managing the (Iliran) and upstream territories (Uluan). The functioned as the chief minister and primary representative of the , overseeing execution of commands and coordination among officials. , as religious scholars, played advisory roles in legal interpretations and governance, integrating Islamic principles into state affairs, particularly through prominent orders like Sammaniyah. This structure blended Malay maritime traditions with Islamic oversight, though power distribution favored nepotistic appointments among royal kin, fostering inefficiencies in decision-making. Legal and social order adhered to the Simbur Cahaya, a 17th-century customary code originating from Palembang's inland governance, which codified rules for disputes, fines, marriage, and moral conduct by fusing local adat (customary norms) with Sharia-derived Islamic elements. Enforced across the sultanate, it prescribed hierarchical penalties in ringgit (currency units) for offenses, emphasizing communal harmony and royal prerogative in adjudication, thereby stabilizing social interactions amid diverse populations. Society was stratified into nobility (priyayi, comprising sultanate descendants with hereditary privileges and land oversight) and commoners (rakyat, free peasants engaged in agriculture and trade), with slaves acquired through raids or warfare forming a subservient class integral to labor and household economies. Chinese merchant communities, regulated by a kapitan system, handled commerce under sultanate oversight, contributing to economic but not political hierarchy. Succession combined agnatic —favoring the eldest son, as in the 1776 designation of Raden Hasan—with elective by court officials and , requiring consensus for legitimacy under Islamic titles like Khalifatul Mukminin. This hybrid approach, rooted in Malay-Javanese cultural synthesis, often devolved into fraternal rivalries and factionalism, evident in disputes like the 1724 contest between Prince Mangkubumi and Raden Lambu, which necessitated external arbitration. 's decentralized influence initially buttressed religious cohesion and counsel but later amplified sectarian divides, enabling internal revolts and weakening centralized control by the , as competing claims eroded administrative cohesion without robust primogeniture enforcement.

Economy and Trade

Key Economic Activities and Commodities

The Palembang Sultanate's economy centered on the extraction and export of natural commodities, enabled by control over the Musi River's navigable access to hinterland resources and connections to regional maritime networks extending to the and beyond. Pepper served as the primary export in the 17th and early 18th centuries, with sultans imposing a monopoly that funneled all production and sales through royal oversight to maximize revenues. Forest products, including gambier, , benzoin, and resins harvested from Sumatran interiors, supplemented trade volumes and were bartered or sold for textiles and metals. Tin mining on Bangka Island, a sultanate dependency, commenced around 1710 and shifted economic emphasis toward mineral wealth by the late 18th century, yielding high-value ore that attracted European buyers despite fluctuating yields. Internally, agrarian activities dominated with paddies irrigated by floodplains sustaining the population, alongside in estuarine waters and small-scale crafts like and blacksmithing for subsistence and tribute. Sultanic revenues derived from agricultural tithes, typically one-fifth of harvests, and port duties on incoming vessels, enforcing self-interested extraction that prioritized short-term gains over sustainable oversight. Trade peaked in the 17th and 18th centuries amid VOC engagements initiated post-1619, with factories facilitating pepper and tin exchanges, yet sultanate policies of elevated taxes—often exceeding 50% on cargoes—and tolerance of eroded competitiveness against rivals like . By the early , tin overshadowed pepper as the dominant , with illicit British trades via intermediaries boosting sultanate coffers through undervalued sales but provoking Dutch reprisals over monopoly breaches. These practices reflected pragmatic revenue maximization, often at the cost of formal alliances, underscoring the sultanate's reliance on commodity booms vulnerable to external pressures.

Commercial Relations with Regional and European Powers

The Palembang Sultanate forged commercial ties with the (VOC) in the mid-, centered on pepper exports from its hinterlands. The VOC secured exclusive contracts for pepper procurement from Palembang rulers, mirroring arrangements in and , which facilitated bulk shipments to Batavia and beyond for the trade. These pacts granted the VOC resident oversight of foreign vessels at Palembang's harbor, aiming to curb and enforce monopoly pricing, though sultans periodically negotiated for larger revenue shares amid fluctuating yields. Tensions escalated in the as sultans like Bahauddin (r. 1776–1804) demanded higher payments, prompting VOC blockades after repeated complaints from regional traders; Dutch logs documented local under sultanate nominal authority seizing ships, exposing weak enforcement as a causal factor in trade disruptions rather than external aggression alone. Such opportunistic breaches eroded mutual trust, with the VOC resorting to coercive to maintain pepper flows, which averaged thousands of piculs annually until declining output shifted focus to tin from territories like Bangka. Regionally, the sultanate extracted tribute from upstream polities such as Rejang-Lebong in the form of and forest products, bolstering its role, while border skirmishes with over Batanghari-Musi riverine trade routes flared in 1666, driven by competition for upstream pepper gardens and migrant labor. These rivalries destabilized supply chains, as Jambi's alliances with Minangkabau disrupted Palembang's overland access, compelling sultans to pivot toward maritime European partners for protection and markets. European rivalries peaked over Bangka tin in the early , enriching through exports but inviting interventions; Anglo-Dutch competition intensified after , when British forces capitalized on Dutch capitulation during the to demand tin concessions, briefly asserting commercial dominance until the 1814 Treaty of London restored Dutch claims. Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II's massacre of the Dutch garrison—framed as retaliation but breaching prior trade guarantees—provoked a British in 1812, forcing territorial cessions and highlighting how sultanate duplicity in honoring pacts fueled escalatory colonial responses over resource control. This interlude of British suzerainty (1811–1814) facilitated tin flows to but sowed seeds for Dutch reconquest, as Palembang's governance lapses in curbing and upholding contracts justified blockades and ultimatums.

Military and External Conflicts

Internal Strife and Succession Disputes

The death of Sultan Abdurrahman in 1706 initiated a protracted period of succession disputes lasting until 1724, marked by competitions among royal relatives for the throne. These conflicts arose from the absence of rigid hereditary rules, allowing multiple paternal kin to vie for power through court intrigues and alliances, often prioritizing familial claims over administrative merit. A notable example occurred in 1714 following Sultan Agung Komaruddin's death, when Prince Mangkubumi Muhammad Ali contested the succession against Raden Lambu, highlighting elite divisions that delayed stable rule until Raden Lambu ascended as Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin I in 1724. By the late 18th and early 19th centuries, internal strife intensified through brother-against-brother rivalries, as seen in the alternating claims between Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II and his brother Sultan Ahmad Najamuddin II starting in 1812. This feud involved depositions and dual rulers—such as in 1818, when Ahmad Najamuddin II held the Kuto Luto Palace while Mahmud Badaruddin II controlled Benteng Kuto Besak—fueled by accusations of treason and personal betrayals within the . participated in succession deliberations, providing approvals that sometimes legitimized these shifts but failed to prevent recurring elite competitions exacerbated by sultans' multiple wives and offspring. Post-1750, empirical patterns of short reigns underscored this instability: for instance, Ahmad Najamuddin II's initial tenure lasted only from 1812 to 1813, while broader familial contests led to frequent overthrows that diverted resources from to palace defenses. Such regicidal tendencies and kinship-based power grabs eroded central authority, manifesting in nobles' resistance to tax enforcement as documented in contemporary accounts of weak oversight, ultimately correlating with verifiable drops in trade revenues from pepper and tin as administrative proliferated.

Engagements with European Colonial Forces

The (VOC) established a in around 1617 to secure the lucrative pepper trade, but the sultanate's frequent defaults on delivery contracts led to intermittent skirmishes in the mid-17th century, as the VOC enforced monopolistic terms through naval demonstrations and blockades to compel compliance. These early confrontations stemmed from the sultanate's prioritization of regional autonomy and alternative buyers over exclusive VOC obligations, resulting in Dutch retaliatory seizures of ships and goods but no full-scale conquest at the time. Tensions escalated during the 1818 handover of territories from British to Dutch control following the , as Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II resisted the reimposition of Dutch suzerainty, viewing it as an infringement on Palembang's independence gained during the Napoleonic disruptions. In 1819, Badaruddin II provoked direct conflict by ordering attacks on Dutch commercial posts and the killing of a Dutch resident, aiming to expel European influence amid fears of renewed economic exploitation. These sultanate-initiated raids, including naval assaults on Dutch vessels along the Musi River, prompted a Dutch under General Hendrik Merkus de Kock in 1821, which capitalized on superior artillery and disciplined infantry to counter the sultanate's irregular forces. The Palembang War culminated in a Dutch siege of the capital in June-July 1821, where Badaruddin II's mobilization of approximately 5,000 poorly coordinated levies—relying on guerrilla tactics and river defenses—failed against Dutch naval bombardments and alliances with local defectors disillusioned by the sultan's authoritarian rule. Strategic errors, such as fragmented command and high rates among troops more loyal to personal or factional interests than unified resistance, underscored internal fractures rather than effective opposition to colonial expansion, enabling Dutch forces to breach fortifications and occupy by 16 July 1821. Badaruddin II fled to but continued guerrilla actions until his capture in 1823, after which Dutch control was consolidated without further major engagements.

Cultural and Religious Life

Islamic Practices and Institutions

The Palembang Sultanate followed in the Shafi'i , the dominant school of jurisprudence among Southeast Asian Muslim polities, which shaped legal interpretations and ritual practices throughout its duration from the mid-17th to early 19th centuries. This adherence integrated Islamic norms into court life without establishing a fully theocratic system, as sultans maintained authority over secular administration while consulting on religious matters. The Sammaniyah Sufi tariqa, introduced in the 18th century by scholars such as Abdus Somad al-Palembangi (d. 1830), exerted significant influence on the sultanate's rulers and became the official order of the palace by the late 1700s. Sultans like Mahmud Badaruddin I (r. 1724–1758) patronized the order's propagation, appointing its as court advisors who guided enforcement of core Islamic obligations, including collection to support community welfare and religious institutions. These , often returning from studies in the Hijaz, emphasized practices like Ratib Saman, fostering spiritual discipline among elites and subjects while reinforcing the sultan's legitimacy as a pious . Central to these practices was the Great Mosque of Palembang (Masjid Agung), first constructed in 1748 under Mahmud Badaruddin I and later expanded to accommodate growing congregations, symbolizing royal commitment to Islamic piety and serving as the hub for Friday prayers, religious education, and gatherings. Pilgrimage ties to were sustained through the sultanate's maritime trade networks, with sultans funding expeditions and scholarly sojourns that linked Palembang to broader Islamic intellectual currents, enhancing the order's doctrinal purity. Islam's role unified the sultanate's diverse ethnic groups—Malays, Javanese, and Chinese Muslims—under a shared religious framework that legitimized monarchical rule, yet sultans pragmatically balanced counsel with input from secular nobles, averting the clerical dominance observed in contemporaries like . This equilibrium preserved administrative flexibility amid economic pressures, though the emphasis on Sufi orthodoxy and Shafi'i conformity prioritized ritual adherence over adaptive reforms in governance or technology.

Society, Architecture, and Daily Life

The society of the Palembang Sultanate was characterized by a riverine centered on the Musi River, where the majority of inhabitants engaged in and small-scale , adapting to the environment through raft houses (rumah rakit) and stilted dwellings that facilitated mobility and protection from seasonal flooding. Among the nobility and urban elites, leisure activities included cockfighting and , pursuits that reinforced social hierarchies and communal bonds in Malay cultural traditions. played a significant role in household and labor economies, with slaves sourced through , raids, or trade, performing domestic and agricultural tasks, though its prevalence waned in the amid shifting pepper exports and European commercial pressures. Architectural forms reflected Javanese-Malay influences, stemming from the sultanate's founding by Demak refugees in 1659, with wooden kratons and elite residences featuring pyramidal limas roofs crafted from durable ulin timber and elevated on to mitigate floods and fires—recurrent hazards due to the combustible materials and dense urban clustering. Urban layout segregated ethnic enclaves, including Chinese quarters in Kampung Kapitan and settlements along the riverbanks, fostering a cosmopolitan trade hub while maintaining spatial distinctions from native Malay kampungs. These wooden structures, prone to destruction by conflagrations, embodied adaptive riparian integral to daily survival. Social norms emphasized patrilineal inheritance, with property and titles passing through male lines, while women contributed to production, notably weaving fabrics that symbolized status through gold-threaded motifs blending local and imported influences. Ethnic diversity enriched via Chinese traders and merchants but occasionally sparked tensions, as seen in segregated living patterns that preserved community autonomy under sultanate oversight.

Decline and Abolition

Internal Factors Contributing to Weakness

The recurrent internal conflicts within the Palembang Sultanate's elite, particularly over succession, significantly undermined the state's cohesion and administrative capacity. Competition among paternal relatives for the frequently escalated into violent power struggles, diverting resources from to factional rivalries and eroding the sultan's over vassals and regional lords. A prominent example occurred in the early , when Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II clashed with his brother Sultan Ahmad Najamuddin, leading to divided loyalties among court officials and local elites, which fragmented alliances essential for maintaining territorial control. These disputes, characteristic of the sultanate's hereditary system lacking clear , mirrored self-inflicted collapses in contemporaneous Malay states like and Siak, where similar elite competitions precipitated chronic instability without external catalysts. Such endogenous strife exacerbated economic vulnerabilities by fostering predatory practices among rival factions, including excessive tolls on riverine routes and tolerance of localized , which deterred merchants and diminished fiscal revenues more acutely than sporadic external pressures in the . Internal elite predation prioritized short-term gains for contending groups over sustainable commerce, as disaffected nobles and princelings extracted rents from passing vessels under the guise of protection, leading to trade diversion to less burdensome ports like . This pattern of self-imposed barriers hollowed out the sultanate's primary revenue base—peppper and exports—contributing to budgetary strains evident by the late 1700s, when court extravagance persisted amid contracting trade volumes. Demographic and infrastructural stagnation further compounded these weaknesses, as recurrent civil upheavals and unmitigated river floods depleted the agrarian population and taxable base without corresponding investments in resilience or naval renewal. Internal wars, often tied to succession bids, resulted in depopulation through casualties, migrations, and disrupted in the , while the failure to transition from traditional prahu fleets to modernized vessels left the sultanate reliant on obsolete riverine defenses ill-suited to enforce monopolies or deter rivals. These lapses in , rooted in fragmented , prioritized elite consumption over systemic reforms, rendering the state progressively brittle against its own centrifugal forces.

The Palembang War and Dutch Intervention (1819–1821)

The Palembang War erupted in 1819 following Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II's rejection of a Dutch-drafted contract that demanded greater Dutch oversight of Palembang's trade and territories, including concessions on tin-rich Billiton (modern Belitung). In response, the sultan authorized raids on Dutch tin mining operations on Billiton and attacks on Dutch merchant vessels, escalating tensions into open conflict. These actions violated prior agreements and threatened Dutch economic interests in the region, prompting a punitive response from Batavia. The Dutch launched their first expedition in 1819 under Constantijn van der Wijnpersse, aiming to capture via amphibious assault up the Musi River. However, sultanate forces, leveraging familiarity with the terrain and riverine defenses, inflicted heavy losses on the invaders through ambushes and fortified positions, forcing a Dutch withdrawal without achieving their objectives. This initial victory highlighted the sultanate's reliance on irregular levies and guerrilla tactics but also revealed underlying weaknesses, such as the absence of a professional and modern , rooted in decades of regional dominance without significant external threats. Undeterred, the Dutch mounted a second, more robust expedition in , commanded by General Hendrik Merkus de Kock with approximately 4,000 troops supported by a naval squadron. Dutch forces executed coordinated amphibious landings, bombarding forts and advancing methodically against sultanate defenses. Badaruddin II's faltered due to overdependence on poorly coordinated irregular fighters, who conducted sporadic guerrilla raids but failed to disrupt the Dutch supply lines or halt their riverine progression; on , Dutch ships secured key positions near the capital. British neutrality, adhering to post-Napoleonic understandings, deprived the sultan of potential allies and allowed the Dutch undivided focus. The sultanate's tactical blunders, including inadequate fortification of the capital and failure to consolidate forces for a decisive , underscored obsolescence from complacency amid prior successes against smaller incursions. By early July 1821, Dutch troops captured after intense urban fighting, with the sultan fleeing upstream before being apprehended. Badaruddin II was exiled to , where he died in 1852, while his brother Ahmad Najamuddin was installed as a ruler under Dutch supervision in June 1821, marking the effective end of independent sultanate rule. Dutch casualties totaled around 95 killed and 220 wounded, reflecting disciplined operations, though total war losses, including and sultanate-side fatalities from asymmetric engagements, were substantially higher, exposing the sultanate's inability to counter European military professionalism.

Final Dissolution and Immediate Aftermath (1823–1825)

The Dutch colonial authorities issued a decree on October 7, 1823, formally dissolving the Palembang Sultanate after determining that the puppet ruler, Sultan Ahmad Najamuddin, could no longer maintain order amid persistent internal unrest and resistance to Dutch oversight. This decision followed the instability of indirect rule established post-1821, where repeated sultanate manipulations failed to suppress local opposition effectively. By 1825, following Najamuddin's armed resistance, Dutch forces arrested him on October 15 and exiled him to in the Moluccas, marking the complete end of sultanate authority and full incorporation of into the as a residency. The Kuto Besak fort, formerly the sultanate's administrative and defensive core, was repurposed by the Dutch for colonial and functions, symbolizing the shift to direct administration. This transition validated the causal link between puppet governance failures and the need for direct control to enforce stability. Immediate aftermath included trade stabilization through Dutch-enforced open ports and suppression of , which had plagued regional under sultanate volatility; naval patrols and administrative reforms reduced such threats, facilitating verifiable increases in colonial revenue from pepper and other exports via streamlined taxation. Population effects involved resettlement of select elites and resistors, with exiles to Maluku contributing to communities, while local adapted under direct Dutch oversight without broader disruptions. These measures yielded prompt economic upticks, as direct control enabled consistent revenue extraction exceeding prior indirect arrangements.

Rulers and Succession

Sultans of Palembang Darussalam (1659–1823)

The Sultanate of Palembang Darussalam was ruled by a succession of sultans from its founding in 1659 until its dissolution in 1823. The following table enumerates the primary rulers, their reign periods, and key verifiable actions, drawn from historical records emphasizing diplomatic and administrative roles.
SultanReignKey Verifiable Acts
Abdurrahman (also known as Sri Susuhunan Abdurrahman)1659–1706Founded the sultanate following Dutch intervention in ; established initial treaties with the VOC to regulate , particularly pepper, securing recognition and support.
Muhammad Mansyur Jayo Ing Lago1706–1714Succeeded Abdurrahman; formalized VOC recognition in 1709, maintaining trade monopolies amid regional instability.
(also Sultan Komaruddin)1714–1721Oversaw administration during a period of internal consolidation; reign ended in civil strife prompting further Dutch involvement.
Muhammad Madali1724–1738Installed by Dutch mediation post-civil war; focused on stabilizing pepper trade agreements with the VOC.
Mahmud Badaruddin I (Jayo Wikramo)1738–1758Expanded infrastructure, including religious sites; navigated VOC relations to preserve autonomy in tin and pepper exports.
Muhammad Bahauddin1758–1803 (or 1776–1803 per some records)Oversaw construction of Kuto Besak Palace; managed escalating European pressures while upholding trade contracts.
Mahmud Badaruddin II1804–1821Last independent ; led armed resistance against British and Dutch forces, including the Palembang War, until exile following defeat.
Reign dates exhibit minor variations across sources due to overlapping successions and disputes, but the sequence reflects consensus from archival and scholarly analyses. No verified records indicate formal female sultans, though maternal influences occurred in patrilineal transitions.

Notable Succession Controversies

One prominent succession dispute occurred between 1706 and 1724, following the death of Abdurrahman, which created a amid declining pepper trade revenues that weakened central authority. This period saw multiple claimants emerge due to the sultanate's flexible Malay tradition allowing selection among royal kin rather than strict , exacerbating tensions between elective consensus and hereditary expectations. In 1724, a specific controversy pitted Prince Mangkubumi Muhammad Ali against Raden Lambu Pangeran Mangkubumi Jayowikramo, with intervening to deliberate legitimacy under Islamic principles, though Dutch colonial pressure ultimately favored the installation of Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin I (r. 1724–1758). Such roles highlighted systemic flaws in Palembang's blended traditions, where advisory consensus often failed to resolve rivalries without external , correlating with economic dips that invited foreign exploitation of power vacuums. The most notable 19th-century controversy involved brothers Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II (r. 1804–1821, with interruptions) and Sultan Ahmad Najamuddin II (r. 1812–1825, with interruptions), who alternated control after British forces installed Ahmad in 1812 following Mahmud's temporary refuge during the Aur River incident. This dual sultanship, with Mahmud ruling from Benteng Kuto Besar and Ahmad from Kuto Luto Palace, stemmed from colonial divide-and-rule tactics amid tin and pepper revenue shortfalls, undermining unified governance. Legitimacy disputes extended to royal artifacts, including manuscripts like PNRI A 161, where marginal notes asserted by both lines—diagonal additions by Ahmad's supporters challenging Mahmud's central claims—reflecting contested of symbolic tied to sultanate authority. The persisted through their sons (Pangeran for Ahmad's line and Prabu Anom for Mahmud's), culminating in Dutch abolition of the sultanate in after exploitable instability eroded internal cohesion.
Claimant LineKey FigurePeriod of DisputeResolution Factors
Hereditary-Elective Tension (Early 18th)Prince Mangkubumi Muhammad vs. Raden Lambu1724 deliberation + Dutch intervention
Fraternal Dual Sultanate (19th) Badaruddin II vs. Najamuddin II1812–1823Colonial alternation + artifact claims; ended by Dutch conquest

Legacy and Modern Context

Historical Impact and Assessments

The Palembang Sultanate played a pivotal role in southern Sumatra's economic landscape as a primary exporter of pepper, delivering 1,895,066 pounds to the in the 1695 book year alone, which yielded VOC profits of 25,684 guilders over the prior twelve months. This substantial output not only fueled regional trade networks but also shaped Dutch policy, prompting the VOC to enforce cloth monopolies from 1681 onward to dominate pepper procurement and counter Chinese competition, thereby integrating Palembang deeper into European commercial orbits. In religious terms, the sultanate accelerated Islamization across southern , particularly during the eighteenth century, by institutionalizing Sufi orders like Sammaniyah as the official palace faith and nurturing Islamic scholarly traditions that laid foundations for local networks. These efforts built on earlier maritime influences, embedding Malay-Islamic and systems that persisted beyond the sultanate's fall. Yet assessments highlight structural failings, including recurrent elite conflicts over succession—often pitting paternal relatives against each other—that eroded central and invited external exploitation, as seen in the 1719 intra-sultanal dispute that ceded tin mining control to the Dutch. Such rigidity contrasted with more adaptive polities like , where stronger sultanic centralization delayed full colonial subjugation until 1903; Palembang's decentralized model, coupled with economic dependence on volatile commodities, rendered its 1823 dissolution avoidable through reforms that never materialized. The Palembang War of 1819–1821, triggered by the ruling sultan's treaty breaches and assaults on Dutch positions, exemplified this vulnerability, with Dutch forces under H.M. de Kock responding to secure stability rather than initiating unprompted . The sultanate's legacy endures in Palembang's status as South Sumatra's provincial capital, where pre-colonial trade booms fostered enduring urban infrastructure, though social hierarchies stifled broader innovation and prefigured colonial narratives of imposing order on fractious native rule. Islamic legacies, including Arab-influenced from the sultanate , continue in contemporary cultural practices, underscoring a mixed of commercial vitality amid political fragility.

Descendants and Contemporary Claims

Following the Dutch abolition of the Palembang Sultanate in 1823, descendants of Mahmud Badaruddin II were exiled primarily to in the in 1822, where they formed a community that intermarried with local populations and preserved elements of Palembangese identity through family lineages known as zuriat. This exile dispersed the royal family, with subsequent generations settling in Maluku and other regions, maintaining genealogical records but without sovereign authority or formal recognition by colonial or post-independence Indonesian authorities. In 2003, the Custom Community Council proclaimed Muhammad Syafei Prabu Diradja as the titular Badaruddin III Prabu Diradja Al-Hajj, positioning him as a ceremonial head of the defunct sultanate's cultural traditions in a hereditary capacity limited to community rituals and heritage preservation. He held this role until his death on September 7, 2017, at age 67, after which no state-level succession occurred, underscoring the non-sovereign, unofficial nature of the title. Upon Badaruddin III's death, Fauwaz Diradja was installed as Mahmud Badaruddin IV Jayo Wikramo in 2017, continuing ceremonial activities such as cultural endorsements, community organizational inaugurations, and public statements on local customs as of 2025, including prohibitions on perceived cultural insults and participation in national heritage forums. These roles confer no political power, legal jurisdiction, or governmental recognition under Indonesian law, serving instead to sustain ethnic identity among Palembangese descendants amid modern republican governance. Contemporary claims face disputes over genealogical authenticity, with rival figures such as Iskandar Mahmud Badaruddin asserting descent from multiple historical sultans and leading parallel cultural initiatives, including organizations like the Yayasan Raja Nusantara, highlighting fragmented lineage interpretations without resolution through verifiable primary records or state arbitration. Such titular pretensions parallel those of other abolished Asian monarchies, where hereditary symbols endure for cultural continuity but hold no causal influence on contemporary administration or policy.

References

  1. https://www.journal18.org/issue4/mosques-and-minarets-transregional-connections-in-eighteenth-century-southeast-asia/
  2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393267317_The_Transformation_of_Islamic_Intellectual_Traditions_in_Palembang_From_the_Sultanate_to_the_Colonial_Era
  3. https://www.brin.go.id/en/news/125286/brin-researchers-explore-the-treasure-left-by-the-palembang-sultanate
  4. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311983.2023.2188775
  5. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/4a376823-1a25-4647-9383-91eb72e773ea/content
  6. https://pathsunwritten.com/ancient-palembang/
  7. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/indonesia/history-srivijaya.htm
  8. https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-asia/majapahit-empire-short-life-empire-once-defeated-mongols-003623
  9. https://www.britannica.com/place/Palembang
  10. http://ijsoc.goacademica.com/index.php/ijsoc/article/download/1045/919/
  11. https://www.prayway.com/unreached/peoplegroups4/870.html
  12. https://keratonpalembang.com/sultan-palembang-darussalam-i-pertama/
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338555202_Malay_Political_Tradition_The_Appointment_and_Succession_Analysis_of_The_Sultanate_of_Palembang_Darussalam
  14. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5c4e/be8e07a2ebd044e473d69f87831426ab8b28.pdf
  15. https://knepublishing.com/index.php/KnE-Social/article/download/14836/23513
  16. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/lembaran-sejarah/article/download/23773/15654
  17. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstreams/e63de2d2-495b-495e-a872-8ac76c4ac1a6/download
  18. https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/126011170.pdf
  19. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5115656/14188793/040018_1_online.pdf
  20. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB_DC22858.pdf
  21. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.7603/s40741-016-0001-9.pdf
  22. https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125997206.pdf
  23. https://digital.lib.washington.edu/bitstreams/4e860ca8-484b-49fc-b8de-5b87164ee048/download
  24. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/75cd/7c307f742158aeb494238523ed6d5c4a45fc.pdf
  25. https://palembang.go.id/charming/benteng-kuto-besak
  26. https://knepublishing.com/index.php/KnE-Social/article/download/10520/17115
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343993660_Identify_the_Place_Brand_Communication_Elements_of_Benteng_Kuto_Besak_Palembang
  28. https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/masjid-agung-palembang-tower-built-between-1216014880
  29. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/396/1/012031/pdf
  30. https://ojs.stkippgri-lubuklinggau.ac.id/index.php/JS/article/view/1195
  31. https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/7542
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393134735_Fine_System_Of_Ringgit_In_Simbur_Cahaya_Manuscript_Analysis_Using_Artificial_Intelligence
  33. http://rejang-lebong.blogspot.com/2008/12/sultanate-of-palembang-darussalam.html
  34. https://journal.iaimnumetrolampung.ac.id/index.php/jf/article/download/6451/2377/28049
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251016897_Traditional_Sumatran_Trade
  36. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/display/book/9789004454255/B9789004454255_s006.pdf
  37. https://www.persee.fr/doc/befeo_0336-1519_1985_num_74_1_1677
  38. https://www.atlasofmutualheritage.nl/page/4001/palembang
  39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3096247
  40. https://jurnal.itscience.org/index.php/ijmdsa/article/download/6434/4743/31330
  41. https://naskahsumatra.org/contesting-sultans-and-the-ownership-of-the-palembang-royal-manuscripts/
  42. https://conference.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sule/article/download/1339/728
  43. http://thespicerouteend.com/indonesia-history-timeline/
  44. https://repository.radenfatah.ac.id/6871/1/Malay%2520Political%2520Tradition%2520The%2520Appointment%2520and%2520Succession.pdf
  45. https://conference.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sule/article/download/1339/pdf
  46. https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/tamaddun/article/view/450/400
  47. https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-Indonesia/Islamic-influence-in-Indonesia
  48. https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125988143.pdf
  49. https://threedecks.org/index.php?display_type=show_fleet&id=63
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372946690_Shafi%27i_Literature_in_Indonesia_A_Historical_Account
  51. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/hts/article/view/247237/233849
  52. http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222022000100043
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376573089_The_Tradition_of_Zikir_Ratib_Saman_in_the_Sammaniyah_Order_at_the_Great_Mosque_of_Palembang
  54. https://mahesainstitute.web.id/ojs2/index.php/warisan/article/download/2692/1523
  55. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0495/f402c96c71d95d82ede9ada936f9889a147c.pdf
  56. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0113723/16870605/070005_1_5.0113723.pdf
  57. https://dimensi.petra.ac.id/index.php/ars/article/download/19990/19128
  58. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/73398/73398-h/73398-h.htm
  59. https://research.vu.nl/files/229224604/Commodification_and_Slavery_in_the_Nineteenth_Century_Indonesian_Archipelago.pdf
  60. http://indonesiacultural.blogspot.com/2008/04/architecture-of-south-sumatra.html
  61. https://waqafilmunusantara.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/3152-9630-1-PB.pdf
  62. https://knepublishing.com/index.php/KnE-Social/article/download/14918/23677
  63. https://www.hrpub.org/download/20230930/CEA14-14833269.pdf
  64. https://notesplusultra.com/2015/04/21/palembang-past-and-present/
  65. https://repository.radenfatah.ac.id/6871/1/Malay%20Political%20Tradition%20The%20Appointment%20and%20Succession.pdf
  66. https://brill.com/view/journals/bki/176/2-3/article-p442_20.xml
  67. https://ejournal.ppsdp.org/index.php/pujes/article/view/463
  68. https://conference.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sule/article/view/1339
  69. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1060&context=irhs
  70. https://iracing.fandom.com/wiki/Palembang_Sultanate
  71. http://first-history-indonesian.blogspot.com/2012/02/sultan-mahmud-badaruddin-ii.html
  72. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v7i2.108
  73. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/e63de2d2-495b-495e-a872-8ac76c4ac1a6/content
  74. https://kyoto-seas.org/pdf/31/1/310104.pdf
  75. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48710350
  76. https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tsaqafah/article/download/13786/12311
  77. https://www.suara.com/lifestyle/2025/03/25/133817/mengenal-smb-iv-sultan-palembang-yang-tegas-mengharamkan-willie-salim-injak-kotanya-seumur-hidup
  78. https://beritapagi.co.id/2025/09/27/ini-komitmen-sultan-palembang-di-forum-makn-di-sragen/
  79. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2025/03/24/201345878/sultan-mahmud-badaruddin-iv-larang-willie-salim-ke-palembang-jika-tak-minta
  80. https://keratonpalembang.com/profil-sultan-iskandar-mahmud-badaruddin/
  81. https://www.rmolsumsel.id/rm-fauwaz-diradja-terpilih-sebagai-ketua-dewan-kehormatan-ini-sumsel
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.